Obama Rallies His Health Care Troops, Likening the “Toughest Fight” Yet to the ’08 Campaign
ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: Speaking before “Organizing for America” volunteers at the DNC headquarters this afternoon President Obama told them not to “lose heart” as they prepare to enter into their “toughest fight” yet on health care reform.
Mr. Obama drew the parallel to this time last year during the general election when his opponent Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) chose Alaskan Gov Sarah Palin – taking much attention away, at the time, from the Illinois Senator.
“Last year, just about this time, you will recall that the Republicans had just nominated their vice presidential candidate, and everybody was — you know, the media was obsessed with it, and cable was 24 hours a day, and, "’Obama's lost his mojo,’ and… You remember all that? There's something about August going into September where everybody in Washington gets all we-we-ed up.”
Like that point in the campaign, Obama said, now they have to keep working and giving people the facts to counter the “absurd claims” over health care reform.
“We cannot be intimidated by some of these scare tactics. We have to understand that there are a lot of people who are invested in the status quo or make a lot of money out of it. We've got to also understand that people are understandably nervous and — and worried about any significant changes when it comes to something as important as health care because it touches on your lives. It's very personal, and so they're more vulnerable to misinformation.”
Where are lies coming from? Obama suggested folks to just turn on their TV.
“We know where these lies are coming from. I mean, I mean, I don't think it's any secret. You know, if you just flick channels, and then stop on certain ones of them then you'll see you know, you'll see who's propagating this stuff.”
Obama said the best offense against lies is the truth and prompted his volunteers – what he dubbed “the best ambassadors for true information” – to keep pushing just the facts.
Obama gave them ammunition and encouraged them to counter fall the “misinformation” – specifically correcting the record that health are may be available to immigrants, that it's a government takeover of health care, that all of the money is going to be funding abortions, and that he’s in support of death panels.
He warned that there are people in Washington, D.C who are eager to write a story line saying, “All the naive, idealistic folks, change we can believe in, yes, we can, that all their hopes were dashed because this is a tough, cynical town."
Countered Obama, “That's the storyline they're operating on. But that's the storyline we've been fighting against this entire time. From the day we announced this race, we were fighting against that. And they have been trying to write that story again and again and again. We are not going to give up now.”
Obama ended his pep talk with a “Let’s go get them!”
-Sunlen Miller
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
The problem is, Obama regards governing as a campaign, not as a job. So far, it’s a job he’s failing dismally at.
Posted by: Beth | August 20, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“Like that point in the campaign, Obama said, now they have to keep working and giving people the facts to counter the “absurd claims” over health care reform.”
We’ve been waiting for facts, for example, on how you can increase coverage, lower costs, and how will the massive new expenditure come from? The above quote is an absurd claim.
Posted by: keys2truth | August 20, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Average of latest NBC, Pew and Gallup polls has Obama approval at 50.7%. Rasmussen poll of likely voters has him at 50% approve, 50% disapprove.
Innumerable current polls show substantial and growing pluralities opposing any of the health care reform bills currently under consideration.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
I know the laws, regulations, and rules are very complex but is there any legal problem with Obama, currently occupying the Oval Office, being connected to so many activist groups who are agitating for his policies? Can campaign funds be used, or funneled, to activist groups? Can groups that receive Federal funds be used for partisan political purposes? Would it be legal for the Executive Branch to send their “enemy lists” or the emails that they admitted to collecting to outside non-government activist groups? Can the Executive Branch use the Orwellian census questions for political purposes or give this highly personal data to these outside pressure groups?
Posted by: Ed | August 20, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
OBAMA: “From the day we announced this race, we were fighting against that.”
THIS race?
Beth hit it on the nail. President Obama doesn’t know when to stop running for the office and actually DO THE JOB! Instead of LEADING, he is letting Congress do their thing while he is nothing more than a Spokesperson in Chief.
Posted by: James Danley | August 20, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
@ Posted by: Ed | Aug 20, 2009 6:35:28 PM
Let’s play the “What if Bush did this?” game…Imagine the uproar…
Posted by: tjp612 | August 20, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“You know, if you just flick channels, and then stop on certain ones of them then you’ll see you know, you’ll see who’s propagating this stuff.”
I’d like to switch to the cable company that provides service to the White House. All of the channels I flick have Obama on them…
Posted by: tjp612 | August 20, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
All of this is no surprise. There is no substitute for experience. You who voted for this guy, what were you thinking? He has reverted to what he knows best: campaigning. He is certainly not governing or leading. An inexperienced man believes that you can throw vague and conflicting ideas over the transom and things will get done. That sort of behavior is not leadership. The cynical have come to believe that Obama is a devious character. I don’t believe that. He is just inexperienced. It is that simple.
Posted by: jcarob | August 20, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Uh… is our president ever going to, I dunno, sit in his office and DO HIS FREAKING JOB instead of scampering about appearing in greenhouse events and propagating bald faced lies?
Wait, never mind- he’s not.
Posted by: 2Brixshy | August 20, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
From Waterloo to Wee-wee-d – what a long summer for Obama.
He’s looking for a wonderful return to “sanity” in September by ignoring townhalls, polls, and basic economics. Good luck – look who’s running the asylum – Reid and Pelosi.
Posted by: robertb | August 20, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
2Brixshy:” is our president ever going to, I dunno, sit in his office and DO HIS FREAKING JOB instead of scampering about appearing in greenhouse events and propagating bald faced lies?”
He is doing his job. Can you cite one of these “bald faced lies” you accuse him of propagating?
All of the blatant lies currently eminate from the Republican camp:
1. Death panels (there are no such things in any of the current bills)
2. “Stephen Hawking would have been left to die by the NHS”
3. Illegal immigrants will get free healthcare (“H.R. 3200: Sec 246 — NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”)
4. Government will decide what care I get – they’re going to start rationing service! (“Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the Commission or the Center to mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for any public or private payer.”)
5. You will be forced into the government plan if you switch jobs! (Not true, and the CBO analysis estimates only 10% of workers will be on the government plan by 2019, everyone else will be under private insurance just like now).
6. Suicide counseling is required! (No, that amendment championed by a Republican was to allow for, at the patient’s option, counseling on setting up a living will and being appraised of options like living your last 5 days at home with loved ones rather than stretching them into 7 days on a machine in a hospital).
To be fair, I’ll toss you a couple exagerations that you could work up a good rant about being bald faced lies:
1. Healthcare will be deficit neutral. (very debatable – most likely the government will end up paying an extra $100 billion a year to save private businesses and Americans $200-400 billion a year; not a bad trade, but not deficit neutral).
2. We will get a bipartisan bill (Obama could find a pile of diamonds and offer to pay for it all personally and he’d be lucky to get a dozen Republicans to support anything he does).
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Volunteers? You mean like the ones they hired at $14 an hour?
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
All Obama knows is campaigning. It’s no real surprise that he is retreating into campaign mode, again.
Posted by: Uh, huh... | August 20, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
“He is doing his job. Can you cite one of these “bald faced lies” you accuse him of propagating?”
You betcha: If you like your insurance plan, you can keep it.
—
Nope. In five years, you have to be in a government-approved plan, regardless of what your employer does.
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
“3. Illegal immigrants will get free healthcare (“H.R. 3200: Sec 246 — NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”)”
——–
Yes, they will continue to get free care at hospitals and hospitals will continue to not be reimbursed for those billions of dollars, which is why premiums go up for everybody.
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
“5. You will be forced into the government plan if you switch jobs! (Not true, and the CBO analysis estimates only 10% of workers will be on the government plan by 2019, everyone else will be under private insurance just like now).”
Except the private insurance will have to be approved by the government!
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
“Death panels (there are no such things in any of the current bills).”
True, but then we don’t have Obama’s bill yet, do we? And we know that Obama had this to say quite recently:
“There is going to have to be a conversation that is guided by doctors, scientists, ethicists. And then there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place. It is very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through normal political channels. And that’s part of why you have to have some independent group that can give you guidance. It’s not determinative, but I think has to be able to give you some guidance.”
And let us imagine what happens to doctors who don’t follow the “guidance.” Obama doesn’t give a name to this group of “ethicists” and other worthies, but until he does, “death panel” seems to be a nice fit.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
“jhw539, could you please point out where in HR3200 they require citizenship verification? Because if they aren’t verifying citizenship how do they plan on enforcing Sec 246?”
When busted on one lie the right wing just moves on to a different telling of the same lie.
Its now obvious that appealing to right wing xenophobia is the next card the Republicans will play.
And they will pay for it in 2010.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
“Illegal immigrants will get free healthcare (“H.R. 3200: Sec 246 — NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”).”
I see. And at what point is the doctor permitted to ask for proof of citizenship, and how is citizenship to be established?
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
“True, but then we don’t have Obama’s bill yet, do we? And we know that Obama had this to say quite recently:”
So when the right wing has its lie thoroughly debunked, they merely tell it again.
The lesson as always?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
“Government will decide what care I get – they’re going to start rationing service!”
(“Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the Commission or the Center to mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for any public or private payer.”)
The response does not address the concern: nothing quoted would prevent rationing, which is of course inevitable. And what prevents the Congress from mandating coverage, as it has already done repeatedly for Medicaid?
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
“And what prevents the Congress from mandating coverage, as it has already done repeatedly for Medicaid?”
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta
That’s a meaningless argument. What prevent Congress from mandating a 80 hour work week?
Concerned in OH:”I can save you the trouble, there isn’t a provision to verify citizenship, and the Democrats won’t allow an amendment that would require it.”
So now the truth comes out – the Republicans ARE against legal immigrant too. The 5 million immigrants here on legal visas, green cards, or dutifully working through the years of naturalization – tough luck. You’re as bad as illegal immigrants, no health care for you.
Of course, this isn’t really news – the Republicans fought to have LEGAL immigrants, with full citizenship, excluded.
The Republican party is against immigrants, legal or not.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
“You will be forced into the government plan if you switch jobs!”
“(Not true, and the CBO analysis estimates only 10% of workers will be on the government plan by 2019, everyone else will be under private insurance just like now).”
How many people are squeezed out of private plans and into the public one is dependent on the reimbursement rates; the Lewin group estimates under a reasonable scenario that 80 million would be shouldered into the public “option.” And of course if you do try to switch to another private plan you cannot do so unless it is approved by the government. So whether you want it or not, for example, you’ll have to pay for in vitro fertilization coverage.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
“Suicide counseling is required!” First I’ve heard that claim.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
“I see. And at what point is the doctor permitted to ask for proof of citizenship, and how is citizenship to be established?”
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta
At any point – probably the same time as they ask for insurance now, since if they treat an illegal alien they will not get compensated by the government for the treatment rendered. (Just like they don’t get compensated by anyone if they treat a poor uninsured American citizen right now.)
This is not at all a difficult concept, which is why the persistence of the lie has to be deliberate.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
“We will get a bipartisan bill (Obama could find a pile of diamonds and offer to pay for it all personally and he’d be lucky to get a dozen Republicans to support anything he does).”
Actually, if Obama proposed a bill tomorrow enabling interstate sales of health insurance, he might get ninety votes. Ditto making premiums deductible for individuals as well as employers.
If he proposed the abolition of the malpractice bonanza for trial lawyers, he’d be hard put to find a Democrat to vote for it, because they’re all on the payroll of the plaintiffs’ tort bar, as is Obama himself. So under Obama, you can write a thousand pages about “health care reform,” but you can’t include a word about that sacred cow.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
“‘‘(h) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall
15 be construed to permit the Commission or the Center to
16 mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for
17 any public or private payer.’’.”
—
Fine, but there are OTHER SECTIONS that make clear that plans all have to be GOVERNMENT-APPROVED.
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
“And let us imagine what happens…”
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta
Gee, I wonder if the paranoid imaginings of Republicans is going to be anything like the actual, decades long experience every other first world nation has had with national health care? Or if it will be like that editorial that has made the Investor Business Daily a universal laughing stock:
“People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.” (Stephen Hawking, a professor at Cambridge, refuted the claim and pointed out the obvious – that he owes his life to the high quality care the NHS has provided him since birth.)
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
This administration if gearing up for s “single payer health plan” and if anyone buys the “co-op crap”…that too, will lead to a single payer health plan….they can try to change the name but they cannot change the game! Redistribution of wealth is the REAL END GAME!!
Posted by: ross | August 20, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
“Looks like Obama’s army is out in force on this site!!! Try again, you guys..do you think you can refute the truth….something which does not come out of anybody’s mouth in this administration!”
Ross, they cannot believe we don’t trust Mr. Obama. LOL. Too funny for words.
Posted by: tanarg | August 20, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
It’s about time for Obama to start acting like a president and do the job he was elected to do.Bring about change and stop kissing up to the REPUBLICANS which is all he has been doing since he got into office. If with the powers of the presidency and the Democrats with Majorities in both houses can’t deliver a “very strong” Natinonal Health Service without regard for the profiteers who created this problem, then they are utterly useless to the American people. They are very weak,whishy washy,spineless and extremely indecisive.I’m sorry to say this little boy president fanatically seeking Republican approval and bending at every Republican breeze is simply ineffectual and the Republicans are “leading” the Democrats in a deadly dance and Obama is following with zeal. We need leadership.
Posted by: exumab | August 20, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
“What prevent Congress from mandating a 80 hour work week?” In all probability, the Constitution, although it’s never going to happen.
In any event, you have assiduously avoided the issue: to say that this Commission or that Panel is not allowed to mandate coverage has very little to do with whether coverage will be mandated. In fact, it quite certainly will be.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
jpt writes:
“Obama said the best offense against lies is the truth and prompted his volunteers – what he dubbed “the best ambassadors for true information” – to keep pushing just the facts.”
Er … maybe He meant “defense”? And “everybody in Washington gets all we-we-ed up”?!
Guess that makes Him the first White House resident publicly to use penis imagery in an attempt to uh peeve off people, especially the female ones and the old-fashioned, on ALL sides.
Der Won is done: this IS like His endless campaign, is PART of His endless campaign — a lot of sound and money, signifying nothing. In the case of His “health care” or “insurance reform”, or whatever it is today, LESS than nothing, a mishmash that makes nothing look GOOD.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
“The Race Card is the new Godwin’s Law.
Posted by: Concerned in OH | Aug 20, 2009 9:22:29 PM”
That really means alot coming from the guy who spread the Ashley Todd hoax.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
tanarg:”They’re calling them “private plans,” and they all have to meet the standards the government sets in the Exchange.”
Yess… the insurance plans will need to adhere to the new regulations. Just like they need to adhere to regulations now. I guess I missed how vacuous your original comment really was:
“In five years, you have to be in a government-approved plan, regardless of what your employer does.”
YOUR IN A GOVERNMENT-APPROVED PLAN RIGHT NOW IF YOU HAVE EMPLOYER INSURANCE. Government requirements for the tax deductibility of employer provided insurance are extensive, and include the acceptance of pre-existing conditions already!
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Does anyone know anyone on Medicaid..cause that is what you will get! And if anyone looks at HR3200 they will see that there is a clause for “Womens Reproductive Services” and just what do you think that means? It means that ALL women’s reproductive services WILL cover abortions! Do you suppose that illegal alien coverage is hidden is some obscure verbage somewhere?
Posted by: ross | August 20, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“Gee, I wonder if the paranoid imaginings of Republicans is going to be anything like the actual, decades long experience every other first world nation has had with national health care?”
An absurd non sequitur. And are you including Canada and the UK in your question? Are you sure you want to?
As you very well know, for a member of any profession to fail to follow federal guidelines poses some quite serious risks, and those risks can be realized in myriad ways. That is not paranoia, that is the real world.
I have no idea what the Investors Business Daily has had to say, nor do I care. Any number of stupid things have been said on this subject on both sides, not least by Obama himself. The stupid utterings of others do not affect one whit anything I have said, nor do they help your arguments at all.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | August 20, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“We all carry our insurance cards around on our person. What do you carry to prove your citizenship? What does the law require for such proof?”
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta
First off, many people do not carry insurance cards around on their person. Last I checked, it isn’t a law. I just grab it on the way out the door to the doctor.
As for your perpetual questioning and paranoid imaginings, any parent realizes that there is no end to how many times you can ask why. I suspect you’re just about 15 minutes away from waxing philosophical about how can anyone really know that the world is not just a figment of their imagination, and why waste efforts on health care for imaginary people?
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
More dishonesty–blaming the Republicans..Their problem is with fellow Democrats. The people they are targeting have read the bill and know what it says, so they are not lying!!!
Posted by: ssmith | August 20, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
1.) The Democrats added the provision not to cover illegal aliens, but we’re the racists for pointing out their provision doesn’t have any means of enforcement.”
Screaming that the medical plan will insure illegal immigrants when it will do no such thing to play upon xenophobia is racist.
Much like touting a hoax by a Young Republican claiming she was attacked by a black man to inflame racial prejudice and scare white people.
Ya know like you did in October.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
“Suicide counseling is required!” First I’ve heard that claim.
Betsy McCaughey said, “The Congress would make it mandatory … that every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner, how to decline nutrition, how to decline being hydrated, how to go into hospice care … all to do what’s in society’s best interest … and cut your life short.”
Check out Sarah Palin’s Facebook pages. She thinks McCaughey’s opinions are to die for!
Posted by: WWW | August 20, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
This “race card” crap is getting old!! Just think of the people USING this race card all the time! My daughter was robbed twice both times by black men! She does not hate all black people and neither do I! We just don’t like black people who commit crimes against society! Just as we do about white people who do it too! Get a grip all you people who think we are just a bunch of racist because we want the freedom to choose our health care, how much money we make, our lamp bulbs and our heat control and how and what we eat! Next thing you know the government will banish McDonald’s from the earth!
Posted by: ross | August 20, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
“So you’re a mind reader?”
Who needs to read minds.
You tried to pull that same stunt by spreading the Ashley Todd hoax…even after it was debunked.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
“Does anyone know anyone on Medicaid..cause that is what you will get!”
The un-rich will LOVE Medicaid — defrocked and retired docs in “community clinics” long on scripts and short on diagnosis — Paxil and/or pain pills for whatEVER ails you, the better to pay executive salaries to a slew of non-profit hustlers in every community out of their “health care” money — kind of like uh the insurance companies.
No second opinions on Medicaid. And people on Medicaid are barred from obtaining private care for CASH (and doctors forbidden to see Medicaid patients privately).
After the Medicaid patient DIES of his/her crappy treatment, the good old government will dun his/her survivors in perpetuity, for mysterious charges the Medicaid recipient is barred from knowing, OR — should he/she win the lottery or rob a bank — from paying off during his/her lifetime.
Oh, you’ll love it, folks.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
“Folks in the press are following every little twist and turn of the legislative process,” Oblabla whines.
That’s what He was AFRAID of, when He tried to shove this pig bill through Congress unexamined, like Cash 4 Clunkers.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Try finding a doctor that will even take Medicaid…and BTW…does this health care plan cover dental …I would hate to think if I needed dental and it was not covered that I would have to gum my food for the rest of my life!! Would appreciate someone’s answer!!
Posted by: ross | August 20, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“”Asked whether they approve or disapprove of the president’s job performance, just 45.3 percent of likely voters say they approve. That compares with 50.5 percent who disapprove of the job Obama is doing.” Zogby today.”
Zogby Interactive?
ROFLMAO!
Its the worst performing poll over the last 3 elections!
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
“Bottom line, the Democrats have a provision to exclude illegal immigrants from federal funding, yet there is no provision to enforce it. So it’s easy to surmise that illegals will be covered by federal health care.
And apparently it’s more racist to point that out then it is to put the provision in there excluding illegals to begin with.”
Claiming illegal immigrants are going to be covered by the plan when they are not to play on xenophobia is racist.
And we know how comfortable you are at stirring up racism based on your past pushing the Ashley Todd hoax
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Zogby’s poll is excellent news. The downward trend continues, as reflected by Pew, NBC and Gallup in the past two days, all showing 50% approval. Rasmussen has it at 50 approve, 50 disapprove. The trend is clear, as is the reason: people now realize that this man doesn’t know what he’s doing, except that he wants to take them places they don’t want to go.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
In HR3200 it states that the government wants to have ACCESS to our bank accounts……anyone here have a problem with THAT? Can you just imagine what they can do with that bookkeeping nightmare….they cannot even handle cash for clunkers…they cannot use my money!!
On another subject…Obama had a conference call with religious leaders and said we have a MORAL obligation to be our brothers keepers..well, he has a very poor brother living in a hut and an aunt living in Boston in public housing! One should practice what they preach!!
Posted by: ross | August 20, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
“Zogby’s poll is excellent news”
ROFLMAO!
Zogby Interactive is so bad that RCP won’t even include them in their poll aggregate.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“How is the no-coverage provision going to be enforced if there is no verification of citizenship?
Let me guess, enforcing the no-coverage provision is the racist part?”
Still need your hand held?
Playing on xenophobic fears by telling people that illegal immigrants will be covered to garber support against the bill is racist.
A bill saying the public plans are limited to citizens and legal residents is not.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 20, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
The RCP does, of course, include Rasmussen, adjudged the nation’s most accurate in 2008. Their average is now around 51%.
Does anyone know if any new president has ever reached this low a level this early in his term? I believe Obama has set the new world outdoor record.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
“So it’s easy to surmise that illegals will be covered by federal health care.”
So … you want em all those Latino restaurant workers and farm workers and whatnot having TB in their little hovels, and breathing it all over your dinner? It’s um contagious, you know . . .
You want little babies to die of whooping cough, for a bureaucratic shortcoming?
The fact that it’s not perfectly clear what provisions, if any, are made for those without papers isn’t promising. They DO do the whole country’s scut work, after all.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
NBC tells us that a plurality believes Obama’s plan will worsen health care, and that only four in ten approve of his handling of this issue.
We have a failed presidency developing rapidly before our very eyes.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
“Does anyone know if any new president has ever reached this low a level [in the polls] this early in his term? I believe Obama has set the new world outdoor record.”
No one has EVER sunk so low, so fast.
Der Won is probably all wee-wee’d off.
(He’s gonna be SORRY, if He’s not already, that He said that — once the mask slips, it keeps on slidin’.)
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Facist Hyena:”
The RCP does, of course, include Rasmussen, adjudged the nation’s most accurate in 2008. Their average is now around 51%.”
Rasmussen most accurate? For a single election result, and the single professor who threw that paper together made an error and has since retracted it. Rasmussen is known to have a Republican house effect (their results versus actual outcomes over many races tend to lean republican by a handful of points). Rasmussen adjusts all numbers through their black-box likely voter model, which appears to assume Republicans more likely to vote so it increases their ‘vote’ in polls.
“Does anyone know if any new president has ever reached this low a level this early in his term? I believe Obama has set the new world outdoor record.”
You would believe that. As for reality, Reagan had similar numbers and Clinton was far lower.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Bet Noir:”No one has EVER sunk so low, so fast.”
Except Reagan. Or Clinton (who started lower and went much lower-NAFTA was a killer).
But don’t worry about reality or anything.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
ross:”does this health care plan cover dental ”
Probably not. I’ve never had dental from my employer provided insurance either.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I believe Bill Clinton was in the mid 40% range at about the same time in his first term.
Posted by: WWW | August 20, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
ross:”In HR3200 it states that the government wants to have ACCESS to our bank accounts……anyone here have a problem with THAT? ”
Yes, because it is another absurd lie contradicted by the bill. I’m guessing you’ve popped open a fact check list and are just going down the line throwing out the most frequently debunked lies to have a little evening fun annoying people. Kinda humorous in its own pathetic way.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 20, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
“But don’t worry about reality [polls] or anything.”
The reality is falling FAR and FAST.
And think how charmed the chilly Sebelius must be by “wee-wee’d off”. It’s delightful to contemplate.
Suppose the Emanuel brothers and Barney Frank are sporting wee-wee pins in their lapels yet?
They’ll be everywhere: wee-wee pins with rubies, wee-wee pins with little rings.
It’ll be bigger than flag pins, now that flag@whitehouse.gov kind of took the starch hahaha out of the word “flag”.
David Gergen will be wearing one, but he’ll look pained.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
“On Sept 13th the real grass-roots of this country must carpet this nation’s capital so thickly that no amount of money or power can mow us down.”
Hahaha. Been there, done that. Better to rally for Single Payer, and bring pikes and cudgels.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
It is becoming ever more obvious…
Obama is better at running for office than he is at running his office.
Posted by: Sweet Pea | August 20, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
El Know-it-all better go for straight insurance reform FIRST, for those who HAVE insurance, and see if He can manage THAT without hornswoggling anybody. And leave everybody else the heck ALONE, until Dr. Dean wins the 2012 election and can enact Single Payer like a serious grown-up, and without invoking “wee-wees”.
Otherwise, the whole COUNTRY is gonna be wee-wee’d off, marching on the White House with … great big shillelaghs (cudgels with a strap, commonly pronounced “shi-LAY-lee”, typically made from a stout knotty stick with a large knob at the top), which somewhat resemble great. big. wee-wees.
The corporados, who got THEIR trillions without a lot of unseemly hemming and hawing, may not be there — THEY’ll all be on Martha’s Vineyard. And points north.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 20, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Rasmussen most accurate “for a single election?” Yeah, the most recent presidential election…
By a single professor? Yeah–did he get it wrong? Where should Rasmussen have been ranked?
There are Medicare advantage plans that include dental–I just got one for my mother-in-law. My understanding is that Obama wants Mdicare Advantage eliminated.
In a free market for insurance you could negotiate ant kind of coverage you wanted in return for actuarially sound premiums. If Obama achieves his stated goal of eliminating private insurance in twenty years or less, you won’t be able to negotiate anything at all. You’ll have the coverage the government wants you to have, and if you don’t like it that’s tough.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Clinton and Reagan were both indoors…
I had dental coverage in my employer-provided plan in the from 1976 through the 1980′s. The firm negotiated the plan with the carrier. There was a pretty low annual cap, on the order of $1,000.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
From UAW:
“Health care benefits for UAW active and retired members in the auto industry include comprehensive hospital, surgical, medical and prescription drug coverage. Other benefits such as dental, vision care, hearing aids and durable medical equipment are also provided.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
“A bill saying the public plans are limited to citizens and legal residents is not.”
Is it racist to ask how the citizenship requirement will be enforced? Does the bill say anything about it? How many readers here carry proof of their citizenship with them?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
“does this health care plan cover dental?”
If Obama achieves his stated goal of eliminating private insurance within twenty years, at that point if it is not included in the government plan you’re on your own. Or perhaps our rulers will permit a private market for dental insurance to develop.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 20, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
UAW LIES!!! RAYAN C STOP TRYING TO PLAY THE RACE CARD FRANKLY IT IS GETTING REALLY OLD. IT APPEARS THAT IF YOU READ THE BILL AND TRY TO STATE THE FACTS THAT ARE THERE YOU ARE RACIST. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING THE PRESIDENT SAYS YOU ARE A RACIST. LOOK EVERYONE IS NOT AN O’BOT LIKE YOU. WE INVESTIGATE AND READ RATHER THAN FOLLOW THE LIES OF THIS ADMINISTRATION! IF YOU WOULD TAKE THE TIME TO READ THE BILL YOU WOULD SEE THE POISON THAT IS THROUGHT OUT THE BILL. LET ME HELP YOU OUT ON THIS ONE. I READ THE THE BILL AND HERE SOME OF THE POISION THAT I FOUND IN THE FIRST 500 PAGES.
• Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure!
• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!
• Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process)
• Page 42: The “Health Choices Commissioner” will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
• Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
• Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Health card.
• Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
• Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (read: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)
• Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange.
• Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participate in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans)
• Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastructure for services; translation: illegal aliens
• Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and AmeriCorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.
• Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.
• Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixing. No “judicial review” is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, private insurers will be crushed.
• Page 127: The AMA sold doctors out: the government will set wages.
• Page 145: An employer MUST auto-enroll employees into the government-run public plan. No alternatives.
• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.
• Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll
• Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll
• Page 167: Any individual who doesn’t’ have acceptable healthcare (according to the government) will be taxed 2.5% of income.
• Page 170: Any NON-RESIDENT alien is exempt from individual taxes (Americans will pay for them).
• Page 195: Officers and employees of Government Healthcare Bureaucracy will have access to ALL American financial and personal records.
• Page 203: “The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax.” Yes, it really says that.
• Page 239: Bill will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors and the poor most affected.”
• Page 241: Doctors: no matter what specialty you have, you’ll all be paid the same (thanks, AMA!)
• Page 253: Government sets value of doctors’ time, their professional judgment, etc.
• Page 265: Government mandates and controls productivity for private healthcare industries.
• Page 268: Government regulates rental and purchase of power-driven wheelchairs.
• Page 272: Cancer patients: welcome to the wonderful world of rationing!
• Page 280: Hospitals will be penalized for what the government deems preventable re-admissions.
• Page 298: Doctors: if you treat a patient during an initial admission that results in a readmission, you will be penalized by the government.
• Page 317: Doctors: you are now prohibited for owning and investing in healthcare companies!
• Page 318: Prohibition on hospital expansion. Hospitals cannot expand without government approval.
• Page 321: Hospital expansion hinges on “community” input: in other words, yet another payoff for ACORN.
• Page 335: Government mandates establishment of outcome-based measures: i.e., rationing.
• Page 341: Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans, HMOs, etc.
• Page 354: Government will restrict enrollment of SPECIAL NEEDS individuals.
• Page 379: More bureaucracy: Telehealth Advisory Committee (healthcare by phone).
• Page 425: More bureaucracy: Advance Care Planning Consult: Senior Citizens, assisted suicide, euthanasia?
• Page 425: Government will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. Mandatory. Appears to lock in estate taxes ahead of time.
• Page 425: Government provides approved list of end-of-life resources, guiding you in death.
• Page 427: Government mandates program that orders end-of-life treatment; government dictates how your life ends.
• Page 429: Advance Care Planning Consult will be used to dictate treatment as patient’s health deteriorates. This can include an ORDER for end-of-life plans. An ORDER from the GOVERNMENT.
• Page 430: Government will decide what level of treatments you may have at end-of-life.
• Page 469: Community-based Home Medical Services: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 472: Payments to Community-based organizations: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 489: Government will cover marriage and family therapy. Government intervenes in your marriage.
• Page 494: Government will cover mental health services: defining, creating and rationing those services.
WAKE UP YOU O’BOT IDIOTS.
Posted by: Eva Brown | August 21, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Why doesn’t the President have the courage to tell Americans who is spreading lies on ‘certain channels’?
He is sounding more like Hugo Chavez every day.Next, he’ll be calling for the closing of some TV and radio stations.
Posted by: J House | August 21, 2009, 3:31 am 3:31 am
“READ THE THE BILL AND HERE SOME OF THE POISION THAT I FOUND IN THE FIRST 500 PAGES.”
Yeah right, Eva Brown. All you did was copy from the bogus email that that certain Palinistas and Limbaughers have been circulating. Go to Politifact and read what they have to say about that email.
Posted by: Rudy | August 21, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Folks, we as Americans should know that you CANNOT pick and choose which laws you want to follow and which laws you do NOT want to follow. The Non-representing representatives of ours are following marching orders from god knows who. but its not us, and its not the Law! We Americans need to STAND UP NOW and tell them enough is enough! FOLLOW the LAW! kick out every illegal alien and their children, send them back to Mexico or wherever it is they are from! they are abusing the system!, and you can bet LARAZA is behind a majority of this! healthcare? say NO to covering illegals out of our pockets! we have done this far to long! and are now facing the consequences! Our schools are overcrowded with them! they get free foodstamps! free medical! free places to live! why would they NOT want these things?? it is TIME for them to GO HOME! Let mexico deal with its own, or they can go their and change thier own country! As an American Citizen iam TIRED of footing the bill here! where in the CONSTITUTION does it say “sneak across the border, drop a child and get free living, compliments of the U.S.Taxpayer??? what did our forefathers fight and die for?? this SNAFU? tell your Non-representing -representatives that it is time to FOLLOW THE LAW! every last one of them that set foot across our border BROKE THE LAW! they need to be apprehended, deported, and if they come back, build a prison in MEXICO and let them take care of their own!
Posted by: steve | August 21, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am
When the going gets tough, the tough … go campaigning? Oh, now I remember. Obama is pulling from his vast reservoir of leadership experience, that is, running a campaign. The American people know the difference between campaigning and governing. Let’s hope Obama figures it out pretty soon.
Posted by: Woody | August 21, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Eva Brown is right on target with those bullit points and it is very scary to say the least..True Americans do not want our freedom suppressed and our lives entangled in more government garbage. They make me wear my seatbelt, pay for abortions (see planned parenthood) and support pornograhpy and call it art. The fact is this is about power and control. If it was about reform we would be talking about tort reform, removing mandates, allowing the purchase of insurance across state lines and the discontinuation of tying health insurance to your employment. But they do not want to have an open debate and bring in medical professionals to REFORM the system they want to ram a 1000 page bill that will give government control over our “live” down our throat. And there is no way we can afford it!! The fact that Obama says we need to pass this bill to reduce the deficit is ludacris. Does he think we are a bunch of idiots? We must continue to write our REPS and SENS. and not allow this to happen
Posted by: Barry | August 21, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Jhw539 wrote: “…and the CBO analysis estimates only 10% of workers will be on the government plan by 2019, everyone else will be under private insurance just like now.”
Have you read HR 3200, Sec. 313 (“Employer Contributions In Lieu Of Coverage”)?
A company with an annual payroll of $1 million will only have to pay $80,000 if it forgoes employee healthcare coverage. $80,000 versus the hundreds of thousands of dollars it now costs to provide healthcare for its employees!
OH! And companies that have a payroll of under $250,000 can forgo healthcare coverage for its employees for FREE! There is no fee assessed! So tens of thousands of dollars in expenses (providing healthcare for employees) versus tens of thousands of dollars more profits!
HR 3200 provides a huge incentive for employers to drop healthcare coverage for their employees.
Posted by: James Danley | August 21, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Is this all the President can do? Campaign? We need leadership from the White House for the next 3 1/2 years, not an endless campaign (temper tantrum?) when things don’t go our way.
Posted by: BH | August 21, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
“Eva Brown is right on target with those bullit points and it is very scary to say the least.”
Bullets really grab your attention, huh?
Eva Brown is circulating a list of:
• Lies
• Lies
• More Lies
Go to Politifact and read the truth about the litany of lies. There is nothing to be scared of.
Posted by: Rudy | August 21, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
it’s started…….. the ‘right’ is losing it….
BOISE, Idaho — An Idaho Republican Party leader who helped oust the state GOP chairman in 2008 faces charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after an altercation escalated while he photographed a home with a delinquent mortgage.
Posted by: Watch Out now | August 21, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“Rasmussen most accurate “for a single election?” Yeah, the most recent presidential election…
By a single professor? Yeah–did he get it wrong? Where should Rasmussen have been ranked?”
Tied for 3rd with Pew, 1 pt off the final total.
4 other polls were tied right behind.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Rasmussen and the Democrat Zogby, almost uniquely, poll “likely voters” instead of “registered voters” or “adults.” Likely voters are more conservative than registered voters, who are in turn more conservative than adults.
The analysis published by Fordham University ranked Rasmussen’s final pre-election poll most accurate.
But why quibble? Everyone knows he’s plummeting across the board among all three groups; today the Washington Post reported that a mere 49% of adults have confidence in him. There are abundant good reasons for this.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 21, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Professor Panagopoulos analyzed the final pre-election polls of 23 polling organizations. Four of them overestimated McCain’s vote; seventeen overestimated that of Obama (anyone surprised?) Two–Rasmussen and Pew–were spot on, although Rasmussen was a hair closer.
I believe that the point has now been well made. And Obama is in serious trouble.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 21, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
“LET ME HELP YOU OUT ON THIS ONE. I READ THE THE BILL AND HERE SOME OF THE POISION THAT I FOUND IN THE FIRST 500 PAGES.”
You read that?
Hmmmm why are your bullet points part of a pdf file floating around right wing blogs.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Rasmussen and the Democrat Zogby, almost uniquely, poll “likely voters” instead of “registered voters” or “adults.” ”
The poll you cited as from Zogby interactive which is a self selected sample internet survey.
Its almost as worthless as a straight internet poll.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“Professor Panagopoulos analyzed the final pre-election polls of 23 polling organizations. Four of them overestimated McCain’s vote; seventeen overestimated that of Obama (anyone surprised?)”
Except that guy rounded up McCain’s percentage from 45.6% to 46% and rounded down Obama’s percentage from 52.9% to 52%.
Basically he cooked the numbers and Rasmussen proudly posted his faulty analysis touting Rasmussen as the most accurate pollster.
You been told this many times yet you still repeat this claim, why?
“Two–Rasmussen and Pew–were spot on, although Rasmussen was a hair closer”
Both had the final percentage of 52 to 46.
How is Rasmussen a hair closer?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“The analysis published by Fordham University ranked Rasmussen’s final pre-election poll most accurate.”
ROFLMAO!
It was an assoc prof whop cooked the numbers.
He had to round up McCain;s percentage from 45.6% to 46% and round down Obama’s percentage from 52.9% to 52% in order to get his results.
Of course Rasmussen linked to this “endorsement” because he enjoys cooking the numbers too.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Soooo ryan c are you expressing doubt in the points Eva Brown presented or is your response merely a distraction to the facts? Are the points a lie, if so prove it by presenting the “Bill” pages numbered in evidence to disprove…
Posted by: Parallex View | August 21, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Soooo ryan c are you expressing doubt in the points Eva Brown presented or is your response merely a distraction to the facts?”
Let’s see she lied stating they were her points not a copy paste(with bullet points) from a list being passed around right wing blogs.
As for the list itself, politifact has done a rundown showing how false they are.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Boy, all that stuff about who rounded up or down is really persuasive! I take it all back; Obama’s poll numbers are really cool, man! He’s doing great!
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 21, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“Boy, all that stuff about who rounded up or down is really persuasive!”
Obviously you are not concerned with bogus numbers.
After all you’ve been told about how worng the paper was doznes of times and yet you repeat it.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Democrat Zogby is showing Obama’s approval at 45%. This is obviously just an effort to rally the troops; the man has no interest in accuracy.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 21, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Rasmussen’s final poll for the 2008 presidential election was 52-46 Obama. The final result posted by CNN was 53-46.
Fools take comfort where they might. I suppose.
Perhaps the results above show that Obama is doing just fine, and Rasmussen for some reason is lying. (But why is NBC lying? The Washington Post? Pew? Quinnipiac?) One waits in vain for sensible commentary…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 21, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
“Democrat Zogby is showing Obama’s approval at 45%”
Zogby Interactive is a useless poll based on self selected sample of people who sign up to take the poll.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“Rasmussen’s final poll for the 2008 presidential election was 52-46 Obama. The final result posted by CNN was 53-46.”
And the final tally with out rounding Obama total down and rounding McCain’s up was 53 to 46.
Again, you know this yet continually cite a paper you KNOW is inaccurate.
Why?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“It’s a sad state of affairs when ABC News
has to ban a rebuttal Ad not in favor of Obamas Health Care Plan.
“ABC television has banned our TV ad from airing on its network.” Quote from the League of American Voters”
ROFLMAO!
Right wingers are angry their lies will not be broadcast.
Have to rely on FoxNews I guess.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 21, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Politifact Ryan, that’s like directing a liberal to read the National Review for the true meaning of life….Not gonna happen…Are the stated points as referenced by Eva B stated in the bill word for word or not?
Posted by: Parallex View | August 21, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
I wonder why ABC refuses to air the League of American Voters ad rebutting Obama’s Health Care Plan? Isn’t ALL sides in this debate important? Maybe not to ABC. Hmmm…maybe they swing toward the left side in this debate? ;oP Its so funny to see how they try to spin a picture that opposition of ObamaCare is organized and orchestrated by the right. Very silly when you think about it. Hey did you see all the right-wing Acorn protesters getting off the school bus at the Penn town hall mtg? Missed that one on ABC News did ya? Hmmm… Now Obama Care is going to fix the nations ills. Look how well other government programs have done, like Medicare and Medicaid and Social Sec. Oops, sorry. ;oP Don’t you trust your life to a government bureaucrat? Look at Canada and see how well they’ve done. Oops, sorry again. Well whatever happened to the Enumerated Powers in the Constitution? What’s that? Well who needs them anyway. As Gore said, the Constitution is just a stretchable material that we can just fold and bend and shape to fit any ends we wish. Amendments? Too much trouble. Founding Fathers? Who are they again? Abiding by the Constitution is just too much trouble and the representatives haven’t read it (nor the health-care plan) anyway! And that’s the reason I watch the most trusted name in news coverage. The fair, and balanced, Fox News Channel. Hey trick question: What country do you live in? If you said the “United States” then read the 17th Amendment. The States in the “Union of States” have NO representation in our Federal System. That’s the reason we have an out of control Federal Government. ;oP And that’s the way it is.
Posted by: Daniel | August 21, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Are the stated points as referenced by Eva B stated in the bill word for word or not?
Posted by: Parallex View | Aug 21, 2009 7:06:18 PM
In the bill word for word? No. Have you not looked at the bill? Or Eva’s post? The bullet points are summaries that purposely misinterpet, and they are a direct copy of the ploy used by the debunked Betsy McCaughey back in the 90s and again recently. But they are in the mass email that was sent out, word for word, and much of that has been debunked. I think the caps in Eva’s email are supposed to make it seem like, wow, she really read the first 500 pages. LOL. Why not pick 496 or something so as not to tip every one off that it was copied from an email? Too funny. Even funnier? People are cheering her on and writing things like this:
“prove it by presenting the “Bill” pages numbered in evidence to disprove…”
It’s not worth the time invested at this point. Would it change your mind? No. You’re mocking Politifact. But good on Ryan for calling liars liars.
Posted by: Alyson | August 21, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Remember during the election, when everyone chastised the President, saying he should be more aggressive, respond more to ad hominem or blatantly false attacks upon him, his character, etc?
What happened then?
Millions of Americans walked streets, picked up phones, and quietly but furiously working to elect Barack Obama.
Organizing for America has sent over 64,000 volunteers to Congressional offices to share personal health care stories and express the desperate need for health insurance reform. We might not be screaming, misleading, threatening or getting the kind of press you get when you carry an automatic weapon to a Presidential event. However, we are quietly but furiously making a difference. Wait and see.
With respect,
Alex Brant-Zawadzki
Regional Communications Coordinator
Organizing for America
Posted by: Alex Brant-Zawadzki | August 21, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm