By Gorman Gorman

Jul 22, 2009 4:36pm

President Obama and Prime Minister al-Maliki Discuss Adjustments as US Troops Prepare to Withdrawal

President Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Wednesday afternoon heralded progress being made in Iraq, addressing complaints from some U.S. troops that restrictions made on the travel of US forces in Baghdad put troops in danger.


Asked about the tensions, the president said “we have seen both improved capacity and greater confidence on the part of the Iraqi security forces. We’re very pleased with that.”


President Obama added that he speaks regularly with General Ray Odierno, the Commanding General, Multi-National Force—Iraq, who “has been extremely positive about the progress that has been made.” The president explained that tensions stem from the reality “that there are going to be, at times, differences in strategy, in the interests of the Iraqi security forces in setting up a checkpoint at some point, and our armed forces suggesting that, from our experience, a checkpoint might create a target for AQI, and so it’s better to be more mobile and to go after them.”


Al-Maliki , through a translator, said that if “Iraqi forces require support from American forces, they will ask the American side through coordinating committees that organize these operations.” He suggested that “what’s happening is organizing the roles between the two sides and — and cooperation.  It is not to marginalize the role of any side.  Based on the agreement, we are still under a joint responsibility to face any threats that Iraq is facing.”


Maj. Gen. Daniel P. Bolger, commander of the Baghdad Operations Command, complained a few weeks ago that an order by the Iraqi government to stop all joint US-Iraqi patrols in the city  runs “contrary to the spirit and practice of our last several months of operations,” according to an email obtained by the Washington Post. “Maybe something was ‘lost in translation.’ We are not going to hide our support role in the city. I’m sorry the Iraqi politicians lied/dissembled/spun, but we are not invisible nor should we be.”


A senior administration official tells ABC News that General Odierno wrote President Obama just yesterday that ‘contrary to press reports, this is going very smoothly,’ or words to that effect.


That, at any rate, was the message from both leaders today.


“Violence continues to be down, and Iraqis are taking responsibility for their future,” the president said, describing the June 30 withdrawal of US forces from cities and towns in Iraq as a “transition (that) was part of our security agreement and should send an unmistakable signal that we will keep our commitments with the sovereign Iraqi government.”


Said al-Maliki, “those who thought that the Iraqi forces, if the American forces leave, will be incapable of imposing peace and security, these people proved to be wrong.”


President Obama cautioned of “tough days ahead,” but said terrorists and “those who want to foment sectarian conflict” will fail.


In their meeting, Al-Maliki emphasized the need for the US to help Iraq get out of what are called “Chapter 7” constraints imposed after the Gulf War, referring to a United Nations resolution mandating that Iraq hand over oil revenues to other nations, such as Kuwait, as reparations for the 1991 Gulf War.


“As I’ve stated before, it I think would be a mistake for Iraq to continue to be burdened by the sins of a deposed dictator,” President Obama said, saying he was seeking “cooperation from various members of the United Nations” to help with specific disputes between Iraq and some of its neighbors. 


For his part, President Obama underlined his view that “Iraq will be more secure and more successful if there is a place for all Iraqi citizens to thrive, including all of Iraq’s ethnic and religious groups,” pushing the Iraqi government “to integrate all Iraqis into Iraq’s government and security forces.” The U.S. has also increased financial assistance to help displaced Iraqis return to their homes.


Both leader pledged further work on economic cooperation and trade, with the US helping Baghdad to convene an investment conference in October for foreign investors seeking opportunities in Iraq.


Al-Maliki will visit Arlington National Cemetery to visit what the president described as “the final resting place for so many young Americans who have paid the ultimate price to help forge this hard-earned progress.  They’ve set an example of selfless sacrifice that all of us must strive to meet, as do the Americans serving in Iraq today.”


 -jpt

User Comments

Well, I’m glad President Obama has finally admitted he was wrong to oppose the war and is doing everything he can to see that tens of millions of Iraqis can remain free and chart their own course in the future.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

That would be “to withdraw” or “for withdrawel”, but not “to withdrawel”…unless Danita is writing the headlines.

Posted by: paul | July 22, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

“for withdrawel”, but not “to withdrawel”
Posted by: paul | Jul 22, 2009 5:02:25 PM
________________________________
You mean “for withdrawal”, but not “to withdrawal”
FIFY ;-)

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I’m glad there was no mention here about Moqtada Sadr, as there was in the last Iraq post, because he is a discredited and criminal figure in the sovereign nation of Iraq.
As I wrote previously ” It is NOT a “good sign” that people like Iraqi Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr would be engaged in the political progress. He has been in exile since 2007 in Iran and sides with Iran in its foreign policy. He regularly threatens both US and Iraq with reprisals unless they do what he says but his political and military standing was measured in Maliki’s successful initiatives to clear out Sadr City and Basra of his militia and outlaw militia related elements from government participation”

Posted by: robertb | July 22, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

If this were a story that said “Bush” instead of “Obama,” how many comments would there be so far? 300, 400, 500?

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Thank God this is winding down for Americans.
Bush, Cheney and their regime killed tens of thousands of Iraqis – many civilians – and several thousand of their own for their neo-con wet dream of a war.
No weapons of mass destruction found, no ‘mushroom cloud’, no connection with 9/11 . . ..
Just months of death and the almost total destruction of the infrastructure of the country – and the influx of islamic radicals killing and maiming many more.
Good luck to the Iraqi people, they will take even a little bit of peace after this mess of death, maiming, instability – and occupation by a foreign power.

Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Thank God that Uday and Qusay Hussein are both dead and gone and they won’t be torturing, raping and killing innocent Iraqiis anymore.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

traffic cop timmy:”If this were a story that said “Bush” instead of “Obama,” how many comments would there be so far? 300, 400, 500?”
Now the right keeps crying Bush? Get over the persecution complex already. Bush was given respect by Democrats in his first months in office as he enacted his signature Bush Tax Cuts without filibuster or Democrat whining. He was given a free pass by the press after 9/11 and he rode it (and his record setting approval ratings) into Iraq. The Republican agenda proceeded to ‘stay the course’ (surplus? Cut taxes on the rich! deficit? Cut taxes on the rich! war? Cut taxes on the rich!) drove America into the ditch over the last 8 years.
Accept documented reality already, clearly the voters have.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

“Thank God that Uday and Qusay Hussein are both dead and gone and they won’t be torturing, raping and killing innocent Iraqiis anymore.”
___________________________________
Yes, it’s way better when foreigners kill and maim innocent Iraqis with nice clean bombs from above . . . or nice clean assault weapons and tanks, from nice clean American boys . . . .

Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I actually agree with Danita’s last comment completely. That makes me feel kind of dirty.

Posted by: paul | July 22, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 22, 2009 5:47:42 PM
Tell it to the “lurkers.”
(I see you updated your patented response to include “without filibuster.” I like it. Adds a little pinache…)

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“Thank God that Uday and Qusay Hussein are both dead and gone and they won’t be torturing, raping and killing innocent Iraqiis anymore.”
Yeah, except there are millions of others in Iraq and innumerable other countries that have already taken that mantle. If Iraq was about removing a murderous dictator, that just makes me wonder how dozens and dozens of other vile dictators were so selectivcely overlooked right up til this day. Oh, that’s right…they didn’t have to be avenged for the results of “Daddy’s War” of the early 90′s.

Posted by: paul | July 22, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Does anyone even care about Iraq anymore? Shocking how it’s fallen off of the radar recently.

Posted by: Matt | July 22, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Did Obama explain to al-Malaki why he didn’t support the surge?

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | July 22, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Posted by: paul | Jul 22, 2009 5:55:20 PM
Pretty simple, really. I’m glad they are gone after finding out what they were like. Let God judge ‘em.
The rest is your opinion and that’s fine. We all have one or we wouldn’t be posting.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Mr. Obama continues to implement the Mr. Bush’s plan signed and agreed to before Mr. Bush left office. Let’s hope he doesn’t screw it up!

Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Hi Danita,
You said “Yes, it’s way better when foreigners kill and maim innocent Iraqis with nice clean bombs from above . . . or nice clean assault weapons and tanks, from nice clean American boys . . . .”
Sort of like what Mr. Obama is doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan right now, in the war he says he supported all along using un-manned drones with stand-off weapons which give no warning at all so people can try to protect themselves? Of course you support that, you support everything Mr. Obama does.

Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Terry . . ..
I found Obama’s stance on Afghanistan hawkish – but his logic made sense in a way. “These are the people who did us damage on 9/11, these are the people we will pursue.”

Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

“These are the people who did us damage on 9/11, these are the people we will pursue.”
Quite true, but they are not our only enemies!! And believing them so leads to worst reactionary (in its original sense) behavior not a coherent foreign policy.

Posted by: robertb | July 22, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

robertb . ..
“they are not our only enemies!! And believing them so . . .”
____________________________________
Nobody said they are are only enemies and nobody is naive enough to believe that.
We have to be very concerned about Finland.

Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

I found Obama’s stance on Afghanistan hawkish – but his logic made sense in a way. “These are the people who did us damage on 9/11, these are the people we will pursue.”
Posted by: danita | Jul 22, 2009 8:03:34 PM
___________________________________
Answer Terry’s question, please.
The President is, as Terry states, “using un-manned drones with stand-off weapons which give no warning at all so people can try to protect themselves”.
Do you support that?

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Timmy . . .
Depends to a degree on the kill rate of al qaeda vs. civilians.
Russia was bogged down in Afghanistan for years, went bankrupt and lost the war.
The United States was bogged down in Vietnam for years, lost over 50,000 Americans and lost the war.
You probably are aware ‘we’ apparently just killed Bin Laden’s son in Pakistan.
“U.S. officials believe Saad bin Laden — a son of Osama bin Laden — has been killed by an American missile in Pakistan.”

Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.