By MichaelJames

Jul 25, 2009 6:01am

Obama Touts Health Care Help for the ‘Mom and Pop’ Small Businesses

From Sunlen Miller:

President Obama again used his weekly address to push for health care reform – this time focusing on how reform would help small businesses.

“Because they lack the bargaining power that large businesses have and face higher administrative costs per person, small businesses pay up to 18 percent more for the very same health insurance plans – costs that eat into their profits and get passed on to their employees,” Obama said. “These are the mom and pop stores and restaurants, beauty shops and construction companies that support families and sustain communities.  They’re the tiny startups with big ideas, hoping to become the next Google or Apple or HP.”

The president referenced the statistics detailed in the release by the White House Council of Economic Advisers, which said such business are getting “crushed by skyrocketing health care costs.” Obama used that as just one more example of why health care reform needs to be passed.

The report showed the extent of the burden that the current U.S. health care system imposes on small businesses – costing them a whopping 18 percent more per worker than large firms for the same health insurance policy. Those costs are passed on to small firm employees through lower wages, and at the disadvantage to the businesses that lose the best workers.

The president said the health care plan in the current draft legislation would reduce the current burdens on small firms and their workers. Small businesses would be able to purchase health insurance though the insurance exchange marketplace.

“They can compare the price, quality and services of a wide variety of plans, many of which will provide better coverage at lower costs than the plans they have now," he said. "They can then pick the one that works best for them and their employees.”

Those mall businesses that insure their employees would receive a tax credit to help them pay for it.

“If a small business chooses not to provide coverage, its employees can purchase high-quality, affordable coverage through the insurance exchange on their own,” Obama said. “Low-income workers – folks who are more likely to be working at small businesses – will qualify for a subsidy to help them cover the costs.”

At the end of his address, and at the end of a long week of health care battles that were not won, President Obama spoke about those who want to block reform.

“I know there are those who are urging us to delay reform," he said. "And some of them have actually admitted that this is a tactic designed to stop any reform at all.  Some have even suggested that, regardless of its merits, health care reform should be stopped as a way to inflict political damage on my administration.  I’ll leave it to them to explain that to the American people.”

Obama feels a “sense of urgency” about moving the legislations forward because once it is passed, he said, they will have to then “move thoughtfully and deliberately to implement these reforms  over a period of several years.”

-Sunlen Miller

User Comments

I just hope this is actually true; that we may be able to give affordable insurance to those who need it. However, I lack TRUST! All of this has a price and sooner or later I, along with all other tax payers, will have to pay for this! I just don’t have much more to give and cannot afford it.

Posted by: AGT-R | July 25, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Health care ‘deformed’ is more like it. This guy should have been a used car salesman, not a politician.

Posted by: Banderman | July 25, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

He knows absolutely NOTHING about small business. The only thing Obama knows about small businesses is how to put the squeeze on them via ACORN and Richard Daley and take something from them.
That’s it.

Posted by: drjohn | July 25, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Obama promised everyone the same health care as Congress gets. That CANNOT be done and cost less at the same time. So either he’s lying or it’s going to cost more. That is a simple fact.

Posted by: drjohn | July 25, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I don’t quite understand the plan as outlined by the administration. Sounds really complex to me. Hey, I am just a small business. What do I know? :)

Posted by: Kevin | July 25, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

A better way to help the “Mom & Pop” businesses afford healthcare, would be to allow them to join a non-profit health consortium of small business to purchase insurance for the group. These groups could be formed by area or type of business. But of course, something that simple isn’t discussed in Washington. Instead, let’s just build another bureaucratic nightmare to “fix” something that has an easier solution.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

No matter what healthcare is a choice not a right. As small business owners we have been told many times how we won’t bear the expense of these programs and also help is on the way, I have never seen any help from anyone. All I know is the cost of having a business keeps going up, my licensing has gone up, my taxes have gone up. Why should we believe anything the goverment has to say.

Posted by: Kevin | July 25, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

What a disingenuous address!
President Obama knows that his policies call for the raising of taxes on those making over $250,000; that Congress is considering adding a surtax on those making over $350,000–including a 5.4% surtax on those making at least $1 million; that Cap & Trade will be the largest tax increase in American history; that the public option for healthcare will encourage small businesses to drop healthcare coverage for their employers in spite of the 8% penalty fee being considered by Congress.
President Obama hopes small businesses will become the next “Google or Apple or HP” so he can steal their new found wealth and give it back to its “rightful owner”–the poor and middle class.

Posted by: James Danley | July 25, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I don’t believe this one sided story. The devil is in the details.

Posted by: LongT | July 25, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

The only thing that will save “Mom and Pop” is to voice your opinion about this nightmare of reform and get this guy out of office after this term.

Posted by: Shane | July 25, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I highly recommend this week’s “Bill Moyers Profile” on PBS. Dr. Marsha Angell spells out why we badly need reform but why this reform may be wrong: 1) it simply feeds into the same basic overpriced system. 2) Lobbyists for the insurance companies may get Congress to steer the worst cases only into a Public Plan. That way the insurance companies get rid of the costliest patients and can later point to the high cost of the public program (due to all those costly cases) and wrongly state: “See, a public plan doesn’t work.”
If we could go to a Canadian-style system, that would add about $100 per week into the paychecks of the average worker. We’d be out of the recession in no time! But that’s NOT what Obama and Congress are doing: Congress is too bought-and-sold by the Health Care Industry and the Insurance Companies.
She recommends that we slowly adopt a single-payer plan by starting with Medicare and gradually lower the age for Medicare: 65 to 55 t0 45, in steps over a decade or so to let the insurance companies adjust to being pushed back out of the health business they pushed their way into a generation ago.

Posted by: The_Mick | July 25, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

this guy needs to give up on health care and try and fix the real problem which is the economy and he and his staff don’t seem smart enough to do that

Posted by: john | July 25, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

What the opponents of dealing with the health care crisis, fail to understand is that it is a crisis. Unless we make changes now, this year, everyone’s cost of health care will double over the next ten years. For the kind of care that members of Congress (including Republicans-even though they wish you didn’t know) receive, a family of four would have to pay over a thousand dollars a month….in ten years it will be at least $2,000 a month (probably more) and how many families will be able to pay for that?

Posted by: Herb Gray | July 25, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

John wrote: “this guy needs to give up on health care and try and fix the real problem which is the economy and he and his staff don’t seem smart enough to do that.”
Rahm Emanuel stated: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”
President Obama and the Liberal Democrats have no interest in really stimulating the economy because they understand that their best chance to implement their Socialist agenda is during this economic crisis. Why do you think so much of the $787 billion “stimulus” bill calls for most spending to be two years out; and much of it only INDIRECTLY stimulates the economy–if at all.
If the real goal HAD BEEN to revitalize the economy they could have made the Bush tax cuts permanent; then implemented an additional across-the-board 10% tax cut, retroactive to January 1st; and cut all non-defense spending by 10%.

Posted by: James Danley | July 25, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Have any of you who are for this healthcare bill they are trying to pass even read any of it? It is nothing but 1,000 plus pages of a shell, there are no specifics. The bill allows 18 months after its passage for the specifics of the plan to be generated. There is nothing which details the amount of coverage, do-pay, deductable, premiums, etc which one would expect to find in anything dealing with a healthcare proposal. There is nothing which details what payments will be allowed to healthcare providers or what providers would be participating in the plan. The only thing in there is fines if you don’t participate and additional taxes to hopefully fund this empty bill. Congress and Obama are trying to sell us the taxpayer a blank piece of paper which contains no details so that we can make an informed decision as to whether this is good or bad legislation. For something this expensive and important to the American people they should not pass any legislation until all of the details are known. Would you buy a house in a city you had never been to just because someone you didn’t know said it was a good house?, a car? Like normal Congress has the cart before the horse and without the details the taxpayers could be sold a bill of goods that will not do what many think it will do.

Posted by: sandcrab1612 | July 25, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

A few posters hit on the reason.
Small businesses are enjoined by law from joining groups to purchase insurance for employees and themselves. Laws passed I am sure because of huge lobby dollars paid to our representitives.
and yes the devil is in the details. I for one am pretty tired of President Obamas half truth, straw men, and false choices

Posted by: TB | July 25, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

TheMick said “She recommends that we slowly adopt a single-payer plan by starting with Medicare and gradually lower the age for Medicare: 65 to 55 t0 45, in steps over a decade or so to let the insurance companies adjust to being pushed back out of the health business they pushed their way into a generation ago.”
Why would we want to do that when Medicare is the reason we are in this mess in the first place? Medicare is basically insolvent -and you want to add MILLIONS of people to it? How exactly would that work? Most people on Medicare have to purchase supplemental insurance for about the same price per month (or more) that families with employer based pay now. Do you even understand how Medicare works (or doesn’t work)?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Herb Gray – I understand perfectly that this is a crisis. What I don’t understand is why so many people are willing to let the institution who caused the problem try to “fix” the problem by doing more of the same.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Thank you, Sandcrab, you really nailed it! I do not want my representatives in Congress to simply pass this shell of a bill and worry about the details later, when it is too late for us to put the brakes on this monstrosity.
Speaking as a small business owner and as one of the “rich” who are targeted as the source of a lot of the money to pay for every one of these boondoggles the Democrats are proposing, I can say that there are health care reforms I would welcome and others that would be ruinous for small business. Pooling small businesses for insurance purposes is a wonderful idea, and is part of numerous plans I have seen or heard of from various Republicans and/or moderate Democrats. I’m with you on that one, Mr. President.
On the other hand, a public option would be a very bad move for our country to make. I’m sure the president is frustrated that people like me aren’t just nodding and saying, “Yep, sign me up because I can offload my employees’ health care to the government and forget about it.” But in the long run, it would ruin private insurance and force those of us who don’t want any part of government- run health insurance to be a part of it. And in addition, while the president would be very surprised to hear it, based on what he has been saying of late, there are still plenty of us out here whose first thought when a politician makes a proposal is, “What’s in it for me?”

Posted by: moderate | July 25, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

IMPEACH OBAMA IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH

Posted by: RAMBOW99 | July 25, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

My small business works mostly wtih small mom and pop businesses across the country. The HR3200 tax of 8% on payroll will devaste many of them. Our customers are small, hire mostly parttime highschool, college labor, and second job types to run their business. The increase in mimimum wage alone makes hiring high schools students for their first job somewhat prohibitive costs wise. The payroll tax and or penanlites should be reconsidered.
The payroll tax would devaste them. we also have customers and suppliers are are small business themselves and are taxed as pass through income to the individual level. The surtax that Pelosi is advocating will drain capital for growth for many of them. If they insist on a surtax or deduction phase outs, they shoudl exclude pass through small business incomes (Sch E) from their calucations.
This would do a lot to help the small businesses in this country who create jobs.

Posted by: scott jeffries | July 25, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

The problem here is that current insurance rates, etc are far too high for most small “mom and pop” companies. Then, you have companies that deliberately keep an employees hours below some standard for receiving benefits. But a government run program will not solve these types of problems. Torte reform, eliminating influence of lobbyists, many common sense changes, will solve the problem. Unfortunately BO and Congress don’t have common sense. They are in the pockets of lawyers (if they aren’t one) and the lobbyists. Know what the difference is between a lawyer and a rat? There are some things even a rat won’t do.

Posted by: jperkins | July 25, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Kevin, the taxes and licensing cost increases of which you speak are state and local, are they not? Obama’s plan seeks to reduce your operating costs if you provide your employees with health care coverage. And, if you’re not making a “personal” killing with your business, it’s not going to cost you a thing.

Posted by: Kent | July 25, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

And, what do you KNOW about anything, drjohn?

Posted by: Kent | July 25, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

All you republicans out there looking out for your inheritance need to help us fix health care. The system is setup to wipe out what the average person works for over an entire life in about 30 days if they don’t have insurance. Even on medicare the copay is 20%. Could you image having to pay 20% for a prosthetic limb that cost over 60 thousand dollars? That 12 thousand dollars! What if they have extended stays in nursing homes or hospitals? We have a chance to fix it. Contact you representatives and let’s fix this.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 25, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

All you republicans that want to protect your inheritance need to help us fix health care. Call your representatives and lets get this done before the health care system lines it’s pockets with your inheritance. Thought I might speaking in a language you understand.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 25, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Mr. Danely, the dictionary defines disingenuous as not being straightforward or candid; giving a false appearance of frankness. So, how has the president been disingenuous?
All of what you say of Obama’s agenda with respect to increasing revenue to restore the economy and reduce deficit spending over time is well known. He is hiding nothing. As to the consequences of whatever actually gets accomplished, well, only time will tell. But I anticipate the nation, as a whole, and future generations will be better off for it.

Posted by: Kent | July 25, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Nice fact less propaganda piece for BO

Posted by: Vet1973 | July 25, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

When you get into the distribution and control of health care… and decide what services the government will pay for, you are talking socialism. The American system of health care is still the best system in the world. You don’t see rushing to Canada or to England, or elsewhere, to get medical treatment. You do see a lot of Mexican citizens coming here for free health care. There is free health care available to citizens who do not have health insurance. Emergency rooms cannot refuse to treat anyone just because they don’t have health insurance. Most hospitals have some sort of good Samaritan policy. There are free clinics everywhere.
The Obama health care plan requires r]preventative medicine. That means that many citizens will be forced to change their bad habits. However, Obama still has an addiction to tobacco. His new nominated surgeon general is quite obese…
What if Ted Kennedy was a recipient of own health care plan, and he had been diagnosed with his inoperable brain tumor, Obama practically said about older people like Kennedy, it will be a difference between having an expensive treatment plan versus a pain pill to help you die easier as a senior citizen.
And you know who is on the losing end. However, Kennedy and Obama are “privileged” to the best health care treatments, doctors and clinics, etc., our tax dollars can buy. However, they will always be exempt from the proposed government run health care plan being promoted.

Posted by: Fran | July 25, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

drjohn, what Obama says is different than what is actually in the bill. The president and Congress are exempt from the bill. Read my comments before this one. You can download the bill to read this for yourself.

Posted by: Fran | July 25, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Obama needs to turn this issue over to a BIPARTISAN commission to fix the problem, with one of the goals being : AS LITTLE GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AS POSSIBLE! One of the things that this administration just does not get is the fact that there is LITTLE FAITH IN THE GOVERNMENT DOING ANYTHING RIGHT — EXCEPT DEFENSE!
Everything the government touches costs an ‘arm and a leg’, and when it comes to health care, that is precisely what it might very well cost.
Obama has not leveled with the American people. It was clearly portrayed on July 22.
If he wants to reform health care — GET IT OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE, and NANCY PELOSI’s hands!
PS: Nancy Pelosi’s popularity is LOWER (34% – Gallup) than that of Palin’s (40%)!!
What does that tell you????

Posted by: PappyHappy | July 25, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I keep trying to read this dang bill, but it’s so big, my computer keeps freezing up. I can’t get past the 1st couple of pages. I’ve read summaries, but I really want to read it as written.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Health care or Health insurance is not a constitutional right. NO FREE RIDES. This health insurance plan is more of a welfare program than anything else. Private management and all contributing with copays is the only way this will not break the bank. We need it but not as a political tool. Medicare deducts my contribution so why not deduct the same from payroll, welfare, unemployment and any other entitlement subsidy payments. Nothing should be free. Enough already.

Posted by: gudgolf | July 25, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

But…, that’s why McCain suggested co-ops to group people for health plans. But, noooooooooooooooo, obama wanted a socialized plan. So the can’t have it both ways. He’s playing politics big time.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Please save me from President Obama’s so-called concern for the small business owner. Spouses of many small business owners work to provide health insurance for their families because rates are higher for smaller groups; however, when I inquired about extending my medical leave a few years ago, I was told by my (large) employer that I could have the additional time, but I’d have to pay the full cost of monthly premium – at the time, four years ago, a hefty $ 1400 for each month of additional leave.
The point being that all health insurance is too costly and nothing in the plans to date will bring the cost of insurance down. Meanwhile, if he’s so concerned about the small business owner, there’s lots he can do without resorting to a full scale reform of health care. Let’s see how firm his commitment to do something for us is.

Posted by: s. valenti | July 25, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

“Some have even suggested that, regardless of its merits, health care reform should be stopped as a way to inflict political damage on my administration.”=======oh please…lets name names….I hope it fails but I am not sitting in the house or congress. It deserves to fail because it is a bad bill. Period. He has yet to even trot out an “approved plan” so we can see it to see if it is viable; he is asking us to pay for blue sky.

Posted by: CWG | July 25, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

1) Dismantle Medicare – the creation of this bureaucratic, bloated, ineffective program was the beginning of our healthcare problems – during the transition give seniors funds to upgrade their supplemental insurance.
2) Allow insurance companies to sell products across state lines (and across county lines within states)
3) Give incentives to pharmaceutical companies to charge other countries the same as what they charge us – why should we fund the research for the rest of the world?
4) Encourage the legal system to throw out frivolous lawsuits and juries to award appropriate amounts instead of the millions they do now (I would say ‘tort reform’, but that is still too much government intervention)
5) Allow small businesses to form healthcare consortiums (with 501(c)3 status) to purchase insurance at reduced rates.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Kent, President Obama’s address makes it sound like he is so sympathic to the small businessmen’s and businesswomen’s plight, when in fact he couldn’t care less. Thus he is being disingenuous–”giving a false appearance of frankness.”
President Obama–as he has stated many times (which you point out as well)–wants to raise the income tax on small businesses that make at least $250,000; he knows that Congress wants to implement a surtax on the more successful small businesses; and that Congress wants to implement the Cap & Trade tax and an 8% penalty if they don’t provide healthcare to their employees.
If President Obama was really so concerned about the small businesses he would eliminate the capital gains tax, make the Bush tax cuts permanent and add an additional 10% across-the-board tax cut.

Posted by: James Danley | July 25, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

What happened to the tax credit of up to 10K for health insurance. Oh, that was McCain’s idea. Why do those of us who pay our own way, pay our kids way, don’t sign up for all the govt. dole get some kind of credit. What’s wrong with a health insurance credit god knows the EITC crowd have milked the system dry why not some reward for those of us who don’t suck off the govt.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Obama needs to turn this issue over to a BIPARTISAN commission to fix the problem, with one of the goals being : AS LITTLE GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AS POSSIBLE!
One of the things that this administration just does not get is the fact that there is LITTLE FAITH IN THE GOVERNMENT DOING ANYTHING RIGHT — EXCEPT DEFENSE! For Pete’s sake! On July 24, they turned on their “CASH FOR CLUNKERS” program, and the system bombed immediately!! And this is just one simple program!
Everything the government touches costs an ‘arm and a leg’, and when it comes to health care, that is precisely what it might very well cost.
Obama has not leveled with the American people. It was clearly portrayed on July 22.
If he wants to reform health care — GET IT OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE, and NANCY PELOSI’s hands!
A BIPARTISAN COMMISSION WILL HAVE A LOT MORE CREDIBILITY.
PS: The President’s approval numbers are tanking, and in recent days, his judgment on issues has come into question. Nancy Pelosi’s popularity is LOWER (34% – Gallup) than that of Palin’s (40%)!! What does that tell you????
It needs to be turned over to folks who have some credibility.

Posted by: PappyHappy | July 25, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Since when does obama care about the plight of small business.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Take all the money wasted on Americ-corp, take all the money wasted on clunkers, empty bullet trains, ACORN, and put it toward a tax credit for individual health insurance.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

I agree with rightbehind, the system is set up to break us and get every dime of our money. So again the question is why does it cost so much. Are insurance companies and health providers in bed together to make $$ on both fronts? Is it the lawyers and malpractice (again insurance)? What’s the deal. obama needs to fearlessly tell us the truth.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

James Danley:”President Obama–as he has stated many times (which you point out as well)–wants to raise the income tax on small businesses that make at least $250,000″
Is the only way to support your opinion to lie? President Obama wants to raise the tax on individuals who earn $250k a year. NOT ON A BUSINESS EARNING $250K. The statistics are pretty clear – it is very rare that a small business owner has $250k income. That money is going into the business and not subject to income tax.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 25, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Obama has lied about everything since taking office. Anybody who trusts him to overhaul health care is a fool.

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

gudgolf:”Health care or Health insurance is not a constitutional right.”
It is the mark of a first world nation that people are not left to die of easily treated injuries or infections due to inability to pay.
Health care is a human right, and it is recognized as such in America, where ERs are not allowed to literally leave people to die on their doorstep for want of a $50 shot and a bottle of pills. Currently universal health care is provided in the most expensive possible manner because of bumpersticker ideologues like you.
What you are proposing – that the poor be allowed to die of trivial ailments, or perform self-amputations and cauterization, like some third world country. If you want to live in a government free paradise without any right to life, move to the libertarian utopia of Somalia. I like living in the best nation on Earth and I am more than willing to quit using the national credit card and pay to keep it that way.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 25, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Seems to me that the anti-republican statements are all about making sure we’re sidelined while a communist inspired system in installed against the will of the American People… What a travesty and shame our beautiful nation is being fed to the beast that is a socialist third-class model that was proven to be inferior long ago…

Posted by: Jon | July 25, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

America better wake up to the facts here, we were sold a bill of goods and those were false in their intent. The voters have fallen for a dialogue and agenda that will put our nation into the dark ages. Bush was not the problem it’s the Senate and Congress, get rid of all the old farts and renew our destiny. You listened to Pelosi and Obama and now we will walk down the path of NO-RETURN. GOD HELP US ALL.

Posted by: NorthCarolina | July 25, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Re: “If President Obama was really so concerned about the small businesses he would eliminate the capital gains tax, make the Bush tax cuts permanent and add an additional 10% across-the-board tax cut.”
The Bush tax cust are part of what created this mess. Republicans wreck the economy every time they take office, and that has been true since Herbert Hoover. Your policies do not work! America’s decline began under Reagan!

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Hey, righbehind, what makes you think us Republicans don’t pay exactly the same thing? Plus I’m trying to run a small business in your President’s economy! Face the facts – make the President and Congress enjoy the same medical care as the average American – and by the way, make them enjoy our Retirement benefits too. Although from where I sit they would all be overpaid!

Posted by: ctorres | July 25, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Rightbehind, in case you don’t know what I’m talking about my husband was airlifted for a heart attack at age 32 after being laid off from his job in 1992 – no insurance. 8 years later I paid him off with no government handouts and no welfare – not to mention I didn’t file for bankruptcy. I guess it’s all about personal responsibility – something the President will never understand. He wants everyone to be dependent on the government – that way he can be in total control. After all – you all think he is the “Messiah”.

Posted by: ctorres | July 25, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

To all you out there that keeps the issue for political agenda’s…..it’s not a Conservative problem or a Democratic problem………IT’S AN AMERICAN PROBLEM…..WE ARE NOT A ONE PARTY SYSTEM …..IF SO YOU ARE PROMOTING SOCIALISM WITH YOUR DAMN HEALTH CARE PLAN….what is wrong with America now is your complacency and narrow-minded attitudes you have sealed our fate…….GOD HELP US ALL.

Posted by: NorthCarolina | July 25, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

“He wants everyone to be dependent on the government – that way he can be in total control.”
________________________________________
Sounds pretty paranoid.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

i am a military widow and have received government health insurance and now medicare. i pay about 90$ per month and choose my doctors. i am very pleased with the system. i have all the faith in our president to do the best to insure all americans. i am very well taken care of, and i wish this for everyone.

Posted by: barbara jaap | July 25, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

SEEMS LIKE MY VOICE WAS A FIGMENT OF MY OWN IMAGINATION………SO HERE IS THE TRUE VOICE OF NORTH CAROLINA. WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRATIC STATE.

Posted by: ETOWAH2009 | July 25, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

ctorres:” After all – you all think he is the “Messiah”. ”
You know, you look incredibly stupid claiming that when he can’t even get the support of the Democrats in Congress for healthcare, closing Gitmo, etc.
Meanwhile, George W Bush commanded absolute support and dedication from Congressional Republicans (and when they lost the majority, they proceeded to filibuster over eight times more in two years than in the entire 19th century combined).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 25, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Jon:” all about making sure we’re sidelined while a communist inspired system in installed against the will of the American People… What a travesty and shame our beautiful nation is being fed to the beast that is a socialist third-class model that was proven to be inferior long ago…”
Over here in reality, EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION has government involvement in health care. They spend on average half as much per capita for health care and their life expectancy is equivalent or longer to ours.
Do you have any facts at all to support your rant, which absurdly implies that every first world nation in the world other than the US is Communist?

Posted by: jhw539 | July 25, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Obama doesn’t care about anything except his own legacy.
He threw his own doctor of 22 years under the bus because the doc was against Obamacare.
The doctor was disinvited to the WH.
Yes Obama is one great guy.

Posted by: max | July 25, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Jhw539:
A large percentage of small businesses file their income taxes as individual or married jointly. The following is an excerpt from an article entitled, “The Small Business Surtax: The Obama Democrats pick income redistribution over job creation and economic growth,” posted on The Wall Street Journal–Opinion Journal (online version), dated July 15, 2009:
“Every detail isn’t known, but late last week Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel disclosed that his draft bill would impose a ‘surtax’ on individuals with adjusted gross income of more than $280,000 a year. This would hit job creators especially hard because more than six of every 10 who earn that much are small business owners, operators or investors, according to a 2007 Treasury study. That study also found that almost half of the income taxed at this highest rate is small business income from the more than 500,000 sole proprietorships and subchapter S corporations whose owners pay the individual rate.”

Posted by: James Danley | July 25, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

A friend sent an excerpt of what is in the health care bill and it is terrible. They will take money out of your checking account, they will give old people end your life counselling, no expansion of hospitals. Free care to the illegals. The unions are exempt, so is the Prez and Congress. The truth is it will be the end of care. There are so many laws that deny everything.

Posted by: Pat Smith | July 25, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Obama seems to like the big fatcats like Goldman Sachs alittle more that the small businesses.
Big corporations own him.
If he likes small business so much then why not lower their taxes? Get the hefty fines on small business out of Obamacare.
He can’t even tell a good lie anymore.

Posted by: nick | July 25, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

“If he likes small business so much then why not lower their taxes?”
________________________________________
You should check the Recovery and Reinvestment plan – lots of tax breaks for small business.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Obama stated that he was sorry that he “GAVE THE IMPRESSION” that the police dept was stupid. IMPRESSION?? BULL – THAT IS WHAT HE SAID AND THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MY MIND, THAT IS WHAT HE MEANT.

Posted by: Manitu | July 25, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Outlaws private insurance, they will audit all employer books, they will say how much money your doctor can make and how much time he can spend with you, small business they want all records, no readmissions to the hospital, a health commissioner will decide what care you get. Acorn will sign you up, doctors will be totally controlled. God please wake up people up.

Posted by: Pat Smith | July 25, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I’m party neutral. I’m an American before I am any party affiliate. It seems to me the Republican Party and several Democrats are content with getting nothing done. It’s interesting that the head of the finance committee, Max Baucus has received over $1.5 million dollars in donations from the healthcare industry, in the last two years.. All Sen. Grassly wants is to destroy Obamma. Neither side has our best interests at heart.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Republicans are doing everything in their power to undermine our President, and our country. If you believe either party cares about you or me, you should see a doctor, because you’re nuts.
Our politicians are in the pockets of big CORPORATIONS. CEO’s from BIG CORPORATE AMERICA determine who gets what and when. Americans always get the short end of the deal. CORPORATE CEO’s tell our politicians how and when to vote. Any of you SHEEPLE disagree with my thoughts on this?

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

For goddness sake, our health care system is no where near the best in the world. Sure Shiks and other ultra wealthy people come to America for specific procedures. Why is that? In America, money buys you whatever you want. Pointing out certain examples of America’s medical system is rigging the game. Pointing only to the positives and ignoring the negatives proves somethings are being done better than in other places. Looking at our health care system as a whole shows how bad it really is.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

A full 40% of all health care costs go for administration.
Continued Healthcare CEO’s make more money in three days than the majority of our citizens will make in an entire lifetime. Do you blame them for throwing millions of dollars to stop health care reform, on an almost daily basis.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Who is happy with their healthcare? Escalating prices, less coverage, higher deductables, higher co-pays, lost claim forms, being told what medications your plan will cover and which they won’t. Who is doing all the dictating now? You tell me. I say it
is CORPORATE AMERICA’S CEO’S, thats who.
I have two insurance policys. One policy my wife is the primary insured and the other I am the primary insured.
Certain medicines I take are not covered under her health plan. If I did not have two plans I would be paying an additional $1600 a month for drugs. Drugs which are sold to other countrys at lower prices than they are sold to U.S. citizens.
Why do you think medicare is in such bad shape. BIG CORPORATIONS,HOSPITALS, and DOCTORS, refused to negotiate with our government on price. Additionally medicare is the mother lode for adverse selection.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

It always amuses me when uninformed SHEEPLE make uninformed decisions and vote against their own self interests,based on comments from talking heads like Rush Limbaugh and Keith Olbermann. Or maybe they like Jim DeMint explaining if Obamma gets defeated on healthcare reform, it will be his Waterloo.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

SHEEPLE, before you declare your thoughts on healthcare reform do some reading. I did. Whether you are for it or against it, understand it before you make a decision.
As of now there are only suggestions on what the final bill might look like.
That is why there are no specific details in the 1012 page offering. Only ways to pay for it. How can anyone vote against or for a bill, before they know what the bill contains?

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

All Obamma wants is a committment from the Senate and Congress to agree to do something and how to pay for it.
There are no specifics yet. That is what needs to be ironed out. Will the bill get that far? I for one hope so.
Also, keep in mind, 47 million Americans, who are currently uninsured will gain coverage. isn’t that a good thing? WE all have one position in common. WE are all AMERICANS.

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Would Marines leave behind their hurt or dead brothers? Not on your life they would. Should we leave brother and sister Americans behind? Think about it SHEEPLE. It’s us aginst them. Them are the BIG CORPORATE CEO’S telling our politicians how and what to vote on.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Gee, that’s funny. Wasn’t it Obama who just said yesterday to beware of “Scare Tactics”

Posted by: sas | July 25, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Obama said. “Low-income workers – folks who are more likely to be working at small businesses – will qualify for a subsidy to help them cover the costs.”… Just what does that mean? People will have to fill out a bunch of forms to “qualify” for subsidy so they can buy insurance?. Who is Obama’s healthcare Czar?

Posted by: CW | July 25, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

FORTY MILLION UNINSURED? TEN MILLION OF THOSE ARE SELF PAY (WEALTHY). ANOTHER EIGHT TO TEN MILLION OF THOSE ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS, AND MILLIONS MORE ARE THOSE IN THE TWENTY-ONE TO THIRTY AGE GROUP WHO THINK THEY DON”T NEED COVERAGE AND WOULD RATHER SPEND THE MONEY ON OTHER THINGS. THE REST ARE HURTING, NO DOUBT, BUT WOULDN’T WE BE BETTER OFF JUST TO SET UP HEALTH ACCOUNTS FOR THE THOSE WHO ARE UNDER INSURED AND THOSE UNINSURED? A WHALE OF A LOT LESS EXPENSIVE AND WE DON”T TRASH THE BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS THE WORLD!!

Posted by: Manitu | July 25, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Hmmmmm. The Health Care Bill looks a bit different that what he’s saying…
Page 145: An employer MUST auto-enroll employees into the government-run public plan. No alternatives.
• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.
• Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll BR • Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll

Posted by: EGBOK321 | July 25, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

If Obama cared about small business he would release the rest of the stimulus money instead of waiting until the 2010 election. Meanwhile the economy gets worse and more and more people are out of work.
I wish Hillary had won!!

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Obama’s comments about small businesses hoping to hit it big like HP, Google or Apple is ridiculous. Most small businesses are in business because they want to remain small. Also, I do not know where he got the idea that people who work for small businesses are lower paid; some small businesses pay their employees better salaries than they could make out in the open market. He needs to get a little more review of his comments before he makes such outlandish statements. I know. I have worked for two small businesses and made more money than I could make with a giant corporation. My bosses had no intention of growing into something huge. He and she both liked small business and intended to keep their firms small. They paid good employees very well because they recognized their contribution to their success.

Posted by: Caroline | July 25, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

bubbles . ..
“he would release the rest of the stimulus money instead of waiting until the 2010 election”
In order for the money to be distributed with checks and controls it cannot be released any faster. It’s pretty simple.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

“small businesses hoping to hit it big like HP, Google or Apple is ridiculous. Most small businesses are in business because they want to remain small”
__________________________________
yes, but because ‘most’ want to remain small certainly does not mean ‘some’ don’t want to aim as high as they can .
“some small businesses pay their employees better salaries than they could make out in the open market”
Small businesses ARE part of the open market . . perhaps you should review what you post before making “outlandish” statements as you accuse the President.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I can’t beleive he’s trying to remake the healthcare industry. IT’s been around since the wild west when people would trade a pig for a Dr to deliver baby. He’s not really familiar with American tradition. This is much less complicated then the Dems try to make it out. Medicare and Medicaid have bastardized the system then you add greedy lawyers to the mix and SCHIP and you have a big govt. stew that costs us all a fortune.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Obama couldn’t care less about small business otherwise he would have stopped that minimum wage increase. Now small business has no choice but to lay off more workers. Just the shot in the arm the economy needs.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

I cannot take this man seriously when he continues to hide behind the numbers. A big numbe of those in 47 million are ones who do not want insurance. Get it? It basically comes down to this: he wants to give it to the illegals who are EXEMPT from paying into it. If you don’t want insurance because you can afford it, then great! Don’t give it to those who are illegal and then claim that I’m doing it for my mom and pop. My dad passed away and only my mom and my mother in law are with us. Guess what? They have great health care. Stop lying to us!

Posted by: Gina | July 25, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

SECREG756 said “How can anyone vote against or for a bill, before they know what the bill contains?” The same way they voted for the “stimulus” bill without knowing what it contained.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

How fast was the TARP money released?

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

SECREG756 said, “Healthcare CEO’s make more money in three days than the majority of our citizens will make in an entire lifetime” Which ‘Healthcare CEO’s'? Hospital CEO’s? They sure don’t. The CEO of an imaging center? I highly doubt it. You need to be more specific, as there are many facets to healthcare and your broad brush of “ALL healthcare CEO’s” is an exageration.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Betsy McCaughey has read the proposed healthcare plan of the Democrats and I am a life long Democrat, but I agree with Betsy. This plan is NUTS. They plan on paying for half of it by deneying healthcare to senior citizens even if they can afford to pay for it themselves. We need healthcare reform but this is not the way to do it. Obama needs to take his blinders off and take a good look at the people he has surrounded himself with. This healthcare plan will ruin any chances of the Democrats getting re-elected in the next election. People with incurable illness such as aids could be denied healthcare. Wake up America!!!

Posted by: Fudgenut | July 25, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

“Now small business has no choice but to lay off more workers.”
_____________________________________
Not true.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

danita said “You should check the Recovery and Reinvestment plan – lots of tax breaks for small business.” Not if they make over $250,000. Not when they get hit with the Cap & Trade Tax. Not when they are forced to pay 8% toward healthcare. Not when what they pay for goods & services goes up because of the above.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

jhw539 said “Over here in reality, EVERY OTHER FIRST WORLD NATION has government involvement in health care” And if those people in those countries jumped off a bridge, would you follow them? Just because they do it, doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I heard the president say that we overpay currently $6,000 per citizen for our health care in the US over what other industrilized nations do.
if we are overpaying so much, does that not mean we have more than enough money to cover everyone? if 45 million are uninsured the other 250million have some type of insurance, shoudl we not be able to take this savings and cover the uninsured.
If i take the President’s numbers, we should be able to lower taxes if the costs come down. e.g. a refund.
How come, they want to spend so much more money if we are already buying the car, twice…to quote the Pres?

Posted by: scott jeffries | July 25, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

bubbles . . .
“How fast was the TARP money released?”
As I understand it, the TARP money was aimed at a small number of targets.
The Recovery and Reinvestment funds are aimed at literally many thousands of targets, all of which have to be properly vetted and approved.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

“Now small business has no choice but to lay off more workers.”
_____________________________________
Not true.
_____________________________________
Yes. True.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

If the president wants to help small business, then do not tax our payroll and profits on our business.

Posted by: scott jeffries | July 25, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

They’re trying to remake healthcare when all they need to do is develop a strong public health system. Where are the govt. nurses in schools? Where are the free mandatory vaccines? Where are the public health centers where first come first served. If people are poor they don’t have jobs and they can afford to wait in line. Productive people can’t that’s why they pay big bucks for healthcare.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

All of a sudden obama cares about business? He doesn’t care about big business or small business he like govt. and all the control it affords him.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

“Now small business has no choice but to lay off more workers.”
_________________________________
To say small business has ‘no choice’ but to lay off workers is patently false.
Many small businesses will absorb the small increase in minimum wage with no problem whatsoever.
Some small businesses will find ways to increase their efficiencies. Some small businesses will raise their prices slightly in order to accommodate the small increase in wages.
Your statement is just plain false.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Between cap and trade and Dem’s healthcare bill small business is screwed. In fact all business is screwed. Does he have any idea how big this country is and how devastating it’s fall would be to the world.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

scott . ..
“If the president wants to help small business, then do not tax our payroll and profits on our business.”
Sorry, to disillusion you scott, but you live in a country where citizens and businesses pay taxes . . it’s been that way for centuries.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

danita said “Many small businesses will absorb the small increase in minimum wage with no problem whatsoever” In what world? Haven’t you read the articles that state that many small business are going to STOP hiring high school & college students because of the cost?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Oh danita, get real. They could release the stimulus money quickly if they wanted to. At this point though it won’t matter because unemployment is skyrocketing. The stimulus money will be used to buy votes in battleground states and that’s it.

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

danita: It’s wrong to charge small businesses with higher taxes during a recession. What he should do is fire Geithner and stop giving our money to Wall St crooks.

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

“danita said “Many small businesses will absorb the small increase in minimum wage with no problem whatsoever” In what world?”
_____________________________________
In the United States.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

bubbles . …
“danita: It’s wrong to charge small businesses with higher taxes during a recession.”
Again, you should familiarize yourself with the Recovery and Reinvestment plan – all kinds of tax breaks in there for small business

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

No danita, small businesses are working on such a thin margin and those that have managed to hang on this far can’t take much more. They’re struggling with operating capital and now labor increases. Either the administration is clueless or this is the plan to gain more control and power.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Bleah total lies. The last thing mom and pop need is a bunch more government crooks with their fingers in the pie. Less government means less crooked politicians just like less criminals means less crime.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

“small businesses are working on such a thin margin and those that have managed to hang on this far can’t take much more.”
__________________________________
Some are working on a very thin margin, many are not. There are many ways in which a small business can adjust to a small increase in MINIMUM wages. They’re called minimum for a reason.
Again, there are many tax breaks and resources for small businesses in the Recovery and Reinvestment plan, worth becoming familiar with.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

By the way there is a typo in the article it says ‘mall businesses’ instead of ‘small’ businesses – fire your proofreader. See how easy a small mistake can become a big one?

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Sure, danita, whatever you say. I’m guessing you have a great deal of experience in running your own business.

Posted by: Gregory | July 25, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

How is forcing small businesses (or any business) to carry healthcare plans for their employees going to reduce their overhead? This makes no sense and is total double-speak. Whats it going to do to the consulting business. Do you think businesses will hire consultants if they have to pay their healthcare or will they just not hire consultants anymore? Think about it.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

CBO says Obama’s plan will not save a dime. His plan will however mean rationing especially to seniors. SInce Obama says that over $100B per year is wasted in the MEDICARE system, why would anybody let the same government idiots who run MEDICARE expand their operation?

Posted by: brian | July 25, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

guesswhaturwrong . ..
“How is forcing small businesses (or any business) to carry healthcare plans for their employees going to reduce their overhead? This makes no sense and is total double-speak.
__________________________________
Did you even read the article above?
“If a small business chooses not to provide coverage, its employees can purchase high-quality, affordable coverage through the insurance exchange on their own”

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Bottom line: its all about the greed and the money that Obama and the dems want to get their hands on at any cost (just like the corrupt NJ politicians who were recently arrested). Obama and co need to stop being so greedy and putting the cart before the horse at the expense of the American people.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

danita said “If a small business chooses not to provide coverage, its employees can purchase high-quality, affordable coverage through the insurance exchange on their own” You are leaving out the part where the business is going to be charged a tax to cover it – in effect, being forced to purchase the insurance.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

15 years ago, the Clinton administration was trying to get Congress to reform health care. 40 MILLION AMERICANS did not have health insurance. All ideas were shouted down by scaremongers and protecters of the status quo, and nothing got done. Looks like it’s happening again. And we now have 46.6 MILLION UNINSURED AMERICANS and counting. This country is so afraid of change, it’s literally PARALYZED with fear. Pitiful…

Posted by: signseeker17 | July 25, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

danita: What if the people DONT want to buy it because they simply cant afford to pay for your healthcare plan (or even their own)? Then what? They get a fine? You are 100% ok with hundreds of offices full of government beaureaucrats popping up overnight to skim the trillions of dollars we are going to have to pay for in the long run? Why mess with business plans that are already working? Like I said its about these politicians wanting to get at the money. This will in turn create more corruption, bribes, cronyism etc. You cant prove otherwise.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

ellesbelles . …
actually it says in the article something quite different . .. it says . .
“Those small businesses that insure their employees would receive a tax credit to help them pay for it.”

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

signseeker17 said” And we now have 46.6 MILLION UNINSURED AMERICANS ” Not all of those people are Americans. And many don’t have insurance by choice. And if it only went up 6.6 million in 16 years, that means a greater PERCENTAGE of people are covered.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

danita – then I guess the article is wrong, because that is NOT what the bill says.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

ellesbelles . ..
“danita – then I guess the article is wrong, because that is NOT what the bill says.”
You go right ahead and ‘guess’ whatever you want.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Re: “This country is so afraid of change, it’s literally PARALYZED with fear. Pitiful… ”
No, people just don’t like Obama’s plan. He messed up the stimulus, he’s giving our money away to Wall St with no strings attached, he didn’t change Dubya’s unconstitutional laws, and he says nothing as Arnold destroys CA.
So why would anybody with a brain trust him to do what’s best for the American people on health care? I would watch very closely this idea of giving an “independent panel” control over all the medicare money. This board does not have to answer to anybody.
How much do you want to bet that our Medicare money will be gone? Get a clue. That’s what this health care bill is really about. Getting their hands on the Medicare funds.

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

danita – I’m not really “guessing”- that was just a turn of phrase. The bill says small business will be taxed if they don’t provide insurance – period.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

danita said “you’re using Republican right tactics” Actually, that would be extreme liberal tactics of the Democrats. (Just like Obama saying the Cambridge police acted “stupidly”).

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

This article is short and poorly written. Its obviously democratice healthcare propganda. No article on ABCNEWS has yet to speak of the negative aspects of government healthcare like the failures and wasteful spending of medicare/medicaid, the beauracracy, corruption it could create, the waits in line and overcrowding it will create for the emergency rooms because people will go to the hospital more because they wont have to pay a bill, more doctors retiring or people not choosing to be doctors because of pay reductions, creating unemployment by placing the burden and cost on businesses, less choices when it comes to healthcare and hospitals, inflation and raised taxes one can see it will truly create a disaster and the democrats seemed determined to not study the negative aspects of their proposal including the people in healthcare insurance companies and drug companies they intend to slather with money coming back (after embezzling the money) with their hand out and saying they are broke and need more.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Obama’s health care plan, if implemented, will change American lives, as we know it; however, the jury is out on whether the changes will be catastrophic to our democratic way of life. Imagine that you can’t use an insurance company across state lines (part of OHB’s plan), and one company is more efficient than another. You might sign your death warrant, unless you moved to another state to get that insurance. Ultimately, under this plan, 100 percent of it is to be financed by tax increases. The majority burden of tax increase will again fall on the middle class, the very “mom-and-pop” people operating the businesses this reform is to benefit. This plan will include health care financed by your tax dollars to an estimated 12 million illegal aliens in our country. Let us first rush to cut costs in current healthcare administration and services and then take a SLOW, methodical, FACT-BASED approach to healthcare reform. It sickens most of us to think of the tax burden stretching out for decades into the future of another rash dumping of trillions of our precious, hard-earned tax dollars on nothing less than a gamble with an outside chance of success that removes many of our traditional freedoms.

Posted by: K. daraa | July 25, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Danita- you never did answer my question… have you ever run a business?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

“danita said “you’re using Republican right tactics”
______________________________
Yes, all through the last election the Republican right called Obama a muslim, a terrorist, a traitor, anti-american, a dictator, a demon, mafia, that he was born on the planet Zoron.
Straight smear and fear tactics.
That you failed to see this, and it was done repeatedly, is your own shortcoming.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

danita – Oh – and the left never said anything bad about McCain? Or did you block that out? He was also called all sorts of names. But I guess that’s okay in your eyes. Personally, I couldn’t stand either one, but I never called them names – just as I didn’t call you any names.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

The President isnt really concerned about anything but the democrats getting their hands on the money for this healthcare bill. If you think he gives a rats patootie about you, the well being of any business big or small or your bills or your children you are very naive. The government and president are still sending your children to die in places like Iraq and Afghanistan on a daily basis.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Save . . . my backside, he’s ushering them to an early grave with rationing, inadequate services and nonsense like palliative care. But never fret, he’ll give them periodic “end of life” counseling. This administration is insane.

Posted by: rplat | July 25, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

david – We are talking about what is in the bill.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

danita said “Is this your substitute for refuting my arguments? Nice try.
And where is the cut and paste from the act? We’re waiting.” Your so-called arguments don’t hold water and it is a question I asked a while ago that you NEVER answered. I’ll take it that the answer is “no”, meaning you really don’t have a clue what it takes to run a business. As for cutting & pasting – go read the bill yourself, as I also stated a while ago – but since you needed me to repeat it, I did.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

“The bill says small business will be taxed if they don’t provide insurance – period.” Posted by: ellsbells930 | Jul 25, 2009 6:03:34 PM
_____________________________________
It’s not that I don’t believe you, but would you please post the applicable part of the bill . .. . as requested. Thanks.

Posted by: danita | July 25, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Obama’s own doctor, Dr. David Scheiner, is against his health care plan.

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

danita said “This was the main plank of the Republican rights’ platform. Obama actually ran on a platform of policies and approaches.
Again, if you didn’t see this, it was your own shortcoming.”
If you believe that, well..let’s just say, I’m glad I don’t live in fantasy-land. I don’t have any shortcoming where that is concerned, because one candidate was just as bad as the other. I didn’t believe the lies either side told.
Posted by: danita |

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Lets all have free healthcare – forget about the 100s of thousands of people & professional private healthcare providers & hospital workers who may find themselves unemployed when the government starts talking about ‘spending-cuts’ for the healthcare system like they do everything else including state and federal jobs. What the heck we dont need as many health insurance companies, doctors offices and hospitals or ambulance drivers & EMT’s. When you die we will just leave you on the road to rot or bleed to death. There’s a line at the emergency room take a number. Your hospital room & surgery or cancer treatment isnt available! Sorry! The government says you dont qualify if youre poor youre at the bottom of the list! Drug abuser? Sorry youre crossed off the list too. Criminal record? Nope sorry no kidney transplant for you but you can be a donor if you like. Welcome to Obama’s new proposed healthcare gattaca where only the rich and elite will get the best healthcare while the poor get the worst and the wait if any at all. Are you psychotic enough to believe these lying dems are about your best interest and pocketbook/wallet? Look at Wall Street for an example of what they think of how to treat the average American.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Republicans cannot even accept the study result of small business owner’s higher insurance premium payment. They are just interested on criticizing of every good programs of Obama’s administration. They can’t do anything good for the people; it is just like the dog not allowing the cow to eat grass. It will not eat and it will not allow the cow also to eat. It is unfortunate.

Posted by: jimjus99 | July 25, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

If you are one of the 10 or 11% of the citizens of the USA who will be unemployed by this Christmas how will you be getting healthcare or health benefits from your employer? You still wont have an employer!!!! Who is going to be left paying for the unemployed if the health benefits are simply given to everyone regardless of if they have a job? YOU thats right YOU a person with a job! They will take the MONEY out of your PAYCHECK to pay for SOMEONE ELSE! You get it now? The real issues of this country are not being addressed! Mexican drug cartels are making money hand over fist and so are the police and local governments who bust people for guess what illegal marijuana the multi-billion dollar bootleg prohibition black market of the USA that is not taxed. Imagine the real jobs it could create in the USA if it were?

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 25, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Re: “They will take the MONEY out of your PAYCHECK to pay for SOMEONE ELSE!”
That’s already happening. When uninsured people get sick, they go to the emergency room, which costs more because by then the person is already sick. Most people who get check ups once a year, catch any problems early.
We need health care reform, but not Obama’s plan. What’s wrong with Medicare for all?

Posted by: bubbles | July 25, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The Repubs will have “a lot of splainin” to do if they keep trying to block Obama on health care reform. The longer the debate on health care goes on, the more educated the American people become on just how much they have been ripped off by the health insurance companies. And it is the health insurance companies that are paying the Repubs to stop reform so they can continue their legalized stealing!

Posted by: Karen | July 25, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Karen, it’s not the Republicans who are blocking Obama’s healthcare! It’s Democrats. The Democrats have a 78-seat majority in the House (bills only require a 1-vote majority to pass) and a 60-40 voting majority in the Senate. The Democrats already have the votes necessary to end any filibuster attempt by the Republicans.

Posted by: James Danley | July 25, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

After reading obamas comments on race these past few days i believe his[CRAZY OLD UNCLE]jerimiah has been whispering in his ear.

Posted by: rking | July 25, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

My husband and I have decided that we will just close our business. We have enough money to life our lives comfortably. Between taxes, workers compensation insurance, premises liability insurance and employees’ salaries it is barely worth our while. We will close and Obama can create 5 more jobs for the people we no longer support. I will be sure to let them know that they will have Obamacare and unemployment. I will be sure to include an addressed stamped envelope to Obama so they can express their gratatude personnally.

Posted by: Judy | July 25, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

So totally obvious that Obama has NO IDEA what it is like to own a small business. In the first place, most don’t even offer employee health coverage, even for full time employees or the employers themselves. The cost of demanding that the businesses MUST pay for it no matter what will shut many down. Employees forced to pay for health care when with inflation they can barely eat on what they are making, much less pay their bills, will cause many to become homeless and go under – even IF their employers stay open. The whole idea of a start-up business is that everyone works together to become something – and government crucifies them at every turn with more taxes and more and more fees. HE WILL KILL SMALL BUSINESS – which I firmly believe is his whole plan. Government dependence and a few czars in charge of who eats, who lives, who dies.

Posted by: Bea Jones | July 25, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

There is a predictability to Obama-talk: whatever he says he says is for deceitful purposes. What utter arrogance. His next book… The Audacity of Arrogance.

Posted by: honestjohn50 | July 25, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Danita… Obama has proven by his actions to be worse than what you would deem to be “smear” descriptions. Sorry you can’t see through the fog, but…. In the very best case Mr. Obama is ill-suited to and inexperienced in running a business – any business. At worst, and this is the unfolding reality, he harbors a deep animosity for pre-Obama America. Open your eyes and ears!

Posted by: honestjohn50 | July 25, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Guess the “Blue Dog Democrats” are hearing enough from their constituents that they think they might lose their jobs by carrying Obama’s handbasket everywhere like good little trained chimps. Note to them – too late to panic now. Everyone already knows what you are.

Posted by: Bea Jones | July 25, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Traveling today listening to taxpayer funded NPR “news” (OK, leftist opinion presented as “news”). Truly amazing how little substance vs the heaping helpings of leftist liberal spin re Obama-care. To balance things, they put on Daniel Schorr to distort the recent Obama/Gates police bashing thing. Got to be impressed by the number and depth of Obama sycophants in the news media. Somebody please remind me why NPR is taxpayer funded rather than by the Democrat party.

Posted by: honestjohn50 | July 25, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

The sad truth is that there is NO dog in this fight represents the best interest of “average Joe and Josephine”. Yes, the health insurance companies are NOT interested in YOUR best interest – but at least they cannot force you into their fold at the point of a “virtual legal gun” as the government can and will do. Also, the REAL issue is HEALTH CARE not HEALTH INSURANCE – insurance per se is just more overhead. As much as I would like to see health CARE be more afforable, the thought of Obama-care is very frightning. Yes, it will be grotesquely expensive and what you personally get WILL be a matter of political connections. Duh!!!

Posted by: honestjohn50 | July 25, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Simple question: If Obama-care is going to make health care so much more affordable, then why is it going to cost a trillion dollars or so?

Posted by: honestjohn50 | July 25, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

bubbles said “What’s wrong with Medicare for all?”
Well, considering that the creation of Medicare is what started us down this road to the healthcare crisis, Medicare for all is a REALLY bad idea. Medicare is all but insolvent. How can adding millions of people to its rolls be a good thing? Most senior citizens carry supplemental insurance to cover everything that Medicare doesn’t – often at a cost nearly as great as what people with employer backed plans pay.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Karen said “The Repubs will have “a lot of splainin” to do if they keep trying to block Obama on health care reform. ”
Do you understand that the Republicans CANNOT block the bill, if all the Democrats want to pass it? Fortunately, there are enough Democrats questioning this ill-conceived bill to save us for a little while. The government needs to stay OUT of healthcare.
I just love the provisions for preventive care (said in a sarcastic tone)… isn’t that what HMO’s were supposed to do? And guess what? People still don’t go to the doctors for preventive care.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 25, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

of the people, by the people, and for the people…guess it means the ultra rich – the only rights “the people” have is to pay taxes and die!

Posted by: toldyaso | July 25, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

He forgot to address those people who don’t want his brand of health care reform because the federal gov’t does not have the Constitutional authority to do so.

Posted by: mammaduck | July 25, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Fudgenut, I responded to your post. The CEO of Cigna earns approx. $30,000 every three days. Not a life times worth of income, I’ll grant you that.
But it’s equal to a years worth of pay to under executive level employees.
And Ed. H. Hannaday is one of the lower paid CEO’s in the industry.
My point is that the CORPORATIONS own our politicians, and they are told what to vote for or against by CORPORATE CEO’S.
Does any doubt that?
Politicians roles for the public at large is to keep WE THE PEOPLE divided,
and arguing with each other.
FudgeNUT, We are all we got.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

My Daughter is a Pulmonolgist and Critical care Specialist and the doctors will leave Medicine in droves. They have worked too hard to have a government commissioner tell them that they can’t do for the patient what they know is right. 97% of the doctors are against this bill. There is no way they will be slaves to Obama’s goons telling them what to do. The care will be rationed and they will say how much time the doctor can spend with you.Doctors have really been insulted with his remarks. My Daughter’s patients love her and she spends tons of time with them. She has saved many lifes and they will be told to die with Obama care.

Posted by: Pat Smith | July 25, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

It’s laughable, you are all argueing with each other over a bill which does not yet have final provisions in it.
Why? You are all wrong. There is nothing anyone can argue over. There are NO provisions for a new health care bill.Stop argueing and move forward. let’s find out what the final bill’s provisions are. Talk about putting the cart before the horse. Stop listening to politicians. They have their own agendas. And it’s not in OUR best interests.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

The AMA has supported changing health care. AMA= the doctors lobbying group in Washington.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Honestjohn50, now you are getting it.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | July 25, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

3 out of 5 bankruptcies in this nation are caused by health care. Republicans if you want to protect your inheritance demand public health care. The health care system is set up to wipe out all that a person works for in an entire life in about 30 days if they don’t have insurance.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 25, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Some suggestions that this legislation needs:
1) Employees of large employers should be able to buy into it. (current bill says they can’t)
2) Subsidies should go ONLY to those who buy into the public option, and NOT to private insurance companies. (current bill says they do)
3) It should begin by representing a large group of peopl – most of the uninsured, as well as Medicad and SCHIP recipients. (current bill doesn’t)
4) It shoud have authorization to use Medicare’s reimbursement rates. (current bill doesn’t)
If they adopt these measures, I think you’ll see the cost of the plan go down to no more than we’re paying for health care currently, while insuring almost every American.

Posted by: Flash Override | July 25, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Our seniors will see their healthcare rationed, while illegal aliens will get free healthcare.
Thank you Democratic Party!!!!!!!! Hope you’re not counting on my vote in 2010 or 2012.

Posted by: Janet | July 25, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Gee, Danita, maybe I can help. I noticed your challenge that someone who had the temerity to point out that the health care reform package being touted by henry waxman and the dems would financially penalize small businesses who don’t offer health insurance. Well, since the “bill” is a work in progress perhaps you will settle for the following quote from Waxman’s Committee on Energy and Commerce’s own website, where they have a summary of the bill (okay, they also seem to have the bill text but I figure it will overwhelm my poor little puter to try to download it so I’ll skip that, thanks). Gee, in the section entitled “employer responsibility,” we find that ellsbells was precisely right (unless you figure the committee is going to lie on their own website about their own bill). I provide the whole paragraph, but the important part is midway through, where it says businesses must provide coverage or “contribute” 8 percent of their payroll. As a small business owner, I can tell you that would be a major burden on small businesses.
Here’s the relevant part of the summary:
“Employer responsibility. The proposal builds on the employer‐sponsored coverage that exists today. Employers will have the option of providing health insurance coverage for their workers or contributing funds on their behalf. Employers that choose to contribute will pay an amount based on eight percent of their payroll. Employers that choose to offer coverage must meet minimum benefit and contribution requirements specified in the proposal.”

Posted by: moderate | July 25, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

“I know many of you here today are single payer advocates and so am I … and those of us who are pushing for a public health insurance don’t disagree with this goal. This is not a principled fight. This is a fight about strategy for getting there and I believe we will.”
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL and ally of Obama) told a group of government-run health care supporters on April 18.

Posted by: Janet | July 25, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Okay, I said I wouldn’t post when drowsy, and I’ve broken my pledge. I meant to write, “I noticed your challenge TO someone”

Posted by: moderate | July 25, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Okay, to be fair, the committee summary does say that businesses with payroll of less than 250,000 are exempted, and that payrolls of less than 400,000 are taxed (or whatever word you use to characterize it) on a sliding scale, with the 8 percent kicking in at 400,000. So tiny companies (like my own) would be exempt, but pretty small companies, in the great scheme of things, are going to be hit with an expense that will make it tough for them. And gee, if they are close to the line, why would they bother to expand to a higher payroll level and let the penalties kick in? So much for job creation.

Posted by: moderate | July 25, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Small businesses will pay more than big businesses because of volume-simple economics! If you buy more in bulk, you pay less per item.
Office supplies, medical supplies, laptops, servers, books, party goods….it is all the same, ALONG WITH HEALTH CARE, the more people you have on the plan the less you pay per person.
Obama’s Plan will not help small businesses, in fact almost ALL economist will tell you the exact oppposit-but go ahead an listen to Obama with all of his economic and governmental experience (saracsm).
You see, Obama is what you get when you hire/put into place an INEXPERIENCE and UNQUALIFIED individual. Think about this for a minute and you will understand.
He had ZERO foreign affairs experience, he had ZERO miliatry experience, he had ZERO economics/business experience and for all intent purposes, his legal experience was minimal to say the least.
So, what experience did he bring to the table other than the ability to speak nicely with the aid of a teleprompter?
NONE! He is nothing more than a puppet with the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Ayers, Wright, Soros and their ilk directing him what to do-and he does so without a fight and all too willingly.
Health Care is an issue in this country, but a monetary issue and one that does not need the likes of Pelosi, Dodd, Frank, BOxer and Reid controlling.

Posted by: KMDay | July 25, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

what do “MALLS” have to do with this, except that certain mall owner/operators like Simon malls supported Obama with much money (alledgedly). To quote this article:
[Those mall businesses that insure their employees would receive a tax credit to help them pay for it."]
The point is that under Obama’s dream it is likely that small business (and mid-size businesses) would cease to exist. His likely ideal is Euro-style. Large corporations, stability, less upward/downward mobility, capital stabilization, and less oportunity but everyone “protected” in their class situation- enough to prevent discord or revolution. He is not a communist but an elistist. His mentors would be ashamed!

Posted by: Ed | July 25, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Okay, to be fair, the committee summary does say that businesses with payroll of less than 250,000 are exempted, and that payrolls of less than 400,000 are taxed (or whatever word you use to characterize it) on a sliding scale, with the 8 percent kicking in at 400,000. So tiny companies (like my own) would be exempt, but pretty small companies, in the great scheme of things, are going to be hit with an expense that will make it tough for them. And gee, if they are close to the line, why would they bother to expand to a higher payroll level and let the penalties kick in? So much for job creation.Posted by: moderate | Jul 25, 2009 11:47:23 PM ========================Because I do not own a business, are the numbers they are using to determine exempt status based on gross or net worth?
I agree, why open a new store and hire a few more people if the government is going to rape your earnings? Seems pretty dumb to me……

Posted by: KMDay | July 25, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Okay, Odd behavior on the moderator’s part tonight. I posted a response to Danita’s challenge, quoting the relevant section of the summary of the bill from Waxman’s committee website. The posts disappeared into the ether and did not show up when I refreshed the page. So, I’ll try to just summarize what I said there– the bill summary says that all businesses must either provide coverage OR pay 8 percent of their payroll as a penalty/tax/whatever you want to call it.
To be fair, there is an exemption for companies with a payroll of less than 250,000 and a rolling scale of penalties for those with payroll of less than 400,000, with the 8 percent kicking in at 400,000. So you have to be pretty tiny (or cheap *G*) to be totally exempt from the requirement. And yes, my own small business has a small enough payroll to be exempt, but barely so and we only employ a few people– guess we pay them too well, huh?
Hope I can post the relevent section of the summary without getting bounced. Here goes:
Employer responsibility. The proposal builds on the employer‐sponsored coverage that exists today. Employers will have the option of providing health insurance coverage for their workers or contributing funds on their behalf. Employers that choose to contribute will pay an amount based on eight percent of their payroll. Employers that choose to offer coverage must meet minimum benefit and contribution requirements specified in the proposal.

Posted by: moderate | July 26, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Good question, KMDay, but the penalty is based on the level of payroll, not company income or profit. But that brings up a question I have– does the pay of the owners count toward payroll? Makes a huge difference. Also, does payroll include benefits or just base pay? Guess I spoke too soon when I said that my little company falls below the 250,000 threshold, depending on what counts and what does not.

Posted by: moderate | July 26, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Many small business, such as landscaping,home improvement, architect etc depend on the willingness of spending by the upper class people. If the tax is greatly increased on the upper class to fund the new health care reform, they will be less likely to spend money on small business. Furthermore, the cap and trade tax will cause increase in electric bill and commodity prices, which in turn bring up the cost on running small business.

Posted by: austin | July 26, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Wouldn’t it be better to get health insurance out of the employers’ hands and responsibility. Why can’t everyone just purchase insurance on their own. If they don’t then they go broke without the benefit of bankruptcy.

Posted by: Gregory | July 26, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am

You nailed it KMDay. This is what you get when experience isn’t a factor. I would have never imagined such an unproven, inexperienced person as POTUS.

Posted by: Gregory | July 26, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Everyone here needs to realize the problem goes much deeper than that. I run a private ambulance service in a medium sized community (Appr. 500,000). The majority of our employees work near the poverty level. Even as the director I make little more than your average “corporate” mid level manager. Let me tell you why that is, the majority of the patients we transport have either no insurance or medicare. Those that don’t have insurance rarely pay, and those who DO have medicare – we literally recieve pennies on the dollar for what we bill. People find it outrageous that we charge on average $600 for a trip to the hospital. People also don’t realize exactly how much it costs to operate emergency medical services. Between the cost of your average ambulance (over $100,000) – the maintenance, fuel, and insane cost of insuring such vehicles. The cost of stocking and supplying the equipment necessary ($10,000 in communications equipment, $30,000 for a cardiac monitor, etc.) – It costs us on average of $200 to run a call. Medicare LITERALLY pays us pennies on the dollar for what we charge, and people actually think this plan is going to make it better? Our company pays for medical benefits for our employees (100%) – which has gone up almost 200% in the past 5 years. So now I have employees who risk their lives every day to save the lives of others, I pay almost $400 each month for each employee to have health insurance, and I make approximately $240 on each call we transport when a patient in need of medical services has medicare. These poor guys are making little more than $10 an hour – but hey guess they at least have jobs – which is more than many folks can say these days right? If this continues they may not, nor will I – and the local fire department? They are in the same position we are – they have to charge the same as we do if they transport a patient – and guess what – they get the same amount from Medicare. good thing they have public funding provided by the taxpayers or we wouldn’t have fire protection if they relied on a government that wants to “CUT” Medicare spending…

Posted by: Speaking With Anonymity | July 26, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am

someone on this blog is trying to make the case that the Democrats are blocking healthcare bill. What a frigging joke Democrats are. Not one Republican has supported the bill. Not one. And only three supported that pork fest of a non-Stimulus. The Democrats are a frigging joke.

Posted by: Gregory | July 26, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

You ceretainly see obama trying to limit what Dr. make. How about the bloodsucking low life lawyers. How about we make them work for free and limit their incomes. WE all need lawyers right. Well, how about they start working for us not their greedy selves.

Posted by: Gregory | July 26, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Two percent of the population will never be able to pay for insurance for 98 percent of the population’s health coverage. Limiting needed procedures and cutting coverage for seniors and all baby boomers who are or will be seniors shortly is sad.

Posted by: anony | July 26, 2009, 4:46 am 4:46 am

This article and the blogs prove my point of theory. This healthcare reform has nothing to do with health. It is about money and control. For the above reason alone the reform bill should not be passed. If the bill were about health, I might want it. Instead, all of the discussion is about costs, expenses, taxes, and incomes. This program does not actually discuss health care. Obama is no different than Bush. Both are elitists. Both live in luxury with the concept of enslaving the working class, and when either one or the other speaks, it is always the complete opposite of what they are and were doing. Fact: This healthcare reform is actually about profits and big business. The Obama administration wants to take in the trillions of dollars for him and his buddies the czars like the current insurance companies do. If anyone on this blog read the Stimulus bill, line 15 clearly states the government no longer controls the budget spending. All the power of spending was taken away from the people’s representatives and given to the Executive Branch who appointed his crony buddies, the czars. Fact: This bill has nothing to do with health care. This bill has everything to do with incomes of trillions and spending only millions.

Posted by: Clancy 49 | July 26, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Look at the plans….Rationed health care…Boards that decide your fate…may even have ACORN members on them…..We will be paying to insure all the ILLEGALS…. Your Mom and Pop will be denied some care and left to wither away..DO not believe what they are telling you..please educate yourselves and demand to look at the clauses inserted into this bill.Obama is not telling you the truth about most of it… there are even provisions where they can go into your bank and checking accounts !!!!!!

Posted by: jimbo | July 26, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Isn’t this charming. Obama telling the American people not to listen to the scare tactics, but you better pass this bill or you’ll kill mom and pop!

Posted by: sas | July 26, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am

Danita, once again you only tell part of the story. According to the 2006 IRS statistics, the top 1% of the nation’s wage earners (1,357,192 individuals reporting a positive AGI) accounted for 39.89% of the total federal income tax revenue. While the bottom FIFTY PERCENT of the nation’s wage earners (67,859,580 reporting a positive AGI) accounted for just 2.99% of the total federal income tax revenue.
Now then The Wall Street Journal, Opinion Journal, reported on Dec. 17, 2007 the following information:
In 1990 the richest 1% accounted for 14% of the total income and paid 25% of the federal income taxes;
In 2000 the richest 1% accounted for 21% of the total income and paid 37% of the federal income taxes;
In 2005 the richest 1% accounted for 21% of the total income and paid 39% of the federal income taxes.
SO under the last two years of the first Bush Administration and 8 years of the Clinton Administration the top 1% saw their percentage of the total income rise 7 percentage points; and their percentage of the total federal income taxes paid rose 12 percentage points. And under the second Bush Administration’s first 5 years the top 1% saw their percentage of the total income remain the same (in 2006 it rose 1 percentage point); while their percentage of the total federal income taxes paid ticked up 2 percentage points (in 2006 it rose 1 percentage point).

Posted by: James Danley | July 26, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Moderate, actually your response to Danita was not deleted. It was just moved back a page.

Posted by: James Danley | July 26, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

impeach all obama and hillary administration be for they take your right away both of them are criminals they are violating your rights what obama are doing to health is unexceptable to the people of this country

Posted by: RAMBOW99 | July 26, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

All you global warming activists take note from AccuWeather.com (reported July 25, 2009):
“1,044 daily record low temperatures have been broken this month nationwide according to NCDC (National Climatic Data Center)–count record “low highs” and the number increases to 2,925, surely to pass 3,000 before the end of the month.”
Just imagine how much cooler it would have been in those locations if it weren’t for greenhouse gas emissions!!

Posted by: James Danley | July 26, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Reform and government takeover are two different things. Won’t somebody enlighten Mr. Obama?
Government-dictated insurance terms are nothing more than despotism.

Posted by: tanarg | July 26, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Filling and overcrowding hospitals and emergency rooms because people arent afraid of the bill is exactly what would happen if this bill were to pass. It also would create more unemployment in the private sector as many companies will lay off or fold as they will be forced to carry the cost of it. It will then in turn create more inflation as the rich pass on the cost to the middle class and poor. It also means creating hundreds of offices full of beaureaucrats which will in turn mean more corruption, more bribes, more cronyism as people will want to get their hands on the trillion dollars paid out. Not to mention insurance, healthcare and drug companies will also embezzle the trillion dollars and in a few years will cry broke to the government again asking for more money claiming their costs are too high while shortchanging the average american for their usually good healthcare which at the moment allows them choices and less of a wait. It will also mean more doctors retiring and less people becoming doctors as the pay rate will be less. The list of potential negatives goes on and on but you wont hear the president or his cabinet mention any of these possible disastrous side-effects of the pill he wants the USA to swallow without even a glass of water.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 26, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Why is some idiot writing about global warming in his message? El Stupido, the article was about healthcare. And, you still are in denial about global warming..what a nitwit.

Posted by: leogorky | July 26, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The wealthiest 1 percent have never had it so good.
According to government figures, 1-percenters’ share of America’s total income is the highest it’s been since 1929, and their tax rates are the lowest they’ve faced in two decades.

Posted by: danita | July 26, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

HEALTH CARE PLANS WILL FAIL:
I predict that likely regardless of the health care plan passed by democrats or republicans, because of America’s financial and political blindness, nothing significant will improve in health care quality or cost.
The only significant improvements in our health care system will come with a single payer, Canadian, or European like plan. The only exception in our for-profit system is when science and technology keep the individual out of the health care system for an additional day, week, month, or years, period.
Health care must become portable, at home test, and personal care except for catastrophic care. Even so, improvements in quality may continue to suffer until society’s for-profit basic health care is modified as an inalienable right in human nature.
Societies’ for-profit industries must EXCLUDE basic needs such as health care, or the human race will not survive the coming miracles of science and technology.
Now let’s just keep our eyes on the news and see who’s right.

Posted by: Bennie Beaver | July 26, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

leogorky, I am proud to be a “nitwit” because global warming is nothing but another “crisis” like universal healthcare being used by the Left to destroy Capitalism, the Free Market and Individual Freedom in their effort to control every aspect of our lives.
Rahm Emanuel: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

Posted by: James Danley | July 26, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

danita: what you fail to understand is that those 1% are what is propping up the american economy and that they employ millions upon millions of people. Why should they be punished and if they are dont you think they will past the cost on to their customers and employees? Do you work for the rich or the poor? Who pays your paycheck?

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 26, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

<
LISTEN EVERYBODY, STOP GLORIFYING PRES. OBAMA AND THE LIBERAL DEMS WHO ARE TRYING TO PASS THIS HEALTH CARE OR HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM IN CONGRESS !!!!!!!!!!!
You want to be forced to buy a consumer service that you don't want or have decided you don't need at the moment. Well, that's what Obama and Congress wants to do right now, THEY WANT TO MANDATE(force) YOU TO TAKE YOUR MONEY THAT YOU HAVE OTHER PLANS FOR AND FORCE YOU TO PAY FOR THE PROFITS OF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES OR WHATEVER FATCAT LOBBYIST OR POLITICIAN THAT HAS STOCK IN THE INSURANCE BUSINESS.
WAKE-UP PPL, you should be blogging and yelling from the top of your lungs against this healthcare reform. Yes, right now they are saying all the sweet word to make you think it's in the best interest of you and America; but when you start forcing people to buy a consumer service- it's all about profits and money then.
So, people, don't praise, support, or glorify, President Obama healthcare plan when it is going to mandate(force) you to spend your hard earned cash on a product that you may need to put that hard earned cash on something else to your like-ing. Sure they say the will provide a hardship provision for those who really can't afford it, but when it comes to the government, fatcats, and the insurance companies making money and profits on taxes and the american people- do you really think they will create a sensible hardship policy that will let you out of giving them money for profit.
These people(fatcats) who are well-off money and have good jobs – will never consider your reason for not paying for their healthcare insurance with your limited budget and money- the same way the states and federal laws don't care if you can't afford car insurance. They will want you to pay for it whether you want to or not.
Just look at what they did with the "Stimulus Package for Jobs", "The WallStreet Bailout", " The Banks Bailouts", "The Car Industry Bailouts". Who does these financial policies protect and help-fatcats- not the Average middle-class and poor family struggling.
Pres. Obama has done a full flip-flop on the individual mandate that forces you to give your money to these fatcats in the healthcare industry; so, right now, can Pres. Obama be trusted on looking out for what in the best interest of your household budget.
Once the government put into law something forces you to purchase something, they care little about where you get the money to pay for it or whether you didn't meet the guide lines or category under the law not to pay because you needed your money for something else.
They (the government) will determine what is a hardship for you, instead of letting you decide where to spend your money for your family. FOLKS, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT THIS IS BEYOND SOCIALISM, IT'S CLOSER TO COMMUNISM.
So, you people better wake-up and stop glorifying the people who are trying to pass this kind of healthcare bill. You need to be telling your neighbors, your friends, and your Congress man or woman that this is not the type of healthcare reform you want or you elected them to fight for you in Congress.
SPREAD THE WORD IN YOUR BLOGS AND EMAILS AND STOP THE PROVISION OF MANDATED HEALTHCARE IN THE OBAMA HEALTHCARE PLAN. IT'S THE KIND OF REFORM WE REALLY CAN'T AFFORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Mick | July 26, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

John Edwards lives in a 28,000 square foot house and made the money to pay for it by suing docs. HC bill will tell docs how little time they can spend, care will be rationed, non-citizens will all be covered, they will directly access your checking accounts to pay for it, small businesses will have to turn over all records, Anyone who doesn’t comply will be taxed an extra 8%. All care will be approved first by a commissioner, most will be denied, hospitals won’t be able to expand.Midwives will deliver babies, abortions on demand and fully funded. People you better wake up and start fighting for your lives. All old folks will be advised on end your life protocol.

Posted by: Pat Smith | July 26, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Also the President, all of Congress and unions will be exempt. No one will be able to buy private insurance after the bill is passed. It is all about total control over us and a new slavery.

Posted by: Pat Smith | July 26, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

There’s more than an 18% difference. I retired from the nation’s 36th largest school system, representing the above average income county centered on Annapolis, Maryland. It has at least 20,000 people in it’s health plan, so BCBS and Aetna low balled the rates to get that business. And I’m sure teachers, in general, take better care of themselves than the average person, so perhaps that helps lower the teachers’ premiums. In any result, the total premium, of which the teacher employees or retirees pay 22%, is $465 for a single person double that for a married couple, and about triple that for a family. The policy has such low copays (and I pay zero for things like blood tests, colonoscopies, flu and pneumonia shots), great prescription plan, low max. yearly deductibles and no lifetime limits that my sister, a nurse, calls my plan “dreamland”. As best as I could estimate from an on-line BCBS worksheet, if I had to independently get such a plan I’d be paying at least $750/month per person. That’s 61% more than the total premium I now pay, counting both my employer and my contributions.

Posted by: The_Mick | July 27, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.