By Nitya

Aug 16, 2009 10:21am

Sebelius: ‘Death Panels’ Talk Is “Horrific”

Obama’s top cabinet official in charge of health reform, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said this morning on ‘This Week’ that it’s “horrific" twisting of facts to say that “death panels” would be part of Obama’s proposed health care overhaul.

“I think it’s really horrific that some opponents of the health reform bill have used painful personal moments to scare people about what is in the bill,” Sebelius told guest host Jake Tapper on ABC’s “This Week.”

Sebelius criticized opponents of the Democrats' plans for health overhaul for using scare tactics to try to derail an overhaul saying, “Nothing could be farther from the truth.”

“If anything seniors should welcome the fact that doctors would have a payment provided to sit down with family members if they choose and have a discussion.”

But, Sebelius said these end-of-life provision would "probably be off the table" in final health care reform legislation. 

Sebelius brought up a personal connection to end-of-life decisions, mentioning her experiences with her own mother who spent ten weeks in three different hospitals before she died.

“I think end-of-life decisions are very, very personal and very difficult for family members, very difficult for people to confront,” Sebelius said. “What every family wants is good information and the ability to make a decision that suits their love ones the best way.”

Watch full video here.

-jpt

User Comments

She’s playing on semantics and obfuscating . . . rationed, limited or refused care by a government board or panel is functionally equivalent to “death panel.” She’s pleading to Obama’s serial followers who apparently lack the ability to engage in any level of abstract thinking. This issue is only the tip of the iceberg in this frightening “health care” aberration.

Posted by: rplat | August 16, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Someone needs to explain to her that Americans dont like the word Mandatory written in laws. This bill did start that way, I have been reading it from the beginning on the Library of Congress web site. It was “Mandatory Death with Dignity meetings, and manatory Government control to all americans financial acccounts, and a lot more that has to do with less health care as you age, as public out cry is finding out they are changing it, and now saying it was rumor….SORRY now that I have seen myself what they are capable of if not watched close, I dont trust this administration.

Posted by: J Smith | August 16, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Insurance companies are “death panels” of today. They decide, not your doctor, what treatment is suitable for you. They make a decision whether you live or die. Remember the 17 year old girl died because of denied treatment(liver transplant surgery)?

Posted by: tina | August 16, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I find it funny that right wingers say Obama followers are unable to think, and sometimes say they are brain washed, yet those same people watch Fox news 24/7 and regurgitate everything that Fox news tells them as a fact when in reality Fox twists things, and blatantly lies to people, that is called brain washing. Everyone I know who watches that garbage does NOT have an open mind to anything and don’t know what they are talking about 1/2 the time.
What is so stupid about this entire “death panel” garbage is that everyday all across the country people have end of life discussions with their Dr. The only thing this would do is pay the Dr. to have the discussion, it has nothing to do with the government deciding who lives and who dies.
Oh and BTW I am not for the health care reform in it’s current form, but I am sick of the right wing nut jobs using all these scare tactics all the time, instead of telling the truth.

Posted by: d70 | August 16, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

my health care system works fine and has been working fine since finding a good job over 30 years ago after working at learning in school and not playing hooky and using drugs. my health care systems doesn’t need reforming. what needs reforming are those lazy, drug addict deadbeats who think I’m paying for their trip trough life. Swim or sink baby cause all I have for your kind is an anchor not a lifesaver….

Posted by: fred | August 16, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

The people who say having the government in the private health care market would be devastating to the insurance industry are some of the same people who wanted a government option to invest social security in the stock market. Remember?

Posted by: Lysistrata | August 16, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

She and the rest of Obama’s side plan is to save money through eliminating people via health care. It will save Social Security and other costs that are out of control. The plans are not clearly written but lay very few details and give incredible power to the Executive Branch. Today throughout the USA anyone can go to a hospital and receive care if needed, so the numbers given are a myth. Do we want to give up our personal decisions to the government?

Posted by: Jeff G | August 16, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

“Insurance companies are “death panels” of today. They decide, not your doctor, what treatment is suitable for you. They make a decision whether you live or die. Remember the 17 year old girl died because of denied treatment(liver transplant surgery)?”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hogwash. I can still borrow money or sell my house and contract with a doctor to obtain any critical care that is disapproved by insurance. Under the proposed socialist aberration I will have no rights and no options. Let them sell you this frightening socialist manifesto and you will become wards of the state to be dealt with as the state sees fit.

Posted by: rplat | August 16, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Why is no one realizing that the insurance companies make “Death Panel” decisions every day when they either drop a person from the insurance or refuse coverage because of a pre-existing condition. The real life death panels already exist and are in the insurance companies! This reform would eliminate death panels.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 16, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Insurance companies are the Death Panels of today.
Why is it that Americans sat quietly through the first Gulf war, 9/11, the second Gulf war and the war in Afghanistan but suddenly, over Washington suggesting we help provide Health Care to ALL Americans, people are outraged and showing up at town halls? This is the thing that makes them mad??
Our armed forces will die to make sure that “no man is left behind” yet here at home we are content to leave sick or dying Americans lying where we find them (as long as we get our Medicare and Social Security).
I can understand fighting to save lives or fighting to save our country; but fighting to make sure that other Americans cannot receive Health Care, even when they need it? I have to admit I am somewhat ashamed of what we have become.
The time has come to do make a stand and to do the right thing. Support Health Care Reform for ALL Americans!

Posted by: cincibaron | August 16, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

WHO DOES OBAMA LISTEN TO?
Percentage of homosexuals in US is 1.5%
Percentage of blacks in US is 12.8%
Percentage of hispanics in US is 15.1%
Percentage worried about government takeover of healthcare in US is 55%
DOES THIS TELL US ANYTHING ABOUT OBAMA’S PRIORITIES?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 16, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

“I find it funny that right wingers say Obama followers are unable to think, and sometimes say they are brain washed, yet those same people watch Fox news 24/7 and regurgitate everything that Fox news tells them as a fact when in reality Fox twists things, and blatantly lies to people, that is called brain washing. Everyone I know who watches that garbage does NOT have an open mind to anything and don’t know what they are talking about 1/2 the time.
What is so stupid about this entire “death panel” garbage is that everyday all across the country people have end of life discussions with their Dr. The only thing this would do is pay the Dr. to have the discussion, it has nothing to do with the government deciding who lives and who dies.
Oh and BTW I am not for the health care reform in it’s current form, but I am sick of the right wing nut jobs using all these scare tactics all the time, instead of telling the truth.”
*********************************************
As I would expect you lack the ability to justify and defend this “health care” aberration. Instead you attack the evil contents of the electromagnetic spectrum and the people that have apparently succumbed it. This is not about end of life counseling, the substantive issue is why this administration has found it to be such an essential part of their health care proposals. You appear to be speaking with great authority so tell us how “Fox twists things” . . . be specific please.

Posted by: rplat | August 16, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

ErnestNM there is one thing that rplat is right in: the Insurance Companies are open to lawsuits and the Government is not. If the Government has the control of the medical system there is no option to get changes.

Posted by: Jeff G | August 16, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

The term “death panels” is being used to talk about 2 different issues in the bills – one issue is the opportunity to have families be reimbursed for end of life issues counseling with a doctor of their choice (not mandatory, but desired for many who’ve had relatives suffering & needing advice on options to honor the person’s wishes). The other issue being lumped here is the advisory panel – which is just that – not a decision making entity.
Right now – insurance companies do decide who lives & dies – I sell insurance and I know. They determine who gets coverage & who does not. Have type 2 diabetes? No coverage for you . . . the only way to be covered in the states I sell in, is to go to the state operated high risk pools which are very expensive and offer no provisions for preventative care. Take an anti-depressant and possibly have a couple of other common ailments? If you can get coverage, it will be very expensive since anything to do with “mental health” is a risk to an insurance company. I’d say probably every other person I sit with is, or has taken anti-depressants – probably because they have to shop for health insurance . . . .

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

I can still borrow money or sell my house and contract with a doctor to obtain any critical care that is disapproved by insurance.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Very True. Everyone has that option now…and after reform!
But what do you do if your money from the sale of your assets runs out? What if you don’t have assets to sell? The insurance companies don’t care. Their motto is “show me the money”!
Under reform, if you don’t like the services that you get, you are still free to sell your assets and get the specific medical care you desire…your choice!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 16, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Oh, I forgot – JeffG – glad you can borrow, have a house to sell & obviously have NEVER been sick with anything major. You’d quickly realize if you had a serious ailment & no insurance that you’d quickly exhaust all of your assets & be destitute enough to then need a different government program – Medicaid. Good luck to you . .

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Correction – sorry JeffG – it was rplat who posted the nonsense about selling the house . .

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I suppose my tax money will help pay the salary of some bureacrat whose sole function is to advise me of my ‘options’?

Posted by: LongT | August 16, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

April 16th 2008, then Gov. Sarah Palin endorsed some of the same end of life counseling she now decries as a form of euthanasia.
***************************************
The 2003 Medicare Prescription Bill, REPUBLICAN, also included end of life counseling.

Posted by: SecondLook | August 16, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

It’s your DOCTOR who would advise on end of life issues – he would simply be paid to do it if you decide you want that. insurance companies DECIDE today what options you’ll get . . . .wise up people.

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I suppose my tax money will help pay the salary of some bureacrat whose sole function is to advise me of my ‘options’?
Posted by: LongT | Aug 16, 2009 11:27:43 AM
***************************************
It’s been proven that the more this is promoted the more it tends to save money as well. Go figure. See, most of us really don’t want them shocking our hearts back five times prior to that leukemia taking us out a week later.

Posted by: SecondLook | August 16, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

its a shame that the provisions for counselling people on living wills (put in the bill by Republicans in the first place), will be taken out….this is a critical element… to over all care.
Have you ever watched someone die hooked up to machines? it is truly horrific…
So because of a bunch hysterical, irrational lunatics, thousands will not get this help to decide how they want the end of their life to be conducted.
The right-wingers, who claim to be “christian” conservatives, and who perpetuated these lies, will have to answer to a higher power for their immoral behavior on this one. Good luck Mrs Palin when you meet your maker…have a feeling this one will be coming up in that conversation!

Posted by: indithinker | August 16, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

paradigmbiz – you do not know me. I was born poor with major health problems. I continued with health problems to this day and it took me many years to overcome my financial problems. I look back at the time of my youth where people like me were supported through kindness of Doctors and Churches, not the Government. I look at the Government and the present medical: Medicare, Medicade, and VA, and none are run well – so why do I want them part of my healthcare?

Posted by: Jeff G | August 16, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Sarah Palin used one simple phrase on two facebook articles and the Democrats can’t retreat fast enough (they caved to Grassley within days). If Governor Palin was wrong in her charaterization then why did the Democrats not stand their ground and fight for what they believe in?
Thank you Sarah Palin for once again being the voice of reason. I would like to see your next articles take on the government option, funding for abortion, funding for illegal aliens, forcing the cowards in Washington to submit to the same plan they pass for the rest of us, and the so called “complete lives system” that seeks to define care based on subjective evaluations of human potential as a determinate for healthcare.

Posted by: Jenny | August 16, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Sarah – plain and simple….Mrs Palin lied…there is no provision for “death panels” in the bill, period…the portion of the bill that she referred to was put in by a Republican…who himself called her out on it – saying she “lied” and that she is “nuts”…
She backtracked….and has never mentioned the phrase since, and has tried to spin her way out of it…
Its great you are a fan of hers, but dont twist the reality of her lie and why she told it (to scare people who do not have the wits or education to understand)….it was bold faced, and clear.

Posted by: indithinker | August 16, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Jeff G – I already corrected my error – it was rplat who made the ocmment about exhausting resources to pay for medical care. But – as far as your comment goes – I have many medicare recipients as clients & they have great care & are very happy with the services they receive. Medicaid provides care for people who are very low income & have no other source of care, although, since the states can do whatever they want there, the programs have become pretty thin & doctors don’t want to accept it anymore since the budgets to pay physicians are constantly being cut & the moneys are being used by the states for things other than health care. Glad your church & doctors have been willing to foot the bill for you. My clients aren’t so lucky & go broke trying to pay for their share of surgery & other large expenses even when they have medical insurance that costs them a ton of money. you must be totally blessed, because your situation is not the norm.

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

“its a shame that the provisions for counselling people on living wills (put in the bill by Republicans in the first place), will be taken out….this is a critical element… to over all care.”
Oh please . . . it not about the need for or efficacy of living wills. I and all my friends and relatives have living wills but obtaining one and its contents were our choices and not some omnipotent, socialist government bureaucracy. You’re missing the point.

Posted by: rplat | August 16, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Sebelius is delerious

Posted by: Dave 2009 | August 16, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

the Insurance Companies are open to lawsuits and the Government is not. If the Government has the control of the medical system there is no option to get changes.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sure there is…it is called legislation.
Civil suits are not geared towards changing bad practices by law, but through monetary penalty. We all know the damages that has done to our medical care!
The most effective way to cause changes is by enacted law enforced by the appropriate law enforcement agency

Posted by: ErnetsNM | August 16, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Jeff G – I’d already corrected the error – it was rplat that made the comment about borrowing money, etc. Although I can tell you that my clients who have medicare get great care & like what they have. Medicaid has been bludgeoned by the states, so it no longer covers the people it is supposed to with quality care. The states have cut the medicaid funding to use the money for things other than healthcare & have created that situation, so now we all pay for the lowest income people who wait until they are very ill to see a doctor. You are not the norm – you must be very blessed to have churches & doctors pay your medical bills. My clients are not so lucky & go broke paying for care. Just having a baby costs $8,000 – $15,000 for a normal trouble free delivery & insurance companies don’t provide maternity coverage outside of employer based groups anymore. I sell insurance in Kansas & MO, and have no companies in KS who will cover it for individuals & families, and only 2 in MO right now. There are some that say they cover it, but they make you await 2 years to get pregnant or have astronomical deductibles that are separate & impossible to meet (try a $10,000 maternity deductible – that means you pay the first $10K). How are young people who are self employed supposed to be able to have families? No one is even talking about that issue . . . .

Posted by: paradigmbiz | August 16, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I still do not understand people that want to get the government even more involved in their lives. Many people have paid into social security for decades and yet the system is bankrupt. Why? Because greedy polticians have been raiding the money collected for social security on other government programs. Everyone should be mad about this; as for mself, I amd 23 and I will be expected to pay throught my life for this governemnt abuse. This is what you people want more of? Government is incompetent and down right lies to us.

Posted by: Jared | August 16, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

The former KS gov took horrific amounts of money from the Wichita late- term abortionist Tiller. Sebelius has a long history of profiting from death.

Posted by: Joe | August 16, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

It’s the rationing part that is immoral. Deciding who is valuable and who is not. What other country in the world actually wants to shorten the life expectancy of its citizens? I heard China did…guess we are just trying to “keep up with the Joneses.”
Have you ever read “Johnny Got His Gun?” It’s classified as an anti-war novel. It is about a young man who is wounded in war; he is blind, deaf, has a trach tube, no arms and no legs. But he has his brain. It takes awhile for him to figure out what is going on. Eventually, a nurse figures out how to communicate with him by tapping the morse code on his forehead and he uses his head to tap out words. He figures out something he can do; he wants to be displayed where people can see him as a detriment to war. They refuse to allow it; it is agains the rules. That pretty much does it for him.
Anyway, without getting into the anti-war thing, what it does show is that there is a purpose for everyone. Thinking of it that way, even someone totally disabled has something to offer someone; perhaps the person taking care of them needs to feel needed or needs a purpose and having this soul to care for provides fulfillment for them. What kind of society would we be with no old people, no disabled people? They are all here for a purpose and maybe that purpose is to teach the rest of us something valuable.

Posted by: Puma for Life | August 16, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Sarah – plain and simple….Mrs Palin lied…there is no provision for “death panels” in the bill, period
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I made this same statement to a far right Republican at work the other day.
His response was “That wasn’t a lie, it was simply an exageration to gain support for an idea…a boogyman as Obama called it.”
This gets to the heart of what is going on today in this country. The far right’s definition of what a lie is is far different than what a lie really is!

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 16, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Sarah Palin was for the death panels by her own proclamation. This exposes her hypocrisy & dishonesty.
When will Sarah Palin apologize for stoking civil unrest based upon a lie?

Posted by: zac | August 16, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Jenny wrote: “Sarah Palin used one simple phrase on two facebook articles and the Democrats can’t retreat fast enough (they caved to Grassley within days). If Governor Palin was wrong in her charaterization then why did the Democrats not stand their ground and fight for what they believe in? Thank you Sarah Palin for once again being the voice of reason…”
Sarah “Death Panel” Palin wrote in her most recent Facebook entry, “I join millions of Americans in expressing appreciation for the Senate Finance Committee’s decision to remove the provision in the pending health care bill that authorizes end-of-life consultations (Section 1233 of HR 3200).”
Jenny, The Senate Finance Committee is bipartisan, not Democrat. They removed the end-of-life provision, but they removed it from one of THEIR versions of the bill, NOT from HR 3200.
Sarah Palin is your voice of reason so perhaps you can explain the reason for this latest lie.

Posted by: WWW | August 16, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

The ambiguous language in the bill that Palin alluded to has now been quickly pulled from the bill. So if it was all nonsense, why was it deleted? Also, Sebelius has now been quoted by saying something to the affect that pulling the government public option from the bill is not a deal breaker. ….That’s a thirsty bill taking on alot of water now.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 16, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I am a registered nurse. You are wrong about this end of life counselling being a death panel. Pts. currently have the right to choose if the want CPR, if they want/need a conservator to help/make decisions for them.
You’ve got it all wrong buddy, the insurance companies are the death panels, they deny, deny and then deny care and that’s when you can die. So put your energies into fighting them.

Posted by: miley | August 16, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

zac | Aug 16, 2009 12:23:05 PM When will Sarah Palin apologize for stoking civil unrest based upon a lie? +++++++++++++Probably as soon as Obama apologizes for saying the AARP endorses the healthcare reform bill.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 16, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Conservatives in this country are being manipulated by lobbyists. They may not realize it, but they are doing the bidding for big insurance. They’re buying lies, reciting the lines and repeating distortions.

Posted by: Archie | August 16, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Archie | Aug 16, 2009 12:34:19 PM Conservatives in this country are being manipulated by lobbyists. They may not realize it, but they are doing the bidding for big insurance. They’re buying lies, reciting the lines and repeating distortions.+++++++Are those the same lobbyists that Obama said during the elections would have a very limited role in any decision making?

Posted by: Boxcar | August 16, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

boxcar wrote: “The ambiguous language in the bill that Palin alluded to has now been quickly pulled from the bill. So if it was all nonsense, why was it deleted?”
Palin “alluded” to HR 3200. The language has NOT been pulled from HR 3200; it has been pulled from a Senate version of the bill. Sarah “Death Panel” Palin is lying again.

Posted by: WWW | August 16, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

WWW | Aug 16, 2009 12:40:57 PM she is just using the Obama playbook to her advantage.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 16, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Sarah “Death Panel” Palin writes on Facebook, “I join millions of Americans in expressing appreciation for the Senate Finance Committee’s decision to remove the provision in the pending health care bill that authorizes end-of-life consultations (Section 1233 of HR 3200).”
And that’s Sarah “Death Panel” Palin’s game plan: Throw out bald-faced lies and believers will run with them, spreading fear and confusion everywhere.

Posted by: WWW | August 16, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Looks like more of the same from Madame Sebelius. In Kansas Sebelius aligned herself very closely with 1 of the 3 late term abortion doctors in the US – that’s not “mainstream” in anyone’s book. Even 90% of die-hard Liberals shudder at the thought of late term abortions, once they take the time to understand the “procedure”.
Context is decisive here folks. The rationalization arguments, are just that, rationalizations.

Posted by: Tom from Kansas | August 16, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Talking with patients about the likelihood of them dying from their disease and options in their care is part of the job of a physician. Discussing the benefit of treatment as opposed to the side effects has always been and always will be a physicians duty. Discussing Living Wills, Durable Power of Attorney, etc. is not new. If a patient chooses to decline treatment then the offer of hospice is on the table for those who need help in making them comfortable and giving them the best quality of life available, if indeed the life expectancy meets medicare guidelines (another topic altogether). I think paying a physician to have this discussion is counterproductive. The focus should be on the patient’s best interest and not the revenue received for the service.

Posted by: Patti | August 16, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Boxcar – check out the Aug 6th Business Week article “The Health Insurers Have Already Won”. I am not sure how I can blame the “Conservatives” when UnitedHealthCare is really happy with the Democrat controlled Whitehouse, House, and Senate healthcare “reform” bill. I’m personally a bit concerned.

Posted by: Tom in Kansas | August 16, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I though Sarah Palin was a has-been. I thought she was incapable of accomplishing anything. Doesn’t the left talk every day about how irrelevent she is? Now, with the effect of two facebook articles the lefties are claiming she is some svengali like creature that has led an army to kill healthcare. Well, which is it?
The public option has also died today with Conrad and Sebelius herself admitting the plan cannot make it through with those provisions. John Murtha also sounds like he wants to postpone until next year (IE: never vote on the thing in it’s current form).
Sarah Palin raised one salient, evocative point and thankfully it looks like it was enough to kill the base of the current proposal; again, thank you Governor Palin.

Posted by: Jenny | August 16, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“Sarah Palin raised one salient, evocative point and thankfully it looks like it was enough to kill the base of the current proposal; again, thank you Governor Palin.”
Sarah ‘Death Panel’ Palin raised one salient, evocative lie. And the Senate killed the end-of-life provision in one of their versions of the bill. They did not kill section 1233 in house bill HR 3200, as Palin claims in yet another lie on her Facebook page.

Posted by: WWW | August 16, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

As a proud “right wing nut bag”, “mobster” and whatever else the left wants to call me, too bad you guys are losing this debate and you don’t even have a clue why. Could it be you share the same combination of traits that Obama has….arrogance and ignorance? “Trust me” from a politician on either side just doesn’t get it anymore.

Posted by: keith in NC | August 16, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

I find it difficult to believe that so many Americans are buying the BS being spewed by opponents to healthcare reform. The time to discuss and devise a Living Will and other end of live provisions for one’s self and one’s loved ones is when we are well, not when in the throes of terminal illness, beset by both overwhelming physical and mental pain. From the near-brawls that have been taking place during the recent townhall presentations on health care reform, it appears that Americans are as incapable of having a meaningful discussion about death as they are about sexual behavior because they’d rather stick their heads in the sand than honestly and openly discuss their inevitability in the lives of all of us.

Posted by: nanameow | August 16, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

It is evident that (G)od’s (O)wn (P)arty will do ANYTHING as poor losers. God help us if their kind ever again gain power in America. First we have to suffer one disgusting love affair after another where family values are ground into the mud by a bunch of horribly self-righteous hypocrites. Now we have to listed to their antics which we all know are only a ploy to destroy our country for the sake of their egos and loss of power.

Posted by: billcue | August 16, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

nanameow | Aug 16, 2009 2:21:04 PM I find it difficult to believe that so many Americans are buying the BS being spewed by opponents to healthcare reform++++++++++Just like I couldn’t believe so many people bought into the used car salesman’s “hope and change” BS.

Posted by: Boxcar | August 16, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I find it difficult to believe that so many Americans are buying the BS being spewed by opponents to healthcare reform. nanameow>>>>> So you think government care will be great right? You are moving now since it will go down in flames. Canada has lots of room.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 16, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

From the near-brawls that have been taking place during the recent townhall presentations on health care reform, it appears that Americans are
nanameow >>>>> TIRED of BEING SPIT ON by the LEFT and the CONGRESS. ENOUGH!
REPEAL the STIMULUS NOW !

Posted by: ChicagoBob | August 16, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

some people should listen more and not be ready to respond as soon as a person stops talking, process what was just said and then respond. second get the facts, most of us who read know that washington today is run by money, Old money with old ideas.
breakdown
The rich want their money and yours (some not all.)
most people who still have a job today is also collecting food stamps, that’s middle class today.
I believe that you should have the right to earn as much money as you like I am ok with that but on top of that you receive loop holes and cash advances and who picks up the tab the middle class. it is time for the rich to put into something that is worth saving us.
signed {the bailout crew} aka middle class

Posted by: own brain | August 16, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Do you think it is very diplomatic or unpartisan for all the crackhead left-wingers to call the right-wingers nutjobs? Putting it simply – I think we handled it ok before government started this power grab, and this is from one of those nutjobs without insurance.
I think the left-wingers are wanna-be do-gooders in that they only help wherever they wanna help – and if it don’t work, it’s your fault. They wanna fix healthcare where they wanna fix it- and if it don’t work, then it’s your fault.
Right-wingers are just left-wingers who are not as far left as those who are in power.

Posted by: simple enough | August 16, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

All the people spouting the ‘death panel” stuff, please shut up – in general, not just on this board. This is such a minor part of current healthcare issues or healthcare issues tomorrow under any scenario. I’m not worried about end of life counseling right now, what I want to understand is how a healthcare overhaul is going to be paid for and whether it would cause my employer to consider ending my private insurance because I could get a public option. All of this death panel talk is just diverting attention from what real people want to know.

Posted by: jimmy | August 16, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Fifty years ago when I was in high school, we had a unit on propaganda. One of the propaganda techniques we were taught was THE BIG LIE. I was told that the gullible people come to believe a big lie repeated over and over. We studied how the technique was used by dictators.
The right wing shout of Granny Killing is a big lie. The original idea of paying doctors for help with planning living wills, etc., was proposed by a Republican congressman, and has been supported by many still-sitting Republicans in the various incarnations of health care bills over the years.
To claim otherwise is a big lie.

Posted by: JAB | August 16, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me. There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you’re willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now. You might ask yourself what my views and issues are that I would horribly feel so disenfranchised by both major political parties. What kind of nut job am I? Will you please tell me?
Well, these are briefly my views and issues for which I seek representation:
One, illegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels. Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution. P.S., I’m not a racist. This isn’t to be confused with legal immigration. Two, the TARP bill, I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you no, but you did it anyway. I want the remaining un-funded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal.
Three: Czars, I want the circumvention of our checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president. Stop trampling on our Constitution and honor it.
Four, Cap and Trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There is more to say.
Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision. Don’t you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night and then go on break. Slow down!
Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. Shrink it down. Mind your own business. You have enough to take care of with your real obligations. Why don’t you start there?
Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes. Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census over with our taxpayer money. I don’t trust them with our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate.
Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs. That is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person. Why do you want me to hate my employers? Why ?? what do you have against shareholders making a profit?
Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves.
Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we’ll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. Have you ever ripped off a Band?Aid? We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us.
Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let’s have it. Let’s say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk. Please try ?? please stop manipulating and trying to appease me with clever wording. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me.
Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.
Take a breath. Listen to the people. Let’s just slow down and get some input from some non-politicians on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed-reading our bills into law. I am not an activist. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent. I work. I’m busy. I’m busy. I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave.
Thirteen, Support businesses. At one time America made the best items, tools, cars, steel. But because of various factors we are becoming a service economy and most manufacturing has been sent overseas because of the EPA, IRS, and other government agencies. We need to re-build our manufacturing base and get the government out of the way.
I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not. It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of our children and us? We did not want the TARP bill. We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is such urgency and recklessness in all of the recent spending.
From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on you to bring our concerns to Washington. Our president often knows all the right buzzword is unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don’t want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we’re morons.
We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented. You think we’re so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work, pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone and we are now looking up at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office. We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn’t ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us when he will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution.
Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don’t care. Political parties are meaningless to us. Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one. We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent? Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming.

Posted by: Terry Maley | August 16, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

rplat, private health insurance companies have done just this for decades. Deny certain life saving procedures where the patient has died fightint go have. I worked for a major insurance company, yet even I was denied being placed in the hospital once when I went to the emergency room and the doctors thought I might be having a heart attack. The excuse my PRIVATE insurance company gave for its denial? I wasn’t haven’t chest pains. Which is not rare for a female. Females, for whatever reason, often do NOT experience chest pains when having a heart attack. This has often frustrated doctors who thought a patient should be admitted as an inpatient, but the private insurance provider refused. And guess what? The individual denying the admission is often someone with no more than a high school education if that, who is reading prompts from a computer screen on what constitute admission or not to the hospital.

Posted by: PrivateINS_Sucks | August 16, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

indithinker, you are sooo right! Sarah Palin and her crew are lying. And lying big time! They probably have stock in the private insurance industry and fear their stocks will drop dramatically so they use fear to sway timid minds unwilling to think for themselves.
In fact, several years ago, weren’t private insurance companies requiring hospitals and doctors to do just that? Talk to patients about their end of life wishes? Advise them on living wills and power of attorney in the event they were unable to speak for themselves?

Posted by: PrivateINS_Sucks | August 16, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

A conservative with no facts on his (or her) side, falls back on their old friend FEAR. That their charges are ridiculous is not a problem; there are enough gullible people willing to run around screaming, “the sky is falling” for them to make an impact.

Posted by: Cassandra | August 16, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

A liberal with no facts on his (or her) side, falls back on his (or her) old friend INTIMIDATION. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”

Posted by: Mittsgurl | August 16, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

A large group of people are concerned about Medicare. The Obama administration indicates that there will be cost savings here?
What are they.
Also I read that there will be reduction in support for Medicare advantage program- sort of a supplement to Medicare for those not qualifying for SSI.
Is this a major cut?
Perhaps, some knowledge (not completely partisan) person could share some information.

Posted by: merchantilist | August 16, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Sarah Palin is the biggest joke since…..Bork,,.I am sorry I am a republican who will take President Obama over Sarah palin any day….SARAH NO!!!!NO!!!!

Posted by: Mike | August 16, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

I don’t know if Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has read Dr. Ezekiel J Emanuel’s “Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions,” which he co-authored with Govind Persad and Alan Wertheimer. If she has, she would know that ‘Death Panels’ talk” Is NOT “Horrific.” Well, I tell you, what Dr. Emanuel writes is rather scary to a lay person like me. Now, Dr. Emanuel’s opinions might not bother most people were he not a White House adviser and the brother of President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel. But, being in such a position of influence, especially concerning “Government health care for all Americans,” it’s worries me to read Dr. Emanuel thesis and see words or phrases like: “Allocation;” “Disability-adjusted life- years;” “Quality-adjusted life-years;” “United Network for Organ points systems;” “Promoting and rewarding social usefulness;” “Maximising total benefits: utilitarianism; and “Favoring the worst-off: prioritarianism.” If the Health Care Bill passes and we, the US Government, continues to create huge debt, I can envision the words contained in “Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions,” becoming national policy. In other words: when “Favoring the worst-off: prioritarianism,” starts, everybody ain’t gonna get the health care they need. I pity the folks like me: old, minority, and poor.

Posted by: Percy | August 16, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I thought that the HMO’s were the death squads? Funny how people are on these boards are claiming that ABC and other networks are communists wanting to control the country and sterilize Americans or something (?) but they have no problem with FOX and its psycho commentators who seem to be living in an alternate universe. And Sarah Palin, who would have been a two minute flash in the pan ten years ago is suddenly an expert? Never thought I would see this happen in my country.

Posted by: Notasheep | August 16, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Funny how people are on these boards are claiming that ABC and other networks are communists wanting to control the country and sterilize Americans or something (?) but they have no problem with FOX and its psycho commentators who seem to be living in an alternate universe.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Every once in a while I tune into to ‘FIXED’ news and am emabarrasingly reminded how seduced I once was. Their lies, and the methods of delivering them, are so plainly obvious now!
I once even listened to ‘psycho’ Glen Beck. I am now thoroughly embarrasssed that I once believed he was a truthful person.

Posted by: ErnestNM | August 17, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Sarah Palin with just a Facebook page is doing the media’s job for them. Asking the hard questions is what ABC should be doing. Instead they agree with Pres. Obama. Sarah is giving voice to the elderly and disabled.

Posted by: Ed | August 17, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

The sad thing about the health care debate is that so many Americans lack the capacity to engage in rational thinking. Feelings are what are relied on as a basis of making life decisions, which makes them open to easy manipulation by those who would use a “big lie” to sway the “un”-rational. The health care we need as a nation is about to be made dead. Killed by its intended beneficiaries – there is an irony there that would be funny if it wasn’t pitiful. It’s one thing to be handed a gun and be told to shoot one’s self. It’s another to pull the trigger.

Posted by: Frank Cannella | August 17, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

What she says is not true. She is a very strange person. She seems to be in a realm of her own design and its not the world I’m living in. Maybe she likes to hear herself talk or maybe she likes to read and hear about herself.

Posted by: jdskansas | August 17, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Reading these comments is unfortunately, like watching a slapstick commedy. I’m appalled at the misunderstandings that are being purposely circulated. This is apparently what comes of the “dumbing down of American Education” that has been ongoing for about 30-40 years. It is a sad thing to behold. No wonder we are slipping from being considered “leaders of the Free World.”

Posted by: linsam92 | August 17, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

) Proof that EUTHANASIA is pushed by Obama’s socialist government “health” care.
President Obama had been confronted by a North Carolina woman asking if “everyone that’s Medicare age will be visited and told they have to decide how they wish to die.”
In response Obama joked morbidly about euthanasia, that he hadn’t yet hired enough bureaucrats to conduct such an operation, yet he could not deny the New York Post’s discovery the House bill “compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life care” (pages 425-430). In other words, your grandmother will be told, when insufficient resources are rationed to young people, that her duty to die begins with mandatory “end-of-life counseling,” or as Obama explained, “encourage the use of living wills” that terminate otherwise salvageable lives prematurely through signed “do not resuscitate” (DNR) legal releases that authorize “pulling the plug” on Grandma

Posted by: meg | August 17, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Sarah Palin wants end of life counselling available to those who want it. Obamacare requires end of life counselling be provided to everyone whether they want it or not. Can’t you understand the difference?
I’m sure Donna Brazile understood the difference and chose to belittle Sarah Palin anyway. Why do you “progressives” so despise individuals who want everyone to be free?
Sure, the various versions of the 0bamaCare medical plan had different names for their “death panels,” but Sarah Palin’s name captures their spirit exactly.

Posted by: Harry Pool | August 17, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Meg, you should be ashamed for spreading so many horrible lies.
Betsy McCaughey was the person who claimed “One troubling provision of the House bill compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life care.”
That statement is absolutely untrue! The consultations are voluntary. There is nothing, I repeat, NOTHING in that bill saying consultations are mandatory. Anyone can read the provision for themselves in section 1233.
And the phony Obama quote about about Grandma is simply ludicrous. Here’s what REALLY happened with the North Carolina woman, per the NY Times:
Obama said the only such provision he’s aware of is one that would allow seniors to get voluntary counseling every five years — more often during illnesses — to discuss their options about dying and being kept alive by artificial means.
“I think that the only thing that may have been proposed in some of the bills — and I actually think this is a good thing — is that it makes it easier for people to fill out a living will,” Obama said.
“But, Mary, I just want to be clear: Nobody is going to be knocking on your door; nobody is going to be telling you you’ve got to fill one out,” he added.
“And certainly, nobody is going to be forcing you to make a set of decisions on end-of-life care based on some bureaucratic law in Washington.”
Obama revealed that both he and First Lady Michelle Obama have living wills, which allow very sick or terminally ill people to specify how they’ll be cared for before becoming incapacitated.
“I’d encourage everybody to get one,” Obama said. “I have one. Michelle has one.”

Posted by: WWW | August 17, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“Obamacare requires end of life counselling be provided to everyone whether they want it or not.”
Again, this is absolutely, positively untrue. Sarah Palin even gives you the link to HR 3200 on Facebook. Use the link and READ IT.

Posted by: WWW | August 17, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Just an observation based on many years of living and watching the Gov’t work. If the BILL does not specifically state that there can be no DEATH PANEL or anything like one, that cost can not be taken into account when deciding if a procedure should be done. Then it will happen becasue there is nothing saying that the Gov’t can’t.

Posted by: LEE | August 17, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

blah blah blah blah and whine, that is all I hear now because of the nutty ideas some have over the health care reform act. It is a work in progress and one I feel sure the country will be very glad to have soon. I think most of this talk is being paid for by thos ewho would be hurt by it happening. THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY. By the way I sell insurance. I know what I am talking about, you can’t give the fox the keys to the hen house and have any hope of coming out with anything. Cooler heads need to speak up and DO SOMEHING.

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | August 17, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

The only difference between you and me is that you are lucky enough that your job was not moved to China.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by: d70 | Aug 16, 2009 10:50:19 AM
my health care system works fine and has been working fine since finding a good job over 30 years ago after working at learning in school and not playing hooky and using drugs. my health care systems doesn’t need reforming. what needs reforming are those lazy, drug addict deadbeats who think I’m paying for their trip trough life. Swim or sink baby cause all I have for your kind is an anchor not a lifesaver….

Posted by: Cris | August 17, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Senior citizens are getting screwed by this proposal National Health Care proposal. You might as well kill them off. The poor devils have paid into Medicare for all these year, because they were forced to ……and now Obama wants to use the benefits/$$$ they contributed to …to buy insurance to those that haven’t paid a nickel into the system …..can you say “Redistribution of wealth”. Just like Social Security, the government will screw this up. Nothing they do works. Fools and idiots make decisions…..and then leave office. The HeXXX with them.

Posted by: Willie12345 | August 17, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I have worked since 1974 helping people find work and since 1986 mostly with welfare eligible people. Which means I have worked with a wide variety of employers for years!
What people don’t realize is that this health plan is for the WORKING MIDDLE CLASS IN PRIVATE INDUSTRY!!!! Low income poeple get Medicaid, senior citizens get Medicare, Government at all levels, school and military workers/people get good health care.
Fewer and fewer employers offer health care anymore and those who do often charge so much their lower paid workers can’t afford it. Employers can’t afford health care and stay competitive globally and the small businesses that politicians are always touting are even less able to afford health insurance for their employees.
I know a person who needed an operation or die & was told by our local hospital when she couldn’t pay for it – no health insurance – go to HOSPICE! Fortunately she knew people who came through for her but not everyone does. A person dear to me with health insurance through the company he works for has been told his 2 hernias are elective surgery & won’t pay until they strangulate and his life is threatened! I could go on & on.
All of these people against public health insurance who consider themselves Christians need to reread Jesus’s words and ask GOD’S forgiveness. WHY SHOULD MIDDLE CLASS WORKING AMERICANS DIE BECAUSE AMERICANS CARE MORE ABOUT MONEY THAN THEIR FELLOW AMERICANS????

Posted by: pat | August 17, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

DEATH PANELS! DEATH PANELS! DEATH PANELS!
What could possibly be the explanation for the American people’s positive genius for falling for the most blatant and obvious propaganda? I have a possible theory if you’re interested in hearing it….
We’re idiots.
That could be the only explanation. What other reason could there possibly be? Any takers?
When a contemptible half-wit like Sarah Palin “twits” (an appropriate word) about “death panels” and the next moment it is a serious part on the national conversation – there is really something seriously wrong.
Here is (Excuse me, I meant “was”) a golden opportunity for real reform and the idiotic Americans are screaming about socialism. Is it any wonder that we are the laughingstock of the industrialized world?

Posted by: Tom Degan | August 18, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Sebelius a person so dedicated to abortion rights, including partial birth abortion, is going to tell me that “Death Panel” talk is “Horrific”. She is the last person on Earth that I would trust to be honest about such a matter.

Posted by: afloatinasea | August 18, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Look this is simple. I don’t want government run health care – they can’t do it (look at clunkers, and H1N1). Canada can’t do it either. However as long as there are mandatory jail terms for our political reps IF our healthcare system worsens (in the public’s eyes) then i can live with it. Anyone want to bet that the politicians are unwilling to be accountable to the performance of a government run option?

Posted by: Gregg | August 18, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Its in the houses bill..They say theyre taking it out…but its there all the same. nothing else to call it but DEATH PANELS.
just dumped AARP for the American Senior Association….for that and many other reasons AARP’s officers broke our trust. The Joker will have his day…I’m waiting for triple six to come up in all this

Posted by: s6u6r6f6 | August 18, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

If I or my loved ones deem it necessary to pay a couple hundred for a doctors visit to have a one on one about end-of-life options……fine. But NO-one, no entitity, no government MANDATE will force me to do that…and THIS :
“The right-wingers, who claim to be “christian” conservatives, and who perpetuated these lies, will have to answer to a higher power for their immoral behavior on this one. Good luck Mrs Palin when you meet your maker…have a feeling this one will be coming up in that conversation! ”
is as close to being an advocate for the devil as I’ve read in awhile.
Of you and your type SecondLook…I grow fatigued. Naturally: you are dismissed!

Posted by: s6u6r6f6 | August 18, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

“Thank you Sarah Palin for being the voice of reason”
Take a deep breath folks, if Palin is the voice of reason we all need to drink from the well.

Posted by: DewyB | August 18, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

“Its in the houses bill..They say theyre taking it out…but its there all the same. nothing else to call it but DEATH PANELS.”
There has been NO announcement that anything is being taken out of the House bill – no matter what Palin says on Facebook.
And, once again, there are no Death Panels. Show me a panel of any kind in section 1233.

Posted by: Shomida Panels | August 18, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

I guess they shouldn’t have written the death panels into the bill, then they wouldn’t have to back-pedal!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 18, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

“I guess they shouldn’t have written the death panels into the bill, then they wouldn’t have to back-pedal!”
You too, Ed. Show me the panels. Where, oh where are the panels? In what section(s) are the panels? Show me the wording that calls for the panels.

Posted by: Shomida Panels | August 18, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

The sad thing about this whole article is that these death panels already exist in the private insurance sector, denying treatment on a systematic basis.

Posted by: Alanh | August 19, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Ask Sec Sebelius if she will guarantee that no commission, board, or group formulated as a result of this bill, will ever take an action that may/will deny any treatment to a patient that could possibly result in the premature death of the patient. If not, then back off and announce that she is only in support of the President and not the American people.

Posted by: James L. | August 19, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Here we are today. Good or bad. What is really horrific is that there are those who have ‘given’ Congress a 1000 page legislative bill for tweaking and told by the President of the United States to pass it in two weeks. Anyone, I mean anyone, has to be insane or an enemy of the US to make such a demand. Along with all the anti-Amercians pushing this through – before we can review and modify it to what America needs.

Posted by: James L. | August 19, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

What is funny is that almost all the people who are complaining about the healthcare reform are not going to be affected by it. If the government decides to socialize healthcare the top and i repeat top 1-2% of this country would basically pay for it. The people who complain will probably never be in that elite group of people which is very few. The ones that should be complaining are the billionares and the insurance companies not poor people who actually need the service.
I could bet my years salary that if it was McCain in office and introducing this bill it would have been passed already.
As for people saying its my tax dollars. It is not your tax dollars. It is the govt. money. Taxes is basically the fee to live in this country. Rent if you will. YOu dont tell your landlord what do you with his money. Second they do not the taxes you pay in an account in your name. So therefore not your tax dollars. It is just another fee for living in this country.
People need to wake up and smell the coffee already. People are tired of the white people complaining that Obama is president. Get over it!!! He is in office and deal with it. The funny thing is all these people supported Bush and look where it got us. Now we have some one trying to do something and they do is whine or cry because the black man is trying to make change.
By the way i am not black. I am hispanic.

Posted by: eduardo | August 19, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Why was such a controversial provision put into H.R. 3200, are the writers of this bill that dense? I realize in the bill that end of life counseling is strictly voluntary, and that the provision was put there to make sure doctors would get paid for this, but why put it in there at all – they shot themselves in the foot on that one.

Posted by: Alex | August 19, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

A “panel” is merely an assemblage of people who come together to discuss some matter. A “Death panel” is not necessarily a sinister thing. We’ve always had death panels. They have consisted of a doctor, his terminally ill patient, relatives of the patient (typically the patient’s children), and in some cases the patient him- or her- self, if in a mentally lucid state.
Obama now wants to modify the composition of these panels. He would retain the doctor, but replace the relatives, and probably also the patient, with an “ethicist”, kind of the secular equivalent of a priest. The big difference being that while a priest would be providing counsel based on individual morality, his secular replacement would be concerned with collective morality – i.e. what’s good for society – which essentially boils down to looking at a cost benefit equation, the solution to which will inevitably come down on the side of eliminating the costly elderly patient, so as to free up more money to be spent on those deemed more valuable to society by virtue of their youth, disadvantaged by virtue of being an ethnic minority, or supremely disadvantaged by virtue of not even being a citizen!
Now THAT’S sinister.

Posted by: BlueEyedDevil | August 19, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

WE ALREADY KNOW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ITS PRINCE KILLS PRE-BORN BABIES!
So why should seniors consider themselves exempt? Don’t sign up for end of life counseling, or you might just find out what they really meant by end of life.
Read the words, don’t let Sebelius or anyone else tell you what the words really mean. What does the plan say in plain English, if they can interpret it as something different, what might they do later?
Remember, they called abortion a right to privacy, now it’s in your face and a campaign plank. And if you voted dem you have blood on your hands.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 19, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

In terms of the political calculus, there are two main motivations for the Democrats to implement legislation that will result in the premature death of as many seniors as possible.
First, it will thin out the ranks of older conservative AND liberal voters, who have now been able to see that Obamacare is a threat to their very lives.
Second, it will allow them to KEEP the hundreds of billions of dollars in Social Security and Medicare benefits which they would otherwise have been required to pay out, and that will help them to fund the trillions of dollars of spending that have been authorized in the profligate binge of just the last 200 days.

Posted by: BlueEyedDevil | August 19, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

J.Smith sez-”I dont trust this administration”??? Say what???? And you idiots trusted Cheney??? Call me a little skeptical, but I smell racism! DUH! The BS that you think is deceit is pure Sarah Palin.

Posted by: WAdem | August 19, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

“If Governor Palin was wrong in her charaterization then why did the Democrats not stand their ground and fight for what they believe in?” Another big DUH! Why justify an absolute lie from a political pawn. Let me ask why it is that Sarah and most of the Right Wing spin machine doesn’t want to argue healthcare reform on it’s merits? Why they keep rolling out straw men which is their normal modus operendi. Because they are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law, thus they pound on the table, carry guns to public events and make a lot of noise. That is why I left this pathetic crowd. One last thing, what was all the GOP posturing about the Teri Schaivo case if counseling about medical directives and a living will is a death panel?

Posted by: WAdem | August 19, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Horrific – yes, believable – yes…it’s just a matter of semantics…rationed care, two few doctors, using the value vs life expectancy equation, Obama’s relationship and association with those who support single payer, universal healthcare, socialized medicine…call it what you like, in the end, the elderly get the shaft, but then again so do babies in the womb, children born with disabilities, and those adults who are deemed valuable by our society.

Posted by: Eve | August 19, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Meant to say those adult deemed less valuable. When you only have enough money for 5 diagnostic treatments, and two patients of seven are terminally ill, guess who won’t get the treatment.

Posted by: Eve | August 19, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Jenny, who cares who put in the death panel provision? It’s wrong. Don’t you get it, it isn’t about Dem or GOP posturing, its about a BILL that the majority of Americans DO NOT WANT and an administration that won’t listen to the people who elected them into office.

Posted by: Eve | August 19, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

I believe the Republicans as much as I believe their lies about death panels. What absolute fools!

Posted by: democratic | August 19, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

She is a typical word game player. Look up fullabull, or is it spelled fullible.

Posted by: Bill | August 20, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

We already have a “death panel” – it’s called the private insurance companies.
The only difference is they profit when we die.
And you want to defend that as a good practice why?

Posted by: DK | August 20, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Wow. That’s all I can say. Wow. I just pray that you people spewing the wacked out, genocidal conspiracy theories are pulling our collective leg.

Posted by: Shomida Panels | August 20, 2009, 6:25 am 6:25 am

you people that think their is a death panel are nuts. It’s not mandatory and NEVER has been to have end of life consulting. On top of that what is the deference in having the government decide your health care or an Insurance company that makes money every time they say NO? Wake up.
Insurance companies ration your care NOW
Insurance companies will say no to life saving treatments NOW.
Insurance companies make money if they let you die NOW!
And even with Insurance many still can’t afford health care because they can’t pay the deductible NOW.
Insurance companies make money by saying NO.

Posted by: Bill | August 20, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

rationed, limited or refused care by a government board or panel is functionally equivalent to “death panel.”
************************************
True, but it’s not in the bill so I’m not sure what they point is. Keep drinking the kool aid.

Posted by: jmengate | August 20, 2009, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Sarah Palin the voice of reason? lmao, boy are we in trouble.

Posted by: jmengate | August 20, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Please inform Sebelius that death panels is just a reference to the end result when government commissioners make decisions in health care. I think it is very important to know whether Sebelius will be forced to participate in the health care plan, like the people. This will clarify whether she understands what is in the plan or if she just wants to counter what concerns the people, as being false.

Posted by: James L. | August 20, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Sounds like an old government trick, which is also being used by CNN lately. True or not, the last person to say that is wrong and here is the truth, is a technique folks use to blur the truth.

Posted by: James L. | August 20, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

I am a very healthy 66 year old father of eight, and I am concerned about a health care “reform” program that includes provisions for preferential care based on age. In particular I am very alarmed about Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel’s position as an official administration advisor. He is Rahm Emanuel’s brother, who has stated that “doctors take the Hippocratic oath too seriously”, and who openly advocates denying procedures to seniors in preference to younger people.
Just how would this work? Suppose I should need a hip replacement at some time in the near future. I could well live into my nineties or longer. A couple of years ago I had a routine physical exam along with my youngest child, a normal 16 year old boy. The doctor said that my blood pressure and cholesterol readings were better than his! I’ve never polluted my body with tobacco, alcohol, recreational or pharmaceutical drugs, and people who guess my age invariably say that I look like I’m in my early 50′s. So let’s say that some 40 year old who was a super obese drug user, with all kinds of medical problems, needed a hip replacement. And further suppose that he had preferential minority status. The Obamacare bureaucracy decides that he gets the hip replacement, after which he dies of a heart attack a couple of years later. Meanwhile, I have to live out my remaining 25 or 30 years as a cripple in a wheelchair, as a result of that bureaucracy’s decision to deny me the procedure because I was considered “too old” to get any significant benefit from it. – and the system would probably spend more on a quarter of a century’s worth of wheelchairs, than the original operation would have cost! Furthermore, if I’ve chosen to live a healthy lifestyle, thereby SPARING the system having to put out money on ME while I was young, then I damn well deserve to receive the care I might need in my old age, in preference to someone younger person who has CHOSEN to make a physical wreck out of himself!
While the denial of care in such a case might not result in me dying earlier than I otherwise would, it is easy to imagine other kinds of denials that would result in earlier than necessary deaths, especially if seniors are going to be required to be subjected to a euthanasia pep talk every five years from the likes of a Dr. Kervorkian. And while this whole program may have the side benefit, for Democrat politicians, of thinning out the ranks of elderly conservative voters, I would caution any lawmaker supporting this legislation to consider the liability for potential future genocide prosecutions, along the lines of the post WWII Nuremburg trials.
In terms of the number of years of life destroyed, assuming we accept the figure of 6 million Jews whose lives were terminated early by Nazicare, and assuming the average number of such destroyed years per person was on the order of 25, we get a grand total of 150 million years of life destroyed in the Holocaust. Now let us further assume that the average amount of life destroyed by Obamacare’s denial of treatment for seniors, will be around 5 years per person. In order to equal the amount of life destroyed in the Holocaust, it would only be necessary for 30 million senior citizens to die under Obamacare. The Census Bureau estimates that 2.5 million die of old age every year in the United States, so every 12 years there would be a senior genocide equivalent in magnitude to the Holocaust. I certainly would not want to be one of those politicians identified as a proponent of this kind of “re-forming” of America’s health care system.

Posted by: Richard Brodie | August 20, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Jenny, Sorry to clog your mind up with facts. Sarah Palin was refering to the great fear that elder people have that health care will be rationed. Not the fact that counciling will be available. The DEms swore there was no such part of the plan that refered to deciding whether an older person was deemed worthy of additional health care. By the way its odd that after swearing there was no such provision in the plan on Monday they came out on Wednesday and said they had removed it.Another neat Democrat trick. LOL But tell me Jenny. If another 47 million people are lining up for care and no new health care providers available don’t you think some will have to go without? Plus Obama intends to cut Medicare benifits by 500 billion.
This was one big assed mistake America.

Posted by: KEN | August 20, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

“Sarah Palin was refering to the great fear that elder people have that health care will be rationed. Not the fact that counciling will be available.”
Sarah Palin was inferring that there are death panels in HR 3200. She started off her death panel message by stating “As more Americans delve into the disturbing details of the nationalized health care plan that the current administration is rushing through Congress, our collective jaw is dropping …”.
“The DEms swore there was no such part of the plan that refered to deciding whether an older person was deemed worthy of additional health care. By the way its odd that after swearing there was no such provision in the plan on Monday they came out on Wednesday and said they had removed it.Another neat Democrat trick.”
Sorry to cloud your mind with facts, Ken. The Dems did not say they removed anything. Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley announced that the Senate Finance Committee will be removing an end-of-life provision from THEIR version of the bill. And the committee is bipartisan. It was Sarah Palin who made the claim on Facebook that the Senate was removing section 1233 from HR 3200. That is utterly false.

Posted by: Shomida Panels | August 20, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Personally, I think that there should be more health insurance companies, the more the merrier. That’s what free enterprise and competition in the marketplace is all about. If you have a service to provide and will provide this service, with the same or better quality for less than the guy down the street,you will get the job. When there’s a monopoly in health care or anywhere else, everyone suffers, except maybe those who want something for nothing.

Posted by: Patti | August 20, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

when will people realize we do not have a health care problem but a cost problem? we have the best health care system in the world and everyone can receive health care–all are worried about the cost. the whole system should not be abandoned when we can solve the reasons for such sky rocketing prices–govt etc causing such

Posted by: jan | August 22, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

It’s so interesting. The right, those that claim to be closer to God in their beliefs are attacking this plan. Calling Obama names like “nazi” etc. Yet, reading the bible, it clearly appears that the Christian teachings are totally in line with helping the poor, caring for all equally, that Jesus would be totally for this NOT against this. Some un-holy mess, eh? Or are the moral and ethical arguments something that’s ok to just turn on and off?

Posted by: Rick_VT | August 22, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

George,
The insurance industry makes a case for premiums based on probabilities which are dependent upon the groups of people that they “lump” together. These “groups” are manipulated, as well as their costs, and then presented to the individual state insurance boards and sold to the regulators (who are not equally matched as regards resources), and then additionally voted on by state legislators who are heavily “lobbied” by
the insurance industry. Until “this” system is really analyzed, the public will be subject to numbers abuse. The analysis for healthcare reform needs to be done category by category (ins., uninsureds,medicare,etc.) and then an individual case done for each to formulate a notional poicy debate rather than doing it generally. There needs to be a rational framework presented before a consensus is reached.

Posted by: Steve | August 23, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

The United States is the only developed nation in the world that does not have a comprehensive plan for providing health care to its citizens. Thanks Republicans.

Posted by: plantain_11 | August 24, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

It is interesting to note that this whole “death panel” spin was devised and is being perpetuated by republicans.
In my experience, most folks who make
claims like this about the intentions of others very often are the first ones to go on and do that very same thing.
Why, then, did the republican party come up with this?
Could it be, perhaps, that THEY are the ones with the “death panel” plans?
Time for this rediculous B.S. to end and for the republicans to do something tto HELP out country, rather than tearing it down in order to further their own selfish interests, I would say.

Posted by: Mark Van Auken | August 30, 2009, 5:00 am 5:00 am

Sections like this from page 432 do strike a note of fear in seniors. I would love for the AARP to address this one in detail, or even Obama or Sebelius with more than their one-liners!
432
PHYSICIAN’S QUALITY REPORTING INITIA
2 TIVE.—Section 1848(k)(2) of the Social Security Act
3 (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(k)(2)) is amended by adding at
4 the end the following new paragraphs:
5 ‘‘(3) PHYSICIAN’S QUALITY REPORTING INITIA
6 TIVE.—
7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of re
8 porting data on quality measures for covered
9 professional services furnished during 2011 and
10 any subsequent year, to the extent that meas
11 ures are available, the Secretary shall include
12 quality measures on end of life care and ad
13 vanced care planning that have been adopted or
14 endorsed by a consensus-based organization, if
15 appropriate. Such measures shall measure both
16 the creation of and adherence to orders for life
17 sustaining treatment.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 13, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

If it’s so horrific why was it in the house version of healthcare? Will it be in the next version? Does the healthcare plan contain a proviso that the bureaucrats can change it in the future almost at will, as does the “cap and tax” disaster?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | October 8, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

We are not even there yet and I already hear about end of life care being rationed. On my evening news today the word was that some patients are just being kept comfortable. Is their any doubt that this is what the “death panels” will offer?
There is one institution that is already affectionately referred to as Kevorkian House!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | October 15, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Notice how casual the USPSTF was about its suggestion regarding mammograms. Now consider the same casual suggestions regarding your mom or your granny’s end-of-life healthare. Suggestions made by panels (CER Panels) quietly funded in the dark by the stimulus package. Why were they funded in the dark? What was the Axis of Taxes (OBAMA-PELOSI-REID) trying to accomplish?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | December 6, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.