President Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence Bill
President Obama threatened to veto the Intelligence Authorization Act Wednesday, asserting that Congress was unconstitutionally pursuing information about executive branch deliberations.
It was the third veto threat the president had issued since being elected last November. The first, made before he was sworn in, was to those lawmakers who wanted to block release of the second $350 billion in TARP funds to bail out financial institutions.
Currently, the White House is required to report on certain covert actions to the "Gang of Eight" – the Speaker of the House, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Democratic and Republican Leaders, and the top Democrat and top Republican in both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.
The legislation being debated would amend the National Security Act of 1947 in ways, the Obama administration asserted, "that would raise significant executive privilege concerns" by requiring the disclosure to the Gang of Eight "internal Executive branch legal advice and deliberations. Administrations of both political parties have long recognized the importance of protecting the confidentiality of the Executive Branch's legal advice and deliberations."
The new legislative language woukd run "afoul of tradition by restricting an important established means by which the President protects the most sensitive intelligence activities that are carried out in the Nation's vital national security interests," said the statement, issued by the Office of Management and Budget. "If the final bill presented to the President contains this provision, the President's senior advisors would recommend a veto."
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Obama can veto whatever bill he pleases. Why the worried speculation?
Posted by: matt | July 8, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Obama can veto whatever bill he pleases, no doubt, but can the editors and authors at ABC proofread?
Posted by: mitaxpayer | July 8, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Thanks for calling this to our attention. This administration lives in the closet and would never admit fault. We all should continue to put pressure on them..
Posted by: MOMLEE | July 8, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
So much for Obama and transparency. Only having to report on certain covert actions is why we’re in the shape we’re in. It’s kind of funny that nobody in Washington knows what Bush did for the last eight years.
Posted by: Hemi | July 8, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Obama has seen the writing on the wall–Democrats want to go after Bush and everyone who gave legal advice on treatment and interrogation of detainees. He wants to make sure no one comes after him that way. How’s that for “transparency in government”? He already takes only pre-approved questions from pre-approved individuals. He already imposed a gag rule on health insurance companies, explicitly telling them “If you mount any sort of PR campaign against the government plan for healthcare, we will not work with you at all on it.” Not pretty stuff. But hey, he’s a cool guy and a great speaker so we’ll just ignore the rest.
Posted by: tristan | July 8, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Sorry Jake, but you’ve got to get spellcheck… “The new legislative language woukd run”…also, “The legislation being debate would amend” I know you have a deadline, but please review before posting. Thanks!
Posted by: Jeff | July 8, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
“top Repiblican”…come on, start over…
Posted by: Jeff | July 8, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Not to point out the obvious, but who here has not caught a spelling error? For anyone paying attention, Jake has been in Russia and is now in Italy. If he is like Major, he has a 2 hour bus ride from L’Quilla to Rome. Since I was in Italy last spring, traveling on a bus, the rides can be long. So could you guys cut him some slack? You still got the message right?
Posted by: freeus | July 8, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Obama has seen the writing on the wall–Democrats want to go after Bush and everyone who gave legal advice on treatment and interrogation of detainees. He wants to make sure no one comes after him that way. How’s that for “transparency in government”? He already takes only pre-approved questions from pre-approved individuals. He already imposed a gag rule on health insurance companies, explicitly telling them “If you mount any sort of PR campaign against the government plan for healthcare, we will not work with you at all on it.” Not pretty stuff. But hey, he’s a cool guy and a great speaker so we’ll just ignore the rest.
===================
What was it he did last week, something about not making public the logs that show who’s running in and out of the White House? He’s probably got his Bilderberg buddies in there discussing policy.
Posted by: Hemi | July 8, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
if the news reporters don’t take a cue from Helen Thomas,then “journalism”is dead
Posted by: lab | July 8, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Translation: Obama wants to make sure he doesn’t have to answer to anyone. What we should expect from a communist dictator.
Posted by: N8dawg | July 8, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
The only thing Obama is transparent about is apologizing to the world for all the ills that white America created. The Apologist in Chief is a wimp and so deluded that he believes that a world without nukes is possible. I was glad McCain lost but Obama does for political integrity what Michael Jackson did for financial restraint.
Posted by: Me | July 8, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
If this provision results in the planning and reasoning behind the Iraq war under Bush the Repubs must be heaving a huge sigh of relief that Obama is taking this stance.
Posted by: Ordermonger | July 8, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Hey, when you have record 42 CZARS (!) in the executive branch who are operating under the radar making hundreds of decisions that affect Americans’ daily lives and who answer only to Obama, the last thing you need is a meddling Congress getting in the way with those arcane checks and balances!
This is Obama’s Era of Responsibility, don’t cha know.
So how’s that Hope and Change working for ya?
Posted by: Jenn | July 8, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Bad English, abcnews.com. This is the second article I have read that contains typographical errors. Not professional at all.
Posted by: what667 | July 8, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Posted by: Jenn | Jul 8, 2009 10:18:56 PM
Are we paying for all these czars? Because it seems to me like it’s time for an Efficiency Czar to come in and start cutting back. Then they can get in the back of the line and wait for those NEW JOBS! to come online.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Are you guys not able to read? This story is about the National Security Act of 1947. That’s 1947 folks. 60 years ago.
Obama has already signed several executive orders rescinding provisions his predecessor decreed in order to keep his (Bush’s) activities a secret.
And Obama is NOT talking about instituting new policies to keep secrets.
But there always have been, and always will be, things regarding our national security that cannot be general knowledge. How effective do you think the A-bomb on Hiroshima would have been had the Japanese known about it 6 months in advance? How effective do you think the anti-terrorist provisions we have in place would be if Al Quaida had access to them?
A lot of things in our government operate on a “need to know” basis. Transparency in government doesn’t mean that the American public needs to know every detail about every thing. We elect office holders with the understanding that we don’t micro-manage them. If they exploit our trust in them, they don’t get elected next time.
The President of the United States, whether that’s Barack Obama or any other president, has a duty to keep some things to himself.
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Obama obviously has something to hide. I agree the whole transparency of government thing is just lie # 197 from Obama and company. Why else would he veto the bill? Maybe he doesnt want us to know about all the secret deals he made with banks and GM and other wheels he greased to get his porkulus bills passed.
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Posted by: Hemi | Jul 8, 2009 9:47:00 PM
Just continued Chicago thuggery from the experts. After all these years, it’s second nature. Besides, when you spend your whole political career running for the next elected office, and never actually accomplish anything, you have plenty of time to practice your “dirty tricks.”
And Bill Ayers was “just a guy in the neighborhood.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
“the Nation’s vital national security interests”
Truth be told, that could cover A LOT if spun the right way. I’m back to I don’t trust him. If he is doing something, especially changing something, I’m already suspicious.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Yeah I can understand why you wouldnt want people in general to know what the executive branch is doing but WHY NOT CONGRESS. Something is up people!! You watch! I smell a scandal!!!
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy, he’s not trying to change anything. He’s threatening to veto legislation that would chance something that’s been policy since 1947.
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
“President Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence”
Posted by: Oonogil | July 8, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Posted by: Jaylah | Jul 8, 2009 10:56:20 PM
Ok, so they want more disclosure and he is saying no? The article is very poorly written.
PS: I still don’t trust him. ;-)
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Ole BO is at it again.. the ole do as I say not as I do routine… BO is one BIG liar…….
Posted by: Vet1973 | July 8, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
“President Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence” Posted by: Oonogil | Jul 8, 2009 10:59:36 PM
Written by Bill.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Does Obama live in the same America as everyone else? The country is hemmoraging 500,000 jobs a month. We are in “The Great Recession”. Companies are scared to death of hiring anyone because of the threat of ‘cap and trade’ (thanks Obama) and that they will be taxed and forced to pay for all employees health care (again thanks a lot Obama). Having been a consultant for 10 years I know this is supposed to be the ‘busy time’ when companies hire (before letting everyone go at Christmas laying them off). Well guess what they arent hiring and there will still be a huge Christmas layoff. When no one is buying stuff (real estate, cars, retail products in general) in January February 2010…what do you think will happen to the stock market? Unemployed people will max out the credit card to give junior & sis a decent christmas. Then what? When April 2010 comes and we are at 15% unemployment what do you think Uncle Sam will do to recoup his missing income tax revenue. All I can say is save every dime you have and be very thrifty we are in for a heck of a downturn, massive tax increases and inflation by then.
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy, that is correct. The current laws regarding “executive privilege” went into effect in 1947.
George W Bush issued several “executive orders” making a whole lot of other things covered by executive privilege, but Obama signed his own executive orders, shortly after he took office, rescinding the ones GWB put in place.
So, essentially, we’re back to the 1947 laws now.
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
guesswhaturwrong, what does any of your last post have to do with this article?
(Or maybe you think that “executive privilege” means Obama can somehow just poop jobs?)
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Jaylah did you read all my posts? I said why doesnt Obama want congress to know what the executive branch is doing? Can you poop out an answer to my question? Why is it you care so much if I am critical of Obama’s handling of things in general? Please explain why I shouldnt post about the countries potential meltdown under Obama’s leadership? Do you think his secret executive decisions have nothing to do with what I am saying?
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Nation,why print and worry what this idiot we have does every day.Lets have him empeached,as he is ruining the great USA.
Posted by: Joeray | July 8, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I see Rush let his puppies out.
Posted by: devilkev | July 8, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
guesswhaturwrong, yes, I did read your posts. Did you read mine where I said that most things in our government are based on a “need to know” basis?
There are currently 535 members in the United States Congress. There are some things 535 people don’t need to know, particularly when they are just at the “advisement” stage.
Currently, the president is only required to report on some matters of national security to the “Gang of Eight” – the Speaker of the House, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Democratic and Republican Leaders, and the top Democrat and top Repiblican in both the House and Senate Intelligence Committee. NOT the entire congress. (Because there are some national security concerns that don’t need to be spread around to 535 people.
What Obama is objecting to is having to disclose “legal advice and deliberations” to the “Gang of Eight.” (Again, not the entire congress.)
If you had actually read the article, you would also see that it specifically says, “Administrations of both political parties have long recognized the importance of protecting the confidentiality of the Executive Branch’s legal advice and deliberations.”
That means that if Obama is just thinking about something — hasn’t decided about any of it but it just thinking about it — and he wants to bring in some legal experts to tell him whether what he’s thinking about is even possible or practical, he doesn’t have to share his thoughts yet.
For example, let’s say that Obama was wondering what, if anything, the US could LEGALLY do about this situation with the coup in Honduras. He could talk to his legal advisers and ask them, without having to share his thoughts with anyone else. Only if he decided that he actually wanted to DO anything about it, would he need to go to the “Gang of Eight” first, and then get congressional approval before implementing a plan.
Basically, guesswhaturwrong, what it means is that there are certain THOUGHTS that every president can have that don’t have to be shared with anybody he doesn’t want to share them with.
Which is as it should be.
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | Jul 8, 2009 11:10:53 PM
I think “the plan” was to trickle out the money until mid-2010 and then show progress in the lower class infrastructure jobs for the 2010 elections. I think it’s gonna backfire. It’ll be too late by then.
Rasmussen has Obama at -5 now afull poling cycle after the unemployment numbers came out. The natives are restless. Even NBC did a story tonight about there being a few jobs but is the stimulus really working. Hopefully the networks’ survival instincts will kick in and they will start doing their job again. They won’t want to go down with the ship.
Right now it’s not about all this “healing the world stuff.” It may have started out that way, but in truth it’s all about jobs. If you don’t have a job you don’t have anything. I think the majority of people still don’t feed off the govt and will be suffering. Most people who are out of work will perceive him as waltzing around the world with his family. That really smacks of being above it all. He should have stayed in the Oval Office and worked hard to get us out of this mess. Go to the important meetings but keep it low key.
I am 5 years from retirement and contracting like yourself. I get extended 3 months at a time. My wife retires next year. We are busy paying off our cars, paying cash for as much as possible and praying that we can at least break even when it comes time to sell the house.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
guesswhaturwrong, what does any of your last post have to do with this article? Posted by: Jaylah | Jul 8, 2009 11:25:36 PM
Nothing wrong with posting whatever you want. It’s done all the time here and Jake & Company don’t seem to mind. It’s hard when only a small amount of topics are posted each day and there is no Open Thread. Are you new?
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy, no I’m not “new.”
But a lot of people wish to read these comments to see a relevant discussion of the actual article, and aren’t particularly impressed when people high-jack the section to talk about any old thing that crosses their minds.
And even though “Jake & Company don’t seem to mind” (I’m assuming you’re talking about ABCNews), it’s not really why the option of leaving comments ABOUT THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION is here.
Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy and guesswhaturwrong, if you want to bash Obama and the current government, head over to the story about “$18M Being Spent to Redesign Recovery.gov Web Site” and I’ll join you. :)
Posted by: Jaylah | July 9, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I would suggest Mr Tapper run this by an editor before he speak about any “Repiblican”, legislation currently being “debate” (add a “D”) in Congress, or that such legislation “woukd” run afoul of tradition.
Posted by: Lojiko | July 9, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Even MSNBC, Obama’s admirer, during his election run, are realizing that he’s a very good liar,
“WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama promised to fix health care and trim the federal budget deficit, all without raising taxes on anyone but the wealthiest Americans. It’s a promise he’s already broken and will likely have to break again.”
Posted by: young_voter | July 9, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Since when did Obama care about the Constitution anyways? NOW he does? He’s basically scrapped it in all of the months he has been in office. You tell me how it is Constitutional to have 16+ CZARS who answer to only the President, and not a legislative branch, who all have the same thing as diplomatic immunity, that he has not essentially trashed the Constitution.
And what is this garbage posted about the President only dealing with certain gangs of 8 for the Honduras situation? A blind man can see that Obama is trying to destroy the Constitution, and implement his own government. Any one who wanted to take down a country, could not create a better scenario than Obama has. The man is a diabolical genius, with the community organizing scheme. And why would he want to support Honduras’ government, that by their Constitution, and Supreme Court, rightfully rejected a tyrant? Hell no, he wouldn’t want to be seen as supporting any kind of country’s Constitution, individual liberty or freedom, as he sees that maybe WE would finally see that in the United States and rise up! How many times have you heard the man mention liberties and freedoms? Obama hates capitalism and the Founding Fathers belief in individual liberties. Bottom line…read what he has read, and what he has said. It’s right out there if you want to.
Posted by: clint | July 9, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am
What happened to Obama’s “transparency” promise??
Oh yeah, that was when he was on the campaign trail, lying to ALL of us.
Why does it NOT surprise me that Obama has threatened to use his veto authority to 1) any bill that authorizes the no-strings-attached expenditure of tax revenues (keep us dependent), and 2) any bill with the word “intelligence” in it (keep us stupid)?
Posted by: Fiercely__Independent | July 9, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am
I find it more than just a little FUNNY that Obama would threaten a bill that would allow information to be shared amongst the entirety of Congress.
Since HE clearly wasn’t amongst the “Gang of 8″ back when he was a newbie in Congress, he obviously knew LITTLE of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan when he was telling us all he was opposed to them. Opposed, without knowing anything of importance (e.g., classified intelligence).
Now he wants to make sure that others like HIM are just in the dark about HIS dealings abroad…
TYPICAL!!!
Posted by: FiercelyIndependent | July 9, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am
I love it. The Obambots are seeing just how much their vote is destroying America. Good job sheep.
Posted by: SChaos1701 | July 9, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am
TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…ENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…RENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRATRANSPARENCY…NSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…TRANSPARENCY…
Posted by: HA! | July 9, 2009, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Obama-Reneg-Orama
–
More of same ole same ole Bush or is it really the Council on Foreign Relations which has infiltrated Repub and now Dem parties with intent to subvert the country and Constitution? Obama’s brain is Zbigniew Brzezinski who is a warmonger and started the CFR and Trilateral for his master Rockafella. They hate democracy and work to destroy the politics and economy all the while playing the American People as fools.
Are we fools or have we been played by secret cults that infiltrated the Government and planted treasonous people on both sides of the political ticket while disabling the Justice Department and Courts the reason we have no law enforcement for War Crimes, Torture, Financial Crimes, etc.?
To stop the cults is simple which would try for treason anyone involved in cults with oaths to destroy democracy such as CFR (Cheney, Obama & almost every other candidate from last election except Ron Paul and Mike Gravel), Skull and Bones (both Bush & Kerry), Trilateral Commission and Bilderbergers. Try and Fry is the way to prevent them from committing these crimes against hard working Americans, as fear from hanging is a good deterrent, as always nooses free
We are in the midst of a coup on the US that began with the Business Plot and since the failure there they have been plotting and planning their demented scheme, note all the players of that Coup are the same families and companies involved in destroying our country in the last years. Obama and his wife are CFR, Zbigniew well his father is credited with starting WWII and if you watch MSNBC his daughter Mika spews his garbrage out daily attempting to start war with Iran as the Iraq war did not go so well (unless you are Rockafella and oil prices surged or Haliburton of Dubia). Zbigniew now appears weekly on his Propaganda channel and Richard Haas pres of CFR visits once a week with Austan Dean Goolsbee (Skull & Bones) Obama Economic Advisor to brainwash the American Sheep. Turn these tv bobbleheads off, what does Mika have in journalistic integrity, nothing.
Wake up America your government has become a joke, demand justice and accountability, force the cults to the light, fear not these greed and warmongers taking our country into the abyss in their delusions of grandeur. Try them, demand true justice, not truth commissions but war crime trials or you have surrendered the Democracy to Nazism and your children will pay the price. Where’s Eric Holder, where’s justice to Wall Street Crimes, where’s Justice to “too big to fail” (this would be called Antitrust and breaking up too big), these spoiled rotten New World Order freaks need to tried for the crimes called Treason and Hung at Dawn.
E
Posted by: Eliot Bernstein | July 9, 2009, 7:23 am 7:23 am
This administration has become so transparent, I can see right through them.
Posted by: David McGraw | July 9, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am
I’m glad to see Obama is willing to use his veto pen more than Bush did. I think signing anything that landed on his desk hurt Bush in the long run.
And I think this is a matter where Obama is right. Yes, we are all for transparency, but then again, some things need to remain private in order for people to do their jobs properly. I have no problem with Obama resisting attempts to give the Gang of 8 even more information on internal matters. Security info is one thing, internal debates on policy is another.
See, sometimes I agree with the prez!
Posted by: moderate | July 9, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I did not vote for Obama but he’s right on this one. Nancy Pelosi thinks it’s a good idea for the two chairmen of the Intelligence Committee to have authority to declassify anything they want. How do people become chairmen of the Intelligence committee? First, they get elected by their state or the portion of the state they get elected (never by all US voters). Then, they get appointed by the leaders of their political party–normally because of their extreme party loyalty and seniority. So, you have the most partisian individuals, with the highest interest in keeping their jobs, guaranteeing jobs for politicians in their party, and discrediting the President (if the President is from the opposite political party) and Pelosi thinks it’s smart to allow these people to reveal any government National Security or other secrets they happen to want to? BAD BAD BAD idea. Once again, Pelosi is only looking out to expand her own personal realm of power, regardless of the consequences. Obama is right to veto this.
Posted by: Chet | July 9, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
I agree with Obama on this. However, he had better look into our Homeland Security after several GAO workers were able to penetrate so-called “security” in a Federal Building no less. Our National Security is at risk right here in our own Capitol. Homeland Security is a joke now since GWB combined every department and no one knows what the hay they are doing now.
Posted by: Ron | July 9, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Posted by: Jaylah | Jul 8, 2009 11:56:59 PM
“But a lot of people wish to read these comments to see a relevant discussion of the actual article, and aren’t particularly impressed when people high-jack the section to talk about any old thing that crosses their minds.”
“it’s not really why the option of leaving comments ABOUT THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION is here.” _________________________________
We all come here for different reasons and unless the moderators are willing to control the thread… well, I have posted on this myself. A matter of self-governance I guess. And you are certainly free to express your opinion about it.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 9, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Homeland Security is a joke now since GWB combined every department and no one knows what the hay they are doing now. Posted by: Ron | Jul 9, 2009 9:52:17 AM
____________________________________
So when they were all separate no one knew what they were doing and when they were combined no one knew what they were doing. That tell you anything about the govt?
So let’s apply what we’ve learned here and create universal health care run by the govt! What could go wrong?
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Can we get Pelosi out of the gang of 8? She doesn’t seem to have paid attention since about 2002. Obama already weakened our CIA enough and maybe he is starting to realize it. “Plausible deniability” was thrown out thanks to Nancy Pelosi and it wouldn’t surprise me if our CIA looked the other way on some issues because of what has happened. Pelosi accuses with no proof and answers to nobody. Get rid of her.
Posted by: lfrichar | July 9, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
I still think its wrong that President Obama demanded 100% government transparency from G.W. Bush and government and now that Congress wants to know what the executive branch is doing he wants a veto of the bill. I am sorry but you’re still wrong. Why shoudnt congress be aware of all national security issues? Otherwise why do we even have a congress if they are clueless.
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 9, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Do you think the first Congress of the United States (you know the drafters of the U.S. Constitution) would want the President to keep secrets from them?
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 9, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
I heard something on the radio about the CIA admitting the have lied over the years. Not sure what the context was. It was just a teaser on the radio.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 9, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
‘…requiring the disclosure to the Gang of Eight “internal Executive branch legal advice and deliberations.”‘
Sounds like Congress has finally decided that an all-powerful Executive branch is a bad idea. Better late than never. It does sound like Congress is overreaching a bit, but in light of the catastrophic Republican abuses of the last administration it is time for the pendulum to swing back to Congress. I am a big Obama supporter, but the health of the nation dictates the Executive branch powers being trimmed down (Palin could be in there next!).
This certainly makes those claiming President Obama is some sort of a cult of personality look like idiots. Once again, he can’t even get a Democratic Congress to give him as much deference as the abject obedience Bush was showered with by his Republican Congress (and Senate filibuster record setters the last couple years).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 9, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Traffic Cop Timmy and guesswhaturwrong, if you want to bash Obama and the current government, head over to the story about “$18M Being Spent to Redesign Recovery.gov Web Site” and I’ll join you. :) Posted by: Jaylah | Jul 9, 2009 12:06:44 AM
_______________________________
Unprecedented Transparency 2.0:
“ABC reports this morning that the Maryland firm Smartronix has won what seems like an enormous $18 million contract to re-design the Recovery.gov website. Approximately $9.5 million would be spent by January in order to make “Recovery 2.0″ out of the site that is at least supposed track the spending of federal stimulus funds in detail.
“Smartronix, a medium-sized Maryland-based firm (over 500 employees) founded in 1995, boasts a large number of government clients, mostly military. The company appears to have just one important political connection: according to FEC records, Smartronix president, Mohammed Javaid, vice president Alan Parris, and partner John Parris have together given $19,000 to House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D) since 1999.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 9, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
guesswhaturwrong:”Do you think the first Congress of the United States (you know the drafters of the U.S. Constitution) would want the President to keep secrets from them?”
They probably expected it since the Constitution is designed to keep the Congress and Executive quite seperate. In fact, early presidents did not even go to Congress to give the State of Union – they sent a letter.
And while George Washington was never offered a kingship, as a common myth suggests, he was held in great esteem and trust by most members of the first Congress.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 9, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
The only branch of government I trust less than the Executive Branch is the Legislative Branch. Neither has acted in ways that earn the trust and confidence placed in them by the American people. With the ascension of Sotomayor to the Judicial Branch, it looks like that branch too is going the way of all flesh.
Posted by: VaGentleman | July 12, 2009, 5:16 am 5:16 am