By Nitya

Aug 23, 2009 8:02am

McCain Defends Palin on Obamacare Claims

In his first comments on Sarah Palin's "death panel" claims, John McCain is standing by his former running mate.

Sort of…

He doesn't like the phrase "death panels," but he defended the substance of Palin's charge, saying the Democrats have only themselves to blame for the controversy.

In my exclusive This Week interview, I pressed McCain several times on the death panel charge:

STEPHANOPOULOS:  The president also says that the debate has been infected by falsehoods.  And probably the most notorious one is the one made by your former running mate, Sarah Palin, who said that his bill would encourage death panels that would encourage euthanasia.  He called that an extraordinary lie and he is right about that, isn't he?

MCCAIN:  Well, I think that what we are talking about here is do – are we going to have groups that actually advise people as these decisions are made later in life and …

STEPHANOPOULOS:  That's not in the bill.

MCCAIN:  But – it's been taken out, but the way that it was written made it a little bit ambiguous.  And another thing …

STEPHANOPOULOS:  I don't think that's correct, Senator.  The bill, all it said was that, if a patient wanted to have a Medicare consultation about end-of-life issues, they could have it at their request and the doctor would get reimbursed for it, no panel …

MCCAIN:  There was a provision in the bill that talks about a board that would decide the most effective measures to provide health care for people, OK?  Now, we had amendments, we republican have said that in no way would that affect the decisions that the patients would make and their families.  That was rejected by the Democrats and the health committee.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  But that's not a death panel.

MCCAIN:  So what does – what does that lead to?  Doesn't that lead to a possibility, at least opens the door to a possibility of rationing and decisions made such are made in other countries?

STEPHANOPOULOS:  Well, every single independent group that looked at it said it just wasn't true.

MCCAIN:  Well, then why did the Democrats turn down our amendments that clarified that none of the decisions that would be made by this board would in any way affect depriving of needed treatments for patients?  I don't know why they did that then.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  So you think Sarah Palin was right?

MCCAIN:  Look, I don't think they were called death panels, don't get me wrong.  I don't think – but on the best treatment procedures part of the bill, it does open it up to decisions being made as far – that should be left – those choices left to the patient and the individual.  That's what I think is pretty clear, which was a different section of the bill.

Watch full interview HERE.

- George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Dementia is obviously setting in for mccain. Thank God he and her lost the election.

Posted by: libertyrulz | August 23, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

McCain is forever linked to anything Palin says. It is part of his legacy now for having chose her as his running mate. She hampered his election and he stil cannot distance himself from her because of his own ego.

Posted by: Francisco M. Litardo | August 23, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

“You have been accused, fairly or unfairly, of being the catalyst for this idea of death panels. Now I know you never called it death panels, apparently that’s the translation of what you had said – in Alaskan.” Jon Stewart, speaking to Betsy McCaughey, former Lieutenant Gov. of NY

Posted by: Jess Sayen | August 23, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

wow, surprising…Mr McCain has usually been a rational thinker…looks like he is drinking the kool aid of the unhinged GOPers….very sad. Its official now, the once great party of Reagan, has lost all of its marbles.
very sad.

Posted by: indithinker | August 23, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

So how does a panel that decides what is covered and what is not different from a clerk at my insurance company denying a claim because they don’t want to pay for it? Right now we are at the mercy of an insurance company when it comes to what is covered (no doctors involved) and it is not between me and my doctor. I guess if you are a republican with enough money to pay everything out of pocket (McCain), then you don’t have to worry about such things as insurance companies refusing a claim or denying a procedure.

Posted by: Susan | August 23, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Wow, the GOP has sunk so low. They only seem to be able to appeal to the lowest common denominator in our society. They come up with two word mantras designed to instill fear, then keep repeating them no matter how many times the facts prove them wrong.

Posted by: helloworld | August 23, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

The senate took it out of the bill…..so does that mean it was in the bill??
What does this have to do with insurance anyway?
How do we pay for this if social security, medicare and medicaid are going broke?
Why is it so important to George to have McCain say something bad about Palin?

Posted by: Kathy in Pa. | August 23, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

John McCain on INTEGRITY:
1. Never admit you picked a wack-job for V.P.
2. Never call out members of your own party who lie about consulting with your doctor about a living will == death panels.
3. Americans must NEVER, EVER, EVER be allowed to CHOOSE a non-insurance company health insurance option for their families. Because it might just work!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

George, now you are an expert on the health bill proposals. All the so called experts have only searched for words and not really read the bills. Even I have not read all five, and Obama has read none. Sara Palin is correct. The Senate recognized that and remove the controversial sections. Anywhere in the bill that directs that a government board, panel, whatever, approve/deny any health care question, we are going to have problems.

Posted by: James L. | August 23, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

She’s an idiot.

Posted by: Gene | August 23, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Uncle Fester doesn’t know when to quit, does he? He is out of touch/doesn’t care when it comes to the common person and health care because he is wealthy and his health care is the best you can have. Sarah Palin is an alarmist fool that does not further the repubs agenda by making idiotic statements. Why people listen to her is way beyond me.

Posted by: pfr | August 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Your insurance company tells you what you can have or not have. Same with Medicare. So what’s new?

Posted by: Gene | August 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

I am just wondering why are we still talking about sarah palin – who is just really a blogger.

Posted by: T-ROC | August 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Palin was absolutely correct. Any government panel that is chartered to make final medical determinations based on cost-effectiveness measures and without appeal, can and will eventually cause the premature death of our elderly. Interpreting the legislation does require a certain amount of abstract thought and the ability to work outside the box . . . nevertheless it sets the groundwork for a system that has the potential for ending your life. Blathering about rich Republicans and their ability to buy their healthcare is a blatantly ignorant response to a very real threat.

Posted by: rplat | August 23, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Kathy,
Integrity means your first obligation is to the truth. And that, my friend, includes calling a liar a liar. (Refering to Sarah Palin, not Senator McCain.)
If some prominent Democrat starts saying things like the GOP’s latest tax for the wealthy somehow requires doctors to withhold life saving care from their patients AND SOMEHOW THE DOCTORS WOULD COMPLY, then it would be the responsibility of every Democrat to call offender out.
Like I said, first obligation is to the truth, not Frank Luntz’s famous anti-health care reform talking points.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

George is part of ABC News which is a Obama Supporter and would not say anything bad about this administration. George should read the bill the House put together and get educated what Pelosi is pushing.

Posted by: MIndy | August 23, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

How can anyone trust this man when he defends stupidity and malaise?
Maybe this is why he appeals to “Joe the plumbers”

Posted by: michelle | August 23, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Why are Republicans in this country anti-science?
It is well known in the medical community that we can achieve BETTER OUTCOMES if we have a scientific, double blind, comparison between alternative treatments.
The health reform bill in the House funds just such research.
It also extends parential health insurance to cover their children, up to the age of 25 (to get them through college) when their offspring don’t have health insurance of their own.
It also funds the training of additional family practice physicians, the heros on the front lines of prevention and early diagnosis.
It also requires health insurance plans to remove the copays for routine, preventative care, visits with your family doctor.
It also outlaws the practice of recending, or retroactively CANCELING, YOUR FAMILIE’S HEALTH INSURANCE.
Who hasn’t read the bill???
The screamers, that’s who!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Welcome to the future my fellow Americans, here is how it works. Insurance companies will force everyone to travel to the cheapest foreign country where health care for your insured illness or injury can be treated. You say you want American health care only? than you will have to pay a 65% deductible! This is your capitalist system in action. This is why your deductible keeps rising year after year. This is where American health care is going.

Posted by: ITWARS | August 23, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

FACT CHECKS!
George is an OBAMA minion on Healthcare, and it is apparent in every comment and question!
The healthcare bill is purposely ambiguous on things such as end of life, abortion and other so called panel decisions, but can be interpreted at will after the bill becomes law (perish the thought).
Also, once bills become law they are most often modified without fanfare via being read into the Congressional Record. FOR EXAMPLE- When is the last time you had input on a change to the IRS CODE, or Medicare?
You have no idea what the actual mechanization might be to put this plan into effect, and neither does cthe congress!
We have no idea who would be sitting on the panels, look at some of the weirdos Obama has already appointed to czar and other positions. Do you expect better of him for healthcare? Don’t hold your breath!
Do you think a toll free number and a panel that doesn’t answer to the people is going to save your life when you are denied treatment? Press one for English and wait, and wait and . . .
The AARP has entered the game now pretending it knows the facts, if you’re a member ask it some of the questions above.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Robin Beaton had her health insurance CANCELLED days before her hysterectomy.
WHERE IS THE REPUBLICAN OUTRAGE?
Her hospital told her they would not permit the operation to go forward unless she could come up with $30,000 down.
WHERE IS THE REPUBLICAN OUTRAGE?

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

rplat – the possibilities you raise of “government panels” who get to decide what procedures are going to be covered ALREADY exist – in every single insurance company in America. If you don’t think that every procedure besides preventive care is scrutinized, you’re living in a fantasy land. I had an xray taken of my ankle in December and I got a questionnaire from my insurance basically telling me I had to legally confirm that the reason the xray had to be taken was not a result of either a car accident or a work-related injury. Anytime they can try and weasel out of paying for something they will. If they go to that length for an xray, what do you think they’re doing for people on long-term care, such as dialysis or expensive prescriptions? All the drama and hand-wringing over this is nothing more than a cynical tactic by the medical establishment and insurance co’s who don’t want to lose money and the “public servants” who took money from their lobbysists. Saying otherwise is what’s ignorant.

Posted by: JML | August 23, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

“All the so called experts have only searched for words and not really read the bills. Even I have not read all five, and Obama has read none.”
It is NOT true that Obama has read none. That rumor started when Obama was responding to a request for a comment about a false claim that appeared in Investor’s Business Daily. (IBD claimed the bill would make individual private medical insurance illegal.) Obama responded, “You know, I have to say that I am not familiar with the provision you’re talking about.”
From there, Rush Limbaugh, Fox Folks, and other right wing sources began spreading the mistruth that the President hasn’t read the bill.
“Sara Palin is correct. The Senate recognized that and remove the controversial sections.”
Sarah Palin is dead wrong, as usual. She claims on Facebook that the Senate Finance Committee announced that they will remove section 1233 from House bill HR 3200. That, of course, is completely false. The Senate removed the advance directive section from THEIR version of the bill, not because it contained “death panels,” but because, as Jon Stewart put it, “people so lost their [bleep] about it.”

Posted by: WWW | August 23, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Ed Taylor,
I am sad that you did so poorly in your American Government class in 6th grade.
Congressmen and Senators do revise their remarks on the floor. They are usually allowed 7 days for this privilege.
But remarks on the floor are not legislation.
Neither Congressman nor Senator nor the President can change the law after it is passed, except for by going through the same process over again.
Don’t confuse congressional law making with executive branch rule making. The executive branch does make rules (after a legally mandated comment period). But that authority is controlled by the law, as passed by the Congress and signed by the president.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

When your health insurance company forces you to travel to China to get that breast cancer operation you need, will you be for health care reform then? That’s what’s coming. The insurers can save as much as 80% on the costs and you incur the risks. You can stay home and pay the amount your insurer would saved in the form of a deductible if you like, or vote now to change health insurance. – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | August 23, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Walter asks, “WHERE IS THE REPUBLICAN OUTRAGE?”
They are only outraged at the efforts to reform health care. They and their Insurance company sponsors do not want it. Period. They will lie like rugs, and scare the crap out of people, to achieve this end. After Mcaughey was shown by Stewart to be a lying hypocrite (and made to look extremely foolish in the process), she was FIRED from her job the next day.
Republican politicians have repeatedly shown they DO NOT want to work with this administration in any way, shape or form. They have one over-arching concern: regain power. They put party above everything else, including the American people and the economy.
It’s no wonder they are STILL out of power, out of favor, out of ideas, and rapidly becoming a fringe player in national politics…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 23, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

This whole stephy interview was inspired by the democrats having a bunch of crap written in their Bill. (and I’m open minded to socialized medicine) I do not understand why Obama don’t take a ‘RED pilot gel pen’ to this 1000 pg bill, then give it back to congress. (and he’s educated enough for the task) Not to mention he’s the leader in our government who has put the most on the line for some sensible socialized healthcare.

Posted by: Ozarkess | August 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Were Senator McCain to sit in on one of these so called “death panels,” he wouldn’t realize what he was doing there.
Will this guy ever voluntarily give up his drivers license?

Posted by: newz4i | August 23, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Right now all I am seeing is that the “Medical Wealthy” of this country do not want any sort of nationalization of the medical industry. They want to preserve their income base, at all costs. Unfortunately, that cost may involve our entire economic system, if we’re not careful! The highest end of this spectrum are individuals with hilltop houses in the South of France, who will NEVER have to worry about how they get their health care, wherever they happen to be. Point!

Posted by: Marie | August 23, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

McCain is representative of an era that is dying a fast death. The era of unapologetic arrogance that saturated this nations government leadership. An era still coveted by many in the GOP. An era that is so intensely anti-American in its character that I would venture to say is perhaps the NUMBER 1 reason this nation has enemies today. This nation of ours is on the cusp of a possible era of peace and prosperity if it were not for this old failed mindset that is still pulled out of that nasty stained hat and sold to many on the right as fortitude and Americanism. In fact, it is the very arrogance that has finally caught up with this nation and brought her to her knees. It is what those on the left have been fighting tooth and nail to over-come and correct this nation we all love.

Posted by: Rick in Santa Ana | August 23, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The only way democrats will open their eyes and educate themselves is for this public option to go through and those that opt for it can foot the bill. Those that are happy with what they have should not pay the increased taxes required to pay for this. Germany’s tax rate is 48% for a subsudized (NOT FREE) universal healthcare. I personally cannot afford to pay 48% of my gross wages in taxes. Democrats seem to think running up huge deficits is a way of life with all their current entitlement programs. The majority of people that this will cover do not pay taxes as all, repubicans backs are broken from carrying the burden of those that make a lifestyle of paying for food with food stamps, getting in their mercedes and driving to their section 8 homes!!! Fix those problems first!!!!!!!!

Posted by: hh | August 23, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

You know the really ridiculous part of this death panel stuff is that this all stems from language on voluntary end of life counseling with their personal doctor, not with some gov’t body or official. Worse yet is that originally this was a REPUBLICAN idea, name R Georgian Senator Johnny Isakson proposed this very same thing in 2007 and then the Dems inserted into the health bill. So apparently the Dems are sponsoring death panels because they thought a repub had a decent idea.

Posted by: Ordermonger | August 23, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I once unknowingly chose an insurance company from the federal plate that in effect had panels . It was a nightmare!
My wife had a prosthetic heart valve that had a suspected fungal growth on it. Attempts to grow a culture were unsuccessful and the valve was failing. The treatment was for six weeks of multi-spectrum antibiotic IV drips (two different that couldn’t be mixed so she had IVs in both arms).
The insurance company hired retired doctors (apparently on commission) to review cases in a panel fashion. The company required pre-certification and even though she was in the hospital for six weeks would not certify more than a few days at a time.
The company also tried to use every trick to reduce their payment and raise my copay. Foe example, if two or more things were done during surgery (such as cutting through scar tissue to get to the heart) it would invoke multiple procedures in the same operating site and reduce payment for the second procedure.
If it had just been my wife alone without me fighting the battle daily or at least weekly the copay would have been thousands of dollars higher.
Bottom line————–Don’t ever let a panel or committee come between you and your healthcare provider!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Through my employers I’ve been insured by United HealthCare and at times the tax-exempt 501 c 3 company called Blue Cross Blue Shield…and, they have all come between me and my doctors. To note: I’m not sick sick, but I do have arthritis. I’m now on cobra and my insurance rate will go from $265. a month to $900. once my cobra rate is over. I’ll become uninsured for the first time in my life. I’m single and do have a pre-existing illness. What will the cost be for me if I want to buy into a public option…because I can’t afford the for-profits or the non-profit insurance companies that now exist. Can anyone, except for the few?
Mr. Will, the pharmaceutical companies should make great profits. But let me give you an example of outlandish greed. In the eary 80′s Imitrex (migraine med.) was developed and launched in Europe. Ten years later it was available in the U.S. I can buy it through my United Healthcare for $150. for 9 tablets. Once my insurance is over (through cobra) that rate goes to $400. for nine tablets. It’s an old drug sir…how long should RD reimbursement continue. Bottom line: GlaxoSmithKline is engaging in out and out robbery. That’s just my opinion.

Posted by: Maureen | August 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

And here in lies the problems with Republicans. They perpetuate the myths. They continue to use fear and scare. I am so surprised that the American people still fall for this crap.
But you know as I am writing this, maybe they are so afraid of end of life counseling because their doctors will tell them that they are no longer capable of thinking properly and shouldn’t be in the Senate or House.

Posted by: catmom | August 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Walter, If this plan passes by the time you realize I am right it will be too late!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I already have socialized medicine:
It’s called The Veterans Administration
My wife already has the government option:
It’s called CHAMPVA
It’s not perfect but it’s better than using the ER for routine healthcare.

Posted by: Steve | August 23, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

MCCAIN: Look, I don’t think they were called death panels, don’t get me wrong. I don’t think – but on the best treatment procedures part of the bill, it does open it up to decisions being made as far – that should be left – those choices left to the patient and the individual. That’s what I think is pretty clear, which was a different section of the bill.
McCain is deliberately lying and trying to mislead. Decisions under a private plan are not left to the patient and families. BCBS won’t put a new hip in a bed-ridden man who’s had a GBM IV for 12 months just like Medicare will not pay for a new heart for a 90 year old with metastisized melanoma. Yet McCain deliberately states decisions are left to patients and families under our current system.
Arizona will be lucky to throw McCain, a recipient of “socialized” health care his entire life, ever since he was in the cradle, OUT.

Posted by: Marcie1000 | August 23, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Why are people listening to a woman who did not know that Africa was a continent? Do you really think she took the time to read the Bills? Or if she did read them, would she be able to comprehend them? However she came to her conclusions about health care reform her thinking is not rational. Not a big surprise I know. Mrs. Palin is not someone I want interpreting or making decisions for me!

Posted by: matt | August 23, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Sarah Palin can’t keep her own house in order so why would any person of integrity think she is qualified to lead this nation. Does anyone honestly think SHE has read the entire bill? And if she had, what are the odds she understood it? There is no way that she has the expertise to be issuing these “twit” twitterings. Remember: She is unemployed, is a fear-mongerer who is being paid to put out misinformation by insurance lobbyists who want to keep health insurance reform from moving forward and will do or say anything to stay in the spotlight until she can get that book written or land a TV gig. It’s all about the $$$$$$$. Repubicans today are petty minded and mean spirited and somehow think if they keep this administration from succeeding that the results of the last election will change. Get over yourselves, get positive and put this country first!

Posted by: Carol Hall | August 23, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

There are so many Lies and misdirections going on today. The American people (most of us) are not fooled into blindly following liars and posturing fools who only do these thing in the misguided belief that they will return to power. I want the public option, I want end of life counseling to be paid for by my insurance, and I don’t buy into this alarmist BS. When did we become such a country of haters. We hate each other for having different beliefs. We insist that only OUR method is best for all and try to force it on everyone. Who are we kidding here saying we are doing what is best for the country. I am tired of the Republican party telling me what to think, where to pray and what decisions are mine to make and what decisions are there to make for me. GROW UP

Posted by: Jim | August 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

John McCain did not put country first when he foisted Sarah Palin on the American people. In one of the worst economic times of this country, with a war raging and our troops facing death everyday, he would have allowed us to possible be left in the hands of this publicity seeking, intellectually lazy, totally unqualified for the job, young woman. She is interesting and charismatic, she reminds me of my very ditzy but fun neighbor but she should not have been considered for one moment as a possible leader for this country. For a man with John McCains stature to even have thought of putting us in that position for one moment should tell us something, he did it and he did it while at the same time telling us the ecomomy was sound. He did it thinking of his own political gain. So why would anyone give him much or any credibility on what he thinks or says now about the Obama administration or anything else.

Posted by: S, Coffman | August 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I don’t think – but on the best treatment procedures part of the bill, it does open it up to decisions being made as far – that should be left – those choices left to the patient and the individual
==========================================
Where in the bill does it say these decisions would not be left up the patient and the individual? McCain’s straight-talk express was derailed the minute he chose Palin to be his running mate and it has never recovered. He is playing politics with words so as not to anger his far-right constituency…Even, if facts fly in the face of it….

Posted by: indy_voter | August 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

When we start losing our health insurance, and not able to afford it once we lose our jobs, then the Republicans will be blamed for it. They took a stand and it will back fire.

Posted by: hybridhealthcare | August 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Republicans:
Do you think it is RIGHT that insurance companies can drop YOUR FAMILY’S INSURANCE when you get seriously ill, like Robin Beaton?
Do you think it is RIGHT that people are locked out of the OPERATING ROOM for cancer unless they can give the hospital $30000 down, like Robin Beaton?
Do you think your employer is going to KEEP PAYING YOUR family’s insurance if and when the price doubles like it did in the last 10 years?
If you were a Christian, you would say that EVERY AMERICAN must be covered.
If and when your insurance company drops you when your wife get sick with cancer,
Or refuses to issue you health insurance because she has a ‘pre-existing condition’ or points out that her insurance has exceeded its lifetime cap and they are no longer going to pay for her care,
Or if she overcomes her cancer, she is still treated as uninsurable,
THEN MAYBE you will be Christian enough to pray for yourself. But probably not for anyone else.
Republicans are hypocrites. Look at their unwillingness to condemn Sarah Palin’s lies.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Find out what’s going on within the Veterans Administration and then tell me that our elderly won’t befall the same fate. The mindless, pandering left is in denial.

Posted by: rplat | August 23, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

2/3 of BANKRUPCIES in the U.S. are due to medical expenditures.
Thank you Republicans.
BUT EVEN MORE interesting is the fact that 75% of these, medical related, bankrupcies are for families who HAVE health insurance.
Will it happen to your family? I hope not. But it will happen to MANY, MANY, MANY American families.
Let’s fix this mess. Pass the House bill.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

President Obama has gone out of his way to be bipartisan on health care. The republicans have remained lock step. This nation cannot continue to pay 10 thousand a day for ICUs and 75 thousand for prosthetic limbs. The only way to bring pricing back into check is with the public option. The democrats need to stop being so nice and get it done. The health care system is looting this Great Nation.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 23, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Enough of John McCain, please !!!! How easy it is to sit on the sidelines critiquing the President. It is easy to say something and not have to face the consequences. How easy it is to be a Republican and constantly preach negativity . It is easy being McCain and not have the weight of the United States on his shoulders. How about he shut up and come up with positive ways to work effectively with our President.
It is time to understand that people rejected McCain and Palin. Perhaps they wouldn’t have if he had chosen a different Vice President. That choice in itself told most Americans everything they needed to know about him. McCain didn’t know what he was doing or that he could easily be manipulated by the right.
I for one am sick to death of hearing anything he says. If he had a clue then he would be President today.

Posted by: catmom | August 23, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

As Joe Klein put it so succinctly, ” the actual state of play on health care: the nutters are a tiny minority; the Republicans are curling themselves into a tight, white, extremist bubble — but there may be enough of them raising dust to render creative public policy impossible. “

Posted by: tinman | August 23, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

ACCORDING to the American Customer Satisfaction Index, in 2008, there was 85% satisfaction of Veteran Health Administration inpatients and 81% satisfaction of VHA outpatients.
By way of comparison, Nasa scored 77% for users of Users of the Earth Observing System Data & Information Systems (EOSDIS).
ANYONE WHO EVEN DARES suggest eliminating the VA has found an extremely hostile reaction coming from our Vets.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I cannot believe the comments here in response to what McCain said regarding the “end of life” section removed from THE bill.
This “extraneous” bit of wording opened up the opportunity for this gov’t selected board to make decisions or advise people on end of life care and decisions.
This DID NOT BELONG IN LEGISLATION of ANY type.
People talk to their doctors and families about these issues, not gov’t panels.
The Directive that is readily available in hospitals and doctor offices are clear cut, simple.
As George “Rahm’s best friend” said, it’s not in bill –true it isn’t anymore. Secondly, he said it was simply to pay for the “end of life” counseling — Again, any counseling is available as part of any routine Dr. appointments or hospital stays.
Including the “AMBIGUOUS” wording was “up to no good” tactics. Been there, done that with directives — only the most “challenged” of human beings wouldn’t “get it.”
And, although, I’m not a McCain fan, I was very impressed with how clearly he articulated issues, solutions. The contrast between him and Obama the teleprompter guy, was no contest with McCain as the voice of reason and not the wee wee challenged Obama who isn’t quite sure what he is doing–scary that Rahm is helping him out — shades of Karl Rove but worse.

Posted by: pjcafe | August 23, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

A government that’s big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.
Who said it Thomas Jefferson, Gerald Ford, both or neither.
Government takeover of healthcare is like putting a few sprigs of Kudzu in North Georgia for erosion control! Stand back and and watch it expand!
1.58 trillion deficit, 12.3 trillion national debt, you ain’t seen nothing yet!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Democrats… As recently characterized in a recent CSPAN program, they were called “parasites” and that was the nicest thing said about them that night when a group of people who believe in freedom got together to decide what to do about them in 2010.
They *are* parasites. They are lazy. They are anti-American. They want other people to pay their way. They don’t believe in working when someone else can do it for them. They want Big Daddy to take care of it all for them. They literally believe government is good… And they now want free medical care while dragging down the care of those who work hard for a living.
They abhor hard work, belief in God, personal responsibility and fiscal sense. They despise sensible debate. They speak volumes of hate-speech against anyone who disagrees with them while defending the second amendment and then when confronting their opposition, they seek to eliminate that same second amendment when it works against their interests.
They speak volumes about tolerance, except when confronted with truth. Then they label people as Nazis, un-American and even worse labels. When described as such by their opponents, they seek to make laws to ban such speech while living the double-standard that is the measure of their small and inconsequential lives.
They spend other people’s money without thought or care for what was purchased or how well the money was spent. They believe that the taxpayer is an endless ATM and that the citizen is there for the pleasure of the government and not the other way around.
What use is a Democrat other than to consume, spend and create chaos then?
This IS the Democratic Party… Know what you are looking at and know that your rights, your very American identity will be slain on the alter of their wealth redistribution and health-care nightmare.

Posted by: Jon | August 23, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

MCCAIN: “Look, I don’t think they were called death panels, don’t get me wrong. I don’t think”
——————————–
He was once able to think.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Final remark. I do wish that even though George Steph. is best friends with Rahm that he would refrain from jumping to the defense of Rahm and Zeke Emanuel — Clearly, he must be worried about the backlash from his friends if he remains neutral.

Posted by: pjcafe | August 23, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

George Robert Stephanopoulos (born February 10, 1961) is former political adviser. He was a senior political adviser to the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign of Bill Clinton and later became Clinton’s communications director.
In 1988, Stephanopoulos worked on the Michael Dukakis campaign. Another Democrate.

Posted by: Partisan Bias??? | August 23, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

It’s interesting that the Rightwing Puppy Kickers are backing a Quitter, someone who obviously can see Russia from her house and calls that Foreign Policy Experience!!!!
The term death panel is the only Fear-N-Scare tactic that the Right can come up with!! Considering that it is the only thing that for the most part seems to get attention!
What that part is about, is for the Doctors to itemize and be paid for when giving couseling to a patient. What the Right fails to tell people is that end of life counseling has been going on for 25 plus years!
I have to wonder why the Rightwing Puppy Kickers are trying so hard to not have health reform/public option….the only thing I can come up with is, they either work for the Insurance Industry or they work for a politician who is in DEEP with the Insurance Industry….either way they are afraid of loosing their job/insurance!
I wouldn’t doubt it if some of those so-call citizens who have been disrupting the Town Hall meetings are people being PAID by the Insurance Industry!

Posted by: Rightwing Puppy Kickers are Clueless | August 23, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

pjcafe,
You seem a little confused about the facts. The end of life counsiling in the bill, which Sarah Palin explitely refered to in her uninformed rant, is exactly and only a conversation, at the patient’s request, between doctor and patient.
This conversation is NOT WITH ANY BOARD.
You can, and probably should have this conversation, or consultation, with your doctor and family today.
Some people, including Republican lawmakers, thought that this should be covered under Medicare.
The Democrats included this as one of many many common sense ideas in the house bill.
The consultation in question is at YOUR REQUEST, it is between YOU AND YOUR DOCTOR, and you can explicitly ask for extraordinary care (tubes, resperators, defib, the whole shooting match) in YOUR LIVING WILL.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I THINK WE CAN AFFORD to defend the lives of all Americans should they become sick with a life threatening illness.
If you disagree, feel free to voluntarily add your name to list of people who should be left to die with cancer without treatment. I won’t be joining you.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

His inability to parse this question is just as frightening as his willingness to go along with the Death Panel lie. I read the legislation on end of life care and there was no ambiguity at all. The Republicans are using smear and fear because they have no answers of their own and they have been caught with their pants down.

Posted by: Joel Miller | August 23, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

A government that’s big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.-Posted by: Ed Taylor
______________________________
I agree. The desire of the right wing wackos to invade Iraq took much away from American people and the concept of America.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Neither abortion nor death panels are specifically cited in the bill, however they are not specifically excluded either.
The wording is such that abortion could be included under women’s health provisions and death panels could be included in the end of life counseling. You can rest assured that the ACLU, NOW and Planned Parenthood will be poised to act.
Obama’s words as to intent are just doublespeak to get him off the hook, but they do not negate his promises to these groups.
Plus, at any later date congress can clarify anything they wish via “joint resolution” which does not require submission to the president as it isn’t considered legislative action. It is read into the Congressional Record and archived in the Federal Register.
Healthcare Reform and Cap and Trade may just be the most pervasive and invasive bills ever proposed.
On Cap and Trade Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Jon,
Do you remember this day: Sept 19, 2008??? Amnesia is a leading cause of Republicanism.
Washington – Seeking to head off the country’s worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1929, the US government Friday moved urgently to back money market mutual funds, curb certain stock-trading techniques and make more money available for mortgages.
The moves came as top US finance officials prepared to hunker down over the weekend with members of Congress to finalize masssive emergency legislation that would allow the government to buy the brunt of banks’ mortgage-related assets.
The assets have plummeted in value and are at the centre of the current financial turmoil.
‘The American economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We are responding with unprecedented action,’ US President George W Bush said in his starkest assessment yet of the market turmoil.
Bush said it would take massive and unprecedented government intervention to tackle the root cause of the ongoing financial turmoil and prevent a collapse of the wider US economy.
Bush said a comprehensive rescue plan, which could run into the hundreds of billions of dollars, was the only way to keep the financial sector from a total failure and prevent credit availability to US consumers from drying up completely.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Walter, you are so right. The conversation does not start with the board — patient can talk with doctor and doctor is reimbursed. The conversation leads to the board, depending upon the requests of the patient. I did shortcut that – sorry.
The paid – for part is the problem and this is where the ambiguous language comes in — Why do you think the Dems. agreed to remove — I taught years of language and logic — The phrasing in the bill drafts makes them open to all kinds of interpretations, depending on who is interpreting.
The whole point is that the insurance company methods and especially the cancellation issues need to be addressed. We don’t need Obama to overhaul, we need “repair”.
The majority of Americans are happy with the way their insurance works — The strain on the system caused by the uninsured or the cancelled policies needs to be addressed.
Most recently, Obama has said that it is a misrepresentation that illegals will receive HC through the proposals.
He is correct — it is a misrepresentation because his next big plan is for AMNESTY — there won’t be any illegals — and there will be real problems then.

Posted by: pjcafe | August 23, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I really don’t like Palin at all or what she has to say because it rarely makes sense.
But this time I sorta go alone with what she had to say this time.
What this plan is going to do is kill all of us to have to pay for this plan and that where everyone is going to die because we won’t be able to go to the doctor because we are going to have to pay for this plan and we wouldn’t have the money to go to the doctor for anything because we are to busy paying for this stupid plan.

Posted by: Carol | August 23, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

I don’t care what was in the bill or not.. the Federal government should not be involved with my health care.. They have screwed it up for old people now they want to do it for everybody else.. Leave us alone.. I think we were better off when they spent there time partying and screwing their secretary’s after they were elected.. At least they have time to mess the country up.

Posted by: bill | August 23, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

A doddering old man and a psyco chick are out there trying to slay windmills. You Ain’t seen nothing yet Don Quixote.

Posted by: BikernAz12 | August 23, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

I broke my wrist in nine pieces and had to call an ambulance to get to the hospital. The ambulance wasn’t covered, it was deemed “unnecessary” due to “only” having a fracture. I don’t drive and would have needed to take the bus or a cab to the hospital. The fracture required subsequent surgery and a plate. Same when my daughter fell rollerskating and suffered a concussion. She was semi-conscious and transported by paramedics to the hospital. It was deemed to not be the nearest, so the ambulance and her overnight stay were not covered. Ask me if I’m scared of “death panels” LOL. Wake up, folks, they already exist. My doctor spend hours on the phone with an insurance company NURSE, trying to get them to approve my medication for rheumatoid arthritis. It wasn’t approved and I got worse, to the point of having to go on Social Security Disability. Tell me again what I have to fear from any changes to the existing health “care”???

Posted by: Char Bransky | August 23, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

So glad these two fools lost.

Posted by: John Bester | August 23, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

“Neither abortion nor death panels are specifically cited in the bill, however they are not specifically excluded either.”
Ed Taylor thinks that health reform legislation should UNILATERALY remove coverage for women’s reproductive health and choices from EVERYONE’s health insurance.
That, Ed, would be ‘government takeover’
You know what is NOT government takeover?
Let every American family make their own decision on whether abortion is included or excluded from their own coverage.
Let every American family make their own decision on whether they want a non-insurance company health insurance policy (known as the ‘public plan’).
But I will tell you what is UnAmerican and Unacceptable. That is the Republican idea that someone hit with cancer should be refused treatment by an insurance company that refused to insure sick people or even hands out bonuses when an employee of the insurance company cancels someone’s insurance AFTER they get sick with cancer, like they did with Robin Beaton.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Bill, apparently “old people” are happy about their Government run plan.

Posted by: John Bester | August 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Ed Taylor can you explain in your own words what the greenhouse effect is and what role carbon dioxide plays?
Try to be concise.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

I wonder where Rev. Rick Warren is in this health care debate. Wonder if he is interested in preaching God’s love for everyone and one of God’s two biggest commandments: love thy neighbor.

Posted by: teddymaniac | August 23, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

The only thing Ole John said that was accurate was, “I don’t think”.

Posted by: JR | August 23, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

McCain is just another shill in the Republican disinformation campaign to scare people into voting for them in the mid-cycle election. There are no “death panels” or anything even remotely close to this concept. McCain’s completely off-the-wall remarks that putting end-of-life discussions and cost cutting together leads to that conclusion are more a demonstration of Republican desperation.

Posted by: GaLiberal | August 23, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Outcry Over Vets’
End-of-Life Guide
Specter calls for Senate hearings to scrutinize end-of-life care guide that one former Bush official calls a ‘hurry-up-and-die’ message to veterans
The Obama DEATHPANELS do exist!!! ABC running from this story..lets see if they play China and take this down

Posted by: stardate: 2732.5 | August 23, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Integrity…McShame has none..he is about as credible as my house shoes.too bad you dont hold him accountable for what he tries to do to destroy the country

Posted by: jmp | August 23, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Indithinkers comment below is right on the mark. “So how does a panel that decides what is covered and what is not different from a clerk at my insurance company denying a claim because they don’t want to pay for it? Right now we are at the mercy of an insurance company when it comes to what is covered (no doctors involved) and it is not between me and my doctor.” Having a conversation with me later in life puts me closer to the drivers seat rather than an allowing an insurance clerk to ration my care.

Posted by: Robin | August 23, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

To score political points, Republicans have decided that you and your family deserve to die. Then, when the bill goes ahead without them, they’ll complain that the WH acted unilaterally, without asking for their input. The death panel is composed of Republican Congresspeople. Don’t forget that during the next election.

Posted by: Evo Lunz | August 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

pjcafe wrote, “This “extraneous” bit of wording opened up the opportunity for this gov’t selected board to make decisions or advise people on end of life care and decisions.”
That is a pure, unadulterated LIE. There is (or was) nothing in there implicitly or explicitly giving the government ANY authority to ‘make decisions’ about end of life situations. NOTHING!

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 23, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Ed — Not quite sure what you are apologizing for — possibly for being the minority voice in the crush of left-wing loyalists. I’ll have to read your earlier posts.
The voices in my head are saying, “some people really don’t care if we lose our rights — and the ACORN people who came to our local council meeting are the voices of socialism and corruption — and they are given more credibility than those of us who have worked hard and been penny-wise.
We’ve always taken care of those in need. Reform means assuring people that there are resources available — not imposed gov’t mandates or feebies for freeloaders. Those who made their way out of the depression and became successful through honesty and integrity are now penalized? Do you think little miss rich Pelosi will be “one of us in the redistribution? Don’t count on it — She’ll be in Martha’s Vineyard with the other celebs — Obamas.
Scary time now with Obama’s agenda.
Can’t believe so many ignorant people.

Posted by: pjcafe | August 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Paul Krugman and the little guy sitting next to him looked like amatures when George Will shot down every theroy they tried to express
Stimulus on hold till close to 2010 2012 elections to make Obama look good Shovel ready anyone? anyone? Got jobs anyone? anyone? Only jobs saved so far have been state jobs….

Posted by: stardate: 2732.5 | August 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

OK, this confirms it. Republicans have devolved into the Party of Fear, lead by wealthy charlatans and Lobby Puppets who prey upon the dimwitted, the emotionally disordered, the conspiracy theorists, and the rapture ready. Let’s scare the serfs! Watch out – Health Care Reform is a Monster in your Closet!

Posted by: Lobby Reform | August 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“I cannot believe the comments here in response to what McCain said regarding the “end of life” section removed from THE bill.”
The Senate Finance Committee announced they would be removing the “end of life” provision from THEIR bill, not THE bill. Sarah Palin claimed on Facebook that they were removing section 1233 from HR 3200. That is utterly false.
“People talk to their doctors and families about these issues, not gov’t panels.”
There is no panel (death, gov’t, or otherwise) in section 1233 that would be involved in the consultations. It is clear that the sessions would be between the individual and his doctor.
“As George “Rahm’s best friend” said, it’s not in bill –true it isn’t anymore.”
Untrue. Section 1233 is still in HR 3200.
“Secondly, he said it was simply to pay for the ‘end of life’ counseling — Again, any counseling is available as part of any routine Dr. appointments or hospital stays.”
Medicare does not currently pay for end-of-life consultations. Doctors are forced to use other billing codes for the more routine types of counseling – resulting in a reduced pay rate.
“…only the most ‘challenged’ of human beings wouldn’t ‘get it.’”i
Yes, Betsy McCaughey, Palin’s “challenged” cohort in the death panel game, certainly had trouble with her reading comprehension during a recent appearance on The Daily Show. That show is a must see and is available in its entirety on the web.

Posted by: WWW | August 23, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Listening to Krugman and Reich, we all get the fact that health care overall costs too much and are all scared should we lose our insurance.
The issue with me and a good portion of the American public is how will the Fed’s keep costs under control? they cannot do it now with Medicare. How will they make my deductible lower, my co-=pays lower, etc?
If Obama and the Dems want support for the public option, they need to tell us what our insurance tab would be, benefits offered, co-pays, etc. Then explain how they will reduce costs to not expand total health care beyond the 16% of GDP or expand the national debt.
they cannot do it or will not do it. They are asking us to buy some ambigous plan and promise that if we spend more money, things will get cheaper.
the Financial Crisis taught us as consumers to know how much that house, that care and that insurance will cost you before signing your life away on the documents. Congress just does not get it.

Posted by: scott jeffries | August 23, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

We already have death panels. They are called INSURANCE COMPANIES. We have heard story after story about insurance companies denying coverage to people who have paid bills for years. They run out the clock banking on the fact that people will die without treatment. OR they just won’t cover you at all unless there is a huge chance that your whole premium will go directly to their profits. At least government death panels you have a chance of voting out. Insurance companies call the shots and are not about to let those shots hit them in the pocket books.
END THE INSURANCE COMPANY DEATH SQUADS. SUPPORT PUBLIC OPTION.

Posted by: Chidem | August 23, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

McCain is also the one who pushed for the “Obama is palling with terrorists” line. It is sad to see this fool undo all that went into creating his reputation. During the last 2 years, he revealed to the entire world that he is just a deceptive cretin with who does not care about the people in this country.

Posted by: Evo Lunz | August 23, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“The whole point is that the insurance company methods and especially the cancellation issues need to be addressed. We don’t need Obama to overhaul, we need “repair”.
Disallowing exclusion for preexisting conditions, eliminating lifetime caps that mean when your cancer goes above that YOU HAVE NO INSURANCE, disallowing cancellation WHEN YOU GET SICK are a big deal.
But you can call it ‘repair’ if you prefer that word.
The voluntary conversation between you and your doctor leads to… A LIVING WILL. Or not. It is always up to you. You always have the right to rescend your voluntary document.
It’s only purpose is to allow you to clearly state what YOU WANT, in the case of medical emergency where you cannot communicate and where your next of kin (if any) may be left with the responsibility to guess what you would want.
‘Leads to the board…’ If you teach logic, I’m sure you tell your student that this is a Leap of Logic.
It is in fact, an assumption, not a logical inference, like suggesting that doctors have secret operations where they remove valuable organs from the homeless, for sale on the black market.
I WANT A PUBLIC OPTION for my own family, but lets be clear what exactly what I am calling for:
Based on their profit directed short-circuit of their responsibility to their clients (cancelling Robin Beaton’s insurance AFTER she got sick) and to the whole society (sharing the financial risk over AS LARGE A POOL as possible, not cherry picking), I don’t trust them any farther than you, evidently, trust Barack Obama.
Therefore, I would like the government to set up a non-insurance company, insurance company. And I would like to be allowed to CHOOSE to enroll my family. This non-insurance insurance company should require premiums that match their expenditures.
But it has to be large enough to compete. Therefore, cutting it up into 51 pieces (including D.C.) is not acceptable. Ask Chuck Grassley about coops in Iowa. They were small and weak and they DIED. Coincidently, like so may uninsured in America.
SOME PEOPLE consider it important to deny me the right to make my own, free will, choice of a non-insurance insurance company.
THEIR AGENDA is politics. Cripple this president. Let the uninsured who get seriously ill die. Machiavellian? Yes. Christian? No.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Thank God McCain and Palin are still out there speaking publicly. Now we can affirm without a doubt and breathe with a huge sigh of relief that we dodged one hell of a bullet in the last election.

Posted by: Karl | August 23, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Unfortunately, John McCain looked like an angry old man, who is still seething that the American public had the good sense not to elect him.

Posted by: mikel625 | August 23, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

The funny thing about Palin’s comment about ‘death panels’ is that she was FOR voluntary end-of-life counseling a couple of years ago. Way back at the beginning of her half-term as governor of Alaska. She was (and is) on record as saying it (counseling) was a good thing and she fully supported it. I guess she has a typical politicians selective memory……

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 23, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Boy, Palin is the albatross that clings to the GOP’s neck. McCain has to defend her, he’s the one that was ignorant enough to pick her as a running mate.

Posted by: Chuck | August 23, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

“I don’t care what was in the bill or not.. the Federal government should not be involved with my health care.. They have screwed it up for old people now they want to do it for everybody else”
Bill, you are entitled to your opinion of course, even if they are fact free.
Tell you what. Why don’t you start a campaign to KILL MEDICARE and Veteran’s benefits.
WHY DON’T YOU SPEND LOTS OF MONEY EXPLAINING THE REPUBLICAN PROGRAM TO KILL MEDICARE AND VET’S BENEFITS on Radio, TV, Newspapers and the Internet.
I might even send you a dollar to help you spread your message. (Even though I don’t agree with it.)

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Dear Sen. John McCain, you are old enough to speak honestly rather than dancing to the crazy GOP tune. You should fear nobody in your party, least of all Sarah Palin.

Posted by: teddymaniac | August 23, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Health Reform is needed NOW. Mental health needs to be reformed too, as demonstrated by the mental problems of McCain and quitter Palin.

Posted by: Karl | August 23, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

it is amazing how much concurrence there is for insurance reform to prevent coverage being cancelled before a surgery, insuring kids to 25 if in college and more.
This can be paid for with current money and dollars. What no one can explain to me how will the public option make insurance and medical care cheaper.
It cannot unless cost controls are in place first. This can be done with Medicare and Medicaid. It should be done first to make these programs solvent and the scientic and procedures knowledge can be transferred to the private sector.
The public option increases debt and spending. It does nto reduce costs.
Our Chinese Bankers (see current Newseek) will not continue to fund our deficit spending indefinitly. We as a country must first get spending under control for current plans before starting new ones.

Posted by: scott jeffries | August 23, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Neo-cons love the term “Obamacare” but they should be using “Obama-Scare”.

Posted by: JR | August 23, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

pjcafe,
So you would like to tell Robin Beaton that her cancer DIDN’T EXIST???
You would like to tell her that her insurance company didn’t CANCEL HER INSURANCE when she got sick???
You would like to tell her that she wasn’t told by the hospital that without a $30,000 deposit, which she didn’t have that her cancer surgery would be cancelled???
You would like to tell her that her cancer was not cancelled and that agressive, cancerous mass in her breast didn’t DOUBLE IN SIZE before she was able to get surgery?
What a dark place you keep your soul.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I’m so incredibly outraged with McCain. He will only ‘standby’ Palin when it suits him and he certainly didn’t do that grand of a job while she was on his ticket (nor in the aftermath). A true RINO and a disgrace to conservatives (and yes, I know he’s NOT one). At least Sarah has the guts to tell it like it is so that ‘we the people’ understand, unlike your typical politician….makes me wanna gag.

Posted by: lyfsatrip | August 23, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Stardate wrote, “Outcry Over Vets’End-of-Life Guide.
Specter calls for Senate hearings to scrutinize end-of-life care guide that one former Bush official calls a ‘hurry-up-and-die’ message to veterans.
The Obama DEATHPANELS do exist!!! ABC running from this story..lets see if they play China and take this down.”
The guide, called “Your Life, Your Choices”, can be found at this site:
va.gov/pugetsound/docs/ylyc.pdf.
This has been around for longer than Obama has been President.
No, there are no death panels. Use of the guide was suspended by GW Bush, and is being revised and may be used again soon. It discusses how to set up a living will, power of attorney, DNR directives, etc. Quite informative, actually…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 23, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

What Mccain is really saying
If You could read his mind
“My constituents, (the Insurance Lobby),
Have Ordered me to Just say No to any Public option–
That way they can keep premiums artificially high”
Therefore, Sarah and I, and The Republican minority will continue to make grandiose
lies, to further dumb down the electorate”
Anyone against a Public option is either paid off or dumbed down
Its Kind of like having Public and Private Colleges
You Choose
Which you would rather go to
Or using the Post office vs UPS or Fedex
Now that’s a scary Proposition
GOP Doom Gloom and the Propagandistic Politics of fear
Once again
Perhaps they really do want to be the Chicken Little Party
Their working hard at it!!!!

Posted by: brian | August 23, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

The Party of Noooo!!!!! They are willing to oppose everything just for the chance of political gain. Ends Justify the Means, but is the end of gaining power worth flushing the sick Americans down the toilet?

Posted by: Dale | August 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

When insurance companies deny coverage, aren’t they being “death panels” too? How come Palin isn’t complaining about that?

Posted by: Bob z | August 23, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

You let teh government into controlling your access to medical care, and you are bound to get something that you do not like in the future. Since we have elections every two years in Congress, we cannot guarantee the make of the congress when the Boomers need Medicare the most or when you yourself will be old and infirmed.
Its intersting the Democrats beat back defining amendments to keep the end of life consuleing voluntary and optional…They know as we all know to control spending, hard choices will need to be made about Grandma.

Posted by: scott jeffries | August 23, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

FActCheck has checked Obama’s lies-you may not be able to keep your insurance if you like it & Obamacare will allow for government funded abortions-check out the factcheck.org site. Become informed on who is being dishonest. Hey George how about a bit of objective reporting on the lies Obama has accused others of, but yet hes the one who is lying. In his phone meeting with religious leaders he accused others of bearing false witness. Obama is bearing false witness against others. George you fail to report these things and your credibility suffers. Your employers credibility suffers along with you.

Posted by: ctay | August 23, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I would love someone to ask him how it is any different than what we already have.
Is he saying that our private insurance companies don’t make decisions from afar, and make “death panel” choices.
Yeah we all know they do.. the only difference is that their choices are PRIMARILY about them making a profit, and if we die with them making extra profit, so much the better.
We already have a death panel – it’s called insurance.

Posted by: DK | August 23, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

In short, I believe that the insurance companies should be pushed out of the system and that a public option should be available. Thank you for listening.

Posted by: scott jeffries | August 23, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Posted by: rplat | Aug 23, 2009 9:34:41 AM
…Interpreting the legislation does require a certain amount of abstract thought and the ability to work outside the box . . . nevertheless it sets the groundwork for a system that has the potential for ending your life. Blathering about rich Republicans and their ability to buy their healthcare is a blatantly ignorant response to a very real threat.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The “abstract thought” you are referring to is called ‘paranoid thinking’.
It is what Republicans and the far-right seem to be ruled and motivated by each and every day of their lives. I have been observing these ‘paranoid’ ideas and conclusions for years now and wondering how this came about. Is there anyone out there that has done (or knows of) a study on this issue?
However, let’s assume that the “groundwork” was laid, and the ‘final solution’ you and the other ‘paranoids’ worry about happened down-line. Do you really think that once was set to happen (even once) and the concerned people started screaming about it (as they are now to the media), that it would not be stopped immediately by any means possible?
Based upon the last statement in your post, I would be willing to bet my bottom dollar that you believe it would continue from that point on.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Thank God we have people like Sarah not afraid to tell it like it is. Mr. President, the American people have spoken and continue to speak LOUDLY. You can cram this BS down our throats or you can work on refroming health care. YOUR CHOICE !!!!!

Posted by: Greg | August 23, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

My previous rant was just a parody, to illustrate how these right wingers are deluded. Health care reform with a public option is the best way to go, together with preexisting condition and cap changes.

Posted by: ctay | August 23, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

John McCain is a Maverick, no doubt and a true Patriot. I have had the greatest respect for him for many years. However, he stopped putting Country First when he chose Sarah Palin for a running mate. He needed someone to stir the base of the Republican Party (who have not thought of him in favorable terms on many occasions). This is not a man willing to speak up and be honest about his opinions of Sarah Palin. He refused to say he would endorse her as a candidate in 2012 which clearly says he doesn’t think she is competent enough to run. He has buckling under to to the Republican base it got easier and easier to do it again.

Posted by: Sharonkathleen | August 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Separate from whether Palin was right or wrong is that in this “interview” Stephanopoulis argues the liberal side of the issue instead of examining the facts behind what was brought up by McCain. Apparently his objectivity is still tainted by his background.

Posted by: William Richards | August 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

So, to make my point clear, we need the health insurance companies out of the system or at least competing in a real market against at least one Government player.

Posted by: Greg | August 23, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

That said, both Palin and McCain are evil liars.

Posted by: William Richards | August 23, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“This can be paid for with current money and dollars. What no one can explain to me how will the public option make insurance and medical care cheaper.”
I would love to answer your question. Thanks for posting it here.
First off, you should know I am in favor of a public option and I would like the CHOICE to enroll my family there.
But first, let’s be clear what I am asking for. The so called ‘public option’ should operate like a new, non-profit insurance company. I call it the non-insurance company insurance company.
The non-insurance company would take in premiums and these premiums would be required to cover their medical and other expenditures.
They would be required to take all Americans (illegals are explicely not qualified to participate), under the same law that will apply to every other oinsurer.
So why do I want my family in this program?
1. I don’t trust the insurance companies. They have a history of dropping people when they get sick or, in the case of small employers, raising rates until the seriously sick employee is dropped. These activities will be prohibited under the house bill, but I believe the insurance companies will do their best to get around the law.
2. A public plan would give me portability. In other words, my family’s health insurance is no longer ties to my employer and I am not locked into my present job to maintain insurance.
3. A public plan would provide competition to the existing insurance companies. They need it. It is estimated that 94% of the U.S. are effectively non-competitive markets for health insurance. (Some Republicans have suggested eliminating state regulation for the purpose of establishing national competition but a small number of mega-companies are expected to own the market, also state based consumer protection is not replaced with national consumer protections.
4. Dividing the non-insurance company up into little coops is intended to make sure they are so weak that they would die. Ask Chuck Grassley. This is exactly what happened to coops in Iowa. Also, the insurance companies would most likely ‘sponsor’ or organize the coops so instead of competing with the coop, they would just add them as one division of their corporation.
5. Most importantly, the directors of the non-insurance insurance company would be working under a best care for their clients mandate, rather than a best care for their stockholders mandate.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

FACT: The Veteran’s administration does have an “end of life” counselling book that is given to Veterans of the US military that seek treatment at the local VA and the medical centers may not give the veterans proper treatment so the VA reads the veterans the book on death options.
FACT: Only veterans get this counselling. The logical conclusion is somebody would have to be STUPID to defend this nation.
Lie on, Obama supporters. You’re all loathsome and deserve VA treatment for your medical conditionsw.

Posted by: Bill H | August 23, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Posted by: rplat | Aug 23, 2009 9:34:41 AM
…Interpreting the legislation does require a certain amount of abstract thought and the ability to work outside the box . . . nevertheless it sets the groundwork for a system that has the potential for ending your life. Blathering about rich Republicans and their ability to buy their healthcare is a blatantly ignorant response to a very real threat.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The “abstract thought” you are referring to is called ‘paranoid thinking’.
It is what Republicans and the far-right seem to be ruled and motivated by each and every day of their lives. I have been observing these ‘paranoid’ ideas and conclusions for years now and wondering how this came about. Is there anyone out there that has done (or knows of) a study on this issue?
However, let’s assume that the “groundwork” was laid, and the ‘final solution’ you and the other ‘paranoids’ worry about happened down-line. Do you really think that once was set to happen (even once) and the concerned people started screaming about it (as they are now to the media), that it would not be stopped immediately by any means possible?
Based upon the last statement in your post, I would be willing to bet my bottom dollar that you believe it would continue from that point on.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Palin was absolutely correct. Any government panel that is chartered to make final medical determinations based on cost-effectiveness measures and without appeal, can and will eventually cause the premature death of our elderly
**************************************
OMG what wacko nonsense is this?

Posted by: Thinking | August 23, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“Sarah has the guts to tell it like it is so that ‘we the people’ understand, unlike your typical politician…”
When the legislative Troopergate report was released last year, Sarah had to “guts” to tell the media: “Well, I’m very very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing, any hint of any kind of unethical activity there.”
And here’s what the report ACTUALLY said: “Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110a of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.”
When are her faithful followers going to open their eyes?

Posted by: WWW | August 23, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The comments calling out George for correcting Sen. McCain with the facts are interesting. Many of you go on about how George is in someway supporting the Dems. If somebody makes a false statement, shouldn’t they be corrected? Or the facts just an inconvenience that you would rather overlook? My favorite Repub sounding silly was Grassley. He said he only said those things about “death panels” to quell the concerns of his constituents that believe there were death panels! He acknowledged there was nothing in the bill like that, so how does it take away the concerns that there are, by stating there are, when you know there are not?

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Why stop at the invention of “death panels”? Why not accuse the President of endorsing “organ harvesting panels” or “sterilization panels”? After all, if the objective is to kill healthcare reform and make doctors richer, then any claim – no mater how big of a lie – is justified, right?

Posted by: AlChemist | August 23, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

“you may not be able to keep your insurance if you like it ”
Ctday, the status quo is that NOTHING stops your employer from switching insurance companies (or removing your current plan from the limited range of options).
SO YOU WANT the Democrats to overrule employers and force them to always offer you your current plan.
SO YOU WANT a government takeover. That’s not in the house bill, but you could ask them to change it. Hypocrite.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

I notice your transcript only capitalizes Democrat. Telling, and childish.

Posted by: hawkdriver | August 23, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

We already have death panels, just private for profit death panels.
Private insurance is a death panel.
Wake up people.

Posted by: DK | August 23, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Obama said “I don’t know all the facts but the police acted stupidly.” And you’re going to trust this lying clown on health care. Palin ran a state and McCain fought for this country (pointless given its present citizens). Obama is only good for bad mouthing the USA and making people fill out forms for emmigration.

Posted by: Bill H | August 23, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Also, now that her death panel rant blew up in her face, Silly Sarah now is on the “death book” for vets! On her face book she stated that “the Veterans Administration encourages veterans to forego care as they make end-of-life decisions.” Of course Steele and Hannity have jumped on the bandwagon. They failed to mention that the so-called “death book” contains the same advance-care planning required of all health care organizations under federal law, has been in use since 1997 and was developed with the input of interfaith ministers. These are the people some of your Republicans put your faith and trust in! Liars all, only interested in power, truth and country be damned!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Currently many doctors will find a way to get a patient treatment even if denied by an “evil insurance company.” However if the government says no to a procedure that’s it.
This is because the government has an armed force, federal marshals, the IRS and the judiciary to punitively enforce decisions made by faceless bureaucrats against doctors who do not follow federal regulations and laws. My doctor and I can deal with insurance companies we can’t deal with the finality of a bureaucratic decision backed by the threat of punitive action.
Nevertheless, if my concerns are about nothing, as the Dems claim, and if the Dems are serious regarding their claims I’ve got it wrong they should be willing to insert something like the following in the bill, “Congress shall make no law and the bureaucrats shall make no regulations which places any government agency between the patient and the doctor regarding treatment.”
Now that’s reasonable isn’t it? I doubt the President or the Dems will be so reasonable which leads me to think perhaps Zeke and the boys have their own agenda for cutting costs.

Posted by: Robert Coggins | August 23, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

“The Veteran’s administration does have an “end of life” counselling book that is given to Veterans of the US military that seek treatment at the local VA and the medical centers may not give the veterans proper treatment so the VA reads the veterans the book on death options.”
Bill H is against Vets having a Living Will and wants to FORCE vets to be hooked up to machines against their will.
Perhaps, Bill would like to join some of the other nutjobs here and call for the elimination of Medicare and the Veterans Administration.
I AM ALL FOR Republicans voicing their anti-Medicare, anti-Vets benefits, anti-government spew.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

McCain is simply one more unprincipled Republican who will say anything to play a political game. Here he is defending Palin when every independent investigator has stated that death panels are a ball-faced lie. This is unconscionable. I’m so glad he was defeated. Why these people would be listened to when the last eight years should have proved beyond a reasonable doubt that they are completely incompetent is beyond me.

Posted by: sosupernova | August 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I believe ‘Soylent Green’ said it all. With research attempting to alter the natural birth/death ratio in the world, its quite possible we will have to resort to some sort of ‘option’ eventually. —- if cancer and other major diseases are curable in the future, no one but the rich will be able to afford it. The rest will get placebos and promises of green meadows.

Posted by: Noregard | August 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Thank God we have people like Sarah not afraid to tell it like it is. Mr. President, the American people have spoken and continue to speak LOUDLY. You can cram this BS down our throats or you can work on refroming health care. YOUR CHOICE !!!!!-Greg
===================================
I too love Sara Palin. She is destroying the Republican party from within.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

why is ABC wasting our time with a brain dead old fool who obviously never read that which he is willing to vote against? McBraindead is an amoral political has-been. It appear that it’s becoming difficult to find Congressional guests who are not hacks spouting the party line and let the facts fall where they may. Puke!

Posted by: billcue | August 23, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Centralized healthcare decisions lead to health rationing. Anyone here the story from Oregon and many other examples from Canada and Britain.? It looks like Centralized healthcare supporters are upset because Palin is exposing this.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Robert Coggins, how about allowing my family to make IT’S OWN CHOICE to join a government sponsored non-insurance company insurance option?
To clarify, this non-insurance company option would collect premiums from those people who choose to participate and these premiums would have to cover all medical and non-medical expenditures.
And you should be free to choose a private, for profit, insurance company for YOUR family.
IF your only objection is that too many people might make that choice, that would be like saying that we should have cancelled the elections last November because it looked like too many people might choose Obama for their president.
Besides, no one who believes it the bad government theory of America is ever going to choose the public non-insurance company insurance option, so the private companies could continue to treat their clients as expenses to be minimized and they will never go out of business!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Posted by: WWW | Aug 23, 2009 1:01:28 PM
“Sarah has the guts to tell it like it is so that ‘we the people’ understand, unlike your typical politician…And here’s what the report ACTUALLY said: “Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110a of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.”
When are her faithful followers going to open their eyes?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You’re trying to carry on a rational conversation with the far-right?….Are you kidding me?!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Again, let me reiterate. These are not my personal opinions but rather an independent fact checking organization’s conclusion.
Posted by: ctay | Aug 23, 2009 1:17:41 PM
————————————
Would you consider yourself Pro-Obama then?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

George Stephanopoulos has never had any credibility. American’s are not stupid. Get off the Centralized Government train already.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Bill H | Aug 23, 2009 1:08:44 PM — McCain fought for this country (pointless given its present citizens)—— Exactly what does that mean Bill? Are there only certain people who should be allowed to be citizens? Your bigotry is showing! And guess what Bill, they did act stupidly! If you listened to the radio calls, The Sgt. said the man did have ID stating he was the owner but to keep the cars coming! Why? The Sgt inflamed the situation. If

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Centralized healthcare decisions lead to health rationing. Anyone here the story from Oregon and many other examples from Canada and Britain.? It looks like Centralized healthcare supporters are upset because Palin is exposing this.
Posted by: Mike | Aug 23, 2009 1:24:23 PM
———————
So then what are do you think the odds are that Medicare will be taken form the oldies?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Palin is a target that ABC is using.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Walter convinced me. His articulate arguments make a lot of sense. I want choice too. I apologize for being ignorant and thank you for educating me. Now I will try to convince others.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

George Stephanopoulos has never had any credibility. American’s are not stupid. Get off the Centralized Government train already.
Posted by: Mike
——Soooooooooo, what country claims you?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Too all the liars out there saying that there will be rationing and no choice: I now KNOW that is not the case. Instead, now that people have explained it to me, I realize that the insurance companies have been rationing, and I definitely have no choice right now! How could I have been so stupid all this time!

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Great to see all the leftys here defending HC reform.Great to see your talking points being expressed with such vigour.Welcome to the real world of socialized medicine.You know,rationning,elective surgery cuts,HC union strikes,(I am sure the SECIU,has a new gov HC union planned,just gotta love those strikes tossing a backlogged system into all out armageddon)legacy costs,administrators out numbering HC workers,massive tax increases,huge HC budget shortfalls.Theres so much more thrilling things your soon going to really enjoy.Great to have a new commer to the real world of socialism.

Posted by: David | August 23, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I cannot believe it. I thought Palin was telling the truth. But after informing myself, it is impossible to keep that belief up. I’m so disappointed. She is a damn liar.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

ctay, the House bill does not require employers to change your insurance.
The house bill does not require employers to freeze you insurance.
SO LONG AS ALMOST EVERYONE gets their insurance from their employer, these decisions are up to the employer.
Because complicated answers tend to make people’s eyes glaze over, and because TV news thinks a 5 second sound byte is just as good as a complete explanation, Obama has sometimes used the short version of the answer.
He has also used the long version.
In this case, factcheck is not saying that Obama’s is being dishonest, nor are they saying that he answer is flat out wrong. They are saying that it overreaching, implying more than is achieved in this bill.
Sometimes an answer is 90% correct. Saying that it is a lie would be false.
Saying that it is wrong would imply that it is 100% wrong would be overreaching on your part.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Walter | Aug 23, 2009 1:24:43 PM— IF your only objection is that too many people might make that choice, that would be like saying that we should have cancelled the elections last November because it looked like too many people might choose Obama for their president —————— That is exactly what some of them would have liked to do! How many times have you seen and heard the phrase “Take back our country!” From who? The democratically elected President. Think about it, all the whine about now is the deficit, none of them had one issue when Pres. Bush inherited a surplus and spent it into a deficit! Money that was spent on a war of choice and rebuilding Iraq. Not on the American people. Now that we have a President who actually wants to help the people of his own country, they scream bloody murder! Pathetic!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Socialized medicine would be very good. There is no place for private “for profit” when people’s lives are at play.

Posted by: David | August 23, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Dave when you use the word socialism what do you mean? Do you consider it a loaded word?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Kenneth,
This is not about pro or anti Obama this is about policies and facts. Lets have a conversation about the facts.
Obama said on August 19th “You’ve heard that this is all going to mean government funding of abortion. Not true. This is all, these are all fabrications”
INDEPENDENTLY CERTIFIED FACT-
“it’s a matter of fact that it would allow both a “public plan” and newly subsidized private plans to cover all abortions.
This makes Obama a liar. Obama’s credibility is blown on this policy. The public is no longer able to trust Obama on matters such as healthcare.
Its not about pro or anti Obama its about FACTS.

Posted by: ctay | August 23, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

ctay why are you scared about proclaiming explictly where you stand?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

The free market has always been a difficult economic subject for Democrats and liberals to understand. A private insurance company NEVER forces anyone to do anything. If you don’t like the way your private insurance company operates, go somewhere else. If the federal government is the only health-care provider, as George so aggressively promotes and apparently supports, then I would agree that the “patient” would be forced to do what the “provider” requires. But only then.

Posted by: Riley | August 23, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I’m with the Republicans on this. Let’s just continue what we’re doing until our country becomes completely bankrupt. Lets get rid of social security, medicare, medicade, welfare, public housing, disability and other social programs until half our nation is homeless. This will become a sensitive political issue before the 2010 election and the voters in this country will see that the Republicans are the one’s who are directly responsible for keeping them from getting any healthcare. Not withstanding they already have sent over 4000 of our finest to their deaths over a ‘war of lies’. We won’t ever forget that! It will be reflected at the polls with another landslide by Democrats.

Posted by: Sue | August 23, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Mike,
If ‘centralized healthcare’, which the house bill neither promises nor provides leads to rationing, THEN IT WOULD BE THE SAME AS TODAY.
You should do some reading about the many, many, many, many times insurance companies denied health care that a doctor thought appropriate, including cases where the insurance company’s decision LEAD TO DEATH.
Ask Robin Beaton how fun it is to have your insurance company cancel your insurance WHEN YOU GET SICK with cancer, and to have the hospital tell you the operation will not be allowed to go forward until you COME UP WITH $30,000 down.
Ask Miss Beaton how it feels to know you have a particularly agressive form of cancer, growing in your body, without treatment, doubling in size.
Ask the family in California (can’t remember the name) whose insurance company denied their little boy a liver transplant, calling it ‘experimental’, but finally sending them a letter saying they were wrong 5 DAYS AFTER the kid died.
Death by insurance company. Death by rationing. Death by the Republicans who fought against health reform in 1993.
Vote! Vote for the PRO-DEATH Republican party! Vote!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Riley,
There are 4 bills in the congress, 1 is pending. ZERO of these plans have only one public plan. ZERO.
I for one want a non-insurance company insurance option for my family.
You should, and doubtless will, make a different choice.
The public option that people talk about should be financed entirely by the premiums paid by those covered. I trust that will be the case, as Obama as made it clear that his position is the same as mine in this regard.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I agree with McCain/Palin. Turning off anything other than a breathing machine blowing air into a dead corpse is considered murder in my book. And removing a feeding tube is cruel and unusual punishment. It literally starves the patient to death. Their body dries up, organ by organ, and the tongue swells and burst from lack of H2O. There is an implicit issue here that is very sinister. In other words, what other options do elderly people have other than to reduce cost?? That’s the whole idea isn’t it?? To reduce costs. IMO – this just makes the elderly person feel more guilty. Just leave it alone for Christ’s sake. Just leave this issue alone!

Posted by: USAForUSA | August 23, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Sue,
If only the Republicans in congress had the courage to publicly state what so many Republicans here WANT TO HEAR: Republicans want to kill Social Security, Medicare, the Veterans Administration.
Also, why don’t they kill the Department of Defense?
After all, protecting American lives is ‘socialism’.
Jesus said ‘heal the sick’.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

That is a hilarious interview. McCain, as usual, blundered into something he knows next to nothing about. The main mistake Obama has made is not being clear about exactly what is in the healthcare bill. It is obvious he needs to dumb it down for the masses -that is why so many conservatives are buying into this death panel nonsence. An erroneous, fear inducing “talking point” for all the Average Joes out there. I just hope Palin sticks around -Democrats, Independents and moderates might not agree on the health care plan but most of us agree that Palin is an idiot.

Posted by: allie08 | August 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“it’s a matter of fact that it would allow both a “public plan” and newly subsidized private plans to cover all abortions.”
My PRIVATE plan covers abortions, should my wife and I need and desire that option.
The “public plan” is one whose medical and non-medical expenditures are covered by the premiums paid by those who choose to join the plan.
Premiums paid by those covered is NOT THE SAME AS tax dollars.
So, it would appear that you are the liar. Since lying is what liars do.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

There are a few things the GOP and their closed minded minions are good for. (1) Fear (2) Greed (3) making sure the ignorant people hear only a few words that stir hate and resentment.
The GOP is in the pocket of big business and they strive to instill fear in the heart of the simple minded. When was the last time they pass a bill that was of help to anyone making less than a million? Never!
The saying goes; ignorance is bliss! Those who are shouting down healthcare will come to regret it very soon and they will suffer along with us who are paying the very high premiums today.
Another saying goes like this: Monkey never know the value of it’s tail until it is lost!

Posted by: Otto | August 23, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Posted by: DK | Aug 23, 2009 1:08:34 PM
We already have death panels, just private for profit death panels.
Private insurance is a death panel.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Absolutely correct. The only real life ‘Death Panels’ exist right now in each of the health insurance companies in America!
Isn’t it clever how the insurance industry, through the far-right and Republicans, was actually able to ‘project’ their behavior falsely onto a pending bill?
Or was it clever?…Because, what is going to happen now that this lie has been widely disproven, is that the reform will take place in two or more legislative bills.
1) The 1st one will stop the current insurance company ‘Death Panel’ decisions by outlawing the dropping of people from insurance, refusing coverage due to a pre-existing condition, and other reforms. This will cause a spike in insurance premiums for all because the insurance companies will insist on their exorbitantly high profit margin (the motive for the insurance company ‘Death Panel’ decisions).
2) The second one will then address the lack of health insurance competition by including a public option. This will force the insurance companies to reduce their profit margin to a more reasonable level consistent with a more reasonable marketplace.
The insurance companies are going to get what they deserve!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

USAForUSA — So if a person at the end of their life, say they are old and very sick or terminally ill and in a lot of pain CHOOSES to abstain from feeding tubes and fluids, you don’t want them to be able to make that informed choice? You stated in “your book” so are you the moral compass WE all have to follow? Not everyone shares your view, part of a living will is to say “Hey do anything and everything to keep me alive” or “unhook me!” Personal choice!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

McCain is correct…..
The Dems are the ones with Dementia problems…they got caught and now they blame the Right rather than their own party…who by the way is blocking the bill!!

Posted by: s.morgan | August 23, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Sarah Palin acted “brilliantly”.
She got the mainstream media looking for the actual words,”death panels” in the Obama/House bill.
The articles they write should be in double quotes because she in fact had death panels in quotes from the beginning…”"death panel”".
The rest of her statement reasoned and well sourced the possiblity that with the lingo at the time could lead to rationing care. And she was right.
If she had not hooked the MSM with the words death panel we be discussig incrediblely fast the Obamacare bill went thru Congress instead of if rationing could have happened or not.
Seems Sarah Palin learned a lot in her time as the VP candidate with hordes of liberal journalist and bloggers combing her every word looking for something to use against her, fairly or not.
Agree with her or not on issues, you can’t deny she has won this hands down with merely a few notes on her Facebook page and not one interview.
Good Job Mrs. Palin

Posted by: Shawn Senec | August 23, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

James L.: “Anywhere in the bill that directs that a government board, panel, whatever, approve/deny any health care question, we are going to have problems. ”
We already have problems, because currently the insurance company has panels that do exactly the same thing.

Posted by: jock59801 | August 23, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

This makes Obama a liar.-ctay
—————————–
Since you claim to be all about facts show us some fact checks where Republicans come out on the lying end.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

USAforUSA, I hear you. You don’t like the idea of taking anyone off of a machine.
But are you willing to respect AND abide by someone else’s decision? Maybe they consider it cruel and unusual to be stuck in a veg state.
Or, do you think we should use the power of the government to TAKE OVER that decision.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Some DEMs have advocated the “duty to die” since the 1980s. Governor Richard Lamm of Colorado was the most outspoken.
My fervently DEM wife advocates turning down expensive treatment for those whom she calls the “greedy rich” when they are at the end of life. Why doesn’t George Stephanopoulos investigate the history of hiw own party on the rationing of end-of-life care? Unlike Lamm or honest DEM activists such as Mrs. N, most DEM public figures try to disguise the fact that they would deny care to the elderly

Posted by: nuanain | August 23, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

s.morgan – McCain is correct about what? What he stated is NOT in the bill! Dems got caught what? Instead of broad sweeping statements, some facts would help your credibility! Oh, the final bill isn’t even written, so there is NO BLOCKING!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

One misconception many of you have bought into is that govt. healthcare is going to be FREE. It isn’t going to be FREE! Obama himself said that at the townhalls. You will have to pay a premium -just not as much as you might have to pay a private insurance company. And if you are a tax paying American citizen, you will be required by this bill to have insurance and will be fined if you do not do so. And as the bill states, illegal aliens will not be required to have insurance (which makes sense… how could they collect – they have no SS# etc. to track them). So… all the illegal aliens who will not be required to have any health insurance will still get all their illnesses taken care of for free, by us the taxpayers. Then when the costs keep getting higher (we keep getting more illegals), your govt health insurance premiums will get higher, and then you will be complaining about the high cost of govt. healthcare, but it will be too late…. The private insurance companies will be out of business and you will be stuck with a government monopoly on healthcare insurance. Just like you’re stuck with your income taxes, social security taxes, utility bills, everything that monopolies control. But if that is what you want…. keep agreeing with Obama and Pelosi. As for me, I prefer to have a choice.

Posted by: Amy | August 23, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

USAForUSA, Palin for one already put her signature on a pro-living will proclaimation, so you might be on your own in USING THE GOVERNMENT to force your choice on others.
Except that she pulled the hypocrite two step on that one. What do you expect about someone who flat out lied about ‘death panels’.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Good Job Mrs. Palin-Posted by: Shawn Senec ——–She sure sold you. How much are bridges to nowhere going these days?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Posted by: Riley | Aug 23, 2009 1:43:08 PM
…A private insurance company NEVER forces anyone to do anything. If you don’t like the way your private insurance company operates, go somewhere else.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Really?
They “NEVER force” one off of their insurance by dropping them?
They never “NEVER force” one to ‘Not’ be able to receive adequate care (possibly leading to death) by refusing coverage due to a pre-existing condition?

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT
COVERAGE.
(a) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE DEFINED.—Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable
coverage under this division, the term ‘‘grandfathered health insurance coverage’’ means individual health insurance coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:
(1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.
Note from the above that it does not guarantee that your insurance company will keep offering your policy. Since it cannot accept new subscribers it will sooner or later drop it if indeed it chooses to continuable with government meddling and opposition. If it were to drop it the amicable Mr. Obama would blame the insurance company rather than his beloved plan.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

You people who say there is no difference between the insurance companies and government dening treatments are dead wrong. If your insurance company denies coverage you still have the option to pay out of pocket. With single payer you will lose that option. Once the government denies coverage based on some “death panels” descission you are screwed. You will not be able to obtain the treatment even if you can pay out of your own pocket.
Stop kidding yourselfs with the belief Obamacare is the great solution, it isn’t. I would much rather have the option of gettig treatment and filing bankrupcy then be denied coverage by our government and die.
There have been a lot of proposals to reform the healtcare system without a complete government take over. The media has ignored those proposals.

Posted by: Jane | August 23, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

McCain should have just said “no comment” on Palin and he’d have avoided looking less than honest himself.
The fact is that the end of life consultation was a separate bill BEFORE the health care reform bills arrived, and it was co-sponsored by both parties and was well supported by both parties. Now, because of Palin’s deceitful statement, enough people are foolish enough to believe her that GOP politicians are dropping support for it.
Anyone who thinks discussions about making a will, a living will, or other provisions are a “death panel” are poorly informed.

Posted by: The_Mick | August 23, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Note from the above that it does not guarantee that your insurance company will keep offering your policy.-Ed Taylor
————————————–
Can private insurers decide to changes terms and conditions and premiums now? Are they obligated now to continue offering anyone coverage? Arguing that bad things are going to happen when they already do is a poor debate tactic.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

” So… all the illegal aliens who will not be required to have any health insurance will still get all their illnesses taken care of for free, by us the taxpayers.”
Amy, that is incorrect. Right now illegals who go into an E.R. will have medical conditions that pose IMMEDIATE threat to life treated. True before health reform. True after. No difference.
But if you think E.R. provides ‘treats all their problems’, you are in error. As Robin Beaton and millions of other Americans have discovered, you will generally have to provide payment before you get treatment for heart disease, diebetes, cancer etc.
In Miss Beaton’s case, her insurance company cancelled her insurance when she got sick with breast cancer, days before her surgery was scheduled. The hospital would not release the O.R. unless she could come up with $30,000 down, which she didn’t have.
She played by the rules and she was screwed. By the time she got her hysterectomy, the cancer mass had doubled in size.
Imagine how it felt to have this agressive cancer in her body, growing, without treatment.
Republicans are not only hypocrites on this issue. Their actions are immoral and unChristian.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

I would much rather have the option of gettig treatment and filing bankrupcy then be denied coverage by our government and die.
————————–Your brand of socialized bankrupcy health care leaves some one a big turd.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Ed Taylor,
My company drops companies from the limited set of options EVERY YEAR.
Could you please MAKE the Congress FORCE every company in the United States to NEVER drop any insurance plan???
This would be like the Government Taking OVER. But I SEE YOU WANT A GOVERNMENT TAKE OVER.
Your argument is weakened by the necesity for you to fish or cut bait. DO YOU WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO FREEZE OPTIONS ARE NOT?
Until you take a stand, your argument is content free.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Jane,
Three bills have been passed out of committee in the house, one in the Senate, one is pending.
NONE of the bills passed out of committee are single payer.
Go attack some other straw man.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Posted by: Jane | Aug 23, 2009 2:22:22 PM
….I would much rather have the option of gettig treatment and filing bankruptcy…
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You left a few steps out of the process prefer.
It should more correctly state: I would much rather have the option of 1) getting treatment using my insurance, 2) getting dropped because of a $cap for treatment or a pre-existing that was discovered…or alleged, 3) having to use my own resources to get the care, 4) filing for bankruptcy, because I exhausted all of my resources, and 5) continuing for the rest of my life without healthcare or anything else.
But, to each their own!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Kenneth, I am so sorry that you are ignorant on this topic.
Robin Beaton and millions of Americans have had life saving medical procedures (a hysterectomy in Miss Beaton’s case) DENIED by their private insurance company.
Going to another insurance company to pay for her cancer surgery was not an option that the free market provided.
I hope this never happens to your family (it could, Miss Beaton had health insurance, she paid her premiums, her only flaw was in getting cancer) because I am a Christian.
Too bad their are no Christians in the Republican party.
I am sure that would mean fewer people arguing the virtue of letting uninsured people get sick and even DIE without treatment if there were any morallity in that party.
Vote for the PRO-DEATH Republican party!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

I am of the opinion that many US residents do believe the death panel myth. Most tend to vote Republican. McCain answers to the many Republicans of Arizona. He thinks he must please the Republican base and agree with Mrs. Palin to prevent a more conservative from snapping up his seat.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

There is nothing “ambiguous” about the language of this bill. There is no conspiracy to impose euthenasia on the elderly or handicapped, impose madatory abortions, forced birth control for all children over 7, implant tracking chips into everyone, or any other despotic action.
When pressed by Jon Stewart to read him the exact words in the bill she was interpreting as frightening, Betsy McCaughey, former Lieutenant Gov. of NY
was UNABLE to support her claims. The passage she read did NOT remotely say what she was claiming it did…it was quite clear and unambiguous.
What ARE ambiguous are the arguments being made by those pushing these wingnut theories. They cannot even be clearly articulated because they are complete hogwash! And so many buy them…astounding.

Posted by: raven | August 23, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Posted by: bielie | Aug 23, 2009 2:38:33 PM
…And no, Palin did not say there would be euthanasia. She said there would be rationing of care.
Oh yes, and your statement that “every single independent group” found it to be a lie is a lie. You should read more papers, George!
Will ya quit makin’ things up!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would suspect that George doesn’t read any of the far-right “papers”.
And, I suspect that you won’t read anything BUT the far-right “papers”.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Jane, I heard the ‘great reform ideas’ from the other side. On the Milt Rosenberg show he had on two people from conservative ‘think tanks’ who wanted to explain why the problem is that TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE.
If only if every American family LOST their health insurance, they would pay out of pcoket and that would limit ‘unnecesary’ medical procedures.
I believe John Stossel (ABC) has a simular opinion.
YOU REPUBLICANS should talk more about your health insurance for no one program!
Vote for the PRO-DEATH Republican party!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Jane | Aug 23, 2009 2:22:22 PM – What part of there is no “death panel” did you not understands? And please explain how your wouldn’t be allowed to pay for your own medical treatment! Would you reference something besides right wing hysteria over nothing!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Everyone knows that to leave health care as it is right now is not acceptable. I don’t understand why the GOP is so against reform. Palin is an idot.

Posted by: Sue | August 23, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Socialized medicare,broke.Socialized medicade,broke.Socialized Social Security broke.Socialised post office broke.Socialized Amtrack,broke.Is anyone asking why people should trust socialized HC to not go broke?Well I guess the Chinese and Saudis will allways be there ready and totally willing to save America from going totally broke.So heck ya bring it on socialize even more of America.Oh your gonna love being socially broke,let those snotty nosed kids pay for everyones socialism yee haa.Yes you can be socialized and even more broke.Go Obama Go.

Posted by: David | August 23, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

SEN. McCAIN: I didn’t see it in the context, Tim, and I don’t want to criticize Bill Frist. He obviously had very sincere feeling feelings about this issue. All of us were very emotional. We-Terri Schiavo had a loving parents and siblings that wanted to care for her for the rest of her life. I think our hearts went out to her in that situation and her family. Maybe we didn’t use our brains as well as we should have. So I can’t–I know that Bill Frist has denied that he “diagnosed” Terri Schiavo. I think we ought to get this issue behind us and move forward. It’s an American tragedy and I hope that the next time we’re presented with one of these situations we’ll perhaps approach it in a more measured and reasoned fashion.
MR. RUSSERT: Would it be fair to say in hindsight Congress should not have been involved in the Terri Schiavo case?
I agree with McCain/Palin. Turning off anything other than a breathing machine blowing air into a dead corpse is considered murder in my book. And removing a feeding tube is cruel and unusual punishment. It literally starves the patient to death.-USAforUSA
————————————–
So you agree with McCain? Are you aware he never came down on oneside or the other? Are you blind?
SEN. McCAIN: I think it’s easy in hindsight to make a judgment. But I do know at the time that many of us, or the overwhelming majority of us as well as the American people saw a young woman whose life was going to end, whose parents and brothers and sisters wanted to care for her. That’s what I think made it so compelling. So in hindsight, perhaps we shouldn’t have. At the time, I understand the emotion, all of us. Who was not moved by seeing the films of this woman, young woman?
MR. RUSSERT: And yet it turns out that she was blind.
SEN. McCAIN: Yeah.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Posted by: Walter | Aug 23, 2009 2:41:30 PM
Too bad there are no Christians in the Republican party.
I am sure that would mean fewer people arguing the virtue of letting uninsured people get sick and even DIE without treatment if there were any morallity in that party.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More and more Christians are leaving the Republican party each and every day, because this whole far-right and Republican platform on health reform goes against the very foundation of their faith.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Kenneth, I am so sorry that you are ignorant on this topic.-Walter
You need to go back and correct your mistake and apologize to me.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

David since you are going for broke “Socialized medicare,broke.Socialized medicade,broke.Socialized Social Security broke.Socialised post office broke.Socialized Amtrack,broke.”
Why not add to your list all the CEOs that have gone broke and left shareholders holding worthless stock?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Henry,
In the current state, there are many many Americans without health insurance and therefore cannot get treatment when they become ill.
Take the case of Robin Beaton. She had private health insurance, but when she was diagnosed with a particularly agressive form of breast cancer, the insurance company cancelled her insurance DAYS before the procedure was scheduled.
The hospital told her that unless she could come up with $30,000 down they would not release the O.R. for her operation. She did not have $30000 and the operation was cancelled.
By the time she had her operation, the cancer mass had doubled in size.
Even if (I certainly hope so) she is cured, she is now uninsurable.
THAT IS THE REAL WORLD WE LIVE IN. The bill does not deny illegals medical care, which many many Americans would object to, nor does it provide it.
Those with illegal status are excluded from benefiting from anything in the bill.
If we pass this, millions who are out there naked will be covered. The bill does not solve every problem, but is as significant in its moral achievement as the Medicare bill.
The Republicans were 100% against medicare and they continue to try to kill it. All they are lacking is the courage to say what they believe regarding medicare.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Marie, my family made some money in medical patents, but it was hard work and they certainly don’t own, not even rent, houses in the South of France. They made their money after years of hard work and sacrifice, and they still barely make above $250,000 combined. Unfortunately, government takeovers of healthcare mean another sixth of the economy at Congressional disposal, while fewer doctors and less innovation in procedures and technology.

Posted by: Possum Dearie | August 23, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Dave I just checked on some things. The mail arrived yesterday. My dad got his Social Security check last week and Medicare paid some of his health care bills from last month.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

When people say that they are concerned that people may be denied medical services,like McCain does here, I am amazed that no one notes that that is exactly what managed care does now. People pay thousands of dollars a month for insurrance, I do, that denies medical services all of the time.People who have excellent coverage can see a Dr. when they have a cold.I have to pay 250.00 for a 1 hr.appt.& I have to pay for it out of pocket.Lets talk brass tacks.People like McCain & most other politicians are so deeply indebted to insurrance companies that they will never support a public option. Obamma needs to ignore the dissenters & give the people health care reform as he promised.Otherwise,he may not get re-elected.If that happens, I will be the first one to move away from a republican run country.

Posted by: kiksadi50 | August 23, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Letter to John McCain:
On August 23rd, 2009, on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” you had the opportunity to refute Sarah Palin’s false and moronic claims that HR 3200 would establish “death panels.” You were given several opportunities to denounce these statements. Instead, while not using the phrase “death panels,” you nonetheless attempted to give support and credence to Sarah Palin’s statements. Such action on your part is appalling! Perhaps you should look at the actual text of Section 1233 of HR 3200 and then go to http://www.politfact.com to get some additional explanation of what it actually means. You clearly have not been able to figure it out on your own. Frankly, it is this type of fear mongering and twisting of the truth that has led me and many others to lose faith in our government. And as for you, you were once a hero, but I don’t think you can lay claim to that title any more. A real hero would have the courage to speak the truth. A real hero would not try to support the blatant lies of others. Frankly, John, we are not playing some sort of annual “democrats versus republicans” football game here. This is the real world and people’s lives are at stake. Consequently, you and your colleagues have an obligation to both tell and stand by the truth. I’m always hopeful that someday you will do so, but I am far from optimistic. You seem to now lack either the courage or the intellectual acumen to live life in such a manner.

Posted by: Christopher Benton | August 23, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Here’s a medical innovation or you Possum: It has long been known that the tetracyclines help with acne rosacea. The tertacyclines are dirt cheap.
Then comes Oracea ® which is a tertacycline with the claim to fame of being time released It is expensive.
Have you seen the TV cartoon ads for Oracea ® ?
The real innovation hear is a new way for a person to part with their money.
(Just curious Possum, what is your cut of the families take?)

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

If President Obama wants to better understand why America’s discomfort with end-of-life discussions threatens to derail his health-care reform, he might begin with his own Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). He will quickly discover how government bureaucrats are greasing the slippery slope that can start with cost containment but quickly become a systematic denial of care.
Last year, bureaucrats at the VA’s National Center for Ethics in Health Care advocated a 52-page end-of-life planning document, “Your Life, Your Choices.” It was first published in 1997 and later promoted as the VA’s preferred living will throughout its vast network of hospitals and nursing homes. After the Bush White House took a look at how this document was treating complex health and moral issues, the VA suspended its use. Unfortunately, under President Obama, the VA has now resuscitated “Your Life, Your Choices.”
Who is the primary author of this workbook? Dr. Robert Pearlman, chief of ethics evaluation for the center, a man who in 1996 advocated for physician-assisted suicide in Vacco v. Quill before the U.S. Supreme Court and is known for his support of health-care rationing.
“Your Life, Your Choices” presents end-of-life choices in a way aimed at steering users toward predetermined conclusions, much like a political “push poll.” For example, a worksheet on page 21 lists various scenarios and asks users to then decide whether their own life would be “not worth living.”
The circumstances listed include ones common among the elderly and disabled: living in a nursing home, being in a wheelchair and not being able to “shake the blues.” There is a section which provocatively asks, “Have you ever heard anyone say, ‘If I’m a vegetable, pull the plug’?” There also are guilt-inducing scenarios such as “I can no longer contribute to my family’s well being,” “I am a severe financial burden on my family” and that the vet’s situation “causes severe emotional burden for my family.”
When the government can steer vulnerable individuals to conclude for themselves that life is not worth living, who needs a death panel?

Posted by: dainmezron | August 23, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Does any one really need vision insurance and is it really insurance. If a person has an eye disease or suspects they have an eye disease medical insurance covers the expenses.
If a person needs new glasses or contacts it is not much different than needing new tires on their car. There is no component of risk involved. Contacts, glasses and tires and will always need to be replaced.
One could then say that routine eye exams help save sight but here again regularly scheduled preventive exams of any kind contain no risk-the expense these exams are more or less known in advance.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Dear John,
This is why I couldn’t vote for you. You sold yourself out. You could have remained to to your maverick ways, stuck to your principles, been honest with the voters, and you may have won. But instead you sold you. You used the same people who got Bush elected; you know, the ones who trashed you in the previous primary. I watched one debate where you purposely trashed Ron Paul with a series of out and out lies. You pick Sarah Palin as your choice for VP and then suffer the consequences. Now here you are, trying to kill heath care when this countries needs it most.
Thanks for NOTHING, John.
P.S. I forgot to add that you top economic adviser was Phil Gramm, the guy who perhaps caused most of our economic problems. It is a good thing you lost. With Palin as VP and Gramm as Secretary of the Treasury I’m sure we had gone under already.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Jane posted “Once the government denies coverage based on some “death panels” descission you are screwed. You will not be able to obtain the treatment even if you can pay out of your own pocket.”
Okay Jane, where in the bill is this NONSENSE? Give us the section this is in, I have to read it for myself.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

When the government can steer vulnerable individuals to conclude for themselves that life is not worth living, who needs a death panel?
———————————-
The docors that were to do the cosuling, and get paid for it, are government employees in the health proposal? The myth grows yet again!

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

If you are denied treatment now, you can appeal and eventually take the issue to the government or the courts. This also causes bad publicity for a company that is trying to gain more customers, keep their current customers etc. Good luck doing that with your government plan. And good luck keeping the plan you have when the other insurance companies are put out of business by the government plan reimbursing at unfairly low rates to doctors and hospitals. Good luck to us all.

Posted by: Mirroe | August 23, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It is obvious that McCain is forever linked to that “whack job” Sarah Palin. He clearly knows that this health bill does not say anything about death panels. What else is he to do? He can’t come out and admit that she is absolutely ignorant and crazy. This would reflect on his poor choice of her as a VP candidate. McCain will always have to defend her outrageous statements. It is a pandora’s box, isn’t it? Just think about it, if he had not plucked her from obscurity, we wouldn’t even know that Sarah Palin exists.

Posted by: Betty | August 23, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

As usual the Dems are playing semantics again. They say we don’t understand nuance, but when we expose the inevitable cost overruns in government health care which will lead to rationing of care, who gets the chopping block? All we need to do is look at Oregon, Britain, Canada. the sickest are cut off and given as Obama says “pain killers” instead. Now who is dolt? Anyone can have health insurance, just drop that cellphone and buy some catastrophic insurance. I raised 5 kids that way, integrity says pay the deductible in installments to the doctor, not whine that you are broke. No excuses.

Posted by: Sparky | August 23, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

I will continue to use this story as I have previously, but I am glad you brought it up as the story illustrates some of the important things the house bill accomplishes.
The ‘missing information’ on her application had nothing to do with this lady’s cancer. The insurance company said that there was a notation on her medical record which they interpreted as being pre-cancerous. Her dermatologist called them on the phone, explaining it was acne and not relevant to her cancer, begging for them to not cancel her surgery. They ignored this information. The insurance company also thought she had left off a (previous) rapid heart beat from her application. Not exactly relevant to her cancer.
The insurance company deliberately write their application to be difficult to fill out completely and use a technique of reviewing your application for any error they can use against you WHEN YOU GET SICK as a cost containment (profit maximizing) strategy.
If fraud prevention (as opposed to committing their own fraud) was the insurance companies’ intent, they would do any review BEFORE you get sick.
The House bill prohibits this behavior on the part of the insurance companies. (There are a lot of good things in there, if you take the time to look at the 4 page summary on the House web site.)
The facts I presented previously are both true (according to her testimony) and telling:
1. Lady has private health insurance.
2. Lady is diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer.
3. Insurance company drops her.
4. Hospital refuses to proceed with life saving surgery unless she can come up with $30,000 (which she did not have).

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

dainmezron, I can’t help but wonder what newmax, sleazy, prepackaged web site you got this junk from.
I am not going to spend the time to follow the newest ‘death panel’ story. The bald faced lie told or sanctioned by so many republicans has bankrupt your side of any credibility.
Q: What is stopping the death board liars from lying again?
A: Nothing. See the latest death book story.

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Sparky,
The U.S. is rated 37th best health care, behind Costa Rica and in front of Slovenia, according to the World Health Organization (Cuba comes in at no. 39).
People do not get the health care the need in this country. The insurance companies just say no.
I guess you don’t get the inenviable private sector rationing!

Posted by: Walter | August 23, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

The Republican opposition to the health care plan comes from a hope to get more from their party elected and has little to do with benefiting the American people.
Much of their hate for Obama comes from their own failures in recent elections.
Obama’s insistence for bipartisanship hopefully will wane if Republicans continue to refuse the same.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

You liberal minded thinkers (all 35% of you, including today’s overly biased and now closed minded liberal media) once again fail to fully grasp the significance of Sarah Palin’s clairvoyant and chilling articulation of future Obama-created Death Panels. Take a breath…as the issue is not simply one of what is or is not written in the bill…it’s the precedence of the bill itself that is the issue! Fact, socialized healthcare countries ration health care on unprecedented levels due to the cost of the program, and worse Orwellian health boards under various names do exist in these countries to regularly implement austere health care cost control measures that cut short the choices and quality of living of its citizens. Obamacare sets in motion by natural extension an irreversible roadmap for creating one the world’s largest and most costly government beaurocratic enterprises ever, comparable only to the 2.8 million strong Red Army of China, in administering a behemoth socialized US health care program. If you don’t believe this future reality, take a look at Great Britain and their 1.4 million government administrators choking their UK’s healthcare program – they’ve got more government paid administrators than there are doctors in the UK! Obamacare creates an irreversible governmental (not free market) process that ultimately deprives Americans of health care choices (freedoms) forever. If you can’t stand America given today’s reality, then pack up, and leave this great country to those of us (the other 65% of us in America) who will fight to the bitter end to preserve the fundamental core values of freedoms and choices (including healthcare) as defined and granted by our great US Constitution to its citizens.

Posted by: AP_Story | August 23, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

rplat: I have spent time in nursing homes with my mother-in-law and my grandmother. In fact, during their months long stays, I visited every day. I observed other elderly folks who had no family to care for them. Some of these people were completely out of it, held into whellchairs with constraints, their heads lolling. Still, because Medicare or private insurance would pay for it, these people were often put through tests and procedures that I knew in my heart of hearts they should not have had to endure. Many times they suffered as a result. Personally, if I am unlucky enough to reach that stage without a personal advocate, I hope someone in the government WILL say no. Leave her alone, quit wasting money and instead, allieviate suffering. That is a totally different argument than the Republicans have put forward. They imply that our government (which, by the way, is us) would deny care to viable people who could still benefit and enjoy living. They imply a callous heartlessness in others that I fear they are guilty of themselves.
Right now in our nation, one of the richest on the face of the earth, homeless and indigent people are dumped in the streets in front of shelters and soup kitchens like so much human garbage. Medical expenses (among the insured) account for over half of all bankruptcies.
Fiscal consrvativism used to be a valid viewpoint. It was worth discussing how and when we could accomplish our goals with our conservative brethren. We were all Americans who were striving along the same path. No more. The average Conservative today is either a religious zealot (who considers him or herself “more worthy”) or a calculating supply side economist with a foot on the neck of those a few rungs down. The real hidden agenda of Conervatives appears to be defeating healthcare reforms altogether. I wish the old style of conservativism would come back. those are discussions we should have. Instead we get Naziism and Death Panels. Personally, I’m for dividing America right down the middle. Conservatives get to choose the half they want. Then you can go and live out your vision of the American Dream, and the rest of us can do the same.

Posted by: Phoenix lady | August 23, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Posted by: AP_Story | Aug 23, 2009 4:25:41 PM
You liberal minded thinkers (all 35% of you, including today’s overly biased and now closed minded liberal media)…. leave this great country to those of us (the other 65% of us in America)…
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, how was it that Barack got 54% of the vote?

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

PLEASE SOMEONE REVIEW OBAMA’S SPEECHES, HE IS THE FIRST ONE TO TALK ABOUT THE ‘PANELS’ !!!!!

Posted by: Fred | August 23, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Dementia is obviously setting in for mccain. Thank God he and her lost the election. libertyrulz >>>>>> Really? Obama doesnt know what BILL he is supporting since there isnt a Bill and yet he is making promises. Obama thinks AARP supported the BILL really? Maybe he is WEE WEED UP? And OOOPS While Obama was president Scotland decided to release a known terrorist to Libya a INTERNATIONAL disaster to foreign policy. HE LOOKS WEAK. Dementia is something all the OBAMA supporters have.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 23, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

If you can’t stand America given today’s reality, then pack up, and leave this great country to those of us (the other 65% of us in America) who will fight to the bitter end to preserve the fundamental core values of freedoms and choices (including healthcare) as defined and granted by our great US Constitution to its citizens.
——————————-
Are you really at the bottom of the barrel and in need of the worn out “pack up and leave” cliche’?
I noticed you offer no solutions. Do you opine that there are no problems or do you see problems in US health care?
If the latter ID and propose solutions.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Posted by: Phoenix lady | Aug 23, 2009 4:32:07 PM
Fiscal conservativism used to be a valid viewpoint. It was worth discussing how and when we could accomplish our goals with our conservative brethren. We were all Americans who were striving along the same path. No more.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I believed it was once too. I was one of the swing voters who voted for Reagan and Bush…once each. But, the money and power corrupted the hearts of the far-right and Republicans. And now they are at a point where they no longer care about human suffering. It all has to do with money and dominance.
I can’t vote for that.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

If you are denied treatment now, you can appeal and eventually take the issue to the government or the courts.
————————————-
I guess you’ve never read the fine print regarding binding arbitration. I’ve heard sometimes the arbitrators come from businesses controlled by the insurers. You may want to look into that.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I wish these nuts were right about the Death Panel because without health care reform I will certainally be unable to pay the insurance premiuns when I reach that point final point, and if I am able I guess I will have to pull my own plug. I am retired and on a fixed income, my insurance preminum has incresed over 400% in the last eight years. What is wrong with these people not wanting health care reform??

Posted by: insreform | August 23, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Really? Obama doesnt know what BILL he is supporting since there isnt a Bill and yet he is making promises. Obama thinks AARP supported the BILL really?…Dementia is something all the OBAMA supporters have.-Posted by: ChicagoBob
———————————–
Come on Bob the AARP supports health care reform. Obama was just a little ahead when he falsely claimed they endorsed the bill. The the video of the AARP spokesman that Obama got his info from certianly did not support the prevalent Republican additude that the US health care system is A-OK!

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Posted by: Mirroe | Aug 23, 2009 3:57:11 PM
If you are denied treatment now, you can appeal and eventually take the issue to the government or the courts…
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Boy, that’s quite a benefit of an insurance policy today.
You get the option to find 1) find and attorney, 2) pay him a bunch of money to pursue your claims, 3) wear yourself thoroughly out litigating, 4) possibly get your money back, and 5) get the treatment you were trying to get in the first place…if you are still alive!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

ChicagoBob posted “And OOOPS While Obama was president Scotland decided to release a known terrorist to Libya a INTERNATIONAL disaster to foreign policy.
OOPS While G.W.Bush was president, 9/11 happened. Sorry Bob, you’re never going to top this one. BTW, since when does the President of the United States start ruling Scotland?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Posted by: Faurtz8 | Aug 23, 2009 5:15:52 PM
ChicagoBob posted “And OOOPS While Obama was president Scotland decided to release a known terrorist to Libya a INTERNATIONAL disaster to foreign policy.
OOPS While G.W.Bush was president, 9/11 happened. Sorry Bob, you’re never going to top this one. BTW, since when does the President of the United States start ruling Scotland?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Fell out of my chair laughing!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Obama has failed to take the bull by the horns in this debate. He needs to use the bully pulpit to champion a bill. That’s what the president should do. He is failing in leadership by not filling the gap and letting his opponents get the upper hand. You have to counter what is not by what is… and he has not done that. Therefore his opponents can use the ambiguity to marshall scare tactics… and that’s what is happening. This could be a Waterloo for Obama if he doesn’t get his mojo workin’ now.

Posted by: J Robinson | August 23, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Posted by: J Robinson | Aug 23, 2009 5:20:20 PM
Obama has failed to take the bull by the horns in this debate. He needs to use the bully pulpit to champion a bill. That’s what the president should do. He is failing in leadership by not filling the gap and letting his opponents get the upper hand. You have to counter what is not by what is… and he has not done that. Therefore his opponents can use the ambiguity to marshall scare tactics… and that’s what is happening. This could be a Waterloo for Obama if he doesn’t get his mojo workin’ now.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Up until a few days ago, I felt the same way. But, remember during the campaign, the same sort of thing happened prior to the home stretch.
The president was wise to be slow to anger. It allowed 1) the far-right to propagate all of the lies, 2) the Republicans to jump on the bandwagon for political gain, 3) the general public to start to believe the Republicans, and 4) the Republicans be shown for what they really stand for.
They will be clear losers on this by the time Insurance Reform is passed. And then general health care reform will follow.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

You can say all you want about Palin, but that is just a distraction. The president is on holiday when he should be facing these controversies head on. It doesn’t bode well.

Posted by: J Rpbinson | August 23, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

J Robinson posted “Obama has failed to take the bull by the horns in this debate. ”
With all the lies and distortions coming up from both sides of this debate, I think W.C.Fields’ variation on this theme is more appropriate….
“Now is the time to take the bull by the tail and face the situation.”

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

It has been said that people are the same all over the world and in some respects they are. Why are such a high proportion of Republicans in favor of helping out Iraqis and not US citizens especially in health care?
I realize Socialism is a name for an economic system, but isn’t the destruction and rebuilding of Iraq just a huge exogenous social program for people who have never and will never send a dime to the US treasury via the IRS?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

?With all the lies and distortions coming up from both sides of this debate, I think W.C.Fields’ variation on this theme is more appropriate….
“Now is the time to take the bull by the tail and face the situation.”"
Exactly my point. And why? Because the president’s role is to:
1.) Clarify and communicate the options clearly to the American people.
2.) DECIDE what is best and get it done!
We are wallowing in this pit of confusion because our president has not taken charge of this situation and exercised his leadership.

Posted by: J Robinson - Obama voter | August 23, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

George Stephanopoulos is not telling the truth when he said, “The bill, all it said was that, if a patient wanted to have a Medicare consultation about end-of-life issues, they could have it at their request and the doctor would get reimbursed for it, no panel ..”

That proves that he did not, in fact, read the bill, either, like so many of the dolts in the House. Instead, the language WAS ambiguous and used the word “shall” over and over, which was interpreted to mean it was mandatory. The bill itself was a sorry mess that was INTENDED to obfuscate and cause confusion.
George S. and others think “death panel” referred to the end-of-life counseling.
McCain is absolutely right, and so is Palin.

Posted by: tanarg | August 23, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

McCain is a loser and a hater. The whole GOP ARE NUTS!

Posted by: gl | August 23, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

The bill, all it said was that, if a patient wanted to have a Medicare consultation about end-of-life issues, they could have it at their request and the doctor would get reimbursed for it, no panel …
SARA PALIN WAS FOR THE END–OF-LIFE BEFORE SHE WAS AGAINST!

Posted by: gl | August 23, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

A new name for death panels:
S.1110: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac) Reform Act of 2009 – Amends title XVIII (medicare) of the Social Security Act to rename the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac) the Medicare Payment and Access Commission, make it an independent executive branch (instead of a legislative branch) agency, and revises its membership requirements. The revised commission controls the purse strings on all Medicare payments and therefore it can decide if a particular procedure or certain care is provided. It is also excluded from judicial review. In other words it decides if you can receive certain treatment and care, its decisions are final, and it is functionally omnipotent. Frankly, everyone should stop referring to “death panels” and “death boards” and instead call them by the proper name. . .“MedPac”.
Couple the power of the rebuilt MedPac with certain other provisions of H.R 3200 and it becomes clear that the government is in total control of you life and even whether or not you continue to live.  Concerning hospital readmissions H.R. 3200, pages 284-288, SEC. 1151 amends the Social Security act and effectively reflects the following:
The government has the power to determine what constitutes an “applicable [medical] condition.”
The government has the power to determine who is allowed readmission into a hospital.
This determination will be made by statistics: when enough people have been discharged for the same condition, an individual may be readmitted.
This is government rationing, pure, simple, and straight up.
There can be no judicial review of decisions made here. The Secretary is above the courts.
These are very complex and convoluted bills and if you’re truly interested you must study them carefully. The two examples are not the only undesirable elements within these bills and everyone should read and understand them. When taken together they more than confirm the fears associated with Obama’s healthcare reform.

Posted by: rplat | August 23, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

So…Sarah Palin had them remove language that didn’t exist.
Kinda like when Clinton said he didn’t doanything wrong but he wouldn’t do it again. This is great fun to watch.

Posted by: keith in NC | August 23, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Amazing…..”she’s an idiot”, “GOP has sunk so low”, “he defends stupidity and malaise”…..To all you dems/liberals out there….remember what Obama said….”We won…get over it”. H.R. 3200 is dead because it’s a BAD bill.

Posted by: keith in NC | August 23, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Once again, we are subject to the irrational tirades of “dumb and dumber”.
As an independant voter, I was shocked when he chose Palin (who?) as his vice presidential canditate. At the light of day, she has proven to be an enigma to her party. Let her rest will ya!

Posted by: Ray Flores | August 23, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Look, folks, we tried to warn you about Obama, and here we are again doing the same thing. Will you listen this time? People are finally waking up to the evil intent of Obama and his gang of fellow fascists.
You voted for a man who fed you only what he knew you would lap up like honey. He is trying to destroy America. When are YOU going to wake up?
Cancer survival rates, which are much higher here than anywhere else in the world, are going to plummet if the government takes over health care.
I know you meant well by voting for Obama, but you were taken in by a scam artist.
I want health care reform, too, but not a government takeover. It will mean very bad things for you and me if it happens. Innovation will stop entirely in the medical field. The fascists will consolidate their control over every aspect of our lives.
Say “No!” to Obama’s brand of fascism!!! Say “Yes!” to life and to freedom.

Posted by: tanarg | August 23, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

That proves that he did not, in fact, read the bill, either, like so many of the dolts in the House. Instead, the language WAS ambiguous and used the word “shall” over and over, which was interpreted to mean it was mandatory. The bill itself was a sorry mess that was INTENDED to obfuscate and cause confusion.
George S. and others think “death panel” referred to the end-of-life counseling.
—————————————-
As the world turns new things happen. After a certain thing happens enough people catch on and the effectiveness of the new thing wears off. We all seen this happen with medications, new music, pet rocks…streaking (That’s why they call it the streak…the fastest thing on two feet)
Well, the Rovian Republican inspired fad of repeating a falsehood over and over tends to make the falsehood appears true,, presumably especially, to the more intellectually vulnerable.
People have caught on to this strategic fad and the strategy is trending from very effective during the Bush/Cheney era and is in danger of (rightfully)passing the zero-line to become a counter productive strategy.
Thank you for your post as it helped me make my point and the point several commentators are picking up on.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

These are very complex and convoluted bills and if you’re truly interested you must study them carefully.Posted by: rplat | Aug 23, 2009 5:53:04 PM
Sure thing dude and when you type in your own words the bill becomes immpossible to comprehend.
Why didn’t you fully demarcate your comments from the Bill? I can think of a coupla reasons.
Please re post your comment so every one knows what is your commentary and what is the bill.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

“The maverick” has no spine. He proved it again today by defended the ignorant nitwit. Its a shame to see that mccain sacrificed his principles and good sense during the last election cycle – his career is a good argument for term limits.

Posted by: Jilli | August 23, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

That proves that he did not, in fact, read the bill, either, like so many of the dolts in the House. Instead, the language WAS ambiguous and used the word “shall” over and over, which was interpreted to mean it was mandatory.
————————————-
I heard the word THE was used over and over signaling that this is THE bill.
If you’re gunna try to get technical with the wording to prove a point you have an obligation to spell it out not just say they spkrinkled alot of shalls in it.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Kenneth. . . This is a “comment” board “dude”. I cited the references, if you don’t like my conclusions read the bills and draw your own.

Posted by: rplat | August 23, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Mr. McCain (soon to be ex-Senator if Arizona Hispanics remain committed against his blatant disregard of Justice Sotomayor’s credentials in order to vote against her heritage…)—
He speaks of Republican amendment:
“Well, then why did the Democrats turn down our amendments that clarified that none of the decisions that would be made by this board would in any way affect depriving of needed treatments for patients? I don’t know why they did that then.”
First, the board is not “in the room” when the DOCTOR and PATIENT have the consultation, as is so often the case with the Insurance Company … they merely set a universal standard that assures all information is provided.
Second, read that “affect depriving of needed treatments” line. Using the same type of logic McCain, Palin and the others who are passing off the lies and misinformation the right wing/corporate machine is pushing like a drug to the gullible and fearful among us — this means “you can’t say DNR” or “the family member does not have the right to turn off artificial life support even though they know BEST the wishes of the person being kept in suspended animation”.
Meanwhile day after day of costs accrue and since this is not active “health care” — the actual value received is less than the cost = more profit.
**********
I am appalled by the Republican obstruction tactics — offering amendments that serve no valuable purpose other than assuring profits for their corporate teat… then when these are rejected, yelling “hey, you’re not bipartisan, we are being locked out… ”
B.S.
**********
I sure HOPE Obama and the Dems get their act together and get this passed.
Forget the OPINION polls — talk about B.S. — the same percentage of idiots that are so easily led by the right wing lie machine who post on discussion boards are surely included among those who answer the phone/participate and they couldn’t care less what the question says, they just vote NO to Obama and “you dam liberals”.
Well, we went to the only POLLS that count last November and we exercised our freedom there … now folks we elected — get the job done!

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Mr. McCain was less than helpful or particularly concise. The decisions that he fears will be made by committee are currently in the hands of mid level bureaucrats at private insurance companies. Insurance companies employ “medical directors”; MD’s whose sole job is to look for ways to disqualify treatment. In many situations, the claims adjusters, and mid level management will approve a treatment only to have a medical director come in late and have the treatment disqualified for varying reasons. Are people really so naive as to think that these sorts of decisions (or worse) are not already in the hands of someone other than the patient? Just try getting an insurance company to pay for a medication that your doctor has prescribed if the medication is not in the insurance company’s formulary. I’m sorry, but the best interests of the patient are not being seen to now either Mr. Senator.

Posted by: CaffeineHat | August 23, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

This is why McCain isn’t in the WH.

Posted by: Veteran38 | August 23, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

jcarob…
Are you aware what Congress does?
They make LAWS.
There is a language in which laws are written … for our purpose here, we’ll call it “legalese”.
What you see in HR 3200 is this legalese. It consists of Sections, paragraphs, subsets, articles, references to prior all-of-the-above, etc. etc (by the way, the Constitution also uses this type of language… just in case you want to have a document to refer to…)
It is only ambiguous to those who can’t follow the extreme detail required in doing something as important as making a law.
It becomes quite dense as it needs to be in order to avoid “loopholes”.
George does advocate the correct conclusions a person who understands what is actually proposed in the legislation (law making) will come to with a careful reading.
YOU telling George he can’t handle the truth — is a compliment to him, since you clearly don’t know what you are talking about.

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

: J Rpbinson | Aug 23, 2009 5:31:01 PM You can say all you want about Palin, but that is just a distraction. The president is on holiday when he should be facing these controversies head on. It doesn’t bode well—- You mean like Bush was during Katrina, and stayed on vacation for 2 more days as thousands died?

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Kenneth,
You still don’t get it. Palin wasn’t talking about the end-of-life counseling.

Posted by: tanarg | August 23, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

jcarob | Aug 23, 2009 7:13:42 PM—- Brazen distortion? How was it distorted? He quoted her verbatim! You know it and those who are kool aid free know it! If I’m wrong, prove it! Don’t expect for you to do that, you can’t!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

McCain defends Palin and then makes it worse by objecting to an effort to improve health care.
Say “Bye Bye” GOP

Posted by: Steve J. | August 23, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

tanarg | Aug 23, 2009 7:46:41 PM— Then what was she talking about? The only thing in this bill that she could lie about is 10 pages long. What was she talking about?

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

if stephanopoulis would have “pressed” obama “several times” on his “my muslim faith” admission, i might have trusted this reporter more. as it is, i don’t trust this guy. george is still in the tank.
obama is trying to FORCE the taxpapers to pay for abortions. is that a government “death panel” for those babies? “there is a way which SEEMETH right unto man, but the end thereof is DEATH.” where is that written?

Posted by: Mercy | August 23, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

tanarg posts”
“You still don’t get it. Palin wasn’t talking about the end-of-life counseling.”
****
Then why did her spokeswoman say her comments were referring to [Section 1233 Advanced Care Planning Consultation] page #425 of HR 3200?
You can spin Mrs. Palin’s spin all you want, all you’re gonna get is dizzy….

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Clay writes “INDEPENDENTLY CERTIFIED FACT-
“it’s a matter of fact that it would allow both a “public plan” and newly subsidized private plans to cover all abortions.”
YOU ARE MISTAKEN. THE 1978 HYDE AMENDMENT PROHIBITS FEDERAL FUNDING OF ABORTION AND THERE IS NOTHING IN ANY OF THE BILLS TO CHANGE THAT.

Posted by: Steve J. | August 23, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

With Obama’s 10 year budget projection going up by 2 trillion it now appears that the nation debt at the end of the 10 year projection will be approaching 21.5 trillion.
Not one democrat or republican has addressed the ever looming national debt.
And some of you sweet people think we can afford national healthcare? I wonder what your grandkids’ grandkids would think of your greed?
THINK NEW CONGRESS IN 2010!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 23, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Mercy writes “obama is trying to FORCE the taxpapers to pay for abortions. ”
This is a LIE. There is nothing in the health care reform bills that modifies the 1978 Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the Federal funding of abortion.

Posted by: Steve J. | August 23, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Mercy…
In the same place it says to “sell all your goods and give them to the poor”… ya done that? Can’t pick and choose.
Also there’s this commandment thing (not an option… like the Public Option is…) — that says not to bear false witness.

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I want to be on McCain’s and Palin’s death panels?

Posted by: Tom Toth | August 23, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

What a wimp McCain is. I’m so glad he’s not our president. Instead of having concrete suggestions to add to the conversation to create a health care system that is more efficient than what we have now, he’d rather just cast aspersions and shadows over Obama’s ideas. Not confrontational directly, but shady dealings.
He’d rather have our health care system stay No. 37 in the world, just below Slovenia. Sad old dude….

Posted by: Sandra Crowe | August 23, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Absolutely correct Steve J.
And by the way Clay and Mercy, even IF the legislation did allow taxpayer funding for abortion — even by way of including existing insurance plans that provide for it through family planning into the Exchange — do I need to remind you that abortion is legal.

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

As usual, John McCain is proving himself to be a spineless hack. He knows full well that he is only propping up the GOP party line of lies and fearmongering. I am just disgusted with the utter lack of ethics shown by Palin, and the press for giving so much time to this whack-job. She has done irreparable damage to their own party’s credibility and preyed upon the less educated people’s fears. Not to mention they have set back the importance of public information about Advanced Directives. And Mr. Stephanopoulous, kudos to you for trying to point out the truth.

Posted by: shelleyt | August 23, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Ed, you are so wrong! The reason that there are questions about abortion being in this bill is that there IS no verbiage or intent to change federal law regarding this. I think many of those currently ON Medicare and screaming about getting the guvt OUT of it (epitomy of stupidity) should just dump it and pay for their own medical care. Save us taxpayers a large chunk of money! Then their own families will have to bear the burden of deciding what THEY want to happen to you if you are incapacitated, rather than what YOU want and could do if you had had a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care or a Living Will.

Posted by: shelleyt | August 23, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Who is John McCain and why is he relevant?

Posted by: Brent | August 23, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Good ol’ Stephy pulling the Dem line. The new entertainment hosts never want to see how things get applied when their is a lot of ambiguity in the bill. I agree the bill says people are entitled (NOT REQUIRED) to have conversation with their doctor about end of life issues. The Obama administration has already revived this option with veterans. This is a FACT. By itself, it is a wonderful conversation to have. Then you look at the questions they asked and begin to wonder. There is a section called “What makes your life worth living”. Some questions are perfectly reasonable like “I am in severe pain most of the time”. Others, perhaps not like “I can no longer contribute to my family’s well being.”. Now lets talk about euthanasia. The bill does not PROHIBIT discussing euthanasia, which means they can. The last thing I want is my grandfather going in for a voluntary discussion about serious end of life issues and hearing that he could receive euthanasia if he really decided its “not worth living” if he “can no longer contribute to my family’s well being” or “a severe financial burden on my family”. This is what Obama is allowing our veterans to hear when they go in for a end-of-life discussion. I dont care what he says. I believe what I see.

Posted by: HalfTruth | August 23, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

What the h*el*l happened to you, Senator? You seemed decent, once upon a time.

Posted by: Dave | August 23, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Why can’t people grasp the fact that this is going to cost a huge fortune and there will be no choice for the government to ration health care. Denial + delay = DEATH. COME ON PEOPLE YOUR NOT STUPID.

Posted by: mary | August 23, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

To the guy that posted all these comments. The Democrats don’t need Republicans. Majorities in both houses and a clear road to victory. The problem is not McCain and Palin, it is your own party. So get a grip, look to your own party troubles.
Birther in OK

Posted by: Brian | August 23, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I can’t believe the Democrats that believed in Obama and change haven’t come out much stronger in favor of health care reform.What will all these people say in 5 yrs.when health insurance again doubles and doubles again in 8. Think people,reform is needed now. Lets pick one of these plans and debate it and get out of there anything that seems to be a problem and pass this thing. Will we blame the GOP in 5 yrs when our cost doubles,no,they will say the dems were in charge and they are to blame. Wake up people before its to late!!!!!

Posted by: Ken | August 23, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Once Obama takes over healthcare, the death panels will come. They won’t dare admit it now. After all, how else will he cut Medicare by $200 Billion, plus cover millions more people, and we will still be paying for all the illegal aliens who come over to have babies etc. He cares more about subsidizing a new car for someone who can’t afford it, than the veterans who risked their lives and our parents and grandparents.

Posted by: CelesteC | August 23, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Posted by: HalfTruth | Aug 23, 2009 8:56:03 PM
…The bill does not PROHIBIT discussing euthanasia, which means they can. The last thing I want is my grandfather going in for a voluntary discussion about serious end of life issues and hearing that he could receive euthanasia if he really decided its “not worth living” if he “can no longer contribute to my family’s well being” or “a severe financial burden on my family”.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here we have an instructional example of ‘Paranoid’ comprehension. “The bill does not PROHIBIT discussing euthanasia, which means they CAN” is interpreted to mean “The bill does not PROHIBIT discussing euthanasia, which means they WILL”….even if the grandfather (or the potential survivors) say “I’m not interested” or otherwise object.
Oh, and this guy doesn’t care what his grandfather thinks…granddaddy’s gonna be kept alive for his son’s benefit regardless!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

HalfTruth…
The proposed legislation does not prohibit a discussion of euthanasia because it does not have to — it is only legal in one state, Oregon.
This was decided in a Supreme Court decision that was very narrow in scope, meaning there are doors open to allow the practice either state by state (as in Oregon) or with what is called “dual effect theory” (basically a legal drug overdose).
It may surprise you to know that not just a few of your fellow Americans have no distaste for euthanasia either for themselves or a loved one (according to their own wishes).
We are all going to die. This inevitability does frighten people, but it should not be treated like it’s some sort of secret that we can’t talk about.

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Posted by: CelesteC | Aug 23, 2009 9:23:21 PM
Once Obama takes over healthcare, the death panels will come.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Somebody really needs to study this disease!
I’ve never in life realized the strong connection between ‘Paranoia’ and the Republican party…at least as much as I have lately. Has it always been this way?

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Sarah Palin is 100% right. John McCain is telling the absolute truth! John McCain is one of the most honest, if not the most honest men in politics, which is why he did not get elected! By the way, why are we still in Iraq and Afghanistan? Obama said we would be out in days, how many days I don’t remember – too many lies to keep track of.

Posted by: CelesteC | August 23, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

CelesteC wrote: “Sarah Palin is 100% right.”
Are you sure about that? Why do you think she wrote on Facebook: “I join millions of Americans in expressing appreciation for the Senate Finance Committee’s decision to remove the provision in the pending health care bill that authorizes end-of-life consultations (Section 1233 of HR 3200).”
Was she lying on that one or just mistaken?

Posted by: WWW | August 23, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Celeste…
The ONLY thing 100% right about Sarah Palin is her side of the political fence.
***********
Right on WWW!
This woman is so clueless she thinks the Senate CAN remove provisions from a House bill…. does she have ANY idea how the government is set up?
Next Sarah screed … “in the Constitution it says that all bills must be passed with a vote of 60 members of Congress with a bi-partisan agreement”.
(Anyone who has ever actually read the Constitution will be laughing their toots off right about now…. :) :-0

Posted by: dassis | August 23, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Strikes me as sort of funny. I started reading HR-3200 the moment it came from the floor in order to be prepared for the onslaught I knew would be coming from the right wingnuts. I’ve read it three times now. Not once do I recall any mention of the sort of panel of which McCain speaks. He either hasn’t read the bill, which I highly suspect, mainly because that has been his forte throughout his career in the Senate, or he is simply trying to finagle the real truth in order to continue the deception perpetrated by Palin and others. I suspect the latter.

Posted by: devilkev | August 23, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Brian | Aug 23, 2009 9:22:38 PM–Birther in OK——– So your one of the sorry souls who believes they know more than the NSA, FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, the DNC, GOP, the McCain and Clinton Campaign, the Republican Governor of Hawaii, the Head of Vital Statistics in Hawaii and every news organization but Faux, with the exception of Bill O’Rielly! Well alrighty!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

devilkev | Aug 23, 2009 10:00:40 PM— Really, well that’s because it’s not in there! This is what I don’t understand from the right, they keep saying something they know is false. Did you know Grassley said, he said it was in there to calm down people who read it on the internet and believed it was in the bill! That makes sense how?

Posted by: Try the truth | August 23, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Posted by: Try the truth | Aug 23, 2009 10:13:58 PM
…This is what I don’t understand from the right, they keep saying something they know is false.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is the tactic that the far-right and Republican party has used for years now…Stick to your story, no matter how false it is, and eventually people will start to believe it is true.
Up until recently, it was very effective. But, now people are taking the time to check the facts out and call them on it.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 23, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

President Obama talks about saving money. The care for the elderly later in life is very expensive – so where is the savings going to come from……………..?

Posted by: ms1236 | August 23, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Does any one agree that the AARP is worried that myths may derail health care reform and that the AARP wants reform?

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

The conservatives are right to express concern about the cost of this plan – that’s fair. But McCain signing on to Palin’s patently stupid distortions just shows that ultimately, politics is more important to Republicans than working to get real reform that benefits most Americans. They would rather try to bring about a defeat for Obama, than do what they were elected to do, work to devise genuine solutions to the country’s problems. Sad that a Senator of McCain’s stature still lowers himself to this sort of thing.

Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Someone commented above that the “GOP has sunk so low”..this is not the lowest..it’s been going on for over 30 years…it’s just that people are waking up to what’s been so obvious in people’s minds and memories. This is just another insult to everyone’s intelligence. THANK GOD THESE PEOPLE DID NOT WIN..but we really don’t have god to thank. WE DID IT!!! WE WOKE UP AN VOTED. WE WANT TO LIVE IN and CREATE AN EQUAL WORLD..FAIR for ALL!! OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL. Young and old. Short and tall. Educated and Ignorant. Blonde or Brunette. Hung or Gherkin! Black or white. WE DONT CARE. We care about everyone getting same fair chance. NO Special treatment. NO Line outside Studio 54. No VIPs. No heirarchy status! We can all eat cake!

Posted by: Sassy Lou | August 23, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Kenneth,
You still don’t get it. Palin wasn’t talking about the end-of-life counseling.
Posted by: tanarg | Aug 23, 2009 7:46:41 PM
——————————-
Many people enjoy Greek mythology; they use it as a way to think about every day situations. I enjoy Republican mythology; it furthers the self destruction of the Republican party.

Posted by: Kenneth | August 23, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

BikernAz12 posted “A doddering old man and a psyco chick are out there trying to slay windmills. You Ain’t seen nothing yet Don Quixote.”
They remind me more of Burns and Allen. Say death panels Sarah.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Mike posted “….They would rather try to bring about a defeat for Obama, than do what they were elected to do, work to devise genuine solutions to the country’s problems. ”
It looks like some of them might be trying to help. I have read some parts of H.R.3400 the Republican bill. They do have some good ideas in that bill including tort reform.
I hope they do work together on this problem.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

ms1236 posted “President Obama talks about saving money. The care for the elderly later in life is very expensive – so where is the savings going to come from……………..?”
I’m not sure, but Obama called and asked me to ask you where YOUR grandma lives!
:-)

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

CelesteC posted “John McCain is one of the most honest, if not the most honest men in politics, which is why he did not get elected! ”
No, he didn’t get elected because he stopped being that honest man; he sold his soul for a chance to be President.
Did you watch the way he LIED to the American people to probably the most honest men in politics; Ron Paul? Where was his honesty there? What was his response to Ron Paul’s telling the truth about why the middle east hates use. Paul was using the 9/11 Commission’s Report, what did Honest John use? The tired LIE that “they hate us for our freedoms” Paul was the only one consistently telling the truth during the debates.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 23, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

‘Death Panels’ … how ignorant. Use of these terms could only come from such stupidity that results from extreme in breeding. You all in the US are arguing about something that could significantly help over 30 million of you who don’t have ‘no’ health care at all. Cost too much … why aren’t you complaining about the defense budget … Oh No … that wouldn’t do … silly people.

Posted by: Dr. Wayne | August 23, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Wait until you are old enough for Medicare and need to take one of the drugs that are on the “Medicare not approved list”. Then try to negotiate with the “Gov’t” and get turned down by the panel and have to pay out of pocket. One of those non approved drugs has kept me in remission from Crohns disease since 2001. When Part D came out I went on my husband’s employer plan which covers all my drugs. What happens if there is a Govt plan for all ages — unless you are rich you may not be able to pay for your meds.

Posted by: Steffie | August 24, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

other than the hard core conservative republicans seriously doubt that any other republican, or anyone else for that matter, cares what mccain or palin thing these days. they are amusing to read about but take them seriously, nah. mccain had a reasonably good chance at being potus but blew it by selecting palin.

Posted by: lawrence | August 24, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Brain Dead. He need to stop “projecting” he is an elder Statesman. Shameful for a long time Senator to back such irresponsible “mess” that an uneducated woman without an agenda for good, but to “conrail” angry people for destruction and disruption in our country .

Posted by: tychisum | August 24, 2009, 5:04 am 5:04 am

Dear Ya’all, hasn’t it occured to anyone yet? In a frenzy to cut costs, insurance companies are coming up with “Death Panels” on their own. The ONLY way to make that STOP, is to take the profit out of it. 99% of everything wrong with this bill, is wrong NOW! Don’t assume that because we turn down this health care that death panels and lower care, long lines, and haffarsed screening will go away, contrary…it will get WORSE.

Posted by: able | August 24, 2009, 6:10 am 6:10 am

It is obvious that Mccain has no real intellectual grasp of the contents and intent of the Healthcare bill. He tried to fudge it but Mr. Stephanopoulos did not easily let him off the hook.
Too bad his ego is such that he feels the need to defend Sarah Palin no matter how deficient and incoherent. Whether Republican or Democrat, many of us have had undivided respect and esteem for Sen. McCain – no longer, and he can thank his continuous stalwartness in supporting this woman who seeks to divide our country, our politics to the extreme of where the “right” stands today. Mr. McCain please take your honour back!

Posted by: Elaine | August 24, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Found this online, regarding ‘death panels’: (1) Make a preposterous and false claim about a bill. (2) Have the claim disproved. (3) Avoid defending the original claim, but instead observe that the controversy reflects “a legitimate difference of interpretation” about what might happen in the future. Effective opposition in three easy steps! And so we have a conundrum: Ignore the tactic, and let the falsehood persist, or engage with the tactic, and play into the false appearance of legitimate debate. I do not have a good solution. The best I can do is repeat, with endless tedium, that the bill is not ambiguous and the original claim is still false. I can further add that people who hide falsehoods behind the smokescreen of an equally false ambiguity are doing a fabulous job of destroying legitimate public discourse.

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 24, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Those FEW of you who still believe that there were death panels suggested–need to actually read the proposed sections. All they wanted (and, by the way, this was a Republican section before it wasn’t) was for Medicare to PAY for a doctor to discuss living wills with patients WHO WANTED TO DISCUSS IT! The other part about deciding what procedures work BEST just makes sense! Not all doctors have time to do research on their own–they have to rely on others. This portion just PROPOSED setting up panels to look at different ways of treating, say, breast cancer or prostate cancer, to find what was the BEST TREATMENT–not the cheapest treatment. That way a doctor could immediately try what has worked BEST rather than do this and then try that and — you get the picture. This was NOT intended to limit care–no where does it say it would mandate the care–just IDENTIFY the most effective treatments.

Posted by: Cheryl56 | August 24, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

GOP = the party of lies, distortions, rumors and NO. No, no, no ideas. No, no, no to others ideas. They want to do the same old, same old, whether or not the same old works. Who in their right mind would support a Republican?

Posted by: Archie | August 24, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

(roll eyes) He’s just wording it different than Palin. She said ‘Death Panels’, while he just words it like a lawyer to mean the same thing.
So in the end, he is saying that the part of the bill supports ‘death panels’.

Posted by: GWP | August 24, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Posted by: able | Aug 24, 2009 6:10:50 AM
Dear Ya’all, hasn’t it occured to anyone yet? In a frenzy to cut costs, insurance companies are coming up with “Death Panels” on their own. The ONLY way to make that STOP, is to take the profit out of it.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nice try Able.
But, even a drunk off the street knows that the insurance companies came up with “Death Panel” a long time ago…to increase profit!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 24, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

We already know Medicare is going to be cut into for monies to help finance the new plan….it was specifically mentioned. Don’t you people know you will be 65 one day and so will your children. There were 2 people on TV last night – one from here and one from Canada. The one from here showed how important it is to have freedom of choice for a 2nd opinion – the first doc said she had 6 weeks to live. The 2nd hospital treated her brain cancer and she is still here healthy 7 years later. The 2nd from Canada was told he needed tests but would have to wait 6 months..he came here to Mayo Clinic and they said – operation immediately regarding his heart. Went back to Canada and no one would listen so he came back here to Mayo Clinic and had 4 stents put in immediately and is still healthy after 5 years and said he would have been dead before the 6 months wait. How are these good systems????? The Canadians do not want this bill passed because anyone with money will not have anywhere to go to save their lives as here there is no wait. Also what about the fact Vancouver is laying off thousands of surgeons and staff because the Govt is short on health care monies. My granddaughter is (was) studying to be a doctor but with all that is going on he is changing his mind. How many others are doing the same? Have you ever heard of doctors being laid off?

Posted by: suggi1 | August 24, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Sorry – I mean’t grandson. Granddaughter is graduating and a certified EMT and is planning on the doc thing also — so, we will see….

Posted by: suggi1 | August 24, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Way to go, George! Obama media putting words into McCain’s mouth. But then, why did Obama back off on the “End of Life Couseling” aspect of the reform act after POalin’s post on her facebook? LOL, sounds tome like the Libbies of America are scared, Reckon? Youbetcha!

Posted by: Lee | August 24, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

RepubLIEcans are morally bankrupt. Destructive distortions, pro-life anti-healthcare, anti-social welfare, pro-war, pro-gun, pro-torture, anti-environment, anti-global warming, pro-distortion of facts, pro-mislading the public on everything form war to healthcare and hypocritically anti-big spending while running up record deficits and promoting un-regulated banking which led to a global economic crisis, business failures, loss of jobs and homes and the Democratic party has to clean up the mess while they blame liberals for everything. Lieing must be a pre-requisite for being a RepubLIEcan.

Posted by: DE | August 24, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

The CEOs of the insurance companies make more in a few hours than the average american does in a year.

Posted by: DE | August 24, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Two festering peas in a pod….

Posted by: Jinny Lee | August 24, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

There is no defense for Palin’s irresponsible talk of death panels. As a healthcare provider, I find it outrageous. Furthermore, the GOP has been spreading falsehoods all along, and we’re all going to suffer because of it. It’s time they started thinking of the future of the American public rather than just that of their party.

Posted by: leogorky | August 24, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Sure insurance companies make you take certain tests before they allow an MRI or CTscan…however, the fact is they do allow it when it is shown it is needed and there is no 6 month wait. I had a cluster of calcifications in my breast and the radiologist informed my PCP while I was still there and her office got an appointment with a surgeon for the next day. I had a biopsy 2 days later and a mastectomy 3 days later. Lucky for me she was a savvy surgeon who said I should not go for the partial removal where the cluster was and get the mastectomy because the whole breast was full not just the cluster part and I had a 1-millimeter clear margin around the breast which is just about nothing. She said if I had waited it would have been in my lymph nodes and I would not be here today. That was 7+ years ago. I want the same options in health care for myself, my children and grandchildren. I just hope those of you who are so much for the Govt plan do not end up kicking yourself in the future because you can’t have the right meds or it takes too long for tests and surgery and end up dying needlessly. Right now you may pay more of a copay for a nonformulary drug but you can get it through your insurance.

Posted by: suggi1 | August 24, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

He’s not an eloquent liar.

Posted by: Beverly | August 24, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

The difference between a big insurance company and the government deciding who gets care and who does not is significant.
The decision on how much is spent on each individual based on the individuals age is at the heart of the rationing system that exists in all health plans. It is worse when the government decides it as the individual has little recourse to get around the decision when the government decides it.
John Mackey’s plan fixes this.

Posted by: welldirected | August 24, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Is it any wonder that McCain lost the election? Sure, let’s not blame the liars, let’s blame those who have been lied about, instead. McCain, retire already. You’re losing your mental functions quickly. Palin is just too stupid to even defend.

Posted by: Rudy | August 24, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

The only thing the Democrats disapproved of was the Republican Amendments that removed a public option.
McCain should close his trap up! He should be considered an enemy of the people as he supports the agenda, long placed upon the American public, to deny health care and to sway people to vote against their own best interests!

Posted by: Sassy Lou | August 24, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

She’s an idiot.
Hey Palin! GO to back porch and wave to the Russians.

Posted by: Michele | August 24, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The funny thing is, these types of panels exist today, in every health insurance provider. They determine what kind of care, if any, desperately ill people get. And if they say no, the patient would die before they get a reversal. Don’t try to slap the “death panel” charge on the reform bill. A public option would keep people from having worries about being dropped from coverage when you are too ill to fight.

Posted by: DaveM | August 24, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Lee wrote: “…why did Obama back off on the ‘End of Life Couseling’ aspect of the reform act after POalin’s post on her facebook?”
Er, since when did Obama back off on the end of life provision?

Posted by: WWW | August 24, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I don’t trust McCain’s judgment on anything since he selected Palin as his running mate. The man obviously has no ability to make good decisions (at least, at this point in his career)!

Posted by: jmb | August 24, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Hey guys you are blaming the wrong person. Senator Johnny Isackson put that addition in the bill as he truly believes that people should have a living will and have their wishes respected. Naturally, you talk to a doctor. It was a good suggestion and now he is backing away because the talk show hosts have made it into a death panel. What a shame….it was a good idea Johnny so don’t be afraid. Limbaugh won’t hate you and call you names. What a joke this party has become.

Posted by: talmag | August 24, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Uninsured workers stand in front of Death Panels everyday on the possibility that an illness or accident will happen and they will have no way to pay for care needed. Uninsured workers pay taxes that is used for Senior Care today. So it just make good fiscal sense that these worker stay healthy so they can continue to pay taxes. Insuring all workers save all our own lives. It simple, stop been fooled by lies.

Posted by: attacked tired | August 24, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Char Bransky:
What is your point? That you should not have to be bothered paying out-of-pocket expenses for ambulance transportation or unauthorized medicine? If you shouldn’t pay for it, who should? Society? The government? If you are so unhappy with your insurance company, you can change plans quite easily … or do what millions of other Americans do — keep a tax-free health savings account and simply pay cash as you go for medical services. In many cases, it’s cheaper insurance.
Getting sick or injured is a fact of life and no one expects their insurance company to cover everything! So you save for those things.

Posted by: No name | August 24, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Why is it so hard for Libs to understand that Gov Palin used the words “Death Panels” to draw attention to what was in the Bill that she disagreed with. It worked, an now its all over the MSM. Had she not done that, no one would have noticed. When the MSM is in the pocket of the DNC, sometimes all methods are necessary.

Posted by: homjett | August 24, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

“Why is it so hard for Libs to understand that Gov Palin used the words “Death Panels” to draw attention to what was in the Bill that she disagreed with. It worked, an now its all over the MSM. Had she not done that, no one would have noticed. When the MSM is in the pocket of the DNC, sometimes all methods are necessary.”
So tell me, what exactly in section 1233 is so evil that she felt compelled to create the “death panel” lie, and politically pimp her disabled baby to buttress that lie?

Posted by: Rudy | August 24, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Let’s look at the facts about John McCain that you don’t get on ABC News.
During his political career received $ 7 million from the health sector, including health insurance companies and pharmaceuticals. $ 1.2 million of McCain’s campaign money comes from lobbyists who are now descending upon Washington Dc like locusts from a Biblical Plague in an effort to defeat Obama’s health care reforms. From 2005 to present McCain’s top 5 political contributors include Merrill-Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs, all of which are reaping record profits from health insurance companies and pharmaceuticals.
Isn’t this the BIG reason McCain back Sarah Palin’s lies? Every time, we pay an insurance premium, John McCain gets a political campaign contribution. That’s also the reason that McCain is so passionately opposed to a public option. It’s all about the Benjamins, and McCain is too much of a liar and a crook to tell the truth. Incidentally, I got my information from Center for Responsive Politics. I invite anyone else to do the homework and find out for him or herself.
My big question am I not getting this information from ABC News?

Posted by: Bill | August 24, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Maybe death panel is indeed wrong.
Judging from Obama’a comment on abortion, maybe Death Neutral Panel would be a better fit.
Death Neutral in that one could take or leave the panel’s recommendations with regard to end=of-life care!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 24, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

dassis, for the record, i HAVE given away things by the CAR LOADS. have you? your comment about giving to the poor has NOTHING to do with the subject,it was just a red herring, a silly jab from you.

Posted by: Mercy | August 24, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Once again, there is NO panel of ANY sort in the end-of-life provision (section 1233) of HR 3200. Consultations are between a patient and his doctor. NO PANEL IS INVOLVED. Read the bill!

Posted by: Shomida Panels | August 24, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

please check out the WASHINGTON TIMES re OBAMA pushing abortions:
“In an Aug. 19 conference call sponsored by the liberal group 40 Days for Health Reform, Mr. Obama accused his opponents of “bearing false witness” and of “divisive and deceptive attacks” on a whole host of claims about the various health bills backed by congressional Democratic leaders. A number of the president’s counterclaims were dubious, but his most demonstrably false statement was: “You’ve heard that this is all going to mean government funding of abortion. Not true.”
That’s not what Associated Press reports. On Aug. 5, an AP story was headlined “Gov’t insurance would allow coverage for abortion.” There’s no wiggle room in that headline – or in the legislation. As AP reported: “Since abortion is a legal medical procedure, experts on both sides say not mentioning it would allow health care plans in the new insurance exchange to provide unrestricted coverage…
~Washington Times editorial, “Your taxes to pay for abortions,” August 24
~Washington Times editorial, “Your taxes to pay for abortions,” August 24″

Posted by: Mercy | August 24, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

year since obama promised planned parenthood that “the first thing i’d do as president would be to sign the freedom of choice act”. FOCA….
FOCA would force medical workers to do abortions AGAINST their own consciences. it’s an unpleasant piece of legislation. poof. it needs to go in the trash, NOT the babies.
obama elsewhere was already talking about aborting his own grandchild. that’s unpleasant.

Posted by: Mercy | August 24, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

“obama elsewhere was already talking about aborting his own grandchild.”
That’s your interpretation. Here is the actual quote.
“I’ve got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old. I’m going to teach them first of all about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. So it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”

Posted by: Rudy | August 25, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Walter: Republicans anti-Science? Obama couldn’t even spit out the words to the question when life begins. A 6th grader can answer that one, yet when it comes to abortion, the Dems insist that the world is flat, refusing to acknowledge ultrasounds, that an unborn child’s head and toes are formed at 7 and 9 weeks, respectively; that the baby’s genitals develop by week 11.
Yet the Dems insist it’s still a woman’s body. Okay, Democrat Einsteins: a woman with two heads, 20 toes, and a 50% chance its genitals consist of testicles and a penis. Yeah, some people used to think the sun revolved around the earth too.

Posted by: Thinking a Little Harder | August 25, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am

More complete quote from Obama:
“When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education – which should include abstinence education, and teaching children that sex is not something casual. But it should also include other information about contraception. Because, look, I’ve got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old. I’m going to teach them first of all about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. So it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”

Posted by: Rudy | August 25, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

This is all so very logical when you look at it the right way…
sometimes the reality of things is just too painful to bear…
please read:
“The GOP and Tina Turner: What’s Love REALLY Got To Do With IT?”

Posted by: Drew Pillow | August 25, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Palin is right. George has to hedge his claim by using the weasel word “independent” to get around the fact that hundreds of blogs and websites have pointed to Oregon’s state-run insurance denying cancer drugs and offering suicide pills instead as evidence that “death panels” are already in existence.

Posted by: Reality Hammer | August 25, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Of course John “McSame” is going to back Palin’s stupid comments. If he did not, he weould be admitting that he selected an ignorant woman as a VP running mate. LOL….. John McCain realized that he lost the election about 2 weeks after he selected Palin for his running mate…. during the Catie Couric interview. …. LOL.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | August 25, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Hey America Medicare is runned by the GOVERNMENT and is going BANKRUPT !!!The only thing this NEW HEALTH PROGRAM is going to provide for us is a COMPRIMISED HEALTH PROGRAM — which means get on a WAITING LIST program .What does this mean? It means you will wind up getting and paying for PRIVATE INSURANCE along with paying PUBLIC INSURANCE by this “smart” PRESIDENT through him raising TAXES!!!!PEOPLE are loosing their homes and going hungry and we are talking HEALTH REFORM????

Posted by: Marie Hardy | August 25, 2009, 6:22 am 6:22 am

I just wish that just one journalist would step up to the republicans ie.McCain and say that part about a “living will” was put in by Johnny Isackson of Georgia not President Obama. It has been proven over and over by Fact Check and other sources that he did not put that in but this fact is never mentioned. Isackson has tried to back away from this, however, Mr. Isackson, it is a good idea. Families need their doctor to level with them and tell them the condition of the patient and then the patient can decide what his wishes are exactly. Most patients do not have this and the burden comes back to the family. I just wish someone would stand up and say Hey…Isackson put that in not Obama. The republicans never will.

Posted by: talmag | August 25, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

It doesn’t really matter whether a democrat or republican places the evil lines in the bill. What does matter is that we can read and the bill has bad stuff in it.
Several networks have begun so-called Fact Checks on Obamacare. Three of the outstanding ones are ABORTION, ILLEGAL ALIENS and RATIONING. The purpose of the fact checks are an attempt to use a minion media to suggest that “we the people” don’t know the facts and are reacting to rumors.
However, a fact that flies in the face of the administration and the media is that especially for these three facts there is further evidence that proves the opposition is right and that the media has failed the public. That further evidence being that for all three of the above there have attempts to specifically exclude by amendment which have been voted down by a party line vote!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 25, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

All the provision would do is pay doctors for their time in helping to ensure that their patients’ wishes are made known. If a patient wants everything done to be kept alive, his or her doctor would not be paid any less for the consultation. There is no incentive to encourage a patient to “pull the plug” even though Sarah Palin and Betsy McCaughey suggest there is.
So, Ed Taylor, what in tarnation are you reading in section 1233 that is so “bad” and so “evil?”

Posted by: WWW | August 25, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Let’s look at the facts about John McCain that you don’t get on ABC News.
During his political career received $ 7 million from the health sector, including health insurance companies and pharmaceuticals. $ 1.2 million of McCain’s campaign money comes from lobbyists who are now descending upon Washington Dc like locusts from a Biblical Plague in an effort to defeat Obama’s health care reforms. From 2005 to present McCain’s top 5 political contributors include Merrill-Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs, all of which are reaping record profits from health insurance companies and pharmaceuticals.
Isn’t this the BIG reason McCain back Sarah Palin’s lies? Every time, we pay an insurance premium, John McCain gets a political campaign contribution. Does McCain tell his followers these facts at his town hall meetings?
Incidentally, I got my information from Center for Responsive Politics. I invite anyone else to do the homework and find out for him or herself.
My big question am I not getting this information from ABC News?

Posted by: William Joseph Miller, Los Angeles | August 25, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Sarah Palin’s turning the real health care concerns into a Robin Cook novel. The U.K. is discussing charging money for their “universal health care” because it’s not working. England has the highest mortality rate of cancer patients in the world. Their health care cannot afford to pay for life saving drugs, and universal health care takes away the incentives for medical technology. The failure of other systems concerns most rational minded conservatives.
I do not believe a board of Dr. Kevorkians will decide who lives and who dies. Sarah Palin is unintentionally mocking those of us who are living in the reality. I wish she were on the other side of the issue!

Posted by: JJM | August 25, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

To JRL, if you knew anything about the economy and insurance, you’d know that your health insurer was merely asking about the cause of your broken ankle to see if it happened at work – and then it would be paid for by your workers compensation insurance. It would still be paid for by an “evil” insurance company. To all you buffoons, including your fearless leader, who are piling on the insurance companies as convenient scapegoats, know that they make contracts with you or your employers and if they don’t pay according to the contract, you can sue the bastards and probably do quite well for yourself. Check your coverage and if you think you need something more, complain to your employer or go BUY the extra coverage. Take responsibility for yourself rather than wait for Daddy Obama and the nanny state to do it for you.

Posted by: Neil | August 25, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

If Senator McCain wasn’t in the Senator and didn’t quality for Medicare, he wouldn’t be able to obtain healthcare insurance because of his history of melanoma. If he wants a quotidian lesson in healthcare, he should have one of his staffers apply for health insurance for a “fictitious” 50-something male with a history of melanoma and see what happens. Then let’s see if he reports the results to the media!

Posted by: Brian Green | August 26, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

So…you think the idea of “death panels” began with Obamacare?
Check this out!
The young lady’s insurance company refused to pay for her cancer treatment;it seems those “people” (if you want to call them that) decided that the young lady was TOO YOUNG TO HAVE CANCER!!! Now, THAT’S a death panel;and it already exists at your “friendly, neighborhood insurance company.
And my OWN perscription insurer one day decided that I did not need the amount of medication for migraine headaches that my doctor had been prescribing to me for YEARS!! Did they ask my doctor her opinion? NOOOOOOO! They simply reduced my meds and said if I wanted more than that amount, I had to pay for it myself! I had to switch to another medication…only to find out that they don’t want to pay for that one either! Sound like a panel that has no regard for our pain? Does to me! So what makes anyone think that a public option would,or could, be worse? My husband has medicare. He has it so much better than I do.
Obamacare will be, and can only be, better than the private options that are allowing people to suffer and, yes, die no matter WHAT age they are.

Posted by: SisT | August 29, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I wish people could just talk about the subject at hand.this is too important to be held subjected to stupidity.all i have to say is national health care or bust.i will go to jail before one more idiot tells me how much i have to pay for something(mandatory health insurance).

Posted by: bleep | August 29, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.