Should They Have Called It The ‘Stabilization’ Act?
ABC News' Yunji de Nies reports: Turns out the $787 billion "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" (AARA) was not designed for full economic recovery, but rather to "stabilize" the downturn. That's the word from White House officials today, who held off-camera briefings with reporters on how the AARA is working so far. "This legislation was designed to cushion the downturn," said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. "That's why we have always talked about this as one function of economic recovery." When pressed about the change in terminology, Gibbs said he was not trying to temper expectations after the fact. "I can probably find 15 or 20 occasions when I said this in the lead up," Gibbs said, explaining that he had always defined the AARA as part of a "multi-legged stool." Senior Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein said that the economy is improving — or at least getting "less bad." And he said, that's a good thing. "It's always challenging to explain that things getting less bad is actually a necessary path on the way to them being good, but that's the truth," Bernstein said. "The trends have to go recession, stabilization, recovery. Negative, less negative, positive." He continued, "For many key indicators, not all but many, we're in that second stage, we're in that stabilization stage. And it's a fragile place to be, and it's a good thing that this recovery act is a two year plan." Bernstein said the administration will gauge recovery on the basis of job growth, and noted that even when the recession is formally declared over, their work won't be. "When the business cycle dating committee declared the recession over, from the perspective of American families, from the perspective of our administration, that's not the end," Bernstein said. "We've got to have an economy that's not just growing at a percent or two, but that's growing fast enough to bring working families along with it." The White House says ultimately the AARA will save or create 3.5 million jobs over the course of its two year implementation. Ed DeSeve, senior adviser to the president for Recovery Act Implementation, said so far $183 billion has been obligated (contracted) — of that $64 billion had been outlaid (spent). DeSeve did not draw a distinction between obligated and outlaid money, as he said obligated funds were already having an effect. DeSeve said that 150,000 jobs had been created or saved so far, and that that number will reach 750,000 by the end of the summer. Some Republicans have been critical of the AARA, saying that job growth hasn’t been quick enough. Gibbs defended the pace of spending, saying that the White House is pursuing a path that spends the money as quickly, but also as responsibly as possible — not just to create and save jobs, but also to lay a foundation for future economic growth. "If this was a four month, $787 billion dollar program, fire away. It was designed as a two year plan," he said. When asked about a second stimulus, all three left the possibility open. Gibbs said the president "isn't ruling anything in, he isn’t ruling anything out. If there are things that can be done to spur the economy back to recovery faster, they'll certainly be considered." — Yunji de Nies

Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
OK, Jake, so can YOU find places where Gibbs said that? My recollection was that the sky would fall if we didn’t do this. I don’t recall this pork sandwich being billed as a stabilization tool, but as THE mode for RECOVERY.
Don’t just say what’s being said now — what did they say THEN?
Posted by: Beth | July 16, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Damn can this guy lie or what?????LMAO the old saying “how can you tell Barry is lying?” His lips move
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | July 16, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
that is funny really.
It did not even stabilize the downturn.
Obama knows that eventually the job losses will hit rock bottom and he can claim credit, he just did not realize (or maybe he did) how many jobs would be lost because of the cost of his kickback/payoff/pork laden, non job creating stimulus.
Anyone with any money is hanging on tight in preparation for those tax increases that will be required to pay for this power pork grab.
The statistics show that savings have increased.
However when those dollars are not being spent at the amusement park, or the beauty parlor, or for the nice shirt that you didn’t need but liked, jobs are lost. It is simple math and has proven true.
Obama is a liar and a thuggish con artist. He knows the media will not call him on this latest distortion and lie. If they do he will get even, he always has and always does.
Posted by: MNM | July 16, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“Senior Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein said that the economy is improving — or at least getting ‘less bad.’”
I did a spit-take on this one! Skyrocketing unemployment means things are getting “less bad?” And what the horse-pucky kind of term is “less bad?”
At what point do people wake up and realize these goofballs are making it up as they go along? If this weren’t so sad because of how many people this garbage is hurting, this would be comical.
Posted by: Bull Moose | July 16, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Call it ANYTHING you want, there is no evidence that it has accomplished anything beyond helping with unemployment benefits!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 16, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
The politicians don’t have a freaking clue what’s going to happen. Neither did they have any idea if the $787 Billion ‘stimulus’ would work at all.
Even worse, clueless Ben Bernanke said there was no threat of a housing crisis – right before the housing crisis!
We’d all be better off if the politicians got out of the way and allowed the economy to recover on its own. Instead, their interventionist policies will simply extend the misery for everyone.
Posted by: JT | July 16, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I think most of us can sense backpedaling and spin when we see it…
I’m not even sure the Obama lap-dog media will be able to put enough spin to save The One from the public figuring out what’s going on. Job losses are continuing and the ARRA/”stimulus” will be an epic failure simply because it simply was not designed to create a significant number jobs (temporary positions at best such as “ARRA Grant Writer”, “ARRA Grant Reviewer and Coordinator”, etc.).
Surely The One will not propose another “stimulus” package after the failure of the Feb. 2009 package. But, with his ego and arrogance, he may just think he can slip another one past us…after all he was able to hoodwink 52% of American voters, right?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 16, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
That Robert Gibbs is without a doubt one of the biggest morons on the face of the earth. It is painfully clear why Obama chose him: In the hope that by comparison Obama, Pelosi,Reid and Biden would appear to be geniuses. Somebody close to the throne needs to tell them it isn’t working. The short-sightedness of their agenda is digging us a hole we will never get out of.
Posted by: Mose | July 16, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
This is the first and only time I wish that America had a option like the parliamentary governments to call for a new election of no confidence vote to rid us of this national nightmare.
The experiment is OVER with this disaster. It was so obviously a huge gamble to put such an inexperienced extremist unqualified man in power and we lost.
Time to cut our losses and move on.
Posted by: LogicalSC | July 16, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I hope even diehard Obama supporters like Ryan C can openly admit what a pile of hogwash Gibbs and Co. are spouting about the AARA being a stabilizing act. No matter how you feel about the stimulus, and a lot of intelligent people took valid opposite views when it was proposed, you would have to admit that the President, his Cabinet, and other associated with this Administration sold this bill as a STIMULUS and promised immediate results.
If you want honest debate and are open to intelligent discussion on this message board and in life, you cannot dispute that fact.
Posted by: Aaron | July 16, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Should they have called it a stabilization bill? Well, they might have had they known how miserably their efforts would fail to stimulate the economy. Most of us called it the crap sandwich, which was certainly closer to the truth than stimulus.
Posted by: huerfano | July 16, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
So this whole time, they’ve been mispronouncing “stimulus” as “stabilization.” You’d think it was written by Sotomayor.
Posted by: Jim Treacher | July 16, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Words must have meaning, and for Obama, the evidence shows that words do not have meaning. There is no excuse for these irresponsibly semantic shenanigans by Gibbs.
ABC needs to relentlessly confront Gibbs about the stimulus. Excuses as glib as these are unacceptable from positions of power, and they must be challenged for everyone’s sake.
Posted by: Mike | July 16, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
“Some Republicans have been critical of the AARA, saying that job growth hasn’t been quick enough.”
_____________________________________
If only those good, clean, honest Republicans were in power, they could cure this economy thing with a snap of their blessed fingers.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Obama’s Economic Adviser actually said “less bad.”…LOL… We’re so $c***ed…
Posted by: Help I've fallen and can't get up. | July 16, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Oh, please, Danita. Maybe your hero could CUT A TAX sometime, since spending money we don’t have doesn’t seem to be working. Slow Joe Biden did his best to cover, but saying we are spending money to keep from going bankrupt is too stupid even for Joe to believe, although Chuck Schumer might buy it.
Posted by: huerfano | July 16, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Anybody read that book 1984 by G. Orwell?
Posted by: Terry | July 16, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
“Oh, please, Danita. Maybe your hero could CUT A TAX sometime, since spending money we don’t have doesn’t seem to be working.”
First arguing for tax cuts because you don’t want to spend money we don;t have is asinine.
2nd the stimulus package had tax cuts incorporated into it.
Right wingers and Republicans dishonestly count it as spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 16, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
“CUT A TAX” Posted by: huerfano | Jul 16, 2009 6:34:17 PM
______________________________________
Do you have any idea how many tax breaks there were in the Recovery and Reinvestment bill?
You might want to read up on it.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
“Anybody read that book 1984 by G. Orwell?” Posted by: Terry | Jul 16, 2009 6:51:07 PM
___________________________________
You mean that book in which the government comes up with phrases like “collateral damage” and “shock and awe” as double speak for killing massive numbers of civilians?
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“This legislation was designed to cushion the downturn,” said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.
Wow. What a whopper. This thing was sold as a “stimulus” bill. I never heard it called anything but that. This is an even more blatant and pathetic lie than Clinton’s, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” This sure affects all of us a whole lot more than that lie did. The incompetence of the Obama admin is stunning, it is quite the contrast to Obama’s speeches which are the only thing he seems to be doing well. The help of a good speech writer and a teleprompter does wonders.
Posted by: Jason | July 16, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
There were some tax cuts in the AARA, but they were mostly in the class of transfer payments/refundable tax credits to people that don’t pay many taxes. It’s an admirable proposition, but it wasn’t the most stimulative kind of cut.
A lot of conservatives argued for stimulus, but their stimulus was not anywhere close to as big as was more targeted on immediate spending. The major problem with this AARA, which was billed as something to be immediately stimulative, was that most of the spending occurs in 2010,2011, and beyond, which doesn’t make a lot of sense if you want to immediately stimulate.
The tax cuts conservatives argued for (even Ryan C says they argued for something and not nothing like Obama keeps straw manning about) were more pro-growth, like a payroll tax holiday and lowering of cap gains for businesses in the private sector. Many economists would and still argue that these had a better chance of creating jobs than increasing.
Either choice would’ve produced an immediate growth in the current deficit, which happens in a downturn, but the argument is that the private sector would be much more efficient in directing that cash to job creating causes than the public sector.
Conservatives were also in favor of shovel ready projects that our nation needs like transporation and rebuilding our defense equipment that has been used up in the two wars that we have going on. Defense spending is by law mostly already covered by the Buy American Act, so most of that spending would’ve naturally occurred in our strong local private industry.
Posted by: Aaron | July 16, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
danita says: “If only those good, clean, honest Republicans were in power, they could cure this economy thing with a snap of their blessed fingers.”
Danita, unlike you Obama supporters, we are under no illusions that politicians are good, clean, or honest. Most of us out here in the real world are head and shoulders above our representatives in D.C. on all those points. We just want our representatives to listen to us and stop their efforts at spending money, raising taxes, trashing our health care system, and making our electric bills higher. We also expect a modicum of truth when the lies are so blatant. Don’t they think that at some point the media will wake up and start showing us the video clips side by side showing the lies? Eventually the media got tired of covering for Clinton and destroying their credibility.
Posted by: Jason | July 16, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Jason . . ..
There has been a global economic turndown – often referred to as one of the biggest economic crisis’ since the great depression. Global unemployment rates are rising faster than almost any other time in history.
The Recovery and Reinvestment plan is both a ‘cushion’ and a ‘stimulus’ during this very difficult economy.
As stated in the above article, the job creation part of the undertaking is a 2-year plan. Seems you’re awfully quick to start calling names and condemning. What exactly is your problem?
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
First it was ‘stimulus’, then just last week it was ‘grant program’. Opps! That’s bad! Need a new word, ah, that’s it, ‘stabilization’! That’s the ticket!
Posted by: LongT | July 16, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
I agree! They are making it up as they go along. I’ve believed it since Bush/Paulson started this last fall.
Posted by: LongT | July 16, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“danita says: “If only those good, clean, honest Republicans were in power, they could cure this economy thing with a snap of their blessed fingers.”
“Danita, unlike you Obama supporters, we are under no illusions that politicians are good, clean, or honest.” Posted by: Jason | Jul 16, 2009 7:09:56 PM
________________________________________
With a snap of their blessed fingers the Republicans could fix this whole ‘economy thing’.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Why don’t you just call it by its name . .. the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act . . .
Who cares if its a ‘cushion’, or a ‘stimulus’ or a combination of the words – we all know what its meant to do.
It’s meant to provide relief during a financial crisis and investment in the future.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
The Obama administration is definitely winging it. All but the most ardent devotees of Obama can see it.
Since the stimulus isn’t working, rename it. Yeah, that’s what we meant to say.
Now, with unemployment reaching double digits, they could now call it the “De-stabilization” Act.
Posted by: Danilo | July 16, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
The stimulus is working, I believe we would be in a worst position if it weren’t for the stimulus, but some of you want jobs on tap, when common sense will tell you it will take a little more time to achieve the goals and make the reforms so this will not happen again, we are driving in the right direction, but personally I believe most of the comment here has nothing to do with whether the stimulus is working or not, it the same ole same ole negative crowd, never changing , hoping for failure, wanting back in power by any means necessary…..You will not get in our way this time…… the time is now or never….. we are at our cross road for change and yes it will not all be comfortable, but when is anything good that will help the greater good easy.
Posted by: gman | July 16, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Is there any one in the press that actually does work rather than just print what Obama says. There was an employment chart that was presented before the bill passes that clearly implied that the Stimulus bill would have an immediate impact on unemployment(8% versus over 9%). How hard could it be to know this. Sad.
Posted by: don | July 16, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Danilo . …
There has been a global economic turndown – often referred to as one of the biggest economic crisis’ since the great depression. Global unemployment rates are rising faster than almost any other time in history.
The Recovery and Reinvestment plan is a ‘cushion’, a ‘stabilizer’ and a ‘stimulus’ during this very difficult economy.
As stated in the above article, the job creation part of the undertaking is a 2-year plan.
Seems you’re awfully quick to start calling names and condemning.
If only the Republicans were in power they could fix this silly little ‘economy thing’ with a snap of their blessed fingers.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Has it been two year already? it hasn’t even be 6 months, I thought the stabilization act was suppose to be implemented over two years, some of you can’t count or read.
Posted by: we'r1 | July 16, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
“Gibbs defended the pace of spending, saying that the White House is pursuing a path that spends the money as quickly, but also as responsibly as possible — not just to create and save jobs, but also to lay a foundation for future economic growth.”
_____________________________________
And coincidentally right before the 2010 mid-year elections. Pfft.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
At the AARP town hall in Alexandria, VA, Obama declares, “I can’t be broke I still have checks left.”
I mean, you CAN spend your way out of bankruptcy.
“We’re going to go bankrupt as a nation,” Biden said.
“Well, people when I say that look at me and say, ‘What are you talking about? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?’” Biden said. “The answer is yes, I’m telling you.”
Where’s the koolaid and cookies?
Posted by: O'biden | July 16, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Doctor: “Mr. Smith, your cancer is less bad than it was.”
Mr. Smith: “Is that good?”
Doctor: “Of course it is! Less bad is good!”
Mr. Smith: “Does that mean I’m getting better?”
Doctor: “Um, I said your cancer was less bad.”
Mr. Smith: “Yes. And you said less bad was good, so that means I’m getting better!”
Doctor: “Well, err…no. You still have cancer. It’s still killing you and nothing we’ve done has really stopped it.”
Mr. Smith: “How is that ‘less bad’?”
Doctor: “Well you’re not dead yet. That’s less bad, right?”
Posted by: catmman | July 16, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Unbelievable how some here are trying to claim there has been no change in terminology. Barney Frank just went on the air and said that the White House has told Democrats to call this a “Recovery Act” instead of “Stimulus.”
Posted by: Larry Gwaltney | July 16, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
This year I have been on vacation three times, twice to Disneyland and once to six flags, once at Disneyland there were so many people there it was hard to even move around, and at six flags the wait line for ride was even longer, and the eating places were full and I mean-full, now if the economy is all so bad as some people commenting here…but really! I know for a lot of people it is bad, but from where I am looking we seem have avoided a depression or worst, something somewhere seems to be working, and why do people even listen to these negative comments that the stimulus isn’t working when you know and I know what they want and the lie’s they want you to believe to get it, it been a little less than six month since the stimulus and it suppose to be a 2 year plan, at least give it the two years it was plan for, there are some working overtime to make sure you don’t see the good it is doing, they know if you see it they are doomed for a long time and they know this, it is working and it will work!…..why do you think they are so afraid.
Posted by: loveamerica | July 16, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
“[Y]ou get the argument, ‘Well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill.’ What do you think a stimulus is? That’s the whole point. No, seriously. That’s the point.”
–President Barack Obama, Feb 6, 2009
Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Danita,
Your views are truly breathtaking…
Posted by: tjp612 | July 16, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
“Where’s the koolaid and cookies?”
My favorite flavor: Barack-A-Berry
Posted by: tjp612 | July 16, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Apparently, Obama and crew think the American people have forgotten what Obama said…His proposal of the American Recovery and Reinvestment was to immediately jumpstart job creation as well as long-term economic growth.
It isn’t working and the backtracking begins…
Posted by: Long-Term | July 16, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
That’s Bush, Paulson, McCain and 0bama.
People, Obama supporters in particular, conveniently overlook the fact that 0bama and McCain interrupted their campaigns last September to fly cross-country just to be in on the “bail-out” [aka Stimulus part Un] decision making process.
McCain and 0bama made it to the University of Mississippi just in time for that scheduled debate.
Posted by: Claire | July 16, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
They think we are so stupid. Unfortunately, they are right.
Posted by: ctmom | July 16, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Let’s just start calling it the ‘economic rescue’ act. ‘Stimulus’ is so passe’ and ‘economic recovery’ is so, well, Barney Frank. What makes the coolest acronym?
Posted by: LongT | July 16, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
How about we just call it the “Spending Bill”? No, seriously. That’s the point.
Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Arizona’s job numbers out for June:
Government shed 39,000 jobs, followed by professional and business services with 4,200 jobs.
So much for the stimulus saving government jobs. I think they saved some teachers, but policeman & fireman? Who knows. Also, they cannot find police recruits in Phoenix thanks to Mayor Gordon.
2400 construction jobs in June. Since January, construction down 26%. No word on what those construction jobs were.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
So this whole time, they’ve been mispronouncing “stimulus” as “stabilization.” You’d think it was written by Sotomayor.
Posted by: Jim Treacher | Jul 16, 2009 6:02:24 PM
_____________________________________
Welcome Mr. Treacher. Don’t be a stranger.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
snap of their blessed fingers.
Posted by: danita | Jul 16, 2009 6:25:21 PM
__________________________________
Finger snapping has replaced wand waving I see. Way to add to the dialogue!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
2nd the stimulus package had tax cuts incorporated into it.
Right wingers and Republicans dishonestly count it as spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 16, 2009 6:54:04 PM
_______________________________________
So let’s see now, you borrow 266? billion which the taxpayer eventually has to pay back with interest. Then you dribble it out to the taxpayer – and you call it a tax cut? Wow! Now that’s Obamanomics!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
You mean that book in which the government comes up with phrases like “collateral damage” and “shock and awe” as double speak for killing massive numbers of civilians?
Posted by: danita | Jul 16, 2009 6:58:38 PM
___________________________________
Ah, the straw man cometh…
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
“Has it been two year already? it hasn’t even be 6 months, I thought the stabilization act was suppose to be implemented over two years, some of you can’t count or read.” Posted by: we’r1 | Jul 16, 2009 7:46:38 PM
___________________________________
Clear point we’rl, almost universally avoided by the critics of the Recovery and Reinvestment plan . ..
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
You will not get in our way this time…… the time is now or never….. we are at our cross road for change and yes it will not all be comfortable, but when is anything good that will help the greater good easy.
Posted by: gman | Jul 16, 2009 7:39:31 PM
_____________________________________
Good gravy… not another one. Si se puede!
“99 bottles of KoolAid on the wall,
99 bottles of KoolAid!
Take one down and pass it around,
98 bottles of KoolAid left on the wall!”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Biden: Mr. President! The ship is sinking! What are you doing?
Obama: Rearranging the deck chairs, you idiot!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 16, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
This is the very definition of political spin.
Posted by: LongT | July 16, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
”
2nd the stimulus package had tax cuts incorporated into it.
Right wingers and Republicans dishonestly count it as spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 16, 2009 6:54:04 PM
_______________________________________
So let’s see now, you borrow 266? billion which the taxpayer eventually has to pay back with interest. Then you dribble it out to the taxpayer – and you call it a tax cut? Wow! Now that’s Obamanomics!”
___________________________________
It’s $288 Billion and it’s in tax credits – ie. taxes that businesses, states and individuals do NOT have to pay, or can have adjusted.
You might remember the Republicans and the Bush administration set the example by overspending for 8 years straight – and at the same time cleverly pretended they were the party of lowering taxes – when in fact they were just borrowing money at a huge amount of interest to the taxpayer.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Oh, boy, one of Danita’s acolytes has picked up on her “it’s a two year plan” mantra and she congratulated him for it. Let me be clear– I know it is not all supposed to be spent in the first six months or to have finished working its “magic” in six months. However, if it is going to be STIMULUS rather than just random spending and tax cuts, in theory, it should be frontloaded. Stimulus plans are supposed to, well, stimulate, which is a relatively short term activity. Otherwise, as they say, may as well call it something else.
But I would direct you to the words of President Obama himself when he made his big speech on the stimulus in JANUARY. Here’s what the prez said, “That is why I have moved quickly to work with my economic team and leaders of both parties on an American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan that will immediately jumpstart job creation and long-term growth.” Yep, HE said IMMEDIATELY and he said JUMPSTART. So at least back then, he himself was pushing the idea that the stimulus would START to have an effect right away.
but then again, now they’re trying to tell us that they didn’t really how bad the economy was when they made this stimulus plan in January, which runs counter to what they were saying back then.
“That is why I have moved quickly to work with my economic team and leaders of both parties on an American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan that will immediately jumpstart job creation and long-term growth.”
Posted by: moderate | July 16, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
At least Joe Biden isn’t lying when he said today that the US was in trouble of going BANKRUPT!!! — Biden: “Now, people when I say that look at me and say, ‘What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?’” Biden said. “The answer is yes, that’s what I’m telling you.” — I just disagree with him saying we have to keep printing bad money to make it good!!!
Posted by: Indiana Mark | July 16, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
moderate . ..
The President has gone to pains to clearly and repeatedly tell us that the economic crisis would not be an easy fix, nor would it be quick.
He also repeatedly told us that things might well get worse before they get better.
He addressed us and told us these things a number of times.
That someone would pick one word out of one sentence and try to prop up an argument on that is very weak indeed, transparently so – and reveals an agenda to wrongly smear the President.
It again proves the moniker ‘moderate’ as laughable.
The President has repeatedly told us this would take time, and the plan and the approach have been clearly outlined.
You can research the plan on the White House web site.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Exactly where is the STABILIZED in unemployment still rising, house prices still falling, CIT failing, FDIC predicting 500 more bank failures, industrial production still still sliding. Soon Gibbs will call it the American De-acceleration but Still Sliding and Third Year Recovery Act(ADSSTYRA)
Posted by: Mace | July 16, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Danita, dear, I did not go nitpicking through the president’s speech to find the one word that contradicts the rest or anything. You keep telling us this plan is suppposed to take time and we must get off the president’s back. I was simply pointing out that he himself claimed from the beginning that the plan would begin to work “immediately” and all the rest of that quote. Yes, he also said it would be a long process, but as I point out, that’s stabilization not stimulus so from the beginning he has talked out of both sides of his mouth on this issue. You, at least, are determinedly single-minded.
And you can back off on that accusation that I’m not really a moderate any time now, not that I expect you will. I am, for the record a moderate Republican. Yes, we exist. You dont’ like it that a moderate disagrees frequently with the president? Too bad. But to say I “smear” him because I quote his own words– decidely odd.
And in case you care, I often agree with the president and have even posted comments to that effect here. Recently, for example, I have been enthusiastic about his Surgeon General pick, I support the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor, and I think that he had some good things to say in Africa (even if he did insist on self-aggrandizing speechifying in the process). Gee, I can name lots of things I have agreed with the president about. Can you name one that you disagreed with him about?
Posted by: moderate | July 16, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
The sleight of mouth continues…Obama said the AARA would save or create 4 million jobs, not 3.5 million.
Posted by: Long-Term | July 16, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
moderate . ..
You most surely did nitpick one word from one sentence from the President and try to hang an entire argument on it. Weak indeed and transparent.
You did this when you know perfectly well the President has very CLEARLY and repeatedly cautioned people that the recovery would not be easy, nor would it be quick, and that things might get worse before the get better.
Your attempt to smear the President with this feeble condemnation using one word speaks volumes – I have found the moniker ‘moderate’ laughable, and still do.
Posted by: danita | July 16, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Get ready for more socialist spending of your money. To quote a friend of mine “they are about to find out what it is like to pay child support”. “For obama’s baby”.
Posted by: Reflect09 | July 17, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Biden told the truth. We will go bankrupt as a nation. Now can I ask a simple question? How does a nation or anybody go bankrupt? Usually one of three reasons. SInkness, i.e medical bills. Lawsuit. But most commonly by SPENDING TOO MUCH MONEY THAT YOU BORROW AND ARE EXPECTED TO PAY BACK. But usually, you have to fill out an application for the loan and get approved, and if your credit is bad, you get rejected. WIth our GOV tho, they print the application, review the application, print the mopney, write the check, and pass the tax increases that we are drowning in. ANd they use that money to buy votes, i.e, create a free money addiction. Problem is, this pyramid scheme wont work indefinaiely, and Joe Biden needs to learn that SPENDING irresponsibly is the crux of this countrys biggest problem both in government and the private sector.
Posted by: WereDoomed | July 17, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
And for the record,
A.) Obama must have by now set the rcord for most lies by a first term president and he is only 6 months in.
B.) Bush is very complicit in this mess also spending out of control for 6 of 8 years, but Congress is the real culprit in this mess.
C.) I truly predict civilian unrest is imminent as those who are being robbed by Peter to pay lazy Paul will be forced to jump ship, and then Peter will be forced to Rob Paul.
D>) Have any of you ever tried to start a business lately? Its utterly high risk, yet your success is subject to a tax penalty, and if you fail you lose everything, unless of course your to big to fail.
E.) America thanks in large part to the media i.e the FREE PRESS (joke) is a polarized nation of warring economic and social philosophies. The media has taken sides and is no longer an unbiased government watchdog. It has largely become a tool of the parties,and currently mostly for the left liberal democratic party. Even lefties proudly acknowledge that.
Be careful what you wish my friends. You just might get it. Byy that I mean this.
You may penalize the Rich into oblivian and feel good about it, and they will become extinct. $hit rolls down hill and so does the national debt. The faster it snowballs, the faster it will roll downhill, and those at the bottom of the hill stand to be crushed.
Its not the rich peoples fault. Its the SPENDERS Fault, ie Pelosi, Ried, Obama, Bush, any politicaisn that signs a bill withouit reading it, any politician who makes a promise he cant or doesnt have the balls to keep, and activist who pressures a govt or business to spend what they dont have, and any individual who spends more than they can possibly pay back.
We are imploding, literally being crushed by a Rolling Snowball of over spending debt. All these huge beauracratic tax and spend proposals, stimulus, Healthcare, Cap and Tax, promise to grow that snowball ever faster. It is unsustainable, and it could be the great equalizer, thus rendering us all trying to survive inflation and even higher tax burdens and opne day, somebody is going to have to tell the Chinese, we cant pay you back. And then what? War? Famine? Locust. Well I got news for ya.
The locusts have arrived. they are collectively called the US COngress and have siblings called state governments who also practice the same fiscal ineptitude. They feed off of our energy and rob us of our dignity, pride, productivity. Somehow, they think they are doing us a favor.
Posted by: WereDoomed | July 17, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am
moderate . ..
You most surely did nitpick one word from one sentence from the President and try to hang an entire argument on it. Weak indeed and transparent.
You did this when you know perfectly well the President has very CLEARLY and repeatedly cautioned people that the recovery would not be easy, nor would it be quick, and that things might get worse before the get better.
Your attempt to smear the President with this feeble condemnation using one word speaks volumes – I have found the moniker ‘moderate’ laughable, and still do.
Posted by: john | July 17, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
First of all, a country that claims to be based on Christian values should not have a problem taking care of the least among us, to be our brothers keepers. For 8 years, we had no trouble spending trillions of dollars & thousands of lives in Iraq but we scoff at spending money here at home, calling it communisim & socialism. We have become selfish & gluttonous. We worship the mighty dollar, the golden calf. And the most vocal of following this path claim to be followers of Christ. Amazing the hypocrisy…
We are ridiculous if we think that a problem that took at least a decade to create will dissolve in 6 months. It’s not realistic and people need to learn to have patience. We have become a country that needs instant gratification. Instead of learning anything from this experience, people are right back to wanting more and more. Give us back our jobs right now! Get us out of debt now! Well, how about some sacrifice? How about it takes time to undo what was done for 10 years? How about having some values that you actually have some integrity around? Please don’t call yourself Christian and then claim helping others is socialism or communism. Because otherwise you are saying Christ was a socialist. So either you are a Christian or you’re not. You can’t have it both ways. Going to church on Sunday and wearing a cross don’t make you Christian – following the actual teaching of Jesus Christ day in and day out to the best of your ability does.
Posted by: AnotherOneofGodsChildren | July 17, 2009, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Ah yes. Pass this “stimulus” or unemployment will go to 8%!
Ooops.
Posted by: drjohn | July 17, 2009, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Obongo, Polosi, and co. have done more damage in a few months than Bush did in 8 years. Start storeing canned goods, because I assure you we are heading for distruction!
Posted by: george | July 17, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am
From day one of the Obama administration, Republicans have been doing everything possible to undermine his presidency. Republicans do not care about the country, they only care about their own re-election.
Posted by: Eric | July 17, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Typical dem move. If it’s not working change what you say you wanted it to do. In all honesty it’s too soon to expect results, and they wasted too much of the money. What they should have done was given money directly to the people they steal it from and they should have given more to the unemployed.
Posted by: Joe Eckhardt | July 17, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
“First of all, a country that claims to be based on Christian values should not have a problem taking care of the least among us, to be our brothers keepers.”
No, we shouldn’t. How about we start with our “leadership” who for some reason feel they are above doing their part to be our “brother’s keeper” by not paying taxes (Rangel, Dodd, Geithner, Daschle (proposed leader), Hilda Solis, etc.) and those who enter in “pay-to-play” schemes to take from their brothers in their self-interest (e.g., Blago, Richardson, etc.). Let’s not forget the ambulance chasers (e.g., John Edwards) who act on behalf of their brothers while taking 50% of damages awarded.
Lastly, let’s consider a brother who shares the same bloodlines as our Dear Leader: When is Barack Obama going to send some money over to his brother George in Kenya to get him out of his shack? Obama spends more on cigarettes in a week than George earns back in the homeland.
I don’t doubt your intents and you seem like a good person, but opposition to a faultily constructed bill that will lower quality of care for all (well, except government leaders (e.g., Congress, the president and their families – they will not be migrating to the “public” plan) does not make us selfish.
Also, when TORT REFORM is placed on the table to bring down costs and MANDATORY PARTICIPATION BY ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS then I’ll consider supporting this measure. Otherwise, I would prefer the government keep out of my healthcare.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 17, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
To quote a friend of mine “they are about to find out what it is like to pay child support”. “For obama’s baby”.
=======
Does that make me a “baby daddy”?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 17, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
“You can research the plan on the White House web site.”
Yeah, because the WH is soooo objective and soooo honest! If the WH says it is so, it is so!
Posted by: tjp612 | July 17, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am
===First of all, a country that claims to be based on Christian values should not have a problem taking care of the least among us, to be our brothers keepers. ===
I didn’t realize that Christ was referring to paying forced taxes. If that is all it takes to be a good Christian, some of us are better than others.
Posted by: Axey | July 17, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
moderate, apparently we have a different interpretation of the President’s use of “jump-start the economy”. But that’s just us.
I guess what he really meant was hold onto most of the money until mid-2010 and then throw open the spigot for the 2010 mid-term elections.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 17, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
I misquoted the President – according to moderate, he actually said “immediately jumpstart job creation”. Probably still up to loose interpretation, depending on how things are going. ;-)
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 17, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The President has gone to pains to clearly and repeatedly tell us that the economic crisis would not be an easy fix, nor would it be quick.
He also repeatedly told us that things might well get worse before they get better.
He addressed us and told us these things a number of times.
That someone would pick one word out of one sentence and try to prop up an argument on that is very weak indeed, transparently so – and reveals an agenda to wrongly smear the President.
Posted by: danita | Jul 16, 2009 10:17:30 PM
___________________________________
Of course, he said these “few words” while he was selling his plan to the public. Not like he happened to mention it offhandedly one day while buying ice cream. He specifically used these words when asked about the plan to sell it to the public. Without the job carrot dangling, he knew it would get nowhere.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 17, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
So when I highlight one part of the president’s stimulus-pitching speech when his supporters want to highlight other parts of the speech, I am ‘nitpicking.’ Here’s another line from that same speech, lest I be further accused of digging out one single line that does not accord with the rest of the speech. The president also said back in his January speech, “Finally, this recovery and reinvestment plan will provide immediate relief to states, workers, and families who are bearing the brunt of this recession.” Note the use of the “immediate.”
And as you say, Timmy, this was a major address by the president, where he was carefully crafting his message to sell the stimulus plan. It was not even a press conference comment, where one could say he was not able to be precise, or an off the cuff remark at a photo op (love the way you threw in that ice cream shop reference, TCT). Words matter, the president tells us. I am simply pointing out words that he used.
Posted by: moderate | July 17, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
this administration is getting downright orwellian. from the revisionist approach to the stimulus to the new definition of “bipartisanship” which the white house says is met when the democrats simply give the republicans an opportunity to be heard even though no republicans vote in favor of a law. it took hard-core republicans a good 6 years before they would admit that bush was a goofball and a failure (although some still refuse to admit it). i wonder if hard-core democrats will ever come to the same conclusion. i fear the answer is NO, because it appears that most hard-core democrats have truly been overcome by the cult of personality that surrounds obama.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | July 17, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
More than nitpicking one word from the mouth of The One, this is part of the new GOP video:
White House East Room, January 28, 2009 – “Now most of the money that we’re investing as part of this plan will get out the door immediately and go directly to job creation, generating or saving three to four million new jobs. And the vast majority of these jobs will be created in the private sector. Because, as these CEOs well know, business, not government, is the engine of growth in this country.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 17, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | Jul 17, 2009 1:52:41 PM
Excellent – Keep this handy – I’m sure it will be useful in the future to feed to the Obamabots as they mobilize to back up the spin that “the ARRA is working as intended” and the “peak of job creation is not expected until late 2010.”
Posted by: tjp612 | July 17, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
It did do what they planned it to do. It allowed the government to take over businesses and industries and give control to the government. It wasn’t designed to “bailout” or “save” anything. I’m amazed that so many people fell for that. Well, maybe not. I mean he did preach socialism during his campaign and women fainted in his presence. I’m thinking people weren’t really paying attention to his agenda, but succumbed to his cult of personality. Women do faint for pop-cons, but not promises of Marxism. Still, this is what was chosen and we must suffer the consequences of it. Now he and the ruling party will take this “success” and build on it and seize control of more and more and put it under government rule. I mean, even now, Obama himself wants the White House to directly control Medicare payment rates and have the Congress sign off on it! It’s law in reverse! His plans are to be a dictator. No wonder Hugo Chavez is mentoring Obama and impressed by what he’s done so far. To Obama, the people aren’t there to represent, but to organize into a force to use against opposition of his Marxist agenda. Remember, he’s planning to build a domestic military police force to manage the citizens. The military isn’t allowed to police the people without Martial Law, but not a Domestic Military. That will be their purpose and his plans are for them to be as well funded, as large, and as powerful as the Navy, Marines, Air Force, and Army. Hey, what could possibly go wrong with that eh? I can’t imagine anything worse than a national version of the attacks at Waco or Ruby Ridge… Right?
Posted by: TexBork009 | July 18, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
An excellent example of ‘spin’.
Posted by: LongT | July 19, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm