By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 31, 2009 8:42am

Ridge, Cheney Assail Holder’s Decision

Officials from the Bush administration this week entered the debate over national security, though President Obama's was not the only administration subject to criticism.

While former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge's new book "The Test of Our Times: America Under Siege…And How We Can Be Safe Again" indicated that he wondered whether some national security decisions by various Bush administration officials were based upon political, and not counterterrorism, concerns, former Vice President Dick Cheney took to the airwaves to assail President Obama's commitment to making the nation safe.

On Sunday, Cheney told his preferred venue, Fox News, that Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to allow a preliminary review into whether any CIA officers crossed the line in their interrogations of detainees "outrageous."

"I think he's right, pure and simple," Ridge said on "Good Morning America" Monday. Ridge said of Holder's decision, "it's wrong, it’s chilling, and it’s inappropriate."

Even though Ridge said he believed waterboarding was "wrong" and "wasn't the appropriate way for America to be conducting itself," the former Pennsylvania governor told Diane Sawyer that "to suggest four or five years later what they (CIA officers) did was criminal — I think that's criminal."

In his book, Ridge suggested that the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program was unconstitutional and he wrote of a time just before the 2004 election when some in the administration pushed for the terror threat level to be raised — and he wasn't sure whether their concerns were based in politics or national security.

After noting a Cornell University study indicating that President Bush's approval rating between 2001 and 2004 "increased by nearly three percentage points each time the government issued a terror alert," Ridge recalled the Friday, October 29, 2004, video message released by Osama bin Laden, at a time when President Bush led Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., in the polls "by no more than two or three points."

The next morning, officials of the Department of Homeland Security, intelligence community, FBI, and Departments of Justice, State, and Defense, participated in a videoconference. "A vigorous, some might say dramatic, discussion ensued. (Attorney General John) Ashcroft strongly urged an increase in the threat level, and was supported by (Defense Secretary Donald) Rumsfeld. There was absolutely no support for that position within our department. None. I wondered 'Is this about security or politics?'"

On Good Morning America today, Ridge said that "a lot of people are hyperventilating about that passage," but he suggested that "this was one of several times that the process worked" since ultimately the threat level was not elevated. He said he never questioned "any of my colleagues' motives or rationales."
 
Such is not the case with former Vice President Cheney who Sunday criticized Attorney General Holder for ordering a preliminary investigation into whether any CIA officers went, in detainee interrogations, beyond the letter of what they were told was the law.

"I just think it's an outrageous precedent to set, to have this kind of, I think, intensely partisan, politicized look-back at the prior administration," Cheney said on Fox News Sunday. "I guess the other thing that offends the hell out of me, frankly… is we had a track record now of eight years of defending the nation against any further mass casualty attacks from al Qaida."

Cheney assailed how President Obama said "a few months ago there wouldn't be any investigation like this, that there would not be any look-back at CIA personnel who were carrying out the policies of the prior administration.  Now they get a little heat from the left wing of the Democratic Party and they're reversing course on that."

In actuality, President Obama said it was his general personal preference that his administration not focus on the past, but that the decision would be left up to his attorney general, who would make his decision independently.

Cheney didn't buy that idea, saying, "the president of the United States is the chief law enforcement officer in the land. The attorney general's a statutory officer."

The Justice Department website states that the Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Office of the Attorney General "which evolved over the years into the head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government."

Regardless, Cheney said "the president's the one who bears this responsibility, and for him to say, 'Gee, I didn't have anything to do with it,' especially after he sat in the Oval Office and said this wouldn't happen, then Holder decides he's going to do it, so now he's backed off and is claiming he's not responsible, I just — I think he's trying to duck the responsibility for what's going on here, and I think it's — I think it's wrong."

Democrats say the former vice president's furor does not come as a surprise.

"Dick Cheney has shown through the years, frankly, a disrespect for the Constitution, for sharing of information with Congress, respect for the law, and I'm not surprised that he is upset about this," Kerry said on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."

"In fact, I think there is a little bit of a tension between the White House itself and the lawyers in the Justice Department as they see the law and as what their obligation is. And in a sense, that's good," Kerry added. "That's appropriate, because it shows that we have an attorney general who is not pursuing a political agenda, but who is doing what he believes the law requires him to do."

-jpt

User Comments

This only goes to provide further evidence that the previous adminstration, especially those now screaming the loudest, never beleived in the foundations of the creation of this nation, that we are a nation ruled by a set of laws which are goverend by the constitution.
They didn’t beleive it then and they don;t believe it now.

Posted by: Rich | August 31, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

The previous administration is entirely for disclosure. Cheney wants all the memos released, not just the ones Obama released and heavliy redacted.
Obama does not dare release them, as they would completely vindicate Cheney and Bush and make painfully clear that what Holder is doing is a partisan witch hunt meant to pacify the bloodlust of the left.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Thanks to Jake Tapper for actually reporting as opposed to preaching as most mainstream journalists do. Tapper shows both sides which is incredibly refreshing for a change.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

“”the president’s the one who bears this responsibility, and for him to say, ‘Gee, I didn’t have anything to do with it,’ especially after he sat in the Oval Office and said this wouldn’t happen,”
But Obama never said that. Cheney’s lying, again. There can be a debate about whether the investigation of the CIA breaking it’s own rules on the allowed use of torture is justified, but what’s the point of listening to a guy who is telling obvious, verifiable lies to try to slander the current president?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 31, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

I strongly agree with the statement … We are Americans… We don’t torture. It does not matter whether torture worked or did not work. The point is the Constitution was violated & International laws were broken.
We do not torture, and torture is a crime, not a technique . If you want to work for a government and want to torture someone, you need to find another country. Government employees take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. If you are a government official and torture someone, you have failed your oath to defend the U.S. Constitution and you have broken the law. We do not need or want people working in our government that conducted torture no matter how many excuses, rationalizations, or justifications they come up with.
There is no way anyone can respect the CIA if it rewards torture interrogators with their job. Abscense of morality in any government agency will not result in respect, ether now or in the future. This controversy is not about legal opinions & the CIA its about the CYA mentality of the Bush Administration.
At the Nuremberg trials in 1946, the U.S., England, and France decided that just taking orders is not excuse for torture. Concentration Camp commander’s defended their actions as just taking orders. No doubt Nazi lawyers declared their actions both necessary and legal under German Third Reicht Law. At Nuremberg in 1946, the decision by the U.S., France, and England was unanimous, that a person is responsible for their own actions. No orders or shadow legality is a defense against a complete loss of morality. The trials at Nuremberg set the standard. Just taking orders does not give anyone, not even an American, the right to torture another person . We do not want our country to have Nazi morality standards.
I hope we still have today as much moral strength as our fathers that fought WWII to save our country and save our Constitution. If government officials today trash our Constitution to gain immediate ends, then we have lost any meaningful difference between our enemies and ourselves.
We are America, and We don’t torture. Our Constitution and our morality are worth far more than any information obtained from torture. The ends do not justify the means & there are more intelligent , effective & efficient means to obtain accurate information..
We should also keep in mind that who knew what & when is irrelevant & who did what and when during the Bush Administration is what is important !
Also if true, giving an illegal order to withhold information from Congress by Vice President Chaney is a crime !
We are Americans, and We don’t torture. NO IF ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT ! See title 18 sec. 241 & 242 if you do torture, this is what you can expect from the law. Also see sec. 2441 war crimes . Eventually the US Government will have to do the right thing and bring all those involved in this criminal behavior to justice ! NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW ! It’s time for the the Executive Branch , the Congress & the Courts to do their duty weather they want to or not & uphold our Constitution & the rule of law. Then & only then can we put this dark pain full period behind us & move forward .

Posted by: gezzerx | August 31, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

drjohn:”Cheney wants all the memos released, not just the ones Obama released and heavliy redacted.
Obama does not dare release them, as they would completely vindicate Cheney and Bush”
What nonsense. The Bush administration had years to release ‘all the memos;’ they released none. The memos released to date show Cheney was lying. Now he’s playing word games to try to avoid more lies, “The documents released Monday,” said Cheney in a statement, “clearly demonstrate that the individuals subjected to Enhanced Interrogation Techniques provided the bulk of intelligence we gained about al Qaeda.”
Yeah, the individuals tortured did provide the bulk of intelligence – but not BY torture, but rather personal effects and the initial traditional interrogations.
Cheney is a proven liar, and that lable applies to you as you willfully repeat his lies.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 31, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

“The point is the Constitution was violated & International laws were broken.”
Opinion is not fact.
Wishes are not facts.
If you truly believe the above, then call for the conviction of Pelosi and Harman and Rocekfeller as well.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

“The Bush administration had years to release ‘all the memos;’ they released none.”
This did not become a political footall until Obama needed to feed some Republican meat to the left wing monster.
Obama won’t do it because it will make Cheney’s point valid.
WaPo also had an article this weekend vindicating Cheney.
It worked.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Obama’s reversal away from his decision not to “look back” was just one more thing he’s reneged upon.
There is no reason to believe anything Obama says.
And besides, Eric Holder’s in charge, not Obama. That’s Obama hiding behind Holder’s skirt.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

“We were just reminded again that our CIA agents murdered detainees,”
I’ll take a citation on that one.
And don’t forget that awful “threatening with an electric drill” and the “threatened with a loaded gun.”
Ooooo, those are just horrible.
Worse thing happen in Chicago and in the prison system, but none of you cares about that.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

You know what the real irony is?
If there really were five people who died at hands of the CIA interogators (and there were not- you have mispresented this) they would all have been far better off being waterboarded.
The three guys who were waterboarded are all quite well.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Ah, but nothing is worse than having second hand smoke blown right into the face.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Eric Holder’s in charge, not Obama.
Posted by: drjohn | Aug 31, 2009 9:45:06 AM
Oh sheesh. Google “The Plum Line
Cheney Badly Distorts Obama’s Claims About Whether He’d Probe Torture” to get a glimpse at how Cheney plays you, “dr.” john.

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

So Alyson, you’re saying that Cheney told Emanuel and Gibbs what to say?
>guffaw<

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

We torture – how terrible… they (Al Qaeda, Taliban, etc.) torture – then cut your head off!

Posted by: Dale | August 31, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

“We torture – how terrible… they (Al Qaeda, Taliban, etc.) torture – then cut your head off!”
Dale | Aug 31, 2009 10:11:39 AM
Yay, we torture innocent people – but Al Qaeda kills them so we’re not as bad.
USA! USA! We’re not quite as bad! We’re not quite as bad!…
Hmm, doesn’t quite have the same ring as ‘We’re number #1′ does it.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 31, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I would say Gibbs and Emanuel mispoke as I’ve been pretty clear on what Obama has said from the beginning, and that as Kerry said there has been some tension between the DOJ and WH positions as there should be. I also find it disingenuous that after the Bush/Cheney folks criminalized the DOJ, they accuse the Obama WH of politicizing it. They’re actually doing the opposite– NOT politicizing it, and you’re accusing Obama of being a wimp and hiding behind skirts for it. It’s actually harder NOT to politicize it when you don’t agree. But I suppose you wouldn’t get that.
Cheney does slither and play word games. Always has. It’s possible Bush caught on. You have not. Good luck to you. You’re gonna need it:)

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Of course, this is a political ploy, but it will end up doing more harm to Obama, than to the GOP.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 31, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Cheney admits to knowing and approving orders to water board prisoners. Even his boss, GW Bush, stood in fromt of the camera’s and said, “America doesn’t torture. He lied. Water boarding is defined as torture by the US and International courts. Cheney’s only defense it that it worked (a dubious claim).
Prosecute Cheney. His actions are a stain on America.

Posted by: thebob.bob | August 31, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

drjohn:”On Sunday, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, appearing on ABC’s This Week, underscored that President Obama had promised that CIA agents who acted in reliance on Bush-era Justice Department memoranda”
Once again, you are allergic to providing the ACTUAL QUOTES preferring to stick to spun paraphrases to distort what was said.
And agents who stuck to the approved torture procedures are indeed shielded. This probe is to look into allegations that some agents broke the few limitations in the CIA’s Bush-approved torture manual.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 31, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

A breathtaking 66% of independents now disapprove of Obama’s performance.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

What did Cheney eat for dinner last night? Better put it in a headline.

Posted by: Hilary | August 31, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Investigation and prosecution of ANY crime necessarily involves “looking back.” Crimes typically take place in the past, do they not?

Posted by: Hilary | August 31, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Once again, you are allergic to providing the ACTUAL QUOTES preferring to stick to spun paraphrases to distort what was said.
And agents who stuck to the approved torture procedures are indeed shielded. This probe is to look into allegations that some agents broke the few limitations in the CIA’s Bush-approved torture manual.
Posted by: jhw539 | Aug 31, 2009 10:19:41 AM
***
Ahhhh. Thanks for clearing that up. I didn’t have time to look up the quotes :>)

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

“USA! USA! We’re not quite as bad! We’re not quite as bad!…”
Oh yes, it’s more important that we act like gentlemen than we save the lives of Americans.
None of this lack of manners for us!
Let’s simply dismantle all of our intelligence efforts! Someone somewhere is likely to be offended and that’s more important than our lives!
Perfect.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

All you bleeding heart liberals kill me.I think you should praise the CIA and BUSH/Cheney for keeping America safe after 9/11.

Posted by: Johnny L | August 31, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

“This probe is to look into allegations that some agents broke the few limitations in the CIA’s Bush-approved torture manual.”
Yeah, sure. And Obama pledged not to use signing statements or allow lobbyists in his administration and to eliminate wasteful earmarks.
So why not believe them now?
It has to be comforting for Obama to know how gullible his supporters are- how they so completely suspend disbelief.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

People seem to have forgotten that this investigation was triggered by a referral from the CIA. The IG investigation within the CIA found that laws may have been broken, so the CIA referred it to the DOJ. The DOJ is responsible for following up on any referral from another agency.
This is exactly how government is supposed to work. The right is screaming all the time that government doesn’t work, and then when it does, they can’t stand it.
Bunch of WATBs, they are.

Posted by: Flash Override | August 31, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This unwise decision confirms, yet again, that Barack Obama does not really know the American people very well. And to the extent he does, he doesn’t particularly like them, and regards them with a certain contempt.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

“STEPHANOPOULOS: Final quick question. The president has ruled out prosecutions for CIA officials who believed they were following the law. Does he believe that the officials who devised the policies should be immune from prosecution?
EMANUEL: What he believes is, look, as you saw in that statement he wrote, and I would just take a step back. He came up with this and he worked on this for about four weeks, wrote that statement Wednesday night, after he made his decision, and dictated what he wanted to see. And Thursday morning, I saw him in the office, he was still editing it.
He believes that people in good faith were operating with the guidance they were provided. They shouldn’t be prosecuted.
STEPHANOPOULOS: What about those who devised policy?
EMANUEL: Yes, but those who devised policy, he believes that they were — should not be prosecuted either, and that’s not the place that we go — as he said in that letter, and I would really recommend people look at the full statement — not the letter, the statement — in that second paragraph, “this is not a time for retribution.” It’s time for reflection. It’s not a time to use our energy and our time in looking back and any sense of anger and retribution.”
Senseless waste of time. What was posted here was absolutely accurate.
“It’s not a time to use our energy and our time in looking back and any sense of anger and retribution.”
Unless we need to feed the left wing monster.
Just remember what comes around….
Obama maintaining rendition and wiretapping could open himself up to prosecution.
Then again, so could his nonstop lying about healthcare.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

The IG also found that Nancy Pelosi was lying.
Let’s indict her ASAP.

Posted by: drjohn | August 31, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

“..Barack Obama does not really know the American people very well. And to the extent he does, he doesn’t particularly like them, and regards them with a certain contempt.”
Fascist;
I would say that you yourself has expressed more open contempt in print on these very comment pages for far more of your fellow Americans than Obama has tangibly expressed for any Americans in his entire political career.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Ok, so Vice President Cheney insists that CIA interrogators should not be investigated for allegedly torturing detainees, and be left alone. He credits them for the U.S. not having anymore terrorist attacks since 9/11/2001, but yet he and his administration relentlessly persecuted national security whistleblowers, such as FBI agents, FAA inspectors, and Federal Air Marshals who made VALID mismanagement disclosures after 9/11/2001.
Do those whistleblowers get any credit and deserve to have their careers resurrected?
Respectfully,
Robert M

Posted by: Robert MacLean | August 31, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Arent we suppose to be a nation of Laws?
So if we dont Investigate how will we know wheather or not Laws were broken? and if they were then people should be held accoutable I sat start at the top with Bush and Cheney they set up the torture prgram

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 31, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Laughable Cheney saying its Political so turning up the Fear and rasing the Terror alert to win an Election is not Political?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 31, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

thank you mr chenny for having the guts to ingnore the cant we just get along crowd and do youre best to protect the country post 911. how quick we forget. in the mean time did the JAPANESE RULING LIBERREAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY JUST SUFFER A dEVASTING LANDSLIDE LOSS? IN POWER FOR 50 PLUS YEARS? SIGNS OF CHANGE WE CAN BELEIVE IN.

Posted by: catman | August 31, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

47% and dropping…time to shift the news eh?

Posted by: catman | August 31, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

I think you should praise the CIA and BUSH/Cheney for keeping America safe after 9/11.
Posted by: Johnny L | Aug 31, 2009 10:37:41 AM
***
Oh, you do? And what shall I do about how safe they kept the American economy? how they protected Americans from medical bankruptcies and escalating health care costs? how they protected the environment? how safe they kept Americans ON 9/11?
I have to say I don’t really care what you think I or others should do. Seriously. I do commend our troops and the CIA and the FBI and our current Prez, SOS, DOJ and many others.I don’t need any pointers from you, particularly if you voted for Bush/Cheney twice and watch Fox News.

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

How quickly people forget. Can you image how some of these people would feel about waterboarding and enhanced interrogation technigues if one of the victims of 9/11 or any other terrorist attack had been one of their relatives? Fact is, soomeone you know or love might have been saved by what was done – but you’ll never know because it didn’t happen!
Yes, we are a country that is based on a set of laws but how do you deal with groups who adhere to NO laws whatsoever. Our interrogators implied that harm would be done to the terrorists family members if they didn’t talk (which was obviously a ploy) but can you imagine what would happen to one of our family members if the situation were reversed!? I wouldn’t even want to think about it!
Get a clue – the world as we knew it has changed.
The reason we won our battle for independence is because the British continued to fight using the standards of war for that time – we didn’t. Now we are the ones on the other side and we better adapt to this new type of warfare or we are to end up like the British.
And don’t even get me started on healthcare!

Posted by: Ricardo | August 31, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

“We torture – how terrible… they (Al Qaeda, Taliban, etc.) torture – then cut your head off!”
Dale | Aug 31, 2009 10:11:39 AM
Yay, we torture innocent people – but Al Qaeda kills them so we’re not as bad.
USA! USA! We’re not quite as bad! We’re not quite as bad!…
Hmm, doesn’t quite have the same ring as ‘We’re number #1′ does it.
Posted by: jhw539 | Aug 31, 2009 10:17:03 AM
The about circular argument demonstrates all the absense of inttelligence required to violate the constitution. How about “two wrongs don’t make a fight” how about “what are we fighting for?”. For the love of god would you please go read a book? or better yet, go live in a place that doesn’t care about human rights, oh yeh, that’s who we’re fighting!

Posted by: WTFster | August 31, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Cheney’s pride is gonna get the best of him. If the guy had just shut his mouth and disappeared into obscurity, then he would likely have been forgotten. But he keeps talking, and keeps getting shot down and exposed to where it it becomes a moral imperative to take action against the garbage that he claims was “proper”.
I mean good grief, didn’t he see “A Few Good Men”? Nicholson’s character couldn’t keep his mouth shut and ends up paying the price, just as Cheney will.
So not only will a few CIA agents come under scrutiny, but eventually it’s gonna get back to Cheney and maybe even Bush. All the idiot had to do was shut the eff up, but he obviously is not able to keep his mouth shut.
Obama obviously was trying to ignore it, hoping it would go away. But if Cheney wants to shoutingly insist that breaking the law was OK, well then, I guess we’ll have to take it to trial and see. From Obama’s standpoint it is not “political” in any way because he didn’t want to have anything to do with it. He just wanted to move forward. But big-mouth Cheney is trying to make it political.
What a dope.

Posted by: Al Oliver | August 31, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

“Dr.” John, for citations, the AP report is no longer available (interesting) and death by US torture remains classified, I believe, but you can google ACLU’s info (autopsy reports and so on) as well as the UN’s Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Also, Glenn Greenwald does a great job keeping on top of torture issues.
Just an FYI. I doubt you’re willing or able to think outside your box, but I like to extend the benefit of the doubt.

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

As of Inauguration Day Mr. Obama had unified the nation with a message of Hope. In a mere seven months he has utterly squandered that unity. What a pity.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I mean good grief, didn’t he see “A Few Good Men”? Nicholson’s character couldn’t keep his mouth shut and ends up paying the price, just as Cheney will.
So not only will a few CIA agents come under scrutiny, but eventually it’s gonna get back to Cheney and maybe even Bush. All the idiot had to do was shut the eff up, but he obviously is not able to keep his mouth shut.
Obama obviously was trying to ignore it, hoping it would go away. But if Cheney wants to shoutingly insist that breaking the law was OK, well then, I guess we’ll have to take it to trial and see. From Obama’s standpoint it is not “political” in any way because he didn’t want to have anything to do with it. He just wanted to move forward. But big-mouth Cheney is trying to make it political.
What a dope.
Posted by: Al Oliver | Aug 31, 2009 12:10:43 PM
***
:>) Seriously. What is up with the dude?And his daughter??

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Just because Chenney and his right-wing psy-ops plant wants to revisit this story doesn’t make it any more or less true. Truth is not generated simply by saying something over and over again. You can’t market or sell me the truth.
I don’t care what the polls say or who was involved either; the law is not a matter of opinion. Torture is against domestic and international law. Period, end of story.
It is striking how many people don’t want to know about our use of torture, but also think it is justified.
The influence of the superficial viewpoints of the military-industrial complex is so insulting. Trying ever so desperately and endlessly to control the opinions of the people and those in power, so that we too will be Americans that are stupid enough to shoot first and not ask questions at all, accept those questions with answers we hope to hear gurgled through the voice box of some water suffocating prisoner.
Did we Americans torture people looking for a justification to invade Iraq? Now 4100+ US service men and women are dead and countless Iraqi civilians because Bush Inc. needed to get some oil and give Halliburton something to do. I can’t believe that some Americans are OK with that. Talk about spending….how about two trillion+ tax dollars down the drain for some failed corporate hacks. Republicans have become Marxists, in the sense that they support propping up our economy with constant defense spending.
The Blue Sky Tribe has not left the building……but they do want you to hate somebody. Get over yourselves you toe tapping Republican propagandist hacks.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

-Did we Americans torture people looking for a justification to invade Iraq? Now 4100+ US service men and women are dead and countless Iraqi civilians because Bush Inc. needed to get some oil and give Halliburton something to do. I can’t believe that some Americans are OK with that. Talk about spending….how about two trillion+ tax dollars down the drain for some failed corporate hacks. Republicans have become Marxists, in the sense that they support propping up our economy with constant defense spending.-
Afghanistan: Just as bad if not worse. How many dead so that Barry can look tough and the US can pull up poppies?

Posted by: Drone | August 31, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

“From Obama’s standpoint it is not “political” in any way because he didn’t want to have anything to do with it. He just wanted to move forward.”
How’s that land purchase is central Florida coming along?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Drone,
I seem to recall Bush and Co. starting the war in Afganistan.
Not BO.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“Truth is not generated simply by saying something over and over again. You can’t market or sell me the truth.”
I’m glad that’s so in your case, but the right-wing propaganda machine successfully markets their version of the truth all the time.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Hey toe tappers and propagandists!
Okay, so instead of tossing out all our freedoms and attacking the wrong country in obvious panic, like the GOPers, Obama is showing courageous faith that a nation can live by rule of law and still defeat its enemies. That makes him your hero, right?
‘…the enhanced techniques that the CIA used against some of the highest valued detainees in the war on terror were “amateurish” and that their use “plays into enemy hands”, “ignores the endgame” and “diminishes the moral high ground.”‘ (former FBI agent who witnessed the procedures.)
Well, gee, that sure flies in the face of the self-adduced “expert opinion” of a man – Cheney – who has NEVER served or been formally trained in the military or in any law enforcement capacity or procedure. Cheney knows about as much about effective interrogation techniques as couch-potato bubba knows about triathlon training! This is what we get when we let two DRAFT DODGER CHICKEN HAWKS run the country and try to run two wars!
Please hacks!
Security from terrorist attacks is conducted by paralleling complex criminal investigations. The search for radioactivity, tracking the sale and use of things that can be made into a bomb, securing nuclear sites, inspecting imports, doing background checks on would-be pilots, tracking the sale of arms within and into our country, and so forth.
Securing the people of our country from terror is about being smart, not paranoid.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

The spectacle of Mr. Cheney going on national television and telling our enemies that its ok to do whatever they want to our soldiers as long as they don’t cause major organ failure is too sickening to watch.

Posted by: Flash Override | August 31, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

>Afghanistan: Just as bad if not worse. How many dead so that Barry can look tough and the US can pull up poppies?
Really, that’s is just too inane a comment to even respond to, isn’t it?
It’s just so deliciously Republican. Such a fine example of demented reasoning. Really, everyone should look at that comment and ask if they really want to be associated in any way, shape, or form to people of that mind.
That’s what got Bush/Cheney elected twice!!!!

Posted by: Al Oliver | August 31, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Skip,
Sad but true.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I’m glad that’s so in your case, but the right-wing propaganda machine successfully markets their version of the truth all the time.

Posted by: Colon Cleanse | August 31, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

I have to say I don’t really care what you think I or others should do. Seriously. I do commend our troops and the CIA and the FBI and our current Prez, SOS, DOJ and many others.I don’t need any pointers from you, particularly if you voted for Bush/Cheney twice and watch Fox News.

Posted by: colon cleanse | August 31, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Does the American left ever get their rage on for anyone other than fellow Americans?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

i love it bush started the war in afghanistan…thats waht liberals think. correction…terrorists started the war in afghanistan and appears to have gotten much worse in the past 6 months. why would that be ? i have freinds in the military FIGHTING there. as much as i didnt like bush little did we know how incompetent anyone else was.the grass is always greener,

Posted by: catman | August 31, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Does the American left ever get their rage on for anyone other than fellow Americans?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 31, 2009 12:38:53 PM
OH….that’s what we need!!
More Americans “getting their rage on”.
See…that’s the problem with you toe taping republican propagandists…..YOU ARE MAD AT EVERYTHING, and if it doesn’t make you mad then it is “weak”.
You really think that you are going to get information from someone who really hates you, by torturing them?
Only fools would think that torturing someone who already is willing to blow themselves up in the name of their ideology, would be fruitful.
The truth is, torture most likely hardens the resolve of those folxs we are ignorant enough to torture.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Posted by: Daniel |
It’s a simple question Daniel. You didn’t answer it. You attacked me.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Posted by: Daniel |
Again with the putting words in my mouth and turning me in to Rush in four easy sentences.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

catman,
If terrorists started the war in Afghanistan by attacking us and killing 3000 Americans then what are we for invading Iraq as a consequence to 9/11?

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“Does the American left ever get their rage on for anyone other than fellow Americans?”
You have to admit it’s a loaded question. What would an acceptable answer be? Yes?
You’re really making an implication couched in a question.

Posted by: Skip | August 31, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Posted by: Al Oliver | Aug 31, 2009 12:30:24 PM
How could I have missed that Afghanistan is a complete success? Obama got his war, we get to live with it. He’s learned nothing. Less poppies, yay!

Posted by: Drone | August 31, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Overall approval for Obama has now reached 46%, with 53% disapproving.  Strong disapproval now comes within five points of overall approval, almost within the margin of error:

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Obama’s overall approval rating has dropped four points in the last two days, which gives an indication that the latest polling is significantly worse than earlier surveys.  Rasmussen uses a rolling three-day poll of 500 likely voters each day.  On Friday and Saturday, his overall approval was at 50%, but has dropped quickly to its new low.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Congress will be looking at a much different playing field than when they left for their recess.  At that time, Obama’s job approval ratings were mixed, and even Rasmussen had it as more or less an even split, with only a point or two between overall approval and overall disapproval.  Four weeks later, every pollster has Obama’s numbers heading south quickly, and Rasmussen has Obama seven points under on overall approval/disapproval.  Only the politically suicidal would not take a lesson from this August.  Expect even more resistance to ObamaCare and the public plan in September.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | August 31, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

You have to admit it’s a loaded question. What would an acceptable answer be? Yes?
You’re really making an implication couched in a question.
Posted by: Skip |
It is a loaded question and you are the only person who has responded with a serious answer.
Others have responded with attacks, oblivious to the irony.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Fascist Hyena defaults to some poll.
Polls not taken near election times are worthless.
Seek and yee shall find. Polls help us do both.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I don’t see the irony.

Posted by: Daniel | August 31, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

This is nothing more than the current “junkyard dog” marking his territory; however, more than likely, we will all end up paying the price of having the carpets cleaned in the future………..

Posted by: Parallex View | August 31, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

daniel your reference was to afghanistan not iraq.i was not happy with iraq but nearly every democrat signed on to it.

Posted by: catman | August 31, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Here’s where I see a bit of irony: In his interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News, Cheney acted like his feelings were all hurt or something (“offended the hell out of me,” he said) by the Obama WH because he hadn’t been consulted. That just cracks me up. Like he’s done such an awesome job!! Sure, if we just totally blow off the events of 9/11, the anthrax attacks, the terrorist attacks against U.S. allies, the terrorist attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush Admin’s failure to capture Osama bin Laden, the distortions and contortions which got us into the Iraq war which inspired more terrorists, the success terrorists had in exploiting the Bush Admin’s international unpopularity, and Abu Ghraib, Gitmo and the torture policies which became such a powerful symbol and excellent recruiting tools for the terrorists– well then, yes, yes, if we blow off al that the Bush/Cheney record on counter-terrorism was awesome and I can see why his feelings would be hurt that he wasn’t consulted.
Sigh.
On top of that,he admitted the rule of law is meaningless to him.
As a slight tangent, I loved Andrew Sullivan’s description of the interview. You should all check it out. Here’s an excertpt: “[T]here are softball interviews; and then there are interviews like this… Even as propaganda, which is its point, it doesn’t work – because it’s far too cloying and supportive of Cheney to be convincing to anyone outside the true-believers. When it comes to Cheney, one of the most incompetent vice-presidents in the country’s history, with a record of two grotesquely botched wars, war crimes and a crippling debt, Chris Wallace sounds like a teenage girl interviewing the Jonas Brothers.”
:>) Spot on.

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

“Posted by: Alyson | Aug 31, 2009 2:52:43 PM”
And that’s with the bar set fairly high by Hannity’s “interview” of Palin last fall.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 31, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

with a record of two grotesquely botched wars, war crimes…
Posted by: Alyson |
Does Sully think Gulf War I was grotesquely botched?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

And that’s with the bar set fairly high by Hannity’s “interview” of Palin last fall.
Posted by: Ryan C |
Is that the one where he asked what her most enchanting moment was?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 31, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Does Sully think Gulf War I was grotesquely botched?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Aug 31, 2009 3:24:11 PM
***
I don’t know– I think he’s talking about W’s two wars in that quote, no? Afghanistan being botched byway of the distraction via Iraq– but I’m just projecting there. You’d have to research it yourself. I just love the Jonas brothers quote because it was quite the softball interview. I also love Ryan’s response.
:>)

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

And “Sully” does have a great blog which pointed me to this quote by Bruce Bartlett, which I like very much (explaining why he is now “anti-Republican)–
“I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also, Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections.”
Some folks other than Dems do appear willing and able to speak some truth about the GOP

Posted by: Alyson | August 31, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Cheney admitted that he doesn’t care if laws were broken by the CIA, which is pretty much an admission that he and others, should the investigations proceed, will find that he and others in the Bush administration broke the law.
What we know looks bad enough…. the rest will no doubt be more terrible than we can imagine.

Posted by: TJ | August 31, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Personally, I think it’s important for that rest of the world knows thru the internet and blogs that we all aren’t “I’ll just bend over so you can kick me good and hard” PC citizens in this country. The sleeping giant was awoken once and I do believe it’s good to know that it can happen again. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying I want to see it happen again-I surely don’t but the rest of the world does need to know that there are a whole lotta ticked off Americans at this time and if they want our continued support, they need to stop trashing us, and that includes those within the country that so enjoy trashing us.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Posted by: Kathy | Aug 31, 2009 6:44:15 PM
***
Personally I think it’s important that the world knows that as Americans,citizens of the land of the free and the brave with liberty and justice for all, we are who we say we are– a country with amazing military troops, diplomats and secret agents who need not rely on illegal, immoral practices to succeed, a country that believes in freedom, liberty, the rule of law, human rights, elections — and that we don’t throw our principles out the door the second the waters get murky. That we don’t sell our souls to become like the fearmongerers who wish to destroy us, but rather rely on our principles, enduring American principles, while ensuring liberty and equal opportunity lives on in the land of the forever free and forever brave Terrorism and adversity will never break us or change our value system.
Thomas Paine:
“An avidity to punish is always dangerous to liberty. It leads men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of laws. He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Cheney admitted that he doesn’t care if laws were broken by the CIA
Posted by: TJ | Aug 31, 2009 4:32:07 PM
Right. In turn, I don’t care that he’s offended or upset or whatever he is (scared? in legal peril? worried about his legacy or oil and business interests? trying to stay in the public eye so that his book sells?)

Posted by: Alyson | September 1, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am

When I clicked on the video clip to hear what Cheney had to say, a commercial for Kool-aid played first. Right wingers should be pre-warned so they don’t OD on the double dose of Kool-aid.

Posted by: WWW | September 1, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.