By Lindsey Ellerson

Aug 31, 2009 6:00pm

ABC News Exclusive: National Security Adviser Says President Obama Is Having Greater Success Taking Terrorists Out of Commission Than Bush Did

Responding to criticism from former Vice President Cheney that President Obama is making the nation more vulnerable to terrorism, the president’s National Security Adviser, Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.), told ABC News in an exclusive interview that actually the reverse is true: President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.

“This type of radical fundamentalism or terrorism is a threat not only to the United States but to the global community,” Jones said. “The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies – both national and international."

Jones said that “we are seeing results that indicate more captures, more deaths of radical leaders and a kind of a global coming-together by the fact that this is a threat to not only the United States but to the world at-large and the world is moving toward doing something about it.”

The former Marine General didn't provide any specific numbers to back up his claim, but he said “there is an increasing trend and I think we seen that in different parts of the world over the last few months for sure.” He added that he was not “making a tally sheet saying we are killing more people, capturing more people than they did — that is not the issue.”

But the numbers are going up, he said.  “The numbers of high value targets that we are successfully reaching out to or identifying through good intelligence” from both the CIA and intelligence agencies from US allies has made the difference, he said. “We have better human intelligence; we know where the terrorists are moving. Because of the dialogue and the tone of the dialogue between us and our friends and allies…the trend line against terrorism is positive, and that’s what we want. If we have a positive trend line we have a safer country.”

Jones made his comments the day after Mr. Cheney said he has “serious doubts” about the extent to which President Obama “understands and is prepared to do what needs to be done to defend the nation.” Cheney assailed the decision by Attorney General Eric Holder to begin a preliminary investigation into whether any CIA officers went beyond what they were told was legally permissible in interrogating detainees.

“It's an outrageous precedent to set, to have this kind of, I think, intensely partisan, politicized look-back at the prior administration,” Cheney said.

Jones dismissed questions that the investigation was the result of political pressure and said “people that were acting within the law don’t have anything to worry about.”

“Obviously the former Vice President feels strongly about certain things,” Jones said, “I don’t know if it is a question of legacy.”

“I take exception” to assertions “that something that we decided or the president decided will make the country less safe,” Jones said. “I just don’t agree with that.  We are about making this country safe.  I think that we are fashioning global relationships with other countries around the world.”

“We are doing everything to make this country safe every single day,” Jones asserted.

Jones didn’t buy Cheney’s argument that the effectiveness of the Bush-Cheney counterterrorism policies are proven in the fact that the U.S. didn’t experience any terrorist attacks on U.S. soil after September 11, 2001. “It’s very easy to leave office and say, ‘Well, no other disaster happened on the size and scope of 9/11, so we did our job well.’  Well, maybe they did, maybe they didn’t.”

Jones did not dismiss Cheney’s argument that Holder’s decision could have a chilling effect on the willingness of CIA officers to do what they are told to do.

“I think it is something we have to address,” Jones said. “I think anybody who works in a law enforcement agency — whether it is the police or FBI or CIA — have to know clearly what the rules are and have to know what the law says and have to act with the parameters of the law. I think we are back, we are getting to a more consistent point.”

“We’re a nation of values,” he told ABC News. “I was on active duty when these techniques were used.  I was surprised and disappointed.” The United States, he said, isn’t “known as a country that tortures people.”

Jones said he couldn’t provide any definitive answer as to whether, as Cheney argues, any detainees who were interrogated using methods President Obama has banned – ones that qualify as torture under international law – provided information they would not have offered using other means.

“I haven’t seen any compelling evidence  that  would argue because somebody was subjected to enhanced techniques that there was a revelation that we wouldn’t have had,” he said, “but it is very hard to prove the negative on this.”

Jones argued that a recent report that terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed provided information after being water boarded dozens of times is counter-balanced by KSM’s testimony to the International Committee of the Red Cross that some of those times he provided false information.

“He himself admitted that in order to get them to stop doing it, he lied,” Jones said, “and he is smart enough to play out the lie a little bit.  I just think it comes down to our laws and our values and we are what we say we are or we are not and I think we are on the way back to being what we say we are.”

-jpt

User Comments

Perhaps if Gen. Jones were not a member of this adminstration, his statements would have more impact…

Posted by: tjp612 | August 31, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

“Perhaps if Gen. Jones were not a member of this adminstration, his statements would have more impact…”
Thanks for saying aloud the right wing rationalization for ignoring what this man has said in favor of what Cheney said.
Who do you trust?
A respected Marine General who believes in this country’s values are more important than political expediency.
Or a nationally reviled politician whose recent statements have more to do with his admin’s legacy than ideas for national security.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

This is why the liberals have it all wrong. They are fed this propaganda and believe it just as if it were true. Obama is nothing.

Posted by: A Thinker | August 31, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

More Predator attacks, Mr. President. No prisoners = no headaches. Sure, there’ll be no info to gather, and a lot of innocents will die and be maimed, but we must keep our perspective.

Posted by: mesquito | August 31, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Oh, this is the National Security equivalent of jobs saved or created.
Terrorists killed captured or converted. But where are the stats?
“He added that he was not “making a tally sheet saying we are killing more people, capturing more people than they did — that is not the issue.”
But the numbers are going up, he said. “The numbers of high value targets that we are successfully reaching out to ….”

Posted by: robertb | August 31, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

You’re really going to say there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil after 9/11? Because that’s just plain untrue.
It’s true, of course, that there weren’t any that killed thousands of people in one fell swoop. Of course, there weren’t any of those BEFORE 9/11, either.
But about that little matter of the anthrax attacks: not terrorism?
And of course, if we’re suggesting that on U.S. soil/off U.S. soil is our prime determinant of effectiveness, does that mean Clinton’s policies after the Oklahoma City bombing should be considered successful despite the explosion of the USS Cole?
The point a) clearly doesn’t follow and b) rests on a falsehood. Please don’t repeat Cheney’s claims as if they’re true.

Posted by: Opie Curious | August 31, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Are you kidding me… Has this guy forgot that we captured Saddam Hussein and his group of thugs and sons.

Posted by: Raymond | August 31, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

tjp612 or BetNoir or whoever you are: This isn’t some “retired general” media shill, its the National Security Advisor. Learn to read.

Posted by: nonpartisan1 | August 31, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

ABC had to look long and hard to find someone who thought this. I bet he also thinks the health care bill is super-duper fantastic dynamite. Then they thought, hey why not ask the adminstration if they think they are doing a good job!
Please give me a break with this guy…”The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim.”
Well no kidding because its not true. Any idiot can see that.

Posted by: Dave | August 31, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

I would view this as somewhat like the football team that is behind is every statistical category, but still wins the game. At least they don’t brag about their game plan. A person has to be looney to believe that being nice to murdering terrorists will have any effect other than more dead Americans.

Posted by: Richard, Dubuque | August 31, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

If he had said anything else, it wouldn’t have made the news… So typical of the Obama crowd. Nothing substantial to back it up… ever… to call it like it is, nothing at all to back it up.

Posted by: Keith Wren USA | August 31, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

He’s being paid to and told what to say while Cheney kept us safe. I take Cheney’s plan so we can keep all our cities.

Posted by: Joe | August 31, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

This guy is a political hack or he would not have that job. Gibbs calls it the war on terror again, but only once so how can there be a war on terror when there is no war on terror and anyway: and he said “he was not “making a tally sheet saying we are killing more people, capturing more people than they did — that is not the issue.”” What a moron the man is . That IS THE ISSUE! No wonder the country is less safe the idiots running it don’t have a clue.

Posted by: Litigant | August 31, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

“…The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim…”
_______________________________________
Any more questions? If anyone really believes this then I have some stock in Lehman Brothers I’d like to sell you.

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | August 31, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

ROLFMAO!
Right wingers are furious that the reviled Cheney has to get into a credibility argument with the NSA who is a respected former Marine General!

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Jim JOnes the joke. Great comments on this post I can’t really add anything to it. But I will add abc news wake up if you went to covering both sides of an issue you’d have more viewers. Look at the comments people don’t watch abc news its a joke. Jake tapper is ok. Why won’t abc run ads against obama health care but yet they do two hours of sit downs in the white house with no republican response and obama gets all the time. Whats up with you abc? You are a laughing stock just like jim jones. I bet you pray every night that the internet and talk radio will be done away with. Ha ha.

Posted by: Tyler | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

“a kind of a global coming-together…”
Oh, the Obama “effect” is bringing the world together, “I’d like to teach the world to sing…”
“this is a threat to not only the United States but to the world at-large and the world is moving toward doing something about it.”
Geez, the WORLD didn’t KNOW this BEFORE. I don’t think so, check out the 40 plus countries we’ve had Special Forces do counterinsurgency / counterterror the past few years, check out the ongoing Proliferation Security initiative…
“Because of the dialogue and the tone of the dialogue between us and our friends and allies…the trend line against terrorism is positive…” Geez, gag me.
“I think that we are fashioning global relationships with other countries around the world.”
And those countries will do the torture and information gathering for US????

Posted by: robertb | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

That’s a pretty serious claim with nothing to back it up. This “I’m better than Bush” nonsense worked in ’08, but it’ll be pretty tired by 2010 and completely laughable by 2012. The guy needs a new theme song.

Posted by: Eric | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Bwahahahahahaha!. This administration is getting desperate to spew this sort of non-sense. The American people are not fooled by their actions, so now Obama and his cronies are resorting to flat out lies. Do we really believe a handcuffed CIA and military are doing a better job of protecting Americans? Is that why report after report claims the situation in Afghanistan is getting worse?

Posted by: Rotorocks | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

The idiot actually said, “The numbers of high value targets that we are successfully reaching out…” So they are talking with the terrorists, not killing them. Sounds pre 9/11 to me. We are in serious trouble.

Posted by: Litigant | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

tip612…
its the National Security Advisor. Gee, tip612, say it like it is… It.s Obama’s National Security Advisor
Now we can all get that warm-fuzzy feeling. LOL

Posted by: Keith Wren USA | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

National Security Adisor, Gen. Jim Jones, Ret. tells us that the world is coming together now that President Obama has taken leadership “to discuss things with other rulers.” Well doesn’t that say it all, Obama having discussions with other rulers. This is how this administration thinks.

Posted by: Secretary | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Jones provides no numbers…nothing, nada.
We are suppose to take this administration at its word. HA!
that is why 46% of Americans now approve of the Obama Administration. I predict that Obama’s approval rating will be in the 30s by late this year or early next year.
HAHAHA!!! “Trust us!” says the Obama administratrion. HAHAHAHA!!!!
Just like 53% of voters trusted you, put you into office believing the patheitc rhetoric of Hope and Change. They sure got change, but hope was thrown out the window.

Posted by: CJ | August 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

If the Obama Admin is talking to other RULERS, does that make the president a ruler? Exceptional choice of words.

Posted by: f brayton | August 31, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Wait a minute, Gibbs today kept underplaying the role that the Obama administration has had had in Afghanistan, indicating yet again that for so long the Bush admin is to blame………with that logic then….perhaps they should be lauding the Bush admin…for the success in taking out terrorists….over that same time period!!! Think they can be morally honest and do so? NOT!!!

Posted by: Kenneth Toumey | August 31, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“Right wingers are furious that the reviled Cheney has to get into a credibility argument with the NSA who is a respected former Marine General!”
And God forbid that saber-rattling and cowboy diplomacy should be proven less effective than real international relations.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Gen. Jones is RETIRED!!! So he has no clue! He needs to sit down and shut up!

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

What is he going to say? Obama is not as effective as Bush was? Come on the guy works for Obama. Report something with some less spin in it.

Posted by: Marion | August 31, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Why am I not surprised that this article comes from ABC? Once they were given a “news office” in the White House, they have relentlessly carried the water for the Obama administration and become part of the Obama propoganda machine. Revolting.

Posted by: Skeptik | August 31, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I wonder if this statistic is anything like the thousands of jobs that Obama “saved” with his stimulus bill? He couldn’t prove that one either, but I guess it sounded good to the brainless sheep that follow him.

Posted by: James from New York | August 31, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

ABC
All Barrack Channel
I don’t believe anything they report. NOTHING!

Posted by: mike-n-tn | August 31, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Someone on this baord called Jones a “respected former Marine General.” Do you mean that leftists suddenly respect military leaders? What happended to General “Betrayus.” What about Barbara Boxer chastising the other General for calling her Ma’am instead of Senator. Do leftists only start respecting military personnel when it’s in their interest???

Posted by: Rocco | August 31, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“..to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies – both national and international.”
So terrorism is merely a law-enforcement issue and Barack Hussein Obama considers himself a “ruler”?
Must have elevated himself from President to Czar.

Posted by: Yasherka | August 31, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Personally, I think attacks by terrorists on high ranking officials in countries sympathetic to Al Qaeda’s causes – like the attack on Saudi’s interior minister – does more to motivate these countries to become involved than anything we are doing.
They talk platitudes about supporting our efforts and watch, and privately laugh, at all of our troubles but when the gun is suddenly pointed in their direction then and only then do they become involved. (Or in this case the suicide bombers.)

Posted by: zony | August 31, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

It is sad to see a Marine bring feelings to a fact fight even if it is just a polical battlefield.

Posted by: Thron | August 31, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

A mushroom cloud over a city in North America courtesy of Iran (and Obama) will be the saddest I told you so in the history of the world, and stupid liberals will STILL think it is not Obama’s fault and/or blame Bush Cheney.

Posted by: VJ | August 31, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“Do leftists only start respecting military personnel when it’s in their interest???”
The Right has no room to complain after how they treated Colin Powell.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Give the marine a break. He liked to be working elsewhere but can’t find a job. No stimulus money for retired military. He never did well in math either. That’s why he can’t give out numbers. He got his job because he is advising a President that knows nothing about National Security, only Social Security. Oh well, he getting close to the age for death panels. He at least has that to look forward to.

Posted by: Werb | August 31, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Good God ….. now it is verified …..Barry gives ABC an hour and you all become the “Good Dogie”.
You know as well as I do that this is all bunk. Barry is destroying the very service that is providing the services that has our adversaries looking over their shoulders.
Gees guys, whose side are you on anyways?

Posted by: American Infidel | August 31, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

“Do leftists only start respecting military personnel when it’s in their interest???”
There are no ‘leftists’ in America. There are only normal Americans and the remnants of the fanatical Republican right.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Pure bovine flatulence!
In a Rasmussen poll today, by a margin of 65-26, the American people believe CIA waterboarding of terrorists elicited valuable intelligence and for good reason. Obama and this doofus, political hack “general” will be run out of Dodge when we are struck again.
“…not making a tally sheet…” “…a kind of a global coming-together…”
You mean you kumbayaed them to death? What drivel.

Posted by: William Brown | August 31, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

What a crock of B.S! Jones is full of B.S. and if the numbers were in fact going up, regarding “taking terrorists out of commission, the MSM would be reporting it 24/7!!!

Posted by: Herm | August 31, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

So, now we have a national security adviser simply playing politics.

Posted by: Sigmonde | August 31, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Ummmm…..Wasn’t August the deadliest month for US troops in Afganistan? Some great success that is. Just so you know, the Pentagon now says the war in Afganistan will cost more than Iraq ever did. Wait, didn’t Obama spend the entire election complaining about the amount of money being spent in Iraq?

Posted by: Brandon | August 31, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Why, yes, it makes sense. Those dirty old initiators of man-made disasters just run right out in front of our missiles when they hear their Miranda warning.

Posted by: Dimslie | August 31, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

THAT IS BS.
People hate this white house and they will say anything and everything to TRY and sway the people.
Marxists, communist, thugs, tax cheats, liars and the mob are now running this country.
God help AMERICA.

Posted by: Martha | August 31, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Does Barry read them their Miranda rights and offer a free lawyer before “taking them out?” Does he give them the choice of being waterboarded or blown to smitherines?? Certainly they would chose the later vs the terror of being boarded!! Barry should be tried as a war criminal!!

Posted by: moron | August 31, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

The Right has no room to complain after how they treated Colin Powell.
Posted by: Skip |
Not following you. Powell made the case for invasion at the UN. That makes him a liar to the left.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

This General doesn’t have a clue and should stop giving unproven facts. If he thinks they are getting better, maybe its because these agents have had 8 years of making good contacts and snitches to gain info on the bad guys. This will stop once the Obama man starts prosecuting some of these agents, they would be fools to keep gaining valuable info, risking their lives and then go to jail, makes no sense. Torture works…….

Posted by: Paul C | August 31, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I love how he says “other rulers”.

Posted by: Mikey | August 31, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Of course this is an “ABC News Exclusive”…no other news organization would touch this “story”, errrr tale.

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | August 31, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

A representative from the Ministry of Truth was quoted as saying, “Oceania has ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia.”

Posted by: Walter | August 31, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

“We’re a nation of values,” he told ABC News.
No sir. We are a nation of laws.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

My Fellow Americans, the Real Issue is the fact that our former Vice-President’s belief in the practice of Waterboarding is within the law. The practice whether legal or not is an impediment on what the world and our nation believes is proper interrogation. Former VP Cheney looks as if he is defending himself against practices that could put his past administration in jeopardy. He should understand that the truth will set him free not his accusations about the safety of our country is in jeopardy. After all, it was under his watch that 9/11 happened!

Posted by: The Real Issue | August 31, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Well, his name is Jim Jones, afterall – we’re supposed to believe everything he says :)

Posted by: nina marvalant | August 31, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

So we can expect Obama to make good on his promise to catch UBL any day now, right? I guess you all have forgotten this little tid bit?

Posted by: Mike From MD | August 31, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Definition of a moron: Gen. Jim Jones, Ret

Posted by: smokehouse | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

They really think that people that actually read the news, and follow the history will believe this? Gen.Jim Jones IS a left wing shill, just like Wesley Clark. Just because this administration says something they believe the everyone will believe it. Well not all Americans have that “American Idol” mentality. The sad thing is that so many people did during the election, didn’t want to look behind the curtain, and wanted to be part of the crowd to vote in “The First Black President” without regard to his politics, or his experience. It’s only been 7 months, I feel sorry for those that will suffer because of this kumbaya mentality. From what I’ve seen with his meetings of world “rulers” is they look at him with disdain, and he looks at them like he’s embarrassed for being an American and will do anything they ask to gain their favor. I think he’s a sad excuse for a leader of the free world.

Posted by: srcamachonj | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

“There are no ‘leftists’ in America. There are only normal Americans and the remnants of the fanatical Republican right.”
So, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Ayres, Van Jones, Henry Waxman, John Holdren, etc. are “normal Americans”…interesting perspective…

Posted by: tjp612 | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

skipee..Collin Powell was NOT ACTIVE MILITARY, but just another politician with an opinion, when the right strongly disagreed with his endorsement of Obama or whatever else they may have disagreed with the General on…If Collin Powell had been Active Military, I can assure you he would NOT have given his opinion so freely….It’s the service personal who are active that are denied an opinion; therefore, it is on the shoulders of those who take pride in our military to express opinions, and vote their opinions, for those who cannot….

Posted by: Parallex View | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Oh good . .. here come the good American citizens who know better than the National Security Adviser.
I’ll be sure to pay attention to your opinions . ..

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

The reason Jones has nothing to back up his claim is that he’s in no position to know if it’s true. As a member of the JCS from 1999 through 2002 he would have some knowledge, by no means complete, of the results being obtained by CIA. Once he left the JCS and went to SACEUR he’d have bee further out of the loop.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

“Not following you. Powell made the case for invasion at the UN. That makes him a liar to the left.”
I don’t know if I can speak for the entire Left but I felt like Powell was a good soldier doing a dirty assignment, so I never held it completely against him.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Jones dismissed questions that the investigation was the result of political pressure and said “people that were acting within the law don’t have anything to worry about.”
Ah yes … We’ve heard that line before: “If you have nothing to hide, yu have nothing to fear” — and then they railroad you.

Posted by: Murgatroyd | August 31, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

ooohh pullllleeeeezzz….is this guy being paid by the word? Get him a teleprompter quick. Jimmy Carter is smiling because now he knows that he will not be known as the worst president in US History.

Posted by: Greg | August 31, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

5 HP, doesn’t burn much oil, wheels not bent that much. It’s time to die for God muslim.

Posted by: Charles | August 31, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

This is beyond ridiculous. The General should reatin some dignity and quit spouting off this stuff.

Posted by: Texmom | August 31, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

pullleeeez! Is this guy paid by the word? Get him obama’s teleprompter quick!
jimmy Carter is smiling now because he knows he soon will not be referred to as the worst president in US History.

Posted by: Greg | August 31, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Oh for sure, if you say the National Security Adviser is an idiot – he must be! How could you possibly be wrong?

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Funny how Gibbs said today that the problems in Afghanistan today were due to the Bush administrations neglect but gains on the war on terror (can I use that term?) are due to the Obama administrations actions.
You can’t have it both ways Obama.
Bush kept us safe for the last eight years minus eleven days, and you now own the war in Afghanistan.

Posted by: Nate | August 31, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Wow, wouldn’t expect such a complete line of excrement coming from a guy with his credentials. Guess this isn’t the James Jones that people thought they knew.
Obama has built a human intel network in 7 months that is more productive than what was built in the last 7 years? Aside from the urge to laugh, this propaganda will be used by those who want to continue to dismantle our defenses as political cover. And that may be a larger act of treason that simply selling the names of our operatives.
I’ll await Gen Jones to announce that he is ‘correcting’ his statement or claiming that he was ‘taken out of context’ or ‘misunderstood’.
Just like Tom Ridge with his supposed claim that ‘political influence’ was used to get his to raise the threat level. Somehow, political appointees manage to say the damndest things which they would never utter outside of the political universe.

Posted by: bpjam | August 31, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

LOL! Prove it ABC! Even the most far left wack jobs I know would laugh at ABC on this report. I see that the State run pro government Media is hard at work covering for their man Obama. ABC is a lap dog and not a watch dog. By the way, I thought they are no longer allowed to use the word “Terrorist”?

Posted by: Dave | August 31, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Where in the hell does this administration get their information from?

Posted by: DanoNM | August 31, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Uggh… I was eating when I started reading this. Where is the Barf alert?

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Not following you. Powell made the case for invasion at the UN. That makes him a liar to the left.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 31, 2009 6:44:37 PM”
I know political amnesia is requirement for being a right wingers but you might remember an argument between Colin Powell and Rush Limbaugh earlier this year.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Hey – I love Jack Tapper. He is one of the few brave genuinely unbiases and fearless reporters out there. However, a consequence of having a Statist media and propaganda politburo that universally reveres President Obama is that you must forgive us if we question your methods and motives, doubt your veracity, and are most hesitant to trust your reports and take you seriously. This is not directed at Tapper, but to the MSM at large. We no longer believe the media. A report could be accurate or not. But, after a quick while the boy who cried wolf was no longer heeded even when what he had to say was the truth. Maybe this report is fair. Maybe not. Being that it’s Tapper, I give it immediate credence. I can’t say that about 95% of other reporters. Tapper knows this. He’s a good man who worries about this potential effect on the public. This story, in particular, sounds like an Obama-bot repeating what he is ordered to say. Obama has no military gravitas so he must rely on a real Marine. How sweet is that – we have a president incapable of making any convincing military argument in war time. But a former VP legitimately can. Nevermind that Cheney, even with his old heart, could thrash Obama in a fist fight. HAHA.

Posted by: JDW | August 31, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

So who are the big names that Obama has taken out, name them. Until he gets Bin Ladin or his second in command, he does not stack up to Bush! What is this crap I keep hearing about we are a nation of values, we are a nation of laws. Go back to school and learn history. We was all that when we was ruled by the British! Come on, try this on for size, “We are a nation of laws, ruled by the people!” Where was the nation of values when we took the land from the Indians. You want to procecute American’s, then take the stolen land back from the American’s and give it back to the Indian’s. Do you own and land in American, Mr. Gen. Jim Jones? Do you own any stolen property? If you buy stolen property, it’s still stolen property, and is not yours! So what values are you talking about?

Posted by: Randal Hawkins | August 31, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I can smell the crap right over the air waves. Everything these IDIOTS say contrdicts what we see. The Taliban is Escalating and more troops are dying because we are trying to be “nice” The Stimulus is being used as a slush fund to buy Senators and Congessmen and Acorn is getting 8 BILLION! Yet the ecomomy is tanking and all Democrats can do is propose astronomical spending on communist style health care and energy rationing bills that will DESTROY the middle class.

Posted by: worddust | August 31, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

So, does this mean the left has abandoned the argument that hunting/killing terrorists on creates more terrorists? It would seem Mr. Jones couldn’t make the case for Obama any other way.

Posted by: No1Dad | August 31, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

these kinds of stories present great ironies. the left will defend to the death this report by a military officer; notwithstanding the long-term disdain the left generally accord the military (especially during a conservative administration). and the right will go bananas about it, and call it all a bunch of lies; notwithstanding their long-term heraldry of the military (and the attendant decrying of the evisceration of the military during a liberal administration).

Posted by: davidfrat21 | August 31, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

How come Obama hasn’t bagged Osama.
He claimed Bush didn’t do enough to get Osama…WELL!!!

Posted by: ikonoklast | August 31, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

What total B.S. This is the most disgustingly dishonest administration in my lifetime…and I was a young teen when Nixon was president.

Posted by: Shawn | August 31, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

If national security wasn’t such a deadly serious matter, this bombast from Jim Jones would be worth several loud guffaws!

Posted by: JustAGuy | August 31, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

ABC’s Jones states:
This type of radical fundamentalism or terrorism is a threat not only to the United States but to the global community,” Jones said. “The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies – both national and international.
Other “rulers”? Last time I checked, the President of the United States was not a “ruler.” Our Congress (as bad as they are, collectively) are the “rulers” since they MAKE the rules. The President’s constitutional mandate is to execute those rules.
But Obama evidently sees himself in a different light. He is, after all, “THE ONE.”

Posted by: John Frykman | August 31, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

General, In that you were part of the last administration as SACEUR/EUCOM when you were one of three combatant commanders (along with PACOM and CENTCOM) whose primary responsiblity and mission was national defense and counter terriorism, your words ring hollow and show your true colors as a grandstanding political hack; just as you were when on active. Pathetic.

Posted by: Chesty Puller | August 31, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

That is…”Jake”…”Jake” Tapper…I know him as “Tap-Tap” from the Dennis Miller Show. :)

Posted by: JDW | August 31, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

While the Obama administration is having “greater international success with terrorists,” Iran has ramped up its rhetoric against Israel and probably has a nuclear weapon loaded and aimed at Israel; North Korea has launched several test missiles, making Japan mighty nervous; and Scotland has released the terrorist behind one of the greatest terrorist attacks before 9/11; and we just had the deadliest month on record in Afghanistan – not to mention the violence against voters int hat country. Yup. I’m feeling that success.

Posted by: me again | August 31, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Give me a break. Can you puff up a policy anymore please.

Posted by: XRAYeye | August 31, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

#1 at taking out terrorists?
Taking them out for $3,500.00 hamburgers, maybe………..

Posted by: TexasSlim | August 31, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

When Jones was picked for White House advisor even the Republicans said that was a great choice and how smart he was and now that they don’t like what he said they all of a sudden think he don’t know what he is talking about.
Please folks grow up and get rid of this hate. I’ll take what Jones says like the good news that it is.

Posted by: monta broughton | August 31, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Who’s next in the choir to sing the praises of the empty suit Barack Obama – the Tooth Fairy?
Does any cognitive person really trust Barack Obama or any of his minions to actually speak the TRUTH?
They can fool some of the people some of the time, but they can’t fool all of the people all of the time!

Posted by: Davole | August 31, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Gen Jones was the guy who wanted everyone to know that Obama had brokered some sort of a deal between Denmark and Turkey so there could be a unanimous vote on NATO’s Secretary General. The picture of Obama being a global healer of sort seems very important to Gen Jones.
I hope he is right that they are getting more terrorist leaders taken out now than before.
As for me, I remember the argument that it was US support of leaders (like Mubarek) that made us a target in the first place. Maybe it will be different this time.

Posted by: MayBee | August 31, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

“Because of the dialogue and the tone of the dialogue between us and our friends and allies…the trend line against terrorism is positive…”
Hmmmm… just how many of these friends and allies are helping us in Afganastan? BO says that Afganastan is the center of the war on terror (oops, I mean Human Caused Disaster People).

Posted by: SteveSD | August 31, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Under Obama we are reading terrorists the Miranda warning instructing them falsely that they have the RIGHT to remain silent.
Is it a coincidence that we’ve had 41 soldiers killed in Afghanistan this year, making it the deadliest year and the deadliest month?
Where are the pictures of the bodies coming home that the PRESS demanded to be able to have?
Now the generals are being pressured politically NOT to ask for more troops.

Posted by: BellaMia | August 31, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Looks like those “anit-war” liberals became pro war Neo CONS in record time. How can you excoriate Bush and continue his useless wars that kill Americans and put their familes as well as the rest of us in perpetual debt.
Either stand on principle…or fall for Everything. Bottom line, the liberals and neo cons are addicted to POWER and will kill and impoverish both countries as their international banking elites laugh all the way to the bank… (that steals YOUR MONEY!!!)
Tell me Neo CONS, Neo Libs, how many dead Americans is worth the price of Heroin, cause the only thing that is rising after all of this needless sacrifice is the price of drugs, the deaths of civillians, and the security of America’s borders. (That Obama would like to destroy with illegal immigration and the “North American Community” or Union, if you will.)

Posted by: jafo | August 31, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Sorry…not sure where this fellow is getting his facts
….but there’s so much horse dung flying around this article…one is inclined to reach for a shovel. Please don’t forget that’s this naive young man is a “political appointee”.

Posted by: Ray | August 31, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Obama better at taking out terrorists? Are you kidding me? These morons, Obama and Bush, have never seen a terrorist in their entire lives, not to mention have anything to do with any of the military operations that take place on the other side of the world. Nice job ABC. Keep spreading the propaganda.

Posted by: Bob | August 31, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

In the words of Barney Frank, “What planet does he live on?”

Posted by: mccollegemom | August 31, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

That a senior military leader could make such a unabashed,sycophantic claim is a new low in the history of American military.It makes one wonder why Bush has not discovered this talent for his own use in Iraq.

Posted by: Jabli Izvesti | August 31, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

“When Jones was picked for White House advisor even the Republicans said that was a great choice and how smart he was and now that they don’t like what he said they all of a sudden think he don’t know what he is talking about.”
Yup.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Oh yeah.Kissing up to the PC socialists in Europe and the leftist thugs in south America is a radical change for the better.Thats why the europeans are not sending anymore troops to afganistan and the terrorists are surrendering themselves because Obama promised them to close GITMO and not to throw water in their faces.To Top that Obama is going after any CIA agent who smacked any terrorist in the face.Interrogations will be conducted by the whitehouse now.Free cookies and signed Obama book for everyone and a free trip to Aruba.Freaking Amazing.

Posted by: Ty | August 31, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Spin spin spin spin…
I am getting very dizzy
Total crap……….

Posted by: jindy60 | August 31, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Ya much better but lets not make any kind of Tally sheet. God I wish life worked like that and people will just blindly fallow me if I say with 0 proof that I am doing it better. The is one small thing that seems to differ on this issue, It’s called common sense. Show me proof that your doing a better job and then I might believe you.

Posted by: Goth VanHellsing | August 31, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Let’s see 5 deferments Cheney who apparently had a nervous breakdown on 9/11 vs former commander of US forces in Europe.
I’m taking the general.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

General Jones was the hack who hung Tony Zinni out to dry-the same Gen. Zinni who was one of the first general officers to endorse Mr. Obama.I respect Gen. Jones’ service, but to make statements like these are crazy.What high-value targets have we hit since Jan. 20?

Posted by: Nephron | August 31, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

” The argument was, and still is, that invading and occupying Muslim countries and killing innocent civilians creates more terrorists.”
So tell us Jocko, what Muslim countries did Bill Clinton invade? US interests were sitting ducks when Clinton was President. What invasion did he authorize that got the Islamic Extremists so upset that they spent years getting ready for 9/11?

Posted by: RW | August 31, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I see words, not facts. Empty talk is obama’s stock in trade.

Posted by: Will | August 31, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Is crazy-sorry.

Posted by: Nephron | August 31, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Can’t believe the hacks are attacking a proud and honorable man such as Jim Jones, a man who has served our country with courage and distinction for more years than most of the blatherers have paid taxes. Aren’t these the clowns that go apoplectic whenever somebody dares to even question somebody in uniform?

Posted by: Just Wondering | August 31, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

” “wah-wah-wah; it’s Bush’s and Cheney’s fault!!”
Yes, indeed 9/11 happened on their watch. The great protectors indeed. I hope Bush enjoyed that month at his ranch in Texas just before the planes hit.
If you’re going to mean, we can be meaner – the truth is on our side.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

ABC would have more credibilty if they allowed descenting opinions of Obamas policies.

Posted by: theKingHasNoClothes | August 31, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

This administration makes claims that cannot be backed up. How stupid do they think we are?
Obama saved more jobs?
Obama created more jobs?
Obama is beating terrorists?
Obama prevented Apocalypse? (I made that up)
Wake Up! We are losing Afghanistan and you can’t blame Bush.

Posted by: Read This | August 31, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

me again Said: “…Iran has ramped up its rhetoric against Israel and probably has a nuclear weapon loaded and aimed at Israel; North Korea has launched several test missiles…”
========================
LOL …. what rock have you been under during the past 8 years? Iran has been building up their nuclear capability since Bush took office (remember, “Axes of Evil”). As for Korea, yep, they were thumbing their noses at the Bush/Cheney jokes, and continuing to build their nuclear weapons right in front of us. ….. LMAO…. I guess “me again” thinks that a nation’s Nuclear Program is built in 7 months…. only showing how ignorant you are about engineering, and what it takes to develop this capability.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | August 31, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

This story is a total lie and fabrication. I wonder what Obama’s PR spin doctors get paid a year!

Posted by: guesswhaturrwong | August 31, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I wonder why, given Obama’s morre enlightened approach to dealing with foreign governments, the Brits held him in such low regard that they sent a convicted terrorist home to Libya rather than turning him over immediately to the US, which has an outstanding indictment and arrest warrant for him.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

It has nothing to do with hate, race, or “birthering”. It has to do with personal political opinion. Fact, when 9-11 happened, the agencies that were in charge of doing something to stop it, were prevented by law to communicate or share information with each other. Fact, this administration is systematically disassembling the safeguards that have been put in place to prevent another 9-11. Fact, this administration is attempting to put on trial those that implemented those safeguards. Fact, it is only a matter of time until something tragic happens again. Fact, then it will be to late to say I told you so.

Posted by: srcamachonj | August 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

this whole left vs. right thing needs to stop if we are to get anywhere..it has gotten out of control

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

“We’re a nation of values,” he told ABC News.
==========
I do wonder what values are held by the countries who are capturing the high value targets on our behalf.
Or are they just being killed?

Posted by: MayBee | August 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Several hundred terrorists have reportedly died of sheer boredom while listening the Cairo harangue of Barack Obama.General Jones might be referring to this devastating speech.

Posted by: Barb OToole | August 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

And the proof of this increased success at routing terrorists by The Almighty Obama is what? Hope and Change?

Posted by: CharlieO | August 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Difference is that Cheney was there; Jim Jones wasn’t.

Posted by: hniermann | August 31, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Hello mirror…wow, sounds like an apt description of the GOP just moments in time ago…wonder how that worked out for them…oh, wait.

Posted by: @JDW | August 31, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

and who apointed Jones? so who do you think he will fall on the sword for?

Posted by: alicegodwyn | August 31, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

“this whole left vs. right thing needs to stop if we are to get anywhere..it has gotten out of control”
Zac don’t worry about it. There is no ‘left vs. right’ thing . . . there really are only normal Americans and the remnants of the fanatical Republican right who name call and use fear and smear tactics as their ‘politics’ – and they’re just about finished.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

If this is true, then it is due to all the hard work put in by Bush/Cheney/US troops over the past 6+ years. Obama is getting credit for all of their hard work.

Posted by: bbbrown | August 31, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

This guy will say anything. Don’t believe a word he says, or the administration he works for. The proof is in the pudding… and he has NO PROOF. Have you heard of the latest capture? I thought there was so many…

Posted by: srdb | August 31, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I HAVE DISCOVERED THE CURE FOR CANCER, HEART DISEASE AND ALZHEIMER’S. I JUST DON’T HAVE THE SPECIFIC NUMBERS TO BACK UP MY CLAIM.

Posted by: VIRG | August 31, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

In a clean word…. BALONEY!

Posted by: Rank | August 31, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

“to discuss things with other rulers”
Since when did the United States have a “ruler.” Oh, yeah, I forgot. Since Teleprompter Boy got elected.

Posted by: Cold Warrior | August 31, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

He states “not tally sheet numbers” and then goes on to say that Obama has taken out more. Which is it?
Talking out of both sides of the mouth.
Screwing up the CIA is not going to improve things.

Posted by: ron c | August 31, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Listen up, people!
Can anyone name ANY ARMY in the history of the world that has beaten Afghanistan on its home turf? NONE THAT I KNOW OF … and our self-appointed expert of experts on all subjects wants to SEND FINE YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN OFF TO THE GRAVEYARD OF EMPIRES DIE AS GROUND TROOPS … IDIOCY!
Google this: Why is Afghanistan known as “the graveyard of empires”? LEARN from history!
Pull the troops out … let the natives wear their tents … fight from the air … CIA covert operations and bomb bomb bomb!
IN the meantime, BO stands to lose the war in Iraq. NOW, whose priorities are screwed up?

Posted by: rod miller | August 31, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

It concerns me that there’s more wrong with some of the wackos in this discussion than some homemade oatmeal cookies can fix. That is very serious.
Obama is trying hard to do a good job and succeeding. He is bringing us together – even for the discussion we need to have.
I think everyone needs to check their arms at the door and sign the form agreeing to the fact that we are all humans on this planet.

Posted by: Mom | August 31, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Ryan, the war in Afghanistan is escalating and we initiated it in large part. We’ve sent more troops over to do this, we are NOT being nice to the taliban. Just goes to show that over the top partisan “thinkers” tend to distort out of convenience. They don’t want to or can’t give the other side credit for anything, including in this case, missing the obvious, we are being more aggressive with the taliban AND improving relations with the rest of the world, but not being adversarial and arrogant. (see Cheney’s latest comments for a reminder of this tendency in the former administration). No one ever said that “hunting/killing” terrorist created more terrorists. It was how it was done, with the said arrogance and adversarial tone in which it was done as well as say, overly depending on air strikes, rather than boots on the ground, that increased the likelyhood of civilian deaths.
Another example of partisanship gone bad is the obvious fact that no one, including writers on this post, can give Obama any credit for his efforts in Afghanistan. He can’t get any credit, it has been only 7 mths., yet a month into(and it continues today) his presidency, many conservatives were dying to blame Obama on the economy, reglardless of how the economy really works.
You most certainly can see a change in relations with allies around the world and how people and governments are relating differently to the US. A change to a more cooperative and less adversarial is what was needed. Bush did have to do a lot of the dirty work as comes with war and some of that gets unfairly thrown in the mix. People on the left are still going on about how Afghanistan was about oil and we shouldn’t be there, they still don’t give the US credit, regardless on how you felt about the start of the war in Iraq, with how we worked tirelessly(in both countries actually) to bring services, food and their own version of democracy to both countries. That sort of thing has never been done in history.(the soviets made them puppets and ran their countries into the ground for instance).

Posted by: devin | August 31, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

“this whole left vs. right thing needs to stop if we are to get anywhere..it has gotten out of control”
Zac don’t worry about it. There is no ‘left vs. right’ thing . . . there really are only normal Americans and the remnants of the fanatical Republican right who name call and use fear and smear tactics as their ‘politics’ – and they’re just about finished.
——————————
there it is again..the underlying message “normal Americans are Liberals”
just another way to bash the right
come on now

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

So Obama is killing more terrorists than Bush did.
Well, since Obama has become President, terrorists are killing more Americans than they killed under Bush.
SINCE OBAMA HAS BECOME PRESIDENT, AT THE END OF AUGUST, MORE AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED IN AFGHANISTAN THIS YEAR THAN WERE KILLED ANY YEAR SINCE THE WAR BEGAN.
I think I liked the way things were going when Bush was President……how about you Bucky?

Posted by: Calie Stephens | August 31, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

wow, all the comments here stating “facts” are nothing but opinion. Typical conservative fear mongering and fake outrage. pathetic.

Posted by: Fauxnews | August 31, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I don’t believe the Pope either. Just because someone is in a position of power doesn’t mean what they’re saying is real.

Posted by: srcamachonj | August 31, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Furthermore, with two ground wars in progress, Comrade Obama has an ADMIRAL in charge … LOL!

Posted by: rod miller | August 31, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

PRETTY AMAZING FEAT FOR A GUY (OBAMA)WHO KEPT TELLING US THAT “WE HAVE LOST IN IRAQ!!” TALK ABOUT A BUNCH OF GOBBLEDEGOOK!!!

Posted by: Manitu | August 31, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

JJ, my goodness! No wonder the USMC isn’t reached its recuiting quota. If JJ has his way, America should beg the world for everything.

Posted by: Rocco | August 31, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Julieterra, you’re right- there is no longer a left vs. right- but you’ve got it backwards.
On the one hand, you’ve got the 75%+ Americans who think that gov’t is too big and intrusive, that the stimulus was bunk, that taxes are too high, that the debt is out of control… you know, the people who believe in the constitution, the idea of limited government, the idea that government is, and always shall be, the problem, not the solution, that free men and women ALWAYS govern themselves better than a distant master in DC, that local solutions fix local problems, that the best way to help the poor, the hungry, etc. is through the most efficient mechanism ever developed… you know, people that believe in freedom…
And on the other hand, you’ve got a) a fringe group of idiotic leftists that defy all history, common sense, and experience and believe that THIS TIME fascism/socialism/communism would work if only the ‘right people’ (ie themselves) implemented it, and b) those that don’t have an iota of interest in government beyond enriching and empowering themselves and their friends at the expense of others.
The irony with the left is, they generally CREATE the problems they claim to want to solve, and in creating them, find justification for doing exactly what they did to create the problem in the first place, and then perpetuate that action… meanwhile, the folks with a real bead on how to solve all those problems are attacked for ‘not caring’ – ie, pressing for the very things that created those problems in the first place.

Posted by: colbay | August 31, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

can you believe a guy would say anything bad about the guy who apointed him?

Posted by: alhall | August 31, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Wow, thank you I learned a lot from this post…

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Thanks ABC news for sharing, with us another bunch of HOT AIR coming from an Obama Aid.
No facts to back up the claims? Then don’t publish the claims. My grandmother talking about her cats is more substantial than this.
“The problem with Socialism, is that eventually you will run out of OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY.”

Posted by: Why is the a Story? | August 31, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

So Republicans assume Jim Jones is wrong, and Democrats assume Jim Jones is right, and none of them have any clue which is really the case. But hey, let’s all go through the motions anyway, because insulting people we don’t even know makes us feel superior to them.
Next topic?

Posted by: jock59801 | August 31, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Zac – you saw the parade of hate march in here to call the National Security Adviser names and smear his character, and spread fear – your think that’ good for the country all the more power to you.
I will fight name calling, fear and smear tactics every chance I get. If they want to be mean, I can be meaner. If you don’t like it, join a convent.
And yes, there is very little left of the remnants of the fanatical Republican right – time has passed the by. And most Americans are not ‘leftists’.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Its funny how many of you advance the red flag on ABC for being one sided as if this publication is any more equitable in its reporting of current events!!! LOL, if I might go further, let me add that I’m willing to bet the house that many of you get your news from the ALWAYS fair and balanced fox news!!!! Not saying that ABC is one way or the other but when will we stop allowing our bitterness to control our views????
If Jones is carrying water, many of you are no better than he is, as it sounds like most of you are just taking the baton from the left wing mouth pieces as though their redirect has nothing to do with trying to shift the balance of power in this country!! I mean, do any of you listen to yourselves …….lol….what is your theme today??? Does the president have some hidden agenda to destroy the country from within???? REALLY????
If there are signs that the administration’s actions are really making us less safe or vulnerable to attack, do you really think they would continue on such a path with elections to be won in the forefront? And if your under the impression that they are somehow simpleminded then let me tell you I’m VERY impressed as you are able to come to that conclusion having never received a daily intelligence briefing in your life!!!!

Posted by: Adam | August 31, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Yep, Obama’s advisor, whom he appointed, says Obama’s doing a better job than Bush.
Didn’t see that one coming. I mean, really. What crap.

Posted by: jahpdq | August 31, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Perhaps he is having so called success due to the fact the Taliban assassinated the lady who was running for office in Pakistan? Remember her? And now the “elected ones” in Pakistan have seen the light and decided to actually help. I dam sure wouldn’t give our joker commander in chief any credit for it

Posted by: Tim | August 31, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Obama is having more success than Bush, because you have to outsmart your enemy, and for Bush, that is impossible.
———————-
sorry forgot to quote it, I learned a lot from this post…

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

I think Jones is probably right, but for the wrong reason. Obama has demonstrated a greater willingness to blow up the terrorists, along with their wives and children while sleeping in their beds, and done far less to capture and interrogate them, stopping fewer plots and attacks on civilians.
It’s much easier to blow up a block of houses than to capture the guy and let his kids live. Besides, dead people can’t complain about how they were treated or appeal to the civilian courts.

Posted by: Dave C | August 31, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

What a joke! Thanks ABC “news”….
Next….

Posted by: Michael From SF | August 31, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Wonder why Obama is not saying he inherited the terrorist fighting system from Bush?
Everything that is set up and in place was by the Bush and Cheney White House.

Posted by: Randy R. | August 31, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Zac – you saw the parade of hate march in here to call the National Security Adviser names and smear his character, and spread fear – your think that’ good for the country all the more power to you.
I will fight name calling, fear and smear tactics every chance I get. If they want to be mean, I can be meaner. If you don’t like it, join a convent.
And yes, there is very little left of the remnants of the fanatical Republican right – time has passed the by. And most Americans are not ‘leftists’.
————————
julie, you are right about there being hate from the right here now that drudge posted this, but hear me out.
i think that hate from either side just makes things three times worse. the left has a tendency to name call more, but they don’t provide a lot of facts…while the right does name call too, they do it less and they provide facts, but most stop reading their posts because they either don’t understand what they are getting at or they don’t want to hear that they are wrong or that there could be another way to solve a problem different from their own. we should listen and ask questions rather than bash and namecall.

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Why have they not captured Bin Laden yet?

Posted by: Chief shallow-pockets | August 31, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

So how many terrorists has Team Obama captured, what are their names, where were they captured and where are they being held?

Posted by: Thom | August 31, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Calie Stephens posted “Well, since Obama has become President, terrorists are killing more Americans than they killed under Bush.”
Let’s look at some numbers, shall we?
Americans killed in Iraq under Bush -
4533, under Obama – 100
Americans killed in Afghanistan under Bush – 630, under Obama -180
Sorry, but it looks like you’re way off on your believes.
You also posted “I think I liked the way things were going when Bush was President……how about you Bucky?”
Bush is the one who got us into Iraq, a NEEDLESS 2nd front. Under Bush 4533 Americans died. And you say you like that?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 31, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

“Why have they not captured Bin Laden yet?”
Bush and Cheney had 7 years, Obama has had 7 months.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

How’s that national debt going?
does china own us yet?

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

It’s simple when you read this board. Republicans don’t have a clue what’s going on. They will always say that the Democrats are wrong and the Republicans are right… and it doesn’t matter what facts and evidence is out there. I mean… even if there was plain evidence out there, the Republicans would simply deny that the facts exist or claim it is twisted by “liberal media”. Republicans lie so much, they really have no idea what the truth even is anymore. Nothing good comes from the Republicans. The Democrats get some things right and some things wrong… but if we’re ever going to get anything done right, we have to dump the Republicans all together. They have no worth to this nation. They are only about themselves and not for America.

Posted by: Jonathan | August 31, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Just like Obama; this guy talks in platitudes only. He has no fact. The only success I’ve seen is the Drone’s. We’re lucky Obama didn’t ground those when he took office. Until this weekend I didn’t think Obama even knew we had a war in Afganistan; not on the front page of the Post?
As for former Vice-President Cheney; I don’t think he gives a rat’s *** about his legacy (Clinton’s the one worried about that). Mr. Cheney loves the country and his main concern is keeping the country safe.
I am sure that there are thousands of people that work in “Library” building and surrounding area in Los Angeles that are thankful that we used waterboarding and avoided another major attack. Interrogation would have never produced that information.
I trust a man that has been Defense Secretary and Vice President more than a guy that served 175 in the Senate…

Posted by: DES | August 31, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I really think it’s quite amazing that liberals have such a major problem with the “torturing” of terrorists but in this article the national security advisor admits that they are killing terrorists. Im sorry, but when did dripping water in the face of a murderer in order to gain critical information become worse than killing them? Don’t get me wrong. Both options are fine with me but one of them gets you info, the other gets rid of a piece of crap. I just don’t understand the hypocrisy of liberals. Should we investigate the Obama administration for the murdering of combatants?

Posted by: BL | August 31, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

When you elect the Messiah as your leader, the miracles (and somehow the lies) just seem to fall from the heavens. I really feel sorry for the “sheep” among us. They will never have a clue.

Posted by: DUginfla | August 31, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

“I trust a man that has been Defense Secretary and Vice President more than a guy that served 175 in the Senate…”
He sure did a great job defending us against 9/11.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Jones is either smoking crack or drinking too much of Barry’s KoolAid

Posted by: starsandbars | August 31, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Thanks for the insight, jpt.
Could you get anyone on-record explaining exactly what “acting outside the law” means, specifically?
Like who?

Posted by: Guesst | August 31, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

My son was wounded Saturday in Afghanistan when a suicide bomber detonated himself 15 feet from my son. These Taliban are not stupid. The suicide bomber, wearing his explosives on the front of himself, walked up to talk to the lieutenant, radioman, afghan interpreter, and another soldier, turned himself to them, and then detonated himself. My son was standing to the side about 15 ft away scanning the area. The blast knocked him off his feet. He crawled/rolled into a ditch not knowing if it was a mortar, rpg, or what the heck happened. As soon as he saw all was clear he charged out to give aid to the wounded, then saw he had blood gushing from his ankle, tied a light tourniquet around is leg, and continued to aid the wounded. Then a sergeant saw he was bleeding from his side, told him to remove his body armor, put clotting powder on his wounds, and slapped some bandages on him. Then my son grabbed a machine gun and held security over the area. He and the other wounded were taken to Kandahar to be treated. He called us from the hospital after coming out of x-ray. My son says his face looks like bad acne from the blast, has shrapnel from head to toe, and has been picking pieces of shrapnel from his arms and leg. He’s partially deaf in one ear…the hearing may or may not come back. He was told they were going to do surgery to remove the piece of shrapnel from his ankle the following morning. Later in the evening we were called by the Dept of the Army and told the hospital in Kandahar had determined he was not seriously injured and returned to duty. The other 3 U.S. soldiers will be sent back to the States for further treatment. I’m not sure where the Afghan interpreter is being sent for further treatment he needs.

Posted by: steven1nc | August 31, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

“KoolAid”
Now that is clever! that “KoolAid” thing! Did you think that up yourself? You are so clever! Congratulations!

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

The situation in this country NOW is not who got picked first in kickball – it’s division! The terrorists are winning – silently .. they are winning! This country has never been more divided! We’ll lose that way!

Posted by: Marcus | August 31, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“This country has never been more divided!”
Not true. The country was far more divided during the fight for civil rights and during the Vietnam war.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

“-to discuss things with other rulers…”
So, is Obama our ruler?

Posted by: Jeff Thompson | August 31, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“This country has never been more divided!”
Not true. The country was far more divided during the fight for civil rights and during the Vietnam war.
—————————-
haha it seems to be getting close though

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

“As for former Vice-President Cheney; I don’t think he gives a rat’s *** about his legacy”
Then why is he is adamantly defending policies his own administration later abandoned?
This about the Cheney’s legacy being the great defenders of the US rather than being caught napping on 9/11 and subsequently shaming America by torturing people.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Stephen: Glad your son is o.k. I will pray for his safe return. My feelings about Cheney is that he forgets there are soldiers still in Afghanistan and they are fighting the war that should have been fought long ago..not the Iraq war. He is making our boys unsafe with his comments by not backing our President who is the Commander in Chief and the waterboarding he defends is not something we would want used on one of our boys just because we did it. I am so disappointed in him and the fact that he is even criticizinag Bush. I did not always agree with Bush but he is a better person. Cheney forgot he was the V.P. not the President.

Posted by: talmag | August 31, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

I really think it’s quite amazing that liberals have such a major problem with the “torturing” of terrorists but in this article the national security advisor admits that they are killing terrorists. -BH
We are killing terrorists in battle, we do not consider killing terrorists once they have been taken prisoner.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

There is a reason why the word “retirement” was created. Please Cheney take a chill pill. You’ve done enough trouble. He’s like the kid who stole the cookie from the candy jar with crumbs on his face, steadily saying I did nothing wrong.

Posted by: ref | August 31, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

To Randy: what a closed mind you have. We are fighting where we should have been years ago. Iraq was a war we didnot have to have..no weapons and little by little everyone is realizing this fact. Cheney is a fool to keep saying waterboarding is o.k. First it was against the law, second that means if one of our boys get captured,they can use the same torture…think about this.

Posted by: talmag | August 31, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

We are killing terrorists in battle, we do not consider killing terrorists once they have been taken prisoner.
============
What are we doing with the guys we don’t kill?

Posted by: MayBee | August 31, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

“Why have they not captured Bin Laden yet?” Bush and Cheney had 7 years, Obama has had 7 months.
Posted by: julieterra | Aug 31, 2009 7:33:55 PM
Reminds me of apportionment of blame for Bin Laden’s 9/11 – Clinton had 8 years, Bush had 8 months. Oh well, what goes around, comes around.

Posted by: robertb | August 31, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Exclusive???? In six months Obama kept the country safe from attack, better than the 8 years Bush di, after the Clinton administration, did nothing to the terrorist attacks against the US????
You have to be kidding…..but its scary and irresponsible

Posted by: Tony T | August 31, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

while I didn’t get to read the whole article that was posted and I’m sure you did not…I can understand why you are upset, but don’t lump all Republicans together because of a couple outliers…get to know average working middleclass Americans like me who happen to have the majority of my views tend toward those of the republican party..while some of my views may be wrong and I realize that is very plausible. not all of us are crazy and the ones that aren’t need to be heard

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

“Reminds me of apportionment of blame for Bin Laden’s 9/11 – Clinton had 8 years, Bush had 8 months. Oh well, what goes around, comes around.”
So if America gets attacked now we should blame Bush and Cheney .. . right?

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I find it interesting that Jones admitted that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is smart and can “play out a lie” so what make Jones believe that he told the Red Cross the truth? Huh?

Posted by: Joan | August 31, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

This is as disgusting as my Representative (Alan Grayson) having a (supposed) Town Hall meeting, except he told nobody about it, except the SEIU, Acorn, and his production crew (the local ABC affiliate in Orlando). Suddenly we see him on the Sunday evening news with a group of zombies pretending they want Socialized medicine. This guy is a disgrace, and certainly does NOT represent the majority of folks here in Lake County or Orange County, Florida!

Posted by: David J | August 31, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

“I trust a man that has been Defense Secretary and Vice President more than a guy that served 175 in the Senate…”
I trust a man who served over 3 decades under Republican and Democrat administrations and is an honorable general (ret.) serving as our current NSA more than a guy who dodge the draft and can’t even shoot a gun straight!

Posted by: Nicole | August 31, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Bush/Cheney successfully prevented any attacks against the US for eight years after 9/11. Hopefully Obama will do as well. Obama has created a pretty clear experiment. Obama is testing the hypothesis that if you demoralize your defenders, remove key means from them and pretend that the terrorists don’t exist then the terrorists will cease and desist or maybe just disappear. I hope he is right. If not, his culpability is 100%, beyond the shadow of a doubt clear and impeachment should follow.

Posted by: student1776 | August 31, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Steven1nc, God bless your son, and your family.

Posted by: marine43 | August 31, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Everybody predicted follow-up attacks after 9/11.Whatever comments may be made about the Bush administration, the fact is that this country has not been successfully attacked since then. That cannot be by coincidence.The fact of the matter is that we will never know about many successful counter-terrorist operations- by their nature they must remain confidential.General Jones knows that his statements are ridiculous- the only way he can salvage this is with facts and figures that he can’t produce without compromising national security.For an intelligent man he has made a foolish statement.

Posted by: Nephron | August 31, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Lockerbie Bomber set free(the UK wouldn’t have dared to do that with Bush as President), Gitmo prisoners being set free, war going badly in Afghanistan, Apology tour around the world, yeah right.

Posted by: DanL | August 31, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Obama will:
Protect us.
Provide for us.
Comfort us.
Calm us.
Everything….he and his annointed czars have our best interest at heart.

Posted by: joeyb | August 31, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Setting aside party labels, if a larger percentage of this country considers themselves conservative, and if Obama is polling below 50 percent overall, doesn’t that mean that at least a couple of people who voted for him are experiencing a gut-check?
I don’t care what Jim Jones says. He can say anything he wants to – how would we know whether it was true or not?
It’s simple. We have a president who bragged he could do so much better than his predecessor that we have been expecting much better. Ain’t happenin’.

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“Reminds me of apportionment of blame for Bin Laden’s 9/11 – Clinton had 8 years, Bush had 8 months. Oh well, what goes around, comes around.”
So if America gets attacked now we should blame Bush and Cheney .. . right?
————————————-
good point, but let’s not blame anyone
and fix the problems we have now

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Here’s why Cheney is so desperately on TV every chance he can get: He’s hoping that if he says “we protected the American people for 8 years” enough times, people will forget it was on HIS watch that the most devastating attack in history on Continental US soil took place. It’s the classic Rovian strategy: no matter what it is that you’re saying, if you say it enough times, some people will believe it (witness the 40% of Americans who thought Saddam was behind 9/11).

Posted by: Reality Check | August 31, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Who in He** are they kidding? Certainly not me or anyone else I know! This admin is a real fantasy island!

Posted by: Aric | August 31, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

You can’t have it both ways. If fhe Obama administration wants to blame the poor economy today on actions of the prior administration, it should give also give the prior administration deserved credit for recent anti-terrorist successes. One day (I’m not holding my breath), the President will say, “OK, EVERYTHING, the good, the bad, and the in between are now my responsibility”.

Posted by: David S | August 31, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

A Jones was appointed by who?

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

It’s despicable that so many party hacks are on this board attacking a decorated General who served his country with distinction for so many years. General Jim Jones is an American hero and you’ve got a bunch of angry ideologues in their basements screaming at him because they can’t stand to hear the truth of what he’s saying. Whatever happened to “we stand up for our men and women in uniform”? For shame…

Posted by: Patriotic American | August 31, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

“if Obama is polling below 50 percent overall”
You should study the history of the polling of Presidents and approval ratings. Regardless of party, the trend is approval ratings fall below 50%. It is not particular to President Obama and does not indicate what you suggest.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Skip said “We are killing terrorists in battle, we do not consider killing terrorists once they have been taken prisoner.” Skip, are you some teenager that didn’t pay attention in school? Killing prisoners is something we have always condemned our enemies of? Now you are saying that is okay for the USA? You need to go back and learn a little out our military past!

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Cheney really seems to be struggling with not running the country anymore, and or has so much covering up to do he can’t simply retire and go off into the sunset.

Posted by: Dave | August 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Apparently the RETIRED General is looking for a job. There is no way that 8-months in office had detered or captured more than 8 years! A good thing the Media doesn’t ask the General for details and examples or they’d both look stupid for making a story of this.

Posted by: Maxwells | August 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Right. I’ll believe it when I see the verifiable numbers.
This administration just flat out lies. What happened to the “transparency” thing?
Besides, what makes the White House think they did this in a few months?
Could it be the former admins actions are starting to pay off?

Posted by: former democrat | August 31, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Hey Cheney: Did you forget that it was under your watch that we were attacked? So I guess they were not too afraid of you and your administration. You are the one making us unsafe implying that we are not up to keeping the country safe. How would you have liked it if someone said that during your years? Truthfully I think your administration did what they thought was right and we are doing the same…doing what we think is right. We are just as safe as you were before the attack so lets get off this and enjoy your retirement.

Posted by: talmag | August 31, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

“julieterra cannot and did not refute the fact that more Americans have been killed in Afghanistan year-to-date than have been killed any year since that war began. She just spouted some other stats . . ”
Not true. I did nothing of the sort.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

going to need to keep a cache of this story. gonna be amusing some day. and sad.

Posted by: fred | August 31, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Sure thing, I believe a lot of what comes from abc. Pure paid purveyors of prevarications and propaganda. Can’t even believe I’m posting in a liberal, leftist, bastion. Won’t waste my time again.

Posted by: Tdog | August 31, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I liked the article I had hoped that we were gaining ground in the real world amid this bizarre Cheney play; so it is good to hear. It can be fairly said that we were never safe under Bush/Cheney, and we are working to be safer.

Posted by: Mike T. | August 31, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

No kidding?? ABC posted a pro-Obama/pro-White House article? Geeez, who’d a thunk it?? I am like so stunned. And we are supposed to believe it because—??? Because they said so?? Whoops. Can’t go there. I don’t believe a word that comes out of their mouths anymore. ABC. Obama. His cronies. Pelosi. Reid. Frank. Boxer. Etc. Etc. Etc. Ad nauseum. We appear to be watching re-runs of Johnny Carson’s old game show “Who Do You Trust?”

Posted by: MJ | August 31, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

we need VP Biden to resolve this! he always speaks the truth ya know.. Where in the world is JOE BIDEN??

Posted by: jaj | August 31, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

What’s really frightening is that Gen. Jones is either too partisan or too ignorant to acknowledge that the progress in the war on terrorism can only be attributed to the diligent efforts of Bush/Cheney for the last 7 years of their administration. Jones argument is akin to saying we won WW II only because Hitler committed suicide at the end, not because of years of superior combat. Way to ignore the valiant efforts of our heroic troops, Gen. Jones (my son is one of them)!
And by the way, before anyone like Gen Jones or his kind request more money or troops for Afghanistan (which has gone south in a big hurry since Obama took the reins) let me give you a suggestion… its a freebie. Give the concerned Afghanis one day’s notice and then napalm every poppy field in the country. That’s a win-win strategy. It cuts the financial heart out of the Taliban and ultimately decreases the supply of heroin on US streets.

Posted by: hamor | August 31, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

it took bush 37 months to go below 50%

Posted by: dee | August 31, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

NDSue – I don’t understand your reasoning. You are saying Obama is a failure at winning the war in Afganistan in his first six months in office while saying Bush did a better job of not winning the war in Afganistan in the seven years he was President. That is crazy!

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I highly doubt obama has put more terrorists out of commission in his first year than Bush did in 6 to 7 years?! What the General is doing is called damage control. If Obama is even close its only because of the intel, the Bush administration had aquired before Obama changed it all.
That being said, I don’t agree with what Bush has done and most of the tactics he approved. To flat out say Obama has done more in a 10th of the time Bush had is completely absurd

Posted by: Jason | August 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I would love to believe this but…show me the facts.
AFGan war you can’t blame on Bush, its all yours Obama.
Holding on that some of my countyr will be left until 2010 & 2012

Posted by: Dick Sicario Las Vegas. NV | August 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I liked the article I had hoped that we were gaining ground in the real world amid this bizarre Cheney play; so it is good to hear. It can be fairly said that we were never safe under Bush/Cheney, and we are working to be safer.
————————–
let’s hope so…we can’t afford another 9/11 both mentally and financially

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

“it took bush 37 months to go below 50%”
But once he did it was a long way down.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Patriotic American,disagreeing with Gen. Jones is not attacking him. Being decorated does not mean that you are incapable of being wrong-as many Obama supporters pointed out about Sen. McCain.He made a foolish statement that he cannot back up with facts-within 24 hours we will see some kind of retraction(if the media reports it at all).

Posted by: Nephron | August 31, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

“it took bush 37 months to go below 50%”
Bush was headed below 50% until 9/11 happened – and then the country rallied behind their leader.
As you know, Bush eventually fell to somewhere around 30% approval rating. President Obama has a long way to go.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

On December 1, 2008 then-President-elect Obama announced Jones as his selection for National Security Advisor. The National Security Advisor is appointed by the President without confirmation by the United States Senate. Jones assumed the post when Obama was sworn into office on January 20, 2009.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Unbelievable! A Marine general soaking up the koolaid. He must have been dazzled by the One’s promises. No one ever heard of him until he caved to the mighty one. This is the only way he can create a lagacy for himself. He is definitely NOT one of the few good men. The Corp is better off without him….

Posted by: Clif | August 31, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Bin Ladin, Bin Ladin… geez, even the Bush administration finally admitted there is ZERO EVIDENCE that Bin Ladin had any direct hand in 9/11. Like Sadam Hussein, he was/is a nasty guy, an enemy in his philosophy to the United States. The Bush administration used him as a tool to incite the country’s wrath after 9/11. Is his destruction critical to our future or an key element in our continued security? Not likely.

Posted by: Rick_VT | August 31, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Ain’t this is a Catch .22.
Killing and capturing terrorists? Oh my.

Posted by: snake | August 31, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

probably is classified because if the general public knows, then the terrorists probably know..just using general knowledge here

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

During the cold war the government would “Bring out the Russians” When they wanted to divert our attention. This guy, Obama “Brings out George W Bush”. I’m smarter than that.

Posted by: fred | August 31, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

julieterra | Aug 31, 2009 8:05:21 PM As you know, Bush eventually fell to somewhere around 30% approval rating. President Obama has a long way to go.
++++++++At the rate he is going he will have the third fastest falling approval rating of any president since WWII behind Ford and Carter per Gallup 8/26/09

Posted by: Boxcar | August 31, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

It’s funny how liberals suddenly promote the killing of terrorists when they are in power.
All while investigating CIA agents who’s dilligent work kept our country safe for 8 years…
All while prosecuting our soldiers on the battle field time and time again.
All during a month when the US has suffered more casualties in Afganistan than any other time during this war.
ABC, you continually prove time and time again why you cannot be trusted with a single story. It will always be deformed along your ideology.

Posted by: Danny Vice | August 31, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

> “terrorist mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed provided information after being water boarded dozens of times”
Where in the report did it categorize the information KSM provided as pre- or post-torture? And where did it categorize any information he provided as having been elicited explicitly because of torture?
What jpt chooses to ignore is the fact that Bush/Cheney used torture-elicited falsehoods to justify invasion of Iraq (see: al Libi), making non-theoretical the deaths that can be attributed to Bush’s torture regime.
————————–
sorry forgot to paste again
probably is classified because if the general public knows, then the terrorists probably know..just using general knowledge here

Posted by: Zac | August 31, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Facts:
The only terrorist attack that ever occurred in America happened on the Bush/Cheney watch. It didn’t happen because there wasn’t any warning. They were warned by their top intelligence person repeatedly but they wouldn’t listen.
Clinton came to office with a huge deficit that the last republican President left him and he whittled it down considerably and left a budget surplus for Bush W. W. tripled the deficit by manufacturing a fake war for his own reasons that had nothing to do with 9/11 and by giving the wealthy a huge tax decrease without having a way to pay for it. He enabled the biggest “socilaized medicine” program ever by passing Medicare part D, which was much better for the corporations than it was for the seniors——and he did it all on credit and made no attempt to pay for it. He also did a lousy job with Katrina.
The Bush administration deregulated the safe guards that FDR put in place to prevent another depression and as a result we got a huge recession when Wall Street went crazy with all their new “freedom” to ruin the economy.
If the wealthy paid the same taxes now that they paid under their hero Reagan, every person in this country could have medical care and we could begin to whittle down the deficit.
Under Cheney, well over 700 hundred people were “disappeared” and forced to undergo harsh interrogation techniques. They eventually determined that nearly 500 of those people were innocent and released them. If it was your son or daughter or father who was innocent and subjected to all they did, would you still feel good about Cheney? They were indiscriminate about who they treated badly and they got a lot of false information that they couldn’t tell from good intelligence. In the process they created the greatest recruitment tool the Taliban ever had.
America never used to be such a nation of cowards that we violated all American principles because we allowed somebody to turn us into a bunch of scaredy cats. It takes a lot more patriotic courage to stand for principles than it does to quiver in fear and beat and shoot everybody you even wonder about. Eisenhower would not recognize the republican party. I used to vote republican but it has become the party of lies and cowardice and that is not anybody’s ideal of a patriotic American.

Posted by: karela | August 31, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Mr. Obama is a serial liar. Lying is contagious, like SARS. It always flows from the top down. Biden started to lie for, about and with Mr. Obama. Hillary, although she was amazing when she was speaking her mind, started to lie about Mr. Obama. Now it trickled down to the General Jones.

Posted by: young_voter | August 31, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

He may be decorated, but he also obviously knows who can butter his bread.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Once again theis administration offers us “words” but no facts to back them up..no statistics, no names, places, nothing..just empty words…show me…prove to me what you say is true…then maybe the American people will believe you….in this short time is office, this foolish President has only proven he is a liar, a non-believer in America, a far left wing politician and believer in government ruling the population….
I don’t think it leads to a victory in 2010 or 2012…1 term, with enormous damage done to America…let’s hope we survive as a Nation….

Posted by: dadling | August 31, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Calie Stephens – Are you saying that Bush did a better job in Afganistan because fewer Americans died per year? In case you did not know it, we went to war in Afganistan because of 9/11. Bush never did win the war their or captured the leaders of 9/11. At the end of his 7 year war, the situation in Afghanistn is the worse it has been in years, according to his own commanders before Bush left office. Our soldiers are heros for their hard work and effort, but Bush put most of the troops in Iraq and left Aghanistan on the back page and allowed it to get worse.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Al Qaeda attacks on Americans on Bill Clinton’s watch: Khobar Towers; African embassies; WTC 1993; USS Cole. (What have I left out?) And what did Clinton do that bothered Al Qaeda in any way?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Maybe Obama can learn from history? Obama was wrong about the surge in Iraq. Maybe he can learn from his mistake and use his own surge in Afghanistan to win. But the big question for President Obama, is what is he going to do about Iran? War is coming with Iran, whether we start it or not!

Posted by: Randal Hawkins | August 31, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Oh, yes. And pigs fly. But when all the secret discussions and memos are made public, perhaps we can make the judgments ourselves, yes? Otherwise, Obama’s “success” in this regard is just a claim made by an appointee who probably fears being investigated by Eric Holderif he doesn’t toe the line.

Posted by: 1Laurs1 | August 31, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Patriotic American, decorated generals are just as capable of gross misjudgement on political matters. Colin Powell comes to mind.

Posted by: David S | August 31, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Cheney and Bush presided over our nation during the only successful attack on our Continental soil in 200 years. Last time we were successfully attacked on our Continental soil was when the British were lobbing rusty cannon balls at us. Based on that metric, their policies were a failure. Cheney has been desperately trying to rewrite history in all these faux-interviews, like the embarrassing fawn-job on Fox yesterday.

Posted by: USA#1 | August 31, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

For all of you people that say ‘we were attacked under Bush’, do some research, see how many times Americans were targeted during Clinton. Using your same arguement about “why didn’t the know or why didn’t they stop them”, guess what, after the “interigations no more attacks”, we did what you wanted, right?

Posted by: Rob | August 31, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Young_voter.
I think its funny how the first word you say is facts and then say the only terrorist attack to happen in America happened under Bush/Cheney. You’ve proven that you’re a young voter because your memory seems to be short. Who was president the first time the World Trade Center was bombed? Bill Clinton. Who was President when the OKC Federal Building was destroyed? Bill Clinton.

Posted by: redsawks82 | August 31, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

LOL… BREAKING: The President’s appointee says the President is doing a better job than his predecessor. Wow. Who woulda thunk it?

Posted by: jeff | August 31, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

There is only one reaction any reasonable person can have to JJ’s (Jim Jones) claim: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA …! Unfortunately it won’t be a laughing matter for long. If JJ doesn’t take his partisan blinders off, we are going to pay dearly for the community organizer’s policies.

Posted by: commonlogic | August 31, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

At one time Clinton was the worse president we ever had and we should never give him credit for anything good. Then it was Bush who was the worse and never did anything good. Today Obama is the worse and we should not give him credit for anything good. The military is full of heros that are fighting for us, yet we are too stupid to use our brain to think for ourselves. Everyone needs to take their blinders off and make intelligent remarks for a change. Every president we have had accomplished some good things for our country and they also all failed in other ways. Say some intelligent instead of making stupid generalizations.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Obama has done #@^&*. Run his mouth and fly all over the place playing the roll. America – you have been flim flamed big time.

Posted by: Old Man | August 31, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Did anyone else catch that this guy is calling the CIA a law enforcement agency!?! Either he’s clueless about what he’s saying, or he’s expressing a rather terrifying intent for the CIA to have police powers.

Posted by: Max | August 31, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

What else would you expect someone in the Obama cabinet to say? Jeeze, he’s Obama’s security adviser for pete’s sake. It’s like that little, my dad can beat up your dad game kids play. They need to grow up.

Posted by: bo | August 31, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Rob, sorry, did you just say “maybe you should research how many times Americans were targeted?” “Targeted?” Do you realize how loony your argument sounds to everybody except those who think Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin are brilliant? “Targeted?” Utterly hilarious argument.

Posted by: Reality Check | August 31, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

As much as this Democrat would like to believe that this administration is doing better……we all know that is a bunch of bs.

Posted by: maria | August 31, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

General do you think because you contradicted Cheney ,things are going to be different.Do you really believe our adversaries will respect us an admired us more? No, no. What the Taliban celebrates, is the discord among yourselves. In the middle of a cruent war general, where our soldiers are dieing every day. Politics will never bring our dead back to life. There are plenty of forums and judicial procedures to bring justice to fruition without this constat self-flagelation circus.

Posted by: Please | August 31, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Right.
The release of the Lockerbie Bomber by our very close Allies shows a noticeable tightening of bonds between us, now doesn’t it.
And with the President declaring the hero’s welcome in Libya “highly objectionable,” terrorists must be shaking in their boots wondering what Obama is going to say next!
What a joke this Administration is.
The next attack ought to be a doozy!

Posted by: Jeremy | August 31, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

David S, so in other words, when the generals agree with YOU, they’re great american heroes whose judgement should be trusted. When they don’t agree with you, they’re political hacks. That is pathetic. Totally pathetic.

Posted by: Patriotic American | August 31, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

“Everyone needs to take their blinders off and make intelligent remarks for a change. Every president we have had accomplished some good things for our country and they also all failed in other ways. Say some intelligent instead of making stupid generalizations.”
Couldn’t agree more Mike. Unfortunately there are people who come on here with their own personal political agenda, and it has little to do with facts or reality – it is ideology.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

When the the Twin Towers were bombed in 1993 under President Clinton’s watch… he also kept us safe for the next seven years… and he didn’t have to torture anyone to do it.

Posted by: Edward Cochrane | August 31, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Obama is merely trying to shift the focus off of health care because he is losing so badly on that front. Figure it out Barack…we aint buying what you’re selling! No socialism for America!

Posted by: bo | August 31, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

All you critics do is blame, blame, blame. Give the new administration a chance. They are trying to get things done, and have to fight people like you all the way. No wonder nothing is getting done as fast as YOU want it to. Maybe if we stop fighting each other and actually work together, something good might happen. Think about it. Its a value you teach your children, practice what you preach!!!

Posted by: Mark | August 31, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Jeremy – it was the Bush administration that cozied up to Libya. Did you not notice?

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

One question the reporter should have asked that would have destroyed the entire claim:
“Would it be your assessment, then, that other nations had the ability to combat terrorists but chose not to simply to spite Bush, and now do the opposite simply because they like Obama more?”

Posted by: A.Shepard | August 31, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Jim Jones has drunk the koolaid, and he has shown how naive he is if he really believes all that nonsense. Anyone who thinks we are safer now that we are appeasing state sponsors of terrorism is living in a 1990′s world where the US was attacked directly because the terrorists did not fear us. The only way to ensure peace is to carry a really big stick, use it when necessary, and then the need to use that stick diminishes significantly. Diplomacy has never convinced terrorists to stop trying to kill those whom they hate.

Posted by: Jason | August 31, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

What I’d like to know is:
what are all the conservatives doing on a liberal news site?

Posted by: tule | August 31, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I feel much safer with Barack in Office, don’t you? What an American hero, what with all his vast experience as a community organizer and two years on the campaign trail. He’s a real leader on terrorism, that one. Hang in there, America: Jan. 20, 2013.

Posted by: s | August 31, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

LOLOLOL..what a freakin lie. This one goes up there with..”You can keep your old healthcare plan”. Obama has done more to ENCOURAGE terrorism than Carter did. What an epic failure…and it’s so bad he has to get his state run media to lie for him in hopes of raising his poll numbers which are in the midst of pulling a Titanic…

Posted by: Ed | August 31, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

USA #1. I’m not going to argue about Bush and Cheney. They and most of our other politicians in this country are underqualified and incompitent but… you are an idiot. The world trade center was attacked in the early nineties. Check your history OR you can just tell the victims of that attack that it was unsuccessful. “Blame Bush in 2012″. Will that slogan still work?

Posted by: Taylor | August 31, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

“People that were acting within the law don’t have anything to worry about.” End of story really. Although rabid rightwingers don’t want to admit it.

Posted by: Michael | August 31, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

“….to discuss things with other rulers…”
Nice.

Posted by: anb | August 31, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Cheney and his cronies keep up the mantra of “no terrorist attack for 8 yrs”! Never mind over 4,000 Americans were killed in Iraq, for what? baiting the terrorists with American lives?

Posted by: Bill | August 31, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

“Would it be your assessment, then, that other nations had the ability to combat terrorists but chose not to simply to spite Bush, and now do the opposite simply because they like Obama more?”
Not as simplistic as that. Co-operation is not something you ‘demand’ or ‘coerce’ from others, it’s something that is worked up together.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Really though, what are all these conservatives doing on a liberal news site? LOL

Posted by: Wehn | August 31, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Gee Whiz!!!What a HERO….not!!!!

Posted by: Rich | August 31, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

julieterra, you forgot about the take over of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran under Carter, the attack on the World Trade Center in ’93, and the two embassies in Africa. All U.S. soil.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Edward claims: “When the the Twin Towers were bombed in 1993 under President Clinton’s watch… he also kept us safe for the next seven years… and he didn’t have to torture anyone to do it.”
Of course, Edward conveniently “forgets” to mention (1) the 1998 Al Qaeda simultaneous attacks on two US embasies and the (2) 2000 Al Qaeda attack on the USS Cole. Apparently we weren’t too safe following the Democrats slap on the wrist against Al Qaeda.

Posted by: Mike | August 31, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

” to discuss things with other rulers…”
The USA does not have rulers, we have elected officials that should do the bidding of those they represent. Disgusting.

Posted by: Chris | August 31, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

OBAMA is making himself look rather
foolish. He is quoting a guy that
during his talk he said: “….I’m not
saying we are killing more of the enemy
or capturing more….it is just….”
WHAT EXACTLY IS THE MAN SAYING???

Posted by: tESSI | August 31, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

IT’s abc news. What do you expect?

Posted by: claire | August 31, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

more freakin obama lies.
throw the bums out. We can’t have 2 faced LIARS representing the United States of America.

Posted by: jake2 | August 31, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Of course Cheney doesn’t want Holder to investigate the operations of the CIA, probably because there is this big paper trail of violations that lead right to his front door. I wouldn’t trust Cheney no further than a snake could spit him. I think if the truth finally came out it will be discovered that Cheney should have been impeached years ago. After retiring from the Army after serving during Iraqi Freedom, I traveled to Europe and the level of animosity towards America because of Bush was swelling. I could only imagine what it was like in the Muslim nations. I can see how the General’s point would be a very valid one. It amazes me that people seemingly hope that we aren’t more secure simply because Obama is President. It’s as if they are praying for something awful to happen so they can have a big “I TOLD YOU SO” moment. I think every thinking man knows the true source of such hostilities. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. Apparently, after so many years of Cheney and Bush lies, when the truth hits the lips of their drones it has become a foreign taste to them. Our Commander-in-Chief is doing an awesome job and if I supported Bush as my Commander as a soldier (though I did not agree with his methods), I will I support Obama even more so. THIS IS AMERICA AND OBAMA IS OUR PRESIDENT!

Posted by: August | August 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Yeah, there you go BAM…so who will get the credit for the billions of profit on the bailout…any one want to bet!!
This is so like them…anyone here could have guessed the reply on this one.
MSMs go get tough now…

Posted by: Detter | August 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Thanks President OBAMA we can really relax without constant fearmongering from Cheney, who is now slowly exposing himself, embedded in the right wing TV Shows.
We are on a brink of an Isreali-Palestinian deal… Wow!!!
Thank you Mr. President, Commander In Chief.

Posted by: JohnS | August 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

What a tool.

Posted by: Chris | August 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

edward cochrane says: “When the the Twin Towers were bombed in 1993 under President Clinton’s watch… he also kept us safe for the next seven years… and he didn’t have to torture anyone to do it.”
Wrong. After the 1993 bombing of the WTC, the following also occured:
1. 1995 Car bomb attack at US military HQ in Riyadh kills 5
2. 1996 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: truck bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex, killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others.
3. 1998 Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: truck bombs exploded almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500.
4. 2000 Oct. 12, Aden, Yemen: U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole heavily damaged when a small boat loaded with explosives blew up alongside it. 17 sailors killed. Linked to Osama bin Laden, or members of al-Qaeda terrorist network.
All these happened when we were not at war and while we tried to handle the situation through diplomatic channels, that obviously did not work well and we were attacked on 9/11 because they saw the weak response to each of these other attacks against Americans overseas.

Posted by: Jason | August 31, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Remember, we are war with Eurasia, we have always been at war with Eurasia.

Posted by: Swampgas | August 31, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

What a SHAME Bush and Cheney have been for the National Security of this Nation and our standing in the World.
We have a new ERA to rebuild our ties with the World we wish to live in.
Thank you President OBAMA.

Posted by: No-BUSH-no-Cheney | August 31, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

It’s amazing how Obama’s followers, live in another planet. These terrorists are killing our precious blood, in front of their face, and they have the gumption to say OB, is doing a better job than Bush. Hello!! Bush is not the commander in chief anymore. During the whole 6 months of Bush advance in Iraq, there were never these many young people killed.More soldiars were killed during the 1st 6 mo. of BO, administration.

Posted by: OMGptl | August 31, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

If I were President Obama I wouldn’t throw my shoulder out patting myself on the back for outperforming the biggest nitwit in the history of the White House. I am glad that he’s doing better. It’s nice to have the grown ups in charge again, but doing a better job than a man with the emotional maturity of a toddler is hardly an outstanding accomplishment.

Posted by: Lockewasright | August 31, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Jones assumed the post when Obama was sworn into office on January 20, 2009. Yep, what else is he going to say?

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

=== he also kept us safe for the next seven years… and he didn’t have to torture anyone to do it.”===
What about renditions? Does that not count as torture since it wasn’t performed by US personnel? But was actual torture?

Posted by: Axey | August 31, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Jone said: ” “The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it” So where are the additional free world troops to help us in Afghanistan? If our statnding has gone up and we are ridding the world of terrorists – why are we and the Brits the only ones standing a post in the desert? It must be remembered that the ego-driven Jones is trying to replace CIA Station Chiefs with his own people. His ambition and political support of this administration supercedes his role as Security Advisor.

Posted by: Galasso | August 31, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Bush and Cheney started the Iraq war with lies and lies and more lies that is costing the tax payers $1.2 trillion
What a shame and disgrace.
Now President OBAMA has to cleam the mess.
We should very grateful and supportive.
Stop being followers of Bush and Cheney and embrace the new World.

Posted by: USA | August 31, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Jason – if your criteria is bombings taking place on foreign soil then Bush and Cheney failed horribly in protecting America. Literally thousands of bombings of Americans took place on foreign soil after 9/11 and literally thousands of Americans were killed.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

“President’s National Security Adviser Defends His Employer”
Shocking.

Posted by: Woody | August 31, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Come to think of it – Jones looks and sounds a lot like Stansfield Turner – who vigorrously tried to destroy the CIA under Carter.

Posted by: Galasso | August 31, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

===Stop being followers of Bush and Cheney and embrace the new World.===
No thank you.

Posted by: Axey | August 31, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

what people forget is that the USA, was attacked, by these terrorists, now the left is making it seem, that we somehow were to blame for invading them for no reason. They declared war on the USA. by attacking and murdering over 3,000 People in the USA. I wonder how many soldiars will die befor his term is over. And there will be peace in Aphganistan. Bush IFEEL WILL BE ONE OF OUR GREATEST PRESIDENT,because he was responsible for setting those in the middle East free from terrorism.

Posted by: OMGptl | August 31, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

sounds like cheney is waiting for an “i told you so” moment.
i sincerely believe he thinks the american public is dumb and that he has the right to twist the facts in order to illustrate the world as he sees it.
anger that you can’t change the world in your image is a bad attribute and a waste of energy.

Posted by: mark | August 31, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

This administration is like a child (dangerous child) in an argument. Everytime someone brings up Bush the answer is; I know I am but what are you”.
It is more a error of bad comedies rather than a comedy of bad errors.
Both parties are two sides of the same evil, corrupt, crooked coin. Heads I win tails you lose.

Posted by: plainolamerican | August 31, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

I served as an officer in the Marine Corps for 20 years. I did not know much about General Jones but have always wondered why a former Marine Corps General officer would want to have anything to do with this administration. I thought maybe he accepted the position to keep Obama on the straight and narrow regarding national security. If General Jones really means what he said during this interview, he is little more than a propagandist for Obama and in my opinion is a disgrace.
The 9/11 Commission concluded that the main reason we were attacked was because of a failure of our intelligence agencies. After seven years of Bush/Cheney trying to repair the damage done to our intelligence gathering capability during the Clinton years, Obama is determined to turn the clock back by investigating the CIA interrogators who help protect us.For General Jones to say this is not political is just plain BS.
In an earlier post, it was stated that Clinton kept us safe after the bombing of the twin towers in 1993. Tell that to the military personnel killed at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the hundreds killed in the African embassy attacks or the US sailors killed on the USS Cole. The entire run up to 9/11 occurred during the final years of the Clinton administration. It was because of their intelligence failures that the terrorists trained in this country right under the nose of the Clinton administration’s broken intelligence apparatus. Unlike Obama, Bush had too much class to say he inherited 9/11 from Clinton which he did.

Posted by: Jerry M | August 31, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Childish perspective. Absolutely Childish.

Posted by: Emma | August 31, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

“, what are we to believe these countries have been doing for the past 8 years? Deliberately withholding intelligence and support?”
Not focusing on co-operation, yes. The bully doesn’t always get the highest levels of voluntary cooperation. The smart guy on the playground often does better.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Thank GOD the years when torture was made legal in the United States of America are over.
Bush and Cheney trampled on the Geneva conventions our Fathers respectfully signed.
We can breathe again.
Proud to be an American, free of torture.

Posted by: Thanks | August 31, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Were doing better… I’m not saying that the numbers back it up… but we are, trust us.
The answer for so many things these days.

Posted by: Jim | August 31, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

I guess it’s time for Obama to play that “decorated National Security Advisor” trump card. I knew he would come in handy!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

@David J,
It’s not whether it comes from Obama’s fawning media (or whatever other delusion you have in your head). It’s whether it comes from a constant liar like Faux “News”. It’s not that is has to come from the MSM. It’s that it can’t come from a perpetual liar like Fox527.

Posted by: lockewasright | August 31, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

drivel.
“I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that would argue because somebody was subjected to enhanced techniques that there was a revelation that we wouldn’t have had,” he said, “but it is very hard to prove the negative on this.”
That has to be one of the most weasel like quotes I’ve ever read. Basically there is no proof at all that he would have given us half the information he did if we hadn’t put him through the ringer. But the former general has to get the thought out there somehow doesn’t he?
This whole exchange is terribly cliche ridden. It looks like it was scripted in a poli sci 101 course.

Posted by: Tigger | August 31, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Don’t diss Jason. WHat about the USS Cole? The Marine barracks in Lebanon? He embassy in Kenya? The Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia? All under Clinton’s watch, while we were treating it as a Law enforcement issue (sound familiar?).

Posted by: David J | August 31, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

FTA, 2nd paragraph: “…with other rulers…”? Gen. Jones should know better. Only monarchies and dictatorships have rulers. It’s reassuring to read the comments and see both a knowledge of Orwell and history represented.

Posted by: Karen | August 31, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

If your criteria is bombings taking place on foreign soil then Bush and Cheney failed horribly in protecting America. Literally thousands of bombings of Americans took place on foreign soil after 9/11 and literally thousands of Americans were killed.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Respectfully, the general’s remarks do not pass the straight-face test.
But a Marine being supportive of Marxist Obama? Can’t figure that out.
And making statements to undermine the CIA?
We’re in a worse predicament than I thought.

Posted by: CKA in Red State USA | August 31, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Doesn’t anyone else smell politics here? I mean Cheney is bitching about Eric Holder’s investigation of the CIA and this guy comes out of the blue?

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Gen. Jim Jones is speaking the TRUTH.
With LIES, Bush and Cheney trampled on the Geneva conventions our Fathers respectfully signed.

Posted by: Beemer | August 31, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

“embrace the new World.” Oh my God. I’m having Woodstock era flashbacks!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Doesn’t anyone else smell politics here? I mean Cheney is bitching about Eric Holder’s investigation of the CIA and this guy comes out of the blue?
Yes, I smell politics, and it STINKS!

Posted by: David J | August 31, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

One mass casualty attack (God forbid) in the U.S. and Gen Jone’s words could ring hollow. Yes, they are still killing and capturing the enemy overseas, but the U.S. still has major vulnerabilities (like air transportation and the inability to detect explosives on one’s person, which is a gaping hole in our security).
This admin has the audacity to hope that day never comes.

Posted by: J House | August 31, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

This is obviously an article promulgated on the left. I can tell because the author doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground.

Posted by: Jeffersonite | August 31, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“We’re a nation of values,”
and NOT a NATION of TORTURE.
Get over it.
We cannot change the past, but we can shape our future.

Posted by: Nation | August 31, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“But a Marine being supportive of Marxist Obama?”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Given that the potus has yet to keep his word, his constant flip flopping on EVERY issue, his planted questioners at town hall meetings. How can you believe anything this Liar in Chief or his goons say. His ratings are in the cellar and he is pulling out all the chicago tricks. Like everything before this , this to will fail and the truth will be seen. The evidence is clear, this emperor and his merry corrupt goons are all naked. they are transparent in thier actions and LIES.

Posted by: enoughisenough | August 31, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

He actually said ruler:
“The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers ….”
- scary

Posted by: AlC | August 31, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

I laughed so hard I had tears in my eyes. Why when anything happens that is negative it is because they are cleaning up a Bush mess, but any positive report as a result of something Bush started is not credited to Bush. These clowns are to funny for words. Take the credit, Obama needs it. Obama wanted to be president, now it is time to accept responsibility like a man. You can not keep the blame Bush wagon going for four years ( or maybe you can ). What I wouldn’t give to have a real man in the White House. Just live by good old Harry Truman’s words. ” the buck stops here “, but then again he was a man.

Posted by: enigmaforever | August 31, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Huh? Doesn’t Jones have a conflict of interest here? What’s he suppose to say? Obama’s useless? Obama controls this guy’s future… another useless piece by the MSM to prop up this empty suit, who in reality knows not a thing about foreign policy. But he did claim to live in a foreign country… yeah right. If that’s the case, I should be POTUS!

Posted by: Gina | August 31, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

“His ratings are in the cellar and he is pulling out all the chicago tricks.”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Jim Jones worked for the Bush administration.
He and Secretary Gates are the only Bush holdovers to work for Obama.
So… when a guy of that stature… a guy who even Sean Hannity, of all people, praised as one of the few good Obama appointments back in January… says that Obama’s administration is doing a better job fighting terrorism than Bush’s…
IT MEANS SOMETHING.
The cognitive dissonance of the righwing folks posting here is hilarious.
They can’t even conceive of the idea that Obama is better at this than Bush/Cheney…. even when one of their own tells them so.

Posted by: Dean | August 31, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

It is a real embarrassment.
The Obama Administration began by trying to call terrorism as something other, with a vapid term of “manmade disasters”.
President Obama has lied about earmarks, lobbyists, signing statements, transparency, bows to kings, tax cuts, AARP support, etc.
The Obama Administration has basically lied about everything, even GITMO.
Now they are politicizing US National Security in the worst Clintonian – Nixonian fashion.
The release of the CIA Interrogation Memos was a cheap Political stunt, and this President was dishonest about looking forward.
It is ugly, and this is returning all to the naive, negligent days of the 1990′s when appeasement, weakness, deceit and utter incompetence made the USA very vulnerable to attack.

Posted by: William | August 31, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

hoping for your nation to fail is schizophrenic.
Schizophrenia is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mental disorder characterized by abnormalities in the perception or expression of reality.
Think about it.

Posted by: USA | August 31, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Mr. Jones knows who butters his piece of toast! I mean Obama has been in office less than 8 months and this guy has come to this conclusion? Considering the latest policy controversies it sounds like a deliberate political play by the Obama administration to me. Rather “Bush League” to me. No pun intended.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Obama is having more success at taking ot terrorists? They must mean taking them out to dinner.

Posted by: Ed | August 31, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

What, in heaven’s name, would you expect a president’s National Security Advisor to say? My president is failing at his job? This is a non-story.

Posted by: Woody | August 31, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Posted by:Thanks Aug 31, 2009 8:52:21PM—I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Posted by: d | August 31, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I’m from Missouri; Show-me the numbers, otherwise it’s just the same-o same-o BS.
LB

Posted by: Lathon Baud | August 31, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

This coming from a network that won’t air ads critical of ObamaCare, yet holds an hour long infomercial from the WhiteHouse over the same issue – I don’t trust anything you say, you have sold out…

Posted by: Simple Man | August 31, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Patriot American…Obama could stick his wee weed up thing up your backside and you’d say “thank you sir, mat I have another.”

Posted by: Jeff L | August 31, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

“But the numbers are going up, he said. “The numbers of high value targets that we are successfully reaching out to or identifying through good intelligence”
WE ARE KILLING MORE OF THEIR-AND THEY ARE DEFINITELY KILLING MORE OF OURS. Every soldier in the US military is a high value target to the terrorists. Every terrorist we kill is not Obama pulling the trigger to get them its our soldiers. Obama gets no credit for having his generals claim victory for him-Obama has never even served in the military. He protested the wars and in my eyes-he can never ever claim a military victory on those grounds alone.

Posted by: Ilovemysoldiers | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

. Just live by good old Harry Truman’s words. ” the buck stops here ”
The buck never stopped on Bush’s desk, at least not to the fanatical Right. Everything was Clinton’s fault, remember?

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

General Jones, you have no class. Like your boss. No wonder the enemy laughs at us. What other reaction could they have to fractured leadership?

Posted by: Bart | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Jim Jones worked for the Bush administration.
He and Secretary Gates are the only Bush holdovers to work for Obama.
So… when a guy of that stature… a guy who even Sean Hannity, of all people, praised as one of the few good Obama appointments back in January… says that Obama’s administration is doing a better job fighting terrorism than Bush’s…
IT MEANS SOMETHING.
The cognitive dissonance of the righwing folks posting here is hilarious.
————————–
They have their personal political agenda to smear the President regardless of the issue, the facts or reality.
They even find reason to criticize the President for taking his children for ice cream.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

“The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim”
Shocked, I tell ya, shocked.

Posted by: Beez | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

I love the part where it says “The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim”……. This is because there are no real facts. Hmmmm let’s ask him who he voted for and how he was put out to say these things. How can you say that Bush wasn’t effective when we haven’t be attacked. This is a waste of an article! It is just a puff piece to try to salvage Obama’s numbers. SAD

Posted by: Christy | August 31, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

That statement proves liberals actually have a sense of humor because the punchline that The One has killed more terrorists than President Bush is a show-stopping side-splitter.

Posted by: Todd | August 31, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Flash! Obama’s National Security advisor, Maj. Gen. Jones has come out publicly and says Obama’s administration just doesn’t get it, and is doing a much poorer job of advancing national security initiatives than Bush’s! Yeah right! LMAO!!! They would probably tie him up and duct tape his mouth before that would happen.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

It is ironic the President relies on our military forces to succeed in Iraq/Afghanistan and on CIA to stop the next attack.
Yet, his Justice goes after CIA with an investigation, despite the previous review,and, releases information that tell other govts we cannot be trusted with their secrets.
It is as if JFK, had he not been assassinated, would have been investigated for CIA plans to kill Castro.

Posted by: J House | August 31, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

“What, in heaven’s name, would you expect a president’s National Security Advisor to say? My president is failing at his job? This is a non-story.”
I can see your point, but what about Cheney? Should we be surprised at what he’s been saying? And what’s happened to Bush? Why isn’t he the one defending his administration?

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

How does Jones know they were terrorists? Was there a trial? Besides, I thought the war on terror was over. Obama is killing man made something or others.

Posted by: Axey | August 31, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

“With LIES, Bush and Cheney trampled on the Geneva conventions our Fathers respectfully signed.” WHo signed the Geneva convention agreement? Our “Fathers”? Like Washington and Jefferson? LOL!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Strange!! Republicans concerned about the mounting dead total in Ahganistan. Democrats saying that it is necessary to win in Ahganistan. Could it be that both sides are hippocrits?

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

The wing nut jobs are so bent out of shape to think that all their dire predictions about Obama are just a bunch of hooey that they are imploding. Jones is a respected military leader. Now, if you wingies don’t think he’s credible, add to the list of notables Generals Zinni, Trainor, Wallace, Sanchez, Swannick; Richard Clark and several other respected people, some of whom worked under Bushie, and all these people will back Jones up 100%. Your guy was a dimwit, we have a winner in the WH. Lump it loonies.

Posted by: Veteran38 | August 31, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Emma posted, “I did not know much about General Jones but have always wondered why a former Marine Corps General officer would want to have anything to do with this administration.”
I served 4 years in the USMC and also don’t know much about Jones. My question about Jones is if he wanted to be useful why didn’t be vocal about the poisoned water at Camp Lejeune NC? Too many cancers, birth defects, etc. I was at CLNC in the 1970′s. They just notified me of ‘possible health effects in 2008. Great! I got cancer in 2001 and 2009.
Keep your mouth shut, get the next star, and screw anyone else. That’s my opinion on Jones and his ilk.
Semper Fi

Posted by: PubliusMD | August 31, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Obummer just sounds desperate now grasping at anything he can as his failed presidency goes down the toilet.

Posted by: Todd from CO | August 31, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Wow, what BS is this? Lets go through the book of whose who of terrorists…remember the deck of 50? I do. Remember all but Number 1 were captured or killed? So now tell us…in order for this clown at the NSA to be correct he had to have captured or killed NUMBER 1, the ACE of SPADES…OSAMA BIN LADEN? thats the only terrorist more valuable than those that Bush caught…such BS coming from this administration..wondewr how may readers out there have drank the Jim Jones (Obama flunkie) cool-aid? Sucks when reality gets served up to you on a platter that yer liberals are incompetent at everything they do.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

I guess if you are critical of something this administration does, especially something as clearly politically motivated as this, you are a “conservative traitor” that wants “America to fail”. Get off it!!!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

On top of that, perhaps someone should explain to jOnes that Obama has donated millions in Us tax money to terrorists like Hamas to help them “relocate”…here. Now, Obama is attacking the CIA for keeping the terrorists in line. We are so up a chit creek without a paddle that it isn’t even funny. Is it 2012 yet? And exactly how accurate where the Mayans? They say we end in December 2012…you know the supposed end of Obama’s term.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 31, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

ABC NEWS–you’re a fraud! Where is the news about the lies coming from this administration? Where’s the information that FOX will speak about, but you won’t? IS OBAMA REACHING IN YOUR POCKET buying you off like MSNBC? Huh? I think it’s time the citizens hold government responsible AND the networks they buy off!

Posted by: Brad Lyons | August 31, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

This man: Marine. Cheney: Weaseled out. Who do I believe? (Hint: Not the weasel.)

Posted by: Cassandra | August 31, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

OT and respectfully…..
Where are the jobs Mr. President?
Correction: Where are any jobs at all Mr. President?

Posted by: Tina Ferrer' | August 31, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

HaHaHaHa!
Oh – oh my, oh, oooh, that’s rich!!!

Posted by: flat9 | August 31, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Jones says, “I think anybody who works in a law enforcement agency — whether it is the police or FBI or CIA — have to know clearly what the rules are and have to know what the law says and have to act with the parameters of the law.” YES!!!!

Posted by: Cassandra | August 31, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Obama = Mental midget

Posted by: Axl | August 31, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

…of course Obama has taken out more terrorists than Bush, Obama walks on water…..

Posted by: Steve | August 31, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Yeah right . . . we can tell that the war in Afghanistan is really going well. To voice such a proclamation is naive, childish and a telling sign of desperation. Obama is completely lost.

Posted by: rplat | August 31, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Wow! If anyone can’t see through this one, we truely are dumbed down. Sounds like Rahm Emanuel has been working overtime.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

David J – Kennedy had connections to the KGB, just like the Bushs had connections to Bin Laden and Muslem oil cartel. You can find that on the Internet also. Along with Bush being behind the distruction of the World Trade Center. Also, we never landed on the moon. Also, aliens have landed in the US. It is easy to find trash presented as facts on the Internet! Just read this blog if you don’t believe it – 90% of it is distortion of the truth.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 31, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

What a surprise – Obama the crybaby-in-chief is blaming Bush for all his current problems.
Anyone remember Obama saying ‘You can lay the blame on me’?
Guess that was just another one of his pathetic lies to throw onto the ever-growing pile….

Posted by: Newshound | August 31, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Cheney is trying to head off a Whitewater investigation into the shadow government he ran under George Bush. Lies, torture, ignoring the moral values on which America were founded… the legacy of Cheney is the legacy of a coward.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | August 31, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

There was a time when Generals were warriors.
Sadly, even in the Marines, you don’t get stars unless you are first and foremost a politican.
Jones is a political hack and a disgrace to the Marines.
Obama has been appeasing the Muslim world, which yes, sad as it is, largely supports the terrorists.
Any success being had, and it’s seems to be fading quickly is a legacy from the past administration, not this band of loosers and perhaps even traitors.

Posted by: Tim | August 31, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“It is as if JFK, had he not been assassinated, would have been investigated for CIA plans to kill Castro.”
JFK might well have been assassinated because of off-spin of those very plots. It’s serious business.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

I support the President’s efforts to continue the former admin’s policy of killing AQ.
Remember, the Bush admin removed the Taliban out of power (and out of the cities) with a light footprint and overwhelmingly precise air power.
The stratgy has changed, to more boots on the ground. How many are needed to tame Afghanistan?
Increasing our troop strength does make it Obama’s war there.
His strategy to stand down and let the Iraqis deal with terrorism is also his call.
He did not ‘inherit’ these decisions.
I do not want a single U.S. soldier to die if the President is not committed to defeat AQ and then bring them home, not ‘rebuild’ Afghanistan.
They want our help, but we are not welcome there.

Posted by: J House | August 31, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Actually, Obama is doing a good job of following in Bush’s footsteps when it comes to the war on terror, without the left even knowing it. As with all things Obama, you have to watch his actions instead of listening to his words. Good on him for continuing to kill terrorists. Even getting the left to cheer him while he does it!

Posted by: Axey | August 31, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

I’m still not sure that the Anthrax investigation should end. I think someone is still trying to cover that one up. How about that Rumsfeld & Cheney?

Posted by: tom | August 31, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

I don’t know how many terrorist Obama has quashed, but the hellfire missiles are taking a toll in Pakistan. Is he taking credit for violating Pakistan’s air space?

Posted by: Ben | August 31, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

American’s biggest foreign threat actually lives in the White House.

Posted by: The Threat | August 31, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

I hope the general is right, but it appears that his comments are just bs, wishful thinking, and self delusion like so much else coming out of the administration. The general talks a good game but where are the victories?

Posted by: nostromo | August 31, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

I believe this story is obvious on it’s surface. Semper Fi!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

“American’s biggest foreign threat actually lives in the White House.”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Axey:How does Jones know they were terrorists? Was there a trial?
==========
You have a point.
How do we know someone isn’t turning in a goat herder with whom they are feuding, or a young boy they beat into admitting he threw a grenade?

Posted by: MayBee | August 31, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I don’t know when Gen. Jones retired? But I do know that he was a commander in Cheif during Bush’s time. So what he is saying is that he didn’t do his job very well!! Interesting that all these prior Generals like to say how screwed up things are after they retire? Kinda like the Senator’s and Congrssmen that have been in office for many terms?

Posted by: Chuck R | August 31, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

“Is he taking credit for violating Pakistan’s air space?”
Didn’t he support this during the election?

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

President Bush and Vice President Cheney only went into Afghanistan because they couldn’t convince this country that it was Iraq who attacked us. They were never concerned that the ones who DID attack up were a terrorist group from Afghanistan. The whole Iraq fiasco could have been avoided if we had had decent people in office at the time to take it to the attackers and nothing else. But no, they began a big campaign to scare and fool America into attacking Iraq with their fear mongering lame evidence that Saddam Husein was a great threat to us.

Posted by: Vicki | August 31, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Our country is morally bankrupt and un-Godly. We will pay for our sins and I honestly almost wished my state along with several others could detach from the Union so we will not be subject to God’s wrath.

Posted by: jc | August 31, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

I see Rahm Emanuel has been working overtime.

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Exactly which terrorists have been taken out since Obama took office? And if any were, wasn’t it from information obtained during the Bush administration?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | August 31, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

To say you’re he is having greater success is like comparing apples to oranges. (LOL)
More reason we should not be going after the CIA interogators. After all they were the ones who figured out who needed to be killed.

Posted by: James | August 31, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

So long everyone. Sleep tight!

Posted by: LongT | August 31, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

When Obama get’s back from vacation he will have to thank the general for covering his back.

Posted by: jf | August 31, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Everybody missed something very important in his statements: “to discuss things with other rulers…” That same reference came from other Obama surrogates…”ruler”

Posted by: Mike | August 31, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

“The whole Iraq fiasco could have been avoided if we had had decent people in office at the time to take it to the attackers and nothing else. But no, they began a big campaign to scare and fool America into attacking Iraq with their fear mongering lame evidence that Saddam Husein was a great threat to us.”
Couldn’t be more true. An idiotic squandering of money and lives on a neo-con wet dream that had nothing to do with 9/11 or protecting America.
And we’ll pay for it for years.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Gee, did it occur to any of the genius obama people that the reason they are having the results they are is due to the info sharing that got ramped up starting in 2001? It can take MONTHS or YEARS to build up good intel on people & places and tie it all in together. This report makes it sound like that Obama and friends have a crystal ball to tell them where all the bad guys are.

Posted by: Steve | August 31, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

General the prior administration had zero attacks in our homeland after 9 11.
“Well maybe they did a good job, and
maybe they didn’t”. Now look straight
into the camera general and say “I am
not smarter than a 5th grader.” Oh yes,
you said those who did not break the law
had no worries, you should have added
those who are not breaking the law (including you, have no worries because
their will be another administration after this one and you boys are not going to like hearing payback is a ….

Posted by: smarter than a general | August 31, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Great Journalism! Actually absolutely no proof provided by General Jones but ABC News prints the story as if it were the truth. What in the world is beign taught at propoganda (sorry, I meant journalism) school these days?

Posted by: Stan | August 31, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Maybe the men of Washington could all go rent some arena and have some chest beating contest. I think I’m sick of listening to this.

Posted by: Secondlook | August 31, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

It is obsurd, to say Obama is having greater success than Bush in taking out terrorists. Bush started the war aagainst terrorism and it is his and his efforts alone that have resulted in the obliteration of dangerous elements. Obama came in and is reaping the rewards that should go to Bush.

Posted by: Kottaras | August 31, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

“They have their personal political agenda to smear the President regardless of the issue, the facts or reality.”
Au contraire, my dear – at least in my case. I wanted desperately to give him the respect that the Left never gave to President Bush. It is his policies and his behavior that have turned me against him – day by day.

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

LOL, what else is Jim Jones going to say about his boss if he doesn’t want his butt fired.

Posted by: Reality2009 | August 31, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

GeneralJones is so full of it. If Obama is having a greater impact then why the hell was August the deadliest month?? Besides we all know the Bush administration goal was to wipe the terrorist,Janet Napolitano’s and Obamas goal is to fight”Man Made Disastors”

Posted by: jonesisaliar | August 31, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

So, if everything is going so well and all the “bad guys” are being captured at an accelerated rate and all the countries of the world love us sooooo much more now because we have the Chosen One at the helm, then why do we keep hearing that Afghanistan is getting worse and worse? And why even bother with all the defense spending. We don’t need that anymore, right? Boy, that Obama…he’s quite the leader!!

Posted by: Shoe | August 31, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Obviously, someone in the WH, with the President’s knowledge, talked to Gen Jones about making public comments to counter Cheney’s interview remarks on Sunday.
It’s politics…like renaming the GWOT, refusing to call them ‘jihadists’, releasing Iranian terrorists in Iraq that killed our GI’s,and other such nonsense.

Posted by: J House | August 31, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

General Jim Jabberwocky. Pretty much sums it all up.

Posted by: Ken | August 31, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Typical Jake Trapper rubbish.

Posted by: Keith | August 31, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

OK, so why didn’t this info come forward BEFORE Cheney spoke this past weekend? And where is the list of “high value” targets we’ve taken over the last few months? Bush/Cheney and all the troops wiped most of them out during their 8 years. Notice when the Taliban has been gaining strength again in Afghan? Over the course of the last 9 months. Any coincidence there?
Really I respect the retired General and all, but come on. This is back-pedaling BS. If all this was such good news, he would not have need to wait to tell the American people about it until after Cheney spoke. All the terrorists are going away because we will now engage them in dialogue? Please…if only it worked that way. Same ridiculous mentality that got us into the 9-11 situation in the first place!

Posted by: John | August 31, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Geez, I’m a Dem and I don’t believe this for a second. Obama was voted in to stop the killing over seas, not out do Bush in randomly killing insurgents

Posted by: Jake B | August 31, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

The general’s hat is on too tight. I’m glad he’s retired he’s obviously senile.

Posted by: Bob | August 31, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Nobody is “indulging” democrats, because we happen to be the majority! It’s sickening, though, that “we” continue to indulge the fear-filled, yellow Right wing when they’re obviously only out for themselves. Continue to dish out the mindless, unsubstantiated insults at your own peril, because it just reflects how little actual thought you put into your daily life. Conservatives are cowards. They’re afraid to admit that the terrorists scared the heck out of them on 9/11, but it shows clearly in their knee-jerk reactions and impulse toward extreme measures. Try fighting against the terrorists, not with them.

Posted by: AnimusVir | August 31, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

This is an exclusive? You’re kidding? I mean, is this what you truly believe, or is it the propaganda you’ve been directed to publish? There are no facts but simply incredible and unsubstantiated talking points without any merit whatsoever. ABC, do you not understand that average Americans don’t believe a word of this, except for the “true believers” of course? ABC, what is going on with your company and in your newsroom? You are shedding and shredding any credibility you possessed as an impartial news gathering organization.

Posted by: JMac | August 31, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

We can safely say that 100% of the terrorist preferred obama over Bush any day of the week.

Posted by: Reality2009 | August 31, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Thank you Obama! At least you are acting on intelligence information given to you by the past president Bush. Unlike Bush, who decided the intelligence Clinton gave him was enough for him to go clear brush. LOL

Posted by: tom | August 31, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Republicans can be led to the truth, but they will not believe. Republicans can have facts proven to them, but they will call them lies. Republicans can be educated, but you would never know it with all the lies and hate that pours from them like venom and evil. God did punish America the whole time Bush was in office. Hopefully, now the Lord will forgive us and lead us forward. Our God is not a republican or a democrat. He knows the truth. Do any of you care about the truth?

Posted by: Vicki | August 31, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Wow! That’s incredible. Obama only 6 months in and making more progress than Bushie and Cheney did in 8 years!! And how many billions did they spend? And how many lives were lost on their time?? This only proves Bush and Cheney’s obvious incompetence at being Commander in Chief & co.

Posted by: lucyk | August 31, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Cheney thinks he is MacArthur to Obama’s Truman.

Posted by: JLS1950B | August 31, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Proof? Anyone… anyone?

Posted by: Richard | August 31, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I cannot begin to imagine why anyone cares what Cheney says. He is very rich and that, and advancing the causes of corporate America, is all he has ever cared about. As for keeping America safe after 9/11,well, the terrorists wanted to destroy the American economy , and they did not succeed, but Bush and Cheney were great at reaching that goal. Bush/Cheney were the prefect poster children for recruitmen also. In addition, they destroyed the reputation of the US as an advancer of freedom by employing torture, and limiting the freedom of US citizens.Why was America “safe” from the terrorists after 9/11? Simple. The terrorists had Bush/Cheney accomplishing everything for them. They are not stupid. Why mess with perfection?

Posted by: Laurel1181 | August 31, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“It is not particular to President Obama and does not indicate what you suggest.”
You’re wrong, julie.

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

All in one 30 minute session of ABC Evening News….Jim Jones(where have I heard that name before?)National Security Advisor, toots his little horn that they are doing a better job than the last administration at quashing terrorism. Next segment,General Stanley McChrystal commander of troops in Afghanistan is going to request more troops because they are losing control of that country to the Taliban. I think little Jimmy just lost all credibility.Don’t ya think?

Posted by: Boxcar | August 31, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

President Obama is going to throw Bush and Cheney in jail and finally teach all the republicans the name of fear. He has a plan, and I am a part of that plan.

Posted by: candle | August 31, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

you can bet your last dollar that obama wouldn’t have touched terrorism with a ten foot pole if it hadn’t been for Bush forging the path. In fact if it hadn’t been for Bush pushing ahead on the war on terror obama would be a junior senator…. finishing his first term.

Posted by: Gregory | August 31, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Hold onto your hats.
Democrat pollster John Zogby now has Obama’s approval at…42%!
That’s right: Forty-two percent.
Since last month, he’s down 13 points among Democrats, nine points among liberals, and 18 points among voters 18 to 29.
Simply an unprecedented meltdown.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

If Brown’s back room deal with Libya, Obama not giving a crap while Iran is funneling the same weapons that killed our troops in Iraq into Afghanistan, and the fact that terrorists in Pakistan are one overthrow away from acquiring nukes are making us safer then I would question their definition of the word safe. Also how do you credit the intelligence with making us safer in one breath and then seek to destroy them in the next, Jones must’ve learned how to talk out of both sides of his mouth from Obama.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 31, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

President Obama will finally throw Bush and Cheney into jail. Our president has a plan, and I am a part of that plan. Together we are going to bring the republicans to their knees!

Posted by: candle | August 31, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

This is a retired Marine General guys, not just some random partisan hack!! What does Cheney know?? He never even served in the military one day, and dodged service at all cost!! So are we now saying the man who served in the military many many years is wrong over Evil Master Cheney???? Gawd you know things are REALLY REALLY bad when people are THIS IGNORANT!!!

Posted by: lucyk330 | August 31, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Why can’t you RepubLIEcans admit when you’re wrong. Of course Obama is better at anti-terroism than Bush. Bush alienated our allies to the point of not wanting to work with us on terroism. And talk about Democrats being sheep is a real laugh. RepubLIEcans believe everything their leaders tell them, just look at the healthcare debate. And your illustrious leader Bush referred to the constitution as a “god damned piece of paper” which should have led to his impeachment not only for failing to live up to his oath of office, but for bring a traitor for being the best recruiter the terroists ever had. He is one lousy American, along with Cheney and all the other RepubLIEcans who let that statement go without challenge. Sometimes I wonder why I spent 12 years of my life in the military just to have anti-American president and vice-president snakes in the grass like Bush and Cheney. Cheney is afraid the probe will lead directly to him, which would be no surprise.

Posted by: DE | August 31, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

“NDSue – I don’t understand your reasoning. You are saying Obama is a failure at winning the war in Afganistan in his first six months in office while saying Bush did a better job of not winning the war in Afganistan in the seven years he was President. That is crazy!”
Mike – I didn’t mention anything about Afghanistan. Could you have been addressing another post?

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I work in an urban setting and commute out of the city to my home each day. This evening, I pondered the “homeless” guy sitting in front me who pulled out his expensive cell phone to make a few calls after shaking down white collar commuters all day for change. I wondered just exactly how offering this guy, and hundreds of thousands like him, wouldn’t lead to massive abuse of the system when none of Obama’s “plans” (that only exist in mantra and rhetoric, the details of which he has outsourced to Pelosi, Waxman and the Sentate) wouldn’t be subject to massive abuse. But, hey, a guy like that would never abuse the system, right?
Seriously liberals, do the math sometime on how a tiny fraction of the populace could have a massive impact on the financial solvency on a single payer system.

Posted by: BH | August 31, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

“… In addition, they destroyed the reputation of the US as an advancer of freedom by employing torture, and limiting the freedom of US citizens.”
Posted by: Laurel1181
Hey Laurel1181: go tell the people of Afghan (who recently voted again) that America, as led by Bush, let them down when fighting for their right to vote for representative powers for the first time in the history of their country. Oh wait, they have voted 3 times since 9-11 for poliical representation. That’s more than in the 5,000 history of their land! Idiot. The rest of your post is DNC bullet point nonsense not worth responding to.

Posted by: John | August 31, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

What a load…Laughing..are you kidding??? Bagdad bombings have increased 10 fold. More men killed in Afghanistan than in any other period of time…What a freaking load…Jones is a traitor

Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

They took the bait. Cheney on guard.

Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Who is this retired general? How about giving facts and figures Sir! Generally speaking we usually back-up claims with data. What Bush did during his term in office deserves respect. Obama is way too soft and is pulling out of Iraq prematurely. Look what is happening.

Posted by: Kottaras | August 31, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

It’s interesting to me that people who wouldn’t give a military guy the time of day love to have one on their side. Problem is they still don’t know what they’re talking about. I worked for Jones at NATO. He’s just another politician – just like every other flag officer.

Posted by: LAG | August 31, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

“Bagdad bombings have increased 10 fold.”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

It’s like Calculus, but different.

Posted by: AssieMcGee | August 31, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Wow! That’s incredible. Obama only 6 months in and making more progress than Bushie and Cheney did in 8 years!! And how many billions did they spend? And how many lives were lost on their time?? This only proves Bush and Cheney’s obvious incompetence at being Commander in Chief & co.
You actually believe this? That kool-aid sure does taste great!

Posted by: oneconservative | August 31, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

General is a patriot and a true American.

Posted by: what667 | August 31, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Jones is a patriot and a true American

Posted by: what667 | August 31, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

“to discuss things with other rulers”
I didn’t know the big O was my ruler. I thought he was just another bad liberal president.

Posted by: David | August 31, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

99.999% of Politicians are one notch below child molesters so how on earth can you believe Demos or Repubs any word that comes out of their mouth is pure bullcrap. The Democrat and Republican party are the main cause of the downfall of our beautiful country. They both want to justify there bullcrap but in the end they are both useless and rotten to the bone. All gov’ts and religions are corrupted and evil. This is not a general statement. This is the truth. “It is better to die standing, than to live on your knees.” — Emiliano Zapata. The world must wake up before it is to late. The big fish are eating all the little fish.

Posted by: cony007 | August 31, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Eat your heart out, Cheney. Oops! Cheney has a bad heart—I forgot.

Posted by: what667 | August 31, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

“I was on active duty…” There’s one thing that Gen. Jones will always have over former Vice President Cheney.

Posted by: Don Rush | August 31, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Gen. James is hired help. He may be highly competent commander but he was given the script. Barry is too busy with golf and health care to be concerned about the troops or the what is it? I thought the war on terror was forbidden. Apparently diplomacy is the key to success.I rather doubt it.
Longdrycreek Ranch
Texas Panhandle

Posted by: James Glasscock | August 31, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

If Bush and Cheney were so good at collecting intelligence, why did they decide to invade Iraq. Oh yea, because their ‘intelligence’ suggested that we would be greeted as liberators, we would find WMD’s and Saddam’s link to Bin Laden. All of these things were wrong.
Lesson to Cheney: this is what happens when you torture ‘information’ out of people… they tell you anything you want to hear.

Posted by: Robert | August 31, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

“Barry is too busy with golf and health care to be concerned about the troops”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

In 1976 Jimmy Carter deballed the CIA in the same way BO is doing today. That’s why we missed the Iran take over of our Embacy in 1979, the USSR going down the tubes in 1989, The Twin Towers blast in 1993, the fact that Osama declared war on us in the late 1990s, the embasssy blasts in Afica, the USS Cole blast, and yes 9-11. It has taken 8 yesrs to build back the CIA to a condition where it can stop terrorism and now Barry and friends are returning us to the old Jimmy days. Will it take a mushroom cloud over NY before BO smartens up?

Posted by: Jake | August 31, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Just remember Somalia and how Clinton screwed the pooch there. And of course Jimmy Carter in Iran…these Dems can’t fight a war…they can’t tie their own shoes. That Moron Carter is still trying to create a legacy other than his nut job brother and his misery index. ALl obaqma can do is vacation..he’s a jerk thug from Chicago stealing our money.

Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Never in my life did I believe that a president could crash and burn so early in his first term – 42% approval rating. Wow, just WOW!

Posted by: jeffrey | August 31, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

“… In addition, they destroyed the reputation of the US as an advancer of freedom by employing torture, and limiting the freedom of US citizens.”
Posted by: Laurel1181
Laurel, the Russians stated that when they were fighting and losing in Afghanistan one technique that was used on their soldiers was they were tied hanging to a tree, the Afghans would slit the skin from the neck to the stomach and literally peel back the flesh forcing the still alive soldier to bake in the sun and be eaten by the insects! NOW, do you still want to talk about OUR torture techniques?

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I served during his time as Commandant. I always suspected there was something wrong with him then, I’m convinced now. I wonder if the CIA would agree with his HUMINT assessment.

Posted by: TJ | August 31, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

they a bunch of bull. Afghanistan is a lost cause, the head of the joint chiefs, mike mullen said that.
anyone who believes this and the rep/dem nonsense belongs to the sucker party.

Posted by: joey | August 31, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Does anyone really believe the administration that is investigating our own CIA is really getting tough on terrorists? Give me a break…

Posted by: Angry Mob Member | August 31, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

This is to Jake Tapper; did you notice Jones said “. . . President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers . . .” and “. . .a law enforcement agency — whether it is the police or FBI or CIA …”?
Obama isn’t a ruler, at least not the last time I checked, the USA is still a democracy and we don’t have rulers. And, since when did the CIA become a law enforcement agency?
Why don’t you push Jones on some specifics and find out if the guy’s comptetent to hold that position?

Posted by: John | August 31, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I can’t believe any self-respecting Marine would work for this President. Obama is taking out more terrorists than Bush?! WTFO! Under Obama’s leadership we have seen our closest ally, Great Britain, releasing captured and convicted Libyan terrorists! How skillful is that? General Jones is now a political hack. DON’T TREAD ON ME!

Posted by: Jumping Dan | August 31, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I am glad they are killing terrorist, but I don’t see this as a contest to out do Bush.

Posted by: james at 37 | August 31, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

When Obama gets back from vacation he will have to have Gibbs get back with us on this.

Posted by: JYH | August 31, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

42%…42%…42%…
Extraordinary.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Obama also took away al queda’s #1 recruitment tool by ending Bush’s policy of torture. Bush and Cheney took the wrong approach and thought they could use evil to fight evil. Only good can fight evil. By strengthening our relationships with our allies, and reaching out to countries that the Bush administration alienated or dismissed, Obama has helped make the world a safer place for peaceful people.

Posted by: Robert | August 31, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

President Obama is the second coming of Jimmy Carter.

Posted by: Whittster | August 31, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I want names not we are doing better. Name 4 big wigs that they have caught. This is BO’s war now he will only be able to blame someone else so long before even his the true believers will have to admit it.
Only a matter of time and they know it. That is the only reason for the finger pointing.
I’d laugh at all of you worshipers if I wasn’t so alarmed by your gullibility.

Posted by: RL | August 31, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

does he know them? just curious.

Posted by: justa | August 31, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Semper Phi .. Jones is a politcal hack

Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

@Robert: how many terrorists did we upset and torture? Do you know? Because the info that has been released to date indicates we have tortured…hold on…3. I bet you were thinking it was hundreds, right? And one of them was Kalhadi Sheik Muhamad, you know the 9-11 mastermind. You’d probably be upset if we tortured OBL wouldn’t you?

Posted by: John | August 31, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Oh yah! I left out the lousey intell that Sadam had WMD in 2003.

Posted by: Jake | August 31, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Birds of the feather flock together. Obama is doing what terrorist have been trying to do for 30 years to America, trying to destroy it. But he under estimate America as most terrorist do!!! ONE and DONE!!!!

Posted by: ratdog | August 31, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

ABC News sucks. No wonder their ratings are in the tank.

Posted by: Whittster | August 31, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

So the “world” wasn’t interested in fighting the threat to the “world” while Bush was prez…but with Obama as prez the “world” cares again about self preservation. Thanks for clearing that up, General Jones. Now if only the imaginary help would materialize in Afghanistan… And when did the CIA become a law enforcement agency?

Posted by: Sarah | August 31, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Duh, of course Obama is doing more, conservatives just don’t get that ‘terrorist = middle america’.

Posted by: RE | August 31, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

I tell ya all, its totally embarrassing that this White House has to stop every 5 mins and act like some 6 year old child blaming the former administration. Totally unprofessional and basically what they are saying is they can’t handle the job and here is our never ending excuse for why we are failing! No backbone, no resolve, no guts…that’s the qualifications of the Obama administration. Perhaps if Obama tried apologizing to Afghanistan first! Well we could have had a 72 year old man who at least knew what to do with a military but nooooo, the ladies wanted to elect a community organizer instead. Well don’t cry to hard when your sons and daughters go to Afghanistan! And remember, BUSH didn’t get involved there because he knew NOBODY ever stood a chance against Afghanistan on their home land!

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Ah, “peace for our time”, that was Neville Chamberlain (1869-1940), appeasement toward Nazi Germany. We all know how that worked out. People who do not learn from history are domed to repeat it!

Posted by: Randal Hawkins | August 31, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Good, does this mean we get to investigate Joe Biden, all of his advisors and the Czars that have been appointed without constitutional authorization?
Thanks

Posted by: Mike | August 31, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

What does this idiot inhale? Kool Aid powder?
How can he make such idiotic claims when the thug in the White House won’t even state that victory is the goal in the Afghan war?
Hasn’t the moron noticed the increase in US casualties and not so many Al Qaeda setbacks?
This is the Hope era, folks. Idiocy and amateurism at its best.

Posted by: Mauricio Villablanca | August 31, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

42% and falling…
How soon can we get rid of the clunker in the white House?

Posted by: ceeLeelee | August 31, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

And when did the CIA become a law enforcement agency?
Posted by: Sarah |
Jan 2009

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Perhaps id Obama mobilized All the members of ACORN to Afghanistan so they could form a human shield for our troops to get behind! Hmmmmm, that might work!

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

I guess he didn’t get the email that the commander of our troops in Afghanistan is going to request that more troops be sent there because the Taliban is gaining control of the country.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 31, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Duh, of course Obama is doing more, conservatives just don’t get that ‘terrorist = middle america’.
Posted by: RE |
Don’t forget seniors on Medicare. They are terrorists too.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Jones and Murtha must be buddies, neither deserve to bear the title of United States Marine. He can say what he wants but the fact remains that under Bush/Cheney we were not attacked in the USA after 911. Where has this General been, in the head? With respect to Obama and his security of the USA what will be said about him if and when another attack is made on us? He’s not smart enough to ask Bush/Cheney for advice.

Posted by: drcusmc | August 31, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Regarding Afghanistan – it is not possible to “win” there. We may engage in the latest fad in counterinsurgency, attempt to avenge 9/11, and get a lot of good soldiers and Marines killed, but at the end of the day, we will leave the field to the wild people of Afghanistan-Pakistan. What worked in Iraq will not work in a place that could care less about central government, democracy, or whatever we Americans want. These are the wildest people in the world. The will back “the strongest tribe”. They know that we will leave, and they can go back to growing opium poppies and fighting amongst themselves. We are not savage enough to exterminate them (Jesus, we can’t even slap one), so , they will prevail. Our punitive expedition has run long enough. Good job guys, we wacked a lot of ‘em, and we can always come back and wack more.

Posted by: Jumping Dan | August 31, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

It has nothing to do with hate, race, or “birthering”. It has to do with personal political opinion. Fact, when 9-11 happened, the agencies that were in charge of doing something to stop it, were prevented by law to communicate or share information with each other. Fact, this administration is systematically disassembling the safeguards that have been put in place to prevent another 9-11. Fact, this administration is attempting to put on trial those that implemented those safeguards. Fact, it is only a matter of time until something tragic happens again. Fact, then it will be to late to say I told you so.
Posted by: srcamachonj | Aug 31, 2009 7:10:34 PM
*******************************************************************************
Fact, every “fact” you provided in this comment is false.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

I hope the White House is not referring to folks like me… If they are not, it seems as though “taking out” the bad guys is a bit like a testosterone policy discussion, as though the present administration is adamant about at least appearing to be the toughest guy on the block, while preparing lawsuits to bring the former tough guys “to justice”. What a curious group. But, alas, I am sure the world that didn’t like America last year feels a lot better about us now. Man, am I relieved!!

Posted by: jggrimm | August 31, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

As a Marine, I am frankly embarrassed by Gen. Jones comments. This quote is particularly eerie– ‘President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships…’ Pardon me? ‘Other RULERS’? The US and most civilized western republics have political leaders called Presidents or Prime Ministers. As an American, I have a President, not a ‘ruler’. Not now. Not ever. I would presume that Chesty Puller is spinning in his grave.

Posted by: DevilDawg | August 31, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

“Regarding Afghanistan – it is not possible to “win” there. We may engage in the latest fad in counterinsurgency, attempt to avenge 9/11, and get a lot of good soldiers and Marines killed, but at the end of the day, we will leave the field to the wild people of Afghanistan-Pakistan.”
I believe you may be right Dan.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Sarah, The CIA is tasked with collecting, evaluating, and disseminating foreign intelligence to the President and senior US policymakers to assist them in making decisions relating to national security. The CIA may also engage in covert actions at the direction of the President and in accordance with applicable law. Part of the US Intelligence Community, which includes the FBI , the National Security Agency, Homeland Security, and number of other federal entities, the director of the CIA reports to the Director of National Intelligence.
But now that their power has been removed the CIA now must collect information from terror suspects by threatening to show them pictures of Nancy Pelosi in a string bikini!

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

ceeLeelee | Aug 31, 2009 10:30:40 PM How soon can we get rid of the clunker in the white House?++++I just hope he comes with some sort of rebate.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 31, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

re: Duh, of course Obama is doing more, conservatives just don’t get that ‘terrorist = middle america’.
Well, Democrats = communists/marxists in this new administration. How else do you explain that Obama appointed Van Jones, a former black panther and a self-avowed communist, to serve as energy czar?

Posted by: Sandy | August 31, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Remember the throngs of fresh-faced, apple-cheeked youngsters who showed up to roar their approval at every Obama rally? Anybody wonder where they are now? Any of them showing up at townhalls in support of Obamacare?
Are the left-wingers a tad bit troubled by this?
This is going to be great…
42%

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

If you believe this I have a bridge to sell you or some ocean front property in Arizona.

Posted by: irishrose | August 31, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Allow me to translate:
“The guy who pays my salary is doing a better job than the guy who didn’t.”
What did you expect him to say?

Posted by: Oonogil | August 31, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Gen Jones reminds me of Saddam’s spokesman swearing that the Americans were no where near the airport or Bagdad. It’s great to still have job security with the government, aint it general.

Posted by: Ricco | August 31, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

===“This type of radical fundamentalism or terrorism is a threat not only to the United States but to the global community,”===
Jones is going to get into trouble…he called them terrorists…not man made disasterists…

Posted by: Axey | August 31, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Regarding Afghanistan – it is not possible to “win” there.
Does POTUS know?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

But now that their power has been removed the CIA now must collect information from terror suspects by threatening to show them pictures of Nancy Pelosi in a string bikini!
Posted by: bz |
Now THAT is torture.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Ruler – A person who . . . governs

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

He saved economy. He saved millions of jobs. He saved banking system. He saved GM and Chrisler. He… he….. he….. And now he is a spy-in chief who got more terrosrist in 7 month then the entire CIA in the previous 8 years. O God Obama, o mersiful…….

Posted by: gb | August 31, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Oh yah! I left out the lousey intell that Sadam had WMD in 2003.
Posted by: Jake
————————————
saddam used it all on the Kurds.
Dead Kurds tell no tales.

Posted by: Reality2009 | August 31, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Oh please. The right invented name calling during Bush, and they’re completley void of facts lately as all they speak is spin off of Fox.

Posted by: Secondlook | August 31, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I believe President Obama can and will make this country what it once was!!!!
An Arctic Region covered with ICE!

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Sandy | Aug 31, 2009 10:42:36 PM Well, Democrats = communists/marxists in this new administration. How else do you explain that Obama appointed Van Jones, a former black panther and a self-avowed communist, to serve as energy czar? +++++++I was reading up on that guy. He has a serious criminal record and is just plain scary.Bo slid that one right on by.Got to love that change and transparency.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 31, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Security advisor/czar? What a friggin joke.

Posted by: al | August 31, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

LOL…ABC and this guy are bought and paid for by the Marxists in the White House….NBC too!

Posted by: American Gal | August 31, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Given Cheney’s values, militaristic assumptions of unlimited power, and skewed reasoning, I think Cheney would fit right in with Inquisition perpetrators or with the drastic strengthening of control and power over in South Africa under Apartheid. IF Cheney is “Pro-Life”, it is only 5% (for the Unborn), yet 95% “Pro-Death” for the Born–for whom he assumes right to determine human value.

Posted by: RDC | August 31, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Let me get this straight. They say they’re having more success in capturing terrorists and killing terrorist leaders than Bush did. Did I miss the news for those captures and kills? I must have because I haven’t seen diddly about it from any news source. In fact the only thing coming out of the news is the casualty list and the need for more troops. Nothing about how we suddenly captured or killed a leading terrorist or captured an insane number of terrorists at all.

Posted by: Chris | August 31, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

so far obama has freed or taken steps to free all guantanamo terrorists (his first act as pres), has pulled out of iraq and left it to collapse, has had the worst ever outcomes in the afghani theater (which he said was the key front), has overseen the release of the second greatest murdered of americans ever in scotland, and has circled the world aologizing for our american identity (while suddenly remembering his middle name actually is hussein – but dont say it! unless it fits the mood). and hes doing better huh? ok

Posted by: robert | August 31, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

The NSA advisor should be tried for treason

Posted by: Luke | August 31, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

But now that their power has been removed the CIA now must collect information from terror suspects by threatening to show them pictures of Nancy Pelosi in a string bikini!=
====================================
Laws were in place in 1994 Title 18 sec 113C. Cheney just decided to legislate from an unknown location.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 31, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

This is why I come to ABC news. The comments here are just hilarious!

Posted by: ABCReader | August 31, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

An Arctic Region covered with ICE!
Posted by: bz |
That made my day.
And hey, it would take care of global warming too.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

As usual, the far right responds by sliming a Marine. The top two tactics of the far right: attack and play the victim.

Posted by: Semper Fi | August 31, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Everybody predicted follow-up attacks after 9/11.Whatever comments may be made about the Bush administration, the fact is that this country has not been successfully attacked since then. That cannot be by coincidence.
Posted by: Nephron | Aug 31, 2009 7:51:28 PM
********************************************************************************
Anyone who knew anything about alQuaida (I’m sure I spelled that wrong) did not expect a follow-on attack. Bush/Cheney did not allow another major attack on this country but I would be more impressed if they had followed the intelligence and prevented the first major attack.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

It sounds great that they are capturing more terrorists, but where are they keeping them, the Bahamas,Ritz Carlton?
I know it’s not Guantanamo; he’s closing that down. Where-o-where?

Posted by: Gerry | August 31, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

People who get their news from the likes of Limbaugh and other neocon snakes will be the most stupid ignorant people in America. Well actually they already are.

Posted by: Vicki | August 31, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Ruler: a person or thing that rules or governs, as a SOVEREIGN.
Sovereign: The chief of state in a monarchy; a king or queen.

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Do you remember the arrogant stupidity of Bush saying “bring ‘em on” when our sons and daughters were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan?
A boastful challenge from a cowardly man, a challenge for those against us to try and kill our soldiers.
Thank goodness, those days are gone.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Gerry: the answer to “where o where” is Bagram Air Force base.
It probably wasn’t a serious question, but just in case it was I thought I’d answer.

Posted by: Semper Fi | August 31, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

How the hell does this guy KNOW that the human beings killed were terrorists? How does he know that they weren’t innocent Afghani civilians in the wrong place at the wrong time? Were there trials? Were they read their Miranda warnings before they were so ruthlessly slaughtered? How is it that torturing these innocent Afghanis by blowing second-hand smoke in their faces is unconscionable, but separating their brains from their skulls, their spleens from their torsos, and their limbs from everything else is not only A-o.k. but something this Administration brags about?

Posted by: Eyas | August 31, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Chris……. you sure did miss the “News”. At least 2 times a month, a primary Terrorist bigwig is captured or mainly killed. Cheney is defending his criminal acts and really appeared to be hyperventilating in the interview. Thieves and liars almost always do this.

Posted by: sara | August 31, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I would be more impressed if they had followed the intelligence and prevented the first major attack.
Posted by: Tom |
Dude! Just the traveling back in time to 1993 would have been cool enough.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Besides the “revving of a power drill” and the “second hand smoke” techniques the CIA used there were some more lesser known ways to extract information from suspects. In order to increase their stress levels terror suspects were forced to take high school math tests they weren’t prepared for! They were also forced to attend high school reunions in their underwear! And forcer to take endless SAT’s using timers that ran fast! Finally those that didn’t talk were forced to watch 50 non-stop hours of the Golden Girls!

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Jones…hack…I know it to be true, but I can’t find any facts to support my claims…hack…because we say it, it must be true…just listen

Posted by: sure | August 31, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Cheney is defending his criminal acts and really appeared to be hyperventilating in the interview. Thieves and liars almost always do this.
Posted by: sara | Aug 31, 2009 11:06:34 PM
—————————————–
Is that why Obama has to breath into a paper bag?

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

As usual, the far right responds by sliming a Marine. The top two tactics of the far right: attack and play the victim.
****************************************
As opposed to how General Petreaus was treated by the left – and not only the far left.

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

To: Fascist Hyena
“Are the left-wingers a tad bit troubled by this?”
Yes, they are a little troubled by the craziness going on on your end of the spectrum, but willing to listen if you can offer valid points instead of talking points.

Posted by: Coastal | August 31, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

I feel much safer with Barack in Office, don’t you?
Posted by: s | Aug 31, 2009 8:28:36 PM
********************************************************************************
Absolutely, I never felt very safe under Bush.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Cheney has got a lot of nerve finger pointing at other people for not protecting America when 9/11 happened on his watch.
Too bad he couldn’t have delivered protection when it was needed, and not just bragged about it when it was too late.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Lousey intell on WMD too.

Posted by: Jake | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Can someone please tell me what big terrorist suspect has been captured and tried and actually convicted of anything in this Administration? ABC obviously hasn’t reported this or is it a secret. I love such a long article that says absolutely nothing and yet makes it sound like great things are being done. Just like the health bill. I wonder if the obscure statements about terrorism that this Marine has made can be verified anywhere by ABC. Oh yes that would be reporting wouldn’t it. Not just fairytales from the deep.

Posted by: MJNJ | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

He didn’t care if there were innocents. He’s a criminal, thief and a liar. Now, if such a person defends a Criminal (Scooter Libby) who “outed” a CIA operative because of her politics…no her husbands, and called him “a honorable man”…..he is cut from that material! I’ll take my chances with the former Marine General than the “punk” that dodged going into the Armed Forces. No wonder he doesn’t give a hoot about our servicemen, just himself.

Posted by: sara | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I believe a guy who’s seen the intelligence over Cheney who hasn’t, and has been caught in so many lies that no one trusts him anyway.
Cheney says America is less safe. Proof? Put up or shut up. Are you as sure of this as you are that “we know there are links between Saddam and Al Qaeda”?
We’re waiting. In the meantime, I’ll put my trust in the armed forces and not some beaurocrat who said he didn’t do his duty during Vietnam because he had “more important priorities”.

Posted by: GAWill | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Oh, I agree Obama is winning the non-war on terror, oops..we can’t call it that, sorry I forgot, but he is killing all the jihadissst…oops can’t call them that anymore. Hmmm…Well he is doing very well with the war between the DOJ vs. C.I.A. ….there…

Posted by: Liz | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I have slept easier knowing that bush and cheney are gone. The past 8 years were almost like a nightmare for most. That’s probably why voters have been throwing republicans out of office as fast as the election process will allow. Clinging to a failed ideology doesn’t sit well with voters. If I were a republican politician I would be an independent about now.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 31, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“As usual, the far right responds by sliming a Marine.”
It’s about the only tactics they’ve got left. Smearing and name calling.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

what planet is jones on? obama admin doesn’t even talk about terrorists- yet alone taking out terrorists. this jones is a real hack! another obama admin liar and deciever. jones is a disgrace to the military- with his lies.

Posted by: robert | August 31, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

“How the hell does this guy KNOW that the human beings killed were terrorists?
Posted by: Eyas | Aug 31, 2009 11:05:30 PM”
Because they are DEAD… duh!

Posted by: Indigo Red | August 31, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

No they were KILLED! Please don’t ask me their names, all of them sound alike. But I watch, read and listens to mainstream news everyday….quietly.

Posted by: sara | August 31, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

>
At what point in history would that be? So far, his changes have been devastating. Maybe you mean during the Great Depression.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

The right attacked Petraeus the same way for saying that torture (not the PC word “enhanced interrogation techniques”, but torture) hurt national security.
Why so many people want to defend Cheney the draft dodger is beyond me.

Posted by: Semper Fi | August 31, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

“I got more terrorists then you did!” “NO! I got morrreeeee!”…. I feel like I’m at some carnival game here. Oh, that’s right. I’m talking politics.

Posted by: Secondlook | August 31, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

I believe a guy who’s seen the intelligence over Cheney who hasn’t, and has been caught in so many lies that no one trusts him anyway.
Cheney says America is less safe. Proof? Put up or shut up. Are you as sure of this as you are that “we know there are links between Saddam and Al Qaeda”?
We’re waiting. In the meantime, I’ll put my trust in the armed forces and not some beaurocrat who said he didn’t do his duty during Vietnam because he had “more important priorities”.
———————————
Cheney got it wrong (or lied) on the weapons of mass destruction as well.
Not trustworthy.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

trends, aren’t they great. no compelling evidence, but we see trends…well, I see trends of expunging the world of the internal combustion engine, and have compelling evidence. cash for clunkers and trends. How did we survive before the chosen one? I don’t know, but they got trends and I got a bike.

Posted by: sure | August 31, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

bz…..No that’s why Cheney was hyperventilating…….that’s what liars, thieves and criminals do.

Posted by: sara | August 31, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Do you remember the arrogant stupidity of Bush saying “bring ‘em on” when our sons and daughters were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan?
A boastful challenge from a cowardly man
****************************************
Name-calling, smears and lies

Posted by: NDSue | August 31, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

So with no numbers he says that Obama is more successful against terrorists. There’s no proof so what’s the point in an Obama appointed person saying Obama’s doing better?

Posted by: melacine | August 31, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Obama… what a disaster.

Posted by: Austex | August 31, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

“Do you remember the arrogant stupidity of Bush saying “bring ‘em on” when our sons and daughters were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan?”
True.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

My son was wounded Saturday in Afghanistan when a suicide bomber detonated himself 15 feet from my son. These Taliban are not stupid. The suicide bomber, wearing his explosives on the front of himself, walked up to talk to the lieutenant, radioman, afghan interpreter, and another soldier, turned himself to them, and then detonated himself. My son was standing to the side about 15 ft away scanning the area. The blast knocked him off his feet. He crawled/rolled into a ditch not knowing if it was a mortar, rpg, or what the heck happened. As soon as he saw all was clear he charged out to give aid to the wounded, then saw he had blood gushing from his ankle, tied a light tourniquet around is leg, and continued to aid the wounded. Then a sergeant saw he was bleeding from his side, told him to remove his body armor, put clotting powder on his wounds, and slapped some bandages on him. Then my son grabbed a machine gun and held security over the area. He and the other wounded were taken to Kandahar to be treated. He called us from the hospital after coming out of x-ray. My son says his face looks like bad acne from the blast, has shrapnel from head to toe, and has been picking pieces of shrapnel from his arms and leg. He’s partially deaf in one ear…the hearing may or may not come back. He was told they were going to do surgery to remove the piece of shrapnel from his ankle the following morning. Later in the evening we were called by the Dept of the Army and told the hospital in Kandahar had determined he was not seriously injured and returned to duty. The other 3 U.S. soldiers will be sent back to the States for further treatment. I’m not sure where the Afghan interpreter is being sent for further treatment he needs.

Posted by: steven1nc | August 31, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Hey abc,
Jones is another American apologist,political appointed hack. Our guys/gals are getting killed and this administration is AWOL.
Link it to HuffPo….they’ll buy this garbage the rest of us see it for what it is hype and spin.

Posted by: Liz | August 31, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Cheney says America is less safe. Proof? Put up or shut up. Are you as sure of this as you are that “we know there are links between Saddam and Al Qaeda”?
Posted by: GAWill |
There’s a link between Saddam and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi now though. They are being spit roasted in the fiery furnaces of hell.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

OT and respectfully…..
Where are the jobs Mr. President?
Correction: Where are any jobs at all Mr. President?
Posted by: Tina Ferrer’ | Aug 31, 2009 9:17:32 PM
********************************************************************************
All the jobs that Obama has to create after returning to the employment levels at the beginning of his administration is 1 (ONE) to create more than Bush did in 8 years.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Why is the guy who allowed 9/11 to happen given any credibility at all? Asking Cheney for advice on national security is like asking Mike Dukakis advice on how to look good in a helmet.
“But…but…. we weren’t attacked TWICE…” LOL

Posted by: JulieinME | August 31, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

“You might hate it, but Bush kept this country safe and the military loved him.”
9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. Iraq was an unnecessary attack that killed tens of thousands and thousands of our own. And please don’t presume to speak for ‘the military’.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Shorter Foghorn Leghorn: “I got nuthin.”

Posted by: GAWILL | August 31, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Jones sounds pretty defensive. As an American I’m delighted enhanced interrogation was used. If Jones doesn’t like it he can believe whatever he wants but we’ll be less safe as a nation. The problem however, is this: it’s not an academic debate. If Jones and Obama are wrong, and I believe they are, thousands of innocent people are going to get hurt.

Posted by: Rich Parsons | August 31, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

righties want to act like 9/11 never happened. We will never forget

Posted by: rock | August 31, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

When this quack provides a list of names I will believe him.
Until then, he is a liar who cannot prove what he says.

Posted by: Brian | August 31, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

With Obama counting maybe He thinks He is ahead. He thinks 9 trillion is 6.5 trillion. Maybe 0 = 2900 to Obama.

Posted by: Jim | August 31, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

He is most definitely a political hack. That’s why he was hired by the Obama admin. Most generals would not have spoken like that. If one studies his face in the clip above, it seems that he is not as serious as one would expect. It sounds like he is trying to save Obama’s neck from Cheney’s accusations.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Imagine if someone like General Patton was alive today and running things….
ahh the good ol days.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 31, 2009 9:41:52 PM
********************************************************************************
If everything he said didn’t meet the beliefs of the neo-cons, he would be an idiot.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

ABC “news” is the lap dog ,propaganda arm of the Obama White House. I DARE anyone to challenge that

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Gen Jones has a long and distinguished history of serving his nation General U.S.M.C. !!!! “Cheney draft dodger”
Gen. Jones risked his life so Faux News and the rest of you yahoos gould keep spouting this B.S
“You always catch more flys with honey than vinigar”

Posted by: fred | August 31, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Its funny how whenever someone tries to find or reveal any kind of truth, the Republicans start shouting “SOLDIERS! ARMY! MARINES! AIR FORCE! YOU ARE KILLING THEM”… Thats basically their excuse for everything… Foreign policy, domestic policy, even economics.
If you wanna help the Soldiers then get off your behind and take their place in the Army so they can come back home and see their families… Dont give me the crap about “I support them with my tongue”… Whats your tongue gonna do when he loses his leg to a roadside bomb? Nothing.
“I wanna protect my country, so I’ll send other people to do the job for me!”… Yea… Shutup…

Posted by: Dabbas | August 31, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“You might hate it, but Bush kept this country safe and the military loved him.”
9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. Iraq was an unnecessary attack that killed tens of thousands and thousands of our own. And please don’t presume to speak for ‘the military’.
Posted by: julieterra | Aug 31, 2009 11:29:09 PM
————————————–
9-11 was set up on Clintons watch and executed on Bush’s watch, his first 9 months as President.
Just so I’m clear which branch of the military did you serve in julieterra?

Posted by: bz | August 31, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Jones gets paid to invent for the White house and is not to be trusted any more than anyone else in politics. Look up Michael Yon if you want any truth, he reports from Afghanistan every other day and is embedded in actual combat. He has no chip in the game and is not whitewashing anything.

Posted by: StevenW | August 31, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Posted by: steven1nc
So sorry to hear about your son.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

One 9/11 isn’t enough for Cheney. There was a guy on the Glenn Beck show who said “the best thing that could happen to this country would be for Osama bin Laden to deploy a major weapon inside the United States.”
It’s sick.

Posted by: Em | August 31, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

“9-11 was set up on Clintons watch and executed on Bush’s watch, his first 9 months as President.”
9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. He got back from his month-long August vacation in Texas in time to watch the planes hit the Towers.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

I was reviewing articles this morning dating from 2001 that contain the phrase, “progress in Afghanistan” and marveling at their number. Turns out the Soviets made lots of progress as well. Obama will perpetuate the path of his predecessors and we’ll have endless war, they’ll call it progress.

Posted by: zeroer | August 31, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

>> “The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim, but he said “there is an increasing trend and I think we seen that in different parts of the world over the last few months for sure.””
What’s he basing this on? His gut instinct? He didn’t provide any specific numbers because he can’t provide any specific numbers.
The U.S. is a safer place because Obama went around the world and apologized to every country he could think of, and then bowed before the Saudi King? Give me a break.
This is just more proof that the “community organizer in chief” has surrounded himself with equally incompetent fools.

Posted by: PainTrain | August 31, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

“I was reviewing articles this morning dating from 2001 that contain the phrase, “progress in Afghanistan” and marveling at their number. Turns out the Soviets made lots of progress as well.”
I have the same concerns zeroer.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I tell ya all, its totally embarrassing that this White House has to stop every 5 mins and act like some 6 year old child blaming the former administration. Totally unprofessional and basically what they are saying is they can’t handle the job and here is our never ending excuse for why we are failing! No backbone, no resolve, no guts…that’s the qualifications of the Obama administration. Perhaps if Obama tried apologizing to Afghanistan first! Well we could have had a 72 year old man who at least knew what to do with a military but nooooo, the ladies wanted to elect a community organizer instead. Well don’t cry to hard when your sons and daughters go to Afghanistan! And remember, BUSH didn’t get involved there because he knew NOBODY ever stood a chance against Afghanistan on their home land!
Posted by: bz | Aug 31, 2009 10:28:42 PM
********************************************************************************
So Bush/Cheney “Totally unprofessional and basically what they are saying is they can’t handle the job and here is our never ending excuse for why we are failing!”? They were blaming Clinton for the recession at the end of their administration. And, if you believe the neo-cons posting here, Clinton is responsible for everything else Bush did wrong.
And, remember, that we were fighting in Afghanistan under Bush.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

I hope he’s right.
I absolutely hope he is right.

Posted by: MayBee | August 31, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Public disapproval of the job Barack Obama is doing as President reached a new high of 42.4% in the RCP Average today. The American people have caught on, and they are not happy. They will be heard.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

He’s not smart enough to ask Bush/Cheney for advice.
Posted by: drcusmc | Aug 31, 2009 10:36:40 PM
********************************************************************************
Slight misconception on your part – He is TOO smart to ask Bush/Cheney for advice.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

steven1nc, I hope he has a speedy
recovery. Anyone thinking war is
a game has never been to one.

Posted by: spacerook1 | August 31, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

How absolutely funny! The conservatives here are just writhing with indignation and rage that diplomacy (instead of wars, torturing people, fear mongering and Republican lying) is what really works in the world! All any of you can bother to say is “but, but, but it can’t be true!” Read it and weep!

Posted by: mshare | August 31, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Let us not forget that 9/11 happened because the laxness of Bush/Cheney. They want us to forget that it happened on their watch even though they had been warned. I have never heard their excuse for that.

Posted by: Bill Carlon | August 31, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Nearly every country in the world has flipped Obama off, Great Britain being the most recent and his national security adviser lies to us and tells us we’re safe because everyone loves Obama? As what? A doormat?

Posted by: Dale Evans | August 31, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

it was dubyas daddy that watched the towers collapse on tv with osama’s daddy.
it was dubya who flew the entire bin laden family out of the country with out asking them a question while the nations airlines were still grounded. I guess he doesn’t believe in torturing people if they’re well connected.
it was dubya who had a cigar in the white house with saudi prince bandar, long time friend of bushes and the bin ladens and supporter of terrorism, while the pentagon still smoldered.
and people say obama’s the one who consorts with terrorists?? why because he has a muslim last name? you people don’t give a damn about terrorism and you never have.

Posted by: calilove | August 31, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

So Obama is having greater success taking down terrorists.
Is he starting to fire the hand picked communists he appointed to his cabinet.
Or is he doing us all a favor and resigning.

Posted by: fourier | August 31, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

9/11 happened on Bush and Cheney’s watch. They had been in power for 9 months when it happened. Bush had just returned from a month-long holiday in Texas. They not only didn’t protect America, they were warned and yet remained oblivious. Nice job of protection.

Posted by: julieterra | August 31, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

If Obama is having better success…could it be because the media is not hounding and second-guessing him every minute? Maybe because they aren’t “exposing” programs before they can be used? Odd that there has been NO media criticism of drone strikes and “civilian” casualties.

Posted by: Boglee | August 31, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

“You might hate it, but Bush kept this country safe and the military loved him.”
9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. Iraq was an unnecessary attack that killed tens of thousands and thousands of our own. And please don’t presume to speak for ‘the military’.
No the military defense suppliers, ie: Halliburton,
loved Bush, the Actual military loved to hate
him.

Posted by: spacerook1 | August 31, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I couldn’t have said it better myself.
The majority of politicians in America are forgetting what and who it is they are representing. The President included. If this administration is “capturing” and/or “killing” more terrorists than the Bush administration, why in the heck is it, that more and more troops (not just American) are dying? This year has been the bloodiest year ever in Afghanistan. What does it matter if we kill more terrorists? What does it gain us, but more and more terrorists?
We’re on “their” homeland, not ours. How would you react if a nation bombed your family attempting to get terrorists?
Would you be able to forgive?
Some people will not, or can not be stopped. Innocent lives have been lost and families torn apart – On both sides of the fence.
America is the leading country in the world. We are setting an example for the rest of the world. How many counties do you want to follow in our footsteps?
I’m not against wars fought for the right reasons. But what started as a war to kill the terrorists and make a point to the world not to **** with America turned into a disaster.
As for the financial toll, we’re already trillions in the hole with the national debt rising tremendously. I hate to say it, but Obama is flashing the “bling”.
Chew on that for awhile people!

Posted by: AHJ | September 1, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

The Bush and Obama Administration continues to hide the truth regarding Al Queda. While they are labeled a terrorist organization their real mission is to secure the Afghan drug trade which supplies 70% of the Worlds heroin product.
The C.I.A. utilizing Al Queda maintains an iron grip on the Afghan drug trade. Groups now under the Homeland Security umbrella such as Blackwater, Kroll, and a collection of other mercenary or private armies use access to bases to control the shipments to the U.S. and other points across the globe.
Former C.I.A. operatives and counterterrorism executives recruit Jihadist’s for domestic operations against the United States to capture lucrative contracts consisting of defense, energy, security, and the increasing flow of narcotics.

Posted by: Rodney Dezarn | September 1, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Afghanistan: Obama’s Vietnam. No, I mean Bush’s Vietnam. No…that doesn’t make sense. Vietnam was Nixon, no, I mean…LBJ, oh no, I mean JFK. That’s right JFK. What a war monger. JFK fought the Communists and tried to save the people of North Vietnam. Tell me what the difference is between Vietnam, Cuba, and Iraq, Afghanistan? Oh, I know, Barry is a Communist.

Posted by: VoteThemOut | September 1, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am

if Bin Laden was caught and brought to the U.S. for trial, the ‘right’ would say it was because of Bush & Cheney,..
re: What’s he basing this on? His gut instinct? He didn’t provide any specific numbers because he can’t provide any specific numbers.
Posted by: PainTrain
so, what are you complaining about?.. Cheney says torture worked even tho’ he has no evidence that it worked,.
if it’s Obama’s economy….
then it’s Bush & Cheney’s September 11th..
re: And what are you saying, they waited for Bush to come off vacation before they attacked? WOW now that’s respect.
Posted by: bz
no, no, no, the plan was launched after Obama was born in kenya……..don’t you know anything?

Posted by: Sasquatch | September 1, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Scott wrote:
Hey Obama voters, would you like to have a do-over?
The country will not look the same after 4 years of this administration.
I sure as H**L hope it’s different. I voted for change – like the rule of law – that’s just one.

Posted by: lynne | September 1, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

When this quack provides a list of names I will believe
him.Until then, he is a liar who cannot prove what he
says.Posted by: Brian ***************************
He’ll show the list, once Cheney shows his. No one
has ever seen that one, so I guess cheney is a liar
also. Cheney hid as usual, behind the so called
“national security” blanket. (looks like the
one Linus uses in the cartoon “Peanuts”

Posted by: spacerook1 | September 1, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

ABC news is in the Tank with the O-administration. Can’t believe anything that you read from them. FAIR AND HONEST JOURNALISM PLEASE!!!!!

Posted by: Independant voter | September 1, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

“I just think it comes down to our laws and our values and we are what we say we are or we are not and I think we are on the way back to being what we say we are.”
============================
These are the values our men and women in the military stand up for and give their lives for, what our country must stand for. If we act just like the enemy don’t we become just like the enemy? What makes us different? We went down a dark, deep rabbit hole after 9/11. The thing is, it’s not a matter that we were kept safe after the fact, but that there were 72 pentagon warnings of immenent threat, nine of them had specific details of foreign pilots being trained on US soil. It’s mind boggling. They knew! So why wouldn’t rational discussion work better than fear mongering. Personally I think Cheney has something to fear. It will come out someday.

Posted by: washingtonstate | September 1, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I would gladly stand alone against this man and his spectacularly ill-advised policies. But I confess to great satisfaction that the majority of the people in our great nation now agree with me.
What we need to do now is hold the line until we can remove him from office as we did withe hapless Carter. And we will. Oh yes, we surely will.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 1, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

What did you expect? What could you expect when you had two ignorant loosers running a show. From bankrupt oil frauds and academic failures to drunk dirivers, neither Bush nor Cheney ever had any succeses previously in life.
Their popularity stemmed from the fact that there were so many ignorant people willing to believe their nonsense. The sad part is that these ignorant people are still out there as many of these posts attest.
Hopefully, the smart thinking and dilligent fortitude of this current administration will impress upon the throngs of ignorant masses the need to use well thought out,well discussed planning vs gang mentality and snappy slogans.
America will once again be known for its best and brightest.

Posted by: Watersisland | September 1, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

All the bunk about the Bush and Cheney administration kept us safe since 9/11 is pure crap.
It shouldn’t have happened in the first place. Bush is an idiot and Cheney is an alien. Both need to be behind bars for life!

Posted by: Stellar | September 1, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Its funny how 9/11 wasnt Bush’s fault because it happened 9 months into his Presidency.
Yet everything that has happened in 9 months since President Obama took office, namely a collapse in our economy that was very well known to be taking place before he became President, is all his fault.
The haters are hilarious. We so obviously just had the worst President in US history. And Obama is supposed to fix that mess in a few months. Bush didnt do anything but parades, vacations, and parties his first 9 months. Then he got a wake up call in 9/11 and actually had to work. And proceeded to freak out and let Cheney start the Galactic Empire.

Posted by: David | September 1, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

When you fight a war you are not “nicer” then the enemy. You go all out and win the battle. No pussey footing around with talks and make nice speechs. The Geneva convention never saved one American from being tortured.If pouring water on someone’s face or shooting a weapon off in another room gets results then go for it. It is still much better then what the enemy does, beheading and things that made you sick to think about. Come on America shed those yellow strips and get some guts. Our forefathers would never have put up with this and we shouldn’t either. God Bless America and our troops

Posted by: Stormey | September 1, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The main reason people are upset with Bush and Cheney Administration is precisely because they didn’t understand how to deal with terrorism. Also, they surrendered civilian control of the military over to corporatist interests. And if only half the money that was spent on uninvolved foreign workers had been spent on American workers, that would have been stimulus enough to prevent the crazy crash the Obama administration inherited.

Posted by: kd | September 1, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Come on America shed those yellow strips and get some guts. Posted by: Stormey
and in which branch of the military did you serve?

Posted by: Opie | September 1, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

This from an administration that warned if we didn’t pass their stimulus we might get up to 8% unemployment. If O relied on faulty intelligence when he made that statement, by the left’s standards it’s a lie.

Posted by: Paul | September 1, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

What “IndependentVoter” meant to say was: “I prefer my news from a network that lies to me but tells me that it’s fair and balanced.”

Posted by: Reality Check | September 1, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Clearly Propaganda being pushed by an Obama NSA member without a shred of evidence. They have not captured anyone of value or as high up as Khalid Shiek Mohammed. The claim that they have captured more is hysterical.Where are they?

Posted by: Dennis D | September 1, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

The fact that this was already investigated by career prosecutors in the justice department and nothing ever came of it seems to also not get mentione Posted by: Jac
oh yeah…. Bushies investigating Bush..
sure .. case closed……

Posted by: Sasquatch | September 1, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Jim, Glenn and Sean are waiting. You’re late for your brain programming…The word of the day today is not “politburo,” it’s “Leninism”. Get with the program or your card will be revoked.

Posted by: Patriotic American | September 1, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Can anyone spell ‘Socialism’? The total democrat party is in the process of dismantling our country! All who voted for Obama wanted ‘change’. Well, you should have been more specific. Change for the better, or change for the worse? I am 67 yrs. of age and I don’t remember any time in my life where I feared for us all. I think we have Jimmy Carter again. The worst problem is that the country elected the Congress as well as Obama, and now there are no checks or balances. You wanted rid of ‘Bush’, so now you have it! Heaven help us all.

Posted by: Roy J; | September 1, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I am 67 yrs. of age and I don’t remember any time in my life where I feared for us all.
Posted by: Roy J
so you think Obama is worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis…. WW2, .. just to name a few
hmmmmm

Posted by: Opie | September 1, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Ha…Ha …Ha..Bush did this and Bush did that…Whaaaaaaa

Posted by: Terry Moore | September 1, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

The only terrorists Obama has taken out were likely apologized to death (which I beleive IS torture). Funny how the WH morons seem to beleive that spewing a lie miraculously changes the truth on their failed issue of the day…terrorism, the economy, healthcare etc. Not one thing Obama has done has worked, (unless you count making Washington twice as corrupt as before). So why in god’s name should we beleive he knows how to kill terrorists? Hang in there America, in 2010- a new dawn.

Posted by: JT | September 1, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

No presidency in our history has ever failed this fast. An amazing phenomenon, and a joy to behold.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 1, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Capture more terrorists and then pay their way to lifetime vacations in Bermuda?
Doesn’t make sense.

Posted by: adam | September 1, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Posted by: NDSue
you might have a point, IF…..
your Republican geniuses hadn’t mistakenly invaded Iraq, bankrupted America, missed Sept 11th, missed Katrina, did’nt get (‘wanted dead or alive’) Bin Laden, oh what’s the use, you’ve already forgotten the last 8 years haven’t you?

Posted by: Rapture Boy | September 1, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

This is a Junior High School debate. I’m sad for our country.

Posted by: jusdafax | September 1, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Well, I was going to comment about ABC and the Obama administration making up another story about how wonderful the messiah is, but you guys got it covered. Guess the propaganda isn’t working. Say, is ABC still in business?

Posted by: Big Guy | September 1, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Clearly the world is working better than ever to staunch the flow of international terrorism. Why, just last week the Lockerbie bomber was released out of pity…

Posted by: L.A. | September 1, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

funny thing is that Cheney admits that people broke he law, and he doesn’t care, that’s republican ‘justice’ for you….
can’t wait to see what the new docs will show about the last 8 years…… the louder they get, the more fear they show….. bring it on… investigations , a tasty treat

Posted by: Xe | September 1, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I don’t understand why everyone keeps yelling “Socialism!” Are we, as a people, THAT brainwashed? We have had socialism for many years. No country on this earth operates a fully capitalistic system. Our blend of socialism/capitalism is similar to many other countries as well. I can keep rambling on, but the point is that before we start yelling random words to inspire fear, maybe we should understand what we are actually yelling about…

Posted by: Josh | September 1, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Wow…this guy is reaching to try to back Obama. This report is laughable.

Posted by: obama=socialism | September 1, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Rapture Man:
Who are you and what on earth “point” of mine are you talking about?

Posted by: NDSue | September 1, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

“The world is coming together”? Our country is being torn apart like never before.

Posted by: Charlie C | September 1, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

the point is that before we start yelling random words to inspire fear, maybe we should understand what we are actually yelling about…Posted by: Josh
that’s a great point Josh… but what do you with people who only know ‘hitler’, birth certificates, socialism, and death panels as conversation points?
not much……

Posted by: Opie | September 1, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I don’t understand why everyone keeps yelling “Socialism!” Are we, as a people, THAT brainwashed? We have had socialism for many years. No country on this earth operates a fully capitalistic system. Our blend of socialism/capitalism is similar to many other countries as well. I can keep rambling on, but the point is that before we start yelling random words to inspire fear, maybe we should understand what we are actually yelling about…
———————————
Good points Josh.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

They found another Wesley Clark…..

Posted by: flounder | September 1, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

The term ‘socialism’ keeps coming up — but ‘true socialism’ is where noone owns title to anything except a select few. The common people have to share an equal share. I certainly would agree to sharing $5 from my paycheck to help a fellow American down the street keep health care, instead of being turned away from the emergency room, while I can still choose if I want an HMO or traditional medical plan from my employer. No way this country will become ‘socialist’ unless those patriots that say all terrorists need to be tortured now classify someone like me as a terrorist because I am opposed to torture, and legally could torture me. That is a never ending spiral downward.

Posted by: gen7sw | September 1, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Let’s not forget the trail of tears too!

Posted by: NHred | September 1, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

gen7sw,
If only it would cost us $5 from our paycheck. No one is planning to torture you. Enough with the liberal fear tactics!

Posted by: Charlie C | September 1, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Ok let’s see, some of you are blaming Obama for the release of a terrorist by a Scottish court, everything Bush and Cheney did was perfectly legal and somehow I am sure you all think that Obama caused Katrina and 9/11. WOW talk about delusional. Why don’t you haters do some ACTUAL research of your own instead of listening to FAUX NEWS and reading The Drudge Report. You might just be surprised. Oh and by the way can any of you tell me what vacation spot Bush was at when he read and ignored the Bin laden determined to attack memo and when Katrina happened? I mean to be honest he was on vacation for 907 days and by that I mean physically, mental he’s was never there. That’s how a C student rules. Party oh Bro!

Posted by: SAYWHAAAT | September 1, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Obama killed Betalluh Massud. The leader of the Pakistan wing of the Taliban. The man who claimed responsibility for killing Benazir Bhutto. That is success defined. Betalluh Massud could have toppled the Pakistan government, and now he is dead.

Posted by: Jason Wolfe | September 1, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

The worst thing about the internet is that it gives idiot malcontent racist mouthbreathers a forum. Gin up that hate! Take the country down. Secede with Texas. Re-start the Civil War. Make Hank Willams your president. Better yet, give it back to the people who screwed it up. Lemmings.

Posted by: beproductive | September 1, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Funny thing is Cheney is out there on an island. The only public supporter he has is Lizzy Borden. Maybe Cheney should take up residence with Mark Sanford. These guys are digging holes deep enough for themselves that burying them is only going to be a matter of kicking a little dirt in on top of them. Cheney is a sadist, poor excuse for a human being. He’s trained his daughter to lie at all costs and never accept responsibility. A great man he is.

Posted by: Neal Norvell | September 1, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

SAYWHAAAT,
mental he’s was never there?
Who’s mental capacity are you questioning?

Posted by: Charlie C | September 1, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The point is that all of us are operating out of our own silos. The far left is in their own echo chamber, as is the far right.
The media are not telling the truth, because they are suppressing information that doesn’t fit their agenda. All of the hundreds of posts are just talking past one another, and no one is changing any minds.
The good news, from what I can see here, is that no one has made vile racist statements, and no one has called those who disagree with Obama’s policies a racist. Maybe progress is being made, after all.

Posted by: NDSue | September 1, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

“The only REAL players are God and Satan, fighting for the souls of people, with each using their chess pieces to hopefully win the day. Good luck, We’ll need it! Johnny El”
I don’t know how to tell you this, the bible is a fairy tale – the only real good and evil on this earth is people – those who chose to do good and those who try and destroy that good. God and Satan have many faces, but they are human faces – not omnipotent beings floating about above or below. Welcome to reality

Posted by: SERIOUSLY? | September 1, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

The worst thing about the internet is that it gives idiot malcontent racist mouthbreathers a forum. Gin up that hate! Take the country down…
Posted by: beproductive |
Do you not see the irony in your post?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 1, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Goodness–the Democrat Zogby has this guy at 42% approval.
Do the left-wingers wonder why this is so?
Love to hear from them…

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 1, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

mental he’s was never there?
Who’s mental capacity are you questioning?
Posted by: Charlie C |
I’m thinking it somehow depends on what the meaning of is is.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 1, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Who is Gen. Jim Jones and what is his record? The article has lots of hype, almost no facts, potentially some hearsay from Gen. Jones, and little credibility. The writing of the article, not Gen. Jones, who is poorly described. Reports of what Gen. Jones says should either be based on whether he is aware of the facts or not, his feelings of how things are from what he’s heard sounds like the definition of a rumor mill.

Posted by: Calvin Hobbes | September 1, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

When I make one, I’ll fess up!

Posted by: Charlie C | September 1, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Cheney is an insurgent former vice president. He is obviously PRAYING for a terrorist attack… just to save face! Now THAT is un-American!

Posted by: topgun | September 1, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

After the successful attacks in Spain, London, India, Pakistan, Iraq, Afgahnistan, Indonesia and the Sudan, with attempts in Saudi. How can anyone argue that no further attacks were ever expected on the US? Even after the release of CIA documented confessions by KSM that they planed attacks that would release anthrax in US population centers that was broken up.
What fantasy world are they living in that reality never enters????

Posted by: DJ | September 1, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

The point is that all of us are operating out of our own silos. The far left is in their own echo chamber, as is the far right.
Posted by: NDSue
… the thing is that there was an election last fall…. and Obama was elected along with a democratic congress…..citizens wanted change from the last 8 years…. neither party is perfect far from it, too be sure… what good are elections if the party that wins doesn’t get a chance to implement the policies that secured their election…
Bush/Cheney did so for 8 years, for better or worse depending on your POV.
too be sure there was a lot of screaming on the progressive side, but a lot of those issues that evoked the screaming proved to true….
Obama deserves a chance to do the same as far as policy. If it all goes wrong, he’ll be voted out.
Some might say that if Obama gets his way it will be too late……. Bush left America with 2 unresolved wars, and a bad economy, the world still goes on……damaged but forging ahead…..
There is a discernible difference in temperament now and then, no one was walking around with guns, when Bush gave a speech.

Posted by: Escuche bien | September 1, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Hobbs — If your questioning General Jones Honor your making a lot of enemys. No better man ever Served his Country. We would follow this man thru hell and back. Many of us have.

Posted by: James Wilson | September 1, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Who is Gen. Jim Jones and what is his record? Posted by: Calvin Hobbes
there’s this thing called the internets, you can look stuff up

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

The world is coming together now that The Great one has taken leadership on this means that the world was holding back while Bush was running thing maybe cause our congress was making back door deals? No they wouldn’t undermind Bush while he was the Pres (IE saying the war is lost), like they say now that underminding the Pres (IE Like wanting Obama to Fail) is rube & selfish, Who was that who wants a paper to Fail? Reid I think? No the dem’s wouldn’t do that.

Posted by: f14fixer | September 1, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

wasn’t it the right wing pundits who cheered the appointment of Jones? Now all of you people want to question him? If he stood up and said Cheney was right you’d cheer him. Bottom line, the right is just the party of no and would rather see the country end up in a trash heap than give Obama credit for anything!!

Posted by: dk | September 1, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Posted by: zeroer | Aug 31, 2009 11:41:43 PM
I was reviewing articles this morning dating from 2001 that contain the phrase, “progress in Afghanistan” and marveling at their number. Turns out the Soviets made lots of progress as well. Obama will perpetuate the path of his predecessors and we’ll have endless war, they’ll call it progress.
————-
This is exactly why we didn’t go in to Afghanistan with guns blazing from the start, we would have lost, thousands of soldiers and trillions of dollars. It was a smart decision made by the military after seeing what happened to Russia.
The argument that should have been made was that the only thing that will keep us safe is freedom in the middle east and this is exactly what the Bush doctrine proposed. He should have never tried to use the WMD in his argument because that was never the real reason we invaded Iraq, the goals were much broader. Sorry to those that don’t understand that.
A band aid approach will not work, cutting and running will not work. Installing another puppet govt. will not work. This is a long term effort and it might not happen in our lifetime but it is finally the right approach.
Only liberty promotes far-reaching and lasting peace.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 1, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Getting back to the storyline, the mechanisms to destroy the Taliban, by whatever means, were in place long before the Obama folks were in office. The only thing they should be taking credit for is continuing the policies that were already in place. Which is not a bad thing.

Posted by: Hugh | September 1, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Let me get this right, It is better to “Take them out” and kill them then it is to capture them and interogate them. In one case the continue living and one the die.
Which should we investigate, Mr Holder.

Posted by: stat_man | September 1, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Ferrari5858:
In our opposition to Russia invading Afghanistan, the US helped train the resistance fighters. One of those trained was Bin Laden himself. Care must be taken in any operation like this. So those good Iraqi officers being trained by us at this time will never turn their gun against us? Many situations are better left alone.

Posted by: gen7sw | September 1, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

It seems that before Obama came along everything was going wrong in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now that the great leader is here everything is going right for a change. The US has come a long way in determining right from wrong and good from bad. From where I sit, I would say Bush had it right all the way. The media gave Bush one hell of a belting and now praise Obama for what?

Posted by: Kottaras | September 1, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Nice try but it is all fake and all sham. The terror dudes are US and paid by us to make it look like we have a real enemy.

Posted by: Reverend Dave | September 1, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Posted by: gen7sw | Sep 1, 2009 1:39:30 AM
And that is why Bush took a different course, it was beyond the old ways of doing business, ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ type of thinking.
—————-
‘America identified the lack of freedom in the Middle East as a principal cause of the threats coming from the region. We concluded that if the region continued on the path it was headed — if another generation grew up with no hope for the future, and no outlet to express its views — the Middle East would continue to simmer in resentment and export violence.
To stop this from happening, we resolved to help the region steer itself toward a better course of freedom and dignity and hope. We’re engaged in a battle with the extremists that is broader than a military conflict, and broader than a law enforcement operation. We are engaged in an ideological struggle. And to advance our security interests and moral interests, America is working to advance freedom and democracy as the great alternatives to repression and terror.
As part of this effort, we’re pressing nations across the region — including our friends — to trust their people with greater freedom of speech, and worship, and assembly. We’re giving strong support to young democracies. We’re standing with reformers, and dissidents, and human rights activists across the region. Through new efforts like the Middle East Peace Partnership Initiative and the Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative, we’re supporting the rise of vibrant civil societies.
We’re also advancing a broader vision that includes economic prosperity, quality health care and education, and women’s rights.’ G.W. Bush
———-
I repeat.
Only liberty promotes far-reaching and lasting peace.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 1, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

The article states jones “..doesn’t give any real numbers..” regarding Afghanistan. Of course not! Last month was the bloodiest yet for American’s. As for cooperation, how about those korean launches? Europe? Well after failing to get them to increase stimulus they patted Obama on the back and sent him home without any concessions; they love him. Took seven days for Hillary to get him to make a statement about the repression in the Iranian demonstration; Ahmadinejad loves him. The tweets from the streets of Tehran weren’t so kind. Hugo and Fidel love him; he’s cutting off aid to Honduras after the courts approved the military deporting a president who trid the Chavez tactic to extend his term in violation of their constitution. Mail service to Cuba resolved any day now. I could go on but, hay, never let the facts get in the way of a good story!

Posted by: richard10516 | September 1, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am

OK, go back further. Recall the documentary that showed a younger Rumsfeld walking across the stage and shaking the hand of a younger Sadam?? WHY? Because we were building up Iraq’s military to aid their defences against Iran. So the Iraqi’s forgot? OR . . . WE forgot? OR . . .

Posted by: gen7sw | September 1, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Well, the Chairman of the Joint Chief’s of Staff came across as a “woose” and worse yet, a lacky of Obama. Missing was the credibility and bearing of a knowledgable miitary professional. If the White House civilians will stay the hell out of the way and let Petraus/McCrystal run the war, they will get it done. It is my understanding that the new Counterinsurgency Strategy developed for both the Marine Corps and Army is being used. This Strategy worked well in Iraq and will work better in Afghanistan, where there is no major religious divide. It will take time, money and comittment and will not be achieved overnight.

Posted by: Ltpar | September 1, 2009, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Posted by: gen7sw
We could have done the same thing again, went in to Saddam and made another back door shady deal, which he wouldn’t have kept or we wouldn’t have kept, all in the name of saying we are going to work together to end terrorism and nothing would ever change. You can see the beginnings of change though, one word of encouragement and Iran could fall, then a domino effect across the whole region. The way I see it, we can either fight there for infinity or we can support a true solution and in my opinion the answer is freedom. Same for Africa, I would invade there too if it was possible.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 1, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am

My original point was: ‘Care must be taken in any operation like this’.
We helped Saddam get too big, and it backfired. Just like the 12 year old detainee at Gitmo just released after 7 years of living in prison. Due process is a good thing. It would have been different if this child had been held in Afghanistan, not under a US held roof.

Posted by: gen7sw | September 1, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Posted by: gen7sw
You have a point, we can’t babysit the Iraqi’s forever either, I understand that. They could choose to live in the old ways. Democracy has to be nurtured and protected no matter where it is, even here.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 1, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Cheney, in his most recent interview, expressed outrage that Obama and Administration have not gone to him to ask, “How did you do it? How can we keep us safe? Tell us what to do so we can keep us safe like you did?” He actually said that. Before long, he will be slipping into a psychosis of sorts, I think. The fact that he can barely speak and breathe at the same time tells me he is not getting enough oxygen to his brain. Probably has some organic brain damage or something, coupled with a “pre existing condition” of paranoia.

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

It seems in America, some people just don’t want peace; they crave war/attacks and ultimately benefit from them! Isn’t so disgusting?

Posted by: Austin Chuks | September 1, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Posted by: TJ | Sep 1, 2009 2:10:26 AM
Perhaps Cheney has info that you are not privy to and it scared the living daylights out of him and he has a desire to not see it played out in real life. What ax does he have to grind now, he will never be prosecuted, no matter what they find and you know it and I know it, and he knows it and Obama and Holder both know it too.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 1, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Can anyone name one thing Obama has done right since taking office? Can anyone name one real success? Please, make a list.

Posted by: Kottaras | September 1, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Sorry it took 25 years, but on behalf of Winston and Julia I want to welcome everyone on FINALLY! arriving to my world. Snack trays are in the kitchen.

Posted by: George Orwell | September 1, 2009, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Not a matter of left/right, Dem/Rep – Obama’s Dept. of Homeland Security considers our own troops potential terrorists. In Afghanistan, this has been our deadliest year yet. Seems to me Obama is hell-bent on destroying our country in every way possible. As for giving Credit to Obama for anything, he can’t keep his word on anything. Everything he promised his own party were lies. So, he deserves credit for stabbing his own people in the back and being so charming they still love him. That is smooth. Heh.

Posted by: Mark | September 1, 2009, 2:48 am 2:48 am

“didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim”
Thus his claim is a lot of hot air and probably a lie.

Posted by: Ifticar | September 1, 2009, 2:56 am 2:56 am

So funny, “we are doing better…because I think so”. What a crock. Why is the press, ABCNEWS, giving Obama such a pass on the military deaths? Remember how the numbers were discussed daily when Bush was in office? August 2009 has already had more deaths than any month since the war on terror began. Why? And why are the press and the same people who were jumping up and down a year ago being so quiet? Was it the actual deaths of our soldiers or that Bush was commander in chief? Where is the commander in chief now? I havent heard a word out of him about the amount of deaths that we have incurred.

Posted by: Bud | September 1, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Wow, the things the White House writes for people to say. Egypt is the hub for weapons smuggling to Hamas to destroy Israel. Guess that explains why Obama went there to make his apology for America. Iraq has a freely elected government and a security force that is taking the violence in stride and maintaining order. Amazingly all of that happened under Bush but Obama will try to take credit for it. 9/11 was planned and prepared under Clinton’s watch but Bush took the blame for it too and he certainly handled the responce for it better then Clinton when the embassies were bombed. Cheney is completely right that a political motivated witch hunt in the CIA will hurt national security.

Posted by: Jon | September 1, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Sorry Mr. Jones. I feel way more threatened since Mr. Obama took office. I personally think hs is a coward, a wimp, and with no testicular fortitude. I think that I would trust the sissie from school more than Mr. Obama. I’m sorry that the administration has you so buffalowed, what is it the power, money, greed? Mr. Jones I’m sorry to laugh a you but your not very convincing

Posted by: jack nichols | September 1, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

I really admire retired General James Jones (he seems so much more credible and trustworthy than Cheney), and liked your piece, Jake. It was a great attempt to get at some truth beyond just repeating what Cheney told Chris Wallace in what was, at best, a lightweight, softball “interview” on Fox News. Now, we have to dig for some data as he didn’t have numbers readily available (unlike others I don’t believe that means he can’t back up every single claim. I bet he can!)

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Obama’s use of the interrogation investigation to draw attention away from his plummeting popularity is straight out of the Clinton White House playbook, except this is more damaging, because it will basically neuter the CIA and undermine the war on terror!!

Posted by: terrorfreefuture | September 1, 2009, 3:34 am 3:34 am

The very best we can hope for in Iraq and Afghanistan are two islamic nations that are corrupt, hate the West and are soon stocking up on cheap Russian made weapons. Most of which will be used by state sponsored criminal gangs in Iraq and to protect the drug trade in Afghanistan. The talk about “freeing the people” sounds great except that the only freedom they want is to kill each other and Iran is most happy to help them do so. Iraq is headed toward civil war as arabs and kurds go at it once the US in out of way. If the Kurds aren’t smart enough to see the US abandoning them again – then God help them. As long as the Taliban have access to drug money – and they always will, that fight is a non-starter.

Posted by: Royce | September 1, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Jones is little more than a shameless political hack…that is why he can not provide any facts and figures to back up his baseless claim that Obama is more effective than Bush was in the war on terror!! The mere fact that the Obama administration has banned the use of terms like “war on terror” and “jihad” clearly demonstrates how much they are shackled by their own political correctness…

Posted by: terrorfreefuture | September 1, 2009, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Fact remains 9/11 was on George W. Bush’s and Cheney’s watch they ignored warnings and got busy planning to steal the next election.That’s a fact try arguing that one. lol.

Posted by: t. | September 1, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am

Had the events of September 11, 2001 occurred prior to Bush having taken office, I would have had no doubt that this catastrophe occurred exactly as it appeared and, further, I would have found any conspiracy theory the invention of the mentally ill. However, given the overall conduct of the George W. Bush and his administration during their tenure, I, like millions of other Americans, am absolutely convinced that there is far more to the story then we are likely to ever know.
Most conspiracy theorists base the reasons for their theories on the assumption that a small and powerful group staged those events to once again impose tyranny on the American people as a whole. Indeed, the extraordinary conduct of George W. Bush and his administration did actually transpire and, with all due respect to Mr. Bush, he has simply never exhibited the intellectual or mental faculties necessary to have achieved such result on his own.
There are billions of dollars that have been stolen from the American people which will seemingly never be accounted for. Virtually every American lost the majority of their life savings to some mysterious and unknown culprit(s). We all still ask, “Where’s the money now?”
During the Bush administration, the country was flooded with cheap labor as the Mexican border was seemingly busted wide open and our government at the time refused to enforce any of our immigration laws. Moreover, virtually every public American corporation during the Bush administration was sued by American stockholders during that period because the boards of directors of those corporations intentionally lied with respect to their earnings so as to inflate stock prices. The stock market then crashed and here we are, all stupefied. Again, the Bush administration and his then U.S. Attorney refused to prosecute and few if any of those directors ever paid a penalty. In fact, most of them are now taking stimulus money, which would appear further insult to injury.
Viewed empirically, the motives of tyranny being imposed on the American people, at least, become far more likely and certainly more believable now, because none of what happened to the American economy could have been possible had it not been for the events of 9/11/01 and most of us are clearly now far more dependent on our government then any of us would have ever fathomed.
Tom Ridge, the Director of Homeland Security during the Bush administration, has now basically testified that the lowering and raising of the terrorist threat levels during that time were purely political. It is, indeed, a fact that Bush’s popularity ratings shot up big after each scare. This in itself would normally be sufficient to indict Bush and those who participated for domestic terrorism. That has not happened, nor does it appear even remotely likely at the moment. However, if such indictments were to occur and subpoena power implemented, there is no doubt that more of the truth would surface.
Being an American citizen, in itself, imposes a duty on each of us to insist on learning the truth. The inconsistencies and secrecy from our own government regarding these events are clearly and extremely disturbing. The United States Internal Revenue Service and national bank records would, under normal circumstances, offer much information on where the money went. However, most American banks have now gone under. Given this, it would now appear impossible to ever know for sure. Either way, it appears to be a colossal and absolutely perfect crime and every American, except those who participated, appear to have been duped and are truly victims. As such, I would think we should want to know and insist on a valid investigation, as it is now also well-settled that the 9/11 Commission Report was grossly flawed and the product of the same persons and entities who are now suspect.
We could all still ask, however, that even if the truth were to actually surface, what good would really come of it? Who would be prosecuted? How would America be recompensed? Could America ever recover from the humiliation of having allowed it to ever happen in the first place? The fact remains that most Americans will need to start from scratch. The life’s work and savings of the average American has been obliterated forever. It is truly sad and quite defeatist to let it ride and ask no questions. Further, a mere few million Americans asking such questions will not do it–ALL Americans would need to step up to the plate.
“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated.”
Thomas Paine
The American Crisis
Common Sense
December 23, 1776

Posted by: Steven Joyce | September 1, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Cheney is a wimp. He is saying that it’s okay for him to torture as long as it saves American lives. Since he’s saved American lives he should get a pass. When you knowing commit a crime, you knowing accept the consequences. Why don’t he just man up & defend his actions in court. Since he’s so sure that he did the right thing then it must have been worth risking his freedom.

Posted by: Retired Soldier | September 1, 2009, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!! Obama and friends the comedians. They are good for one thing…a good laugh.

Posted by: jim | September 1, 2009, 3:59 am 3:59 am

Thomas Paine is a pain.

Posted by: yeah right | September 1, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am

Obama treats Americans like the enemy.
The Bush/Cheney haters cannot see
through their hate.

Posted by: What? | September 1, 2009, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Jones is little more than a shameless political hack.
Posted by: terrorfreefuture | Sep 1, 2009 3:39:44 AM
***
“From July 1999 to January 2003, General Jones was the 32nd Commandant of the Marine Corps. After relinquishing command as Commandant, he assumed the positions of Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR) and Commander of the United States European Command (USEUCOM), positions he held until December 2006. General Jones retired from active duty in the U.S. Marine Corps on February 1st, 2007, after more than 40 years of uniformed service to the nation.”
And what have you done in comparison to guarantee our liberty? Let me guess, you’re going to claim to support our military????

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Ferrari5858,
What an idiotic thing to say.
We don’t kill our daughters for
wearing bluejeans.

Posted by: What? | September 1, 2009, 4:19 am 4:19 am

The (PRESIDENT’s) National Security Adviser says Obama has been more effective than Bush….hummmm?
Isn’t Obama this guy’s boss?

Posted by: mhudd | September 1, 2009, 4:20 am 4:20 am

I am a service connected disabled Vet and the son of a Korean Was Vet. Why are military personnel in rison for “mistreating” prisoners in Iraq. When politicians who ordered the torture of prisoners are walking the streets. What a slap in the face to every man or woman who has worn a uniform. Once again the politicos treat the military as 2nd class citizens.

Posted by: James F | September 1, 2009, 4:24 am 4:24 am

I kind of have to laugh at this one. In the same breath Mr. Gibbs of the White House blames the failure of Afghanistan on the Bush administration.
Let me see now? Congress does the appropriating of funding and over the past two years that the Democrats have controlled Congress they have been stingy and slow in getting the monies needed to handle the two areas of conflict.
As well Congress howled so much over Iraq they influenced where troops were put.
And finally, we are eight months through the current administration yet we are failing in the area of conflict?
At some point the current leadership in Washington D.C. is going to have to admit to their own failures and the campaign promises that have been broken. The sooner they do so, is the sooner people might start to believe the rhetoric they are shoveling.
In the meantime, it is up to each of us to compare their rhetoric to facts in order to gauge what is going on in our own backyard.

Posted by: Sane American | September 1, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am

I know these facts are hard to swallow.
Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, reaffirm that Geneva Conventions apply to W.O.T. detainees.
UN Convention Against Torture (1988 Reagan)…
Article 1:
1. ”…torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed…”
Article 2
2. “No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.”
The debate on torture efficacy ended when these international treaties were signed and codified in U.S. law. The “opinion” of partisans has no merit or weight in determining the value of torture as a “policy preference.

Posted by: 2moons | September 1, 2009, 5:28 am 5:28 am

As someone who had two tours in Iraq, I find the torture of prisoners very defeatist and embarrassing. I risked my life to ensure freedom for all. How does torturing other humans make the United State “morally better” than the terrorists? It puts us on the same level. We are not God, we are servants and trying to justify the willful torture of prisoners is not something I can stand behind. I can stand behind my country and service and be proud, but not of that. From all reliable accounts, the terrorists from Iraq were not directly responsible for 9/11, the Taliban from Afghanistan were. If torturing was going to be done, they should make sure they have the right people. Let’s remember God in control of everything. It is His punishment that will ultimately be just. As a Christian nation, we need to remember that.

Posted by: Timothy Williams | September 1, 2009, 5:29 am 5:29 am

I still don’t understand how men and women claiming to be patriotic Americans can say that it’s ok to torture another person as long as they aren’t Americans or American allies.
Don’t you people realize that we’re fighting a war AGAINST terror?
Our belief in the necessity of guaranteeing basic human rights is what makes us better than terrorists, remember?
We hate them because they do bad things to people, like imprisoning them indefinitely (that means for as long as we want) without proof of due cause (you know,without any evidence that they’ve done something wrong?), or punishing them for “crimes committed against the state” without a trial- you know, that thing the government has to let us have before they can put us in jail or give us the death penalty?
That is why we hate the terrorists, right? Because they do those things to people?
And they torture people- torture-infliction of great pain and agony- a method used to inspire fear (might I say terror?) in a person to cause them to do as they are asked?
Isn’t this why we hate them?
So how can any true American support torture, for anyone? Would you become what you hate? Would you persecute, punish, torment, and destroy men and women and their families to support what you believe in?
Because if you would, you might as well go over there and join them, we don’t need you here.
Bush and his followers should be prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and treason. They’ve smeared blood all over our constitution and put our own freedoms here in jeopardy. Particularly Cheney, he’s smarter than Bush and had more influence. If we let them get away with it in public, they’ll want to get away with it at home.
Anyone, regardless of their political party associations, should receive the same treatment. If Obama felt the need to continue in the Cheney tradition, I’d think he was a damned traitor, too. And I’ll think he’s a coward if he doesn’t go after the two who commanded the CIA.
I’d hate to invoke Godwin’s Law, but slaughtering thousands for the cause of a political agenda is the case here.
It’s like Nuremburg- you get the guys who did as they were told, and the guys that told them to do it.

Posted by: Anastasia | September 1, 2009, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Posted by: James Glasscock | Aug 31, 2009 10:10:53 PM
“I was on active duty…” There’s one thing that Gen. Jones will always have over former Vice President Cheney.
Over Øbama too!!

Posted by: Jim02351 | September 1, 2009, 5:44 am 5:44 am

THOMAS
Terrorists hated us because of our abilities to contradict ourseleves and double standards, we say we stand for democracy and will of the people and yet we support Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudia Arabia, we interfere in their internal affairs on a daily basis and the fact that we have been directly and directly responsible for deaths in their countries. We need to start calling a spade a spade and stop all the hypocrisy. After 9/11 we flew the family of the Saud out, Bush had briefings pre 9/11 and did nothing. The power of oil has meant that we are loosing our morals and principles and these terrorists see through our so called moral high ground.

Posted by: Gabriel Tolefe-Taylor | September 1, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am

Obama is not talking to terrorists, he is cutting off the flow of would be terrorists by holding out his hand of friendship. A muslim is likely to shop a terrorist amongst them only by being cooperative with the community. The world is more responsive to Obama, look at North Korea, Sudan, Burma, Resolutions being passed by the UN – the image of the USA is at its highest. Listen people humility and not arrogance is the way forward. The North Koreans were surprised at the lack of support they got from China and Russia, you guys have a thing or two to learn from international relations.

Posted by: Gabriel Tolefe-Taylor | September 1, 2009, 6:06 am 6:06 am

Terry Moore:
so you think Obama is worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis…. WW2, .. just to name a few
hmmmmm
You forgot WWI and Vietnam and Korea.
WWI and II: When did Germany attack the US? Korea and ‘Nam same thing. We were never attacked but decided to get involved anyway. All under democrat Presidents.

Posted by: Jim02351 | September 1, 2009, 6:15 am 6:15 am

We need to start practising what we preach and stop the do as i say not as i do. All our allies in the Middle East barring Israel are all corrupt dictators and yet Bush was all about spreading democracy, if thats not hypocritical then i dont know what is.

Posted by: Gabriel Tolefe-Taylor | September 1, 2009, 6:18 am 6:18 am

THIS CLAIM WOULD BE A HECK OF A LOT MORE CREDIBLE IF IT WERE ISSUED AFTER EIGHT YEARS OF NO TERRORIST ATTACKS ON OUR HOMELAND – AS WE HAD UNDER BUSH. MORE GOBBLEDEGOOK TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM OBAMA’S FALLING APPROVAL NUMBERS. OBAMA’S ATTACKS ON BUSH ARE GETTING A LITTLE OLD, NO? DUH.

Posted by: Manitu | September 1, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am

NDSue: We didn’t miss Katrina, we waited, as we were legally obliged to do, for the democrat governor to ask for federal assistance. The request came three days after the fact but what the hell, blame Bush.

Posted by: Jim02351 | September 1, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am

I’m surprised and disappointed that Gen. Jones was a Marine making these comments which are really sad and politically charged. If it wasn’t for the fact that he sold his soul, I’d say he should be ashamed.

Posted by: Mac | September 1, 2009, 6:20 am 6:20 am

Water boarding is torture according to the Obama supporters, but abortion on demand isn’t?

Posted by: Francis Godici | September 1, 2009, 6:23 am 6:23 am

National Security Adviser, Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.) could tell us water runs uphill and pigs fly and that would not be true either. Oh these fools who sell their souls for fleeting glory-sad.
“”And what have you done in comparison to guarantee our liberty?”"
Infantry officer US Army? (Ranger/Airborne/taught US Army Infantry School Fort Benning/taught The US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks?) We thank Gen. Jim Jones for his service and are baffled by this ridiculous statement and so it the man with a bad leg who never got to serve. What have you done?

Posted by: RobertG | September 1, 2009, 6:25 am 6:25 am

“The world is more responsive to Obama” I guess that’s one way to describe events. Like North Korea launching missiles and testing a nuke. Like Iran ramping up its nuke programs. Like Obama asking for help in Afghanistan from our European allies and getting the finger. The world is indeed more responsive to Obama…

Posted by: Sarah | September 1, 2009, 6:37 am 6:37 am

Re: “…the president’s National Security Adviser, Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.), told ABC News in an exclusive interview that actually the reverse is true: President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.”
WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME ONE SUCCESS PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS HAD PUTTING ONE SINGLE TERRORIST OUT OF COMMISSION??? GENERAL, GIVE A TERRORIST NAME!
IF HE HAS PUT ONE TERRORIST OUT OF BUSINESS IT MUST BE A NATIONAL SECRET…
#

Posted by: Alfonso Barrs | September 1, 2009, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Anastasia: Why don’t you write a book. Former Marine: Yeah..yeah…yeah. Wise up…it worked!!

Posted by: Bonnie Carroll Davis | September 1, 2009, 6:43 am 6:43 am

Obama having better success against terrorism than Bush? Yea right, when pigs fly! This is absurd.
Obama doesn’t even want to call our war against terror a “war against terrorism”. But when the present adminstration’s approval ratings are now at 46% and falling, I suppose you get desperate.

Posted by: Robert R. | September 1, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Sounds about as credible as this “number of jobs saved” “metric” that the President likes to tout. Funny how all of these claim are so ethereal.

Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am

The Real Issues My Fellow Americans in fighting terrorism is how we fight it. Terrorism is war and politics. It is the politics of fear. America has to handle it both ways/ by war and politics. Bush/Cheney handled it by War and fear. The world is beyond that now. We have to handle this by war and the politics of negotiation. This is the era of President Obama who with his leadership will handle this crises with tact and negotiations. Cowboy diplomacy like Cheney promotes will not work now. The politics of fear does not mean anything to anyone but terrorist. Americans must go on with their lives in a cautious careful manner but must remain diligent and mindful of the dangers and deal with them. (i.e. Proper security/ utilizes forces when necessary/ train forces to take out terrorist camps/ promote democracy or independent government in other countries, etc. We are a global society that is interconnected through economics and politics. America is the leader and we must promote our leadership in a way that is an example to the rest of the world.

Posted by: The Real Issue | September 1, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am

This could only be plausible if the Obamist started at the same level of threat and will remain true only up to the first terrorist attack.
This claim is similar to a Home Security System reporting a robbery and claiming it defended the home after the Homeowner shot the burglars dead in the living room.
Lame Amateurs, they sound like Clinton lying all the time to appear like a real man instead of the white trash mommy’s boy he was. Obama is the same personality type. Narcissistic nonentities.

Posted by: Rufus Choate | September 1, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Amazing how some lies by Democrats just keep turning into more lies. The only thing that can stop it is our vote next year.

Posted by: A Conservative | September 1, 2009, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Yeah right. If this administration is getting better intelligence from the CIA, all I can say is watch your back CIA. That intelligence will be investigated. And by the way, where is Bin Laden, ABC. You would think Obama would have found him now since he is doing such a better job. Get real ABC. We are tired of the lies and cover ups for Obama.

Posted by: Pat | September 1, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am

How can they say that when the biggest terrorist regarding American values and principles resides in the White House?

Posted by: TxBoB | September 1, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Facts .
17 of the top 24 Terrorist leaders of Al Quada were taken out under Bush .16 others were hit by drowns in 3 middle east other countries…
Under BUSH the 3 terrorist water boarded only …
one was the main man who planed 9/11 .
that info helped kill , capture 63 terrorist top listed Thugs and 31 cells 12 HIDEOUTS across the world not to mention Pakistan and Iraq .
One MEDIUM Top Level Al Quada and 3 Telibane leaders were taken out under Obama .
General Jones is a long time Democrat .
I know him well .
Enough said .

Posted by: ReCon USMC | September 1, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

how is threating someone torture? how is secondhand smoke torture? Grow-up people. Torture is a horrible thing. but threats and secondhand smoke is NOT torture. Pulling someones fingernails out is torture. Breaking bones is torture. Beating someone is torture. Did we do any of those things? If these tactics kept us safe, threaten away.

Posted by: lenore | September 1, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

I didn’t think there were any terrorists left. I thought they had been renamed, manmade disaster makers, or some such nonsense.

Posted by: rallies | September 1, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

I is a greater level of success if your measure is the number of lives that our sons and daughters in Afganistan.

Posted by: Cogito | September 1, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Obama and gibbs must think we’re all eating the mushrooms they been chewing on since the begiining of their admin!
These guys are really way out there! Cheney is right this obummer is going to lead us into the worst catastrophe ever, and of course they will blame anyone but themselves.

Posted by: Aric | September 1, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

why would he say that? Obama is losing ground with the American people and needs to reinforce his popularity. To do this he is reverting back to his strategy for wining the election by putting the belame on Bush for everything up to and including cancer. As a neofite politician he doesn’t realise it’s not about Bush anymore, Obama is in charge and it’s all about him

Posted by: pm | September 1, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Somebody should inform Prince Obama and his Keystone NSC that we don’t have “rulers” in this country, only elected officials who serve at the pleasure of the People of the United States.

Posted by: Steve O. | September 1, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

LOL!

Posted by: JB - NYC | September 1, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am

I don’t think ABC News has any credibility when it comes to reporting on this administration. They can air an hour long infomericial from the White House on health care free of charge, but won’t run a commercial against Obamacare that wouuld be paid for. I, for one, don’t trust ABC as a news source.

Posted by: Idsandy | September 1, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Man up Obama…I think we should just “move on”, so that you can take responsiblity now. We the People are a little sick of your childish refusal to take any responsibility for anything.

Posted by: mikethetiger57 | September 1, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Jones said. “The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it and is approaching it in a slightly different way – actually a radically different way – to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies – both national and international.”
***************
In a radically different way?? The party with members that loves and adores dictatorships and thinks our CIA agents are to harsh on terrorist..What’s going on here? Do they not understand that these guys support interogation techniques far worst than the things our CIA agents have supposedly done. Not to mention that they are mostly DICTATORS!!!
Looks to me like the Obama Admin. wants to get closer to these countries and dictators to integrate their way of thinking..Certainly a threat to our Constitution and way of life..
As far me..I love my freedom the way it is, thank you very much.

Posted by: proavman | September 1, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

>> Jones said … any detainees who were interrogated using methods President Obama has banned – ones that qualify as torture under international law …
Have you noticed how “reporters” these days slip in some oppinion, stated as fact, then quickly move on to avoid the justification part of their incorrect assumtions?

Posted by: xJonx | September 1, 2009, 8:06 am 8:06 am

“The politics of fear does not mean anything to anyone but terrorist.”
Well, duh.

Posted by: Ana | September 1, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

so everything is Obamas fault, right?
Then lets not forget that 9/11 happened which King George was ruling and Yellow Cheney was holding the strings of the puppet-king.
9/11 happened because they were playing games and politics instead of doing their job.
The deficit is their fault, because they made their personal friends rich and bankrupted the country.
therfore the blame goes to the puppet-kind and his yellow-string-master

Posted by: MichaelSC | September 1, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

It is not arrogant to put your life on the line to free a people. Hussein and his sons, killed and tortured indiscriminately, for fun, or to set an example to others. You do not make friends with terrorists by putting out your hand in friendship, they want the entire world under sharia law, and ALL infidels dead, period. They throw bombs into schools and kill children because they dare to teach children, but you think the world will be safer if we back off and leave them alone? You are a moron, it may have worked when you were in grade school to pay the bully to leave you alone, but in the real world you will be dead. This is called war for a reason, people die in wars, you eliminate those that want you dead by killing them, not by trying to appease them so they won’t. When someones entire life is consumed by hatred of anyone that differs in thought from them, and their solution is not to talk, but to kill all those that don’t conform, then you, at some point, must stand your ground and say enough. You have the right to believe as you do, and I have the right to believe as I do. That does not give either of us the right to kill the other, but if one of us believes it does, the other has the right to protect them self by any means necessary. And if you don’t have the stomach to stand between those people and those that aren’t strong enough to defend themselves, then at least have the decency to get out of the way of those that are.

Posted by: srcamachonj | September 1, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

I find it interesting that Mr. Obama’s National Security Advisor uses the word “rulers” when speaking of government officials, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the role of the federal government and the principles underlying the Constitution. I suspect that this lack of understanding is common among many in Washington. However, people such as this are only one type of symptom of the disease of “failure by the people to understand the lessons of history” and unfortunately, unless this disease is cured, we are destined to experience even more of the symptoms tyrants tend to inflict on those they rule.

Posted by: Larry | September 1, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am

So someone on the Obama payroll says he is doing a better job than Bush? Where is the ‘news’ here?

Posted by: ed | September 1, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Feds are now raiding garage sales. Climate Change laws in Britain are causing blackouts. Socialized medicine is killing people in other countries with alarming numbers. Obama is thumbing his nose at the Constitution and usurping power at an alarming rate. NOW is th etime to stop him and Soros. Note: If we can cut Soros off, we can separate the head from the beast.

Posted by: ricardo maxwell | September 1, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am

>> So how can any true American support torture, for anyone?
Your ABSOLUTELY right Jim. Thank goodness, making someone FEEL BAD isn’t torture. Otherwise we would have to shutdown our public school system.

Posted by: xJonx | September 1, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

“The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim…” and so it goes. Lies, spin, propaganda, and shadow government positioning. 2010 can’t come soon enough. I miss the grown ups.

Posted by: Phocus | September 1, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Other “rulers.” That is creepy!

Posted by: ccs | September 1, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

MichaelSC , 9-11 happened because you illustrious King William made it illegal for the agencies that could have prevented it from sharing information with each other, and his administration also believed that the bombings that had been happening during his watch be handled like criminal investigations, and that the people involved be treated like common criminals, with Miranda rights, and due process. This administration is doing the same thing, and it will result in the same thing. If they had waterboarded the first bombers of the world trade center, there may not have been a 9-11.

Posted by: srcamachonj | September 1, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Thank you ReCon USMC.
One of the things that makes me want to yak when I listen to this administration, is the constant, constant ‘we’re better than them’ spin.
It’s campaign rhetoric and it doesn’t pass the mustard when it comes to informing the public in a mature way about the serious issues of the day.
Facts are facts, this guy doesn’t have any, so it’s the ‘my team is great’ routine. Spin with a party hat and called policy without substance.
And ABC News calls that an interview?

Posted by: JR | September 1, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

We all see how effective the U.N. is when they pulled their “Peace keeping” force out of Rawanda and watched hundreds of thousands killed with out mercy. How effective they are in stopping the pirates off the coast of Africa and how they were able to convince North Korea to stop their nuclear weapons development.
Just about as effective as The League of Nations were with their negotiations with Hitler before WW11
It’s not about making nice with people around a cocktail party at a hollywood ball.
Nations respond in their own best interests and unless you have some advantatage other than presenting yourself as a “nice person” no one is listening. The US and global affairs is far different than influencing a Chicago ward.

Posted by: pm | September 1, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Can this guy try any harder to apply to the information ministry. What a complete joke. No facts, no named arrests or detentions, just a claim that “the world is coming together”. Right. The terrorists tremble in fear…

Posted by: Proamerican | September 1, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

“jobs saved” equals “terrorists thwarted” It’s all a psychological, manipulative, propaganda war against the American people.

Posted by: Jenny | September 1, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Raise your hand if you don’t know what any of the following mean…
1. Constitution
2. Democracy
3. Rule of Law
4. Values
5. Morals
6. Independence of the Department of Justice
7. America
Any of the comments that support torture as a means of getting information are ignorant fools who admittedly don’t know what the aforementioned enumerated concepts mean.
Torture makes America less safe and goes against everything that makes us who we are as a nation and people.
Anyone offering support to the contrary are un-American and ignorant.
The fact that they would argue their immorality in public shows a real depraved barbaric lack of intellect and humanity, too dumb to be ashamed.
The majority of Americans are unfortunate to have citizenship association with people who are this lacking in mind, heart and spirit. They ignore facts, history and even common sense. And rather than act as upright learned humans they pretend civility and take on the code of animals. Fortunately their in the minority otherwise America would fail as it almost did under Bush.

Posted by: Huckleberry Hound | September 1, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

And what’s this RULER thing. This admin is so disconnected they’ve forgotten they draw a check written by the people in this country. We hire them. We can sure FIRE them.

Posted by: Proamerican | September 1, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Those of you who think that the United States can bully its way to security are deceiving yourselves. We do not live in the 1950′s any longer. The Bush/Cheney administration had the worst foreign policy in the country’s history. Ronald “Ray-gun” spoke like a cowboy, but he was backed by a brilliant diplomatic core. Effective administrations must work with the rest of the world.

Posted by: empire in decline | September 1, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Y’all have been watching too much “24″ – in the real world, not only is torture ineffective, but even if it worked, it’d still be illegal. Americans seem to have no problems stooping to the terrorists’ level, and I for one believe that we are a better country than that. I’m sorry to all those that don’t – torture seems to be the new right-wing family value.

Posted by: Josh | September 1, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Terrorist attacks under GB = 1, Attacks under BO = 0, I think our current president is winning.

Posted by: TurdSandwich | September 1, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

In reviewing some of the post above, I am struck by the amount of hipocritical and absolute denial of many of my fellow posters. This positive trend in reducing the threat of world wide terrorism, has indeed been documented via many other sources world wide. It was also predicted to happen with a change in the approach taken by the US. It is welcome news, but no surprise to any who have followed the issue in good faith. However, evidently that cannot be said about those who would degrade this administration with any and all things including the most absurd lies.

Posted by: Howard Waxwood | September 1, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Unfortunately there are people in this country that believe we are the cause of the worlds problems, when in fact we are the cure. We have done more to free people of other nations than any country in history, yet these self hating libs want to blame us for all the problems in the world. What about all the dictatorships, that kill those that oppose them? what about all those people that kill anyone that disagrees with them? Do you really believe the world would be better if we left them alone to run wild? 9-11 showed that by doing that we were still not safe. The whole point of 9-11 was for them to show us that it was our capitalistic free society that they were at war with. So if you want to appease them, convert to Islam, give up your worldly possessions, grow a beard, cover all females in your family in sheets from head to toe, don’t allow any female in your family to work, go to school, walk alone, or have any basic human rights, and if one of them gets raped, kill them, not the rapist, then you can live as one in their version of nirvana. Idiot

Posted by: srcamachonj | September 1, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Intelligence is about getting ahead. If you simple people remember Clinton dismantled the CIA and exposed their method and guess what happens within months of him leaving. And now you have Obama really dismantling the CIA and guess what is going to happen. The CIA only does illegal stuff…that is it point. So Holder and company will now pick and choose what illegal stuff they do and change the rules afterwards. CIA employees will leave in drove since WHAT THEY DO IS ILLEGAL somewhere. This Jones guy seems to have a limited grasp as to how the world works. There were bad people trying to kill each other long before George Bush…so get over him being the bad guy. The China and Soviets are laughing at us…they don’t want us safe…why do they supply Iran and North Korea… It must be great to be a blind idealist who can’t interpert history. George Bush is not the root of all evil. He did nothing before we were attacked you fools. They attacked us because they hate us and they still hate us Obama or not!

Posted by: Barry | September 1, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

If the Bush Administration tactics were working, why didn’t they capture Bin Laden? Where is he? We’ve spent billions of dollars fighting the war on Terrorism and look at the state of our country and the view by the international community? The threat to our country isn’t just from the outside, there are also those in this country who want to see Obama fail and the rhetoric by Cheney, Palin Limbaugh, Steele and others is showing the world that we want an attack just to say, see Obama tactics aren’t working and Bush didn’t have an attack during his 8 years. What is wrong with this country? Clearly politics is more important that the safety of Americans and building relationship with our allies and other developing countries.
Wake up my fellow Americans and support our Commander-in-Chief!!

Posted by: cstephens | September 1, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

I don’t care about the past, all i know is that we have got a lot of problems in this country that we all need to come together to fix… I blame bush and his boys for the state we are in and the fact that the world now hates us and the fact he sold out the american worker but that wont help… Lets try supporting the new president and we will all come out of this ok… Stop the hatting…

Posted by: Tom Hernon | September 1, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Posted by: srcamachonj | Sep 1, 2009 8:09:53 AM
In reply to your post: Get the heck out of other people’s business. Your question:
. They throw bombs into schools and kill children because they dare to teach children, but you think the world will be safer if we back off and leave them alone?”
Stop sending drones into Pakistan to kill innocent villagers. Americans don’t have the right to kill indiscriminately using any old lie as a reason.

Posted by: Alecia Raniba | September 1, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

General Jones? In whose army?

Posted by: LDC | September 1, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

>> We need to start calling a spade a spade and stop all the hypocrisy.
OK, oil to a nation is like blood to the human body … without it, we die. Period.
The three MAIN reasons we went into Iraq was first, to secure the oil, second, to eliminate Sadam as a hostile, WMD owing threat to the US, AND finally, to establish a greater presence in the middle east to fight the anti-american propoganda the extremists were putting out.
We PAY every year LARGE sums of money to various nations for the RIGHT to put our nose in their business. If they don’t like it, they can choose not to take our money.
Sovereign does NOT mean equal and thus the argument that one sovereign nation has nukes, therefore this other sovereign nation should be allowed to have nuke is an invalid, DUMB argument.
God does exist, Jesus DID die for our sins, and one of the many points of life is to prove that we CAN’T do it on our own … we NEED a benevelent King, which IS God.
There are a number of other Spades I could mention, but the point is, if your ARE going to call out the spades, you need to do so on both sides of the argument AND you can’t be wrong in what IS a spade and what is actually a joker.

Posted by: xJonx | September 1, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

“So someone on the Obama payroll says he is doing a better job than Bush? Where is the ‘news’ here?”
Yeah, that’s not nearly as good as the Alaska Personnel Board (comprised of panel members who can be fired by the governor) clearing Governor Palin of wrongdoing in the Troopergate fiasco.

Posted by: Good for the Goose | September 1, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Note to Jones…What the CIA does is illegal that is the point. So people there are engaged in illegal activities. It is called “SPYING”. Everyone there can be brought up on trumped up charges somewhere. It is obviously they will no credit to anybody but their true believes. This is shameful.

Posted by: Barry | September 1, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Very Glad to see that Bagdad Bob has landed on his feet..

Posted by: steve | September 1, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am

“Somebody should inform Prince Obama and his Keystone NSC that we don’t have “rulers” in this country, only elected officials who serve at the pleasure of the People of the United States.”
Sounds real good and POMPOUS, but the fact is you have rulers, you just don’t want to admit it. If YOU the people had any sense, you would ask for a good health care bill – but your RULERS have taught you to think of their interests first!
Your rulers live at Martha’s Vineyard and retire in Texas- and feed you a load of scary stories.
No matter what you may think, your “democracy” is a load of bull.

Posted by: Alecia Raniba | September 1, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

My fellow Marines and I are embarassed that General Jones was one of us. He has been selling out the Marine Corps for his own personal benefit, now he is selling out America as well. He was one of the worst Commandants in history. The real Marines who have been fighting this war know the truth, President Bush was a million times more effective in putting terrorists on the run. He allowed us to do our job, not play a politacally correct game. Notice how once obama took office, Afghanistan started going down hill? Just like America. He likes to blame President Bush for everything, but it is the dems who took control of congress (who, by the Constitution, control the purse strings of America) in 2006 who led the destruction of the economy through Fannie and Freddie (strange how the media ignores that fact also), not President Bush’s policies that successfully stabilized the economy after the 9/11 terrorist attack. The people of America may be gullible and believe the media lies, but you can’t hide the truth forever. That is why obama’s polls are plummeting. The people are starting to open their eyes and see the socialist agenda he has been hiding.

Posted by: Jarhead | September 1, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

What a joke..lol welcome to 1984. doublespeak. I have NEVER in my life seen such disregard for truth! It is really sick that all one has to say is anything he wants without proof of any kind and the media does not even try to verify such bs.

Posted by: Datr | September 1, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Jones appears to have a limited grasp of history. Clinton dismantled the CIA ablility and guess what happened within months of him leaving. Terrorist attacked us before George Bush? Clinton oversaw numerous attacks and left us mess…Jones doesn’t seem to be aware of the softly softly aproach didn’t work. He give no credit for all that has happen in preventing and seems to believe his 4 months on the job have completely changed the world. He has a very high opinion of himself if he thinks he has changed the entire US gov in his 4 months or is it BLIND FAITH.

Posted by: Barry | September 1, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

As always the “blame the other guy” card is played.
The preamble says “We The People of The United States” not those of us who attack the United States. Being a citizen of the United States has it’s benefits not being one has it’s drawbacks. One of those drawbacks is that one doesn’t have the protections provided.
When any elected official or those appointed by the same violate The Constitution then those officials need to be called to task by We the People.
So if you’re really the true Americans you say you are then we hold them all responsible for their actions regardless of what party or group they belong.
Paying taxes doesn’t make one a Patriot but holding those in power to the rule of law does.

Posted by: Phlebo | September 1, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

It’s true that in the field of mathematics the concept of “rounding up” is practiced and acceptable in certain applications.
However, in History it’s necessary to be a little more precise.
Okay boys and girls, let’s don our little propeller hats and take out our slide rules, or calculators. This is addition and subtraction, tough stuff, so I apologize in advance if we lose a couple of you.
Bush took office on Jan 20th 2000. FACT
Bush was POTUS for 8 years. FACT
Al Qaeda attacked the USA on Sept. 11, 2001. FACT
Bush did not prevent the USA from being attacked for a total of 8 years. FACT
8 years = 96 months of Bush two terms -
20 months of Bush before 9/11 = 76 months of Bush after 9/11
76 months = 6 1/3 years
Because there were only 6+ years remaining after 9/11 and rounding up is not applicable in this context because it would mean that 9/11 didn’t happen at all, which is really what Cheney wants to obscure – don’t play into it even if you’re a republican Bush/Cheney apologist.

Posted by: Huckleberry Hound | September 1, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

He gives them jobs as Czars in his administration.

Posted by: dcrumpton | September 1, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

The biggest threat to our freedom resides at 1600 Pennyslvania Avenue, Mr. Facist, Barry Hussein Obama

Posted by: coachj | September 1, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

@cstephens: I’ll support your Pretender-in-Chief when I see his long form birth certificate.

Posted by: Bobarian | September 1, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Please, those of you crying about the “torture” of the last admin. need to grow up and stop being so damned naive. Torture as described by you all is merely something that a person does not “want” or “desire” to experience. IN that light, listening to NOBAMA and his Obamatons is torture for more than half of the country right now. Besides that, any gains in getting terriosts now, are they really called that now?, has been set up by the past actions of our country.

Posted by: Darren | September 1, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

The same folks who argue against applying circular logic here seem to repeat it a sentence later. And to those who argue Bush’s effectiveness after 9/11, I have a rock that prevents bear attacks without a blot on it’s record.

Posted by: Angus T. | September 1, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Moneyman I hope someone else counts your money because Bush became President 8 Months before 911 not 20 Months.
It’s true that in the field of mathematics the concept of “rounding up” is practiced and acceptable in certain applications.
However, in History it’s necessary to be a little more precise.
Okay boys and girls, let’s don our little propeller hats and take out our slide rules, or calculators. This is addition and subtraction, tough stuff, so I apologize in advance if we lose a couple of you.
Bush took office on Jan 20th 2000. FACT
Bush was POTUS for 8 years. FACT
Al Qaeda attacked the USA on Sept. 11, 2001. FACT
Bush did not prevent the USA from being attacked for a total of 8 years. FACT
8 years = 96 months of Bush two terms -
20 months of Bush before 9/11 = 76 months of Bush after 9/11
76 months = 6 1/3 years
Because there were only 6+ years remaining after 9/11 and rounding up is not applicable in this context because it would mean that 9/11 didn’t happen at all, which is really what Cheney wants to obscure – don’t play into it even if you’re a republican Bush/Cheney apol

Posted by: Dennis D | September 1, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Wonder what would happen if the terrorist set off a small nuke in DC, would we better off? Maybe we could elect some honest people to run our Goverment then, somehow I doubt it because I believe about half of the people in America have no brain at all. God help us.

Posted by: mike | September 1, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Can I get some of whatever this inbred wild donkey (Gen. Jim Jones) is smoking? Is Dumbobama’s greater success with international relations defined by starting WW3? I swear that you should have to pass a test to vote! Hope and “change” to what??? Idiots!

Posted by: Deborah Gold | September 1, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

I hope no one actually believes this nonsense…

Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | September 1, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am

The world was always envious of us. You think suddenly N Korea and Iran loves us because of Obama? How about Venezuela? Russia? Perhaps the only people who suddenly like us more are Hamas and Hezzbollah because Obama is seen as anti Israel.

Posted by: Dennis D | September 1, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

The moochers will believe anything from this administration and sell their Grandmothers soul for a chance at some free Government money. This soundbite does not stand up to truth or logic but it will be repeated through out the obedient Lewinskey-esque new networks. The polls are falling faster then home values in California and they will flat line once the war really becomes an issue because as of now it has been swept under the rug. A true leader would stand on his own merit, a puppet blames someone else and race.

Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

torture seems to be the new right-wing family value.
Posted by: Josh | Sep 1, 2009 8:28:28 AM
Interesting, isn’t it? One dude even proclaimed himself a right wing terrorist at a town hall and was blessed by the Republican congressman.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

dcrumpton wrote: “Bush took office on Jan 20th 2000. FACT”
….uhhhh…..wrong
It was 2001. He was in office for only 8 months before the World Trade Center was attacked. What is the point of all your non-facts anyway?

Posted by: Doctor Mikey | September 1, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

9/11 happened on the Bush/Cheney watch. No one is to blame but them. Not Clinton as the Bush/Cheney brainwashed supporters are always trying to claim. And Afghanistan was going down hill before Obama took office and it is just a matter of time before there is a demand to get out of there.

Posted by: Anne | September 1, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

“actually the reverse is true…”
Well, that pretty much captures the whole sorry history of the Bush/Cheney/Rove nightmare, don’t it?
Not to mention the working philosophy of Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, etc.:
their Ministry of Orwellian Propaganda.
Good riddance.

Posted by: Thomas Brown | September 1, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

I keep seeing comments about how those of us that support torture are idiots, and un-American, but I don’t see any comments supporting torture. So what are you babbling about? For the past 8 years this country has been on an aggressive campaign to either find and arrest, or kill those that kill innocent people. If we could take them alive we did, but these are people that blow themselves up along with anyone in the immediate vicinity, so sometimes it’s safer to just hit them with one of our missiles that we can put right down an air vent duct. Have some non targeted individuals been taken out in the process? Sure, you are known by the company you keep, and if you like to hang out with known terrorists and help them make bombs, or cook them some goat burgers while they make bombs and tell terrorist stories, then say hi to Allah if or when you see him. But if someone had my brother, and I knew in the past that person liked to slice off hands and genitilia, and hack off heads with a butcher knife while they stepped on peoples heads, then yeah, I think I would stand in front of his buddy with an electric drill and scare him until he told me where he was. None of these terrorists that were so called tortured, have any physical damage, no broken bones, no missing body parts, no poked out eyes, no children decapitated in front of them. But we simulated drowning by water boarding, scary, but not life threatening. By your standards, many amusement park rides that make you think you’re going over a cliff, or a haunted house where some guy in a zombie suit is hopping out at you could be considered torture. Sheesh

Posted by: srcamachonj | September 1, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

When we “torture” the terroris can still walk without a limp. When the terrorist torture the people have to jump out of buring buildings or they are beheaded. We are fighting pure evil, we must do what is neccesary to protect this country and this countries citizens. I don’t care what the rest of the world thinks about us.

Posted by: Mariyn | September 1, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

This is not ABC’s shining moment for journalism. The General will not cite specifics, and ABC certainly isn’t asking.
For simple minds, that may give a warm and fuzzy feeling. Sounds like Baghdad Bob to me, as military command in Afganistan is asking for more troops, again.

Posted by: GotLipstick | September 1, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Taking them out of prison, to be more precise.

Posted by: mnewman | September 1, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

With all due respect, it seems to me that General Jones forgot that in a constitutional democracy the citizens of our nation elect political officials to lead not to rule.
I believe that while his use of the term “rulers” could easily be written off as misspeaking, it’s actually quite troubling that someone who’s spent many years of his life in the military would make such a verbal blunder.
He knows well the difference in the mind-set of elected political leaders and non-elected, totalitarian rulers. His verbal misspeak may provide insight into what he observes in back room conversations with some of our current elected officials who have forgotten they were elected to serve as “leaders” not “rulers.”

Posted by: RDB1011 | September 1, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

To all you people that think the CIA should nothing illegal…what about using spies? or wiretapping? or bribing? What about using guns aren’t those bad? What about soldiers killing people or dropping bombs…those are illegal? Did Obama declare war on Afghanistan? What laws are you following or do you just make them up? Where exactly are you going to get your information: Facebook? Do you realize how silly your arguments are. The world is a dangerous place. I love how you take credit for world piece with 6 months of being on the job. LOL

Posted by: Barry | September 1, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Get your facts straight, Bush was in office 7.5 months when 9-11 happened. He was still trying to find w’s for the computers, trace all the phone lines that were cut, and inventory all the missing property from the white house from when the Clintons and their staff left office.

Posted by: srcamachonj | September 1, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Ok. September is here. I for one, am worried that this administration with invent an attack soon….”to test the mettle” of our president. Then Obama can lay this at Bush’s feet and then take credit for Bush’s and Cheney’s work later on when the real attacks don’t materalize. Given the nonstop lies and manipulation, I don’t doubt their willingness to pull something like this for a minute.

Posted by: GG | September 1, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

A true leader would stand on his own merit…
Posted by: Steve | Sep 1, 2009 8:56:06 AM
So you don’t blame the Democratic Congress for the crappy economy Bush’s policies created up to the day he left office, and you don’t blame Clinton for 9/11. Good!! Progress!!

Posted by: Rage _on! | September 1, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

When the Republican Party agrees to stop shoplifting elections as they did in 2000, I’ll support that imbeccile’s comment about “Pretender-In-Chief”. The state government of Hawaii says the President was born there. As for Cheney, no doubt Obama’s picks, who are actually qualified to hold their jobs, as oppossed to Bush’s idiots (see FEMA director during Katrina) are stopping more terrorists. Why doesn’t Whistler’s Father (Cheney) go sit down and enjoy the ripoff profits he harvested during Haliburton’s franchising of Gulf II? His time is over.

Posted by: Truman | September 1, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

“9/11 happened on the Bush/Cheney watch. No one is to blame but them. Not Clinton as the Bush/Cheney brainwashed supporters are always trying to claim. And Afghanistan was going down hill before Obama took office and it is just a matter of time before there is a demand to get out of there.”
Oh OK so What Clinton didn’t take care of was the next guys fault but what happened duirng Bush’s presidency is not the next guys fault – good logic their you dolt – credibility of your inane statement = 0

Posted by: me | September 1, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

The entire story is political propaganda and completely wrong. What exactly have other countries done because of Obama’s apologetic style? NOTHING. When the next attack occurs, we will get told it was all Bush’s fault again.

Posted by: brian | September 1, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am

This is just another example of the Obama administration’s approach to problems: Say something, no matter how ridiculous, and hope that enough people will swallow the story to make the problem go away.
Their credibility depends on how many are not paying attention to the facts — and on a compliant news media that continues to provide a smokescreen for the blunders and deceptions of this administration.

Posted by: Diogenes | September 1, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

FACT george bush was IN OFFICE when America was attacked on 9/11. FACT bush attacked an innocent country whom had NOTHING to do with 9/11 FACT bush allowed Ossama Bin Laden to escape and is still free today after stating 3 mons after attacks he didn’t think about OB
anymore. FACT bush no only destroyed the nest egg Clinton had amassed for America, he borrowed 50 million per day to run America into near bankruptcy as he has EVERY SINGLE business he’s ever stuck his lame brain into. FACT bush families Occidental Oil has amassed 100′s of BILLIONS of $$ in profits from the Iraq war bush started. FACT bush was up to his neck in the s and l collapse in the 70′s. FACT bush left this country in worse shape than it has ever been in in her history in every conceivable way! Morally, globally, financially, her reputation destroyed and from one of the most trusted countries in the world to one of the least trusted in the world. FACT bush and chenny should be executed for crimes against America and humanity!

Posted by: rebelle | September 1, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Remember Clinton sending cruise missles
after some “terrorists” to steal the headlines away from the Lewinsky story? Then the “terrorists” turned out to be civilians working in a factory. If I remember correctly, this was the first unilateral move of his administration (didn’t seek UN approval first). The move was predicatable and transparent but the press gave him cover. Obama may try something similar…we need to keep our eyes open.

Posted by: GG | September 1, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Typical self-serving nonsense. The good intelligence being generated allowing the increased terrorist kills cited by the good gentleman is based on 6 or 7 years of groundwork by an energized national security system decidedly not put in place by the Obamassaiah. As for the rest of his argument, history will be the ultimate judge but, wishful thinking aside, it does not pass the instinctive logic test. Simply partisan fluff.

Posted by: Kurt, NY | September 1, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Gen Jim Jones Ret. is a political hack for the Obama administration, an anybody that believes this garbage is nuts.

Posted by: savage24 | September 1, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Is it possible that the Obama people have discovered there is a painless way of taking “terrorists” out of commission by just changing the terrorist’s classification to “community disrupter”?
Problems solved, no more “terrorists”, and ready for the headlines!!!

Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Truman wrote: “…no doubt Obama’s picks, who are actually qualified to hold their jobs…”
You mean appointments like:
VAN JONES as Green Jobs Czar–a self-proclaimed Communist, who in 1994 formed STORM (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement).
MARK LLOYD as Associate General Counsel and Chief Diversity Officer of the FCC–a Marxist who lamented the fact that non-state-run radio stations prevented Hugo Chavez’s “incredible revolution,” and who stated: “…and came back and had another revolution. And Chavez then started to take the media very seriously in this country.”

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Wait more high value targets have been taken out???? What about international law???? Are we just killing people????? What if they are innocent????? I thought everyone was going to be read their rights????? I love the idiots who say 9/11 was all Bush’s fault… the terrorists were in the USA and done taking flight classes while Clinton was still in office… FBI field officers in AZ and FL sent memo’s that there are middle eastern men taking flight classes but Eric Holder put up the Wall and the CIA and FBI didn’t communicate. Clinton and Bush are to Blame!!!! Just as Obama said mortgage foreclosures weren’t a problem in 2005 and FAnnie/Freddie didn’t need any oversight… well well Barry foreclosures are a huge problem and Fannie/Freddie both failed so Barry also contributed to the economic crisis…

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Anyone that actually knows a marine would not be so quick as to call them a politcal hack. My brother was a marine and doesn’t put up with BS. He also thinks that the chickenhawks of the previous administration made this country less safe.

Posted by: Brandon | September 1, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

“Anyone that actually knows a marine would not be so quick as to call them a politcal hack. My brother was a marine and doesn’t put up with BS. He also thinks that the chickenhawks of the previous administration made this country less safe.”
So you’re not part of the General BETRAYus crowd I assume.

Posted by: GG | September 1, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

9/11 happened on the Bush/Cheney watch. No one is to blame but them. Not Clinton as the Bush/Cheney brainwashed supporters are always trying to claim. And Afghanistan was going down hill before Obama took office and it is just a matter of time before there is a demand to get out of there.
Anne
Anne,
I wish you would quit watching MSM. 9-11 can be blamed mostly on Clinton. Ole Bill had the chance to put Osama Bin Laden in prison (I believe it was Sudan that was willing to extradite OBL to the US under Clinton). This was after Clinton was informed about a possible 9-11 attack. Clinton refused the extradition. Under Clinton we had multiple attacks. Under Bush, we only had one, which was actually more of a byproduct of Clinton gutting the military and intelligence agencies. I’ll bet under Obama we’ll get hit again because, he too, is gutting our infrastructure.

Posted by: militaryman | September 1, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

“Obama’s job approval is down to about 50 percent. All presidents fall from their honeymoon highs, but in the history of polling, no newly elected American president has fallen this far this fast.” – David Brooks, in the New York Times today.

Posted by: BH | September 1, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

New Zogby poll shows Obama’s approval at 42%.
Ouch. I bet that won’t send a thrill up Chris Matthews’ leg.

Posted by: Jimmy Carter's Second Term | September 1, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Fact of the matter is we were attacked by an Islamic Terrorist under Comrade Obama’s first three months…or does killing Marine recruiters not qualify as an act of terrorism to you treasonous liberals?

Posted by: hellpig | September 1, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

oh, dear. Mike, Militaryman. Please see Steve. No blaming on past presidents allowed! Or is only good for the geese?

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I’ve notice many Bush/Cheney supporters have left the building on logic. Logic leaves you accuse Obama of going after the Bush administration when Bush did the same b/c Clinton removed the ws from all the keyboard. Or that now this is Obama’s war (from day 1 essentially) when it took Bush till after 9/11 to be responsible for anything. Or that because terrorist kill thousands of Americans that we should torture them. You guys are not on the moral high ground nor are you using any standard for reasoning. You guys decided you don’t like Obama or Democrats and make your arguments up after the fact. By the way only cowards and hypocrites torture.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”—Joseph Stalin (a man who murdered 40 million of his own people under Marxism/Communism) Sounds like a familiar tactic used by Obama’s ACORN thuggery this past November.

Posted by: WeMadeAmistake | September 1, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Does he mean more success winning over the terrorists? Frankly, between investigating the CIA, ignoring that two wars are going on still, focusing on any issue but terrorism, labeling military vets and conservatives as terrorists, reducing our security policies, cutting defense and intelligence spending (yes, he has) and not giving a damn that we just had the bloodiest month of the war in Afghanistan…I can see where he’s turned the tide. No need for Al Qaeda to attack us and dismantle our economy, liberty and security…Obama is doing their work for them.

Posted by: Kory | September 1, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Now that is a credible source…ABC?

Posted by: astatist | September 1, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Dear Alyson: You might tell your Mr. Cheney the same thing as he is bashing President Bush while he is at it. He shows no loyalty to his past president, his country only to himself. His ego is so large that nothing else matters not even the safety of the country. How would be like it if someone said that he was making the country less safe during his reighn?

Posted by: talmag | September 1, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Obama is putting them on his staff and Czar list, They are on the same team.

Posted by: TexasRobert | September 1, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Only treasonous liberals think waterboarding is torture….
The Marxist regimes mandate via the terrorist protecting Holder is to defend terrorists and investigate American patriots…..
BTW have you ever seen a Liberal General who wasn’t a hack?

Posted by: hellpig | September 1, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Rassmussen just released his numbers….President Obama is down to 45% approval. 45-53. Ouch. You just simply can’t “Rahm” anything through Congress with those numbers. No wonder we had such frantic urgency before the August break. The Administration couldn’t hide their 2 Trillion dollar “accounting error” through the fall as numbers were due during August, and a public they knew was growing more uneasy by the moment would have a chances to (gasp!) read the bills moving through committees on the hill.

Posted by: BH | September 1, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

astatist
I remember that you guys kept quoting NSA Jim L Jones memo to suggest that Cheney’s torture program work when in fact if you read it for yourself it said the opposite. I guess Jones is only a good enough source if it can be construed against Obama. Partisanship at its best.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Under Bush, we only had one
****
Ah. You’re not really keeping track of what happened– let’s see except for the catastrophic events of 9/11, and the anthrax attacks against Americans, and terrorist attacks against U.S. allies, and the terrorist attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the failure to capture Osama bin Laden and beginning the Iraq War which inspired more terrorists, and the success terrorists had in exploiting Bush’s policies of torture international unpopularity to recruit more terrorists– yes, yes, except for all that the Bush admin’s record was STELLAR. Never mind the economy, Katrina, and so on, as that’s a different matter.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

obama is the best

Posted by: Sam Stone | September 1, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Many more terrorists? Names, dates, times, by who, how?

Posted by: JJohnson | September 1, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Show me the numbers………Show me the numbers!!!!!!!!!!!All the general did was speculate and offer opinion without cold, hard facts. By failing to offer this information, ABC has once again aided and abetted an inept president to pad his resume.

Posted by: MaryS | September 1, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

hellpig
A sheriff in Texas was sentence to prison for waterboarding a confession out of a suspect. But I guess Texas is a liberal state.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Has anyone corrected the idiots who seem to think Bush took office BEFORE the 2000 election? No wonder this country is in such a mess when you’ve got clowns screwing up basic facts…like Obama, who not only never read HR3200, but doesn’t have a clue what the Constitution says! REAL TORTURE is what this imbecile is doing to American citizens right now, stripping us of our rights, shredding the fabric of this country, and pulling out the race card to create more divisiveness today than was present during the Civil War!!! If you want to talk FACTS, the FACT is, that if you treat these terrorists with kid gloves, they’ll chop off your head the first chance they get; but if you deprive them of sleep and throw water in their face, they sing like canaries and THAT RESULTS in American lives being saved. Seems to me those on the left are more concerned with their egos and blaming Bush than they are with ridding the world of people who would destroy us. Perhaps the REAL SOLUTION here is to put those American citizens who despise the Constitution and the freedoms it protects and send them to Afghanistan to support their terrorist friends!

Posted by: AmericanBelle | September 1, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

The mentality of the left is to pit MY guy against YOUR guy. Fact is they are both OUR guys. Now, lets look at the facts about how things are NOW and decide for ourselves how they should be interpreted. I think we all now propaganda news when we are willing to open our eyes. For god’s sake, let’s all open our eyes, clear our minds of the bs, stand on our own feet and demand honesty and credible leadsership.

Posted by: GG | September 1, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

“to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies”
“other rulers”
Obama is not our RULER!! Have we really forgotten the millions who have fought and thousands upon thousands of lives that were sacrificed to give us our freedom from RULERS?? Sanity has left the building.
I think we need to replace every single REPRESENTATIVE in government next election no matter who they are or what party they belong to. If they are in office and not screaming about SOCIALISM not being CONSTITUTIONAL they need to be replaced – period.

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

—The Obama administration has been trying out a new policy toward Syria since the day it came to office. The Bush cold shoulder was viewed as a primitive reaction, now to be replaced by sophisticated diplomacy. Outreach would substitute for isolation. Thus there have been six visits to Damascus by high-level administration officials, including two by George Mitchell. Moreover, the administration has signaled that its handling of export license applications for Syria will be more “flexible” than that of the Bush administration, which tried to deny every shipment it could.
Well, the returns are in. Within the past week, Iraq has withdrawn its ambassador from Damascus and accused Syria of involvement in terrorist incidents in Baghdad. Iraqi TV has also aired a confession by an accused al Qaeda terrorist, a Saudi who claimed he had been trained in Syria–by the Asad regime’s intelligence services. Nor is this all. Syria continues to support Hezbollah’s blocking of the formation of a government in Lebanon, backing Hezbollah in its demand for a “blocking third” that would prevent any decisions Hezbollah opposes in any new Cabinet. The Palestinian terrorist groups remain headquartered in Damascus, and under no visible restraints. And on August 19, President Bashar Asad paid a visit to President Ahmadinejad in Tehran, to showcase his support of the latter during the current Iranian political crisis.—

Posted by: Kumbaya is not a Foreign Policy | September 1, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Comrade Obama will go down in history as the worst president in U.S. history
and made possible after only 8 months
with another 3.4 years I believe we will even be able to prosecute this traitor

Posted by: hellpig | September 1, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

AmericanBelle
What rights have you lost since Obama has taken office? Your whole post is based off that, so it must be happening.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

There will never be a lie too outrageous for these people. Why doesn’t the administration just declare that the moon is made of government cheese and that we’ll need to spend a trillion $$$ to go mine it?
Is there any doubt they believe that the people of this country are gullible to swallow anything? They have another thing coming.

Posted by: blushark | September 1, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

“Simply put Obama is shaping up to be the best president ever.”
LOL. More than 50% of the country don’t believe that he’s the best president now!
The rest of your screed is silly fear mongering and strawmen that no one believes.
But keep dancing around, wearing that partisan tin foil hat. Folks these days could use a laugh or two in the face of fiscal irresponsibility, record deficits that make Bush look like a fiscal genius, and shrill bigotry of liberals that are destroying any chance of convincing independents that they are the party of hope and change.

Posted by: BH | September 1, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

“If they are in office and not screaming about SOCIALISM not being CONSTITUTIONAL they need to be replaced – period.”
Agreed.

Posted by: GG | September 1, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

hellpig
I’ve read history and the worse is considered to be Warren G. Harding. And he was the worse because of the Cabinet he chose not by his ability to be President. Bush is on the lower end of average but definitely not the worse.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

New Zogby poll shows Obama’s approval at 42%.
Since last month, Obama’s down 13 points among Democrats, nine points among liberals, and 18 points among voters 18 to 29.
No public option, no peace?

Posted by: Jimmy Carter's Second Term | September 1, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

*** FLASH *** ABC NEWS EXLUSIVE!!!
“President’s National Security Advisor Says His Boss is Totally Awesome and Much Better Than the Previous Guy”
What a scoop!!!

Posted by: Woody | September 1, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

I thought the war on terror was over? Does that mean Obama is doing better because he successfully ended the war or does it mean that he is able to kill and capture the non-terrorists that the Bush administration missed when they were foolishly chasing terrorists? I’m confused.

Posted by: Obamamammajamma | September 1, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

RDB1011 (6:09am) is right on about the general’s use of the term ruler. It is not a Constitutionally valid way of looking at the role of the President and would be disasterous to our country if that is the way our people began to look at the Presidency. Did not all our servicemen sacrifice so we would not have a ruler? This and several other comments from the General make one wonder how he reached such a high level of command. He must be a lot better at killing the enemey then talking about policy and politics.
Didn’t the Obama camp recently say it would no longer count dead enemy bodies so not to inflame the enemy? So why is the general doing it here. He was obviously told to go out do this interview.
It is sad that liberal Presidential campaign rhetoric has become policy. Obviously Eric Holder did not get the memo. Or like Willy Wonka, Obama, the is feigning his protest.

Posted by: Matt33 | September 1, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

I guess when you supported a President that was that bad last time around, You are happy to see bad poll numbers for the other guy.
Bush/Cheney supporters wants Obama to fail has President. If the President fails, then the country fails. Bush/Cheney supporters want to destroy the United States. Bush/Cheney supporters are secessionist anarchist.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

ABC can’t show you the numbers to support the Administration, nor are they willing to challenge the White House’s “facts.” They swallow the press releases the WH gives them and then pass them on as “news.” Skepticism in the MSM is dead – until another Republican President is elected.
I can’t wait for the media to begin spinning the President’s sub-50% job approval rating. The “Oh, it’s not that bad” puff pieces are bound to hit in about, say, two days or less.

Posted by: BH | September 1, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Look at Matt Drudge Report with Obamas picture at Kennedy funeral, Its painful he has to be there, Obama shows his Love for the fallen comrade

Posted by: TexasRobert | September 1, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Quick, get Baghdad Bob Gibbs in front of a camera to give the official Minister of Information take one this.

Posted by: Timmy | September 1, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

“I guess when you supported a President that was that bad last time around, You are happy to see bad poll numbers for the other guy.”
As a moderate, I’m not happy. I’m just astonished how quickly the President lurched to the left when Pelosi tugged his leash. My expectation was for a strong President who would govern no further from the center left..much like Clinton did…boy, was I wrong!

Posted by: BH | September 1, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

as i recall just reading that aug was the worst month for lossing our troops in afgan since the war began. i think our pres is BHO now not GB. Quit trying to blame everything that you are doing wrong on the past admin. we have had no attacks over here because we have did things right the past 8 years. but you dems always run to “its bushes fault or your racist”. if that all you can come up with, then you have no merit. I fear for our military because of this pres. he gives nothing about our boys and girls that elected to serve this great country. God bless our military..This admin has woken a sleeping giant and everyday more people are seeing how they are trying to destroy our country… your days are numbered washingtion. dems and repubs.. 2010 in or out……

Posted by: liz | September 1, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Is this article supposed to be an Op-Ed piece?
“The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim, but he said “there is an increasing trend and I think we seen that in different parts of the world over the last few months for sure.”
This bit is as silly as past administration claims of “N” jobs saved (although we cannot point to any specific jobs or sectors where they were) by the economic stimulus package.
If Mr Obama’s efforts have been more effective than GWs great, wonderful, fantastic, hooray for the prez.
But, please, before making that statement, how about looking for some facts rather than opinions to back it up.

Posted by: Ivan Peck | September 1, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

You know the American public taste with revisionist history is still healthy. Whether or not you agree with any administration there are simply in front of us all the facts. Yes former President Clinton tried to kill Osama Bin Laden. Richard Clarke was promoted to chief counter-terrorism adviser on the U.S. National Security Council a position which continued under the GW Bush Presidency but not as a cabinet level position. The Bush presidency was built on a position of “bringing integrity back to the office”, a reference to former President Clinton indiscretions in the oval office. Under President Clinton terror suspects were monitored and tracked to the best ability the US government had seen under any previous president because of the mounting issues related to terrorism and foreign policy. Suspects who were caught were tried and convicted in federal court and today sit behind federal bars (aka in US Soil). Under the GW Bush administration, an administration which once again reflected the GOP affection for a more interventionist foreign policy (although during the 200 campaign Bush talked about being a humble leader), the US intelligence community was asked to re-prioritize and focus on making our military lighter, more aggressive and privatize whatever defense functions which did not directly relate to combat (such as security, supplies and construction, although new revelations regarding a Blackwater assassination squad would add new light) Whatever the case the US government did have intelligence prior to 9-11, read the 9-11 commission, regarding eminent attacks aimed at our shores by Al Queda. The Bush administration found it self as the leader of our country trying to make sense of the 2nd attack in a century on US shores. Whatever your political persuasion the GW Bush administration was ultimately responsible as the leader of the US to protect our nation and on 9-11 we as a nation were let down. The attacks brought our country together in order to help all of those in need, whether it be by donating time or money or joining the military. The stock market was shut down, our airline industry was shut down and our President Bush at the time expressed his sorrow and resolve and then ordered us Americans to go out and shop! Yeah that is right, he asked Americans to sacrifice by shopping (of course many, if not most of our goods are made in China, but that is beside the point). He did not ask us to build a victory garden, he did not ask us to buy war bonds, and he did not ask us to volunteer in the military, he asked us to shop. Our country was already heading into a recession era economy shortly into 2001 but mainly going into 2002 and 2003. And so we were asked to personally stimulate the economy and we as Americans did as we were told. America was right to go into Afghanistan after the Taliban (who harbours terrorist and those that planned 9-11) and Al Queada. The the Bush administration believed that Saddam Hussein provided the next threat to America. During his dad’s Presidency (G H W Bush) it was discovered during the original gulf war upon inspection that Saddam had greater accumulation of weapons and chemical weapons than previous intelligence reports stated. So from the Gulf War going forward through the Clinton and Bush II presidency their were greater restrictions placed on Iraq by the US and UN security council. President GW Bush came multiple times in front of the American people and the people of the world and told us that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat to the US and the world. He said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) and he said there was a connection between Al Queada and Iraq. The 9-11 commission completely rebuts the idea that Saddam had WMD’s and exonerates Saddam as having any substantial/operational ties to Al Queda. So not only does GW Bush have to take responsibility for not protecting America on 9-11, but he is also responsible for leading us into a war based on false conclusion because of poor evidence collection and verification. The GOP’s legacy as a avid military supportee by an measurable standard should be completely questioned if not outright abandoned by Bush’s leadership while commander and chief. Of course I am not even bringing up his leadership failures in Iraq from 2003-2006 or prior to the “Sunni Awakening” and the leadership of Gen Patreus.
No matter what your political persuasion is these are the facts as I see them, these are a few of my recollections and perspective over the last eight years. As for Obama, we are still on track, according to Gen Patreus to exit Iraq by next year, we have expanded our operations in Afghanistan and have successfully handled a pirate kidnapping. The Obama administration has got N Korea talking with the S Koreans, we have rescued two American prisoners from N Korea and have calmed the tensions in Georgia and Russia for now. The Obama administration just passed the best GI bill since its inception and seems committed to health care of its returning veterans and the rest of the American people, rich or poor.
I thank God every day for releasing the American people from the failures of the GW Bush administration.

Posted by: joshquasimoto | September 1, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

BH
How far left. What position has he moved to the far left on. Obama hasn’t adopted a single payer platform since taking office. He ran on the public option, closing Guantanamo, and a cap and trade system. But then again is counter intuitive to understand that seeing how everything a Democrat does moves him towards the Liberal wing of the party. But tell me all your moderate positions maybe I am wrong.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Maybe O’bama could improve his popularity if he spent more time hanging out with the “A” team. People like Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Schummer, Durbin and Gore. That is a group that puts shiver up your spine.

Posted by: Morton Mike | September 1, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Instead of attacking you he should have responded with some additional “FACTS.” Here are two facts:
1. Iraq was not an “innocent” country.
Iraq was supporting terrorists. Saddam Hussein gave over $10 million to the families (up to $25,000 per family) of Palestinian suicide bombers.
Iraq fired missiles at our planes. On at least one occasion, the plane was in Kuwaiti airspace at the time. That alone was an act of war.
Saddam Hussein continually failed to comply with the conditions of the 1991 Cease Fire. After nearly 12 years of diplomatically attempting to convince Saddam Hussein to comply, and after the UN Security Council refused to follow through on their “final ultimatum,” President Bush gave his own “final ultimatum.” When Saddam Hussein still would not comply, President Bush rescinded the 1991 Cease Fire and resumed the War.
NOTE: One of the conditions of the 1991 Cease Fire was that Iraq would prove they no longer had WMDs. Instead Saddam Hussein wanted his neighbors and the rest of the world to continue believing he still had WMDs.
2. The “nest egg,” as you put it–or the trillions of dollars in surpluses as some on the Left claim–that Clinton had amassed, was really only projections not actual cash.
In 1993 Clinton’s budget forecast huge deficits into the new millenium. It was the Republicans controlling both Houses of Congress from January 2005 through December 2000, that balanced the budget: $69 billion surplus in 1998; $123 billion surplus in 1999; and $230 billion in 2000.

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

James Danley
Your logic falls a little flat considering Clinton became President in 1993. And the Congress was Democratic until 1994. You could say the deficit was budgeted from Bush 1 last budget.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

“No matter what you may think, your “democracy” is a load of bull.”
For one, this is not a democracy it is a republic. If people were at least smart enough to know the difference we might be smart enough to realize how close to lunacy socialism really is. Sooner or later you will run out of other peoples money.
Second, this is the absolute worst form of government on the planet – until you compare it with every other one. The problem is not our government it is the corrupted politicians in it. Replace every last one of them no matter who they are or what party they belong to and freedom might have a chance.
We have contributed more to humankind than the rest of the countries around combined. When we procured our freedom the average lifespan was in the 30′s, there was no such thing as electricity, there were no light bulbs, no cars, airplanes, etc., etc. and it wasn’t government that brought that to humankind it was a free and moral people. It was freedom. Freedom we can kiss goodbye (what is left of it) if we keep listening to people who have lost sight of what it means.

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Tom
The strongest government is the most oppressive government. Our Democratic Republic is far better then the majority and the alternative is worse.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

National Security Adviser Says President Obama Is Having Greater Success Taking Terrorists Out of Commission Than Bush Did….
Comment: What is this dude smoking?

Posted by: DrEdu | September 1, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

0bama won’t stop until he has set up him and his merry men up to own it all.
Wake up!
We are NOT safe like we were for the 7 years before 0bama.
He is always on vacation, no matter where he goes. All he has to do is read the speaches that the people pulling his strings wrote. Pretty good gig.
He has no moral compas. He wants his elbow room. More people abort, more people refused medical treatment, more people die in the world. That’s more elbow room for him and his cronys. Sick!

Posted by: CarDriver | September 1, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

I think National Security advisor General Jim Jones must have a wind-up key on his back. A perfect example of pulling out the ‘decorated hero’ trump card when appropriate. Rahm Emanuel is working behind the scenes on this.

Posted by: LongT | September 1, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Show me the money! Name names. This is more liberal spin control to cover a plot by some liberal to have the Democrarts take over the economy and implement a one party system like the Furher in the 30′s. Obama is just the puppet. Spare me the “he’s intellegent” commentary. He’s a face a front man. Think about it. He’s almost always scripted on teleprompter and when he’s not he screws up like no president before him. See comments on Pennsylvanians and the police. Obama is a Chicago thug and needs to be stopped now.

Posted by: T3 | September 1, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

There is no trend that would indicate that things are getting better becaues Obama is now in the White House. Obama and his staff are unprincipled egotists who can lie without shame because they are blind and their consciences are seared. Any party that can support and propogate the murder of millions of children is criminal. Their word is completely void of merit and untrustworthy beyond measure.

Posted by: Jack49 | September 1, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Bubba
My comments were a response to someone elses comments on torture. But if you want to misquote I be glad to tell you taking away gun ownership has never been a priority or a goal of Democrat. Taxes come with a elected government, nor have we nationalize any company. Your fears are misplaced.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

The Bush/Cheney policies set us on a ruinous course both at home and in foreign policy. Putting an end to the torture practices has raised our image abroad and is restoring us to a nation that can again be admired and respected.
It seems to me that Cheney is a pretty lone voice in his fierce defense of his own questionable actions. I don’t hear elected GOP officials rallying around support for torture – they are pretty quiet on the issue.

Posted by: bademus | September 1, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

MM You Wrong
If The Socialist Marxist Obama, fails, The United States of America will survive this regime that needs over throwing Sir!

Posted by: TexasRobert | September 1, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

If what General Jim says is true, give us some mumbers. ABC will not ask that question.

Posted by: JGC | September 1, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“nor have we nationalize any company. Your fears are misplaced.”
Tell that to the people who used to own government motors (GM).

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

We are NOT safe like we were for the 7 years before 0bama.
***
We were safe? Let’s see– anthrax, terrorist attacks on our allies, economy spiraling downward, two wars on borrowed money, terrorist attacks against our troops in the Middle East, torture policies serving as a powerful symbol when it comes to terrorist recuritment, failure to capture Osama bin Laden, shrinking middle class, small businesses feeling the squeeze, aftermath of Katrina, crumbling infrastructure, politics being played with alert levels, ignoring science to the detriment of medical advances, energy policy and environment protection.
Ah, “safe.”

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

“The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim…”
Imagine *that*!

Posted by: M_Stracka | September 1, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Tom
GM was not nationalized.
Nationalization intels taking over a company completely and having it be government own. GM is still a public traded company.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

TexasRobert
What country you know of has survive without a leader?

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

After reading this story, I am struck with one sad fact. The fact is that even Marine Generals can be leftist skunks to whom truth means nothing.

Posted by: nolie | September 1, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Under the Clinton Admin they managed to arrest suspects and stop huge terrorist operations planned for the the millennium in Seattle at the space needle and LA LAX.
Dubya was warned Al Quada planned attack with airplanes a month beforehand and promptly went on vacation.
He said to the official who told him “now you’ve covered your butt”
FBI identified some of the hijackers prior to 9/11 but were told by higher ups not to act.
The name of those higher ups that suppressed the investigation have never been revealed, no disciplinary action was ever taken for the worst security failure in US history under Bush’s watch.
Dubyas daddy and Osama’s daddy both watched the towers go down together on t.v. at the Carlisle Group Building. Just the latest chapter in the long family relationship between the Bush’s and the Bin Ladens.
But its all Clintons fault right?

Posted by: calilove | September 1, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

chill guys…just go play basketball

Posted by: HM | September 1, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Gen Jones isn’t in tune with the times. There are no such things as terrorist anymore, at least not in the middle east or Asia. According to this administration the only terrorists we have to fear are on our own soil and of the right wing variety.

Posted by: olyrover | September 1, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

olyrover
Proof? That’s right there is none because you just made that up.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

All it will take is just one (1) terror attack on US soil, whether it relates to Obama’s policies or not, for him to be blamed. It is just a matter of waiting, that’s all. It will eventually happen and when it does, the public wrath will come down on Obama and the democrats hard and fast.

Posted by: dogbark | September 1, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

“Tom
GM was not nationalized.
Nationalization intels taking over a company completely and having it be government own. GM is still a public traded company.”
Don’t drink the koolaid.
The government now owns 60% (um, can you say majority?) and Canada owns a significant portion as well. If I remember right the original owners now own less than 20%. I suppose you could say it wasn’t a complete takeover but it may as well have been.
Liberals have figured out they can’t just force socialism on everybody so they are settling for getting their foot in the door and taking the slower approach, mainly taking Stalin’s advice and telling people lies over and over again until they start believing them anyway.
And by the way, people aren’t calling it government motors because it has the right first letters.

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

We (Obama administration) are having more success taking out terrorists? How can that be when you won’t even call them terrorists? It’s not the administration that is getting better at taking them out it is the military getting better at using the information and technical systems available to the that is getting better at taking them out! Don’t you love liberals who take credit for things they have nothing to do with!

Posted by: Phil | September 1, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

THIS DOESN’T MAKE SENSE???
If terrorists are a threat to other countries (including our erstwhile allies), then they were a threat even when they were p.o. at George Bush for “being a cowboy.” I don’t see why they would “step up” security actions just because they like Obama.
When something doesn’t make sense, it strikes me as being political posturing. That’s OK folks, but let’s not really believe it, Huh?
sanjosemike

Posted by: sanjosemike | September 1, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Tom
Anyway you slice it. GM was not nationalized. When country nationalizes an industry there is no part ownership. Canada, the Government, and UAW all own a portion of GM. And this is an especially bad example for you because GM would have collapsed and had 0 workers instead of have 61,000 workers it has now. But I guess you generally miss the position.
I encourage you to examine Mexico’s nationalization of the oil companies to understand the topic better.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

I think when most people digest this story and think about it, they’re not falling for it!

Posted by: LongT | September 1, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

It’s not enough just to say “we’re having more success” without examining seriously why that might be. While it’s possible that the Obama administration has suddenly discovered the secret to knocking out AQ, it’s far more likely that this is the natural end-result of the concerted efforts of the CIA et al. over the last eight-nine years. That is, somewhere there’s likely a tipping point or series thereof where people over there become more and more willing to rat out the AQ guys, and we may have reached one of those.
It is in low form for the O-team to grab all the credit.

Posted by: Jimmy | September 1, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

How about some specifics to support his contention? Convince me……….

Posted by: LongT | September 1, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Gee…no numbers to back up his claims….it reminds me of a dope who went on the Imus show and said that Obama has the highest IQ of any president in history…Imus asked the guest if he knew the actual number…the guest said he didn’t but he imagined it must be the highest….

Posted by: HobokenJohn | September 1, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

This story will disappear from ABC news faster than Charles Rangle’s tax evasion story………..Oh wait! ABC didn’t run that story.

Posted by: LongT | September 1, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Two things: first, claiming the world is holding hands and singing kumbaya does not kill terrorists. Second, your response to Cheney’s criticism is the equivalent of a kid saying “nuh uh!” show me some facts.since when are we supposed to just take someones word?

Posted by: Shawn | September 1, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Phil
If all you are worried about is the name. Then we shouldn’t have invaded any country. We should have just call them terrorist and felt better. All your priorities are in the wrong place.
By the way if you have to demonize a population to fight them, then odds are you are on the wrong side.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Under the Clinton Admin they managed to arrest suspects and stop huge terrorist operations….
Posted by: calilove | Sep 1, 2009 10:33:07 AM
You mean like:
- The first World Trade Center bombing
- USS Cole
- TWO African embassy bombings
- Khobar Towers

Posted by: Seriously?? | September 1, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Lets see: Obama is doing a way better job, ya know, because, well, we said so. What? Stats to back up the statement? Nah, we don’t need no stinkin’ stats…it’s really, really true because the WH says so. And..and…even though we [WH] said before that there were no such thing as terrorists anymore we’re kicking their butt….if terrorists exist that is….which they don’t cause we [WH] said they don’t..and there’s no such thing as a ‘terrorist act’…its all man-made, ya know…

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Shawn
All our problems can’t be decided with a barrel of a gun or the precision of our missiles.
The Mid East Problem is that of instability and poverty. Terrorist needs both these conditions to thrive.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

MM, maybe I could have been more specific! In 1993, when President Clinton submitted his 1994 budget, it forecast huge deficits throughout his presidency.

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Jason Wolfe Sept 1 @ 12:58 AM:
“Obama killed Betalluh Massud.”
I really don’t think Obama killed him.

Posted by: NDSue | September 1, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

James Danley
Yeah but that budget was brought under control by the then Democratic Congress.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

calilove ‘FBI identified some of the hijackers prior to 9/11 but were told by higher ups not to act.
The name of those higher ups that suppressed the investigation have never been revealed, no disciplinary action was ever taken for the worst security failure in US history under Bush’s watch.’
Are you saying that Bin Laden, et al. planned, organized, trained and acted out there crimes in the nine months that Bush was in office as POTUS? Or are you saying that the Clinton administration was aware of the pending danger and did nothing?
Worse, is it possible that all of the preparation and training took place during Clintons turn at the helm and the people he had working for him knew nothing about it?
Please confirm.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

joshquasimoto, that’s funny. “No matter what your political persuasion is these are the facts as I see them, these are a few of my recollections and perspective”. You can have your prespective and your opinions, BUT you do not get to define the facts as you see them. They are either facts or they are not. The biggest problem, and there are many, with the current administration and their peeps is that they play fast and loose with the “facts” while accusing the previous administration of doing the same. They assume that we, and the rest of the world in turn, will be so mesmerized by their “chosen one” saying it is so, that we will have no choice but to believe it is. He could come out and say the sky is green and I guarantee there would be those rushing out to prove that it is so…

Posted by: SKRDad | September 1, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

joshquasimoto, that’s funny. “No matter what your political persuasion is these are the facts as I see them, these are a few of my recollections and perspective”. You can have your prespective and your opinions, BUT you do not get to define the facts as you see them. They are either facts or they are not. The biggest problem, and there are many, with the current administration and their peeps is that they play fast and loose with the “facts” while accusing the previous administration of doing the same. They assume that we, and the rest of the world in turn, will be so mesmerized by their “chosen one” saying it is so, that we will have no choice but to believe it is. He could come out and say the sky is green and I guarantee there would be those rushing out to prove that it is so…

Posted by: SKRDad | September 1, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

All these Obama haters.
They use the same language against Obama that the haters used against Martin Luther King.
They called Martin Luther King a “socialist” and a “communist” too.
These are just names these cowards hide behind like the Klan hides behind its hoods, when they don’t want to reveal their true intentions.
They failed in the civil war and they failed opposing civil rights – although they did murder MLK. God I pray the haters of freedom that we are forced to share this country with fail again.

Posted by: calilove | September 1, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Hope they are not counting the murder of the three Somali pirates.

Posted by: mike | September 1, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Perhaps ABC could offer up some emperical data (captures since Jan 09′ vs. prior periods) to verify these claims?
In the old days, that is what a news organization would do, rather than just parrot statements.

Posted by: TX Family | September 1, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

MM, I didn’t catch my error in my original comment. I meant to say: “It was the Republicans controlling both Houses of Congress from January 1995 through December 2000, that balanced the budget.”

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Jim02351 Sept 1 @ 6:19 AM wrote:
“NDSue: We didn’t miss Katrina, we waited, as we were legally obliged to do, for the democrat governor to ask for federal assistance. The request came three days after the fact but what the hell, blame Bush.”
Jim – I think you must be addressing someone else. I didn’t make any comments about Katrina, but if I did, it would be to agree with you 100%. I am a Bush supporter, and think the governor of LA and the mayor of New Orleans were the ones to blame – if anyone – for the tragedy and the aftermath that befell them. Surrounding states seemed to be able to prepare and respond far better.

Posted by: NDSue | September 1, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Pretty nice retirement gig, eh, General? It seems the only requirement to get your crony status from Obama is that you be willing to lie and mindlessly parrot the democratic party’s socialist propoganda. This tool’s ludicrous statements is a a despicable insult to the good men and women who fought and died for this country and it’s Constitution.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

If the U.S. is in fact catching and killing more terrorists – it is only because of President Bush’s policies – that Obama “inherited”.
But give Obama enough money and time, and he will screw that up, too.

Posted by: One_American | September 1, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

The ultimate measure of success — the only meaningful measurement — is whether the U.S. is attacked or not.

Posted by: chuck | September 1, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

“All these Obama haters.
They use the same language against Obama that the haters used against Martin Luther King.”
Posted by: calilove | Sep 1, 2009 11:02:37 AM
Behold the new Progressive rules of political discourse:
Opposition to Obama’s policies =
- racism
- hate speech
- membership in KKK
- standing in the schoolhouse door
- un-American activity
- anti-patriotism
- treason

Posted by: Information Czar | September 1, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.
Is this because he kissed up and made deals with them like he did with the auto makers and banks?

Posted by: Ann | September 1, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Information Czar
You can’t say “Obama policies are similar to Nazi socialist policies” then criticize the other side for calling you on it.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

One_American
Yeah it took Bush 7 months before America got massively attack. And it took 8 years for our financial system to collapse. Bush the standard in crash and burn.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Tom your right it GM was not nationalized it was handed over to the unions which is scary then nationalization. Jonny stock holder was told to kiss off while the union bosses got handed a pay day and like the post office, hospitials, education and Amtrak Jonny tax payer will keep pouring money into it. Funny the worst run businesses and institutions in the US are highly regulated by the government and heavley unionized???????

Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

And the appeasement continues as America sets out to eat her own, Eric Holder and the Justice Dept. prosecuting the CIA for being mean to terrorists.
Eric Holder has a history of helping terrorists. He PARDONED Marc Rich, once among the FBI’s “ten most wanted” fugitives, stood accused of racketeering, defrauding the Treasury out of tens of millions of dollars, and Trading with our Nation’s enemies—including Iran, which Rich supplied with desperately needed funds while Khomeini’s embargoed regime held American hostages.
Eric Holder PARDONED the FARC Colombian terrorists (who are responsible for kidnapping and murdering thousands of Colombians and Americans alike) so Hillary would get the Hispanic vote when she first ran for Senate in NY.Black Panthers at voting polls with clubs,NOT PROSECUTED. Now, he’s PROSECUTING American heroes who got information out of Islamic barbarians and helped America stay safe. That information helped capture other terrorists and prevented further attacks – DOCUMENTED.
There will be “change”. We just may not survive it.
There’s another (cynical) side to this. They put this story out when President Obama is in hiding in order for the dumbed-down American voter (who hate George Bush) to forget about how they’re trying to take over health care.

Posted by: blackirishblonde | September 1, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Ron
Just like Ridge, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, etc. etc.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

blackirishblonde
To bad the majority of those dumb-down voters are college educated latte sipping liberals. LMAO. You guys love to name call.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

The most distressing thing I see in the article isn’t the assertions without facts. It is the comment about law enforcement agencies. The CIA isn’t a law enforcement agency, it’s an intelligence agency. They aren’t looking for bank robbers, that’s the FBI’s job. They are looking for external threats to this country. It’s disappointing that a retired Marine General who happens to be the National Security Advisor doesn’t know the difference.

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Bob
GM lost a 3rd of there jobs. And if UAW hadn’t steped in they would have lost 100% of there jobs. But union members often pay more taxes then non-union members so why should your opinion matter.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

This is a great article proving that we now have State run media… there is NO way anyone really belives that Barry is doing a job at the War on Terror… Oh? Is the white house using the word “terror” again? Must have realized it wasnt popular to just say “overseas contingency operation” anymore…Funny how whenever a Dem is loosing popularity, they just try and act like republicans.
Good job ABC, way to put out articles on behalf of the bafoon PS Gibbs.

Posted by: kev | September 1, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

MM, when presidents submit their annual budget they also include a 10-year forecast. It was this 10-year forecast to which I was referring. Now then, according to the Congressional Budget Office the Clinton actual (as opposed to the original forecast) annual budgets were (fiscal year is Oct 1 – Sept 30):
1994 — $203.2 billion deficit
1995 — $164.0 billion deficit
1996 — $107.4 billion deficit (first budget with Republicans in control of Congress)
1997 — $21.9 billion deficit
1998 — $69.3 billion surplus
1999 — $125.6 billion surplus ($2.6 billion more than my original comment)
2000 — $236.2 billion surplus ($6.2 billion more than my original comment)
2001 — $128.2 billion surplus

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Maybe you should check your facts because the glorious Clinton made sure that FBI and CIA could not communicate with eachother which is exactly why the information of these pilots did not get to the correct source to stop what was the horrific 9/11. As always, the dems in pursuit of complete control are blind until it is too late. How convenient to blame Bush for something that he “inherited” but Obama need not live by the same rule.

Posted by: ditto | September 1, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Ashley
Bush sucked even with the teleprompter. Reality check every President Since color tv has used a teleprompter.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I like how selective this administration is. This guys actually does both. Blames Bush and then says this administration can show that things are better because of what they have done. Isn’t is possible that any of your successes NOW can be atrributable to Bush/Cheney efforts THEN. If not, then this is your economy now. If you can change the entire climate in international relationships as it relates to intelligence and finding/capturing terrorist and take full credit for any success, then take full credit for unemployment too. I am not saying this is correct, just pointing out that he is actually making Cheney’s point by playing politics with the security of the nation.

Posted by: DAC | September 1, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

James Danley
Yeah but the budget deficit was already being reduce before the Republican Congress so to say only Republicans should take credit is ridiculous.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I am ashamed, and dismayed at the amount of hate, on display here. I don’t know how conclusions like these can be arrived at on less than 9 monthsof Obama in office, and the guy inheriting the country in the worst state it has been in since the civil war. I believe this is ALL sour grapes, because your party LOST. Well, I was pretty upset back in 2000 when you guys stole the election, and then proceeded to take us into a zillion dollar unnecessary war,that killed almost as many people, deregulated everything,that took us into an alomst uncontrollable downward financial spiral. We had to stomach it for eight years. There are only a select few that benefit from republican policies, the key word is “few”. I wish you guys would get rid of your hate and fear it’s going to kill you, believe me.

Posted by: Rebra R. Stevens | September 1, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

“GM would have collapsed and had 0 workers instead of have 61,000 workers it has now. But I guess you generally miss the position.”
I am not even remotely so sure it would have collapsed. In fact, I don’t believe that at all and I would be willing to bet some intelligent moves by real leadership while facing the realities of the market could have worked wonders. Downsizing yes. Having to sharpen their tools in order to survive in a tight marketplace yes. But collapse? I was born at night but it wasn’t last night. If they did collapse it would be their own fault and it arguably should be that way.
“I encourage you to examine Mexico’s nationalization of the oil companies to understand the topic better.”
I might look into that but I think history taught me all I need to know. Socialism destroys freedom and takes lives. Millions upon millions of lives. I encourage you to examine Germany’s nationalization of pretty much everything they could to understand the topic better.

Posted by: Tom | September 1, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Randal
I care more about the state of the countries then a bunch of cowards in another country.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Clarification: While the Republican’s took control of Congress in 1995 and may have affected the actual 1995 budget. The 1996 budget was the first budget PASSED by the Republicans.

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Tom
GM would have collapse. What the U.S. did it did under the current bankruptcy law. Examine Mexico has a case study. To be fair your more reasoned then the majority on this blog. I commend you.

Posted by: MM | September 1, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Wee goes the spin machine!!

Posted by: larry | September 1, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

“we see results that indicate more captures” There either are or are not more captures. If there was evidence confirming more captures, it would be written in bold script on all the major newspapers. Of course, Obama’s numbers are falling and he needs some positive press so they send out someone who is willing to say whatever is needed to justify the means that brings about the end result. If that doesn’t work then there will be more concerted efforts to ridicule. Ridicule to quote Saul Alinsky ” man’s most potent weapon”. Whatever means used, even if they are untrue or manipulations, are justifiable as long as they produce the end result. I am not making any charges, but am just paraphrasing a socialist principle. Wake up america and educate yourself and get on the Tea Party express!

Posted by: native son | September 1, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Interesting, More high value targets captured or killed…….now that the low value targets have been eliminated, the only ones left on the board is the king, rooks and bishops all the pawns are gone… so it must be that Obama is better at this.

Posted by: gasyusblast | September 1, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Oh yeah,I believe this guy. No really.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

They say there are “more captures”. I wonder where they are keeping them? Are they in Guantanamo?

Posted by: perkyron | September 1, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

When the Bush administration was in power, they issued a list of captured or killed terroists. I don’t see any list of terrorists killed or captured in this article.
So how can their claims be proven? I also thought there was no war on terror,only a “overseas contingency operation” according to Obamessiah.
If you ask me, the biggest terrorist of all is the guy who is destroying the US economy, and whose only news is bad news. Expect more unemployment, higher energy costs, etc.

Posted by: Peter | September 1, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Jones is just being a good little ‘bot…even the Marine Corps occasionally produces a Perfumed Prince of the Pentagon.

Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I am reminded of the liberal charges that accused repubs of being chicken hawks, sending people to was when they hadn’t been themselves. What does that make obama and his crew? Chicken hawks, that is what.

Posted by: jopiper | September 1, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

To all you people who continue to blame Bush for this countries ills – take note. Obama has spent more money in the first 9 months of office than the last 20 presidents combined. This economy isnt because of anything Bush did but because of Congress starting under Clinton – Congress (dems and repubs) deregulated the housing industry and this can be directly attributed to a democratic plan that was passed (Barney Frank was the founder of that one) to do so and that has been added to every year since then. But Republicans are not blameless. Make no mistake though this country is in the shape it is because of the last 60 years of having a worthless Congress. These people have made careers for themselves instead of doing the job they were hired for. They all need to be fired.

Posted by: kerry | September 1, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Prediction our D student at Harvard President will have a 22% approval rating,by christmas and the networks and newspapers will say its racism.

Posted by: Ashley | September 1, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

ABC had to search to find this guy – who wasprobably promised something for saying what he says. The military is overwhelmingly Republican because they know that Dmeocrats only care about power, not keeping America safe. Why is it that the three of the four major networks are and have for decades been pro-Democrat when most Americans are conservative? ABC, like NBC and CBS have no credibility and are yesterdays news. With the years of bias against Republicans and for Democrats would believe ANYTHING reported by the traditional three networks? EVERYTHING about the networks is biased – choice of news, story content, everything. Nothing to see here, move on….

Posted by: B. S. Davis | September 1, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Because we say it, it is so.

Posted by: J4140 | September 1, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Bias bias bias – you can go back William Paely and the radio news of the ’30′s for the beginnings of the bias by the networks in favor of Democrats and against Republicans. THE MAJOR NETWORKS HAVE NO CREDIBILITY – they are one seamless whole with the Democrat party, from which they get much of thier news personnnel. I knew someone who worked at the news division at NBC – they are open about being biased – it’s all a big joke to them. It infects everything about the networks and about public broadcasting as well – ever wonder why in debates the pro-left side are reporters for NPR and the pro-right side is columnists? NPR and the networks thinks Americans in general are stupid sheep, and that they are the elite.

Posted by: B. S. Davis | September 1, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

National Security Adviser, Gen. Jim Jones swore an oath to uphold the constitution as a marine, but must believe that oaths last only as long as the last job. Jones may be the first Ex-Marine.

Posted by: Tom Genin | September 1, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Calilove:
In her testimony to the 9/11 Commission, then National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, told of more than 40 Presidential Daily Briefings regarding al Qaeda in the first 8 months of the Bush Administration. That 13 of those briefings were in response to questions by President Bush or his top advisers. It was the CIA that stated it was in direct response to several occasions where President Bush wanted to know whether al Qaeda was planning an attack against the United States, that they prepared the August 6, 2001 PDB, “Bin Ladin Determined To Strike In US.”
Yes, President Bush was on vacation in August 2001. But he still received the PDBs and held daily meetings with his staff. The only difference between being in the White House and on the Ranch in Crawford, TX was the geography. The President’s ability to conduct business was never diminished by where he was physically located.
CIA Director George Tenent visited President Bush in Crawford on August 17, 2001. He also participated in the PDBs following President Bush’s return to Washington DC between August 31, 2001 and September 10, 2001. Director Tenent stated that he did not recall any discussions of a domestic threat during that period.
The FBI was very active in investigating tips. The last two paragraphs of the August 6, 2001 PDB state:
“Nevertheless, FBI information since that time (1998) indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
“The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full-field investigations throughout the U.S. that it considers bin Laden-related. CIA and the FBI are investigating a call to our embassy in the UAE in May saying that a group or bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives.”
Following the PDB of August 6th, President Bush and the National Security Agency began planning changes that might have actually prevented the attacks had they had a few more weeks to implement the changes. One of the areas looked at was the “wall” that prevented law enforcement from communicating with the intelligence agencies. The PDB mentions that BOTH the CIA and the FBI were investigating the SAME call to our embassy in the UAE. Had they had a joint investigation would that have prevented 9/11? We will never know.
But the main point is that AT NO TIME was there ever a credible warning with specifics of an imminent threat.

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

“The world is coming together on this matter now that President Obama has taken the leadership on it.”
The world has a problem with terrorists, regardless of who heads the charge, moral leaders should be doing all they can to stop terrorists and protect their people.
You just found out leaders around the world did not do all they could to protect their people becuase they did not like Bush. It was probably a political advantage for them to oppose Bush, but at who’s expense?

Posted by: Rman | September 1, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

According to the Obama administration there are no more terrorists – hence, instant 100% success rate for fighting terrorism.

Posted by: steve | September 1, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Well if the scary overseas contingency monsters don’t get us Obama/Teddy Care will…Maybe that’s what the bad guys are being threatened with, a life time of Obama Care.
They probably have Chuck Todd, Kay-tee Couric and the rest of the government media darlings doing the interrogating…working from a scripted questionnaire as prepared by Mr. Robert “Astro Turf Himself” Gibbs.

Posted by: IraqWarVet | September 1, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

More Obama administration hot air and symbolic empty rhetoric without fact. How can anyone take these people for their word alone? They have yet to be correct about anything. They miss the budget numbers by 20%. They don’t have death panels but yet they tell us now they some how removed them. They don’t want to nationalize everything but they do. They will keep competition but then raise regulations and cost to do business so high all competition fails. Case in point the bank reserve requirement has doubled under Obama rules since he took over the large banks. It’s like the referee playing in the game. Small banks are failing because they haven’t the capital but government has capital our tax dollars that they are able to funnel to their banks. If you think health care will be any different your nuts. These people are on a course of total destruction of the free market system of this country while telling us they love it. Why would you want to believe people involved in this scam on the American people?

Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Tom Genin: Jones may be an ex-Marine, but Murtha would be in line ahead of him.

Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

From the article:
The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers…but he said “there is an increasing trend and I think we seen that in different parts of the world over the last few months for sure.” …not “making a tally sheet saying we are killing more people, capturing more people than they did — that is not the issue.”
Ok, lets see if I understand this correctly. He said “I think” there is an increasing trend…that’s “for sure”…but not keeping count because “that is not the issue”.
So he thinks he knows for sure there are increasing insignificant numbers that he’s not keeping track of….so therefore Obama is good; Bush is bad.

Posted by: AninTx | September 1, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

So let me get this right: Jim Jones says we are winning so therefore we are winning.
There is something about these Jim Jones-es that makes them say things and expect us to believe them.
See we learned from the previous Jim Jones (he of Jamestown and mass suicide fame) that just because Jim says you should drink the kool-aid does not mean it is so.

Posted by: Ellen O'Day | September 1, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Obama went around the world did what? Leaders around the world just sit down and laughed at him how his indecency and stupidity are. What leaders of the world do. Just laugh and give him a middle finger.

Posted by: tom | September 1, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Terrorism is a thing of the past. Everyone in the world loves the U.S. now that BHO is our leader. Now let’s all come together, black and white, yellow and brown, terrorist and pacifists and sing “kum by ya”.

Posted by: GI Joe | September 1, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

So Gen Jones says Obama has killed more terrorists in “overseas contingency operations” then Bush did in the “war on terror”. But of course Gen Jones offers no proof to backup his claims, we’re just supposed to believe him. Like we were supposed to believe that unemployment would not rise above 8% if the Obama stimulus passed.What Americans can believe is that the current President is incompetent and in way over his head.It getting to a point where not even the state run media is able to prop Obama up.

Posted by: Hera | September 1, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Rebra R. Stevens… most of the money used in the Iraq war was to pay our military personnel, those that make military equipment, those farmers that send food to them etc… Your ideology is simplistic as it only delves with obama’s dictations. I was there, I fought for freedom! What have you done but eat bonbons and criticize those of us fighting! Typical lib! And Congress set the new regulations, barney filled his pockets due to these major mishaps! And we didnot steal the election, you lost! As you will in 2010 and 2012. Nowhere in history has a president fallen below 50% favor in such a short time! Obama’s a failure! The biggest failure this country has seen since carter! Naive fools! Jim Jones is lying, where are all these captured prisoners? Can’t be at Guantanamo bay! It’s all lies lies lies! Say what you will but Bush protected America, Our Freedom, and freed the Iraqi people! We Won the War in Iraq!!! Ask the people of Iraq, not charlie gibson! Obama’s just on a spending spree, the Biggest in World History!!! What accomplishments has he really done? Give welfare a raise, his lazy acorn followers needed that! Sad sad sad… Biggest loser in history!!!

Posted by: Fabiansbass | September 1, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

This is the same government that has communists in its ranks, and in the White House.
This is the same government that says the war on terror is over.
This is the same government that says terrorists that are detained must be read the Miranda rights.
Dont believe anything this administration says.

Posted by: JAQUEBAUER | September 1, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

test

Posted by: funkyone | September 1, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

More lies by the Obama regime. They make an outrageous statement without any evidence to back up the statement. They just assume we will all believe what they tell us.
Jim Jones needs to stop drinking the “magic punch.”
You have to assume the opposite is true of what the Obama regime says. If they asay they are doing a better job than Bush, then the reality is that they are doing a worse job and trying to cover it up with lies.

Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Seriously, where is the empirical data to back up the General’s claim and justify ABC covering this story? Doesn’t ABC’s BASIC journalistic integrity demand they provide this information before running such an incredulous story?
I hope this is not just another blatant attempt by the MSM to sway the voters. That would mean ABC is just an extension of the DNC and the Obama Administration.
Please say it ain’t so!

Posted by: The Common Sense Kid | September 1, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

the economy is going great and you will soon have free healthcare too….(NOT!!)C’mon 2010!!

Posted by: funkyone | September 1, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Obama’s brain continues to stay on vacation to make these claims.
He’s a typical Democrat
1) take credit for everything he doesnt do
2) never take responsibility for the things he does
3) spend tax payer money

Posted by: Bob | September 1, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Good interview. I believe we have and will have positive impacts from the Obama administration’s policies and leadership. Finally, we are moving away from the “either you are for us or against us” mentality and into a collaborative effort. Policing the world is the responsibility of all Nations and not just the United States. Cooperation will not only make the US safer but will also spread the financial burden around as well. A fiscal responsibility note for those of you who complain about OBama’s spending.

Posted by: Vicki | September 1, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

I’m trying to understand the our new humanity towards suspected terrorists.
Aparently you can have the lawyers OK a predator strike in which all living flesh within 25-50 yards of the strike becomes dis-emboweled including children; thats an Obama-OK.
But to threaten a known terrorist leader without mirandizing him and getting him all lawyered up is a grave sin against humanity??
Say it isn’t so Obamy; you’re God’s representative on Earth according to the news media so can you ‘splain it to we mere mortals.

Posted by: SirGareth | September 1, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

My grandpa said… when you go walking in the pasture, always know where the BULL is and don’t step in the steamy cow pies..our general? jones… BULL?

Posted by: James | September 1, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

What a load of bull. This guy makes claims (he must need a job under Obama) and nothing at all to back them up. He is setting up ANY success over there to be attributed to Obama. ABC should be ashamed for even reporting this pro Obama BS. Glad this idiot was never my general.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Awesome news. Go Obama! He’s got the economy turning around, and he’s showing the terrorists who is boss.

Posted by: Luther Poach | September 1, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Yep, The Obamamessiah is winning the terrosim war, doing wonders for our economy and has intalled dozens of Czars answerable only to him (including a marxist black nationalist in Jones), installed an openly racist supreme court justice and has an openly racist Attorney General in office that engineered the Mark Rich pardon & a huge donation from Rich’s wife to the Clinton library.
Obama is doing just great. Can’t wait for his third & fourth terms…

Posted by: Adam Smith | September 1, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Obama is a terrorist. He has done more damage to America than Al Queda ever has.

Posted by: JB | September 1, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

All I want to know is how much did the Dali Bama have to pay him to be a mouthpiece in uniform? Just for that malarky alone I would have needed a Lambo in the garage and a twin screw cigarette boat in the driveway but hey, so long as he polished his stars.

Posted by: Red Ruffansore | September 1, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Where’s Bin Laden?

Posted by: Jb | September 1, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Well now. Once again the new president,who doesn’ know the difference between terrorists, his czars and loyal americans, is taking credit for the policies of the previous adminstration.
Maybe he should issue everyone a BS button so we can all push it when he and his Czars speak.

Posted by: Sealdoc2001 | September 1, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Jones is about as honest as Gen. Wesley Clark was during his campaign. Just figure this: The media didn’t really like Bush, yet you still heard about terrorist thugs being killed/captured.
Now Obama is the media darling. What great “catches/kills” can he boast? Really, Gen Jones, just who the heck is paying you to make your stupid statements? Real hard guess there, right?!

Posted by: David Anderspon | September 1, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Haven’t we had to endure enough of Cheney? Even President Bush knows it’s time to move on. I would think His Usurpation (Cheney) would be exhausted from outing a dedicated secret agent, then dumping the blame on a grown man called Scooter. Boy, foreign leaders must have pounced on that. I.E.: What do they call Condi Rice behind closed doors? Rolli Blade? No doubt you could hear the knees getting slapped from London to Tokyo!

Posted by: Truman | September 1, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Yeah, but Obama thinks taking terrorists out to dinner on commission which is not what President Bush did.

Posted by: Rafael | September 1, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Vicki ——— I truly believe you have no idea of fiscal responsibility and these wars. We left Afghanistan to NATO forces who so quickly lost ground against our terrorist and now we aer back to recapture and root out. We still pay NATO more than any other NATO country and they are not doing their job. Now, Obama put McChrystal in there who doesn’t want to bomb as much. So, we have a prez who didn’t like the other general because he wanted more troops. Now, his replacement is asking for more troops. He is not bombing as much while our Sec Def is asking for more Preditors to bomb with???? Yes, leadership from an administration with literally no military background. We wasted months because of the general change which could have already given us the upper hand. Doesn’t sound fiscally responsible to me. Nor is it leadership.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Luther Poach at 12:28, you forgot your “sarc” tags.

Posted by: unclesmrgol | September 1, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Truman ——– This post has nothing to do with Cheney. You’re on the wrong site!

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Obama has been president for 8 months and all he and his regime can do is still blame Bush. If Bush was dead, Obama would still blame him.
Obama is bad for our nation. They want to “get” our CIA for doing their job. They want to hold hands with terrorists. They say Obama is doing better against terrorists than Bush, yet the Afghan was has been escalating while Obama has been in “charge”.

Posted by: Ken H. | September 1, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

If you Lib’s had your way you would have given the Medal of Freedom to the families of the 9/11 terrorist’s!

Posted by: Joe | September 1, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Explain to me then why the number of casualties in Afghanistan have increased since President Narcissist took office. Just another Stalinist lie by the narcissist. I saved jobs…I am against lobbyists….I am against earmarks…..I am for you keeping your current health care plan….I am going to provide the public with a 5 day public vetting of any bill….I am going to accept public funds in this campaign….I wasn’t aware of any radical speeches made by Rev. Wright….lie lie lie lie lie lie

Posted by: WeMadeAmistake | September 1, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Please ABC… Sugar coating your reports about Obama’s imaginary accomplishments is only adding to our country’s ever-increasing epidemic of glucose intollerance. That’s almost as bad as preaching CO2 reductions to heal the earth while continuously adding the greenhouse gas to soda pop. We are not fools!

Posted by: bigbraunco | September 1, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

the Afghan was has been escalating while Obama has been in “charge”.
Posted by: Ken H
General David McKiernan wanted more troops and was fired 4 months ago. This really set us back at a time when he was wanting to go after insurgents. Obama and gates (2 conscripted years of military total) decided they wanted new ideas so they hire McChrystal. How ironic he wants more troops too! Obama and Gates are an embarrasment and they should let the generals determine what they need and Gates and Obama should give them the resources to win. That should be their involvement.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

I guarantee you Chairman Maobama’s numbers are far worse than the state run media even states. No one but his communist/facsist/socalist/marxist and progressive henchmen like him and yet I predict he’ll win re-election in 2012. Don’t kid yourself folks, ACORN is already working on re-electing the dems who are up for election in 2010. Our last free election was in 2004.

Posted by: Me | September 1, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Good Afternoon, All–
So Jones attributes the primary reason for success to be “intelligence.” If this is the case, how can you blame Bush? His administration had to rebuild the intelligence sources after years of neglect and damage by the Clinton administration.
Anybody can look good if your key activity is the inheritance of eight seven years of hard work…..
Have a blessed day–

Posted by: Bud | September 1, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

We have an incompetant politically motivated narcissist president who is concerned about interrogation? Our enemies don’t care about interrogation. They just cut your head off with a dull knife. Holder is but President Narcissist’s front guy to the dirty work for him so that Obama can wash his dirty thieving hands and deny everything. What a disgrace.

Posted by: WeMadeAmistake | September 1, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Anyone even suggesting Obama’s leadership has improved our situation over there should have their head examined. I did 2 tours in Iraq and 7 other tours in the countries surrounding it and can tell you our military is performing well. The inputs from politicians are what’s hampering some of our plans. If you get the chance, read the book “Sole Survivor”. It will show how ruthless our terrorist friends are.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Sure, and pigs can fly.
(Somehow, the Obama administration thinks that by stating something that makes it true.)

Posted by: FL | September 1, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Hahahahaha…that’s rich!…Gen. Jim Jones should try the comedy circuit…

Posted by: Pat | September 1, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

This fellow must have been hired directly from the nut house.

Posted by: smith1 | September 1, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Liberal Mike wrote “”"”"”Wow. It’s like a convention of right wing douchebags here”"”"”"”
Hey Mike, I am an Independent, but even we see complete lies when they are thrown out there. Show us ANY facts to the contrary of what is being said and you might get some credibility.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I’m grateful Gen. Jones retired. The poor man’s delusional

Posted by: thanksalotkenya | September 1, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

As a 28 year Army veteran I am ashamed to see my brother Marine prostitute himself for his ego and ambition. I guess that Gen Jones forgot his oath of office so many years ago.

Posted by: Tanker80 | September 1, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Clearly this is Jim Jones has been drinking some of the Koolaid too? (if you do not get the reference please google “Jim Jones Koolaid”)

Posted by: NoSoPC | September 1, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Change you can believe in.

Posted by: Lizzie | September 1, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Tanker80 — Thanks for your service. I think the general took a new oath to Obama. He will be a “Defense Czar” or something soon.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Pay very close attention to the language in this quote of Jones’, “President Obama has taken the leadership on it… to discuss things with OTHER RULERS.”
This suggests that the Mr. Obama and his administration views itself as the RULER of the United States.
Regardless of where we stand on policy, it is dangerous for any administration to view itself as the RULER of the USA.

Posted by: Lord Boru | September 1, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I see a lot of partisan nonsense in the comments here. Grow up, all of you! And for the one veteran on here who says that Jim Jones has forgotten his oath of office, look to yourself, soldier. Political disagreement should have nothing to do with it.

Posted by: teacher | September 1, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Regardless of where we stand on policy, it is dangerous for any administration to view itself as the RULER of the USA.
Posted by: Lord Boru
And even worse when a former General bows down in front and back of him! This is the most wishy washy BS with no facts I have ever read.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

teacher —– As a 20+ year retiree I support our former Army man in saying this gex-general appears to have forgotten his oath. Please explain how Afghanistan has turned far worse since Obama’s leadership if this ex-general is correct? You say political, read the article, the ex-general is only in this one for his political gain. Look at the facts, not the ex-generals words alone.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

There’s only one thing Obama is better at than Bush, and that being the rate by which he is destroying the United States of America. With Bush, we were at a leisurely pace. With Obama, we are sprinting towards a Fascist state. For those who get their panties in a twist over that word, get educated instead of being just opinionated.

Posted by: Bob Hunter | September 1, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

apparently the general fell on his head and woke up next to murtha.
Semper Fi all Marines

Posted by: ron stark {marine} | September 1, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

teacher —- In the military, we have old school and new school generals. This man is clearly new school. Example: Old school would be General Jalwain when he served in Europe. New School is bucking for a political position and does what politics dictate. Trust me when I tell you it is much better fighting under an “old school” general than a weasel like this.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

wemadeamistake
I’m certain yer talking about Bush….
number of casualties has risen because there are more troops, there are more engagements and battles and fire fights…
now, that wasn’t so hard.. was it?

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Brainwashing our children day is Sept 8 when Obama goes on TV in our schools like Hitler to brainwash America’s youth. My grandsons will be home that day. What about your children and grandchildren? will they get the state sponsored indoctrination

Posted by: ricardo maxwell | September 1, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Jim Jones says the obamination is having more success than Bush regarding terrorists. He said it, so it’s true. And that means Cheney is lying. What a criminal bunch of turds in this administation! When will the hill begin impeachment proceedings and reinstate our precious constitution?

Posted by: mrsharfer | September 1, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

General Jones may or may not have trouble sleeping nights when he makes obviously questionable statements like those quoted here. That’s for him to know. But, on their face, his remarks are drivel. How do you increase our national security by attacking the CIA, trying to criminalize previous actions that were legally sanctioned, kissing the ring of a Saudi ruler whose country funds terrorists and their activities, kissing Palestinian behinds while dissing our only real ally in the middle east, Israel, deleting ‘war on terror’ from the official dialogue, constantly whining about the Bush administration, and treating Americans who disgree with your policies more like enemies than those who want to kill you and have proven they’ll keep trying? And that doesn’t even touch on all the other lies, misstatements, reversals of promises, and other missteps of this president and his cohorts. The man isn’t just a socialist, he’s bloody incompetent as well. God help the United States if this continues. Fortunately, we have a chance to correct the course somewhat in 2010.

Posted by: soljerblue | September 1, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Bob Hunter
well, if you really knew what a fascist state really is , you might have cause for a discussion..
re: ‘get educated’
why don’t you share your analysis of how Obama is making America into a fascist state, if you say universal heath care….. you lose right off the bat.

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

did he really say “– to discuss things with other rulers to enhance ….”
So is this the step in transition from being our president – representing the people of our country to being the RULER of our country?

Posted by: h-thown-eddy | September 1, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I am surprised that President Obama’s National Security Adviser would make such a non-factual statement, but the grandeur of this administration has never been in doubt. This administration has done more to release terror suspects from GITMO and to reassure our enemies (present and future) that they are guaranteed safety and humane treatment, unlike our troops. I don’t believe we should come right out and say we will use enhanced interrogation techniques or even that we should; just don’t tell them we “definitely” won’t use them. They need to feel some fear of being captured, but now they don’t. In fact, they are more encouraged to attack Americans, since most of them are being assured better treatment than they are currently receiving in their home countries or their terror network. Al-Qaeda, Insurgents in Iraq and rogue nations have a wonderful new recruiting tool, so I can’t justify the claims of the NSA. The Obama Administration is way over-reaching on this and some other issues, and they will pay a severe price in public opinion and possibly in next years mid-term elections. This President, probably more than his two predecessors, NEEDS a Congress controlled by an opposition party, for he is on a path that will destroy him and the hopes of his party…and possibly African-Americans. He is young, inexperienced and over-confident…a formula that works for politicians about as well as it works for multi-million Rookies in sports. He needs resistence to be successful and to save his credibility.

Posted by: Gary | September 1, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

“when Obama goes on TV in our schools like Hitler to brainwash America’s youth”
More name calling and smear tactics.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Wow, where can I go and make outlandish statements that can never be verified? And if any of this is true, all the time Bush people spent tracking down leads and laying the groundwork accounts for nothing?
If that’s true, then Bush can’t be blamed for this recession either, since it’s happening under Yobama’s watch.

Posted by: jimmy37 | September 1, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

mrsharfer
re: ‘muslim in the whitehouse’
as the Prez says….
‘they take pride in their own ignorance’
thank you for proving him correct, yet again
btw: if TARP is “W’s baby, then the crashed economy is also his baby…. ooooh the great ‘decider’, clear some brush will ya ‘W’

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Eerily familiar to the Third Reich.
Posted by: ricardo maxwell
the only thing that’s ‘Eerily familiar’ is the profound lack of historical knowledge by anyone making this kind of reference…………
but when you have no argument or policy, like the Republicans… that’s what you’re left with

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

number of casualties has risen because there are more troops, there are more engagements and battles and fire fights…
now, that wasn’t so hard.. was it?
Posted by: TJ
That wouild be a great post if there was actually the surge of troops that was supposed to happen. My nephew is still waiting for those orders. So, the problem is Obama and Gates wasted 4 months on this new general only to find what McKiernan asked for in January. What a waste of time. Change huh?

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

“Obama is a wanna be dictator and he needs to be stopped”
More name calling and fear and smear tactics.
That’s all you’re got left. Name calling and smear tactics.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

What taking them out on date night? That is more of Obams speed. Or tking them out to apoligize to them?? The Liberal way. sorry teacher but did you really read the article? This reads like it was written by the white house. The MSM is so in O’s pocket we will be broke and wondering what happened to all the money before those fools wake up and relize we were taken for all the we have, plus more than half of what our children and their childern will ever have!

Posted by: KMc | September 1, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

julieterra —– Here’s no name calling for you: general McChrystal wrote:”"”"”"”"”success is achievable and demands a revised implementation strategy, commitment and resolve, and increased unity of effort,”"”"”"”" Funny thing is, General McKiernan had the same idea. I do believe he wanted commitment and resolve and MORE TROOPS. So, after a 3 month assessment and the deadliest month yet, you are ready to ask for more troops? Obama, Gates and McChrystal really cost us on this debacle. McKiernan wanted the very same thing 4 months ago. We could have avoided the deadliest month had our Prez and his Sec Def given the general what he needed in May, instead of giving him the boot. Obama, zero military experience, Gates, 2 years conscripted USAF. These 2 fired a general with more experience in his pinky than these 2 idiots could ever read about. Obama and Gates have a direct responsibility for these past 4 months and clearly we could have limited the deaths had they supported McKiernan. Jones is telling lies.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Julieterra: Who is paying you, you just give comments that have no basis and you have been on this thing for 2 days. Obama is a Marxist socialist and is failing as a president. All you have left is to play the victim, your messiah is failing miserably. So we play the victim. Won’t work.

Posted by: Joel Weymouth | September 1, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Isnt this quote telling as to how they see themselves?:
“to discuss things with other rulers to enhance the working relationships with law enforcement agencies ”
Apparently, we’ve corronated a king here in Amerika

Posted by: Jeff | September 1, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I am a black man from Charlotte, North Carolina who is unafraid to say Barak Obama has already failed as a president as he apparently did as a community organizer. So far nothing has worked and he continues campaigning against George W. Bush. Looking in the rear view mirror is not going to help him, he doesn’t understand that or Emanuel and Axelrod don’t. They need help, they apparently do not have clue what they are doing. In the meantime they need to stop everything and start over and stop trying to change the nation to something worse than it has ever been.

Posted by: RobNclt | September 1, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Gen. J. Jones USMC Ret., is spouting nonsense.
The Bush Administration with an aggressive War on Terrorism policy on many front and overall it worked! Regardless of political views and feeling the Bush War on Terrorism Policy worked.
At first Obama and company followed in trace of Bush, but now he is striking out with his own ideas by marginalizing the CIA, creating a new intelligence gathering and interrogation organization and generally returning to a post 9/11 stance which was a failure.
General Jones keep in mind it is unwise to screw with success and you and President Obama are screwing with success.

Posted by: Arthur G. Shadforth | September 1, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

look at barackobama- you have to give a contribution to the “President”. And you do not have to be a US Citizen and you can influence American Politics. The campaign is over but the buffoon is still running. Are these contributions paying Julieterra, or is it George Soros. Are you even a US Citizen Julieterra, or are you some ACORN SCUM that is nothing more than a leech that lives off the producers.

Posted by: Joel Weymouth | September 1, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Sorry lfrichar, had I realized you were such a world-renowned military strategist, I would never have pointed out the idiocy of people trying to smear President Obama by calling him Hitler.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

” you some ACORN SCUM that is nothing more than a leech that lives off the producers.”
More name calling and smear tactics. Do you fanatics not have any better tactics at all?

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Thanks for the comedy interlude!
Jones has been around Obama too long! He has come to think, as does Obama, that everyone else in the country is as stupid as they are in Chicago.
The rest of the country likes things like evidence, proof, documentation.
This is hysterical.
Freeing terrorists and prosecuting those who protect the country is the not the path to security.
Obama knew that the Lockerbie bomber was going free. Right here I said that there was no way that happened without Obama’s approval, and that is exactly what happened.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Jeff – apparently reaching out to nations is working as it has worked historically. I shudder to think where we would be now with a president who works unilaterally, alienating the world. No other president has operated like that and no other president has been as great a failure.

Posted by: DaveM | September 1, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Posted by: lfrichar
if I believed anything you say we would have a discussion, there are so many former CIA operatives, state dept workers, homeland security, military personnel who can’t tell you, what they do in the military’ etc
who post here, it staggers the imagination
..the Afghan mission has morphed from it’s original goal into nation building, history shows little success for that being a reality in Afghanistan, …..
even tho’ Iraq was a strategic blunder, and mistake
were you ticked off about the wasted first years of Iraq?

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

How comforting to know that we have a National Security Advisor who lives in his own little world. Great

Posted by: Joan | September 1, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Where did Obama and the marines find General Jones?

Posted by: hb | September 1, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

“apparently reaching out to nations is working as it has worked historically.”
For sure! Ask Neville Chamberlain!

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

If this “reaching out” thing was so successful for Obama why don’t we have more combat troops in Afghanistan from those countries as Obama promised would happen?

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“As of January 2009 its troops number around 55,100 from 26 NATO, 10 partner and 2 non-NATO / non-partner countries, including contributions from Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Poland and most members of the European Union and NATO also including Australia, New Zealand, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Singapore.”

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

“President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.”
but…but….but….
‘He added that he was not “making a tally sheet saying we are killing more people, capturing more people than they did — that is not the issue.”’
So when Jones says we’re putting more terrorists out of commission we’re not putting MORE terrorists out of commission….
Now I get it!

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Joel – Diplomacy will never be a sign of “weakness”. Weakness is defined as the inability to change and unwilling to accept feedback. The diplomat I promote. The other I fire.

Posted by: DaveM | September 1, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

“As of January 2009 its troops number around 55,100 from 26 NATO, 10 partner and 2 non-NATO / non-partner countries, including contributions from Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Poland and most members of the European Union and NATO also including Australia, New Zealand, Azerbaijan, Turkey and Singapore.”
Bush built quite the coalition, didn’t he?
But where are the additional COMBAT troops Obama promised?
Hello???

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

President Obama is More succesful then Bush could ever dreame of at least President Obama pays attention unlike Bush when he was told about Bin Laden and him possibly attacking on 911 chose to clear brush off his ranch instead!

Posted by: Angie in PA | September 1, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“Bush built quite the coalition, didn’t he?”
That is a NATO mission, not a Bush mission. The arrogance is appalling.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

After I recommended therapy…

Posted by: DaveM | September 1, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Pakistan, India, Iraq, Afghanistan, Colombia, Mexico, Israel, Canada, France, Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic, Ukraine, Indonesia, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, Lebanon, various African nations who were helped by the Bush campaign against AIDS and malaria, and Japan are nations that drew closer to the U.S. during the Bush presidency. Syria has drawn closer to the U.S. under the Obama presidency after being kicked out of Lebanon during the Bush presidency and getting its nuclear plant destroyed by Israel. Also during the Obama administration, Japan is making noises about moving away from the U.S.; only 4 percent of Israelis think the U.S. is pro-Israel now;; Poland and the Czech Republic fear the U.S. will abandon them by abandoning the proposed anti-missile sites, maybe as part of a deal with Russia on Iran; Ukraine has similar fears regarding possibly not being taken into NATO in this administration.

Posted by: rls | September 1, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Posted by: Joel Weymouth | Sep 1, 2009 2:06:09 PM
Getting your picture taken while sitting next to Bill Clinton so that you can gain currency and be taken seriously?
PRICELESS!
Kim got exactly what he really wanted.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

“That is a NATO mission, not a Bush mission. The arrogance is appalling.”
NATO did not build the coalition.
Bush did.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

my military friends read
***
oops, I meant recommended after they read it and I read it too.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

“Kim got exactly what he really wanted.”
North Korea is now back at the table negotiating with South Korea for better relations. Talks and negotiations have begun again since the Clinton visit to free the Americans.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I smell a big fat lie – just remember that Obama and company define “terrorist” as anyone that opposes his agenda. Any arrest of a tax protester now would qualify as a “terrorist” taken out of action.

Posted by: bilbo | September 1, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

“Talks and negotiations have begun again since the Clinton visit to free the Americans.”
Why? I thought Clinton solved this a long time ago.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Japan is making noises
Posted by: rls
are they ‘grunts’, ‘chirping’ or whistling noises?

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

How do you even talk to insane people? And ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBC just put out the press releases the socialists send them. Talk about the death of journalism, at least how they “practice” it.
Oh that Dear Leader! WE LUVS HIM, haha.
November 2010 can’t come soon enough!

Posted by: jaime sanchez | September 1, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“Talks and negotiations have begun again since the Clinton visit to free the Americans.”
You have no idea, do you?

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

NATO did not build the coalition.
Bush did.
———
Bush built the Coalition of the Coerced for Iraq.
The Afhanistan operation is a NATO operation. Again, arrogance.
“International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) is a NATO-led security and development mission in Afghanistan established by the United Nations Security Council on 20 December 2001[1] as envisaged by the Bonn Agreement.”
Of course, its convenient for you to attribute this force to Bush, so you do. It was the United Nations who put this force into play, not Bush.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Most of these people were educated in US Public Schools. That is were the bias began. If you indrocinate children at a young age its almost impossible to modify their opinion when they get older (look at the Palestians). Tragic events are needed for that to take place and that may not even change them. To forstall that event liberals realized that a run on the government coffers is required. It will be short lived because you can only take tax money from so many generations in the future. The way the government has been spending in the past decade we will take a loan on the 23rd centuries generation taxable income by next year.

Posted by: Sammy | September 1, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

“You have no idea, do you?”
Huh? Is this supposed to mean or prove something? Weak.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“the Obama Administration’s unilateral disarmament”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Next someone will try to blame Katrina on bush….surely not though, would they?

Posted by: DP | September 1, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“North Korea is now back at the table negotiating with South Korea for better relations.”
Would you care to point me to some news article about this?
Let’s see:
North and South Korea begin high-level military talks
Oops, that’s 2007
Official: US, NOrth Korea to begin talks
um, that was 2003
North-South talk resume over reuniting separated families
Well, that was August 2008
Oh, here ya go:
Kim pardons reporters after Clinton ‘apology’
Sydney Morning Herald 8/5/09

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

DaveM Wrote: “Diplomacy will never be a sign of “weakness”. Weakness is defined as the inability to change and unwilling to accept feedback.”
No, weakness is defined as making your country more vulnerable to attack. In that, Obama has greatly succeeded.

Posted by: KSM | September 1, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

The key words here are, “The former Marine General didn’t provide any specific numbers to back up his claim…”
I find it pathetic that the Obama administration simultaneously blames Bush for the current economic situation (while spending us into the ground!), while taking credit for the intelligence and operational capabilities that Bush promoted.
I hope Obama is prepared for change, because it will begin with Congress in 2010!

Posted by: Ambrose | September 1, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Operation Enduring Freedom
The War in Afghanistan, which began on October 7, 2001 as the U.S. military operation Operation Enduring Freedom, was launched by the United States with the United Kingdom in response to the September 11 attacks.
The stated aim of the invasion was to find Osama bin Laden and other high-ranking Al-Qaeda members and put them on trial, to destroy the whole organization of Al-Qaeda, and to remove the Taliban regime which supported and gave safe harbor to Al-Qaeda. The United States’ Bush Doctrine stated that, as policy, it would not distinguish between terrorist organisations and nations or governments that harbor them.
Two military operations in Afghanistan are fighting for control over the country. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) is a United States combat operation involving some coalition partners and currently operating primarily in the eastern and southern parts of the country along the Pakistan border. Approximately 28,300 U.S. troops are in OEF.[2][3][4]
The second operation is the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which was established by the UN Security Council at the end of December 2001 to secure Kabul and the surrounding areas. NATO assumed control of ISAF in 2003. By July 23, 2009, ISAF had around 64,500 troops from 42 countries, with NATO members providing the core of the force. The United States has approximately 29,950 troops in ISAF.[2]

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Did i hear someone invoke europe,africa, asia…..surely u must know that bush and his fellow republicans are apalling 2 the world, along with everything they stand for. Obama is only helping the rest of the world 2 put up with u!

Posted by: julia | September 1, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

It became a NATO operation in 2006:
From January 2006, a NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) started to replace the U.S. troops of Operation Enduring Freedom in southern Afghanistan. The British 16th Air Assault Brigade (later reinforced by Royal Marines) formed the core of the force in Southern Afghanistan, along with troops and helicopters from Australia, Canada and the Netherlands. The initial force consisted of roughly 3,300 British,[90] 2,300 Canadian,[91] 1,963 from the Netherlands,[92] 290 from Denmark,[93] 300 from Australia,[94] and 150 from Estonia.[95] Air support was provided by U.S., British, Dutch, Norwegian and French combat aircraft and helicopters.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

It is neither Bush or Obama to be credited for our successes. It’s the damn military.
Unbelievable!!!

Posted by: Dave | September 1, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Posted by: julia | Sep 1, 2009 2:32:28 PM
Saying things doesn’t make them so.
George Bush is a hero in Africa, and is attributed with saving a million African lives.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Paragraph two, quote:
Obama…”to discuss things with other rulers…”. America was not setup to have its people “RULED”. Jones gives away the thinking within this president’s circle of advisers. This type of thinking and speech is truly repugnant to all Americans. Obama truly is their Messiah. Kool-Aid on the house…

Posted by: Madison's Apparition | September 1, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Medical News Today 4/7/09
Bush’s AIDS Treatment Program Saved 1.2 Million Lives In Africa
That must really hurt you guys, eh?

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Dr.John
re: Julia’s Bush built the Coalition of the Coerced for Iraq.
Posted by: julieterra
your copying of the stated Bush goals does nothing to disprove Julia’s point…
sort of like saying that since the Bush justice dept OK’d torture, it must not be a crime because the Bush people said it wasn’t….

Posted by: JayZ | September 1, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

“Bush’s AIDS Treatment Program Saved 1.2 Million Lives In Africa”
Why would this news hurt? It seems like good news to me.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Next someone will try to blame Katrina on bush
Posted by: DP
nah, just for ignoring it and playing air-guitar while the city flooded

Posted by: TJ | September 1, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Also worth noting..
1.The recession is over.
2.Global warming is killing baby seals.
3.Bush lied about the state of the economy.
4.The war on terrorism is over.
5.The 911 commission, which stated that the wall of separation between the FBI & CIA helped allow the 911 terrorist attack, was wrong.
7.If you lie your health care you can keep it.
8.The only way to prevent our country from going bankrupt is to spend more money.
9.Barrack does not want to run Government Motors.
10.If you just put air in your tires, we would save 183 billion barrels of oil a day!!
Yep, Obama is batting one million. Could someone please shine my halo.

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

“A nation of values” Would this include Freedom, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Or the Obama “values” – dependence on government, high taxes, Marxism, the “black value system” of his church and government control of every aspect of your life?

Posted by: bilbo | September 1, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“dependence on government, high taxes, Marxism, the “black value system” of his church and government control of every aspect of your life”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

I don’t believe a thing this administration says.

Posted by: Kim Slade | September 1, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

After Obama dismantles the Bush/Cheney framework which kept us safe for 7 years and returns us to the Clinton era, pre-911 mindset of treating the terrorist’s declared war against the United States as a law enforcement issue, our standing in the world will once again become that of a “paper tiger”. I believe we had at least 3 unanswered terrorist attacks against us when Clinton was busy bangin interns in the oval office. Wait, we did shoot a bunch of 30 million dollar missles at a 10 dollar tent once, but we only hit 3 scorpions and a paraplegic bunny rabbit. It’s cool though.. I’ll just hangout in my bunker until we get a real president in 3 years. God love the Libs, cause no one else does!!

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I am dumbfounded by the press (Juan Williams on FNS, being one of many to state) citing the “KSM” has now said he was just lying the the Red Cross when he was waterboarded. What do they think he is going to say?

Posted by: IowaHokie | September 1, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

No one can possibly believe that America is now safer because of the new restrictions on enhanced interrogation and the subsequent appointment of a special prosecutor. The captured terrorist of my fertile imagination, assuming he had access to an Internet cafe, knows about the special prosecutor. He knows his interrogator is under scrutiny. What person under those circumstances is going to spill his beans? – Richard Cohen 9/1/9 WaPo

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 1, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“the Bush/Cheney framework which kept us safe for 7 years”
Bush and Cheney had control of the security apparatus for 9 months when 9/11 happened. They had numerous warnings about Bin Laden. Bush had been on holiday in Texas for the month leading up to 9/11. They surely were on their toes and did the best they could for America – it just wasn’t good enough.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Obama is actively trying to destroy this nation’s ability to gather intelligence.
That is how Obama is reaching out to other countries. He’s painting a target on all our backs.

Posted by: drjohn | September 1, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

And unemployment will not rise above 8% (now 16%), I will sign no bill with earmarks (signed stimulus bill with 8,000).
Obama is the LIAR IN CHIEF.

Posted by: bilbo | September 1, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Just remember, the world is watching your moves America,
It is AMERICA that is in debt,
And you can all blame Obama, Bush, but you should all be blaming yourselves.
You keep going down this path of playing this stupid game, and your all right America will be a wasteland in no time while the rest of the western world passes you buy.
Like come on your country can even establish socialised healthcare, what a joke your country has become.

Posted by: WorldIsWatchin | September 1, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

“No one can possibly believe that America is now safer because of the new restrictions on enhanced interrogation”
Enhanced interrogation techniques ended in 2005 with the Detainee Treatment Act.
What kept us safe since then?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

“And unemployment will not rise above 8% (now 16%)”
President Obama did not say that.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

One thing Gen Jones did not mention and none of the MSM will ever mention is that the groundwork for most of the “successes” we see now was laid during the Bush administration, using Bush policies…

Posted by: prcauch | September 1, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“And unemployment will not rise above 8% (now 16%),”
While unemployment is high, its not close to 16%.
Dept of Labor comes out with their Aug unemployment report on Friday. In July it was 9.4%
“I will sign no bill with earmarks (signed stimulus bill with 8,000).”
Learn what earmarks are. There weren’t any in the stim bill.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

“the groundwork for most of the “successes” we see now was laid during the Bush administration”
Oh you mean like the robust economy, the spectacular employment rate and the smooth relations with the rest of the world including Iran and Korea?

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Julieterra, no one had a clue we were to be attacked because of the walls the Clinton administration put up between the FBI & CIA, which is exactly my point. The framework I refer to occured post 911 and had the input of far more than the Bush administration. Or did you forget all the money we spent on the 911 commision and the changes our country made based on their recommendations, which by the way,

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Apparently you do not believe Obama admin. spokesman Dennis Lockhart who says the real unemplyment rate is 16%. The stimulus bill did have 8000 earmarks.

Posted by: bilbo | September 1, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Oh you mean like the robust economy, the spectacular employment rate and the smooth relations with the rest of the world including Iran and Korea?
Posted by: julieterra
Clearly you live in a different world than the rest of us! We are 5000 points down from Bush’s high, 4% higher than Bush’s unemployment average, Korea and Iran are still making bombs. And we have the same friends as we had under Bush. Hmmm.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

“no one had a clue we were to be attacked”
Lie.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I don’t give a rat’s *** as about whether it was “right or wrong” to extract information from terrorists (a word that many of you here will not use). War is a dirty ugly scenario, and we can examine any past war to find broken rules and even reprehensible acts–but so what?
Too many of you people have no idea about war and evil–and some of you do not even think evil exists, preferring to claim people are just “misdirected” or “abused.”
I wish all you sophisticated “armchair soldiers” could have spent a few days in VietNam…
DT

Posted by: Dave T | September 1, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“Apparently you do not believe Obama admin. spokesman Dennis Lockhart who says the real unemplyment rate is 16%.”{
Yes its called the U6 measurement of unemployment.
Most people when referring to unemployment use the U3 number (what the 8% refers to).
U6 measures those claiming unemployment, those who have given up looking for a job and those who are under employed
The U6 number is a better measurement of unemployment.
Too bad right wingers didn’t like it when Bush’s economy had a U6 in double digits.
But I do like that more people are at least aware of the standard.
“The stimulus bill did have 8000 earmarks.”
Learn what an earmark is. Pork and earmarks are not one in the same not are they mutually exclusive concepts.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“the groundwork for most of the “successes” we see now was laid during the Bush administration” Posted by: prcauch | Sep 1, 2009 3:16:34 PM
Oh you mean like the robust economy, the spectacular employment rate and the smooth relations with the rest of the world including Iran and Korea?

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

“We are 5000 points down from Bush’s high, 4% higher than Bush’s unemployment average”
The Dow opened at 8279 on Jan 20th 2009.
Its now at 9300.
Unemployment in Dec 2008 was 7.2%
“The U.S. economy lost 524,000 jobs in December, the 12th straight month of decline. “Nearly 2.6 million jobs were lost in 2008, with 1.9 million destroyed in just the past four months.” It’s the biggest job loss in any calendar year since 1945.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I don’t believe a word this administration says. They are all liars and thieves. They are always wanting to give away our money. How about putting some of their money up for all of their good causes. Peolsi is a perfect example. She wants us all to pay for the illegals healthcare but I don’t see her putting up any of her money. When she gives her money I will give mine. Otherwise stay out of my business.

Posted by: Diana | September 1, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

julieterra ——– Your comments, presented with facts might sway some in your direction.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

“President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.”
SUCCESS: Right that why Scotland refused to release the terrorist bomber to Libya.

Posted by: LAMRE | September 1, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Obama has killed or saved more terrorists…oops that’s jobs…sorry

Posted by: Bill | September 1, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

“Obama has killed or saved more terrorists…oops that’s jobs…sorry”
If you want to know where the jobs went, ask Bush.
“The U.S. economy lost 524,000 jobs in December (of 2008), the 12th straight month of decline. “Nearly 2.6 million jobs were lost in 2008, with 1.9 million destroyed in just the past four months.” It’s the biggest job loss in any calendar year since 1945.”
You expect President Obama to stop this catastrophe with a magic wand – you live in la-la land.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

julieterra — Nice cut and paste of facts. Are you so inclined to check on the unemployment from 2009? Anyway, keep blaming Bush and living in the past, but here is one fact for you. It is an amazing coincidence that the rate you speak of and our economic downturn took place just after Congress was taken over by Democrats. You know, Congress with the purse strings. SO, I blame Republicans and Democrats for our downturn while you would pin it only on Bush which would be, well, your favorite term…. a lie.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

If you compare President Obama’s first 6 months in office to President Bush’s first 6 months in office–then Gen. Jim Jones is actually correct! Typical Obama Math!

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

If you want to know where the jobs went, ask Bush.
“The U.S. economy lost 524,000 jobs in December (of 2008), the 12th straight month of decline. “Nearly 2.6 million jobs were lost in 2008, with 1.9 million destroyed in just the past four months.” It’s the biggest job loss in any calendar year since 1945.”
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 1, 2009 4:06:13 PM
***
People who blindly support Republicans and their policies really should take a gander at jobs created overall and per year of presidency for the past sixty years, or at the very least looks at jobs created during the Clinton years versus jobs created during the Bush years, either Bush, but particularly W. (google “Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record”)
There is no magic wand, but Obama, his admin and many members of Congress are making an honest effort to dig us out of the hole. What would be fruitful for those supposedly independent self-motivated and self-directed folks doing so much complaining would be to start a small business, vote for health care reform so you can provide it for your employees and hire people.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Julieterra wrote: “You expect President Obama to stop this catastrophe with a magic wand – you live in la-la land.”
Actually President Obama could have! On January 20th, in his Inauguration speech, he could have told the American people that the recession was far worse than he thought. Therefore he was going to immediately ask Congress to make the Bush tax cuts permanent; ask for an additional 10% across the board tax cut; and insist that all non-defense spending be cut by 10%.
In fact, HAD then Sen. Obama advocated THAT instead of the wealth redistribution rhetoric–raising taxes on those making at least $250,000 to pay for his programs–during the campaign, the recession would not have been so deep.

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Alyson —- Wow, you all certainly stick together with your cut and paste. Our politicians working for the good of us in your opinion, but it is certainly not supported by the health plan right now. If it was so good, congress and the rest of them would agree to it. Can you not agree that if we required our politicians to submit to their health care plan, they would write it differently?

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

James Danley – the economic collapse was precipitated with Bush in power and his tax cuts in place.
Billions of dollars of tax breaks WERE included in the Obama administration’s Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.
Only an extremely simplistic analysis would present a ‘magic wand’ – it doesn’t exist and Bush proved that amply.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Therefore he was going to immediately ask Congress to make the Bush tax cuts permanent;
****
I would advise everyone to google Bruce Bartlett’s piece regarding the GOP’s misplaced rage on the economy. He’s a conservative, supply-side economist who makes many good points.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

James Danley – don’t forget it was Bush (and later McCain) who thought the economy was just going through ‘a rough patch’ – millions of jobs later we find out they didn’t have a clue.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“Pork and earmarks are not one in the same not are they mutually exclusive concepts.”
These are one and the same. Earmarks are how pork is put on the menu at congress.

Posted by: bilbo | September 1, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Billions of dollars of tax breaks WERE included in the Obama administration’s Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.
Posted by: julieterra
Really, because all I have seen in the way of taxes was tobacco and alcohol and none of them went down. I definitely foresee higher taxes needed in the very near future and I don’t believe we will limit it to those above $250K. In this I hope I am wrong. Now, to say Bush precipitated the economic collapse is like saying Clinton precipitated 911. you can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Sorry Keif, but giving billions of dollars to the unemployed and the underdeveloped nation of ACORN is not what most would consider a tax break.

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

julieterra —– So you place absolutely no blame on any Dems? You do know Obama said our economy was fundamentally intact right after McCain right? You won’t put any blame on Franks lieing about F and F? Or the relaxing of regulations to allow low income to own the American Dream whether they could afford it or not?

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Oh, and BTW Keif, the recovery bill was only signed by Obama. He, like most of the idiots in Pelosi’s House of Horrors had no clue what was in the bill. It was actually written by George Soros and the union bosses to help propel America into Obama’s recovery program of Trickle up Poverty.

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Wow, you all certainly stick together with your cut and paste.
Posted by: lfrichar |
***
Hardly cut and paste. I asked you to look at jobs created per year per president for sixty years!! But, yes, I’ve definitely chosen sides and gone fully partisan. Didn’t really want to quit on the bipartisan notion, but, hey, things happen.
Regarding this question: “Can you not agree that if we required our politicians to submit to their health care plan, they would write it differently?” I think they ought to go public option and increase the pool! Likely not the answer you were looking for :>) I do think if both sides put politics aside they could come up with something closer to very, very good than we might get given the state of the debate. I think whatever we get now will need to continue to be improved BUT will improve upon what we have and insure more people and that’s a start. I don’t see honest effort on the GOP’s part. Haven’t for many years– at least not regarding health care. It’s more about defeating reform and protecting the status quo and engaging in a disciplined attack against progressive ideas. I’ve been chided for not seeing the effort Repubs claim exist and I likely will be again, but I don’t see it. I see quite the opposite. As a small business owner, I’m very likely to benefit very much from reform. I support it. I believe it’s the practical thing to do and as an added plus I get to feel bighearted and community-oriented because being my brothers and sisters keeper doesn’t bother me. I believe the best country in the world, the land of the free, brave and amazing, can find a way to extend a decent education and affordable health care not run by greedy insurance execs to all its citizens. But thats just how I roll. Clearly, there’s a whole other group of folks out there that think differently seem really paranoid to me in many regards– and I don’t say that to be rude. Sometimes I am contrary and rude, I admit– I’m feisty– but I honestly see a lot of paranoia and undue stress and hype (IMHO) and I don’t get it.
Oh, and btw, since you’re here (if you’re still here) can you tell me if when you recommended Sole Survivor you meant Lone Survivor? The Sole Survivor I’m aware of is a work of fiction by Dean Koontz. But two of my friends in the military did recommend Lone Survivor and is a testament to our very brave troops. If you’re talking about another book, I’d be interested in reading it.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Alyson—- It is Lone Survivor and it is a good book. It also shows what we are working with on our military ventures. Now I have to go. Have a great day.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 1, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Yeah, right!! What is Obama going to do with a brain?!?!?!

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

All Americans need to have there taxes raised!
You idiots have a Trillion Dollar Deficit, how else do you ever expect to pay it,
Anyone who thinks a tax cut would be a solution to Americas problem needs to get there head examined.
Companies are out sourcing more and more everyday, not just because the work is cheaper, but America can no longer even produce the same results it could in the past.
America is doomed, You guys spend all day arguing your stupid political ideology while the rest of the western world begins passing you by.
What a joke.

Posted by: Tyler | September 1, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The 50 cents went towards his Mathas Vineyard vacation. I only wish I had more to give.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Tyler my friend, it’s been proven since the days of JFK, lowering taxes increases federal income and raising taxes drops federal income. Every state in the country that continues to raise taxes is going broke. Look at New York and California’s economies and then try to tell me more taxes will help. The more money the government tries to take from us, the more aggressively we aspire to keep it. The more reasonable taxation is, the easier it is to cough it up. The only way government can get out of debt is for them to realize you can’t cut the throat of the golden goose if you want them to keep laying them golden eggs!

Posted by: NoMarxist | September 1, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

“Tyler my friend, it’s been proven since the days of JFK, lowering taxes increases federal income and raising taxes drops federal income.”
ROFLMAO!
Actually what happens is if you close the loopholes the rich were using to avoid paying taxes, tax revenue increases.
See that’s the part the right wing never shares with you when touting Reagan’s tax cuts or Kennedy’s tax cuts.
While the marginal rate was lowered, the big factor in revenue increasing was elimination of loopholes.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Alyson—- It is Lone Survivor and it is a good book. It also shows what we are working with on our military ventures. Now I have to go. Have a great day.
Posted by: lfrichar | Sep 1, 2009 4:55:24 PM
***
Thanks. Have a great day, too.

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

“to say Bush precipitated the economic collapse is like saying Clinton precipitated 911. you can’t have it both ways.”
It’s worth pointing out (in response) that both the economic collapse and 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch.

Posted by: julieterra | September 1, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

BUSH WATCH – EIGHT YEARS OF NO ATTACKS ON HOMELAND AFTER 911. OBAMA – JUST APPEASEMENT (WHY CAN’T WE JUST GET ALONG)AND LOTS OF BS INCLUDING THAT FROM SECURITY ADVISER. GOOD DIVERSION FROM OBAMA’S FALLING APPROVAL NUMBERS, NOW LESS THAT FIFTY PERCENT. ISN’T THAT SOME SORT OF RECORD?

Posted by: Manitu | September 1, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

That has not been proven, and on top of that there were 8 years of tax cuts during the bush administration and look where it got you, also California is a terrible example, there is far more to it then higher taxes that have caused this issues its currently facing.
[Th]ere is a list of what the adverage person pays world wide for taxes, you may notice that Germany, Sweden, Belgium, France, all pay way higher taxes then america does.
Is it just some magic, that these same countries have been also have some of the best health care, highest literacy rates, better education, lower crime rates.
Oh wait I forgot America is number one in all those right?!!?!? American Ignorance makes me laugh,
Im not in American, and trust me in January we gained some respect for America, but lately that opinion is turning sour. And its not Obama thats the problem, its the people.
I’ve watched American news, Republicans blame democrats, Democrats Blame Bush and it goes on.
Obama maybe made to many promises, but its you guys who really are making this president fail, and if he does. Well its not just your president who would of failed, your country will also.
Just watch!

Posted by: Tyler | September 1, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“BUSH WATCH – EIGHT YEARS OF NO ATTACKS ON HOMELAND AFTER 911.
OBAMA – JUST APPEASEMENT ”
So to recap
Bush – 1 horrible terrorist attack on the homeland in which 300 people are killed.
Obama – no terrorist attacks on the homeland.
I think Obama wins that one.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 1, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

WHEN OBAMA”S POLICIES WOULD RESULT IN THIS NATION GOING BANKRUPT AND/OR TO BE ATTACKED – I “WANT” HIS PROPOSALS TO FAIL, AS EVERY RATIONAL PERSONAL SHOULD.

Posted by: Manitu | September 1, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

ifrichar — didn’t you notice an increase in your paycheck? It’s not a large amount by paycheck, but add it up and it turns into a lot. My paycheck went up 19 dollars sometime in March or april — Obama tax cut. If you add up everybody’s tax cut amount, it adds up to billions.

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 1, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

I am so sick of you people equating universal healthcare to the red commie menace. Good God, you are literally a throwback to the nineteen twenties. We’re in the twenty first century guys! Update your insults and slurs.

Posted by: Anna | September 1, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Obama’s policies will neither bankrupt the country nor make us less safe.
As a matter of FACT — his policies will serve to improve the overall economy, lower the deficit and keep us MUCH more secure within our borders.
My opinion. For all of you who disagree… okay — that is merely your opinion.
Sadly, yours is looking forward with fear, mine is looking forward with hope. I am confident and secure… that alone adds to the truth of security within our borders.
PS — as Alan Simpson said “You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts”.

Posted by: dassis | September 1, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Anna…
If you have noticed many of the folks at these Town Halls are in the upper age brackets, you can understand why the “fear machine” uses the red/commie menace tactic.
From way back, this has been the “go to” scare tactic. It’s almost like a button to be pushed. Add to that the fact that those at the end of their life have a subliminal fear of the future.
So, “the red commie menace is your eternity” becomes the message by which to rattle and gather them.
It works better than hellfire and damnation because it is something that can be accessed from the person’s past — with even a fading memory function.
This is deplorable. It sickens me and I can only hope those who promote it find only futility in their cause.

Posted by: dassis | September 1, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Elizabeth wrote: “…didn’t you notice an increase in your paycheck? It’s not a large amount by paycheck, but add it up and it turns into a lot. My paycheck went up 19 dollars sometime in March or april — Obama tax cut.”
Actually that was not a tax cut. It was just less withholding from your paycheck. Congress has yet to actually pass a corresponding tax cut. If they fail to do so, then the tax rate will remain the same and you may owe a little more tax (since less was taken out) or your tax refund may be a little less (again, since less was taken out).

Posted by: James Danley | September 1, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Actually, that small increase in your check is both a decrease in your witholding, and a decrease in your taxes. You won’t end up owing that amount when you do your taxes next year.

Posted by: Stephen Daugherty | September 1, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

“Too many of you people have no idea about war and evil–and some of you do not even think evil exists, preferring to claim people are just “misdirected” or “abused.
I wish all you sophisticated “armchair soldiers” could have spent a few days in VietNam…”
Posted by: Dave T
————————————–
I’m with you Dave.
During the first Gulf war, our squad detained this guy who claimed to be a farmer on a desolate road while his wife and kids was sitting in the car car near by. We had a strong suspicion that he had planted an IED meant for the convoy behind us but can’t proved it because he got nothing on him and in his car. So we told him we’ll let him and his family go if he would drive down the road the way that he came from.
He of course refused so we pretend to force his wife with his kids to drive down this road. That’s when he broked down and told us where he planted the explosive.
No one wants to scare the woman and children but in war, sometime ugly things can’t be avoided.
When I hear clueless libs lecturing about what is right and wrong, it makes me want to laugh in his/her face.

Posted by: Reality2009 | September 2, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Directly from the Internal Revenue Service’s website:
Information for Individuals
Check Your Withholding
How will the Making Work Pay tax credit affect you?
Most wage earners will benefit immediately — or already have — with a larger paycheck as a result of the changes made to the federal income tax withholding tables to implement the Making Work Pay tax credit. Some people may find that the changes built into the withholding tables result in less tax being withheld than they prefer.
If you’re not eligible for the Making Work Pay tax credit, withholding changes could mean a smaller refund next spring. A limited number of people, including those who usually receive very small refunds, could in some situations owe a small amount rather than receiving a refund. Those who should pay particular attention to their withholding include:
Pensioners (see more information under Pensioners, below)
Married couples with two incomes
Individuals with multiple jobs
Dependents
Some Social Security recipients who work
Workers without valid Social Security numbers
The Making Work Pay tax credit, normally a maximum of $400 for working individuals and $800 for working married couples, is reduced by the amount of any Economic Recovery Payment ($250 per eligible recipient of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, Railroad Retirement or Veteran’s benefits) or Special Credit for Certain Government Retirees ($250 per eligible federal or state retiree) that you receive. If you are affected by this reduction, you should review your withholding to ensure that sufficient funds have been withheld to meet your tax obligation.
If you believe your current withholding is not appropriate for your personal situation, you can perform a quick check using the IRS withholding calculator. Adjustments can be made by filing a revised Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate, with your employer.
Pensioners
Pensioners do not qualify for the Making Work Pay credit, unless they receive earned income. However, because the February withholding tables also apply to pensioners, the IRS has provided pension plans with an optional adjustment procedure. If you are a pensioner with questions about your withholding, contact your pension plan administrator.
If desired, pensioners can adjust their withholding by filing Form W-4P, Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments.
Self-Employed
Self-employed individuals can also benefit now from the Making Work Pay tax credit by evaluating their expected income tax liability, allowing for this tax credit if they are eligible, and making the appropriate adjustment in the amount of their regularly scheduled estimated tax payments.

Posted by: James Danley | September 2, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

AND/OR TO BE ATTACKED
Posted by: Manitu
wow… we get a choice?
OK..I vote NO on future attacks on America, how ’bout you…

Posted by: + or - | September 2, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

The title says: Obama is having greater succes at removing terrorists than Bush.
this is true since obama replaced chainy and gang.

Posted by: John the truthful | September 2, 2009, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Obama Is Having Greater Success Taking Terrorists Out of Commission Than Bush Did?
I can’t stop laughing. Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, woo, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha………Too funny.

Posted by: Detr | September 2, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am

I agree:
Ever since Obama was placed in control, we have had no more of these silly terror alerts, terror level yellow, orange and all that baloney.

Posted by: Joanna the white | September 2, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am

I think liberals/democrats are seeing the Great Obama as some kind of king but people listen up NOT ALL IS IN LOVE WITH THAT FOOL! As for terrorist attacks, Please, Bush was in OFFICE 8 YEARS NOT 6 MONTHS AND COMPARING OBAM’S 6 months in office with 8 years of no attacks is a joke! Bush did protect us for 8 years no matter how much liberals hate that fact. About the economy, Bush did bring up the debt but everyone has forgotten the fact that we had a 9/11 attack that shut down this country from one shore to the other and he bailed out the airlines because 9/11 almost destroyed them plus he gave every family memer from 9/11 attacks money, LOTS OF MONEY! The economy was weak already and 9/11 almost destroyed our economy plus we had the worse natural disasters to hit this country in history, one after the other and in each one, hands were out for MONEY! Democrats/ liberals keep forgetting they were the ones with their hands out, I guess it slipped their little minds. The American people have finally decided to wake up and see the real King Obama and real democratic party and people no matter what your great leader say’s or what liberal groups and democrats say WE’RE NOT GOING TO GO AWAY OR SHUT UP, ACCEPT IT BECAUSE WE’RE HERE TO STAY AND WE ARE GOING TO GIVE YOUR GREAT LEADER THE SAME RESPECT LIBERALS SHOWED BUSH EVERYDAY HE WAS IN OFFICE, we’ll accept him and support his polices just like democrats did for 8 years, we will LOVE THE GREAT ONE AS MUCH OR MORE THEN DEMOCRATS LOVED BUSH, I’d say we’ll love him even more the democrats loved Bush. And I promise his time in office will be just as joyful as Bush’s 8 years in office, THAT I PROMISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sandy | September 2, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Elizabeth —– Your paycheck does not show a tax cut. You listen to our president too much. What you have is less “withholding”, but at the end of the year, you will pay the exact same amount in taxes. It’s a little trick to make us feel good. Trust me, when you pay your taxes, you will not see any cut.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 2, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

First, Jones makes is sound as though Pres Obama has a chrystal ball.
what Jones doesn’t state is that these intelligence gathering units have been on the ground Intel searching during the Bush Administration. These sort of tasks take time, and cannot glean the data they purport in a mere 5 months.
Secondly, he backs up his comments with no names of these high value targets purportedly apprehended or killed….This is mere Hype at best.
Lastly, “RETIRED” – Rank no exception, is just that. Your classification for security clearance is revoked and one has no further access to sensative data such as this….SO who’s HIS source ?
BOGUS Report…IMO.

Posted by: justanobserver | September 2, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Ever since Obama was placed in control, we have had no more of these silly terror alerts, terror level yellow, orange and all that baloney.
Posted by: Joanna the white
An aweful lot of warnings about the “swine flu” though! Those terror alerts are there for a reason, but Obama believes Bush did EVERYTHING wrong and will probably reverse those too.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 2, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

lfrichar | Sep 2, 2009 9:07:18 AM – An aweful lot of warnings about the “swine flu” though! Those terror alerts are there for a reason, but Obama believes Bush did EVERYTHING wrong and will probably reverse those too. ———— How dare the World Health Organization, The CDC and President attempt to let people know that there could be a serious epidemic! Would you please reference when President Obama stated “Bush did EVERYTHING wrong”. Also and lastly Mr. Ridge has already stated that the terror alerts many times got raised for political reasons, so any reversal of that would be welcome!

Posted by: Try the truth | September 2, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Try the truth wrote: “Also and lastly Mr. Ridge has already stated that the terror alerts many times got raised for political reasons, so any reversal of that would be welcome!”
That is totally untrue! On August 31, 2009, Tom Ridge said, regarding the discussion of raising the alert just prior to the 2004 election: “A lot of people are hyperventilating about that passage. This was one of several times that the process worked. People express their opinion. The process worked. We didn’t go up — that’s — and it was designed so that nobody could pressure anybody to do anything. A consensus was reached.”
Tom Ridge NEVER said that ANY of the raises of the alert were for political purposes.

Posted by: James Danley | September 2, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Jones said “It’s very easy to leave office and say, ‘Well, no other disaster happened on the size and scope of 9/11, so we did our job well.’ Well, maybe they did, maybe they didn’t.”
Using the same logic, it is easy to say our rapid stimulus action turned this nation around. Well, maybe it did, maybe it didn’t, maybe it just hit bottom and eventually the only way is up!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 2, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Using the same logic, it is easy to say our rapid stimulus action turned this nation around. Well, maybe it did, maybe it didn’t, maybe it just hit bottom and eventually the only way is up!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | Sep 2, 2009 12:33:17 PM
========================================
Because using logic and understanding that recessions are cyclical via Economics 101 makes too much sense!
I am still trying to figure out how Obama is taking out more terrorist than Bush did. Or how the threat of murdering terrorist was NOT a big one until Obama took office or how NO OTHER NATION was alarmed or taking action before Obama took office. LOL…last time I checked they were and were effectively taking action—-
Wait, You mean he is killing them?
What? Where is the ACLU now? Why are they not up in arms that Obama is killing terrorist? Those poor murdering terrorist need to be defended and have representation in an American court against Obama because he killed them!
Murdering people—isn’t Obama against the death penalty?
See how stupid that sounds, but alas I realize it is only good if used against Bush and his administration.
Question Obama and his BS policies–you’re a racist and a right-wing terrorist!

Posted by: KMDay | September 2, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

The title says: Obama is having greater succes at removing terrorists than Bush.
this is true since obama replaced chainy and gang.
Posted by: John the truthful | Sep 2, 2009 6:40:18 AM
=======================================
Interesting: Bush and Chaney take out murdering terrorist and they should be brought up on War Crimes but when Obama does it he is successful and doing a good job?
Someone explain this logic, please!

Posted by: KMDay | September 2, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Obama’s policies will neither bankrupt the country nor make us less safe.
As a matter of FACT — his policies will serve to improve the overall economy, lower the deficit and keep us MUCH more secure within our borders.Posted by: dassis | Sep 1, 2009 8:17:37 PM
Interesting considering what he is doing and by the CBO, he is increasing the DEBT in the trillion and by his own calculation was $2 Trillion off. Not million, not billion but TRILLION! So again, lower the deficit how?
How are his policies improving the economy? Recessions are cyclical, that is proven in all countries among all time frames. Did the first stimulus package help, the second one? The one he said we had better put out there or unemployment would reach over 8%…..now it is over 9% and in some states over 15%?
The 250,000+ jobs he was going to create over the summer that NEVER happened?
He is increasing troop need in Afghanistan, a war that COST MONEY like the one in Iraq everyone was complaining about. Maybe you can justify the Afghan war for the rest of us and why billions are spend over there and soldier lives lost since Obama has take office is over 260.
I do not want to hear about Bush and the Iraq War, I already know your answer—I want a justification for the Afghan war and the billions spent there.
How is he keeping us much more secure in our borders? Have you seen what is taking place right at the border of Mexico and the US? How many hundreds have been murdered there because of the Mexican drug cartels, to which are now spreading into the US because of LAX border regulations?

Posted by: KMDay | September 2, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

How dare the World Health Organization, The CDC and President attempt to let people know that there could be a serious epidemic! Would you please reference when President Obama stated “Bush did EVERYTHING wrong”. Also and lastly Mr. Ridge has already stated that the terror alerts many times got raised for political reasons, so any reversal of that would be welcome!
Posted by: Try the truth | Sep 2, 2009 10:02:31 AM
There were also many who were in that same room who have called Ridge a liar….so maybe you can explain that? I can…..book sales=$$$$$
Now……. The CDC estimates that on average 36,000 American die from the “regular” flu annually. Where is the outcry for this? 36,000 is a lot of American lives lost, yet why not rush to deal with this issue?
The Swine Flu is a variation of the “regular” flu virus with the difference that Americans do not have immunity for this type of virus. We have “some” immunity to the “regular” flu because we are constantly exposed to it, which means that if we come down with the flu, the extent will not be as harsh as if we have never been exposed. This is why they are saying older American’s will not have it as rough because they were a one point to exposed to the Swine Flu virus decades ago when the outbreak occurred.
Funny thing (and not in a laughing manner), it is a VIRUS, which means there are NO CURES for viruses because they MUTATE constantly! What are you going to do, lock everyone down until the virus goes dormant again?
The vast majority of those who have died from the Swine Flu thus far had an UNDERLYING health issue already, which we all know increase your risk of becoming more ill or possibly dying.

Posted by: KMDay | September 2, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

So……what has this individual been drinking?????

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 2, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Angie, just show me one thing Obama has done on his own to make America better, don’t worry I’ll wait……..nothing huh? Bush had more class in his little finger than Obama has or will ever have…the people are awake, and all plans are to take America Back!!

Posted by: lyineyes1956 | September 2, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

I believe that Obama/Jones may have a different definition of terrorists than the “average Americans that actually pay their taxes”. Obama is attempting to take us down America, and under no circumstances will be succeed!

Posted by: lyineyes1956 | September 2, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I think that a special prosecutor should be appointed. Just to be fair, I think that EVERY administration should have a special prosecutor appointed to review their actions while in office. If Bush/Cheney is guilty…go to jail! If Obama/Biden is guilty…go to jail!…….I’m afraid we’re going to end up with a LOT of people in jail.

Posted by: Eric Holland | September 2, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

If we are to judge the actions of anyone or any group, we must judge them based on the standards that existed at the time of the actions. In this case, we would be violating that level of fairness if criminal proceedings were to take place. If these CIA agents broke the law back then, they should have been prosecuted then, or at least have been prosecuted “fairly” several years ago, when this information was released to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. Since we don’t have the same fears today that we had in the days, weeks and months following 9/11, we can’t possibly judge their actions in that context. This is a dead issue and a waste of our tax dollars. The Attorney General should be spending his time going after corporate crooks and government officials who tanked our economy, but that is my opinion.

Posted by: Gary | September 3, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Jake: I would like to refer you to the Atlanta Journal Constituion today sec. B page l where the republicans are planning to amend the state constitution to prevent democrats in Washington from enforcing health care reform in Georgia. They plan to us the 10 ammendment to prevent Georgia from having to participate in any federal reform that passes. They are deciding whether or not we get health care…who gave them that authority? Talk about socialism…this is it in spades. I think democrates need to address this problem and start making noises like the republicans do. It’s time to get off your butts if you want health care.

Posted by: talmag | September 4, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

OMG, talmag I think you need to read the 10th amendment! It means that the people and the states reserve all the rights to control whatever’s not specifically delegated to the federal government (and the fed powers are VERY limited, and do not include health care – Jefferson himself even commented on who controls one’s health..hint..not the federal govt). I’m not Republican, but if that’s what they are doing, good for them! The power to mandate, change or provide health care is first with the people, lastly with the states. Congress and the Pres are overstepping their bounds.

Posted by: Liberty_Chick | September 5, 2009, 1:44 am 1:44 am

I thought the Marines were immune to “cool-aid”.
The general presents opinions as facts without supporting evidence. It reminds me of the: ” I was not there and I do not know all the facts but I know the police actions were stupid”.
Are these really our elite thinkers? I am not impressed.

Posted by: Lil | September 6, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

If he has, it is because the Bush administration put the wheels in motion before Obama became President.

Posted by: jim 234 | September 6, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Come on people. Bipartisanship is a bunch of BS. I never supported Bush/Cheney not because of their ideals but how they carried out their ideals. One day Cheney is part of the legislative branch next day he’s part of the executive branch. A different branch everyday depending on what group was trying to ask him questions.
They lied and bended around the constitution to see fit. This “War” is to distract Americans from what they are really doing.
Filling their pockets through our naivety.
You want to be strong, Replubican, Democrat, or whatever, support your President. Don’t hope he dies or suffers. When he suffers so will you, so will you.

Posted by: Mike | September 6, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

For those too young to remember(look it up!) the school lunch program (another federal failure?)was instituted with Republican support because the Pentagon experts advised Congress that American military recruits needed better nourishment to be better soldiers.
Given the GOP arguments against health care reform maybe we should ask the military again if the nation would be better served by recruits who had basic health care.
Against federal support for education, right? The military has already testified that it is essential to our security that recruits have better education.
American security cannot be maintained without healthy and educated military recruits. Or maybe those same conservatives think that they can outsource American security from a coalition of the felons they seem to have recruited at Halliburton and Wackenhut. This is not a discussion I think they really want to have!
BRING IT ON…

Posted by: lwcata | September 6, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Obama hasnt been able to get those who are our friends to mobilize but he’s a killer when it comes to terrorists? Hmm seems to me like all i see is him trying to set them free just like the one he let go 3 weeks ago. what a lieing left leaning debauch this arttical. ABC you have reached a new low
Obama will be proud of you

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

title says: Obama is having greater succes at removing terrorists than Bush.
this is true since obama replaced chainy and gang.
Posted by: John the truthful | Sep 2, 2009 6:40:18 AM
=======================================
Interesting: Bush and Chaney take out murdering terrorist and they should be brought up on War Crimes but when Obama does it he is successful and doing a good job?
Someone explain this logic, please!
=======================================
OBAMANATION IS THE MESSIAH AND YOU SHOULD BOW DOWN TO HIS WILL AND THANK OBAMA FOR ALL HE HAS TAKEN AWAY> YOUR MONEY IS SINFUL AND YOUR SOULS WOULD HAVE BEEN LOST BUT HIS GRACIUNESS IS A BLESSING AMEN!

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Angie, just show me one thing Obama has done on his own to make America better, don’t worry I’ll wait……..nothing huh? Bush had more class in his little finger than Obama has or will ever have…the people are awake, and all plans are to take America Back!!
========================================
He accepted van jones resignation
it was the only good thing i could think of

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

COME ON folks BUSH was the worst President ever….Until Obama was elected and now bush is the second worst President ever

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

“to say Bush precipitated the economic collapse is like saying Clinton precipitated 911. you can’t have it both ways.”
It’s worth pointing out (in response) that both the economic collapse and 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch.
=====================================
seems to me that the dem’s where in charge of both the house and the senate and they where in charge of fanny and freddie and as i remember the dems said that freddie and fanny where an example to the finaical market and then barney franks went as far as to say that freddie and fanny where sound and then the bottom fell out, none of this was bush’s doing it was the dems get your story right. dems where in control when it fell and freddie and fanny werent under bush’s control but barney frank is directly responsable….

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Obama is a head of bush in 1 way
bush used to be the worst president ever. a title obama easyly captured

Posted by: Phillip Bias | September 6, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

You are kidding me right with this left wing bull!!!! HAs Hussein even had a controversy to annoy anyone??? He has been too busy kissing their backsides!!Tell the truth!!!!! We were never safer than when Bush was in there!!!

Posted by: lonette59 | September 7, 2009, 5:24 am 5:24 am

You cant take the country back because you are not capable of winning an election. The Gop is all washed up. Even Laura Bush said she loves OBAMA, and so does JR. In response to more class,..cmon the man is a redneck from Texas,..he got a DUI

Posted by: Mark | September 8, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Now that is a laughable matter! You get rid of torture techniques, you bow down to foreign leaders and you don’t even know what you are saying half the time and the country is more safe! I almost fell out of my lazyboy. Thanks for the laugh!

Posted by: jacob | September 9, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

The media continues its constant propaganda assault. This drivel in the news is so blatantly bias anymore it has become comical, tabloid quality. The headlines themselves are so slanted as to negate the need to even open the link to the story. I GET it allready. To you Lefties no analytical stories on Obama allowed. Bush bad, Obama good. You rubber stamped your support for him from day one and will continue to write falasies until you elevate him to above your other false prophet Martyrs tha are above reproach. MLK JFK etc.

Posted by: Don | September 11, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Enough already with the mindless horse manure and hate of President Obama. He will go down in history as a pivotal person in American history. The Guy who stopped the drift of this Country to oligarchy. He will be one of the great ones. If you are dumb enough to think Bush/Cheney had it right, please explain why our priority of effort was regime change in Iraq when we had very sketchy intelligence about Saddam Hussiens intent regards terrorism while at the same time we had solid intell regards the the organization and location of those behind the 9/11 attacks. Something is very wrong with that picture. To top things off now we have a resurgence of the Taliban. Obama will have no choice but to put more American service people in harms way to do a job that old ‘W’finish ;- Cheney or McCain could not articulate. Obama’s lot is to clean up behind these GOP buffoons in the Executive and Congress. The way you can tell the GOP is lying is watch there lips move. The party of Lincoln has become a greedy, thieving, collection of old ‘bigots’ trying to maintain the status quo, while the rest of America and indeed the world suffers. May God bless President Obama and America.

Posted by: Walt Whitfield | September 11, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

If we were so safe under Bush and Cheney, why did 9/11 happen in the first place?

Posted by: foreveryman | September 11, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

In conventional wars of the past, intelligence played a supportive part, with blood and sacrifice combined with luck achieving the victories. In this conflict between extremists and Western influence, intelligence combined with traditional law enforcement may be key to neutralizing extremist advances. Unfortunately, the US validated some extremist claims through lowering its standards on human rights. Hopefully we can regain the “high ground”. The US also needs to beware of falling into the trap of manipulating international law enforcement entities for national ends, a “Nazi’s used INTERPOL to hunt Jews in World War II” scenario. As far as the Obama administration’s actions, many of their successes were from actions taken prior to their advent, and they have been smart enough (or lazy) to let them stay in place.

Posted by: k. daraa | September 12, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

SORRY BUT i dont beleive the general. i think the obama administration is hurting the country in the fight against terrorism. they are going after the CIA agents who might have done torture. but Im sorry, torture is what happened to mc cain in the vietnam as a POW.
Mark as for you saying bush is from texas. He isnt. he was born in New Haven, CT

Posted by: james | September 12, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

SORRY FOR MY TYPO ERRORS !!!

Posted by: amind2think | September 13, 2009, 4:26 am 4:26 am

“SORRY BUT i dont beleive the general.”
Well, there you go… case closed. What’s left to discuss??

Posted by: MalcolmT | September 13, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

There was no al-qaida (poor spelling) threat in Iraq before the current war, now it is a significant problem, their numbers are much higher now than on 9/10. This will be the legacy of the Bush/Cheney anti terror efforts; we helped raise a generation of terrorists that the next several presidents will have to deal with.

Posted by: brian simmons | September 13, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

It is really fun to sit back and listen to the whining of the liberal pundnts, that have no Idea what they are talking about having never had to survive on their own, or been in combat, because they were to busy heading for Canada.

Posted by: Apachelx | September 18, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

The only thing that the dieing conservatives have left is hate. When shown the facts that all your proposed reasons for your hate are false you still hate… this is because you will not admit your real reasons for your hate even to your self. He is a black man sitting higher than you.

Posted by: Cowboy71 | September 18, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Does anyone know why they hate us? Does anyone know why these “terrorists” call us (or at least used to) the “great Satan”? A soldier friend of mine went to Iraq and Afghanistan and said when he got back that he never faced a “terrorist” in battle, only other soldiers. Anyone remember 1984? Anyone worried that we don’t have all the facts here? Anyone? no apparently, because most of these comments deal with a man no longer in power and calling people racist, both of which are a waste of time, and/or a diversion, and/or an ignorant blasting of those who oppose your viewpoints. If you had a problem with what bush did, why don’t you have a problem with what obama is doing? What is he doing so differently then what bush was? Same policies. NO ONE protests the war anymore. WHY IS THAT? I could enlighten more of you but it is best that you seek these answers yourself, far from any ideological, political, narrow minded, biased viewpoints that most of you seem to repeat, its like watching the news cause all i see are soundbites written down. There are few real, original, and independent thought in any of these comments. I fear for my country even more after reading these thoughts.

Posted by: Jazzy_Pickle | September 22, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am

I looked at this, and I am concerned at the representations–there is a war in Afghanistan that I believe is shaking the foundations of terrorism at some level, so there is an increase of activity, more security infrastructure built up in part because of Bush, and so more bad guys are being caught. I give credit to our national security for that, but it hasn’t proven that it is really up to a new threat. Not sure these talks internationally are viewed as anything but BS among the populations of other countries. I think we are the great Satan because of cultural issues that come out of Hollywood, etc. in part in the sense of the consumer nature and its impact internationally, not just politics. This report by the National Security Advisor sounds cocky to me. I’m concerned, and I don’t care about the politics anymore. We’re not safe.

Posted by: Karri | September 22, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Walt Whitfield, I couldn’t have said it better. Cowboy71, same goes for you. God Bless President Obama and his efforts. God please CREATE A CLEAN HEART FOR THE HATE-FILLED GOP. Thank you.

Posted by: TexMex4Obama | September 22, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Keep up the good work, President Obama. Thank you, Retired Marine General Jim Jones, Sir, for setting Cheney and gang straight. I’m so tired of his like getting away with their negative and misguided views. When someone of your caliber sets the record straight, it speaks volumes. Now, all of a sudden,though, the GOP bloggers are spewing their negative views about how we are NOT to believe our National Security Adviser who happens to be a Retired Marine General. How do they figure they, or for that matter, Cheney knows more about this subject than he? . . . Go figure. . .Laughabale. Tsk-tsk-tsk.

Posted by: TexMex4Obama | September 22, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

It was Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians for 50 years that created suicide bombers/Osama Bin Laden etc!

Posted by: Mike Fisher | September 25, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Why are the GOP so hate-filled? It seems to me they have much in common with the terrorists they proclain to hate! We are all Americans and we should behave in such a manner. Godbless President Obama and God bless America.

Posted by: Andrew | September 28, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Nine months in office: when liberals want to tout an issue, Obama gets all the credit. When things are going poorly, we are reminded that we are ‘unfairly’ blaming him and must ‘give things a chance to work’. How patently hypocritical.

Posted by: gobnait | September 30, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

It seems to me that everyone on here acts like they know everything about the situation. Surprise! The government, military, etc. don’t tell you everything. We may have gone into Iraq for other reasons (not oil) but terrorism was a convenient excuse. The left never talks about how girls can now go to school where they couldn’t before. You also don’t here about women voting for the first time. Why all the negative and absolutely NONE of the positive?

Posted by: Jace | October 4, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Its political spin to characterize Obama’s approach as being more successful than that of the Bush administration. Our intel community began to rebuild itself in the post 9/11 world, and this effort takes a considerable amount of time. What we are seeing – in terms of HUMINT – is these networks starting to mature and produce vaild, real-time intelligence information. To attribute this success to a sitting president is simply political “spin.”

Posted by: Jack | October 6, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Why are the DEM so hate-filled? It seems to me they have much in common with the terrorists they proclain to hate! We are all Americans and we should behave in such a manner. Godless President Obama and God less America.

Posted by: Horner | December 4, 2009, 4:32 am 4:32 am

I love how the right always tries to manipulate facts to their convenience. When the economy fails, They say “Bush isn’t president. This is Obama’s economy”… but when Obama takes down the top two of Al Quaeda, suddenly it was all Bush’s doing. Why don’t you guys pick a story and stick to it?

Posted by: v1cious | October 2, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.