By Caitlin Taylor

Aug 12, 2009 9:27am

The PhRMA Deal: The Plot Thickens?*

"In terms of savings for you as a Medicare recipient," President Obama told a town hall attendee yesterday, "the biggest (change) is on prescription drugs, because the prescription drug companies have already said that they would be willing to put up $80 billion in rebates for prescription drugs as part of a health care reform package."

Then the president said, "Now, we may be able to get even more than that.”

That sentence — seemingly an aside — could be significant. Because it may indicate that President Obama does not consider himself bound by an agreement upon which the pharmaceutical industry thinks the White House has signed off. 

As you may know, there have been some questions as to just what the White House agreed to in a deal Senate Democrats have cut with the pharmaceutical industry. (See our blog post from Saturday for a fuller background, with links.)

Ken Johnson, senior Vice President of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA , tells ABC News of the president's comment that "clearly it creates a little teeth-gnashing" among PhRMA members, "but we're in this for the long hall and at end of the day remain convinced the Senate Finance Committee will produce a bipartisan bill that will serve as a blueprint for comprehensive health care reform."

In other words, PhRMA remains convinced that Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chair of the Senate Finance Committee, will uphold the deal.

In June, Baucus announced that pharmaceutical companies had agreed to a deal as part of an overall health care reform package, where the companies will provide, as Baucus put it, "affordable prices on prescription drugs when Medicare benefits don't cover the cost of prescriptions," as well as kicking in some money for health care reform efforts.

Former House Energy and Commerce chairman Bill Tauzin, R-La., now the head of PhRMA, said his industry had committed a specific amount of money and part of the deal was Democrats would refrain from seeking more than $80 billion.

That would preclude, for instance, a campaign pledge by then-Sen. Obama to re-negotiate the cost of pharmaceuticals through the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

"$80 billion is the max, no more or less," Tauzin said to the New York Times. "Adding other stuff changes the deal.”

Says Johnson: "in the beginning of this process we made pretty clear the dangers of going above $80 billion; the impact it could have on research and development and the potential job losses in a very fragile economy.

Tauzin said that after the deal was reached with Baucus, he confirmed the terms of the deal with White House Chief if Staff Rahm Emanuel, deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, and health care reform czar Nancy-Ann DeParle.

“They blessed the deal,” Tauzin told the Times. "As far we are concerned, that is a done deal. It’s up to the White House and Senator Baucus to follow through.”

On Friday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs seemed to confirm the deal, saying, "we feel like $80 billion is — is an appropriate amount. And I think the — I don't have the statistic in front of me, but I think the House bill has $85 billion in it, so I would argue that we're all in the same ball park."

Asked a reporter: "there is a deal that you won't squeeze any more?"

Said Gibbs: "Well, I hate to blow our cover here, but we announced it publicly."

"But there had been some reports saying you privately told Democratic senators that there is no such deal," Henry said.

"I don't know where that's coming from," Gibbs said. "I don't what that's being based on."

But then the White House seemed to back off the notion that it had agreed to an $80 billion limit.

"The White House, Senate Finance Committee and PhRMA agreed that PhRMA would contribute $80 billion to lower costs as part of the health insurance reform legislation that the President expects to sign this year," Linda Douglass, the communications director of the White House Office of Health Reform, told ABC News Saturday.

Asked if the deal precludes the government engaging in direct negotiations for the Medicare prescription drug benefit, Douglass said "that issue was not discussed" during the White House negotiations with PhRMA.

The president's comments yesterday would seem to indicate that he's not on board with any $80 billion limit.

Says Johnson: "People need to recognize that $80 billion is a huge investment by our companies, and will require them to make some very difficult choices. It's not loose change found in the sofa, it's real money that carries some consequences for our companies."

Stay tuned.

-jpt

*This post has been updated with a response from PhRMA.

User Comments

The media has done a poor job documenting the back-room deals this admin is making with the pharma industry….all after-the-fact.
The elephant in the health care room is tort reform. There is no way the President can reign in costs by ignoring it.
He needs to be honest about ALL of the costs associated with healthcare, and, who is really going to pay for it over the long haul.

Posted by: J House | August 12, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Shocker: Obama cuts a secret deal with villainous, immoral drug companies–and refuses to disclose any deals.
Big pPrama has committed $150 million for ads supporting ObamaCare. And the Dems keep grazing on astroturf.
Remind me again which side is being funded by big, evil corporations??

Posted by: Health Scare Debate | August 12, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The media has done a poor job of investigating the back door shinnagins of Rove and the firing of several employees. Today, it comes out he was very,very involved. What a surprise. No demonstrations on this, I suppose.

Posted by: talmag | August 12, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I’m starting to think that the President and veracity are akin to oil and water.

Posted by: Jen B. | August 12, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Ahem!!
Where is the lie about AARP being on board,too? If he will lie about this then there is NO threshold he won’t cross!!
I love the way the Media picks and chooses the bits and pieces of this debacle they care to report(?)on. Thanks for letting your fellow Americans down.
When are you ALL going to do your jobs? Where are the real journalist today?

Posted by: American Infidel | August 12, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

‘Then the president said, “Now, we may be able to get even more than that.”’
Say what? Obama is going to renege once again?
I am shocked, I tell you.
Then again, those negotiations were supposed to be on C-SPAN.
Obama promised us all that they would.
That guy cannot tell the truth if his wife depended on it.

Posted by: drjohn | August 12, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

No closed door negotiations.
Keep your own doctor.
Keep your own plan.
No waiting lines.
Add 50 million people, end pre-existing conditions and save money.
Lies. All lies.

Posted by: drjohn | August 12, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Anyone notice that the name change?
Health Care Reform is now Health Insurance Reform.
New name……..Same ol’ crap!!

Posted by: American Infidel | August 12, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Anyone notice that the name change?
Health Care Reform is now Health Insurance Reform.
New name……..Same ol’ crap!!
Posted by: American Infidel | Aug 12, 2009 10:01:15 AM
Why not? Global Warming is now Climate Change? More word games.

Posted by: George Orwell, please call your office | August 12, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

The only black and white that this article has to do with is the truth that is staring you in the face. The President repeatedly says one thing and does another. He could be chartreuse. It wouldn’t matter to those that judge by the content of a man’s character and not the color of his skin. The content of his character of late is that what the President says can’t be counted on.

Posted by: Jen B. | August 12, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

So no one thinks I’ve gone entirely off the deep end, there was a post I was addressing that implied questioning the veracity of the President was racially based. Sorry about that.

Posted by: Jen B. | August 12, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

===The media has done a poor job of investigating the back door shinnagins of Rove and the firing of several employees.===
The media has indeed done a poor job of investing firings. But you have the wrong administration in mind. I am still waiting on MSM to investigate the firing of the IG by Obama. However, you can bet your bottom dollar if Rove is back in the news, Obama’s poll numbers are worse than being reported.

Posted by: Axey | August 12, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

The media has done a poor job of investigating the back door shinnagins of Rove and the firing of several employees.
Posted by: talmag | Aug 12, 2009 9:52:43 AM
The media did a poor job of vetting President Obama during the Presidential campaign.
What was your point again?

Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 12, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Actually, I’m very disappointed with Big Pharma. Not so smart. The idea is to be like Goldman $achs. You don’t give money to the gov’t, the gov’t gives money to you!

Posted by: Backwards | August 12, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Check out the various health care documentaries online. There are some interesting solutions to drug pricing. Drugs are only free to those who can’t afford them, and a regulated co-pay for those who can afford drugs. The government listens to the people. Drug corporations only listen to their stock holders….sort of.

Posted by: KsDevil | August 12, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“Keep your own plan.”
Fine Print: Must stay on the plan the rest of your life. Do not miss a payment. Do not change your job. Do not quit your job. Do not retire. Pay all rate raises due to higher costs and fewer consumers since your plan can’t write any more business after bill is signed. Did I miss anything?

Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 12, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Fine Print: “Croaking” is allowed and encouraged.

Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 12, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

by pharmaceuticals companies with prescriptions do you mean drug barons with monopolies…..or is that only in mexico and afghan?

Posted by: abel | August 12, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

The government listens to the people. Drug corporations only listen to their stock holders….sort of.
Posted by: KsDevil | Aug 12, 2009 10:26:32 AM
My 88 year old father gets “free samples” all the time from his docs. Has for years. I’m assuming they are not coming from the government.
(I think he would also like to get in on the free lunches delivered by the cute pharma reps, but I digress.)

Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 12, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

“Did I miss anything?”
Yes. Higher taxes.

Posted by: Backwards | August 12, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

“Did I miss anything?”
Yes. Higher taxes.
Posted by: Backwards | Aug 12, 2009 10:35:05 AM
Of course, how could I forget.
Revised Fine Print: Must stay on the plan the rest of your life. Do not miss a payment. Do not change your job. Do not quit your job. Do not retire. Pay all rate raises due to higher costs and fewer consumers since your plan can’t write any more business after bill is signed. Higher taxes. Rationing. Longer and longer delays after your plan cuts employees and services to try to stay afloat. Your plan can never go under or be eliminated by your employer.

Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 12, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

“(I think he would also like to get in on the free lunches delivered by the cute pharma reps, but I digress.)”
I’m in favor of cute Pharma reps. Or cute babes in any line of work. That is a major plank in my political platform. And on a not unrelated note, where has the fetching Ms. Miller been? Away on a dangerous foreign assignment? The dusty streets of Kabul?

Posted by: Playa | August 12, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Really?
What this really means, is that congress caved to the drug companies, for petty concessions, to allow the companies to continue to earn huge profits.
The public is more than aware, that lawmakers are in that class of the “wealthy and powerful”, who own significant interests in such companies, and whose personal fortunes are tied to ripping off the consumer.
This is just another prime example of the corruption in congress, and the federal government.
It should be obvious, why the public is so opposed.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 12, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

so yet another reason tossed out there for the American people not to trust the word of this president – especially on this issue!
Cut a deal, then lead the peole to believe you have more than you actually agreed to.
Same as the outright lie he told about AARP backing the bill.
And then the liberals wonder why everyday americans are upset & angry about the way this issue is being handled!

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

To say there is no transparancy is not true…anything you need to know you can find on the web. In regards to health care you can check out http://www.white house.gov.reality check. I admit that Obama has not done a good enough job in getting the facts to the general public but there is no one bill. There are five in Congress and some in the Senate and nothing has definitely been voted on. These meeting will be beneficial in telling the administration what America fears so that is a good thing. To go to the meetings just to stop them and shout and not let the people speak is wrong. Too much misinformation out there heralded by talk show hosts, media, etc. Keep an open mind and let the Obama administration know what you do and do not like but let’s not get carried away with swastikas. That has nothing to do with health care…that is all about hate. We don’t need that at this time when we are trying to get a good health care program.

Posted by: talmag | August 12, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

“Too much misinformation out there heralded by talk show hosts, media, etc.”
And the President himself, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, etc…

Posted by: Backwards | August 12, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

To be sure this backdoor deal was on C-Span like Obama promised.
He’s changing how Washington does business—to Chicago style business.

Posted by: larry | August 12, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

American Infidel wrote:
Anyone notice that the name change?
Health Care Reform is now Health Insurance Reform.
_____________________________________
It should be called “Government Takeover of Health Insurance”

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | August 12, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“What this really means, is that congress caved to the drug companies, for petty concessions, to allow the companies to continue to earn huge profits.”
Merck Research Labs, funded by drug profits, responsible for different treatment drugs you’ve probably taken before. If you haven’t, you’ll probably be glad its there when you need it. Huge profits is not a bad thing in the medical field. Most of the US medical breakthroughs are born from profits and private sector investment. I wouldn’t poo poo them too much. You’ll probably miss it when its gone.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

The senate health care bill is poop. Might as well rip it up now. Health care reform better include a strong public option. Vote it straight up or down then we the voters have a choice to make. We win either way. We either get strong public health care of a list of politicians to send packing.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 12, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

When did our government start a shell game with bills? The congress writes 3 bills and the senate writes a bill. Don’t remember that one in civics class.

Posted by: rightbehind | August 12, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

“Health care reform better include a strong public option.”
Public option is what most of the people are against. The democrats are for it, but they are for a job in November 2010 more.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

“Public option is what most of the people are against.”
Wrong.
Most people are against taxing employer provided health benefits and any cuts to Medicare.
Pew:”Although the public has a more negative than positive general reaction to the health care proposals being debated on Capitol Hill, there is broad support for many of the core elements of the legislation currently before Congress. Nearly two-in-three (65%) favor requiring that all Americans have health insurance, with the government aiding those who cannot afford it. Nearly as many (61%) favor requiring employers who do not provide insurance to pay into a government health care fund. And there is broad support (79%) for prohibiting insurance companies from denying insurance to people with pre-existing conditions.
But reactions to the methods proposed to make sure more people have access to health care coverage are mixed. A thin 52% majority favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans. There is broad support (63%), however, for raising the taxes on affluent people to help pay for changes to the health care system. On the other hand, there is equally strong opposition (62%) to new taxes on employees with health insurance benefits above a certain value. Most (58%) also oppose putting tighter restrictions on what medical procedures Medicare and Medicaid will cover.”
Much the same in the recent Q poll
” * 62 – 32 percent in favor of giving people the option of a government insurance plan;
* 61 – 36 percent for higher taxes on high income earners to pay for health care reform;
* 60 – 32 percent in favor of insurance subsidies for individuals making up to $43,000 and families of four making up to $88,000;
* 54 – 38 percent for requiring businesses to provide insurance or pay the government.
Voters oppose 68 – 26 percent requiring people to have health insurance or pay a fine and oppose 68 – 27 percent taxing employees for health care benefits from employers.”

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

ABC and you were so close. let’s not forget that the drug industry has authorized its lobbyists to spend as much as $150 million on television commercials supporting President Obama’s health care overhaul, beginning over the August Congressional recess.
interesting though this hasn’t been talked about more by the MSM.

Posted by: mikemcdon321 | August 12, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

jpt writes:
“Said Gibbs: “Well, I hate to blow our cover … ”
The Obama organization’s cover on the all-but-nonexistent “public option” ALSO has been blown: “The argument that any “public option” is better than none has rarely been articulated, but I suspect we will hear it more often as the reality sinks in that the “public option” in the Democrats’ bill is a joke.”
search up
“Bait and Switch: How the “Public Option” Was Sold”, and
Reply to critics of “Bait and switch: How the ‘public option’ was sold”
both available through Physicians for a National Health Program

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“What this really means, is that congress caved to the drug companies, for petty concessions, to allow the companies to continue to earn huge profits.”
–> It’s worse than that: Oblabla made the deal, but neglected to INFORM Congress.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

So basically, the PhRMA companies are refusing to give us the same price they give consumers in the UK and Canada? Why do we have to pay extra?
Drug research is largely funded in its initial and most expensive stages through government grants.

Posted by: lovebugs | August 12, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

“Wrong.
Most people are against taxing employer provided health benefits and any cuts to Medicare.”
Let me rephrase, most Americans are against a public plan replacing their private health insurance. The introduction of a public plan competing with a private plan would do exactly that. If you look at what you posted, most people (even myself) support a public plan for those without insurance. However, it should be handled like anything else, by income level they qualify. Guess what, we already have that. Its called medicaid.
Plus, its not competition when the government makes the rules and also competes against you. Imagine a football game where one football team also owns the refs.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

What about new drugs? Suppose for a moment you were on obama’s plan and you did not want to be a “case study”. What would happen to you then? After all, research and development(experimentation) requires “sacrifice”.

Posted by: Reflect09 | August 12, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

“Let me rephrase, most Americans are against a public plan replacing their private health insurance. The introduction of a public plan competing with a private plan would do exactly that.”
Why?
I thought public plans were so horrible that we should never even attempt them.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Hey Ryan,
Try catching up a bit, the Pew Poll was from 7/22-7/26.
Most Americans do not believe that the U.S. healthcare system is in a state of crisis.
Liberal want to push that idea, but the public is not buying it.

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

“Try catching up a bit, the Pew Poll was from 7/22-7/26.”
And it was one of the most complete polls in terms of discussing what is in the bill.
The most recent poll asking about the public option was Quinnipiac and they had support for the public option at 62%.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

“I thought public plans were so horrible that we should never even attempt them.”
Because brainiac, once they figure out how to pay for this (taxes), people or companies will end up paying for both. Now they can opt out of paying for a private plan, they can’t opt out of paying taxes.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

“The most recent poll asking about the public option was Quinnipiac and they had support for the public option at 62%.”
–> That might be because people there IS an actual “public option”.
What the vast majority of people in the US ACTUALLY support is … Single Payer. The Oblabla organization has tried to transfer that support to its bogus “public option”.
The realization that these squirrelly con-persons are running a scam of such proportions should terrify people of all political parties. Let em stick to crippling used cars.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Ryan,
You are clinging to the crumbs…
++++++++
American voters, by a 55 – 35 percent margin, are more worried that Congress will spend too much money and add to the deficit than it will not act to overhaul the health care system, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today. By a similar 57 – 37 percent margin, voters say health care reform should be dropped if it adds “significantly” to the deficit.
By a 72 – 21 percent margin, voters do not believe that President Barack Obama will keep his promise to overhaul the health care system without adding to the deficit, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University national poll finds.
American voters disapprove 52 – 39 percent of the way President Obama is handling health care, down from 46 – 42 percent approval July 1, with 60 – 34 percent disapproval from independent voters. Voters say 59 – 36 percent that Congress should not pass health care reform if only Democratic members support it.
Voters are split 39 – 41 percent on whether the President’s health care plan will improve or hurt the quality of health care in the nation, with 14 percent saying it won’t make a difference.
Only 21 percent of voters say the plan will improve the quality of care they receive, while 36 percent say it will hurt their quality of care and 39 percent say it will make no difference.
“President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress appear to be losing the public relations war over their plan to revamp the nation’s health care system,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
“Americans are more willing to scrap a health care overhaul than they are to increase the deficit in order to produce such legislation. That’s a bad omen for the White House and Congressional leadership as they try to sell their plan to the country this month before the vote counting gets serious on Capitol Hill in September.”
There is still strong support for critical elements of the Obama/Democratic plan:
62 – 32 percent in favor of giving people the option of a government insurance plan;
61 – 36 percent for higher taxes on high income earners to pay for health care reform;
60 – 32 percent in favor of insurance subsidies for individuals making up to $43,000 and families of four making up to $88,000;
54 – 38 percent for requiring businesses to provide insurance or pay the government.
Voters oppose 68 – 26 percent requiring people to have health insurance or pay a fine and oppose 68 – 27 percent taxing employees for health care benefits from employers.
Independent voters, perhaps the key voting group, are more worried about the deficit rising than congressional inaction, 54 – 37 percent. These voters say 59 – 36 percent that overhaul should not occur if it would “significantly” increase the deficit. Independents oppose 63 – 33 percent passing a bill with only Democratic votes.
Independent voters also don’t think Obama can keep his promise to avoid increasing the deficit and pass health care by an overwhelming 77 – 17 percent.
“The key to this political battle over health care out in the country is independent voters. And that bloc is the key to most elections,” Brown added. “These are the voters who broke strongly for the President last November and who were in his corner during the first months of his administration. But on these key health care questions they are siding with critics who question whether health care reform is worth the projected cost.”
+++++++++++++++
People want to provide that public option, UNTIL they are confronted with rest of the problem.
Your cherry pickin my friend!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

The most recent poll asking about the public option was Quinnipiac and they had support for the public option at 62%.
Posted by: Ryan C
LOL…sorry but clipped it to early on my post….
“Since Quinnipiac University’s July 1 survey, support for a government-run option has fallen from 69 – 26 percent to 62 – 32 percent and the number who would rather buy insurance from a private rather than public insurer has jumped from 53 – 28 percent to 61 – 25 percent.”
|
|
\|/

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Mike C……wait for it, Ryan is checking the Daily KOS and the Huffington Post to counter your arguement, statistical evidence when it opposes his view is always wrong…..
Great post BTW!!!

Posted by: KMDay | August 12, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Who really really really believes that Obama intends to keep the really difficult promises? I would say very few people that have studied this man just a wee bit. It’s a shame.

Posted by: Mitch in NC | August 12, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“Posted by: Mike_C | Aug 12, 2009 3:17:16 PM”
The claim was that people don’t want a public option.
I proved that false and KR’s has backed off it.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

jpt quotes Ken Johnson, senior Vice President of PhRMA:
” … a huge investment by our companies, and will require them to make some very difficult choices”
–> If politicians and their corporate ennablers could just REFRAIN (or be PREFVENTED, by force if necessary) from using ALL variants of the phrases “hard choices” — especially in their efforts to imporse some variant of this faux “reform” — it’d be a better semantic world.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

A 150 million questions for this administration and their political tactics…

Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 12, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

“I proved that false and KR’s has backed off it.”
No, there is little support for a public option replacing their private insurance, which is what this plan does. No one is going to pay taxes for a public plan and also premiums for a private plan unless they are filthy rich. Employers are not going to pay taxes for a public plan and also a private plan for their employers. They can cancel a private plan, they can’t opt out of taxes. And it will take major tax hikes to pay for this.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“Posted by: Mike_C | Aug 12, 2009 3:17:16 PM”
The claim was that people don’t want a public option.
I proved that false and KR’s has backed off it.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 12, 2009 3:38:29 PM
========================================
Looks like KR did NOT back off.
The fact is, you cannot prove that the vast majority of American’s support a public option because in truth, they do not.
Most American support health care reform, which does not include a government option.
Regulate the Insurance companies, make sure they are not killing Americans with prices or denying care for pre-existing conditions.
The government cannot even run their medicare/medicaid entities properly or efficiently. How many hundreds of million or even billion do tax payers lose out on due to fraud in these two alone?
Now, Tennessee is broke because of government health care, Mass is getting sued by hospitals because they are not paying their bills and their finances in the state are drying up, and Hawaii had to can its Universal Health Care for Children only plan within 7 months of taking off back in Oct. 2008.
Ryan, with all of your infinite wisdom, explain to me why our crooks in washington can run a health care program when they cannot run medicare/medicaid properly, fannie and freddi properly, social security properly, the post office properly, etc..etc..etc…

Posted by: KMDay | August 12, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

LOL…ryan, Ryan, Ryan,
Your cherry picking…plain & simple.
You want to cling to the 10,000 foot question… “do you support a public option?” with no details about implementation.
Not real…just fantasy!
But then when specfics such the presidents plan, or the bill before Congress, or the deficit get added to the question, the answers change.
You were here beating your chest with all these polls a few weeks ago when they showed support for Obama’s plan. Now people have dug in more, the support has fallen off and your cherry pickin a few random stats that dont hold up to the real world.
You cling to a falling number (62%) that support a public option, The EXACT same group of people do NOT believe “President Barack Obama will keep his promise to overhaul the health care system without adding to the deficit”
YET Obama himself has made it VERY clear that he will not sign a bill that adds to the deficit.
Your clinging to dreamland and the American people have woken up!

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

What the vast majority of people in the US ACTUALLY support is … Single Payer.
==================================
LOL…Good Try…Love it when people make this stuff up.
Let me guess, you have a poll to back that up ??????

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Ryan is a devout socialist and I won’t blame him for trying to push his perspective. However, I will fight it. There is no example of socialism that I would want to trade for capitalism. Every example of socialism in our country is failing, as it is in other countries. Yet, there will still be believers because they think they can do it better. Good on em, I disagree and always will, but give him some credit for putting up the fight. He wants it to be popular.

Posted by: KR | August 12, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

After five years, ALL plans have to be government-approved plans.
See page 17 of the House bill.

Posted by: tanarg | August 12, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

“Let me guess, you have a poll to back that up??????”
Google it yourself (Single Payer polls, or Medicare for All), as of about the beginning of the year — CBS and others.
In the last few months, of course, the Obamabots have made a big push to hijack Single Payer support for their phony-baloney “public option” — AND to suppress Single Payer discussion, and to demonize and misrepresent the Canadian system, AND to posit a “tradition” in the US of employer-provided PRIVATE insurance — as much as possible.
Medicare for all is what the PEOPLE want. The VAST majority of the people, that is.
It’s funny: if Oblabla had named Dean to the cabinet, and gone all out for Single Payer, He’d be a people’s hero now, instead of a laughingstock, exposed as a behind-the-scenes collaborator with the corporations.
Too bad for Him: there’s no way, now, to “back off” this gutless error.
Note: any un-rich person who thinks he/she has philosophical reservations about Single Payer national health is just one ALS (or leukemia, or something similar) diagnosis away from changing his/her mind.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

This is the kind of thing that happens when the president calls private business into his office and makes those really transparent deals. All of the parties seem to acknowledge 80Billion dollar figure, but Obama is now failing to honor the agreement. Obama should never call any private business into his office for secret deals. That is either extortion or a payoff. Either one not too ethical. This is a change from politics to mob tactics.

Posted by: ubu1991 | August 12, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

There is no news in America. Its all a game and there is no need of looking for any American News Media Television, Newspaper, or radio to keep the people fully informed.
I live in Valdosta-Georgia and I have experienced that no news media outlets are really concerned about reporting hard coure news worthy events.
This includes Charles Gibson of ABC. Its all a game and the American people need to wake up to this real reality. Please keep in mind that its a game to those who are paid by the rich and thte poor can only look and wait for a god that few Americans seem to know in 2009! How sad?
Peace!
Retired United States Armed Forces
A concerned citizen

Posted by: George Boston Rhynes | August 12, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

“No, there is little support for a public option replacing their private insurance, which is what this plan does.”
Better tell the CBO who states 90% of people will remain with private insurance thru 2019.
But I love how right wingers claim people don’t support their gross misrepresentation as if that is somehow revealing.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

“The fact is, you cannot prove that the vast majority of American’s support a public option because in truth, they do not.”
I said majority you change it to vast majority, yet another example of your dishonesty.
Questions are summarized.
“Do you support or oppose a public option to compete against private insurance”
Support percentage:
Q poll: 62%
Gallup: 52%
Time: 56%
CBS/NYT: 66%
“How important do you feel it is to give people the option of both a private plan and a public one”
NBC/WSJ: 41% said extremely important, an additional 35% quite important.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“This is a change from politics to mob tactics.”
–> Yes He CAN!
In fact, aside from purring borrowed slogans, Obama’s ALWAYS been a one-trick pony, and that’s His trick.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“After five years, ALL plans have to be government-approved plans.
See page 17 of the House bill.”
Not true.
The no new enrollees issue past 5 years applies to grandfathered plans (ie plans that do not take pre-exsiting conditions etc).
Right wing media has been circulating an out of context portion of the billl….again.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“He wants it to be popular.”
It is popular contrary to the right wing denial of reality.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

“You cling to a falling number (62%) that support a public option, The EXACT same group of people do NOT believe “President Barack Obama will keep his promise to overhaul the health care system without adding to the deficit”
Other things from Quinnipiac (though I think this is a separate poll)
“American voters disapprove 59 – 29 percent of the way Republicans in Congress are doing their job and trust Obama more than these Republicans 47 – 36 percent to fix the economy and 46 – 37 percent to handle health care.”

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“It is popular … ”
–> When people figure out that the “public option” (which is likely to be negotiated away at the end) ALREADY has been so truncated as to cover nearly NObody, Obama’s going to be about as “popular” as polio.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“There is no example of socialism that I would want to trade for capitalism.”
You would prefer all roads be toll roads?
How about a fire department that charges you when they come out?

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“There is no example of socialism that I would want to trade for capitalism.”
When the government and the Fed shovel several TRILLION “public” dollars to mega-corporations and the very rich, that’s not “capitalism”, but corporate f-a-s-c-i-s-m.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Talk about distortions and pants on fire Mr Totus.
Pharma is willing to put up $80 billion in rebates for prescription drugs as part of a health care reform package.” … “Now, we may be able to get even more than that.” ~ Ummm, that is slimey and opportunistic to the inth degree.
“The irony is that actually one of the chief sponsors of this bill originally was a Republican — then House member, now senator, named Johnny Isakson from Georgia — who very sensibly thought this is something that would expand people’s options.” ~ Isakson came out immediately after this and emphatically condemned this outrageously false claim.
“AARP would not be endorsing a bill if it was undermining Medicare, okay?” ~ The AARP quickly corrected this misinformation: “Indications that we have endorsed any of the major health care reform bills currently under consideration in Congress are inaccurate.”
“I’m not promoting a single-payer plan.” ~ Obama admitted that such a plan is exactly his goal here. And a non-partisan study confirming that ObamaCare will indeed destroy free market health care, leaving us with no other options but government-run care.
“Under the reform we’re proposing, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.” ~ The Congressional Budget Office estimated that 10 million workers would be forced out of their employer-based coverage and into government health care by this bill.
“So the intention…was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they’re ready, on their own terms. It wasn’t forcing anybody to do anything…And somehow it’s gotten spun into this idea of ‘death panels.’” ~ House Republicans, patient advocates, and conservative publications have repeatedly highlighted the specific parts of the bill that would in fact force seniors into counseling sessions that pressure them to stop burdening the system.
Zeke Emanuel, health policy advisor to the Pres. and brother to Obama’s own Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has bluntly admitted that cost cuts will not be pain-free. “Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely ‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change,” he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008). The real savings will come from rationing care. ObamaCare will have panels modeled after Britain’s system, which cuts costs by denying care to the sick and elderly.
“We’re not talking about cutting Medicare benefits.” ~ Obama admitted that this was how his health care scam would be funded. He has proposed $500 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to pay for this.
“This is not about putting government in charge of your health insurance.” ~ yes it is, read page 16 of the bill. Health ins will either be public plan or “qualified” private plans. Qualified means that govt will decide what qualifies and will mandate what is and isn’t covered with the public option guidelines.
“I won’t sign a bill that adds to the deficit or the national debt.” ~ According to the Congressional Budget Office, the current legislation being promoted and defended by Barack “No Pork in This Bill” Obama will cost an absolute fortune and increase, rather than decrease, health care costs…making this claim completely absurd.

Posted by: BK | August 12, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

“ObamaCare will have panels modeled after Britain’s system, which cuts costs by denying care to the sick and elderly.”
How embarrassing for the right wing Investor’s Business Daily yesterday when they editorialized that Stephen Hawking would have been killed off had he lived in the UK apparently completely unaware that Stephen Hawking is English and has been living in the UK for most of his life and credit the NHS with wonderful care that made his life possible.
“We’re not talking about cutting Medicare benefits.” ~ Obama admitted that this was how his health care scam would be funded. He has proposed $500 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to pay for this.”
He has proposed to end $100B in subsidies to private companies from Medicare.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 12, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

-When the government and the Fed shovel several TRILLION “public” dollars to mega-corporations and the very rich, that’s not “capitalism”, but corporate f-a-s-c-i-s-m.-
The fix is in. Goldman is going to get whatever they ask for, but that’s not the worst of it. I’m beginning to wonder if Obama is even in control of the situation. It certainly doesn’t appear so. But the Chinese have taken note. So every few weeks Timbo G. gets called to the carpet. Not that I feel sorry for the creep, but I feel sorry for what we’re going to have to pony up when the ChiComs call their markers in. They’ve got HUMMER, maybe they’ll take the rest GM off our hands. Obama was right about one thing though. Those jobs WILL NOT be coming back. Everybody had better get their checkbooks out…

Posted by: Flat Broke | August 12, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Ryan said: “90% will remain with private insurance until 2019″
Considering this mess won’t go into effect until 2015, that means 10% will be switched over in 4 years..I ask you, how long before 30% are converted? How about 50%? Ryan, do you have children? I do, and I have grandchildren….I don’t want socialized medicine for them either….The government can’t even keep track of Air Force One, how will they execute our healthcare?
Obama has repeatedly made false and quite frankly slanderous remarks about physicians of late. He implied that they are making decisions based on profit OVER the best care for their patients. I am an NP and I know this to be a LIE. He doesn’t know anything about medicine or business so I don’t know how the minority that is still supporting this ridiculous reform is continuing to do so.
The country is flat out turning against it, and against Obama, Pelosi, and the rest of the democratic crooks. Watch 2010. Unless Acorn and the Black Panthers succeed, Obama and the rest of them are OUT.

Posted by: mjishernameo | August 12, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

“AARP would not be endorsing a bill if it was undermining Medicare, okay?” ~ The AARP quickly corrected this misinformation: “Indications that we have endorsed any of the major health care reform bills currently under consideration in Congress are inaccurate.”
WHY hasn’t the press got the gumption to just expose this hustler for the liar that He is? If they don’t care about the American un-rich, maybe they care about the armed forces whose lives — along with enough $ to keep everybody’s grandma in specialists forever — He’s squandering in military adventures which are as muddled as His speechifying about medical matters.

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 12, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Bet Noir
Your full of it on Single Payer,
in case you have been asleep overthe past 2 months, the game has changed.
Polls from the begining of the year are meaningless today

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

“You cling to a falling number (62%) that support a public option, The EXACT same group of people do NOT believe “President Barack Obama will keep his promise to overhaul the health care system without adding to the deficit”
Other things from Quinnipiac (though I think this is a separate poll)
“American voters disapprove 59 – 29 percent of the way Republicans in Congress are doing their job and trust Obama more than these Republicans 47 – 36 percent to fix the economy and 46 – 37 percent to handle health care.”
Posted by: Ryan C
———————————–
As usual Ryan, your a day late & dollar short….check Gallup….
++++
Americans disapprove of his handling of the issue, by 49% to 43%by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ — Americans rate President Barack Obama’s handling of healthcare policy essentially the same as they did roughly three weeks ago, remaining slightly more likely to disapprove than approve. The update comes after several weeks of Congress’ working to advance legislation through committees and the Obama administration’s stepping up efforts to win public support.
July 17-19 Approve – 44%
DisApprove – 50%
Aug 6 -9 Approve – 43%
Disapprove – 49%
I stand by my statement – Your cherry pickin to win a fight, while your side loses the war.

Posted by: Mike_C | August 12, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

My last prescription went up +280% this must be how there cutting 500 billion by adding 500 billion now

Posted by: Bill | August 13, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

If we are putting poll numbers out there how about gallup and the current legislation
Would you advise your member of congress to vote for a healthcare reform bill in September?
36%-NO
35%-Yes
29%-No opinion
So people are not fawning over this idea like before.
Also what is not mentioned about those public option polls is the dates but given the poll numbers that were in favor of the public option listed below they were 10-20 points higher in June and going down.

Posted by: GO | August 13, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am

“You would prefer all roads be toll roads?”
Roads are paid for by users already in gas taxes, inspection taxes, etc, etc. And I actually love toll roads. They are always in superb condition (at least in Oklahoma), and I only pay for them when I use them.
“How about a fire department that charges you when they come out?”
Police and Fire benefit us all, just like national defense benefits us all, secure borders, etc. Pulbic insurance for 10-15% of the population doesn’t benefit us all. Though you could argue in a round about way it would (lowering cost to the health system), but I don’t think it flies with the intent of the federal government in the constitution.
Either way, the social systems in our country are failing. They are overspent and under performing programs. All of us pay into social security and that money doesn’t generate one dime. My father, who is starting social security next year, paid something like 15 cents a week into the program when was young. The way the system pay in happens, that money didnt generate one penny of interest since then. So the system essentially loses money as it doesn’t even adjust for inflation every year. It’s a constantly deteriorating system that will continually put itself into deeper and deeper debt. Its the same with medicaid. Why don’t we study some of the programs that eastern europe is putting forth with private savings plans for health and retirement that actually generate money over time and are not sucked up into government budgets?

Posted by: KR | August 13, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

“When the government and the Fed shovel several TRILLION “public” dollars to mega-corporations…”
Thats not capitalism. I didn’t support TARP or the stimulus bills. Government should not be involved in private sector beyond sensable regulation.

Posted by: KR | August 13, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

All the President said was we’ll see if we can do better. He is ambitious and hopeful..nothing wrong with that. Pharma has agreed to help close the donut hole. Why are people making such a big deal of this?

Posted by: talmag | August 13, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Roads are paid for by users already in gas taxes, inspection taxes, etc, etc.”
In a social fashion. We all pay for the roads regardless of our use for them.
You said you prefer capitalism ALWAYS to socialism.
“Police and Fire benefit us all, just like national defense benefits us all, secure borders, etc.”
More socialist endeavors.
“Pulbic insurance for 10-15% of the population doesn’t benefit us all.”
Senior citizens beg to differ.
“Either way, the social systems in our country are failing.”
So we should immediately end Medicare, Unemployment & public schools.
Right wingers dream of the US becoming like Somalia.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 13, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

“Says Johnson: “in the beginning of this process we made pretty clear the dangers of going above $80 billion; the impact it could have on research and development and the potential job losses in a very fragile economy.”
-I think they meant to say the impact it would have on the advertising budget, since they spend considerably more money pimping there drugs and protecting there patents than on R&D.

Posted by: Online Pharmacy | August 13, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“As usual Ryan, your a day late & dollar short….check Gallup…. ”
Gallup did not ask about approval of Republicans.
Just more of your dishonesty.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 13, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

healthcare reform is just a way for the Gov. to get more control over the people of the United States. If they are paying for our medical bills then they can say what we can eat and what we can not. recently on the news there was a controversy about the Gov. trying to make it illegal for Obese people to eat fast food. Where is our freedom going? If this passes it will be the decline of our great country as we know it. this is how hitler came to power in Nazi Germany. when Germany was down in the world Hitler came and took over and because the people were blinded by the state in which there country was (just like we are blinded by our economy)hitler came to power and ruined the lives of many people. so if healthcare reforms pass then hail Obama.

Posted by: Luke Casciato | October 28, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.