The Note: Rogues & Reset — Out of GOP Chaos, Dems Take Control
By RICK KLEIN One-party control? You betcha. Order out of the political chaos? That would be swimming upstream. To go with this flow, this is what going rogue gets you: As scandals begat stunners — as Ensign morphed into Sanford, and then all got swirled into your very Palin holiday weekend — Democrats have been given a series of gifts that also happen to be burdens. The disorder in the Republican Party, coupled with the long-delayed resolution of a Senate race that give Democrats 60 votes starting this week, gives Democrats control of the court, the clock, and maybe the scoreboard (to borrow yet another metaphor). But it also puts complete governing responsibility on the party that isn’t imploding at the moment, the one that controls all the levers of government and even has fewer high-profile opponents to deal with on the other side. The Obama White House has actually been hoping for some degree of order inside the GOP; as long as there’s none, President Obama will continue to be measured against himself, his actions judged based on unhappiness among his allies.
And as the president takes ownership of all that he inherited, admissions like these may start to matter: “The truth is, we and everyone else misread the economy,” Vice President Joe Biden told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, on “This Week” Sunday. All eyes are turn to Russia for the day, but this is a critical period for the Obama domestic agenda. Govern now, if you can: “As President Obama confronts his testing time this summer, he holds major assets but faces deep tensions within his governing coalition. This will force him to make hard choices earlier than he might have preferred,” E.J. Dionne Jr. writes in his column. “In his first six months, Obama showed he was up to the job. This summer will test his ability to make agonizing choices — and make them stick.” Key to understanding where things go: “The pace of the economic recovery heading into the fall — electric smooth or diesel rough — will determine whether Obama can prod Congress on the key features of his agenda with momentum or from a defensive crouch,” the AP’s Jim Kuhnhenn reports. Heads down: “A more focused and on-point minority would be more troubling, but I think that has a lot to do with the quality of ideas,” White House senior adviser David Axelrod told Bloomberg’s Julianna Goldman and Edwin Chen. “They need to regenerate themselves as an intellectual force and they haven’t done that work yet.” But first — and before we get to Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska — we all get to be Sarah Palin: We see Russia, from the White House bubble. President Obama’s meetings in Moscow commenced this morning, with a 10:30 am ET news conference at the Kremlin with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev providing your day’s highlight. Among the striking aspects of this summit (with its separate meetings with Russia’s president and prime minister): The stated modesty of the goals. We know President Obama wants to hit “reset”; we know less about what program he hopes to boot up thereafter. Coming Monday, per ABC’s Jake Tapper: “Sources from both the US and Russian sides say that everything is on track for an announcement today on a ‘joint understanding’ on reducing warheads from around 2200 to closer to 1500 per country.” “The focus of this first leg of the trip is the continued ‘reset’ of US-Russian relations, first expressed by then-President-elect Obama last December. White House officials said that they want to make progress in warming the recent thaw that has characterized relations between the two countries,” ABC’s Karen Travers and Jake Tapper report. Complicating things: “Despite calling for an end to the Cold War mentality, when President Obama sits down with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday it may seem like the Cold War is still raging,” Stephen Dinan reports in the Washington Times. “For Mr. Obama, the meeting finds him on unusual territory – he's visiting a country where the population is not enamored of him.” It will be a “rather dull trip,” Time’s Bobby Ghosh writes. “The end of the visit is unlikely to be marked by grand declarations of friendship or announcements of breakthrough deals. Indeed, experts on both sides say the area where progress is most likely is in negotiations on the reduction of nuclear arsenals — the continuation of a process that began back in the Reagan-Gorbachev era.” “Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev appear to be taking a more pragmatic tack than did their predecessors: concentrating first on the issues that in the parlance of the diplomatic community are ‘deliverables,’ things that can get done, instead of getting stuck on thornier issues,” Tom Lasseter writes for McClatchy. Looming over the meetings: “President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in separate interviews this weekend, said that the accelerating crackdown on opposition leaders in Iran in recent days would not deter them from seeking to engage the country’s top leadership in direct negotiations,” The New York Times’ David E. Sanger reports. President Obama, to Sanger: “We’ve got some fixed national security interests in Iran not developing nuclear weapons, in not exporting terrorism, and we have offered a pathway for Iran to rejoining the international community.” The administration, Sanger writes, “has been preparing for two opposite possibilities: One in which the Iranian leadership seeks to regain a measure of legitimacy by taking up Mr. Obama’s offer to talk — a situation that could put Washington in the uncomfortable position of giving credibility to a government whose actions Mr. Obama has deplored — or one in which Iran rejects negotiations.” As for the vice president: “Three times, I asked Biden if the Obama Administration would stand in the way of an Israeli military strike. Three times, he repeated that Israel was free to do what it needed to do,” per ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. In Russia, Obama “is sure to emerge with tangible signs of progress — including another step toward the world's two largest nuclear powers reducing their arsenals — thanks to agreements negotiated before he shows up,” the AP’s Ben Feller reports. “But what much of the world will watch for are signs of Obama's relationship with Russia's two leaders, President Dmitry Medvedev and his mentor, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.” All this with a Democratic Senate: “With the clock running out on a new US-Russian arms treaty before the previous Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, expires on December 5, a senior White House official said Sunday said that the difficulty of the task might mean temporarily bypassing the Senate’s constitutional role in ratifying treaties by enforcing certain aspects of a new deal on an executive levels and a ‘provisional basis’ until the Senate ratifies the treaty,” ABC’s Jake Tapper reports. The thornier issues: “The summit's centrepiece is supposed to be a groundbreaking pact on nuclear arms reduction, but Russia said there could be no agreement unless the US was prepared to heed its concerns on missile defence,” The Guardian’s Luke Harding reports. “This week's visit was supposed to break the ice, but some pre-summit moves have added to the chill,” David Ignatius writes. “The normally sure-footed Obama stumbled last week when he contrasted his ‘very good relationship’ with Medvedev against Putin's ‘outdated’ Cold War attitudes. This will look to Russians like an effort to play internal politics, and it will complicate his meetings.” Who to talk what with? “Mr. Medvedev holds the highest office in Russia, so protocol dictates that Mr. Obama meet and negotiate nuclear arms control and other matters with him. Yet questions about Mr. Medvedev’s authority hang over the summit meeting like an awkward familial arrangement that everyone acknowledges but no one knows how to handle,” Clifford J. Levy writes in The New York Times. Meanwhile, just over the horizon: “The FBI is taking the unusual step of declaring that Gov. Sarah Palin is not under investigation, as Palin herself left for Western Alaska and communicated to the world through her Twitter account,” Sean Cockerham writes in the Anchorage Daily News. Not another disappearing governor? “Palin ‘tweeted’ that she would be going to two ‘West AK’ villages on Sunday and indicated she'd soon be joining her family for a day of fishing at its commercial setnet site on the Nushagak River in Bristol Bay. That was the best indication of her whereabouts, as neither Palin's personal nor state spokeswomen responded to requests for comment. She remains the governor until July 26,” Cockerham writes. “Republicans were offering a lot of theories, but really only a limited, tight circle of Palin advisers know what’s going on,” ABC’s Kate Snow reported on “Good Morning America” Monday, from Anchorage. “Gov. Sarah Palin was spotted on the sidelines of a July 4th parade this weekend — but otherwise she laid low, after rocking the political world.” Maybe we shouldn’t look too far for the causes: “Some Republicans here said she was increasingly troubled by growing criticism in her home state since she returned from her run as vice-presidential nominee,” The Wall Street Journal’s Jim Carlton reports. You don’t think she’s really disappearing, do you? “Sarah Palin is pretty much toast for 2012, but she can still make a lot of money for herself and the party, top Republicans said Sunday,” Richard Sisk writes in the New York Daily News. The Wall Street Journal editorial: “Giving up on an executive job a year and a half early isn't the best way to persuade voters you're ready for the more demanding rigors and scrutiny of the White House.” Karl Rove: “She marches to the beat of her own drum, and it's going to be very interesting to see how she pulls this off.” Former Gov. Mike Huckabee, R-Ark.: “If she's looking to be a national political figure, it's not going to get easier.” “If this is geared for her run for the presidency in 2012, it is one of the most politically tone deaf decisions that we've seen,” GOP consultant Stuart Roy tells ABC’s John Hendren and Kristina Wong. This simple? “You don’t need politics anymore once you’ve discovered that the alchemy of celebrity has turned you into a 24-carat phenomenon,” Tina Brown writes for The Daily Beast, saying that Palin’s performance reminded her of Princess Di. “Palin is clearly terrified. Her M.O. is to cloak her terror in grandiosity. Both shine through in the suppressed hysteria of her increasingly strange appearances before the camera.” She should have said no, Ross Douthat writes in his New York Times column: “Had she refused John McCain, Palin would still be a popular female governor in a Republican Party starved for future stars. Her scandals would be the stuff of local politics, her daughter’s pregnancy a minor story in the Lower 48, her son Trig’s parentage a nonissue even for conspiracy theorists. There would still be plenty of time to ease into the national spotlight, to bone up on the issues, and to craft a persona more appealing than the Mrs. Spiro Agnew role the McCain campaign assigned to her. Most important, nobody would have realized yet how much she looks like Tina Fey.” Back home: The critical phase for health care reform. “Let the trade-offs begin,” Shailagh Murray and Lori Montgomery write in The Washington Post. “While Obama may be prepared to compromise, it is not clear whether the public is ready for a less-than-perfect outcome, a key factor in determining the bill's long-term political success.” It may take a while: “Senate Democratic leaders’ hopes of approving health care reform before adjourning for the August recess appear all but dead, with the prospect of meeting President Barack Obama’s demand for a bill on his desk by Oct. 15 looking increasingly difficult,” Roll Call’s David Drucker reports. As for the economy, Biden’s comments are “likely to intensify calls for the administration to do more to counter job losses,” Deborah Solomon writes in The Wall Street Journal. “Some economists are pressing the White House to enact a second round of stimulus spending or find some other way to avert a prolonged job and wage slump.” Buckle up: “The unemployment rate will likely be higher in 2010 than in 2009, just as it’s ramped up over the course of the year,” Biden’s chief economic adviser, Jared Bernstein, said on ABCNews.com’s “Top Line.” On the hiring line: “Democratic strategist James Carville, who ran Bill Clinton’s presidential bid in 1992, is helping another challenger: a U.S.-educated rival of Afghan President Hamid Karzai,” Bloomberg’s Indira A.R. Lakshmanan reports. “Carville, who has close ties to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said his advisory role to former Afghan Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani shouldn’t be interpreted as tacit backing by the U.S. for a change of leadership in Afghanistan.” Book your tickets: “With the summer getaway season in full swing, the White House is busy arranging the president’s first vacation since taking office,” Jeff Zeleny reports in The New York Times. “The destination — officially, at least — is classified. Yet it is hardly a secret to the people on Martha’s Vineyard, several business owners and others said, where reservations have been made and preparations are under way for the Obama family’s August arrival.” Closing out this wacky stretch — Bloomberg’s Al Hunt gives us his Top 10 American political sex scandals. (No. 1 is Bill Clinton, and you go through Wilbur Mills and John and Rita Jenrette before getting to Eliot Spitzer and David Vitter.)
The Kicker: “Am I annoyed? You betcha.” — Shannyn Moore, a blogger and radio talk show host in Anchorage, after Gov. Sarah Palin’s personal attorney threatened legal action against her over “defamatory” material. “Grateful Todd left fishing grnds to join me this wkend; but now he's back slaying salmon & working the kids @ the site; anxious to join 'em!” — Sarah Palin, via Twitter, in the most concrete information she’s offered about her whereabouts since Friday’s resignation announcement.
Today on “Top Line,” ABCNews.com’s daily political Webcast: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.; Mark Leibovich of The New York Times. Noon ET. Follow The Note on Twitter: http://twitter.com/thenote For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
You don’t win the presidency or even make anything resembling a comeback when the incumbent Dem is at 70 percent approval and your own party is in thew news for all of the wrong reasons thanks to some real knuckleheads.
Posted by: matt | July 6, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Chaos? Reaching a bit here aren’t we? Affairs are hardly new and neither men would not have been serious contenders. Palin resigning? According to the paparatzi press she didn’t matter, wouldn’t have the support to wage a serious effort so where is the chaos?
Yesterday on Wallaces show a female administration member stated that the white house was amusued at these stories and perhaps it is good for a laugh but what is not funny is the way this administration is handling the economy. Nearing 10 percent unemployment, spending money they don’t have and following in Bush’s footsteps with “stimulus”packages which don’t work for long. With all the intelligence Obama has surrounded himself with (although I bet most have never ran so much as a newspaper route) you would think creativity would be in ample supply yet all we are getting is more FDR and Jimmy Carter.
Misreading the economy or blaming the previous doesn’t work…remember the house and senate were and have been democraticly controlled for nearly 3 years now. Stop whining and get to work.
Posted by: david | July 6, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Just in case anyone has forgotten, the Democrats have been in control of Congress for over 2 years now. How has that helped? Seems to me that the last two years have been the worst 2 years for America in 2 decades.
Posted by: Meab | July 6, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Meab | Jul 6, 2009 9:02:58 AM
You say; … “Seems to me that the last two years have been the worst 2 years for America in 2 decades.”
_____________
There was sufficient GWB “debris” created over the last 2 years”, to correct any assumption that Congress “Controlled” anything.
Posted by: bobj72 | July 6, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
How does anyone really expect the economy to recover by putting trillions of tax dollars in the corporations responsible for the collapse originally?
There was nothing “misread.” Just a big hurry to cover the losses of the rich. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Ted Johnson | July 6, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Regarding the part of this story about Shannyn Moore, I hope they do bring legal action against her and make it stick. It’s about time these bloggers learn to be responsible for what they write, and no longer allowed to write defamatory material about people they don’t like. If it’s found she started the rumors or helped perpetuate them, I think she should be punished.
Posted by: Baddawg00 | July 6, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I’m confused – how many of the Sens/Reps are new ?? control or no, this same group of idiots have been in their offices for quite a while.. blame yourselfs and get to work spending more of my money…
Posted by: halfmn | July 6, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Sarah Palin is playin’ (haha) the media for all it’s worth! She’s having a great time ‘twittering” clues as to where she’ll be so the media can “find” her! Of course, the media is following the breadcrumbs. Again I ask, why is she getting all this coverage? Who really cares what she’s up to and what is she going to do now? Am I missing something? Is she merely an amusement? How much money is the media spending following her antics and are they getting their moneys worth? The sooner the media gets over her and starts ignoring her, the better! She’s last years news!
Posted by: js45601 | July 6, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
I agree, I personally have never seen such chaotic behavior out of a group of people who claim to have the knowledge and recipie for moral living, family values and fiscal stability. Hog wash!! This is what happens when you push yourself above everyone and look down. Now you are looking up. Revaluate, and take a focus which includes all of us, to include yourselves “work’s in progress”. Get into the game with the highest stakes, getting America straight.
Posted by: SD | July 6, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
the Democrats have been in control of Congress for over 2 years now. ?????
This CRAP started when bush fell into the job by mistake. Problems he started making were hid by the Iraq war. He spent much more money on that than we had coming in for it. All the contractor payments, so for 4-5 years money was pumped into jobs that would not last, then he hid the fact that it was going down fast. BUSH almost destroyed America.
Posted by: Hawk | July 6, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
LOL….. Anyone who thinks that the unemployment situation is going to turn around within 6 months of a new administration…. well (LOL)….. their just playing party politics, and supporting their party over being “realistic”. The fact is, since 1948, the worst unemployment in the country happened under the watch of Ronald Reagan (10.8% during November and December 1982). Reagan acquired an Unemployment Rate from Jimmy Carter of 7.5% (Jan 1981). It wasn’t until May 1984…. 3 YEARS and 5 MONTHS after Reagan took office, that Unemployment finally went to 7.4%.
So if you “REALLY” believe that the current unemployment rate should change overnight…. LOL…. you’re either being a little unrealistic, or you don’t understand how unemployment “lags” behind the state of the economy, or you’re just trying to pick away at the new Obama administration for “any little thing”… LOL… I think it’s OPTION # 3 for most people here.
Believe me…. it’s going to get worse before it gets better…. but 4 years from now, unemployment will be far lower than anything we saw under G.W. Bush…. watch and see.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 6, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Biden and 0bama were members of the senate and part of the party who controlled congress for the past 2 years. so it’s funny that they inherited anything, & seriously the still blame their failures on Bush no mater how much control they have. Therefor, R. Klien is an idiot.
Posted by: vinson massif | July 6, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
What a Mess the Republicans are They made a mess of this country for the last 16 years and they made a mess of their Party be along time coming before they come back! For those of you blaming the Democrats for the Mess were in Remember this Republicans held power during Clinton and Bush! like i said 16 years of a mess!
Posted by: Angie in PA | July 6, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
AMERICA has never been in more dire straits than it is today. Obama has expanded the federal government to a degree never seen before, if you thought Nixon was the “Imperial President”, think again, Nixon couldn’t hold a candle to this guy. Obama has also put us into debt beyond any reason, 13% of GDP compared to Bush’ 1.2%. On top of all that, he has managed to weaken our national defense, Homeland Security and CIA which puts us in great danger of another terrorist strike. God help us all.
Posted by: Ron | July 6, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
x-repub’s saying is pretty simple – give 0bama credit for anything good that happens at any point in the future, and attribute any short comings to Bush – no matter how long it takes. That way, he can’t fail. It’s pretty simple, if things had rebounded, you can thank Biden and 0bama, but until then, it’s Bush’s fault. How do people not get that? Even if things improve and then reverse, you would credit the improvement to 0bama and the reversal to Bush. Most of see through your weak fallacies.
Posted by: vinson massif | July 6, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Obama can shout all he wants that he inherited a mess… he was never even in the US Senate.. the minute he got elected to that job, he started running for Pres… he isn’t qualified to have been included in the mess making ! My 3 year old has the same amount of experience, she doesn’t read either!
Posted by: halfmn | July 6, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Now for the next two years Palin won’t have to deal with developing consensus on anything, she won’t have any resistance from political opponents, she won’t have to obey any state ethics regulations, and perhaps most importantly, she won’t have to do anything on the record — it really will be Sarah’s word against the rest of the world’s. It will be an interesting but crazy-making trip.
— pegd1213
Posted by: peg1213 | July 6, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
“What a Mess the Republicans are They made a mess of this country for the last 16 years and they made a mess of their Party be along time coming before they come back! For those of you blaming the Democrats for the Mess were in Remember this Republicans held power during Clinton and Bush! like i said 16 years of a mess!”
Posted by: Angie in PA | Jul 6, 2009 11:29:44 AM
_________________________
agreed!
Posted by: gus amaral | July 6, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Much of what Obama has said, he has meant for the opposite to occur. So, do you really believe he wants the economy to get better? Too many of his policies say otherwise.
Posted by: Deanbob | July 6, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
THE DEMOCRATS have just as many scandals as the Republicans: Senators Conrad and Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank’s roll in the mortgage meltdown; Rep. Conyer’s lunacy and his wife’s scandals; Joe Biden’s moronic statements, etc. The difference is that the leftwing media doesn’t bother to report on the massive corruption and scandals of Democrats.
Posted by: Ron | July 6, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Posted by: halfmn | Jul 6, 2009:
“Obama can shout all he wants that he inherited a mess… he was never even in the US Senate.. the minute he got elected to that job, he started running for Pres… he isn’t qualified to have been included in the mess making ! My 3 year old has the same amount of experience, she doesn’t read either!”
_________________________
It’s comments like this that should make us thankful for the advent of secondary school education.
Posted by: Ima Halfwit | July 6, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
matt, BO’s approval is in the 50′s. Quit making things up.
Posted by: BK-1970 | July 6, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
halfmn | Jul 6, 2009 11:38:00 AM
You said; “Obama can shout all he wants that he inherited a mess…”
__________________________
If you listen closely… YOUR Claim is more a “Talking Point” of ‘Far Right Edge Radicals’, than it is the wringing-of-hands on the part of The President or his party. (Everyone wishes the best for your 3 year old.)
Posted by: bobj72 | July 6, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Angie – Gus you 2 sound like you are worried you are going to lose your govt. paycheck. You realize of course there are no Repubs or Dems in our Congress, they are all the same, just a different letter behind their names. Cripes, every one of them has been there for over 16 years, not just the repubs… you have got to get a life and worry about something important, like fixing the problem , not whining about who’s problem it is… the one in charge now is the one in charge… get to fixing and shut the h* up !!
Posted by: halfmn | July 6, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Biden was quoted saying “We misread the economy”
Liberal Translation: We thought if we just threw more money at it it would get better.
Posted by: vinson massif | July 6, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Be patient all you Conservative GOPs, give Rush, Sean, and Newt some time to work all of this out. They profess to have all the right answers (if you listen to them).
Posted by: Don | July 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
In control! How about some jobs done.
Posted by: Dan | July 6, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
This economy is not going to turn around. Investors aren’t investing because the current administration has every aspect of the economy in turmoil. You have to have market stability for investment. The administration is threatening energy sectors, oil, gas, nuclear and coal. Gov’t pushed Ethanol is tanking because of market driven lower gas prices. The administration has attacked the banking sectors, threatening incomes, changing credit card rulings. Now it’s going after the health care and insurance industries, creating havoc and uncertainty. Investment in this country drives growth and innovation. No one is going to invest in chaos. These factors are all Obama policies. Obama owns this faltering economy.
Posted by: Gary | July 6, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Don’t worry about the Republicans.
They will rebound in 2010!
The non-working stimulus bill,
“cap and trade” bill(if passed) and
the President’s ineffective foreign
policy aka, Blah, Blah, Blah will
see to that.
Having 60 votes in the U.S. Senate
means there is no more “cover” for the
president and his policies.
He owns the economy and our foreign
policy.
His and his party’s fortunes will rise and fall on the success or failure of
those policies.
Don’t celebrate too loudly, Dems!
The “party” could be over sooner
than you think!
Posted by: reaganfan | July 6, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Blame Bush after Democrats have been in power for over two years. How not Original. It seems Mr Klein must of got his home mortgage from Barney Frank and his family is part of the Citigroup Empire taking all the tax money from the future. The average person knows ABC is in the tank for anything and everything Democrat since they took off their robes at the KKK rallies. Then there is a large percentage of the population (now > 50%) that wants something for nothing (like Mr. Klein). Rather than embark on it via hard work and education its easier to vote a Donkey in Public Office. Most Donkey’s in Office now follow their leader, spending money they don’t have (kind of like your sister) and passing the buck (bills in this case) to their kids. The NEW American Way – Make your Kids Broke before they realize it. Smart move Mr. Klein, in 20 years are you going to explain your reasoning to the next generation as to why they have no money. Instead you as a Journalist will be lucky to have any work.
Posted by: Casey | July 6, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
You don’t win the presidency or even make anything resembling a comeback when the incumbent Dem is at 70 percent approval and your own party is in thew news for all of the wrong reasons thanks to some real knuckleheads.
—————————————
Bush Sr.s approval numbers after the 1st Gulf war were beyond what Obama’s are now. I dont recall him winning re-election…do you?
If the economy continues to stall and falter, and this administration contnues on a path of spending like we riding high times here, Obama will have no chance at re-election.
Since they have now admitted they mis-read or underestimated the real state of the economy, we can now without doubt conclude this “dream team” of advisors is not so hot either.
It is indeed timeto step back and slow down in regards to these other “agenda items” until we get the economy back where we can afford to move on these other items. ALSO, it will give the administration and it’s advisors TIME to properly “read” the situation in regards to both Energy/Climate & Healthcare.
Just pushing ahead because you can has already proven to be a BIG MISTAKE.
Time to LEARN!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 6, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
The GOP is in such disarray that Colin Powell is now saying Obama needs to slow down on his spending and encourage smaller government. He didn’t say he had made a mistake in voting for BHO, but his words stated it. More people need to WAKE UP. The Dems (and yes, they DID have control for the last 2 years) are spending us into oblivion, and now they want to tax us on EVERYTHING!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | July 6, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
I THINK WE NEED TO BE DOING SOME RESERCH ON THE NUMBER OF CZARS OBAMA HAS APPOINTED AND WHY SO LETS ASK OURSELVES WHO IS PAYING FOR THESE GUYS, WHY DO WE NEED THEM AND WHY DO WE NEED SO MANY DEM. IF WE HAVE ALL HIS OTHER ROYAL CAB, NOT A ONE IN CONGRESS CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO THEM IT IS A WAY TO GET RICH ALL YOU GUYS HAD BETTER START ASKING WHO IS OBAMA AND WHY IS HE MAKING THE GOVERNMENT SO BIG LETS FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT BEFORE WE DONT HAVE FREEDOM,LETS MAKE OBAMA ACCOUNTABLE AND SOMEONE MIGHT TELL THE DEM.IN CONGRESS THIS IS THEIR FAULT NOT BUSHES WERE TIRED OF HEARING IT AND WE REFUSE TO PAY TAXES ON A BILL THEY DIDNT READ TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION AND I AM A DEM HOPE I AM NOT AS STUPID
Posted by: BARB | July 7, 2009, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Don’t cry any crocodile tears for
the Republicans.
Big Brother Obama and his band of
socialist control freaks are providing
enough reasons to give Dems the boot
in the 2010 elections.
The “stimulus bill” that the president
and his Democrat friends in Congress
rushed through without even reading it
is Not Working!
More than 450,000 people lost their
jobs last month.
The stock market remains unstable and
unreliable.
President Obama’s foreign policy aka
Blah, Blah, Blah is a joke.
Iran and North Korea continue their
nuclear programs without skipping a
beat.
Not surprisingly they have not
responded to his empty rhetoric!
The president’s position on the
Hondouran situation puts him on the
same side as Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega,
and Raul Castro.
By this time next year the Dems will
be sweating big time!
Posted by: reaganfan | July 7, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm