Obama Addresses ‘Outlandish’ and ‘Misleading’ Claims About Health Reform
From Sunlen Miller:
After a week of rowdy town halls where President Obama’s policies on health care were challenged, the president used his weekly address to debunk what he called “outlandish rumors” about what reform will mean to Americans.
As senators and representatives head home for the August recess to meet with their constituents, the president said it is important that Americans have the facts.
“So let me start by dispelling the outlandish rumors that reform will promote euthanasia, cut Medicaid or bring about a government takeover of health care,” he said. “That’s simply not true. This isn’t about putting government in charge of your health insurance; it’s about putting you in charge of your health insurance. Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”
The president said that as Congress draws close to “finalizing and passing” health insurance reform, “the defense of the status quo and political point-scorers in Washington are growing fiercer in their opposition,” and they are trying to “exploit differences or concerns for political gain.”
In recent days and weeks, the president added, “some have been using misleading information to defeat what they know is the best chance of reform we’ve ever had.”
Obama admitted that there are details to be hammered out on Capitol Hill, but played up the areas of agreement.
“There are still differences to be reconciled,” he said. “But we are moving toward a broad consensus on reform. Four committees in Congress have produced legislation – an unprecedented level of agreement on a difficult and complex challenge.”
Briefly mentioning Friday’s better-than-expected job loss numbers, Obama said they are just one sign that “we’ve begun to put the brakes on this recession and that the worse may be behind us.”
The president said health care reform is key to a long-term economic recovery.
-Sunlen Miller
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
Obama & the rest of the Dem leadership just don’t get it.
It’s not about rationing or keeping your Dr.
America does not want the federal government involved in health care — period.
It doesn’t matter what the bill says or doesn’t say.
The fact is people know from past experience that when the government gets involved things go from bad to worse.
We are trillions in debt and this will only add more. Look at the historical costs of Medicare vs what the projected cost was supposed to be.
And to top it all off, the Treasury is asking to increase the debit limit because $12.1 trillion just isn’t enough.
When will the jerks in Washington stop and remember that they work for us, and if we say No, we mean No!
Posted by: Phil | August 8, 2009, 6:47 am 6:47 am
Phil, the “jerks” in Washington as you call them are listening to us. Maybe you remember the last two election cycles, they happened to be Democratic landslides. The people that won the election are moving forward with what they specifically told us they would do. If it wasn’t the will of the majority, they wouldn’t have won the elections. It’s really not that complicated. Were you here complaining when Bush accumulated 4.5 trillion dollars of debt and took us from a balanced budget to a yearly deficiency of 1.5 trillion dollars? I don’t remember seeing much posted from the “fiscal conservatives” then.
Posted by: Coracii | August 8, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
“Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”
_____________________________________
Why does he blatantly keep lying about this? It’s simply not true. Just read pages 16-18 of the bill and you will quickly see that you will lose the insurance you like and be FORCED into the public option if: you change jobs, or your insurance company raises your premium $0.01! Oh, and there’s that little part about how insurance companies can write exactly ZERO new plans after this bill becomes law! Again, I ask, why is the President lying about this? Has he read the bill???
Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | August 8, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am
No, Coracil, YOU don’t get it. We already HAVE government involved in healthcare – Medicare! It works and it’s necessary. We, as citizens, (as Christians, or whatever your religious affiliation) are obligated to care for our fellow man. Right now the rich and middle class get what they need. The ones who fall off the radar are left untreated. Yes. They. Are. And I hope you were as ‘righteously indignant’ when Bush asked for billions for his foolish war…
Posted by: sevresblue | August 8, 2009, 7:58 am 7:58 am
The people that want to kill health care reform are the same vociferous bunch that think George W Bush was a good president. Loud, stupid and wrong. Fortunately, they’re in the minority.
Posted by: Eric | August 8, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am
If this is such a great plan, why is it so hard to sell? A majority of the population doesn’t want it and is concerned that we are spending too much already. Why does the White House need to gather information from those who have a god given right to oppose this bill?
Posted by: Texas | August 8, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Medicare is going broke … Social Security is running out of money … and the president wants to add a new $1.5 trillion entitlement the nation can ill afford. Let’s address the entitlements we have now before taking on a new fiscal burden. Plus, we should all be concerned about government taking responsibility for 1/6 of our economy which makes up the health care industry.
Posted by: Patrick | August 8, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
In the wake of GOP and billion-dollar health and insurance corporation lies like Granny Killing, I don’t know anything to do except to remind people–millions are uninsured, and all of us who have insurance know it is likely to he canceled if we get an expensive illness. We need a public option health care plan now.
Posted by: JAB | August 8, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Bull!
Posted by: Andy | August 8, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Coracii,You don’t get it the goverment is already involved in our health care . It’s called Medicare and Medicaid where have you been . The goverment need’s to fix both of these fraud run programs there is so much waste and fraud that it is killing both programs.
Posted by: Bud | August 8, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Obama has shown that he is not to be trusted. He was very clear that he believes that seniors would be better off taking painpillers that receiving expnsive pacemakers.
Posted by: ubu1991 | August 8, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
The insurance providers are funding and encouraging the opposition to this bill. Does that not tell you something? Eric is right, it’s the idiots that voted for Bush twice that are against this bill. They take the lies and talking points provided by the insurance lobby and quote them as gospel without taking the time to check the facts.
Posted by: Taloka | August 8, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Patrick said it so well i’m going to repeat it here, “Medicare is going broke … Social Security is running out of money … and the president wants to add a new $1.5 trillion entitlement the nation can ill afford. Let’s address the entitlements we have now before taking on a new fiscal burden. Plus, we should all be concerned about government taking responsibility for 1/6 of our economy which makes up the health care industry.”
Also, this guy deserves a second read, “”Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”
_____________________________________
Why does he blatantly keep lying about this? It’s simply not true. Just read pages 16-18 of the bill and you will quickly see that you will lose the insurance you like and be FORCED into the public option if: you change jobs, or your insurance company raises your premium $0.01! Oh, and there’s that little part about how insurance companies can write exactly ZERO new plans after this bill becomes law! Again, I ask, why is the President lying about this? Has he read the bill???”
Posted by: James | August 8, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
The problem is that there is no specific health plan yet so the oppositon can lie or exaggerate constantly. They keep saying pages 16-18 say this or that but there are a number of health plans in various committees so no one can knoww what they are talking about.
Posted by: Jim | August 8, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Hopefully the Obamaessiah will do a better job correcting the “outlandish and misleading” claims about the health reform plan than he has about the recent “drop in unemployment” !!! Which, by the way, is not due to less people being unemployed—- The Washington Post—-”The July decline in the jobless rate came about not because more people had jobs, but because 422,000 people removed themselves from the labor force, essentially giving up the search for work. The number of long-term unemployed people — those who have been out of a job but looking for more than 26 weeks — rose by another 584,000.” —– This sorry excuse for a president couldn’t tell the honest truth if his life depended on it !!!! If the health reform plan is so wonderful—why is so difficult to sell it ???? Everyone knows what we have now sucks !!!
Posted by: roscoe | August 8, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
sevresblue, just wondering, did you even read my post (you even spelled my id incorrectly)?
To quote you… “No, Coracil, YOU don’t get it. We already HAVE government involved in healthcare – Medicare! It works and it’s necessary. We, as citizens, (as Christians, or whatever your religious affiliation) are obligated to care for our fellow man. Right now the rich and middle class get what they need. The ones who fall off the radar are left untreated. Yes. They. Are. And I hope you were as ‘righteously indignant’ when Bush asked for billions for his foolish war…”
My post (second post in the topic) specifically endorsed the health care reform, which you them attempt to claim I’m ignoring. You make a reference to my religion (I’m agnostic), and then ask about my support for Bush after I point out his ineptitude in managing the national finances? And yes, being a Democrat and a liberal I was very vocal against the war in Iraq if you must know. Try reading posts thoroughly before you reply with off-the-cuff remarks.
Posted by: Coracii | August 8, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Perhaps he should address his own outlandish and misleading claims…it’s kind of hard to overlook something if it came out of his mouth. We have video of the big O talking about the elderly going home and taking a pill, we have video of him talking of wanting single payer, we have video of him saying it is going to take time to do away with private insurers…so what exactly is it we are misunderstanding?!
Posted by: samhiguchi | August 8, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am
I guess Obama forgot to mention the SEIU union thugs that beat up a black conservative outside the Russ Carnaham Hall meeting in St. Louis and sent him to the hospital for selling flags and pins. When “O” says for supporters to push back hard, he means it. I don’t think this guy is a Socialist. I think Marxist is more descriptive. I wonder if he thinks they acted “stupidly”.
Posted by: Andy | August 8, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Obama’s proposal is inadequate to the need and expensive due to kowtowing to the pharmacy industry.
What should have been done was to create single payer, tell people with insurance that it would not cost them more than their insurance premiums cost them, negotiate for cheaper drugs, and adopt medicare’s rules and guidelines for treatment.
Posted by: jan | August 8, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Bill, show me where in the proposed reform it says illegal aliens would be covered (don’t bother pointing to a Fox news website). I’ll save you time if you prefer, none of the versions going through sub-committees have that language, they all exclude illegal immigrants from coverage. And your “granny-killing” fantasy… Have you ever heard of a living will or hospice care counseling, they already occur every day and this amendment to the bill was added by two republicans. And your final falsehood, we the people put Obama in the White House through a democratic process called voting.
Posted by: Coracii | August 8, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Obama didn’t address the fact that illegal aliens will be covered. I really think he’s lying through his teeth and will say later it was worse that we thought so we had to change it.
Posted by: James | August 8, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Yes we the people put O in the WH and we the people WILL remove his arse come next election! Along with a lot of the cronies who claim to be representing us.
Posted by: samhiguchi | August 8, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Does the below look like you can keep your current health plan?
The first quote is from the current health bill, which prohibits buying a private plan once the new government health plan is in place. Obama is a liar.
“Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day” of the year the legislation becomes law.”
So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised — with, of course, exceptions: Those who currently have private individual coverage won’t be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.
From the beginning, opponents of the public option plan have warned that if the government gets into the business of offering subsidized health insurance coverage, the private insurance market will wither. Drawn by a public option that will be 30% to 40% cheaper than their current premiums because taxpayers will be funding it, employers will gladly scrap their private plans and go with Washington’s coverage.
The nonpartisan Lewin Group estimated in April that 120 million or more Americans could lose their group coverage at work and end up in such a program. That would leave private carriers with 50 million or fewer customers. This could cause the market to, as Lewin Vice President John Sheils put it, “fizzle out altogether.”
What wasn’t known until now is that the bill itself will kill the market for private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.
The legislation is also likely to finish off health savings accounts, a goal that Democrats have had for years. They want to crush that alternative because nothing gives individuals more control over their medical care, and the government less, than HSAs.
Posted by: mark | August 8, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
If the American people were stupid enough to elect Bush twice, I am sure they are capable of welcoming being screwed by the big insurance companies. Still one has to wonder how the American people are able to ignore the facts that all the other industrialized countries have single payer systems that work, keeping in mind the seventy-five million Americans who cannot get adequate insurance, keeping in mind that the US spends three times more for comparable health care. We are such an ignorant people. If single payer insurance did not work in all the other countries, wouldn’t least one of those countries abandoned the system?
Posted by: geneonlbk | August 8, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Mr.President, outlandish rumors just doesn’t cut it. Stop being nice and say it like it is. These people are LYING. Palin lies, Bachmann lies, Boenner lies, ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS are lying about health care. They are LIARS AND FRAUDS, spewing selfish hate, and they are attempting to swindle the American people of what they need, REAL heathcare reform. They want to STEAL this opportunity from us by manipulating their followers of puppets that say and believe what their told to say and believe.
LIARS AND FRAUDS! WAKE UP PEOPLE! The Republicans are LYING TO YOU!!! 22,000 PEOPLE DIE EVERY YEAR FROM LACK OF HEALTH CARE! That is BLOOD on Republican hands! They are Murderers! And they want to keep murdering to fill their pockets and the pockets of insurance companies making BILLIONS of dollars off your suffering. WAKE UP!!
Posted by: mshare | August 8, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
The reason why the town hall meetings are going this way is because the representatives have no answers because they have no idea what is in the Health Care Reform bill. Which keeps changing daily. Just listen to Arlen Specter say “The bill is over 1,000 pages and things are moving too fast and have time to read it”. I would say stop and read the bill so you have an idea what you are defending. Our representatives need to stop being puppets for Pelosi, Reid and Obama. We need to use our right to vote and not re-elected these officals. This is the only thing they understand.
Posted by: Mindy | August 8, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
You people defending Obama are so naive. Do you honestly beleive what ANY politician says? Not just Obama, but anyone? He is telling his version of the truth. You criticize the right for “folding to the insurance companies” just as the left is about to take over 150 million from drug companies to push their plan. Both sides have sold out. Obama says you can keep your own plan/doctor. Sure you can….for a year or so b/c no private company will be able to surive too long when competing against the Federal Government. Democrats apparently didn’t learn their lesson in 1993-1994 of what happens to them when they support this socialist crap that most Americans don’t want.
Posted by: Bl224 | August 8, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am
These people that Belive the Republican Lies also Belive there are WMDS In Iraq, And that Bush was right to Invade Iraq people we Elected CHANGE Understand CHANGE! Not the Same old Republican BS And Believe me when I tell you once the Lies of the Republicans are exposed you will see the Obama supporters unite and see a real grass roots Movement just like the Election!
Posted by: Angie in PA | August 8, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am
When the congress is forced to use the same health care system that is forced on citizens, then and only then will I support government health care reform. Don’t be stupid all your life. Why in the world do you think congress will have a different set of rules??????
Posted by: Bill | August 8, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Aside from the details, why are we Americans not asking why this proposal is being forced down our collective throats. Are we not a free nation to pick and choose as we like?
Posted by: Andy | August 8, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Americans are catching on; Obama’s goal of a socialist government is NOT in the best interest of its citizens.
Posted by: fedup_11 | August 8, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Please ask the President to give the people specifics. Generalized quips by the administration on health care is no better than generalized quips by critics. Long term change in health care is so important that people demand specifics to review, not crap. President Obama has made promises that will be and are being changed. Show me a draft of the health bill and force Congress to read the bill before they vote.
Posted by: James L. | August 8, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
When the president of America is trying to put the people in charge of their health care, I do not know why some republicans’ are against that. Why they are barking? Unfortunately the good news’s are bad for the GOP’s. They do not care about the future generation. The ultimate goal for them is; Obama to fail, the country’s prosperity is not important for them. I do not see any intelligent people in the Republican Party.
Posted by: jimjus99 | August 8, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Instead of debunking outlandish rumors that most people don’t believe anyway. Why doesn’t he use his time to tell us how this is going to be paid for and how it’s going to work. And yes I do tend to believe the CBO’s figures as opposed to the administrations.
Posted by: andy | August 8, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
The ABC Obama townhall offered a few glimpses of what will change. After a woman discussed her mother’s pacemaker surgery at 95 (the woman is still alive and well at 100 today!) Obama went on to say that maybe the elderly, instead of having surgery could just take another pain pill.
During another townhall a man referenced the provision that if you lost the insurance you had at the time the bill became law, that you would be forced into the public option and could not buy another private insurance. Obama was unaware of this provision.
Nobody in the Obama administration, nobody in Congress or the Senate has stepped forward to say they would choose this very same insurance they’re trying to force upon us.
As long as Obama and his minions in congress keep demeaning concerned citizens by calling them “astro turf” there is going to be hostility and anger at these townhall meetings. People need the facts, not glorified promises.
Posted by: grannysunni | August 8, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
President Obama better make do of his promises else he will be the last black president in the history of the USA!
The American people are tired of being pushed around by those greedy rich corporate jerks and we want action, period!!!
Posted by: Brian | August 8, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am
another plan on top of another plan that’s going to be paid for by hard-working Americans…again. This health care plan is just another good-will gesture like Medicaid was and now we know that Medicaid is a mess and out of control. Medicaid needs to be cleaned up and cleaned out…it’s a very corrupt program / organization spearheaded by the government. Only took Obama less than 100 days to start spouting useless rhetoric – no substance, no plan, no schedule, no nothing.
Posted by: Anna Uickie | August 8, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I have Gov’t employee insurance BCBS and many other companies have employee insurance that is better than my policy. I pay over $4000 a year as my share, have co-payments of 20% -30%, deductibles of $600 for me and wife, and max of $4800 a year. My brothers employee insurance is a lot better than this. Yes, my insurance is better than some, but lots of other employee insurance is better, check it out and compare.
Posted by: JSS | August 8, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
I think that those yelling the loudest are the most insecure and pathetic! Just what are they afraid of: actually being able to go to a doctor when sick or injured, not being denied treatment because of inability to pay, being denied coverage because of abstract “pre-existing conditions”? If the answer is “socialism” than I give up… That’s just a smoke screen like the idiots dressing up in colonial costumes to protest government spending. Those same people were very silent when Bush took the previous administration’s budget SURPLUS and created the largest deficit this country has ever known, creating this bleedn problem in the first place!
If you don’t have an intelligent argument in this “debate” you don’t belong in it. Go home an drink your beer with Joe the plumber and let the rest of us do the real work of actually thinking!!!!
Posted by: Ginny | August 8, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Ultimately, it all comes down to Obama asking us to “trust him.”
LOL!!!
Not while I’M still breathing!!!!
Posted by: Laughing_All_The__Way | August 8, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
As the late Don Meridith used to say on Monday Night Football, at the time in the game when the end was apparently decided… “Turn out the lights, the party’s over…”
This Administration went “all in” on this abomination of a health care program, and they LOST!!!
Can you Dems all repeat after me… OBAMA’s A LAME DUCK!!!!
One term, and his party’s over… and I’m referring to the Democrats. Now, if we can just keep the GOP out of the vacuum the Dems’ exit will create, we just MIGHT be able to have a representative Government once again.
Posted by: Laughing_All_The__Way | August 8, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Jack,
If you seek to bring light to the debate surrounding health reform, you would do well to hold Obama to account when he uses misleading statements about the reform. When he declares that you get to keep your health care he conveniently forgets to tell the other,necessary, part of the story. Currently most insured people have insurance through their employer. It is their employer that choses what insurance company they use and what plan to offer. The President knows this very well but he is trying to hide the ball by suggesting that people are in control of their own personal insurance.
Posted by: Mark S. | August 8, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am
How would he know? He most likely never read the legislation; along with his political minions. I am so Obama’ed out.
Posted by: Banderman | August 8, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
You can’t be trusted, Bamy. You’ve already proven that. You’re a one term loser. Shut up for the next 3 1/2 yrs and you may not go down in history as one of, or perhaps even, the worst President. I can’t even stand to hear your voice. You sicken me.
Posted by: WhatChange? | August 8, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Many people are taking things out of context and not looking at the whole picture about healthcare reform and just to let you know I did not vote for the President. Insurance companies have denied policies and coverage and dictated what kind of care a person gets for years and done it legally. If you have not experienced a denial from these companies for a critcal care issue, you are naive about the insurance gods already working out there. If something is not done many people who need care will continue to not get it and will never get it. People like me who have had the experience of no insurance for years. You decide then whether you get treatment or not at your expense and face the possiblity of filing bankruptcy when the hospitals and doctors come after you. Try making that decision when you are sick then tell me you believe the outlandish rumors out there about reform and try to track them back to the wealthy insurance companies who are fighting it tooth and nail. I am not that naive.
Posted by: Bonnie | August 8, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
all you left wing nuts will regret this push for national health care when the country is broke !! I don’t want this crap
look at Canada and Britain
it is a joke
Posted by: M S Long Beach | August 8, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
To some of the individuals here who crow about their alleged intelligence and complain about this political party or that political party, read the Banker’s Manifesto of 1893 and then wonder if you’re actually so intelligent or if you are a mere pawn. Wake up sleeping Americans! It doesn’t matter whether it’s the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. They are both the Party Of Money and are leading you down the path of ruin! You’re playing right into their hands.
“BANKERS MANIFESTO
We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.
Organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.
At the coming Omaha convention to be held July 4, 1892, our men must attend and direct its movement or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome.
This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When, through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes,
they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm
of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers.
People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.
The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.
By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete actions, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished.”
Posted by: ao | August 8, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Instead of telling us what the health care bill is NOT, his time would be better served tellling us what the program IS and how much it will cost taxpayers. He avoids the “meat of the matter” simply he knows this plan is a crock.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Seriously, can’t Republicans who oppose something do so by debating the merits? Why does it always come down to lies and fear. The town hall meetings were supposed to a place people could ask the hard questions, but the vitriol coming from the Right makes it impossible for others to get information. Let people make up their own minds after hearing the facts, or does the right now believe in communism, only one message can be heard, theirs!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
“Watch this video from 2003…” – RonInIrvine
How about you watch the videos of McCain in 2004 and compare them to his statements in 2008 – you won’t believe that they are the same man.
People change. Are you ths same person you were in 2003? If you are I pity you.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I will manage my own health care. I do not want the government to do that for me. Congress needs to lead by example. They should adopt this health care plan for themselves instead of the plan they have now. After about five years if it has worked for them the rest of us will sign on.
Posted by: Phyllis | August 8, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Maybe you should spend a little time reading it for yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon-feed you
I have read HR3200 completely. IMHO is is the biggest CROCK since HR1.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Why won’t Political Punch fact check Obama? They take everything he says as gospel. They need to do thier jobs and be critical of Obama for once.
Posted by: Mr. Big | August 8, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Yes, Obama said single payer would be best if he could start from scratch, because is would be a better system.
The US is 37th in health Care quality but 1st in cost. Something is wrong. It will be 20% of GDP in a decade if left the same.
Also, All of our allies have Universal Health Care. Britain, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Germany. And not one moved to repeal the system after the fact.
Posted by: case | August 8, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
The Republicans want Healthcare reform to Fail, why? Well for one thing they are in bed with the Insurance Company,They have even admitted if Healthcare Fails that will be Obamas Waterloo they do not Care if People have Insurance, They do not care if your going bankrupt because of medical bills. They care how much money the Insurance Lobbsit will give them, And if they can Destroy President Obama and the Democrats to hell with the rest of you AND THAT IS THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Angie in PA | August 8, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Angie in PA – I was just sitting here thinking about that. I predict a big ugly thing taking place. The following is part of a post on here and it chills me: You liberals think you are so much better than everyone else. At the heart of it….you are cruel. You are evil. YOu want to control other people. You think blacks aren’t equal to whites because they need “extra” help. You think babies would have a bad life so lets murder them before they enter the world. You will get what is coming to you….
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
“I will manage my own health care. I do not want the government to do that for me.” – Phyllis
Then you will be pleased to hear that under the current bill, any existing plans will be grandfathered in. So you don’t have to change.
Now, aren’t you happy? See how easy that was?
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Funny how everyone demonizes the health care industry, and then demands tax-payer subsidized health care insurance so they can exercise their “right” to gain full access to it.
INCREDIBLE!!!
Posted by: Laughing_All_The__Way | August 8, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Honesty is always the best policy and leaders need to be honest when they state how many are uninsured, how many are illegal and how many could afford it but do not. I doubt though that our President knows exactly whats in the bill. What makes no sense to me is the continued bashing of Insurance companies. Insurance is highly regulated at the state levels and that it is expensive is partially because of politicians dicking with stuff they know nothing about. And while insurance is expensive for us isn’t quality of life important no matter your age or circumstances?
Social security, medicare are already trillions of dollars behind in unfunded mandates. Thats trillions with a T.Government already runs medicare/medicaid and if they want to control something let them get that mess in order before they take on more.
By the way, execs riding around on planes seem to bother some proponents of health care yet our congress just spent millions for G5 aircraft themselves. So I conclude that the larger the Government becomes the more irresponsible they are and bloating the federal government with a takeover of healthcare makes no sense.
Posted by: david | August 8, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
The Justice Department refuses to pursue charges against Black Panther members who actually intimidated (with weapons in hand) voters. However, the White House wants to shut down public discourse with anyone who disagrees or dares to question the President or democrat leadership in Congress. He wants dialogue with Iran and North Korea but not the people who actually elected him. Scary.
Posted by: Mary | August 8, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
“I have read HR3200 completely. IMHO is is the biggest CROCK since HR1.” – No Common Sense in DC
How so? Be specific.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Phyllis | Aug 8, 2009 9:41:53 AM -* This plan is about CHOICE! You can keep your plan, I can keep mine for some it may be beneficial for them to go with with the new plan. Why do you feel you should be able to force others to change when you wouldn’t want that to be dictated to you?
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
The fact that keeps getting ommitted is that an OVERRWHELMING majority of American taxpayers simply do NOT want this plan. The fact that our elected officials are trying to force it on us makes the matter worse.
Heath care is broken. But this cure is worse than the disease. We need bipartisan agreement on a solution that works and is affordable. HR3200 AIN’T IT! Just start over, Dude!
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
No Mary, it’s not about shutting down public discourse. It’s about shutting down outright lies and fear mongering. It’s about telling the elderly that Obama doesn’t want to kill them. And what dialogue? You guys just want to disrupt.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
The Justice Department refuses to prosecute actual voter intimidation by member of the Black Panther party. The White House wants to shut down public discourse with anyone who disagrees or questions the President or democrats in Congress. However, the President wants to listen to Iran and North Korea. It is scary and makes me wonder how long our nation will remain free.
Posted by: Mary | August 8, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
“The Justice Department refuses to pursue charges against Black Panther members…” – Mary
I don’t mean to rain on your parade but his forum is for discussing the article, “Obama Addresses ‘Outlandish’ and ‘Misleading’ Claims About Health Reform” if you want to discuss Black Panthers, well…. go back to the sixties.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
In all of this “who is interfering with whose “public” forum on healthcare,” I think there is a bigger point…and hardly addressed at all by the so-called “mainstream?” media….and that is the growing dissatisfaction “mainstream Americans” have with the growing inability of our government to govern……the Obama teleprompter is getting a washed out look, Congress…like lost chickens looking for their coop goes on and on with much ado about nothing unless it benefits them personally…and now we have 40+ czars on the loose in the west wing….all of whom probably are enjoying their “special” Health Insurance as well as their sabbaticals from the University of Chicago. ( Remember when one could rattle off the names of the Secretaries of this and that in an administration?…..they used to be responsible for their respective areas of expertise…for the most part we now have them competing with czars (..and isn’t the word itself saying a great deal about the flavor or our current executive branch?). You just can’t have a good…let alone a great Administration if an increasing mass of voters are wondering what you are up to next…….the times they are discomforting, aren’t they?
Posted by: justj joey | August 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I don’t know one Senior that regrets having Medicare. Do you? Thanks LBJ….the Extremist and the Republican Party did you the same way.
Posted by: tychisum | August 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Angie in PA – Somebody, somewhere, will go after a group of “evil liberals.” I’m not sure it won’t be soon. The volume is up. I think it’s gone entirely too far. Just when I think it can’t get any worse they pull another trick out of the bag.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
The Justice Department refuses to prosecute actual voter intimidation. The White House wants to shut down public discourse with anyone who disagrees or dares to question the President or democrats in Congress. Yet, the President wants to listen to dictators who want to destroy us. Scary!
Posted by: Mary | August 8, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
People are upset because they know the government cannot be trusted to effectively and efficiently run ANY program. Regardless of what Obama says, this bill will grow out of control like every other entitlement program and bankrupt the country. Stop villifying citizens with legitimate concerns!
Posted by: KCNelson | August 8, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“The fact that keeps getting ommitted is that an OVERRWHELMING majority of American taxpayers simply do NOT want this plan.” – No Common Sense in DC
Could you please drfine for us what you mean by overwhelming with all caps. I mean, 1%, 2%, 4%, 6% I mean what exactly are your figures that convince you that the margin is overwhelming with all caps?
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
If “socialized” government sponsored healthcare is so bad, why don’t GOP leaders drop their “government sponsored healthcare plan” and go out and try and buy healthcare for their families?
Posted by: Mr Tibbs987 | August 8, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Angie, please take a deep breath and tell me exactly WHICH “wealthy” republicans are “in bed” with the “BIG INSURANCE COMPANIES”. Please. You guys used this same “sleeping with the enemy” routine during the campaigns: “All Republicans are “in bed” with BIG OIL”; “All Republicans are “in bed” with Big Banking”; and “All Republicans are “in bed” with Wall Street. It seems as though, since you cannot come up with anything positive to say about your Democrats, you must resort to villifying the Republicans. You say that republicans spread false stories (notice that you never said your guys tell the truth?). Well, here’s your chance to prove that you are not spreading false stories. WHICH REPUBLICANS are “in bed” with Big Insurance? I can name a few Democrats that profited hugely from donations from the pharm companies and insurance companies (including Obama himself), but, please…provide some names of these big bad republicans that have evidently ‘sold out’ to Insurance companies…..please?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
The overwhelming majority of Americans don’t even know what the plan includes.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
ObWann….it is over 73%, according to various polls, that do not want this health care reform. That is more overwhelming than the ‘overwhelming’ victory that Obama won by, yet many on the left consider his “overwhelming” victory to be a mandate
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
. Regardless of what Obama says, this bill will grow out of control like every other entitlement program and bankrupt the country. Stop villifying citizens with legitimate concerns!
Posted by: KCNelson | Aug 8, 2009 9:59:17 AM
Very will said!
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
>>>Hey granny? Try to grow up and play on an adult field and lay off the lying.
Posted by: Secondlook | Aug 8, 2009 9:23:37 AM<<<
Secondlook,the event happened. ABC Townhall. Obama talking with Jane Sturm about elder care. He made the comment about looking at other options and instead of having surgery people could maybe take another pain pill. The day following the townhall there was a lot of criticism by doctors because taking pain pills will not relieve cardiac arrhymtia, the problem Jane's mother had.
Just because you don't agree or didn't watch the townhall doesn't mean Obama didn't make that comment. I watched the townhall and there is a video available on you tube.
Posted by: grannysunni | August 8, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
After quoting the president “…
the president said it is important that Americans have the facts,” you quote this:
“So let me start by dispelling the outlandish rumors that reform will promote euthanasia, cut Medicaid or bring about a government takeover of health care,” he said. “That’s simply not true. This isn’t about putting government in charge of your health insurance; it’s about putting you in charge of your health insurance. Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”
Where is the counter claim that is made by reputable people that his assertions are just not true? Could you not get any good quotes from someone who asserts that down the road you CANNOT keep your doctor, or your health care plan? that it WILL promote euthanasia? If I remember my recent history, quoting Bush claims was always accompanied by citing a Democrat spokesman saying “balderdash.”
Posted by: Dale Richardson | August 8, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
When I read these comments all I see are closed minded individules.
Wake up!
Look at the real issues, look who is making the most money in our country…Heath Care Related Busineses!
at the top of the food chain is health insurance. Big bonuses are paid out for the number of claims they deny! Look at the real problems. I commend Obama for accually trying to change our government from the nasty political game that has been going on for years. Read the consitution this is what our fore fathers were trying to stop from happening. Fair and honest trade. Not take as much as you can regardless of who it hurts. Think about it. The people are the ones who should be in control not the nasty polititians or money grubing insurance companies. My hope is the majority of us who do not make over $250k a year will do their due dilligence and look at the real facts, not what Rush limbaugh is saying or what you hear on the news. Look to see the truth and what is truly good for this country and act on it. Stop complaining and watch what happens. Get out and fight for your rights. Make sure the people you vote for hear your voice. This is what our country was built on.
Posted by: Celisa | August 8, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
SOMEBODY MUST PREVENT THESE AMERICAN VOTERS FROM ACTUALLY READING THIS BILL! Their ability to read and understand what obama has planned for them in the new socialist agenda is the real problem!
Posted by: Frankin | August 8, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
There is so much misinformation being spouted by those that want to keep any discourse from happening.
I am so amazed at how afraid people are of having a discussion.
People could talk about what they don’t want and what they do want, but instead, we just get screaming, hate-mongering and scare tactics.
Posted by: Debbie | August 8, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
And, ObWann, I think that most of us that oppose this bill do NOT oppose health care reform. What we DO oppose is having such a bill be passed by congress that is voting strictly for the purpose of passing something. When even the sponsor of the HR admits that his reading of the bill would be ridiculous since it would take a “room full of lawyers” to explain it to him, then I would say that is a serious problem. I can’t speak for everyone in here, but I can speak for myself. And all I’m saying is let the light of day shine on this bill BEFORE signing it. It may be perfect. If so, great. Let’s pass it. But it just might have some pretty bad stuff in it, put there by some dishonest politician for his own personal or political gain. If so, let’s ferret that out and get rid of it. But don’t sell the American Citizens a pin in a poke. As Judge Judy Sheindlen says in her book, “Don’t pee down my leg and try to tell me it’s raining”
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Obama has repeatedly moved us towards socialism while denying it. I don’t believe anything the man says.
Posted by: Bob | August 8, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
“czars (..and isn’t the word itself saying a great deal about the flavor or our current executive branch?) – justj joey
Well, now you’re showing you ignorance. Ever heard of a Drug Czar? Is that an invention of the current Admin.?
In fact, Richard Nixon (a conservative Republican) named the first U.S. government czar in 1973: energy czar William Simon, who officially headed the Federal Energy Office, which later became the Energy Department.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
people on here take everything so personally and are so fearful of change. We are the only industrialized country without a public health care system for citizens!!! Sure medicare for seniors but HMO’s and managed care have their hooks in that too! It’s the norm to have bigger entities meddling in our health care…it’s been happening for years. Insurance companies have us all by the balls and you don’t even see it. We are paying more and more every day for less and less and they get richer and richer off of sick people. I can’t say for certain that this plan is the answer, but I know that we aren’t in that great a position right now either. I know for one thing, business DOES NOT belong in health care because the consumer ALWAYS looses, if not the government…then who? Insurance companies do not challenge health care providers to drive down their costs and just pay whatever so there is no competition and prices are through the roof! Dr.’s still get paid the same and the insurance companies get a hefty cut I’m sure…why the middle man?
There has got to be a better way..we just cant seem to figure it out.
Posted by: Libertas1 | August 8, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
AS I READ ALL THE COMMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE “LEFT’, IT IS AS PLAIN AS DAY THAT NOT ONE OF THEM HAS READ THE HEALTH BILL. THEY JUST REPEAT WHAT HEAR FROM THE SOCIALIST.I AM IN A BUSINESS WHERE I TALK TO SEVERAL HUNDRED PEOPLE EACK WEEK AND 90% ARE AGAINST THIS BILL AS WELL AS “CAP & TRADE” AND BIG GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: BRIAN | August 8, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
most people do not have a clue that we actually pay more for healthcare than they do in France. Furthermore, people have not read the bill, they are just reacting on a school age gut level.. It is always a NIMBY problem, they want change in the health system, but no one is willing to give a little bit. How immature, grow up people. The era of having employer based care is OVER!, if your get it through your employer, chances are you are paying the premiums. But try to get rid of another government program (Social Security), and every one has a fit. Choose people!
Posted by: mike | August 8, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
LOL, the bill will not be passed in its pure form, the dems and repubs have their pockets greased by the insurance companies…and where do you folks get euthanasia from? Gee, have you seen how the elderly pass away on a daily basis in hospice setting…how they wish to pass away as stated within their living wills is up to them…some do not wish for CPR and others do…Although the president has made mention that we will be able to maintain our current insurance plans, I doubt the companies will allow us to do so because the government plan is much cheaper for employers and I believe there is where the right wingers believe it is actually a nationalized health insurance…also, this question has never ever been addressed, how will the costs of the public plan be affected by undocumented residents of the U.S.?
Posted by: phallon | August 8, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I trust the government to run programs. And they do a very good job. for example: cdc, fda, Social Security is a success, OSHA, NASA, The Military, GI bill, the VA, …. I could go on, but the point is the federal government does a very good. especially with obama at the helm.
Posted by: Mr Tibbs987 | August 8, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Phallon absolutely right, I’m a Social Worker in a nursing home and the state requires us to have advanced directives (the form you refer to) on file which we do at admissions. Euthanasia is not where we are going, if anything we need a MUCH better plan on how to cover the aging baby boomers in 15 years or so, we are so not prepared to take care of this influx of older adults and we are going to see big problems.
Posted by: Libertas1 | August 8, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
These idiots aren’t shouting about Healthcare…… they don’t even have the facts…….. this is purely about the President of the United States…. Go Figure! Bye.
Posted by: tychisum | August 8, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Debbie, and all…if there is so much “false information and fear mongering” being spread, how about agreeing to this. Let the bill be put out in open in it’s final proposal. Let those in the public who are interested review it. This is a pretty serious bill, with the potential of a huge impact to our country. Let us see the bill. That’s all. And don’t say it’s out there. There are several provisions of the bill…several proposals. Put out a final proposal, and if approved, the pass it WITHOUT adding to it (like they did on the last hour for the Cap and Trade Bill). How about some open and honest government. How about they don’t pass such a huge bill from behind closed doors? If the bill is good, should it not stand on its own merit??
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Strange! The right-wingers had little to say when Bush and his cronies “filtered” every one of their “Town Meetings”. Only supporters and were allowed in. And anyone else who got in who protested was arrested. In other words, the Republicans completely suppressed dissent and protest in direct violation of the Constitution and civil rights. But that does not matter as long as the Repubs kill freedom of speech. But then the right-wing extremists go around to the healthcare debates for the sole purpose of suppressing the free speech of everyone else while attempting to defeat low-cost health care for their corporate cronies. It is amazing how these extremists can be, both, the aggressors and “victims” at the same time. That is, they go out there for the purpose to destroy and subvert, and then claim to be victims! If this isn’t political fraud, I don’t know what is. It is really high treason. But then, this kind of corruption had never been seen as a liability to the Republican extremists – in fact, they are proud of it. And, it is not only happening at the healthcare forums, the Republicans are doing the same thing throughout our government. In every government agency, Republican hirelings and appointees from the previous administration are trying to subvert the current government – that is high treason for which these extremists will eventually answer!
Posted by: Sentinel | August 8, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
the problem here is the goverment gets upset when the citizens want to express them selves,PEACEFULLY using first amendment rights. it was the right of the people to protest wars and conservative causes. secondly the concerns are that this bill will limit care and the cost will grow out of control.this is a realistic possibility. the job of government seems nowadays not to serve the people but to get bigger.
Posted by: gb | August 8, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
One wonders if Obama has even read, let alone comprehend, this health care bill.
The entire exercise exposes Obama as a hypocrite. He says he is a community organizer, yet he is against community organizing when it comes to questioning him or his policies.
Posted by: Winton W. | August 8, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
ncpilot0.
Thank you for the repremand. I deserve it and I do apologize. I am neither a Democrat nor a Republican. I am an American, “just a little right of center” Unfortunately, I have no representation in D.C. which frustrates me. I do apologize for the rude comment.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Those trying to push this legislation through do not want a debate. Why did it have to be done by August (now September)? Why can’t we get this right? Why the mad rush? This is too important to pass something just to pass something. Get it in and then figure it out? No thanks. Convince me it will work and is in the best interest of the country. Don’t force it down my throat and tell me you know best. The arrogance…
Posted by: buster | August 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
I should not have to be afraid of going to a town hall meeting and I should be permitted to ask questions, NOT be screamed at. What barbarians. Thanks Mr. Limbaugh and Mr. Beck. You are creating your own monsters for profit.
Posted by: WW | August 8, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
The people who have “crafted” this legislation and will subsequently vote on it are unqualified to use a rectal thermometer, let alone decide who does and who does not get health care.
Do any of the politicians look like they are qualified to run a local ice cream shop? How about a local hospital? They are going to change the way all of us in the US get health care.
This work should not be done by poorly trained politicians who are solely motivated by identity politics.
It is clear this legislation was hurried along in the hopes that it could be kept from the general public. The people pushing this legislation know that the voters do not want it.
Posted by: welldirected | August 8, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Winton, Obama has admitted that he has not read the bill. He was taken by surprise when asked about not being able to have private insurance after you move from one job to another. Once you do that…..you MUST sign up for the gov’t plan. His reply was, “i did not know that that was in the bill. IF it is, then i will not sign it.” THAT is an example of why I personally want to stall the passing of this bill until it can be seen by the public
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
it doesn’t matter if you like Obama or not…you are left or right I would just like to hear everyone agree that we are headed for trouble in this country concerning health care. I’m not saying his plan is the answer…but what other solutions are being raised? It just seems that I hear everyone crying socialism but no one is say what they think we should do. Something has to be done, can we at least agree on that? Maybe it’s not the governments role if that’s what you think, but then what should we as citizens do to protect our ability to access health care?
Posted by: Libertas1 | August 8, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
granny, I watched the video. Which cuts off right there to make sure everybody comes to that conclusion. It’s obvious the man is referring to waste. Not in respect to this woman necessairly. Try logging onto the Dept. of Health and Human Services and you’ll see reports on waste and other issues. They do believe there is waste in too much testing, biopsies, operations, etc. Some of which is promoted by fear of a lawsuit. I can attest to this as I was put thru an painful one a while ago, and I have since come to the conclusion it was just bunk. The money they spent on me could be better used towards somebody else.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
As many have pointed out, the President fails to address and answer the main concerns about this plan. The underlying idea of any insurance plan is to spread the total liability among many policyholders. The goal of any policyholder is to pay premiums commensurate with (or lower than) their personal risk of liability. A legislated plan will of necessity cover those who are unable to pay the premiums that the cost of their plan benefits would normally require. The only difference between the legislated plans and plans now available is that the legislated plans would seek to keep the premiums artificially low by forcing those not in the plans to pay for them. In theory you can keep the plan you have, just as you can have a personal retirement plan. In practice you still must pay for an insurance plan in which you are not enrolled (just as you must now pay for Social Security even if you have your own IRA or 401(K)), in which case you are paying a tax, rather than a premium, for a plan you did not want and from which you receive no coverage or benefits. The only response to this is to force everyone into the legislated plans, just as the government now forces nearly everyone everyone except themselves into government-mandated retirement and medical coverage plans. And history shows just how successful those have been – not!
Posted by: Publius | August 8, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Bo does do a good job reading his propaganda of his teleprompter
Posted by: licentiousmedia | August 8, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
“And, ObWann, I think that most of us that oppose this bill do NOT oppose health care reform…”
Good, at least we can agree on that. See we’ve taken the first step.
“…the sponsor of the HR admits that his reading of the bill would be ridiculous since it would take a “room full of lawyers” to explain it to him…”
Well, he’s a liar and I don’t care which party he belongs to. It isn’t easy to read, but it can be done. I’ve done it and I’m not a roomful of lawyers.
“… the light of day shine on this bill BEFORE signing it.”
And that’s why its available on-line. All together now, let’s sing Aquarius – “Let the sun shine. Let the sun shine in. The sun shine in.”
Hey do you think that’s why they’re called “sunshine” laws?
“It may be perfect.”
Well, now you’re just being silly. With all due respect, no law is perfect.
“But it just might have some pretty bad stuff in it, put there by some dishonest politician for his own personal or political gain. If so, let’s ferret that out…”
Well, of course it does! Surely you don’t believe that any law can be written that doesn’t have something for special interests, something for politicians, something for the radicals…. You can’t write a perfect law and trying to wait for one is shorthand for doing nothing.
“But don’t sell the American Citizens a pin in a poke.”
Actually the expression is “a pig in a poke”. It comes from the old days meaning don’t try to sell me an animal without letting me see it first (a poke is a bag). But you can see it. Just look below for the link I embedded in a post.
“As Judge Judy Sheindlen says in her book, “Don’t pee down my leg and try to tell me it’s raining”"
And that’s what BO is saying – that the opponents of this law are willing to lie and mislead you about what it REALLY says. The only answer is to read if for yourself.
I hope you will take the time to do so, because you don’t sound like those that are blind to reason.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Sorry, Mr. President, this time, your rhetoric, is seen for what it is……misleading lies, seeking to lead the citizens down the primrose path, to disaster.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 8, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
President Obama DROP the Ball on this one .
He is trying to push a 2 tier system which not only is confusing the people but it doesn’t address the problem which is cost, and that COST you can chalk up to the Insurance companies.
This is NOT a TRUE Universal healthcare say like in Canada, Where every citizen is supply with a healthcard good for 1 year, and can go to any doctor they so choose and NOT LISTEN to the LIES here that a Governement run healthcare dictates where and what doctor to see.
President Obama should have said from DAY 1 “we will OVERHAUL healthcare and that means KICKING the INSURANCE companies to the CURB”…BTW..they do that in Canada.\
The president needed to say healthcare is more of a RIGHT even than education and yet we provide that for everyone.
the problem with our HEALTHCARE is not the CARE itself,its the COST and who enjoy the full and best access to it,
As a TAX payer you should NOT be PAYING any Insurance company for something essential like HEALTHCARE.
Our TAX dollars automatically takes care of emergency stuff like fire service and police .
We may NOT use these services everyday but its nice to know when there is a problem you don’t have to worry about cost ,
Imagine say if we had to pay a fireman to put the fire to our home,but didn’t have any money/coverage to do so.
Well connect the DOTS our healthcare system is a emergency enough to fall under these other ENTITIES.
Finally to pay for healthcare iam sorry MR PRESIDENT there is not enough rich people in this country to cover that, so the solution is very easy just add a Goods and service tax ,
iam quiet sure millions of americans would take that anyday over paying thousands of dollars a year to a Insurance Company whose main goal is to make profits,and could care less about the citizens,and is ready spring a fine print on to that individual so they dont
have to honour the coverage.
Atleast when the Governement make a profit in heathcare unilke the insurance company who would take the profits and RUN , The government would take the profits and put it back into the system which can be use to build more hospitals and equipments.
And finally for those who would say why trust the goverment in running anything well last i check medicare is doing fine and we do trust them in protecting the country and the communities,
nothing is ever perfect but
last i check our soldiers… policemen , firemen and other emergency entities do a pretty good job.
Posted by: faron s | August 8, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Time for Obama’s Chicago/Daley style political machine to send out the hired ACORN, SEIU, AFL-CIO, MoveOn thugs to apply their “persuasion of power” and “argue and get in their faces” and physically assault citizens asking tough questions about ObamaCare.
Best quote from MoveOn: “We’ve hired skilled grassroots organizers.”
Hired + grassroots = definition of astroturfing
Obama said he doesn’t want certain people doing a lot of talking. He just wants them to get out of the way.
Posted by: The Chicago Way | August 8, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
nc – After that last post about anger and guns? You have my total respect. I am just sure something is going to get ugly, and it’s refreshing to see a republican consider it’s getting a bit much. I say this with the full understanding there are nuts to the left as well. They’re just not as angry.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
The right wing will stop at nothing to SC@RE people. They’ve been a political Cloverfield monster, st@lking the world with their BS ever since the W/T/C att@ck
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
ncpilot09 | Aug 8, 2009 10:25:29 AM – Because there is no FINAL bill to read.
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
no common sense…no problem. I’m proud to be a Republican, and so i’ll state it. Comments in here make me even prouder because it proves time and time again that the Republicans are held to a much higher standard even by the Democrats themselves. Think about it: Obama screws up, excuses are made. Bush bashing begins. (Bush is held to a higher standard). Bill Clinton has an affair, even the Nat’l Org of Women come to his defense (“Boys will be boys”). Governor of SC has an affair? The dems have a field day and the Republicans censure him. It goes on and on, and ironically proves that even the libs hold the conservatives to a higher standard. I think it’s great
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
It’s BO fish story…. and it sure does smell
Posted by: licentiousmedia | August 8, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Try the Truth, that is exactly my point. There IS no final bill. And that’s why I believe it is so important to delay any voting on it until there IS a final bill. For crying out loud, would you buy a new car before it’s even off the drawing boards???
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Where is the proof that insurance companies are busing Townhall participants to these meetings?Where are the Nazi symbols that Speaker Pelosi claims to see?Where is the proof that these participants are coordinated by the Republican party? And even if they were,so what? What is wrong with freedom of speech and assembly?This country is in trouble if citizens can’t speak out about policies that they disagree with.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Love to read and laugh at this idiot,can not beleive a dam thing that comes out of his lying mouth.
Posted by: Joeray | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
I read Bill Maher’s article on American stupidity. He’s right. When I was working I would often get in conversations with my co-workers about politics and other issues. It amazed me how uncaring and thoughtless most of them were. Most didn’t know who their representatives were and didn’t care. Many would simply repeat what they heard on Fox news the night before. I was often criticized for being obsessed with politics. People need to understand the government has the power of life and death over them. I began to care about politics when I my brother was sent to Vietnam. That year of white-knuckle anxiety made me realize what government does affects a person’s moment by moment peace of mind. It also taught me suspicion of anyone who runs for political office. Now I’m more fearful of ordinary ignorant Americans than power-hungry political figures.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
President Obama has to understand that more and more American people do not feel that he is credible. The same smooth talking he did during the campaign is doing him in now. As he said in Northen Virginia on August 7, he really doesn’t want to hear from the opposition!! (A REAL BELIEVER IN THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH).
ObamaCare does one major thing: turns individual health care over to the government!! BAD NEWS!
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
ncpilot09 “Our President is trying to …”
Ridiculous. We have vendetta politics being practiced at all levels of government. There is very little of anything that could be called work going on. We do have a lot of politicians pitting Americans against Americans. Who brought in the union thugs to keep people from speaking?
Posted by: welldirected | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
The only difference between the Radical terrorists in other countries and those disrupting healthcare reforms and other issues that require an open mind in the US is our law enforcement is better in many but not all situations…save this we would be involved in some very violent and dangerous activity…
Glenn Beck et al…are the “Supreme Leader’s” of these ignorant cannon fodder/puppet’s!
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
It’s quite funny… BO and the Democrats are in FULL control and they are blaming the Republicans cause THEY cant pass the Socialized Heath Care bill….. huuummmmmmmm….
Posted by: licentiousmedia | August 8, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Trouble IS, most of the “outlandish” and “misleading” claims about insurance reform, or whatever they’re calling it today, comes from the White House and the Congress.
Search for “Top Ten Ways To Tell Your President & His Party Aren’t Fighting For Health Care For Everybody”, by Bruce Dixon.
Possibly the WORST baloney is the former Democrats’ flim-flam on the “public option”:
“In their haste not to bite the hands that feed them millions in campaign contributions each hear, the president and his party have scaled the public option back from a Medicare-sized 130 million to a maximum of 10 million, too small to put cost pressure in private insurers. Worse still, the president and his party are playing bait-and-witch, not telling the public they have reduced the public option, to nearly nothing.”
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Talk about nuts! Look at the two posts just above your last post. This is cut and pasted to save you time: >>>
The right wing will stop at nothing to SC@RE people. They’ve been a political Cloverfield monster, st@lking the world with their BS ever since the W/T/C att@ck
Posted by: ncpilot09 | Aug 8, 2009 10:31:15 AM
Our President is trying to revive the economy, strengthen education, provide practical health care, establish international relationships, rid Washington of wasteful spending, end wars he didn’t start, be a loving supportive Dad….eg….he has had nothing but nonsense to deal with, with the republican machine……..so many things are coming to light with Cheney, Blackwater, they would love to silence his administration, but we need Obama now more than ever.
<<< Both of these posts are credited to me, of all people. Shows that i've got someone on the left pretty upset, huh? Posting nonsense like this with my name below it. I think i've won my case.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
This is FrankenCare. Once the Democrat controlled gov. jolts their FrankenCare to life there is no turning back. They will say anything to get it passed. Once passed it will change over time until it is resembles the Canadian healthcare system. The liberals in Congress have made no attempt to hide their plans in that regard. Why do you think they like to talk about Cuban healthcare all the time? Do so homework people. Study UK and Canada and you will see that there are 1000′s of people in socialized medicine who are withheld treatment, suffer and die each year. Obama FrankenCare = DMV lines, fewer qualified doctors, huge beauracracy, corruption, rationing, increased lawsuits against doctors to keep Democrat funding trial lawyers rich and happy. That’s why nobody in Congress is reading the bill. It’s meaningless. It’s not what’s in the bill that counts. It’s giving the gov. total control that counts. The bill is merely what will bring FrankenCare to life.
Posted by: freemort | August 8, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
All the phony people (the right wingers) never in their wildest fantasy ever thought the people of the United States would ever elect a black man as president.
These people are so mad’ the thought of this president being so much more intelligent than the puppet of eight years ago, they are blind in their ignorance and their own racism.
Posted by: Joeray | August 8, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Obama and his Chicago Gang, will have blood on their hands if things go wrong with the union thugs. BAD DECISION TEAM OBAMA!! They sure are showing signs of desperation!!
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 8, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
well directed, thank you. The post that was credited to me was done by an imposter. Don’t know how, but i do know why. In case you have not met me in here or read my posts (the real ones), you will find out that I am quite conseservative, very much against the excuse making for obama, and quite right of center
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
“If socialized medicine is best … why didn’t Ted Kennedy go to Canada?”
Maybe they should rethink their signs…
He has gov’t health care
Posted by: Joeray | August 8, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Certainly Obama knows a great deal about outlandish claims.
Posted by: flopez | August 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Why not demand that they (Congress AND the President) be on the SAME plan they pass for us? As it is, Rep. Waxman says they don’t have to be on it, as they already have a good solid plan for themselves.
Posted by: Donna | August 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The people of America have always chosen leaders based on perceived merit. If those percepts change over time, we elect new leaders.
Now some aer stuck in identity politics and name calling – example follows:
Joeray “All the phony people (the right wingers) never in their wildest fantasy ever thought the people of the United States would ever elect a black man as president.”
Posted by: welldirected | August 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Publis, the government does not force people in to their insurance, HMO’s often do not give full coverage to seniors depending on what their needs are. If a senior comes into my nursing home with say…Keystone for rehab, they are not really able to receive more that say 2 weeks a rehab because they are under such strict guidelines by that managed care…sure they tell their consumers they have the same 100 days as medicare consumers but here’s the difference. Managed care reviews those on their case loads, and we at the nursing home review those on straight medicare. Managed care patients I have never EVER seen stay their 100 days because they want them out ASAP. Guess who has the higher success rates? Those we have to rush out the door because MC pulls the plug on their rehab payer source after two weeks of rehab when they have a hip replacement and can barely walk…(but hey they’re walking so get them out), or those who actually get their hundred days because we assess them and make sure they truly are able to do what they need to do to function in the community. Guess who returns after needing another hospitalization and guess who lives longer productive lives in the community. When someone in a cubicle is reading about MY residents and tells us what should be done with consumers and making decisions about what is right for their lives, rather than the therapists and Drs actually working with them I can not accept that. Their job is to make money for that HMO by cutting costs, and ours is to keep them well. We don’t screw medicare, if someone platos or doesn’t need that 100 days, we don’t keep them. we have nothing to gain from screwing the government, we just want to make sure our residents are well before we send them into an environment that would be unsuccessful if they were not prepared. In my experience the government, not the insurance companies have made the smarter choices regarding the safety and health of the patient.
Posted by: Libertas1 | August 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
ObWann, I know quite well how laws are made and passed. And I am also quite aware of how pork, special interests, and bad laws are passed. I have indeed glanced over the HR that you refer to. I have seen nothing good in it. I got an idea: Why don’t you explain why YOU thing the HR is great? Just a few examples of what you really really like and how it will improve out health care?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
* People who want Congress to take more time debating healthcare–-are the ones shutting down debate.
* Obama says the time for talk on healthcare is over–but his critics are the ones trying to shut down debate.
* Harassing and threatening the families of AIG employees is awesome; razzing Representatives and Senators is totally immoral!
* Asking Representatives and Senators to read bills before voting on them is killing democracy.
* Sen. Specter saying “we have to make judgments very fast” is awesome. Booing him for saying so is shutting off debate.
* Healthcare protesters are thugs shutting off debate; antiwar protesters are “rowdy and spirited.”
And don’t forget the Community-Agitator-in-Chief last year commanding his legions to go forth:
“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to ARGUE WITH THEM AND GET IN THEIR FACE,” Obama said.
Obama said he doesn’t want certain people doing a lot of talking. He just wants them to get out of the way.
Posted by: "Shut Up!", Obama Explained | August 8, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Couple comments.
- I read Sarah Palin’s comments about the whole plan, her “Death Panel” speech. WOW, just stick a fork into her, because her time in politics is done, she’s cooked. This loonytune will never be president.
- If this healthcare plan is good enough for the American people, make it good enough that Congress and Senate also have the exact same plan and nothing more. It’s called walking the walk, Mr. Obama.
Posted by: Rick_VT | August 8, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
ncpilot09 – good post. We have to keep the dialog going and help move all of us to a higher level and keep the truth in front of us all. Thanks! Sorry there are thugs among us.
ncpilot09 “well directed, thank you. The post that was credited to me was done by an imposter. Don’t know how, but i do know why. In case you have not met me in here or read my posts (the real ones), you will find out that I am quite conseservative, very much against the excuse making for obama, and quite right of center”
Posted by: welldirected | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
joeray: Why did Farrah Fawcett go to Germany?
Posted by: phallon | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“As he said in Northen Virginia on August 7, he really doesn’t want to hear from the opposition!!”
He probably isn’t eager to have anyone asking “their” Congresspersons about His intention to cut Medicare and Medicaid by 313 BILLION dollars — or that nothing that winds up IN His flim-flam bill would actually be enforced until AFTER the next presidential election.
Not only does He not want to hear from the opposition, He doesn’t want there to BE opposition.
The misrepresentations from the White House have ALREADY been so extreme that the best thing would be for Him to resign, rather than corrupt the entire media in the struggle to prop Him up.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
We are seeing the ultimate expression of GOP and big health corporation nastiness–lies, fist fights, death threats and Nazi Swastikas. We all know the health reform bill is not about Granny Killing and all that other baloney. We all know that the mobs are web-site inspired with the huge health insurance lobbies and the GOP behind the web sites. Also, media outlets like FOX network (with people like Glenn Beck who jokes about poisoning Nancy Pelosi using California wine) are fomenting the anger.
Are a minority of people angry? Yes. Are web sites and TV outlets whipping them up? Yes. Are the billion-dollar corporations, their lobbies, and the GOP behind it? Yes. If things change the corporations lose the exploitative health insurance goose that lays the golden eggs.
So Obama is right. It is time to come out clearly against all this nastiness, to name lies for what they are, and to call shouting down your neighbor at town halls what that is–anti-free speech behavior.
Posted by: JAB | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
>
Well, misinformed. It’s not that they can’t ever enroll anyone in private insurance again, it’s that plans that don’t provide minimum coverage can’t enroll new patients INTO THOSE INSUFFICIENT PLANS after that date. The people who already have those plans will be allowed to keep them, but new enrollees must choose insurance that meets the basic requirements. Here’s the part just before the part you quoted, maybe it will shed some light:
“SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT COVERAGE.
(a) GRANDFATHERED HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE DEFINED.—Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable coverage under this division, the term ‘‘grandfathered health insurance coverage’’ means individual health insurance coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:”
Posted by: mallory | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“Publis, the government does not force people in to their insurance” If that is so, Libertas, could you tell me how FICA and Medicare is taken out of my paycheck when I NEVER opted for them?
Posted by: Publius | August 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
joeray: Why was the first face transplant conducted in France?
Posted by: phallon | August 8, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
So when the right-wingnuts can’t win with intelligent debate, they resort to violence.
Bill Maher was right tonight – they are nothing but stupid. I am embarrassed for my country.
Posted by: welldirected | August 8, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
joeray: Why is Sweden ranked number 1 in medical technology innovation and science?
Posted by: phallon | August 8, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“Bush is held to a higher standard”
A higher standard? The man couldn’t even speak English and he was re-elected:
“The German asparagus are fabulous.”
June 11, 2008
“I thank the diplomatic corps, who is here as well.”
March 12, 2008
“And so, General, I want to thank you for your service. And I appreciate the fact that you really snatched defeat out of the jaws of those who are trying to defeat us in Iraq.”
March 3, 2008
“I can press when there needs to be pressed; I can hold hands when there needs to be — hold hands.”
Jan. 4, 2008
A Higher standard? We didn’t even hold him to the standatds of Seseame Street.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
So when the right-wingnuts can’t win with intelligent debate, they resort to violence.
Bill Maher was right tonight – they are nothing but stupid. I am embarrassed for my country.
Posted by: welldirected | Aug 8, 2009 10:47:37 AM
Things did not get violent until Obama’s paid thugs from SEIU, AFL-CIO, MoveOn, and ACORN (funded by taxpayers!) showed up to muscle concerned citizens out of the town hall meetings.
Posted by: The Chicago Way | August 8, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
ObWann, you just proved my point again. I never said that Bush was perfect. Yep, he made gaffes. No doubt about it. And you libs took great pleasure in bringing them front and center. But Obama? “I’ve visited all 56 states”…..and he’s still perfect. So that means that he is not to be expected to know how many states are in the country he is running for. Held to a lower standard. That’s just one example. Every single time your man screws up, you guys immediately come back with they “yeah, but, Bush…..” Admit it…you hold republicans and especially Bush to a higher standard. You EXPECT perfection from Bush, but accept mediocrity from Obama.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
We are letting these “Brownshirts” get away with this.
Wake up the 375 million dollars the big healthcare industry uses to
inform politicians to leave things just the way it is ,is WORKING.
Our President has backed off and is becoming a WIMP about these
President Obama has got to be strong and not so nice like.
With Palin saying Obama health care plan is gonna kill undesirable patients
we sure need to stop this movement that is rallying our lies.
Are we wimps as well?
Posted by: Joeray | August 8, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Obama claimed he wanted a single-payer system and it’s on video him saying so. Deal with it Libs! Obama’s just another lying Communist.
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
The GOP is cornered and rabid. Their spokesman: Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck and O’Reilly are on the last bite. There’s not too many GOPers left. Won’t be long until they’re a history class.
Posted by: newz4i | August 8, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Will someone just explain to me why these people are allowing themselves to be USED by the insurance companies? I couldn’t understand how easily they sucked up the birther stuff. Are they just dumb, gullible or both?
Posted by: WW | August 8, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
well Publis that’s not forcing you into using it, just to pay for it. I can’t fight you on that. I’m not saying its technically right we have to, but I think you need to have a little empathy. I don’t know you or anything about you, but you have to ask yourself what happens when your 85 and need medical help? Without insurance you can’t afford it, and not many people have guaranteed insurance that follows them after they are no longer employed. What happens to you? I’m am not the one who says it’s your responsibility to pay for it, but what do we do for people who can no longer take care of themselves? The seniors I worked with paid their dues by helping to build this country, how can we turn our backs on us when they need us? It just seems so un-American
Posted by: Libertas! | August 8, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
well directed, they are doing the same childish thing to me…don’t worry about it. It shows their desparation since they cannot argue maturely with logic. Like I stated earlier, if they are idiots or morons, they will prove themselves to be such.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Read H.R 3200 and compare it to Obama’s words . . . that’s all you have to do.
Posted by: rplat | August 8, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
OB…sorry man..didn’t realize, I get worked up and forget such things :)
Posted by: Libertas1 | August 8, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
“If things change the corporations lose the exploitative health insurance goose that lays the golden eggs.”
Au contraire: “if things change” to mandatory insurance, the health insurance goose, and the golden campaign donation eggs for the politicians, will be fatter than ever.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
and ObWann, how about Mr. President’s speech on Memorial Day? “I want to thank the members of the Armed services who made the supreme sacrifice to our country. Many of them are here in this audience today..”??? It’s Obama-speak so it’s acceptable. Because? He’s held to a lower standard. You keep proving my point
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
photo
isn’t it interesting how over the years we consistently hear of violence being threatened and even perpetrated by conservatives against those who disagree with them, but never the other way around.
Anyone else here think that’s interesting?
Very interesting and was so obvious during Bush’s two terms. That’s why no one, who had the smallest inkling of being a liberal, was allowed into any town halls or during his campaign.
Posted by: Joeray | August 8, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
So let me start by dispelling the outlandish rumors that reform will promote euthanasia, cut Medicaid or bring about a government takeover of health care,” he said. “That’s simply not true. >>>>> And we need this stimulus money so that Unemployment wont reach 8%. ANOTHER LIE. I will not have lobbyists in my cabinet. ANOTHER LIE. How about we wont raise taxes on the middle class? Isnt that already in play for health care? ANOTHER LIE.
Man does anyone think he has read HR3200? Does anyone thing he is telling the truth? I sure dont, I read some of HR3200 and people are right in what they have said about it. Its whats in the BILL and not made up in Obama’s head.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Swedish size, society and population make-up is nothing like ours. Get a clue.
Posted by: frankin | August 8, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Will someone just explain to me why these people are allowing themselves to be USED by the insurance companies? I couldn’t understand how easily they sucked up the birther stuff. Are they just dumb, gullible or both?
****************************************
Fear caused by lack of understanding perpetuated by ignorance.
Now health care is evil, product of the devil I tell you. Where are the priest?
Posted by: Thinking | August 8, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Obama, “I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody. And that’s what Jim is talking about when he says everybody in, nobody out. A single-payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. That’s what I’d like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we’ve got to take back the White House, we’ve got to take back the Senate, and we’ve got to take back the House.”
Who’s going to dispute Obama’s own words?
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Heath care is broken. But this cure is worse than the disease. We need bipartisan agreement on a solution that works and is affordable. HR3200 AIN’T IT! Just start over, Dude!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree 100%
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
We have to face facts. There is a limited amount of money. It is going to be necessary to make some tough decisions, patriotic decisions. Just as Obama let his own grandmother die without paying for pointless life-prolonging treatment–she was on her way out, why waste the money?–we have to weed out some oldsters who are doing little but sitting around in nursing homes, when we could be getting our inheritances now, instead of them wasting these precious limited resources.
Posted by: mary larin | August 8, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
The CBO tells us, well actually Congress, that after the ten years we will probably have substantial increases in the federal budget and continue to grow rapidly.
So while the first ten years is good, the budget and deficit can be expected to grow rapidly with this bill.
That is a concern. The CBO is not spreading lies.
In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
“As he said in Northen Virginia on August 7, he really doesn’t want to hear from the opposition!!”
Gee, did you read that somewhere? Did you attend the speech? Becuase your representation of what happened is contridicted by the AP.
‘Appealing across party lines, Obama told the Democratic audience that leaders must listen to their opponents and disagree with civility…”We want to make sure that we listen to other people’s ideas.”‘
Gee, how do you account for the fact that what you say happened is the exact opposite of what happened? Were you maybe lied to about what happened at the meeting?
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Coracii >>>> Dont believe the LIES have you read the BILL for yourself? If not dont doubt the comments others have made. The President is lieing to you.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Joeray | Aug 8, 2009 10:59:23 AM— And all the while threatening and yelling they call liberals brown shirts! LOL! Instead of debating the merits, they hijack the meetings not allowing questions to be asked or answered then have the nerve to say that anyone who criticizes their tactics or gives it back to them are thugs! Some of them take victimization and hypocrisy to a whole new level
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
“Obama claimed he wanted a single-payer system and it’s on video him saying so. Deal with it Libs! Obama’s just another lying Communist.”
Nononono: Obama’s a lying corporate fascist.
He did indeed, in the past — before He muscled into the political big time — claim to support Single Payer. All THAT did was to hornswoggle a bunch of people into voting for him.
Single Payer health care is no “communist” threat. In fact, it’s what about 75% of the American people WANT — even with the media and the politicians suppressing discussion about it.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Obama claimed he wanted a single-payer system and it’s on video him saying so. Deal with it Libs! Obama’s just another lying Communist.
Posted by: toby hill | Aug 8, 2009 10:52:42 AM
*************************************
This is where we discuss “desires” vs. “reality.” See, I desire world peace but that will never happen. I desire the GOP to dial it down a dang notch because they are going to get somebody killed. Won’t happen. So, in a nutshell? Obama can “desire” all he wants and that in NO WAY implies it will become a reality because of a little thing called congress and writing legislation. Next we can discuss how the GOP is playing you people.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
sentinel….please give me a reason you think I work for Blackwater? Or for any other group? Because i have the courage of my convictions? I’m 59 years old. I don’t NEED a “group” of any kind to define who I am. Because I won’t march in lock step with you? I certainly don’t need you to validate me. So…why the ugly post? I’m just curious.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
These fanatics are set ups and nothing but the lunatic fringe of our society. Angry, racist and misinformed.
“Keep the government off our medicare” are common refrains at these ridiculous events. How do you even have a discussion with a person that only wants to be angry and refuse to listen. Maybe someone could tell these fools that medicare is a government program with a 78% satisfaction level.
When did all these nuts want to defend their mediocre health insurance plans that draw a 49% satisfaction level and will hang you out to dry once you have medical bills.
Why defend a broken down health insurance company or the status quo when indeed we are ranked 39th in the world and the most expensive per capita. While France has a health care system that ranks #1 and a 1/3 per capita of ours. Imagine if we had a successful program like that in which medical costs would go from 17% of GDP to less than 10%. We all would be healthier and a lot more money in our pockets.
Posted by: tylerkad | August 8, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Can’t somebody in D.C. just get the marbles to say “This bill stinks! American taxpayers deserve better! Let’s go into session and not come out until we have forged a bill that gives basic health care to every legitimate American Citizen at a price taxpayers can afford without borrowing more money?” (i.e. tort reform and no pre-existing conditions exclusions).
This isn’t hard. Government just needs to put the laws in place. They DO NOT need to control the programs or our wallets! We all long for LESS Government – NOT more Government!
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Do people want the government to have complete access to you bank accounts to take what ever they want? >> Its in the bill.
Do you want the government to have access to your medical records?? Its in the bill.
Do you want an unelected unaccountable committee to decide if you get treatement? Its in the Bill.
There is a LOT more in the bill and OBAMA cant hide from the CBO numbers because they actually read the BILL. HR3200 is garbage!
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Right, “If you like your doctor and you like your current insurance plan, you can keep them” !!!! What a Hoot!!!! —–But if you ever change your job–your screwed–you can’t take the insurance with you and you can’t pay for it yourself and you can’t get anything other than the Government plan because no private insurers will be permitted to write any new policies!!!! I hope Obamessiah clears up the the “outlandish and misleading claims” !!!
Posted by: roscoe | August 8, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Republicans have been lieing for so long it has become part of their persona. Lieing must be a pre-requisite for becoming a republican. Case in point: Sarah Palin stating on her blog that Obama’s health care proposal has a “Death Panel” to deny needy people healtcare. LIE, LIE, LIE. Republicans have zero morals.
Posted by: DE | August 8, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I pay threw the nose in health care to my insurance company every month. And still pay through the nose when I go to the doctor. It ain’t right! Glad we have a president that’s doing something about it.
The GOP rules by hate mongering. The sooner people realize this the sooner they will go away forever.
Posted by: viktims | August 8, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Does anyone thing they can make a complex system form scratch without making a mess? These guys could not even get Cash for Clunkers right. Read the BILL !
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Explain the solution to this problem?
Huge deficits after ten years, that is a big problem.
In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
ChicagoBob | Aug 8, 2009 11:00:46 AM— There is nothing in the bill about euthanasia! It does discuss end of life planning, a living will. Oh, by the way that provision was put in by 2 Republican Senators!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Cost estimates for ObamaCare are $1 Trillion UNDERSTATED…..but Obama says “the time for talk is over.”
—The biggest player in the health-care debate right now isn’t Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or even President Obama. It’s the Congressional Budget Office, which is responsible for estimating the costs of proposed legislation. After the director of the CBO testified on July 16 that none of the health-reform bills in the House or Senate would reduce the rate of increase in federal spending on health care, congressional efforts fell into disarray. Many policymakers began searching for a way to get costs below the CBO’s frightening estimate of $1.1 trillion over ten years. Others attacked the CBO, calling its estimates irresponsible.
The CBO is actually being kind to the would-be reformers. Its analysis likely understates—by at least $1 trillion—the true costs of expanding health coverage as current Democratic legislation contemplates. Over the last few months, my colleagues and I at the consulting firm Health Systems Innovations have provided cost estimates of health-care reform to both Republican and Democratic members of Congress, and we’ve posted these estimates on our website as well. We believe that the Democratic bills currently under consideration in the House and Senate would cost $2.1 trillion and $2.4 trillion, respectively—much higher than CBO’s figures.—
Posted by: The Chicago Way | August 8, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
What do we need health care insurance for? All we really need to do is go back to the “good old days” when we used leeches for everything.
What’s REALLY great about using leeches is that we seem to be infested with them in Washington DC!!! There’s PLENTY to go around!!
Posted by: Laughing_All_The__Way | August 8, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
I pay threw the nose in health care to my insurance company every month. viktims >>>>>> AND THE CBO SAID YOUR COST WILL GO UP. Thank you Obama for making health care MORE expensive. DONT be A FOOL. Read the bill. Obama LIES
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
and, sentinel, i am in no way in denial of republican corruption. I know it exists and i will fight it too…to the best of my ability. But guess what? I also realize the there is a LOT of corruption in your party as well. That’s the point of one of my posts: you guys show that you hold my party to higher standards. You want perfection from the GOP (it is NOT perfect) but accept mediocrity from the Dems. When a dem is caught in corruption, you circle the wagons around him. When a GOP is caught in corruption, the party censures him….
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
The IRS took over a brothel in Navada for tax evasion. Within six months, the Government had bankrupt this once thriving business selling prostitution and alcohol.
Think they can do better managing health care?
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
For those claiming the Republicans are misleading us,
does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens?
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Hey The Chicago Way – Sort of like how the Bush WH got caught lying about Medicare Plan D – THE PILL BILL? You remember that? That was commie, huh?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Democrats have zero morals. DE >>>> Cash in the freezer WELFARE programs that destroyed the family unit and kept people in poverty. Thats just a few of the great democratic programs. Democrats have become the party against freedom and the American people. How about the Report your neighbors unleashed by Obama? Brown shirts?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
How about the outlandish claim that this bill is completely unConstitutional? That there is no place in the Consitution that allows the federal governmet to take over health care? Obama is lieing about us keeping our insurance if we like it. He has been caught on video proclaiming his desire for a “single payer” health care systm. That means government run!
Posted by: mammaduck | August 8, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Interesting — Cincy Sheehan can camp out for months in Crawford TX, and she is just excersising her right of free speech — But citizens expressing their disagreement with health care reform are “ANGRY MOBS”??? — WHAT HYPOSCRISY!!!
Posted by: Mark | August 8, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens? >>>> HR3200 does We have money for medical care but not deportation? Seems cheaper to throw them out doesnt it?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Obama making statements about misleading information is laughable. He’s a master at that.
The present bill is too expensive, will eventually cause entrenched double digit unemployment like Europe’s through excessive taxation on the population.
We have the example. We know what will happen. Why would we choose to cripple our economy for a minority of citizens who are not covered by insurance…many of whom choose not to buy it…when there could be alternatives…if this administration would slow down and listen to other ideas that never get out of committee.
Posted by: pam | August 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Mr. President, What do you expect? You propose a 1000+ page ‘mystery bill’ that not only do legislators not even have time to read and doesn’t apply to them, but you set a deadline to ‘ram’ it through before congress goes on recess vacation. And you’re surprised at the push back? It might work in Chicago, but apparently, the rest of the country doesn’t like that kind of governing.
Posted by: LongT | August 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Democrats are ALL about bringing people down not helping them up. Thats all pushing everyone into misery what a STUPID party.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Still no comment on the predicted substantial increases in the budget deficit after ten years?
I’m still waiting to hear how the government plans to resolve this in the future.
Cutting health care? Raising taxes? What?
Congress knows this is a future problem, they should plan ahead.
Obama complains about the past administration, while leaving his own big pile of dirt for future generations and administrations.
“In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.”
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
There are also many liberal supporters of Obama at these rallies raising hell, but you don’t get that from the media.
Posted by: LongT | August 8, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Hey The Chicago Way – Sort of like how the Bush WH got caught lying about Medicare Plan D – THE PILL BILL? You remember that? That was commie, huh?
Posted by: Secondlook | Aug 8, 2009 11:14:04 AM
The Medicare drug plan is coming in under costs, is very popular, and uses free markets to lower cost. That is why Obama and the Dems stripped money away from it to fund their risky government-run health schemes. They can’t afford for the people to see a free market solution succeed.
Posted by: The Chicago Way | August 8, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
A volatile mix has resulted. In Mehlville, Mo., St. Louis County police officers arrested six people on Thursday evening, some on assault charges, outside a health care and aging forum organized by Representative Russ Carnahan, a Democrat. Opponents of the proposed changes, organized by the St. Louis Tea Party, apparently clashed with supporters organized by the Service Employees International Union outside a school gym.
>>>>>>>> HERE COME the Brown Shirts with thier clubs to BEAT honest democracy. WELL AMERICA ARE WE GOING TO STAND FOR THIS?
Obama the great uniter?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Kinda tough when folks start catching on, huh? You see it’s not what the bill actually says that we must fear – its what the bill actually ALLOWS. The people must not give the government the ability to expand itself or insert itself – or, it will. Too much smoke and too many mirrors in 1000 pages cobbled together in a partisan manner by the party in power. Bad. Bad. Bad!
Posted by: N'erdowell | August 8, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
For those claiming the GOP is misleading us,
does any of the proposed bills include provisions for Government funded abortions despite current law prohibiting it?
To all those that support the legislation, not every dispute from the GOP is a misrepresentation of what is being proposed.
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Mr. President, What do you expect? You propose a 1000+ page ‘mystery bill’ that not only do legislators not even have time to read and doesn’t apply to them, but you set a deadline to ‘ram’ it through before congress goes on recess vacation. And you’re surprised at the push back? It might work in Chicago, but apparently, the rest of the country doesn’t like that kind of governing.
WHEN THE PRESIDENT WANTS OUR OPINION HE’LL GIVE IT TO US. That’s the way it works in Chicage.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Again, what does Obama expect? More sheeple I guess. Just be honest with the American people for God’s sake. YOU caused this!
Posted by: LongT | August 8, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Still no solution to a growing budget defict after 10 years.
While Obama complains about the previous administration he leaves a big dirt pile for future generations and administrations.
Congress knows this will create a problem, and rather then admit it and resolve the situation they mislead people.
What is the solution in ten years?
Cut benefits? Raise taxes?
“In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.”
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
toby hill | Aug 8, 2009 10:52:42 AM Obama claimed he wanted a single-payer system and it’s on video him saying so. Deal with it Libs! Obama’s just another lying Communist.——- Yes, he said he wanted one, didn’t mean he’d get it! There are other branches of Govt. that actually take part in this, you know that right? As for Communist, no that would be the “protesters” who don’t want to allow any other voice or message to be heard but theirs. It’s exactly what the brown shirts did in the 30′s.
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
WHY are people SO upset? because the News media ignores those that are no upset. Because the congressmen have been voting against the public for MONTHS now. Obama and his Democratic cronies are RIPPING the nation APART !
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Does ANYONE really think that the kind of “reform” (read government control of the people) prescribed by O’Bamegalomaniac will help THEM in the long run? We wil ALL suffer down the road. Only O’Bama’s ego will benefit.
Posted by: Simple Truths | August 8, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
ncpilot09, I think you have expressed yourself rather clearly throughout this blog. My comments are a reaction to yours. Your support for the extreme right is clear. Considering the obvious corruption and damage the Republicans and right-wingers have wrought, my previous comments are your answer.
Posted by: Sentinel | August 8, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Why would Palin put out such an easily refuted claim?
She either is that stupid or she knows that the opposition the healthcare reform is running on lies and crazy emotion. So she has thrown Trig into the furor to gin up more hatred.
Good move mummy.
Posted by: doug | August 8, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
libertas—Bulletin–Seniors are covered by Medicare now. My mother is very poor and is 84. We help support her. Her health concerns have been covered by Medicare and another insurance policy that covers the 20%. When she was poorer, the 20% was covered.
I saw a post by a retired union worker who wondered what would happen if he lost is deluxe benefits. Talk about duh! He would go on Medicare like the rest of the population.
And, what are Union workers doing at these meetings anyway. They are exempt from this bill, along with Congress.
Got the picture yet?
Posted by: pam | August 8, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
well, it’s a pretty day in NC, and I have a lawn to mow and a pool to dive into afterwards. I’ve managed to get someone upset enough to co-opt my name and post liberal rants under my ID…so I’m quite proud of that accomplishment. Shows the desperation. Second Look, my dear…if you see any more posts from me that praise the Chosen One….rest assured, one of two things have happened: Either it’s that imposter that wants to be me….or I’ve had a frontal lobotamy. And i’m pretty sure that i have no surgery planned for today
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I understand now why Obama did not support the protesters in Iran and Honduras–he does not like dissenters.
He supports tyranny.
Obama needs neighbors to spy on each other because he is afraid.
Posted by: larry | August 8, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
WHEN THE PRESIDENT WANTS OUR OPINION HE’LL GIVE IT TO US. That’s the way it works in Chicago >>>No Common Sense in
DC >>>> I have to admit the peope in IL avoid confrontation and thats why are are sheep that Blago and the rest of the Chicago MOB have taken advantage
of for decades. The CITY is a MESS thanks to Daley.
Schools? Aweful.
Streets? In sad shape.
Murder Rate? WOW we are working on a record.
And the people? LAY DOWN here like nothing is happening. The Democrats control everything and we have over 10% unemployment. I FEEL SO GLAD to have democrats run this State.
OH and Obama is from Chicago.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Still no solution to a probable substantial budget growth and defict after 10 years according the CBO.
The idea was to make health care cost less, I don’t see that mentioned in the CBO report either.
While Obama complains about the previous administration he leaves a big dirt pile for future generations and administrations.
Congress knows this will create a problem, and rather then admit it and resolve the situation they mislead people.
What is the solution in ten years?
Cut benefits? Raise taxes?
“In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.”
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
“Why would we choose to cripple our economy for a minority of citizens who are not covered by insurance…many of whom choose not to buy it…”
Get a clue: except at the corporate tippy top, the economy IS crippled — and in years to come, Single Payer health care — which bears NO resemblance to Oblabla’s “insurance reform” — can be a lot of help to EVERYbody.
The “problem” the Democrats’ plans address is the problem of those who HAVE, and those who can afford, medical insurance — which doesn’t work, when it’s needed, for many of those people.
Single Payer health care would be cheaper than what’s going on now — in which dozens of millions of people have NO health care, or crappy “care” from government funded non-profit (corporate) clinics that pass out psycho-meds and pain pills in lieu of actual health care.
Excluding Single Payer — which is what nearly everybody beyond the political elites, who get bazillions FROM the insurance companies, want — from the proposals in Congress has kept the question from being part of the cost estimates.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Obama himself said in 1993 that he favored a single-payer health care system. Now, his spokesman, Robert Gibbs, denies that Obama favors such a system.
True, end of life consultations are not mandated by the House bill. But, the Secretary of HHS and others may well decide what care is appropriate for the sick and elderly.
And, we still don’t know the likely costs of subsidizing more insured people.
There are many other questions that cannot be answered because of conflicting legislation still in Congress.
It’s hardly outlandish for many people to be confused and concerned. But, shouting down legislators is not the way to proceed. Neither is sending thugs out to provide “order.”
Posted by: vrytix | August 8, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Obama has proven what kind of president he is going to be.
And it’s not president for all the people.
Only for those who agree with him.
He will dismiss/silence those who don’t.
So this was Obama’s plan to remake America?
And his little sheep follow obediently along with him.
Posted by: max | August 8, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
ChicagoBob | Aug 8, 2009 11:15:55 AM >>>> HR3200 does We have money for medical care but not deportation? Seems cheaper to throw them out doesnt it? —-Gotta love the Christian right, rather have a person die in the streets than help them!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Obama is saying ANYTHING he can to sail this turkey through. When Social Security was installed, the American people were told that there would NEVER be the use of the public funds for things other than the retirement system, that there would NEVER be the use of the social security number as a private tracking system and that the system would NEVER go broke.
Well, all three of those promises were broken.
Now we’re watching a new fascination that the Democrats have with a national system eugenics program being heavily promoted and I can’t help but remember the Social Security system promises. That system was bankrupted once in the 1950s (and everyone had to start their contributions all over again – no explanation!) and also we face the specter of Social Securty doing the same thing again in the early part of this century.
What better way to reign in Social Security spending then to kill off the elderly? That seems to be the “social” argument being talked about seriously in Washington D.C.
The association with Nazi Germany is highly appropriate. Germany lost it’s appreciation for life and liberty in much the same manner as this government is now embracing in Washington D.C. Why are the Democrats so upset when intelligent Americans see the parallels and begin to draw conclusions about intentions of said Democratic party?
Folks… your country is being sold out from under you.
If you don’t like it, write Congress, write the President and speak out. Attend the meetings of local, state and federal government and make it a priority to call them to the carpet for what they do and say.
This matters. Given what I see happening, our very lives now depend on us acting. If we don’t, we’ll literally be leading ourselves to slaughter and slavery (and I am not kidding).
Posted by: Jon | August 8, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“You see it’s not what the bill actually says that we must fear…” – N’erdowell
Now that I believe.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“And his little sheep follow obediently along with him.” Ya, that’s why insurance reform went through so quickly.
Posted by: Disgusted | August 8, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Seeing Obama mock and smirk while he tells opponents to shut up and get out of his way is proof that his arrogance overshadows his thinking.
He looks rediculous, immature, classless, and unpresidential.
When Obama is pushed into a corner his ugly sinister side emerges.
Posted by: bailey | August 8, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Obama caused this with his tyrannical style of leadership. I’ve heard about this kind of stuff from Chicago. i.e. when Mayor Daley bulldosed up Miegs airport “IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT!!!” to confiscate land for a pet project of his. By the way, why is it every Mayor of Chicago is always named ‘Daley’?
Posted by: LongT | August 8, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Why do the people believe ANYTHING , either party tells us?,,,,the last eight and a half years right up to today ,,,have been nothing but LIES from BOTH parties. Do NEITHER of them understand….”We the People” voted then in to REPRESENT US….not the GREAT LOBBY DOLLAR. Have they completely lost track of WHAT THEIR PURPOSE IS, and JUST WHO they are supposed to be representing? By conspiring with corporate America to defraud the American people, BOTH PARTIES have committed TREASON against the people of this country.
Posted by: tincup356 | August 8, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
obama said in 2003 he is for a singlepayer system this a disaster for seniors and the public option of which just about everyone would go to because its cheaper and these congresspeople do not read the bill3200 why in world dosnt obama right his own bill? there will also be a commission set up to ration healthcare and even tell seniors to have a end game option this guy is crazy
Posted by: kerry | August 8, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
“But, shouting down legislators is not the way to proceed. Neither is sending thugs out to provide ‘order.’”
“Legislators”?? Hahaha. Most of these clowns aren’t even READING the “legislation” — composed by G-d-knows-who — that their mob “leadership” dictates they approve.
I’ve been surprised none of them’s been “pie-d” yet. Confronted with misrule of suce ridiculous proportions, the citizens of MOST countries would move straight to mass revolt.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
max | Aug 8, 2009 11:34:10 AM Obama has proven what kind of president he is going to be.
And it’s not president for all the people.
Only for those who agree with him.
He will dismiss/silence those who don’t.
So this was Obama’s plan to remake America?
And his little sheep follow obediently along with him.—— And would he President for all the people if he did what you the minority want? As for silencing people, what exactly are the “protesters” doing at the town halls? Silencing people! Now, it’s degraded into death threats and assaults! I can remember not to long ago, if you didn’t agree with the whole WMD’s and we need to invade, your were labeled un American, a terrorist lover! Please stop projecting your parties way of dealing with those who have different opinions on the rest of us!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 8, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
“this guy is crazy”
That’s a real possibility.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Problem is Obama isn’t apparently reading the bill. If it passes, as written (which it won’t), euthanasia certainly will be as big a controversy twenty years from now as abortion is today. Right now it’s a huge mess. I don’t understand why he doesn’t see the reasons the bill is causing such controversy. And yes, I HAVE read the bill.
Posted by: CLR | August 8, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
so our leaders have all agreed that no longer can insurance companies discriminate based on a person’s medical situation, but it is OK to discriminage based on age. the wordiing of the bill specifically allows premiums for older people to be twice as high as those for younger people, regardless of health. This is not health reform, it’s a giant welfare program.
Posted by: linda | August 8, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Mr. President, What do you expect? You propose a 1000+ page ‘mystery bill’ that not only do legislators not even read, but doesn’t even doesn’t apply to them. And then you set a deadline to ‘ram’ it through before congress goes on recess vacation. And you’re surprised at the push back? It might work in Chicago, but apparently, the rest of the country doesn’t like that kind of governing.
Posted by: LongT | August 8, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
We had this debate in November, remember? And the Republicans lost because they put the American economy into the toilet. They also had 8 years to push through a health reform plan of their own, and didn’t. Now it’s our turn and our responsibility to get it right. Health care reform is just one of the things Obama was elected to change. Those who lost at the ballot box(and who now claim they really do want health reform)are now willing to try anything to stop the will of the majority–lies, threats, shouts–in short, the absence of the spirit of democracy. Is it small wonder that your party is being marginalized?
Posted by: perumal11 | August 8, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Also, I have private insurance that covers 90% of allowed expenses.. yet in a few years when I become 65, my private insurance will become secondary, thereby transferring the bulk of the cost of medical treatments which are now paid by private insurance on to the taxpayer. There is no talk of reforming this totally wastefull aspect of the current system. They (the government) WANT more people in the system, not less. This is not reform, this is transfer of wealth from private to public sectors.
Posted by: linda | August 8, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The only thing that is “outlandish and misleading” about this plan is the fact that it exists. Give me Liberty not tyranny,
Posted by: Bob | August 8, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Seeing Obama mock and smirk while he tells opponents to shut up and get out of his way… When Obama is pushed into a corner his ugly sinister side emerges.” – bailey
Well, gee, its a good thing that you don’t have to have any facts to back up such nonsense. After all, trying to find actually citations for your fantasies might take a while.
Posted by: OB-Wan222 | August 8, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
It’s now official: We are living under a dictatorship- we, the American people are to “stupid” to know what’s best for us, so our elected leaders have decided not to hold townhall meetings- or even answer emails! Answer me this: If this healthcare bill is so wonderful, how come Congress exempted themselves from going on it themselves????
Posted by: Cindy Merrill | August 8, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
By the way, here on the street this is not a partisan thing and it is not organized by insurance companies. Instead, it is a people trying to remain free and defend itself against government intrusion!
My healthcare plan is only 137 pages and does rather well, thank you. It also has no senior counseling for end of life crap.
Obama didn’t like 14 pound bills such as the patriot act being rushed throug in 2004, so why is he upset now that we speak out against such tactics.
His reassurances and marginalizing the opposition comments are simply adding accelerant to the flames!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 8, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
linda – You do get at age 65 all insurance companies pretty much refuse to touch you? God forbid we make sure you’re taken care of?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Fascinating. Those who oppose “health care reform” (which it is not, it’s insurance “reform”) are puppets of Big Corp, according to Obama and his cult.
Gee, I must have missed that phone call from Big CEO offering me money… darn.
In reality, those who shout down opponents (and the shouting is much louder from that side, has been since mid-2008) are the puppets. Incapable of reading for themselves, incapable of reasoning, hearing only what Obama says. Generally with an agenda of their own, after all, many are raising their grandchildren when they’re barely into their thirties. Government handouts have been a part of their lives for two or three generations. And yay! Here’s even more government stuff!
Bottom line, I don’t give a rip if you get all the goodies Obama’s offering for your worship. Just don’t drag us non-believers into your church. That’s what the Holy HR3200 will do, force tithing to something we do not want, to pay for those who expect to be taken care of.
Posted by: Eyes Open | August 8, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
ISN’T IT GREAT TO HAVE BHO FOR OUR LEADER? I KNOW I’M CRAZY HAS HE IS
Posted by: rob1 | August 8, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Where the Sam Hill were you people when they passed The Pill Bill? You recall? 2003. Almost all republican. Cost almost 550 BILLION dollars/10 years.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
This is all good Obama, but how about some actual facts on the health care plan. We know what isn’t true, but please tell me what exactly your plan is.
Posted by: Lauren | August 8, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
“Oh please, cut the hysterics. You want to talk about ripping the nation apart – where were you during the Viet-nam war? Probably not even born yet.”
–> Remember that Lyndon Johnson, a politician with SOLID accomplishment (including delivering Medicare as a working program in less than a year) behind him, was forced from office by his obsession with “winning” in Viet Nam.
Obama just wants “wins”, regardless of content — He doesn’t care a fig for anything but that psychological validation of Himself.
Is that “crazy”, as one poster here suggests? It seems likely, but crazy or not, it’s bad politics.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
“Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.”—–
This lie has been refuted time and time again and yet Obama keeps repeating it.—-
He never mentions the fact that many people who are on employer based care already don’t have much say as to whether they keep their insurance and they sure won’t have any say if their employer decides to drop them which this plan was DESIGNED to encourage.—–
(1) Obamacare is rightly understood to be a threat to people’s existing insurance and doctors and (2) the president repeatedly and falsely “guarantees” voters that they can keep their insurance and doctors. The refusal of proponents of Obamacare to honestly address these obviously major problems and concerns feeds the fear which feeds the anger. The president, Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman and the rest are hiding the truth about the consequences of Obamacare and voters know it.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
do not trust a word obama (not capitalized on purpose) says afterall he is a politician. do NOT trust. I have always voted Democrat but not this time no freaking way and all you obama lovers just sit back and wait you will see just wait.
Posted by: Punky Mama | August 8, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“Obama didn’t like 14 pound bills such as the patriot act being rushed throug in 2004″
–> He’s gone way beyond the Patriot Act, with the snitch line.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Premiums are going up, the cost of insurance is going up, cost of meds are going up, cost of overall healthcare is going up, and malpractice insurance is going up. Who can say that they are happy with the status quo? Perhaps the insurance companies. Lets spend our engergies on supporting the possibility of healthcare system that can be more affordable which is what the Obama administration is trying to offer. We can always choose to keep aupporting the current system and the growth of the insurance companies.
Posted by: hopeful | August 8, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Can someone point me to the section where it says illegal aliens will not be covered?
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
The Chicago – You’re supposed to pull your head out of your partisan hoo hoo and THINK. First off? Not only did they lie about this “expansion of entitlement which you guys now call commie on this issue,” BUT – the dang drug companies immediately raised the prices of their old people drugs and took your tax paying butt to the cleaners. Yet here you go sign songing about this like it’s the best idea EVER. The Pill Bill and this? Not a whole lot of difference. Except your leaders are telling you to pitch a fit now.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
winz illegals are already covered. They get care if they walk into a hospital. This is more about the middle class. Neither side of the isle is going to touch the illegal issue.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Anyone who thinks that Obama’s plan is going to alleviate the suffering of the American working class is completely ignorant. Obama is a pawn of the corporate class.
Posted by: Eustace | August 8, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
The reason our president wants to reform health care is because insurance premiums are going up. No one wants to take your insurance plan that you have now. If you are happy with it..keep it.
There are many things the Congress and Senate are looking into and one needs to wait to see what is being presented before you can demonstate. Lies like “he wants to decide which older person will be killed to save money” That is so ridiculous. These demonstrations started as people against health care and have morphed into much more than that. Freedom of speech is for both sides. If you do not let the other side speak you are doing just what you are demonstrating against. We all need to calm down and get information properly not from the likes of Limbaugh and hannity. They have their own agendas and certainly not yours in mind. If you get hurt, will they pay your bills? Absolutely not. Both sides should have the same opportunity to speak or else it is a mob.
Posted by: talmag | August 8, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Obama himself has to bear some responsibility for the distortions that are being put out there, he admitted himself he wasn’t aware of some things in the bill, there are 5000 pages of bills and he sends the senators out with nothing but a bunch of rhetoric, no real answers for people because they don’t even know what is in these bills, which one is most likely to pass, or even how the key components will affect people. Not only that the only independent review of this bill is the CBO which wasn’t favorable and also disputed everything Obama said. So is it any wonder that people have questions, I think not. This is the worst leadership for a major proposal that I have ever seen and even the Democrats have been begging for leadership.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I do believe that we all can agree that the insurance and health care system needs to be fixed. Something is amiss when you have to spend almost one complete paycheck a month on health insurance for a family of four healthy people and each year it goes up at least 10 percent. THIS NEEDS TO BE OVERHAULED!
A lot of people want to turn this into a Democrat/Republican issue. This is not the time for partisan politics. We all need to come together, right and left wingers alike, find common ground and do what is best for the people of this great nation.
When health insurance and oil prices are more affordable, we all will have more income we can spend. This should be our goal.
No bill that comes out of congress will make all happy but if our government will reach across the aisle with open dialogue, ideas can be weighed and a solution can be had.
We did not get into this mess (economy speaking) in the last seven months, but it is also not the time to point fingers or place blame on either political party or any individual. It is a time for constructive ideas not destructive critisism. This is the time, again I say, to come and let us fix the problems we have in front of us.
Posted by: David Shepard | August 8, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Eustace – News Flash. Corporatism rules our politicians on both sides of the isle. They are also ruiling the ones telling you the line of bull they are telling you. You guys yell about how everything out of Obama’s mouth is a lie when you’re being fed lies yourself and you don’t even know it.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
If the issues are ‘so outlandish’, why are some of the members of congress so hesitant to get into specifics with their constituents? Obama is not coming clean! He does assume the population is pretty ‘stupid’. Think that he may find out that THEY ARE NOT!
The guy is losing credibility each time he steps in front of a camera!
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 8, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“If the issues are ‘so outlandish’, why are some of the members of congress so hesitant to get into specifics with their constituents?”…….. Gee, I don’t know. Maybe because it’s not finalized, and they don’t even know what they are?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
“We don’t allow mob rule, right? We have a Constitution, right? We have elections, right?”
When the White House invites people to turn in “fishy” folks, we might as well NOT have a Constitution that guarantees free speech.
“The president and his party have received more money from private insurers and the for-profit health care industry than even Republicans, with the president alone taking $19 million in the 2008 election cycle alone, more than all his Repubican, Democratic and independent rivals combined.”
“And speaking of elections didn’t you guys get your asses kicked in the last one, right?”
–> I’m a long-time Democrat who didn’t vote for Obama because I don’t knowingly vote for mobsters, even half-African ones who bleat about their special DNA. It was rank-and-file Democrats who “[got their] asses kicked” in the last election, when the Democratic Party was hijacked by crypto-Mormon corporate mobsters.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Then if they will get it health care they should have to pay. Currently the bill does not seem to cover nonresident aliens, that includes illegal aliens, student visas, work visas, etc.
Nonresident visitors, are excluded.
Are we supposed to foot the bill without any help from them on the benefits they receive from it?
Eustace:
“winz illegals are already covered. They get care if they walk into a hospital. This is more about the middle class. Neither side of the isle is going to touch the illegal issue.”
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Yes, terrible and outlandish claims- based on footage of obama’s actual words coming out of his stuttering drooly mouth.
How dare they use scare tactics like direct quotes.
The very nerve.
Posted by: 2Brixshy | August 8, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
This comment section is indicative of why real reform will fail. The anti health reform remarks are based on false “facts”. Facts that are out there, but they refute them as lies with out being able to substantiate their interpretation of the bills. Talk about loud, please? Where are the comments from pro health care reform? An apathetic society ran by the loud and ignorant, while we scurry around like ants trying to survive on what little the corporations have left to us.
Posted by: james | August 8, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Remember all those horror stories we used to hear about the Soviet Union, how they had bureaus that would decide who would be a doctor or mechanic or ditch digger, based on the needs of the Union, and determine where they would be educated and where they would work?
Check out page 897 of the Bill 3200.
Posted by: Woody | August 8, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Hmm. This is almost surreal to watch. If you step back, and simply observe as clinically as possible, you’d say the country is at a decision point.
What’s almost awe inspiring is that these townhall audiences are really self-generated, and not organized nefariously by some shadowy group, as Gibbs keeps saying.
They don’t look like the kind of people who would just hit the streets in response to an ACORN or MoveOn org-type call to arms, which the Democrats have benefited so much from. Moderates and conservatives don’t have that kind of instant network. Besides, conservatives don’t operate that way — it’s the nature of the beast.
These are the silent people who have a long, long fuse, and usually just shrug their shoulders at DC excesses. Getting them out of their plaid Ethan Allen easy chairs takes some doing. When their own elected leadership cavalierly dismisses their concerns, calls them manufactured mobs, and sends in union thugs to silence them, well, let me just say this: “Don’t you get between me and my Medicare, son.”
Obama and congress took an adversarial, defensive posture from the outset. Instead of bringing critics to their point of view, they intimidated, tried to chill debate, and called out the union thugs. They talked about “battle plans” and getting critics out of the way so Obama can “clean up their mess”. Instead of telling voters why this bill is an improvement, they hurled insults.
While I’m sure M. Steele would be flattered that the WH gives the GOP so much credit for this turnout, that’s not it either. These people probably sniff at Republicans the same way they roll their eyes at Democrats.
You just can’t have union thugs beating up black conservatives on the street. You cannot have AFL-CIO leaders menacingly promising their own members will flood the townhalls. This country doesn’t work that way.
The American people aren’t a “special interest group”, they’re the electorate, and if you want to get a bill passed, you have to go through them. The WH is talking like they don’t even understand how the American system works.
The WH should look at the proposals offered by C. Krauthammer today, maybe that could be a way to pull the debate back to the substance of health issues. (Tort reform, malpractice, etc…)
Posted by: mj | August 8, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
I was at one of these healthcare town-hall meetings the other day, once the group of 80-plus-year-old ladies (standing next to me) had become winded from screaming out “no socialized medicine” and could scream no longer, I heard an older Republican gentlemen (his “I hate Nazi’s” sign, gave him away) talking about how his dog, had just crapped in his favorite shoes. This older gentlemen, then, proceeds to tell how he’s sure, that his dog had been planning this crap attack for at least a week. Next, he states that he had been noticing, over the past 5 or 6 days, that his dog had been studying his movements, patterns, and habits, and is absolutely convinces, (just for cover) his dog crapped in his favorite shoes, a day before the dog knew, he was going to wear them.
What’s going on? Surely, most people are not this stupid or paranoid. Fueled by an organized ignorance, the principal factor at play, can only be explained, as a un-American hatred, for the President of these United States.
While stupidity and ignorance is a condition of the mind, thus, subject to toleration, hatred, a destruction of the soul, must never to be sanctioned, nor, allowed to prevail.
Posted by: david moore | August 8, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
“This is the worst leadership for a major proposal that I have ever seen and even the Democrats have been begging for leadership.”
The only possible salvation is to vote for the Weiner amendment, substituting Single Payer (HR 676) for these pig bills.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
“We all need to calm down and get information properly not from the likes of Limbaugh and hannity.”
Or obama and pelosi and gibbs. Both sides “have their own agenda.” This issue is obama’s Legacy.
Posted by: Eyes Open | August 8, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
2brixshy -> just another of those who have handed over their brains to their puppet-masters, the drug companies and Fox. You’d think people would be embarrassed to be owned by clowns such as Glenn Beck. Bill Maher had a fascinating commentary on the dumbing-down of America this week. But of course people such as 2brix won’t even listen to him because “he’s part of the liberal elite.” And the great empire that was America spirals downward…
Posted by: Reality Check | August 8, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
This whole bill is ‘outlandish’ and ‘misleading’. Why no tort reform accompanying this bill? Trial lawyers like John Edwards getting millions a year suing doctors is a major reason costs have escalated. They are one the largest contributors to the Dems is why. ObamaCare is a monster = FrankenCare.
Posted by: freemort | August 8, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
I actually read the Health Care plan. It was long and boring but I LOVE the power of knowing when someone is full of it when they make silly claims. Some of you should try it…knowledge is power.
I listen to politicians or radio personalities and wonder if they are really as dumb as a box of rocks or intentionally misleading dumb Americans.
Posted by: Mark | August 8, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Also when a bill was introduced that required everyone in the senate to be covered under the same plan that they are asking us to be under, they refused to sign it. Only Kennedy and Dodd signed it I believe. So do they really have to wonder why there is skepticism?
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“They talked about “battle plans” and getting critics out of the way so Obama can “clean up their mess”. Instead of telling voters why this bill is an improvement, they hurled insults.”
It’s not terribly surprising that putting a race-baiting Chicago mobster in charge of the White House isn’t working out well, except for the corporations who are emptying the Treasury at a great rate.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
It’s so funny. American’s cried “change!”, and then when change starts happenin, they get scared. Ha ha. We’re not used to someone who makes things happen like this.
Posted by: Ang | August 8, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
obama is lying about everything he is a danger to the american way of life.
Posted by: john | August 8, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
WHY WON’T THE DEMOCRATS LEVEL WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
* WHAT IS IMAC? WHAT WILL IT DO, AND WHAT WILL IT NOT DO?
* HOW WILL THEY PROVIDE THE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH AN EXISTING NURSE SHORTAGE AND A GROWING DOCTOR SHORTAGE — MORE TO COME IF THEY HAVE TO BREAK THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH? (Please do not use AMA and AARP as being for the program, for they do not represent the vast majority of doctors, and after this past week, the AARP is going to represent many fewer seniors!)
*HOW WILL THE ADMINISTRATION’S PLAN CHANGE MEDICARE — GIVE SPECIFICS — NOT GENERALITIES?
*WHY IS THE ADMINISTRATION SO STRIDENTLY AGAINST TORT REFORM — WHICH WOULD SAVE BILLIONS FROM BOGUS LAW SUITS?
*WHY IS THERE NOT LANGUAGE TO GO AFTER MEDICAID AND MEDICARE FRAUD — WHICH AGAIN WOULD SAVE BILLIONS?
*WHAT MAKES UP THE 47 MILLION ‘WITHOUT INSURANCE’ THAT THE ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES TO TOUT? WHAT ARE THE DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKOUTS — INCLUDING ILLEGALS?
*WHY IS THERE NOT SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IN THE BILLS ON TARGETING MONEY TOWARDS CURES FOR DISEASES: DIABETES; VARIOUS CANCERS; AUTISM; MS; HEART DISEASE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; AND VARIOUS DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH AGING?
I just see a lot of government control on who lives and dies, and very little in real health care reform!
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 8, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
These people may or may not be republicans but they are spurred on by three very prominent republicans. Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck. They continue to give out distorted truths and are spurring these people on to continue this type of demonstrations. Freedom of speech works both ways. To keep shouting which they are advised to do and not let the people speak is not free speech. The dates of these meeetings have been sent out to republicans so that they can demonstrate and they have been sent by Mr. Rick Scott. He admitted this on R. Sanchez’ show. Mr. Sanchez asked him about the fact that he and his company received the highest fine (1.7Billion dollars) for defrauding the medicade and medicare system by charging for procedures which never happened and increasing unnecessary procedures. He did not deny this and said well so what I am not in jail. This is the type of people who the frightened are listening to instead the people who can straighten them out with facts. They don’t want you to know the facts just what they want to propagate.
Posted by: talmag | August 8, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Those who oppose health insurance reform with the public option. Why don’t you oppose public education? It is the same, the American people educate individuals who cannot afford private education. Why don’t you Republicans oppose public education? What is the difference between public education and public option (health care)?
Posted by: Liza | August 8, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Who are behind this? The insurance companies are. They know if there is a public option in place, the insurance companies will go out of business because they will not be able to compete with the government. Well, that is what we need. Lower premiums. Now people cannot afford to buy health insurance because it is so expensive. The American people are filing for bankruptcy because they cannot continue paying monthly high insurance premiums. The CEOs at the insurance companies deny claims because they put money in their pockets. But who suffers? The American people do even though they have been paying for years their monthly insurance premiums. Enough, let’s fix this problems. If the Democrats have to do it without the Republicans, so be it. We did the same with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. The Republicans did not help. President Barack Obama was elected to fix this problem. That is a mandate. Democrats go and fight this one. Do not trust the Republicans. They will not help the American people. All they want is money like the CEOs at the insurance companies. Let’s fight this one and we will win Democrats.
Posted by: patty | August 8, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Demorats come on all the boards every day and proclaim how we need reform and NONE can tell you anything about the bill. How it will reduce costs? No one knows. How it will insure everyone No one knows. OH and guess what the CBO discredits most of the claims and they read the BILL. Party over country? Isnt that the dumbest thing ever? Many democrats are NOT for HR3200 and the LEFT cant deal with it.
1) Offer pooling.
2) Offer health care across state lines
3) Mandate health insurance purchased like life insurance. this will fix the costs.
These DONT cost the taxpayer a dime and help to reduce the costs and improve the availability but thats not the point is it?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
So far, it seems there are several failures in the bill.
The CBO predicts that the deficit will rise substantially and escalate rapidly after ten years. Congress should plan ahead and resolve the issue before it gets to a crisis point.
President Obama has often blamed the previous administration for the current problems, rather then considering that decades of Congressional laws had more effect then the past administration, and Congress has ignored it for decades.
Yet, he is creating a big mess for future administrations and future generations.
They need to plan ahead, and let us know how this is going to be controlled now.
The bill does not lower costs in health care, which was one of the main reasons for it.
Nonresidents will not have to buy insurance or pay penalties and or taxes if they fail to buy it. However, we will continue to provide health care for them as needed.
If a nonresident alien, illegal or legal has access to health care, which they will of course, they should have health insurance rather then burdening us with uninsured health care costs.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Here’s a radical idea: Get employers and government out of health care. Put the money back in our salaries and we’ll buy our own. Government assistance for the disabled and elderly.
Posted by: TooLogical | August 8, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Mj, you mean the Medicaid recipients who in one breath scream “don’t you dare touch my Medicaid” and then in the next breath scream “NO SOCIALIZED medicine?” Are you referring to those people?
Posted by: Reality Check | August 8, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Posted by: mj | Aug 8, 2009 12:21:56 PM
Not only that but one member of Congress said, ‘what are they doing at a Democrat Town Hall.”—– Well excuse me, do you only represent Democrats in your district?—-
The guy has even gone so far as to require proof that your a Democrat to participate in his phone in town hall, he won’t even have a public debate.
And for the president to act like he only represents the people that voted for him, I got news, it was barely over 50% of a lower than usual turnout for a presidential election.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“Here is all anyone needs to know about Obama flag@whitehouse.gov
YES if people disagree you collect their information. Have your neighbor SPY on you. Stalin would be so proud.”
Didn’t they include an option for prospective informants who DON’T use computers?
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I saw the “protests” on the news. The people protesting at the town halls worried that health care reform will cut Medicare and Medicaid benefits. In other words, they don’t want the gov’t to interfere with their gov’t benefits. Obviously the irony of this was totally lost on these individuals.
Posted by: incog-nito | August 8, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
It seems that Fox has released all its Sean-sheep and commanded them to do the insurance companies’ bidding. Actually, maybe they have a point about this socialism thing: clearly the “socialist” system that is our public education is failing Americans terribly when they so easily get manipulated by fact-free demagoguery.
Posted by: AmericanPatriot | August 8, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
It is getting very sad when a former Vice-Presidential candidate can come out with mean-spirited lies, like Obama wanting to appoint bureaucrats to decide if her son should live, and she is not ridiculed by liberal and conservative alike.
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
President Obama and the Democrats deny your statements.
Shall we not trust the President and Democrats to? Shall we only trust you?
According to them it will not put health insurance companies out of business.
Most American’s do not want government run insurance, so if as you say that is what will happen, Congress should not pass it.
The “medical bankruptcies” are often touted as an example of why we need a single payer option, but I’ve read the reports and considered the data the reports were based upon.
The resolution to medical bankruptcies, are the same as many other bankruptcies, teaching responsible financial behavior, and budgeting.
Patty commented:
Who are behind this? The insurance companies are. They know if there is a public option in place, the insurance companies will go out of business because they will not be able to compete with the government. Well, that is what we need. Lower premiums. Now people cannot afford to buy health insurance because it is so expensive. The American people are filing for bankruptcy because they cannot continue paying monthly high insurance premiums. The CEOs at the insurance companies deny claims because they put money in their pockets. But who suffers? The American people do even though they have been paying for years their monthly insurance premiums. Enough, let’s fix this problems. If the Democrats have to do it without the Republicans, so be it. We did the same with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. The Republicans did not help. President Barack Obama was elected to fix this problem. That is a mandate. Democrats go and fight this one. Do not trust the Republicans. They will not help the American people. All they want is money like the CEOs at the insurance companies. Let’s fight this one and we will win Democrats.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
If a nonresident alien, illegal or legal has access to health care, which they will of course, they should have health insurance rather then burdening us with uninsured health care costs.
winz >>>> WE have money to isure them but not SEND them back to where they came from? WOW another PRO law breaking administration.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
“What is the difference between public education and public option (health care)?”
One big difference is that so far public education hasn’t been scaled down to ten million people, as the phony-baloney “public option” — slated to disappear altogether — has.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
well, it is a bit disengenuous for the president to say ‘you can keep your health insurance if you like it.’ The likelihood is that having a government alternative health plan will cause the cost of existing insurance plans to increase at an even higher rate than they would if nothing is done, making it impossible to keep one’s plan even if they like it.
Posted by: jbarrer | August 8, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Have you read the bill?
I have. In as much as Palin’s statements suggested it could lead to that, the bill does seem to have that as a possibility.
There are not enough controls on the Secretary, Committe, and other buerocrats, and little to none accountability.
jock59801 commented:
It is getting very sad when a former Vice-Presidential candidate can come out with mean-spirited lies, like Obama wanting to appoint bureaucrats to decide if her son should live, and she is not ridiculed by liberal and conservative alike.
jock59801
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
I saw the “protests” on the news. The people protesting at the town halls worried that health care reform will cut Medicare and Medicaid benefits. In other words, they don’t want the gov’t to interfere with their gov’t benefits. Obviously the irony of this was totally lost on these individuals.
Posted by: incog-nito …………… About like a pack of elitists, demonizing those other elitists, and them buying into that.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
clearly the “socialist” system that is our public education is failing Americans terribly when they so easily get manipulated by fact-free demagoguery. AmericanPatriot >>>> AGREED
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Independent here. Yesterday I heard Obama speaking in Virginia where he told the crowd that he doesn’t mind cleaning up after the Repubs but he doesn’t want to hear them talk. I would like to suggest that all people interested in the health care reform are Americans, regardless of what the Demos are now saying. If the Demos can’t discuss the health care issues with others, then they do not need to govern.
Posted by: roger king | August 8, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
YES if people disagree you collect their information. Have your neighbor SPY on you. Stalin would be so proud.”
The Bush administration said exactly the same thing. Were you complaining then?
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
There is one primary reason that the GOP is against health care reform. Their wealthy dollars afford the best health care their money can buy. Beyond that, most (and honestly, not all) just don’t care about the “lower classes.” As part of the middle class with a good job and great health insurance, I am still tired of rich, old, straight white men (and yes, I’m white) telling me what’s best for me and what’s good for the country through their ivory tower lens. There would have been no Katrina debacle had the hurricane hit a rich enclave like West Palm Beach. Bush and the GOP would have seen to it that help was immediate, expansive and complete. Rush Limbaugh and others looked down their noses at those who lost everything in Katrina: everyone should have cashed in several hundred shares of their Exxon stock, got in their BMW’s and gotten out. I bring this up only to highlight the way the majority of the GOP views every issue from health care to war to social justice to recovering the economy. To them, what is good for the rich and the corporate just HAS to be good for everyone else. How arrogant, narrow and lame.
Posted by: Lee | August 8, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The Bush administration said exactly the same thing. Were you complaining then? jock59801 >>>>>> YES I was
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Posted by: incog-nito | Aug 8, 2009 12:36:44 PM
The real irony is that here you have proof if you are already on the govt. dole, you have no say in what will happen, period, if they cut your benefits, tough, for seniors especially since they are not allowed to switch to private insurance, at least in my state.
That is govt. control in a nutshell.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
roger king
At least he didn’t claim that they weren’t real Americans, like Sarah Palin, Bill, O’Reilly, and a large number of posters on here do about liberals.
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
When President Obama was running for office a man who had wrote a book about him was on a Chicago radio station discussing the book. What happened? Emails flew out instructing callers to the show to disrupt it. Who sent the emails? No need to ask. Was that an organized response?
In an effort to protect representatives from being grilled by the folks back home the response from who knows where was given to send the unions in and in fact union members were given seats inside while the rest stood outside. Who organized this?
The right to voice an opinion is our right, the right to counter is also our right. Spokesman Gibbs and speaker Nancy are being disingenious in saying that this is solely an effort of big companies. We who want to know more, who want them to reform it but reform it in a way that doesn’t hand control of our healthcare to government hands, are asking questions and we deserve the truth, no more or no less.
Posted by: david | August 8, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I haven’t seen freedom loving Americans this energized and patriotic since 9/11.
Maybe it took a president as radical and controlling as Obama to wake us up. To make us appreciate freedom of speech and freedom of choice and privacy.
For those of us that hate big government that sticks their nose into our lives–and loathe a president that thinks he knows everything and knows what is best for us
We have to keep our eye on the goal of taking our country back in 2010/2012.
Posted by: riley | August 8, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
If the Demos can’t discuss the health care issues with others, then they do not need to govern. roger king>>> Thats not governing thats Royalty telling the surfs what kind of garbage they are willing to bestow on you peasants. ENOUGH with King Obama and the Royal Democratic Court of Pelosi and Reid with the Court jesters like Franks and Dodd. They work for the people. You can do a LOT to change this. You can throw them out on their sorry behinds. THIS IS YOUR JOB as citizens to do everything possible to toss out these fools.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“The Bush administration said exactly the same thing. Were you complaining then?”
Yes. Bush was a mediocre president and set into play some very dangerous precedents. Obama has gone one BIG step farther in asking the American people to rat on their neighbors, families and co-workers.
Question: If labor unions health care decided by collective bargaining is opted out of the health care overhaul, why is the SEIU sending purple shirted goons to town halls?
Posted by: Blue Skies | August 8, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
At least he didn’t claim that they weren’t real Americans jock59801 >>>> No they send out thugs to beat them. Thats what the good ole boy Democrats do.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
“The resolution to medical bankruptcies, are the same as many other bankruptcies, teaching responsible financial behavior, and budgeting.”
Does that include the “bankruptcy” of the US government, for which Geithner was begging Congress, only yesterday, to extend the debt?
Many Americans — millions upon millions of them, each of whom is, or will be, in need of medical care — are now far below the upper-middle-class game of “bankruptcy”.
Hothouse hustler Obama hasn’t QUITE denounced poverty as the result of “bad behavior”, but He’s come close, and — barring impeachment for playing fast and loose with the Treasury — has a couple of years of stupid opinions yet to be delivered.
Shoring up the well-employed, as their ranks thin by thousands a day, and ignoring what’s going on beyond the suburbs, is just dumb. Cash for Clunkers — benefitting the same group — is about as good an example of official idiocy, aside from the “insurance reform” scam, as one could wish.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
We are the richest nation on the planet, I think we can afford to take care of all the people in this country. There is enough abundance to share with everyone. The government programs are in place to help those who are under served. I have lived in the State of Montana for 10 years. I have not been able to afford health insurance since I moved here and there are very few small businesses that can afford to provide health insurance to their employees. I now am in a job that offers benefits, but I have to wait 90 days (which is reasonable). However, I fractured my foot within one week of starting that job. Now I face extraordinary bills and everyone wants cash up front. I make too much to qualify for any programs or even a sliding scale. I am one of those that is caught in the middle. I work very hard and I pay all my bills, but this situation can put me in a very precarious position financially. You get squeezed from both ends. It is also interesting to experience how you are treated by various medical providers when you don’t have health insurance – it is quite amazing. We all know this country needs health care reform and I believe a health discussion is warranted – brings about out of the box ideas. We all need to step out of our fear and chose what is BEST for ALL.
Posted by: kathy | August 8, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
“Yes. Bush was a mediocre president and set into play some very dangerous precedents. Obama has gone one BIG step farther in asking the American people to rat on their neighbors, families and co-workers.”………. Bush wanted to easedrop on all phonecalls, etc. but this is worse? ALL THIS IS is “to help me stop the bogus lies let me know what they are.” Considering how bad it’s gotten off the GOP I can’t exactly blame the man for trying to nip it.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Blue Skies I agree. This is NUTS. Obama should be impeached for this action and so several members of congress as well.
Isnt this inciting a riot?
White House to Democrats: ‘Punch back twice as hard’
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
White House to Democrats: ‘Punch back twice as hard’
Obama the great divider!!
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
The task of explaining the complex health care reform plan is difficult. Expecting the health care reform plan being executed or enforced by government in an orderly efficient way is even more difficult. Overall the American people are fair and open to new ideas but if the job of explaining a plan truthfully and clearly is not done, there is going to be confusion and anxiety and those with vested interests like Palin, making up stories, are going to add fuel to the fire of the legitimate concerns that people have. After 8 years of lost confidence in government, it will not be an easy task restoring credibility that the government can work and do things efficiently for the people. Shoving down costly new plans without simplifying the key features of the plan is bound to cause an outrage. When tax payer bailed out banks and institutions give away bonuses in the millions and fly fancy private jets and deficits mount closer to 12 trillion, don’t expect we the patriotic people just sit and say hail to the president.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | August 8, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
“When President Obama was running for office a man who had wrote a book about him was on a Chicago radio station discussing the book. What happened? Emails flew out instructing callers to the show to disrupt it. Who sent the emails? No need to ask. Was that an organized response?”
Not to worry: when the ACTUAL Mob does it, it’s okay.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
“if they cut your benefits, tough, for seniors especially since they are not allowed to switch to private insurance, at least in my state.”……. I do not believe there is any law claiming one MUST sign up for Medicare. Whatsoever.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
The very word option is misleading, pol tested I am sure. Where is the option for those on Medicare, there is none? They are forced into the govt. system, barred from buying private insurance even if they can afford it and would rather have it. They can buy supplemental but I have seen nothing in these bills that will allow Americans to do the same if they don’t like the so called ‘option.’. In Europe they offer supplemental for those who don’t like the public system.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Posted by: Secondlook | Aug 8, 2009 12:59:29 PM
In Pennsylvania no one offers coverage for seniors, so they are in effect forced into the system. Whether this is true for every state I don’t know.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
kathy >>> The current democratic rammed bills are no good. The ideas to make a better system exist and they dont cost anything. Whats the problem? I can tell you the problem is the objective is not to fix anything. If fixing this was the point they would listen to the CBO. Take the good ideas they agree on like allowing for state pooling to reduce costs and pass them. Instead they want to ram a public option down your throat. And after the messed up cash for clunkers program you think this 1100 page junk full of spending is going
to fix anything? Really do you believe that? Did you read any of it? If you did you would be in shock at the junk in it.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Ferrari – They don’t offer insurance to them because they are entirely too expensive to make money off of. I am 50 and starting to get this. It’s not that it’s illegal. If they did offer it most could not afford the premium.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
ChicagoBob
I agree that some of the bills are not very good, but not because they have a public option, but because some do NOT have a public option. Without a public option, we will continue to be at the mercy of profit-seeking insurance companies. I really don’t understand why people are defending he current system.
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Bet Noir: “Obama hasn’t QUITE denounced poverty as the result of “bad behavior”, but He’s come close…”
“Are you kidding? This is the CONSERVATIVE mantra. “We shouldn’t be giving poor people any of our hard-earned money because they are too lazy to work.”
–> Obama IS conservative — not quite a Republican, but not much of a Democrat.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
You hear it from the Obama haters on here all the time. jock59801 >>>>> Yeah I hear the koolaid drinkers all the time. No facts just words like haters and Republicans are evil. Funny in Chicago I think the same thing of Democrats like Blago who was strong arming a Childrens Cancer hospital for campaign funds. How is that for a model Democrat that Obama campaigned for?
Cheap shots help no one. You have not read the bill and probably are paid to post. Obama was great at doing that during the campaign.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Many people do not realize it but government regulations severely penalize seniors who wish to keep their private health insurance, rather than enrolling in Medicare Part A, the government hospital insurance program, upon turning age 65. Little-known administrative policies adopted by the government in 1993 and strengthened in 2002 say that seniors can’t refuse Part A coverage unless they give up their Social Security benefits. Adding insult to injury, once enrolled in the program, the only way seniors can withdraw from it is to repay all Social Security benefits they received, as well as any hospitalization benefits Medicare paid on their behalf.
Medicare was not intended to be forced upon seniors. When Medicare was created in 1965, Congress promised that the program would not interfere with seniors’ freedom to purchase and use private health insurance. That law, which remains unchanged, clearly says that “nothing contained in this title shall be construed to preclude … any individual from purchasing or otherwise securing, protection against the cost of any health services.” Yet, over the years the program has been regulated into becoming more of a trap than a safety net.Former federal employee Brian Hall and four other plaintiffs in Hall v. Leavitt, a lawsuit filed this past October, have asked the courts to strike down the government’s arbitrary and improper policies. The plaintiffs aren’t asking the government to refund the taxes they paid during their working years to finance Medicare. They simply want the right to say no to an entitlement “benefit” they don’t want; they want the right to make their own health care choices and pay for what they want; and they want their Social Security benefits without being forced into Medicare.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
OUTLANDISH? HOW SO – LOTS OF BS BY LEFT, BUT THEY ARE UNABLE TO DEBATE IN-DEPH ISSUE BY ISSUE. OPTION? WHAT OPTION? HOW CAN THE PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES COMPETE AGAINST THE POWER OF THE FED. I WOULD GIVE THEM TWO YEARS MAX TO REMAIN ALIVE. THEN MILLIONS TO LOSE JOBS – AND THEN THERE WOULD BE “NO OPTION” DUH!!
Posted by: Manitu | August 8, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
jock59801 >>> The public option is fools gold. It looks like gold but isnt real.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
People will say anything to scare others out of their wits about anything Obama does or says.Where were all the fearmongers when Bush was in office?If he messes up,don’t vote for him again,that’s your right.I don’t have any idea what Hannity,Rush.Dobbs,O’Reilly,Susteren and the nut Beck(who needs to be admitted in a mental institution)will have to talk about on their show when Obama is out of office.Until then I think a couple of them may have a nervous breakdown if they are not careful.
Posted by: imjustnoisy | August 8, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
This law does have that requirement in it. You must file for medicare and recieve it at the age you are eligible or in case of certain other instances.
There is also a requirement to be on VA health care if eligible.
The above is based on my reading the bill.
Posted by: Secondlook
“if they cut your benefits, tough, for seniors especially since they are not allowed to switch to private insurance, at least in my state.”……. I do not believe there is any law claiming one MUST sign up for Medicare. Whatsoever.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Lee, i read with interest you claim that we “rich, old, white, straight guys” not caring about the ‘lower class’. That is a very interesting observation. Gleaned from what source. I’m not easily offended, but you just managed to offend me. I’m old, I’m white, well off, and straight. And for the past 2 and a half years, my old, white, straight wife and I have been giving up our vacation time and travelling to the gulf coast to help rebuild katrina damage. We are in no way compensated (except for tax deductions for our expenses), but are more richly rewarded than you can imagine. And you know what? The Gulf Coast, from Pascagoula to Wavelend is FILLED with old white straight rich guys that are donating their time and money. The horrible Christians are down there with their various churches. The Amish are there in their humble ways. You know what I have NOT seen? I have not seen the self proclaimed atheists that complain about the christians. I see few minority groups down there. And the ones that are there are pretty much conservative, giving people. Can’t afford the time to give up? How about money? These old white rich guys sure have given a lot. Why do you liberals insist on demonizing wealth? Why is success of whites such a big deal? I have yet to hear any one of you whine about Oprah’s BILLIONS, or the unrealistic salaries in the NBA. Julius Peppers makes over 1.3 MILLION dollas a game. Even if he sits on the bench. (Don’t get me wrong…i admire the athletes. But why is their success not vilified?) I think you talk of something you know nothing about. Sounds like you want something for nothing…and think you deserve part of my earnings and/or savings
Posted by: NCPilot09 | August 8, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Secondlook >>>> Wow that was a useless response. What do you want to say? Do you have any facts that contradict the CBO assesment? No? Then you must have read the bill and can tell me how page 16 wont destroy the current health insurance system. You can explain why ILLEGAL pay for clinics are poping up in Canada. And maybe you explain why TORT reform isnt in any legislation to reduce the cost. How about a way to get more doctors. Democrats and their blind support is a joke. Just blind name calling like kids in the back of a classroom. Useless bable.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I DON’T GET IT? WHY DOESN’T THE FED TRY TO FIND WAYS TO FIX THE CURRENT HEALTH SYSTEM FIRST?? DOESN’T THAT MAKE MORE SENSE? MOST OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM ISN’T BROKEN.” WHY TRASH THE WHOLE THING??
Posted by: Manitu | August 8, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
My point is if they are going to be getting the health care anyhow I would rather have them paying as much as we have to for it.
I do agree we should send them back, even better, the government needs to stop enabling them entering the country in the first place and enabling employers to easily avoid our laws.
There needs to be huge penalites on both the employer and them if they fail to buy health insurance for them though. Otherwise, we end up footing the bill.
I can assure you as long as we foot the bill, the government and employers, and other open border groups will continue to allow them in and do as little as possible about deportation, and they will pass an amnesty bill.
winz >>> If a nonresident alien, illegal or legal has access to health care, which they will of course, they should have health insurance rather then burdening us with uninsured health care costs.
ChicagoBob >>>> WE have money to isure them but not SEND them back to where they came from? WOW another PRO law breaking administration.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I DON’T GET IT? WHY DOESN’T THE FED TRY TO FIND WAYS TO FIX THE CURRENT HEALTH SYSTEM FIRST?? Manitu >>>> You know why. Its not about fixing anything. Its about control, power and spending.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
There is a new post up from Jake which exposes confusion about what the Pres actually negotiated, and told the country in June, about a deal with drug companies to lower prices as a significant part of Health Care reform. Look no further than this type of thing to understand why citizens are no longer as willing to merely take the Pres at his word without backup and fully fleshed out bills. Sometimes when people are paranoid there’s a REASON to be paranoid. Like it or not, the WH has unintentionally created this environment for rumors and fears to flourish– because for all his face-time the credibility is being lost.
Posted by: Croation | August 8, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
imjustnoisy, the fear mongers were there when Bush was in office. It’s just that they were shouting from YOUR side of the field. And chief among them was the man that became president. He was the main fear mongerer. Even afte elected and sworn in he continued to use fear to get his agenda passed thru. Remember him saying about the stimulus bill, “Every day this is delayed, 10,000 jobs will be lost!” (FEAR). The interesting thing about that, though, is that when congress presented him with the bill on a Wednesday, he put off signing it until the following Monday so he could get prime time. So, by his own fear mongering figures, he, his narcissistic self cost this country an additional 50,000 jobs. He’s trying the same words with this bill. “If we don’t pass it by August, so many more jobs will be lost. The economy will not recover”. (fear mongering). So don’t think that your guys don’t do the same. It’s just that you guys hold the GOP to such a higher standard. IF there is fear mongering from this side, you squeal like a stuck pig. From your side? “Oh, well, it’s free speech.”
Posted by: NCPilot09 | August 8, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
DESPERATION? WHEN ALL THE LIBS CAN BLOG ON AN ISSUE = BUSH AND CONS TALK SHOW HOSTS INSTEAD OF DEBATING THE ISSUES…. IT’S ABOUT OVER.
Posted by: Manitu | August 8, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
“Little-known administrative policies adopted by the government in 1993 and strengthened in 2002 say that seniors can’t refuse Part A coverage unless they give up their Social Security benefits”……. Do you know the names of these?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
ChicagoBob, you are right. And Obama (well his administration) has proven time and time again that they have the power to make liberals feel like victims. Once they become victims, the administration defines the villains (me and you perhaps). It’s called class warfare, and it has been used by liberal governments the world over. That is exactly how Chavez got in power. Che Guevera, the same way. All this cry about the health care system being horribly broken. It’s not. It could use some improvement, but it’s not broken. Many in here shout it’s horrors. Few can give any personal anecdotes to back their claim. The horrors always happen to “a friend” or a “distant relative”, etc….And when asked in several polls, over 3/4 of them say, yeah, the health care system in broken, but i’m satisfied with my provider. Kinda wierd, huh? Obama’s playing them like fiddles
Posted by: NCPilot09 | August 8, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Secondlook >>>> Wow that was a useless response. What do you want to say? Do you have any facts that contradict the CBO assesment? No? Then you must have read the bill and can tell me how page 16 wont destroy the current health insurance system. You can explain why ILLEGAL pay for clinics are poping up in Canada. And maybe you explain why TORT reform isnt in any legislation to reduce the cost. How about a way to get more doctors. Democrats and their blind support is a joke. Just blind name calling like kids in the back of a classroom. Useless bable.
Posted by: ChicagoBob ………. Bob, when you take note that a huge EXPANSION took place in 2003 maybe we can have a real conversation. In the meantime? Why are we discussing the Canadia system when that isn’t even what this is?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
This is “he said, she said” journalism of the worst sort. Saying something like ‘what he called “outlandish rumors” ‘ implies that it is his opinion and a reasonable person might disagree.
The ‘euthenasia’ claim is outlandish, in an objective sense. It can be proven wrong with the precision of a natural science.
Likewise the fact that the ‘cut Medicaid’ claim is false is provable.
Finally, the “put government in charge of health care” claim is objectively misleading.
You may have legitimate problems with the legislation, I know I do. But this is just purposely muddying the waters.
Since you get paid, since you studied the discipline in college, we must assume that you know exactly what you are doing.
The question is why? I don’t want to try to read your mind or speculate on your motivations. What we do know is that given the above, the motivation is not to inform your readers about the truthfulness of Obama’s or his opponents’ claims.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 8, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I can read and I read the bill. The only disinformation is the lies that are coming from the White House about what is in the bill.
Posted by: dlc | August 8, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Until all American’s can receive a “respectable” education, up and to collegiate level… Until all American’s can receive the benefit of equal care under our medical system… Until all American’s are guaranteed equal access to the foundations and fundamentals necessary for a good life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Until those things are accomplished, we should stop calling our nation the greatest nation on the face of the Earth.
The truth is that we’re not. We have the potential to be the greatest nation on Earth, but we’ve got a ways to go before we can claim that mantle.
There are a lot of selfish people in this world, in this nation, and from the blog postings here they have no shame. To care for the plight of your fellow man is Christ-like. Yet, here, I see no Christian values. Only envy, greed, and selfishness.
Jesus would weep, to see that this is what has become of his followers.
All people have the right to see a doctor when they’re sick without fear of going broke. As Christians, we all have a moral and faith based obligation to see to it that this is done.
And yes, it means that we all have to chip in. The same way that we donate in church, the same way that we volunteer our time to help those less fortunate. We do this as a tenant of our faith, and because we pray that others will look as kindly upon us in our hour of need.
Our lord god, placed us upon this Earth to serve his will, and through his will we help one another.
Anyone on this blog who’s forgotten these things needs to really take a moment, read your bible, and pray for forgiveness.
Do this, before you lose your way.
Posted by: DogInDaHunt2 | August 8, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
“This is “he said, she said” journalism of the worst sort. Saying something like ‘what he called “outlandish rumors” ‘ implies that it is his opinion and a reasonable person might disagree.”
For some outlandish dissembling from Oblabla, see the new thread, “What Did The White House Know About the PhRMA Deal?”
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Nonsense. The claims are neither “outlandish” or “misleading” . . . all you must do is read and understand H.R. 3200 to debunk that claim. Obama has either not read the house resolution; is lying; or, simply supports this frightening socialist manifesto.
Posted by: rplat | August 8, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
It’s time for Obama and his personal agenda and that of the liberal left to learn what Lincoln said “You can’t fool all the people all of the time”!
The Representatives should have their town meeting and public gatherings and hear what their citizens think. Keeping the conversation low key and quiet is to their advantage, as it is to the Chinese, Iran and used to be to Iraq and even Germany in the late 1930s!
Posted by: US Citizen | August 8, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Posted by: DogInDaHunt2 | Aug 8, 2009 1:39:17 PM
“All people have the right to see a doctor when they’re sick without fear of going broke.”—–
Where is that written, not even God promises you a life without fear of consequence. No one has a right to anything but life but somehow that fact gets conveniently lost and if you are out to quote the bible, Jesus said live as free men, he didn’t go our proclaiming that the Roman Empire had a duty to give everyone what they wanted but you with your free will should.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I read that Obamahasn’t read the full bill. If so, how can he make any comments on what is factual in it?
Posted by: BJ | August 8, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Ferrarri…let’s be fair now. Kerry’s money WAS dirty for a while. That was back before it was his money. Back when it was his wife’s money, when she was a white republican, married to Senator Heinz. Then the Honorable Sen Heinz was killed in an airplane crash, the money became Theresa’s. She met Kerry, fell in love, became a democrat, and the money became suddenly “clean”. I bet it was touched by His hands.
Posted by: NCPilot09 | August 8, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
imjustnoisy said: ” . . . People will say anything to scare others out of their wits about anything Obama does or says.Where were all the fearmongers when Bush was in office?If he messes up,don’t vote for him again,that’s your right.”.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Read H.R. 3200 and then determine if you care to adjust your attitude. If you are too lazy or ignorant to do that, then you deserve the fate that is about to befall you.
Posted by: rplat | August 8, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Posted by: DogInDaHunt2 | Aug 8, 2009 1:39:17 PM
I would also argue that from the time of Genesis everything that God has said is based on the premise of free will and choice.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
“Outlandish rumors”?
Like Obama suggesting that that a 99 year old woman take a blue pill instead of get a pacemaker?
That would have killed the woman.
Health care would be dictated by the likes of Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and Chris Dodd.
Barack Obama knows his words are false. ANY plan put forth now is but a stepping stone to complete government control of health care.
Posted by: drjohn | August 8, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Posted by: NCPilot09 | Aug 8, 2009 1:50:25 PM Good memory!
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
ANY health care plan that does not Obama, his family and ALL current and past members of Congress should NEVER be passed.
Posted by: drjohn | August 8, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
There is nothing done to stop either insuring or paying for their health care either way.
They are specificially excluded from paying penalties or taxes if they don’t have insurance, as are all nonresident aliens.
Another words, they don’t have to get it, but if they need it we will pay.
Personally, I think they should have to pay for insurance irregardless of their income or else their employer should be fined the whole amount of costs of care, cost of insurance, and all legal fees.
But that is because until we make it tough on both business and government they are going to work together against us on the illegal alien issue.
For those claiming the Republicans are misleading us,
does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens?
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Bob, when you take note that a huge EXPANSION took place in 2003 maybe we can have a real conversation.Secondlook>>> What expansion are you talking about? The GDP which is a GOOD thing. We reached unemployment numbers that economists said were impossible. And that should tell you what they know. Expansion because Bush was a weak knee’d man who gave into the democratic bashing that the republicans were cold hearted and giving into Medicare prescription drug coverage? You mean that deficit?
You mean that expansion ?
More worthless spouting off.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Read H.R. 3200 and then determine if you care to adjust your attitude. If you are too lazy or ignorant to do that, then you deserve the fate that is about to befall you. rplat >>>>> I agree and if you are too lazy to do that STOP posting you fools. At least read part of it. The bill is aweful.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
I would have guessed you for a person that regularly visited the left sites.
They are of the view that it is single payer or will lead to it.
It is well known that this is meant to lead to a single payer plan. Democrat leaders and their supporting gropus have indeed “promised” it.
Obama trying to say it doesn’t now is just him being a politician.
*************************************
Secondlook >>>> This is where we discuss “desires” vs. “reality.” See, I desire world peace but that will never happen. I desire the GOP to dial it down a dang notch because they are going to get somebody killed. Won’t happen. So, in a nutshell? Obama can “desire” all he wants and that in NO WAY implies it will become a reality because of a little thing called congress and writing legislation. Next we can discuss how the GOP is playing you people.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Here is a great idea to get something passed. FIX the current system first. Then let me know if you need another system. If you can not fix whats wrong with this system then you are too STUPID to create another system.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Nonsense. The claims are neither “outlandish” or “misleading” . . . all you must do is read and understand H.R. 3200 to debunk that claim. Obama has either not read the house resolution; is lying; or, simply supports this frightening socialist manifesto.
Posted by: rplat | Aug 8, 2009 1:46:35PM ******************** I have perused the bill and I don’t interpret many of the things the way some do. For instance, the “death panel” doesn’t exist. It just gives people the right to make their own end of life decisions. It offers you the choice of having your doctor explain your options, which in my area, already happens. The worry that the government will have access to all your financial dealings, that already exists in the form of the IRS. However, one area I don’t agree with is mandating that small businesses provide insurance to even part-time employees or face penalties. This bill is simply for those that can’t afford health insurance, but make too much to qualify for Medicaid (welfare). Those that have insurance, can keep it. Insurance companies are already making decisions about whether you get treatment or not every day.
Posted by: akskimo | August 8, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
“does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens?”
It sure does.
You will be forced to compete with illegal aliens for health care.
Posted by: drjohn | August 8, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
I am really starting to LOATHE all Republicans and hope they all die!!!!! Debbie Curnes <<<<< A mature and informed opinion from a fool. You haven't read the bill either have you?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
If single payer is the goal, I don’t see any reason why people can’t be mandated to purchase private insurance, subsidize the poor, lift restrictions that bar competition like shopping across state lines, end employer based coverage (can you imagine the hiring that would happen then), there is no reason that private insurance can’t be highly regulated and the cost driven down like auto insurance. Even force all govt. recipients into the private system, the govt. doesn’t pay for anyone’s auto insurance. I also see no reason why there isn’t forced modernization and standardization to help lower costs. In essence there is no reason that I can see why this can’t happen within the private system while still allowing choice.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“Those that have insurance, can keep it.”
That’s a canard. Obama is flat out lying when he says that. He has no intention of abiding by that statement. He jerked doctors around with reimbursement fees and played them with tort statements.
Obama cannot be trusted with the health of the nation.
Posted by: drjohn | August 8, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Why is it democrats want to destroy all thats good and bring people down. They never create anything that brings people up. Welfare. Remember that great idea? Kept people in poverty for decades. Tore families apart. Another failed program.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
I also see no reason why there isn’t forced modernization and standardization to help lower costs. In essence there is no reason that I can see why this can’t happen within the private system while still allowing choice. Ferrari5858>>>>> You going to start labor camps? Maybe you need to drive people into barb wired fenced areas to FORCE them to do what you want. We can just print more money since it will be worthless. You have any idea whats in the constitution?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The reason, ChicagoBob, is that the more people they can force into government dependency the more secure their political jobs are.
Posted by: Publius | August 8, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
“Outlandish rumors”?
Like Obama suggesting that that a 99 year old woman take a blue pill instead of get a pacemaker?Posted by: drjohn | Aug 8, 2009 1:54:05 PM******************* Yes, that is outlandish!! Actually they were talking about a 100 year old woman. Sometimes, no matter the age, pills would be better than surgery because if you are not in good health maybe the surgery would kill you. (excerpt from Politifact on ABC’s June 24 special hosted by Gibson and Sawyer talking about a 100 year old person)”Maybe this isn’t going to help. Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller. And those kinds of decisions between doctors and patients, and making sure that our incentives are not preventing those good decisions, and that — that doctors and hospitals all are aligned for patient care, that’s something we can achieve.” Sometimes people need to read the whole article (which I did).
Posted by: akskimo | August 8, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
No one can dispute that the bills being proposed all carry government (taxpayers) funded abortion.
No one can dispute that that Obama has said in the past that he would like a single-payer system.
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“Yes, that is outlandish!! Actually they were talking about a 100 year old woman. Sometimes, no matter the age, pills would be better than surgery because if you are not in good health maybe the surgery would kill you.”
I am a doctor.
The woman in question did receive a pacemaker at 99 and has survived to 105 so far.
Your remark is completely ignorant. If a person is not deemed strong enough for surgery, surgery is not done, no matter what the age.
You need to come to grips with a fact: the only way to reduce health care costs is to reduce health care. It will be rationed, and Obama is absolutely dishonest about it.
Posted by: drjohn | August 8, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Posted by: ChicagoBob | Aug 8, 2009 2:09:34 PM
All I am saying is that most people don’t have a problem with being forced to buy auto insurance even Republicans. In a great world I wouldn’t require that anyone be forced to do anything but this is at least some middle ground. And I asked all of my doctors what their biggest complaint was and they all said, the endless and never the same paperwork that takes at least two hours out of their day, from Medicare to private insurance. Is it too much to ask that one form be sufficient instead of twenty different forms to try to end this simple problem which they say is costing time and money?
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
If you have a doctor under your employer’s plan and your employer drops that plan, are your guaranteed to keep your doctor?
Posted by: deanbob | August 8, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Both parties in D.C. need to put their units back in their trousers and retreat from the quest for control of the American people. I think Americans finally see that HR3200 really does nothing to help the average American. It is all about who gets to control the money. Hey guys, stop the greed for a while and do something for America.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
If Washington wanted to HONESTLY reform the plan, then they’d first have a blue ribbon panel to determine what’s not working. Then formulate a plan to rememdy the deficiency(ies). Have they done this?
Posted by: deanbob | August 8, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
You need to come to grips with a fact: the only way to reduce health care costs is to reduce health care. It will be rationed, and Obama is absolutely dishonest about it.
Posted by: drjohn | Aug 8, 2009 2:17:51 PM
FINALLY, Someone who gets it!
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Posted by: ChicagoBob | Aug 8, 2009 2:09:34 PM By your argument, there would be no housing codes and every other form of regulation that we currently live under, no restrictions either. I am against govt. run health care for anyone, I am also against social security, Medicare and the VA system. I am not against Medicaid but I would also rather have the govt. just send the poor a check so they can purchase their own insurance within the private system.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
So the system is an unsustainable disaster, but you can keep your piece of it if you want. And the Democrats wonder why selling health-care reform to the public has been so hard?”
Ramesh Ponnuru in Time magazine
And he wonders why Americans don’t buy that tossing more Government into the mix will make the problem go away?
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
There are no successful socialized healthcare programs. Why should we jeopardize what we have. We just need tort reform!
Posted by: KD | August 8, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Briefly:
1) Our nation is BROKE. We have no money for this.
2) It’s funny how many people are willing to spend $65 billion dollars per year… because health care costs too much. If that doesn’t deserve an “LOL”, I don’t know what does.
3) Every economist on the earth knows that this plan will cause the cost of private health insurance to rise. So, sure, you can keep your private plan if you’d like… just know that it’s going to soon cost a fortune (at which time you will run to the government plan).
4) No one in America complained about health care costs prior to 1973. That was when the government mandated that our insurance companies cover every health illness and procedure under the sun. Our government continues to attempt to fix their mistakes by making new and bigger mistakes. As mentioned above, Obama’s plan will increase the cost of private insurance. Don’t be surprised if they socialize the entire system 10 years from now in order to “fix” another problem that they have created.
Posted by: Dave | August 8, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
We just need tort reform!
And term limits on elected officials. Why should we have to pay life-long retirement and health care benefits for politicians.
My view of the Constitution is that it’s framers intended representation “by the people” to be more like jury duty and less like “grab all the gold you can while you are there”.
Don’t hear any of the 374 lawyers talking about tort reform or term limits, do ya?
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 8, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I would like to tell people what it is like to be one of the 47 million uninsured (PS-I hope ABC does a news story on us).
Colon Cancer runs in my family. The best prevention of this deadly disease is to have a colonscopy. Colonscopys are recommended every three years for high risk individuals.
In March of 2009, I contacted the Saint Louis County Health Department about getting a colonscopy. It had been five years since I had one. “Indigent Care” is rationed by the County of Saint Louis-not all the uninsured are eligable. They said that I would need a letter from my employer stating my income.
When I contacted my employer,the City of Saint Louis (Metro Transit),they refused to write the letter. They even refused when I stated that this was for needed medical care and required by the County of Saint Louis. Finally, under threat of lawsuit they wrote the letter. The next day they fired me!
When I told my story to my Republican friend,he laughed and said,”Don’t you know we Republicans believe in euthanasia of the poor and uninsured?” I laughed at the time but now when I see these teabagers it doesn’t seem so funny!
Posted by: One of 47 Million | August 8, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
What information is there that shows that government controlled health care and health insurance in this country, is more cost effective, considering as many pertinent details as feasible, then private health care and health insurance?
The studies I have found, those that considered more then the surface factors anyhow, show the opposite. That private care is more cost effective, especially considering that they have to meet regulations and laws that the government does not have to meet.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The president said that as Congress draws close to “finalizing and passing” health insurance reform, “the defense of the status quo and …
“defense of the status quo”??? POTUS’ strawmen are getting really tiresome. Who is defending the status quo?
“Four committees in Congress have produced legislation – an unprecedented level of agreement on a difficult and complex challenge.”
Is this just bizarre reasoning (the more versions of legislation then the more agreement???) or is he just stating the obvious(there is no “level of agreement” precedent so by definition it is unprecedented).
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 8, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Insuring illegal aliens will be the political suicide of the Democrats.
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
I’d prefer my Doctor and me to discuss those issues if they occur instead of having the government sitting there with us.
Some accuse insurance companies of rationing care. The federal, state, and other groups are there to regulate the insurance companies though. The regulation for the federal governments decisions would not exist.
The government cannot do a good job of both regulating health care (including insurance), and controlling pretty much all aspects of that same health care.
drjohn >>>> “Yes, that is outlandish!! Actually they were talking about a 100 year old woman. Sometimes, no matter the age, pills would be better than surgery because if you are not in good health maybe the surgery would kill you.”
I am a doctor.
The woman in question did receive a pacemaker at 99 and has survived to 105 so far.
Your remark is completely ignorant. If a person is not deemed strong enough for surgery, surgery is not done, no matter what the age.
You need to come to grips with a fact: the only way to reduce health care costs is to reduce health care. It will be rationed, and Obama is absolutely dishonest about it.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Obama is still out there putting out the half-truth that if we want to keep our current plan and current doctor we can. Well, it will start out that way, but eventually the public plan will crowd out private plans that can’t compete because of the mandates put on them by the government, and eventually doctors will be in short supply as they retire and aren’t replaced because they won’t be paid enough to make all the education and hard work worth it. Common sense tells you that when the government subsidized plan or product competes against private ones, that is not really a true competition as public plans can be susbsidized to the lowest cost a congressman or president wants to push it. Common sense also tells you that when a doctor can’t make enough money to pay off his loans and reward the insanely long hours they work, there will be fewer of them. The rural areas will be hardest hit by a doctor shortage, but those in DC could care less.
Posted by: Jason | August 8, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
No Common Sense and Dr John, yes, and as soon as people dared to talk about reducing healthcare expenses, Glenn Beck would command to you come on here and scream about “euthenasia.” It’s so transparent it’s laughable.
Posted by: Reality Check | August 8, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Posted by: DogInDaHunt2 | Aug 8, 2009 2:40:09 PM
You just made my point, God doesn’t force you to do any of that but there are consequences.
You can choose to suffer whatever consequences that come about due to your own actions, that choice is offered by God but make no mistake it is still a choice.—–
I live near a town where ten people died in a fire, probably caused by using space heaters. Now obviously they couldn’t afford heat, does the govt. require that everyone have heat, or electricity even though it would be for the common good, no they don’t. As for these people, at some point didn’t they realize that having ten people in a house meant that they were outgrowing their ability to take care of themselves. Should someone have gone in and made them get two jobs to enable them to pay their own way or should the govt. have forced the utilities to pay for their heat or should these people have been allowed to make a choice to do for themselves the best they could even though they suffered the greatest consequence, losing their life.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 8, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Ms. Miller:
“… the president used his weekly address to debunk what he called “outlandish rumors” about what reform will mean to Americans.”
I respectfully suggest that “attempted to debunk” would be more accurate.
If I were to disregard the narrow path journalists must walk, I’d suggest that the whole sentence would more accurately read:
The president used his weekly address in yet another attempt to debunk what he calls “rumors” with the same tired, disingenuous, talking points he was already reciting before Congress even started hashing out a bill.
Posted by: JM Hanes | August 8, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
we all know it is about CONTROL, not health care. Obama wants to destroy doctor-patient privledge and wants a political henchman, who is unelected, to control a centralized database containing personal and health information of every American. This would likely contain: health history, sexual history, prescriptions, dna, bloodtype, dental records, mental health history, psychiatric records, etc.
This data is very useful in politics, for blackmail, or even in the worst case scenario for framing people.
Posted by: Ed | August 8, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens?
winz >>>> HR3200 does Not sure about all the legislation since the Senate isnt out of committee. Winz why cant they fix the current system first? And if this is such a great system shouldnt the President and all of congress be forced to be FIRST in line at the clinics or what ever he is mandating. And
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
“Every economist on the earth knows that this plan will cause the cost of private health insurance to rise.”
Are you trying to claim that without a public option the cost of private plans is going to stay the same or go down?? It must be news to you then that the cost of these private plans is going to skyrocket anyway.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Are you trying to claim that without a public option the cost of private plans is going to stay the same or go down?? It must be news to you then that the cost of these private plans is going to skyrocket anyway Skip >>>> So what you are telling me is we are spending over a trillion dollars for nothing. Costs will go up either way. Right Skip. If so whats the point?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
If illegal aliens are paying into a public option at least they will be contributing something to healthcare costs instead of receiving healthcare in emergency rooms and paying nothing.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
If this bill is so great, then why did they want to get it passed before anyone could read it?
Why in the world would they not want anyone to read it before it was passed?
What were they trying to hide?
Posted by: mieeek | August 8, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
It’s so transparent it’s laughable. Reality Check
What facts are you bringing to the table? Oh I forgot its not about debate or facts its about ramming a bad bill down everyone’s throat. Its about control and being a demagogue.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
If you had a job with the metro in St. Louis, why were you without health insurance?
First, I believe your story is either a downright lie, or a mistatement of some small kernel of truth.
Second, you most likely have a basis to sue your employer if that part of the story is true.
Third, your friend does not sound like a good friend or a good Republican. Perhaps you shouldn’t put so much faith in this “friends” words.
fourth, there are multiple ways to get help with healt care even in St. Louis. It does seem reasonable that they would require verification of income, perhaps you could have suggested some way other then a letter from your employer.
One of 47 Million >>>> I would like to tell people what it is like to be one of the 47 million uninsured (PS-I hope ABC does a news story on us).
Colon Cancer runs in my family. The best prevention of this deadly disease is to have a colonscopy. Colonscopys are recommended every three years for high risk individuals.
In March of 2009, I contacted the Saint Louis County Health Department about getting a colonscopy. It had been five years since I had one. “Indigent Care” is rationed by the County of Saint Louis-not all the uninsured are eligable. They said that I would need a letter from my employer stating my income.
When I contacted my employer,the City of Saint Louis (Metro Transit),they refused to write the letter. They even refused when I stated that this was for needed medical care and required by the County of Saint Louis. Finally, under threat of lawsuit they wrote the letter. The next day they fired me!
When I told my story to my Republican friend,he laughed and said,”Don’t you know we Republicans believe in euthanasia of the poor and uninsured?” I laughed at the time but now when I see these teabagers it doesn’t seem so funny!
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
If illegal aliens are paying into a public option Skip>>>> You think the democrats want their new voting block to pay? ROFL. They will find a way to make everyone else pay. Because lets face it its all about CONTROL and POWER and bringing down the hard workers. If you cant win by playing fair make up new rules and cheat until everyone is miserable. Its the democratic mantra.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Our President has repeatedly stated that one of the primary requirements was that it lower the cost of insurance.
Are you suggesting, our President would deceive us?
Go turn yourself into the snitch line.
Skip >>>>> Are you trying to claim that without a public option the cost of private plans is going to stay the same or go down?? It must be news to you then that the cost of these private plans is going to skyrocket anyway.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“So what you are telling me is we are spending over a trillion dollars for nothing”
No, we’re going to make heath insurance available to everybody. I know to right-wingers that might be nothing but to us it’s everything.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
This isn’t about health care, it is about more government. They can’t handle Medicare now, they can’t handle the Cash for Clunkers now, they can’t handle hurricane relief in a timely fashion. What makes anybody think the government can make healthcare better? Wake up America before it is too late and you owe your grandchildren’s wages to China!
Posted by: Bob | August 8, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Your remark is completely ignorant. If a person is not deemed strong enough for surgery, surgery is not done, no matter what the age. winz <<<<<< Really you read the bill correct? Remember Obama said maybe you just need to take the pain PILL. You have to laugh when the President tells you out of his own mouth people ignore it. again Winz did you read HR3200? Can you read HR3200? Do you think its free? Are you giving 11% or more of your take home?
If you make 20K a year you now make less than 18K. thats about 200 a month less take home. How is that working for you.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Can we believe this man? I can’t. He has lied so much about so many issue that he can’t be believed any more.
Posted by: oldrtoy | August 8, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. Ben Franklin. This is what the Obama NUTS want us to do. DONT SIT DOWN GO to the town halls and you make sure EVERYONE knows what you stand for.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“You think the democrats want their new voting block to pay?”
You’re straying into propaganda.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
No, we’re going to make heath insurance available to everybody. I know to right-wingers that might be nothing but to us it’s everything. Skip >>>>> Thats a lie SKIP CBO said over 30 million wont be insured by HR3200. BUT YOU DONT CARE because you cant READ. You just buy the ,,, from ObamaNUTS
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Skip,if you think that illegal aliens are going to pay into a public option plan you need to face reality. The last thing an illegal alien wants to do is to reveal himself to the federal government.This is the kind of pie-in-the-sky assumption that makes financing this bill something out of the Twilight Zone.If 80 to 90 percent of Americans are happy with their coverage,why not listen to them?
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
“Thats a lie SKIP CBO said over 30 million wont be insured by HR3200″
Since your reading skills are superior enlighten us as to who these 30 million people are.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Why are the right-wingers complaining that everyone will be forced to have insurance then? You’re arguing out of both sides of your mouths again.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
You’re straying into propaganda. Skip>>>> I get quite enough from CNN and MSNBC every night thanks.
How few there are who have courage enough to own their faults, or resolution enough to mend them. Ben Franklin. And it fits whats going on with the failed Democrat party. They avoid owning their own faults. They avoid the resolution to mend whats wrong. Instead they run from them as they RUN like they run from their voters. Afraid that people actually see through their fake facade. They work you and ME. And we need to FIRE them for they deserve not the duty they were entrusted with as they vote not for their country or its people but for their party. These current congressmen and President are not people to be entrusted with the public good.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
“If 80 to 90 percent of Americans are happy with their coverage,why not listen to them?”
You may mean the percentage of Americans who have insurance, not just all Americans. But it still doesn’t make sense when a large majority of Americans want reform. They must be unhappy about something.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
You’re arguing out of both sides of your mouths again. Skip >>>> More baseless words. Skip its kinda like you only want to name call. Do you have no facts to offer? Guess not.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
How can the Federal Government take over one-sixth of the economy? They can’t even successfully estimate the cost of a simple “cash for clunkers” program; that extra $2,000,000,00.00 funded is from all of us taxpayers.
Barney Frank was quoted as the ultimate goal was to kill off private healthcare eventually (let it wither on the vine), and eventually encapsulate Medicare and MediCal into the overall federal health care program.
In England’s socialized healthcare, some cancers are deemed “elective” surgery. Do you see the wait time for seeing a doctor for an ailment over there? Whenever anyone gets the sniffles, they’re going to run to the doctor instead of getting rest and DEAL WITH IT!
Private industry Healthcare workers will eventually see that it is not profitable to operate, and have to switch to either other fields, or take the Orwellian Federal Healthcare jobs available.
And what the hell is going on with the huge defecits already? China may cause a destabilized economy here, and eventually gain might over us beacuse they are helping to fund our debt.
When the cyclical nature of the economy boomed, we saw more employment (those paying taxes) and more discretionary income (buying goods and services which eventually means paying more in taxes for them).
More taxes = less workers paying federal and state taxes, and buying less goods and services, meaning even further reductions in tax revenues.
What do I do when I have more money left over at the end of each pay period? I SAVE IT FOR A RAINY DAY! Why did the politicians (and Prez signed it) create more bureaucratic and bloated programs during the economic boom a few years ago?
Why does Nancy Pelosi fly home to San Francisco nearly every weekend in a private Gulfstream airplane, instead of the military planes proveded for just that reason?
There’s talk about how the “Mob” created by “extreme right-wingers” are speaking out, and exercising their Democratic rights (people from both parties) of free speech. Whatever happened to that free speech? Why do the holier-than-thou present attitudes of the politicans telling us little people what to think, when they HAVEN’T EVEN HAD.. no MADE… TIME TO READ THE BILL?
I’m scared. So should Americans of all races and parties.
Posted by: Mitchell | August 8, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Ferrari5858 – Yet again you continuously demonstrate that you live a life without Christ, without faith. Perhaps, this is the reason for your hardness of heart; why you cannot, and will not, acknowledge your interconnectedness with your neighbors.
Read your bible. Open your book, and your heart to Ecclesiastes.
“I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and chance happens to them all.” – Ecclesiastes 9:11
Perhaps if someone had cared enough to look into the families well being, instead of looking past them, tragedy may have been averted. You look down upon those less fortunate than you, and with a false certainty and self-assurdness that blinds you to your own callousness. No good can come of it.
We are all connected. What effects one, affects all. Or perhaps you failed to notice the vacant burned out house that now sits as a reminder? The same house that’s lowering the property values of the neighboring homes on that block, of all the homes in your community.
On a final note: Those were people, not undesirables. While you cast them out as indigents who had it coming because they lived 10 to a house and couldn’t afford to keep their lights on; someone now mourns, for a lifetime, for each of those perished souls.
Shame on you.
Posted by: DogInDaHunt2 | August 8, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Mitchell: “How can the Federal Government take over one-sixth of the economy?”
They are not. Period.
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
ChicagoBob,
The cut and pastes are looking confusing, but let me explain how it works from my reading. And yes I have read the current bill. I have also read other laws, and read legal precedent on some of those issues that might apply here. I like to read.
They will be get health care either way. No one will be turned away for health care.
This will hold true whether it is in the bill or not. Simply because if they do they will be open to litigation for not giving equal tretment to minorities, checking immigration status, or any other thing possible.
It will be cheaper for medical professionals to give the care and make the costs up some where else, as they do now.
A bill can say that no illegal aliens get a benefit, but as long as there is no mechansim in the bill to verify whether a given person is legal or illegal, assume they will get the benefit. THat is the idea for not putting the mechansim there in the first place.
The health insurance companies cannot check immigration status, the medical professionals cannot check it.
So they will get health care.
They will get health insurance when using fake documents.
The insurance companies or medical proffessionals will not be able to do any checking.
Since they are going to get it, make them and their employer pay, and pay high. Do not give them any subsidy, and in the event that they get caught, have strict penalties specific, much as they do have for businesses now.
Do not let them walk free, they will get the care anyhow.
ChicagoBob >>>> does all the proposed legislations in congress include insuring illegal aliens?
winz >>>> HR3200 does Not sure about all the legislation since the Senate isnt out of committee. Winz why cant they fix the current system first? And if this is such a great system shouldnt the President and all of congress be forced to be FIRST in line at the clinics or what ever he is mandating.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
President Obama DROP the Ball on this one .
He is trying to push a 2 tier system which not only is confusing the people but it doesn’t address the problem which is cost, and that COST you can chalk up to the Insurance companies.
This is NOT a TRUE Universal healthcare say like in Canada, Where every citizen is supply with a healthcard good for 1 year, and can go to any doctor they so choose and NOT LISTEN to the LIES here that a Governement run healthcare dictates where and what doctor to see.
President Obama should have said from DAY 1 “we will OVERHAUL healthcare and that means KICKING the INSURANCE companies to the CURB”…BTW..they do that in Canada.\
The president needed to say healthcare is more of a RIGHT even than education and yet we provide that for everyone.
the problem with our HEALTHCARE is not the CARE itself,its the COST and who enjoy the full and best access to it,
As a TAX payer you should NOT be PAYING any Insurance company for something essential like HEALTHCARE.
Our TAX dollars automatically takes care of emergency stuff like fire service and police .
We may NOT use these services everyday but its nice to know when there is a problem you don’t have to worry about cost ,
Imagine say if we had to pay a fireman to put the fire to our home,but didn’t have any money/coverage to do so.
Well connect the DOTS our healthcare system is a emergency enough to fall under these other ENTITIES.
Finally to pay for healthcare iam sorry MR PRESIDENT there is not enough rich people in this country to cover that, so the solution is very easy just add a Goods and service tax ,
iam quiet sure millions of americans would take that anyday over paying thousands of dollars a year to a Insurance Company whose main goal is to make profits,and could care less about the citizens,and is ready spring a fine print on to that individual so they dont
have to honour the coverage.
Atleast when the Governement make a profit in heathcare unilke the insurance company who would take the profits and RUN , The government would take the profits and put it back into the system which can be use to build more hospitals and equipment.
And finally for those who would say why trust the goverment in running anything well last i check medicare is doing fine and we do trust them in protecting the country and the communities,
nothing is ever perfect but
last i check our soldiers… policemen , firemen and other emergency entities do a pretty good job.
Posted by: faron s | Aug 8, 2009 10:29:18 AM
————————————–
best post i have seen on the subject all day .I believe mrs. clinton was trying to push for universal care, I really thought the president for serious about overhauling a broken system.plus it seems he never took the bull by the horn and showed he had the vision.
Posted by: mary | August 8, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Please, allow the president to do his job. Those pesons in need don’t have jobs, insurance, laptops, or internet to way in on the topic.
CNN & other media is only fueling division of this country with daily air time to the party of no action. What is that point?
My health ins doubled during the Bush years. I am retired with insurance and one illness cleared $40,000 out of my pocket.
Posted by: Joyce | August 8, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Hey jocko59801- $1 out of every $6 in our economy is spent, in a direct or an indirect way, to goods and services related to healthcare.
I’ve worked with hospitals, physicians, surgery centers (et all) all of my working life. Most recently, I’d say over 90% of those I’ve spoken with working in those capacities are very fearful of this proposal. While I recognize my sample is not a true statistical representative sample due to the size of the group, one can’t deny their EDUCATED views.
If you probe those (mostly younger people) on the subtle intricacies of our system, they have the typical knee-jerk reaction of “hey, I’d like free healthcare”. many have said so they can get to a doctor and get prescriptions (and some have said to get medical marijuana).
Someone had a post saying that they have read the entire bill. How do you get a copy, and more importantly, how did you find the time to read it in it’s entire version? I wish I had that much free time, but I’d like to try myself. Where can I get the copy?
thnx
Posted by: Mitchell | August 8, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Just cant wait untill obama crowd goes to dr. office and there is waiting room full of big butted women watching judge judy on tv while their 7 children roll and scream in floor.NOW THERE IS CHANGE YOU CAN BELEIVE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: paws 7000 | August 8, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Y’see, faron and mary, there’s one problem with your argument: the president does not have the power to bestow (or remove) rights from the American people. At least, so far, he does not. No telling what the near future may bring. But for the time being, the president cannot legally say that you have the RIGHT to health insurance. Congress can pass an ammendment to the Constitution, but they won’t. You DO have the right to health insurance. You have the right to work and to pay for it. I don’t think that you have the right to take MY money to buy YOUR insurance while you fritter away your money on things that you should not have if you can’t buy your own insurance. The Government has no money to pay for your health insurance. They are using MY money. I don’t mind paying taxes, but I want some say in the way it is spent. How about cutting spending first and THEN buy your sorry butt some insurance. How about denying the 3 new gulfstreams for pelosi and her bunch? How about denying the high speed train from LA to Las Vegas that Reid has gotten okayed? Both of those serve a tiny minority of people. Take those projects and add a few hundred more (including Alaskas bridge to nowhere). THEN buy the insurance for the poor. But leave me alone. Can’t you see that it would be tremendously cheaper to just buy insurance for the 47 million non insured? Especially since once you remove the illegals, that number drops to 22 Million. Subtract the 10 million or so that can afford insurance but just choose to not buy it. And then that number that is left is still grossly inflated, but we’ll leave that alone. So buy policies for about 12 million truly needy. Let everyone else buy their own. Save tons of money. There is health care reform that I can believe in
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Hey Paws! whoah! I like Judge Judy. And I got no big butt! Actually quoted her in here today in respect to this fiasco called Obama care: “Don’t pee on my leg and try to convince me it’s raining”. Judy is great! But i gotta admit, seeing who sponsors her (mostly “call me i’m hurt” law firms), i can see the target audience probably is the big butted bama belles
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Why isn’t the government going to takeover health care? It should.
We need a bit more than $900 billion per year to fully fund a US version of the British National Health Service (universal health care).
In 2007, the combined Federal, State, and local government expenditure on health care was $1035.7 billion. So, we can fully nationalize health care with the US National Health Service, and cut government health care spending by about $100 billion per year at the same time. No additional tax source is needed.
Everybody but the health care ‘industry’ wins.
The bottom line is that we are already paying for universal health care, we just aren’t receiving it.
/Data from: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group; U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; the U.S. Bureau of the Census; and the UK NHS
Posted by: AC | August 8, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
mitchell, I honestly do not believe anyone when they claim to have read the whole bill. But you can find a copy by googling HR3200 and follow some links. But that bill is not the final bill. And anyone in here claiming to have read it all…well, i don’t think they are truthful. There are some pretty intelligent folks in here (on both sides), but i really don’t think there’s a one with the legalese to have read and understand the bill…..just take it with a grain of salt when they make that claim
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
They will be get health care either way. No one will be turned away for health care.
checking immigration status, or any other thing possible.
It will be cheaper for medical professionals to give the care and make the costs up some where else, as they do now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then they should be given a PRISON ride out of the country. You make the other laws meaningless unless you enforce the major laws on the books such as citizenship. ITS not a RIGHT to cross a border in the middle of the night and take advantage of another countries hard workers that are LEGAL. To accept this depletes the belief that the law is enforced. It demoralizes those waiting to get into this country to gain citizenship. YOU are making them into SUCKERS.
A bill can say that no illegal aliens get a benefit, but as long as there is no mechansim in the bill to verify whether a given person is legal or illegal,
So why are Democrats against Card Check?
So they will get health care.
>>>> Currently they are uninsured. You know that. Most dont pay for any insurance. 12 million illegals are in the numbers of the 40 million uninsured. And 35 million make over 50K a year and have chosen not to be insured.
There are VERY few Americans uninsured by choice. The Garbage number the democrats throw around is just that. JUNK.
They will get health insurance when using fake documents.>>>>>>
GOOD more law breaking and more reason for card check.
Since they are going to get it, make them and their employer pay, and pay high.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The current bill HR3200 doesn’t mandate small business (which most illegals are paid cash from) pay for insurance.
So nothing in that bill does anything to fix this. winz
MY problem with all the democratic proposals is they dont FIX the problems with the system. They avoid that by big promises that dont deliver.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Obama is taking care of his union pals. He has proposed taxing health care subsidies that my and your employers provide us. By the way, he derided McCain for this very idea, but that is another point. Once he proposed that tax, he immediately exempted the union workers from having to pay on THEIR subsidies…..croneyism at its finest
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
I want to know why Ezekiel Emmanuel says people under the age of 15 and over the age of 40 should be denied expenditures in order that more care can go to others yet no one in the Obama administration except Hillary wants to exclude illegal immigrants from getting benefits?
“Considering prognosis forestalls the concern the disproportionately large amounts of resources will be directed to young people with poor prognoses. When the worst-off can benefit only slightly while better-off people could benefit greatly, allocating to the better-off is often justifiable….
When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.” Ezekiel Emmanuel
Posted by: anon | August 8, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
We need a bit more than $900 billion per year to fully fund a US version of the British National Health Service (universal health care).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Which is rationed and has serious problems, Why do you want to bring down the health insurance in America to a lower level? Why is that always the democrats goal? DRAG everyone down lift no one up.
Can they fix the current system? If the answer is NO then what makes anyone believe they can make a system that actually works and is better than what we have?
Everybody but the health care ‘industry’ wins AC >>>>> Really? Who will advance medicine and health care without profit? What would be the point? Who would be a doctor for minimum wage? who will pay for malpratice? How much rationing will you wait for?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Mitchell Google HR3200.
Read page 15 and 16 first. its a blast.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
ChicagoBob
I don’t know who said that, but we are not talking here about anything like the British system, which obviously has many problems (as do all systems).
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
If they cant they fix the current system first who believes they can successfully build a better new system?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Obama hasn’t debunked anything. Obama is a liar. Nice bit o’ biased reporting going on here.
Posted by: mojo | August 8, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
mary, the one thing that you and your pals don’t realize is that the GOP is not against health care reform. Not at all. As a matter of fact, Bush proposed Health Care Reform, and then senator Obama rejected it, stating that something of this importance must be approached slowly and in a calculated manner. Democrats stopped the health care reform. So, see? we are not against reform. What we are against is irresponsible health care reform. Let’s take Obama’s advice: approach it rationally, slowly and fix it right. We (Republican and Dem conservatives) are simply trying to force Obama to govern us in the transparent manner in which he promised.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Its simple really. They have been told to want reform. The mulitple mass media articles which used the flawed who rankings, without giving the explaination on the data would be part of it. Specifically those that use that same ranking to “show” that government care aka single payer is better. Those that have single payer got a bonus because they are single payer, it is part of the calculation.
Those articles that say government care has less administrative costs then private care. The administrative costs are two different things.
Government accounting does not directly compare to the same costs in business accounting. Many costs of government, are shoved off to other budgets.
When the same definition, as close as can be done, are used the costs are about the same.
People have a poor understanding because they aren’t given facts, and are instead given talking points. Even when facts are given, they are often misrepresented or statistics misused.
So 80% of the 85% percent, which looks like it includes current government insurance, rate it at either good or better.
The Rasmussen poll did ask about insurance. It does not look like governemnt, or private was specified.
3* Do you have health insurance?
85% Yes
14% No
2% Not sure
4* (answered only by those who have health insurance) How do you rate your own health insurance coverage?
35% Excellent
45% Good
15% Fair
4% Poor
0% Not sure
“If 80 to 90 percent of Americans are happy with their coverage,why not listen to them?”
You may mean the percentage of Americans who have insurance, not just all Americans. But it still doesn’t make sense when a large majority of Americans want reform. They must be unhappy about something.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
ncpilot09: “He has proposed taxing health care subsidies that my and your employers provide us.”
No, he has said he might accept it in a compromise bill. He has never proposed it.
Posted by: jock59801 | August 8, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I don’t know who said that, but we are not talking here about anything like the British system, which obviously has many problems (as do all systems).
jock59801 >>>>>> Yes you are. HR3200 is going to create a bunch of new Czar like people. A board (cant recall the initials) which have all kinds of controls. I REALLY dont want this kind of federal control. There is WAY to much corruption and incompetence in government. Why make another system? You want to allow states to create POOLs that would eliminate the preexisting condition issue. You want to lower costs work on MalPratice insurance which is an INSANE cost for doctors.
You can also mandate health insurance be sold like life insurance. FIXED rate for the entire time of the policy.
You can also address the coverage issue as well. There are so many simple things that can be done but I repeat myself. WHY can you not fix the current system first. PROVE to the American people you can do something RIGHT before you ask me and everyone else to take a TRILLION dollar gamble.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Anon, when one reads ANY of the words that Ezekial Emanual, National health care policy advisor and brother of Rahm Emanual, ANY of the words he has written, then that person would shudder. All the rumors about GOP crying “euthanesia”, stem from Ezekial’s words. I have never said, nor has anyone else that i know of said, that the health care reform would require euthanesia. We do, however, claim that the elderly, the feeble, and the mentally challenged citizens of our country probably will be denied life easing procedures because they will never again be “participating citizens” (Ezekial’s words). That means that my elderly mother, suffering from Alzheimer’s would not be elibible to receive a hip replacement surgery because she has no chance of ever becoming a “participating citizen” again. So she would instead be given the pain pills and confined to her bed. No, this is NOT euthanesia. But THIS is what Ezekial’s words say. Read them yourself if you doubt my statement.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Mr president, what a great job you’re doing. You have millions supporting unlike a minority cry babies popping up in town hall meetings and posting negative ignorant remarks.
Go Mr President!
Posted by: pana | August 8, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I do not like it, I had hoped they would use the bill to add more protection to our law.
I see no reason why they don’t check immigration status and deport them if they walk into a Doctors office. Give them the care at the Deportation center, and ship them out.
I think they should make it easier to deport, and not give them a right to break the law.
All that said, I know we will end up paying for their care and subsidizing their health insurance.
Our Government is more responsive to the lobby groups that support them, the nonprofits, and the businesses, and the immigration lawyer groups, then by us.
******
ChicagoBob:
They will be get health care either way. No one will be turned away for health care.
checking immigration status, or any other thing possible.
It will be cheaper for medical professionals to give the care and make the costs up some where else, as they do now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And then they should be given a PRISON ride out of the country. You make the other laws meaningless unless you enforce the major laws on the books such as citizenship. ITS not a RIGHT to cross a border in the middle of the night and take advantage of another countries hard workers that are LEGAL. To accept this depletes the belief that the law is enforced. It demoralizes those waiting to get into this country to gain citizenship. YOU are making them into SUCKERS.
A bill can say that no illegal aliens get a benefit, but as long as there is no mechansim in the bill to verify whether a given person is legal or illegal,
So why are Democrats against Card Check?
So they will get health care.
>>>> Currently they are uninsured. You know that. Most dont pay for any insurance. 12 million illegals are in the numbers of the 40 million uninsured. And 35 million make over 50K a year and have chosen not to be insured.
There are VERY few Americans uninsured by choice. The Garbage number the democrats throw around is just that. JUNK.
They will get health insurance when using fake documents.>>>>>>
GOOD more law breaking and more reason for card check.
Since they are going to get it, make them and their employer pay, and pay high.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The current bill HR3200 doesn’t mandate small business (which most illegals are paid cash from) pay for insurance.
So nothing in that bill does anything to fix this. winz
MY problem with all the democratic proposals is they dont FIX the problems with the system. They avoid that by big promises that dont deliver.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Jock, no. He has proposed it. Not Obama himself….his administration. Hang on, i’ll show you.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
mary Sorry to say that just because it comes from the government doesnt it make it better or fair. My entire issue is that no complex system can be designed without major flaws. We currently have a complex system. Guess what they tell us they cant fix it. So why are being told to build another one? Whats the point? There isnt one.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
TWO IDENTICAL CANCER PATIENTS. ONE IN THE US AND THE OTHER FROM ANYWHERE ELSE. WHICH ONE WILL BE LIKELY TO LIVE LONGER? THAT IS THE ONLY TRUE TEST FOR LONGEVITY. APPLES TO APPLES PLEASE!!!
WITH ALL ITS FAULTS, THE US HAS THE BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN THE WORLD. WHAT COUNTRIES HAVE A JOHNS HOPKINS, A MAYO CLINIC OR A CLEVELAND CLINIC?
A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF OUR CURRENT HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS WORKING “VERY WELL” NO EFFORT HAS BEEN SPENT BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO IMPROVE THE CURRENT SYSTEM – SAYS A LOT DOESN’T IT??
Posted by: Manitu | August 8, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Union members and their families who receive healthcare benefits paid for by their employers would be exempted from a new tax on healthcare under one option being proposed by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mt)…..As shown on page 3 of the Baucus outline published under two of Baucus’ four options, healthcare benefits provided under collective bargaining agreements dated on or before January 1, 2013 would be exempt from the tax.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Thank you pana for your oh so intelligent comment on this board. You must be applying for Obama’s “Cheerleading Czar” position.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
There have been some fantastically good ideas proposed for health care reform. How about Tort reform? Fear of lawsuits by itself forced doctors to order and re-order specialized, non necessary tests. And the lawsuit awards are the lottery for not only the recipients, but the John Edwards type lawyers too. If you have the opportunity to read an OpEd piece by Krautheimer…please do. read it and ponder it…..it is a brilliant idea, and simple, and cost effective.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
This bill is wonderful. The government can do this much better than the insurance companies.Doctors are greedy and need to be controlled.Anybody who questions this approach does not like poor people.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
nc – Are you still on here twisting stuff? The following was what Bush proposed: That agenda — which includes expanding health savings accounts and slowing spending on Medicare and Medicaid
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
They don’t get it for free. They pay out of pocket expenses for it in most countries to of one kind our another.
Our medical professionals are paid more. They have to pay more for their education too. Our laws are more litigation prone. Lots of reasons really.
If you are talking about us being no where near the top in the WHO rankings, or similar rankings, that is because of the flaws in the calculation used. The flaws are well known, and have been covered in several professional journals. WHO stopped doing the ranking because they don’t have good enough data, The rankings were health systems, which isn’t health care by the way, health systems includes everything, such as safety in automobiles.
All deaths were included, not just health care ones. A single payer was ranked higher because it was considered to be more equally dispersed, without considering if it actually provided for the population better. There were many faults. Look up the journal articles if you wish.
mary >>>> and if our system was truly great why do we spend 3 times as much as other countries and they get healthcare for free Oh yes! We are nowhere to be found in the top 10 in the world when it comes to healthcare, had we been number 1…. I guess they would be no talk of reform now would they.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The Obama joke is he doesnt even know whats in the bill. He hasnt read it either because there isnt one bill that has passed the Congress. Also Obama and all these other jokers dont have a CLUE as to how much it will cost or if we in our current beat up economic position can afford it. FIX the current system. If you can do that you might be able to build a new system. If you cant then you are a BIG joke and liar. You wont be able to keep any of your promises just like the 8% unemployment promise. It was a lie as well.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
secondlook…come on now…you are accusing ME of twisting stuff??? Can you give an example? The proposal to exempt taxing union members health care benefits while not exempting non union members? That is straight from the horse’s mouth. You said you’d read Ezekials words last night if i gave you the link. I gave you the link. Did you read his proposals? Did I twist anything about that? Love ya, kid, but if you are gonna accuse me of twisting words, you should give me some examples. If I misspoke or misquoted, I’ll be happy to admit it
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
SecondLook…hey, would you like to see a GOOD proposal for health care reform? I’ll send it to you. Can’t send the link unless you are willing to take a free membership to the Washington Post web site. If you prefer, I’ll be happy to copy and paste it to whatever forum or e’mail you’d like. His idea is definitely one that I would support. You say you’re centrist…..then give this a look at…
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
nc – To sit here and claim republicans aren’t against healthcare reform is laughable. About all they’ve supported is Bush’s savings accounts which don’t remotely help those that need the help the most. There was some brief discussions on MAYBE the states could help out some people, but nothing really came of that. No I haven’t read the guys words yet. Right now I’m busy hunting down if you guys have been played in about the biggest way possible. The new “if you opt out of Medicare you can’t get SS” rumor. There’s even some proposed bill by a republican. Right now my lawyer friend and I suspect this is one of the biggest hoaxes they’ve pulled on your side yet. So far the only thing supporting this are far right blogs. And, considering many seniors are on insurance thru retirement it’s stupid. Not to mention not everybody even qualifies for Medicare.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
and, honestly, second look…i have no issues with Bush’s proposal to expand the Healthcare Spending Accounts program. I am not participating in that particular program that is offered by my employer, but i still think it is a great program for those who do use it. I don’t like the idea of “if you don’t spend it you will lose it”, but otherwise, I’m all for it. So as you might be able to tell, i am not sure why you used that as an example of villivying Bush. He did plenty wrong, but in my opinion, that was not one of them
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
secondlook, i don’t have a definite answer about the medicare/SS tie. But I can tell you a real life story about it, even though I am still confused about the whole thing. My mom is 84. She lived on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi and her house was destroyed by Katrina. Since then, her health has gone dramatically downhill, to the point that I have had to move her into an assisted living facility near Atlanta. She is in the Alzheimers’ ward there. During this transition, my brothers and sister and i were going thru what paperwork of her life was left after Katrina. She had failed to sign up for Medicaire when required. We have rectified this, but, for whatever reason, she was indeed penalized in SS payments for having failed to sign up correctly for madicaire. I cannot for the life of me tell you why nor which law makes it so. But I can swear to you the truthfullness of it, because I lived it
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Obama said…..”Obama admitted that there are details to be hammered out on Capitol Hill, but played up the areas of agreement. “…….The Bill is not written yet. He is pushing a Bill that he hasn’t read. Like the stimulus.
Posted by: CW | August 8, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
nc – I used that as an example of him doing not much of anything. Healthcare was never his baby. For years the republicans have ignored this area in the name of capitalism. That proposal helped people that are better off and didn’t even get to the root of the problem. What’s the name of the Post article? With me it’s more about cutting the spin right now.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
And, secondlook, if you will read Charles Krauthammers Op Ed piece, you will finally realize that republicans are NOT at all against health care reform. What we are against is this fiasco, hurry up and pass it because the earth will end with out drama that Obama is trying to press. How in the world can you or any intelligent citizen blindly support a bill that has not even been finalized and has not even seen the light of day? What is laughable, sadly so, is that those of you who would blindly follow ANY of our politicians in their “trust me” attitude. The democratic congressmen and women say they will sign the bill. Since they have no idea of what is in the bill, the ONLY reason they would be signing it is to get a notch in the “win” side for Obama. And that is politics at its worst
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
nc – What you speak of here? I can see some dumb gov. rule doing that. I was told the other day by a friend that “yeah, she got Cobra and they made it less – only due to the fact she didn’t have it for three months when it was unaffordable she was billed over a grand if she wanted it, to go back on those three months.” This is not the hoax. The hoax is claiming SS bennies will be denied if you don’t wish to be on it.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
nc – Since I have no substance to even KNOW what this bill really is yet I can’t really say what I think about it, huh? I will say this. This has been a concern for YEARS. Many of which republicans ruled. They did not choose to touch it. They never will unless it’s to help with another tax deduction. So, what’s the hurry? What hurry? This has been needed to be addressed for a good 20 years. It appears if they’re ever going to do something here is the small window.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
What is outlandish is the way Obama, the liberals in congress and the liberal media are characterizing hard working American patriots for voicing their opinions about this railroading going on in the house and senate. They need to slow down, and start listening to the people who put them into office. At congress.org every one of their letters show that Americans are ovewhelmingly against their brand of health reform, cap and trade, yet they don’t give a dam* what the people think.
Posted by: lulu | August 8, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Gosh, second look, it appears that the link to the article about medicaire and SS is pretty enlightening. I did not know that that was a fact, but here are words from the last paragraph that pretty much prove it to me: >>>Officials said they could not respond Wednesday to the rationale for barring people from Social Security if they opted out of Medicare Part A, but they did confirm that participation is a requirement to get a Social Security check.<<<
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
second look, that’s my point exactly: our lawmakers are wanting to pass a bill that no one knows what is in it yet. We got burned by the stimulus bill (Harry Reid’s high speed train to Las Vegas…which cost many many jobs; Nancy Pelosi’ pet projects, ets. Many, i’m sure are GOP backed waste). I don’t want my country burnt again by behind closed doors legislature. They can do things that just don’t make sense …(medicaire and SS tie for instance??) And the “whats the hurry” line? That is the exact phrase that Obama used when the “other side” (bush) was pushing reform….All i’m asking is don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. I have volunteered as a paramedic with a local rescue squad for over 20 years…and i have yet to have had one of my patients refused care due to lack of insurance. As a matter of fact, it is illegal for any public hospital to refuse care to indigent.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
The United States does not have a health care system, it has a health care industry. The well being of the individual, the health of the populace is not the focus but rather the bottom line. We have the best health care for those who can pay the most and the rest get what’s left. Our Congress is much the same, it is the best money can buy, but fsar from the best for the poeple.
Posted by: olde cobb | August 8, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
nc – What article? Since Medicare isn’t even for everybody this has to be bogus. I read Charle’s piece. It’s McCains. He’s a neo. And BTW, I’m not against a bit of a cap on the lawsuits. I’m not sure I could support taking it out of the court system and putting it into some government bodies hands. Too much potential for abuse. While you guys yell about freedoms being taken away?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
olde cobb…do you honestly think that those countries that do have government health care have equal health provisions to all people? Do you honestly think that should a member of the House of Lords or a family member needs care that they will receive the same care as the street sweeper? And do you honestly believe that should we have government health care that YOU would get the same treatment at the same facility as, say, the mayor or your town? Or your senator? Or Oprah Winfrey or Magic Johnson?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Please follow the President’s example.He is the Moses of the 21st century,leading us into the new land of rightousness and hope.He will protect us from the greedy opponents of health care reform.Let Frantz Falon be our guide as a true doctor for our country.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
hussein’s “Healthcare Freedom of Choice” for seniors:
“Take either the red pill or the blue pill. With the red pill you die immediately. With the blue pill you die in one day. It’s YOUR choice!”
Posted by: ALEX H. | August 8, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
hussein’s “Healthcare Freedom of Choice” for seniors:
“Take either the red pill or the blue pill. With the red pill you die immediately. With the blue pill you die in one day. It’s YOUR choice!”
Posted by: ALEX H. | August 8, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
nc – I’m with you on your last post. In Canada? No hockey player ever had to line up. lol Of course they cut lines. I’ve upset my liberal friends pointing that one out.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
“second look, that’s my point exactly: our lawmakers are wanting to pass a bill that no one knows what is in it yet.”……… Well give them a NY minute? What is with all of this frenzy here? I don’t recall spazzing during the republican rule. We waited until it was presented, and then made up our minds. I’ve never seen so much wild speculation.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Why don’t they just take out the parts the other side doesn’t like? I read the so called “death panel” provision. It’s not that at all, but if they took it out, it really wouldn’t affect much. So why not just remove it?
Posted by: hey Scoob | August 8, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
second look…i gotta go. I have enjoyed our chats as usual, though i was a bit surprised at your claim that the article about medicaire and SS is bogus. That is just not like you to make that claim without reading it first. And then the cursary slam against McCain…he’s not even part of the discussion.. Anyway, i’m sure i’ll see you again this evening or tomorrow. After that, i’m back to work…vacation is over and work begins again Monday. Talk to you later
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
If the country is beginning to ease out of the recession without health care reform, then, why is it necessary to completely overhaul the entire system? If it’s just to insure the uninsured, then concentrate on that portion of reform only and leave the rest of it alone as most Americans are fine with their health care. Perhaps tweek the current system a little for current subscribers by not allowing health insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions – those little things vs. a total revamp.
Posted by: Blanche | August 8, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
nc – I said I believe it’s bogus. I still think there is something fishy on this. Give me time. Rome wasn’t built in a day. And would you REALLY be surprised to hear they wrote an article while not checking facts? All this article says is “the men say.”
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Much of this is left up to a Secretary, Committes, DHS and other groups.
So it will not be known until the bill is a law, which would be to late.
That is why the “spazing” now.
There is enough in this bill not to like it now, so why wait until its got more momentum to “spaz”.
Even more, I personally had no fault with HSA’s, beyond that it should not be use it or lose it. I didn’t spaz for or against it though.
Secondlook:
“second look, that’s my point exactly: our lawmakers are wanting to pass a bill that no one knows what is in it yet.”……… Well give them a NY minute? What is with all of this frenzy here? I don’t recall spazzing during the republican rule. We waited until it was presented, and then made up our minds. I’ve never seen so much wild speculation.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
nc – McCain IS a neo.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Second look that is exactly why the republicans are trying to slow down the process….to give them a NY minute. Of course, when you do it, it’s mature. When we do it , its obstructionist and mean spirited. Ah, what can i say? Said it before and will continue to say it….you guys just hold us up to a higher standard. See ya, kiddo
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
“There is enough in this bill not to like it now, so why wait until its got more momentum to “spaz”.”…….. First off? YOU do not know this bill since the bill isn’t remotely complete. But I’m open for what is bugging you.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Trust the President,he is so much more intelligent than anybody else in Washington.You people who want to drag him down are blind to his brilliance.I am tired of the critics of the President-by definition they must all be racists.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
nc – I’ve said it’s more about the bogus spewing from mouths on the right with me. I’m waiting to see what happens on the bill.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Second Look, I don’t CARE whether McCain is a neo con or not. It does not make me lose one minute of sleep. McCain lost the election. Obama is the president. McCain is a Neo. Bush is at fault. Palin is an air head. And on and on and on. WHO CARES??? All of those phrases and terms are nothing but liberal diversionary tactics: When you have no point, then call someone on the other side a derogatory name. C’mone, second look….you are better than that. We were talking about the merits of a health care reform that Krauthammer wrote ….It does not have a thing to do withe whether McCain is a neo con or not. It has nothing to do with whether Limbaugh is an airbag….you claimed we don’t want health care reform. I just provided you with an excellent plan submitted openly and freely by a conservative. And you revert to the diversions again???
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I am an Independent. Yesterday I heard Obama speaking in Virginia where he told the crowd that he doesn’t mind cleaning up after the Repubs but he doesn’t want to hear them talk. I would like to suggest that all people interested in the health care reform are Americans, regardless of what the Demos are now saying. If the Demos can’t discuss the health care issues with others, then they do not need to govern.
Posted by: roger king | August 8, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
No, the article says that Jeff Nelligan, spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service said this that the law was clear and that a person that receives a social security check must accept medicare part A.
“Officials said they could not respond Wednesday to the rationale for barring people from Social Security if they opted out of Medicare Part A, but they did confirm that participation is a requirement to get a Social Security check.
“The law is clear here,” said Jeff Nelligan, spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “If an individual receives a Social Security check, that person must accept the Part A benefit.”
*******************
nc – I said I believe it’s bogus. I still think there is something fishy on this. Give me time. Rome wasn’t built in a day. And would you REALLY be surprised to hear they wrote an article while not checking facts? All this article says is “the men say.”
Posted by: Secondlook
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
i’m really really outta here now. *LOL. Being the southern gentleman that I am, I think i’ll cook dinner for my wife tonite. She puts up with a lot of my crap…its the least i can do. Hope y’all have a great night.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I to am an independent. I find it hipocritical to say things like that then not mention that given the CBO expects costs and budget deficits to escalate from this bill after 10 years, he is doing the same thing he accuses others of doing. Leaving a mess.
Nor does he mention that it was not all Bush’s mess. Much of the current issues have been building up over decades. Congress and Administrations have contributed to the whole mess for 50 years or so.
roger king:
I am an Independent. Yesterday I heard Obama speaking in Virginia where he told the crowd that he doesn’t mind cleaning up after the Repubs but he doesn’t want to hear them talk. I would like to suggest that all people interested in the health care reform are Americans, regardless of what the Demos are now saying. If the Demos can’t discuss the health care issues with others, then they do not need to govern.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
secondlook, you blindly believe that Obama’s health care plan will be the do all tell all saving grace for our country and you freely admit that you know that it is not even written yet…but somehow you doubt the veracity of an article in one of the most liberal, left leaning web sites in the US?? Well, have fun debunking it. Like I said, i did have a run in with medicaire/SS with my mom…and now i think i understand where it came from. It’s all taken care of now, but there was some issue there.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
nc – I’ve figured out the hoopla on the Medicare A “that proves people will be forced to use Obama’s plan.” It is an automatic enrollment when you begin getting your SS. It simply covers some hospital (so think if of a fed guarantee to hospitals) If you have another policy you can use it as your secondary. So, isn’t that horrible? Those feds are forcing free coverage on you and you don’t have to use it. OMG that is absolutely commie. NOT.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
It seem obvious that some of the public can still read and check info on certain lines. Has Oboma really read the nearly 1000 page proposal. (I have’t, of course). Doubt that many legislators or aids have read the entire report but they must. We cannot afford another cash for clunkers fiasco, which apparently no one actually thought through. Already, another two BILLION added, and what happens when when those buying new cars, with loans, cannot pay charges. And has anyone actually put the pencil to what all the tax credits will cost the country, for cars, water heaters, ac, windows. Has someone gone completely mad. Cassandra
Posted by: lou green | August 8, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
always trust obama he is super intelligence…just the opposite of that palin person. when palin appears on the screen the best thing to do is reach for the remote and rid your self of her!
Posted by: shirley lewis | August 8, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
I hear that the President is taking a well-deserved vacation to Yellowstone before his planned visit to Martha’s Vineyard.I suppose that somebody will object.I can’t think of a better use of time than visiting as much of our country as possible.I like a curious man-unlike our previous president who only saw a vacation as a time to relax.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
winz – Check out my explination. Again, whoop about a big nothign.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
winz…nothing hipocritical about what I said. I just repeated what the President said yesterday repeatly in Virginia. He doesn’t want to hear the objections of others. Repeated quote “I don’t want to hear them talk”. He is trying to shut down the discussion of his health care proposal.
I just suggested the dialog, in its many forms, is called the American discourse of any political proposal.
Posted by: roger king | August 8, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
roger king – I believe the President was referring to the industry. But I suppose he could go snuggle up with them to fix this?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
The REAL quote: “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.”
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
rogerking,the President does not need little voices telling him what to do. The complainers are racists and hateful.Hate speech should be banned-as they do on college campuses.We don’t need to discuss things that are already decided.The President is way too intelligent to need to read a bill to know what is in it.We are so lucky to be blessed with this exceptional man.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Why in the world to people keep saying you can keep your health care? If the Government Offers for Free then why on earth would a company pay for it?? Corporations are looking at the bottom line. If they can drop coverage for you and save money, they will do that. That will force everyone on the broken Govt. system. Think it through.
All other government programs work great; I’m sure their version of heath care will . lol
Also even if you are for this plan why would you want a group of people (congress) decide this for you and not go under they same system?
If it’s such a good thing then make them go under the exact same plan they are proposing.
Posted by: Jeff | August 8, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
NCPILOT09
You need to rethink what you said.
That is why this Country will never
be the same.
Serena4141
Posted by: Serena4141 | August 8, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
The REAL quote: “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.”
–> Oooh. He’s gone nuts in public after only six months. Maybe His DNA isn’t really so special.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
It is called “coordination of benefits”.
The problem is that medicare is your primary insurer if you are 65+.
As such, once you reach 65, almost all private plans change the benefits you get.
I haven’t dealth with it personally since I am not on medicare, but I suppose it could be a pain.
Then don’t you either enroll in part B or pay in life time penalty for not enrolling once you are medicare part A eligible? That could be another downside.
I do know coordination of benefits is a pain in general, I have dealt with that, so I imagine it would be a worse pain under medicare.
Secondlook:
nc – I’ve figured out the hoopla on the Medicare A “that proves people will be forced to use Obama’s plan.” It is an automatic enrollment when you beg
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
OBAMA IS A LIER HE IS NOT FIT TO BE IN OFFICE HE HAS VOLATED THE RIGHTS OF ALL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY THE OBAMA STUPIED EVIL HEALTH CARE LIKE THAT ONE SANATOR SAID THIS OBAMA HEALTH CARE IS NOT FIT FOR A DOG WHY IS OBAMA TRY TOP PUSH IT ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HE WILL DESTROY OUR COUNTRY IMPEACH OBAMA BE FOR IT TO LATE
Posted by: RAMBOW99 | August 8, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Virtually every Democrat (from Obama, Barney Frank, Jan Schakowsky, and every other liberal group out there) is saying the same thing………….this Public Option plan will lead the way to Single Payer Healthcare provided by the government. The majority of Americans do NOT WANT single payer healthcare. This is why there is SO much anger out there. And the last I heard, we are all entitled to free speech and the right to protest. Although, based on President Obama’s comments, he just wants us all “to get out of the way”. He does not want debate and he certainly doesn’t want to hear any other ideas.
Posted by: MLM411 | August 8, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Jeff,
There is no free healthcare in the reform bill unless you are very poor.
Corporations will not be able to drop insurance for their employees, as all businesses except very small ones will be fined if they don’t provide health insurance.
The government isn’t going to decide which health care you get, you will decide what you buy. But insurance companies will have to be truthful and clear about their policies, provide a good minimum of coverage (I bet they are real happy about that) won’t be able to turn people down for pre-existing conditions (they really don’t like that) and other good stuff for us consumers.
The system we have isn’t working for those who can’t afford the high insurance premiums, it doesn’t work for many who have a catastrophic illness (half of all bankruptcies are because of medical bills, and most of them had insurance!) it doesn’t provide affordable insurance especially for those between the ages of 50 and medicare age and it is getting too expensive for most of the middle-class with premiums jumping up every year and higher deductibles and co-pays.
Inform yourself from reliable sources. And if you hear something silly like euthanasia in the bill, just dismiss that source as being reliable.
There is so much false information about what this bill will and won’t do, it is ridiculous.
Posted by: Lydia | August 8, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Roger,
My post meant that I believe it is hipocritical for politicians to blame problems on their predeccessors and then do the same thing by leaving a mess, i.e. a rapidly growing deficit for the next guy. I also believe that they should be honest about how long this has been building, relatively little of the current mess was actually created by the previous administration, it has been a long time building.
roger king commented:
winz…nothing hipocritical about what I said. I just repeated what the President said yesterday repeatly in Virginia. He doesn’t want to hear the objections of others. Repeated quote “I don’t want to hear them talk”. He is trying to shut down the discussion of his health care proposal.
I just suggested the dialog, in its many forms, is called the American discourse of any political proposal.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Dear Leader Chairman Maobama said “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.”
How soon he forgets the Constitutuion, the President does not initiate appropration (spending) bills, the House does. The bill then goes to the Senate and once both the House and Senate pass the final bill it is passed to the President to be signed or vetoed.
Since 2006 the Democratic party has been in charge of both the House and Senate and have been responsible for all spending since 2006, not the President. I know that Dear Leader Chairman Maobama probably doesn’t know that as he spent his time in the Senate voting Present rather than the customary “Aye” or “Nay”.
The bottom line ids that the Republicans did not make the mess, the Democrats are responsible.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Describe “very poor”, per the bill.
They can drop it, and pay a fine, if it is more cost effective for their bottom line then.
Or they can switch to a lower cost insurance that meets the minimum through the exchange,
Go read the report that says (half of all bankruptcies are because of medical bills, and most of them had insurance!).
That isn’t what the report says at all.
The report says they are medical related, not because of.
Medical related itself is actually kind of loose and easy.
Then what is going to be done about the rapidly growing budget deficit it creates, according to the CBO, after the ten year period?
Jeff,
There is no free healthcare in the reform bill unless you are very poor.
Corporations will not be able to drop insurance for their employees, as all businesses except very small ones will be fined if they don’t provide health insurance.
The government isn’t going to decide which health care you get, you will decide what you buy. But insurance companies will have to be truthful and clear about their policies, provide a good minimum of coverage (I bet they are real happy about that) won’t be able to turn people down for pre-existing conditions (they really don’t like that) and other good stuff for us consumers.
The system we have isn’t working for those who can’t afford the high insurance premiums, it doesn’t work for many who have a catastrophic illness (half of all bankruptcies are because of medical bills, and most of them had insurance!) it doesn’t provide affordable insurance especially for those between the ages of 50 and medicare age and it is getting too expensive for most of the middle-class with premiums jumping up every year and higher deductibles and co-pays.
Inform yourself from reliable sources. And if you hear something silly like euthanasia in the bill, just dismiss that source as being reliable.
There is so much false information about what this bill will and won’t do, it is ridiculous.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
What do Medicare, Medicaid, Amtrak, Social Security, USPS, and Cash 4 Clunkers have in common? They are efficiently run government entities with gracious, service-minded employees. These employees are always willing to go the extra mile for their customers! Just last week, I needed a stamp at 4:58PM on a Friday, and with a warm smile, the USPS employee was willing to hand me a stamp even as the clock struck 4:59PM!!
As President Obama promised while campaigning, we will all have the same exact coverage as members of Congress, and this will not affect the defecit!! For example, Ted Kennedy flew to Durham, NC for treatment after contracting brain cancer. He received first rate care at Duke University. This is why Obama-Care will be the greatest coverage in the world. When Americans are diagnosed with these fatal illnesses, we will be whisked away to the greatest facilities in the US for treatment.
Why do you think the Congress just ordered 3 new private jets with a combined bill of $500,000,000? It could not be for “fact-finding” trips!?! My congressman’s office just told me yesterday, if I get a cold or flu, that I will be picked up on one of these jets and flown to the Cleveland Clinic!!
I love America, Barak Obama, & mediocrity!! This is great, if you feel like slacking, just vote Democrat. We do not need to raise taxes, that is why we have the US Mint. Inflation is overrated!!
Posted by: The Pot Stirrer | August 8, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
If Obama could bring himself to start acting worthy of the office he was elected to instead of trash talking and belittling the American people, this all could be going a lot better for all of us. At this point, I’m not sure it matters what he says anymore. He and his administration have insulted too many people. He lost a lot of support of 2 of my children over the Cambridge police comment and the comments he made in Virginia has caused them all to withdraw all support(one is in the health care industry and engaged to a doctor). There is absolutely no reason to rush this through Congress. There is absolutely no reason to get this done in September, or even by the end of the year. His behavior honestly saddens me.
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 8, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
This is a bad Bill. Obama puts the American taxpayer in between a woman seeking an Abortion and her Doctor. If She wants to Abort her baby that is her legal perogative but not a responsibility of other Americans. This is just one of the Bad items in this Bill! Obama is Wrong!
Posted by: Sandra | August 8, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Obama “Dr. Death” Go to your end of life counseling session you old geezer! Oh – but hey are not mandatory – So why is it in the Bill???? Very strange indeed! Dr. Death Obama and his Hell Plan.
Posted by: Jake | August 8, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical….It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government.”
—Thomas Jefferson to James Madison (Jan. 30, 1787)
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Dear Leader Chairman Maobama said “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.”
Posted by: sandcrab1612 |
Unless by “mess” you mean the financial industry.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 8, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
While stupidity and ignorance is a condition of the mind, thus, subject to toleration, hatred, a destruction of the soul, must never to be sanctioned, nor, allowed to prevail.
Though these are my own words, the thought of them could not have been invoked, were it not a re-discovering, of the inspirational words and thoughts of Martin Luther King Jr., and one quote in particular. And that is this;
Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man’s sense of values and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false and the false with the true.
Posted by: david moore | August 8, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I was lied to. Obama said Unemployment would not go above 8 percent, it hit 9.5, currently 9.4 and now they say it will go above 10 percent. I can’t trust anthing else he says. He said nobody making under 250,000.00 would be taxed, i smoke so now my taxes went up – he lied. regardless that I choose to smoke. He is a liar. I cannot and do not trust him. I will not vote for him again and I do not support this health package.
Posted by: Nora | August 8, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I was at one of these healthcare town-hall meetings the other day, once the group of 80-plus-year-old ladies (standing next to me) had become winded from screaming out “no socialized medicine” and could scream no longer, I heard an older Republican gentlemen (his “I hate Nazi’s” sign, gave him away) talking about how his dog, had just crapped in his favorite shoes. This older gentlemen, then, proceeds to tell how he’s sure, that his dog had been planning this crap attack for at least a week. Next, he states that he had been noticing, over the past 5 or 6 days, that his dog had been studying his movements, patterns, and habits, and is absolutely convinces, (just for cover) his dog crapped in his favorite shoes, a day before the dog knew, he was going to wear them.
What’s going on? Surely, most people are not this stupid or paranoid. Fueled by an organized ignorance, the principal factor at play, can only be explained, as a un-American hatred, for the President of these United States.
While stupidity and ignorance is a condition of the mind, thus, subject to toleration, hatred, a destruction of the soul, must never to be sanctioned, nor, allowed to prevail.
Posted by: david moore | August 8, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Union officials continued to receive a barrage of threats on Friday evening and into Saturday punctuated by warnings that if organizers were sent to counter-demonstrate at health care town halls they would be met with violence.
I guess the day is about to come when the right wing shows us their true vioIent colors.
Posted by: Nora | August 8, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
An official with the AFL-CIO, a federation of labor organizations, passed on what he described as a “pretty direct threat” to those union hands who were showing up to balance out anti-Obama demonstrations being waged at local Democratic forums.
“I will be going to a local town hall this weekend, all you union members BEWARE!” an emailer wrote at 9:40 Saturday morning. “We will be waiting for you. better make sure you have arrangements with your local ER. today is the day when the goon meets the gun. see you there.”
Posted by: RAMBOW99 | August 8, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The thing that bothers me the most about these people threatening unions is just about every benefit they enjoy as American working people is the direct result of union blood, sweat, and tears. Nobody stood up for labor in this country until the unions organized. I’ll be the first to admit they aren’t always perfect, but this country’s middle class, or what’s left of it, can thank unions for what they have. And that is why the GOP hates unions so. Unions created the American middle class, and the GOP can’t stand it.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Union Broths ad Sisters! We progresive also have the right to bear arms! protect yourselves aainst rightist thuggery! Put an end to bullyism, fight back!
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
You’re right. I’m embarrassed. I just now checked the facts. I should have been more careful before blowing off like that.
Posted by: david moore | August 8, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Dr. Gregory Garamoni – Your Aug 8, 2009 7:20:15 PM post is 100% correct and couldn’t agree more with your last paragraph. “Earth to politicians: Health care is not a right, doctors are not your slaves, businesses are not your banks, the wealthy are not your wet nurses, and patients are not your pawns.”
The other thing that the idiots in DC need to do is read the constitution and if they have trouble understanding it they need to get someone schooled on the Constitution to explain to them how out of bounds theyr are.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
It is time for the FBI to start arresting anyone who threatens others. Some years in jail will gentle them down and give them some manners. There are several folks in prison who would be happy to teach the conservatives the social graces of prison.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
The unions today are not what they used to be. Ask any one who was a member back in the day. Those people faught in wars and were truly being taken advantage of the the company store. This is not your dad’s union.
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 8, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
The difference between a liberal and a conservative. Liberals will read the works of Mark, Engel, & Lenin while conservatives will read it and understand what they are reading.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
i went to a local town hall meeting with my union t shirt today.
the patriotic americans out numbed the the anti ameican rabble rousers by at least 3 to 1. their were not incidents.
all the anti american demonstrators were over 70 white male with their tbag t shirts. inside the meeting their were a few anti americans with questions of other types.
all in all the patiriotic americans who support the president, the constitution and health care reform carried the day.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“10. Forcing one group (older Americans on Medicare) to accept reduced benefits in order to fund other public health care plans.”
All the more reason to go for Single Payer, Medicare for All, instead of the over-bearing ObamaCare.
When right-wing doctors start organizing, you know The One is done.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 8, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Yeah Right – Sure I get to keep my doctors and my health plan – but I’m also going to have to shell out my hard earned dollars to pay for government health insurance for those who can’t afford it. It’ll be a double whammy. And of course employers will likely push us all into the government healthcare because it will be cheaper for them to do so – thus all the Rich will opt for expensive, but private health insurance. And of course the Dems say the Rich will need to carry the burden, but how often have you seen that? It will be the middle class, as always, that will be paying for it. Geitner is already talking about raising our taxes and putting the burden on the middle class. After Bush, welcome to even-BIGGER government. All hail to Big Brother Obama.
Posted by: Robert | August 8, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
The constitution gives us rights to our lifestyle but what everyone fails to recognize are the responsibilities which go along with it. You have the right to have a large screen TV but you not I or the government have the responsibility to pay for it. You have the right to a home but you not I or the government have the responsibility to pay for it. You have the right to health care but you not I or the government have the responsibility to pay for it. Wake up and take on your responsibility, if you can’t afford it then you don’t need it and the government shouldn’t provide it for you. A liberal is a person who will give away everything they don’t own.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and others. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights.”
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone — not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes ..
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we’re just not interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don’t be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won’t have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don’t care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly….)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country’s history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
I hope the media keeps showing footage these unstable people freaking out so that everyone can see the true behavior of these losers.
Posted by: J Price | August 8, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
It’s the taxes which will have to be drastically raised just to pay the interest on the government debt that is causing the concern. I think that there was some concern when Bush was in office but what he did in eight years Obama is on track to double in less than four years. At the current rate of spending (which has significantly increased under the present administration) our tax revenue will pay for nothing other than the interest on the debt owed by the government. In the first year that the debt was recorded (1789) the debt was $75,463,476.00 and when Barack Obama took office (January 19 2009) it was $10,628,881,485,510.00 and as of today it is $11,218,863,034,278.00. This is an increase of $589,981,548,768.00 since this administration took over and if this rate of spending is continued the debt at the end of one year in office will be approximately $13,578,789,000,000.00 and at the end of four years in office will be approximately $20,658,569,000,000.00. This is debt that the country does not have the money to repay anywhere in the near future. Looking at history James Madison, John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford Hayes, Chester Arthur, Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover accomplished the one thing that no administration since 1933 has accomplished and that is to reduce the government debt while in office. All other Presidents have increased the government debt during their term of office. Who had the biggest change you ask? In order of magnitude (percentage of change as over the years the actual numbers have increased so the only fair method is to look at the percentage of change during each administration) they are:
1. Abraham Lincoln (2,959% increase, Civil War years)
2. Martin Van Buren (1,558% increase, Andrew Jackson had reduced the debt by over 99% during his preceding terms)
3. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1,147% increase, WW II)
4. Woodrow Wilson (822% increase)
5. James Polk (395% increase)
6. James Buchanan (315% increase)
7. Ronald Reagan (286% increase)
8. James Madison (216% increase)
9. George W. Bush (185% increase
10. Gerald Ford (147% increase)
This is the top 10 so the next question to answer is where did William Clinton rank among the Presidents who had an increase in the government debt during their time in office? William Clinton had an increase of 136% in office which ranked as number 13 (not a ranking to be proud of). Where would Barack Obama rank if his administration continues the rate of spending we have experienced to date? Barack Obama at the current rate of spending would have an increase of the federal debt to the tune of $194% which would rank him as number 9 on the list of top ten ahead of George W. Bush. This data is all verifiable from the dept of the treasury website, just google government debt and it will lead you to the right area.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
CBO predicts escalating government budget and deficit from this bill after 2019.
This is the 7/26/2009 letter
continue to grow at a slower rate than the cost of the coverage expansion in the following
decade. In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.
Looking ahead to the decade beyond 2019, CBO tries to evaluate the rate at which the
budgetary impact of each of those broad categories would be likely to change over time.
The net cost of the coverage provisions would be growing at a rate of more than 8 percent
per year in nominal terms between 2017 and 2019; we would anticipate a similar trend in
the subsequent decade. The reductions in direct spending would also be larger in the
second decade than in the first, and they would represent an increasing share of spending
on Medicare over that period; however, they would be much smaller at the end of the
10-year budget window than the cost of the coverage provisions, so they would not be
likely to keep pace in dollar terms with the rising cost of the coverage expansion.
Revenue from the surcharge on high-income individuals would be growing at about
5 percent per year in nominal terms between 2017 and 2019; that component would
continue to grow at a slower rate than the cost of the coverage expansion in the following
decade. In sum, relative to current law, the proposal would probably generate substantial
increases in federal budget deficits during the decade beyond the current 10-year budget
window.
Under any proposal that provided new federal subsidies for the purchase of health
insurance, the rate of growth in federal spending would depend importantly on how the
subsidies were indexed over time. As long as overall spending for health care continued
to expand as a share of the economy, people’s share of insurance costs would continue to
rise faster than their income, or the government’s subsidy costs would continue to rise
faster than the tax base, or both. The proposal limits the share of income that eligible
people would have to pay when they purchased coverage in the insurance exchanges, and
that share of income would not change over time. In addition, insurance plans offered
through the exchanges would be required to pay a specified share of costs for covered
services (on average), and that share also would not change over time. Combining those
provisions, increases in health care spending in excess of the rate of growth in income
would be borne entirely by the federal government in the form of higher subsidy
payments—because those payments would have to cover the entire difference between
the total premium for insurance coverage and the capped amount that enrollees would
pay. Those factors help explain why the costs of the coverage provisions would continue
to grow rapidly in the decade after 2019.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Obama you would have to read it first to comprehend it, something I am positive you would have trouble with, you have no plan this is Pelosi’s plan. Why don’t you have an original idea and come up with the White House plan you spoiled frat boy!!!!
Posted by: Louis Russo | August 8, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
“The constitution gives us rights to our lifestyle ” — were does it say that in the USA Constitution? it does not.
Posted by: RAMBOW99 | August 8, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
What makes any sane person think that the government can manage health care. Look at what the government has done to Social Security, Medicare, Public Housing, and now AIG. With this kind of a track record they have proven that they aren’t even capable of successfully operating the local burger stand. To start with where will the money come from and not cause an increase to the government debt any more than it is? In his first 170 days in office Obama has increased the debt of the government by 901.25 Billion dollars. At this rate he will increase the debt of the Government by 1.82 Trillion dollars in his first year alone and 7.74 Trillion dollars by the end of his 4 year term in office. If he is elected for a second term with the same rate of spending then the government debt will increase by 15.48 Trillion dollars. Since the debt owed by the Government was 10.6 Trillion dollars when he took office an additional 7.74 Trillion will almost double the debt in just 4 years to 18.34 Trillion dollars and at the end of his second term it will have increased to an unthought of 26.08 Trillion dollars. The interest alone on this amount of debt will consume more than half of the entire federal budget. This does not even include what Obama wants to put into healthcare which has been estimated may actually cost upwards of 1.6 Billion dollars by the Congressional Budget Office. This is money that the Government does not have and cannot conceivably have without raising taxes to the point where everyone in the country will be paying a much higher tax rate than they are currently paying. No matter how you want to put it any healthcare reform will require government involvement which will lead to required government spending so the money is an important issue, if it’s not there then healthcare will have to wait until such time as it is available. Obama promised change but this is ridiculous he makes all who came before him look minor on their spending while in office. Time to stop spending and do what should have been done long ago, cut spending which is not specifically authorized in article 1 of the constitution. There is NO money for healthcare, there is NO money for education reform or any other dreams in the upcoming budget. Look at what the government has done to Social Security, Medicare, Public Housing, Chrysler, GM, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Thanks for helping make my point.
Posted by: J Price | August 8, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Obama needs to start listening to the people and stop pushing his agenda on a populace that doesn’t want it. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT WANT THIS HEALTHCARE PLAN. Go back to the drawing board and consider options that do not include a government run plan, tax hikes, and unfair gov’t intrusion into citizens’ medical rights.
Posted by: KCNelson | August 8, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
I am already sick and tired of these radicals shouting at town hall meetings and stopping intelligent Americans from gathering information and learning about health care reform. These people are being planted by a small group of right-wing conservative extremists who have been hired to disrupt these informative meetings.
I fully support health care reform, and without it, the number of Americans who will be unable to obtain even the most basic healthcare will continue to grow by leaps and bounds. I think 50 million Americans unable to obtain health coverage is way too many already! Let’s act like true Americans and try to help everyone in this country!
PLEASE IGNORE THESE CRAZY SHOUTING IDIOTS WHO ARE PLANTED TO DISRUPT OUR DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
Posted by: jmb | August 8, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
No logic has ever been defied, however, much has been denied.
The very idea, that the majority of the 97% of all Americans, who would not be affected by an increase of taxes on the top 3% of America’s highest income earners, would object that the very rich should pay for healthcare reform, denies all logic.
Remember the “me generation”, welcome to the “ether generation”, how much longer til the gas wears off?
Unless you’re among the 3% of highest American income earners, or have nothing positive to add, Sit-down, Shut-up, and be quiet.
How do ya like me now?
Posted by: david moore | August 8, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
jmb – You need to realize that under Ammendment 1 to the US Constitution these people you are berating are within their rights. Nowhere in the COnstitution is the Legislative Branch (Refer to Article 1) nor the Executive Branch (refer to Article 2) given the power to fund or provide a health care plan for all citizens. The real people who are out of line are the members of the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch who are not acting within the bounds of the Constitution.
Posted by: sandcrab1612 | August 8, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
jmb,
You pay for it if you want but I’ll tell the government to keep their hands off my stash and that’s my constitutional right to do so.
You seem to think it was ok for Liberal Groups to interrupt conservative town halls when Bush was President but it’s not ok for conservatives to turn the tables on the Liberal Pols.
Posted by: toby hill | August 8, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
The very idea that people should decide for themselves whether the government taking over the nations health care system affects them or not.
I’m not dead, yet. It affects me.
david more wrote:
No logic has ever been defied, however, much has been denied.
The very idea, that the majority of the 97% of all Americans, who would not be affected by an increase of taxes on the top 3% of America’s highest income earners, would object that the very rich should pay for healthcare reform, denies all logic.
Remember the “me generation”, welcome to the “ether generation”, how much longer til the gas wears off?
Unless you’re among the 3% of highest American income earners, or have nothing positive to add, Sit-down, Shut-up, and be quiet.
How do ya like me now?
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
I’m an ordinary American who supports what President Obama and the Democrats are tying to do. And I think the screeching, bullying people showing up to disrupt and destory these town halls are a disgrace.
Calling the Democrats nazis, saying they are trying to destroy the constitution, or that they want to kill grandparents is just lies and scare tactics.
The latest polls show that President Obama has lost some support amongst poorer, less educated whites. It makes sense this kind of nonsense would appeal to the gullible. They are susceptible to repeated lies on right wing sensationalist media.
I’m looking forward to seeing information on the various agreements and compromises being worked out.
And I’m not looking forward to any more nonsense from the Republican right wing, or people pretending to be ‘moderates’.
Posted by: jennysandford | August 8, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
“The worst may be behind us” No, it is ahead of us, Obama–because you have only kicked the problem down the road to a future generation. Stop lying dude.
Posted by: John Salley | August 8, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
@tasha – Not everything is about race! This IS about health care! Liberals seem to forget how they have demonstrated in the past, burning the American flag, being mobs of angry unruly and boisterous citizens. Now the show is on the other foot, and the liberals think it’s outrageous. Such convenient memories! Millions of Americans do NOT want government health care forced upon them, and the only way to get this thick-headed congress to hear them is to speak out and continue speaking out until the idiots listen.
Posted by: QuitScreening Racism | August 8, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Then what is that the President Obama and the Democrats are trying to do that you support so much compared to what they are actually doing.
I fail to understand your anger at others who do the same thing that the progressive left Democrats and their minons were doing. Oh, I suppose it is because they have political views that differ from yours.
Not good enough.
It helps when people become more informed, that appears to be your fear.
jennysandford
I’m an ordinary American who supports what President Obama and the Democrats are tying to do. And I think the screeching, bullying people showing up to disrupt and destory these town halls are a disgrace.
Calling the Democrats nazis, saying they are trying to destroy the constitution, or that they want to kill grandparents is just lies and scare tactics.
The latest polls show that President Obama has lost some support amongst poorer, less educated whites. It makes sense this kind of nonsense would appeal to the gullible. They are susceptible to repeated lies on right wing sensationalist media.
I’m looking forward to seeing information on the various agreements and compromises being worked out.
And I’m not looking forward to any more nonsense from the Republican right wing, or people pretending to be ‘moderates’.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Explain to me how the same government that says a woman has the legal right to an abortion, can say that we do not have the right to health care without government interference and control.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Mike,
Jake Tapper is about the only MSM reporter I can tolerate. I think he tries to report honestly and without bias, difficult as it may be for him personally. He does strike me as a person who is at least interested in what others are thinking and their frame of reference on any given issue, and is willing to recognize that may mean one has just as much a legitimate POT. ABC News as a whole==different story. I like Jake and he makes me think. I believe he likes to “think” too by hearing others’ POT. Heck, I don’t agree with my own mother 100% of the time.
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 8, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
The only thing the present health care system has is “it’s the devil that you know.” But it stinks. It is hugely expensive, makes us collude with our doctors to get the care we need, makes everyone sweat to make sure they get basic coverage, makes huge headaches for people changing jobs or with pre-existing conditions, is crushing businesses and taxpayers, is squeezing out good doctors and pharmacies, and flat-out doesn’t even cover 50 million people. It will take time to work out the kinks but don’t worry — health care reform will be a huge improvement!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 8, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
If our current health system is such a failure, why let the government that regulates that own the new one.
Most people are happy with their insurance.
Yes, we know some things do need to change, but that doesn’t mean Congress has to write a 1000+ page bill to fix those things. Even Congress is not that inept, and if they are, we don’t want them writing the bill.
hopesprings52
The only thing the present health care system has is “it’s the devil that you know.” But it stinks. It is hugely expensive, makes us collude with our doctors to get the care we need, makes everyone sweat to make sure they get basic coverage, makes huge headaches for people changing jobs or with pre-existing conditions, is crushing businesses and taxpayers, is squeezing out good doctors and pharmacies, and flat-out doesn’t even cover 50 million people. It will take time to work out the kinks but don’t worry — health care reform will be a huge improvement!
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
People look at the increased cost of health care but ignore the increased benefit. If the mortality rate today were the same as it was in 1960, 500,000 *more* Americans would die each year. It is those lives that the increased price of health care has bought us. People talk about wanting 1960s health care prices. What they really mean is that they want 1960s prices but 2009 quality.
Posted by: anonymoususerguy | August 8, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
The CBO lies.We can all agree that President Obama is the smartest president ever elected.That man who faked getting beat up in St. Louis is an obvious racist who hates the idea that a black man could get elected to the presidency.Mr. Obama should not worry about criticism-he won and he can do what he wants.
Posted by: Nephron | August 8, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
There is so much information about what this bill will and won’t do, it is ridiculous. winz >>>>> Yes and to be honest you have a lot of wishful thinking. Doesnt Massachusetts and Tennessee have health care in deep trouble. And how about California? Since people cant tell what the outcome will be why not test ideas in states willing to try. winz you can move where ever the test is so you can be the guinea pig for everyone else. For 80% who have health care they like, leave us out of this until you experiment on others have proof that your ideas work.
So far the only thing the government plan will do is increase cost and mess up everyones current insurance. Thats all it does. It doesnt cover anyone as the CBO. It doesnt reduce cost as the CBO.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
I do hope that you are being facetious.
Thats the way I’m taking your statements.
Nephron stated:
The CBO lies.We can all agree that President Obama is the smartest president ever elected.That man who faked getting beat up in St. Louis is an obvious racist who hates the idea that a black man could get elected to the presidency.Mr. Obama should not worry about criticism-he won and he can do what he wants.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
If the mortality rate today were the same as it was in 1960, 500,000 *more* Americans would die each year. It is those lives that the increased price of health care has bought us. People talk about wanting 1960s health care prices. What they really mean is that they want 1960s prices but 2009 quality.
anonymoususerguy >>>>> Well cost could be reduced but HR3200 doesnt reduce cost it increases it.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
“And I think the screeching, bullying people showing up to disrupt and destory these town halls are a disgrace.”
Multiple videos show that the bullying is being done by pro-Obama supporters.
Feel free to support the SEIU union thugs physically assaulting ordinary Americans exercising their constitutional rights. Let’s see where that leads us, shall we?
Posted by: Jenn | August 8, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Well, perhaps the president will explain to the American people what HIS HEALTH CARE PLAN CONTAINS; WHAT IT DOESN’T CONTAIN; AND WHY CERTAIN ELEMENTS ARE NOT CONTAINED!!
* WHAT IS IMAC? WHAT WILL IT DO, AND WHAT WILL IT NOT DO? WHO WILL SERVE ON IT, AND WHO WILL DO THE SELECTION OF THOSE WHO SERVE?
* HOW WILL THEY PROVIDE THE HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH AN EXISTING NURSE SHORTAGE AND A GROWING DOCTOR SHORTAGE — MORE TO COME IF THEY HAVE TO BREAK THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH? (Please do not use AMA and AARP as being for the program, for they do not represent the vast majority of doctors, and after this past week, the AARP is going to represent many fewer seniors!)
*HOW WILL THE ADMINISTRATION’S PLAN CHANGE MEDICARE — GIVE SPECIFICS — NOT GENERALITIES?
*WHY IS THE ADMINISTRATION SO STRIDENTLY AGAINST TORT REFORM — WHICH WOULD SAVE BILLIONS FROM BOGUS LAW SUITS?
*WHY IS THERE NOT LANGUAGE TO GO AFTER MEDICAID AND MEDICARE FRAUD — WHICH AGAIN WOULD SAVE BILLIONS?
*WHAT MAKES UP THE 47 MILLION ‘WITHOUT INSURANCE’ THAT THE ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES TO TOUT? WHAT ARE THE DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKOUTS — INCLUDING ILLEGALS?
*WHY IS THERE NOT SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IN THE BILLS ON TARGETING MONEY TOWARDS CURES FOR DISEASES: DIABETES; VARIOUS CANCERS; AUTISM; MS; HEART DISEASE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; AND VARIOUS DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH AGING?
He turned this bill writing over to his left wing, and he now has a DOG’S BREAKFAST! It is his own fault, but only he can extricate himself from it. He best get busy!!
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 8, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
If you wonder why people are upset is that we have another massive quick push by Obama and the Democrat controlled Congress, and during the Townhall meetings they again say they haven’t read the bills their to vote on. Also now we have the White House and their supporters claiming the Townhall blow-ups against these legislators are controlled and planned by the Right, but you now are having people attacked by the SEIU Union – A big Obama chum
Posted by: Jeff G | August 8, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
“Multiple videos show that the bullying is being done by pro-Obama supporters.”…… Yeah, right. Perhaps they’re reacting to your new thing of bussing in people not living in the area to disrupt Town Halls, but it’s easy to see who the people yelling are.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 8, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
If President Obama can give the American public anything like the health insurance the Civil Service employees have, he will have been successful in reforming the medical care nightmare. I speak from my experience with the Federal insurance program and my wife’s experience with private insurance from her employer. The thing that made the most difference was that once a year (in December), the private insurance companies that competed under the guidelines outlined in the Federal oversight, had to send me summaries of their programs in standard formats that made comparison between services offered and prices required easy to do….and I could switch between the different companies with no muss and no fuss…about pre-existing conditions or anything else. On the other hand, my wife had misery getting coverage due to companies reluctance to take doctor’s report relative to conditions that insurance company automatically condsidered to be pre-existing. Since we are both retired and are both on my Federal insurance…we have had no problems.
President Obama is on the right track and he has my support…and my thanks.
My kids need better than what the No! No! No! Republicans are trying to do to them.
Posted by: msgijoe | August 8, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
PappyHappy >>> You are completely correct. The current bill is not about fixing anything. They give you the straw man argument. If it doesnt contain X then its not reform. I say BUNK. Lets go slow and make a good system we have had for decades better cheaper and all grow as a nation. We dont need a new system we need to fix the old one. We need to make it beyond reproach and even more world class.
Instead of giving your data to internet why not place it on two USB drives that you carry with you at all times.
This way you have your medical record in your pocket. Mandate a common record data format designed by some of the great hospitals in the USA. Mandate all insurance companies must accept this format. That would help doctors by reducing their record keeping. It would help the patient by allowing them to have their record with them and reduce costs for the doctor. WOW.. things can get better if that was the goal of the congress and Obama.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
“So far the only thing the government plan will do is increase cost and mess up everyones current insurance.”
If you have insurance that is.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
In a couple of years, some member
of congress will take pity on
some poor soul using the public
option that will cost too much
and pass a bill to lower the cost.
This will kill private insurance
and usher in the single payer
system Obama, Frank and Dodd want.
To lower cost the govt will dictate
fees to hospitals, doctors, drug
companies resulting to doctors
hospitals going under, drug companies
cutting research, and less care
available. Congress can’t pass up
and opportunity to buy votes.
Posted by: jschmidt | August 8, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
There have been some apparently outlandish claims. The health care bill will run well over 1000 pages and it is difficult to digest it all. In addition there is a lack of trust of congress and to a lesser extent Obama. Even if congress does not try to deceive us, legislators do not have a good track record in the estimation of cost. More directly the house bill (like the stimulus legislation) bill made illegal immigrants ineligible. But the house has failed to pass any amendment that requires checking of immigration statues. So congress is blatantly setting up a path to breaking of the law. In the last few days some recordings of Obama’s indicating that the type of proposed legislation is a step to a single payer system. He assures us that it might take 5, 10 or even 15 years but that the cost savings and government subsidies will eliminate private plans. Of course, this conflicts with his recent statements.
Today Obama has reportedly said that the health care legislation is critical to economic recovery. There is not much truth in that. I am sure that his economist cringe at that wild assertion.
Given the complexity, deception and risk associated with legislation that involves trillions some of (that generally support the initiative) would like to see congress proceed slowly and deliberately.
Posted by: merchantilist | August 8, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
If you have insurance that is.Skip
>>> And if you dont Skip you still might not have insurance. The CBO states that as many as 30 million will still not be insured under this plan.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
“Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement.”
Like the Republicans tried to do to critics of the war in Iraq.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“Perhaps they’re reacting to your new thing of bussing in people not living in the area to disrupt Town Halls, but it’s easy to see who the people yelling are.”
Cite your proof.
But let’s say they WERE organized. Who cares? Don’t you lefties support protests by ACORN, Code Pink, Answer, and MoveOn? Obama always touts the importance of community organizing, so let people organize! Obama should welcome it!
Or is it that free speech only belongs to the left? Wow, are you going to be in for a shock in the coming weeks.
Posted by: Jenn | August 8, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Why can’t members of the SEIU or any other group who might support President Obama do the same thing that those who have disrupted the town hall meetings? Why do some people want to insinuate that they are somehow not as legitimate. I know Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the like have told you to be afraid of them, Unions and of course anyone from Chicago. I just find it rather interesting that these so called grass root people are now whining because people supporting the President are doing exactly what they are doing.
Posted by: catmom | August 8, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Congress should force insurers to not drop people, force them to take anyone. The govt should encourage a coordinated claim system common to all insurers to reduce admin costs and pass the savings along. States already govern premiums of insurers. Would the public option be governed by the states or would the Fed control it? That would be a savings for the public option that the private insurers would not have. An unfair competition. The Flexible Savings Acct would be cut according to the house bill which results in a tax increase for all, since those funds are tax deffered. Allow insurers to compete across state lines. Each state has regulations for insurers that can differ from the Fed regulations. Streamline those regulations to reduce costs among insurers. Instead of competing with the insurers, the govt should help them reduce costs. Reduce the 10 years it takes to get a drug approved. Drugs are often introduced overseas. These are the steps that should be tried instead of the grandiose scheme the Dems propose. The people are really mad that the Congress is not listening. They should n’t mistake the anti-Bush vote in November for a mandate to do anything they want.
Posted by: jschmidt | August 8, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
“The CBO states that as many as 30 million will still not be insured under this plan.”
I have not seen an estimate nearly this high before and I am skeptical. The Obama administration does not agree with all of the CBO’s estimates. They do agree however that the increasing costs of healthcare will become unsustainable if something isn’t done.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
You only have to read the thousands of horror stories every year about private health insurance companies screwing their policy holders to understand how Federally run universal health care could hardly be worse. BTW, it’s mightly curious how most of these “protesters” appear to be Medicare age. Do they express their disgust over “socialized Medicine” by paying their own medical bills instead of getting that nasty Federal government to pay them?
Posted by: AlChemist | August 8, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“It will take a while but it will slowly vote for free food for everyone…”
A public option for health insurance will not be free.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
How can our congressmen refuse to see us the voting public and have closed door town halls. Calling these invitation only meetings, town hall meeting is dishonest.
ITs a meeting of the GOOD OLE boys clubs.
Thats what the democrats are all about.
THESE CHICKENS NEED to GO.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
It’s a town hall meeting for truly concerned citizens to ask questions, not some kind of pep rally to be disrupted.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Lets face it nothing Obama has said has been truthful since he got elected. He always promised transparency in government, five days reading laws before voting, and no taxes affecting anyone under $250k. So far all wrong. Obama says his health plan will cost nothing and not hurt us. Obama gives massive numbers of people that are not covered by doctors. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) tells us it will cost us a massive amount, and today anyone in the USA can walk into an emergency room and receive care.
Posted by: Jeff G | August 8, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Federally run universal health care could hardly be worse. AlChemist >>>>> You have no idea how wrong you are. This is a very simplistic outlook. IT CAN be a LOT worse. People dieing waiting for treatment. People not getting treatment because age discrimination. People not given medicine because it costs to much like what happens in Canada. ETC. Costs so high everyones standard of living is decreased yet again. Your arguement is without merit.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
The Obama administration does not agree with all of the CBO’s estimates. Skip >>> Obama doesnt agree because he doesnt like the numbers. I would say the cost estimates are WAY WAY LOW and that would increase the individual outlay and cost to the country by a LOT. Skip they are not trying to FIX whats wrong. What is wrong with that idea? Or is that too easy?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Don’t you people realize that those of us that have health today , are paying for the ones who do not. Are rates are inflated to cover those who have lost their jobs or choose not to be insured. Under this new plan you have a choice of keeping what you already have ,or switching to another plan . This will keep costs down when others are required to help pay and the burden isn’t on those of us who pay for it all now.Wake up people!!
Posted by: Kenny | August 8, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Jeff G >>> I agree. WORST PRESIDENT in history. I mean dead last. His actions have been knee jerk and poor.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
“Anyone but Bush” was one thing. “Any health care system but the current system” does not resonate because most people (65-70%) are perfectly happy with their health care just the way it is, and 75% of people (correctly) believe this plan will increase the defecit. The Dems are reaching too far and they ignore their constituencies at their own risk. The tide is turning.
Posted by: Woody | August 8, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
“You only have to read the thousands of horror stories every year about private health insurance companies screwing their policy holders to understand how Federally run universal health care could hardly be worse.”
There are thousands and thousands of Medicare and Medicaid horror stories. And the fraud in those programs is legendary. They also both have TRILLIONS of dollars in unfunded mandates. If those programs were run by public companies, they would have been bankrupt many years ago.
Posted by: Jenn | August 8, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
In 1965, politicians pushing Medicare said it would cost $9B/yr. in 1990. Actual cost, $66B
Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 8, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
There are 46 million people out there right now with no insurance.Many are dying way before their time because the richest country in the world has failed them.This new system will require that all pay to get insurance and not just require those of us to pay for all of them. Insurance rates will not be able to be paid for if we continue with the current plan. We all will are insurance if nothing is done now!
Posted by: Kenny | August 8, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
The Bush administration did nothing to help the uninsured.President Obama is trying to save the health care system for those of us who have it ,and to get some kind of insurance for those who don’t . Simple as that.You don’t have to switch if you are happy with what you got . A decrease of premiums is possible when all are required to pay.My car insurance hasn’t increased in 10 yrs. because all are required to pay ,this new health plan has the same principle,everyone pays to make it more affordable to all.Think people ,we need a new health plan before none of us have it at all. Yes I have Blue Cross,Blue shield,but the rates keep going up and up and up11 Something must be done NOW!!!
Posted by: Kenny | August 8, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
No thank you to the plan! If drug companies are paying for the plan, it is already screwed up. Pharmaceuticals are a racket. People of American Unite against this plan. This is a money grab by our politicians. This is crazy. I do believe we need some kind of reform. However, I am absolutely against tax payers paying for abortions. I am absolutely against any form of socialism which is where the President and his clowns up in Washington wants us to go. My mom and in laws use medicare. They want to cut from the very people who helped lay an amazing foundation for our country. THIS IS WRONG WASHINGTON! Again, another sign of socialism. Folks, come on. We are being treated as if we are stupid. We see the signs on the wall. Hey here is an idea, why don’t each of you call someone in Canada who has come to America for medical treatment and find out why they came to america. Why don’t each of you speak with the Parliament in the EU and find out how great their health care is. America please see the truth of this situation. The people in Washington have forgotten who they work for. We have a right to take their job. They work for us. Not the other way around. They should be losing sleep not us. Come on Americans. We are smarter than this.
Posted by: Concerned Citizen | August 8, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Palin, you pale in real leaders. Just how much did health care opponents pay you to quit your job?
Posted by: Robert Campbell | August 8, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
“There are 46 million people out there right now with no insurance.Many are dying way before their time because the richest country in the world has failed them.”
That’s an overblown bogus figure. 10 to 15 million of the uninsured are ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. If you’re so worried about Americans dying due to lack of insurance, promote getting these illegal immigrants deported. Or do you just plan to give them free insurance?
Posted by: Jenn | August 8, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
meant -
“Palin, you pale in comparison to real leaders.
Just how much did health care opponents pay you to quit your job?”
Posted by: Robert Campbell | August 8, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Read “Culture of Corruption” by Michelle Malkin and then name anyone in the Obama administration, President, Cabinet Member or Czar, with a track record that deserves your trust.
Posted by: Bil Watts | August 8, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
kenny, there are 46 million people out there that are uninsured. That means that there are 260 million people out there that ARE insured. And according to non partisan polls, that means that there are 208 million (give or take a few) that are extremely satisfied with their current providers. And all of my numbers exclude the estimated 25 million illegals that are counted in the “uninsured”. So, if YOU discount those illegals, then there are more like 20 million uninsured. And if you look at the ‘tricky’ way the numbers are counted, if anyone at any time for any length of time becomes uninsured (for instance, between jobs for a month), they become an addition to the uninsured. Also, it is estimated that about 15 million can afford their own insurance, but choose to not carry it. This may be because they are wealthy enough to handle catastrophic illnesses or they may just flat out be irresponsible. In either case, the CHOOSE to remain uninsured. Now your number of truly “needy” is down to about 5 to 7 million. So, our whole system, in which 208 million citizens are happy with, should be changed for the benefit of 7 million???? Come on…let’s just buy those 7 million folks and insurance policy. It would be a lot cheaper.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Those who buy into the hateful right wing propoganda should think, that Obama is smart enough to understand that he would lose the next elections, if he does a bad job and mess up the health care for the poeple. He understands people would reject him if he is not able to deliver a good health care for the people, and if he is not able to genearte milloins of good paying employment.
I think his cash for clunker is generating business for the auto industry and will create good paying employment.
Cash for clunker has been a success for europeans too.
Obama must expedite employment generation.
He should start programs similar to cash for clunker to create good paying employment.
I think the right appraoch is to feed the directly horse where the mouth is, isntead of givning stimulus money to banks and companies.
These banks and companies after taking the stumulus money are giving out employment & contracts to overseas (China and India) to cut the cost.
Obama should initiate incentives like paying half the salary if these companies retain employment until recovery, and do not lay off.
Europeans are doing the same succesuflly.
Also, he should incentivize these companies with tax breaks for every employment they create and retain for at least one year.
Obama had promised to take away the tax credit that was given by Bush to the outsourcing companies for outsourcing.
I have not heard anything, though he once said that he would take it back.
Posted by: Brian | August 8, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Wake up, 10 million of those uninsured are illegal’s. I do not want my elderly parents to have to think about the lack of medicine coverage in their last days due to the “new” insurance coverage no longer helping them with medicine but will cover assisted suicide. OH MY GOD AMERICA! What have we come to!!! America, in the last 12 months, can you tell me one thing that has come out of Washington that has worked? NO!!! The Bush team did not do the right thing about the bailouts. Let the companies fail. The Obama team continues to destroy our nation, heritage and patriotism. This is crazy. IT IS ALL ABOUT GREED! Wake up America. There is not one person on Obama’s team we can trust. I cannot even believe our nation is in the shape it is. Again, it is all about GREED! This is just wrong!!! The people who voted this mess into office should go and FIRE this government team. I would personally do it, however, I did not vote this mess into office.
Posted by: Concerned Citizen | August 8, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
“Jenny Sanford,” I too am an ordinary American, and I oppose what Obama and the Democrats are trying to do the the American health care system. I agree that the shouting and bullying at town hall meetings, BY PEOPLE ON ALL SIDES OF THIS ISSUE, is wrong and counterproductive and disgraceful. Calling those who disagree with the president on such matters as the public option racists and right wingers is equally uncalled for. Telling people that if the Democrats’ proposal does not pass soon, none of our health insurance is secure and that unless we reform health care the president’s way, we cannot repair our economy (things the president has said in recent days)is also using scare tactics.
I agree that we need an intelligent discussion of this important issue. The shouting should give way to talking openly and calmly. But much of the shouting is caused by deep-seated concerns that we who disagree with the Democratic plans are being disregarded in a rush to push through a bill that does not serve our best interests, just as the stimulus bill was passed over the objections of much of the public.
I’m not pretending to be a moderate; I am a moderate. I support sensible health care insurance reform— I want to see a plan that: improves access to quality insurance for those who have trouble paying for it, through government subsidies or tax credits or something; includes serious malpractice/tort reform so that we can dramatically reduce the needless defensive doctoring practices that help keep costs high; provides for insurance portability and large pools for high risk individuals and small businesses; reforms in the coverage of preexisting conditions; expansion of Health Savings Accounts (with the government perhaps contributing to the HSAs of lower income individuals). I am opposed to a public option.
I am tired of people on both sides demonizing individuals and groups with whom they disagree and personalizing their attacks. It is not JUST the “poor and uneducated” with whom the president is losing support over health care reform. I hold a PhD, my family is filled with members holding advanced degrees, and we all disagree with the president on this issue. We are not among the gullible. It is not nice to make patronizing assumptions about those who disagree with you. I do not assume that those who support universal health care, for example, are uneducated rubes, even though I completely disagree with their opinions on such things as the comparison of the American and Canadian system.
I am anxious to see the Senate Gang of Six come out with a plan, which is the closest thing to a bipartisan effort I have seen.
PS Just curious– is your name a tribute to or take off of Gov. Sanford’s wife’s name? I wasn’t sure, since you spell it differently. Seems odd, if so.
Posted by: moderate | August 8, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Bill Watts, there’s more truth in Cat in the Hat than the drivel that Michelle Malkin has duped you into believing. Good Lord. When Michelle Malkin is referenced as legitimate journalism, our country is in a WORLD of hurt. That’s the greatest argument against socialism I’ve seen yet; our public educational system, which is of course a form of socialism, is CLEARLY FAILING us.
Posted by: Average Joe | August 8, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
msgijoe…your kids “deserve” whatever YOU provide them with including the type of insurance coverage you provide them. They DON’T “deserve” to have their insurance supplemented by me!
Posted by: ohnotheydidnt | August 8, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Brian,
Please read the Constitution for a complete and comprehensive explaination of the powers of the President. You’ll find they are quite limited.
Posted by: Woody | August 8, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Brian, just a curious question: Where would our country get the money to do even one tenth of the things you propose? Pay half the salaries…..??? Heck, we can’t even afford to do what Obama is proposing NOT. Geithner has just announced that he is going to try to get congress to increase the legally established debt load of the US, just to cover the give away crap that the administration has already heaped upon us…..Do you have any idea that the US does NOT have that kind of money and that it really really has to be paid back some day?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Look how small the republican party has become. You can fit them into small rooms at these town hall meetings. less than 1% of the population trying to determine the course for the other 99% of the nation. Looking forward to the 2010 elections. Maybe they will accept that their ideology has been rejected.
Posted by: rightbehind | August 8, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
It is strange that Obama never addresses the causes for high medical care costs. I have been looking at many studies and it turns out the government is the main culprit. They have made an utter mess of things with MEDICARE payment strategies and encouraged high costs and incredible hospital overhead costs.. 10% of medical care cost is due to malpractice awards and Obama refuses to address this problem. Then the FDA has caused drug companies to spend Billions in paperwork and excessive testing all of which is passed on to medicine purchasers. Results: The government is the cause of most of the problem so who in their right mind would want it in charge of anything. Obama is just completely wrong.
Posted by: brian | August 8, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
ncpilot, if you were warning about the debt when Bush was blowing $1 trillion on his pet project in Iraq and when he was giving away hundreds of millions to drug companies, you have standing to call into question the debt now. if not, you don’t.
Posted by: Average American | August 8, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
you know, average american, I was supporting the president when he was “throwing” 1 trillion dollars at Iraq. As was most of America. You can try to rewrite history if you wish, but until Michael Moore told you guys to stop supporting the war efforts, you were too. Bush did not ever have the power to go to war by himself. He had the support and okay of 95% of congress. So that is where I was. And congress continued funding that war. And as far as giving away millions of dollars to drug companies? Show me some facts about that, will you? Which companies, and how much? See, you are merely parroting the Lib’s talking points and it makes you look foolish. When the campaign was going on and gas prices were high, your flavor of the day was “Bush was throwing millions of dollars at BIG OIL”. Now, it’s the same tired song, but big oil replaced by big pharma companies and insurance companies. Can’t you think of anything original? How about this. Take a look at campaign contributions from the insurance and pharm companies. I don’t think you’ll like what you see. They gave a lot more money to the DNC than to the GOP
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Please, Mr. President, if you’ve any decency at all, any respect for us at all, let the Congress and the American people read the bill at the very least. Why are you pushing something that you don’t know the details on when it is so personal to the rest of us? Why? What do you gain from this?
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 8, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Because the education system is a failure.
We spend more on education then any other country and fail miserably at educating them.
Why fix that when we can fix health care instead.
Do you really think they want to blame the public school system, the unions, the government for its failure.
“An interesting component of the PISA data is the analysis of school spending in relation to performance. Educational spending does have an affect on performance, though it only accounts for 20 percent of the variability between countries, Schleicher explained. The United States spends the most per student on education, but performs worse than many countries that spend significantly less, including Finland and Korea.”
Skip spoke thus:
“…our public educational system, which is of course a form of socialism, is CLEARLY FAILING us.”
Then why do you guys always fight more funding for public education? If you think public education is expensive what do you think nationwide private education would cost?
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Note to Obama: “Anyone But Bush” does not equate to a mandate for a complete dismantling of our health care delivery system. And all the whining in the world won’t change the fact that 65% of Americans are happy with their health care delivery just as it is. Of course there is room for improvement but HR 3200 is not an improvement. There is only one word for it … radical. The majority of Americans have no taste for radicalism.
Posted by: Woody | August 8, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
I wish it were true that what President Obama wants is a done deal. That is not true. Our President has to wait for agreement by Congress and the Senate. What he has to deal with is a republican Party of No who during the last administration could say only Yes, and the Democrats who are more worried about re-election than what is good for the country. Someone actually wrote our newspaper saying he paid $1470.00 a month for health insurance, but he sure did not want any improvement in that rate or for anyone else. What is rediculous is that most people could not begin to pay that for health insurance. America does need health care reform and it will happen because we have a Democratic administration. Republicans know that all they have to do is lie a lot and their base will lap it up like dogs. Right now I believe there are more sensible people in America. The republican base is now the extreme right wing people who listen to and believe all the lies opposing our government and believe them without question.
Posted by: Viki | August 8, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
jennifer…that is all most of us republicans are asking for. Just for an open and honest bill, and stop rushing a behind closed door legislation at us. Obama is in such a hurry to get it passed because he knows it would never pass the smell test. His “trust me” arrogance is overwhelming, but it is working on his fan club
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
“The United States spends the most per student on education, but performs worse than many countries that spend significantly less”
And yet when the same point is made regarding healthcare instead of education opponents attack the data.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Perhaps if you discussed what people were actually posting you would realize this is not about Republican talking points. It isn’t about Democrat talking points either.
Its about the bill as it has been presented to us, as we have read, and the information we have available from credible sources.
The gentleman probably realizes that he is able to pay the rate, and it is better to pay that rate then push it off on others, or to put it onto the next generation in a decade. He is being responsible and thinking ahead, although Congress fails to, we do not have to also fail.
Viki commented:
I wish it were true that what President Obama wants is a done deal. That is not true. Our President has to wait for agreement by Congress and the Senate. What he has to deal with is a republican Party of No who during the last administration could say only Yes, and the Democrats who are more worried about re-election than what is good for the country. Someone actually wrote our newspaper saying he paid $1470.00 a month for health insurance, but he sure did not want any improvement in that rate or for anyone else. What is rediculous is that most people could not begin to pay that for health insurance. America does need health care reform and it will happen because we have a Democratic administration. Republicans know that all they have to do is lie a lot and their base will lap it up like dogs. Right now I believe there are more sensible people in America. The republican base is now the extreme right wing people who listen to and believe all the lies opposing our government and believe them without question.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
skip, why do you say we always fight funding for education. It’s not as simple as that. I can’t speak for other states, but let me tell you what just happened here in NC. In Charlotte. Our city government okayed several MILLION dollars to construch a tunned underneat a street that divides an old art museum from the new one. This airconditioned tunnel is to serve the sole, one time purpose of transporting artwork from the old museum to the new. Now that money was given to the museum at the expense of the Charlotte Mecklenburgh School systems. The laid of many teachers. This during the recession. NOW, they have used education funding as an excuse to raise taxes in NC. I think that a wiser move would have been to put off the tunnel, keep the art in the old (functional) museum at least until the economy turns around. It is little things like this that makes it look like fight funding for education. Spend our money on education….IF any is left over, give it to the artsy crowd. Better yet, let the arts and sports be self supporting
Posted by: ncpilot09 | August 8, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Vicki,
That is not true. He does not have to deal with Republicans in Congress. We all know it’s democrats that are causing him trouble. That’s not really my concern. Why is he pushing this? What is the hurry? There are currently 5 versions, if I’m not mistaken. Why do we need this, whatever it is, passed in September? What happens in October if this ( who knows what legislation) isn’t passed? Does the world stop spinning? I mean, seriously, WTH?
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 8, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
“This isn’t a rich school district, it is in rural Illinois, and private school costs less.”
That is an exception instead of the rule is it not? It sounds like you have a very reasonably priced private school near you.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
You people can debate back-and-forth all night and accomplish zip! There IS no FINAL health care bill. Until there is and until we know what it is, you are just wasting your breath and your fingers.
Posted by: sandy | August 8, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Sandy, actually, I think we need to make our feelings known well before a final bill emerges. I am enough of an idealist and optimist to hope that there are members of Congress who will listen and help shape a compromise bill that actually addresses the concerns and wishes of the American people. If they continue to think, for example, that a public option will be supported by the public, they will continue to include it in their bills. Only by making clear to our elected representatives that we want them to vote against any measure that contains a public option do we have a chance to get that removed from the final bill that emerges from the battle between different groups of Democrats (because, let’s face it, they are not really listening to their Republican coounterparts much, now are they?)
Posted by: moderate | August 8, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
sandy | Aug 8, 2009 10:56:52 PM
You might be right, but at least we’re having fun and are home staying out of trouble.
Posted by: Skip | August 8, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
“Why is he pushing this”? You need to
understand how revolutions work. Shock
and awe disrupts your ability to
assess facts at a rational “pace”.
Your Mom told you to never make im-
portant decisions in haste. Obama
wants to be your mama and whip you
up to reject the “old” notions.
Speed is the key to keeping you
unbalanced, and therefore more vul-
nerable to the new dogma. Anyone
who tries this is NOT your friend
and should NOT be trusted.
Posted by: Trajan | August 8, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Isn’t Obama the one who’s been “outlandish” and “misleading”??
Posted by: John | August 8, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
When we the citizens of the United States become fed up with the garbage, money and spending that comes out of Washington, no matter Democrate or Republican or independent, we then can take charge again by vote from the ground up to make even Obama, Palosi, Congress and his Czars listen and began to do what the people an country want and need. Some rumblings are happening now.Remember 2010 and 2012 are coming, we surley might come to our senses by that time or be taken over.
Posted by: David Humphrey | August 8, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Ahh, but I attacked the WHO rankings before I became an opponent of this bill.
The school info is based on PISA from the OECD. In truth, I do not judge our educational system on that study. Bringing it up was mostly humor. The rankings are not meant to say which country is worst, or best. They are meant to give contrast to different areas to find improvement.
One point though, the data is more concrete in education. It can also be added in a more international world, our education system keeping on par with what other countries expect becomes more important.
Now, our education system fails in graduation rates, keeping children in school and providing them with life skills, education and health are closely linked by the way.
Personally, I feel that we feel those that rely on this system most, then we fail those that come from other countries. As long as that is the case, whether at prek-12 or higher, we have a failing education system.
Skip said:
“The United States spends the most per student on education, but performs worse than many countries that spend significantly less”
And yet when the same point is made regarding healthcare instead of education opponents attack the data.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I just watched a Repub commercial claiming health care reform would gut take billions from medicare and effectively kill senior citizens. I’ve read all four prelilminary bills. NONE OF THIS IS TRUE. The AMA actually endorsed the House Ways and Means draft.
Do you think doctors would be part of something sinister, like killing grandma? Repubs risk reaping the bitter whirlind of lies, deceit, and political thuggery.
Posted by: Fed Up | August 8, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
moderate: you WANT no public option? Sorry, I am a strong supporter of a public option. I see no other way to level the playing field. Our lawmakers health insurance is publicly funded – why can’t the American people have the same choice?
Posted by: sandy | August 8, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
I just watched a Repub commercial claiming health care reform would gut take billions from medicare and effectively kill senior citizens. I’ve read all four prelilminary bills. NONE OF THIS IS TRUE. The AMA actually endorsed the House Ways and Means draft.
Do you think doctors would be part of something sinister, like killing grandma? Repubs risk reaping the bitter whirlind of lies, deceit, and political thuggery. Posted by: Fed Up | Aug 8, 2009 11:24:59 PM========================== News flash…..the AMA only represents about 20% of our nations doctors, therefore I would suggest you try again. Also, they stated in their letter that they recognized it because they are under the impression it met or WOULD Meet the bullet points in their letter.
I would suggest you pull up the letter they sent and read it CAREFULLY not just listen to the sound bites the media has given you.
As well, if you paid attention to CSPAN and listen ALL congresionall leaders speak, it does in fact CUT INTO MEDICARE…pay attention sheeple!
Posted by: KMDay | August 8, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
People have been being warned about the debt and warning about the debt for a while. Not that it matters, since the individual decide if they have a stake and not you.
There are all kinds of reasons we could use to say people have no stake in this or other discussions, but it isn’t our call.
Example: why should older people care about debt. They probably won’t be around to worry about it.
why should younger people worry, they aren’t the ones that have to put up with the issues we must spend money on today.
why should poor worry, they have it all handed to them anyhow.
why should rich worry they can afford it.
Average American said:
ncpilot, if you were warning about the debt when Bush was blowing $1 trillion on his pet project in Iraq and when he was giving away hundreds of millions to drug companies, you have standing to call into question the debt now. if not, you don’t.
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Skip
“You might be right, but at least we’re having fun and are home staying out of trouble.”
Hey, I can’t argue with that! :)
Posted by: sandy | August 8, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
KMDay: Yes, there will be cuts in Medicare by eliminating unnecessary procedures and hospital readmissions, among other things, but no cuts to needed benefits.I also suggest you stop yelling – we all have good eyesight!
Posted by: sandy | August 8, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Our law makers work for the government, they can choose from a variety of plans offered by their employer. The plans are private plans offered through their employer and they and their employer pay for them.
That is what we have now. They do get some extra perks, but we won’t be getting those. The new bill will add some things, but it will take away some. It will not be equal the federal employees plan nor have close to the selection they have.
If you want to equal the playing field, you need a job with the federal government. Thats the way it works when they write the laws.
sandy said:
Sorry, I am a strong supporter of a public option. I see no other way to level the playing field. Our lawmakers health insurance is publicly funded – why can’t the American people have the same choice?
Posted by: winz | August 8, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
KM Day- If you transfer funds from Medicare accounts to other programs providing equivalent or better care to seniors, you do not kill grandma. You just provide a false argument to those who would propogate a half-truth to scare old people for your own personal gain. Exactly, the argument I was making. Also, if, as you say, only 20% of docs approve of the House Ways and Means bill, are saying 80% are heartless to seniors? Finally, I don’t know what a “sheeple” is. However, I do know what a mob of Limbaugh Lemmings looks like. I just them at a health care reform town hall.
Posted by: Fed Up | August 8, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
KMDay: Yes, there will be cuts in Medicare by eliminating unnecessary procedures and hospital readmissions, among other things, but no cuts to needed benefits.I also suggest you stop yelling – we all have good eyesight!
Posted by: sandy | Aug 8, 2009 11:39:09 PM
======================================= Capitalizing a few words out of all I typed is not yelling-find something else to pick apart. The fact is, as you just said there will be cuts. The unnecessaries you are referring to, who decides what is and is not necessary? Obama and those he cherry picked?
I read in the bill as it reads today that the panel will consist of I believe 8 that are not goverment employees, 8 that are and the surgeon general. Now, I may be off on the 8 part the number may be a tad more for each side but you get my point.
We already know who Obama will have a say on those from the government but who determines the panel from those not within the government, Obama and Rahm?
Seriously?
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am
moderate: you WANT no public option? Sorry, I am a strong supporter of a public option. I see no other way to level the playing field. Our lawmakers health insurance is publicly funded – why can’t the American people have the same choice?
Posted by: sandy | Aug 8, 2009 11:28:10 PM====================================== Sandy? Congressional leaders have 17 different options to CHOOSE from-the only thing public about their health care plans is that the PUBLIC pays for it.
IF this health care bill as it reads today is so awesome and good for American’s, then why are they shooting down amendments as well as suggestions that they too must use this same plan?
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Eliminating unnecessary procedures.
Can you explain that to me, how the bill does this?
The same for hospital readmissions.
I will add though, that the medical field believes there will be rationing, nor will I deny there is now. Rather I will point out that it will be the government doing the rationing, and there lies the problem since they also will do the regulation.
There lies the problem.
Are you aware of the Supreme Court decision that this came from? It was a decision written by Justice Souter. The decision was written after 1992, when he seemed to switch sides has consistently sided with the liberal side of the court by most accounts, until his recent retirement was considered the leading liberal on the court.
Please point me to some strong evidence that your view is correct, since there is plenty of strong evidence, in medical journals, bioethics reports, and legal cases to show that no matter what the politicians tell us, reality is different.
Like other risk bearing organizations, HMOs take steps to control costs. [Among these] are specific financial incentives to physicians, rewarding them for decreasing utilization of healthcare services, and penalizing them for excessive treatment. Hence, an HMO physician’s financial interest lies in providing less care, not more….[I]nducement to ration care is the very point of any HMO scheme [emphasis DrRich's] and rationing necessarily raises some risks while reducing others…Congress, which promoted the formation of HMOs for 27 years, may choose to restrict its approval to certain preferred forms, but the Judiciary would be acting contrary to congressional policy if it were to entertain an ERISA fiduciary claim portending wholesale attacks on existing HMOs solely because of their structure.
- in Pegram et al. v. Herdrich (98-1949), 530 U.S. 211 (2000)
sandy: Yes, there will be cuts in Medicare by eliminating unnecessary procedures and hospital readmissions, among other things, but no cuts to needed benefits.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Viki??? Obama has a fool proof house and senate, every single republican could vote against this bill in both houses and it would be no big deal if all democrats were on board-the fact is they are not because this bill, as it reads today is a farce!
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
KM Day- If you transfer funds from Medicare accounts to other programs providing equivalent or better care to seniors, you do not kill grandma. You just provide a false argument to those who would propogate a half-truth to scare old people for your own personal gain. Exactly, the argument I was making. Also, if, as you say, only 20% of docs approve of the House Ways and Means bill, are saying 80% are heartless to seniors? Finally, I don’t know what a “sheeple” is. However, I do know what a mob of Limbaugh Lemmings looks like. I just them at a health care reform town hall.
Posted by: Fed Up | Aug 8, 2009 11:47:36 PM
========================================
1. I do not listen to Limbaugh, so get over it. That is like me saying your leg tingles everytime you listen to Chris Matthews and Olberman-who by the way are the lefts equivelant to Limbaugh.
2. The key word is “if” you transfer the money-which they are not. They are cutting in fact a lot of money from medicare and not stating, in anyway-shape-or-form where they will make up for this.
3. Obama has publicly spoken about how the elderly should be dealt with, therefore I do not understand why you keep saying he will not deny seniors care when he has already stated he would. Give me a bit to find the clip an I will post it on here
4. I do not use scare tactics because if you pay attention, what I post on here normally are the actual pieces from the bill as it reads today.
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
All of these arguments are well and good but the fundemental flaw is simple. Show me where in the constitution is specifically grants the power to in any way pass socialized medicine. Not infers or is interpreted. The constitution was written in simple language and the ENUMERATED powere are the only powers granted to the federal goverment. They have been ignoring this for far too long so if you dont call for putting a stop to it now dont complain when they violate the bill of rights,
Posted by: Chris | August 9, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Okay…..let us take this portion of this bill as it reads today.
Begining on pg 167, if you do not have a health care plan that the government approves on, they will tax you 2.5% of your GROSS INCOME or if you do not have health care or their approved health care for a portion of the year they will tax you more as well:
Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage
Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLEHEALTH CARE COVERAGE.‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of—‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over‘‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
‘‘(2) PRORATION FOR PART YEAR FAILURES.—
The tax imposed under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of tax so imposed (determined without regard to this paragraph and after application of paragraph (1)) as—‘‘(A) the aggregate periods during such taxable year for which such individual failed to meet the requirements of subsection (d), bears to‘‘(B) the entire taxable year
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
HOw about this portion of the bill as it reads today?
American Tax Payers, if the bill passes as is, will shell out Billions of their tax Dollars so that Hospitals and Doctor’s Offices will be MORE Inclinded to HIRE, RETAIN and EDUCATE Minorities-Who cares about who is most qualified for the position, it is all about skin color. This in turn means that our hard earned money is taken from you and given to to another based soley on the color of their skin, not on their ability to perform the job at hand with expertise and/or experience!
On page 881-882 the bill states:
to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
On page 884-885 the bill states:
“In awarding grants and contracts . . . the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of training . . . individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds . . . .”
On page 889-890 the bill states:
“In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
On page 908-909 the bill states:
“The Secretary shall award grants and contracts to eligible entities” to do the same things for the field of public health as the Secretary can do for dentistry.
On page 909 the bill states:
“In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
They don’t have to be US citizens, or even LPR do they? So basically we import them. I have to wonder sometimes how much of our education dollar goes towards educating those that rely on the US education system most, us.
Some of these exist now, not as many, not as much but some anyhow.
KMDay said:
HOw about this portion of the bill as it reads today?
American Tax Payers, if the bill passes as is, will shell out Billions of their tax Dollars so that Hospitals and Doctor’s Offices will be MORE Inclinded to HIRE, RETAIN and EDUCATE Minorities-Who cares about who is most qualified for the position, it is all about skin color. This in turn means that our hard earned money is taken from you and given to to another based soley on the color of their skin, not on their ability to perform the job at hand with expertise and/or experience!
On page 881-882 the bill states:
to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
On page 884-885 the bill states:
“In awarding grants and contracts . . . the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of training . . . individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds . . . .”
On page 889-890 the bill states:
“In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
On page 908-909 the bill states:
“The Secretary shall award grants and contracts to eligible entities” to do the same things for the field of public health as the Secretary can do for dentistry.
On page 909 the bill states:
“In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
All of these arguments are well and good but the fundemental flaw is simple. Show me where in the constitution is specifically grants the power to in any way pass socialized medicine. Not infers or is interpreted. The constitution was written in simple language and the ENUMERATED powere are the only powers granted to the federal goverment. They have been ignoring this for far too long so if you dont call for putting a stop to it now dont complain when they violate the bill of rights,
Posted by: Chris | Aug 9, 2009 12:22:15 AM
======================================= This is why you now see over 36 states preparing to invoke their 10th amendment right. The government, via the constitution cannot force upon the states ANYTHING that is not guaranteed in the constitution.
This was the whole purpose of the founding fathers writing the constitution-to get out from under the thumb of congress-to get away from the European Socialistic style of government.
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am
They don’t have to be US citizens, or even LPR do they? So basically we import them. I have to wonder sometimes how much of our education dollar goes towards educating those that rely on the US education system most, us.
Some of these exist now, not as many, not as much but some anyhow.
Posted by: winz | Aug 9, 2009 12:32:10 AM
You know, I just want someone operating on me, giving me medical advice and prescribing medicine for me and my children who is qualified and highly educated in the field of medicine-period. I do not care what color he/she is, I do not care if they are gay, straight, short, fat, old or young—I want someone who got into medical school because they were qualified or hired becuase they were the most qualified not becuase they jumped ahead of others more qualified simply by the color of their skin!
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
What other programs will be providing equivelent or better care for seniors?
Medicare is the plan for seniors, then medicaid for dual eligibles.
Fed Up said:
KM Day- If you transfer funds from Medicare accounts to other programs providing equivalent or better care to seniors, you do not kill grandma. You just provide a false argument to those who would propogate a half-truth to scare old people for your own personal gain. Exactly, the argument I was making. Also, if, as you say, only 20% of docs approve of the House Ways and Means bill, are saying 80% are heartless to seniors? Finally, I don’t know what a “sheeple” is. However, I do know what a mob of Limbaugh Lemmings looks like. I just them at a health care reform town hall.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Nor was I saying I cared, I was pointing out another flaw in the program.
Now as a young promising student ready to choose a field to enter into in College, do you not think that the competition in that field might make a difference? It does.
There are plenty of young, promising, people in the US that would I’m sure be great in the medical profession, they should have reason to expect that they get that chance before someone from another country of a difference skin color or the same, all else being equal.
However, the programs that apply to the color of skin, lets call them affirmative-action programs, are often open to those of that skin color whether they live in the US or not.
So, since presumably these are based on the color of the skin because of some missing opportunity, those people that miss the opportunity have to compete with those who are often rather well off from another country.
In any case, such programs are made worse by the reality that the success of the program is based on statistics for the whole population, whether the whole population is eligible or not, or capable or not.
KMDay said:
You know, I just want someone operating on me, giving me medical advice and prescribing medicine for me and my children who is qualified and highly educated in the field of medicine-period. I do not care what color he/she is, I do not care if they are gay, straight, short, fat, old or young—I want someone who got into medical school because they were qualified or hired becuase they were the most qualified not becuase they jumped ahead of others more qualified simply by the color of their skin!
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Nor was I saying I cared, I was pointing out another flaw in the program.
Now as a young promising student ready to choose a field to enter into in College, do you not think that the competition in that field might make a difference? It does.
There are plenty of young, promising, people in the US that would I’m sure be great in the medical profession, they should have reason to expect that they get that chance before someone from another country of a difference skin color or the same, all else being equal.
However, the programs that apply to the color of skin, lets call them affirmative-action programs, are often open to those of that skin color whether they live in the US or not.
So, since presumably these are based on the color of the skin because of some missing opportunity, those people that miss the opportunity have to compete with those who are often rather well off from another country.
In any case, such programs are made worse by the reality that the success of the program is based on statistics for the whole population, whether the whole population is eligible or not, or capable or not.
Posted by: winz | Aug 9, 2009 12:53:57 AM=====================================
Agreed! BTW…..why is it that when I put parts of the bill up to back up my argument I never, and I mean never get a reply except to call me a racist for pointing out the minority preference in the bill?
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
and not just the minority part, I put up the taxing citizens who do not have insurance the government approves of or the portion that reads that at Y5, the insurance we have MUST be on the governments approved list or we will be fined. Meaning, you get to keep the insurance you have now until Y5 and if it is not on their list, you must get an approved insurance plan or risk increased taxes.
They never answer me when I put it on here….I absolutly love it!
Posted by: KMDay | August 9, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Because there is a conflict between what you are saying and their idealogical vision.
It is the never ending liberty vs equality struggle, along with possibly different ideas on what liberty and equality are.
KMDay said:
Agreed! BTW…..why is it that when I put parts of the bill up to back up my argument I never, and I mean never get a reply except to call me a racist for pointing out the minority preference in the bill?
and not just the minority part, I put up the taxing citizens who do not have insurance the government approves of or the portion that reads that at Y5, the insurance we have MUST be on the governments approved list or we will be fined. Meaning, you get to keep the insurance you have now until Y5 and if it is not on their list, you must get an approved insurance plan or risk increased taxes.
They never answer me when I put it on here….I absolutly love it!
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am
No, people just tend to hear about the high cost ones, so it scares them away from looking. There are scholarships available to that help.
Private schools are often considerably less then public schools cost across funding levels, the cost of a good private school can often be half the cost of a public school.
winz said:
“This isn’t a rich school district, it is in rural Illinois, and private school costs less.”
Skip asked:
That is an exception instead of the rule is it not? It sounds like you have a very reasonably priced private school near you.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am
THE ADMINISTRATION SHOULD WORK ON FIXING OUR CURRENT HEALTH SYSTEM – FIRST. MOST PEOPLE ARE SATISFIED AND THE SYSTEM WORKS VERY WELL FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF US. I DON”T THINK THAT OBAMA HAS EVER CONSIDERED PLUGGING THE HOLES ON THE SYSTEM WE HAVE NOW. I THINK THAT OTHER BLOGGERS HAVE IT RIGHT – THIS IS NOT SO MUCH ABOUT HEALTH CARE, IT IS ABOUT “SHARE THE WEALTH” AND HEALTH CARE LEGISLATION FITS IN WELL WITH OBAMA’S (SOCIALIST) GAME PLAN.
THE US HAS THE BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ANYWHERE. TAKE TWO CANCER PATIENTS, ONE GETTING AMERICAN HEALTH CARE AND THE OTHER GETTING CARE FROM ANYWHERE ELSE – DOESN’T MATTER WHERE. WHICH PATIENT IS MORE LIKELY TO SURVIVE? YOUR CALL. THE STATS BEING PRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION WHICH SUGGEST THAT OUR LONGEVITY RATES ARE BEHIND OTHER COUNTRIES ARE CORRECT, BUT THEY FAIL TO MENTION THAT THOSE STATS INCLUDE MURDER SUICIDE AND ACCIDENTS, FOR WHICH WE ARE WAY OUT FRONT.
CANADA HAS JUST ANNOUNCED THAT THEIR SOCIALIZED HEALTH PLAN HAS AGAIN FAILED TO MEET ITS GOAL OF REACHING AN EIGHTEEN WEEK WAITING PERIOD FOR COMMON PROCEDURES. SAYS A LOT ABOUT SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, DOESN’T IT? CANADA EVEN HAS HEALTH LOTTERIES (UNOFFICIAL) IN WHICH THE WINNERS GET MOVED UP THE WAIT LIST FOR CARE.
WHEN COSTS, FEWER DOCTOR STAYING OR ENTERING, QUALITY OF CARE AND RATIONING ARE CONSIDERED, REJECTING THE OBAMA HEALTH PLAN SHOULD BE A NO BRAINER.
PUBLIC OPTION? HOW CAN THE INS INDUSTRY COMPETE AGAINST THE POWER OF THE FED WITH UNLIMITED (TAXPAYER) FUNDS? PRIVATE SECTOR INS WILL INDEED BE SHORT LIVED. ANY IDEA HOW MANY JOBS WILL BE LOST WHEN PRIVATE HEALTH CARE GOES DOWN?
THE LARGER THE GOVERNMENT GROWS – THE SMALLER THE INDIVIDUAL BECOMES. SPOT ON AND HISTORICALLY ACCURATE.
Posted by: Manitu | August 9, 2009, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Mr. Obama is kind enough to refer to these statements as ‘misleading’ or ‘outlandish’. Anytime you’re told half truths it’s a lie. We trust someone until we catch them in a lie. Rather than try to truly solve our problems politicians lie if it may get them your vote. Wake up America. Health care costs are skyrocketing. Haven’t you heard those GM employees screaming bloody murder because they have to pay $10 for a prescription? For the rest of us every year our health care premiums eat up our raises. Our employers eat some of it but require us to help. The last time premiums dropped was when Hillary pushed this. Want proof? Look at your old pay stubs, that is if you didn’t work for GM. Are GM employees more deserving of health care than non-GM employees? Are employees more deserving than the unemployed? If you’ve had any illness our insurance companies can deny us coverage. If you forget to dot every ‘i’ or cross every ‘t’ our insurers would just as soon deny payment. We have been warned about this problem for many years. If we do nothing the CBO tells us that for every $2 we earn in 2050 health care will eat $1. Are you wanting to dump all of this on your grandchildren? Wake up people.
Posted by: xatnam3 | August 9, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Comment on manitu’s: THE US HAS THE BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ANYWHERE. TAKE TWO CANCER PATIENTS, ONE GETTING AMERICAN HEALTH CARE AND THE OTHER GETTING CARE FROM ANYWHERE ELSE – DOESN’T MATTER WHERE. WHICH PATIENT IS MORE LIKELY TO SURVIVE? YOUR CALL.
You’re right, manitu. It is a flip of a coin as to who will survive. Ditto for driving our cars on the interstate. My sister-in-law had colon cancer surgery & got a staph infection that nearly killed her right here in a major Indy hospital. My 81 year old British mother-in-law will soon be going in a UK hospital for wrist replacement. Yeah that surgeon learned how to do it by following an American surgeon’s example. Don’t you think maybe we learn from other countries how to also do things?
Do you truly believe America has the best of health care? If so, then why are we behind all of the other major countries in life expectancy and infant mortality rates? I dare say our infant mortality rates do not include all of those aborted either because our government believes them to be ‘fetuses’ and deny they are unborn babies. Wake up America.
Posted by: xatnam3 | August 9, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am
“Do you truly believe America has the best of health care? If so, then why are we behind all of the other major countries in life expectancy and infant mortality rates?”
Please stop citing statistics like this. People make choices in their lives, even bad ones. My father who is 69 years old has been the doctor maybe 15 times in his entire life. Hes a tough old contruction worker and just hates going to the doctor. Do those statistics exclued these people? Does it exclude women who do drugs and drink while pregnant?
Not to mention most of those statistics are comparisons between a nation with 50 million people and ours which is over 300 million.
Have you ever had government care? I was in the military 13 years, and on several occasions i went outside to a private doctor for diagnostics the government refused to give me. How about VA hospitals? Are they examples of fantastic government care?
I know, its government insurance you will say. You think those doctors will be motivated to make you happy or make the government happy once the big G is paying the bills? Hmm?
Posted by: KR | August 9, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
There is a problem with trying to compare health care from one country to another, even one state to another. The societies them selves vary and that affects the outcome of the comparison.
If the life expectancy rates and infant mortalities rates were adjusted for the societal differences, the US would rank much higher on the studies I have seen.
Life expectancy is based on deaths by driving and homicide. The US popultion takes more health risks, obesity for one.
Infant mortality is increased by birth weight, low birth weight is associated with illicit drug use.
Not all countries count infant health mortality the same way as the US as well. The US may have a better record on successful births of high risk infants.
Actully, yes, the US is considered one of the best health care systems in the world. Rich people from other nations spend quite a bit to come here and receive care. Several hospitals even market to them, one in Arizona markets to expectant mothers to come and have their baby here, several in Florida market to an international market, quite a bit is spent in the US from medical tourists.
xatnam3 said:
Comment on manitu’s: THE US HAS THE BEST HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ANYWHERE. TAKE TWO CANCER PATIENTS, ONE GETTING AMERICAN HEALTH CARE AND THE OTHER GETTING CARE FROM ANYWHERE ELSE – DOESN’T MATTER WHERE. WHICH PATIENT IS MORE LIKELY TO SURVIVE? YOUR CALL.
You’re right, manitu. It is a flip of a coin as to who will survive. Ditto for driving our cars on the interstate. My sister-in-law had colon cancer surgery & got a staph infection that nearly killed her right here in a major Indy hospital. My 81 year old British mother-in-law will soon be going in a UK hospital for wrist replacement. Yeah that surgeon learned how to do it by following an American surgeon’s example. Don’t you think maybe we learn from other countries how to also do things?
Do you truly believe America has the best of health care? If so, then why are we behind all of the other major countries in life expectancy and infant mortality rates? I dare say our infant mortality rates do not include all of those aborted either because our government believes them to be ‘fetuses’ and deny they are unborn babies. Wake up America.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
“Private schools are often considerably less then public schools cost across funding levels, the cost of a good private school can often be half the cost of a public school.” -winz
Are you quoting Mackinac when you say half? My friends who teach in the public school systems like to point out that most private schools don’t summarily cover the cost of all the large extracurricular sports and other programs and activities that public schools do. There is plenty of debate about what it really costs per student like anything else that can be complicated to calculate.
Posted by: Skip | August 9, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
If the bill passes we will be dumping the costs of this on future generations.
Go read the CBO report.
After ten years costs and budget deficts will probably increase substantially.
The CBO report does not say premiums will lower. They do not not know whether it lower or raise them, but it would probably be modest.
“Although the direction of the overall impact is not certain, the magnitude of the effect on average premiums would probably be modest”
It doesn’t help costs and it does put it off and instead creates a bigger deficit for future generations and administrations.
xatnam3
Mr. Obama is kind enough to refer to these statements as ‘misleading’ or ‘outlandish’. Anytime you’re told half truths it’s a lie. We trust someone until we catch them in a lie. Rather than try to truly solve our problems politicians lie if it may get them your vote. Wake up America. Health care costs are skyrocketing. Haven’t you heard those GM employees screaming bloody murder because they have to pay $10 for a prescription? For the rest of us every year our health care premiums eat up our raises. Our employers eat some of it but require us to help. The last time premiums dropped was when Hillary pushed this. Want proof? Look at your old pay stubs, that is if you didn’t work for GM. Are GM employees more deserving of health care than non-GM employees? Are employees more deserving than the unemployed? If you’ve had any illness our insurance companies can deny us coverage. If you forget to dot every ‘i’ or cross every ‘t’ our insurers would just as soon deny payment. We have been warned about this problem for many years. If we do nothing the CBO tells us that for every $2 we earn in 2050 health care will eat $1. Are you wanting to dump all of this on your grandchildren? Wake up people.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
“If the bill passes we will be dumping the costs of this on future generations.”
Yes but the very same CBO says that not doing anything will be dumping huge costs on future generations in a different way.
Posted by: Skip | August 9, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
No, I wasn’t quoting anybody. I looked at the NCES numbers, so it isn’t exactly a scientific study. I’d like to see a scientific study though.
Private schools tend to be more community involved and take advantage of community resources in areas such as sports. They tend to be small, so that is part of it. Private school students can enroll for some subjects or activities in public schools, this depends on the state as well I think, as well as other criteria.
Public schools may not be the best educational enviornment, and it actually makes sense that they would not be. It isn’t the educators fault, it is a side effect of our society.
Private schools are smaller, groups of more homogeneous students. Public schools are more diverse, that has its downsides, especially considering that it is not just the school but the classroom.
Parents enroll their child in private school because they believe the school will fill a goal. That alone shows that the parents are more involved in the education of children in private schools. They enroll their child in public school because they have to.
Maybe smaller schools and shared goals make a better education experience. Perhaps not as diverse, but that is resolved by having times where different schools get together etc.
Skip:
“Private schools are often considerably less then public schools cost across funding levels, the cost of a good private school can often be half the cost of a public school.” -winz
Are you quoting Mackinac when you say half? My friends who teach in the public school systems like to point out that most private schools don’t summarily cover the cost of all the large extracurricular sports and other programs and activities that public schools do. There is plenty of debate about what it really costs per student like anything else that can be complicated to calculate.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
The cost dumping will be bigger if the bill passes, the different way is a larger quanity.
We need to get past the idea that our health care quality is going to stay anywhere near the same and our health care costs lower. In order to do that we would fundamentally have to change our society, and even if we could it is doubtful it would work.
Skip posted:
“If the bill passes we will be dumping the costs of this on future generations.”
Yes but the very same CBO says that not doing anything will be dumping huge costs on future generations in a different way.
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
There is one topic that has been glaringly missing from this discussion. Our birth rate has been on a steady decline as it has also in Europe. Fewer people = fewer income tax dollars flowing in to pay for the huge debts Obama want to saddle us with. Not only that, but is a good bet that 25-50 percent of future generation Americans will be paying little or no income tax whatsoever. Unfortunately, that is a non – topic which reflects on the break up the two parent home.
Posted by: Manitu | August 9, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
winz is right. American life expectancy is lower than other nations largely because of the higher rate of death by violence and death by accident here. Very regrettable, but not something that will change a great deal based on upending our health care system. I have posted numerous times about infant mortality rates– we count more live births because we try to save extremely low birth rate babies, leading to more births followed quickly by deaths that would not “count” in other developed countries.
As winz says, our health care system is the envy of the world, in terms of quality, innovation, etc. What we need to focus on is increasing access to that health care (without a public option) and reducing costs. Let’s hear it for large risk pools, portability of coverage, and tort reform.
Posted by: moderate | August 9, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Skip:”‘If the bill passes we will be dumping the costs of this on future generations.’
Yes but the very same CBO says that not doing anything will be”
That can mean only one thing: back to the drawing board! If the CBO is to believed, we are in danger of spending our way into oblivion if we do nothing or if we adopt this plan. Let’s try again.
Posted by: Woody | August 9, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
The one thing government could do is promote some private programs that can provide access at lower costs.
Big-box stores have basic health clinics in some metropolitan areas. These aren’t for complicated care but can provide cost effective, basic care.
Teach healthier life styles across the board, promote health as an important part of life and society. If something is bad for society and it is taxed to discourage, then put the tax money into getting people away from that activity, for example smoking cessation programs.
There are things that the private sector is already working on that can lead to better care.
Medical records that patients can access on their pda and doctors can have access as needed. Tehcnology that can read the veins in a palm to identify the patient and access their records without human error of getting the wrong record.
There is one topic that has been glaringly missing from this discussion. Our birth rate has been on a steady decline as it has also in Europe. Fewer people = fewer income tax dollars flowing in to pay for the huge debts Obama want to saddle us with. Not only that, but is a good bet that 25-50 percent of future generation Americans will be paying little or no income tax whatsoever. Unfortunately, that is a non – topic which reflects on the break up the two parent home.
Posted by: Manitu
Posted by: winz | August 9, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
It all boils down to ‘change’. We worry we will lose our doctor. It’s unrealistic to think that our doctor will be with us until the end. Congress has held on to our health care system because the industry is buying their votes! The more money politicians get the more they spend to get re-elected. My health care premiums went up a mere $36 a paycheck from 2004 to 2009 but back in 2004 we had no deductible & no paperwork with our HMO. I kinda felt like a GM employee! Now we pay our deductible on each visit and then we have annual deductibles that we have to pay. My teaching contract says this fiscal year I’ll be paying another $90 every two weeks. That’s right! Let’s make those fatcats at Wellpoint fatter! Wonder what hidden changes Wellpoint has put into this contract? That is what is happening to teachers. Pull some of your old paystubs to compare. I think you would be surprised to learn health care costs have affected yourself. Today 1 in 6 adults can’t get health insurance. Congress has made bandaid changes to health care over the years. Pull your old tax returns for the codes HSA or FSA or MSA etc, etc. And costs continue to spiral out of control. This is the first chance we’ve had to truly address all of these issues. I would hope that those politicians writing this reform will set aside ‘politics’ and truly serve our nation and not their political interests. If they do then maybe our grandchildren will finally benefit. We ‘boomers’ have been a greedy lot. It’s time we thought about the future of our dependents and not about our own selfishness. Our grandkids in 2050 will know that we only spent $1 of every $6 we earned on healthcare & because of this change they won’t have to spend $1 of every $2 they earn on healthcare.
Posted by: xatnam3 | August 9, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Anyone who thinks government-run health care is a good thing needs to read what Rahm Emanuel’s brother thinks about providing health care to the elderly.
Posted by: tanarg | August 10, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Nobody in their right mind is against health care reform. Health care in this country is bad, and horribly expensive.
The people rudely shouting and protesting health care reform are tools for a big insurance company agenda. This is obvious. Why they are letting themselves be used like this is a mystery. It may just mean there are more fools in the U.S. than we thought, and even health care reform wouldn’t mean there’s a cure for being a fool.
Posted by: Shellyt | August 10, 2009, 5:49 am 5:49 am
From FactCheck:
Obama promised that a health care overhaul “will be paid for.” But congressional budget experts say the bills they’ve seen so far would add hundreds of billions of dollars to the deficit over the next decade.
He said the plan “that I put forward” would cover at least 97 percent of all Americans. Actually, the plan he campaigned on would cover far less than that, and only one of the bills now being considered in Congress would do that.
He said the “average American family is paying thousands” as part of their premiums to cover uncompensated care for the uninsured, implying that expanded coverage will slash insurance costs. But the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation puts the cost per family figure at $200.
Obama claimed his budget “reduced federal spending over the next 10 years by $2.2 trillion” compared with where it was headed before. Not true. Even figures from his own budget experts don’t support that. The Congressional Budget Office projects a $2.7 trillion increase, not a $2.2 trillion cut.
The president said that the United States spends $6,000 more on average than other countries on health care. Actually, U.S. per capita spending is about $2,500 more than the next highest-spending country.
Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 10, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Nip it in the bud.
Instead of defensive medicine I think medical reform will bring on offense medicine. By treating people before they get chronically ill will save money. You cannot put that in a Co report. Yes will it cost more to get started, but long treaping of benefits will be worth it. What businesses you know don’t invest capital to make a profit. The saving in health is preventing major sickness in the uninsured. They are the one that’s driving your heath cost, and they are the one that most end up in emergency rooms with major sickness that we insured pay for. They are the hidden cost in our insurance bill. Remove the known you can tame the cost explosion.
Posted by: Erv | August 11, 2009, 5:49 am 5:49 am
Is this “outlandish” or “misleading?”
Obama: “I would hope that we could set up a system that allows those who can go through their employer to access a federal system or a state pool of some sort. But I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process. I can envision a decade out or 15 years out or 20 years out where we’ve got a much more portable system.”
Posted by: Anonymous | August 11, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Its cause he only cares about the his short term results.
Posted by: Stanford Solaita | September 28, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm