By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 10, 2009 8:30am

The Note: Time to Ram It Through? — Schumer Sets Sept. 15 Deadline for Health Care Deal

By TEDDY DAVIS Time is running out for Senate negotiators on health care. That’s the message from Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. If a bipartisan deal cannot be reached in 37 days, Democrats will have to go it alone. “If they can’t do it by Sept. 15th, I think the overwhelming view on the Democratic side is going to be, then, they’re never going to get it done,” Schumer tells John Harwood of the New York Times. “And there’s always a worry that, you know, delay, delay, delay, you lose any momentum whatsoever.” Schumer’s calculus is based on the view that what will matter in the end is not whether Democrats can craft a bill that Republicans support but whether the governing party can pass a bill and whether it will actually work once it is implemented. There are problems, however, with a go-it-alone approach. If Democrats decide to circumvent the Senate’s usual 60-vote requirement by using budget reconciliation procedures, some aspects of the legislation may not qualify for action.  Reconciliation would also require stricter pay-as-you go rules which could mean even deeper cuts to Medicare payments. The heavy reliance on Medicare savings was born out of a desire to minimize the amount of new taxes needed to pay for health care-reform. But it is proving to be a political headache for the Obama administration. According to a new USA Today/Gallup Poll, seniors are “by far the most resistant to the idea of changing the current system.”
To counter the opposition to health-care reform which has surfaced at town-hall meetings across the country, Organizing for America sent out an email on Sunday urging the president’s supporters to visit the district offices of their local member of Congress. In a bit of verbiage which is likely to be seized on by the president’s critics, Mitch Stewart, the head of the president’s political organization, paints protestors as “partisan mobs with lies about health reform.” ABC’s Jake Tapper has more. In addition to the push from Organizing for America, Obama is also getting help today from the Rev. Jim Wallis and other progressive faith leaders who are holding an 11:00 am ET conference call with reporters to launch “40 Days for Health Reform.” The organization’s health reform push includes a national cable television ad which begins airing Monday, in-district prayer events on Tuesday, and what the group is calling a “major national event” on Wednesday.  Watch the ad by “People of Faith for Health Reform” by clicking HERE. The president is also getting help from the liberal blogosphere. The FireDogLake blog is pushing back against “the teabaggers” by launching a widget for Democratic recess events that is searchable by zip code.  According to Jane Hamsher, the blog’s founder and publisher, the widget includes an events reporting tool that people are using to upload photos and to tell other blog readers what happened following each event.    ABC’s Subway Series: Burris on 2010: ‘You Never Say Never’ Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill., announced last month that he would not run in 2010 to retain his Senate seat.  But in his first television interview since making that decision, Burris told ABC News that he could change his mind. “You never say never,” Burris told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl in a “Subway Series” interview for the ABC News program “Top Line.”  The Subway Series, which debuts on Monday, features interviews with Senators and other political leaders on board the Capitol Hill subway. “What I’m still hearing,”  Burris said, is “people from all over the country and they are saying, ‘Don’t give up that seat.’”
2010: Governor’s Races: At 2:05 pm ET, the Republican Governors Association will be hosting one of its by-invitation-only conference calls with reporters to discuss the health-care debate going on in Washington, the state of the 2009 races in Virginia and New Jersey, and a look ahead to 2010. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R), the RGA chairman, will be joined on the call by Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue (R) and Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle. The weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal reported that more than two dozen Republican gubernatorial candidates converged Friday in Sun Valley, Idaho, for a three-day session organized by the RGA to lay out a strategy to rebuild the GOP for the 2010 election cycle. The weekend event was expected to feature sessions led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Michigan Gov. John Engler, and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. .” The Journal wrote that it was “the latest sign” that the RGA and Barbour, who is a possible 2012 candidate for president, “were emerging as influential players in shaping a Republican comeback bid from disastrous losses in the past two election cycles.”
The Kicker: “The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.” –Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s Friday Facebook message “Communal standards historically is a very dangerous concept.” –Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich defending Palin on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos”
“That’s crazy — the crazies are attacking the plan because it’ll cut off granny, and that–that’s simply not true.” –New York Times columnist David Brooks criticizing Palin on NBC’s “Meet the Press”
For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

User Comments

With American Politicians taking a vacation, the news media in the USA is covering up the most illegal activities of an American President since Richard Nixon.
President Obama and his administrations illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen is breaking the 1974 privacy act and the Constitution.
As always the pro and biased USA main stream media is no where to be found these days when it comes to reporting facts or informing the public about Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional acts. For them all criticism about Obama and his policies are labelled as racist! Yet, the only anti-white remarks are emanating directly from and within the white house.
Will this attempt against the people of America, to erode civil liberties, which has been orchestrated from the white house NOT be challenged in courts of Law? It is time for criminal charges to be laid in a court of law against Obama, his administration and his unelected gang of czars for these unconstitutional acts against the American people.
Why have elected Senators and Congress members NOT spoken out against this abuse of power and illegal act by the white house. Seems they tend to represent only their own self interests and not that of the American people or the constitution?
Time for Congress and the Senate to do their job of representing the people by holding hearings on the possible impeachment of this President for such illegal activities which are clearly in violation of the constitution; the 1974 privacy act and The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988. Where is the appointment of an independent prosecutor to investigate such abuse of power allegations?

Posted by: peterclarke | August 10, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

“President Obama and his administrations illegal act of gathering and soliciting emails and conversations about information from one citizen concerning another American citizen is breaking the 1974 privacy act and the Constitution.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
wow, you folks will make up anything to deflect from the real business of the country…conspiracy after conspiracy theory…
- Obama Death Panels
- Birthers
- Kill Granny prgram
- Govt take over of healthcare
- Obama Citizen Informant program
People, lets see credible sources for this stuff, or you are just looking really silly
The GOP is a total laughing stock, just when we need an effective oppostion, they have checked out to la-la land…

Posted by: indithinker | August 10, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Here are some key reality checks ; for the climate bill, they said ” millions of green job will be generated”, the fact is that most manufacturing jobs will go oversea, not in US. For the stimulus bill, they said ” it will keep the jobless rate below 8% “, now it is 9.4-9.5%. On the health care bill, they said “the current health care spending is out of control, only the new health care reform can control the spending and save us money”, the fact is that, as found by CBO, the new reform will cost one trillion dollars more than the current spending and cut in current medicare will be needed.

Posted by: austin | August 10, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

You people are blind not to see the truths behind Obama and what he’s doing, he’s out to destroy the american way of life period!!!! Stop drinking the media kool-aid and check out the facts for yourself. Unless you want to not believe facts! God help us stop this man and the liberals before it’s to late. In jesus name please.

Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Kudos to George on This Week for actually bringing up the fact the claims Gingrich was making: the death panel stuff, etc. are not actually IN the bill being considered. Wow, a journalist actually mentioned the facts. Howard Dean made exactly the point I keep making: the Republicans had 15 years after they defeated Clinton’s healthcare initative, to demonstrate how THEY would control costs and get people insured: and they did NOTHING. Now they are the party of “No” and they have refused to work on this with the President. The Republicans are dividing the country, once again, just to raise their political chances. Republicans DO NOT CARE how many people go without care or go bankrupt trying to pay medical bills.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

What ever Chuch Schumer says, turn around immediately and run the other way! He even ‘looks’ the part of a sleazy politician.

Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Keep spreading lies, peterclarke.
I have no respect for conservatives who are too lazy to formulate rational arguments against the President’s health care iniative, and resort to lies, smears and personal attacks, you know, the usual conservative playbook.
Heck, I could formulate more intelligent arguments agaist this bill, and I support it! There is no need to resort to spinning lies and shouting down congressmen at town halls: open your brain and use facts to make your case.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

austin posted: “the fact is that, as found by CBO, the new reform will cost one trillion dollars more than the current spending and cut in current medicare will be needed.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
keep in mind, this is the same CBO that reviewed the Bush admins cost estimates for Iraq, in 2003, and deemed them “adequate” – doh!

Posted by: indithinker | August 10, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

austin
I too am disturbed by the CBO report, and I would like to hear how the President plans to address it. Kudos to you for presenting a rational argument against the bill. THIS is how democracy is supposed to work: people in opposition raising good points and contributing to making better policies.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

The republicans were right. It is the democrats to loose. They blow this one trying to please people that didn’t vote for them and the voters may not be there for them in 2010. Vote public health care straight up or down. Then the voters have a choice to make. More than 70% of the nation wants public health care. These town hall meetings are the dying cries of the republican party and it’s highly unlikely many of them voted democratic.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 10, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

They are feeling the heat from the drug companies. The pharmaceutical industry, with its $80B agreement, has told the Administration to pass this bill by the start of the fiscal year (1 October). Not only will the pharmaceutical industry love this bill but the major hospitals bordering urban communities, i.e., the University of Chicago Hospital/ Medical Center, can be count on billions of dollars coming their way via the huge influx of government dollars from the now uninsured or under-insured who will make these urban hospitals/medical centers their second home.

Posted by: Percy | August 10, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Everyone knew the fight for health care reform was going to be tough. There’s too much money involved–too many people making too many billions on the system as it is now.

Posted by: JAB | August 10, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Who in their right mind would want republican ideology in a health care plan? The republicans brought us the credit default swap, hedge funds, derivatives, speculators, and speculation. Might end up with a brokerage firm in the front lobby with them selling hedge insurance to total strangers on whether you live or die. Of course if they had some inside speculators working as doctors the outcome may be design to line some pockets.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 10, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Obama is out to destroy America and should stand trial for not upholding the constitution. It is refreshing to see that ABC news is slowing moving away from its liberal bias. NBC & CBS are nothing but state run media. As a nurse I know Obamacare will destrou our society. I think we have an administration loathers of self hate who want to spread the wealth. Dr Ezkiel Emanuel loathes life, Raham Emanuel loathes is Jewish identity, etc.

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | August 10, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

10 violations of our rights under HR 3200:
1. Forcing people to buy health insurance.
2. Forcing employers to provide health insurance for employees.
3. Forcing one group (wealthy, soda-drinkers, etc.) to pay for the health insurance of another group.
4. Forcing future generations to pay for the health care of the present generation.
5. Forcing patients to participate in a government-run plan.
6. Forcing doctors to participate in a government-run plan.
7. Forcing hospitals and other health care providers to participate in a government-run plan.
8. Forcing insurance companies to compete with a government-run plan.
9. Forcing insurance companies to write policies that offer coverage for specific conditions.
10. Forcing one group (older Americans on Medicare) to accept reduced benefits in order to fund other public health care plans.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | August 10, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Sure, let the dems ram it through. however, when 2012 comes around the costs start escalating and employers drop plans…the voters will remember and not be happy.
the dems are treading on dangerous ground. I cannot beleive that they have already started uniting the GOP.

Posted by: scott jeffries | August 10, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

One thing for certain is if the democrats do not pass strong public health care they are done and go into lame duck now. If they pass it they show they can lead and will be more respected than ever and will have pleased those that put them in office. Don’t worry about rejection from the health care industry. Plenty out there ready to replace them.

Posted by: righbehind | August 10, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Given the economic events of the past 10 months, people have seen their 401ks tank, their house values plummet, unemployment skyrocket to 9+% and the federal deficit quadrupled with threats of new taxes. Of course this has created fear and uncertainty. Now the administration and Congress decide is the time to ram through yet another massive, systemic altering policy that will intimately affect everyone’s life. Add to that, existing healthcare programs run by the government – Medicare, Medicaid and the VA system are rife with fraud and abuse and how are we supposed to trust that the public option will be any different. Add to that the CBO is emphatic that the program will increase costs and not provide added coverage. Add to that the new cost of employment put on small businesses during a recession and we will never create desperately needed new jobs. Add to that no change in lawyers ability to sue doctors for not performing every procedure in the book; a major factor in cost increases. Worse still, the debate over the healthcare bill has become only about winning and expanding the power of the government over people’s lives. It’s no longer about fixing the healthcare system. Congress and the administration are now demonizing and bullying people who exercise their free speech rights to question and disagree with public officials. I for one am sick of this Congress and this administration’s name calling and bullying. Don’t even get me started on the report on your neighbor web site! People have legitimate concerns – let them talk!!!

Posted by: bct | August 10, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

austin posted: “the fact is that, as found by CBO, the new reform will cost one trillion dollars more than the current spending and cut in current medicare will be needed.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
keep in mind, this is the same CBO that reviewed the Bush admins cost estimates for Iraq, in 2003, and deemed them “adequate” – doh!
just have defeated your own argument..perhaps you should also take in consideration that you have forgotten the inmense debt this administration got us into on the first 100m days…ohhh..I see . That does not count ..duh !

Posted by: Frank | August 10, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I’d really like to see the analysis of issues currently in the healthcare sector related to cost overruns and the solutions that have been developed to address those issues. Has anyone seen these presented in a report that is for public consumption? If this analysis has been done have they implemented some solutions which would almost surely bring down cost and allow a significant amount of people to sign up for insurance. Would it not? Thoughts?

Posted by: JW1824 | August 10, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Spell checked
If you support goverment run health care you have lost your mind. I do not care what party you support but for once put politics to the side and research what you are supporting. Govt. run plans in other countries are NOT better than what we have, just ask a Canadian or someone from the UK. They think we are crazy to go down this path and they are right. If you want substandard care and dont mind waiting in long lines and waiting years for operations, than a Govt. plan is for you. Lets reform health care without the goverment plan and start with tort reform and allow insurance companies to cross state lines for more competition. That would be a good start. For the people who cannot afford health care than let there be a goverment plan to help them pay for private insurance but not just a give away.

Posted by: billy bob | August 10, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

austin posted: “the fact is that, as found by CBO, the new reform will cost one trillion dollars more than the current spending and cut in current medicare will be needed.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
keep in mind, this is the same CBO that reviewed the Bush admins cost estimates for Iraq, in 2003, and deemed them “adequate” – doh!
just have defeated your own argument..perhaps you should also take in consideration that you have forgotten the inmense debt this administration got us into on the first 100m days…ohhh..I see . That does not count ..duh !
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++===
I made no argument….stated a fact…unlike your statement…$76.4 of the stimulus has been spent…the President has not signed off on anything else other than the budget (which was [put together in 2008 under Bush)….so has spent not even a fraction of 1% of what Mr Bush spent in one year on Iraq ….
So where are your sources for this 100 day spending ? better go check the facts matey.

Posted by: indithinker | August 10, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Americans need health care reform. BUT NO PUBLIC OPTION. The idea that Obama can cover 50 million more people and reduce costs is ludicrous. Insurance companies must be held more accountable for their business practices, but that doesn’t mean the government should be the entity determining healthcare. There should be laws passed to protect consumers and allow them to negotiate for their own plans, independent of their employer. But medicare and medicaid are already bankrupt and now Obama wants to expand them? And he claims to be able to do it without raising taxes on the middle class? Wake up! This isn’t a realistic proposal!!

Posted by: KCNelson | August 10, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Ammie B.Maine
Have you READ this bill? I didn’t think so.
Lets fix Social Security and Medicaid that are broke, before we borrow any more yen from China

Posted by: Ed Lee | August 10, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

I’ll say it yet again. In 2003 Bush and the republicans passed The Pill Bill with no way to pay for it. The largest expansion of entitlement during my lifetime. And NONE of you opened your mouths.

Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

indithinker babbles: “People, lets see credible sources for this stuff, or you are just looking really silly”///////Why don’t you read the House version of this piece of pathetic legislation and get an understanding why people are upset over this issue.

Posted by: gtessex | August 10, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

WHAT is happening to the democratic party? They are totally getting out of control. They are sliding downhill quicker under Obama than the Republican party did under Bush.
I’m sick of all the game playing of which both parties are equally guilty of participating. The politicians need to grow up and look at the whole picture, not just their personal gains and/or perceived victories.

Posted by: Nel | August 10, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Ed Lee
I have read through the bill, can’t say I understood all the legalese, but then I doubt I would understand the language of most bills.
I looked, and I can tell you, there is nothing in there about creating “death panels.” There is nothing in there about government taking over healthcare. Yes, employers will be compelled to offer health insurance or pay a fine. Unless their payroll is less than $500,000, in which case they are exempt. Yes, everybody will be compelled to carry health insurance; unless they can’t afford it, in which case the government will pick up the tab. Currently, if you want to drive you have to have a license and carry car insurance. You got a problem with that? Australia, France, Scandanvia, the UK have universal health insurance, and these are democracies. If their citizens didn’t like it, they would have voted to end it a long time ago. If we don’t like this new bill, we can vote to change it. Nothing is “forever” in a democracy.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Why are libs so defensive, even apprehensive. Conservatives do want reform but not to carry the weight of lazy negligence at the cost of Taxpayers! This universal plan is obamas way of rewarding his acorn followers (already gave them a welfare raise while the rest of us took a cut). They don’t work, they stay out all night till 5 (their alcohol provided by taxpayers)in the morning and dont wake till 2 in the afternoon. They have no worries, obama provides them all they need. Sadly welfare is an accepted way of life in their communities. We are tired of the old excuse: It’s because of my race!That’s old and no longer an issue. I am a minority and I work for what I have! I scrape and cut coupons so I can send my children to a private school! Yet, somehow… they get it for free?! Wake up America, make the lazy earn thier freedom by their own hand and not our expense!!! And yes, lets put in firm regulations for commercial healthcare, fix Medicare and Medicaid as well as VA. But most of all make Welfare a 3 year maximum!!!!!!!

Posted by: Fabian | August 10, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

the hyesterics on Healthcare Reform are amusing…
lets put some facts into the “debate”
1. socialized healthcare is a “single payer system, where the government collects a specifics “health insurance tax” and proivides healthcare through local trusts free at point of sevice.
2. the house bill (and President Obama’s proposal for reform) is NOT a single payer system…it is a government health insurance company – that is not free – the members pay into the insurance plan, just as those with private insurance do, and use the same healthcare providers that folks with private insurance…
now, someone show me how these two things are the same thing, and then I can accept the “socialism” description…
just as well, I dont see anyone hysterical about the fact that the goverment provides “single payer” schools, or provide medicare….why is that?

Posted by: indithinker | August 10, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Just a heads up to all bloggers on these news sites, I think there is something “fishy” going on at the MSNBC website. I have been banned from blogging on their news stories and I don’t know why. There are many more offensive blogs than I have ever posted on their website. I am just wondering if they are attempting to keep a “fair” balance between liberals and conservatives blogging on their stories. If that is their intent, this is concerning that the MSM is deciding who is entitled to free speech and who isn’t.

Posted by: conversefive | August 10, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Sand Crab1612. YES YES YES. Fact we are 37th in the world in Health Care. Fact we pay more than anyone else does by far. Fact we are 50th in life expcetancy. Fact you already pay for the older people. When you pay SS tax and Medicare tax it is to finance the people who are on it now. Fact. No one wants to loose their medicare. Fact it is a government run plan that has never not paid or covered your illness. Fact health care cost are so high because their over head is 30%. Medicare’s is 1%. What is the other 29%. Big salary ceo’s and at least 5% spent in legal fees trying not to pay claims. My husband recently had knee surgery. He has an 80-20 policy. I have received 3 letters the last on threatning from the insurance company insisting that I tell them AGAIN this was not work related. I am now making payments on the hospital bill they have not paid one dime on so as not to ruin my creidt. Yet my medical insurance payments to them are more than my house note. These people are robbing you blind. My daughter lost her college job of 4 years at a starbucks and in the last months it was discovered that my 22 year old daughter has a heart condition. Now I can’t put her back on my insurance policy because of this. She has one semester of school left and her heart medicine is 400. dollars a month without insurance. So, YEs. YES> YES> to all of the things you suggested. This country will spend a trillion dollars to blow up another one but it won’t care for its own. Sarah Palin, you know the vice presidential canidate for the Gop that did not even know Africa was a continent, said OBAMA’s death panel would want to kill her baby. What a crock. We are the only ones who want to see to it that her baby is taken care of. You people think its socialisum to support her baby. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Posted by: macrose | August 10, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

OBAMACARE is about government control of our lives, not better healthcare. All we need is a reduction in cost(get the illegals out,reduce waste and fraud,etc.)not wholesale control of 1/7th of the economy. Say no to Socialism.

Posted by: Ron | August 10, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

“…he’s out to destroy the american way of life period!!!! Stop drinking the media kool-aid and check out the facts for yourself. Unless you want to not believe facts! God help us stop this man and the liberals before it’s to late. In jesus name please.”
Posted by: william | Aug 10, 2009 9:23:31 AM
__________________
tent revival drama.
irrational and pointless.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

conversefive: re, MSNBC
That site is very tricky to get posted on, they only have a short window of opportunity to comment, unlike this site which accepts comments all day. The “regulars” on First Read jump on right away. I seriously doubt the MSNBC site is editing for content.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

People are upset and voicing their concerns at Town Hall meetings? Not at all. OLD people are upset and trying to jam their view of the world, fears and prejudices, down the throats of the rest of us. Where are the young people at these Town Hall meetings? Where are the twenty and thirty something college educated Americans at these meetings. Grass roots, more like mulch. – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | August 10, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Schumer and the other dems. from NY and CAL. AREN’T FROM THE SAME PLANET AS THE REST OF THE COUNTRY! Schumer should move to cal. where he will fit in with of the LALA LAND mentality found there!

Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Republicans say the public plan would drive insurers out of business and lead to “socialized medicine” or a government takeover of health care.
For now, the Republican criticism seems overblown. Major versions of the legislation all rely heavily on a continuation of private health plans, offered by employers and by insurance companies, subject to sweeping new federal regulations.
Whether a public plan would crowd out private insurers depends on details yet to be decided, including its premiums and its payment rates for health care providers.
The public plan is not even a certainty.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

NYT:
“the federal government already holds sway over the health care system through Medicare, Medicaid and various insurance programs for children, veterans, military personnel and other federal employees. The federal government will account for 35 percent of the expected $2.5 trillion in health spending this year, and that does not include subsidies built into the tax code.”

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Give Obama a chance. He has yet to figure out how to transform a strategy based on bi-partisanship to a more aggressive effort to combat and defeat opponents for whom the First Amendment is an excuse to terrorize political opponents and intimidate their fellow citizens. He does not understand that their are some interests — Big Health and Big Pharma — who are focused on maintaining profits at any cost, even as they cause people to die.

Posted by: KT | August 10, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

We’ll never get a reasonable health care system in this country or a reasonable energy/climate change/environmental policy until we get a law that corporations are not people covered under the Bill of Rights and money for lobbying is not tax deductible and money or services given to politicians are not a legal campaign contribution or whatever else the lawyers have come up with, but an illegal bribe. Until that happens, we are hostage to corporate special interests that will do absolutely anything, including fomenting violence, to protect and increase their profits.

Posted by: Jackie | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

“Ramming it through”, just might lead to a major backlash in the mid-term elections.
Wouldn’t that come as a shock to the Dems?

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 10, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

NYT: Timothy Egan-
“The United States, like most countries, has long had a lunatic fringe who channel in the flotsam of delusion, half-facts and conspiracy theories. But now, with the light-speed and reach of the Web, “entire virtual crank communities,” as the conservative writer David Frum called them, have sprung up. They are fed, in the case of Sarah Palin, by people who should know better.
For a democracy, which depends on an informed citizenry to balance a permanent lobbying class, this is poison. And it’s one reason why town hall forums on health care, which should be sharp debates about something that affects all of us, have turned into town mauls.
The lies and shouts have had the effect that all crank speech has on free speech — stifling any real exchange.”

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Gallup poll shows seniors the most resistant??……what a joke since all of them HAVE MEDICARE!!! GOV RUN PROGRAM…give us a break. HEY GALLUP, NOW ASK THE SAME SENIORS WHO IS READY TO GIVE UP MEDICARE, THATS THE POLL I WANT TO SEE. I BET NOT A ONE!!!! HYPOCRITES.

Posted by: mackie | August 10, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Whooooooo….. Socialism! Does having universal health care make you a socialist? Look up socialism in the dictionary and re-think yourself the next time you use that word. Now I don’t know exactly what Congress is attempting to do with health care but, I’ve heard Obama say that a single payer system is out of the question. Just so you know a single payer system is akin to socialism. I know personally I would like to see all people have access to health care. I would also like to see a drop in price in health care rates, do away with the pre-existing condition BS, and get these hospitals and doctors in line with inflation. Don’t get me wrong, I think what doctors do is very important and they should be well compensated, but when is enough, enough? Not to mention for profit health care. The only people that should be making a profit off of my health care are the people that had some hand in making me better. Not some share holder in an insurance company.

Posted by: Brian Pride | August 10, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I honestly think it should be illegal to claim that a government program is going to kill you. Conservatives talk about “treasonous” democrats, while conservatives imply that the US government will have “death” panels, deciding who can or cannot have health care -as if the goal was not, in fact, health care for everyone!

Posted by: brian | August 10, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

The more this kicks up the more I feel it’s a window into how bad our education system really is anymore. The ignorance out of republicans buying into the spin just continues to blow my mind. It’s always so refreshing to run across one that actually argues legislation on merits. One that considers a fact vs. rumor.

Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

The most recent polls clearly show that the bulk of opposition to the President is coming from older white evangelical men (i.e., the Christian version of the Taliban), who tend to be concentrated in the South. The President remains popular in the strongholds which elected him.
So, the North should encourage the South to secede…we’ll get health care done the next day!

Posted by: That Guy | August 10, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

How do we know what the Presidents health care initiative is. Has any one of you read the over 1000 page bill. Has anyone read it. What exactly are they voting on. Would you vote for something you know nothing about. That is the reason that this needs to be beaten and a true cost saving system needs to be set up.

Posted by: bpose | August 10, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“There are groups that are out there trying to disrupt public meetings with specific strategies that they have put on the Internet,” Senator Kent Conrad, a North Dakota Democrat and one of the Finance Committee negotiators, said in an interview. “I mean, is that what we’ve come to in the United States, that we’re going to have people basically functioning as thugs?”
That in turn makes it easier for liberal Democrats to turn away from conversations with Republicans and press ahead on their own.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, recently called the Republican negotiators less independent decision-makers than agents of their party’s caucus — the same caucus that overwhelmingly opposed Mr. Obama’s economic stimulus legislation at the peak of the new president’s popularity.

Posted by: gus amaral | August 10, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

hell no to this stupid evil obama heayh care needto impeach obama

Posted by: RAMBOW99 | August 10, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Disease does not respect artificial class distinctions or income levels. If a pandemic hits a population in America with limited access to medical care, do you believe that the middle and upper class would be immune because of their “worthiness”? Do you understand that making immunization and other treatment available to every American is a form of enlightened self-interest? It’s not just innoculations, either — if your fellow citizen has good overall health, he’s less likely to be infected with a bug that can be passed on to you.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | August 10, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Conspiracy? You think it is just some conspiracy to go after Obama for his FASCIST gathering of names of dissenters? Having his minions out looking for those that speak out against the state is something Hitler and Lennin did.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 10, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Analysis of Health Care overruns—sure I got one. Everytime the government gets involved in health care—-Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Obama’s health care is scam to give more power and money to politicans while screwing over the american taxpayer and all of the rest who will be forced to suffer rationed care.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 10, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

If the dems ram this thing down America’s throat without republican support—-it will be the same as painting a bullseye on the dem party—-many will be voted out just for having a d after their name.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 10, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

to demonstrate how THEY would control costs and get people insured: and they did NOTHING
————————————–
Explain SPECIFCALLY how HR3200 or any of the other “so-called” plans will CONTROL costs.
My point has been from the very beginning that NO ONE has a real plan to do this. Because they wont or cant explain what the components are in ANY individual bill you have in your own possesion.
They can’t tell you that out of a $350 Radiology charge that (for example) $125 is escalating overhead due to operating costs. That out of that $125 cost, 66 dollars is to offest legal costs. … ETC
People are not buying that you can magically create a unverisal data base in virtually no time and at no cost and that this will bwecome the spring from which savings will just flow & flow.

Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Anyway,…it is nice to see that now Chuckie Schumer is driving the healthcare bus!
Who will it be next week !

Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

The Democrats/administration were trying to hijack the health care system. They tried to rush their health care bill through without allowing the public understand the implications.
Now they are not interested in hearing concerns at town hall meetings.
To show good faith that the true motivation is not to hijack health care they could stop blowing off ideas from Republicans.
I would feel better if this were a true bi-partisan bill.

Posted by: tillyerkt | August 10, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Here are some key reality checks ; for the climate bill, they said ” millions of green job will be generated”, the fact is that most manufacturing jobs will go oversea, not in US. For the stimulus bill, they said ” it will keep the jobless rate below 8% “, now it is 9.4-9.5%. On the health care bill, they said “the current health care spending is out of control, only the new health care reform can control the spending and save us money”, the fact is that, as found by CBO, the new reform will cost one trillion dollars more than the current spending and cut in current medicare will be needed.
————————–
austin,
It’s OK, Remember they just ‘misread’ those events. Trust them! They have really worked this healthcare issue! Everything will be alright.
Red Pill or Blue Bill ??????

Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Currently, if you want to drive you have to have a license and carry car insurance. You got a problem with that?
————————————–
Amy, Amy, Amy……
I dont have aproblem with it at all…HOW coem you dont?
LOL….YES, AND IF YOU ARE NOT A PERFECT DRIVER, YOU PAY MORE!!!!
Pre-existing conditions exist there – you previous driving record affects the rate you will pay! Why are you not up-in-arms over that?
And if you cannot afford it, YOU DONT GET TO DRIVE!
EVEN IF YOU A PERFECT DRIVER, IF YOU ARE MALE & UNDER 25 YOU GET HOSED!
So why aren’t you liberals outraged that “profiling” exists for auto insurance?
WHY are you not screaming that EVERY American should have a right to drive on the roads of this great country.
By the way, under certain circumstances, the GOVERNMENT (albeit state government) can take away your ability to operate a vehicle!
Strange, I do not recall this happening when a horse was the #1 method for people to get from point A to point B.
Their is no ‘right’ to healthcare just as their is no ‘right’ to drive.
People “interpret” phrases to extend what they “believe” are rights.
Has any court yet declared heathcare as a “right” ?
Has the Supreme Court upheld such a ruling ?

Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

why is all the reporting on this subject limited bashing the players or lifting them up. but very little subsidence to the debate at hand. where are the facts about this bill, everyone has facts except the public brodcast media. where are the graphs and charts hell when were at war 5 years ago all we had where experts. the only thing that i have seen in the media is a flow chart that congress produced. I think that it looks like a complete disaster.this is a bigger issue that the war.
the problem is that this bill is so open ended anything can happen once congress grabs control.
the the appointed regulators will stat making all the rules they see fit to make. you will not have due processes if you do it will take years in federal court
when this passes we can debate how health care is run by blaming the political parties(like Medicare).
the dems can spend, spend, then the gop can spend, spend,spend. all of them kicking the problem to my kids kids.
Our constitution set the roll of government is to be the referee, not one of the players. this bill will make the Federal government the supper star in the health game.

Posted by: pat | August 10, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Question: if all or part of what is said about this healthcare bill comes true, can they be held liable in a court of law???????? Democrats won’t always be in the majority unless Pres. Obama has his way and rewrites the constitution.

Posted by: Lizzie | August 10, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

the Republicans had 15 years after they defeated Clinton’s healthcare initative, to demonstrate how THEY would control costs and get people insured: and they did NOTHING.
Posted by: Amy B Maine | Aug 10, 2009 9:31:50 AM
You forgot to mention that every bill that was brought forth, was voted NO by the democrats including the President.And now they are the ones to change everything. Give me a break.

Posted by: Lizzie | August 10, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

There is a lot of back and forth about whether euthanasia is in this bill, with the elitist hacks making fun of the notion of “killing granny.” If you will go to pages 424-430 on the House health care reform bill you find it all there. First you will note that “Advance care planning consultation” will intensify as the patient lingers on without recovering. This is code for “You are using too much oxygen and you need to stop doing so.” Orders for life-sustaining treatments will be standardized. These are “actionable medical orders” that can be signed by a physician, nurse practitioner or a physician assistant. The orders can range from standard treatments to that of withholding antibiotics, nutrients, water, etc. In other words it is plainly written that standardized care includes the option of the health care provider being able to make the judgement (code for ordering) to withhold treatment, and to withhold food and water. We already had a practice run of this with Terri Schiavo and it worked marviously. And, if it’s good for Terri Schiavo it is good for the rest of the masses, i.e., the little people. So yes, granny, the physically and mentally disabled are marked individuals and are truly in danger if this health care reform is enacted. I think that Ted Kennedy, and his ilk, are safe, however. Wonder why that is??

Posted by: Richard, Dubuque | August 10, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Listen Up, Chuck:
If you pass or try to pass a bill that
includes a “public option” you and
you Democrat buddies in Congress are
TOAST!
We seniors will “pull the plug” on
you before we ever allow you to
“pull the plug” on us! Count on it!

Posted by: reaganfan | August 10, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Lizzie
When President Bush started his 2nd term, he tried to privatize social security – that is, putting those retirement accounts in the stock market, which, shortly after the senate defeated that plan, crashed.
Is that what you are talking about?

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Richard, Dubuque
Apparently, you are the only one with a code book, because “Advance care planning consultation will intensify as the patient lingers on without recovering” sounds like arrangements are made for hospice care.
Have you lived through watching your elderly father die? Because I have, and it does require planning, and it does require a shift from trying to save a life, to trying to ease a death. That is all this is saying, it is NOT encouraging euthanansia. PS My doctor’s office automatically sent me a Living Will form the first time I went. I have private insurance. Is my insurance company trying to kill me?

Posted by: Amy B Maine | August 10, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

There is nothing “bipartisan” about this plan. It’s a totally liberal/socialist agenda and “ram it through” is an excellent choice of words.

Posted by: KK | August 10, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Obamacare: Don’t infringe upon my right to choose! Isn’t that the democrat mantra? Oh well, I guess they’re just hypocrites!

Posted by: Tony | August 10, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Amy B Maine – please address the standardized medical orders that include withholding of antibiotics, food and water. That is euthanisia whether or not you believe it is, or whether or not you want to believe that it is not.

Posted by: Richard, Dubuque | August 10, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

How about serious tort reform before we gut the most innovative medical system the world has ever known. As to the post stating the U.S. is 37th worldwide in health care, according to whom? Do you really believe that Latvia, Mexico, or Vietnam has superior care? Get real. Nothing would please the America haters more than demolishing the finest health care system in the world. Except maybe a 2nd term for BHO.

Posted by: geddy lee | August 10, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

congrats republicans – my mother cried over the horror of Terry Schiavo being kept alive against her will – she pleads with me from time to time to be absolutely sure that doesn’t happen to her.
And now we have Sarah Palin and the republicans twisting an end of life documentation initiative into death panels!
This just makes me furious. This is important stuff and a lot of seniors want their wishes honored.

Posted by: trueblue | August 10, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Richard in Dubuque,
Those of us who once supported John Edwards for President, remember the story of Nataline Sarkisian, the 17 year-old girl from California who died when her health insurance company wouldn’t pay for a liver transplant.
That is a real story, not a hypothetical scenerio generated as a scare tactic. A health insurance company can easily deny coverage for your loved one. End of life consultations are routine for elderly patients, and this bill talks about covering those visits, not mandating them! Obama left the campaign trail to see his grandmother before she died, do you really think he would sign anything that short changed senior citizens?

Posted by: Amy | August 10, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Anyone that believes government can run a massive healthcare insurance program more efficiently than many private sector providers do it today…you must be out of your minds. And rationing is an automatic MUST for any governenment run plan..today the market does its own rationing of HC resources…by the millions of workers and people making decisions on their own…which Drs to chose, which plans, and which procedures to have, etc…in the future should this bill pass..those decisions will largely be made by government bureaucrats…and we the people will have far less freedom and choices than we do today. Seniors and special care patients will be the ones likely to see the greatest change in benefits and coverage..much less than they have today…in order to cover the millions that don;t have coverage today including 11MM illegals (don;t forget amnesty is around the corner as well)…this plan is all about increasing government power and scope first…and last…nothing more. In the end..we will all be on the single payer government run system..and the quality and choices will be less.

Posted by: JL | August 11, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Two things folks first Obama wants to push everything through Congress because he can and knows from it’s last six month spending spree he will never have the chance again…fear tactics.(ex. I need the bill now!! signs it four days later.)Second someone needs to find help for Pelosi ever look at her eyes and smile ? She is a good candidate for a psych exam.

Posted by: Anvil | August 12, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Actually, health care rationing is already a reality. Almost a quarter of the population is rationed no health care whatsoever. The rest of us get our rationing from private insurance bureaucrats. As far as efficiency, the overhead for Medicare (a “public option” for seniors) is no more than 3%, compared with 25% (or more) for the multitude of private insurance plans.

Posted by: That Guy | September 1, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Medical costs have rocketed up over the years-look at the rate of inflation. Take the costs and add in the ever increasing insurance premiums and the rate of profit of the insurance industry in the last 7 years. NO, no change needed here-lets all go broke! Then we can all form long, long lines outside the emergency rooms while congratulating ourselves that we are not socialists.

Posted by: Watch 915 | September 2, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.