By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 20, 2009 1:10pm

Sec. LaHood: Cash for Clunkers Will End Before Labor Day

UPDATE: The Treasury Department said late Thursday that the Obama administration plans to terminate the Cash for Clunkers program on Monday at 8 p.m. ET, according to the Associated Press.  "It's been a thrill to be part of the best economic news story in America," Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. "Now we are working toward an orderly wind down of this very popular program." ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: The popular government “Cash for Clunkers” program will be shut down before Labor Day, but every dealer who’s sold a vehicle under the program will be reimbursed as promised by the federal government, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said today. On ABCNews.com’s “Top Line,” LaHood said the department needs to wind down the program — which provides vouchers of up to $4,500 to those who trade in older cars for more fuel-efficient models — to be able to guarantee that all dealers will be repaid for the discounts they gave buyers.  “This is the most popular stimulus program going in America today. It’s put show rooms — it’s made show rooms look like Grand Central Station,” LaHood said. “We have enough people on board now, processing paper to get the backlog cleared out. Every dealer who has a deal in the pipeline will be paid. We have the money to pay them and they will be paid and we’re committed to doing that.” A formal announcement on how and when the program will end will come from the department later today. “Look — we don’t want to run out of money. And I want to be able to substantiate what I’m saying here. If you do a deal with us, you submit the paperwork, you will be paid,” LaHood said. “I’m telling you all and everybody that I can talk to: They will be paid. They’re going to get their money,” he added. The program was authorized to last through October, and LaHood himself had said an infusion of $2 billion in additional funds should have been enough to keep the program on track through Labor Day. But the entire $3 billion allocated by Congress for the program is now in danger of running out, with well more than 450,000 claims already having been submitted to the government. The Obama administration has indicated that it will not seek a third round of funding. Car dealers have expressed frustration with the slow pace in processing reimbursements, and some have even said they aren’t participating in the program any longer because of fear that they won’t get the money they’ve been promised by the federal government.  LaHood said those concerns are unfounded — and pushed back at suggestions that his department wasn’t prepared for the deluge of claims. “Nothing went wrong. This is a wildly successful program! In four days, when we had a billion dollars, we sold 250,000 cars. Now who’s to say that’s not successful?” he said. “That’s loans that have gone out to credit unions and banks and salesmen that are making commissions, and it’s the car manufacturers particularly — GM that’s saying they’re going to call back people to make more cars. This is a win-win for people all over America. And for the economy. LaHood also talked about a summit he’s organizing to find ways to ban texting while driving. “What I support is the elimination of texting while driving. If it were up to me and I could wave a magic wand — and I can’t — that’s what I do, that’s why we’re having the summit. So we can explore all of these ideas, some that have been introduced as legislation, others that have been talked about, but we should not allow people to text while they drive or allow them to be on a cell phone while they — this is a distraction that has caused accidents, caused fatalities. We’re in the safety business and we’re going to really be about very strong safety measures.” (LaHood also guaranteed that he won’t update his Fast Lane blog from behind the wheel.)  The secretary also said a Transportation Department inquiry into an incident where passengers on an ExpressJet plane were held on a runway overnight will wrap up tomorrow.  “This is an untenable situation. All of us that fly don’t want to get stuck overnight and into the morning on an airplane. Some measures were taken but look, we’ll have a lot more to say about this in the next day or so,” he said. You can watch the full interview with LaHood HERE. Also today, we chatted with Sam Youngman, a White House correspondent for The Hill, about President Obama’s attempt at energizing his campaign army, Sen. Ted Kennedy’s extraordinary letter to state leaders about his Senate seat, and the possibilities of political reconciliation for Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev. (Youngman, a die-hard University of Kentucky fan, even slipped in a dig at Louisville coach Rick Pitino.)   To check out our discussion with Youngman, click HERE. UPDATE: The Transportation Department announced this afternoon that the program will be cut off Monday evening, August 24, as of 8 pm ET. “This program has been a lifeline to the automobile industry, jump starting a major sector of the economy and putting people back to work,” LaHood said in a statement. UPDATE: A senior administration official told reporters this afternoon the Cash for Clunkers program was “an overwhelming, overnight success” that has driven “positive outcomes across the industry.” But there are currently no plans for an extension or another installment. “Right now we are focused on winding down the program in an orderly way, providing a soft landing and getting the applications processed and the dealers paid. There’s no plan to seek additional funding to have an additional extension of the program,” the senior official said in a conference call after the Transportation Department announcement. The administration’s goal now is “to provide a soft landing for consumers and for dealers and ensure the program ends in a successful way.” This official said there were no worries that the program would be overwhelmed by a surge in demand between now and Monday night, as consumer race to get in on the program before it closes, and they are
confident that their economic projections will allow the program to operate through 8pm on Monday in an orderly way.

User Comments

Stimulate! Stimulus! Jobs! Consumer Buying! If these aren’t some of the key components that we have been TRYING to achieve in the past 6-9 months then why is everyone in Washington trying to stimulate things with the STIMULUS? Is it because this program has been wildly SUCCESSFUL and nobody predicted it would be? Did the wrong group of people or the wrong party suggest it? I don’t understand our leaders. If this program is DOING what we have been trying to do then why does everyone want to wind it down? I’d be trying to wind it up to make it go better and faster!! Someone PLEASE help us in Washington. There has got to be some common sense and good business judgement in someone there. Is this program perfect? No. Is it the end all and be all of getting us out of our problem? No. But for goodness sakes can somebody please recognize that it is a program that is ACTUALLY succeeding in getting some STIMULUS happening!!!!!!

Posted by: Andy Molinari | August 20, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

I said it a long time ago and so did others. We didn’t have to bail out the big 3. They needed sales not money.
If we would have given every house hold in America a $5000.00 voucher (LEGAL working Americans)Billions would not have needed to be given to the Auto Makers. Now the Auto makers are bailing out the Government until they get there money. It doesn’t take a Harvard grad to figure this out. It was all about CONTROL just like everything else in this administration.

Posted by: Bob | August 20, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Andy Molinari – You are right, it is a good program. But why do they only allocate $3 billion to this program, which helps out consumers, and yet they allocate hundreds of billions to help out big business? It’s just not fair. They sould extend this program, but put more restrictions on the age of the car traded in and the gross vehicle weight of the car being bought. I’ve heard that a lot of people are using this program to buy pick-up trucks and SUVs. That doesn’t seem right. Poor oversight, in my opinion.

Posted by: tom | August 20, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

All the fools in Washington who vote for this bill are finished Democrat and Republican. I don’t know what this SEIU dude is smoking but the Dems are screwed either way. The people are awake and these punk special interest groups that think they are so powerful are going to find out what real power is. We The People are taking back America. Freedom Day 11/2/2010.

Posted by: 1hughj | August 20, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

As popular as this was and the facts it helped consumers, auto manufacturers and the tree huggers of the world, our govt allotted very little to it. I will put it this way. $4500 for a 20000 car is near 20% to stimulate buying cars. A house, for example only gets an $8000 tax break and given the average price ($175000) is a miniscule of percentage comparatively. Here’s an idea seeing as homes = construction = jobs. The govt should continue the tax break AND pay the closing cost of any home purchased through the middle of next year. If you want to use some stimulus, there’s your chance. And, keep the clunkers going to the end of the year. The clunkers problem is the govt created some beaurecracy within the system and underestimated everything about the program. That should make you feel confident about the health care plan.

Posted by: lfrichar | August 20, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

The main problem with ‘Cash for Clunkers” is the fact that people participating in this program are buying vehicles at the expense of retail. What is the point of stimulating one sector of the economy for a short period of time while other sectors falter? True stimulus will not occur until jobs in both public and private sectors are available.

Posted by: Marco | August 20, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Government can’t even run cash for clunkers and now they want to run health care>

Posted by: George | August 20, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Lets see unemployment still at 9.5% and will probably be higher next month. First round of benifits are running out, so look for more forclosures. The ones that got new cars, how fast will they be repossed? AAnd last, with out the C for C program, watch new car sales dive to the bottom and stay there. How is that change working for you?

Posted by: Dan | August 20, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

by the way how are people paying for these cars they are buying? is someone magically making the payments for them? those I know that are driving and relying on these clunkers to make it to their dead end low paying job can’t afford the payment on a new car.

Posted by: Katmomof3 | August 20, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Oh good grief. This is a no-brainer. Dealers and government say look at this, wow. Auto folks make well over 10K profit per vehicle. They even advertise 8K to 10K off, etc. Government says we’ll chip $4500 of your tax dollars to help you. Dealers say great. Sad the government is stopping the program. Duuhhh. Auto industry still refuses to cut their profits to improve business.

Posted by: James L. | August 21, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Good…, as they say, all good things come to an end. Actually, this could be considered a BAD thing b/c it’s CRAZY, we are giving people money to live more vicariously and lavishly than before all this economical bust took place? What are we doing? Spoiling every single last American? Let’s learn to live in moderation, then we wouldn’t have so much debt…Well, the fish sticks from the head..so the head is the While House…right?

Posted by: jasonbradyut | August 21, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Apart from tears, only time could wear everything away. While feeling is being processed by time, conflicts would be reconciled as time goes by, just like a cup of tea that is being continuously diluted.

Posted by: Amy | October 29, 2010, 5:11 am 5:11 am

Apart from tears, only time could wear everything away. While feeling is being processed by time, conflicts would be reconciled as time goes by, just like a cup of tea that is being continuously diluted.
aa

Posted by: abc | December 18, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.