The Gibbs Gaggle: Obama Regrets Media ‘Obsession’ Over Skip Gates Comment
ABC News' Yunji de Nies reports: Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told a group of reporters this morning that the President regrets the “obsessive” coverage that his comment on Skip Gates has caused. “I think he would regret if he realized how much of a overall distraction and obsession it would be, I think he probably would regret distracting you guys with obsessions,” Gibbs said. The President has not and has no plans to speak to either Gates or the officer involved in the Cambridge incident. Asked if he would apologize to the officer involved, Gibbs was non committal, but did not indicate that such an apology was forthcoming. “I think the president believes and understands just how hard job law enforcement is. He has great respect for the men and women that keep us safe. I think he’s said most of what he’s going to say on it.” Onto the other battle: health care. Today the President will be meeting with Senator Max Baucus, D- Mont., and Majority Leader Harry Reid today to discuss health care. Gibbs said no one thought they would be signing any bill by the August recess, and added that no one in planning meetings decided to take August off. The health care push will continue – evidence of that already next week: the President is heading to Raleigh, NC and Southwest VA to hold health care events. On the emerging issue of whether health care reform will lead to taxpayer-funded abortion, Gibbs called this a "red herring," arguing that medical procedures are already tax deductible. — Yunji de Nies

Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
Obama Regrets Media ‘Obsession’ Over Skip Gates Comment
“Spinning wheel, got to go ’round”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 24, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Obama’s lack of understanding can be explained in two words: Reverend Wright.
Posted by: Skittles | July 24, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
“I think he would regret if he realized how much of a overall distraction and obsession it would be, I think he probably would regret distracting you guys with obsessions,” Gibbs said.
============
Wasn’t this guy elected due to his “judgement”?
For The-One-We’ve-Been-Waiting-For to believe that comments on race on national prime-time TV would not spark controversy and “distractions” is either dishonest or downright scary.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
ABC News:
“On the emerging issue of whether health care reform will lead to taxpayer-funded abortion, Gibbs called this a “red herring,” arguing that medical procedures are already tax deductible.”
Could you please elaborate? Are abortions specifically tax deductible or medical procedures in general?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Isn’t it funny that when he speaks without the telepromter we find out what he really thinks. Listening to Rev. Wright for 20 years did rub off.
He hates america, has nothing good to say about our nation, its getting better all the time.
Posted by: Lizzie | July 24, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
What a lot of nonsense is getting whipped up by the wingnuts over next to nothing. I’m confident that any of our fine upstandin’, gun totin’, authority hatin’ white citizens would have reacted with civility, restraint, understanding and grace had they been put in the same position as Professor Gates.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | July 24, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
“I think he probably would regret distracting you guys with obsessions,” Gibbs said.”
So the Race-Baiter In Chief is saying that the press is obsessed with race? Didn’t we hear this kind of stuff in the campaign against his opponents “I’m the guy with the funny name…”
Obama is truly a liberal. He just doesn’t have it in him to say, “I was wrong.” Kind of like a few on this blog.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 24, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I think it’s pretty funny. I agree that he should have had all the facts before making any sort of comment. However, what he said regarding whether or not it was actually necessary to handcuff the cane dependent man in his own home has some basis.
Posted by: kevin | July 24, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Mr. Obama has stepped in it big time. I picture PBA’s across the country gearing up. You don’t insult the Blur with impunity.
Posted by: Bigguy | July 24, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Obama liked it better when he could get the whole press talking about how many houses John McCain has.
Posted by: MayBee | July 24, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Right about now he should be regretting the position of the police and the police unions in uber liberal Massachusetts. This does not bode well at all for him.
Posted by: Plumber | July 24, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
First of all, someone who calls others a derisive, meant-to-be-insulting name in an argument has already lost.
Most people, white, black or any variation there of, would be thankful and a little embarrassed that the police would have to check on someone breaking into their house, even if it is a misunderstanding.
Most would give the police their drivers license first, not a work ID which has no address on it. Most would not expect to be “recognized”. “You don’t know who you’re messin’ with.”
It was a possible home invasion. No one is above the law.
Gates made it about race. Obama upped the ante. The police officer should be given an apology and Obama and Gates should be sent to “Sensitivity Training”.
Posted by: Skittles | July 24, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Close your eyes and picture reverse rolls same outcome ..ARREST
Black officer handcuffs and arrest prominent white elderly professor (your dad)who walks with a cane on his porch for talking, or yelling back to him……..
Posted by: watching | July 24, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Ryan C:
What the hell point are you trying to make? Have you forgotten Obama’s a Democrat?
Posted by: jordin | July 24, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
“What the hell point are you trying to make? Have you forgotten Obama’s a Democrat?”
Much like the birther idiocy and the Sotomayor hearings, this incident is a more opportunist example of the GOP trying to paint Obama as anti-white to appeal to their base that does not like having a black President.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The pres was wrong. He came off as a race baiter just like other African Americans who use it as a political and PC tool. The race hate is pushed at non-whites because without it social justification will not happen. God forbid people really get along. Yes, there are haters in all races, but real change happens in each of our hearts.
Posted by: teesee | July 24, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“What a lot of nonsense is getting whipped up by the wingnuts over next to nothing. I’m confident that any of our fine upstandin’, gun totin’, authority hatin’ white citizens would have reacted with civility, restraint, understanding and grace had they been put in the same position as Professor Gates.”
Nope.
“A man opened fire on officers during a domestic disturbance call Saturday morning, killing three of them, a police official said.
Friends said 23 year-old Richard Poplawski feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns.
Three officers were killed.”
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
How long before the liberals, with full cooperation of the media, start digging in to this police officer’s past in an attempt to smear him and his family? Simply calling him a racist and stupid won’t be enough for Obama and his followers.
Posted by: jennifert7 | July 24, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“Much like the birther idiocy and the Sotomayor hearings, this incident is a more opportunist example of the GOP trying to paint Obama as anti-white to appeal to their base that does not like having a black President.”
As usual, Ryan, you are way, way off base. You seem to be an intelligent person – Why are you so angry?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
“As usual, Ryan, you are way, way off base”
Well let’s see.
“Obama’s lack of understanding can be explained in two words: Reverend Wright.”
“Listening to Rev. Wright for 20 years did rub off.
He hates america, has nothing good to say about our nation, its getting better all the time.”
“So the Race-Baiter In Chief is saying that the press is obsessed with race?”
Looks like I was dead on.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“That quote was often used to describe Martin Luther King and has been used many times by whites who don’t like those uppity black troublemakers. So its no surprise to see a right winger use it here.”
When? In 1963? C’mon. MLK was a good man. I think he would be very disappointed to see what is happening in today’s USA. On many levels.
BTW – Why would the ABC moderator censor a quote from a truly great American such as Booker T. Washington?
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
How long before the liberals, with full cooperation of the media, start digging in to this police officer’s past in an attempt to smear him and his family?
~~~
I’m pretty sure that is going on as I write this. Hopefully the MA police and the police unions will make clear the consequence of such actions.
I really don’t think this president can spare every cop (and firefighter) in this country.
He’s got the professors tho. I’ll give him that.
Posted by: Plumber | July 24, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Um, Ryan, Reverand Wright isn’t exactly in line to win any Medal of Freedom awards…The thread was not racist. And Obama is a race-baiter. As are you.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
A black officer handcuffed and arrested a 58 year old (elderly? LOL) white man after a young black woman called 911 having observed said man wedging his shoulder into a door, appearing to be breaking into a residence.
The suspect asked the officer if he was being questioned because he was “a white man in America.” He also threatened the officer by saying “you don’t know who you are dealing with.” When asked to come outside onto the porch the man taunted the black officer with, “yeah, I’ll speak with your mama outside.”
The man persisted being beligerant, yelling, and refusing to follow the officers instructions. As the situation was escalating, the officer arresed the man for disorderly conduct.
Yes, I believe it could happen.
Posted by: Skittles | July 24, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“Much like the birther idiocy and the Sotomayor hearings, this incident is a more opportunist example of the GOP trying to paint Obama as anti-white to appeal to their base that does not like having a black President.”
Ryan C get over your self who should have kept their mouth shut and stayed out of it? OBAMA!. Then it would have been a dead story. But this is typical OBAMA he loves to divide us politically and racially when ever he can. Please pay attention and take your blinders off. I do not remember other presidents whine about being opposed on a bill to the point of calling them out or to subject himself to a local event in which he had no facts but jumped right into COMMUNITY ORGANIZER ACORN LAWYER MODE. It has to be the stupid white cops fault and the reason why is the man did and does not have the experience to do this job and he will be a 1 term president.
Posted by: NO OBAMA CARE | July 24, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
“Close your eyes and picture reverse rolls same outcome … ARREST
“Black officer [suspects break-in and then] handcuffs and arrests prominent white elderly professor (your dad) walks with a cane on his porch for talking, or yelling back to him……..”
________________________________________
Interesting perspective . . .
Posted by: danita | July 24, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
BTW – Why would the ABC moderator censor a quote from a truly great American such as Booker T. Washington?”
Probably because its quite popular at place like Stormfront and I assume the word to describe African Americans is not kosher.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Well media, now that Obama has blamed you for causing the backlash over his stupid comments…
Does he still make you weak in the knees?
Was he worth losing your integrity and credibility?
Posted by: larry | July 24, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I am glad there were African-American cops on the seen supporting there fellow cop. Next time there is a break in at the Gates house, let the belligerent professor protect himself.
Posted by: Huh | July 24, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 24, 2009 1:34:27 PM
or we could be saying, “We told you so.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 24, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Hopefully the MA police and the police unions will make clear the consequence of such actions.
Posted by: Plumber | Jul 24, 2009 1:51:49 PM
__________________________________
They already have and continue to do so.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Shows how arrogant, naive and clueless Obama really is to believe this wouldn’t cause a huge reaction.
Some Americans still appreciate the truth.
Posted by: max | July 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
I have a good friend who actually had to sell his house and move because the police would hassle him at least once a month.
He’s a young, black professional with a college degree and a good job… but he lived in an upscale neighborhood… and the police always wanted to know if he could show some ID.
We are only hearing about this incident because Gates is a leading scholar. But this happens all the time across America…. and often ends with a tragic outcome.
Posted by: blip | July 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
larry:”Was he worth losing your integrity and credibility?”
They lost their integrity while they were cheerleading Bush’s efforts to take care of Sadaam’s massive store of chemical and biological weapons and on-the-brink-of-a-mushroom-cloud nuclear weapons program.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 24, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
You can’t blame Obama for protecting his street cred.
If he apologizes his favorability among blacks may drop to 96%.
Posted by: riley | July 24, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Besides leftist professors (who loved him anyway) and frustrated liberals (what to do with their “everyone’s a racist” meme, now that we have a black president), Obama has cemented his “street cred” with the very same people who cheered about the OJ verdict and descended upon Jena, LA. (Remember when some said he wasn’t black enough?)
It’s a win/win for Obama. His core base applauds his remarks as speaking the truth. Don’t get bogged down in the details or the facts. Besides, how many police officers are there in America anyway…
Posted by: Skittles | July 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The other part I don’t get is the man is yelling in his own home at the police officer – the man is obviously upset- (and the police officer says he can’t hear his communication device) – so the police officer invites the man outside to continue the exchange.
The upset man comes outside and continues yelling so the police officer notices a bunch of people around and arrests the man for yelling outside (disorderly) and puts him in handcuffs.
Posted by: danita | July 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“How long before the liberals, with full cooperation of the media, start digging in to this police officer’s past in an attempt to smear him and his family?”
What you mean the media reports about how he is well liked? Or how he gave CPR in an effort to save Reggie Lewis?
The officer acted stupidly, he does not appear stupid or evil. Obama’s comments were politically clumsy since they allowed this distraction from more important issues, but not inappropriate.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 24, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Every now and then the real Obama slips out.
It must be hard for him to hide his true feelings all the time just to stay popular and get elected.
I would bet he stayed in Rev Wright’s church for so long not just because he didn’t have the courage to leave–but because he agreed with Wright.
Posted by: travis | July 24, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
My son gets hassled by the police all the time because he has a car commonly used for “drifting.” He gets approached in parking lots and pulled over for safety checks. No tickets, they just let him know they have their eyes on him. Guess what? He’s WHITE.
Posted by: Get Real | July 24, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
It was astounding to watch the POTUS go on and on about some local event. It would have been pleasing to hear him discuss N.Korea or the Honduras situation in just as many words.
He’ll be on Oprah within a few months to resurrect his poll numbers.
Posted by: jonec1200 | July 24, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I bet Obama’s speechwriters are busy writing Major Race Speech Part II.
Posted by: millie | July 24, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
“(Remember when some said he wasn’t black enough?)”
Rush Limbaugh?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Ryan C: Rush Limbaugh?
Close, Jesse Jackson, Jr.
Posted by: Skittles | July 24, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Wake up kool-aid drinkers.
Obama doesn’t like our country.
He wants to pay us back for everything he perceives as a misjustice.
Are you OK with that? Really?
Posted by: nick | July 24, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“Obama doesn’t like our country.
He wants to pay us back for everything he perceives as a misjustice.”
Looks like I was way off in those accusation of the GOP fanning the flames of racial tension.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Obama spoke without knowing the details and circumstance…..and those clearly indicate that proper procedure was followed, as dictated by the details.
Playing the race card, is again, not consistent with the facts in the matter.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | July 24, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
“the President regrets the “obsessive” coverage that his comment on Skip Gates has caused.”
Awww . . . but He doesn’t regret setting up the question with Chicago groupie Lynn Sweet?
When things don’t go their way, the Obama organization ALWAYS blames somebody else . . .
Was that blue eye shadow He was wearing, at the press performance? It didn’t look all that great.
Posted by: Bet Noir | July 24, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
“He doesn’t regret setting up the question with Chicago groupie Lynn Sweet?”
Groupie?
Lynn Sweet is pretty fair, very much like Tapper.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Sure but I do enjoy politics and this is one of the few sites I make comments on.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“(Remember when some said he wasn’t black enough?)”
Did somebody STOP saying it?
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
jhw539: “The officer acted stupidly, he does not appear stupid or evil.”
You should not judge what a police (fire, rescue) officer does when they are in the middle of a possibly dangerous situation, with no idea what the outcome will be. And I doubt they were thinking “is this politically correct?” You do not know what went on that day, only what the media has told you and you said the media has no integrity.
“Obama’s comments were politically clumsy since they allowed this distraction from more important issues, but not inappropriate.”
While I agree the comments were clumsy, I disagree that it was inappropriate. People in positions of power HAVE TO watch what they say. Like it or not, that is one of the responsibilities of having power.
Posted by: Rican | July 24, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Oh come on, Ryan C, Lynn Sweet has quite the reputation in Chicago for her ability to detect racism in the smallest of dust motes.
Posted by: Kat5 | July 24, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“Oh come on, Ryan C, Lynn Sweet has quite the reputation in Chicago for her ability to detect racism in the smallest of dust motes.”
With who Freepers?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“Looks like I was way off in those accusation of the GOP fanning the flames of racial tension.”
Yes, you are way off. You don’t get it. These are “Obama’s perceptions” – it is how he sees the world. He thinks that so many have been wronged including himself due to his transitory up-bringing by white grandparents after abandonment by his father and mother and long struggle to find a place in which he fit in). He went to some of the finest schools in the country where some many had so much more than he. He resents it to this very day. He is a class warrior and draws power by “standing up” for the “downtrodden” and those “who didn’t get breaks in life” (although his approach is to bring society down rather than raising it up). He is a Marxist and an acolyte of Alinsky. Pulling the race card is just another tool in his toolbox.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“Lynn Sweet is pretty fair, very much like Tapper.”
She USED to be.
After the election, not so much.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
No, ryan, not with Freepers, but rather with everyday people who are tired of having all of life portrayed through the prism of race and racism. Sweet loves crying wolf.
Posted by: Kat5 | July 24, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“No, ryan, not with Freepers, but rather with everyday people who are tired of having all of life portrayed through the prism of race and racism. Sweet loves crying wolf.”
Yeah I don’t think of Freepers as everyday people either.
But I disagree with you on Sweet as I think she has asked tough questions of Obama and is pretty fair.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
The One is back on TV addressing this situation…What a dope.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
“Yes, you are way off. You don’t get it.”
Well let’s see.
“These are “Obama’s perceptions” – it is how he sees the world. He thinks that so many have been wronged including himself due to his transitory up-bringing by white grandparents after abandonment by his father and mother and long struggle to find a place in which he fit in). He went to some of the finest schools in the country where some many had so much more than he. He resents it to this very day. He is a class warrior and draws power by “standing up” for the “downtrodden” and those “who didn’t get breaks in life” (although his approach is to bring society down rather than raising it up). He is a Marxist and an acolyte of Alinsky. Pulling the race card is just another tool in his toolbox.”
Guess I was totally wrong about the Republicans are trying to frame OBama as an aggrieved black man who hates his country.
The stupid it burns.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
He has called this a “teachable moment”….
Here’s a teachable moment: Keep your mouth shut when you (admittedly) don’t have the facts!
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
If you just watched TV, Pres. Obama is back peddling just as fast as he can.
Posted by: Lizzie | July 24, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
He disagrees “that he should have stayed out of this”…
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
“Guess I was totally wrong about the Republicans are trying to frame OBama as an aggrieved black man who hates his country.”
Did I mention race? No, I did not. You (as usual) inserted race. But he does seem to dislike much about this country.
Have you been discriminated against? Perhaps it would explain why you are so quick to pull the race card.
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Now, it’s GIBBS who won’t look at the cameras. (on CNN)
He’s “not going to get ahead of” The One’s inevitable misty-eyed public apology.
How Sweet It Is.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
“Did I mention race? No, I did not. You (as usual) inserted race. But he does seem to dislike much about this country.”
In the first 5 comments right wingers brought up race calling Obama a race baiter and mentioning Rev Wright.
You responded to my response to that which was that the Republicans are encouraging the framing of Obama as anti-white (in this case opportunistically but its fits with the pattern of the election and since he was inaugurated) in a cynical ploy for votes.
Then after disagreeing with my premise you basically did the same exact thing as the posters I originally responded to.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Note that Gates started The Root website, which was quite helpful to Obama in co-opting “black” criticism of The One when He was a mere candidate.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“Have you been discriminated against? Perhaps it would explain why you are so quick to pull the race card.”
Me? I am a white male age 25 to 40, everyone listens to me.
But I have seen the different treatment handed out when out with friends that are not white, whether business or the police.
I have seen racism at my place of employment.
Which is why it baffles me when people shrug it off.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
“[Gates] perhaps had a few cocktails on the plane”
He looked like he’d had a few SOMEwhere, certainly.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
“In the first 5 comments right wingers brought up race calling Obama a race baiter and mentioning Rev Wright. You responded to my response to that which was that the Republicans are encouraging the framing of Obama as anti-white (in this case opportunistically but its fits with the pattern of the election and since he was inaugurated) in a cynical ploy for votes.”
Barack Obama IS a race-baiter!
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
“Note that Gates started The Root website, which was quite helpful to Obama in co-opting “black” criticism of The One when He was a mere candidate.”
This is new since I did not see the Root mentioned by anyone during the campaign.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“Barack Obama IS a race-baiter!”
So you agree with my premise that the Republicans are making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white is hopes of gaining votes in 2010.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Not one person has said, “thank you” to the Cambridge police for responding to a break-in call – regardless of the resident’s color. Shame on Obama…even Bush knew when to keep his mouth shut.
Posted by: YoSuzan | July 24, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
So, Obama now tells us this was a “teachable moment.” I hope he learned a thing or two in the process.
Posted by: jennifert7 | July 24, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“it escalated to where his disrespect and anger got him into handcuffs”
Only in banana republics is disrespect and anger against the law.
There is no debate on two facts:
1) Gates did nothing illegal.
2) Gates’ arrest was illegal.
Police are not allowed to let their anger and other personal feelings color their enforcement of the law. They are supposed to be professionals.
We don’t know what was going through the officer’s head when he made the illegal arrest, and we don’t have any evidence that race played any part, other than the general disparate treatment of racial minorities.
We do know that the arrest was unwarranted. Not really much of a story though.
Posted by: Flash Override | July 24, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
“Note that Gates started The Root website, which was quite helpful to Obama in co-opting “black” criticism of The One when He was a mere candidate.”
This is new since I did not see the Root mentioned by anyone during the campaign.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
HAHA Gibbs is a moron. Obama just apologized and said he erred in his choice of words and that he had spoken with Crowley, the Cambridge Police Sgt., on the phone and apologized to him.
Posted by: Jason | July 24, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
So, Obama now tells us this was a “teachable moment.”
It’s gonna be a looong teachable moment for The One, for Lynn Sweet, for Henry Louis Gates, for David Axelrod, and for Deval Patrick, anyway.
Sometimes, people are just too darned smart for their own good: could Gates have done this on purpose to set up a “racism” story, with an eye to saving The One’s bacon on so-called “health care reform”?
If so, it went waaay wrong.
Why the heck didn’t Gates go to a neighbor’s house, or use a cell phone to summon a locksmith, when he found himself locked out? In other words, how did it come about that Gates was “locked out”, with no hidden spare key, etc.
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Ryan C:”"Barack Obama IS a race-baiter!”
So you agree with my premise that the Republicans are making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white is hopes of gaining votes in 2010.”
You know English better than that. He obviously is not “agreeing,” he is “demonstrating” that Republicans are making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 24, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Ryan C: “The stupid it burns.”
Obama offers apology.
Is that what you meant, Ryan?
Posted by: Hmmm... | July 24, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
flash says: “There is no debate on two facts:
1) Gates did nothing illegal.
2) Gates’ arrest was illegal.”
Those “facts” are debatable. Gate’s followed the officers outside the house and continued to yell loudly and not listen to instructions to calm down. This is not a black and white decision for a cop when it comes down to public disturbance complaints, so they have to make a reasonable decision under stress. You and I can debate all we want, but neither of us was there and so we just don’t know for sure if the line was crossed from being just a big jerk (or little jerk as Gates might prefer) to being disorderly in public. If he would not let the police conduct their business that is a problem and the best way to solve that problem is to take them into custody and let the prosecutor decide what to do. That is what happened. The best case scenario would have been for Gates to be friendly and cooperative when the police showed up to investigate a possible break in of his house instead of being rude and uncooperative. The situation could have been over in a few minutes instead of him being taken to jail until they dropped the charges. Just because they dropped the charges does not mean the arrest was illegal.
Posted by: Jason | July 24, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Rican:”You should not judge what a police (fire, rescue) officer does when they are in the middle of a possibly dangerous situation, with no idea what the outcome will be”
Yes, yes I should. We are not a police state.
The last time I sat on a jury (a fun 4 weeks), every member of that white, middle class suburbanite panel assumed the officer’s testimony did not meet the reasonable doubt threshold. We started from the assumption that the officers were lying (information we gained after the trial was over, supported this belief).
Why do you think that was? Do you think it serves justice to have officers unquestioned when they arrest someone for being disrespectful, protected by unions regardless of their infraction, held and honored as above the law themselves – and then viewed as liars by the jurors who ultimately put people behind bars? I don’t. In our system, ultimately police command respect proportional to the standard they are held to.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 24, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
So you agree with my premise that the Republicans are making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white is hopes of gaining votes in 2010.”
Obviously, I do not. What you fail to see is that in many people’s minds (including this one), the issue is less of race but more of Obama calling out the police officer as “acting stupidly” when he admittedly did not know the facts of what happened. Then, he (Obama) brought up “racial profiling” when this was not an issue of racial profiling (officer was responding to a call). Obama displayed a serious lack of judgment in (a.) getting involved, and (b.) bringing up racial profiling given he did not know the facts.
It is a long, long reach for you to suggest that critics are “making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white is hopes of (Republicans) gaining votes in 2010.”
Posted by: tjp612 | July 24, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Bet says: “Why the heck didn’t Gates go to a neighbor’s house, or use a cell phone to summon a locksmith, when he found himself locked out? In other words, how did it come about that Gates was “locked out”, with no hidden spare key, etc.”
It really doesn’t matter why he was trying to break into his own house, that is his own business. What does matter is how he responded to the police investigating a possible burglary, and that is where Gates is a total jerk and he really shows us how much a Harvard education is worth.
Posted by: Jason | July 24, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Biden must be getting a laugh out of this.
Gibbs has had to come out twice to do damage control for his genius of a boss.
The most brilliant president ever looked like a fool.
Biden never screwed up this bad.
They are a good match.
Posted by: max | July 24, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
BO isn’t surprised that the media created a controversy…
He’s probably stunned that he got negative publicity from the press.
Posted by: bailey | July 24, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“You know English better than that. He obviously is not “agreeing,” he is “demonstrating” that Republicans are making a cynical ploy to cast Obama as anti-white.”
HAHAHA!
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
jhw539 says: “We started from the assumption that the officers were lying (information we gained after the trial was over, supported this belief).”
Well, so much for having an unbiased and open mind. You took your preconceived judgement and prejudices into the courtroom and whether you were correct or not on the veracity of the officer, you did a disservice to our justice system.
Posted by: Jason | July 24, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
What is it about Harvard professors that makes them think they are above the law?
You don’t mess with Obama’s friends.
Inspector General Walpin was fired for investigating one of Obama’s pals.
Posted by: larry | July 24, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Gates (on theroot}:
“My driver and I carried several bags up to the porch, and we fiddled with the door and it was jammed. I thought, well, maybe the door’s latched. So I walked back to the kitchen porch, unlocked the door and came into the house. And I unlatched the door, but it was still jammed.”
Posted by: Bet | July 24, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Well atleast he admits he was wrong, I and 1000s of Military Familes that lost love ones in Iraq are still waiting for an apology from Bush/Cheney for lying and getting them killed for no reason!
Posted by: Angie in Pa | July 24, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
If you break it, disown it.
Posted by: Markos | July 24, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“Well at least he admits he was wrong, I and 1000s of Military Families that lost love ones in Iraq are still waiting for an apology from Bush/Cheney for lying and getting them killed for no reason!”
_____________________________________
I’m sorry to hear this Angie . . .
Posted by: danita | July 24, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
NOBAMACARE
Do not make Excuses for that pathetic piece of garbage Bush they Knew there was no WMDS That is not why Bush/Cheney started that war
Posted by: Angie in Pa | July 24, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Angie, there were WMD’s in Iraq. Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons against his own people. Chemical weapons are WMD’s. They didn’t find them when they (the UN) were allowed to look; that doesn’t mean they weren’t there and were moved. Chill.
Obama is in no hurry to end the two wars that are ongoing. U.S. deaths in Afghanistan have surged to a record high this month. Where’s your outrage?
Posted by: Hmmm... | July 24, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
angie says: “Do not make Excuses for that pathetic piece of garbage Bush they Knew there was no WMDS That is not why Bush/Cheney started that war”
Wow, Angie must be really angry or something else, to account for the odd capitalization errors mid-sentence and and I really like, “they Knew there was no WMDS” (sic) which is really a great example of the tragedy that our public school system has become. Angie, why did “they” start the war? I am sure it had nothing to do with Saddam being a state sponsor of terrorism, and that he was constantly refusing to comply with UN inspection requests regarding said WMDs. Bush lied people died sounds good to the left as they chant it, but it does not mean it is rational and even viewed as valid by the majority of Americans. Get over your Bush hatred and cheer for Obama if you choose, or not.
Posted by: Jason | July 24, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“I am sure it had nothing to do with Saddam being a state sponsor of terrorism,”
This was a lamer than lame excuse for invasion as Saddam’s terrorism support was basically handing out cash to suicide bombers families.
Certainly not on the level of Syria or Iran.
“and that he was constantly refusing to comply with UN inspection requests regarding said WMDs”
Hans Blix and the inspectors were in Iraq doing their jobs when Bush and Co said not goo enough and invaded anyway even though nothign was found despite Rumsfeld and Cheney insisting to the American public that we knew where the WMDs were.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
“Angie, there were WMD’s in Iraq. Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons against his own people. Chemical weapons are WMD’s.”
Umm that was in the 1980′s, ya know when Saddam was glad handing with Rumsfeld and had the support of the Reagan administration.
Saddam’s WMDs were systematically destroyed by the US and the UN over the course of 10 years post the 1st Gulf war.
In 2003 there wasn’t anything left and we knew that.
“They didn’t find them when they (the UN) were allowed to look that doesn’t mean they weren’t there and were moved. Chill.”
Chill? Over 4000 Americans are dead. Over 100,000 innocent Iraqis are dead. To say nothing of the tens of thousands of both groups who have been maimed.
All for a country that was no threat to us and had nothing to do with 9/11 despite the Bush admin’s attempts to conflate the two.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Further, there is alot of confusion about what WMD actually are. Chemical weapons CAN be, but arent necessarily, WMD. For instance, pepper spray is a chemical weapon, but not WMD,
Bush told the inspectors out before they could issue a categorical answer, but they have categorically stated that there was no evidence of WMD either being in or being found in Iraq.
Posted by: Flash Override | July 24, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
de Nies:
“The President has not and has no plans to speak to either Gates or the officer involved in the Cambridge incident.”
He shouldda STUCK with that. But noooo, He’s slopped over into total slapstick.
Posted by: Bet Noir | July 24, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Narcissism means never being able to say you’re sorry.
Posted by: drjohn | July 24, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Saddam said that he had every intention of reconstituting his WMDN program once he got the sanctions dropped. The Iraq war was going to get fought sooner or later.
And now Obama is setting the stage for losing Afghanistan.
Posted by: drjohn | July 24, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
What a coincidence that all this silly media coverage is distracting from the health care reform that Obama’s press conference was all about, when the ‘acting stupidly’ comment was made.
It does make you wonder, since so much media revenue comes from Big Pharma if this is accidental.
As for the comment Obama made, if someone says I am acting stupidly, that is not the same as saying I am stupid. Every person on this planet, no matter their intelligence level, has acted stupidly numerous times. It is almost the one common human experience. Some of us may have fallen in love, some of us may have cheated but I would bet everyone of us has acted stupidly.
To those who try to insist ‘acted stupidly’ is the same as being stupid, they either don’t know how the english language works or they have an agenda that is purely partisan and has nothing to do with improving our country’s race relations.
Posted by: Lydia | July 24, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“The Iraq war was going to get fought sooner or later.”
______________________________________
More revisionist history by an apologist for the Bush Republicans.
For sure, just like the Bush administration said ‘the mushroom cloud’ is looming. Lies.
Posted by: danita | July 24, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Narcissism means never being able to say you’re sorry.
Posted by: drjohn | Jul 24, 2009 5:16:50 PM
The Iraq war was going to get fought sooner or later.
Posted by: drjohn | Jul 24, 2009 5:18:55 PM
Posted by: Ryan C | July 24, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“Every person on this planet, no matter their intelligence level, has acted stupidly numerous times.”
It’s doubtful, however, that ANYone has ever equalled the acting-stupidly “race” play Obama — with a coy straight-man set-up from Chicago media-marm Lynn Sweet — tried to run at the “press conference” performance.
(Not since 1938, anyway, when Wrong Way Corrigan read his compass wrong and flew to Ireland, instead of to Long Beach.)
Posted by: Bet Noir | July 24, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
jhw539, you missed the point. The point I was making is that you (and others) were judging Crowley by the same media you said had no integrity. Sitting in a courtroom, hearing the facts, is a little different then reading them, or hearing them, from a news source on the internet or TV. And even if I was in on this jury, I would not have presumed the police officer was lying to start with. But I wasn’t in on the trial, so I would not judge your presumptions without all the facts.
No where did I say we should treat police officers the way you described but I do not think we should treat them the way Obama and the media has, neither. They have my respect, just by the fact that they are willing to do the job, but that doesn’t mean I won’t question them if I have a problem with something. What I won’t do is judge them from what the media is telling me!
Posted by: Rican | July 24, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
If you break it, disown it.
——————————
why are the press oseessed with my stupid comment? uh, casue you intentionally brought it up with a planted question and inserted yourself. wow. he’s starting to show some signs of a deteriorating mental state. 25th amendment time for mr biden. soon.
Posted by: fred | July 26, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm