By Gorman Gorman

Jul 16, 2009 10:21am

What’s the Rush? Asks Moderate GOPer Snowe

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf reports: President Obama will try to woo one very important Republican vote for health care reform in a meeting at the White House today. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine is the only Republican in the Senate who has publicly said she could support a government run public health insurance option if the market fails to adequately insure everyone. That’s not exactly on the same page as President Obama and Democrats, who want a public option right off the bat. And in recent weeks, Snowe has veered toward a proposal by the moderate Democrat Kent Conrad to create a series of regional, non-profit insurance co-ops to compete with for-profit insurance companies instead of a public insurance option. But hers will be an extremely important vote if either Sen. Teddy Kennedy, D-Mass., or Sen. Robert Byrd, D-WV, are too ill to make a health care reform vote. Snowe has been locked in intense, closed-door negotiations with Conrad and other moderate Democrats, as well as Republicans like Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, Orrin Hatch of Utah and Mike Enzi of Wyoming in search of a bipartisan plan. But beyond policy, Snowe and other moderates are bristling at the time table set by President Obama – he wants bills passed through the House and Senate before the bodies leave for their August recess on August 7. She told reporters last night that’s probably not enough time. And she pointed to the creation of Medicare in the 1960s, which she said took a lot longer than the time table set out by Democrats this year. Question: President Obama had made it clear to Chairman Baucus that he had wanted a bill this week. A mark. So is that going to happen? SNOWE: A Good one? (laughs). I’m just saying, you  know, I don’t know why there’s this insistence on getting it done yesterday.  You know, I’m telling you, if you use President Johnson’s model on Medicare, for example, it took a year and a half, for good reason…” Hers is a timeline that might be disputed. The Kaiser Family Foundation's timeline on Medicare marks the beginning of the legislative process at the outset of the 89th Congress, just after a Democratic landslide in 1964, to the signing of Medicare in July of 1965, its less time than President Obama has set out. — Z. Byron Wolf

User Comments

*Everybody* should be asking why Obama has set this false deadline.
As I understand it, Democrats are afraid opposition will grow more the longer it takes. So what? If it is good and it is what people want, the Democrats and Obama should be able to convince people more than the opposition can.

Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

The problem is the opposition here has deep pockets. The insurance companies and lobbyists can indefinitely spend millions every day fighting this, when the people who need it and can fight for it have severely limited pockets.

Posted by: Paul | July 16, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Yeah, right Olympia. We’re only fifty years behind the rest of the industrialized world – what’s a few more years. A couple of hundred people dying because they lose insurance or have none to begin with? But, hey, you can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs.
I’ve actually heard that callous comment from a conservative in the healthcare industry. He was serious.
Olympia must be getting some serious pressure from the conservative leadership. She usually shows more sense than this.

Posted by: Tony in Maine | July 16, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Way to go Sen Olympia! It is amazing how every durned thing has become a “crisis” since Jan 20th! The only crisis I see is the empty suit POTUS

Posted by: cgw | July 16, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Team Obama knows that its political capital is going nowhere but down. So this huge, stinking pile must be wrapped up in a pretty bow and shoved under the door before it undergoes scrutiny that will lead to its failure.

Posted by: karo | July 16, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

OLYMPIA SNOWE is NOT a Moderate, she’s a Liberal.

Posted by: Ron | July 16, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Everything needs to get done yesterday. Snowe is a Liberal…she will vote with the Democrats anyways – she is probably grandstanding to see what is the maximum she can get out of it. I think the Congress should not have the power to take such far reaching measures without a national referendum…i do not trust them to take smart decisions or any decision without some vested interest. This “you scratch my back and I will scratch yours” mentality HAS to stop!! They are taking the common people for granted while they live the high life. If they pass a public option WE the people should mandate that all Fed employees and the Congress should be on the same plan. Whats good for the goose should be good for the gander too..

Posted by: vr2009 | July 16, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

The insurance lobbyists who pay the Republicans and many Democrats are only worried about their billions in profits. They could care less about health care for the more than 45,000,000 Americans who have none. What a disgrace in the wealthiest country in the world. It’s about corporate greed, and Senator Snowe should admit it.

Posted by: Luke23 | July 16, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Every day that passes increases the likelihood the American public will figure out this game plan and begin to turn on the anointed one. Much like his stimulus bill, he is trying to push through his agenda as quickly as possible before people can read or understand what is hidden in 1500 pages of pork and socialism. His 15 minutes of fame are quickly fading and he needs to create as much socialism as he can before his adoration wanes.

Posted by: zebhead | July 16, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Maybee, the obvious factor here is that there are elections every two years for House people. If you let this process drag on into the election year, it will at best stall. You can’t take a year and a half to do things in Congress – you can either take a year or three years.

Posted by: David | July 16, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

So Republicans, including Olympia Snowe, think there is no need to rush. Rushing does not mean do a sloppy job. But here’s a good reason to “rush”: Forget the financial, which these Republicans who love to on bended knee, kneeling with an oversize flag, praying so all can see their piety,the reason is to take care of our neighbor, to love our neighbor. When hundreds of thousands lose their homes, go broke, lose all their savings or are simply discarded by “insurance” companies who collect when health is good and who abandon when health declines, when our loved ones suffer for want of minimal health care, that is a reason to act. But I keep forgetting, praying in the streets while keeping one eye open to see if others are fooled by Republican piety, is a Republican “virtue.” You know, the Bill Bennett kind, preach morals while gambling like the Romans at the foot of the Cross.

Posted by: SKVAM | July 16, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

The longer it takes to come up with a sensible, cost effective program, the more time pharmacutical and other deep pocketed lobbying groups have to get the bill changed to favor them and lose the overall savings in a single payer system.

Posted by: Herb | July 16, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Maybee, the obvious factor here is that there are elections every two years for House people. If you let this process drag on into the election year, it will at best stall. You can’t take a year and a half to do things in Congress – you can either take a year or three years.
================
Why?
If it is good and it’s what the people want, Congressmen will want to be able to brag about it to their constituents.
Remember the Iraq war vote that Tom Daschle scheduled at the last minute in Oct 2002? He did that so Congresspeople could go on record just before their elections.

Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Why a timeline? Perhaps because 47 million Americans are without health insurance. Because corporate America has decided that employee health care is a luxury, not a benefit. Because people will die of curable health problems if someone doesn’t act. Or because one in six dollars is spent on health care in America, the most in the world, and the majority goes to profits, paper work, insureres and bloated executive salaries, not to healing people. Cons all believe our problems will go away if we ignore them. They won’t. And if you don’t set deadlines for action, what you have are not goals but dreams.

Posted by: Rky Mtn Patriot | July 16, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

The problem is the opposition here has deep pockets.
==========
The opposition has deep pockets? How much did people contribute to Barack Obama when he was running for President? There are some deep pockets on his side.
Besides, deep pockets are nothing if the health care reform is really what the people want.

Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

It took a a year and a half to produce Medicare… a system that no one is happy with, costs 2.9% of all wages made in this country… that’s an average of $1500/yr per family (according to the US Census Bureau.. which translates to $150,000,000,000 per year) and is on the verge of Bankruptcy… ….. but if it goes Bankrupt then maybe the the taxpayers can bail it out like it did GM or AIG.. ummm huh?.. but I digress.. . WAKE UP AMERICA… Ms Snowe… please hold the line on this socialist blitzkrieg on America

Posted by: JJC | July 16, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

“You know, I’m telling you, if you use President Johnson’s model on Medicare, for example, it took a year and a half, for good reason…” (Snowe)
The Kaiser Family Foundation’s timeline on Medicare marks the beginning of the legislative process at the outset of the 89th Congress, just after a Democratic landslide in 1964, to the signing of Medicare in July of 1965, its less time than President Obama has set out. ”
Wow. So even a so-called “RINO” is blatantly lying to push the false “rushed” party line.
Healthcare has been on the docket for almost six months now. That’s rushed? You can have a baby in less time than the Republicans insist is required to talk healthcare reform to death.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 16, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

The president cannot afford to lose Snowe.

Posted by: matt | July 16, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

zebhead:”Much like his stimulus bill, he is trying to push through his agenda as quickly as possible before people can read or understand what is hidden in 1500 pages of pork and socialism.”
Ah yes, the terribly porky stimulus bill. Which, after months to thoroughly digest it, Republicans are bitterly complaining that it is not dispersing funds quickly enough. (And that is in great part due to the review mechanisms in place to minimize waste and fraud.)
What happened to saving that mouse in Pelosi’s district? Or that rail line to Las Vegas? Why is it that now the money is being spent we don’t hear them trying to pass off the blatant lies and innuendos they shamelessly spread over the several weeks the stimulus was beat out?
Senator Snowe is clearly shown to be lying in her attempt to claim this is rushed. The Republican party has been clearly proven by the funds actual disbursement to have been lying during the stimulus debate. I’m not sure why anyone believes a word they say at this point.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 16, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Well Mr.Wolf, your final paragraph makes it clear which side of the issue you’re on. Do you promote all of Obama’s policies equally, or is this one at the top of your personal agenda?
Perhaps it’s me that is confused. Although this web page is under the ‘News’ tab, the url reads ‘blogs.abcnews.com’ so I guess the line between news and opinion pieces/advocacy is blurred here. But that’s nothing new for ABC is it?
TXPatriot512

Posted by: TXPatriot512 | July 16, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“A couple of hundred people dying because they lose insurance or have none to begin with?”
And you have facts to prove that these people would live except for not having health INSURANCE?
Stupid. Health insurance is not health care. No one is turned away from an ER! We are simply talking about how to pay for it. THAT should be very, very carefully looked at and studied before making any lasting decisions.
All you have is vague claims to try to scare people into making rash decisions before they get a chance to think about it.

Posted by: Toby | July 16, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

We need healthcare reform NOW! If you are one of the 25% who are too narrow minded and foolish to realize it – thank GOD this is a democracy. I have adequate health insurance. But I’m not blind to the millions of my fellow Americans who don’t. America is not a socialist nation but it is also not a greedy, neighbor raping, diehard capitalist nation, either.

Posted by: Nichole | July 16, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Rockymtnpatriot, their might be 47 mil in America with no insurance but their are not 47million American citizens without it. If you want to subsidize Mexico, use Western Union. The reason the push is because the dems don’t want taxpayers to realize what the bill for all this liberal crap will cost. They hurried on TARP for a reason.

Posted by: bob | July 16, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

jhw- only because you asked, the San Francisco Wetlands restoration project, home of the infamous mouse, did indeed receive $16.1 million from the stimulus.

Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

If you are an older person dependent on Social Security and Medicare, you have a lot to fear from the Democrats in Congress and The President.
There is no way they can afford the programs they are proposing to pass. There is just simply not enough money in potential taxes to pay for them.
You will be asked to sacrifice. Since they won’t be able to afford your medicare or your social security, you will be asked to step aside. It will be your patriotic duty!

Posted by: Terry | July 16, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

i agree dont rush if it takes a year and a half so be it. you know no offense to obama supporters but he doesnt know what the hell hes doing rushing a policy like this is not a good leader but a foolish one.

Posted by: natale from mass. | July 16, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Like every other move made so far by this administration the tactic is to ram legislation through under the guise of “emergency”. They don’t want saner minds to have the time to work out better alternatives, and they damned sure don’t want the ‘sheeple’ to have time to realize that there is no such thing as ‘free’ anything and that this boondoggle will in fact cost them dearly – as will all the other leftist boondoggles being rammed down our throats.
You lefties may now resume your drivel.
TXPatriot512

Posted by: TXPatriot512 | July 16, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

The rush, just like the horribly damaging, failed, debt producing, kickback, payoff laden stimulus, is that no one get a chance to analyze the pork and clauses in the bill.
For example:
Page 16 of the bill has a paragraph that outlaws the selling of private insurance after the public plan is initiated, forcing everyone very quickly into the public option. Without new enrollees the private companies will quickly go under.
Chuckie Schumer, in his usual gratuitous lying claims they will now raise billions by taxing private insurers.
However the lie is in that they will have run the insurers and YOUR CHOICE out of buisiness.
The paragraph from page 16:
“Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day” of the year the legislation becomes law.
So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised — with, of course, exceptions: Those who currently have private individual coverage won’t be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.
Investors business daily has the full scoop on this if you don’t believe that Obama is lying about your choice.
Also Teddy has inserted items for farmers markets, playgrounds, education, walking paths, and so on.
They will ration our health care but will still get the pork to their own districts, just like the failed stimulus and the auto industry grab ended up being more about paying off Obama supporters than doing anything about the needs of the people, or unemployment.
In fact, with all the unemployed the government has just given a contract to a buddy of Dem Steny Hoyer to redesign the failed stimulus website to the tune of 18 million dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!
How many unemployed folks are thrilled at this bloated, overpriced kickback. Obama has one priority and that is his own survival.
Health care grab is just another high tax power grab, the people be d*mned. IN fact, in his famous ABC paid for informercial Obama would not promise to use just the public option for his family?
He knows he will have enough money to travel and buy health care. Rationed care is for the little people, not royalty like the Obama’s.

Posted by: MNM | July 16, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

The ‘rush’ is that the President’s poll numbers are slipping, and have no where to go but south.
Even Rahm knows that if it doesn’t happen this year, it doesn’t happen in this admin. They have already lost on the CO2 bill…this will be 2 strikes, and a sour economy in 2010 will be 3.
The President should start planning now for a ‘habitat for humanity’ position with Jimmy Carter.

Posted by: J House | July 16, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Failed to mention that the bill does not address tort reform and frivolous law suits, and carves out an exception to make sure that unions don’t have to pay the health care tax for not covering their employees the way other businesses, large and small must do,
I assume all of you are aware that businesses who have a gross income (not profit) of more than $250,000, and who do not provide insurance to their employees, (which is funny since the bill outlaws private insurance sales) will be heavily taxed in lieu of that insurance. Except of course for the unions.
Of course that would involve the two largest donors and supporters of the dems. Lawyers and unions.
The payback and kickback at taxpayer expense never ends.

Posted by: MNM | July 16, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Hi Watching,
Did you miss the fact that there were 17 firefighters including two Hispanics involved? It is a usual Democrat tactic to find one minor issues and make it seem like some major flaw.

Posted by: Terry | July 16, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

‘watch’,
The unfairness to Ricci and others was that they were told if they scored high on the test, they would be promoted.
Once they did, the city retroactively scrapped the test results in fear of being sued.
Those are the facts.
No matter what color, ethnicity or religion, you are getting screwed by the city if they tell you one thing about the path to promotion, then do another, after the fact.
That just isn’t fair…to everyone.
And, do you think the city would have scrapped the results if the majority of the high scorers were ‘minorities’?
We know EXACTLY what would have happened….NOTHING.

Posted by: J House | July 16, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Hi MNM
No need for Tort Reform. Once the government is running things, no suits will be allowed under Sovereign immunity.

Posted by: Terry | July 16, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

jhw,
we have bantered this about before. I dont care how long it has been on the docket, the only thing that is matters is that coverages Vs Premiums cost card I have told you about several times.
I doesn’t mean squat if they rush to pass to some glorified outline by some dopey date on Obama’s calendar.
The ONLY thing that matters is detailed final plan. (By the way, I apply the same requirements to any other plan offered up by ANY politician)
The rherotic is USELESS! That sheet with all the various levels of coverages, premiums, co-pays, deductibles and maximum payouts is the ONLY thing that the American people can take and compare to their current plan or any other plan that is available to them.
The biggest BS is that “passing” a bill with without theses details has any meaning at all. It would mean that all the real hard work is still TBD !

Posted by: Mike_C | July 16, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

What freakin RUSH!
Health care reform has been on and off the table a very long time… It was on the table back when Clinton was in so that has been almost a decade…
Fear and scare tactics are exactly what the insurance giants want and they have the money to use their influence to manipulate politicians, the media and the public…
Come one people… There are moments in life when it becomes more important to do the right thing rather than just always making a profit…
And,,,There is nothing wrong with making a profit if it is done responsibly and in good conscious…
But, you know what we all get exactly what we deserve, whatever goes around, sooner or later comes around… and we all end up pay in one way or another…
Without health care reform… we will all still end up paying… more

Posted by: theafalcon200 | July 16, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Do you followers of BO even read what this health care fiasco means. The rich will not be paying for everything. Even now, they will have their accountants working on the loopholes. Then, the taxes will be leveled on citizens making under $250K a year. In the end, the middle class will be carrying the load. And, like a previous poster said ‘unions are not required to pay.’ Sure there needs to be a plan so that working, legal, non insured citizens can get help. But, not these thrown together plans and how to pay for them.
Also, why do illegal aliens get to participate in Soc Sec?

Posted by: Evelyn Sealy | July 16, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Mike_C:” I dont care how long it has been on the docket, the only thing that is matters is that coverages Vs Premiums cost card I have told you about several times.”
Setting an impossibly high bar is just another petulant way of saying no. There is no possible way the entire system’s administration down to the cost of wart removal can be defined by
Congress. And clearly you haven’t used insurance much or had any loved on who has if you think such a comprehensive ‘card’ exists for any insurance coverage.
The fact is every other first world nation spends an average of half as much per person for health care. Documented fact.
They achieve equivalent levels of health (part of being a first world country really). You have never offered why the US government is so uniquely incompetent and corrupt that it cannot offer an option as effectively as France, or Belgium, or even Canada. Rather you insist that they offer a fully completed, operating company before even being voted on (the data you demand is the final, completed, continuously maintained product of an operating insurance company – the only other thing they do is billing).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 16, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Toby:”Stupid. Health insurance is not health care. No one is turned away from an ER! We are simply talking about how to pay for it. THAT should be very, very carefully looked at and studied before making any lasting decisions.”
Speaking of stupid, why haven’t you bothered to look at all the very, very careful studies done on ER use over the last decade? The ones (among many) that are feeding directly into the last four or five months of work by Congress?

Posted by: jhw539 | July 16, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

They achieve equivalent levels of health (part of being a first world country really). You have never offered why the US government is so uniquely incompetent and corrupt that it cannot offer an option as effectively as France, or Belgium, or even Canada
=====
Then let’s see them offer that.
I don’t think the US government is so incompetent it can’t offer such an option. They aren’t doing it, though.
And they certainly aren’t detailing how they will get to the lower cost portion of the program.

Posted by: MayBee | July 16, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Thank you for speaking out on this one Olympia. The bill as presented will make insurance companies richer and more powerful then they already are — it will not improve health care!
Insurance companies are the problem with health care in this country – they are not the solution.

Posted by: hmm | July 16, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

“And, do you think the city would have scrapped the results if the majority of the high scorers were ‘minorities’?”
We know EXACTLY what would have happened….NOTHING.
Hi Watching,
Did you miss the fact that there were 17 firefighters including two Hispanics involved? It is a usual Democrat tactic to find one minor issues and make it seem like some major flaw.
since u brought up minor issues. She ruled on over 3,000 cases and they (the disadvantaged threatened senators)spent 75% of their time on one case.
And she was on a panel of 3 judges (2 white & 1 republican) which upheld a ruling of a majority of 21 judges. supreme ruling was 5-4. A minor majority loss does not make her a racist.
It’s good to see you guys come out and fight so hard for equality.

Posted by: watching | July 16, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Congress has had YEARS to come up with health reform. They went through all this rigamarole during the Clinton administration. If not now, WHEN??!!Certain people DON’T WANT things to get better, they WANT the President to fail, because THEIR party is out of power – just pure selfishness – putting party over country and their fellow citizens, trying to FRIGHTEN the American people into voting for THEM by using that mean ole scary S word. WEll, you’re not scaring ME. When you guys were in power you didn’t do SQUAT for the American people, you just helped your rich friends get richer, and put us in the mess we’re in now. Too bad we can’t get back the BILLIONS spent on treaure and lives in Iraq so Bush Jr. could feel like a big man. No, I don’t see ANY reason at ALL why we should believe YOU.

Posted by: signseeker17 | July 16, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“Do you followers of BO even read what this health care fiasco means… In the end, the middle class will be carrying the load.”
As opposed to now, when they get the most expensive healthcare in the world by about a factor of two for… free? Who is paying now?

Posted by: jhw539 | July 16, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Why the rush? Because I am sick, as are millions of others who have no access to the health care we really need. That’s why the rush! Oh and please don’t send me to the ER for that “free” care. I’ve got a box full of bills for that — right next to the box full of insurance company premium bills and denials or reductions of coverage.

Posted by: hang | July 16, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

jhw,
Exactly when & how then will you be able to actually purchase this plan?
How will you KNOW what your coverages are?
“There is no possible way the entire system’s administration down to the cost of wart removal can be defined by
Congress. And clearly you haven’t used insurance much or had any loved on who has if you think such a comprehensive ‘card’ exists for any insurance coverage.”
(By the way, even though that is not the “card” I was talking about, Every insurance plan DOES actually have that. Try looking at how your treatments are coded and then compare that code to the detailed billing statement. You will see the cost that was billed along with what yuor insurance paid. For most of these things its usually 100%, but not always!- Guess what son, someone is going to have to create that for whatever govt plan comes out of this thing!)
jhw – as usual, now that your arguements are used up and its time for the rubber to hit the road, you resort to this. I have stated here before of having one of my kids into the ER for ankle injury last month. We have had our fair share of athletic injuries and other broken bones, etc.
So, No problem – take your shots.
I am not talking about a card with every possible illness and YOU KNOW IT!
I am talking about the summary card that ACTUALLY does come with your package when you sign up for a plan.
It goes over things like office visits, hospitals stays (ie, private/semi-private rooms) Xray coverage, etc.
Anyone who has ever actualyl purchased insurance knows exactly what I am talking about! Or did you just check a box and not even care what you were getting? Every single offering I have seen has had 2 or more levels of coverage plans. Obviously the higher the premium, the better the coverage (i.e. a lower co-pay, or lower decuctibles…etc)
They ALL tell you what your premium payments are, what your co-pays are, what deductibles you have, and any possible maximum payouts! If you have not seen this “card”, you either have never bought insurance, you were too foolish to look through the information!
You can call it “petulant ” all you want. The FACT is until we have those details, the is no healthcare plan.
Until the day I can make those comparisons, I can’t even buy the “gov’t plan”. All that exisits is an outline that can go in a thousand different directions in its implementation.
If that is what gets passed in August, then WHO do you want to be in charge of taking the outline and making the REAL plan?

Posted by: Mike_C | July 16, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

The fact is every other first world nation spends an average of half as much per person for health care. Documented fact.
===============================
China – 1.33 Billion
India – 1.17 Billion
United States – 307 Million
Indonesia – 231 Million
Brazil – 192 million
Pakistan – 167 Million
Bangledesh – 162 Million
Nigeria – 155 Million
Russia – 142 Million
Japan – 128 Million
Mexico – 108 Million
Philippines – 92 Million
Veitnam – 88 Million
Germany – 82 million
Ethopia – 79 Million
Egypt – 77 Million
Turkey – 72 Million
Iran – 70 Million
Dem Rep. of Congo – 66 Million
France – 65 Million
Thailand – 63 Million
United kingdom – 61 million
Italy – 60 Million
Burma – 50 Million
South Africa – 49 million
There are the top 25 countries by population….So jhw…out of the 25…who has successfully put together the mythical universal healthcare plan?

Posted by: Mike_C | July 16, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

‘watch’, you don’t know me…
I am all for equality, and live by Martin Luther King’s creed-not to judge by the color of one’s skin, but by the content of their character’.
I only wish Judge Soto agreed.

Posted by: J House | July 16, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

The insurance lobbyists who pay the Republicans and many Democrats are only worried about their billions in profits. They could care less about health care for the more than 45,000,000 Americans who have none. What a disgrace in the wealthiest country in the world. It’s about corporate greed, and Senator Snowe should admit it.
Posted by: Luke23
The insurance companies are the ones who will benefit from this! Not the people, not the doctors – the insurance companies. This law mandates that people buy insurance – if this law passes, you will pay a fine for not buying health insurance. Tell me, who benefits most from a bill mandating that you buy a product — the people who sell that product!!

Posted by: Get real | July 16, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I cannot believe that people talk about current insurance coverage denying a treatment or service, and you really, really think that a government health plan would never, ever deny treatment or service. That’s just thick. You base this on what? Words of a politician? You deserve what you get.
Oh, and WITH health care reform, WE still end up paying…more. Money, freedom, choice. Guess the getting is worth the giving up for you.
Not for me. What’s making ME “sick” is being dragged along in your wonderfully constructed delusion. I’ll be fined, taxed, punished and pressured to obey (this isn’t a choice that’s being offered, but perhaps you missed that in all your drooling and hand-rubbing), just so you can get your little delusions shattered in the end.

Posted by: Eyes Open | July 16, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Come one people… There are moments in life when it becomes more important to do the right thing rather than just always making a profit…
And,,,There is nothing wrong with making a profit if it is done responsibly and in good conscious…
But, you know what we all get exactly what we deserve, whatever goes around, sooner or later comes around… and we all end up pay in one way or another…
Without health care reform… we will all still end up paying… more
Posted by: theafalcon200 | Jul 16, 2009 12:50:34 PM
____________________________________
Without that profit motive in the health care industry, where do you think the many medical breakthroughs and medications are going to come from? They come from us right now, not Europe, etc. Kill the incentive to do the research and further innovation dies with it. No and/or fewer profits also equals fewer doctors, nurses, etc. Sure, my mom likes helping people, but she’s a nurse more than anything because it affords her a decent living, and she was able to help provide for us. Otherwise, I doubt she would have put in the hard time it took to do what she does. Same for doctors, but even more so. Profit drives innovation …. perhaps that’s why we have so much innovation here (and when it comes from elsewhere, it’s from place w/ Western, profit-driven ideals!). Kill profits, you may as well kill our society.

Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | July 16, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I think Senator Snowe is right on the mark. Making sure you do it right the first time is the most effective way to reform anything this large and complex. It may take 6 months to come up with a plan that the American people (yes, WE elect our representatives) approve of. We don’t need any further ‘shotgun wedding’ legislation.

Posted by: Kb | July 16, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

“Without that profit motive in the health care industry, where do you think the many medical breakthroughs and medications are going to come from”
How are insurance companies part of medical breakthroughs and medications?
Do they conduct research and development or do pharmaceutical companies and medical research companies do that?
All the right wing has are fear and lies.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 16, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“Also, why do illegal aliens get to participate in Soc Sec?”
Right wing lies live 9ong after they are debunked.
Is that because right wingers are gullible?
“Republicans are tagging Democratic opponents across the country for wanting to “give Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants.” But nobody’s proposing paying benefits to illegals, not until and unless they become US citizens or are granted legal status.”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 16, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

“The unfairness to Ricci and others was that they were told if they scored high on the test, they would be promoted.”
After Ricci sued because he said he didn’t get a job because of his dyslexia his current lawsuit just smells.
Of course he’s a hero to the right wing who care more about the myth of the man than the truth much like welfare collecting, tax avoiding Sam the Plumber’s helper.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 16, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

There is no sane logical reason to rush something this big, this important, that represents 17% of our economy. This needs to be done correctly from the start.
A mistake could be devasting to the economy or could cost lives. It’s impact needs to be completely understood before enacting such a massive overhaul.
The more they try to rush and push it through, I have to ask why? Why the pressure to move fast? If it’s a good solid plan what’s the harm in due dilligence? None. So why the rush??? Let’s get it right.

Posted by: Jake | July 16, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.