Today’s Q for O’s WH – 7/22/2009
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Jake.
TAPPER: Thank you, Mr. President. You said earlier that you wanted to tell the American people what’s in it for them. How will their family benefit from the health care reform? But experts say that in addition to the benefits that you’re pushing, there is going to have to be some sacrifice in order for there to be true cost-cutting measures, such as Americans giving up tests, referrals, choice, end-of-life care. When you describe health care reform, you don’t — understandably, you don’t talk about the sacrifices that Americans might have to make. Do you think — do you accept the premise that other than some tax increases on the wealthiest Americans, the American people are going to have to give anything up in order for this to happen?
OBAMA: They’re going to have to give up paying for things that don’t make them healthier. And I — speaking as an American, I think that’s the kind of change you want. Look, if, right now, hospitals and doctors aren’t coordinating enough to have you just take one test when you come because of an illness, but instead have you take one test, then you go to another specialist, you take a second test, then you go to another specialist, you take a third test, and nobody is bothering to send the first test that you took, same test, to the next doctors, you’re wasting money.
You may not see it, because if you have health insurance right now, it’s just being sent to the insurance company. But that’s raising your premiums. It’s raising everybody’s premiums. And that money, one way or another, is coming out of your pocket. Although we are also subsidizing some of that because there are tax breaks for health care. So, not only is it costing you money in terms of higher premiums, it’s also costing you as a taxpayer. Now, I want to change that. Every American should want to change that. Why would we want to pay for things that don’t work? That aren’t making us healthier?
And here’s what I’m confident about. If doctors and patients have the best information about what works and what doesn’t, then they’re going to want to pay for what works. If there’s a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that’s going to make you well? But the system right now doesn’t incentivize that. Those are the changes that are going to be needed — that we’re going to need to make inside the system. It will require, I think, patients to — as well as doctors, as well as hospitals, to be more discriminating consumers. But I think that’s a good thing, because ultimately we can’t afford this. We just can’t afford what we’re doing right now.
And — and — and just to — to raise a broader issue that I think has colored how we look at health care reform, let me just talk about deficit and debt, because part of what’s been happening in this debate is the American people are understandably queasy about the huge deficits and debt that we’re facing right now. And the feeling is, all right, we had the bank bailout, we had the recovery package, we had the supplemental, we’ve got the budget, we’re seeing numbers, trillions here and trillions there. And so I think, legitimately, people are saying, “Look, we’re in a recession. I’m cutting back. I’m having to give up things. And yet all I see is government spending more and more money.” And that argument, I think, has been used effectively by people who don’t want to change health care to suggest that somehow this is one more government program. So I just want to address that point very quickly.
First of all, let’s understand that, when I came in, we had a $1.3 trillion deficit — annual deficit that we had already inherited. We had to immediately move forward with a stimulus package because the American economy had lost trillions of dollars of wealth. Consumers had lost through their 401(k)s, through home values, you name it, they had lost trillions of dollars. That all just went away. That was the day I was sworn in; it was already happening. And we had 700,000 jobs that were being lost. So we felt it was very important to put in place a recovery package that would help stabilize the economy.
Then we had to pass a budget by law, and our budget had a 10-year projection. And I just want everybody to be clear about this. If we had done nothing, if you had the same, old budget as opposed to the changes we made in our budget, you’d have a $9.3 trillion deficit over the next 10 years. Because of the changes we’ve made, it’s going to be $7.1 trillion. Now, that’s not good, but it’s $2.2 trillion less than it would have been if we had the same policies in place when we came in.
So the reason I point this out is to say that the debt and the deficit are deep concerns of mine. I am very worried about federal spending. And the steps that we’ve taken so far have reduced federal spending over the next 10 years by $2.2 trillion. It’s not enough. But in order for us to do more, we’re not only going to have to eliminate waste in the system — and, by the way, we had a big victory yesterday by eliminating a weapons program, the F- 22, that the Pentagon had repeatedly said we didn’t need — so we’re going to have to eliminate waste there.
We’re going to have to eliminate no-bid contracts. We’re going to have to do all kinds of reforms in our budgeting. But we’re also going to have to change health care. Otherwise, we can’t change that $7.1 trillion gap in the way that the American people want it to change. So to all — everybody who’s out there who has been ginned about this idea that the Obama administration wants to spend and spend and spend, the fact of the matter is, is that we inherited an enormous deficit, enormous long-term debt projections. We have not reduced it as much as we need to and as I’d like to. But health care reform is not going to add to that deficit. It’s designed to lower it. That’s part of the reason why it’s so important to do, and to do now.
- jpt
Email
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
That was a great question: it elicited the most pure horse-puckey of any. And the “answer” made it absolutely clear that Obama has never been within a country mile of anybody who even KNOWS anybody with a serious medical situation — even if Mrs. O DID take home nearly $400,000 a year as a non-profit “health executive” at U/C.
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
THat was one long answer. The short answer is: jake, Americans will have to sacrifice. That MRI that everybody wants to make them feel better is going to have to wait. That test you heard about for cancer gene and you want to see if you have it, well you can forget about it.
You see Mr. President it doesn’t take 6 minutes and thousand of words to answer one simple question.
Posted by: j0 schwarz | July 22, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
THat was one long answer. The short answer is: jake, Americans will have to sacrifice. That MRI that everybody wants to make them feel better is going to have to wait. That test you heard about for cancer gene and you want to see if you have it, well you can forget about it.
You see Mr. President it doesn’t take 6 minutes and thousand of words to answer one simple question.
Posted by: j0 schwarz | July 22, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
the sacrifice Americans will have to make is having less contact with insurance companies: less phone calls to helpdesks and tell a complete stranger your complete health history and wonder if their insurance covers the latest development, etc etc etc
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Obama made it pretty clear that millions of illegals will get free health care.
He said everyone–47 million.
Get ready for rationed health care.
Posted by: nick | July 22, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
“OBAMA: They’re going to have to give up paying for things that don’t make them healthier.”
Things like vacations, and freedom.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
The fact is health care needs to be fixed or we will all go broke. All these wingnuts who are arguing that it’s socialized medicine are only repeating talking points from the right.
I, and all my friends and family, stand with the president on this.
Posted by: lucydog33 | July 22, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
“the sacrifice Americans will have to make is having less contact with insurance companies: less phone calls to helpdesks and tell a complete stranger your complete health history and wonder if their insurance covers the latest development, etc etc etc”
Indeed. Now you’ll have Barney Frank controlling your health care, making the decisions.
Latest developments?
Forget that. It’s too costly. It’s cheaper for you to die.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
I have heard too many “It’s not about me. It’s about you”. Mr. Obama is very skilled politician.
Posted by: young_voter | July 22, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Thanks Tapper have a good night.At least you tried. Well try again next time. we keep listening.
Posted by: MFB | July 22, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
“The fact is health care needs to be fixed or we will all go broke.”
The only way to cut health care costss is to cut health care. Period.
Just look at the comments from lefties complaing about what insurance companies won’t pay for. Everyone wants EVERYTHING covered and then they whine about how much health care costs.
Obamacare is RATIONING. Get used to it.
It means Chris Dodd and Harry Reid decide what you get, not your doctor. It means your parents will have to die sooner.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Unemployment Rate: 9.5%
Obama Job Approval: 51%
Posted by: Angelo | July 22, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I hear a lot about how bad insurance companies are but in my 12 years of having it I have never had one complaint. I was just diagnosed with breast cancer in June of 09. I felt a lump under my arm on a tuesday, went to see my gyno on a thursday, got a referral in 25 minutes to see a surgeon, got an appointment to see the specialist 10 minutes after. Went to see the surgeon the following week on a Monday, had a referral to get a momogram and a ultrasound on wednesday. My radiologist kept me there and told me I needed to have a biopsy. Got a referral the same day to have the biopsy the next day. Came back positive in two days. Got a referral to have an MRI and a PT Scan that same day. Got the MRI and the PET scan done 1 day later. Surgeon told me I needed to see a oncologist and I got a referral for that too on the same day, and I got to pick my doctor. Started chemo 2 weeks after MRI results came in.
I have Zero, Zero complaint about the American health care system. None Nada. I have Anthem Blue Cross. Maybe I was lucky, but from discovery of lump to treatment 3 weeks. AMAZING CARE!!!!!! When Obama says that the insurance company decide what kind of care I get, I don’t know what he is talking about. Everything, my doctor asked for they got.
Posted by: jo schwarz | July 22, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
P. J. O’Rourke said it best:
“If you think health care is expensive now, just wait until it’s free.”
Posted by: Eric | July 22, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
The questions left for Americans about the healthcare reform is very simple.
Would you rather have free healthcare that is cheaper to the government but is slow to get care and not adequate or healthcare that is expedient and life saving but expensive? I don’t know about everybody else, but I would rather go bankrupt paying for great healthcare that saves my life, than have free healthcare that keeps me waiting months to see a specialist while I die inside.
Posted by: Jo schwarz | July 22, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
If you are healthy enjoy it.
Because under Obamacare if you are over a certain age you aren’t worth the cost.
Obama wants a level playing field and treat us all the same.
We will compete for health care with millions of illegals.
Posted by: reed | July 22, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
“We will compete for health care with millions of illegals.”
That is a great point and the Numero Uno reason to kill off this bill.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
“Maybe I was lucky, but from discovery of lump to treatment 3 weeks.”‘
“Maybe” you were lucky? It sounds like the expected course of treatment for a well-to-do person, probably in or near an urban area, with a straightforward problem.
Now, imagine you’re an underclass woman, with the very same complaint, in government-dictated “clinic” care, that your clinic mammogram — probably NOT state-of-the-art machinery, technicians, or interpretation — didn’t detect anything before OR after you noticed a change in your own body, and that you got put on pain and/or psycho-meds for a couple of months, or years, instead . . .
Posted by: Bet Noir | July 22, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Nice question Jake. When do you think Mr. Obama will begin answering it? I was also glad to hear in his answer that he inherited a bad economy (twice in fact)–I hadn’t heard that before.
Posted by: Winston Smith | July 22, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
drjohn:”Obamacare is RATIONING. Get used to it.”
Our CURRENT system is RATIONING by for-profit companies who make more money the harder they make it for you to get care. Get used to it I guess.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Bet Noir:”It sounds like the expected course of treatment for a well-to-do person,”
Also standard practice under single payer programs, where the wait times for such serious illnesses is well documented as being quite short (cancer getting pushed to the front of the line is why it takes forever to get an MRI of a bum knee).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
We can all sleep well.
Obama has rescued the economy.
He has brought America back from the brink.
He really believes we are stupid.
I think he should reserve that label for his supporters only.
Posted by: bailey | July 22, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
“I don’t know about everybody else, but I would rather go bankrupt paying for great healthcare that saves my life, than have free healthcare that keeps me waiting months to see a specialist while I die inside.”
Believe it or not, several dozen MILLION poor, and near-poor, people — unknown millions of whom are literally dying inside at this very moment — can’t make breezy pronouncements about “going bankrupt”.
For MOST people, Single Payer is the best answer.
The VIP classes should consider that certain specialists, certain transplants, etc., are already “rationed”.
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Gibberish. This is the worst infomercial the President ever made.
Gibberish
Posted by: ChicagoBob | July 22, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“Our CURRENT system is RATIONING by for-profit companies who make more money the harder they make it for you to get care. Get used to it I guess.”
You don’t have the first idea how insurance works. Insurance companies provide what your company negotiates. If you don’t like what they do, you can change insurance carriers. You can’t do that one Obamacare takes you by the neck.
Your disdain for “profit” is interesting since you are a for-profit enterprise as well. People have the sad tendency to hate those who make one dollar more than they do.
Most companies are “for profit” or they don’t survive.
That is, unless you have enough union members. Then Obama takes over the company and wipes out the debt and the creditors. If you’re a small company you get to pick up the tab.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Bet Noir:”It sounds like the expected course of treatment for a well-to-do person,”
If you call unemployed well-to-do, than I guess I am very, very well-to-do. I used my savings to pay for my health insurance and I would rather to do that than have it free and have to wait for care. Any day of the week.
If the Canadians are happy to wait for Dr appointment and care, well good for them. But I’m not Canadians and I hate waiting.
Posted by: Jo schwarz | July 22, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Uhhhh….okay. Whatever. Well, nice try Jake. I’ll bet the president and Gibbs understand eachother perfectly fine.
Posted by: jennifert7 | July 22, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Bet Noir”For MOST people, Single Payer is the best answer”
MOST people never think they are ever going to be sick. I sure did not.
If people know that they are going to be sick and know the care they would receive when they have serious illnesses under a single payer plan, they would tell Obama to suck it. Single payer is great if you have a cold, you need prenatal care and labor and delivery. It’s a breeze. If you have cancer or some fancy to pronounce disease and need cutting edge science, single payer plans can kiss my $$$. I would rather be poor in America with a grave illness than be middle class or poor with same illness in Britain or Canada. Rich people can fly to get care wherever they want so single payer or no single payer system, they won’t be hurting.
Posted by: Jo schwarz | July 22, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Jake I loved your question to the president as to what I may have to give up, but unfortunately I must be really dumb because his answer has me a lot more confused than I ever was before, as a matter of fact to me this entire press conference has me wondering what the hell it is that Obama is trying to do with health care, please someone make is simple for the average folks like me to understand.
Posted by: SJ | July 22, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
To all those who say that no news was made tonight I strongly disagree. The big news is that our enchanted media is starting to seem a whole lot less enchanted and is starting to ask questions a little more difficult than “Mr. President, is being so awesomely awesome a hinderance to being the most awesome being on the planet?” Look what you get when tougher questions are asked, the real Barry, a complete empty suit.
Jake, I give you credit for consistently asking some of the toughest questions. A suggestion for next (an you know it’s inevitable that there will be next for this narcissist) presser, ask Obama when he will stop with the endless strawmen crap. Nobody has ever said that the health care system doesn’t need reforming yet he says this endlessly. Either we accept his crap package which even he can’t explain or we don’t want reform. It’s a tired practice and he does it with every single proposal he makes.
Posted by: Jack | July 22, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
If Obamacare is not good enough for Obama and it is not good enough for Democrats in Congress it is not good enough for my family either.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Obama: Blah Blah Bush Blah Blah I inherited all this blah blah its everyone fault but mine blah blah and everyone is a racist but me blah blah blah “yawn”
Obama smells defeat as his poll numbers plummet and the crayon eaters and midol takers can’t save him
Got Jobs? anyone?…..anyone?
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | July 22, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Funny how it took him six months to pick out a family dog, yet only two weeks to reform healthcare. Everyone should just feel sooooo much better now. Wouldn’t want him to get the wrong dog, now would we?
Posted by: Lisa | July 22, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Clearly, Obama has no depth of knowledge on this issue. He did not help the liberal cause at all tonight.
Pass it, dems. You’ve got the numbers. What’s the hold up? Just do it. What are you afraid of?
Posted by: jennifert7 | July 22, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
@jo schwarz: I wish you a very speedy recovery. And hope your insurance company will cover it all.
Two things. First, that was an awfull lot of tests: physical examination; a mammogram; an ultrasound; a biopsy; an MRI; and a PET-scan? That’s really overkill from what you’ve written, especially since you are receiving chemotherapy and no surgery.
Typically: physical examination, mammogram and biopsy are enough. Especially when the treatment is chemotherapy. MRI is more and more included when the mammogram is inconclusive but an ultrasound and PET-scan? Seriously?
Second. Since you are now a “marked” woman, it will be very difficult under the current system to change your insurer. Premiums will increase dramatically. Even your daughters might now find it more difficult to get affordable insurance.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Barrack Obama frightens me and I pray to God
the For-Obama dems wake up before it’s too
late because this wonderful country that we
live in will be ruined by he and his socialist
friends! Prayers are needed Big Time here & now!
Posted by: Cristie Needham | July 22, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Jake, I missed the presser but I think you’re doing a pretty good job so far for ABC. One complaint I have is that often this site loads slowly. It would be nice if the content loaded and appeared first, but it appears that it’s waiting for various ad servers to load ads before displaying your posts. Sometimes I just give up and check other sites.
Is anyone else experiencing this issue?
Posted by: S.P. Gass | July 22, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | Jul 22, 2009 10:36:37 PM
Question for you- should a car insurance company be forced to take you on and pay for your accident damage AFTER the accident?
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
I saw it. Mr. O is one scary guy.
Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Thank you Mr. President
You andwered the question and follow-ups very throughly. Some might not like the answers but only the ignorant do not understand. Your plan is much needed competition for the wealth insurance industry.
Posted by: watching | July 22, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
drjohn:”You don’t have the first idea how insurance works. Insurance companies provide what your company negotiates. If you don’t like what they do, you can change insurance carriers. ”
Don’t you mean your company can change insurance carriers? And if you’re a small business, good luck – you will pay that 20% a year cost escalation or take a hike. As for an unemployed person or independent contractor, if you have any pre-existing condition you cannot get insurance, you cannot change carriers, and you are stuck.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
“Don’t you mean your company can change insurance carriers?”
Yes I do.
And I am a small business.
Posted by: drjohn | July 22, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
jenniferT7:”Pass it, dems. You’ve got the numbers. What’s the hold up? Just do it. What are you afraid of?”
Some Democrats are paid off by the multi-trillion-dollar healthcare industry. Some represent very conservative districts. And all of them want to be sure to get it right.
I find it refreshing that Congress doesn’t just march in unquestioning lockstep to orders from the Whitehouse like Republicans under Bush.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
I have Zero, Zero complaint about the American health care system. None Nada.
Posted by: jo schwarz | Jul 22, 2009 9:44:34 PM
_______________________________
I’ve made the same point on this blog and I’ve been told I’m selfish. So go figure.
To some degree, I believe that a big part of the problem is with HC for small businesses because of the lack of insurance and options. I would like to see them concentrate on those that REALLY need the help. Obama says we won’t be affected but the wording in this Plan makes me nervous.
My company offers plenty of options, has over 100,000 employees so they negotiate good rates and like you I have never had a problem since HMOs started up.
So I say again, fix the problems. Don’t jeopardize what works already.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
The news conference is now up on the White House web site for anyone who missed it.
Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
I would rather be poor in America with a grave illness than be middle class or poor with same illness in Britain or Canada.
Posted by: Jo schwarz
==========================================
Well, that’s funny. Since the International Journal of Epidemiology published a study in March 2009 that found Canada performed markedly better on breast cancer survival, ESPECIALLY amongst the poor.
This was the conclusion of that particular study: “More inclusive health care insurance coverage in Canada vs the USA, particularly among each country’s relatively poor people, seems the most plausible explanation for such Canadian advantages. Provision of health care for all Americans would likely prevent countless early deaths, particularly among the relatively poor.”
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
drjohn:”Yes I do.
And I am a small business.”
And how have your insurance rates been doing the last 8 years? They have not gone up a cent for your competitors in every other first world nation.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Excellent question. Terrible answer.
Posted by: poncou | July 22, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
“If there’s a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that’s going to make you well?”
___________________________________
Isn’t that what generic drugs do? What is this red pill, blue pill tap dance?
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
First he insinuated that doctors are generally dishonest, ordering needless procedures and operations to pad their wallet, then went on the say the Cambridge police are stupid. Of course he must think Americans at large are stupid as will if he believes they are going to buy his health care plan based on so few details.
He say doing nothing is not a option. Of course not! No one is saying do nothing. We just want an honest exploration in a way we can understand that does not include the Federal Government controlling every aspect of health care.
He says the problem is that Medicare and Medicaid are busting the Federal budget. Exactly! So expanding them to include all medical care is the answer? I don’t think so.
He said the problem was too many tests. Hello? Defensive Medicine? How about a little tort reform?
Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Question for you- should a car insurance company be forced to take you on and pay for your accident damage AFTER the accident?
Posted by: drjohn
===========================================
So you think a woman with a history of breast cancer should be treated as a car wreck? It’s okay for health insurance companies to deny that woman, and her daughters, insurance because she poses a risk?
Thank you for making the case how immoral conservatives are.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
He said the problem was too many tests. Hello? Defensive Medicine? How about a little tort reform?
Posted by: Terry | Jul 22, 2009 10:55:41 PM
___________________________________
When pigs fly.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
“Do you think — do you accept the premise that other than some tax increases on the wealthiest Americans, the American people are going to have to give anything up in order for this to happen?”
Well, Jake. You uh see it’s uh like this. Uh, hit it Gibbsy!
“The head-bone’s connected to the neck-bone, the neck-bone’s connected to the back-bone.
The back-bone’s connected to the thigh-bone, the thigh-bone’s connected to the knee-bone.
The knee-bone’s connected to the leg-bone, the leg-bone’s connected to the foot bone.
Oh hear the word of the Lord!”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
How about a little tort reform?
Posted by: Terry
====================================
Ah. That urban myth again, “tort reform”.
Reform tort all you want, but you will have only addressed 0.49% of health-care spending. After all, *including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts*, the cost of the suits comes to less than one-half of 1 percent of health-care spending.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Hi Willem van Oranje
Actually cancer outcomes are about the same between the US and Canada. But that is mainly because the really sick Canadians pack a bag and head for the US to get life saving treatment on their own dime. The US provides a valuable safety valve for the Canadian system. When that is gone, the short-comings of national health care will be come more apparent.
Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
We have the best health care system in the world. A leader would have acknowledged that fact and praised the professionals who serve in this field. Can it be improved, of course it can. This President is going to kill the opportunity to improve the system, by trying to forcing Government run health care on a center right majority who will not let it stand. Tonight he dodged the question….will you force those on the Congressional plan into the superior system you are fighting for. Mr Tapper push this question!! Everything the public needs to know is in the answer to this question.
Posted by: Ralph | July 22, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
“Isn’t that what generic drugs do? What is this red pill, blue pill tap dance?”
Red and blue, Crips and Bloods, Republicans and Democrats.
Isn’t he cuuute? Don’t you hate it when in a supposedly-grown man, in a supposedly-somewhat-serious position, stoops — during the primaries — to cute, then goes on to prove that’s ALL he can do?
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Hi Willem van Oranje
You say that tort reform would only save .49 pct of the total bill. Is that only in payouts, or does that also include all the unnecessary testing done in defensive medicine? Let’s at least be honest with our figures.
Posted by: Terry | July 22, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
The thing lots of people don’t like about President Obama is that he actually is intelligent and articulate. Some people prefer the ‘gosh shucks, we gonna smoke him out’ gibberish of a Bush or a Palin.
This was an articulate session with generous amounts of information for people to digest. A substantial individual and a substantial presentation despite the cat calling from the ideologically single minded.
Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
His very first sentence is so dishonest, I left the rest of it as fast as I would walk away from a con-man at the corner.
There are some sound suggestions out there if he and Congress would be willing to listen, from the Mayo Clinic to Governors like Bobby Jindal.
I had the sense around December that perhaps we had already seen Obama’s greatest moment: Nov. 4 Election Day might be his history-setting pinnacle and it would be all downhill from there. For Goodness’ sake, President Obama, prove my notion wrong. Start here. Start now. Reset.
Posted by: Carol | July 22, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Terry:”Is that only in payouts, or does that also include all the unnecessary testing done in defensive medicine? Let’s at least be honest with our figures.”
You should check out some of the CBO’s work, “The Effects of Tort Reform:
Evidence from the States” is a good place to start. States that DO have limits on malpractice cases do NOT show statistically significant reductions in ‘defensive medicine.’ The research on this is pretty solid, thanks to the fact that you can crunch the data from US states that have implemented tort reform and compare it to demographically similar states that have not.
Obama is also guilty of pushing this fallacy. Every time the data has been crunched, the reality is that billions of dollars WON’T be saved just by reining in ambulance chasers.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Ralph:”We have the best health care system in the world.”
It costs literally twice as much per person as all the other first world nations, does not provide superior life expectancy, nor is it rated higher by the citizens it serves, but Ralph insists it’s the best in the world so it has that going for it.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
He said the problem was too many tests. Hello? Defensive Medicine?
Posted by: Terry
==========================================
Just read Jo schwarz story in this thread. They dianosed her with 6 different test – some of them very expensive – were typically 3 are enough, especially since the treatment turned out to be chemotherapy.
To give you an analogy, it’s like they first photographed every rooftile in Nagasaki with high-res satelite imagery to get a precise location where to drop the atom bomb. They could have used a simple map of the region to get the same results instead.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Terry:”But that is mainly because the really sick Canadians pack a bag and head for the US to get life saving treatment on their own dime. The US provides a valuable safety valve for the Canadian system. ”
Citation please. All the research I have seen indicates that is just a flat out lie (although at times the Canadian health system will actually pay for its citizens to get served in the US).
Life threatening conditions get top priority in Canada, hence the few month wait to get tennis elbow or a bad back dealt with.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
“His very first sentence is so dishonest, I left the rest of it as fast as I would walk away from a con-man at the corner.”
_______________________________________
There’s your problem right there Carol, judging someone on their first sentence and then being so intellectually generous as to walk away and condemn the man.
Either that or you’re being intellectually dishonest in your first sentence.
That type of approach to understanding and evaluating someone, or their policies, is pretty darn lame.
Press you own reset button.
Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
“If you call unemployed well-to-do, than I guess I am very, very well-to-do. I used my savings to pay for my health insurance and I would rather to do that than have it free and have to wait for care. Any day of the week.”
It’s an unpleasant fact of American life that having savings, and health insurance worth keeping up, is a situation of unimaginable financial privilege to millions. upon. millions. of Americans — whose plight is determinedly UNmentioned in Obama’s blabla about seizing the medical system under the guise of “insurance reform”.
You know what fabulously, immensely well-off people — call their situation, if they can bring themselves to comment at all on a subject so crass, and so taboo?
“Comfortable”. :^)
Posted by: Bet Noir | July 22, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Concerned in OH:”Conservatives aren’t the ones proposing doing a cost-benefit analysis on people’s lives to see if a certain procedure is “cost effective” enough.”
Amazing how if you fear monger hard enough you go all the way around to a naivete that would make a liberal scoff. If every person in America were given an MRI that was closely examined by a professional, lives would be saved. At a cost of hundreds of millions of dollar (representing many lifetimes of human labor) each.
So I suppose you are in favor of an immediate government program costing trillions to get those MRIs done, right? After all, how can you put a price on a human life?
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
He said the problem was too many tests. Hello? Defensive Medicine? How about a little tort reform?
Hear, hear.
Posted by: poncou | July 22, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Ah. That urban myth again, “tort reform”.
Reform tort all you want, but you will have only addressed 0.49% of health-care spending. After all, *including legal fees, insurance costs, and payouts*, the cost of the suits comes to less than one-half of 1 percent of health-care spending.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | Jul 22, 2009 11:06:28 PM
_________________________________
And of course you have the numbers on extra tests ordered to avoid these law suits.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Willem, welcome back. Long time, no read.
Don’t want to bog down in dueling studies, but I think you have cherry-picked the one study that claims Canada has higher breast cancer survivability rates than America. The Lancet study says the US has the best breast cancer survivability rate in the world.
Now canada’s survivability rate is probably going up now at least in part because in 2004, a class action lawsuit was filed in canada on behalf of all the women who were having to wait unacceptably long times (over 8 weeks) to enter radiation therapy for breast cancer. At that time, over 6.5 million dollars canadian had been spent by the canadian govts sending canadian women to america for treatment, and 8000 women were sent to the us for treatment in 2000. This does not include the women who came to the US for treatment on their own. Since then the situation has improved, but it has cost the canadian govt. billions (yes, with a b) of dollars to reduce wait times. And wait times are key to survivability where cancer is involved. The sooner you are diagnosed, the sooner you begin treatment, the better your chances of surviving are.
So I’m sorry, but I am skeptical of the data you cite. If it is true, congrats to Canada. But it is not enough to convince me the canadian system is better.
Posted by: moderate | July 22, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Obama’s plan: a third-rate VA that has no doctors OR hospitals — just paperwork.
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Conservatives aren’t the ones proposing doing a cost-benefit analysis on people’s lives to see if a certain procedure is “cost effective” enough.
Posted by: Concerned in OH
===========================================
And that’s why you end up paying twice as much with substandard results.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy:”And of course you have the numbers on extra tests ordered to avoid these law suits.”
? How hard is this to comprehend:
1. Some states HAVE IMPLEMENTED TORT REFORM.
2. Data from those states do not show a reduction in diagnostic costs.
3. Hence the CBO, repeatedly, has been forced to conclude tort reform is not a magic bullet to cut costs.
Obama has (erroneously) advanced tort reform as one way to pay for his health plan. I though you’d be eager to point out that he is exaggerating on this point (reality doesn’t always have a liberal agenda).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
72 % of Americans favor the creation of a public plan because the system is broken. Some in congress want to go home for three weeks and maybe take up healthcare reform when they get back. In those three weeks:
143,250 people will loose their health insurance
53,507 people will file for bankruptcy because they can’t pay their medical bills
1,265 people will die because they lack adequate healthcare
The truth is that most of us are a pink-slip and an illness away from loosing everything we have worked our whole lives for. And some republicans and blue-dog democrats want us to keep playing that crap game with our lives. And they will use any trick or tell any lie to accomplish that goal.
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 22, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
I had the sense around December that perhaps we had already seen Obama’s greatest moment: Nov. 4 Election Day
Posted by: Carol | Jul 22, 2009 11:14:10 PM
__________________________________
Nah, it was definitely in January when he danced with Michelle while Beyonce sang “At Last” in the background.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 22, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Terry: “Let’s at least be honest with our figures.”
Terry: “But that is mainly because the really sick Canadians pack a bag and head for the US to get life saving treatment on their own dime.”
=========================================
I want figures from peer-reviewed journals, you’ve got those? Or are you just spouting right-wing talking-points?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 22, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
It’s sad to see a presient lying in order to promote legislation that will harm most people and help very few. He’s a dishonest man, as we now know, and if there is any delay between now and when this deceitful program comes up to a vote, the widom of the people will have worked its way, and it will be defeated.
He is harmed by having been untruthful about it from the beginning.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | July 22, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
“Nah, it was definitely in January when he danced with Michelle while Beyonce sang “At Last” in the background.”
Tee-hee: the bedspread prom dress! With the trippy train! Thanks for the giggle at bedtime.
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Radiation Wait Times Canada
British Columbia: .9 weeks
Manitoba: 1 week
Newfoundland: within 30 days
Prince Edward Island: 1.6 weeks
Alberta: 4 weeks
Quebec: less than 4 weeks
Canadian Institute of Health Information
(2008)
Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
72 % of Americans favor the creation of a public plan because the system is broken. Some in congress want to go home for three weeks and maybe take up healthcare reform when they get back. In those three weeks:
143,250 people will loose their health insurance
53,507 people will file for bankruptcy because they can’t pay their medical bills
1,265 people will die because they lack adequate healthcare
The truth is that most of us are a pink-slip and an illness away from loosing everything we have worked our whole lives for.
How can Jake Tapper ask if we are willing to sacrifice this crap-shoot of a healthcare system?
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 22, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
“Two things. First, that was an awfull lot of tests: physical examination; a mammogram; an ultrasound; a biopsy; an MRI; and a PET-scan? That’s really overkill from what you’ve written, especially since you are receiving chemotherapy and no surgery.
Typically: physical examination, mammogram and biopsy are enough. Especially when the treatment is chemotherapy. MRI is more and more included when the mammogram is inconclusive but an ultrasound and PET-scan? Seriously?”
You know what, I agree with you. I said the same thing. The mammogram is standard procedure when they find lumps, but the mammogram did not show a lump. It only showed specs of calcification. The ulrta-sound showed the lump. The Dr. ordered an MRI so could know what they could get a better idea of what they were looking for surgery. The PET scan is to know if the cancer had spread to other parts of my body since it was in my lymph-nodes that means it could have migrated to the brain, the lung or God knows where-else. It did not or at least no showing, that is why the chemo is necessary before surgery. I have high-grade invasive cancer.
The mammogram was semi-useless in my case, but it is the first step before they pay for the more accurate and expensive MRI. All those test had their merits. Not one of them was useless.
Posted by: jo schwarz | July 22, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
I thought Mr. Tapper asked an excellent question, and that it was hilarious when another reporter (i’m blanking out on whom, but then the presser did make me doze off toward the end) asked the same question, basically, all over again, since the president didn’t really answer it the first time.
So all we have to do is eliminate all those pesky unnecessary tests and procedures those greedy doctors do and all will be well (I exaggerate, before someone else points it out)? It’s called defensive doctoring and if there is no tort reform, it will not go away.
I have not experienced test-happy doctors myself. Unfortunately, I have have had a lot of exposure to the health care system of late, having spent a night in the emergency room last week and having had a thallium stress test (which I ‘flunked’) from my cardiologist a few days later. There were no duplication of tests between the hospital, my internist, and my cardiologist. They shared the results they had– and the president has been pushing the electronic medical records, so surely he’s already licked that pesky “duplication of tests” problem. There were no long waits for appointments or tests, since I had a potentially urgent problem. Like Jo, I have no complaints about my health care or my insurance. And I would like to keep it that way.
Tort reform and letting individuals and small businesses be pooled in larger groups for purchasing health insurance– those two moves would make a tremendous difference.
Posted by: moderate | July 22, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta: How is the president’s going to “harm most people and help very few?” Do you have specifics or are you just spouting?
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 22, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
moderate:” It’s called defensive doctoring and if there is no tort reform, it will not go away.”
Why does “defensive medicine” still exist in states that DO HAVE TORT REFORM (including tight caps on both punitive and non-economic damages)? Why, specifically, do you reject the CBO’s repeat analysis on this subject?
Posted by: jhw539 | July 22, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Danita, why on earth do you keep redundantly posting Canadian wait times as if they are strengthening your argument for a single-payer system like canada? If I lived in British Columbia and had to wait 9 weeks for radiotherapy to begin, I would be on a plane to the US pretty darn quick. Yes, there are short wait times in some place for some procedures and therapies and long wait times in other places for other therapies and procedures. So?
Posted by: moderate | July 22, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
moderate . ..
“Danita, why on earth do you keep redundantly posting Canadian wait”
You must not be feeling well moderate. You were just posting old Canadian wait times – so I responded with updated information.
And I’m worried about your eye sight too.
That is .9 weeks or British Columbia, in other words 9/10 of a week. Not 9 weeks.
Posted by: danita | July 22, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
moderate”
Under the healthcare plan, if you like your current healthcare arrangement you can keep it. So what is the problem? Do you just not care about the nearly 22,000 people who die every year because they don’t have access to your system? What is your response to the nearly 1M people who file bankruptcy every year because they can’t pay their medical bills. And with our job-based system in this slumping economy, what advice do you have for the nearly 2.5M people who will loose their insurance this year? What is your solution?
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 22, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
“The PET scan is to know if the cancer had spread to other parts of my body since it was in my lymph-nodes that means it could have migrated to the brain, the lung or God knows where-else.”
The kind of creepy protocol for breast cancer is that a biopsy IS surgery.
In other words, to determine whether it’s something you might want NOT to stir up, they STIR it up. It’s a dilemma.
Posted by: Bet | July 22, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
How can the president say, with a straight face, “you haven’t seen me out there blaming republicans” when he did just that in his opening statement? I have seen him blaming Republicans, when actually there is opposition to the bills as currently circulating not only among Republicans but also Democrats.
Posted by: moderate | July 23, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
moderate…NOT
The President did not “blame” republicans in his opening statement. He pointed out a fact that some republicans are working against any healthcare reform because they want to “break” Obama. To hell with the American people, if they can win a political battle.
Speaking of “to hell with the American people,” you still haven’t answered my questions.
Do you just not care about the nearly 22,000 people who die every year because they don’t have access to your system? What is your response to the nearly 1M people who file bankruptcy every year because they can’t pay their medical bills. And with our job-based system in this slumping economy, what advice do you have for the nearly 2.5M people who will loose their insurance this year? What is your solution?
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 23, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
moderate . ..
“How can the president say, with a straight face, “you haven’t seen me out there blaming republicans” when he did just that in his opening statement?”
moderate he was responding within the context of a question on getting health care passed, not the economy . …
And if you’re going to be fair, the President seldom attributes the economy and the deficit he inherited to ‘the Republicans’. He didn’t even mention the Republicans in his opening statement.
Posted by: danita | July 23, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
moderate .
Just sniping and carping, aren’t you?
Posted by: FairIsFair22 | July 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Hi jhw,
Not only the patients come here, but a lot of Canadian doctors and nurses come here to practice, preferring the US system to the Canadian system, causing doctor shortages and longer wait times in Canada. Private health care is now a booming growth industry in Canada, people preferring to pay out of their own pockets to escape the government system. The more well to do and those near the boarder just head south. You would too, if you were really sick and wanted the best care possible quickly…
Of course under the plan being considered in the house, both you and the doctor would be eventually be federal criminals if you pay for your own health care. They will need everyone in the government system to even begin to balance the books.
Don’t even think about getting old or you will get the dreaded “pain pill” instead of a hip-replacement.
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
barely mentions them at all . . .
Posted by: danita | July 23, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Dr. Diane Normandin learned that the hard way.
A graduate of Montreal’s McGill University, Normandin moved to Clearwater in 1994 because she thought U.S. doctors had more freedom.
But she spent an inordinate amount of time trying to tell whether a patient’s insurance covered visits to a particular lab or specialist.
“You had maybe five minutes with the patient but 20 minutes of paperwork and the ridiculous sorting out of where the patient could go,” says Normandin, who needed six employees to handle the workload. “It was crazy.”
In 2003 she went back to Canada and opened a family practice near Montreal. Now she has one employee.
Posted by: danita | July 23, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Hi JO SCHWARZ
I’m really happy to hear you were cured of your cancer with our really limited health care system.
As for the making of babies, I’m afraid I can’t approve. Are you at all aware of the unfunded liability a baby represents to the Government Health Care system, a lifetime of medical care and all, possible illness, accidents, etc. We will definitely have to limit the making of babies if we are going to control costs. That’s why birth control will be such an important part of our program.
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Hi Danita,
If a doctor has a problem with billing, he hires a medical billing company to do his billing, or someone on his staff to do the work. That way he has more time for patients, and someone else has a job with medical benefits. Problem solved.
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Hi U.S.A. Citizen
You quoted: “Obama Health Bill: Those on Social Security – Mandatory Counseling on Assisted Suicide”
Well of course. You did know that the “pain pill” Mr. Obama has mentioned several times is just a euphemism, didn’t you?
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Error correction on link to an interview with Betsy McCaughey, former Lt . Gov . of NY,
Obama Health Bill: Those on Social Security – Mandatory Counseling on Assisted Suicide
click this link: http://tinyurl.com/mcmq6h On Page 425 of Obama’s health care bill, the Federal Government will require EVERYONE who is on Social Security to undergo a counseling session every 5 years with the objective being that they will explain to them just how to end their own life earlier . Yes . . . They are going to push SUICIDE to cut medicare spending!!!
Posted by: U.S.A. citizen | July 23, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
The President basically said health care would cost nothingto anyone and would actually save us all money overall, except for the wealthy people.
It is simply not realistic to believe you can add 50 million people to the health care industry as an entitlement, and there will be a net savings.
The President should shoot straight with everyone and deal with the cost of this…instead, he has Congress write the bill so he can say later ‘ I’ll veto it it if raises taxes for anyone but ‘wealthy’ people’.
Posted by: J House | July 23, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Just take the red pill already!
Posted by: beetfeet | July 23, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am
It is the height of I-bama ignorance and arrogance for him to state that physicians do not look at previous testing that patients have had in trying to determine the cause of symptoms. My God, he speaks as though going to more than one specialist is an example of physicians and hospitals “not coordinating enough.” If you are the person experiencing intractable pain or losing your balance and falling to the ground, you would go to the ends of the earth to find out what’s wrong and then seek a remedy. And most physicians will do likewise for their patients. And what point was he trying to make with the sore throat example? He essentially stated that physicians will bypass treating a sore throat medically to make more money by doing a tonsillectomy. What? And, damn it, what’s wrong with the WH press corps. The questions were limp and unchallenging. Has anybody noticed that this man doesn’t know what in God’s name he’s talking about? And if he’s not blathering, he’s whining about being criticized. He protests, “It’s not about me.” I say the lady doth protest too much. It is all about him and his desire to shove this onto the backs of the American people just to say he did it. We currently have the best health care in the world. Does it have problems administratively? Sure. They can be fixed without destroying it, rationing it or socializing it. He’s on a path to do all three. And you’ll note, he still would not give a definitive answer as to whether he and his family would participate in such a health care plan. After all, as he so humbly stated, “I’m the president.” What a nightmare, and it’s just beginning!
Posted by: liam | July 23, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am
I hope Jake enjoyed his question not being answered. My goodness, that was the most bizarre so-called press conference I have ever witnessed. What a bumbling, incoherent loon our TOTUS is. He did not answer one question, and basically stumbled and bumbled his way through. Kind of like he smoked pot or something prior to the press conference.
Can we all just have the blue and red pill now, please? Maybe that will take away the pain that we have elected an absolute idiot as our president.
Posted by: TxBoB | July 23, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am
One wonders if Obama has ever been to a doctor.
The press conference was the biggest blah,blah,blah in the history of Presidential press conferences.
The reporters questions were terrible.
Do you guys just read White House press releases then tailor your questions to their PR?
Jake, you seem to be getting soft in your questioning. Nothing pointed, direct…just through him some wordy question that he can´t remember and does not answer.
Posted by: sally j | July 23, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am
The White House hopes people tuned in for the knock-out opening statement…and then turned the TV off for the very wonkish and uninspiring Q&A.
Posted by: matt | July 23, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am
President Obama pulled a Fonzie last night.
Remember when Fonzie jumped the shark tank on “Happy Days”? After that show the ratings fell to the ground. The show sucked from then on in.
Barry jumped the shark tank last night!!!
Posted by: American Infidel | July 23, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
The President did not “blame” republicans in his opening statement. He pointed out a fact that some republicans are working against any healthcare reform because they want to “break” Obama.
****WRONG! He pointed out Republicans and again blamed the Bush Admin for him inheriting this mess even though his party has been in control of Congress since then end of 2006! Second- HE SAID HE heard a Republican say those words—really? He HEARD THIS? Did anyone that is not stuck up his rear hear these “alleged” comments as well? If so, please stand up, if not then shut up about it because there is no proof to back your accusation so that you can further push your political propganda to destroy America because you and your wife cannot stand America!***
Do you just not care about the nearly 22,000 people who die every year because they don’t have access to your system? What is your response to the nearly 1M people who file bankruptcy every year because they can’t pay their medical bills. And with our job-based system in this slumping economy, what advice do you have for the nearly 2.5M people who will loose their insurance this year? What is your solution? Posted by: FairIsFair22 | Jul 23, 2009 12:14:54 AM
***FairIsFair22: Here is my answer to your question: Why push this through without reading it properly and then screwing tens-of-millions of Americans over? Why not be responsible and read through the bill, make sure it is in the best interest of ALL AMERICANS and bring it to a vote say in October or November?
I hate to break it to you, but ramming this through in August is not going to change much, if any of what you have mentioned above-it is a sad fact but it will not!
Second: The GOVERNMENT DOES NOT need to get into the health care business-period! They need to pass strict laws so that insurance companies cannot keep screw over Americans by jacking up the prices and denying care, but we see how well the government operates and business like: Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Housing and the VA Hospitals.
All one has to do is look at just the RECENT issues over the last 6 months to come out of the VA hospitals to know what I am talking about.
10,000 Vets from three states had to be notified because the VA hospitals exposed them to HIV and Hepatitis. 96/111 cancer patients received botched treatements from ONE doctor in ONE VA hospital who then tried to cover it up. ABC just this past April aired and printed (look on line) about how filthy, health hazard and poorly ran the VA hospitals are.
Most recently-last week a 22-year old Air Force soldier went in to a VA hospital for a routine gal bladder surgery and came out losing his legs because the Surgeon screwed up.
Here is the best part (not in a good way)-because of the current law in place, he nor his family can sue the government for what they did to this poor YOUNG man!
I await your responses!
Posted by: kmday | July 23, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Tapper to Obama: “. . . When you describe health care reform, you don’t — understandably, you don’t talk about the sacrifices that Americans might have to make. . .”.
Why, Mr. Tapper, is it understandable that he doesn’t talk about this. Oh, it’s all about politics and getting a bill passed to buck up the President’s cred, right?
What would be understandable? Perhaps, Obama might actually tell the truth to people in straight forward language, not rambling rhetoric.
But Obama can’t do that because either the reality of what’s going to happen under the government run healthcare plan is too horrible to contemplate; or, telling the truth simply is not a capability Obama possesses.
I vote for the latter.
Posted by: Greyledge Gal | July 23, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Posted by: danita | Jul 23, 2009 12:16:24 AM….And if you’re going to be fair, the President seldom attributes the economy and the deficit he inherited to ‘the Republicans’. He didn’t even mention the Republicans in his opening statement.=================================Ummmmmmm woooohooooo——earth to Danita…….did you watch the same BS the rest of us did? He again said he Inherited this mess and he pointed to Republicans—TWICE. A friggin reporter even called him out on it asking him how he can blame Repbulicans like he did in his opening statement when HE WAS THE FRIGGIN SUPER MAJORITY!!!!
Good Grief it is one thing to be soo far up your party’s but you cannot see straight, but to blatantly LIE about what he said when everyone and their mother heard it is, well just IGNORANCE at its finest.
Danita——please go back and listen to just his opening statement and then get back to us. Obama would not even acknowledge the fact that many in his OWN friggin party do not like his bill!!!!!
Posted by: kmday | July 23, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
kmday:”even though his party has been in control of Congress since then end of 2006! ”
It is a documented fact that Republicans in the Senate have set two records for filibusters – 2007 and 2008. Almost DOUBLE the number Democrats ever, in the history of Congress, did. Republicans put in place the current failed system, and Republicans resorted to over 4 times more filibusters in a single year than over the entire 19th century (which saw the battles over slavery) combined to protect that failed system. Sorry if verifiable reality does not support your bumpersticker argument.
“The GOVERNMENT DOES NOT need to get into the health care business-period! They need to pass strict laws so that insurance companies cannot keep screw over Americans by jacking up the prices and denying care,”
That is, in fact, getting into the health care business. Although in a way that will do nothing to deal with the ER-as-health-plan problem that is bleeding our hospitals dry.
“All one has to do is look at just the RECENT issues over the last 6 months to come out of the VA hospitals to know what I am talking about. ”
And people have been left to die lying on the floor of private hospital waiting rooms. Anecdotal evidence, and holding up a system bled dry by Republican’s ‘starve the beast’ anti-government strategy is not very convincing.
The documented FACT is every other first world nation has government involved in healthcare. The documented FACT is every other first world nation spends less, on average half as much, than America on healthcare. The documented FACT is that every other first world nation has equivalent or longer expectancy.
I do not hold my Constitutional government, which has resulted in the most prosperous free nation mankind has ever seen, in such contempt as to believe they can not do as well as France, or Switzerland, or even Spain in the area of health care.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
The president “acted stupidly” last night.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 23, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
OBAMA: “They’re going to have to give up paying for things that don’t make them healthier.”
In the context of this press conference, President Obama was specifically talking about things doctors do, i.e., duplicative tests. But since preventative healthcare is going to be such an intregal part of the public option, could President Obama have actually been speaking in a more comprehensive context? Could he also be warning us that we may have to stop eating junk food, sweets or even possibly red meat; stop drinking sodas; stop buying non-green products, etc.?
Posted by: James Danley | July 23, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Terry:”Don’t even think about getting old or you will get the dreaded “pain pill” instead of a hip-replacement.”
Funny you mention hip-replacements, as people often like to highlight that the US has low wait times for a new hip versus the dreaded Canada. Of course, in the US the majority of those quick and efficient hip replacements are paid for by… Medicare. The government health care system.
Your comment about a growing private healthcare system is obvious considering it was only 2005 when such an industry was made legal by the Canadian Supreme Court striking down a law banning it. Of course it’s growing, four years ago it was zero!
Hardly an indictment against government care, the growth of private insurance along a well-entrenched total public option clearly demonstrates that the Republican argument that government health care would drive all private firms out of business is just another lie to try to stop any change through their fear, uncertainty and doubt obstructionism.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Terry:”If a doctor has a problem with billing, he hires a medical billing company to do his billing, or someone on his staff to do the work. That way he has more time for patients, and someone else has a job with medical benefits. Problem solved.”
What a genius. I’m sure NO ONE has EVER tried that. And insurance companies NEVER require the accredited physician to provide the rationale for treatment, in detail, on forms X2, TRT7, and MP1a (in triplicate, or they will just be forced to delay payment/increase their profit that quarter).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
James Danley:”Could he also be warning us that we may have to stop eating junk food, sweets or even possibly red meat; stop drinking sodas; stop buying non-green products, etc.?”
Has government health care in ever other first world nation EVER resulted in that? Even once? Heck, under most government health care system you can even get cheaper cigarettes (albeit with huge warning labels on them)!
Why do you believe that your government is uniquely incompetent, when the fact is the government our Founding Fathers put in place has resulted in the most prosperous free country and sole superpower remaining in the world?
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Hi jhw,
If ever get hospitalized under Obamacare, just remember, take the green pill, but not the red one…
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Terry:”If ever get hospitalized under Obamacare, just remember, take the green pill, but not the red one…”
Is that your cute way of saying you have no rebuttal to the documented facts I laid out, yet deign to have reality impact your opinion in any way?
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 23, 2009 9:06:38 AM
Here is my response so pay attention: My point with the government getting into health care was with perspective do running it, not making sure insurance companies do not screw us. I am pretty sure there is a huge difference.
***France/Spain/Sweden ALSO do not INSURE ILLEGAL ALIENS, or do they? Do they have approx. 20 MILLION illegal aliens who are bilking their system more than they are paying in???? I am very interested to know the answer to this.
I should be noted that Sweden is a country of approx. only 10 million people—–We have MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS than they have people all together!
Spain’s population is 40 million—they are about double what we have in ILLEGAL immigrants.
France’s population in 2008-according to the French Journal France’s overall population — comprising mainland France and overseas territories — totalled 63.753 million on January 1, 2008, swelling by 400,000 since the previous year.
So let me get this straight…….all three of these country’s are suffering financial burderns because of health care and their COMBINED total of citizens do not even equal half of ours. That one of the country’s you mentioned has less citizens than we have ILLEGAL immigrants.
Please tell me this is not the basis for your argument!
We are expected to insure double what these three country’s have combined with less coming in because of the close to 20 million illegal and you do not see the problem with your statement?
Do some research before you start throwing out France, Spain, Sweden etc…etc…etc…. they cannot sustain their own population with having financial difficulties!
I have to head out for a meeting now so that I can work harder, to make more money so Obama can take it and give it to those unwilling to work or who are here illegally!!!
Posted by: kmday | July 23, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
jhw,
do you ever disagree with obama or his policies? I have never seen anyone defend every word or action coming out of another human. seriously, it’s like obama can do no wrong in your eyes. i’m glad france, spain, etc have gov’t run healthcare. Good for them…but we’re NOT france, spain, etc. if you love them so much…move. the gov’t has yet to run anything without turning it into a large money pit…you should be able to admit that…and believe that because obama is in the WH, things will change is quite naïve. Do we need some kind of reform? yes, but it doesn’t involve the gov’t actually running our healthcare. Do you honestly believe that these people actually know what they’re doing? Do you think that they know what’s best for you in regards to healthcare? Do i think the current insurance companies know all of the answers? no, but they’ve been in the business for quite some time and appear to be pretty successful…as opposed to medicare. personally, i do not care who lives in what mansion as long as i can afford what i need and it does it’s job. i didn’t have healthcare until i was 25 by choice. sure, there are people out there who want healthcare, but can’t afford it. my fiancé is one of them…but she’s just as opposed to this plan as I am. shocking that someone who could benefit from this bill is actually against it, right? well, some people can see the big picture. You know, if they REALLY wanted to ensure that people could keep their current coverage, why not just open clinics around the nation and issue those who cannot afford insurance their own little card. That way, illegals wouldn’t be allowed into the clinics and those who really NEED it can have access. juat a thought.
Posted by: stdntDrvr | July 23, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Hot stock tip: buy into hospice companies soon to become a serious growth business under Obamacare…
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
kmday:”France/Spain/Sweden ALSO do not INSURE ILLEGAL ALIENS, or do they? Do they have approx. 20 MILLION illegal aliens who are bilking their system more than they are paying in???? I am very interested to know the answer to this.”
Yes, France and Spain certainly do have a significant illegal alien problem. And the US does not have 20 million illegal aliens bilking the system. The most reputable studies (Current Population Survey, National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation, Kaiser Family Foundation) indicate 9.7 million of the uninsured are immigrants, and that includes legal immigrant. The best guess is that half of those are illegal, but clearly your 20 million number is at best a wild exageration. That you have to fabricate false support for your opinion makes it look very weak.
“all three of these country’s are suffering financial burderns because of health care and their COMBINED total of citizens do not even equal half of ours. ”
? No, they are not suffering financial burdens due to healthcare like the US. They are spending less than half as much PER CAPITA (that means per person, so the populations are normalized out) than the US is. And their life expectancy is longer than the US (by years in one case, despite having higher smoking rates).
“Please tell me this is not the basis for your argument!”
The basis of my argument is documented facts pulled for a variety of publicly available and verifiable sources. And yours?
“We are expected to insure double what these three country’s have combined with less coming in because of the close to 20 million illegal and you do not see the problem with your statement? ”
Ah, your argument is based on a lie about 20 million illegal aliens that is supported by no reputable studies, and is in fact contradicted by every one of them. I’ll stick to reality. Thanks.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
As I said before, millions are losing their healthcare coverage-
why, because they are now unemployed.
Let me be clear, people cannot afford their health care-
why, because they are now unemployed.
Where are the jobs Mr. President?
Posted by: beetfeet | July 23, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
stdntDrvr:”do you ever disagree with obama or his policies? ”
Yes I have, publicly and on this board.
“Good for them…but we’re NOT france, spain, etc.”
I believe America is the best nation in the world, and that we can do better than any other in the world.
As you chose to both personally insult my integrity and then insult my country in your first four lines, I don’t see any point in responding further. Good day.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Sarah Palin, Where are you… We need someone with charisma and following equal to Mr. Obama to take him on….
Posted by: Terry | July 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
jhw,
i did not question your integrity, just your loyalty…nor did i insult our country. just stating the facts, as you like to say.
…personally, i would never insult a land that every generation of my family has fought for…nor would i support antyhing that would jeopordize it’s future…but that’s just me.
Posted by: stdntDrvr | July 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
jhw539, just look at what is happening in some states! Some school districts have already banned sodas. Some state legislatures are considering taxing sodas. But to your more specific question, yes some European countries are already denying some medical procedures for smokers. And then Japan has mandated that individuals over 40 must meet specific weight guidelines. If they fail a weight test, then they must pass the next weight test or attend a mandatory class on weight loss. IF the individual’s employer or local community health clinic does not meet their government mandated weight guidelines, then the employer or local community health clinic will be fined.
Medical costs can be dramatically cut if people live healthier lifestyles. Even a caveman (apologies to all you cavemen out there) can see the writing on the wall!
Posted by: James Danley | July 23, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
The president is saying here that Americans are too stupid and passive to avoid wasting time on invasive batteries of tests they’ve already endured.
I’m not about to have three colonoscopies in three weeks just because they’re free.
Posted by: mad | July 23, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I am wondering that when the US was in WWII or Korean War or Viet Nam war or Gulf War I, did the press totally void themselves of asking any questions about the war raging in foreign countries and our military troops being killed and wounded?
The United States is fighting in two wars, people are dying and yet our media feels no need to ask the President questions about these wars. Why is it the media ignores these wars while Obama is President. Could Obama start a new war and the press would never ask him about it? They only ask the questions the President wants to hear?
If the press is not a thorn in the side of any President then they are not doing their job and should quit.
Posted by: Rick Bantsman | July 23, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Jhw539 wrote: “…when the fact is the government our Founding Fathers put in place has resulted in the most prosperous free country and sole superpower remaining in the world?”
I totally agree with that statement. But that was because Capitalism, the Free Market and Individual Freedom has been the cornerstone of the entrepreneurial spirit that fostered the American Dream that so many strive to achieve.
However, the Left is now poised to destroy Capitalism, the Free Market and Individual Freedom with their Socialist agenda. They want to punish success and return the wealth to its “rightful owner,” the poor and middle class. Destroying what made this country the most prosperous free country in the world, by definition will destroy our prosperity and turn the greatest nation on earth to just another third-world country.
Posted by: James Danley | July 23, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
However, the Left is now poised to destroy Capitalism, the Free Market and Individual Freedom with their Socialist agenda. They want to punish success and return the wealth to its “rightful owner,” the poor and middle class.
Posted by: James Danley | Jul 23, 2009 11:31:10 AM
____________________________________
Don’t forget they will continue to be the elite class to rule over the masses. Bread lines for thee, but not for me.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 23, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
I’d like someone to ask him why TORT REFORM isn’t part of health care reform. Without it costs cannot ever be controlled.
That conference was thirty minutes of white noise.
Posted by: Melvin_Udall | July 23, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
60 minutes. Very sloppy of me.
Posted by: Melvin_Udall | July 23, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
JWH…..I would also like to know why so many foreigners come to our country for treatment rather than their own if they have such awesome and inexpensive health care.
Typically you see Americans heading over there because they have treatments that our FDA will not approve-in most cases.
Therefore, I await your response as to why they come here versus stay there.
Also-please clarify why tax payes should foot the bill for abortion and euthanasia because they are both included in the bill unless and amendment states otherwise.
With that-this is not a debate on Abortion or euthanasia but merely a logically question as to why legal tax paying american citizens should be forced to pay for some girl/womans abortion or someones “right-to-die” AKA: Take their own life.
If a woman is raped or it is medically necessary to abort is different, so please save that as well as I am for medically necessary abortions just not ones that are used as a means of birth control because they are too lazy to go down to planned parent hood clinics that are on just about every street cornor and pick up a FREE FRIGGIN condom or get on birth control that is free or cost them next-to-nothing.
I, of course await your responses.
Posted by: kmday | July 23, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Jake, after Obama gave you that long-winded, non answer, why didn´t you speak up and tell him he did not answer the question???? Then asked it again in a simpler, direct format?
Has someone told you to lay off the pointed questions? Did Obama promise you an exclusive interview or something to pay you off???
Posted by: James Whitfield | July 23, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
So I finally have a chance to catch up on my web reading and I see that I had some responses to comments I made last night, to which I should respond in turn.
First of all, I must apologize to you, Danita, for not understanding the reason for your post of canadian waiting times and my harsh response to that– I asked “why on earth” you had posted them. sorry about that and thanks for explaining the context of that comment.
In your follow-up, you wrote, “You must not be feeling well moderate. You were just posting old Canadian wait times – so I responded with updated information.”
Now I understand. And you are right, I am not feeling well, as I may have mentioned here before. I should not have been up that late last night making comments, because I was physically and mentally drained. but I could not sleep and I made the mistake of not just reading the internet but posting responses. I should not post under those conditions. Sorry for the confusion. I have spent too much time lately interacting with our health care system, having spent at least part of each weekday for the past two weeks in either a doctor’s office, a medical lab, an emergency room, or a rehabilitation center.
Now I understand that since I had written about wait times for breast cancer treatment and the lawsuit that caused canada to work to reduce them, you responded with the most recent figures available on breast cancer radiation wait times in canada, or at least with general radiation wait times, which would include breast cancer radiation therapy. It does sound as if they have improved, and that is a good thing.
And I completely misread something else you wrote, and responded accordingly. Again, I apologize (yes, sincerely– no snark today). You wrote, “And I’m worried about your eye sight too.
That is .9 weeks or British Columbia, in other words 9/10 of a week. Not 9 weeks.” yes, I responded railing against 9 week wait times for cancer treatment and I was wrong to do so based on this figure. I did not, indeed, notice the decimal point. In my defense, expressing a week in decimal form is a little odd (on the part of canada, not you), since I tend to think of whole weeks and whole days, rather than tenths of weeks. But I guess since they are talking averages, they just express them in this form and I should have read more carefully.
Again, I will try to resist the temptation to comment while drowsy in the future.
Posted by: moderate | July 23, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Good G-d. Can Obama please learn to answer a question?
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
OMG.. Blah blah blah… Talk about a bore..
Posted by: Heidi | July 23, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Again, I will try to resist the temptation to comment while drowsy in the future.
Posted by: moderate | Jul 23, 2009 1:40:02 PM
__________________________________
Now see. That was nice. You’re a good person, moderate. Now get some rest.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 23, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
The only question Mr Obama definitely answered was the one about his buddy at Harvard! You could ask Obama what color the sky is and he would spend 15 minutes answering with out an answer.
Posted by: Al inOhio | July 26, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm