By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 13, 2009 2:10pm

Clinton Dodges Question About Losing Her Cool in Congo

ABC News' Kirit Radia reports: At a press conference in Liberia today Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked to explain why she lost her temper earlier on this week when a Congolese student asked her what her husband thought of a Chinese trade deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo. She effectively ignored the query today, when asked what was going through her mind during the incident, and whether she had any regrets.  Instead, Secretary Clinton chose to answer only the first part of the question asking her to reflect on her whirlwind 7 countries in 11 days tour of Africa that concludes tomorrow in the island nation of Cape Verde. "I've had a great time on this trip, I opened this newspaper and I think it looks like she's having a great time and from my perspective the most important part of this trip are the relationships that we have built, the commitments that we have discussed, the problems that we have honestly explored," Clinton answered, "We have not shied away from raising the difficult problems that exist and stand in the way of the people of Africa realizing their potential." A portion of her response can be seen HERE. On Monday the male student asked Secretary Clinton, through a translator, what "Mr. Clinton" thought of the deal. "You want me to tell you what my husband thinks?" Clinton replied, clearly irked by the thought of being her husband Bill's spokeswoman. "My husband is not secretary of state, I am," she replied. "If you want my opinion I will tell you my opinion. I am not going to be channeling my husband." Clinton aides initially said the question had been mistranslated, but later suggested that the student misspoke. He and Clinton chatted after the event and the State Department says there were no hard feelings on either side. Either way, the notion of Secretary Clinton's deference to her husband clearly touched a nerve with America's top diplomat. Last week ago the former President stole his wife's thunder when he appeared in North Korea to rescue two American journalists detained there. His trip came just as Secretary Clinton embarked her Africa trip, one she hoped would shine light on the plight of the continent. The State Department on Tuesday tried to put her remarks into context. "An abiding theme that she has in her trip to Africa is empowering women. As the question was posed to her, it was posed in a way that said, 'I want to get the views of two men, but not you, the secretary of state.' And I think it obviously — she reacted to that," spokesman PJ Crowley said.

User Comments

I imagine that people who want to imagine that it is some staggeringly horrible character flaw are going to see it that way.
But, you know what? As the question was posed, she gave an entirely appropriate response.
As far as Secretaries of State go… she’s doing a great job.

Posted by: gobot | August 13, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I typically hate the Clintons, but Hillary here gave a good response here. We are the more powerful country and we don’t have to be soft and squishy and polite about ugly blatant insulting sexism. The question was clearly sexist. She gave a clear and firm answer that I’m sure made the audience notice the latent sexism in the question. Good for her. Being a diplomat doesn’t mean being spineless.

Posted by: dj | August 13, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

-As far as Secretaries of State go… she’s doing a great job.-
The PRC agrees.

Posted by: Lisbon | August 13, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I imagine that people who want to imagine that she is doing a great job will see this as an entirely appropriate response.
I think she seemed a bit testy which doesn’t quite rise to the level of “staggeringly horrible character flaw”.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 13, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Headline: “Clinton visits Liberia, backs woman president”
Hillary then proceeded to say that her Liberian birth certificate can be found on FactCheck.
LOL

Posted by: Hillary | August 13, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

The question was clearly sexist. She gave a clear and firm answer that I’m sure made the audience notice the latent sexism in the question. Good for her. Being a diplomat doesn’t mean being spineless.
Posted by: dj | Aug 13, 2009 2:34:42 PM
***
I totally agree, and her response to the question here focused on the important things. I think she’s doing a great job. She’s a tough cookie at times. The SoS should be.

Posted by: Alysona | August 13, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

When have we had a Secretary of State who criticized the PRC?
It’s been a long time since the US has stood up for human rights in China.
But, yeah, I wish Obama were harder on China. But Wall Street and years of climbing debt have tied our hands, to a certain extent. We simply have little leverage to use against China beyond some tough words.

Posted by: gobot | August 13, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Tina Brown said that “(Hillary)’s feeling fat and needs to hit the gym.”
What an absurd statement.

Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 13, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Can’t we all give Hillary a break? She’s doing great work in Africa…

Posted by: matt | August 13, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Why can’t abc cover the substance of her press conference? I am getting tired of “news” organizations that do not give any in depth coverage of important issues anymore. Only PBS seems to be able and willing to do that.

Posted by: Bianca44 | August 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

What was so bad about what she said. It’s a male dominated society asking the female secretary what her husband thinks. She had every right to stick it to him.

Posted by: brian | August 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Good grief, this was a question from a foreign student. You would think she would have been much more graceful in answering a question like that. It’s no wonder her partner did some of the things he did.

Posted by: ken | August 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

It’s not What you say , it’s how you say it. What happened to her poise & dignity? Her job is not to champion womens rights, but represent the United States in the best light possible.
She looked like “The ugly American” very resentful , and pitching a fit, like a spoiled kid. The poor guy asking the question can’t speak english,
and she should have cut the question some slack. Now she has drawn the wrong kind of attention.

Posted by: ZK | August 13, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Do you people ever write about anything important?

Posted by: Roguerrrunner | August 13, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

If I were HRC, I would be mad too.. knowing that if I had listened to my husband.. I would be the POTUS.. yep, he’s a know-it-all.. but, you know what.. it’s not just talk.. he does ‘know it all’!!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | August 13, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Jake, can you please report on the reason she is there and not give these people an outlet to bash her? You all are completely ignoring the amazing work she is doing. The only time you referenced why she is there is when you quoted her!
There are only two types of people posting comments here: the ones that hate her and the ones that hate you for not doing your job. Get a clue.

Posted by: Get a clue Jake | August 13, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

I love how often the Left resorts to the good ‘ol, “what I meant to say was” or, in this case, it must have been mistranslated. Sure, blame the third party for getting it wrong in order to excuse your outburst. Classic!

Posted by: S | August 13, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

I reaally don’t blame her. And I really don’t like her.

Posted by: LongT | August 13, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Just take a look at the pictures of Hillary at the time. She was having a bad hair day and was a little bloated. It’s nothing unusual. She just wasn’t feeling pretty. Perhaps the pants suit was just a bit tight.

Posted by: Willie12345 | August 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

This article is totaly biased. shame on ABC News. where has journalistic integrity gone? Sec. of State Clinton has important things to discuss, and a misunderstanding with a local student’s question is not at the top of the list. Besides, why should she answer on behalf of her husband, they are not the same person, she has her own thoughts and she is the top diplomat in this country. I think the political right is trying to put Sec. of State Clinton under heavy scrutiny as payback for that shameful Palin debacle. I think she does an excellent job and is the right person for the job.

Posted by: fred | August 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

And she’s an ambassador of the United States and third in line to be president? Condi at least had more class.

Posted by: Robert | August 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Why do you have to “hate the Clintons” or anyone else for that matter? Is your life so meaningless that you have to hate people? Life is too short to waste time on hating another human. Pretty sad, pretty pathetic and pretty petty.

Posted by: Andrea | August 13, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Just another example of HRC flying off the handle. Hillary blew her fuse when she didn’t have to, and now the world is abuzz over her short temper, and the “raw nerve” she still has toward Bill. I do not consider her good Secretary of State material. I wish Obama had picked someone else.

Posted by: Tom | August 13, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

hillary is clearly jealous of bill!haha this is great stuff.i think the years of denial about his extra marital affairs is catching up with the old lady.

Posted by: fatankles | August 13, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

S cried “I love how often the Left resorts to the good ‘ol, “what I meant to say was” or, in this case, it must have been mistranslated. ”
Do you love it when the Right resorts to amnesia? “I don’t remember that” “I don’t recall that”.
As for being mistranslated – well that was what happened. Under the circumstances I would be tick if I held that job and somebody asks what my husband’s view was. They met afterward and there were no hard feelings. Story over.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

It is obvious to me that HRC doesn’t want this job.. she wants Obama’s job.. well, there’s only one thing to do..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | August 13, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Too bad she was right!

Posted by: Ken | August 13, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Why don’t you jackals leave Hillary alone? A mistake was made. When she realized what happened, she apologized. It’s over. Let it go.

Posted by: Michele | August 13, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I like this side of Hillary and hope to see more of it. Go Hillary, you’re doing a great job!

Posted by: DKR | August 13, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Tax payers in this country right now could not care less about AFRICA! For many years our tax dollars have funneled into a country that even wiht all our dollars ,still is unable to controll it’s own destiny! FEED the exploding population! Or even try!

Posted by: william | August 13, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Hillary is a woman and no matter what title she holds, she is still not a man. Hillary knows this is a man’s world. Questions like this absolutely do hit a nerve and I don’t blame her for standing up and telling them like it is because it’s fact. She’s there, she’s representing the United States, she knows her stuff, ask the questions of her. Not Bill’s opinion or any other man’s for that matter. She did the absolute right thing.

Posted by: rkt | August 13, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Robert (3:51 PM); Hillary is not third in line to the presidency. It’s worse than that!!!!!!!

Posted by: LongT | August 13, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Other than those that sell media to the public. Who else really cares what HRC does as Secretary of State. Obama picked her, all politics. Just as well ignore her. I feel sorry for the ol’ gal. Everyone reading these threads knows what she really needs.

Posted by: Glenn Babcock | August 13, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

For all who was listening to the question, they now know to ask only questions that pertain to Hillary and her job! You news people need to print something that is going to be helpful to the people!

Posted by: Mary johnson | August 13, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

What is all the “amazing work” this
woman is doing, ‘Get a clue Jake’?
She doesn’t have the even temperament
needed for the position, she has
a big chip on her shoulder, and
reminds us all everyday why she lost
to Obama. She needs a quiet year
off, living daily with Bill…but
we all know he would never sign up
for that gig.

Posted by: Trajan | August 13, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

The question was pretty darn insulting. She didn’t “loose control”, she simply said firmly how it was.
She was in a part of the world where many hold the view that a woman should only give her husband’s opinion (and hold no opinion of her own).
“Loosing control” in my book involves a lot more than firmly stating the facts with barely a raised voice. Come on, she certainly wasn’t “screaming”.

Posted by: John | August 13, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I have never ever been a Hillary Clinton fan and still am not. Also, I am not a “feminist”. However, I certainly don’t blame her for saying what she said given what she thought was the question. If it had turned out that the question really was “what does your husband think?” then what would you expect anyone to say? That would be a really tacky and, frankly, stupid question. She’s not a child and she was the one giving the press conference or whatever it was so it should be her giving the answers. How ridiculous!

Posted by: KMason | August 13, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I don’t blame her for the response concerning channeling Bill, but her comments about the 2000 election and her implication that the outcome was because Bush’s brother was the governor of the the swing state of Florida in a foreign venue was dumb.

Posted by: LongT | August 13, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I know that will get some of you wound up, but it served absolutely no purpose. Just yet another mea culpa moment for the administration.

Posted by: LongT | August 13, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

And people wanted her to be President?? That’s a joke.

Posted by: Kevin | August 13, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

It’s simple but strategic. Mrs. Clinton wants to be asked to step down as Secretary of State so she can focus on her bid to become the Democratic nominee for president in 2012.

Posted by: DaveM | August 13, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

You feminist apologists should calm
down. There isn’t a group of guys
out there who wouldn’t like her in
the “anchor” position on their
tug-of-war team.

Posted by: Trajan | August 13, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

why don’t you get off her(hillary) back over nothing.

Posted by: robert rosia | August 13, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Mrs. Clinton did NOT do the right thing. Look again at the video.
Is that the proper image for a Secretary of State? Did you ever see Madelyn Albright or Condeleeza Rice look or act like that when they had Mrs. Clinton’s job?
Yes, diplomacy is, no doubt, still a man’s world. But, other women have managed the Sec. of State job more diplomatically.
Bear in mind that Mrs. Clinton is the same woman who lied at least twice about coming under fire in Bosnia and who has made other ridiculous statements.
If she can’t stand the heat – properly stated or not – she should get out of the kitchen.

Posted by: Wayne Corey | August 13, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

how embarrassing for this woman. She is the epitome of a bitter, illogical, emotional woman with a huge chip on her shoulder and who has not accomplished anything worthwhile for the public good.

Posted by: fructoseyou | August 13, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Let’s take some of the billions the US gives to Israel and give them to Africa instead.

Posted by: John Bester | August 13, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Can we give the woman a break? How would any of us feel if in her position, we were asked publicly and worldwide not about our opinion, but about our spouse’s opinion on an important subject. I am a male who likes Obama and voted for him from the start. I am not a feminist nor a Clinton hater- Bill OR Hillary. I think she replied just like anybody else would in such an important job who had any self respect.

Posted by: hardtimes09 | August 13, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Regardless of what any of you say in public, there is NO way you would have tolerated the question that was posed to her by the translator. Sure sure, you can tell us how you could “rise to the occasion”… “take the high road”… anything you want really.. but none of you were THERE in THAT situation. I would bet 20 million dollars any of you nay-sayers would have ‘flunked’. Anyone understanding football: I make a GREAT coach on Monday morning.

Posted by: Troy Street | August 13, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

It’s okay Hillary. Perfectly understandable. Your doing a great job. Just don’t be promising money to questionable friends.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 13, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Hillary is a lousy Secretary of State.
She was a crooked lawyer who rode the coat tails of a political hopeful and wound up a woman scorned but in a high political position. She hates men and she hates this country as much as Obama. Her chip on her shoulder is very obvious.
She’s not qualified for high office and she only got the job as a concession since she’s a democrat and she lost the primary. Just another administration failure.

Posted by: luigi | August 13, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

We deserve these people, The Hilary, pelosi, reids,franks, we deserve them all. The sad thing is our children deserved better and they are going to pay for the mistakes of Obama, Hilary

Posted by: a citizen | August 13, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Losing her cool? I don’t think so. I am not a Hillary fan but there was nothing wrong with her reply. She had every right to say what she did. It was a stupid question.

Posted by: geniejean | August 13, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Many people don’t seem to realize that women over there are treated like dirt, and that the question was asked by a man that did not want a womens opinion, but wanted her husbands. She was clear with the response that she demands the same respect he would have given a man, and was offended by the question. She has made it very clear that womens rights in other countries as well as our own are a high priority.

Posted by: texas outlaw | August 13, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Couldn’t she have just been nicer and told the person that she couldn’t speak for her husband? Nice is a thing of the past in our world today.

Posted by: Dani | August 13, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Hillary’s behavior was calculated to reset our relationship with the Congo and erase the incivility of the previous administration.

Posted by: mad | August 13, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Hillary Clinton is no diplomat, that’s for sure. Put her in an office somewhere. Ew.

Posted by: tanarg | August 13, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Hillary lost her composure and was very unprofessional and undiplomatic. She does not have what it takes to be Secretary of State. I am a female in my 40′s and from NY and deep down inside I am thankful she is no longer one of our Senators. She is useless and as time passes more people will see this. Hillary: just go away!

Posted by: SCSMITH | August 13, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Look at SCSMITH & Luigi both are right on the money.
Our country would have better off never seeing a Clinton in any position of power. No Class from Bill and Now Hilary.
God we do so much better – Shame on us

Posted by: a cirizen | August 13, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Of course it is always very quick to judge someone when you’re not in their shoes.The secretary of state should have been more professtional in handling
the the situation,but we aren’t the one traveling all over the world when you don’t have proper time to rest.I do know she feels bad about her answer,but is the cause of all this. sincerly,John.mcnally

Posted by: John Mcnally | August 13, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Apparently ABC is channeling Star and National Enquirer by super-inflating Hillary’s response to the Liberian questioner. “Hillary Blows up…” is an absurdly hyped news line. I didn’t see her flinch,sputter or even get red in the neck-like Rush and O’reilly do every day. Her response was stern and pointed, but not anything near uncontrolled rage. It was also appropriate. How could anyone-male or female-honorably preempt their spouses view on an issue. File it under the category: “Women need to look tuff at times” and get on with the real news.

Posted by: Mark Buckwalter | August 13, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Enough already about the Clinton thing last week. I swear this reads sexist. Has nobody else ever lost their cool before? Give her a break. She was sitting in heat in Africa after putting up with gosh knows what for days, and it was hardly the dang end of the world here. You guys never reported on UN Bolton like this.

Posted by: SecondLook | August 13, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Mrs. Clinton answered without any question as to what she meant.The questions should of been addressed to her about her,and when she closed her answer everyone knew this.When Pres. Clinton was requested to go in reguards to the situation;it pops up questions as to what kind of workings he has arranged with the leaders of foreign countries that they have him marked as “THE MAN” and why didn’t he put himself in his right place by informing them of his place? Once again his wife has to clean up his mess.

Posted by: kenneth chelf | August 13, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

I don’t have a problem with Hillary’s response, and I don’t even like her very much.

Posted by: LongT | August 13, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I don’t think she lost her cool. I think she just demonstrated that women can be independent of their husbands. She had no way of knowing the question was mistranslated.

Posted by: JAB | August 13, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

ABC is making “news” out of nothing. Deliver real news and leave the gossip to GMA.

Posted by: Mona | August 13, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Grow up ABCNews! Who are you pandering to? Only my teenage children would regard your dramatization as world news! Whether a mistranslation of the student’s question or not (which I doubt, why would Obama translate as Mr. Clinton?), the question to Hillary Clinton was disrespectful. She travels half-way across the world to a continent most other countries have chosen to ignore only to have the visit tainted in the press because some ignorant student asks her to act as a mouthpiece for her husband! She handled the question as she should have, she did not make a “gaffe” nor “blowup”. Let’s move on to the important issues of the world. This is a partly why our world is in such a mess, our “news” agencies are an absolute joke. Quit wasting the time of our public officials, who are paid by we taxpayers, just so you can stir up a non-story!

Posted by: Caren | August 13, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Would not a very secure Sec. of State or very secure woman or a very secure person simply have answered the question posed in Congo without feeling any threat to their own position. The answer may have been I don’t know I’ve not spoken with my husband but let me give you my opinion etc…

Posted by: RWOssentjuk | August 13, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I love this story. I hope it goes on and on and completely drowns out the health care “debate”. The Clinton’s are America’s favorite distraction. They are like ken and barbie dolls we can stick pins into. Discussions about them bring out the worst in all of us. And it’s great entertainment. That’s why the media loves them.

Posted by: J Robinson | August 13, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Imagine being asked in the Rape Capital of the world after seeing hundreds of little girls and grandmothers damaged by soldier-rapists….”What does Bill Clinton thinks through the mouth of his wife, and what does the Football star Matumbo think, too”?
Hillary Clinton gave this ignorant guy some AFRICAN TEACHING MOMENT to think about before opening his mouth and degrading an American Administration Official and treating her like the sheep-chattel women are treated in his tragic country!
BRAVO, HILLARY! Best thing you’ve done for African girls and women!

Posted by: Teaching Moment | August 13, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

This is old news rehashed over and over again…not significant…not interesting…designed to embarass Hillary and not worth reporting!

Posted by: sosupernova | August 13, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Hey, Hillary! You GO, GIRL!
These gang-raped women lying in hospital beds must be praying for you, girl. Tell it like it!

Posted by: Pat Esler | August 13, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

I know I said Hilary is a lousy Sec of State and I still believe that. But, I have been watching the video over and over and I now feel the question was a bit stupid. Her response, while totally undiplomatic, was not off base in letting the student know that her opinions were her own and not her husband’s. An awkward moment but I don’t think her reaction was as bad as it has been made to look in the press. Diplomacy is a tricky thing.

Posted by: luigi | August 13, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

I don’t like Hillary, but I don’t see what the fuss is about here… DUMB STORY

Posted by: Bill | August 13, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

If Hillary’s behavior was calculated to reset our relationship with the Congo and erase the “incivility” of the previous administration as stated by tanarg, then she has just demonstrated how uncivil this administration can be.

Posted by: WhatAJoke | August 13, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Her irrational behavior is obviously probably the fault of George W. Bush!!

Posted by: Gnyshdenuf | August 13, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

If you consider how you really and I mean really feel about any country in Africa or Africans for that matter. And if you ask yourself how much you know about Africa and it’s people; not to mention the diversity of it’s people among different country’s, then, ask yourself this question: Do I really care how any U.S. official responds to a dumb question by a student? I bet, most Americans would say, “No”. So, this story is “nothing”.

Posted by: John | August 13, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

If you consider how you really and I mean really feel about any country in Africa or Africans for that matter. And if you ask yourself how much you know about Africa and it’s people; not to mention the diversity of it’s people among different countries, then, ask yourself this question: Do I really care how any U.S. official responds to a dumb question by a student? I bet, most Americans would say, “No”. So, this story is “nothing”.

Posted by: John | August 13, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

She is not paid to lose her cool. And she was on our taxpayers dime. Suggest she listen more and worry less about her and her husbands supposed problems of being upstaged by the other.

Posted by: Pamela A. Burge | August 13, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Someone looks to have lost their cool. Must of touched a nerve. Not a very diplomatic response.

Posted by: d | August 13, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

She makes Palin look smart.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 13, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

She should have been President. We need people who make a stand and dont flip flop like Opromise…

Posted by: mark - FL | August 13, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Why shouldn’t she say that…. she isn’t Mr. Clinton and can’t speak for him. I think we are making a BIG deal over nothing. Because she’s a woman the question comes up. Why? I don’t understand.

Posted by: E T Pierro | August 13, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

So a student misrepresented the statement… even though Mr. Clinton and Obama don’t sound the same. and in the long run, SHE didn’t loose her cool, she was just stating a valid point. She’s not Mr. Clinton… She’s MRS. Clinton. So true.

Posted by: E T P | August 13, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Secretary Clinton is damned if she does; damned if she don’t. It’s almost like she’s not allowed to be strong minded or intense because some would view her as unstable. UNREAL. Our so-called unbiased media organizations have their own agendas. I would like to think citizens in this country are smart enough to see through the drama and sleezy political tactics.

Posted by: Sabrina | August 13, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

It is not necessarily what she said. It was the way she said it. Of course there are times when I wish our government officials would say “OK boys let’s take it outside.” to some of these countries.

Posted by: d | August 13, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Way to go Secretary or State, Mrs. Clinton. You make WOMEN PROUD. PLEASE keep up the GOOD WORK and continue to STAND for what is right.
This would be “no big deal” to the press if you were a “man”. You are a better “man” than any of “those” others who think otherwise.

Posted by: B. Carr | August 13, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

It is so not a big deal!
Cannot believe people are obsessing on this.

Posted by: Anna | August 13, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

This is not a man Vs woman thing. The point is that she was asked a dunb question by someone MUCH lower down the pecking order than herself and she reacted badly to it.
This is not the sort of behaviour one expects or wants from a diplomat.

Posted by: Daz | August 13, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

The student asked the set up question to get an emotional rise from Hillary and make her look bad. I think he did just that. Diplomats should have the ability to carry themselves over such obvious traps.

Posted by: Jimmy J | August 14, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I can’t believe the blindness of the people on here who don’t think this is a big deal – IT IS A BIG DEAL.
Clinton is our Secretary of State, the highest ranking official of our country in dealing with foreign leaders – some are allies, some are our sworn enemies.
If DIPLOMACY is what Obama is hoping will keep us out of future armed conflicts, then our Government will have to be respected.
Clinton is acting like she’s talking to her neighbors, or still out on the campaign trail (and I suspect the LATTER to be truly the case), not in front of the WORLD;S CAMERAS in Africa.
The rest of the world gains insight into the U.S. from a variety of sources, most of which they realize are likely NOT 100% accurate – like movies and song. But to be sitting in front of a television set, and hearing that U.S. is no better than Nigeria when it comes to elections, well, THAT’S going to cost us on the “respect” scale.

Posted by: Laughing_All_The__Way | August 14, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

suffered since 1996 and lost almost 6.5 Millions people death and,that started from the Neighbouring (Rwanda)to overthrow Mobutu Sese Seko from the Power which was Supported by the Former President Bill Clinton and remember about the letter carried by Bill Richardson to bring to Mobutu to step down.So,that is why Hilary Clinton was prepared and being in the defensive

Posted by: J J Charles | August 14, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

The DRCONGO has been suffered from the 2 wars since 1996 and lost almost 6.5 Millions people death (The U.N does Not talk about it) and,that started from the Neighbouring (Rwanda)to overthrow Mobutu Sese Seko from the Power which was Supported by the Former President Bill Clinton and remember about the letter carried by Bill Richardson to bring to Mobutu and step him down.So,that is why Hilary Clinton was prepared and being in the defensive

Posted by: J J Charles | August 14, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am

So now suddenly the right wing Clinton haters care about diplomatic relations?? What a joke! Hahaha…you can’t seriously think we believe that now do you? You didn’t seem to care about that for the last eight years, have you? But since it’s Hilary Clinton it must be okay. Oh please! The people of the Congo aren’t making a big deal out of it. They could care less. The whiners of America are out in full force as their party dies. It’s pathetic. That’s all there is to it.

Posted by: Ohplease! | August 14, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

It’s hard to have a Secretary of State menopausing while on tour.Let’s send Bill. He will bring better results.

Posted by: Frank | August 14, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Hillary has really packed on the Lbs.! I wonder if she pregnet?

Posted by: Ed Wilkinson | August 14, 2009, 2:58 am 2:58 am

I seem to remember Joe Biden calling Milosevic a war criminal to his face, and no one freaked out. We thought it was a manly thing to do, and we stood around and patted him on his back. Clinton makes the point that she is the Sec. of State not Bill to a nation of misogynists, and torturers or women, but she’s gone too far!
I find it amusing that everything a woman politician does is because of PMS and menopause. I’m going to start referring to male politicians who use emotion as the small man complex. I think we all know what that means.

Posted by: ohplease! | August 14, 2009, 4:53 am 4:53 am

I think people should rather look at the issues she raised on her visits instead of some question she responded to. She has done what most influential leaders wouldn’t do in Africa, that is working with the one you ran against for the position of President. That is democracy. As she said in Liberia, she works with President Obama because of both their love for America. I wish most politicians in Africa would speak that way. “Though we ran against each other , we can still work together because of our common goals and objectives”. Mrs. Clinton is one of America’s great. She should be respected for her views and opinions. if she didn’t like the question that is her right to respond in the way she thinks is appropriate. She is Secretary of State not her husband. Her opinions matter not his right now.

Posted by: irenebw | August 14, 2009, 5:55 am 5:55 am

What a fool she’s making of herself! Hillalry lost it and thinks if she ignores it, it will go away. Sorry, it was all over the news. Your elitist self shone forth for all to see. You’re inept and were only made SoS to keep you out of Barry’s way. Did you notice how he now has Czars to take care of many parts of the world as he knows you’re inept, too. Keep playing the role, we all know who you are. But, then, Barry’s inept, too. What a terrible bunch of idiots we have in the WH!

Posted by: MaryA | August 14, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

“Why shouldn’t she say that…. she isn’t Mr. Clinton and can’t speak for him. I think we are making a BIG deal over nothing. Because she’s a woman the question comes up. Why? I don’t understand.” Let me explain: It wasn’t so much WHAT she said but HOW she said it. She was obviously disgusted that anyone would dare ask that quesetion of HER and she put on her elitist, ‘better than thou’ face and told the kid off. Very unbecoming to anyone – male or female. Gender doesn’t matter – it should be the best PERSON for the job – and she clearly isn’t.

Posted by: MaryA | August 14, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

What a fool she’s making of herself!
Posted by: MaryA | Aug 14, 2009 3:10:16 PM
Seriously?? Check out Judith Warner’s column titled “Hillary Fights a Tide of Trivialization.” She’s not making a fool of herself. The folks that trivialize her efforts are the fools.

Posted by: Alyson | August 14, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Haven’t we all had enough of the Clinton’s?? Why can’t they both just go away once and for all. He brought shame on the office of the Presindency and she is SO disengenious, it’s really quite pathetic.

Posted by: ADF | August 14, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Hillary was out of line on this. It is not that I do not understand her feelings but her ego was out of control and when that happens, you can’t go back and make up for showing your colors in a way you wouldn’t normally. If she were not the Secretary of State I would have thought, “More power to ya!”. Her husband has had his way in his life despite out it may affect her and I don’t blame her for being angry.

Posted by: Lizzy | August 15, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am

And yes…she has put on weight and she looks tired and stressed out. I imagine that the fact that she is not President coupled with a grueling travel schedule has been really tough on her. Think about how you would feel. Should she behave like that as Secretary of State? No. However, if a man behaved the same way it would be brushed off, no doubt. This will stick with her a while.

Posted by: Lizzy | August 15, 2009, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Once again she has shown that she can not handle a tough question without getting ruffled under the feathers. Not ready for prime time emotionally. A calmer more thought out answer simply would have been a smile and saying “I’m sorry but I can’t speak for XXXXXwhoever”

Posted by: Bill | August 15, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

J.J. is 100% right on. It is a big deal. In this high position you should have ice water flowing in the veins, and nothing should ever rattle your cage.

Posted by: Bill | August 15, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

I see nothing wrong with her reaction, although she could have tempered her response a bit, allowing for a possible gender mistranslation. I would have been thoroughly hacked-off had I been asked that question.
For the record, I didn’t support her in the Democratic primaries last year. I worked hard for President Obama.

Posted by: purplehawk | August 15, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

BRAVO for Hillary again! Jim’s post on Aug. 15th is the way most men think. Maybe if our politicians in high positions had more emotion and less ice water, we would be more able to solve some of the world’s problems without commiting hateful acts and making cold decisions…just another reason why we need to elect more women to office.

Posted by: Sass | August 16, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.