Obama Trounces Palin in Poll
ABC News' David Chalian Reports:
Yes, it is far too early to be polling potential 2012 matchups. They are nearly meaningless at this stage (and for the next several stages) of the game. But in the doldrums of August, these poll numbers are far too much fun to resist.The Marist Poll is out with new numbers today showing President Obama soundly defeating former Gov. Sarah Palin 56 percent to 33 percent if they were the candidates in the 2012 election and if it was strangely held in August 2009.There are a couple of clear and important warning signs for Gov. Palin in these early numbers. She appears unable to create the near monolithic support among voters in her own party. In this poll, Gov. Palin only receives support from 73% of Republicans. Gov. Palin’s outsized popularity with a segment of the Republican Party may not necessarily translate to the entire Republican electorate in a general election. By comparison, Sen. McCain garnered 90% of the Republican vote in his defeat to Barack Obama last November.It also appears Gov. Palin has some continued work to do to turn her high profile resignation into a political plus. 61 percent of those polled said her resignation was a bad political move, according to Marist. In fact, among Republicans, 51 percent believe stepping down from office the way she did may have potentially damaged her political future.Perhaps the most devastating number in this poll for Sarah Palin is the basic measurement of her popularity with the American electorate. Her numbers are upside down with 43 percent of respondents view her unfavorably, compared with 37 percent of respondents who hold a favorable view.The Marist folks also took a look at the 2012 Republican field. For all her name recognition and popularity among a segment of the Republican Party, Sarah Palin is in a three-way battle for 2012 GOP frontrunner. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney scores 21 percent support, Palin comes in at 20 percent, and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee gets 19 percent in the poll of Republican voters.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
You won’t see this one on our fair & balanced network. We will never recognize anything that even seems positive for Obama. Our mission is to destroy them.
Posted by: Beck baby | August 18, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
That WAS fun.
But 73% of the Republicans support a woman who lied in her tweets about Obama creating death panels? Yikes.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | August 18, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Obama has to worry most, about his own actions, and about number one priority, creating jobs for the tens of thousands of people laid off and out of work.
If that doesn’t get addressed, it won’t matter who he faces, in the next election.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 18, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
It’s very scary, indeed, to contemplate who these 33% and 37% who think Palin is anything but a “whack job.” Geez, how severe are their Axis I and II DSM-VIr diagnoses? Clearly, there is no cure for stupid.
Posted by: Sammy | August 18, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
I guess there are many out here who have much to say about SARAH PALIN, yet it is not what she has said but articles she posted from other directions that they refuse to read ,if they can read! Most of the voters ,as now ,voted blindly because they voted for race not ability!
Posted by: william | August 18, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Anyone who believes that there was no end of life written in the hc package ,I have a bridge in brooklen I will sell you! become informed! read,read,read! why did they drop from the hc what you say didn’t exist? Read what the american collage of surgins wrote about OBAMA should stop fabricating information to the voters!
Posted by: william | August 18, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Read about ACCORN and who the radicals who started it are! DRAFT CARD BURNING RADICALS!
Posted by: william | August 18, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Polls only matter when they can be used against Obama. Like when the polls show that Obama’s support is decreasing!!!!!!!! (PRINT that) and yet it is still several times the support of the republicans (Don’t mention).
Posted by: xmarks | August 18, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
With all of the liberal media working against Palin and hate groups smearing her, all barack can get is 56%?
Even Bush was around 75% and the libs hate him. This is too funny.
Posted by: Reality2009 | August 18, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Amy in Maine ——– While I am not a Palin supporter, which is worse? Lieing about death panels (which there are panels in this plan, but not death), or that the AARP has endorsed this plan? I would say Obama has tried to speak for a group that openly stated they did not endorse it whereas Palin only spoke for herself. Now, some boogieman sent me an email from Axelrod supporting chain emails. Something to think about.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
xmarks ——– It appears you used negative poll numbers against the reps, so why would you complain if the Pro-Obama media would show his rapidly decreasing support? He promised alot of things IF the timulus passed, please point out which one has come true after almost 8 months? No wonder his support is fading.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
GO SARAH PALIN AND KEEPS AGAINST NATIONALIZED DEATH CARE REFORM UP !!!!!
The funds to reform it would cost range from US$1,500,000,000,000.00 up to US$3,000,000,000,000.00 which enable definitely for America to go to bankrupcy within five years. I only support health care reform within range of American economic can handle it.
STOP PRINTING MONEY, BORROWING MONEY FROM CHINA AND RAISING TAXES.
Posted by: Julie-NY | August 18, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
The GOP isn’t the only party looking for a leader! 2012 will be interesting when it comes to independent voters and which way they sway. Hillary is messing up any chance to overtake Obama and Obama is messing up his reelection possibilities.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
lfrichar
I would say lying about death panels is far, far worse than saying AARP has endorsed a bill when they haven’t officially. Palin spread a lie to influence a policy issue, frightening people into thinking healthcare reform would mean their babies and elderly parents would be brought before panels that would decide if they would live or die, which is a total falsehood. I think deliberatly lying to the public, spreading misinformation, is very close to treason in a democracy. It poisons the debate. Obama saying AARP had endorsed the bill was hardly a lie – they endorse healthcare reform, but they want to make sure nothing in it changes Medicare – you know, that government run agency on which seniors depend?
Posted by: Amy in Maine | August 18, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
william
I just read an article about a teenager who had to have an emergency liver transplant – a risky, expensive and desperate operation but first, doctors checked to make sure she had enough health insurance to cover it.
Thank God she did. She lived. What if she hadn’t?
Posted by: Amy in Maine | August 18, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Obama is certainly jepordizing his reelection if his embrace of healthcare co-ops turns out to be significantly weaker than a public option. John Edwards better as time passes. His indiiscretion is certainly no worse than what Bill Clinton survived multiple times and who is still obsessed with the Dean scream?
Posted by: whysaduck | August 18, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Obama saying AARP had endorsed the bill was hardly a lie -
Posted by: Amy in Maine
So the AARP Prez the very next day calling it a lie was lieing? Your support for Obama is unwavering to where you won’t admit a clear lie when you hear it? In two words Amy, you’re wrong.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
I bet those 33% who support Palin still think that Bush was a great president. That segment of the population will always support any Repulican regardless of how radical they are.
Posted by: Dan in the west | August 18, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
THAT’S IT? 56 to 32. That’s the best the liar in chief could do against the lowly Palin? Bye Bye Bary. 2012 can’t come fast enough.
Posted by: pmsnbc3 | August 18, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
If you are so convinced by this snapshot poll that Sarah Palin is irrelevant, then why do you constantly dwell on her and discuss her? Why not Romney, Thune, Pawlenty or Jindal? I know why and so do you. She scares the bejeebers out of the political class and their smug arrogance about the average American and what she or he can do to affect the direction of this country. She will have the last laugh, not you! Just remember, you heard it here pundits!
Posted by: Jim Cunningham | August 18, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
lfrichar
No, you are wrong. AARP supports healthcare reform. The CEO can’t say he endorses a bill at this point, in case the bill calls for Medicare cuts.
Obama did not lie, and for you to keep saying that is in itself a lie. What you are trying to do is muddy the waters of the debate, move it off of the facts, because the facts, as usual, fly in the face of the Republicans’ position.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | August 18, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
ifrichar, this is on FoxNews online:
Look out AARP. There’s a new senior advocacy group on the block offering a conservative alternative to seniors.
The Atlanta-based American Seniors Association (ASA), which is opposed to President Obama’s health care plan, is trying to capitalize on growing public dissatisfaction with the AARP.
About 60,000 seniors have quit AARP since July 1 due to the group’s support for health care reform, a spokesman for the organization said this week.
AARP is running ads to support a health care overhaul and hosted Obama at an online forum recently to promote his agenda to AARP members. But the group has not endorsed a specific bill and says it won’t support a plan that reduces Medicare benefits.
Spokesman Drew Nannis told The Associated Press it wasn’t unusual for the powerful, 40 million-strong senior citizens’ lobby to shed members in droves when advocating for a controversial issue.
Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 18, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
More non-news. Obama is 7 months into a 4 year term. Palin is a private citizen. Why is this even an story? Oh thats right I forgot, Obama is still on the campaign trail. He’s been on tv now more then Bush and Clinton combined. He has wore out his luster and within the 7 months made Jimmy Carter look like a patriot.
Get some real stories like… find his college records, or tell the real story of Wn Ayers, Tony Rezko, Rev Wright and Donald Young.
Non-news is just that, takes up space.
Posted by: dave | August 18, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Palin is God’s gift to Democrats.
Posted by: Sammy | August 18, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Amy in Maine Obama, “That is why the AARP endorses this bill”.
AARP prez, “we have not endorsed any government health care plan”.
I am not a republican, but this sure looks and sounds like a freekin’ lie to me. Fly that in the face of fact. Supporting reform and endorsing a bill in congress are COMPLETELY different. And, oh yes, a flat out lie.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
What can i expect from ABC or from that poll from left leaning media outlet? nothing!!
You guys pretend to be neutral but people can see your true colors….”liberals in tank with the One even when O was running againts Hillary back in the primary”
With all the help from CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS,NPR etc Obama can get only 56 % of the vote?
Posted by: alvin | August 18, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Some posters seem to get great satisfaction from learning the Obama’s poll numbers have decreased since November. Everyone of them is wearing their ignorance like a sign on their backs. Every president’s poll numbers decrease during their first year in office. Putting weight on that as if it indicates something significant shows that the GOP is desparate for substative criticism of Obama. he’s doing a great job and they know it; especially compared to the last guy. GWB makes Obama look like Einstein.
Posted by: Mike In Carolina | August 18, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Palin will not win, if you want to cast your hopes on palin,well go head, she will lose!
Posted by: gman | August 18, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I am a very senior citizen. If my old bod becomes so expensive to maintain that young people have to do without health care to afford mine, I have no problem with putting me on palliative care. Just keep me well fed and comfortable. God will do the rest.
Posted by: Old lady | August 18, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Mike In Carolina wrote “”"”desparate for substative criticism of Obama. he’s doing a great job and they know it; especially compared to the last guy. GWB makes Obama look like Einstein.”"”"”
Well Mike, it took until the middle of 2003 for GWB to fall below 50%. How’s Einstein doing?
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
It’s not to hard to figure out who the Liberal Media (And lib’s in General) fear the most. I will give you a clue. They keep writing stories about her.
Posted by: Mike Jones | August 18, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Mike Jones —– It is amazing how they keep her “hanging” around. I thought the death panel would have been her death.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“Well Mike, it took until the middle of 2003 for GWB to fall below 50%.”
How soon they forget…9/11.
The country rallyed around the President because we were freakin’ attacked. By the time George had finished his two horrible terms he had the lowest ratings in Presidential history. And yes, GWB makes Obama look like Einstein.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | August 18, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Amy in Maine wrote “”"”How soon they forget…9/11.”"”"”
Actually, I was in Iraq and all over the ME after 9/11 so I won’t forget. The fact is, GWB’s first term, while running a deficit (as most do) was quite productive and lucrative to many. His 2nd term as the Iraq war went on was his downfall. My point was to show his and Obama’s popularity is almost identical up to this point. I am still intrigued with dems and reps only pointing out the worst points and never the best. You should try it sometime.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 18, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Interesting that this poll was conducted August 3 through August 6. Palin’s series of notes about health care began on August 7. I wonder how much opinion has changed since then?
Posted by: Guille | August 18, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Give it time. Back in 2006 no one knew who Barack Obama was.
Posted by: TangledThorns | August 18, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
As a republican, it scares me that there are people out there who believe that Palin is the future of the republican party. Palin is a never was and an embarrassment to the party each time she opens her mouth. If she had 1/2 a brain more… she might have been a sucessful democrat!
Posted by: Richm | August 18, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Never underestimate the stupidity of the American people. Sarah could very well come out on top. With the right advertising agency you can convince them of anything from Rodney King deserving to be beat up to invading a country that didn’t attack us to denying Americans universal health care.
Posted by: Deegee99 | August 18, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
No amount of polls and spin by the msm will help Obama in 2012 if people have no jobs. So keep polling, just like his plummeting poll numbers, the matchup polls will continue to tighten as more Americans are forced to “wake up” by the coming economic tsunami that this administration’s policies will bring on our country.
Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Amy, if the death panel clause didn’t exist in Obama’s health plan, how did he manage to take it out? Obama supports the Daschle plan that calls for and enforces RATIONED CARE. Obama has already said that the elderly should not be receiving expensive care for things like HIP REPLACEMENT. Not receiving care is like ushering in death, for I know if I am elderly and break my hip that I will not be allowed to get fixed by Obama’s panels (death panels) then they might as well shoot me.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 18, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
why is sarah palin being compared to President Obama? That’s an insult for the president. she’s comparable to a 4th grader. this woman has no solution to any problem or issue; she’s too polarizing, wacky and dumb.
Posted by: judy taylor | August 18, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
So President Obama is beating private citizen Palin in a poll that was done in the first week of August and it’s now the third.
That is some hard hitting journilism.
Pathetic
Posted by: Bosk | August 18, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
“Amy in Maine” – What has happened to New Englanders? You (we, as I was brought up in Boston) used to be a hardy, down-to-earth lot who could spot a snake oil salesman a mile away and who honored hard-wroking, honest people. Yet here you are not understanding ANYTHING about what’s goin on and throwing in behind the worst kind of lying socialist bum from the depths of dirty Chicago over an honest, religious woman who SPEAKS THE TRUTH and walks the walk. In particular, death panels ARE in the bill, of course not in those words cause democrats are good at fooling people like you with words. Read up on recent deaths in Oregon due to their “public health care” when folks were refused expensive treatment. Read up on how the chief doctor (like our surgeon general) in Canada was quoted this week saying Canada’s social health care system is about to “implode”. And ask anyone you meet from Britain to smile and count their teeth. Any one of those should scare you away from obamacare. Then pehaps read up on the views of obama’s advisors who dont think children are “human beings” until they reach a certain (undefined) age, or that old people are worth far less than 30-somethings. THen realize that when it comes to a choice for the obamacare (death) panel of experts to either spend money to care for a retired white American who’s worked and paid taxes their whole life vs a 30 year old ILLEGAL ALIEN who’s NEVER paid a dime to the US Treasury, the death panel will choose to let the old American DIE every time. That is a fact. READ THE BILL. Sarah Palin has.
Posted by: GMan | August 18, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
AARP supports a portion of the bill that pertains to seniors. So like most bills you have to weigh the good with the bad. You can support a bill without endorsing it wholeheartedly. That’s what Obama was saying.Most of us got it. Except for those that want to tear down anything good that could come from it.The right for seniors to discuss their options and wishes with their doctor during an office visit, covered by medicare.When someone 30 years old gets cancer, it’s a given they will want treatment to fight it. When a person 85 gets cancer, your choices may differ when it comes to treatment, for the simple fact, the treatment may kill you first.
Posted by: Bea | August 18, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Of course there are “death panels” built into the Health Care bill. While the language of the 1018 page bill is deliberately designed to be obscure there is a “benefits advisory committee” who will play God and decide benefits. If you have read anything by Ezekiel Emanuel, Rohm’s brother, and Obama’s advisor and friend, you know he advocates Quality Adjusted Life Care which produces a priority curve where the young get the most chance and elderly and infants get less. Cost Saving Death Panel! PALIN was right!
Posted by: Linda | August 18, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Of course liberals wouldn’t know anything about the health care bill because they don’t bother to read it they just get their marching orders from their approved scripts and staged Obama townhalls. At least, Palin thinks for herself, gives speeches without a teleprompter and isn’t out to destroy individual freedoms, cripple small business, and spend taxpayer’s money. How’s the Stimulus job and money working out? Health Care bill is not about health or care it is a massive build up of government. Try reading and thinking.
Posted by: Linda | August 18, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Obama is a liar, but liberals can’t get past the “Hope and Change”. Do you really believe he will pay your mortgage and buy you a car? LOL liberals get by on hysterical emotions while conservatives think with common sense. Palin is honest, intelligent, and tells the truth. How is B. Hussein doing on his campaign promises? Eh, not so much!
Posted by: Linda | August 18, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
It’s going to take a woman like Sarah Palin to bring about REAL change for our nation. With this adminstation it is HOPELESS!
Posted by: Jim from Leola | August 18, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
The way Obama is going by 2012 we could run Richard Nixons corpse against Obama and win.
Posted by: Dennis D | August 18, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
potatoegator..My 82 year old father went to his doc for a check-up and to get his blood pressure meds. Aside from severe arthritis and hypertension he was in very good health. During his office visit the doc asked him if he’d ever had a colonoscopy. He said no. Doc said medicare pays for it, do you want one? Well first off, he didn’t know what it was, but decided to have it anyway.I didn’t think it was a good idea or even necessary at 81, with no symptoms.During the procedure his blood pressure dropped dangerously. When he was brought back to his room he was incoherent and hallucinating. I was told that sometimes older people have increased dementia when they are in a strange place. I said he didn’t have dementia when I brought him in. He was also very dehydrated from the prep. Long story short, he got out of bed in the hospital when no one was there, fell and broke his hip. He had a partial hip replacement, spent the next two weeks talking out of his head, throwing things, stripping off his clothes and trying to get someone to wipe the water off the dripping ceiling that wasn’t really dripping.After 13 weeks in the hospital and 2 more months of therapy, he’s home. He’ll be on home health care for the rest of his life. He now has to walk with a walker and spends most of his time in bed. Now, did he really need that colonoscopy? NO I wish someone would have rationed his care.
Posted by: Alice | August 18, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
You would think a graet man and a lawyer like Obama would have AT LEAST READ THE HEALTH CARE BILL. At least Sarah Palin doesn’t have her head stuck in the sand OR up where the sun doesn’t shine with special interest groups.
Posted by: Jim from Leola | August 18, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Did you read about the teenager who needed a liver transplant and Cigna insurance company turned her down? but changed their mind later? but they delayed too long and she died not getting the transplant.
people need to remember that all these fear tactics are about what already happens with private insurance – the government could manage health care for about 2/3 or less of what private insurance is reaping.
Posted by: McGreen | August 18, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“So the AARP Prez the very next day calling it a lie was lieing?” Well, go look at the AARP “Health Action Now” website and see for yourself how one might think that they support the bill.
Posted by: mallory | August 18, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
PotatoeGater22 | Aug 18, 2009 5:03:11 PM….I think your(and others) logic is too large a leap for some!
Posted by: deanbob | August 18, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“Then pehaps read up on the views of obama’s advisors who dont think children are “human beings” until they reach a certain (undefined) age, or that old people are worth far less than 30-somethings.” Ezekiel Emanuel never said this. He has fought his entire life AGAINST legalizing euthanasia.
He was deliberately misquoted in an attempt to mislead Americans into thinking that he was promoting killing babies and old people. What he was doing, in his book, was stating an OPPOSING viewpoint so that he could refute it. It wouldn’t take you long to just look up the basic facts on the internet and find out the truth instead of just swallowing the lies you have been fed.
Posted by: mallory | August 18, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Hen realize that when it comes to a choice for the obamacare (death) panel of experts to either spend money to care for a retired white American…vs a 30 year old ILLEGAL ALIEN who’s NEVER paid a dime to the US Treasury, the death panel will choose to let the old American DIE every time. That is a fact. READ THE BILL. Sarah Palin has.”
This is so *not* a fact that it’s hilarious you are saying it is. Here is some actual text from the bill: “SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS.
Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.”
Do you think if Sarah Palin had read the bill that she would be against advanced directives? Because last year, she was heavily in favor of advance directives.
Posted by: mallory | August 18, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
“Amy, if the death panel clause didn’t exist in Obama’s health plan, how did he manage to take it out? ” Because there was a provision in the bill for the government to pay for everyone to have a voluntary meeting with their doctors every 5 years to formulate and update their advance directives. This is what got twisted into this stupid “death panel” thing.
Posted by: mallory | August 18, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
“mallory” thinks that “Advanced Directives” are what the death panel comment was about? Open your mind, mallory, to a day in the not too distant future when the obamacare chickens have come home to roost and there’s no money. Just like every other God-forsaken do-goody ill-advised program the democrats have ever dreamt up to spend taxpayers (read: Republican’s) money (Social security? Medicare? …). And when, mallory, your mother or father is old and grey and God-forbid is stricken with cancer. Curable cancer but cancer nontheless. Well, mallory, it can be very expensive to cure cancer. So the (death) panel group of “EXPERTS” will need to convene and decide if there’s enough money to treat your old man or old lady. At some point, for some people (whites only? – read the bill – there is a Department of Minority Health in there. So obviously minorities will be getting SPECIAL TREATMENT of some sort) there will BE NO MONEY to treat them. They will be offered some painkillers (IF there’s enough money for that) or a Michael Jackson concoction and bye-bye mama and papa. Think about it. It’s that way now in Britain and even Oregon. it WILL be that way in obamacare and if you doubt me, then say hi to the tooth fairy tonite for me.
Posted by: GMan | August 18, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
If she isnt a threat, why does the State Run Media continue to talk about her?
Posted by: WRA342 | August 18, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
If she is not a threat, Why does the State Run media continue to focus on her?
Posted by: Dr342 | August 18, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Obama is done if all he can get is 56%
Bush was around 75% this time in his term.
People are running from Obama.
56%…..that’s a riot!
Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
“mallory” and as for ‘Zeke’ and euthanasia – First off, the liberal bastions of Oregon and Washington already HAVE euthanasia. We all know you liberals won’t rest til we all have it, no matter what Zeke says. But it’s now only Zekee, do u understand wha obama’s science advisor stands for (though he, like you, wants us to believe he only ‘used to’ believe what he wrote in his books.) Look it up, you can read.
Posted by: GMan | August 18, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Oh, I’m sorry mallory, in one of my comments above I mentioned Wash, Ore and Britain but neglected to cast focus on Canada and their great gov’e health care system.
Posted by: GMan | August 18, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The Great Republican Hope “Sarah Palin” NOT!
Posted by: gman | August 18, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
I would have to say that Huckabee would be a better choice than Palin. I think name recognition had a big part to do in the poll that was presented. Palin got her name out there and it was not always in a flattering way. By the way: “Amy in Maine” – Obama was correct in saying that the AARP supported the bill. He just failed to say that they only supported parts of the bill, not the whole bill. You say Palin LIED, but you say Obama SAID. Why the difference in words? A lie is a lie. No matter how you spin it.
Posted by: d | August 18, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
I don’t believe a word he says. Its too early to state polls for Obama and Palin. Besides that Obama is also slipping in the polls at this time and has made some good mistakes in the last few months. His Health Care Reform got him in deep trouble with the public and it isn’t over yet. We don’t need the government to choose insurance for us we can get on our own.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 18, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Posted by: Richm | Aug 18, 2009 4:49:55 PM — I agree wholeheartedly. What was McCain thinking?
Posted by: d | August 18, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
I think Palin would be a good match to campaign against Obama. Its worth the effort even if she lost. And the people that comment against her are jealous of her accomplishments because they will never accomplish anything in their lifetime and will be lucky to get a job after they gradute college. They will have to apply for welfare. Palin will run in 2012 but there may be another democrat and republican running also as an independent.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 18, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Amy: For your information AARP lost 60,000 insurers over Obama’s Health Care Reform and will lose more if they accept it. That Health Care Insurance is a joke. We don’t know what the contents of that bill state. Just by Obama talking doesn’t mean he is telling the truth. Obama has some of the public fooled and they don’t know the difference when he’s lying.This country don’t need government health care people should take out their own insurance.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 18, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Jim Cunningham: The democrats fear Palin but will not admit it. I believe she will run in 2012 but she better get herself started early in 2010. She is a good match against Obama and I believe she has a good chance. Palin knew what Obama’s Health Care Reform plan stood for and he got caught and had to change it. The networks don’t like her because she knows what they stand for and let’s them have it. She also knows that Obama is not running this country the way it should be run. We now have a trillion dollar or more deficit that it will take Bill Clinton to balance for him.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 18, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
OK yahoos..Obama will loose to anyone at the present rate. Palin has not bearing on it but surprisingly as soon as Palin spoke about the death panels it was taken away from the bill !! So my question is who are the real loosers ? The crazy Palin or the looney liberals ?? take a pick ! ;-)
Posted by: Frank | August 18, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Well Palin spoke against the death panels and the liberals droped the measure out of the bill.So there most be some true on the allegations I think. Now who are the loosers ? The crazy Palin or the lonney liberals ? LMAO
Posted by: Frank | August 18, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Wow! Obama out polls Palin! Two years of fawning positive coverage versus 10 months of the most partisan, rabid attack stories and Obama barely gets over half the votes… Imagine how well a sucessful governor like Palin will do against a failing president like Obama in a couple of more years. He won’t look so smart, smug, and his halo will have already be pawned for political favors.
Posted by: Calvin | August 19, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
That anyone can support Palin speaks volumes for the poor job that’s done in educating Americans.
Posted by: The_Mick | August 19, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am
Paul wrote: “Obama is done if all he can get is 56% Bush was around 75% this time in his term. People are running from Obama. 56%…..that’s a riot!”
Are you talking about approval ratings? If so, George W. Bush’s approval ratings in August of his first term where in the 50 to 60 percent range, depending on the pollster.
Posted by: WWW | August 19, 2009, 5:20 am 5:20 am
Mariann Pepitone wrote: “We don’t know what the contents of that bill state.”
Perhaps you should read it then. It’s available on the internet.
Mariann Pepitone wrote: “Palin knew what Obama’s Health Care Reform plan stood for and he got caught and had to change it.”
Just because Palin says something doesn’t mean it’s true. Nothing has been changed in House bill HR 3200 at this time.
Posted by: WWW | August 19, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am
Frank wrote: “Palin has not bearing on it but surprisingly as soon as Palin spoke about the death panels it was taken away from the bill !!”
There are no death panels to take away. The Senate Finance Committee announced they will be removing the advance care planning provision from one of their versions of the bill. There has been no announcement that anything will be removed from House bill HR 3200, even though Sarah Palin has made that claim on Facebook. It simply is not true.
Frank wrote: “Palin spoke against the death panels and the liberals droped the measure out of the bill.”
Again, it was the advance care planning provision that was removed from one of the Senate bills by the Senate Finance Committee. They are not liberals; they are a bipartisan group.
Posted by: WWW | August 19, 2009, 5:22 am 5:22 am
Calvin wrote: “Imagine how well a sucessful governor like Palin will do against a failing president like Obama in a couple of more years.”
Sarah Palin is not a successful governor. She quit the job.
Posted by: WWW | August 19, 2009, 5:22 am 5:22 am
Hey, that’s not fair! You put the smart, articulate president guy up against the stupid, bumbling idiot gal from Alaska. Of course he’s going to win.
Posted by: Eric | August 19, 2009, 6:36 am 6:36 am
I’m more amazed that there are 33% who would vote for the illiterate but I guess 2 years of gov of one of the smallest, most insignificant states in the country is “experience” to some….
oh no, wait……would that be the same 33% that approved of the Bush administration? It must be getting awfully hard to breath with their heads still buried in the sand…..
Posted by: dk | August 19, 2009, 7:15 am 7:15 am
Sammy, you are right, there is no cure for stupid…how many of you voted for Obama? How many are gonna drink his purple koolaid?
Posted by: conservative | August 19, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
The POTUS seems to be doing what he does best, when there is controversy or he isn’t agreed with, then cut and run. If he believes in the public option so much, why is he backing down from it? Same ol’ Same ol’…exactly what he did when he was in the senate…don’t make a firm decisoin and don’t vote any way but “present.” He makes me sick.
Posted by: Illinoisan | August 19, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am
33%? I am surprized Sara Palin got that high of a rating. Clearly they were jokes being played on the polsters.
Posted by: KsDevil | August 19, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Reading this article was no different then reading a piece of fiction.
Sarah Palin is a private citizen and is not running for any office. President Obama’s popularity is falling every day.
Who cares if he beats her in some sort of fictional pole?? This story is nothing then a device to prop up his ego.
Posted by: mental floss | August 19, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
There is good news for Palin supporters; in a theoretical Presidential matchup between Palin and a pile of fresh moose nuggets, she only trails the nuggets by two percentage points.
Posted by: Yukon Sam | August 19, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
The poll was taken by a democrat in an all democrat voting district..Obama’s polling numbers are lower then Bush were during his first 8 months in office and lower then most other Presidents in the last 50 years…
Romney or Ron Paul would cream Obama in a election if held today..People have woken up to realize what a phony and fraud he truly is..
Posted by: jim | August 19, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Even comparing Palin to Obama is moronic. Palin is a racist, liar, quitter, dimwit, who likes the limelight but not the work involved to achieve any real success. Of course if you think being Governor of Alaska, who’s population is less than most major cities in the lower 48 an acheivement. All it took was an ex-beauty queen in a state with three times + as many men as women. Do you really think she was elected for her intellect. LMFAO
Posted by: Chuck | August 19, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Obama’s buddy Bill Clinton in 1994 sent a Presidential panel around to different areas of the country to gather information about human radiation expierments and other crimes against humanity that happened on USA soil during the cold war and what happened to adults and children were beyond horror. Clinton gathered the information and left the people that were still living high and dry. So I don’t want to hear what a moral man he is. Don’t let the gov get in control of this healthcare. You can research what I have told you.
Posted by: domino | August 19, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I am amazed that anyone would take Palin seriously or even as a serious candidate. She has got to be one of the most scary and most stupid people I have ever seen attempting to work for the public good. If she’s the best the republicans have to offer, they are in very sad shape!
Posted by: jmb | August 19, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Every-time Sara Palin opens her mouth, her poll numbers drop by about 5 percent. By my calculations, she has about 6-7 press conferences, public statements or widely publicized twitters before she drops off the radar completely… becoming a statistic, a has been, wanna be – but never gonna be. Keep talkin’ Sara, keep talkin’. —- And to those that support her… give it up folks, she is so far away from becoming president that you really need to focus elsewhere.
Posted by: Rick_VT | August 19, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
This is a surprise? He is brilliant; she is really stupid and uninformed. He cares about people; she cares about…well, herself. He is honest; she is a crook [just ask where their Wasila house came from and who paid for it]. No comparison.
Posted by: LawyerTom1 | August 19, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Sarah Palin may still be looked upon as to new a candidate for a high republican office, but her relatively new position is certainly something to build on. I remember when Jimmy Carter, from Georgia, ran for president and people were asking,”Jimmy who??” And he came virtually out of nowhere to be elected as President. I believe Palin has a much greater chance to be a serious and victorious candidate for President. It may be 2012, or 2016, but with her youth, intellect and determination, she could easily become the candidate we need as republicans in the next few years. I hope she doesn’t make a run against Obama, unless he gets canned by or before the end of his first term. If she should lose in 2012, she might not be a viable candidate in 2016. But I believe she is a rising star in the republidcan party.
Rudy
Posted by: Rudy | August 19, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Ifrichar’s statement that republicans vote for anyone who is a republican will vote for any candidate who runs. Do you think democrats (Dummycrats)don’t follow the party line no matter who or what? Democrats invented that style of loyalty: “Democrats, be they wrong or be they right, but my party!”
Posted by: Rudy | August 19, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Palin’s right
Posted by: grap | August 19, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
The gap between the two is highlighted by the many differences between the people who trust each of them. Obama uses reason and logic, neither of which are available to Palin. Like many from the extreme right Palin counts on fear to control her fans, making it all too obvious that ignorance is NOT bliss.
Posted by: Cassandra | August 19, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Cycles… Reagan won in 1980, took office in 1981, unemployment was almost 7%, 2 years later into Reagan’s administration unemployment was 10.8% and some people where calling him the anti-christ. Even a failed attempt to assasinate him (Foster’s stalker), but in 1984 jobs kicked in and Reagan was re-elected winning 49 states. Same with FDR, the previous clown messed up, it took a while for recovery to kick in, overwhelming re-election. The only ones who actually lose elections are junior senators from the new President’s party during the midterm elections.
Posted by: Miguel | August 19, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
There is no such basis to match Obama with who? – Sarah Palin!!?? Match her with a graduating student from the college!
Posted by: Austin Chuks | August 20, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
David Chalian?
Do not think that I am stupid…
I posted to you (2) days ago with a worthwile Post about Sarah Palin…and you have so far, not posted it.
Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck (by permission) are watching your Article…Good Luck.
Posted by: John Austin | August 25, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Dedicated to Sarah Palin:
1) 150,000 Dollar clothes…”A man can wear the same clothes and no one will notice. A woman cannot do that because if She wears the same clothes in July…and then again in October…People will notice. That is why women have big wardrobes”.
Personal from Sarah…”She gave her clothes to Charity”.
2) Written to Boston University:
The (5) Continents…”All are bordered by Water and begin with the same first and last letter “A”, (Alaska)? America, Asia, Australia, Antarctica, Africa. Arctic is not a continent because it has no Earth beneath.
Is Sarah Palin qualified to be president?
Yes
79.28 %
No
13.30 %
Not Sure
7.42 %
Who would you rather vote for in 2012?
President Obama 21%
Sarah Palin 73%
Don’t want to vote for either 7%
Posted by: John Austin | August 25, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm