By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 13, 2009 12:03pm

Palin Renews False ‘Death Panel’ Charge

ABC News' Teddy Davis reports: Sarah Palin is standing by her discredited charge that House Democrats are proposing to create "death panels". The former Alaska governor's statement, which she posted to Facebook on Wednesday evening, came one day after President Obama implicitly took issue with her stance during a Tuesday town-hall meeting in New Hampshire. Referring to Section 1233 of the House Democratic health care bill, Palin writes: "With all due respect, it’s misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients." The truth, however, is that the end of life counseling contained in the House Democratic bill would be voluntary. As the Associated Press has reported, the House bill would permit Medicare to pay doctors for voluntary counseling sessions that address end-of-life issues. The doctor-patient discussions would cover living wills, making a close relative or a trusted friend your health care proxy, learning about hospice as an option for the terminally ill, and information about pain medications for people suffering chronic discomfort. Palin first leveled her "death panel" charge in a Friday message on Facebook. “The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil,” Palin wrote last week. Palin's "death panel" claim has been debunked not only by ABC's Jake Tapper but also by FactCheck.org and Politifact.com. A Palin spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. –Teddy Davis

User Comments

Of course, Palin has lost what little mind she ever had.
As a Holier-than-Thou, lunatic fringe, Christian Extremist……..someone should ask Sarah the ol’ WWJD question. Would Jesus lie as Palin does? Geez, Sarah……….you don’t think God ain’t gonna git ya’ for all this nonsense?

Posted by: Sammy | August 13, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Why does anyone give her the time of day? You reporters give her more credit than she has earned. You all are making her the celebrity. I guess the old adage that a pretty face gets further than a homley intelligent person. This is true…I have seen it work.

Posted by: talmag | August 13, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Okay everyone, settle down, and don’t be so jealous of Sarah……she’s gonna be around for a long time! LOL

Posted by: lyineyes1956 | August 13, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Why are we Democrats so afraid of her. If your not afraid of her, then ignore her and she’ll go away.

Posted by: Gunnerv1 | August 13, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“Okay everyone, settle down, and don’t be so jealous of Sarah…..”
LOL, who in the world would be jealous of a loser? You may have fantasies about this woman, but normal people think she’s a fruitcake.

Posted by: Trent | August 13, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Rick Klein shows his bias in not only the title of his blog but also his omission of the cash incentive for doctors to hold such end of life counseling. Why should the government intrude into a family issue.

Posted by: Explorer65 | August 13, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

her politcal career is over after her bizzare behavior over the pas t few months….she is clearly angling for a “Glenn Beck” type show…where she does not have to have any real education or depth on issues.
if so, god help our country…she’ll get the nutjobs all riled up, and tragedy is sure to follow.
She will be nearly as dangerous, as if she had became VP.

Posted by: indithinker | August 13, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

This woman is certifiable, lock her up and throw away the key.

Posted by: Ron | August 13, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

One can only hope Palin will go far, far away. She was annoying on the campaign trail with her whiney, maverick-y tone……and she’s only gotten more so. Seriously, she needs to go into hiding. She’s an embarrassment and a moron.

Posted by: Joanne Brown | August 13, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

The Republican ammo is and always has been to repeat a lie over and over until it becomes accepted as the truth by their faithful yet uneducated followers.

Posted by: Eric | August 13, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Only her uneducated beloved followers in the GOP will continue to believe the crap she says.

Posted by: GWP | August 13, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

The woman needs to have some of those demons exorcised by her witch doctor.

Posted by: libertyrulz | August 13, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

yikes

Posted by: jimt | August 13, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

You are assuming that she can read and cmprehend above the third grade level. Even her own party is running away from her. Too bad someone does not sue her for liable/slander. She is making false statements which can easily be refuted. You are free to offer opinions, but when you say balck is white you are mistating fact. Even after the truth was pointed out, she continues to spread the equivalent of political gossip. Why doesn’t she spend some quality time with her child who is in desperate need of maternal care and leave the comments to the grownups who can deal with complex situations.

Posted by: Chidem | August 13, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Sarah Palin is nothing more than a pot stirrer.

Posted by: juneorzoey | August 13, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Sara Palin’s outragious rants make for good editotial fluff. Her nonsens always makes waves and waves sell advertising. Sarah Palin is a joke that we all enjoy. Other than that, she has no real validity.

Posted by: KsDevil | August 13, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Only teh uneducated beloved follwers of the dems can still stand up for lies and false that comes out of their mouths. The change we can believe in is ruining our country and you still believe them. Palin is the most honest politian in decades, that is your problem with her. The bill has not been finalized and there are many versions out there. How the hell are you going to give healthcare to everyone without raising taxes? Easy, you don’t call it a tax. You are falling for it hook line and sinker, just like unemployment will not go over 8.5%. It is still rising. where is the outrage in that! Read the bills, understand the bills beofr they are passed. don’t forget, politians are supposed to represent the people that elected them. If we complain, we do so because we are being stabbed in the back, and they want to hide.

Posted by: mike | August 13, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

This woman is DANGEROUS Look at her Hate rallies during the Campaign she belongs to the Right Wing Extremist you know the likes of Timothy Mcveigh SHE DOES NOT BELONG TO MAIN STREAM AMERICA!Shame on her for ralling up the Nutcases.

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | August 13, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

The inmates are running the Republican asylum right now. And the press treats their insane, paranoid and deluded rantings as if it’s dealing with sane, well adjusted people.

Posted by: Will | August 13, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

why does the media keep her around? She’s nothing? She no longer holds public office. She has no brains and no credibility. Oh wait, She can see russia from her house which makes her an expert on socialism.

Posted by: Brendan | August 13, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

As an expat living in England I am embarrassed by the new s coverage of Sarah Palin and the angry mobs.
Surely in the interest and direction of the country I believe the media needs to get serious about the critical times in which we live and deliver on that basis.

Posted by: deborah | August 13, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

I LOVE THIS WOMAN!! Keep it up Sarah! The “Progressives” are self destructing!
Face it, two months ago the Democrats and Obama were up in the polls and everything was happy, happy, joy, joy.
Now it looks like the Obama presidency is toast and the Republicans will take back both houses next election cycle!

Posted by: thecentrist | August 13, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I used to brush off Palin as simply crazy, but this latest statement %$@#@ me off.
I volunteered at a hospice and later, when I was a graduate student helped a gerontologist conduct interviews with terminally ill veterans at a VA hospital. It was heart breaking to hear about how these people felt so ignored by their doctors and families when it came to end-of-life care! All they wanted was to die with dignity and not be a burden on their families—so inforamtion about living wills and DNR orders NEED to be brought up. A provision that offers this on a voluntary basis is important, and in the greater health care bill not even a big issue.
Dear Lord, protect us from the slimey ignorance that is Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Cara | August 13, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Nice try Teddy Davis and ABC! Sarah Palin provided a full explaination of why she feels “it’s misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients.”
Yet, this reporter conviently left out parts of her well written explaination of why the president is misleading the public, in regards to rationed care.

Posted by: Marsha | August 13, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

She is absolutely certifiable – as in crazy as a loon. Anybody that doesn’t see that is as nutty as she is. Even though everything out of her freak mouth is a blatant lie, I almost wish it were true – AND SHE WAS FIRST IN LINE! She should be put down!

Posted by: durrs | August 13, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I realize Sarah Palin has serious difficulties in properly verbalizing her ‘thoughts’, but for God’s sakes, can’t she even read either?

Posted by: Gnarly Erik | August 13, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

When are you guys going to realize that you are losing this debate? Sarah Palin has outsmarted you again because she has now framed the debate and you are buying into it. She is the center of the discussion, not Obama or the congressional leaders and the media by publicizing her statments is elevating her to the front of the health care issue. How dumb you guys are! You deserve the falling ratings you are getting!

Posted by: Jim Cunningham | August 13, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Poor Sarah needs that witch doctor to exorcise her demons again.

Posted by: JR | August 13, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

I do not think this bill will pass with this in it but Palin is correct it does state that you will need this if you or over 60 and have a health condition. Sorry ABC you are wrong on this one.

Posted by: Robert | August 13, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Rats, I just noticed that libertyrulz beat me to it.

Posted by: JR | August 13, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Wheres the tweet ,I read the tweet and it makes a case. Its like when dems make the case about theres nothing in the bill about abortion of course when they tried to make an amendment to the bill saying you couldnt have us pay for abortions. It was not put in just because Its not there doesnt mean it wont be.If you listen to obamas advisors and czars many of them support giving pills to old people because old people eat up money at their end of life. Why else would they want end of life talks?If not to get them to get on hospice the panel that some people call death panels will be made after the bill passes then they will make the rules so the question is do you trust the panel the libs will make?

Posted by: school_bus_yellow | August 13, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Brendan – I will assume the news keeps reporting on her because she does have a major grass roots following and could become a major player at a later date. And with most if not all the media leaning to the left, they are scare of her majorly scared.

Posted by: Robert | August 13, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Palin is a private citizen … if people don’t care what she says, why is the media constantly scoping out her facebook page and reporting every little thing she says?
Fact is, any report on Palin is bound to get the Palin-bashers wound up. They sign onto message boards like this one, post nasty insults (which for some reason fills a sad void in their own little lives) and ABC smiles, because more people visiting the website makes their advertisers happy.

Posted by: Bella | August 13, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

ksdevil: The points you are raising are at least arguable; but they have nothing whatsoever to do with Sarah Palin’s remarks. As much as you may hate Democrats, do you honestly believe we would wish to deny needed care to our own loved ones, not to mentrion ourselves when we reach their ages?
Yes, it is arguable that some services may be denied by a government plan, just like they are now denied by private insurance companies. That is worth arguing about and setting up guidelines for. On the other hand, counseling about end of life issues, if voluntary, can only be a positive. Many old people are forced into torturous procedures they would really prefer not to have, because they do not have a voice and power over their own lives any longer. The time to assert your preferences is while you still can.
Sarah Palin is pandering to the the lowest intellects in our society and creating fear among the most vulnerable. what little respect I might ever have had for her is gone. I am only grateful we will never be president.

Posted by: phoenix lady | August 13, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Sarah Palin is only DANGEROUS to the far left and they know it. And as we all know ABC NBC CBS FOX CNN are all in bed with the far left for some unknown reason.

Posted by: Robert | August 13, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Palin is useful. When she comes on the TV I point her out to my children and and tell them: “This is the face of ignorance and the worst of what America has to offer—etch it into your memory and fight this type gross lynch-mob rallying with all your might.”

Posted by: Scott | August 13, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

I think she had better learn the facts before she opens up her mouth.
She could handle her job and resigned, yet she has the audicity to criticize others who are trying to help us.
She is part of the problem with the Republicans. We had Bush for 8 years and look where we’re at.

Posted by: smt | August 13, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Just my two cents. If you actually read her post on Facebook I can see why she would feel this way and I actually agree with her. The article ABCNEWS wrote paints it a different way IMO.

Posted by: Rich | August 13, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Any model of the UK NHS, will have a degree of denial of services for the elderly. that is a fact, not fiction.
While the UK is not appreciating those comparisons, I have followed their own media for some time, and there is no doubt that is happening.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 13, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

“Death panels”, eh? You think these don’t already exist within insurance companies??

Posted by: Doug | August 13, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Palin discovered that the TEN COMMANDMENTS contains no prohibition against LYING, so she’s just “FOLLOWING THE BIBLE!”

Posted by: AlChemist | August 13, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

It isn’t what is stated, it is what is implied. I believe that is what Palin and many other conservatives are getting at. An example of this would be speeding limits. The laws state that anyone going over the speed limit will receive some sort of “punishment”. What those laws don’t state is that speed limit laws can be used to stop vehicles because the drivers are black, or look suspicious, or may be going to the hospital. What is implied? What is stated?

Posted by: Christian | August 13, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

There’s an explosion of extremist rage in America — a backlash to Obama’s election and to the progress we’re making toward social justice and tolerance. These groups and their allies traffic in bizarre conspiracy theories — like the claim that Obama is not really a U.S. citizen and that he wants to euthanize senior citizens.
The Department of Homeland Security has recently warned that right-wing extremists currently pose the No. 1 threat of domestic terrorism.
The loudmouth conservative platform drivers [coulter, beck, limbaugh, gingrich, palin...] are firing up their followers.
They are dangerous.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 13, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

KSDevil-
Far as I know, no one in congress is entertaining a “single payer” plan. Thus this would not be health car for all like you are talking about. All the bills that are currently in discussion merely bring a government option to those that do not have, or can afford health care. Geese, maybe you should take some of your own advice – read and understand the bills. I hope you are also listening to the millions without a job, and that cannot currently have no health coverage. Please save a place for them in your “people they are to represent” column.

Posted by: Cizzo | August 13, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

It is my understanding… and I am sure I will be corrected if I am wrong here… but I saw that the “end-of-life” section in this bill was created by the Republicans. So I am sure Sara is back paddling very quickly.

Posted by: insight | August 13, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

It’s so odd that Palin is demonized for stretching the truth by the very people who overlook the whoppers Obama tells.
At his town hall, Obama actually said that because doctors receive “a pittance” for properly treating diabetics, they are instead amputating their limbs for cash! Outrageous lie — yet the media yawns and the peeps smile and clap.
He told the same lie a few months ago using a child’s chronic sore throat as an example.
Overlooking of course that most family doctors are not surgeons (there is no financial incentive for referring a patient to another doctor for surgery) and the fact that absolutely NO insurance company would prefer to pay for surgery over cheaper, preventative care … if this is true, where is the outrage? Where is the media? Why aren’t these doctors being exposed? Why aren’t patients coming forward and complaints being filed?
Obama lied. Pure and simple. But let’s focus on Palin, a private citizen, instead.

Posted by: Diabetic but still have my feet | August 13, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

We all need to stay informed so that we can fight back against this rising tide of extremism.
Remember to speak out against hate and intolerance in your community.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 13, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Mike – Palin is NOT the most honest politician in decades. That is just as stupid as stating that Obama is the most honest President in decades. They are both extreme fabrications by extremist that don’t like facts. There is nothing wrong with voicing concern to public officials about any issue. But it dishonest to say there is nothing wrong with repeating fictional concerns that have no evidence. It just impedes the discussion of real issues.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 13, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

A thought has just occured to me. When my 16 yeard old got his drivers license recently, he had to indicate if he wanted to be an organ doner. Is this not the same knid of “death panel” Palin is referring to? All the bill is doing is encourging people to think about these things before that catastrophic event occurs that renders you unable to communicate. Good grief.

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Thank God for President Obama. Scares me to death to think this looney tune lady could have been a missed heartbeat away from holding the most powerful political office in the world. This lady is going to be like trying to get rid of a bad wart.

Posted by: devilkev | August 13, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Sarah Palin – Gods gift to the Democrats!
Palin/Bachman 2012!

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 13, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Palin/Coulter ’12, yay.

Posted by: jim | August 13, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Why are doctors going to be paid for counseling dying patients about medical options? Don’t doctors already do this type of counseling? What concern is being addressed by this part of the health plan? How will this help people, or reduce the health care costs?

Posted by: tina | August 13, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Every time it’s reprinted, even when noted it’s not true, this ludicrous falsehood gains credibility. (“Well, I saw it on ABC.”) I appreciate the much more clear rebuttal in this instance, but it’s not strong enough. It’s not that Jake Tapper says it’s not true, IT IS NOT TRUE. It is not true when Sarah Palin posts it, not true when Gingrich supports it and not true when it’s yelled at those in government service. I’m really getting sick of this crap.

Posted by: coffeeocity | August 13, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Jenny, I believe she is referring to the panel who would decide exactly who receives those organs if there are more people in need of the organs then there are organs available, how should organs be distributed when they become available …. on a first-come-first-serve basis, or should some other criteria be used to determine who is most worthy to receive it?
It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about organs, antibiotics or flu shots, these are the tough choices many countries grapple with when there are not enough basic medical services to go around. That’s what she was referring to, not the bill.

Posted by: Smiley | August 13, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Goes to show you that the media can find nothing better to report on because reporters and editors have no true talent for news finding and reporting.

Posted by: MArs Chemistry | August 13, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

The fact she actually said what she said and she possibly believes it, hard to believe she was a governor of a state – any state! This woman needs psychiatric help.

Posted by: MJ | August 13, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

What is wrong with this woman and her fellow republicans??? They are complete idiots who should be ashamed of themselves for trying to scare senior citizens….everyone should consider what they want to have happen if they get sick or injured..I am in my forties and have a living will and a durable power of attorney for my healthcare…if anything would happen…my wishes would be carried out!! This allows the people left behind to grieve without guilt…this is a compassionate benefit that would be available to someone of any age if they chose the public option….Sarah Palin should be ashamed of herself!!

Posted by: sarah | August 13, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Didnt this fruit loop tell the Media when she quit her job in the name of our troops quit making things up? jeez cant this airhead pratice what she preaches what a complete insane joke this airhead is!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | August 13, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

smiley do not now what you are referring to but this is what I am referring to.”The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil,” There is not going to be any death panel that does not already exist. The elderly and the handicapped will be taken care of .

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I believe that most of you liberal so called “educated” demcrates are brainwashed!
My fervent prayer is that Sarah Palin is the next President of the United States.

Posted by: lovetheflag | August 13, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Page 30—–”"”"”12 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—13 (1) IN GENERAL.—There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a “PANEL”of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans.”"”"”"” Here’s your “panel”. Call it what you will, but they recommend what services you will receive.

Posted by: SChaos1701 | August 13, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Sarah, honor a soldier, quit making stuff up!

Posted by: SugRDaddy | August 13, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Christan – “What is implied? What is stated?” is true for any law, even God’s laws. Does that mean that God shouldn’t have laws? I don’t think so. The facts about this controversy is that the proposal in the bill say that Medicare will pay for counseling for end of life decisions, but not more than once every five years. There is nothing about requiring the elderly to have these discussions. There is nothing about a government person being involved in the decision. There is nothing about the decisions are reported to the government. This is the type of discussion every adult should have regardless of age so the person so they have a legal document that specifies what they want in a major medical crisis that they have little or no chance of recovering from. If they want every medical procedure possible to be used to help them recover or remain living, they will have a legal document that family members, the hospital, and the government cannot override. The only government involvement is that the bill for the counseling is sent to the government and they will verify that they have not already paid for this in the past five years.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 13, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Wish the Dems had cool spokespersons like Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck….BAWWHAWWWW

Posted by: Trent | August 13, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

It is sad, truly sad when a so-called leader repeats lies to stir up a popular uprising as Palin and her ilk are doing….Seems to me that this type of utter disregard for truth is more in line with fascism than anything I’ve seen from the administration…But, alas people like Palin have absolutely no shame….and that is what truly makes them dangerous…

Posted by: indy_voter | August 13, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

SC -c As someone already pointed out these panels exist already. It is called Insurance companies. Ever see “The Rainmaker” buddy. If the insurance comapnies do not get you then your age, your past addictions and just about anything else will come into play when deciding who does and does not recieve care. Do you think that the guy who pickled his liver in alchol should recieve a new one? Should an 85 year old man recieve a new heart or should that 25 years old man? Can the pateint survice the surgary? Why put a liver into some opne who will die on the table?

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

She accomplished what she wanted to – get in the news. I wish she would go hunt a moose – get her out of the news.

Posted by: senior | August 13, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Robert wrote: “I do not think this bill will pass with this in it but Palin is correct it does state that you will need this if you or over 60 and have a health condition. Sorry ABC you are wrong on this one.”
What makes you think these consultations would be mandatory? I have asked several times on these blogs for you folks to PLEASE provide the page and line numbers from HR 3200 that support your claims. Not a single response to my requests yet.

Posted by: WWW | August 13, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

The elderly and the handicapped will be taken care of .
Posted by: jenny
What are you basing that opinion on? The fact that our current federal system does such a great job of taking care of them now? Have you talked to a veteran lately? How is our overburdened VA system can’t even care for our vets properly.
Or are you basing that opinion on the words of a president who also claims that doctors are routinely referring patients for surgery just because they need the cash (have you seen the statistics on this claim?)
We already have “death panels” who decide who should receive organs. We have death panels at insurance companies who routinely deny coverage to terminally ill patients. We have death panels in the Medicaid system who routinely deny certain services that extend life. Do you really believe that when 47 million more people are added to the health care system, and the government is footing the bill for a good portion of them, that these “death panels” won’t suddenly get a lot busier?

Posted by: Smiley | August 13, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

The Terri Schiavo case informed our nation just how important documenting end of life choices can be. My 74 year old mom was in tears that if something happened leaving her brain dead that doctors could keep her body alive indefinitely. Everytime this comes up in the news she pleads with me again to be sure it doesn’t happen to her.

Posted by: trueblue | August 13, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

smiley – perhaps I should have said that they would be taken care of as well as they are being taken care of right now. Your right they are many death panels and people who play God and will continue to do so.

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Yes there is a cash insentive….payment for services. Right now Dr do this same job, many people need help at this time in thier lives, if they don’t have anyway to know what is happeneing and are worried they need help. Why do you think this is wrong it is part of the end of a persons life. If they live long enough they will need help to die well; not just taking what is thrown at them.Dr need to be paid for thier time for heaven sake this simply says they will get paid for thier time. That is what is wrong right now. This is part of trying to make things better. I swear it is like trying to talk to a wall you have it in your head this women is right and nothing will ever make you see differently. I just wonder why you have this mind set on this issue.

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | August 13, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Why are we Democrats so afraid of her. If your not afraid of her, then ignore her and she’ll go away.
Posted by: Gunnerv1
+++++++++++They said the same thing about Bush. Look what that got us.

Posted by: Chuck S | August 13, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

What I find curious is that Republicans claim to love America, yet clearly can’t stand American’s.

Posted by: Chuck S | August 13, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

What would you call Cigna who denied a kidney transplant to a young girl who subsequently died. They turned her down because they decided she wasn’t likely to survive and it should go to a person with a better chance of living a full life.
people are foolish or uninformed if they think these kinds of decisions aren’t made today – by health insurance companies.

Posted by: citizenvoter | August 13, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

To Trent @ 12:43
“Rick Klein shows his bias in not only the title of his blog but also his omission of the cash incentive for doctors to hold such end of life counseling. Why should the government intrude into a family issue.”
Cash incentive? It’s called getting paid for a consultation. Please tell me what is wrong with a doctor counseling their patient on end of life issues and getting paid for it? And on your last point about government intrusion, how did you feel when the Republicans made politics out of Terri Schaivo?

Posted by: CK1 | August 13, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

All this because we had the nerve to elect a thinking caring human being to be POTUS all this because all of us should have health care and live our lives to the fullest extent all of this because we had the nerve to want change?

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | August 13, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

All of this because we wanted change because we elected good people to help us get it and all this because we had the nerve to think it could happen. Whats next the over throw of this government. I really think we need to look sharply at people who put stuff like this out there to rile up crazies country wide. What does this get us? What on earth is wrong with this women?

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | August 13, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I read her entire article and it has more explanation of what is in the bill than Obama, any Democrat Congressman or Senator has ever offered. I think she is right from a practical stand point. You people who are just bashing Palin need to go read her full remarks and logic before you write another word. This ABC article has zero credibility because the author is just another liberal in the tank for Obama. I don’t believe a word written in it.

Posted by: brian | August 13, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I actually read the sections of the bill that are being distorted by Palin and nowhere is there a referenced to a “death panel.” As many have said already, the insurance companies make those decisions right now – every single day they deny coverage for this procedure or that procedure based on some unknow reason. Why isn’t Palin screaming and pitching a fit about that?
The end-of-life discussions are truly getting blown out of proportion. It is something that every adult should do – let one’s doctor and family know what they want done or not done when they are no longer able to communicate those wishes. I had that conversation with my doctor in my early 40s. Not everyone is aware of living wills, healthcare power of attorneys or in-home hospice care. As we age, we need to deal with these things.

Posted by: Office Goddess | August 13, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

WHAT IS THE GENARIC RATIO OF PALIN TO OBAMA SUPPORTS?

Posted by: william | August 13, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Obama should actually be thanking Sarah Palin because while so many of his ardent supporters are outraged over her comments, they’ve completely ignored the lies he has told. I actually wonder if Obama and Palin are secretly in cahoots to distract the media from Obama’s “mistruths.”

Posted by: no name | August 13, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

WOW! What a bunch of clueless people you are. Read the facts for youselves – don’t take the word a left-biased member of the media. Have any of you actually read that section of the bill?

Posted by: American | August 13, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Sarah’s looking for a new job, right? Okay. Death Panel consultant – government pay.

Posted by: newz4i | August 13, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Just follow the money trail that leads right to Palin’s bank account. She will say anything for the money. Health care companies-and the Pharmacy companies-need a nut case to tell their lies. The repulicans need a nut case to keep their healthcare stocks profitable. Palin will yell anything out of her mouth-even I think turn her back on the US as a traitor if given enought money.

Posted by: lowes4321 | August 13, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Gibbs was torn to shreds in today’s press conference by the media. There has been a change in America. We no longer believe in Obama or the Democrats.

Posted by: dk | August 13, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

This woman tells the MEDIA to stop making things up?? She made up the “death panels.” She often says “leave my kids out of it” or “stop talking about my kids.” Yet, she invokes the name of her son Trig during her comments about “death panels.” Hey Sarah? When will YOU stop talking about your kids? When will YOU leave you kids out of it?”

Posted by: June | August 13, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

I am beyond anger with that woman. I was a caregiver to 2 very special family members dealing with terminal cancer and we had “the discussion” concerning DNRs and living wills and all of the last wishes. This is normal and responsible to do before hand. Sarah Palin should seriously consider reading the full bill in its entirety or hire someone to interpret for her to get the facts before she stirs up any more trouble and cause more embarrassment to the party and my fellow citizens. Am I the only party member honest enough to say she does not speak for me nor does she represent my party philosophy? Can we please do better and be more honest with the needs of this country? Can we please solve the issues ahead of us in a bipartisan fashion of compromise? Honesty is the key here folks, what a concept!

Posted by: afbrat59 | August 13, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

There’s nothing “crazy” about what Sarah Palin is doing. Her pronouncements are doing exactly what they’re supposed to do. (1) They generate criticism so she can blame the media. (2) They keep her name before the public. (3) They reaffirm her audience so her career in right-wing journalism is assured.

Posted by: Robert Maxwell | August 13, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

It’s not a stretch to see that portion of the LIB bill and see where they are headed. Where exactly are all these medicare cuts that obama promises going to come from? Grandma who is 85 and sick is the easy answer. The LIBS want to “counsel” grandma right out of that expensive dialysis. Funny how the LIBS all of a sudden trust this corrupt government

Posted by: carl | August 13, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

You know she didn’t write that herself! It’s much too concise, researched, and well spoken (yet still wrong) to come from her brain. There are no references to God, our troops, Alaska, her prize of a husband, or fishing…it had to have been staff who posted that.

Posted by: Jodi | August 13, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I wish Palin and all these purposefully obstructionist town hallers would read the news about people waiting hours in Inglewood, CA for free medical care provided by RAM. Everyday Americans, are hurting and need coverage now. If town hallers’ excuse for their behavior is cost concern, their stall tactics don’t make the price tag cheaper. As someone with a kid who will need lifelong care, Palin should really know better.

Posted by: JDN | August 13, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Carl – No No NO! No one wants to “counsel grandma right out of that expensive dialysis.” We just want to make sure that she is at peace in her final years and not hooked up to machines that are keeping her alive against her wishes. As has been said before everyone should have the end of life conversation with their physician and get it put in writing before some event occurs that renders the unable to voice their opinions and say what they want. What part of Living Will do you not understand?

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

“Plain-spoken” is a term of endearment that republicans throw around that I never understood. While I genuinely appreciate someone able to make their point without resorting to 10-syllable PhD vocabulary drills, the term is usually reserved with pride, for the politicians with the least desire or motivation to think before they speak. Sarah Palin seems to go out of her way to make outlandish comments with no bearing in truth, after what I can only assume is intense research within the field of ‘color by numbers’.
Why on Earth do some look to people like this for leadership, it’s beyond me. I look forward to the day that Sarah Palin goes the way of New Coke.

Posted by: Chad | August 13, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

“Rick Klein shows his bias in not only the title of his blog but also his omission of the cash incentive for doctors to hold such end of life counseling. Why should the government intrude into a family issue.”
The government isn’t intruding into a family issue – its finally proposing a way for doctors to be compensated for an age-old practice that allows the elderly to have say in their end-of-life treatment and care. Ignoring death doesn’t make it go away – kudos to those who have finally recognized that doctors should be encouraged to support their patients (and patients’ families) through one of the most difficult passages of their life. Should a patient want to sit down with their doctor and discuss living wills or end-of-life treatment options, the doctor’s time will be compensated, just as if the doctor were billing for a discussion about erectile disfunction or tennis elbow (which is now allowable under existing plans, unlike end-of-life counseling). They’re not death panels – its a financial incentive for doctors to talk to their patients and understand their wishes.

Posted by: Erin | August 13, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

What’s the difference between Sarah Palin and a pit bull? The pit bull knows there are no death panels. And also, the pit bull knows when to give it up. Give it up, Sarah. You are looking more ignorant and dangerous every day.

Posted by: Debbi | August 13, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“LOL, who in the world would be jealous of a loser? You may have fantasies about this woman, but normal people think she’s a fruitcake.”
Who decides what normal is?

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Palin-Gingrich ‘Death Panel’ statements. This proves my claim that the GOP bailed out all the insane aylum detainees! There are two schizophrenic-paranoids on the loose!!

Posted by: Sentinel | August 13, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Did we really expect Sarah to understand anything? She cracks me up! Whats funny is she keeps spouting off and no one wants her opinion. I sure haven’t seen her do any interviews since she QUIT her position. I guess Alaska is glad to get rid of her and her stupid remarks. What I want to know is why hasn’t Hannity and Greta had her sitting beside them since they supported her? She see’s dead people!

Posted by: Joker1956 | August 13, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Can we unplug Sarah?

Posted by: jenny | August 13, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

IF THIS WOMAN GAVE YOU A PIECE OF HER MIND SHE WOULD HAVE NOTHING LEFT, IGNORE HER, AND FOR GOD SAKE DO NOT GIVE HER MORE” AIR TIME” OMG, THEY ARE STILL (REPUBLICANS) GOING TO RUN HER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2016,SHE CAN PICK UP WHERE BUSH LEFT OFF……. TWO MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: cc Pennes | August 13, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Again… ABC news is Anti Palin. What else would you write here?

Posted by: I Support Palin | August 13, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I’m so sick of her pandering that child. Seriously, it was like this revolving door during the campaign the way she and her family passed that baby around and now this. I guess I need to retrain myself to think and say things like, “The … and my baby without Downs Syndrom…”
Give it a rest and for the record, if your God is so all powerful you don’t need health care, he’s sitting at your dining room table fixing all your woes.

Posted by: Rae D | August 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

So–Palin is up to it again–is she? What is it this time? Is she trying to delude/empower/implore AARP/medicare recipients to resist government sponsored health care programs at all costs.

Posted by: JRC903 | August 13, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

What can you expect from a half educated person?

Posted by: Al Rider | August 13, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

I’m in favor of creating wills, and in creating living wills and designating powers of attorney—but if this living will benefit could be stricken from the bill, maybe the public could actually talk about important matters.
If people can just keep their doctors and relatives guessing when they are unable to speak for themselves, maybe the discussions as to what the average citizen wants in the rest of the public health option — maybe that could go forward with productive discussions.
Just strike it from the bill.

Posted by: Debbie | August 13, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

I really think this woman is a national emberassment. I find it so hard to believe she was almost vice president. We would be in so much trouble if mccain won. I think she needs to take time off quitting things and read the bill. What is wrong with end of life consultation..we are all going to die soemday. Its for the family and the patient to plan for a worse case scenerio. Why anyone would listen to this whinning redneck is beyond me.

Posted by: brian | August 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Sarah Palin is a blooming idiot, that is not new. What blows my mind is that some people actually believe she is intelligent.

Posted by: Bryan | August 13, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

As far as Palin is concerned, the only good news is that in some cases “agitators” are extremely useful.. i.e washing machines for instances.

Posted by: JRC903 | August 13, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Jim—the counseling is in order to put ‘in writing’ aka ‘living will’ what the person’s wishes are. As it is now, most patients, when they are too sick or or in a coma–they make their relatives and doctors guess what kind of medical interventions they desire. If the patient could put in writing that they wish every possible heroic effort possible at sustaining life, such as feeding tubes, artificial respirators, etc. then the doctors and relatives know that that is what is needed. How many times did you hear the Schiavo’s arguing about what Teri’s wishes were. Nobody had them in writing. P.S. Living wills are not just for the elderly, we should all have them.

Posted by: Debbie | August 13, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Every day, Americans suffer and die because they cannot afford health care. Palin doesn’t care about those people.
And now she’s upset because people who are dying might be given access to counseling. She’s as vicious as she is clueless.

Posted by: Truth | August 13, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Every body know by now Sara Palin is a very sick person that have an education level of a 5 year old to believe in something as sick as the Death Panel.

Posted by: gl | August 13, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

you people smearing SP are completely out to lunch! As a nurse working in a govt mandated system, I find you all very ignorant. They have very subtle and smooth ways of coercing elderly people into signing their DNR papers whether they want to or not–it has almost become a career to learn how to smooth-talk people into signing papers. You know nothing of what you speak. wake up and live in the real world.

Posted by: siftto77 | August 13, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

She was quite up until Grassley brought it back up and supported her claim and he is starting to look just as nutty as Sara Palin. We all see where this is heading. The Repubicans need to be a shame of themself trying to scare the uneducated and the elders.

Posted by: gl | August 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

The morons exist on both sides of this so called debate.
On the left they’re morons for wanting state run health care or state run anything for that matter.
On the right they’re morons for thinking they can do anything to stop it. “Dear Leader” wants “Dear Leader” gets.
The constitution has been thrown out and the slide toward socialism is now unstoppable. Too many people in this country have been conditioned to depend on the state for their needs. Too many people are willing to give up freedom in exchange for a little security. What they don’t understand is that now they will have neither. Dankeschön “Dear Leader”.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

She is a very dangerous and evil woman standing behind the falsehood of Christianity. She hates Obama so much and is so crazed with jealously that she is not sitting where he is sitting that she will do anything she can to destroy him, his credibility and even his physical welfare by inciting others to carry out her destructive plan for her. What a lunatic. And there are people out there that actually want to see her as President. What a scary idea. This woman is so vindictive and out of control.

Posted by: bjthomas1959 | August 13, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Just remember to keep her family out of it….(the alleged reason she resigned/quit), unless of course SHE wants to bring them into it. What an idiot!

Posted by: marc | August 13, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

cara–i don’t know where you “volunteered”–but you are giving out completely false information–SP is only telling the truth–Govt mandated systems are especially hard on handicapped and infirm people–the push gets even harder on families to “let them go”. You people should be ashamed–it is not up to people to decide who should live or die. When it is your turn to be “appraised” you may change your mind. It may come sooner than you think.

Posted by: sifto77 | August 13, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Sara Palin did not write that becasue we all know she can not put two sentence together. Sara Palin quit her job and hired a ghost writer to tell lies about the President Health Bill. What a joke Sara Palin have become. She is irrelavent.

Posted by: gl | August 13, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

This woman is a danger to herself….She has broken all the rules in the book and still the press covers her.
A daughter preg not back in school her son in Iraq just to get rid on him before the election,why???A crook, a liar, a user that should be made to pay back all the monies owed Alaska .

Posted by: NH voter | August 13, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I am ready for republicans to start telling the truth. I am sick and tired of lies and stupidity coming from these so-called top tier republicans who are supposed to be worthy to be president. Palin was a trouble maker from the very beginning using words that whip up hate and anger. We need honesty from responsible people representing us.

Posted by: Viki | August 13, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Sarah Palin is standing by her discredited charge – “You see waht you want to see and your hear what you want to here” The Rock Man.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 13, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Why are we Democrats so afraid of her. If your not afraid of her, then ignore her and she’ll go away.
—————————————
Becasue she is the Dealth to this country and was all most a heart beat away from the White House and still trying to be our next President.

Posted by: gl | August 13, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

How do you control costs?

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

What the Republicans need to do is to step up the fight for me, a “just right of center” independent voter. Neither side in this whaco fight is concerned with the typical American Taxpayer.
Health care needs to be fixed- NOT confiscated by the Government. HR3200 is not the answer. Under HR3200, all taxpayers lose.

Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 13, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

If you think that government systems are hard on the infirm and handicapped, what do you think of the private insured systems?
What if, heaven forbid, you might need to buy insurance but you have that dreaded pre-existing condition?
Private insurers are only for the independently wealthy individuals that don’t really need to worry about how much they have to pay out of their own pockets.

Posted by: Debbie | August 13, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Could someone please shut this ignorant broads mouth. She does nothing but incite hatred and fear. She would make an excellent skin head leader.

Posted by: Itchy | August 13, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

How do you control costs?
Posted by: Aaron | Aug 13, 2009 3:49:05 PM
That is simple. You ration health care. Health care is a $0 cost for the healthy. It’s all those ugly sick folks that run the cost up.
Does anyone really believe that the Government can reduce health care costs without reducing health care? If you do, I got some oceanfront property to sell ya – in Arizona.

Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 13, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Even her own state senator has called her out on these lies. Alaska must be proud.

Posted by: Tonya | August 13, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

“Why are we Democrats so afraid of her.”
Not afraid, just beyond annoyed. If she was qualified to be VP, so was I (& I’m not qualified)
“Why should the government intrude into a family issue”
Government would not be intruding. They are simply stating that the cost of end of life counseling would be covered by the health insurance. If the insurance companies chose to, they could also cover this counseling.
“The Republican ammo is and always has been to repeat a lie over and over until it becomes accepted as the truth by their faithful yet uneducated followers”
Yes, & they won’t let anyone else get a word in ….. they just keep talking & yelling you into the ground not to mention nitpicking. Example: You would not believe how many emails I’ve rec’d that think they have proven the truth about the birth certificate. How can intelligent people spend their time on such a totally off the wall issue.
I think the health care debate could be a wonderful thing & people could actually find out exactly what’s going on, but a very vocal minority want to stir things up & keep people confused & unsure. It’s a sad state of affairs.

Posted by: Linda | August 13, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

No Common Sense in DC,
My point exactly. I don’t get all these people who think Obamacare is going to be some kind of limitless healthcare cornicopia (hope I spelled that right). It’s not possible if you want to control costs. So either the government will have to decide who gets care based on cost effectiveness, (ie. survivability), or they will have to continually raise taxes in order to cover the costs. Please people let’s apply a little more logic to this issue and a little less emotion.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Posted by: Explorer65 | Aug 13, 2009 12:46:53 PM – posted “why should the government intrude into a family issue?”
a) The government is NOT “intruding” – in keeping with your conservative values, physicians who take the time to provide this service for their patients should be paid for it. Don’t you think that’s fair?
b) End-of-Life counseling is NOT simply a “family issue”. Some elderly people don’t have family, others are only comfortable talking about health issues with their doctor, and not all family members are knowledgeable about Living Wills. Have you discussed a Living Will with your doctor?
A physician is a perfect resource to help explain our end of life medical choices. It’s a positive for everyone: Doctors are paid for their time, patients can understand the options, and family can be assured they are following the patient’s wishes.
AND, our health care costs are contained by not forcing people at end of life into expensive medical procedures they do not desire.

Posted by: Idahogirl888 | August 13, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

If people want to disagree on the issues, I’m all for that. However, we need to remove the fact from fiction and people like Palin have no interest in that. What was it about her that was so good during the VP nomination? It was getting the base riled up. Same as it is now.
These lunatics who are saying Obama is a communist and making death threats to our congressmen and women, should be treated as domestic terrorists. So, it seams Sarah Palin is getting really buddy-buddy with these domestic terrorists. Who said this about our president? Hmmmmm.

Posted by: Elliott | August 13, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Oooooh, listen to the Democrats all worried about Sarah’s political future. She’d better take heed of what they say.

Posted by: betsy | August 13, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Obviously many have not read the bill. There is a section in HR 3200 that states that the elderly will be counselled every 5 years regarding end of life decisions. There is also a section that appoints a Health Care Commission to decide health care. What is most frightening is what is not in the bill, it is so broad that government agencies will be the ones creating the details. If it is so great, why are ammendments to prohibit certain items rejected? The bill reads like a SEIU labor contract, vague which leads to any interpretation at whim. Why would unions who have excellent health care support this public option? Unions need to be careful for what they wish for. It would be cheaper to bump union members off private insurance to the public plan. Sarah Palin has common sense and is right on this issue, the problem is it hurts to hear the truth.

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | August 13, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Mike posted “Only teh uneducated ”
Not the brightest way to start off there, Mike.
Mike also said “…Palin is the most honest politian in decades, that is your problem with her.”
Why is it that Palin supporters always have to TELL us what our problem is with Palin? “You’re jealous”, “You’re afraid of her..” and now we hate her for her honesty? The most honest politician I’ve ever seen is Ron Paul. Palin isn’t even close!
Now, I will TELL you why I don’t like her. She possesses average, if not a little below average, intelligence. She spews total nonsense most of the time and people like YOU eat it up.
Okay. Let’s see if she IS being truthful. You show me in the bill where they have death panels! Put up or shut up! Here’s a hint -> it is in section 1233. Show me the death panels. She says it is in there, so it can’t be too hard to show me. If you can’t then both her and YOU are not telling the truth.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I can see a lot of jealous people here. oh yes the nerds that sit on the computer posted stupid remarks about defending big ears and his health care. You are the ones that we will be laughing at when your loved ones have to die to be put in Obamas hall of deaths………. just keep judging Palin but she is going to be the next president and go down in history as the person that bought American back after a stooge screwed us all

Posted by: Mamie | August 13, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Sarah Who…. please take your medicine. You must have missed a dose today. Nut.

Posted by: tychisum | August 13, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I disagree, the news media got a good “joke”. Nothing more and nothing less. This is a jokester, a fraud. Please tell me what planet is she on?

Posted by: tychisum | August 13, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Oh, excellent! With even mainstream Republicans trying to correct her attempts to contact the mother ship, the hardcore fellow wack-jobs are still with her. Way to go Sarah, split that right-wing vote!

Posted by: Cassandra | August 13, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Downwithsocialism wrote: “Obviously many have not read the bill. There is a section in HR 3200 that states that the elderly will be counselled every 5 years regarding end of life decisions.”
I assume you’re referring to section 1233. Now please provide the page and line number where it says the elderly “will” be counseled every 5 years. I have made this request time and again to you folks who insist these consultations are mandatory. Not a one has responded yet.

Posted by: WWW | August 13, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

If 80% of health care cost come at the last 6 months of life. The democrats say this plan will control health care cost. Since most of the cost are at the back end of life what ever the democrates call the panel in the end it will be a death panel

Posted by: Gary Froehlich | August 13, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Every time Palin opens her mouth, she demonstrates her ineptitude and another Republican dies a slow agonizing death. Is that what she means by ‘death panels?’

Posted by: Steve Hanes | August 13, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

SChaos1701 posted “Here’s your “panel”. Call it what you will, but they recommend what services you will receive.”
Hey, look here. SChaos1701 search the text of the bill and found the word Panel, so it must be true! Never mind that it is in a totally different section. Never mind that somebody has to run this thing and make decisions about what is and what is not covered. The word “panel” IS in the bill, so Palin must be right!

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Even her own state senator has called her out on these lies. Alaska must be proud.
Posted by: Tonya
________________________________
Ah yes — no bias there? The senator who “called her out” is the daughter of Alaska’s previous governor – the one Palin defeated by exposing his corruption. Yes, that senator is certainly an unbiased commentator with no axe to grind.

Posted by: LIl L | August 13, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I just came from Sarah Palin’s FaceBook notes named “Concerning the “Death Panels”". I thought it was interesting that she never provided any evidence that there is a “Death Panel”. It was basically a bunch of quotes she gathered to prove that the present government is not interested in helping the elderly and the only objective of the health care bill is to cut costs. Even if her conclusion is true based on these limited quotes, she still hasn’t explained where “Death Panels” is part of this bill or any other bill being considered by the federal government.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | August 13, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I personally think Palin is a little too “bubbly” for politics, though I guess she isn’t the first (Bush…nuff said). Though her “Death Panels” remark is not far from the truth. They already exist in big insurance companies who refuse to cover the costs of life saving operations. Or, in transplant cases, where a smoker is placed on he bottom of the list for a new lung for example. Although he may be more to blame for his condition, the fact he is placed further down the list that he would be if he were not a smoker, can be a death sentence in itself. To say our lives are NOT in the hands of those at insurance companies, whom decide coverage and cost, particularly when it comes to the poor, are deluding themselves. If an office visit costs $500, and my surgery will cost $30,000, and I cannot even afford the office visit, guess what; Im either in debt for decades from the visit & surgery, or die in the process of waiting for it to be covered by my healthplan. Its the cost of healthcare in this country that is to blame in my opinion, not who runs it.

Posted by: Klatu | August 13, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

We should be cheering Sarah’s lunatic comments on. Afterall, she is apparently representative of mainstream Republicans, which as we all know have become the new flat earth society.

Posted by: redrockraven | August 13, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Her death panel analogy is dead on….Obama’s health commission will be empowered to deny necessary care like Hip Replacements for those they deem unworthy such as the elderly which will be a death sentence.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 13, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

If we could find a way to buy Sarah Palin for what she is worth and then sell her for what she thinks she is worth, then I think we should have enough money to get free insurance for everybody.

Posted by: Raul Aguilar | August 13, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Sarah is a woman of GOD and you all better watch what you say about this great lady. She is here to change this country and return it to GODS hands. The Anit-God movement may have snatched the country away for now, but She will bring high morals and standards back to government.

Posted by: Esther in Ohio | August 13, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

No Common Sense in DC posted “Does anyone really believe that the Government can reduce health care costs without reducing health care? If you do, I got some oceanfront property to sell ya – in Arizona.”
No, but do you really think the insurance companies are looking out for you? Did you know that in 1993 95% of the premium you paid to the insurance company went to pay medical bills while the remaining 5% was for administration costs and profits. Do you know where it is today? It is close to 80% for medical needs, close to 20% for administration and PROFIT! How did they go from 95% to 80%? By denying claims, by finding mistakes on the claims for so that they can just drop you, or by raising prices so high for certain groups that they stop their coverage. The government is incompetent, insurance companies only care about profits and can be down right evil at times.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Both parties hate Palin…she is not a Washington Insider so those other corrupt politicans fear the woman.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 13, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I agree with countless others here that you media folks are either getting suckered in by Palin or are giving her all the publicity because you figure it sells. On the other hand, she is, despite claims of others, no fool. She is a dangerous demagogue and to ignore her simply allows festering of the worst kind: as such, she needs to be brought out into the light of day so we can see her for what she truly is. A bit of a dilemma here!

Posted by: Roger | August 13, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Stick her in a gulag if she can see Russia from her doorstep maybe she belongs there! Just get her the hell out of the spotlight and lets get on with correcting the mess we created with fifty years dominated by the Republican Machine! And yes I was a Republican! Never again!

Posted by: natamexpat | August 13, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Because the President and ABC news says its a false statement, I am to take their word for it. That is hilarious.
I have no trust in our media or our President at this point.

Posted by: Jaye | August 13, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Downwithsocialism posted “Sarah Palin has common sense and is right on this issue, the problem is it hurts to hear the truth.”
Palin said there were death squads in the bill, there aren’t.
Downwithsocialism also posted “Obviously many have not read the bill. There is a section in HR 3200 that states that the elderly will be counselled every 5 years regarding end of life decisions. ”
Obviously YOU didn’t read the bill either, or comprehend it. That section says that the only PAY for end-of-life consoling every 5 years. It is NOT mandatory. The patient does NOT consult with the government. end-of-life decisions are very important to have written down. Remember that lady in Florida they kept alive for years?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

The reason people are afraid of Palin is because most American’s like shiny objects and she is one. She says the earth revolves around the sun and millions will believe. That’s why we are afraid. People are studip. Yes, stupid and they listen to anyone who is talking. She is a sham and I wish that she would just go away.
Sarah, you don’t want your baby to be the target of backlash, then don’t put him infront of the cameras. And Sarah, when you get downs syndrome removed from the disablility list that allows you to receive special education money then I’ll back off. But while I’m paying for your childs education I will certainly say that he should not get a better education than those who can become productive members of society. Very few, if any downs babies, can carry 40 hour jobs that don’t require my tax dollars to take care of them as adults.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If we can pay for that babies medical bills forever, then we can handle some uninsured. She is a moron! God help us if she is around in 2012.

Posted by: Amanda | August 13, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

sarah’s face book page article has footnotes!! Didn’t know she even knew what one is! It’s gets more and more bizarre. And makes no sense. Sarah- get over it! Someone needs to take care of her and put her somewhere she can’t hurt herself!
-

Posted by: cjr | August 13, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

I guess you have to be a far left liberal to get your thoughts on this blog. ABC news does not want anyone disagreeing with them.

Posted by: Jaye | August 13, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Explorer65:
What do you mean by “why should the government intrude”? The only intrusion is Medicare reimbursement for a covered service – the consultation. It might be a family matter, but it’s a family matter requiring medical guidance. Or do you make medical decisions without seeking professional input? I have already reviewed this topic with my health care provider and it’s in my living will. Not everyone draws up a living will so it might be a discussion that some might have later rather than sooner. Too bad the issue has been so distorted. It’s despicable to use this issue to scare people.

Posted by: TureNorth8 | August 13, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I HOPE SHE RUNS IN 2012!!!!!!! SHE IS SO BRILLIANT AND TALENTED.

Posted by: Brandon | August 13, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

TureNorth8 posted ” It’s despicable to use this issue to scare people.”
I wish I can get more people to go to Bill Moyers Journal , look under Archives, and watch his show from July 31st were he interviews former head of P.R. for an insurance company. It was his job to discredit any form of government heath care or discredit someone who supports it like Michael Moore’s movie “Sicko”. It really is eye opening. It amazes me how much trust people put into their insurance companies and how they are more that willing to screw people out of their coverage.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

“Never mind that somebody has to run this thing and make decisions about what is and what is not covered.”
The fact that you trust the same govenrment that brought you the United States Post Office to do this, is what I find most disturbing of all. At least the corporations can’t steal my money unless I participate. With the government it won’t matter if I participate or not, they’re still going to steal my money to pay for it.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

So Palin – were you speaking out against your fellow republicans who decided to involve themselves in the Terri Schiavo end of life case? Oh right, when republicans get involved in private end of life decisions that’s not counted as meddling.
I’m shocked you are so ignorant as to not realize that everyone who enters a hospital for major medical is asked about DNR – do not resuscitate wishes – the evil ‘End Of Life’ counselling.
I’m tired of the ignoramuses snowballing their lies and preventing our country from really doing something about our health care cost nightmare.
It’s as if the Golden Rule has been transformed to the Golden Screw – I got mine so who cares if you don’t.

Posted by: mcgreen | August 13, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

It’s a sad sign of the times that stupidity and paranoia are glorified over intelligence and logic by so many people in our country. What other than party politics could induce so may people to admire such a vacuous, insipid human being? Nobody is jealous of her. Nobody hates her for any virtues she might posess. She is disliked because she is an insult to the collective intelligence of our nation.

Posted by: AnimusVir | August 13, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

“It really is eye opening. It amazes me how much trust people put into their insurance companies..”
It’s not that I the insurance companies, it’s that I trust government bureaucrats less.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

“It’s as if the Golden Rule has been transformed to the Golden Screw – I got mine so who cares if you don’t.”
****************************************
And you could call Palin “the Golden Shrew?”

Posted by: SecondLook | August 13, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“Sarah Palin is standing by her DISCREDITED charge that House Democrats are proposing to create ‘death panels’.”
~emphasis added~ that really says it all, doesn’t it? the woman is incapable of recognizing the truth, even if it is told to her slowly, in words of only one syllable. sadly, her followers are similarly afflicted.

Posted by: justsane | August 13, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

So funny reading all the hate, the self righteous (yet bumper sticker thick quality) comments against Palin.
Oh yeah, the Death Panel provisions were dropped today from the bill.
Or as US News and World Report stated, “Palin was Right”
But you all just keep telling each other you worn out cliches about her.
It’s really funny.

Posted by: Tim in Phoenix | August 13, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who smacked Palin down hard yesterday, seems to be the only Republican senator with a modicum of integrity and backbone. Personally, I tend to agree with McCain/Palin campaign staffers who feard she had a diagnosable “screw loose.” Who better to lead the neo-con mob?

Posted by: Fed Up | August 13, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Aaron posted “The fact that you trust the same govenrment that brought you the United States Post Office to do this, is what I find most disturbing of all.”
What do you have against the United States Post Office? They have been profitable for decades. It is only recently (2006 or 2007) when they started having problems and the problems were NOT caused by them.
I’m not 100% on this bill, but I’m starting to think maybe it won’t be a bad idea. You don’t like taking part in it, fine. You don’t like your tax dollar going for it? Oh well. I hate my tax dollar going for a needless war in Iraq , or for building bridges to nowhere, but there is little I can do about it.
Maybe they should give people who have their own insurance a tax break. Write your representatives about it.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

mike, you need spell check, grammar check and Reality Check before you can call anyone else “uneducated” or draw any other conclusions. Caribou Barbie, you’re just a 10 cent sideshow. No, make that 2 cents, and it ain’t worth that. You betcha!

Posted by: sign seeker 17 | August 13, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Tim in Phoenix posted “Oh yeah, the Death Panel provisions were dropped today from the bill.”
How is that possible when there weren’t any Death Panels in the first place? Do you mean they took out the provision that would pay for end-of-life consoling every 5 years? They took that out?
I guess the insurance companies are winning again.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

After resigning her job as Alaska governor, to which she made a political commitment to Alaskans, how can one take her seriously? The women needs to see a shrink. Everytime she opens her mouth she puts her limbs inside. Only person getting exposure is her ex-future son-in-law!

Posted by: Gloria | August 13, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

How did this woman ever get elected governor of anything? I know people in Alaska are cold most of the year but have their brains frozen solid?
John McCain continues to insist he put her on the ticket because she was the most qualified candidate for Vice President. McCain has also gone a bit soft in the head if he really believes that.

Posted by: cass blaine | August 13, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

To the poster who said “why should government interfere in a family issue”, that is the first time I have ever heard that encouraging patients to discuss difficult but necessary issues with their Dr is “interfering in a family issue”. By that logic why should police arrest men who beat their wives or their children? After all, that’s a “family issue”. I get the feeling that people think there’s going to be a HHS employee sitting in the room with the Dr and the patient giving poker signs to the Dr as to what to say. These comments and attitudes border on the insane. I feel like I fell asleep and woke up in bizzaro world where people want to actively fight to prevent getting the same promise of healthcare that countries like England and Australia have enjoyed for decades. The only reasonable objection, the _only_ one, is that it might cost too much. Anything other than that is just fear mongering, plain and simple.

Posted by: Kent | August 13, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

To the poster who said “why should government interfere in a family issue”, that is the first time I have ever heard that encouraging patients to discuss difficult but necessary issues with their Dr is “interfering in a family issue”. By that logic why should police arrest men who beat their wives or their children? After all, that’s a “family issue”. I get the feeling that people think there’s going to be a HHS employee sitting in the room with the Dr and the patient giving poker signs to the Dr as to what to say. These comments and attitudes border on the insane. I feel like I fell asleep and woke up in bizzaro world where people want to actively fight to prevent getting the same promise of healthcare that countries like England and Australia have enjoyed for decades. The only reasonable objection, the _only_ one, is that it might cost too much. Anything other than that is just fear mongering, plain and simple.

Posted by: Kent | August 13, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Given how vapid she is, I’m surprised she was able to read the words on page 1233 of the bill. Oh wait … she did it with her lips moving to help. LMAO!!

Posted by: SFRussel1963 | August 13, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I think Sarah is the only one who will face that panel – that’s what I read, anyway! Poor Sarah, Rush has got to stop lying to/teasing her.
It is really time for people with their minds intact who are not prone to lying to have the serious discussions about health care.
Hugs, Mom

Posted by: Mom | August 13, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Kent posted “The only reasonable objection, the _only_ one, is that it might cost too much. Anything other than that is just fear mongering, plain and simple.”
Don’t forget the Insurance Industry is behind a great deal of these protests. The insurance companies remind me of the character James Taylor in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington”. They manufacture lies while at the same time they try to stop the truth from going out.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

sarah plain’s idea of health care reform and to save money was charging victims personally for their evidence collecting rape kits back in wasilla. the state of alaska was so embarrassed by these practices they had to pass a state law banning the practice. her hand picked police chief was very vocal in the local newspaper about his opposition to the bill and she didnt care. they wanted to continue to charge rape and molestation victims personally.
it’s hilarious to see her faking concern for others now. she is the most phony politician i have ever seen.

Posted by: birdy | August 13, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Do people not realize that in _any_ system, including the system we have right now, someone, somewhere will decide whether you will get certain care or not in extreme situations. If you need a bone marrow transplant that costs $1M but has only a 20% chance of success to save you, do people not realize there is a board on every HMO that would decide if you will get it? Same goes for a 90 year old who needs $500K of chemo, do people not realize HMO’s play stall games all the time hoping the patient dies before they get the care? Why do people think having an unknown and unaccountable bean counter whose primary motivation is to save money making that decision is better than having a board of known individuals appointed by elected politicians? How could the govt board possibly be worse? I don’t get it, do people not realize their care is “rationed” RIGHT NOW? (unless you are independently wealthy and can afford to pay out of your own pocket for anything you want)

Posted by: Kent | August 13, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

@Kent | Aug 13, 2009 6:32:04 PM
Just has to be one of more sensible posts here. That’s for explaining it to the people.
If people want proof, Google “Bill Moyers Journal” and go to his PBS page.
Click Archive and then select the story “Wendell Potter — Profits or Patients”
Wendell Potter was the head of P.R. for a large insurance company. He talks about the things that he knows are going on (because he use to do them) by the Insurance companies to 1) stop any government health care 2) discredit anyone who speaks in favor of government health care 3) how they screw people out of benefits to make more profits.
I keep trying to get people to watch this. It really is an eye opener.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

I personally hope she runs for President as many times as humanly possible – the more times the better. Maybe someday then, her complete lack of intelligence and integrity will sink in.

Posted by: DJ Simmerdown | August 13, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

this woman is one nutcase pitbull

Posted by: Cassandra Washington | August 13, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Sarah Palin = IDIOT

Posted by: Julie | August 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

“What do you have against the United States Post Office? They have been profitable for decades. It is only recently (2006 or 2007) when they started having problems and the problems were NOT caused by them.”
Nothing actually, it was Obama that brought them up. But when they have problems what do they do? They raise prices. When nationalized health care has problems what are they going to do? Raise prices in the form of higher taxes I will have to pay weather I like it or not.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

The discussions regarding advance directives (i.e., who makes my health care decisions if I am unable to) are already occurring within families and between patients and doctors (although not nearly enough). Section 1233 of the bill merely makes the consultation with the physician a covered benefit under the health plan. It isn’t interposing government between the patient and the doctor and it isn’t government intrusion into a family issue. It is a way to make information more affordable and more available.

Posted by: Liz | August 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

She should just lie about things like Obama does. He says surgeons will amputate people’s limbs if they’re diabetic because they’ll get $30K, when in fact they get around $700. He says the AARP supports his bill, but a) they never said that, and b) Obama doesn’t even have a frickin’ bill. There are 5 bills in Congress right now and he won’t choose any one of them so that he can respond to questions about specifics by saying “that’s not necessarily the bill that I’ll sign.” He won’t take leadership on anything and then he wonders why he’s losing the debate on this. Campaign tactics that worked on Hillary Clinton and John McCain, when pulled on the American citizen who has every right to question his ability to do this (considering how wrong he was with Stimulus, Cash for Clunkers, and a variety of otehr things), look like bullying tactics. He’ll lose the House in 2010 and he’ll be outta there in 2012. Thank goodness.

Posted by: Dave | August 13, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

birdy said “sarah plain’s idea of health care reform and to save money was charging victims personally for their evidence collecting rape kits back in wasilla. the state of alaska was so embarrassed by these practices they had to pass a state law banning the practice. her hand picked police chief was very vocal in the local newspaper about his opposition to the bill and she didnt care. they wanted to continue to charge rape and molestation victims personally.”
Please site sources for this.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

…and had America not wanted change so badly, she would be making these easily fact checked (not to mention WRONG) accusations from the Vice President’s Desk. yikes!

Posted by: Helen | August 13, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Aaron posted “But when they have problems what do they do? They raise prices.”
True, but they still perform a service, a useful service at that. If I want to send 30 invitation out via USPS, the cost is around $13.50 and most will get there is a day or two. Using Fedex 2nd day delivery I can get the same service, but it will cost me over $200 (based on rates from Fedex’s web page).

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Just remember liberals…..
Obama is a PROVEN LIAR!!!
YAHTZEE!!

Posted by: Paul | August 13, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Explorer65: This is not JUST a family issue. It is a medical issue. A living will has to do with your wishes for what measures you want taken if you code (DNR–Do Not Resuscitate; do everything, do only chemical-drugs-intervention, do nothing). There are options to consider and it would be difficult to do that without your MD helping you to understand what they are. There is NO CASH INCENTIVE. The MDs are allowed to bill for their time spent counseling the patients and their families on this important issue. Get your info straight; understand what end of life counseling really is before adding more lies/and paranoia hype to the discussion

Posted by: ANN | August 13, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Mike: How is Palin the most honest when several organizations have checked the facts and said her statements are completely false?!?

Posted by: ANN | August 13, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Marsha: It doesn’t matter what Palin’s explanation is for HER interpretation. Her interpretation is WRONG, no matter how she claims to justify it. The facts are: 1. It is HER INTERPRETATION, not the facts; and 2. MULTI organizations have checked the into it and said she is WRONG.

Posted by: ANN | August 13, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Faurtz8
That also is true but here is the point I was trying to make and I admit I wasn’t clear on this. If I don’t want to use their services I don’t have to and it doesn’t cost me anything. If I don’t want to participate in government health care, Obama says I don’t have to. Fine but I bet he won’t let me out of paying for it will he. Heck no!
And when it starts to have problems I’ll have to pay the higher and higher and higher taxes as well.

Posted by: Aaron | August 13, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

As if the market driven health care is not, for many, an “invisible hand” signature of a death panel?

Posted by: Blaine | August 13, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

With no respect whatsoever to her, the ONLY thing that portion of the bill did was allow the insurance to PAY for the type of dr visit that happens every day in this country already. The government has nothing to do with it otherwise. Sarah Palin IS a dangerous woman, in that she encouraged vitriolic lies and actions during the campaign, and is continuing to do so now. She set this current tone last year which is becoming more and more nasty. If she had any decency at all, she would use that word salad that she is good for and dampen down the rhetoric. The Reps have lost all credibility.

Posted by: shelleyt | August 13, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

glad she is in Alaska, not washington

Posted by: Arun | August 13, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Potatoegator22: Your have no idea what you speak of. The govt (medicare) already covers hip replacements!!! I see and work with these patients everyday at the hospital I work at!

Posted by: Ann | August 13, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The use of the word “death” to describe the panels is nothing more than a fear tactic used to elicit a visceral and vile response from people. It is an irresponsible thing to do, especially from someone who wants to lead the people!

Posted by: Ann | August 13, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Well, Palin’s stupid but at least she’s committed.
And probably should be.
Yup, death panels, it’s her story and she’s sticking to it.

Posted by: Rick From Texas | August 13, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

The senate has dropped the “death Panel” from their version of the bill. I guess Obama was afraid to take Sarah Palin on when he knew he would lose.
Maybe we can just elect Sarah in 2012 so we can avoid these types of mistakes.

Posted by: Jenn | August 13, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I bet Todd Palin’s pretty happy about all of this, though.
Before she became famous, she did all of her babbling to him alone.
One man can only take so much…..

Posted by: Rick From Texas | August 13, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

“The senate has dropped the “death Panel” from their version of the bill. I guess Obama was afraid to take Sarah Palin on when he knew he would lose.
Maybe we can just elect Sarah in 2012 so we can avoid these types of mistakes.”
Since when is Obama in the Senate?
Another confused neocon, I guess.
Can’t tell the players without a program, Jenn.

Posted by: Rick From Texas | August 13, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

I guess the Repubs have scared their poor little selves silly with all this death panel hysteria.
Until recently, I never would have guessed that stupidity is actually contagious.

Posted by: Rick From Texas | August 13, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I guess the Repubs have scared their poor little selves silly with all this death panel hysteria.
Until recently, I never would have guessed that stupidity is actually contagious.

Posted by: Rick From Texas | August 13, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Rick, convenient that you ignore the main point -
THE SENATE HAS DROPPED THE DEATH PANEL PROVISION – BECAUSE OF SARAH PALIN
Sarah can write one post on facebook and make Obama look the fool. What does that say about Obama’s ability. Sarah Palin continues to show that she is the odds on favorite to take the presidency away from Obama in 2012. By the way, Obama’s approval fell to 47% today. I guess “hope and change” has become “incompetence and fearmongering” and the American people will not put up with it.

Posted by: Jenn | August 13, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

It’s not surprising that Palin cooked up a Death Panel out of HR 3200 and is sticking to it. Just look back to last year when the legislative “Troopergate” report found that “Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110a of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.” Palin’s response to reporters was: “Well, I’m very very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing, any hint of any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any of that.”
The woman is a pathological liar.

Posted by: WWW | August 13, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Jenn posted “Sarah can write one post on facebook and make Obama look the fool.”
For the 2nd time, Obama isn’t writing this; the senate is. And it is a pity how your hero has to stoop to outright LIES. And you’re proud of that?
BTW, if Sarah is so bright, why isn’t she in the White House instead of Obama?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Go Sarah – I sincerely appreciate her effort in getting the so called death panel idea killed. I know the haters on this panel will never understand how she has improved their lives and the live of their families through your actions.

Posted by: Kimber | August 13, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Jenn posted ” I guess “hope and change” has become “incompetence and fearmongering” ”
Yes Jenn, Obama’s “hope and change” lost to Palin’s “incompetence and fear mongering” ”
You display all the joy of a little boy pulling the wings off a butterfly.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

“BTW, if Sarah is so bright, why isn’t she in the White House instead of Obama?”
She will be in 2012 if her ability to destroy a major povision in the healthcare bill with on article is any indication.

Posted by: Jenn | August 13, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

I wonder what piece of the healthcare bill will become the subject of Sarah Palin’s next article. I will guess she that she will go after the public option. That is even scarier than a government panel deciding who will get healthcare and who won’t.

Posted by: Greg | August 13, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I have to agree that Palin is a fear-monger in that if she was without a valid argument the democratics would not fear her as much as they seem to do with their uninformed rhetoric against her. She stood by her family while some like Kennedy even ran away from a drowning woman he left behind in the water and now he is treated with respect in the Senate while she is demonized and for what….telling her down to earth truths?

Posted by: Diane | August 13, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Jenn posted “She will be in 2012 if her ability to destroy a major povision in the healthcare bill with on article is any indication.”
Gee, I KNEW you were going to say that. And it is possible. After all idiots like YOU got G.W.Bush in twice.
So, tell us again, where in the bill did it mention death panels? Or are LIES your only weapon.

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Diane posted “….telling her down to earth truths?”
Again, please PROVE to us that there were death panels in that bill. If to, we can all assume that you and Palin are liars!

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Faurtz8, Ezekial Emannuel sure makes them sound like death panels. You can be mad at Sarah Palin for putting focus on these provisions but it was Obama and his fellow Democrats that foolishly added this to the bill.
If it performs the same function as a death panel, if it is making life and death decisions like a death panel, then I guess it is appropriate to call them death panels.
You should be happy today – Sarah Palin has killed the death panels before they were able to kill any of you relatives, or yourself, by denying healthcare.

Posted by: Kimber | August 13, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Greg posted “That is even scarier than a government panel deciding who will get healthcare and who won’t.”
Can you explain to me why it is scarier than some person at an insurance company deciding who will get health care and who won’t when his driving concern is to make a profit for his company by denying claims?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I agree with President Obama that all these capricious doctors who cut off people’s feet and take out their tonsils so they can make thousands in fees are a big cause of high healthcare costs.
In the past few years America has witnessed an epidemic of innocent Americans robbed of their limbs just so their doctors can add room additions to their houses (God forbid your doctor owns a McMansion; you could lose an entire leg).
I see it more and more in my own neighborhood – one-legged people lining up at the deli section at Dierberg’s or hobbling to their seats at the local movie theatre. This is an outrage!
I’m so glad that President Obama drew attention to this growing problem in our midst. (And to those of you who say he’s throwing the medical profession under the bus, I have one thing to say to you – you’re a racist.)
Controlling these morally corrupt doctors is the first step in controlling costs. The second step, and far more important, is convincing our elderly relatives that living a long, long life is really not all it’s cracked up to be.
I totally support President Obama in his efforts to spread the wealth, and to spread the health. If you don’t agree, you must be a racist.

Posted by: Janet | August 13, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Death Panel! oops, that just slipped out. Why are you so angry about this? You should feel fortunate that a poorly worded provision that could have been misconstrued, was removed from the healthcare bill. And by the way, it does not matter who authored the individual items in the bill, only who supports them. I don’t have any faith in the Republicans and have even less in the Democrats since they took over Washington.
Obama should have been smart enough to actually read the bill and to oppose a clearly frightening provision. If we cannot rely on Obama to do this simple thing then why should we believe him on the rest of the bill?

Posted by: Kimber | August 13, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Kimber posted “Extremely liberal people like you ….”
BTW Kimber, I donated money can campaigned for Ron Paul last year.
I was originally 100% against the bill.
After doing some research on my own, I’m only 75% against it now. But people like YOU are convincing me that maybe there is something to this bill. The Insurance companies are running scared, paying millions to push their propaganda and YOU are proof of how effective they are.
There were NO DEATH PANELS in that bill. Yet here you are, post that there were.
How does it feel to be a puppet?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

I am still amazed that one article by Sarah Palin has had such a big impact on the healthcare debate. Maybe we can get her to write something on the wasteful spending in the so called “stimulus” plan. Or maybe, an article on Cap and Tax – Oh yeah, I guess she already wrote that one!

Posted by: Kent | August 13, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

If the provision that Republican opponents of reform are focusing on is as unimportant as the Democrats claim it is then why don’t the Democrats just drop it? Don’t let the Republicans serve their corporate masters with scare tactics – make them them show that what they really oppose are curbs on the corporate extremism that has wrecked this country.

Posted by: John | August 13, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

“services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia. A less obvious example is guaranteeing neuropsychological services to ensure children with learning disabilities can read and learn to reason.” E. Emmanuel
This is the kind of rhetoric that underpins the Obama healthcare initiative. Mr. Emmanuel is one of Obama’s closest advisors on healthcare. Be mad at Sarah Palin if you wish but that sounds to her and to me like the actions of a death panel.

Posted by: Kimber | August 13, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

This bimbo, and I’ll repeat Bimbo is so airheaded she can’t remember the declaration she made on April 16, 2008 concerning her proclamation of Healthcare Decision Day for Alaskans.
In it she declares that all citizens are encouraged to talk to their doctors about end of life and to plan for it. Also to make an Advanced Directive OMG – she is talking about death panels!
What a bimbo – go read it – her own words are perfectly fine but when a blackman makes the same statement- the poor old white woman makes something else out it. Get educated or shutup

Posted by: jozy | August 13, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Okay everyone, settle down, and don’t be so jealous
of Sarah……she’s gonna be around for a long time!
LOL
Posted by: lyineyes1956 |***************************
Heard she’s looking into getting divorced. Family
values was her forte…Hey,hey

Posted by: spacerook1 | August 13, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

“About 15 years ago he did think rationing was necessary because of cost issues but he has come to change his mind. “The more I’ve looked into it the less I think it’s true,” he says. “We spend a lot of money and resources — hundreds of billions of dollars — for unnecessary care, care that doesn’t help patients,” and in some case might make them sicker by exposing them to hospital-acquired infections.” E. Emannuel
Sounds like Obama’s healthcare advisor was for rationing healthcare before he was against it. Do you really want to trust your healthcare to a bill that was crafted by a new “convert” to the novel idea that healthcare should not be rationed?
Thank you Sarah Palin for exposing this underhanded attempt to destroy our healthcare system and to put our lives on the line just so politicians can exercise more control over the people.

Posted by: Kimber | August 13, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Kimber posted “Thank you Sarah Palin for exposing this underhanded attempt to destroy our healthcare system and to put our lives on the line just so politicians can exercise more control over the people.”
Yes thank you Sarah for foiling this Republican plot (as I pointed out earlier, a Republican put 1233 into the bill).

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

kimber, thanks to Sarah Palin, Advance Care Planning Consultations have become known as Death Panels. In HR 3200, these consultations are covered in section 1233, starting on page 424. These are consultations between a patient and his or her health care provider in which end-of-life topics such as living wills, powers of attorney, proxies, hospice, etc., are discussed. There is absolutely nothing in the wording to indicate that these consultations are mandatory.
A panel is a group of people. I could find nothing in section 1233 indicating involvement of a panel of any sort, be it of death, life, or game show variety. Only the individual’s provider is is involved in the consultation. Also, I found nothing in this section that in any way relates to Trig Palin, or his entitlement to health care. Would you, or any of the other believers in the alleged death panels, PLEASE copy and paste the exact passages from section 1233 that support your side of the argument. Thank you.

Posted by: WWW | August 13, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Shara is like Paris Hilton they are nobodys theat are always in the limelight

Posted by: Jim Bauer | August 13, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

WWW asked “Would you, or any of the other believers in the alleged death panels, PLEASE copy and paste the exact passages from section 1233 that support your side of the argument. Thank you.”
Give it up WWW. You can’t argue logic with a parrot. I’ve been trying to get someone (including Kimber) to post anything. Kimber knew nothing about that part of the bill. Kimber blamed Obama and the Democrats until I pointed out a Republican put that into the bill.
You won’t get any honest posts for the likes of Kimber or the other ones because they KNOW they are defending a LIE and a LIAR (Palin).

Posted by: Faurtz8 | August 13, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

republicans are fine with government meddling if they are the ones doing it -we all remember George Bush calling back Congress for a special session for Terri Schiavo – the woman whose brain dead body was kept alive 14 years. Fascinatingly these stories are never heard about the desperately poor – we never hear about some homeless guy being kept alive in a vegetative state for years.
It takes just a few brain cells to realize what thats’ about and to realize it obviously occurs now. Those that have money get care and those they don’t can just die.
Palin and the republicans are playing to the lowest common denominator in society – those that are always angry and resentful because somebody else is responsible for all their perceived unfair treatment. What you do now affects our children and the following generations – the future of our country.

Posted by: ticked off | August 13, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Stop giving Sarah Palin news time!! I have extensively researched her last fall, and discovered many problems. This time her continued statements about “Obama Death Panel” is/has been proven untrue. What she is referring to is end of life planning and is a much needed and appreciated counseling coverage which will help everyone. No one likes to face their own mortality or the mortality of a family member. We need all the support and referrals we can get. We need to have someone help us know what is available for help. Legal documents need to be in place so our wishes are known and followed. We will always, alwys be able to choose. Let me state loud and clear no “death panel” exists in eihter bill.
I am 65, an RN, Republican, and medical coverage is extremely important to me. I am familiar with reading the legal aspects of bills, and quite knowledgeable of medical care after 30 years of employment.
Senate has just announced they have taken out any mandatory insurance benefit coverage for end of life counseling visits. Time will tell what happens to bill in congress, coverage is still in. Real reason Senate dropped – the “rumor mongrels” have frightened too many people with false statements. Lawmakers are listening to their constituents and they want to stay in office. Other claims that may be given will only be political stances on each side. Sadly some lawmakers , news media individuals, etc have purposely been scaring people with lies and untruthful facts. Why?? Can’t you guess??? Why these rumors, when end of life counseling is already being given. But visit session may not be covered. Why did poiticians start a scare for no reason at all???? Why did these individuals create a scare with lies???
Senators did hear the people. Deleting is fine with lawmakers, they aren’t affected as their medical coverage is quite good. WHY SHOULD THEY EVEN TRY! LAWMAKERS FEEL – OK, LET PEOPLE PAY THAT’S FINE WITH THEM.
Could you face an inevitable family mortality? Yes, there is no crystal ball available here to foresee what future will be for us.. Cost of my husband’s care was close to $1,000,000. We were lucky with double medical coverage, and only had to come up with $20,000+.
MY ADVICE BEFORE ANYONE MAKES REFORM HEALTH CARE PLAN CLAIMS – FIND OUT FOR SURE HOW WELL YOU ARE COVERED. MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT COVERED AS WELL AS THEY THINK THEY ARE. IT IS HUMAN NATURE TO JUST ASSUME WE ARE. JUST IS FACT MANY MAY NOT BE. MOST WORK RELATED COVERAGE HAS BECOME LESS OVER THE YEARS. EMPLOYERS ARE CHOSING CHEAPER PLANS, OR MAKING WORKERS PAY MORE AND STILL CHOOSING CHEAPER PLANS. MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN AWARE. DO CHECK – IF YOU HAVE NOT USED YOUR INSURANCE MUCH – YOU MAY NOT BE COVERED AS WELL AS YOU THINK. ARE YOU PREPARED AND MEDICALLY COVERED WELL FOR $1,000,000 TREATMENT CHARGES? CAN YOU AFFFORD TO PAY WHAT YOUR INSURANCE DOESN’T COVER?? PLEASE BE ADVISED MY HUSBAND’S TREATMENT ONLY WAS FOR SIX MONTHS. A CLOSE FRIEND WHO IS ALSO AN RN HAD TWINS WITH CLEFT PALATES – BILL FOR JUST ONE YEAR WAS OVER $2,000,000. THEY WERE FINE AS THEY HAD KAISER PERMANAENTE MEDICAL COVERAGE. BOTH GIRLS WERE REFERRED TO NATIONALLY TOP RANKED UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL CENTER IN SAN FRANCSICO FOR SURGERY. SURGERY WAS PAID BY KAISER AN HMO. GIRLS RECEIVED BEST MEDICAL CARE AVAILABLE. MY FRIEND SAID COUNSELING WAS EXCEPTIONABLE.
Everyone please calm down. Stop listening to just what people say. Read and analyze yourselves. We have political battle going on between the two parties. Many lies are being stated. All concerning people’s lives!! Sarah Palin is the worst!! I am so angry Sarah Palin used her own child, a handsome little boy with down syndrome to pander these lies for her own political gain!! And this is quite something coming from a Republican – right??? Can’t fool this Republican medical professional with lies!! And
“No” none of us in the old age group will have care restricted if reform plan is passed.

Posted by: Sharon | August 13, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Lordy, are some of us gullible! As a gentleman in his 50′s I’ve already had the “death talk” with my doctor and filed all the paperwork for a DNR. In fact, I had that talk 20 years ago. It amazes me how people pervert the truth like they do.

Posted by: dramaguy | August 14, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I personally don’t pay any attention to Palin but nevertheless there is too much un comprehensible stuff in both bills. None of the so called advocates have spell it out to the Nation.This hurry up push of the bill it to satisfy Ted Kennedy’s dream before he kicks the bucket.Too much government intrusion on our lives, more taxes, yes, that is correct, more taxes for every american men , women and children for many generations to come.The gov. cannot run a program without extracting more blood from the taxpayers period.From where anyone thinks the money is going to come from ? Ohh yeah, if you are happy with your plan you can keep it. really ? I heard Obama himself saying that the goal is to eliminate the insurance companies within 10 years on an interview in SF California. Those who live out of welfare want this bill to pass. Those working and paying taxes will not. Polls shows 49% against and 42 % for those pro the plan. It seems to me that the bill will be killed before 2010 but either way, Pelosi and Reid will pack their bags in 2010 and Obama’s reign will come to an end.

Posted by: Frank | August 14, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

As a child, I used to wait with baited breath for Saturday to roll around so I could watch Looney Tunes. Now all I have to do is turn on my computer in the mornings and Looney Tunes are all over the place, led by the likes of Palin, Gingrich, Boehner, Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter, Kyle-Anne Shiver,etc. etc., and followers who lack the intelligence to think for themselves.

Posted by: devilkev | August 14, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Sarah Palin is a reflection of what the GOP has become. The party of Lincoln has reversed the evolution process. They are counting on uneducated voters to stump while they create fear and panic. Nothing good has come out of the GOP in the last 20 years. It’s sad.

Posted by: Ohplease! | August 14, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am

1. no-one with any sense is without a living will. Who cares who counsels them on it.
2. those crying about “death panels” make no sense. First they complain the govt is too inept to run the healthcare system. Then they turn around and talk about how they are going to pull the plug on you. If they are so inept in the first place I would think we’d all die of old age before they could get through the red tape to pull the plug.
I’d really love to end this with a big “DUH” but we’ll watch Sarah Palin videos if we want to see examples of that……..

Posted by: dk | August 14, 2009, 3:07 am 3:07 am

As ThinkProgress reports today, Sarah Palin was for end-of-life counseling before she was against it.
As governor, Palin declared April 16, 2008, “Healthcare Decisions Day,” signing a proclamation to “encourage medical professionals and lawyers to volunteer their time and efforts to … increase the number of Alaska’s citizens with advance directives.”
An advance directive can be a living will, which describes the medical treatments you do or do not want at the end of life, or a power of attorney, which designates someone to make those decisions for you.
Palin has been railing against a provision in the House health care bill which would reimburse doctors for counseling patients about such advance directives. She says that provision really calls for a “death panel,” where government bureaucrats would decide who could get life-extending care based on their usefulness to society. This claim has been thoroughly debunked.

Posted by: thinkprogress | August 14, 2009, 4:25 am 4:25 am

“Rick Klein shows his bias in not only the title of his blog but also his omission of the cash incentive for doctors to hold such end of life counseling. Why should the government intrude into a family issue.”
The whole POINT is to encourage more doctors to discuss end-of-life planning with their patients prior to the time it is needed. This benefits the patient by not forcing him/her to undergo potentially painful treatments that he or she may not want (or not withholding treatments that he or she does want), and it protects the families from having to guess what their loved one’s wishes would be. I have seen families torn apart by disagreements over what should be done in regards to heroic care at the end of life – think about Terri Schiavo’s family and how much easier it would have been on all of them had she just had that talk with her doctor ahead of time!
Interestingly, Sarah Palin was FOR advance directives before she was against them, as was Newt Gingrich.

Posted by: mallory | August 14, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am

Irresponsible rants of a spot light seeking pseudo celebrity, nothing more. What is truly amazing is the wilfully ignorant people who lap up her partisan rhetoric like ice cream.

Posted by: DaveM | August 14, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Been reading Sec 1233, End of Life stuff. Paragraph also has “The level of treatment indicated under sub-paragraph may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions.” It goes on to identify ‘interventions’ like ‘antibiotics’ and ‘use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration’, etc. Confusing for a lot of you. Think Palin has something worth reviewing.

Posted by: James L. | August 14, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

To be fair. The Note should acknowledge that Section 1233 is not limited to end of life discussions on living wills. It also says “limit some or all or specified
interventions” (like antibiotics, etc). It is about a dozen pages long and has complicated language.

Posted by: James L. | August 14, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Dear Teddy, I hear what you are trying to blow into my ear. I see you are trying to justify what you are saying by tossing outside sources that Palin is wrong. I have read the dozen or so pages of HR 3200, Sec 1233 and it covers more than you guys are limiting your Palin attack to. Bottom line: Please explain why this ‘End-of-Life’ section has been declared too controversial and has been dropped from the Senate version of the Bill???

Posted by: James L. | August 14, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

James L, it would have made a lot more sense if you had not left out the wording from the referenced subparagraph: a medical order that “effectively communicates the individual’s preferences regarding life sustaining treatment, including an indication of the treatment and care desired by the individual.”
In other words, it’s the individual’s choice whether or not they want the antibiotics, artificially administered nutrition, hydration, etc. etc. (Think Terri Shaivo.) There is no evil Death Panel lying in wait to snuff out Grandma or poor little Trig. Sarah Palin is doing the lying to fan the flames of controversy and scare people.

Posted by: WWW | August 14, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

“Can you explain to me why it is scarier than some person at an insurance company deciding who will get health care and who won’t when his driving concern is to make a profit for his company by denying claims?”
You know what, you’re right. In fact I think we should just scrap personal responsibility AND our free society entirely and put the government in charge of everything. I mean after all they are so much more efficient, honest and compassionate than the evil profit mongering private sector. What could possibly go wrong?

Posted by: Aaron | August 14, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Palin’s insistence of the ‘death panels’ being in the health care reform bill despite news organizations, the W.H., bi-partisan fact checkers, even Republican senators telling her she is wrong, just proves one thing. It is dangerous for any politician to not read well. The ability to read text and correctly interpret what the words mean should be a requirement for public office.
Palin is either lying or she can’t read very well.

Posted by: Lydia | August 15, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I just don’t understand why the Democrats would agree to pulling the “voluntary counseling” provision from this terrific legislation. Why pull something just because some loonies are misrepresenting the clause? Any thoughts?

Posted by: jcarob | August 15, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Joseph Goebels said that if you repeat a lie often enough, sooner or later people will start believing it.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | August 17, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Don’t you democrats have anything better to do than bash on this woman? How about you look at the facts and start bashing on the President you voted for who has done absolutely nothing productive since taking office. Oh, that’s right, he won a noble peace prize for doing nothing. You need to actually read the bills and not just go off of your liberal news shows to give you what they deem “accurate” information.

Posted by: Karen | November 16, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I thought death panel was chartered to figure out what to do with America if Palin got elected to anything. Thats before she didnt like end of life counciling for people in need.

Posted by: Jon | January 11, 2011, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.