By Lindsey Ellerson

Aug 11, 2009 6:05pm

Here’s Johnny!: Isakson Pushes Back on “Death Panels” – But Also on House Democrats’ Bill

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf reports: During a town hall meeting in New Hampshire Tuesday, President Obama made sure to point out one Republican proponent of end of life counseling to argue there are no “death panels” in health care reform bills in the House and the Senate.
 
“The irony is that actually one of the chief sponsors of this bill originally was a Republican — then House member, now senator, named Johnny Isakson from Georgia — who very sensibly thought this is something that would expand people’s options,” said the president in Portsmouth, N.H. Tuesday. “And somehow it’s gotten spun into this idea of “death panels.”  I am not in favor of that.  So just I want to — (applause.)  I want to clear the air here.”
 
But, apparently Obama did not invoke Isakson with the senator’s blessing, and now there is some pushback today from the Georgia Republican who voted against the Senate health reform bill in committee, but did add an end-of-life consultation amendment to it.
 
“This is what happens when the President and members of Congress don’t read the bills,” says Isakson in a paper statement. “The White House and others are merely attempting to deflect attention from the intense negativity caused by their unpopular policies.  I never consulted with the White House in this process and had no role whatsoever in the House Democrats’ bill.  I categorically oppose the House bill and find it incredulous that the White House and others would use my amendment as a scapegoat for their misguided policies,” Isakson continued.  “My Senate amendment simply puts health care choices back in the hands of the individual and allows them to consider if they so choose a living will or durable power of attorney. The House provision is merely another ill-advised attempt at more government mandates, more government intrusion, and more government involvement in what should be an individual choice.”
 
To be fair, however, you can understand their confusion at the White House.  In a conversation he had with Washington Post blogger Ezra Klein on end-of-life issues, Isakson sounds like he’s for Medicare patients discussing these things with their doctors. Isakson also sponsored a bill in 2007, that would “amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage of an end-of-life planning consultation as part of an initial preventive physical examination under the Medicare program.” That’s very similar to what the House bill would do, although with much less specificity. 
 
In the written statement, Isakson’s office says the House version would “incentivize doctors by offering them money to conduct ‘end-of-life counseling’ with Medicare patients every five years.” And it disagrees with the mandated list of topics doctors providing the counseling must provide to receive the benefit.  Scroll way down to Section 1233 to read the House version’s difficult to understand legislative language HERE.
 
Isakson’s amendment to the Senate bill, they say, is very different because, “anyone who participates in the long-term care benefit provided in the bill – if they so choose – may use that benefit to obtain assistance in formulating their own living will and durable power of attorney. ”
 
And it’s true that his amendment is two pages whereas the section in the House bill is ten. But the bill Isakson offered has more similarities with the House Democrats’ bill than it has differences.

User Comments

So giving doctors a financial incentive to discuss end-of-life issues whether the patient wants to or not is basically the same thing as empowering the insured to have that discussion should they so choose? I have a lot of respect for you Jake, but you seem to be buying the White House’s spin on this one…

Posted by: ranckandfile | August 11, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

in the ideal world doctors should be paid to discuss death and end-of-life procedures and should be able to do so. However, we already see corruption, or outright fraud, in other medical aspects (medicare fraud, prescription fraud, doctors giving scripts to addicts, doctors prescribing unnecessary- or certain branded- drugs, etc.) So if we have “death panels” that are paid for with government money there would sure to be some corruption. BUT, as long as we don’t allow the docs to actually inject (like in Switzerland) nobody should be harmed by Obama’s “death panels”. I’m more concerned about this crazy database Obama wants about ALL of our personal medical history and information. Talk about blackmail, identity fraud, frame-up jobs, etc!

Posted by: Ed | August 11, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Logan’s Run..Great science FICTION movie or so I thought….Insurance Reform, Yes, Tort Reform, Yes…NO to Obama’s science fiction health care plan.

Posted by: Parallex View | August 11, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

It shows how messed up Republicans are. In the system we have now, Doctor’s time must be paid for, itemized. Many patients have living wills. They don’t want to be kept alive by machines. They want to be able to go home and die in a hospice-like setting. Under the current system, if a patient wants to discuss this with their doctors, the doctor can’t be paid by medicare.
Patients want control over their lives, they want to be able to discuss it with their doctors. Calling these conversations a “Death Panel” is, as Senator Isakson said, “Nuts”!

Posted by: thebob.bob | August 11, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Maybe at some point, there will be some real reporting of what is actually in these bills. Would be helpful since neither elected officials nor journalists actually read what they are voting on/writing about.
This bill will NOT cut costs whatsoever. Adding individual and employer mandates will increase costs and small businesses will have to lay people off if they *have* to provide health insurance for employees. If we want to do something useful, divorcing health insurance from employment, without a mandate, would be more useful.

Posted by: Bob | August 11, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

The President compared UPS and Fed Ex doing well versus the US Post Office “always having problems” and used this analysis when talking about private insurance being able to compete with government health care. How is that an endorsement for government run anything?

Posted by: Charlie C | August 11, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Are you neo-cons against “living wills”? That’s what the GREAT controversy is over, whether the government should reimburse people for consulting about how they want to be treated if in a coma. What’s wrong with you people? Are you so paranoid and frightened of life that you think the government is “after you”? WOW….
I knew you neo-cons were dumb, but christallmighty, are you delirious?

Posted by: JR | August 11, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Another Obama lie.
Barney and Chris and Hairy and Nancy are going to determine what’s economically viable treatment at the end of life.
In other words, a death panel.

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Oops, another lie from jugears. Put that on the pile with his claims that ARRP endorsed his plan (they haven’t), that his plan is budget neutral – it isn’t according to the CBO, and that he isn’t for a single payer option- proven a lie several times by video of himself saying he WAS in favor of single payer.
Liar liar, mom jeans on fire.

Posted by: 2Brixshy | August 11, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

“In other words, a death panel.
Posted by: drjohn | Aug 11, 2009 7:25:06 PM”
Straight from the mouth of the right wing “doctor” who thinks chemotherapy is an experimental treatment for cancer.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 11, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

JR, I hope you have a living will stating that no life saving technique should be used.

Posted by: Lizzie | August 11, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

I didn’t suggest an elderly woman take a pain pill for an arrythmia, Ryan.
Obama did.
And that would have killed her.
Dr. Obama also suggested treating asthma with a breathalyzer.
Obama is a one man death panel!

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Even if they’re correct about this portion of the bill, your skill going to have a panel set up rules for who gets what treatment (mandatory ‘guidelines’…). Also, the UK did have panels that judged individual’s worth in regards to transplants (true death panels)… ergo… its not off the wall to think this bill will be step on way to similar things here. And fun fun fun, it will all play out in the public / political sphere….

Posted by: Thomass | August 11, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

“Even if they’re correct about this portion of the bill, your skill going to have a panel set up rules for who gets what treatment”
So even though the lie the right wing has been telling is not true, they;re still gonna tell it.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 11, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Isakson is playing games while no one is pushing back at the insurance companies that continue to appear to be untouchable. To add the clause seems simply put dum. To hold up and sabotage the whole concept of affordable insurance is just as crazy as Countrywide having a VIP loan list with members of congress on it (not to mention blocking the subpoena). This is not a game but when big business open their wallets this is what you get from people with free insurance that we are paying for.

Posted by: Lynn | August 11, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“Also, the UK did have panels that judged individual’s worth in regards to transplants (true death panels)…”
Why go to the UK when PRIVATE Insurance has examples right here?
“he husband of Judith Packevicz, the Saratoga Springs woman who died after battling her HMO over a liver transplant, joined with other advocates in Albany Monday to call on New York’s congressional delegation to support a patients bill of rights at the federal level. ”
And
“An insurance company that initially refused to pay for a liver transplant for a 17-year-old Northridge girl who died in a hospital should face criminal charges and pay civil damages, an attorney for the girl’s family said Friday.
Cigna HealthCare “literally, maliciously killed” Nataline Sarkisyan, attorney Mark Geragos told reporters in downtown Los Angeles.”

Posted by: Ryan C | August 11, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I would make sure we have the real transcripts before we believe anything Ezra Klein says. He is more an arm of the Administration than Linda Douglass, and Linda Douglass is scarier than Big Brother from 1984. The media has been lying to you about Obama every day. They told you he was moderate, but he’s a communist like both of his parents. If you have a job and pay income tax Obama hates you and wants you to subsidize his community. That’s why he organized it.

Posted by: Ezra Klein lies every day | August 11, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

“An insurance company that initially refused to pay for a liver transplant for a 17-year-old Northridge girl who died in a hospital should face criminal charges and pay civil damages, an attorney for the girl’s family said Friday.
Cigna HealthCare “literally, maliciously killed” Nataline Sarkisyan, attorney Mark Geragos told reporters in downtown Los Angeles.”
Wow, a lawyer said that?! Call John Edwards! You can do better than that, Ryan.

Posted by: Leagle | August 11, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

“SEC. 440. HOME VISITATION PROGRAMS FOR FAMILIES
11 WITH YOUNG CHILDREN AND FAMILIES EX12
PECTING CHILDREN.”
Wow. Obama is going to have ACORN tell us how to raise our kids!

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“The Obama administration is proposing to scale back a long-standing ban on tracking how people use government Internet sites with “cookies” and other technologies, raising alarms among privacy groups.”
And Obama is going to monitor us on the internet. And to think some people were worried about Bush….

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

You know how you can be certain this plan is pathetic?
Obama won’t be in it.
No plan that does not include Obama and his family should be passed.

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Too bad Obama didn’t get any tough questions.
Instead he got:
A kid asking about mean signs.
And a woman said “he winked at me”.
How about:
Are you going to sign a bill that pays for abortions?
Do you believe in Ezekial Emanuel’s end of life ideas? If not, why did you choose him as A health adviser?
Why are you on tape saying you want a public option but you tell us you are against it?
He is a joke. And so was the hand picked audience.

Posted by: larry | August 11, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

“No plan that does not include Obama and his family should be passed.”
Try that with public school!

Posted by: Bored of Ed | August 11, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

A majority in this country now realizes that neither this strange man in the White House nor the congress can be trusted to fix anything, nor to tell the truth about what they are doing. And a sizable majority do of believe that their health insurance needs fixing at all.
Nothing remotely resembling the current house bill will be enacted into law. Whatever finally emerges will be a humiliating defeat for the president, but of course he will simply lie and pretend that it is a monument to his greatness. A majority, of course, will see it for exactly what it is.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 11, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Obama today:
“I have not said I was a single payer supporter”
Obama 2003:
“I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care plan.”
So what does one call a person who does this?

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

…do *not* believe…

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 11, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Arlen Specter took very tough questions.
Obama’s townhall was the only one that wasn’t fiery. Hmmmmmmm
Something the WH wants Obama to avoid at all costs.
It would be a PR nightmare to see a crowd with the majority against Obamacare.
In other words an audience that relects the polls and the people.

Posted by: jacl | August 11, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Poor saps in that crowd still hanging on to hope and change.
Still quite a few out there that have their heads in the sand.

Posted by: max | August 11, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Should note it is the link for the 2007 amend to title XV111

Posted by: Lou | August 11, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Mark Geragos? Would that be the same Mark Geragos who told us that Scott Peterson didn’t kill Laci?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 11, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Aug 11, 2009 8:05:32 PM
That would be one and the same!

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Isakson had to find some way to regain his conservative cred after trashing Palin.

Posted by: matt | August 11, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

You can always sue Cigna Health Care. Try suing the government.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 11, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

That death panel thing is under his skin.
Someone should have asked him why he suggested the elderly take a painkiller rather than treatment.
Obama doesn’t respect the beginning of life (he won’t even say when it begins)or the end of life.
Obama just sees dollar signs.

Posted by: tyler | August 11, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

It’s not the money, Tyler. It’s the control.
Obama does not believe that there’s anything government can’t do.
That’s because he’s never worked a real day in his life.

Posted by: drjohn | August 11, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

It is about government takeover.
As one townhall questioner said today:
Government control from birth to death…
If you are that needy and dependent I guess Obama is the right president.
I prefer freedom.

Posted by: gary | August 11, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Ezekial Emanuel
Do the research.
This is who Obama appointed as a health policy adviser.
I believe Palin’s Death Panel statement terrifies Obama.
It put a huge spotlight on the end of life issue.

Posted by: bailey | August 11, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

What scares Obama?
An informed public.
He tried to rush reform before we educated ourselves.
Ram it through like the stimulus.
Fool us once……

Posted by: jack | August 11, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

“That’s because he’s never worked a real day in his life.”
I cannot restrain myself from pointing out the ridiculousness of that assertion every time you post it Dr. Obama has been working one of the hardest jobs on Earth day after day for months now under politically and economically arduous circumstances. We’re not in anything like the roaring ’20s here.

Posted by: Skip | August 11, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Section 1233 is a perfect example of the problem with this bill.
A. We have had umpteen years of public discussion of Power of Attorney for Med Decisions, Living Wills, advance health directives, DNR etc. etc. etc.
B. 95% of the ppl are fine with this (made up number)
C. I have had several surgeries where there is a constant asking if I have an advanced directive and do I want one, just in case I wind up not doing well in surgery.
D. So being the busy bodies that they are, the Congress/Staff insert a needless provision which smells faintly like Yes, you will have a discussion every 5 years (at least) because we may choose not to provide you the care needed for you to live.
Die with Dignity…Please. Go quitely.
Very stupid people putting these bills together…unless, of course, they’ve read the Dr. Emanuel paper.

Posted by: jeffco | August 11, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Wish someone had asked Obama whether that “right to health care” that he has been promising will be a right held by each individual American, or a right in favor of the “community” that will be exercised by a politically appointed committee setting the rules based on “community values” for the delivery of health and treatment services to all Americans on the basis of circumstances like, say, age or quality of remaining life or maybe even whether the economy goes real bad so that certain services and treatments for certain people are denied because it would violate the community’s right to health to care?
With these follow-up questions:
What the heck is “communitarianism” all about, anyway, and does it have anything to do with all the policies you’re intending to enforce with your “fundamental” reforms for the financial industry, the car industry, the health care and health insurance system, the cap and tax bill, your yet-to-be-announced-in-any-real-detail-but-still-upcoming reform of our education system, and his similarly mysterious reform for immigration?
Since these questions were missed at you town hall today, maybe Obama could cover both of them in a “Major Speech” entitled:
“What I’m Really Going To Do When I Say I Will Fundamentally Change America”.
Maybe he’ll give that “major speech” real soon? Like, sometime before he rams through any more bills as “urgent” and “necessary” to save the country from imminent total collapse?
And maybe he’ll throw Americans a bonus bone in that speech by describing what exactly is his proposal for that big immigration reform that he promised in Mexico a few days ago, especially as it relates to the actual number of folks who’ll be covered by his still pending health reforms proposal.
Might be nice to know all the bad news before jumping off anymore cliffs.
And we do have a little tradition that involves the “consent” of the governed.
Informed consent.

Posted by: TParty4USA | August 11, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Oh Lookie lookie—-Obama in lie number three for the day?
He lied about AARP backing his government run health care plan-they don’t
He lied about a “death panel” said there isn’t one and then said there is one but a Republican put it on there
He lied about the Republican putting it on there, the same republican who voted against the current form it is in.
” categorically oppose the House bill and find it incredulous that the White House and others would use my amendment as a scapegoat for their misguided policies,” Isakson continued. “My Senate amendment simply puts health care choices back in the hands of the individual and allows them to consider if they so choose a living will or durable power of attorney. The House provision is merely another ill-advised attempt at more government mandates, more government intrusion, and more government involvement in what should be an individual choice.”
His version is a far cry from what Pelosi and Her clan have in their bill….of course!

Posted by: KMDay | August 11, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Obama some how believes that holding townhalls with his immediate family and the press will somehow help him. He should have gone out in the street in front of the building and tried to convince the 54% of the American Public that are against his bill.
Of course that would take courage and a thick skin. Something this whiner sorely lacks.

Posted by: robtr | August 11, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

So, Isakson is basically lying about how his bill is different from the Democrat bill (there so similar it’s almost not even worth pointing out the differences).
Why the change of tone from Johnny? Because he has to kow-tow to the REAL leaders of the GOP – Limbaugh, Hannity, Palin, etc.
What a gutless coward.

Posted by: Bob R | August 11, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

robtr | Aug 11, 2009 9:05:38 PM
Yeah right. Nobody should be fooled into thinking that the people who showed up to disrupt the meetings represent the 54%, or that anybody could convinced them of anything.

Posted by: Skip | August 11, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

So, Obama has been caught in yet another lie? This does not bode well for the health care bill.

Posted by: Don't Tread on Me! | August 11, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

People who want this health care act shouldn’t be offended that there is opposition to it, does anyone remember amnesty for illegals, who was President and who opposed it? Yep, the same people who are now trying their best to get their Representatives to at least read the bill before they are for or against it.
So relax, there are enough Democrats to speed us forward to a mega welfare state and Soros is coming to the rescue with fresh money to hire ssome protesters. One has to wonder that if we slip into 3rd world status will Soros do to us what he did to Indonesia?

Posted by: david | August 11, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Is Obamacare going to be limited to American citizens or can citizens of other countries come here to get care at the expense of American taxpayers? So far I haven’t heard Obama or his minion say that illegal aliens and other foreigners can be denied. Right now it looks like my Medicare could be endangered to provide care for a drug smuggler who snuck across the border yesterday. And I have to pay for it.

Posted by: Oonogil | August 11, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

If you think about it, uh…uh…uh, UPS and FedEx are doing just fine.
[pause]
Right? Th-The, uh, no, they are! I mean, i-it’s-it’s the Post Office that’s always having problems.
ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Posted by: marx my words | August 11, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

What happened to all the Obama supporters?
Why aren’t they here defending him?
Is this not the change they wanted?

Posted by: Oonogil | August 11, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

When all the shouting, threats, lies and misnomers are all done, Congress will go back to DC to reconcile the various bill on the docket. All the looney arguments and outright lies and missunderstanding…WON’T EVEN BE DEBATED or even mentioned. The only debate will be what is ACTUALLY in the bills…..not all of that “death panel” talk. None of this nonsense will even be entertained on the floor of Congress. So…….get it all out of your collective system while you have the chance, because when all the Town Hall Meetings are over with……Congress WILL go back to DC and reconcile WITHOUT EVEN mentioning the lunatic fringe positions that grabbed the headlines in the media. You have been had….because instead of Republicans actually adding something substanitive to any of the reforms, they will be SHUT OUT because the only thing they want to talk about is not in any of the bills. YOU HAVE BEEN snookered

Posted by: levelhead | August 11, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

“Where are all the Obama supporters?”
Well, we’ve tried to talk to you. We’ve directed you to the facts using actual page numbers and sections number of the bill. It just doesn’t matter. We support Obama. We support health care reform. We support our democratically elected president. We support our Constitution. We support our country. WE don’t talk about tearing apart the Union. WE don’t talk about circumventing the Will of the People through intimidation tactics such as carrying guns or threats of violence. So many of you are past the point of reason, it’s frightening. The things you choose to believe! The rage! George Bush tripled the deficit. He cut taxes for the rich at a time of war. He deregulated the financial industry. He did nothing to curtail the loss of jobs overseas…just gave those corporations more tax breaks, then a gave the financial industry a HUGE zillion-dollar bailout this past fall, no questions asked. The comments about our nation becoming a third world country? That will come about because of corrupt politicians selling out to corporate industries,such as the health insurance industry. That will come as a result of a shrinking middle class due to the policies of the Bush era. Insanely rich people and desperatley poor people…these are always ingredients for dangerous unstable societies. The final blow that will plummet us into third world status will be the violence that seems to be a hair trigger away…a violence that will render our Constitution utterly useless, as enraged right-wingers ignore MY right to live in a nation governed by citizens rightfully and fairly elected to office. I don’t understand this whole “tyrant” thing. Obama is pursuing the courses of action that a free people elected him to pursue, remember??
Please, please read the proposed bills, both the House and Senate versions. Read, follow links, listen to both sides of the argument, evaluate your sources of information for credibility, and see for yourself that most of what you fear are ideas that are not supported by any facts, but are supported by studies, politicians, and others who are maintain their status and earn their livings by defending the health insurance industry, the very industry that is in the fight of its life, that considers paying for your medical care as a financial “loss” that needs to be minimized, and realize: We already have death panels and rationed health care overseen and doled out by souless corporations who care nothing about any single person’s plight, but cares everything about their stockholders. And please, please, I’m scared for my little boy. I don’t want him to grow up in a country beset with political violence, and the right wingers are scaring me!

Posted by: TomsMom | August 11, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Isakson said:
Eighty percent of the cost of health care to me, to you, and to anybody else happens in the last 60 days of life. More often than not, people are not in a condition to make a decision for themselves. Because of laws, and because we are a compassionate nation, the physician will keep you alive as long as he can. If you had a chance, you might rather say if I am being hydrated and given nutrition but will never become conscious again, I give the doctors the authority to make the appropriate medical decision. The money that would save is in the ‘gazillions’ of dollars–if there is such a number. It would help us to manage that cost.

Posted by: wmholt | August 11, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
The three slogans of the party; from George Orwell’s 1984. Remember “Newspeak”?

Posted by: Dave | August 11, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

They already know what they are going to do. we know now what we must do. “All it takes for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing”.

Posted by: Dave | August 11, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

“Olds and boomers, why didn’t you look after yourselves better during your productive time on this mortal coil? To the rest of the deadbeats that support this program, please get off my back. It diminishes you when you freeload.”
Wow. Anyone who says this must have some serious job security. Lucky you! I hope you don’t suffer an illness that tops out your health care coverage as my father, who WAS a productive citizen, (a high school teacher), had happen when he experienced three occurrences of cancer. I wonder why you think that people without adequate health care coverage are all deadbeats? Such disdain must make the heartbreak, stress, despair, suffering, and anguish of your fellow man much easier to overlook. Your self righteousness must make you feel so warm and cozy. I’ll bet you sleep soundly at night. Seriously. It must be nice.

Posted by: Toms Mom | August 11, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

The Status Quo are selling propaganda and downright lies, across the TV, radio bandwidths. LIES! Lies and more lies about both Health care and illegal immigration. The facts are that President Obama has an objective of introducing a Canadian and European type single payer system. In truth it’s like a nationwide–MEDICARE–like all senior citizens receive now. It’s only difference their will be–NO CO-PAYS, DEDUCTIONS, NO PREMIUMS AND NO PRE -EXISTING CONDITIONS. The Special interest lobbyists, who work for the wealthy health care industry, are using every means possible to derail any kind of Universal health care. We must remember the British/English, French, German, Danish and other have been well accepted by their population for decades, with no worries about bankruptcy or Debt collectors calling. My health care in England, was first class when I lived in there, without financial worries and no distractions from profiteering insurance companies.
Since the inception of the European common market and the directive of open borders for cheap labor pouring into the industrialized nations, they have been overwhelmed by the impoverished needing health care. Such conditions didn’t exist before the 1960′s, as the their was no mass immigration and waiting periods. In America today and since the newest waves of legal and illegal immigration, costs to medicate these people have sky rocketed who have never paid one penny into the system. Each previous government never have restricted immigration, but allowed taxpayers to pay for their health care and welfare benefits. Each year approximately 1.5 million new immigrants are granted work visas and many become public charges.
Now Obama is insisting on yet another AMNESTY, which will be even costlier to the American taxpayers, so says the Heritage foundation. American taxpayers should not have to subsidize US businesses, which has been happening for years? A large majority of pariah corporate executives, do not want any restrictions on foreign national workers, that is why they have tried to kill a mandated E-Verify identity data base, to extract all illegal immigrants from the working environment.
That SANCTUARY STATES like California must rescind illegal immigrant refuge policies. That President Obama’s health care renewal plan—WILL–attract millions more impoverished people from around the world. That they can join with the 20 plus million already here, to get free medical care under the Democrats law now passing through Congress.
MY QUESTION IS! WHY SHOULD TAXPAYERS SUPPORT THE ILLEGAL LABOR FOR THE PARASITE CORPORATE ENTITIES ACROSS AMERICA? CALL TODAY AND GIVE POLITICIANS AT 202-224-3121 YOUR CRESCENDO OF FRUSTRATION? THAT’S ALL THEY UNDERSTAND–WHEN THEIR JOBS ARE IN PERIL. GOOGLE NUMBERSUSA AND JUDICIALWATCH TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CORRUPTION AND PROFITEERING FROM BOTH PARTIES. OVERPOPULATION will be the irreversible consequences of mass immigration.

Posted by: Brittancus | August 11, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Dear Tomsmom, first, some enlightenment;it is now health insurance reform, not health care reform. You should pay attention, that changed the last time a democrat changed socks! We, the “Right”, also uphold OUR constitution,also love OUR country,are not circumventing the will of the people,intimidating,;(where did this come from),by carrying guns?And speaking of violence,I believe it was some union bullies that hurt a protester(one of our rights),not the other way around!As far as the President “pursuing”, it is more like “mandating” than anything.And about 48% of americans did NOT vote for this person, maam!And if you will pay closer attention, you will notice that when the officials go back from recess, then they will hammer out the final bill, so the details are actually not fully known yet, thus we would like to know how all these “Leftist”can tell us how wonderful a bill it is! It appears like majic to some of us!Or, hocus-pocus. I also do not want your son growing up in a country beset with political violence and the Left-wingers are scaring the hell out of me!!

Posted by: Dave | August 12, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I was in the hospital room visiting my father who was in his late seventies when his cardiologist came into the room,notified him that he had reached his “benefits limit” and his care was “no longer covered”,and discharged him from the hospital–still sick.
My brother had to come from Texas, get my father, and add him to his own health plan in order for my father to get the pace maker which saved his life.
My father’s initial “health plan”?
Veteran’s benefits earned during battle in WWII,and …MEDICARE !!!
They can talk all they want, I have seen the truth with my own two eyes.

Posted by: Gloria | August 12, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Are any of you getting tired of seeing Obamma on TV? Gee Whiz, the guy just got back from Mexico and he’s GOT to have his “media fix!” I just today watched Frost/Nixon & heard Nixon telling the American public that his appearance to announce his resignation from office was the 37th time he’d spoken on TV in 5 yrs. 37 times in 5 yrs! Folks, that’s only 7 televised speeches to the American public per year! I’m beginning to think Obamma is just too busy being a celebrity rock star instead of a statesman that represents us.

Posted by: WBGSJ | August 12, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

RE: The raucous Town Halls: I have no problem with people protesting or debating the issues, that’s the American way, but do people have to behave like guests on the Gerry Springer show? A little dignity and respect for our fellow citizens would be nice.
The “Patriotic” Right always claims to love America, they just don’t love Americans.

Posted by: Tane | August 12, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

TomsMom: Great post, thanks!
On another note, I’d like to remind everyone that this country is a constitutional republic, and as such we democratically elect representatives and then they make decisions as they see fit, even if they are unpopular. As long as they operate within the confines of the Constitution they’re doing their job. This Health Reform legislation is not up for referendum / direct vote, so you do not necessarily get to bully your Representative into voting the way you want them to. If you do not approve of their voting record then I suggest that you exorcise your rights and vote them out of office the next time they are up for re/election.
The Dem’s and the President ran on health reform and in case you missed it, they won large majorities. Yelling at Congresswo/men and slandering the President will not usurp our democracy. If you don’t like it then vote the Dems out next time. That’s what we did when we felt like the GOP and Bush were destroying our Constitution… and we won, resoundingly.

Posted by: Tane | August 12, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Tane,
Thanks for the reminder that we have you and your fellow Dem.s to blame for this fiasco of an administration. Only 8 months into it and nothing but significant damage brought on by his desire to change the US for the worse.
Over 3 more years of this guy to go and then we still have to let our children dig themselves out of the tax burden for a couple of more generations.
Thanks again

Posted by: Linus | August 12, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

We all know the death panel thing is a sham.
You could disrupt every town hall meeting in the nation with a very small minority of the population. That’s why the GOP is using the tactic.
In 2008 the average Fox network viewership was 2.2 million. Even if that represents a total of maybe ten million watching the network which is promoting town hall disruptions, the population of the U.S. is over 304 million. Ten million is one-thirtieth.
When we spend all our media time and space writing about yelling and name-calling at town halls, we are catering a very small minority.

Posted by: JAB | August 12, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Has anyone noticed that AARP has suddenly come out and emphasized that they are NOT on board with Obamacare (after quietly promoting it)?
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that so many seniors are cancelling their memberships?

Posted by: Janet | August 12, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

JAB, you forgot to mention the dropping poll numbers for Obamacare and the President. Apparently, it isn’t only Fox viewers who have a problem with this plan.
We ALL want health reform. We could start with tort reform.

Posted by: Janet | August 12, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

From Rasmussen:
42% favor Obamacare
53% against Obamacare
32% favor public option
57% against public option

Posted by: Janet | August 12, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

You need to look carefully at what President Obama says, he does not say there will absolutely not be any death panels in this health care bill instead he says, “I am not in favor of this.”

Posted by: buckaroobonsai4545 | August 12, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This “death panel” business is absolutely without merit. My mother recently died in March from an irreversable vetebral stroke. She was in fact “brain dead”. She had had a heart attack while she was in ER and her liver and one remaining kidney was failing. My mother had an advance directive and had had made it absolutely clear that she only wanted aggressive relief of pain and suffering and no artificial life support. After consultation with the attending physician, my sister and I decided to not seek further invasive tests and expose my mother to further pain. The hospital gave her comfort care. While the entire process was not easy, I thank god that my mother had made HER wishes very clear BEFORE she couldn’t speak or function. Everyone will die someday. I, myself, have leukemia and have been given a 10-year life expectancy. I do have an advance directive and healthcare proxy. Every responsible adult should also get one. This outright lie denigrates the medical profession and every family that has to make these difficult decisions. I’m almost hoping and praying that some (not all), but some of these hysterical disrupters keep this up and keep bringing up Nazi themes and the like. Every time they do this, this makes Obama look a little more reasonable and rational and inoculates him politically. What the Republican party doesn’t realize is that their tactics are all backwards. They should be rationally and reasonably be protesting parts of the House bill (which I even don’t like as a Democrat) and offering rational solutions, such as tort reform. Alot of this anger is about the role of government in general, not healthcare in particular. I, for one, am supporting healthcare reform, because no insurance company will cover me with my pre-existing condition. I hope and pray that all of you posters face the fact that one day, you too, will be faced with a chronic and/or life-threatening disease and be desperate for medical coverage with no where to turn.

Posted by: Laura Brown | August 12, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Tane:
Great post . . . yes, elections have consequences. Dem/Ind. voted for change and that’s what we are getting.
Linus:
Have you noticed the stock market going UP and unemployment going DOWN?
Have you noticed home sales going UP?
PS: While Obama’s “poll” numbers have come back to earth, he and the Democrats still have more support than Republicans for running the country.

Posted by: Tom Kaye | August 12, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Linus: There is change…change where if you want to know something you can go on the web and find it, not like before find out after the fact. Also there is a change in how the women now earn the same pay as men…a change I can agree with…also a change in bringing home the soldiers in honor not behind back doors in shame….they deserve at least that…a change where vets returning from the war, get an education to help them find jobs…not too bad…a health care for children alredy signed…not to bad an idea…at least they won’t be turning up at the emergency rooms…change where meetings are open to all…I could not get into a Bush meeting….no waterboarding…this was law no one paid attention to it…respect among nations again…I can deal with that. Yes, there are some changes…ones I can live with….for those who are crying about taxes…nothing has changed. Those making under 250,000 have not seen a change…so is that enough change for anyone?

Posted by: talmag | August 12, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Obama never said Isackson supported the bill…he only said he wanted to see the part about having a living will inserted into the bill. Nothing more so what is Isackson upset about? Mr. Isackson has been pushing for living wills for years and no demonstrations? How about that?

Posted by: talmag | August 12, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

It never ceases to amaze me the liberals outrage over their members being shouted down at these Town Hall meetings, yet when a conservative speaker at a liberal college is shouted down, that’s perfectly fine…Old double standard at work. And “scare” tactics?…Dems play the Class & Race card scare tactics in every election…

Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

It is interesting to see the out cry on death panels by a group of fat, smokers who would rather have healthy Americans that take care of themselves pay for their health care.
Being self employed I pay for my insurance and those that work in companies that i am an investor. we promote healthy living and wouldn’t hire an over weight person or one that smokes as it shows lack of self discipline and low self esteem.
Most of the people at the Spector rally were fat folks, many in Tee shirts with messages that should have been registered as Billboards.
If people would take some responsibility for their health our problems would be accidents and the unfortunate.

Posted by: Joseph Stafura | August 12, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

“It never ceases to amaze me the liberals outrage over their members being shouted down at these Town Hall meetings, yet when a conservative speaker at a liberal college is shouted down, that’s perfectly fine.”
So its ok to shout down your fellow constituents because of what some college students did to a conservative speaker?
Do right wingers EVER take responsibility for their own actions?

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

From Rasmussen:”
Who overweighs Republicans because he considers them to be 33% of the electorate, hence his popularity with being featured on FoxNews.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

To be fair to the white house they can’t be expected to get the details correct. Why does he even need t mention a republican why not address the bill before congress now. I listened to the presidents answer and he passed/ glossed it over in generalities and partisanship. No mention of every 5 years or after your diagnosis becomes terminal or chronic the government making sure that end of life checklist is repeated and repeated. Anyway the ammendment sounds like coverage for an option someone can choose if they want to. The tone and content seem distinctly different to me. Please keep trying to make excuses for them they are the white house stand on the merits, let people decide or give it up. This is america I really think with better regulations the private sector will handle this better and hey it could create new job too boot.

Posted by: GO | August 13, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

who cares if it’s a liberal or conservative / dem or repub? The point is that 99% of the people that WE pay to represent us are a bunch of arrogant power besotted egomaniacs. With that said, it’s the liberals who have the upper hand now and they are tring to pass goverment takeovers wherever they can. Yet the government can’t get anything right and I surely do NOT want them making medical decisions for me or deciding what procedures i can have. And why in Hell would anyone “incentivise” (pay) a doctor (with our tax dollars I might add) to have end-of-life discussions with patients. Most people are taking steps on their own with living wills or powers of attorney. what B.S. Re-elect NO ONE.

Posted by: ellen | August 13, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

I thought we were a Christian Nation?
It seems to me that people that call themselves Christians should maybe reread their Bible, or at least read it the first time. Start with Matthew 24, 25
Christ talked more about feeding the hungry and taking care of the sick more than anything else
But you hear these so called Christians are screaming the loudest against healthcare for all.
Well when they die we know they at least we know they won’t be going up.

Posted by: Michael | August 13, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Tane:
It’s too bad you’re tired of Obama popping up on Fox, but it’s called “working.” You must have forgotten what it looks like when the last President spent so much time relaxing. President Obama is actually taking his job seriously. You know, doing the job that a majority of Americans elected him to do? Businesses and low-income Americans are going bankrupt every day because of health care costs, and it needs to be fixed. As long as Murdoch and Limbaugh and Beck are getting rich denigrating every single thing the administration does, I imagine you don’t really care.

Posted by: barbarian_horde | August 14, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Linus: Right, in only eight months President Obama has got the economy back on track, tapered down the mess in Iraq, rescued one of our largest manufacturers from bankruptcy, and started to undo the mess George Bush left behind. But I guess since he’s black, President Obama will never do a single thing that you admire? Is that what you learned in your civics class?

Posted by: barbarian_horde | August 14, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

” I had no role whatsoever in the House Democrats’ bill.”
and then he goes on to talk about “my amedement”?
Isaksan is represetative of why nothing gets done in Washington. To concerened with talking points to even comprehend what he is saying.
We need to rid ourselves of these people.

Posted by: John In GA | September 26, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

BOOT ISAKSON!!!
He is NOT defending conservative values! He releases little tidbits about being against certain things but he continually joins in with the Democrats.
When have you ever heard him LOUDLY and STRONGLY denounce liberal/socialist agendas AND vote against it 100%?
To me he is just another Washington sellout. DO NOT reelect this guy. Let’s elect a firm conservative that is not “owned and operated” by the Republican party or New World Order crowd. BOOT HIM OUT OF OFFICE!!!

Posted by: Jim | October 13, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.