By Gorman Gorman

Aug 28, 2009 2:33pm

Senate GOP Doctor: Kennedy Death Doesn’t Change Health Care Politics; ‘What I’m Hearing is “Kill the Bill” ‘

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: With Democrats seeking to use Sen. Ted Kennedy's passing to refocus efforts to pass health care reform, Republicans are signaling that their strong opposition to President Obama's plans haven't shifted.Today on ABCNews.com's "Top Line," Sen. John Barrasso, one of the Senate's two medical doctors, called Kennedy's death "a great loss," but not something that has changed the political dynamics surrounding health care.  "It is a loss to the nation, but I will tell you, people are actually focused on what's in the health care bill — that's what's turning out at all of these town hall meetings," said Barrasso, R-Wyo."What I'm hearing all across the country is 'kill the bill,' " he said. "So when Nancy Pelosi and others may say that this is a contrived — these are contrived events, she may be saying that just to try to lessen the effect of them. These are hard working American people who are turning out, have great concerns about what the government is trying to do in terms of health care and taking over health care. There is opposition very loudly spoken all across the country to this. And if people don't realize that this is real, then I'd have to say Nancy Pelosi is absolutely out of touch with the rest of America."Barrasso has been traveling the country along with the Senate's other doctor, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., livestreaming the "Senate Doctors Show" and hosting town hall meetings on health care. "People are focused on the details of the bill," Barrasso told us. "I held up the House bill at a town meeting in Wyoming, and somebody yelled, 'burn it' because they know what the details are, then held up the Senate bill, all of the loose leaf papers that are together in that and somebody else said, 'Start a bonfire.' "Click HERE to see the interview with Sen. Barrasso.We also checked in with ABC's George Stephanopoulos about the political fallout in the wake of Kennedy's passing. He agreed with Barrasso's take, that the warm remembrances of Kennedy haven't changed the politics of health care. Stephanopoulos' show this Sunday will be heavy on Kennedy legacy, with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, reflecting on their friend and long-time colleague. Click HERE to see the interview with George Stephanopoulos.

User Comments

The present bill, in the form of HR3200, has hundreds of pages of law, that have nothing to do with health care.
Thats the rub. Let’s pass a bill that deals ONLY with health care, not a subterfuge for obama to tighten his grip on the way we live.
This now out in the open , and has become a justifyable question and major concern

Posted by: DK | August 28, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Lies? Sure, Pelosi.
Hate? I do not hate anyone. Dislike, sure…but not hate.
Do Nothing? The GOP has come-up with healthcare plans…none of them will ever reach the floor thanks to the Dems
Torture? If you can name 1 conflict that the US has not tortured a prisoner, I would be shocked. Even under Dem presidents, we have tortured.
Illegal Wars? Dems voted for it as well.
Party before country? yeah, let’s see a Dem go off to war.
Fear Mongering… ie ‘We have to rush this through to save the economy?’
I’ll leave you with this:
GIBSON: All right. You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton,” which was 28 percent. It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.
But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.
OBAMA: Right.
GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.
OBAMA: Right.
GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.
So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.
…yeah, i’m sorry…’Fair’ is not a valid reason based on the numbers that were presented. I hope you can do better, obama.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

“People are focused on the details of the bill. I held up the House bill at a town meeting in Wyoming, and somebody yelled, ‘burn it’ because they know what the details are, then held up the Senate bill, all of the loose leaf papers that are together in that and somebody else said, ‘Start a bonfire.’ ”
Yeah, we can tell the GOP are really having a detailed, reality based debate. Count the facts cited by the Senators…
The town hall turnout isn’t very impressive. Republicans still make up over 20% of this country, and 60 million people with no respect for others turn to speak can scream lies loudly enough to drown out rational conversation.
Polls indicate the majority of Americans don’t even know what the hot-button “Public Option” is. The only public option proposed is creating a government-funded insurance company that competes with existing private insurers to offer a health coverage option at market rates.
There is NO national health care system proposed (like the British NHS that serves Stephen Hawking). There is no proposal to create a network of healthcare cooperatives. There is no proposal to eliminate private insurance.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Ramrodding a bad bill, will not make it into a good bill.
Either put together something that will work, and make good sense, and will not bankrupt the government, or leave things as they are.
Either national health care overall, or status quo. Those are truly the only workable options…..and under NO CIRCUMSTANCES……should health care be provided to illegal immigrants, on tax payer dollars.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 28, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Vote public health care straight up or down. The GOP and any yellow dogs will be dealt with when the time comes. Just 15 months away from the 2010 elections!

Posted by: rightbehind | August 28, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

“Either put together something that will work, and make good sense”
Rick McDaniel | Aug 28, 2009 3:25:50 PM
Demanding that a bill both work in the complex field of health care AND “make good sense” to Billy Bob Republican is impossible. If the Constitution were proposed by a Democratic Congress today, it would be derided by the do nothing GOP as a loophole ridden hidden power grab at this point that is too complex for anyone to read.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Rick it already is as with millions of US Citizens, and at a much more expensive rate. It is called the emergency room!!!

Posted by: jim | August 28, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

STDNT DRIVER
BS the Republicans has offered plans and it wont come to the floor why dont FOX NEWS The Republican propganda machine tell their plans? or why dont they hold a news conference? Heres a question the Republicans had 16 years of power why did they not address our rising healthcare cost, or the deficit, or the job losses, or the fact Bin Laden was about to strike WHY? Student Drv and what torture took place under a democrat President? please name one and what do you mean party before country Dems wont go to war? Make a little sense will ya! and yes if we dont get control of Rising Healthcare cost it will hurt the economy its tied together

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I really do not understand why you people continue to defend a bill that we do not have the money to pay for. Seriously, a 9T deficit…and everyone wants to continue to spend more money…it makes no sense. Reform can come in other ways besides passing a public option. Do you people not grasp the concept that we cannot afford it? Is it really that hard to understand?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Rick
No one is paying for Illegals Healthcare with Tax dollars stop falling for the lies but you do pay when they go to the Emergency room we all pay for the Un insured when they go to the Emergency room!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

STDNT DRV
Please answer my Question of why when the Republicans held the Power the Majority they did not Address the High rising cost of healthcare? why they did nothing? Why they let the deficit get out of control were talikng 16 years of a Republican Majority now all of a sudden they care and they have no plans

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

“under NO CIRCUMSTANCES……should health care be provided to illegal immigrants”
Rick McDaniel | Aug 28, 2009 3:25:50 PM
Would you at least allow for taxpayers to pay to have any illegal immigrants in need of emergency care killed humanely? Or if an illegal immigrant gets hit by a car do you want them to just be left to slowly bleed to death on the side of the road? We could have police use their service weapons just like when an injured deer is put down after a car hit. The bullet won’t cost the taxpayer much.
But I’m not sure how we know that a person showing up at the ER in need of emergency care is a legal citizen (some of them are brown too)? Perhaps everyone is required to carry citizenship identification papers, or else they will be left to die in case of injury? I’m happy to hear your ideas.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

jhw539 -
So we take it that you endorse the subterfuse for obamas agenda, and we should just take it. And you fully endorse the creation of his civilian
security force hidden in the original prosposal. Why is it so hard for you and your followers to stick to the point of a bill that is for health care only? If this would happen, we could have a fair bill. Hurry and jam it through – WHY?

Posted by: DK | August 28, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

stdntDrvr: Bush and the GOP supported a war that we didn’t have money to pay for. Bush took a surplus and turned it into a deficit. How much of the 9tillion were at the hand of the GOP.

Posted by: Tonya | August 28, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

STDNT DRV
Claims we cannot afford to reform Healthcare, But we could afford Trillons of Dollars spent on the Iraq War, Bush and Republicans hid from us, We could afford no bid contracts to Haliburton, we could Afford Billion Dollar Perscription drug plan for Medicare with no way of paying for it!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

“I really do not understand why you people continue to defend a bill that we do not have the money to pay for. Seriously, a 9T deficit…and everyone wants to continue to spend more money…it makes no sense.”
stdntDrvr | Aug 28, 2009 3:30:29 PM
How can you defend the status quo, which costs $1 trillion A YEAR more than if we had a system with costs similar to every other first world nation?
Again, how do you defend SPENDING $1 TRILLION PER YEAR MORE THAN ALL OTHER FIRST WORLD NATIONS ON HEALTHCARE?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Bush was left with a nice surplus and BLEW IT And not in this country TRILLON DOLLAR SENSELESS IRAQ WAR! And he HID The real cost of the Wars! and he still didnt catch Bin Laden

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Republicans did release a health care plan in May of this year.
FDR (Dem) and WW2…yes, we tortured!
JFK (dem), LBJ (dem) and Nixon (rep) in Vientnam, we totured.
…so since health care is tied to the economy sooo closely, the US economy will fail unless was pass this reform to help lower the cost? If that’s the case…wouldn’t it be MUCH cheaper to impose more regulation on the current market? Medicare/Medicaid will be broke by when…and we believe these same people can increase the number of people covered by the millions? Do you not understand simple math?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

“Do you not understand simple math?”
stdntDrvr | Aug 28, 2009 3:40:32 PM
Corrected for population, the US SPENDS $1 TRILLION MORE PER YEAR THAN THE AVERAGE OF ALL OTHER FIRST WORLD NATIONS ON HEALTHCARE.
Can you do simple math? How can we afford this? Do you really think our healthcare, with equal or lower life expectancy despite extreme measures at the end of life and lower smoking rates, is twice as good as France? Or Switzerland?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

jhw,
I never said that our system was better. I stated that the Gov’t cannot afford to pay for a public option. There are other ways to bring down costs. Please read EVERYTHING I write before you jump to conclusions.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Maybe those complaining about a healthcare bill will love things when their healthcare costs double in ten years and their income remains stagnant. Oh, well. Social Darwinism suggests they simply be told they’ve lived a good life and to fend for themselves when they can’t afford healthcare.
Emergency room as an option? That turns a $60 doctor visit into a bill for over $2000, payable by the taxpayers. I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather pay sixty bucks for somebody’s office visit than be taxed like I am today for that two thousand dollar visit.

Posted by: yodacohen | August 28, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Michelle,
I agree with you 100% concerning Steele.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Spending has balloned in the last 8 months, leaving the war spending in the dust. Needless spending – Stimulas mess – Save the “It saved us from a depression” 80% is political payback.
I thought we elected obama to correct the bush situation, not continue it.

Posted by: DK | August 28, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I have not heard one Plan out of Republicans regarding Healthcare all I hear is we must stop Obama, we must kill this Bill, Obama is a Socialist yada yada ya! No suggestions, no plans, Just Bashing Obama and The Democrats all day long! after a while they sound like a broken record repeating the same thing over and over in hopes people will fall for their BS

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“I never said that our system was better. I stated that the Gov’t cannot afford to pay for a public option. There are other ways to bring down costs.”
stdntDrvr | Aug 28, 2009 3:47:18 PM
Of course there are. Lets just ignore the last 30 years of history in this country and the last 50 years of history in every other first world country that exists and go for “other ways.” And while ignoring the well documented successful approaches of everyone else, WE ARE WASTING $1 TRILLION A YEAR.
The government can’t afford $100 billion a year for a public insurance option, but somehow we can afford that 1 TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR waste while the GOP whines about the bill being too confusing and the radical rights screams while waving posters of Obama with a Hitler mustache scribbled in to “debate” the other ways.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

STDNT DRV
So why dont they talk about it more? I watched one of the Republicans town halls not one plan he spent the Whole time Bashing Obama and the Democrats lying about the Bill to his people it was a Obama Hate fest not a debate!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Angie,
Read the proposal.
jhw,
How are we going to pay for it?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

STDNT
The only thing they talk about is tort reform they say
NO TO PUBLIC OPTION
NO TO CO- OPS
They can sure say no to everything but then fail to offer a different way!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

stdntDrvr’s plan of choice, the Patients’ Choice Act, would eliminate the tax break that employers receive for providing health-insurance benefits to their workers. IE, a huge tax increase on everyone currently recieving insurance from their employer.
Then, it would give an annual tax credit of $2,300 to each individual and $5,700 to each family that they could use to offset the cost of their health insurance. The average cost of a family insurance policy is now over $12,500 a year.
Low-income families would get money from the government to buy into private insurance plans.
So, no competition to drive down costs. At all. Just a tax hike and some more handouts to the poor (and probably like with Reagan’s earned income credits, the handouts will soon be viciously attacked for technically taking more people off the tax rolls.)
And this is not the status quo?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“How are we going to pay for it?”
stdntDrvr | Aug 28, 2009 3:58:23 PM
Increased economic output due to relieving the 1 TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR WASTED under the current system. A return to the capital gains tax levels set by Reagan at the end of his term, and increasing income taxes back up to the level required to support a first world nation.
This isn’t rocket science. Petulantly insisting we can’t afford $100 billion a year to save $1000 billion a year is stupid. And it is the GOP’s pathetic line, as they collect soundbites for their next election rather than consider the good of the nation.
Compare to the actions of Democrats in the 90′s, when they put compromise to make welfare reform happen over their personal political ambitions, or even in the last eight years when they compromised on all the Bush tax cuts to the rich (which gutted our treasury and killed our economy).

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Angie,
Here are the facts: Fiscal
Year Year
Ending National Debt Deficit
FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion
FY1995 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion
FY1996 09/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion $250.83 billion
FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34 billion
FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion
FY1999 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion
FY2000 09/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion $17.91 billion
FY2001 09/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29 billion
Clinton NEVER had any surplus, he just had less of a deficit. While I applaud him on that, he NEVER had any surplus.

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Spoken just like a true GOP- Kill the bill. Republicans do not want to pass any Health Care Bill because if the did they would have did the 8 years the were in office. JUST HOT AIR!
GOP you are not relavant any more.

Posted by: gl | August 28, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Republicans are signaling that their strong opposition to President Obama’s plans haven’t shifted.
GOOD AND WE WILL PASS ONE WITH OUT THEM!

Posted by: gl | August 28, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

jhw,
Please reference my ealier post (page 1, I believe) concerning a raise in capital gains taxes.
Again, there are ways to bring down costs without having a ‘public option.’ Regulate the current market. That wouldn’t cost the Gov’t much AND it will lower the costs for everyone else. That’s just my opinion.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Ok. George W. Bush was not the brightest president we’ve ever had. He did some things that I really did not like. Some of the things he said were pretty embarrasing, but for the most part, he didn’t try to involve the government in my life. That part, I liked. Barack Obama is a smart guy who speaks well, but he tries at every opportunity to force his personal views and government mandates on the people of our country. I don’t like that. Based on their individual goals, I would rather tolerate the verbal awkwardness of Bush than live with the smoothly-presented government takeover of our private economy by Obama.

Posted by: bkm | August 28, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

“”"GOOD AND WE WILL PASS ONE WITH OUT THEM!”"”"
Posted by: gl
Right now he can’t and I don’t believe he wants to anyway. He would have noone to blame and the party would lose many seats in the upcoming elections. It has nothing to do with bipartisanship and everything to do with the Dems afraid to try it alone.

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Republicans will prove that is far easier to say no and do nothing than tackle the problem head on and try to resolve….Where are the Republican statesman? There are none….not when they stand idly by and let their most radical constituency carry the argument based false statements and outright lies…It is all politics, pure and simple. Republicans want Obama to fail and then push the healthcare debate into the next election…meanwhile, time is lost, money is lost, and nothing is accomplished..

Posted by: indy_voter | August 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

bkm — Very well stated. I agree with the govt involvment.

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

When are the people in this country going to wake up and realize that the people in Congress and the President work for them. They are supposed to be doing what the majority of the people want, not making decisions based on politics. I am sorry that Ted Kennedy died, but that should NOT be used as a reson to pass healthcare reform. I heard what a congressman from New Jersey said a couple of weeks ago. He said we live in a democracy and it his duty to listen to the people in his district, but in the end he had to make up his mind what HE thought was best for the country. I guess he has lost sight of the fact that we live in a Republic and laws should be enacted by what the majority of the people want. Or have they just decided to scrap the constitution. NEITHER party is looking out the the people.

Posted by: Jack Taylor | August 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

jhw,
Again, that’s my opinion. You have a right to disagree and I am more than happy to listen to your reasons as to why.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

indy_voter —– Senator Tom Coburn (MD) has his version of a health care initiative that nobody seems to want to hear about. He is one of 2 doctors in the senate and has some good ideas.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.1099:

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

“…but for the most part, he didn’t try to involve the government in my life. That part, I liked. ”
bkm | Aug 28, 2009 4:13:48 PM
Patriot act. Domestic wire tapping. A US citizen declared an enemy combatant and stripped of Constitutional rights. Terry Schivo. Stem cell research ban. Unprecedented use of National Secrets doctrine (Obama is guilty of carrying this on, showing the danger of bad precedents).
There are reasons to like Bush, but it is documented that he presided over a large increase in domestic intrusion into our lives.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I think the ‘pary of no’ thing is to the dems as the ‘birthers’ are to the repubs?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

jhw539 —- None of what you stated had any affect on my life. It may have had an effect on some of the bad guys. Did anyone from the government ever contact you? Did it affect any part of your life except on paper?

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

jhw,
Private companies could conduct stem cell research under Bush. It just wasn’t funded by the Gov’t. Seriously…and you people call the GOP liars? Wait, no…that’s right…it’s just a half-truth.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I think the Dems are trying to get the Reps on board because they are afraid to go it alone! I haven’t seen anything to the contrary yet.

Posted by: lfrichar | August 28, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

OK. Everyone seems to have an opinion on health care and is reporting about the legislation, BUT THIS QUESTION HAS YET TO BE ANSWERED OR BROUGHT UP: Has anyone actually read this rediculous bill and ALL the details or are we all just sitting around waiting for everyone to tell us whats in it(which you will be surprised whats in it, including tax information) and taking their word for it… when that source very likely has not even read it!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!?

Posted by: Concerned | August 28, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

“Senator Tom Coburn (MD) has his version of a health care initiative that nobody seems to want to hear about. He is one of 2 doctors in the senate and has some good ideas.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.1099:
lfrichar | Aug 28, 2009 4:20:41 PM
Please do read that bill. What – SPECIFICALLY – do your support in it?
Careful now – you’ll have to avoid saying you like the big tax increase on everyone who currently receives insurance through work while also avoiding all the aspects that are key components of the current proposed legislation.
So what, SPECIFICALLY, from the Patient’s Choice Act (which I have briefly described already on this thread) do you like?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

“I, personally, do not believe the cost of health care is ‘out of control.’ Is it expensive? Yes, but not quite out of control.” – Out of control is a relative term that relates to: 1) The percentage of folk’s income that goes to medical costs which has doubled in the past ten years 2) The percentage of the GDP which has also skyrocketed and 3) How much you personally profit off our despicable current system. In the first case it stinks for you in the second it stinks for the country as a whole and in the third case it stinks for your future peace of mind. Remember: You cant take it with you.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

We need to get health care reform done. I don’t trust the GOP, simply because when they had the power to create change, they did nothing, so let the democrats do it. At least they are doing something insteady of nothing like the GOP. I CAN SAY THIS AS A FORMER REPUBLICAN AND NOW INDEPENDENT.

Posted by: Brandon | August 28, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

“None of what you stated had any affect on my life. It may have had an effect on some of the bad guys. Did anyone from the government ever contact you? Did it affect any part of your life except on paper?”
lfrichar | Aug 28, 2009 4:23:42 PM
The Constitution has only affected my life on paper. Sorry if I find the government shredding Constitutional protections a direct danger to my way of life. I suppose you think that eliminating the right to bear arms would only impact those people who own guns?

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Angie in Pa Why do you get on this site day after day and try to blame Republicans for everything. I can only guess you really belive that. We have never had a president in the history of this country increase the deficit as much as Obama has done. Was some of it needed? Yes. Did he inherit a recession? Yes. But he has made huge mistakes. 1. The stimilus was poorly planned out and way too big and is taking too long to affect the economy. The budget that passed this year was full of pork and Obama let congress get away with it. Now Obama wants to do a MASSIVE health care plan that we cannot afford. Bush made mistakes but Obama is making more than his share and some could hurt this country for generations to come.

Posted by: billy bob | August 28, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Mark,
I’m not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. I do not profit off of our ‘current’ system in any way, shape or form. As a matter of fact, a public option would benefit my family greatly. I, personally, do not believe it is the role of the gov’t to compete with private industry. If you doubt me, I live an hour south of you. We could discuss this over dinner one day or something.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

STDNT DRV
So your not in favor of United States Post office VS Fed Ex or UPS ?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

You say we can’t afford to fix health care? How about this: can we afford our health insurance premiums in ten years if we do nothing? Most of the people screaming “kill this bill” don’t know what it’s about and don’t care. Lots of them seem to think that Medicare is not a “public option”. And when did health insurance companies become pure as new fallen snow compared to the dark sinister forces of a democratically elected government? Seriously? My insurance carrier has whole departments dedicated to figuring out how not to pay claims.

Posted by: GreybirdK | August 28, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

BILLY BOB
Who ran the country for 16 years In congress- REPUBLICANS
Who ran the White House the Prior 8 Years REPUBLICAN
So add 16 years plus Bushes 8 that equals 24 Years of Republican ruling governing and running the Show
Now you ask why I blame the Republicans for our mess?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“As a matter of fact, a public option would benefit my family greatly. I, personally, do not believe it is the role of the gov’t to compete with private industry” – With a lot of families the issue is not profit, but survival. I worked at several Atlanta area hospitals over the years and I saw folks who were dumped by their private insurance companies when they got a catastrophic illness, but never saw that with Medicare. They were not looking for a square financial deal (although it would have been nice) they were just looking to survive their illness. You probably know as well as I the level of care at Grady for indigents is not nearly as good as Northside private hosptital, but that was their only option. With a public option they would not have to make that choice (PS thanks for the invite, but I am overworked for the near future).

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I love it when you guys say our country has a lower life expetancy rate like that has anything to do with our health care system? There are hundreds of factors that can affect that statistic (Obesity, exercise, drinking, smoking, stress, ect, ect) so what is your point?

Posted by: billy bob | August 28, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Angie,
I ship via UPS and FedEx, if that answers your question. They are more reliable and actually give you the ability to track the items you ship.
Greybird,
Based on what you are saying, you think everyone should be covered under a gov’t plan?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Mark,
While I wouldn’t go to Grady for a cold, they have excellent GSW and stab-wound care. I had a friend that was punctured by glass and that was where she was flown. Granted, there are several respected hospitals in the area…Grady is probably the best place for that kind of care. Like with most hospitals, they specialize…so, to respond to your comment about which hospital is better…it depends on why you are going in the first place. Reform could make it to where people are not dropped from their insurance due to illnesses. That does not require a public option.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

STDNT DRIVER
Same thing with the Public Option do I want Private Insurance or Public Insurance, Private may be better but Depending on your needs Public may be for you! same thing with the mail and it Forces the Insurance compaines to be Honest

Posted by: Angie in Pa | August 28, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

“There are hundreds of factors that can affect that statistic (Obesity, exercise, drinking, smoking, stress, ect, ect)” – Yes, but dont you think that those same factors effect all those countries that have longer life spans. Think about it: The Swedes have higher alcoholism rates, the French smoke a lot more than we and many Germans drive like crazy on the autobahn, yet these countries have longer life spans. There is a direct correlation between life span and access to quality primary care just as there is between infant survival rates (another area we lag) and access to good prenatal care. Please do not let ideology get in the way of the realization that our health system is killing us (even the most vulnerable among us).

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

The postal service does no such thing. Did you see FedEx/UPS rates go back down when the price of fuel dropped by $2 a gallon? How much money does the USPS lose every year? Really, since they are a gov’t entity, they should theoretically break even…but they cannot even manage that. Do you have a better example?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

“I love it when you guys say our country has a lower life expetancy rate like that has anything to do with our health care system? There are hundreds of factors that can affect that statistic (Obesity, exercise, drinking, smoking, stress, ect, ect) so what is your point?”
billy bob | Aug 28, 2009 4:43:18 PM
If we’re not spending DOUBLE on healthcare to live longer, what is the point? And studies have corrected for the factors you listed (rough summary: low levels of smoking cancel out obesity, which is also a rapidly rising problem overseas). We’re not getting our money’s worth.
More extensive studies have looked out outcomes of many different conditions, with the same result – we’re a bit better in some, worse in other. Never a significant difference. Where’s our 100% higher spending going?
Life expectancy is an easy to understand summary. We’ve already seen how the right reacts to a 1000 page detailed treatment, so it seems best to keep it simple.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

“Reform could make it to where people are not dropped from their insurance due to illnesses. That does not require a public option.” – A change in regulations is exactly what the insurance companies want so they can change them back as soon as the political wind blows the other direction. A public option, like Medicare would have a constituency that would keep the insurance lobby from killing it in the future. Why do think the insurance corporations have come out in favor of the regualtion changes but are fighting the our option tooth and nail? As far as Grady being a good truama center: Agreed. But, thats why we need reform, folks without insurance with non-truama illnesses are overtaxing their recources because they have no other place to go but the ER. Right?

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The Congressional Budget Office has found that “about half of all growth in health care spending in the past several decades was associated with changes in medical care made possible by advances in technology.” Other factors included higher income levels, changes in insurance coverage, and rising prices. Hospitals and physician spending take the largest share of the health care dollar, while prescription drugs take about 10 percent. The use of prescription drugs is increasing among adults who have drug coverage.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

that was from wiki…which, I know, isn’t all that reliable…but i’ve got to go. I’ll try to verify that later and update as needed.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Mark,
How often is it that these things are changed? Based on the volume of people actually participating in the political process now (see obama campain, tea parties, etc), do you honestly think that Congress could get away with such a thing?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

“How much money does the USPS lose every year? Really, since they are a gov’t entity, they should theoretically break even…but they cannot even manage that.” – Actually, the USPS breaks even every year becuase they are required by law to. The USPS/FedEx/UPS is a great model. By law the USPS has to be able to deliver to every address in the nation. The Fedex/UPS can pick and choose based on profit. The three work well together because the USPS is guarenteed basic service while folks can always choose to turn to Fedex/UPS for additional services. That model is similar to the public option/private insurance choice that health reform would set up. What do you think?

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Mark,
The USPS currently has a $6B deficit.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | August 28, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

“Based on the volume of people actually participating in the political process now (see obama campain, tea parties, etc)” – If you are basing it on volume, not numbers, yes I would agree there is a pretty loud minority who are trying to drown out reasonable debate such as that we are engaged in. But recent polls indicate that a slim majority of Americans support reform. Which is actually surprising given the “death panel” nonsense that the media has widely reported. The question is: Do the members of both parties have what it takes to do the right thing? Or will the insurance corporations win out once again? I gotta go, take care my friend.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Mark from atlanta: A few minor nitpicks (they don’t undercut your argument, but could be used to derail the discussion):
Infant mortality is a tougher number to get a handle on due to differing definitions of viable pregnancies. America does lag even when corrected, but life expectancy (which excludes infant mortality) is a cleaner metric for simple discussion.
And the Post Office doesn’t have to break even every year – just like a private corporation, it can carry a loss for a year or two to get through lean recessions. Ultimately, it has to break even and pay off it’s debt (rate increase, cut employees, cut days of delivery, etc.).

Posted by: jhw539 | August 28, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

________________________________________
This was taken from a NY Times article, written on September 30, 1993, by NY Times reporter, Robert Pear: CLINTON’S HEALTH PLAN; A.M.A. Rebels Over Health Plan In Major Challenge to President: “At today’s conference, doctors booed and hissed Donna E. Shalala, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, when she told them of the President’s proposal to limit medical malpractice lawsuits, a proposal the doctors see as inadequate.” Now, these were doctors booing and hissing, not the so-called dummies who show up at today’s town hall meetings. I wonder what the proponents of the current health-care reform bill would be saying if the AMA behaved now as they did in 1993. Not only did the AMA castigate the Clintons, using vicious, personal threats, and outright lies but they were joined by the pharmaceutical/drug industry. Today, both of these organizations support the current bill; having lobbied for its passage. When someone like the pharmaceutical industry pledges $80 billion in support of this bill; you got to wonder what is in this for them as opposed to what is in it for us little folks.

Posted by: Percy | August 28, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

All the Ted lovers should make a contribution to the Ted Kennedsy Sobriety Center. After they sober up they would agree the current focus of the health care debate is off course. Fixing the broken health care system does not require a Socialist style Federally managed bureaucracy.

Posted by: DadR | August 28, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Obamacare is a nightmare that needs to be ended before it tears our country apart and possibly bankrupts it. If you see anger now can you imagine if its passed what will happen as the cutbacks hit medicare, people’s companies begin to drop private insurance, and people begin to be denied life saving care like pacemakers? Obama needs to just stop everything concentrate for the next year on fixing the economy, and getting Americans back to work, and then we can take a look a modest reforms that make sense!

Posted by: valwayne | August 28, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“needs to just stop everything concentrate for the next year on fixing the economy, and getting Americans back to work” – Adding 46 million Americans to the ranks of the insured will open up a lot of jobs for PAs, Nurse Practitioners, RNS, LPNs, CNAs, Techs and other support personnel. Since reform would not be fully implemented until 2013 that will give plenty of time to get these folks trained. The community colleges and tech schools are good at retooling their offerings to meet projected occupational demands. Health Reform = More good paying, stable jobs.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | August 28, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Illegal aliens WILL be covered under HR3200 or any other bill…why…because Obama is going to give Amnesty to ALL illegals before any healh plan is passed ..ergo..all aliens will be covered!!! That is his plan! And ABORTION…that is covered under “Women’s Reproductive Services”! So much for cover ups and lies! This is what this Administration is all about …lies, czars with connections to communism, tax cheats, and criminals! If you don’t believe that this country is in deep trouble with these people you are kidding yourselves! And I thought GW Bush was an idiot but I will take him back any day! And this comes from a long line of DEMS who voted for this radical believeing his CHANGE…cannot tell you how sick we are about what we have done!

Posted by: ross | August 28, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

This is too funny not to share. A story just released claims the Republicans are claiming that democrats will deny them healtcare if Obamacare passes.
How desparate can this party get? I mean they are getting goofier by the hour! Who would believe that?
But I figured it out. When the McCain chose Palin, he lowered the bar as far as qaulifications for public service. So the republicans must figure: If Palin was so dumb and yet generated such enthusiasm, maybe if we get even dumber, we will have a chance!

Posted by: Extremism-Sucks | August 28, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Folks should pay taxes based upon the property they control. If the main purpose of the Federal Government is defense then one should pay based upon what they would lose if this country was overtaken in an armed conflict. What do you think?

Posted by: Brent Deter | August 28, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

If the Democrats play the “Kennedy” Card and rename the bill for him it simply proves that this effort is not about substance but more about politics.
If the dems want reform it is pretty simple they need to offer up 4 simple concepts:
1) Tort Reform – Eliminate the wasteful lawsuits. Let doctors practice medicine.
2) Primary care clinics by all hospitals, provide incentives to build clinics where patients can be triaged based on need. If they are next to the hospitals it would be easy to move the patient from one facility to the next.
3) Inform the nation about OBRA90. This bill passed in 1990 provides FREE medication to those who can not afford to pay for it. A letter from the doctor and a form is all that needs to be sent to the drug company and the meds are sent to the patient. No one knows about this LAW.
4) Catostrophic Coverage – All we need is to ensure that when we get critically ill we do not lose our homes and our life savings. So we should develop a catosrophic insurance plan where everyone pays a very small tax from the fist day of work and this is used to ensure that people do not go into bankruptcy, it would kick in when coverage levels are maxed out.
Four simple items, not 1000 pages of legal ease.

Posted by: Jim | August 28, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Under President Obama’s health care plan, Kennedy would have been told to “go home to take pain pills and die” during his last year of life.
“[I]t was President Obama himself who suggested that seniors who don’t have as long to live might want to consider just taking a pain pill instead of getting an expensive operation to cure them. “Yet when Sen. Kennedy was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer at 77, did he give up on life and go home to take pain pills and die? Of course not. He freely did what most of us would do. He choose an expensive operation and painful follow up treatments. He saw his work as vitally important and so he fought for every minute he could stay on this earth doing it

Posted by: Anna | August 28, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Anna | Aug 28, 2009 9:30:51 PM — First please reference when President Obama said that. He didn’t. I have asked numerous times for the quote and none of you seem to be able to provide it. Secondly for those railing against abortions, well they are a legal medical procedure. You don’t want the Govt to have rights over your body but you want to impose them on others. Thirdly it’s obvious many of you have not read the bills currently being written. None are the final draft but they don’t contain “death panels” death books or any of that other nonsense that is being spouted. Maybe Sen. John Barrasso, might want to remember the backlash is do to the blatant lies and mis truths his party is spouting!

Posted by: Try the truth | August 28, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

The Republicans have never really cared about reforming health or truly providing for anyone other than the wealthy. Should I lose my job and be able to obtain or afford insurance because of a pre-existing condition and I become ill, I will be sure the hospital or clinic sends my bills to Barasso.

Posted by: Lee | August 28, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Dear Angie in PA
Can you do simple Math ? You state “the Republicans had 16 years of power” Can you explain how you get that? 2008 – 1994 ( when republicans took congress ) = 14 years
But even then, you are saying that Republicans were in power in 1994-2000 with a republican congress and a democratic president, but you are also saying that republicans were in power 2006-2008 with a democratic president and a republican congress. So your longest timeline is 1994-2006 = 12 years. A more realistic one is when they controlled all chambers, so 2000-2006 = 6 years.
Angie, maybe when you learn to subtract people will take you seriously

Posted by: Scott | August 29, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

DK -
Exactly. Although Obama “went” to Harvard, he apparently isn’t even bright/versed enough to understand that tax revenues are not a linear function. As you raise rates, you kill business, thereby forfeiting whatever tax revenue those businesses would have generated. There is a maximization point, rates vs. total revenues generated, and determining that point is the subject of great debate. But Obama isn’t smart enough to know even that, and to suggest that the rates be changed for “fairness”?? You decide where “fairness” is, Dear Leader? Maybe you should try to maximize tax revenue, to pay for all those inefficient, idiotic programs you plan. Fool, and impostor…..

Posted by: sub | August 29, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Frankly this article is quite stupid. Who actually thinks the people getting their pockets filled by the insurance companies are planning to shift in any other direction than greed? No, the latest lie they propagate is that a public option will deny healthcare to republicans. So obviously they don’t plan to become the purveyors of truth anytime soon.

Posted by: Rudy | August 29, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

stdntDrvr,
It’s not just about bringing down costs,it is about making sure everyone can get the medical care they need, both in preventative care and emergency.

Posted by: Rudy | August 29, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

@ Angie in PA:
Deficits and negative outcomes only count when Democrats were in any way involved, that’s the rule. A Republican congress and president could pass a law to build a giant pyramid for Ronald Reagan at a trillion dollars and it’d be an enormous new stoneworking sector opportunity; a Democrat could pass a law for new street signs and be ruining the country with deficits and destroying our native American street sign culture.

Posted by: T | August 29, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Does the Public Get the SAME Health Care BENIFITS that Congress Gets OR Not? That Is The Question ???? Anything Less is Discrimination And Should Not Get Passed !!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Moderate | August 30, 2009, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Our system is light years better than any other system in the world. I don’t see Americans desperately swimming across the Atlantic to get some of that “superior” French, British, Swedish, etc. “health” care. However, hordes of Canadians, Mexicans, Haitians, etc. routinely cross our borders (illegally in most cases) to get the best health care in the world for free in most cases (i.e. if you’re nonwhite).

Posted by: CPTBMan | August 30, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Of course, that Republican senator is hearing ‘kill the bill’ from the people who have been deceived by lies about the bill. Over and over again many Republican leaders, senators and representatives have spoken untruths as fact to the media. On-air and television ‘entertainers’ have said outright lies about the health reform bill. The health insurance industry has bought and paid for groups and individuals to further this misinformation online.
We need people to be intelligent enough to actually think the situation through. Read some of the bill yourself and compare it to what those pundits said.
Think about the motivations of those who take huge amounts from the insurance industry for their campaigns or advertisements and ask yourself if they can be unbiased in their thinking.
Think about the million+ the insurance industry spent daily to kill health reform and ask yourself if they have your interests at heart or their huge profits.
Read unbiased sources on the internet and the known-to-be unbiased fact check site.
We should be smart enough to see those who lie aren’t trying to do the right thing but to fool us into getting what they want.
We need health care reform, and the public insurance option to truly control the out of control expense of health care in our country.

Posted by: Lydia | August 31, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

DK, when you compare the length of the bill, which will affect health care in a country of over 300 million people, to the length of a Harry Potter novel, it doesn’t seem too long, does it? It has to be long to be thorough, as does any legal contract that involves anything expensive.

Posted by: Lydia | August 31, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

DK, when you compare the length of the bill, which will affect health care in a country of over 300 million people, to the length of a Harry Potter novel, it doesn’t seem too long, does it? It has to be long to be thorough, as does any legal contract that involves anything expensive.
Read the Bill! It is NOT a healthcare plan at all. It is in FACT a very vague guideline! NOTHING MORE!

Posted by: Mike_C | August 31, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.