President Obama, Bookworm
ABC News' Yunji de Nies, Stephanie Smith and Karen Travers report:
President Obama is taking his first full week of vacation since taking office in January and while his week will feature a lot of golf, family time and R&R, he is also planning to tackle an ambitious stack of books.
According to a spokesman, Obama brought five books up with him to Martha's Vineyard:
- The Way Home by George Pelecanos
- Hot Flat and Crowded by Tom Friedman
- Lush Life by Richard Price
- Plainsong by Kent Haruf
- John Adams by David McCullough
- Yunji de Nies, Stephanie Smith and Karen Travers
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Oh please, who believes he’s going to crack even one of those books (unless there’s a copy of Mao’s little red book slipped inside)? Who reads five hefty books during a one-week vacation already filled with golf, tennis, sightseeing, ice cream eating and enjoying all the other things the taxpayers have provided?
Posted by: ferd | August 24, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Interesting. I wonder if he’s even heard of John Adams. I mean, I think his idea of a founding father is Bill Ayers.
Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | August 24, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
ferd:”Who reads five hefty books during a one-week vacation already filled with golf, tennis, sightseeing, ice cream eating and enjoying all the other things the taxpayers have provided?”
I take it you don’t know many academics.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 24, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“750 pages for the Adams bio alone.”
The Adam bio is actually an easy read in the way the narrative is set forth.
I enjoyed it.
Also there were quite a few footnote pages, index etc.
I doubt the text is 750 pages.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
No reading healthcare legislation?!
Posted by: Phonics | August 24, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Who reads five hefty books during a one-week vacation already filled with golf, tennis, sightseeing, ice cream eating and enjoying all the other things the taxpayers have provided?
****************************************
Well I do not know about you, but sometimes I have 3-4 books going at one time. Not that I’ll get them all read in a week. Even in school I studied Math, History, Science, Government, geography, etc.. Not all minds are inflexible.
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
750 pages for the Adams bio alone. In His SPARE time, after playing three sports a day, He can hang out in the alley with Imminent Skip, pounding down a bunch of booze and smoking Kools . . . and order up some special Cliff Notes.
Posted by: Bet Noir
The right wing now assails reading on vacation.. great stuff……. you’re right.. Obama should get in a truck and clean some brush like old ‘W’ and take 31 days to do it…
of course most of the ‘right’ doesn’t read.. that’s why they don’t understand people that do….
altho’ Bush did read ‘My Pet Goat’.. I hear it took him a few days to struggle through it……
Posted by: + or - | August 24, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
He might want to look at The Forgotten Man, by Amity Shlaes. Especially with Academics like Krugman attempting to whisper in his ear.
Posted by: pauldia | August 24, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
No reading healthcare legislation?!
Posted by: Phonics
I’m sure he has….
I know what Bush didn’t read… the PDB doc that said:
Bin Laden will attack US..
guess he was too busy clearing brush
Posted by: + or - | August 24, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
-I know what Bush didn’t read… the PDB doc that said:
Bin Laden will attack US..
guess he was too busy clearing brush-
Always comes back to Bush, doesn’t it? Rivals the Palin obsession…
Posted by: VRWC | August 24, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
obama favorite: Karl Marx my success story
Posted by: stardate: 2732.5 | August 24, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
know what Bush didn’t read… the PDB doc that said:
Bin Laden will attack US..
Why didn’t Clinton let the Sudanese hand him over?
Posted by: Old News | August 24, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“Why didn’t Clinton let the Sudanese hand him over?”
Probably because the Sudanese never had Bin laden.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Bookworm = bo work mo
Why not read the number one book in the country? Culture of Corruption.
Posted by: Blue Skies | August 24, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
FoxNews of course neglected to mention it was an infomercial.
Relax, it isn’t like a current administration appointee wanted to use his old ad agency or anything for some policy reasons.
Posted by: Goldman Rulz | August 24, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
“The Booklet has NOT been in use since Bush told the VA not to use it in 2007,”
ROFLMAO!
The Bush admin changed the book in 2003 and in 2007.
From 2007
“1. REASON FOR ISSUE. This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Handbook establishes procedures for enabling health care staff to fulfill their obligation to support advance care planning for veterans.
2. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. This VHA Handbook defines the obligations of health care staff to help veterans consider the types of health care decisions that might need to be made in the future and presents VHA’s requirements for the management of advance directives. This Handbook defines Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national policy to address new developments, the revision of VA Form 10-0137, “VA Advance Directive,” and implementation of iMedConsent™ throughout VHA. It encompasses advance care planning for the full range of health care decisions that may be relevant for patients who have lost decision-making capacity.”
In 2009, Obama’s “big” change to the policy was to change the definition of close friend to authorized surrogate and to create a national ethics board to resolve disputes that a local ethic board cannot under the old directive
“a. In the previous version of this Handbook, “close friend” was inadvertently omitted from
the list of authorized surrogates established in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulation
(Title 38Code of Federal Regulations 17.32) and VHA Handbook 1004.1. This version:”
b. The previously established procedure for handling disputes has not always resulted in
effective resolution at the local facility level. This Handbook changes the procedure for
resolving conflicts between a surrogate and the treatment team by requiring consultation with the
National Center for Ethics in Health Care on conflicts that the local ethics consultation service is
unable to resolve. It also ascribes specific responsibilities to the National Center for Ethics in Health Care.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
“Why not read the number one book in the country? Culture of Corruption.”
It seems Obama prefers non fiction.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
-It seems Obama prefers non fiction.-
And tax cheats.
Posted by: Goldman Rulz | August 24, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Relax, it isn’t like a current administration appointee wanted to use his old ad agency or anything for some policy reasons.”
Of course Axelrod no longer works for the firm and while they owe him $2M he is not going to remain invested like Cheney and Haliburton, though it does bear watching and seems indicative of the relationship between the political apparatus and the governing apparatus.
It is refreshing to see right wingers interested in good government even if for baldly partisan reasons.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
“…though it does bear watching and seems indicative of the relationship between the political apparatus and the governing apparatus.”
No kidding. And Bush ain’t Prez anymore. Things were supposed to be different, remember? This doesn’t look different. It would help if Obama tells Axelrod to use a different firm, tells Rahm to send his brother packing and fire TurboTax Geithner. Otherwise, he looks weak and corrupt.
Posted by: Same Old | August 24, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
he is not going to remain invested like Cheney and Haliburton
Why the wait?
Posted by: Divest Now! | August 24, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
“No kidding. And Bush ain’t Prez anymore.”
True. And considering the right’s behavior during the Bush admin, I think they have pretty much forfeited any complaints dealing with ethics. Especially spurious ones that are about making political hay.
“Things were supposed to be different, remember?”
I happen to think they are quite different.
“This doesn’t look different. It would help if Obama tells Axelrod to use a different firm,”
He no longer works for the firm and was no involved in the decision to select the firm. Not exactly sure what you would have him do there.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 24, 2009 5:40:45 PM
So thinking corruption is bad is making political hay? So that’s what it is called now. Why is a guy who cheated on his taxes running Treasury? Nobody else could do the job? Didn;t anyone think that maybe the guy who is in charge of the money should be well, honest? Why was Goldman bailed out again? Axelrod’s old firm was the only one that could do the job? Didn’t anyone think that it would look odd? Rahm Emmanuel’s brother gets involved in policy? Nobody else could be found? For an administration that is trying to be different, they aren’t doing such a great job.
Posted by: Same Old | August 24, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I’ve read two of the books, John Adams and Plainsong–I always take at least 2 or 3 books with on vacation. I’m happy we have a President who likes to read. Don’t badmouth Krugman–I wish Obama would pay more attention to him–read his books instead of the self-important Friedman (yuck!).
Posted by: bluedem | August 24, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“So thinking corruption is bad is making political hay?”
It certainly is the way you pursue it.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“It certainly is the way you pursue it.”
You pay taxes too, don’t you?
Posted by: Same Old | August 24, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
“So thinking corruption is bad is making political hay?”
It certainly is the way you pursue it.
Wow, pointing out that the guy Obama chose to run Treasury is a tax cheat is “mean.”
Posted by: Not Nice | August 24, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
-You pay taxes too, don’t you?-
I have no idea why anyone would get angry over Obama give away vast billions to a financial company that went and paid record bonuses in 2009.
Posted by: Goldman Rulz | August 24, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
“I have no idea why anyone would get angry over Obama give away vast billions to a financial company that went and paid record bonuses in 2009.”
I wouldn’t understand anger at Obama either since Goldman’s bailout happened in 2008.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“You pay taxes too, don’t you?
Posted by: Same Old | Aug 24, 2009 5:50:22 PM”
Sure.
Not sure what paying taxes has to do with your sincerity or lack thereof when it comes to political corruption.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Maybe he’ll have time to read HR 3200 as well
Posted by: DJ | August 24, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I would ignore this thread, but when folks start that tired old “right wingers can’t read anyway” garbage, well… I’m not a right winger, don’t even play one on tv, but I know plenty of them and they are as well-read as the liberals I know. That is, some read a lot, some read very little. I have found reading for pleasure a lost art in America, mostly. I’m glad to see people reading, including the president.
And jhw is right, if you think reading 5 books on vacation is a lot, you don’t know a lot of academics. During the summer, I read at least 5 books every week. It’s heaven.
And as Ryan C says, the Adams bio is a quick read. As is Friedman, because it is his usual tedious shtick, but, hey, you need to read widely, not just those who agree with you, so I read the man.
Posted by: moderate | August 24, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
“Not sure what paying taxes has to do with your sincerity or lack thereof when it comes to political corruption.”
You don’t? Maybe I expect too much of our elected representatives. You and I have to hand over the money, but they don’t feel the need to. Daschle, Dodd, and Rangel included…
“I wouldn’t understand anger at Obama either since Goldman’s bailout happened in 2008.”
He voted for it in 2008. And yes, he bailed them out again. And AIG…
Salon Robert Reich
March 20, 2009 |
“We’ve also learned that much of the $170 billion has been used by AIG to pay off AIG’s putative obligations to other Wall Street banks such as Goldman Sachs. Goldman has maintained that it got no bailout money from the Treasury. But in fact it received some $13 billion through AIG. More troubling is that the original plan to bail out AIG was concocted at a meeting held last fall, run by then Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson who, before becoming treasury secretary, had been CEO of Goldman Sachs. Also attending the meeting was Lloyd Blankenfein, the current CEO of Goldman Sachs. Also at the meeting: Tim Geithner, then head of the New York Fed.”
Posted by: Same Old | August 24, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Pelecanos is a good choice, though, frankly I like his earlier stuff better. But it is still a good read. I only wish Obama, our erstwhile leader, would read The Constitution, The Federalist Papers, The Anti-Federalist Papers, The Declaration of Independence, and Washington’s Farewell Address.
Posted by: Ed | August 24, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
maybe he should read the nearly 800 billion dollar porkulus…or the 5 versions of the heath care bill…
make it kind of a “working vacation”…just a thought.
Or maybe he could read jake tappers blog. Or the Constitution.
Or Michelle Malkins best seller.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 24, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Ryan: try to go 24 hrs without saying “right-wingers”…betcha can’t !
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 24, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
“You don’t? Maybe I expect too much of our elected representatives. You and I have to hand over the money, but they don’t feel the need to. Daschle, Dodd, and Rangel included…”
No mention of the Duke?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“Ryan: try to go 24 hrs without saying “right-wingers”…betcha can’t !”
The phrase is “Right wingers lie”
And right wingers could go 24 hours….or even 5 minutes without lying your “bet” would be taken.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 24, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I agree, Ryan. You should use “wrong-wingers” from now on.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
How about “How to Always be Wrong” by Tom Friedman. Its his most lucrative work to date.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
The most important book of the year publishes today:
“The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper and Fairer Health Care” by T. R. Reid
Excerpt:
“In Japan, waiting times are so short that most patients don’t bother to make an appointment. One Thursday morning in Tokyo, I called the prestigious orthopedic clinic at Keio University Hospital to schedule a consultation about my aching shoulder. “Why don’t you just drop by?” the receptionist said. That same afternoon, I was in the surgeon’s office. Dr. Nakamichi recommended an operation. “When could we do it?” I asked. The doctor checked his computer and said, “Tomorrow would be pretty difficult. Perhaps some day next week?”
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Almost forgot to mention:
Total spending on health care, per person:
United States: $7290 (2007) – incl uninsured
Japan: $2581 (2006)
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
For you “tort reformers” out there: yes, malpractice claims aren’t as big a deal in Japan. Why? Simple: highly publicized criminal prosecutions of medical personnel.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
FactCheck.org: House Bill Authorizes Coverage of “All Abortions” Under Obamacare!
President Obama said on Saturday:
“Some are also saying that coverage for abortions would be mandated under reform. Also false. When it comes to the current ban on using tax dollars for abortions, nothing will change under reform.”
FactCheck.org reported on Friday:
“As for the House bill as it stands now, it’s a matter of fact that it would allow both a “public plan” and newly subsidized private plans to cover all abortions.”
The House bill would mandate the establishment of at least one insurance plan that covers elective abortions in every regional health-care “exchange” for federally-subsidized plans. Who’s “bearing false witness” about the health-care bill again?
Posted by: Obama is a Wormy Little Liar! | August 24, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
How many times can he read Mao’s Little Red Book anyway?
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | August 24, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
How about this book, paperback edition, for Mr. Obama:
Save Me from Myself: How I Found God, Quit Korn, Kicked Drugs, and Lived to Tell My Story (Paperback)
by Brian Welch
Posted by: young_voter | August 24, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
mjishernameo “maybe he should read the nearly 800 billion dollar porkulus…”
Almost a third of that bill was tax cuts and breaks. Did you refer to all the Bush tax cuts (which helped the economy into its current state) as pork too?
“or the 5 versions of the heath care bill…”
I guess you’ve been standing at his shoulder for the last few months to be so blindly confident he hasn’t read the health care bills (only about 300 pages if you formatted them like real documents, and most of the definitions are a quick skim). It may be hard for you to imagine, but academics and university professors can and do actually read such stuff.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 24, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Obama is a Wormy Little Liar! | Aug 24, 2009 9:30:31 PM — The charge he was speaking against was the insane idea that there would be “forced” “mandated” abortions! You see, the government does not disallow a legal medical procedure! What is amusing is how you all scream you don’t want the Govt. to have control over your body (they wouldn’t under the plan) but have no issue wanting control over a woman’s body!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 24, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
jhw:
No, I assumed he hadn’t read it because he responded that “I am not familiar with that part of the plan” when asked a specific question about the plan at a town hall meeting. His words.
If he is familiar with it then maybe he could SHARE it with us….
I’m familiar with “academics” as I have an advanced degree in medicine.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 24, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
How many times can he read Mao’s Little Red Book anyway?
Posted by: ConservativeWoman
have you ever read it? do even know what is talked about in the book, I mean for real, not by what you’ve heard from whomever……
that’s the difference between an educated mind and folks like you… you read not only for enjoyment but also for knowledge and differing perspectives….to find out what other people think, that way you don’t become a ‘birther’ or a ‘deather’ or other republican nut job.
that of course, assumes you can read…..
Posted by: Tex | August 24, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Yeah it went like this:
WINGNUT: How about that provision of the bill that makes it illegal to mine the cheese on the moon?
OBAMA: I’m not familiar with that part of the bill
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
as I have an advanced degree in medicine.
Posted by: mjishernameo
an advanced degree in ‘medicine’…….. lol
hmmmmmmm….
Posted by: + or - | August 24, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
For you “tort reformers” out there: yes, malpractice claims aren’t as big a deal in Japan. Why? Simple: highly publicized criminal prosecutions of medical personnel.
========
That’s not the only reason why.
The Japanese don’t sue people very much at all. Not for malpractice, but also not for almost anything. Culturally, it just isn’t done because blaming other people is not the first instinct, as it often is here.
And yes, patients often don’t make appointments with doctors, but Japanese doctors working with National Health told me they were very very busy taking too many patients and spending little time with any of them, and they felt that was a downside to the system.
Posted by: MayBee | August 24, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
MayBee,
You’re right that isn’t all of it, but the Japanese did recently have an upswing in malpractice suits, similar to the way we did in the 70′s.
Back then, we passed alot of reforms that protected people better, and since have less malpractice suits.
The Japanese took our experience, and instituted some needed reforms, but also went hardcore on the malpractice problem, and made it criminal.
See, if you want to make malpractice insurance cheaper, you have to deal with the malpractice problem, not the meager remedies that are available to people in the courts.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
See, if you want to make malpractice insurance cheaper, you have to deal with the malpractice problem, not the meager remedies that are available to people in the courts.
Meager remedies!? You’ve never heard of John Edwards?
Posted by: Dewey, Cheatem and Howe | August 24, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
-It may be hard for you to imagine, but academics and university professors can and do actually read such stuff.-
Unlike John Conyers or out POTUS. This vacation would be a perfect time. But gotta work on those putts..
Posted by: 9 Iron | August 24, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
DCH, its much more likely that someone who has been wronged will receive no compensation at all than it is that someone who wasn’t wronged will get undue compensation.
The courts are stacked in favor of the rich.
And, speaking of Edwards, the contingent fee system makes it very unlikely that lawyers are going to go around filing frivilous lawsuits.
The frivilous lawsuit thing is a myth. Although, I do remember someone getting their suit against Obama thrown out because it was frivilous recently.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 24, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
And, speaking of Edwards, the contingent fee system makes it very unlikely that lawyers are going to go around filing frivilous lawsuits.
Good to know. I’m sure Edwards will be for tort reform. We need to keep costs down.
Posted by: Dewey, Cheatem and Howe | August 25, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am
-The courts are stacked in favor of the rich.-
John Edwards, poor country lawyer!
Posted by: 2 Americas | August 25, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Tort Reform is simply a euphemism for eliminating victims’ rights.
You’re like the battered spouse who has been convinced that the battering is your own fault.
Wake up and smell the coffee, our system has been taken over by corporate interests!
Posted by: Flash Override | August 25, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
frivilous lawsuit… you mean like Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks wanting to file a lawsuit about……. Obama’s birth certificate?
sad………. but…….. not unexpected for republicans.. this guy was elected? wow
Posted by: + or - | August 25, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
yes, I am an NP in Adult medicine. I practice in NJ and PA.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 25, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
How is an NP an advanced degree in medicine?Is there an “NP” degree?How many years of medical school do you need?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
+or-,why doesn’t he just release the long-form certificate and be done with it?I don’t care if Franks is a nut or not-There is no rational reason not to release the long-form certificate.The State of Hawaii says it exists,so let’s see it.
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
why doesn’t he just release the long-form certificate and be done with it? I don’t care if Franks is a nut or not-
Posted by: Nephron
I rest my case…..
please contact Orly Taitz at your earliest convenience…
and report to the nearest FEMA re-education camp near you….. just ignore the black helicopters, they’re there to assist you if you can’t make it to the the death panel on your own……
you will have buy your ‘tree of liberty’ t-shirts on your own, they not be provided….
you will also need to leave your census information with Michelle Bachmann, she will make sure it is secure.
Posted by: + or - | August 25, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am
I’m glad Obama is reading ‘Hot, Flat and Crowded’, it is a real eye-opener.
As Fareed Zakaria wrote in a recent Newsweek, our country is usually good at dealing with crisis situations, but terrible at looking down the road to head them off. The topics in ‘Hot, Flat and Crowded’ need to be addressed now to avoid the extreme situation the book describes in our near future.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Yeah…….
Mien Kampth, Maos’ Little Red book, Lenin and Stalin with some Karl Marx thrown it for the fuzzy feeling!
All on the best sellers list, somewhere!!
Posted by: American Infidel | August 25, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am
An NP requires a master degree in advanced practice nursing with an additional year of study in a medical specialty, ie Adult Medicine for me. An NP can practice independent of a physician in the clinical setting, can write Rx, perform simple surgeries and manage an independant case load of patients in or out of the hospital/clinic setting.
Why all the questions? What is your problem?
I was answering the snarky remark that perhaps I didn’t understand “academics”. I spent 4 years post graduate at a medical school (UMDNJ) and in research.
Now lets attend to the topic at hand, I really think this is ridiculous how you grill people over any comment (if they are a “right winger”)…
Carry on.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 25, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
To American Infidel,
It beats “My Pet Duck”…. It is SO great to have a President who CAN read and Talk IN COHERENT SENTENCES…
Posted by: The Reminder | August 25, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I also find it reassuring that Obama is a ‘reading’ president. There is just so much information needed to know before you can make an intelligent decision, to understand how a change can affect many other areas, negatively or positively.
There is too much that can be missed by only relying on others to read and then summarize for you, as Bush did. There is too much that will be over your head if you don’t have a really strong understanding of every system the presidency touches: the financial system, the economy, the health care system, currency value, the energy structure, etc. and how they inter-relate. The presidency is really a job that requires a scholarly mind today as the world is so much more complicated than when our country started.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Posted by: American Infidel
afraid of reading you are….. your ‘brain’ might become contaminated with.. ‘thoughts’… that are not talking points or innuendo.
your suggesting not to read books that don’t agree with your ideology……?
guess you and your buddies on the right will have to get back to burning books, music, and altering science texts…… a ‘fine’ representative of a traditional ‘freedom loving’ american …. scared to death of books… you haven’t read.
would you like some ‘freedom fries’ to go long with your order of fear?
Posted by: Gonzo | August 25, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Nephron SAID with a straight face, “why doesn’t he just release the long-form certificate and be done with it?I don’t care if Franks is a nut or not-There is no rational reason not to release the long-form certificate.The State of Hawaii says it exists,so let’s see it.”
————————————–
And what, pray tell, is the “long form”? Please post your “long form” birth certificate so we will see what a real one looks like. You, Nephron, and others like you are an example of the single, simple minded thinking that makes it soooo difficult to get anything done in Washington. All the needless, hours spent on answering this senseless nonsense is astonishing. Post your “long form” birth certificate or find another “real issue” to complain about.
Posted by: metrsgm | August 25, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
mijshernameo,I was just curious,My wife has a M.S.N. and did not know that you needed a Masters to be a NP.As for + or-,even if I was mentally ill or paranoid or schitzophrenic or sociopathic or suffering from dementia- why doesn’t he just release the long-form birth certificate?What could be so bad that he can’t do such a simple thing? We know it exists-even McCain released his and he had bona-fide foreign birth issues.This is what is troubling me about this president-when questions arise we hear obfuscation and insults but no real answers,even if the answers could be simply produced.I’m a firm believer in Occam’s Razor: the simple answer is usually the correct answer.The simple answer to the “birther” argument is to release the long-form certificate.Failure to do so is simply bizarre,perhaps even more so than some of the conspiracy theories of the nut cases.
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Nephron SAID “….I’m a firm believer in Occam’s Razor: the simple answer is usually the correct answer.——————-
Well, that statement explains your thinking. And in agreement, I always knew babies were found in cabbage patches. Like you said, it is the simplest theory out there and, therefore, must be correct. Maybe a rabbit in the cabbage patch ate the “long form birth certificate” – now there is a “simple explanation” – does that make it true?
Posted by: mertzgm | August 25, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Again,a nonanswer from mertzgm.Maybe you had a cabbage patch kid- I frankly don’t understand what your comment is supposed to mean or imply.The State of Hawaii has stated that they have the long-form certificate, by law the President can request a copy.What is the big deal about releasing it?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Wow, the birthers are still asking the same silly questions.
Obama can’t ‘release’ the long-form birth certificate because the state of Hawaii’s regulations don’t allow it on their request forms, for anyone. The long form is the one filled out with birth weight, etc. It is not more legal than the short form.
Go to factcheck and read and see Obama’s short-form certificate, authenticated by experts. The short-form certificate is what every person I know has as their birth certificate. I just requested a copy for my son and that’s all we got.
The bigger question is how much longer can the ‘birthers’ doubt the facts before they accept that we indeed have a legal, black President. I haven’t talked to a ‘birther’ yet that didn’t show strong signs of racism.
As a Christian I find racism a real insult to God. God made us different colors for a wise reason, or for those who believe in evolution, we evolved to have different color skin, simply because of the connection between sunlight and Vitamin D and the weakness of sunlight when far from the equator.
Yep, it is that simple. As man originally developed in Africa, a land with lots of sun, darker skin protected from sun damage. But that same dark skin in the northern latitudes will not absorb enough sun to make adequate amounts of vitamin D. So as humans moved north, those with lighter skin were healthier because they had enough Vitamin D.
As a health note, if you live in the northern latitudes, like me in New England, a vitamin D supplement is recommended in the 6 cold months (maybe longer if you have very dark skin and live far from the equator) when the sunshine is weak and our skin is bundled up in warm clothes. Vitamin D is essential for strong bones and heart health. Ask your doctor about it at your next check-up or read about it on a good health website. Eskimos survive way up north by eating fish rich in D.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
“There is too much that can be missed by only relying on others to read and then summarize for you, as Bush did.”
I’m just going to assume that you are ignorant of the amount of reading Bush did while in office.
Just google “Bush Rove reading contest” and you will find a WSJ article that may enlighten you.
Posted by: Blue Skies | August 25, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Lydia,you are not correct. Hawaii state law clearly states that an individual can request a copy of their long-form certificate.I am not a birther;I think that most if not all of the citizenship issues are nonsense. What bothers me is that he simply will not release the long-form certificate. Why? Again,we see obfuscation-I ask a question,therefore I am a racist.What in heaven’s name does vitamin D have to do with any of this?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
The Japanese took our experience, and instituted some needed reforms, but also went hardcore on the malpractice problem, and made it criminal.
========
But the Japanese do that with everything. They are hard core.
You know their drunk driving laws punish the adult passengers in the car because they allowed the driver to drive drunk?
And do you want to talk about their policy toward illegal immigrants? Or drugs?
It seems silly to try to pick and choose things you like about their system and say that’s the thing that makes it work.
Posted by: MayBee | August 25, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Nephron, sorry, but I trust factcheck.org over your opinion on how easily Obama can get his long-form birth certificate from Hawaii. They state Hawaii doesn’t have an option on the birth certificate request form to get one. For the very good reason, it isn’t needed legally anywhere.
You conveniently don’t say where your information comes from.
Blue Skies, Bush was quoted in many articles as not reading much, not watching the news but depending on those around him to fill him in. I’m sorry you missed all that.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Lydia:USA Today 7-28-2009:Dr. Chiyome Fukino “saw the original vital record”;Worldnet Daily 10-26-2008:Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release long-form birth certificate if requested by Mr. Obama.There is a procedure to obtain copies of original Hawaii vital records from prior to 2001 BY THE PERSON CONCERNED or certain kin.It is a myth to say that he could not obtain a copy of the original.Again,why doesn’t he release it?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Nephron, I read the USA today article you quoted and didn’t find what you said was there. But I did find this quote:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”
Those who continue this silly argument have some other issues, whether racial, or just plain diversionary from the important issues of today, in my opinion.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
The vital records exist and he can release them.So why doesn’t he?Why doesn’t he release his school transcripts?Why doesn’t he release his medical records?Why doesn’t he release his passport records?why doesn’t he release his college financial records?Why should he be treated differently than other presidential candidates have been?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Back to the topic of this article, I’m repeating what I said earlier:
I’m glad Obama is reading ‘Hot, Flat and Crowded’, it is a real eye-opener.
As Fareed Zakaria wrote in a recent Newsweek, our country is usually good at dealing with crisis situations, but terrible at looking down the road to head them off. The topics in ‘Hot, Flat and Crowded’ need to be addressed now to avoid the extreme situation the book describes in our near future.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Lydia,you can’t answer the questions,so change the subject.What is he afraid of?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Nephron, I’ve answered the question. Obama and Hawaii officials have answered the question, as factcheck and other credible sources have attested to.
Why do you keep asking it?
What are you afraid of?
The topic of the article you are supposed to be commenting on, is about Obama’s reading material. The topic isn’t Obama’s very real birth certificate.
Posted by: Lydia | August 25, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
a typical republican answer to the health crisis:
Woman: Senator Coburn we need help. My husband has traumatic head injury. His insurance will not cover him to eat and drink. And what I need to know is, are you going to help him, where he can eat and drink? We left the nursing home and they told us we’re on our own. He left with a feeding tube. I’ve been working with him, but I’m not a speech pathologist, a professional, that takes six years for a Masters, and I’ve tried to get him to eat and drink again and it’s been so much – (cries)
Coburn: Well I think think personally, yeah we’ll help. The first thing we’ll do is see what we can do individually to help you, through our office. But the other thing that’s missing in this debate is us, as neighbors, helping people that need our help. You know, we’ve had a – (applause). The idea that the government is a solution to our problems, is an inaccurate, a very inaccurate statement.
So if your husband is dying because he cannot eat or drink due to traumatic brain injury, and the nursing home kicks him out,
you are on your own.
Unless your neighbors come over to help him relearn to eat and drink again. Quickly.
Hopefully, your neighbors are fully trained specialists with lots of free time on their hands. Good night and good luck!
Posted by: Reform Now | August 25, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Well,let’s look at how Obamacare will help:that traumatic brain injury is serious and disabiling.Why don’t you do us all a favor and look into these end-of-life issues outlined in this here VA book.You don’t want to be a burden,do you?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
“Why should he be treated differently than other presidential candidates have been?”
Demanding he release that material that no other President has released is treating him differently.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Blue Skies, Bush was quoted in many articles as not reading much, not watching the news but depending on those around him to fill him in. I’m sorry you missed all that.”
Lydia,
That was true until Karl Rove decided to that truth had to be muddied.
So he claimed he and Bush engaged in book reading contests in which Bush kicked his butt.
Of course that begged the question of when he was reading those books since he goes to bed so early.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Ryan C:Bush,Gore Kerry and McCain released their medical records.Bush,Gore, McCain and Kerry released educational info including transcripts and class standing.Medical information on candidates has been standard political information since Nixon.What is your education level?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Barry ain’t reading jack crap!
OOOOOoooooo…..he carried in 5 books. He is an excellent and profound speaker unless the teleprompter is off. Then is a current run of er’s and um’s and uh’s…….yup, a.. um.. thinking er ..um..man!!
2012 can’t come quick …um….enough!!
Posted by: American Infidel | August 25, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
He needs to read Mark Levin’s Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto then read the health care bill.
Posted by: 'Un-American' | August 25, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
“Bush,Gore Kerry and McCain released their medical records.”
McCain allowed a few reporters two hours to review his huge medical dossier.
While Bush has released info related to his health after the pretzel fainting incident, I could not find such a release during the 2000 campaign.
Same with Gore.
Kerry’s medical records were tied up in his military records, some of which came out in 2004, the rest in 2005.
Personally I think a statement by their personal physician regarding their health is sufficient.
“Bush,Gore, McCain and Kerry released educational info including transcripts”
Bush, Gore and Kerry had their college records released via media request.
They did not release them.
Privacy laws have changed.
McCain didn’t release any transcripts.
“Medical information on candidates has been standard political information since Nixon”
Medical information. Yes.
Not college transcripts, college financial records, passports records etc.
Its not his paperwork, its his skin color that disturbs birthers.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“Mark Levin’s Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto”
A sequel to the Turner Diaries?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
It is being reported that Obama was reading the Friedman book a year ago.
Posted by: mad | August 25, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
What an insult to bookworms.
Posted by: Eyes Open | August 25, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
At what point will a simple request for information not be labeled racist? Ryan C, don’t you have the simple curiosity to wonder what is the intellectual underpinning for the repeated claims for the brilliance of Barack Obama?Don’t you have any curiosity about his backround,education or health?Truly, what is your education level?Have you ever experienced during your education meeting people similar to Mr. Obama who apparently have no academic history before entering Harvard Law?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I think for the most part, liberals are petrified of what they will see if they open their eyes and ask the questions they should…
So they attack. I understand, most of them are young, just out of college and this is a first love for them. One never wants to see the flaws of a first love.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 25, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“Have you ever experienced during your education meeting people similar to Mr. Obama who apparently have no academic history before entering Harvard Law?”
Except Obama does have a academic history prior to Harvard Law at Occidental University and then Columbia.
But it is a weird question
If in conversation someone mentions where they went to school, do you then ask them for their GPA and transcripts?
Do you accuse them of lying unless they supply you with a diploma?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
“don’t you have the simple curiosity to wonder what is the intellectual underpinning for the repeated claims for the brilliance of Barack Obama?”
His status as magne cum laude at Harvard Law and being elected to editor of the Law Review tells me a great deal about that.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Ryan C, have you ever been to Graduate School? Do you know whether his grades had anything to do with his Law Review position or his magna cum laude graduation?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Ryan C:
If someone mentions “in conversation” that they went to grad school, no I would not ask what their GPA was or if they had a diploma.
If someone applied for a JOB at my clinic, then YES , WE REQUIRE ALL OF THE ABOVE, AND A FULL BACKGROUND CHECK. This is a STANDARD in any hiring policy.
Obama works for US, we have every right to demand proof.
Personally, I don’t care where he studied or where he was born. I just believe that his response to questions have been less than “transparent”…much like his entire Presidency thus far.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 25, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
“Do you know whether his grades had anything to do with his Law Review position or his magna cum laude graduation?”
Editor of the Harvard Law Review is an elected position meaning your fellow students at the Review choose you.
Magna cum laude means with high honors in Latin.
It means he was in the top 10 or 15% of his class.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“If someone applied for a JOB at my clinic, then YES , WE REQUIRE ALL OF THE ABOVE, AND A FULL BACKGROUND CHECK. This is a STANDARD in any hiring policy.
Obama works for US, we have every right to demand proof.”
You require college transcripts, college financial records, passport records for applying for a job?
“Personally, I don’t care where he studied or where he was born. I just believe that his response to questions have been less than “transparent”…much like his entire Presidency thus far.”
This is my fav new tactic.
Demand things that no other President has released.
Then pretend you really don’t care about it when you realize what a fool you look like.
Then make a snide comment about transparency.
Again the problem birthers have with Obama is not his paperwork but his skin color.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 25, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
PS Ryan: Do you know what color MY SKIN IS?
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 25, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Ryan c can’t answer questions about his education. He apparently does not know basic requirements for employment for many businesses.For instance, did President Obama truthfully answer all questions on his Illinois Bar application?There is a question on the application about outstanding parking tickets.Did he answer it correctly?To legally practice law in Illinois you must pass the Bar exam.Did he falsify his application and fail to acknowledge disqualifying information?Why was he never asked to clerk for a prominent judge-something that always happens for top law students.What top legal firms actually offered him a position?Yes,there is a racial aspect to this-the belief that his skin color makes him immune to the simplest questions related to experience, competence and honesty.Ryan c,have you ever matriculated at any professional school?If not,how do you know what the criteria for magna cum laude are? If he is so smart,why isn’t he a Phi Beta Kappa?
Posted by: Nephron | August 25, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Interesting….had Obama filled out the bar form, he’d have to admit to hundreds of dollars of ignored parking tickets he received in Cambridge. It’s a little thing, I know…but really it’s not a little thing…it says alot about his respect for the law of the land.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 26, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am
For someone whose favorite symbol is the elephant, this guy sure has a short memory:
“This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or the white culture…” – Glenn Beck, 30 seconds into his July 27th appearance on Fox and Friends
“I’m not saying that he doesn’t like white people…” – Glenn Beck, 2 minutes into his July 27th appearance on Fox and Friends
Posted by: WWW | August 26, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“He apparently does not know basic requirements for employment for many businesses”
ROFLMAO!
Because when hiring someone businesses always demand college transcripts. And college financial records. And passport records.
You obviously have never hired anyone.
“Yes,there is a racial aspect to this-the belief that his skin color makes him immune to the simplest questions related to experience, competence and honesty.”
Birthers hate to get called out on their true motivation.
Hatred of a black man running the country.
“If not,how do you know what the criteria for magna cum laude are?”
Because Harvard law publishes that info.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 26, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Ryan C,you still have not answered the education question.I have hired many people,some with advanced degrees.You have to do that when you run a business; have you ever run one?However,I have never hired a President of the United States-I would think that additional info would be important.At Harvard Law a GPA above 7.2 gets you summa cum laude, the next lower 10% get magna cum laude,the next lower 30% get cum laude.So, at a minimum 40% of each Harvard Law class graduates with honors.More likely 45% to 50% graduate with honors.With the curve magna cum laude becomes less than meets the eye.What do you think about the Bar application issue,namely question #51- the parking ticket issue?
Posted by: Nephron | August 26, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“Ryan C,you still have not answered the education question.”
My education is not your business.
“I have hired many people,some with advanced degrees.You have to do that when you run a business;”
Yes one does have to hire all sorts of levels of education when running a business.
Not once have a I heard of a job demanding college transcripts.
In fact unless you are hiring right out of school, one’s job experiences are given much more weight than one’s level of education even when stipulating that one must have a degree of a certain level.
“t Harvard Law a GPA above 7.2 gets you summa cum laude, the next lower 10% get magna cum laude,the next lower 30% get cum laude.So, at a minimum 40% of each Harvard Law class graduates with honorsWith the curve magna cum laude becomes less than meets the eye.”
ROFLMAO!
Summa cum laude is the top 1%. Harvard usually has 1 or 2 students achieiving that honor.
So according to right wing math, 1 + 10 + 30 = 50.
“What do you think about the Bar application issue,namely question #51- the parking ticket issue? ”
I think its a desperate attempt by birthers.
Since their other lies have been laughed at, they just move on to new ones.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 26, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Ryan C,is it a lie that President Obama had multiple outstanding parking tickets from Cambridge,Massachusetts when he took the Illinois Bar exam?Summa cum laude at Harvard Law School is granted to a graduate with a GPA of 7.2 or greater on the Law School grading scale.It is not based on percentage.Period.Ergo, a particularly bright class could have many summa graduates,not one or two.Every higher learning institution can set its own honors standards-by their natures professional schools will have many bright individuals who might meet a high grading standard.Perhaps if you had attended a prominent university you would know these things-SKI-U-MAH!
Posted by: Nephron | August 26, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
“Summa cum laude at Harvard Law School is granted to a graduate with a GPA of 7.2 or greater on the Law School grading scale.It is not based on percentage.Period.Ergo, a particularly bright class could have many summa graduates,not one or two”
Check out the graduating classes.
Find me a single class with more than 2 summa cum laude graduates.
“Perhaps if you had attended a prominent university you would know these things”
*chuckle*
Posted by: Ryan C | August 26, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Again I ask: do you know what color skin I have?
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 26, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
The majority of undergraduate honors programs base awards on GPA,not class ranking.As such,the percentage of graduates with certain levels of honors is not constant.I don’t see why you don’t understand that.Harvard Law’s honors guidelines are on their website.A GPA of 7.2 for summa is clearly stated.As such,any graduate with this GPA is eligible for summa cum laude,whether it is one,ten,fifty or even none.I don’t make the rules, the Law School does.The next 40% of the class will get honors.This is a large percentage by any standard. I know of a professional school that graduated 205. There were no summa, only 2 magna and 8 cum laude graduates- less than 5% honors awards.I believe that rate is more typical for non- law professional schools.What Rocks!
Posted by: Nephron | August 26, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Also,if Mr. Obama is so smart,why didn’t he get any honors at Columbia? Why wasn’t he Phi Beta Kappa?
Posted by: Nephron | August 26, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
We do know that Obama tanked in HS because he was using drugs and booze, by his accounts…
I often wonder how any kid who messes up in HS can get into an IVY..That just doesn’t happen unless AA is at work.
Level playing field? I think not.
Posted by: mjishernameo | August 26, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
The 7.2 for a GPA is the minimum standard for consideration.
Harvard law had 1 summa cum laude last year and 1 the year before. Feel free to prove me wrong by providing more that two people as summa cum laude for Harvard Law.
” I know of a professional school that graduated 205. There were no summa, only 2 magna and 8 cum laude graduates- less than 5% honors awards”
Falwell’s Liberty university is not a professional school.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 27, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
He did not graduate with honors from Columbia, he was not Phi Beta Kappa, there is no evidence of undergraduate academic distinction.How did he get into Harvard Law School?
Posted by: Nephron | August 27, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
“He did not graduate with honors from Columbia, he was not Phi Beta Kappa, there is no evidence of undergraduate academic distinction.How did he get into Harvard Law School?”
He took the LSAT and applied.
Apparently his undergraduate grades and LSAT score were good enough to get in.
And once there he graduated in the top 10% of his class.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 28, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm