Top House Democrats Call Town Hall Disruptions ‘Un-American’
In an oped in USA Today titled "'Un-American' attacks can't derail health care debate," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., attack those who've been raucously protesting health care reform at town hall meetings.
"These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views – but of the facts themselves," the write. "Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades."
Pelosi and Hoyer say "an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue. These tactics have included hanging in effigy one Democratic member of Congress in Maryland and protesters holding a sign displaying a tombstone with the name of another congressman in Texas, where protesters also shouted 'Just say no!'' drowning out those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion."
On Fox News Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said, "I don't think either side ought to be trying to engage in disrupting meetings, either the Democratic side or the Republican side. We ought to focus on the issue. And to demonize citizens who are — you know, who are energetic about this strikes me as demonstrating a kind of weakness in your position — in other words, you want to — you want to change the subject. And rather than talk about the half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts, let's talk about somebody at some town meeting who misbehaved. It strikes me that's missing the point.”
McConnell repeated: "attacking citizens in our country for expressing their opinions about an issue of this magnitude may indicate some weakness in their position on the merits. … Frankly, the truth of the matter is we don't know who's organized and who isn't. The point is the issue, the substance. They need to deal with it. Americans are concerned about it."
– jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
So, Pelosi thinks encouraging Union thugs to attack those with valid health care concerns… American?
Right. Thanks Nancy.
People are not showing up at town halls to drowned out debate. They are showing up because the Democrats are telling us there is no more debate, nationalizing health care is a done deal.
Well, it ISN’T a done deal and we will speak up, no matter how many Union workers you employ to shut us up.
Posted by: Blue Skies | August 10, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
People are getting angry because they are frustrated! The Administration simply will not listen to the majority of the American public who says they absolutely do not want this health care plan. Calling us names, ignoring us, insisting that we are not really representative of the American public, this are the types of things that are escalating the situation.
Posted by: Ruby2sday | August 10, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Shouting, screaming, threats. Next step, beatings, then retaliation, then revenge. Then, well – sounds a good bit like Iraq. If we loose civil discourse, we loose democracy.
Posted by: R Warner | August 10, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I remember the Democratic Convention in Chicago in the Mayor Daly days. What kind of demonstrations did they call those outside convention hall? Seems history is repeating itself.
Posted by: Don | August 10, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
There is a fine line here that we should all take into consideration, regardless of your opinion on health care.
Expressing ones opinion about gov’t policy is fine and needed in our system of democracy, just think of the original cause for the birth of our country … “taxation without representation”.
Other the other hand and more recently, remember that Watergate started out by Nixon/CREEP funding “dirty tricks” and planting “demonstrators” at the strongest democratic rivals to eliminate them during the primaries. I have no idea if that is the case here but I also don’t think anyone wants a repeat of that period in our history.
Posted by: Steve C | August 10, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Un-American? How about the democrats shoving legislation through without bipartisan support? How about Obama’s “grassroots” network to get votes and influence outcomes?
As mentioned above, Americans are fed up with big gov’t spending, the social reform, etc. Socialized Healthcare will not save this economy it will destroy it. Small businesses, the backbone of this country’s economy are already burdened with a higher minimum wage, reduced revenue, higher taxes down the road, etc. Now you want to load them up with this nonsense? I hear they said a socialized health system will create around 1 million jobs, yeah, all for the Federal gov’t. That isn’t real growth for the economy because those jobs are funded by tax dollars.
The Democrats in congress want to destroy this country so they can rebuild it in their vision.
Posted by: Enough | August 10, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Wow. Plenty of First Amendment haters here, defending other First Amendment haters. Are there any Americans left in America?
Posted by: Judge C. Crater | August 10, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Rasmussen:
When it comes to health care decisions, 51% of the nation’s voters fear the federal government more than private insurance companies. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 41% hold the opposite view and fear the insurance companies more.
Posted by: Health Scare Debate | August 10, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
It is this type of poor leadership that will cause Arkansas to elect it’s first independent Senator. Blanche Lincoln and others like her are not doing the job. We have a former Green Beret here in the state that is gaining alot of support in Arkansas. The Republican party who has not found anyone to run against any Senator or Congressman or even Governor this year have all of a sudden found 8 people to run against Blanche. People of Arkansas are sick of partisen politics that is why a leader like Trevor Drown will be the next US Senator for Arkansas
Posted by: David Fitzgerald | August 10, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
The first amendment allows for free speech. That included dissention.
The Democrats have been blindsided by the fact that average Americans are finally waking up and remembering they HAVE a voice and a right to use it.
And, we won’t be intimidated by anyone. Our freedom and for the elderly their very lives are at stake.
Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 10, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
EVERYONE has a right to speak- NOBODY has the right to highjack a meeting and prevent others from asking questions Civil discourse is the hallmark of a free, democratic society. Being “frusrated” is no excuse for bullying.
Posted by: glen bencivengo | August 10, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
I am the mob.
A 54 y/o retired special education teacher.
Pelosi, Obama, and the rest are making a huge mistake by dismissing ordinary Americans.
Posted by: bailey | August 10, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
People..calm down. Some people are showing up to keep these meetings from going on and that is evident. Many want to listen and learn but these others are keeping this from happening. What does a swastiker and a stupid signs have to do with health care? These are the same people who showed up at the reps. rallies especially Palins with signs saying “let’s hang him.” Nothing good can come from this. Mc Cain had to calm them down but Palin never did. We need to take a step back and try to get the correct information. Nothing can be accomplished by shouting and keeping the people who came there from speaking. You are playing into the hands of lobbyists and the insurance companies who do not want to lose control. And Sarah…you are attacking the only president who passed a health care bill strictly for children in the first two months of his administration. No one want to hurt Trig. We are all happy he is here. Funny how you are the one who always brings him up at meetings and speeches. Most politicians keep their families out of the public eye. Ya can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: talmag | August 10, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Vote as many out as possible in 2010 and get Big Brother out in 2012.
Posted by: max | August 10, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
R.I.P. Constitution
Now we know why Obama did not support the Iranian protesters.
Posted by: jack | August 10, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Intimidation is not why we have free speech.
This health care debate has spun completely out of hand thanks to our typical ill-informed core of Americans, mainly supporters of the Republican party. When I read the comments section and hear about the elderly are going to death camps, I just have to feel sorry for that individual.
If anything reforming health care will save the coming babyboomer generation from certain death. Do people that oppose health care realize they can get the rug pulled out as soon as they have a terrible illness? Do they realize as soon as you lose your job your health care is gone? Do they realize that once you have a pre-existing condition, all the money in the world can’t buy coverage? Do realize the amount of bankruptcies from health costs (Most, middle-class WITH insurance)
This is what they are screaming to protect?
Posted by: MikeNYC | August 10, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Pelosi’s right on this one.
If people have concerns, voice them at these meetings. But, not allowing others to express views, & creating chaos… that’s mob mentality & thuggery, whether by a grandma, or whoever.
These people don’t want dialog, they want silence. Most of these same people, seem to have no idea what’s being proposed. They only repeat bizarre lies told to them, like what Palin said about Death Panels, or euthanasia, etc.
It’s sad how ignorant so many in the electorate are… and at this moment in time, the ignorance seems to be centered on the Right.
Posted by: jon | August 10, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Since when did opposition and dissent become unAmerican? Is she taking a play from the George the III’s play book?
She should re-read Paine’s Common Sense again. Maybe she will realize what is American!
Posted by: scott jeffries | August 10, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
So is fascism and so is socialism. Both parties have practiced these two unamerican isms.
Posted by: Huh | August 10, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
apparently i am a member of the “un-american mob”… but i have to tell you; i am NOT going to sit there and have my congressman LIE to me and not call him out.
Posted by: paige | August 10, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
This all sounds like a calculated distraction to keep Congress from restructuring the financial industry. We don’t need to remember that Bill Clinton supported legislation to repeal Glass-Steagle and George Bush failed over 8 years to enforce the securities laws, allowed FASB and big business to get away with mark to market accounting rules, and gave away a trillion tax payer dollars to his banking buddies during the last five months of his administration – destroying the American economy in the process. We just need to be at each other’s throats so that we won’t be able to actually solve any problems – real or otherwise.
Posted by: RSWarner | August 10, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
“So, Pelosi thinks encouraging Union thugs to attack those with valid health care concerns… American? ”
Union thugs? The SEIU represents mainly hotel workers. You’re afraid of a desk clerks and hotel maids? That’s pretty sad…
Posted by: Mike | August 10, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
We need to have Pelosi, and all of her fellow Dems on the new health care plan if it is so good.
Senior and don’t want the Dems health plan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Sparky | August 10, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Well at least these areas are having town hall meetings…our spineless Reps have resorted to telephone “town hall meetings” where the calls are screened first and a delay is in place to catch the ‘bad’ ones that might slip through. Maybe these outspoken patriots are so frustrated because they feel like they are being dismissed…wonder why they would get that idea. Oh, and sending some union “Brown Shirts” to these meetings is soooo more “American” then letting opposing views be heard.
Posted by: Steve | August 10, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
The president said he didn’t want to hear from anyone who opposes his policies. We’re all just suppose to “get out of the way” so he can do what’s best for all of us. He, Pelosi and Hoyer are the ones who know best. Sit down, shut up and get out their way all you tax paying un-americans!
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 10, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Isn’t it just a little more than hypocritical that the representitives of the Left Side of the Democratic Party (pelosi et al) are talking about “Un-American” disruptions when for the last 8 years the left has orchestrated protest after organized protest. Are we to beleive that the “Demonstrators” at any G-8 Meeting, Presidential Speech, or any “green” despised event were there out of soley their desire to express their right of protest??? Come on! Let me have some of what you are smoking.
The Left, Greens, and others are the architects of Modern Political Disruption, Diversion and Media Manipulation (not that that is too hard to do these days).
Free Speech is something we should all cherish and support, especially our elected officials. When it goes to far (i.e. fire bombing buildings like our “eco-friendly” friends do), then it needs to be addressed. If a little heckling by concerned citizens (organized or not) concerns them, they should either exit politics or grow a set.
Posted by: Really??? | August 10, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
“We need to take a step back and try to get the correct information.”
You’re assuming they do not have the correct information. As if, they only disgree because they aren’t educated on the bill. Thats a bit silly to assume. The public plan is the point of contention. Those who disagree realize this will lead to a single payer system where there is strong opposition.
“Nothing can be accomplished by shouting and keeping the people who came there from speaking.”
Maybe they feel like they are being ignored?
“You are playing into the hands of lobbyists and the insurance companies who do not want to lose control.”
Really? You somehow think we’ll have MORE control with government supervision? Explain how that is so?
“And Sarah…you are attacking the only president who passed a health care bill strictly for children in the first two months of his administration.”
SCHIP bill? Medicaid for children. If you are principled against government run health care, why would they support it for any sector of our society? Just because its for children doesn’t mean these people are child haters. Though it is a typical tactic of the left to say “oh you don’t want children to get health care you evil conservative” when thats a bunch of bull. We don’t believe the government can do it efficiently and effectively, as they haven’t proven to do much efficiently and effectively. So nice try to place the emotion card, but principles remain. We need an alternative to government run anything, not more of the same.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
It’s only un-American when conservatives do it.
Comparing Bush to Hitler was quite acceptable.
Hillary Clinton said that she would not be denied the right to protest. But she did not say that any opposition had the same rights.
Barack Obama thinks that people take this democracy thing a little too seriously and so he’s collecting your names for future consideration.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Forgot one thing!!
Remember the 60′s, We are the generation that made protest a way of life and if we need to we will do it again!!!!
Posted by: Sparky | August 10, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Mitch McConnell misses the point completely, or is trying to twist the point, if he believes Pelosi has a problem with people expressing their opinions. It’s not their opinions, it’s their frankly rude, obnoxious, and belligerent behavior!!
It’s like in Latin America, where people get pumped up listening to Chavez radio broadcasts (which follow the Rush Limbaugh format of excess, exaggeration, blaming, and general buffoonery) and then go out mob style to harangue the non-believers.
It’s time for these people to put of the FOX television performers, and if they have serious questions to ask then come to the meetings, but be respectful , listen, and then ask questions like an adult.
Posted by: Sammy | August 10, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
If you think that government can provide unlimited health care, remove barriers to pre-existing conditions, add 47 million people (including at least 12 million illegals) and cut costs you are quite simply out of your mind.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
This is not just about health care.
This is frustration about a government out of control. Spending wildly, and leaving trillions for our kids/grandkids to pay off.
A president that cares more about lawyers, special interests and CEO’s than the people.
And a president that is chummy with tyrants but apologizes for America.
Congress has a 20% approval and Obama dumps the future or our heath care in their laps.
This frusrtation is about losing our freedom to an out of control, out of touch government.
Posted by: millie | August 10, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Before Pelosi starts tossing about the term “nazi” I suggest that she look at the meaning of the acronym. “Nazi” stands for Nationalistiche Sozialistiche Arbiter’s Partei” or, in English, “National Socialist Worker’s Party”. It was the triumph of the German political left. The nazis ended free speech, they initiated public labor brigades, they attacked “foreign bankers” and outlawed “investment income”, they created a system in which the elderly and the infirm were subject to extermination if of no use to the state, they silenced political opposition, they encouraged snitches, and they had their own Olbermann-style propagandists.
StevenC alleges that the NIXON/CREEP crowd planted demonstrators and they probably did, but they did not invent the tactic. Actually, the Democrat party was the first to use the tactic in modern times when the Dems assigned a special “dirty trick” squad to disrupt Nixon’s gubernatorial campaign in California in 1962. (The head of the squad even published a best seller boasting about the campaign back in the 80′s.) LBJ and JFK (actually dirty-trick specialist RFK) spent a fortune undermining each other (and Hubert Humphrey’s campaign) in the 1960 Democrat Primaries. In 1968 the Dems had “pregnant women” holding up signs saying “Nixon’s the One”. Nixon’s people were incompetent imitators.
Obama-Reid-Pelosi have shown their true colors and their basic , arrogant, contempt for the American people. Like all leftists, they think they know what is best for the “great unwashed masses” and it is astounding to them that teh “proletariat” are rejecting what is “good for the little sheep”.
Lenin, in a speech to dockworkers in 1927, once exclaimed that the people had no right to criticize a government that was doing what it deemed best. Now we have the Democrats, backed by ads from the DNC, attacking the American people for criticizing the party ‘AFTER IT WON THE ELECTION”. hOW DARE WE DO THAT!!
We not only need to protest, we need to start recall petitions against Pelosi, Reid, “Turban Durban” , Schumer and those other neo-nazis who would take away our constitution “for our own good”.
Posted by: MARKM | August 10, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Now, disagreeing with the Democrats has become “Un-American”. I think that’s called fascism.
Posted by: BubbaRight | August 10, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
As far as *nationalizing* health care, people should actually educate themselves about what the word *option* means.
Option infers choice… you can stay with what you have, or OPT for a public plan, similar to the plan our Representatives have.
Given the choice, I’d take my chances with a Government plan, over the current for-profit model. I don’t want someone that’s focused on the bottomline, making decisions about my family’s health. Unlike the Chicken Little Sect, I think Medicare, Medicaid, the Military, Police, Fire Depts, etc, do a good job. I can imagine what our society would be like, if for-profit entities ran them.
Stop being manipulated People… learn to think for yourselves.
Posted by: jon | August 10, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
you forget, Acorn has 9 billion of our tax dollars compliments of stimulus to help it with the next two elections. You can fun a lot of Dems with that money.
Posted by: Tim | August 10, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Couldn’t rush the bill through fast enough to eliminate all discussion so now the Dems embrace “discourse” which obviously means questioning the patriotism of those who disagree.
You Dems must be so proud of your speaker.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 10, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
what PELOSI wants: continued STIFLED debate and continued HIDING of the facts – SHE HATES THE FACT THAT THIS IS TAKING HER DISCIPLES OFF OF THEIR TALKING POINTS ONLY STATEMENTS WHICH ALWAYS AVOID TALKING ABOUT THE FACTS so as to say ONLY propoganda – once again PELOSI is GUILTY of EVERYTHING she complains about
Posted by: tojoley | August 10, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
“I don’t want someone that’s focused on the bottomline, making decisions about my family’s health.”
You really believe Barney Frank is more qualified to make decision on your health care than is your doctor?
Do you think you’ll be able to have everything you want and need?
Not a chance. Health care would HAVE to be strictly rationed or the costs will explode.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Just who do they, Pelosi and Hoyer think they work for? It is obviously not us, We the People. The gaul of our elected officials, to tell us how it is unpatriotic to protest, while they have exempted themselves from any Health Care plan they ram down our throats.
It is apparent that the political party in power is out of touch with the people and the economy.
“IT IS THE ECONOMY STUPID”
Posted by: pipian | August 10, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
They should listen to the people instead of denying the reality that most people do not want the Health Care mess they are about to push on us. They are sent to represent us not their beliefs. THe town hall meetings turned out to be a great sounding board which proves they should slow down, shelf the idea until we can afford to discuss a lasting solution. The focus should be on saving money by weeding out fraud and inefficiency as Obama says. We can design a system around that later.
Posted by: Onebythesea | August 10, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I guess Pelosi thinks ACORN and SEIU are the only legit grassroot organizations.
You can tell by their pretty T-Shirts and manufactered signs that we paid for.
Obama’s rent-a-mobs financed by taxpayers.
Posted by: tyler | August 10, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
polosi;s a nut case should be fired. she spends to much time under obama desk to make him happy. the ppls of this nation have right speak out. obama does;t care he crap this before a [ war ] break out that he can not handle. it will happen !!
Posted by: j | August 10, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
If we don’t get health care right, the American economy will become so uncertain that citizens who can choose otherwise, the educated, will not decide to stay here. We will experience a brain drain because people don’t want to put down roots in a place where they don’t feel economically safe having children, where the rights of individuals are consistently superseded by the interests of corporate industry.
Posted by: Hilary | August 10, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
“of course you do, that’s why you and your buddies are clueless to what fascism really is,..”
George Bush never had anyone beaten. He never told anyone to strike back “twice as hard” at protesters. He often said that protesting was an important part of democracy.
Obama wants protesters pounded and ACORN andf SEIU are the muscle.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Hysterical crowds together armed with specific tactics to “disrupt,” incite shouting, interfere with debate, intimidate under the threat of violence and falsify the facts is not democracy – it is anti-democratic. These groups are incredibly similar to the Arditi Reparti d’assalto in Italy. These people don’t believe in our great Constitution as they stifle debate and discussion. They are not representative of a majority but instead chose to threaten violence and, as is clear from their blogs and web sites, impose their narrow will against fellow citizens. They threaten the use of violence because they’ve lost at the polls.
Posted by: Richard Prince | August 10, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Now, disagreeing with the Democrats has become “Un-American”. I think that’s called fascism.
Posted by: BubbaRight
——
I do not typically vote Republician. But the Democrats are destroying the US. American people have the Freedom of Speech and the freedom to challenge our government. What I am seeing of the Democrats now, I can tell you that I will never vote Democrat again. Some American people do not want socialism or the Democrats expensive health care plan shoved down our throats. I am glad people have the guts to stand up against the Democrat party.
Posted by: PC | August 10, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I think it’s OK to call showing up to town hall meetings with ugly posters of the President of the United States as ‘the joker’ and with horns sticking out of his head, or anti-reform signs with swastikas all over them, or shouting throughout Health Secretary Sibelius entire Q&A session so she was drowned out, or hanging up an effigy of a pro-reform Congressman, or a Republican Congressman on record being heard taking pride in the successful disturbance of a town hall meeting as being just like “a lynching”…is 100%UN-AMERICAN.
These protests began with Recess Rally who issued this call-to-action to attend town halls nationally:
“This is a collaborative effort to make it known that we will not stand for socialized, government controlled
healthcare.”
“It’s time to grab a sign and raise your voice against this monstrosity that Barack Obama and his liberal allies want to shove down America’s collective throat. Liberals will certainly be making noise, we need to as well.
“Tell Congress to keep its dirty paws off our healthcare system, and tell President Obama that you don’t want a future with socialized healthcare.”
American Pundit
Nice, huh? This is an anti-reform activist call-to-action…did you read “come to these town hall meetings to ask questions about the health reform so you can be well-informed voters”?? NO you read “Congress’ dirty paws”, “monstrosity that Barack Obama & his liberal allies” “stop socialized medecine”….efforts made to pre-dispose an angry crowd to fight. This is hooligan UN-AMERICAN behavior.
Don’t pretend the people who showed up were just there because they independently wanted more info – they were there to fight because the organizers had unfairly pre-disposed them to.
Sponsors of Recess Rally, as appeared on their website, include the following lobby and big business-financed groups, masquerading as pro-patients and people:
Let Freedom Ring, Patients First,
Americans for Prosperity, Sam Adams Alliance, American Majority,American Liberty Alliance
Posted by: AMC/NYC | August 10, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“These people were Republican ringers, period.”
Really? So… wait just a minute. Are you saying there are “ringers” out there just ready to pounce and protest? When have conservatives protested on a regular basis to be dubbed “ringers”? Republican party has always asked for their consitutants to get involved and they never do. This isn’t something new that the Republican party asked for people to get involved, they have for years but little comes of it. They usually have jobs and responsibilities to tend to, and take it to the voting booth. It’s different now… and this is definately not a norm for conservatives.
So while you try, as do so many from the left recently, to characterize this as more “engineered” anger, those are real people, with real anger. And it’s also a bit nefarious that the left would frown on organized politics when thats the keystone of their party. UAW, ACORN, Moveon.org, Sierra Club, NAACP, etc etc. All perfectly acceptable organized politics but anything from the other party is thuggery? Such a double standard.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
What’s unAmerican is 15 million children without health insurance. Republicanism=collusion between the wealthy and the stupid.
Posted by: Bryan Miller | August 10, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
According to a friend of mine the new proposal on page 56 will give rights to the agencies who will provide this health care direct connection to your bank account to take funds to pay for your health care without your consent whether you wish to use it or not.
Politics as usual and now who is UN-American.
Posted by: ED | August 10, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Pelosi forgot to mention death threats against union organizers (historically the MO of fascist organizations), people bringing guns to the town halls, and death threats against elected representatives.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
These “disrupters” could care less about listening, learning or keeping their pea-brained minds open, but they have every right to rant, rave and wave their arms about like an orangutan. Dissent built this country!
Posted by: Steve Hanes | August 10, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
To Break Time and others that seem to have issue with an organized group of protesters, may I remind you that the “Tea Partiers” that they are so afraid of are named after a group of brave men and woman that were willing to risk their lives and livelihoods to make their protest. I assuming, since I was there, that those folks had some sort of organization and plan. I don’t think the all coincidently arrived at the docks in Boston Harbor with the same idea. Some on, organiztion is required. I believe one of largest supporters of these folks that are whining about “American Bullies” are the Unions (i.e. AFL-CIO, UAW, ….). If I recall from history, that group has been and continues to be a Bully to get what they want and to make their desires known. What about the organizations for Gay and Lesbian Rights (which I happen to support to some degree)? They are very good at organized bullying type protests. Countless others could b referened, but you get the point.
Protest is good for us. It opens up discussion. How can that be a bad thing?
Posted by: Really??? | August 10, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Let’s see. The leader of the Democratic Party is friends with a guy who bombed the Pentagon and stomped on an American Flag, he’s friends with a Palestinian Jew Hater, Rhashid Khalid and the L.A. Times still won’t release the video of his party Obama attended, he attended Rev Wrights church which spewed anti-American hate for twenty years, his attorney General lets go voter intimidation charges & pursues CIA interrogators, Obama hides all his personal records and today a report comes out that the address listed in the Hawaii newspapers announcing his birth is most likely false, he never lived at those address’s!!! BUT, Americans attending Town Halls to express anger are un-American???
Posted by: pauldia | August 10, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
“I think it’s OK to call showing up to town hall meetings with ugly posters of the President of the United States as ‘the joker’ and with horns sticking out of his head, or anti-reform signs with swastikas all over them,”
You did all of this to Bush and he never whined about it. Now you whine all the time when it happens to Obama.
Bush had class. Obama has none.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Political dissent and public discourse are the MOST American of activities. Keep it up!
Posted by: Wanda | August 10, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
How dumb is it for these politicians to call ordinary people unAmerican?
Who are they trying to impress–their base? They aren’t going anywhere.
And the president of all the people telling dissenters to stop talking and get out of his way?
If Obama had any hope of winning over any of those that didn’t vote for him I think he blew it.
Posted by: glenn | August 10, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Barack Obama on 9/17/2008:
“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face.”
Hmmm. Guess that in your face stuff is only supposed to flow in one direction.
Posted by: Bridget | August 10, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
LMAO at the facist cardbord faced pe-kno-ke-losi.. she hired migrant workers that could not even speak English to carry signs for her in Denver
Now you see why America is in an uproar over the democrats becoming the facist party of America.. Silence free speech is there top priority
Hey thats Flag@whitehouse.gov LMAO.. the freedom of information lawsuits are going to fly when this is over and we will find out WHO sends what to the whitehouse and what media networks are involve in this illegal activity
Posted by: stardate: 2729.9 | August 10, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“NO you read “Congress’ dirty paws”, “monstrosity that Barack Obama & his liberal allies” “stop socialized medecine”….efforts made to pre-dispose an angry crowd to fight. This is hooligan UN-AMERICAN behavior.”
I’m sorry, I read his posts and don’t see anything in there nearly as venomous as the democrats have done on Iraq, the patriot act, or katrina. Is your memory really that short?
And for how many years now have we heard these defenses of patriotism from the left? For how many years have we heard about “McCarthy-ist” tactics? Here YOU are engaging in them. The hypocrisy is absolutely astounding.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
If this is such a great plan, why won’t Democrats in Congress include themselves?
Democrats are talking about taxing “gold” plans. Will they tax their own gold-plated plans?
Steve??
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.” – Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2003
Posted by: Chelsea C | August 10, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Posted by: LibertyMan | Aug 10, 2009 10:20:33 AM
Easy.
Billions for ACORN and SEIU in the “stimulus”.
“Strike back twice as hard” at protesters.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Ed your friend is giving you bad information. The provision they are upset about would give providers the option to receive payment by direct deposit. Since insurers generally wait 89 days to pay if they can’t come up with an excuse to deny you, this will not only cut paperwork for providers but also help your credit rating.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Posted by: Chelsea C | Aug 10, 2009 10:22:20 AM
Bingo!
Thanks for posting that. I could not locate it quickly enough.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
One thing that obama and pelosi are doing right now is stirring up those great feelings of being an American and being proud of it! If I was apathetic before I sure am not now! I will be taking my 3 young sons to a town hall meeting and voicing my opposition to this crap of a health care bill. We all know obama (no flag pin, no hand over heart, wife is not proud of her country until he wins the primaries) and pelosi are the un-american thugs.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Posted by: Enron | Aug 10, 2009 10:24:38 AM
Enron flourished under Democrats and the fraud was ended by George Bush.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
they should take a national poll to see how poeple feel about impeaching obama.. and biden . this stupit health care he trying to past and spending tax payer money. obama does;t care about the white poeple in this nation just his kind !!! i bet his home town got a big pot of that money.
Posted by: j | August 10, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
America was based on a free market econonmy – spend where YOU want to spend your money and how much of it YOU want to spend. Let’s wake up America, stop this administration immediately. No more billions and trillions of money wasted, on actions that do not and will not work. Everything they have tried is a complete and total failure. Disagree, name one thing they have accomplished.
Posted by: Wake up | August 10, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
The only thing more scary than Obama being our president for the next 3.5 years is Pelosi being 3rd in line.
In reality she probably already is making all the decisions. Obama is too
indecisive and weak–just window dressing.
Posted by: larry | August 10, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
drjohn, you have a short memory. Protesters at Bush rallies were arrested all the time even in the fascist-sounding “free speech zones”, and pushed around by GOP operatives impersonating Secret Service. There were several successful lawsuits against both the GOP and the Secret Service.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Personally,
If healthcare goes down in flames
it’s good for the people of Connecticut, where I live.
Why?
The bulk of insurance companies are run out of my state.
If you are anti-healthcare reform?
You are pro Connecticut and that’s the way I like it.
Now I ain’t rich
and reform would probably be good for all of us,
but I have to look out for my people’s too.
Posted by: Steve Real | August 10, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Just step back for a second…. hanging effigies? Isn’t that what was going on when the British were here holding reins of oppression over us? Just the fact that these things are going on disturbs me, and should our current government. We fought the British for rights to speak what we think freely, why would someone like Pelosi believe she is above being criticized by the American People? We have, in our Constitution the right to keep and BEAR arms, these are freedoms we fought for… why does anyone question when the populace get fired up about anything they feel strongly about? Face it Pelosi (and anyone else in government) – we are a feisty people who do not like being spoon fed socialism!
Posted by: Paul Revere | August 10, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
You go right ahead and keep telling yourself these people demanding answers are not in the majority. Every poll shows otherwise. You continue to believe and repeat whatever OFA tells you to believe without actually reading HR 3200. If they’re such a minority, why do you care what they’re doing? The only person who has been physically hurt is a conservative man who was beaten up the SEIU members. Is that American to you? Speak up, get beat up by Obama supporters? Just keep believing those long distribution emails sent to you by Obama and OFA full of “facts.” Take those “facts” door to door to the American people like OFA instructs you to do and see for yourself what the “minority” thinks. Go on, go out and educate everyone. Be sure to insult them like the example set by the prez and the democratic leadership. Change the world.
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 10, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
they should take a national poll to see how poeple feel about impeaching obama.. and biden . this stupit health care he trying to past and spending tax payer money. obama does;t care about the white poeple in this nation just his kind !!! i bet his home town got a big pot of that money.
******************
Be careful what you wish for, though. Wouldn’t pelosi be next in line after biden? I think we should go straight to Clinton – she was the legitimate winner of the Democratic primaries anyway.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
This was very tactless. Doesn’t it occur to Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Hoyer that there are many people in the US who are either opposed to their excessive and costly bills in the House, there are also many Americans who have more questions or who feel that the aggressive agenda in Washington is moving way too fast. That is downright scary and doesn’t represent “Change” from some of Mr. Bush’s less honorable tactice.
They label people “un-American” at their own risk. She and Obama ought to take a few lessons in civility from the Senators on the Finance Committee who are trying to find a consensus health care reform program that most Americans, save a couple factions on the far left and far right, would rally behind.
I personally feel that the House bills are not only costly but also inflexible. We shouldn’t lock ourselves into any particular type of reform, rather we should take some time to find out what is more popular with the people. Also, I’m not normally on the side of some nativist elements in this country, but I would say that the only way to do healthcare reform right in this country, no matter how the end result looks, we also need to do something about illegal immigration and enact some sort of limited tort reform. We cannot have the illegals draining our system; we simply cannot afford it. There is no offense intended here, it’s just the facts.
Posted by: Joe C. | August 10, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
If this healthcare plan is sooooo good, why isn’t Congress taking part in it?
If, according to the bill’s wording, “this tax should not be considered a tax,” than what is the additional 2.5% a person who “opts” out of this enforced healthcare to be called? A fine for exercising freedom of choice?
If Pelosi thinks it unAmerican to ask questions, to protest a bill we all know in our guts is terribly wrong, then what country did she grow up in? Indonesia, like our would-be Fuhrer?
Why hasn’t Gladney been invited to the White House for a beer summit with the union thugs who beat him up?
Might email your senators and representatives with a simple yes-or-no question: do you support Pelosi’s charges that American citizens exercising their Freedom of Speech are unAmerican? See what you get there. I emailed my two senators the other day to ask if they supported the Snitch on Americans program. Not a peep, yet, although the last time I emailed them about the stimulus they were both quick to respond with stump speeches. The right questions, simple and direct, and their silence is deafening.
Posted by: M.L. Bushman | August 10, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Posted by: Flash Override | Aug 10, 2009 10:28:16 AM
Name those lawsuits.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
If anti-war protesters had used the same tactics at public forums in 2003 they would have been dragged off by the police for disturbing the peace, or at least limited to “free speech zones.” Pelosi’s choice of words was unfortunate, but the fact is, going and drowning out the voices of people who you disagree with at a public meeting doesn’t sound much like how the American political process should work to me.
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Protest is how this country began.
Pelosi / Hoyer / Obama etc are scum. They live by the Chavez playbook. We need to boot these morons out of office asap.
Posted by: reason | August 10, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
This is not the change i was looking for when obama got in. This is a passinate debate on health care by both sides but for people like pelosi and hoyer to make comments about people who voice strong opposition to this health care reform bill as un-american is a insult on freedom speech.
Posted by: ron | August 10, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Eleanor Roosevelt and others said “Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people.” The orchestrated disruptive behavior at town meetings across America ranks below even those small minds. It is children with fingers in their ears shouting No No No No NO.
The day we stop working entirely for the Health Care Complex is now in March, and under it’s current rate of growth it will quickly be in May. And this is for average income people. Many, if they want any decent health care at all, would need to work deep into Fall and beyond, simply to pay medical insurance and bills.
Millions with *good* health insurance go bankrupt every year anyway, to pay what their insurance companies denied or did not cover, after catastrophic health events.
Between Medicare and Medicaid and federal employee health insurance and indigent emergency care and prisoner medical we are already supporting socialized medicine at massive levels. We also defacto bailout all health insurance companies on an ongoing basis, because without this underlying payment for the elderly, the destitute, the working poor, the sickly and those with previous conditions, health insurers and hospitals and doctors and pharmaceuticals would not have a cherry-picking first pass through the health care orchard.
We need reform. We need mature discourse. We need a leveled playing field for the Health Care Complex. We need gov’t to change how the already socialized health care system is administered. We do not need children shouting and holding their breath to get their way.
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“What’s unAmerican is 15 million children without health insurance. Republicanism=collusion between the wealthy and the stupid.” writes Ed
One,in Pennsylvania, all children are covered.
Two, the federal government has no business interferring in my health care so they can provide for others.
Three, the government have no right to decide life and death issue involving treatments ( rationing)
Four,noone has a right to my health or financial records unless I grant permission.
Five, are they Congress,President and govermnent employees going to be under this plan?
Have you seen film of Obama stating he wanted to abolish private insurance?
I did not vote for Obama but I was proud that Americans would vote for a African American. This isn’t about race or even party. It is about our HEALTH CARE…. get it?
Posted by: SusanR | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
This woman needs to be recalled. She is an embarassment to this nation. Why anyone would back her in anyway is a mystery to many Americans. What a loser!
Posted by: Charleston | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
And it goes downhill – on and on.
Posted by: RSWarner | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
If these “protests” where just protests, it wouldn’t be a problem. Everyone has a right to dissent. These “protests” are all about shutting down any discussion and spreading lies about the healthcare bills. Sure, the left did it to Bush/Cheney. Bush/Cheney actively suppressed dissent. They set up “free speech zones” and screened attendees at their “town hall meetings”, preventing anyone who even might dissent from attending.
Obama is a long way from that. At least these “protesters” are allowed a seat in the hall. Too bad they don’t know how to behave as responsible citizens, participating in the democratic process.
Posted by: Small | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
BubbaRight – Mod rule is un-American. Going to a public meeting with the specific intent and instructions from right-wing extremist and anti-American groups to shout down, intimidate with threats of violence and tell lies is “un-American” and fascistic. It is exactly what Mussolini did in Italy to rise to power. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Richard Prince | August 10, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
This is an amendment folks called freedom of speech. Nancy Pelosi is trying to take this away. Look who she used to govern California .”Fine state they are in”. Now she wants to continue her destruction throughout the country!
Posted by: susan | August 10, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Protesting is not un-American although the shouting, screaming, and unwillingness to let others also ask questions is not what I’d called the American way (and this goes for vehement protestors on both sides of the political spectrum). As it is, I am constantly amazed how inept Pelosi and Reid are in dealing with the public. They need PR advice badl!
Posted by: BachisBest | August 10, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Why can’t we have a national televised debate,with just the 2 top senators from each side. Maybe that will settle this, and get some of these unanswered questions taken care of.
Posted by: Idea! | August 10, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Short and simple. This is an expansion of the welfare system. You take from those who work and you give to those who don’t.
Granted, there are some who are incapable and we need to care for them, but when I see people who decide to purchase an iPod and cell phones with texting and internet access instead of buying health insurance, then YES I’m going to get mad as hell when the Government comes in and tells me that I have to pay for their health insurance.
Every time I turn around there’s another tax. Almost 10% of my phone bill is taxes, my gas and electric bills are filled with additional taxes, I’ve got a sales tax on virtually everything I buy, there’s .24/gallon of federal tax on gasoline, another .17/gallon of state excise tax, then we have employment taxes, income taxes, property taxes…. Where does it ever end.
I’ve HAD IT!!!
Show me two things and maybe I’ll change my mind.
1.) Show me ONE Government program that has actually “saved” money.
2.) Show me ONE Indian Tribe in the US that has seen an improvement in their quality of life from a federal program (as opposed to their business activities).
Government programs don’t save money and they haven’t improved our quality of life for anyone. If you want to improve your quality of life try working for a living and saving for your own future.
I’m sure there are some who will say – yeah, how’s your 401(k) looking right now? And I’ll tell you – if the Federal Reserve and the Federal Government had provided the ovesight they were supposed to be providing, this mess wouldn’t have been so intense.
The Federal Government and the Federal Reserve blew it and we’re paying the price. Now they think they’re going to fix it by going further into debt and raising taxes to pay for it.
It’s time for the Federal Government to start looking at their own house instead of trying to “fix” the private sector.
It’s not about Republicans or Democrats – it’s about both!!
That’s just THIS President’s strategy – find someone to point the finger at and make them the bad guy when the truth is they all need to look in the mirror.
When Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama and his hired thugs (ACORN/SEIU)begin to understand that the Citizen’s “We the People” run this country, not the electorate and taxpayer funded special interests – then we’ll see some civility in the town halls.
If you want to find a place to save some money Mr. President, you can eliminate ACORN’s funding and leave health care alone because I, for one, am tired of Government taking my income and using it to finance special interests and your former employer.
Posted by: MakesSense2Me | August 10, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Demonize free speech? Touchy touchy!
Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
So, Pelosi feels that anyone who disagrees with her agenda is Un-American? Nancy, your brown shirt is showing.
Posted by: patilee | August 10, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Just shut up and do as you’re told! Listen to Barry and Nancy and Steny. They have your best interests at heart and remember, this is change that we all NEED, right? It doesn’t matter that a majority of Americans are against this junk legislation, they’re going to continue to lie and tell people this is important. If you don’t agree, and even worse, if you let people know that you don’t agree, then you’re bound for the gulag.
Posted by: John | August 10, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
The unions and the democrats have always tried to stifle free speech. The democrats use organizations like ACORN and the unions to do their dirty work of crooked elections and preventing Americans from protesting against moves that take their freedom and allow illegal aliens to take our jobs and use our resources. I have attended both the TEA parties and town hall meetings. There was no organized group represented. The people there were my neighbors and fellow citizens that are tired of both parties taking their freedoms away and imposing government on every aspect of our daily lives. As far as health care, the government should not have a thing to do with it. If you can’t provide health care for you and your children, don’t have children. Tax payers shouldn’t have to pay for lazy people’s housing, food, and health care. All Americans have the same chance to succeed. If people would rather take dope, drink, and make babies that is their problem, not the tax payers of this country. There is no where in the constitution that says a citizen is owed health care. The socialists and free loaders are the people that elected Obama. There are now more people that live off their fellow citizens than there are people that work and pay their own way. That is why Obama won. He bought votes with checks to the lazy and now is doing the same thing with cash give aways of our tax dollars to support the auto unions in the “Cash For Clunkers” welfare move.
Posted by: George Douglas | August 10, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
There was a doctor at a townhall meeting in Atlanta who asked Rep. David Scott (D-GA) why he was supporting a bill that was essentially like the failing one in Massechusetts. Mr. Scott went ballistic on the doctor.
Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
And these are the people who blasted Sarah Palin as being stupid? Pelosi is beyond moronic. She obviously has never studied American history nor does she have any cognizance of the Constitution. So what the heck is she doing in a position of power in Washington? It’s time for a recall.
Posted by: luigi | August 10, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
For those people who wish to pay double digit increases for their health insurance premiums have at it. For those people who are covered at work who think their employers while continue to pay inflated premiums for your policy , good luck.
For people who are members of HMO’s who don’t Think there is a ” bureocrat” between them and there doctor , think again. Your health care is in the hands of your HMO. Don’t want reform , don’t get sick. Oh and all of a sudden protesting is suddenly patriotic?
Posted by: Mfein | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
More recently, 61 year old librarian was arrested at a McCain “town hall” last year for wearing a “McCain=Bush” tshirt. The police were told by a McCain staffer that he was Secret Service.
Even the conservative Rocky Mountain News agreed her rights were violated.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
“What’s unAmerican is 15 million children without health insurance. Republicanism=collusion between the wealthy and the stupid.” writes Ed
If you deduct the illegals, the people that chose not to have health insurance, etc. It gets down to less than 5 million. One estimation has it at about 2 million.
Posted by: patilee | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
For those of you who think Congress care more about you than does your doctor:
(B) developing measures of rates of read8
mission for individuals treated by physicians;
9 (C) applying a payment reduction for phy10
sicians who treat the patient during the initial
11 admission that results in a readmission; and
12 (D) methods for attributing payments or
13 payment reductions to the appropriate physi14
cian or physicians.
HR 3200 page 298
What this means is that doctors will be penalized for readmitting you to the hospital even if your life depends on it. Government is discouraging use of services. And you thought insurance companies were bad?
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
“still waiting for your proof….
guess like most republican nonsense..”
Not going to speek for John but I think he was stringing together the statments by Obama, such as “get in their face”, and “hit them twice as hard”, and connecting it to some of the violent confrontations at some of these situations recently. He extrapolated from these statements to the protests. I wouldn’t say Obama “ordered” it, but one could see that he is inciting confrontation based on his statement of “hit em twice as hard”. I wouldn’t say it was an order for violence however, but by promoting confrontation I think it’s logical to assume violence could ensue.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Shouting and attempting to disrupt town meetings is a direct result of a “weakness of your position”. Clearly, the right wing is being driven by greed, selfishness and fear. They have lost the rational argument and are running on emotion. Pent up anger over losing the election is spilling over here. I say let them vent all they want, let them make complete fools of themselves, and see if it works for them. There will be blowback from the civilized thinking independents at the polls.
Posted by: Robin from Colorado | August 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Go see why the democrats “opted” out of Obama deathcare At Michelle Malkins website LMAO these are nothing but creeps
Posted by: stardate: 2729.9 | August 10, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said, “I don’t think either side ought to be trying to engage in disrupting meetings, either the Democratic side or the Republican side.”
Well it would have been awfully nice if you really held that view before whipping the hard right up into a frenzy of screaming zealots. There are idoits out there demanding that government ‘keeps it hands off’ Medicare !?! To show ‘both sides’ of the argument, one news station turned to an analyst who is either a liar or hopelessly ignorant:
“If you like the Post Office and the Department of Motor Vehicles and you think they’re run well, just wait till you see Medicare, Medicaid and health care done by the government.” —Arthur Laffer on CNN
(I assume everyone here knows that Medicare and Medicaid ARE done by the government and always have been.)
It would be helpful if the press would fact check these folks and hold them accountable to reality. Who started the shouting in town meetings – for or against? Was Palin lying about euthanasia being in the bill or not? Will the bill result in an increase in government funding of abortions?
Lets try to get some reality out there.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 10, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
What the President needs to do is break down his Health Bill so every person can understand it. Including how he is going to pay for it, then print it in every newspaper and put it up on the internet so we can read for ourselves what this bill is all about and what it will cost each of us in the end. Just stop the rumors and the circle talk. Give it to us straight and to the point. Will the old and sick be taken care of like Obama’s cabinet members or will be put out to pasture? He said will running we would and deserve health care like the members of senate and house and I expect nothing less.
Posted by: insight | August 10, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Retro; No that wasn’t a townhall meeting. Nice try.
Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
What’s unamerican is the Messiah and his communist cronies, trying force us into a government run program. They do not want to give treatment to the elderly, just give them pain pills and let them die. They will never be productive people who can pay taxes again. Anyone who can’t pay taxes is useless to the communists. The Messiah wants to be a dictator. He already has his cabinet, the Czars. Why congress allowed to to hire those people, including communists, is beyond me. That sounds like hiring those Czars was unconstitutional. In fact, that sounds more like treason. An attempt to overthrow our government, which he is slowing doing anyway. At least a few dems have some common sense, otherwise, it would be a done deal because the judicial branch is not willing to go againt the Messiah, no matter what he does! I am also canceling my membership to AARP because the leadership has no idea what is being done to seniors and they are supposed to be on our side! The Messiah also has that leadership brainwashed into believing in his tactics. He is anto American, anti Isreal and pro Muslim. The radicals are the ones who attacked us on 9/11 and the Messiah would bring them to American so that they can go free. As long as they are in Cuba, they can’t go free!
Posted by: Henry Flynn | August 10, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Sorry messed up that last part….
Obama said we deserve and that he would see to it that we get the same health care as his senate and house people receive and we would get nothing less.
This is what I expect from him.
That was almost word for word.
Posted by: insight | August 10, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Agree, agree, agree. However, at 70, I can’t understand how anyone can support or vote on a legislative bill they have not read. Cost?? The detailed contents of the health ‘law’ will be written by multiple groups ‘after’ it is signed into law. After the details are written, the Congressional Budget Office will estimate the cost of the plan and recommend where the money might come from. So, we are premature in screaming, after the COB does it’s thing we are going to cry ourselves to sleep, because by then it will be too late. It will be law and we voted it in. So smile, now.
Posted by: James L. | August 10, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
HR 3200 and abortions:
“Massive increases in abortion, the largest since Roe v. Wade, are looming because health care proposals such as HR 3200, “America’s Affordable Health Care Choice Act,” will not only fund abortion, they also will mandate coverage of abortion on demand in virtually all of America’s health care plans, preempt abortion-reducing state limitations and protections, and create an abortion clinic mandate. These proposals will reverse America’s steady, reduction in abortions.”
- Don Nelson
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Can Pelosi explain why some Dems are also protesting against the Health care porposals ? Is she calling her own party members un-American ? Perhaps Claire McCaskill is un-American because she believes this is truly a grassroots movement as are other Dems who believe this is truly grassroots are they all liars and unAmerican too ? Blue Dogs must be un-American too using Pelosi’s reasoning . I would like to thank Queen Nancy and Steny for driving more to the opposing side by thier balatant lies and attacks on the citizens . I ask this what if those you claim have financed this outrage , actually now would throw thier money behind this movement of citizens ?
Posted by: Bill Strong | August 10, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I think people up on the hill who are responsible for passing these bills are lazy and incapable of doing their jobs. (On both sides). We pay you to read a bill front and back and back again if necessary, and decide for us what will be good for us. Not take the lazy road and allow someone to brief you or pay you under the table to cast a vote.
Posted by: insight | August 10, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Pelosi is not only moronic, but more than inept..She is un-American and because of her past and present comments should be told to step down..she makes Obama look like a stupid…Let us not forget that the total Goverment system of the US was created, For the People,and By the people, So the question is, why is it Un-American to voice an opinion loadly??
Posted by: Connie Pratt | August 10, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Somebody tell Pelosi those people disrupting her little town hall meetings ARE the opposition to this ridiculous health plan. Maybe she should listen a little. Why are they RAMMING this through? Take your time, do it right and tweek it after implementation. We’re sorry we are disrupting your “ram it down our throat” health care bill. Even Dems admit they didn’t and won’t read it.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
“Un-American” is a sitting President telling Americans to “shut up” and “get out of the way” as arrogant Obama did last week.
Posted by: Jessica | August 10, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
(I assume everyone here knows that Medicare and Medicaid ARE done by the government and always have been.)
======================================
Ah yeah—-that’s just one of the problems people are having with HR 3200. Those programs are on their way to bankruptcy. Did YOU know that?
Posted by: jennifert7 | August 10, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Patilee writes: So, Pelosi feels that anyone who disagrees with her agenda is Un-American? Nancy, your brown shirt is showing.
________________________________
Actually Pelosi’s talking about the fear-mongering and hatefulness of those who go to health care meetings to stop debate and hurl vile, ignorant comparisons to fascism.
Posted by: Danny | August 10, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
The democrats should not forget that socialistic government is beyond un american!They should stop putting the discontent off on the republican party and they just might see that rhe people protesting at tea parties and health care are also democrats who realise the party they supported is not what they got! I think the tearm is ( BATE AND SWITCH)
Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
If Congress and our government had to use this system, I bet they would all read it before voting on it! They don’t, so why waste the time we pay them for to read it if somebody else already read it? What a joke.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Pelosi has chosen to call those who oppose government takeover of healthcare “un-American”. Doesn’t this seem a bit ironic from a person who considers flag burning to be an expression of free speech? Doesn’t Pelosi exhibit a bit of gall and temerity here? Isn’t this an outlandish insult to a free people?
Both Obama and Pelosi say or infer that all who oppose their government takeover of healthcare are organized by republicans, the insurance companies or some right wing organizer. However, the word is out that Obama has energized, by email, some 13 million members of his OFA (Organizing for America). Members of which pledge to support — not the flag, not the constitution, not the country, not even the Democratic Party, but Obama and his “bold plan.” OFA does not use the Democratic Party logo but the “O”-shaped logo of the Obama campaign in which the red white and blue of the flag are abstracted to soft pastel colors. So I ask the question, isn’t the real conspiracy from the left?
Why does the left use election campaign tactics in attempt to marginalize opponents of government takeover of healthcare? Why can’t a supposedly representative government just accept the fact that we are a free people who don’t want a bigger more intrusive government?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 10, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
“then why do republicans not denounce the fringe portion of their party who are ‘ promoting confrontation’ and disruption? that fact that this is a well organized coordinated attempt to stop a town hall meeting is beyond debate..”
Enouraging people to go to the town halls and have their voice heard, as posted from numerous republican sources, isn’t really the same but people will see all of this different ways. Saying you are going to “hit them twice as hard” clearly has a different meaning. I personally think that people should express their anger at the town halls, but also be civil about it. I don’t agree with just yelling constantly so that the meeting can’t be held, and only read of one instance of this (may be more, I just didn’t read about it). But at the same time, is it sending the message they want to send? Probably. I’m not sure there is a conductor there in all cases either as has been claimed.
I think that it’s being mis-characterized on a wide scale by both sides. While Republicans should (and have done so by some) to ask people to temper their emotions but at the same time still show their voice, the Democrats have tried to completely de-legitimize their voices even at the highest office in our land. That is a huge mistake in my opinion. The people who jump on that bandwagon are no better than those that shout down the town halls until they grind to a halt.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
regarding drjohn:”If you deduct the illegals, the people that chose not to have health insurance, etc. It gets down to less than 5 million. One estimation has it at about 2 million”
————————————–
Many of the people who “choose” not to have health insurance “chose” instead to have food on the table. Or “decided” not to spend $4,000/month on COBRA because they were laid off and have no direct source of income, even though they have Hepatitis or HIV or MS or cancer. When these people and the homeless and indigent and illegals go to the emergency room or hospital now, we already pay, just with vast surcharges, because the system is broken.
And by the way, for those with comfortable jobs and *good* health insurance policies, me included. Your salary would likely be higher if your company wasn’t paying so much for your insurance. Companies look at total compensation packages. Health Care Complex inefficiencies impact your bottom line not only when you actually use the system, but every payday, regardless.
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
More and more it looks like the consttution that our fore fathers gave us was even better thought out and 2oo+ years ahead of it’s time!
Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
“Many of the people who “choose” not to have health insurance “chose” instead to have food on the table.”
Simply not true.
These are the population making over $75K and choosing not to buy insurance. There are about 17 million who qualify for programs and have not signed up.
Democrats cannot wait to provide health care for illegals.
That means that you and your family will have to queue up behind illegal aliens in your wait for health care.
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
“Many of the people who “choose” not to have health insurance “chose” instead to have food on the table.”
That is not true. People at those incomes typically qualify for medicaid.
I was on the rolls of “uninsured” for about 6 months. I purchased a $65 a month plan that only covered emergency/critical care. I had been to the doctor twice in a year and it didnt make sense to pay $400 a month when I didn’t go to the doctor much. At that time, COBRA was around $360 a month.
So you’re statement is based more on perception than reality. Some people see it as more cost effective to just pay cash for their health care, and they typically have money.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
To flash override
And all socialistic government is correct? people in germany loved hitler untill the real hitler came out!
Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Someone should break the news to Pelosi and Obama that this is beyond party lines. It’s Democrat and Republican. And the poor seniors are getting a kick in the teeth after giving the best years of their lives for this country.
Posted by: Joe De Fina | August 10, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Signing statements, transparency, lobbyists- there really isn’t a single thing Obama has been honest about.
Why would anyone believe him now?
Posted by: drjohn | August 10, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I guess we can’t disagree with Princess Pelosi or this adminisrtation or we are UnAmerican. So at the risk of being UnAmerican and added to the White House’s enemies list, I disagree with the government’s take over of Healthcare. From the Czars to the Government take over of PRIVATE companies, to the withholding of information, this, so far, appears to be the most unconstitutional admonistration since Nixon. Unless the people of this country wake up and look at what is going on the US is gone forever.
Posted by: TreEpin | August 10, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
THE BRITISH CALLED US TRATIORS WHEN WE FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDANCE,AND NOW THE DEMS CALL THE TEA PARTIES AND THE TOWN HOUSE PATRIOTS, UN-AMERICAN AND EVERYOTHER NAME IN THE BOOK. ITS A GOOD THING WE DIDN’T LISTEN TO THE BRITISH, AND I THOUGHT NAME CALLING ENDED IN FRIST GRADE
Posted by: art | August 10, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
The bridge in mass were our fore fathers stood, never forget what they stood for and what our constitution stands for. support what and protect whattheygave !
Posted by: william | August 10, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
And all socialistic government is correct? people in germany loved hitler untill the real hitler came out!
==========================================
This type of comment is typical from those opposing Healthcare. It lends nothing to serious debate, it just inflames. And they should be treated as irrelevant until they decide to tone it down and contribute to the debate..
Posted by: indy_voter | August 10, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
These Democrats are the worst hypocrites.
How come they remind me of Bush when he said critics to his Patriot Act is Un-patriotic?
Posted by: Jim | August 10, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Most of those in middle income brackets who chose not to be covered under their employer’s health insurance do so because they are already covered under a spouse’s plan. You can’t deduct them from the total of uninsured, because they are insured.
And “People of those [lowest] incomes” are indeed covered by Medicaid, but don’t forget that many of them started with a job, perhaps with marginal insurance, and now once again are on a broken system. Keeping them off Medicaid would be a good thing, for them and the people as a whole.
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
If this is another right wing conspiracy, am I ‘allowed’ to ask for some proof?
Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Un-American? I’ll tell you whats Un-American!
- government ownership of automobile companies
- taking my hard earned tax dollars to buy someone elses car
- procuring executive jets for Congress just months after chastising industry for the same
- offering senior government positions to tax cheats
- trying to push bills through Congress before Americans have had a chance to read them
- driving our country to it’s largest debt in history in only 6 months
- a profiling President
- and calling obvious senior citizens at townhall meetings mobsters because they say what you don’t want to hear
Un-American? What the hell is wrong with you.
Posted by: dbc | August 10, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
It’s disgusting to see people behaving in such a barbaric way. The GOP is encouraging these individuals, mostly older Americans, to disrupt meetings because the GOP does not want them to hear the truth, and these people are falling for it, they are being controlled by the GOP, it’s really disgusting.
Posted by: Davina | August 10, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
To Cynthia and Chris..
oh yeah..we disagree with your messiah, so we have to be racists. Lets see ..he is losing his popularity and people are disagreeing so it has to be racisim . of course. also someone disagrees so it has to be Un-American…
On that subject where are all the war protestors now. Things are worse than ever and I dont see one SHeehan in the streets.. maybe it was people that hated a white president not the war they were protesting..
Posted by: bubba | August 10, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
who voted Obama????
Posted by: unamerican | August 10, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
“The GOP is encouraging these individuals, mostly older Americans, to disrupt meetings…”
Disrupt? Really? I’ve only seen that claim by the left, but haven’t seen a GOP member say “go DISRUPT that meeting!”. I’m not saying there isn’t, just post it cause I haven’t found it yet.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
It’s disgusting to see people behaving in such a barbaric way. The GOP is encouraging these individuals, mostly older Americans, to disrupt meetings because the GOP does not want them to hear the truth, and these people are falling for it, they are being controlled by the GOP, it’s really disgusting.
Posted by: Davina | Aug 10, 2009 11:22:17 AM
Oooooooooo, those elderly are DANGEROUS!
Posted by: Dissent is NO LONGER patriotic. | August 10, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
The permanent ruling class of the Democratic Party sure didn’t complain about 8 years of disruptive protest of the Bush administration. This country was FOUNDED on disruptive protest and rebellion. This country kicked an entire ruling class and government out of power. It is time we kick out the permanent politicians that make up current Washington. TERM LIMITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: bobster | August 10, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
The mere fact the dems are saying “if we don’t have a bi-partisan agreement within 37 days or we will go it alone” should be enough to scare anyone. Does this not sound like a threat to force it down our throats? In other words “go with our plan or we will do it anyway”. Doesn’t sound like the dems want ANY outside interference.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Telling people to shut up because you don’t want to hear their views, because they are devastating to your case IS un-American.
People have something to say and the best argument you have is “shut up; you’re trynig to take over our lives.”
“but…”
“SHUT-UP!”
We’re supposed to be living in a free country where we can speak our minds, not where we have to be quiet or risk being lynched.
Posted by: Joe_in_CA | August 10, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
The major health care insurance companies are publicly listed on the stock exchange. That means that they must file a quarterly Form 10Q and an annual Form 10K to disclose their financial information. The information below is from those insurance companies publicly filed information.
Why hasn’t the news media disclosed these facts? The only place I saw this on TV is on Bill Moyers Journal on PBS. Other than that, one has to dig it out on the internet.
So if you want to continue paying more for health care and getting less for your premium dollar, urge your representative to vote against health care reform. This constituency is probably the same dumb group that voted Bush in for a second term.
Here are the profitability facts of the major health care companies.
The medical-cost ratio – also called the medical-loss ratio or medical-care ratio – is the key number for health plans in terms of their level of profitability. That ratio, simply, is the percentage of dollars the companies spend on health care.
Whereas 10 years ago many plans had medical-cost ratios in the high 80s or 90s, now the highest percentage among large, publicly traded health insurers is Health Net, at 83.9%. Aetna, which had a medical-cost ratio well into the 90s when CEO John Rowe, MD, took over in 2000, recorded a ratio of 76.9% in 2005, Dr. Rowe’s final full year before his retirement. That was the lowest medical-cost ratio for the nation’s largest publicly traded plans.
Medical-loss ratios for 2005 (Source: Company 10-K, year-end filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission):
76.9% – Aetna
82.3% – Cigna
83.9% – Health Net
83.2% – Humana
78.6% – UnitedHealth Group
80.6% – WellPoint
The multi-million compensation packages for the health care CEOs is not far behind, some of this already exists.
Eugene T, C.P.A.
Posted by: Eugene | August 10, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I read our dictator leader Obama has opened a tattle tale number to call in and report who is talking about health care reform in a way that is not in line with the socialist republic of the democrates. Wow you yes we canners or blind and just like to follow like sheep. The cliff is near and your about to fall off yet you still blindly follow the lead. Funny how the administration and both houses, Supreme court and other agencies will not have the same health care they are trying to force down your throats. Have any of you asked them why???? or are you afraid the tanks and troops will come to your house??
Posted by: Jim Rod | August 10, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Having seen clips of some of these “meetings”, I have seen better behavior on World Wrestling. The behavior being demonstrated is most definately unamerican. How many of these people have read the PROPOSED bill. Probably none. I have been unable to locate the thing on line anywhere. Everyone neeeds to calm down and listen to the legislators who have at least seen the PROPOSED bill.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Like it or not we are already a country with socialized medicine, it’s just that it’s ineptly inenacted in practice. A vast majority of the cost of the average person’s healthcare is spent in the last 30 days of their life. Without socialized healthcare, this would be their house, their small business, their inheritance for their children. Even with “catastrophic care” insurance. For those who think socialized medicine is evil, how do you propose folding all the people covered already under myriad federal programs into mainstream capitalist driven insurance? The Health Care Complex would suffer a meltdown far worse than what we’ve experienced in housing, and the consequence would not just be people out in the street to live, but literally dying in the streets. Will you sell your home (if you have one), go bankrupt, starve a bit, so mom can have 11 extra days in a coma?
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Is this the best the Dems can say??? There are millions and millions who are mad as hell about how the dems are trying to shove a health care bill down their throats and all the Dems can say is that they are Un- American???? I was worried that they might succede but not now. The dems public plan is toast.
Posted by: billy bob | August 10, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Where was I when Obama was appointed King. Where in the Constitution was the President given the power to take my personal helthcare away and replace it with some inferior plan. I did not ask and I do not want the Federal Government to have anything to do with my health care. Excuse me Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstien, and Obama if you don’t like my opinion. You are the new face of Socialism and I’m not a socialist. It’s time for the True Patriots to standup and throw these NAZI’s out.
Posted by: rjharen | August 10, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Ok…let me see if I have this right. Crowds of people pushing the agenda of the left are simply exercising their freedom of speech….while anyone in disagreement with the current administration is “unamerican”?
Can anyone say sycophants? Or is that not PC enough?
Posted by: GF | August 10, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Its an interesting albeit likely unsuccessful political ploy by the Dems to sway uniformed independents by breeding “opposition to those inopposition”. The various health care reform bills cant be sold on their own merit at present (if they could thats what the Op-Eds would have been about). Instead its “create a villian to rally against” time.
The Dem strategy banks on a) that the current polls showing a clear majority against the currently proposed health care reforms is “soft” – ie that it is a surfacy uninformed belief – capable of being reversed and b) that those who hold strong informed views in oppositon are only Republicans who will never vote Dem anyway. This point is crucial to being able to label the opposition racist astroturfers. If the Dems are wrong on this and some of the strongly held beliefs are from independents – the plan backfires as the Dems insut the very voters they will need to court at 2010.
Notice how the debate is about the “veracity of the debaters” as opposed to the merits of reform. Hope and change = same old song.
Posted by: undecided2012 | August 10, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Speaking of short memories, it was only a couple of months ago that the people being denied entry to and being arrested at “health care town hall” meetings were the people advocating single-payer.
Don’t forget that it isn’t just Republicans that are bought and paid for by the insurance and drug lobbies.
You don’t hear about any of that because it has become a useful meme that this discussion is about people for and against Obama’s plan.
Let me tell you there are tons of people on the left against the legislation currently in congress (except maybe HR 676, which of course gets NO coverage).
The problem with the legislation when viewed from the left is that it isn’t single-payer, it isn’t even a strong public option, and it is loaded with pork thanks to the Blue Cross Democrats, and mainly that it is a huge subsidy to the private insurance industry again thanks to the Blue Chip Democrats.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
The democrats need to represent the people that put them in office and back in control. Don’t think that the republicans haven’t. It’s time to vote strong public health care straight up or down. It’s time a patient gets what’s best for them instead of what’s best for the stock holders. Vote strong public health care straight up or down then we will know who to send packing coming the 2010 elections.
Posted by: rightbehind | August 10, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Davina————-Do you think maybe, just maybe the elderly took the time to read the plan and do not like it? Mandatory 5 year counseling on ending your life? Their literal lives would be resting on the will of our government. As I said, if our government had to use this plan, they would read it and then reject it. Why? Because most of our government is at retirement age.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
This comment was sent to the White House “fishy” email.
This Government is “of the people, by the people and for the people” not of the Democrats, by Pelosi and for Obama.
Posted by: AJ | August 10, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
It is just absolute ignorance.
Posted by: WW | August 10, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
If it were up to Pelosi there would have been no meetings, no reading the legislation. They would have voted this in before anyone had an opportunity to comment.
This is why people are mad as hell and this will continue. Pelosi is a disgrace, a liar and about as dumb as dirt.
Posted by: Chris | August 10, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
There is a lot more dissent over this health care plan than when Hillicare came out. When will the dems learn that it has to be bi-partisan and have public support. This is looking a lot like waterloo to me.
Posted by: billy bob | August 10, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Our health care is horrible. I can barely afford it and have a HMO. If costs go up anymore, a lot more people will not have it. And if you do have it they do not pay for pre-existing condtions and if you have a horrible disease God help you. Republicans are spreading a lot of lies about Pres. Obama’s plan. Instead of working with him on it they are having a field day with rumors. So yes it is Unamerican. The president gave a speech and listed everything he was doing. If you listened to him you would not believe all this garbage going around. No wonder our country is in such a mess.
Posted by: Barb | August 10, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Health care can not be realistically repaired with tort reform. Exhorbitant settlements from lawsuits is what drives medical costs. If private insurers drop off the map because they are unable to financially compete, how is the government going to be able to contend with the excessive amounts awarded by malpractice courts that it will undoubtably be slammed with?
Posted by: sandy3434 | August 10, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
THE DEMOCRAT-SOCIALISTS have forgotten that this country is about small government and big individualism. They’ve forgotten who is in charge and who the servants are.
Posted by: Ron | August 10, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Straight from HR 3200
SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT COVERAGE.
(a) Grandfathered Health Insurance Coverage Defined- Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable coverage under this division, the term `grandfathered health insurance coverage’ means individual health insurance coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:
(1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT-
(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.
Lose or change jobs and you MUST take the government ‘option’. Just one more lie so often touted by the annointed one.
Posted by: akcoyote | August 10, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
“Here are the profitability facts of the major health care companies.”
Health care insurance companies are not taking in record profits right now. Their profits are lower than 2006 and 2007 by a long shot. Also, the industry averages about 5% profit as a whole, when compared to most retail or technology markets that enjoy 15-20% profits. This also ignores that health insurances companies invest in future medical technologies and research. During the Clinton administration, a study found that for every person who invested $65 dollars a year into medical research, they saved up to $5k a year on medical costs for new innovations. So it makes sense that a health insurance company would be interested in investing in new technologies and research to make you healthy and save them money. It makes good business sense. That’s something the government doesn’t do a good job of.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Here’s a deal. If the govt can take all programs related to health care, remove all the fraud and abuse from them and pay for the reform without taking more taxes, pass it and leave me alone. Reform and “government run” are 2 different things. No more taxes!
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
“Medical-loss ratios for 2005 (Source: Company 10-K, year-end filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission):
76.9% – Aetna
82.3% – Cigna
83.9% – Health Net
83.2% – Humana
78.6% – UnitedHealth Group
80.6% – WellPoint”
Just thought I would point out that while that shows the percentage spent on health care, it does not mean that the resulting percentage is profit. The insurance companies do have employees correct? Those costs are not included, and those costs will also be included in any government plan.
The only potential argument you could have on a cost basis for single payer is the elimination of the need for marketing. However, that cost would be marginal, and when compared to the inefficiencies which would crop up due to the lack of competition, would be completely eliminated.
Overall I found your post misleading, and the data involved worthless in terms of comparison to any potential governmental system.
Posted by: Jim | August 10, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
What has bothered me for some time with this administration is it’s inability to accept criticism without lashing back with sarcasm, ridicule and down-right lies. The blaming never stops and neither does the campaigning.
What’s next? Chavez-like criminalization of critics? Shutting down voices of dissent?
People are angry with the swift left turn this president has taken our country. If Obama and his cohorts can’t stand the heat, they better get out of the kitchen. Hopefully, they will be voted out.
Posted by: pam | August 10, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obviously they have forgotten their demostrations and riots during the Vietnam days…haven’t they ?
Posted by: Frank | August 10, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
(No one is paying me to point out the obvious fact that) Nancy Pelosi is dangerously out of touch. It is not un-American to suggest that she’s in for more of the same until she realizes that the people shouting at her are the people she’s supposed to be representing! When did our elected officials begin to think of themselves as divine leaders whose tasked with the responsibility of enlightening the people they represent, or failing to do so, to overruling said people and violating their will by promoting an impossibly utopic future. Every distopia looks like a utopia to the leaders who view themselves as outside the system. We, the unwilling inmates of that proposed future, are voicing our concerns because we will not go willingly into the night.
Posted by: Matt | August 10, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Liberals have been using these tactics for years. They just don’t like it when the tables are turned.
P.S. conservatives and independents aren’t opposed to healthcare reform – just to the massive and expensive expansion of government being railroaded through by Pelosi and her gang.
Posted by: SB52IA | August 10, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
regarding rjharen comments.
Obama wants more better insurance for everyone. (“We the people…promote the general welfare…” remember?)
The Nazis were Fascists (per wiki: “comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.”) Health Care Complex lobbying and it’s rewards is a perfect example of this in practice, in America. Oh, and engendering rage for ” the other” attempting to take away “my insurance” by spreading FUD? Let’s not get started.
Socialism is not Fascism. It is, in many ways, it’s direct opposite.
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
The UK Socialized Medical systems is the 3rd largest employer in the world, ahead of them are employers like the Chinese Red Army.
Most employees are administration and they have a shortage of doctors. Their system has become the most expensive item in their governments budget. Most employees are administration and they have a shortage of doctors.
If the UK’s system is the worlds 3rd largest employer and they have 1/3rd our population, What would a US system look like. OMG. disastrous.
This is what the libs want another huge enormous Government program staffed by more Government employees.
Posted by: Chris | August 10, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
ifrchar “Mandatory 5 year counseling on ending your life? ” From what I have heard this is a total fabrication. Your primary care physician will discuss with you at a minimum of every 5 years and end of life plan. I imagine something like this. “Joe do you still not want to be hooked up to machines etal if something were to happen to you and that is the only way you could survive? ” Joe says “no machines.” Dr notes this and probably signs a from that Joe also signs. Sounds like a good idea to me. Everyone needs an end of life plan. I think they call it a living will.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Jenny,
Part of the problem is that most of the legislators haven’t read the legislation.
Posted by: lmk | August 10, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
How much of this idiotic inflammatory rhetoric from the extreme right can people stomach? “Socialism” “communism” “yoBamaism” – it is xenophobic, racist, extremist, inflammatory rhetoric than does not serve the nation or anyone. It’s the language of morons and confrontational brutes. Our country and culture has been completely debased by lies and fear-mongering that seeks to pit neighbors and communities against each other and they’re seeking to destroy all rational discussion. A person can’t even read these internet comment boards anymore because they are filled with hatred and lies.
Posted by: Michelle | August 10, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
“I can barely afford it and have a HMO. If costs go up anymore, a lot more people will not have it.”
The plan doesn’t do much for health care costs, it addresses patient costs. That means that if you have a problem with health care costs, how does subsidizing the patient make them cheaper? They still cost the same, its just subsidized with tax payer money. We should be looking at the major costs to health care providers and how to reduce them.
An OBGYN in Florida pays an average of 200k a YEAR for malpractice insurance. Who do you think is paying for that? Patients. Thus, we aren’t addressing high health care costs, only patient costs.
How about government run malpractice insurance?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
The stupid thing is that there are already dozens of governent run insurance programs in this country. Virtually every state has multiple state run insurance programs, for things like property insurance, business insurance, unemployment insurance, worker’s compensation, etc. These are mostly “insurer of last resort” type programs, which is exactly what the public option is proposed to be. For all these people talking about how a public option with either A) be “socialized medicine”, B) will take over the market, or C) lead to reduced coverage, why are NONE of these things true of all of the other dozens government insurnce programs in this country?
Do you want to get rid of the dozens or hundreds of current government run insurnce programs? Worker’s Compensation insurnace providers (theer are private and public), property insurnce (both private and public), unemployent insurance (private and public), existing medical (both private and public for ppl who qualify), etc., etc. The problem with the opponents is that they are all just spouting nosense and not having a debate, they are just spreading lies and engaging in absird ad-hominim attacks.
Posted by: Jeff | August 10, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Personally, I welcome dissent. It is possible I could understand the other’s viewpoint and learn. However, if that dissent is couched in yelling, screaming, and just uncivil disruption, I can’t be bothered with the message they are trying to impart or the people who are trying to present it.
Posted by: FS | August 10, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
The shouters are only making things worse. Why don’t they want questions to be answered? Personally, I think Obama’s national plan with the millions newly minted Latino/American citizens piled onto it by the first of next year is really a low down thing to do to the American people who elected him. He didn’t tell us he wanted to change the entire nation over to minority-combined control, effectively kicking many Americans who supported him to the curb.
Posted by: Vickie | August 10, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
“What’s next? Chavez-like criminalization of critics? Shutting down voices of dissent?”
LOL, maybe they will borrow Bush’s “free speech zones” where protestors are coralled into pens far away from news cameras, then harrassed and intimidated, and often put on watch lists.
Short memory you have there.
Posted by: Lisa | August 10, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
#1 – people are being lied to by the insurance industry and their lapdogs the Republicans — the lies they are spreading are designed to create fear and keep people from learning the truth because the insurance industry and the Republicans don’t want Americans to know the truth.
#2 – people are being encouraged by the “faux/fascist news” and the “righteous reich wing nuts” to disrupt the meetings, a tactic used quite well by the Nazis, to prevent civilized discussion….
#3 – why is it okay to spend billions and billions of dollars to kill people in war and to rebuild the countries we destroy during war but NOT to help our own people here in America?
#4 – even that very, very capitalistic, conservative country Switzerland has a national health care plan so why can’t America, a major industrialized nation not offer the same?
The insurance industry does NOT want the health care plan to pass because they will lose the gravy train they have been on for decades, ripping off Americans…..
Posted by: abby0802 | August 10, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Jenny———On Page 425 of Obama’s health care bill, the Federal Government will require EVERYONE who is on Social Security to undergo a counseling session every 5 years with the objective being that they will explain to them just how to end their own life earlier.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
The grass roots movement we really need is insisting on a health plan that Congress must participate in. Why not folks? Isn’t this a Democracy or is it a Quasi Royal, quasi benevolent government.
Posted by: Vickie | August 10, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Health care can and needs to be repaired. People need to take a step back and calm down. They need to listen to the facts not shout them down. Those who are shouting are afraid that if some hear what is being said will agree. Free speech is for both sides and we can discuss this in an orderly fashion where all can get to ask their questions but more importantly, the answeres can be heard. Stop listening to the distortions of the insurance companies as they are afraid to lose control and the talk show hosts who just want Obama to fail. This is more important…it involves our health care and if we do not addres it soon, none of us will have any. This president is courageous to tackle what no other president would. It is hard but he is willing to do this and he should be commended not demeaned like he has been at these meetings.
Posted by: talmag | August 10, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Posted by: KR | Aug 10, 2009 11:47:28 AM
No need – know a lot of people that live in Canada – and though their health plan is not perfect it ranks 6th in the world – American is way down the bottom of the list!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
The Chicago Mafia is good as putting the opposition as mongers and conspirators. It worked during the elections but is not working now. We have become more aware and will not fall again.Mountains of lies soon rather than later will crumble.
Posted by: Frank | August 10, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Hah, what a comparison, yes, the UK system is not perfect, but it is for one reason or another is rated as being much better than the US current system for profiteers, not humans. Humans being dumped out in the street because they can not afford to stay in the hospital, and the hospital refuses to provide care, this sounds more like China to me, than the example that was somehow made to once again, using deception, to associate national health care with socialism and even nacism. This, I am sure of this, come from the upper echelons of the profiteers who are afraid of things like “error reporting system” for hospitals, and from the insurance lobby, who are afraid to loose that 30% of overhead cost that they blame on “paper work”.
I would blame it on CEO salaries of top insurance companies in this country.
“The UK Socialized Medical systems is the 3rd largest employer in the world, ahead of them are employers like the Chinese Red Army”
Posted by: andrew wang | August 10, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Regarding ron : “Health care can not be realistically repaired with tort reform. Exhorbitant settlements from lawsuits is what drives medical costs.”
————————————
There are more cases every year of deaths in American hospitals, due to *already clearly* demonstrated malfeasance or incompetence or neglect, than there are wrongful death suits filed. The bar for filing is already incredibly high. How much more “reform” do we need?
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Posted by: lfrichar | Aug 10, 2009 11:50:33 AM
No – you are wrong – it is to cover the expense of creating a LIVING WILL with a consultation between a doctor and their patient… Something every AMERICAN should have!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“These are mostly “insurer of last resort” type programs, which is exactly what the public option is proposed to be.”
Kind of what medicaid is for? This public option is designed to compete with insurance companies and it will need to be paid for, thus taxes will have to go up. Then you are faced with the situation, pay taxes for the public options, or pay taxes and insurance premiums for a private option. How about we pay taxes on the public option if we sign up for the public option, if we don’t use it, we aren’t taxed? It is set up exact opposite right now, which means its intent is to drive out private insurance. When private insurance is driven out, we are forced into a single payer system. Then it will no longer be of “last resort” and will be the only resort unless your filthy rich.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Why don’t the citizens of this country demand, en masse, that Congress participate in any plan they pass? This is fundamentally WRONG for Congress to set itself above the citizens of this country. Perhaps a grass roots riot is called for.
Posted by: Vickie | August 10, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“No need – know a lot of people that live in Canada – and though their health plan is not perfect it ranks 6th in the world – American is way down the bottom of the list!!!”
The infamous WHO ranking based on limited perspective perception. If the poll is conducted of people who only have experience in one system, does that poll correctly compare to another system? Of course not, but that’s exactly what the WHO ranking does. The only thing that ranking shows is what people THINK of their health care, without experiencing the other. They are completely disconnected.
Also about costs. It says that less are spent on patients in the social systems than ours. Well, thats not a good thing. Good health care costs good money. This shows rationed care, not a good “efficient” system. Health care costs are generally the same wherever you are, difference is either cost controls, or rationed care.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
I really think the most prudent thing to do with this health care bill is for congress to pass the government-option and implement it for themselves and their federal employees to test it out for one election cycle. Then they can come back, tell us how great it is and sign us all up!
Posted by: conversefive | August 10, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
if – “-Jenny———On Page 425 of Obama’s health care bill, the Federal Government will require EVERYONE who is on Social Security to undergo a counseling session every 5 years with the objective being that they will explain to them just how to end their own life earlier” WHere did you find the info I spent most of the weekend getting nowhere? Please tell
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
#3 – why is it okay to spend billions and billions of dollars to kill people in war and to rebuild the countries we destroy during war but NOT to help our own people here in America?
Because silly, big corporations, especially defense contractors, make HUGE $$$$ off of war, just like big insurance companies make HUGE $$$$ off of the sick and injured, kinda like parasites. There’s no money to be made in healthcare that doesn’t seek to make HUGE profits. That’s why they OWN Congress, especially the GOP. That’s why they pay to bus in GOP interns and right-wing think tank employees to disrupt town hall meetings. Hired goons, nothing more, nothing less.
Posted by: Julie | August 10, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
World Health Organization’s rankings:
Rank Country
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 Israel
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Between Obama berating police on national TV, and now Pelosi saying its un-American to disagree with the messiah, I’m convinced Obama and his crew are Incompetents. If they had done their homework on healthcare reform, and if they had communicated a plan effectively, this would not have happened. They’re incompetents. and if they worked for private business they would have been fired long time ago.
No excuses.
Posted by: paul | August 10, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
JENNY, Furthermore,
‘‘(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), an explanation of
2 orders regarding life sustaining treatment or similar
3 orders, which shall include—
4 ‘‘(I) the reasons why the development of
5 such an order is beneficial to the individual and
6 the individual’s family and the reasons why
7 such an order should be updated periodically as
8 the health of the individual changes;
9 ‘‘(II) the information needed for an indi10
vidual or legal surrogate to make informed deci11
sions regarding the completion of such an
12 order; and
13 ‘‘(III) the identification of resources that
14 an individual may use to determine the require15
ments of the State in which such individual re16
sides so that the treatment wishes of that indi17
vidual will be carried out if the individual is un18
able to communicate those wishes, including re19
quirements regarding the designation of a sur20
rogate decisionmaker (also known as a health
21 care proxy).
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
“There are more cases every year of deaths in American hospitals, due to *already clearly* demonstrated malfeasance or incompetence or neglect, than there are wrongful death suits filed. The bar for filing is already incredibly high. How much more “reform” do we need?”
Malpractice insurance for an OBGYN averages 200k a year for a single doctor in Dade county. Whos paying for that do you think? Patients? We should be advocating government run malpractice insurance. How about they compete there?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I would like to comment on another lobby paid commentator who said, “long line are a way of life for Canadians going to the doctor.”
Have you been to a local county hospital in Chicago? Have you seen the rats and the roaches and the bathrooms filled with vomit and blood. Have you seen peopple waiting for up to 24 hours to receive treatment?
Yes, Canadian/UK system is not perfect, I will even admit to the fact that Canadians have much fewer MRI machines per every 1000 people. Yet, based on all the information available, Canadians live longer, even if they have to wait to get treatment, they GET IT, and get it with standards in place that are lacking in the USA. Basic disregard for people is just outstanding, the only nation, that forces people to decide whether they want to send their kid to college to or to have a heart operation is none other than USA.
Keep on commenting on how you are afraid of a reform that will “take away the healt care” that you don’t even have, unless you have money to pay for it.
Before anybody comments, I would also ask them, have you been ever denied by insurance due to preexisting condition?
If not, please lower your tone.
Posted by: steinberg | August 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Personally, I like my healthcare and do not want any more government in my life, but if we could just get an explanation/answer to some of our questions, there might not be anything to “protest”!
1. Will we get to keep our current insurance FOREVER?
2. Will this bill cause our insurance companies to go broke or out of business, and if they do:
3. Will we HAVE to join the government run plan?
4. Will we have to have “counseling” every 5 years after a certain age?
5. Any other questions we may have.
While it can’t be predicted with 100% certainty, we already know that under the government run plan there will be longer waits for everything, given the fact that there isn’t one government run program that doesn’t have a line associated with it, so I don’t need an answer to that.
Just answer these questions truthfully, backed up with page numbers and explanations of the part in the bill that covers this. Then, just maybe, there wouldn’t be any disruptions at these meetings.
And don’t call me un-American because I am frustrated at the lack of answers and the fact that I am being called names because I am upset about not getting any answers. Give us a reason to calm down, not a reason to get more frustrated.
Posted by: Rican | August 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
No, you are wrong. I lived in Canada for six years. You have no idea what you are talking about. They are not ranked 6th in the world, they are 30th.
I had a child born in Canada and the experence was WORSE than my first child who was born in PANAMA!!! So Melanie, where do you get your facts? Have you ever been there or is this just more rhetoric BS.
Posted by: Navvet | August 10, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Regarding jeff :”An OBGYN in Florida pays an average of 200k a YEAR for malpractice insurance. Who do you think is paying for that? Patients. Thus, we aren’t addressing high health care costs, only patient costs.”
————————————–
His insurer, just like the doctor, and the hospital, and the pharmaceutical, and the health insurance company, have many instances like this where they squeeze each other to make their profit margins. Everyone passes on these costs to the final payer, you and me, either directly, or through taxes, lowered salaries, higher insurance premiums, etc. The insurer against malpractice just wants his piece of the pie, and then some. It isn’t exhorbitant payouts that drive their pricing, it’s exhorbitant profits.
Posted by: LLCisyouandme | August 10, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Nancy “Let Them Eat Cake” Pelosi is a thoroughly corrupt, power-hungry elitist who harbors deep disdain for the average American and the Constitution. She represents everything we hate in a politician. Mark my words, her political days are numbered. She’s FINISHED.
Posted by: Jenn | August 10, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
There are alot of people on the right and left who don’t seem to understand some basic facts, and the media doesn’t seem to be able or willing to educate. So as a public service, I offer the following definitions:
Socialized medicine – like UK, has a national health service, doctors get a salary from the government, hospitals are run by the government. Even so, there are still private doctors and institutions.
Single-payer: Like Canada, doctors and hospitals are private, everyone gets health insurance from the government.
Public option(strong): Starts with a large pool of uninsured, like Medicare did, so that the government policy has bargaining power. Funded by premiums. Everyone is allowed to join if they want to. Leaves the private system intact.
Public Option(weak): starts with a small group or has a “trigger”, limited groups are allowed to join, provides subsidies to both the public plan and private insurance companies to provide insurance to the uninsured.
Right now, the main plan being discussed is the weak public option, although it isn’t even in all of the bills.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
PEOPLE!! WHERE IS A COPY OF THE PROPOSED BILL LOCATED. You keep citing sources and I want to read the darn thing. Someone please give me a web address or something.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
“Before anybody comments, I would also ask them, have you been ever denied by insurance due to preexisting condition?”
Denied? No. Their premiums were inflated and much higher. This is an area that needs reform I agree. Why are people switching insurance with pre-existing conditions? That shouldnt happen. WE should be shopping and choosing our plans, not PPO/HMO group plans with employers etc. People have contracts longer with their cellphone than they do with their health insurance. That should change. It should only change if you can get a better deal, not be dropped changing jobs and re-rolled.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Abby, I would be willing to bet you are on welfare , dont work, or Afician American. ????? that is the base of your thoughts
Posted by: Lottiesmith | August 10, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
JENNY, Oops, page 426.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
The ratings listed in the previous post come from none other than World Health Organization.
You don’t need to be a genius to realize that US is one of the most obese nations of the world. You don’t need to be a genius to realize that mortality rate in US is much higher than in Canada or United Kingdom.
You don’t have to be a genius to realize that it is for the benefit of the country to help people receive health care, not to prevent them from getting it.
Posted by: steinberg | August 10, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
People are again either too ignorant to understand their point or willfully ignoring their point. The point is that it un-American to try to stifle/stop/interfere with CIVILIZED discussions on the issues. No one is saying that you cannot disagree, but what gives you the right to disrupt or try to intimidate others into not discussing the issues? You have no right to try to intimidate anyone, that is NOT in the Constitution.
People cannot be so stupid as to not see that distinction.
Posted by: Dewayne | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
lfrichar, how on earth do you get “Obama wants to euthanize grandma” from that out of context passage?
Sounds more like avoiding another “Bill Frist has examined the video tape of Terry Schiavo and has determined that she must remain on life support, despite the wishes of the family” debacle we saw under Dubya.
Posted by: Mark | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
What a shame we have such un-American leaders like Pelosi and Reid. If this was happening at a republican rally it would be called freedom of speech by these hypocrites. I find disturbing that the white house is compiling a list of those who differ with them.
What is the old saying? If you can’t take the heat stay out of the kitchen. The democrats voted to decline any new medical program over the one they currently have, does that tell you anything? It tells me their hide is better than ours and they deserve better than the rest of us.
Obama who started out as possibly the best president in decades could easily wind up being the worst, even worst than Jimmy Carter, if that is possible.
What is un-American is our congress comprised of self serving crooks – yes crooks, not one member stood up and took responsibility for our economy. Their answer is always it was Bushes fault, where were they, they had control of the house?
I am afraid our government has become broken a lot like Mexico, filled with the self serving bums like Pelosi and Reid who speak out of both sides of their mouth.
God help us all for as long as the democrats and republicans act like children we are all in huge trouble. The real un-Americans are in congress and the senate.
Posted by: a citizen | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
people look at the bill. It is not 1000 pages long only because it is printed in third grade reading lettering. High school student and college students have to read chapters prior to a test. Even if it was 2000 pages long it is their job All govenernment My wish is that we all had the same Health coverage and social security coverage that our politicians have. Maybe if they pass this health plan at least we will have the same health coverage.
Posted by: Elaine | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
jeff,
From 2001 to 2002 when many OB-GYNs saw their rates double, malpractice payouts to victims were actually on the decline.
But insurance companies were losing big on their investments.
The problem with malpractice insurance is the same as the problem with health insurance in general – the insurance companies.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Have we reached a level where if one doesn’t agree with someone, they are called “UnAmerican”, stupid, idiot, racist, etc.?
Posted by: Don | August 10, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
“World Health Organization’s rankings:
Rank Country”
Ah the infamous WHO rankings sprouts again and again. Do you folks know how it works? Its based on self perceptions of people who have only experienced their OWN system. It is also based on fuzzy statistics, its also not flatted for population sizes. The US is 4 times (or more) the population of almost ever nation above them. It also does not take into account costs in terms of medical care recieved, only overall averages and calls it “efficient”. A country spending less for health care per citizen isn’t a good thing in general. It means rationed care and price controls.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Protestors have always been organized and supported by groups of one kind or another. That doesn’t make their voices any less valid. Although, I do believe many of these people show up on their own as has been reported. I would go if my congressman would hold a meeting, but he won’t. And no lobbyist has contacted me.
The administration made a mulit-million dollar deal with the pharmaceutical industry. Does that make the ads the pharma industry pays for somehow less honest or true to the administration’s message?
All this name calling by Pelosi, et al, is a distraction to the message they don’t want to hear and they don’t want America to hear. A govt option is not wanted by a great number of Americans.
Posted by: pam | August 10, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I’m tired of people quoting these very small countries regarding their health care system. First of all, over 3,000 people died in one summer in France because of lack of adequate air conditioning. They were backed up in the hospital wards. Stop believing this bad information that the govt is spewing.
Instead of offering this grand socialist plan, offer a specfic health program to people who do not have insurance either because they can’t afford it or because of previous health issues. We don’t need a massive plan that will bankrupt this country and force us in to complete socialism.
Posted by: Kathy | August 10, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
What is it going to take these politicians to realize they are working for the American people. We have the right to protest, especially a bill that would affect us all. They need to remember who they are and how they got there. If they keep overlookin us we might see a similar approach that happened during the French Revolution!
Posted by: LLagrande1791 | August 10, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
What Pelosi and Hoyer don’t understand is that they tried to pull a major piece of legislation though, with the idea it would pass very quickly, and a reform bill that has a lot of flaws that are disburbing. I can see how many freaked out Americans feel powerless that these rogue Congress people who decided to go on a tangent and do what they think is right. I don’t see this as Un-American, I actually see it as being very democratic.
I for one find the private system being taken away after a year of the bill going into effect very disburbing. What is more Un-American? Taking choice away from Americans?
I believe most Americans agree that we need Healthcare reform, but not at the expense of putting some sloppy legislation though that is not very well thought out, at least by all, than the few who will be managing this monster.
Posted by: Quincy Brown | August 10, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Sorry……I call it one of the few opportunities for citizens to voice their wishes to their representatives.
If they can’t handle the fact that citizens are not happy with what is being proposed…..that’s too bad.
Americans deserve to be heard, over the political spin.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 10, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
If – thanks I will check it out after work tonite.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Un-American? To dissent and question government is un-American? What drivel.
Has anyone noticed the subtle shift in wording. It is no longer “health care reform” it is now “health insurance reform”. The health insurance companies are now “villans”. All of this from Nancy Pelosi, who is a blithering idiot.
Posted by: Brad | August 10, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
“From 2001 to 2002 when many OB-GYNs saw their rates double, malpractice payouts to victims were actually on the decline.
But insurance companies were losing big on their investments.
The problem with malpractice insurance is the same as the problem with health insurance in general – the insurance companies.”
Not really. If you read into it, you find that it comes down to various state laws. OBGYN malpractice insurance in Oklahoma was 4k a year. Why the big difference? State laws.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Melanie, In the eyes of the rest of the world we do everything wrong. Yet we give more to fight aids and hunger then any other nation on earth. Also if we rank so low on health care why do the wealth from other countries come here for care?
Posted by: hkdakota | August 10, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Posted by: Navvet | Aug 10, 2009 12:01:49 PM
They are ranked 6th ABOVE the US… sorry for the typo… But in the end of the day – all Canadians are covered and do not have to fear bankruptcy or being denied health coverage… There are many, many Americans who can’t get health insurance because private insurance companies in this country deemed them too risky/expensive to cover – who do you think covers them when they go into an emergency room??? The US taxpayer!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Melanie, have you ever spoken to a Canadian about taxes? cost of living?..you also stated they live longer…thats complete BS and please post facts..they are taxed more than 55% of their income, cost of living is insane!! Try 5 to 6 dollars a gallon for gas, a gallon of milk 4.50..now you get the idea how its paid for!! No thanks, I will not be taxed over half my income so you or anyone else can have it for free. Its called work ethic!! If you need more, work harder!
Posted by: Navvet | August 10, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Part of the anger that has been generated is the fact that none of them have read the bill. Sen Conyers even made fun of the members who suggested that they should read the bill. The Democrats have only themselves to blame for this commotion. They declare an emergency on a problem that has been known for 4 decades and insist that the bill be passed by August. Then they turn out a 1000 page bill and declare it must be passed before anyone can read it.
You can find the bill easily by Googling “HR 3200″. You need lots of time and patience to read through it. I have read 150 pages and have been pleasantly surprised so far. There are alot more pages there to hide the bad stuff though.
Posted by: Skippy | August 10, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Sorry to say as a Obama supporter and voter that Pelosi is un American as well as Dodd and others like them. While I don’t agree in creating such a ruckus at town hall meeting that neither side is heard of discussed freedom of speech is very American.
Posted by: CAW | August 10, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Posted by: hkdakota | Aug 10, 2009 12:12:08 PM
Because they can… and because certain border hospitals advertised in say – Mexico – to get the rich there to come here and pay ridicious fees for care…
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
“It isn’t exhorbitant payouts that drive their pricing, it’s exhorbitant profits. ”
This has been proven wrong over and over again. Politifact showed Obama lied about record profits. Health insurance companies average 5% profit compared to retail/technology markets that average 15-20%. Also, medical insurance companies invest in medical research, which a portion of profits go towards, the rest go towards your 401k. Garanteed, your 401k has health insurance investments.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
If you want to see “organizing” on steroids, visit Organizing for America.
Posted by: nomomoney | August 10, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Posted by: Jeff | Aug 10, 2009 11:47:14 AM
Take a look at the biggest ‘public option’, Medicare, one could argue that it should bring down prices because it is competition, trouble is, it doesn’t. Your private insurance is higher directly because of Medicare, they underpay an average of 20% for hospitals and 32% for doctors, costs which still exist and must be paid by someone, namely you. So what happens when the govt. decides that everyone should be on Medicare and they think a test costs 20% less than it really does, somewhere down the line this is going to result in fewer tests, less technology, or rationing. Another thing, seniors were promised when Medicare began that they would always be allowed to keep their private insurance, over time this choice disintegrated making it nearly impossible for seniors to have any other choice other than Medicare so today they are being told their benefits are going to be cut in this plan by 150 billion. Are they happy, no? Are they the ones who know they are some of the people who will be getting the shaft, yes. Are they the ones showing up at town halls by the hundreds yes.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
MARK———–PAGE 427::::”"”"”"A program for orders for life sustaining
9 treatment for a States described in this clause is a
10 program that—
11 ‘‘(I) ensures such orders are standardized
12 and uniquely identifiable throughout the State;
13 ‘‘(II) distributes or makes accessible such
14 orders to physicians and other health profes15
sionals that (acting within the scope of the pro16
fessional’s authority under State law) may sign
17 orders for life sustaining treatment;”"”" “”"”"MAY sign life sustaining treatment?????”"”"”
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Pelosi is telling us Americans that it is just courtesy that she gives you a headsup.
With the power in Senate, Congress and White House in the hands of Democrats, they don’t really need any of your input – so shut up.
Posted by: Not Un-American | August 10, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Kr, if you look into state laws, you’ll find that tort reforms have no effect on malpractice insurance costs.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Plain and simple, people are fighting back and will not shut or back down.Our capitalistic system is under attack by the progressive socialistic agenda. They will not prevail.This is not Venezuela !
Posted by: Frank | August 10, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
“Kr, if you look into state laws, you’ll find that tort reforms have no effect on malpractice insurance costs.”
I never said it was tied to tort reform. I said it was tied to state laws. OBGYN in Oklahoma is 4k a year, Dade Country Florida 256k a year. Why the difference?
In either case, it wasn’t the point. Point being is that PATIENTS are paying for malpractice insurance. 256k a year for malpractice is insane, and WE are paying for it. Why is it so outlandish to look at costs to health care providers in order to bring down health care costs?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
“…No thanks, I will not be taxed over half my income so you or anyone else can have it for free. Its called work ethic!! If you need more, work harder!”
Posted by: Navvet | Aug 10, 2009 12:12:59 PM
Sorry if you think I need your help!!! I have the best health care money can buy in this country. I pay my taxes and I rather see those taxes go to pay for a public health insurance program that would cover those Americans who are too ‘wealthy’ to get Medicaid and to young to get Medicare but work their tail off to make a life for their family and just can’t afford private insurance and/or they have a pre-existing condition.
YOU SIR – WOULD RATHER PAY $10 BILLION A MONTH FOR WARS THEN TAKE CARE AMERICANS!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Pelosi reminds me of Leona Helmsley taxes are for the little people.
Posted by: hkdakota | August 10, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Do you want your medical care controlled by people who think it’s un-American to criticize them?
Posted by: bct | August 10, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Posted by: Skippy | Aug 10, 2009 12:13:44 PM
If only it were one bill with a 1000 pages, it is five bills with 5000+ pages.
They can’t even agree among themselves what the final bill will be, talk about incompetent. How about this novel idea, create a plan and know it, and then try to explain it to people.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Reps better get used to dealing with the people asking sharp pointed questions at their meetings cause were mad as hell and were not going to take it any more !!!
Posted by: hkdakota | August 10, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
“.you also stated they live longer…thats complete BS ”
You keep on using this phrase BS, perhaps you should educate yourself by going to Google and using a phrase “Canadian average lifespan versus Americans” – you will come up with a site called Wikipedia – if you think they are wrong, you can easily edit the information, I wonder what your sources be, some commentator on a radio station?
By visiting the site you will also learn this:
“n 2006, per-capita spending for health care in the U.S. was US$6,714; in Canada, US$3,678.[5] The U.S. spent 15.3% of GDP on health care in that year; Canada spent 10.0%.[5] In 2006, 70% of health care spending in Canada was financed by government, versus 46% in the United States.”
US government already pays awful lot for health care, but what do they get in return? No ability to regulate to pass rules that would force hospitals to be held accountable by “error reporting system”.
Posted by: steinberg | August 10, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Given the economic events of the past 10 months, people have seen their 401ks tank, their house values plummet, unemployment skyrocket to 9+% and the federal deficit quadrupled with threats of new taxes. Of course this has created fear and uncertainty. Now the administration and Congress decide is the time to ram through yet another massive, systemic altering policy that will intimately affect everyone’s life. Add to that, existing healthcare programs run by the government – Medicare, Medicaid and the VA system are rife with fraud and abuse and how are we supposed to trust that the public option will be any different. Add to that the CBO is emphatic that the program will increase costs and not provide added coverage. Add to that the new cost of employment put on small businesses during a recession and we will never create desperately needed new jobs. Add to that no change in lawyers ability to sue doctors for not performing every procedure in the book; a major factor in cost increases. Worse still, the debate over the healthcare bill has become only about winning and expanding the power of the government over people’s lives. It’s no longer about fixing the healthcare system. Congress and the administration are now demonizing and bullying people who exercise their free speech rights to question and disagree with public officials. I for one am sick of this Congress and this administration’s name calling and bullying. Don’t even get me started on the report on your neighbor web site! People have legitimate concerns – let them talk!!!
Posted by: bct | August 10, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
lfrichar, thats a ‘living will’.
Do we really have to do the Terry Schiavo thing all over again?
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
YEAH! Keep the government out of my medicare!
Uh. Wait. nevermind.
Posted by: Jeebus | August 10, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“YOU SIR – WOULD RATHER PAY $10 BILLION A MONTH FOR WARS THEN TAKE CARE AMERICANS!!!”
War is the federal governments responsibility. Providing you health care insurance is not the federal governments responsibility, at least not yet. Health care wasn’t foreign to the framers of our constitution. I would think that if they envisioned the federal government giving everyone medical care, they would have put that in.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Posted by: lfrichar | Aug 10, 2009 12:16:47 PM
So you are against writing a “Living Will” – having a discussion with your own personal doctor and deciding on the type of treatment you want later in life – whether you want extraordinary care to keep you alive on machines or not… There is nothing wrong with creating a LIVING WILL – all Americans should have them and, finally, will have the chance to get them at little to no expense.
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Melanie, No I would not rather pay 10 billion a month for wars ( another odd number) but I have been to a few. You seem to be ok with the billions spent on bailouts..Please remember these folks are sent to DC to represent us, not to take care of us! I can manage that on my own.
Posted by: Navvet | August 10, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“Congress decide is the time to ram through yet another massive, systemic altering policy that will intimately affect everyone’s life.”
Yes, it will have major effect on people’s life – primarily, by giving them basic right to receive health care even if they cannot afford it.
You think that you are OK, because you are financially secure and have a stable job, very good insurance, that you perhaps don’t want to loose, I can understand that. But imagine this – you get sick, you loose your job, your deductibles and copays add up, and you go bankrupt. Your private hospital no longer wants to see you because your insurance will no longer pay the bill.
Think twice about spreading disinformation.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
So, you think it’s alright to act like idiots just because you don’t like what your government does or doesn’t do? Some of us might like to hear what our elected representatives have to say, and perhaps take turns asking questions. Do you even know the difference between a democratic process and a child throwing a tantrum? Do you act like that at home too? Then I pity your families.
Please stop disrupting the progress! I can’t afford health insurance and I would like to have the right to see a doctor & get proper care.
If you want to continue denying help to people,then state your case in a civilized manner! Otherwise, help the President or get out of the way!
Posted by: com1.ich | August 10, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
People, I really would like an answer to this question: If the government-run option is such a necessary and wonderful thing, why is the Congress writing into the bill they will give up their current gold-plated health insurance for themselves and their federal employees, sign up for the government plan for one election cycle, then come back and tell us how great it is. They can test it out, see how it works, and then if it works we will all sign up. If someone can answer that one question for me I will support this bill.
Posted by: conversefive | August 10, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Posted by: Navvet | Aug 10, 2009 12:26:13 PM
Good for you… Then don’t forget to give up your Social Security and Medicare benefits when you retirement because like you said – YOU don’t want any socialized programs helping YOU out or any other American!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
KR, I agree its insane. If we had a pure capitalist system, doctors who are convicted of malpractice would go bankrupt and out of practice. If we had any controls on doctor malpractice, we’d delicense the 5% of doctors that cause most of the injuries.
Right now, 50,000 to 100,000 people die each year due to medical errors, and the only control is a malpractice lawsuit.
It is really stupid, I agree.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Oops, I mean why “isn’t” the Congress writing into the bill … sorry
Posted by: conversefive | August 10, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“War is the federal governments responsibility. Providing you health care insurance is not the federal governments responsibility, ”
What a joke, war is nothing more than a profiteering for the few firms had/have
board members/vice president/presidents that are only interested in profits.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
This is outright pathetic! Un-American is when Pelosi accuses our intelligence community liars. Un-American is when Pelosi and Congress chastises executives for flying expensive jets to congressional dog and pony show to testify before a bunch of clowns who themselves just approved millions for private jets; Pelosi is not without guilt. Un-American is pushing for healthcare reform and benefits that congress will not touch with a two foot pole. They expect us to buy the product but they will not buy it themselves. Un-American is congress’ failure to fix Medicare, VA Healthcare, and other programs before moving to another one that will no doubt be a debacle. My fellow compatriots, lets show these idiots who their boss is. Lets give them the boot in November 2010! Legislators must be shown the door if they continue to do the people’s business. It will be a choice they’ll have to make between self serving interests or the interests of the people! Pelosi must be shown the door back to California! Reid, without a doubt, too, must be shown the door. America, it is time to revaluate our two party system!
Posted by: Mike | August 10, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
People – take your kool aid and stop complaining. Even though it’s suppose to be a government for, by, and of the people, it’s none of your business how things are done!!!
Posted by: Gina | August 10, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Somebody said that cancer survival rates exceed most of the nations above it, can you back it up by some facts?
And how about the fact that if you want to survive cancer, you better cash in your 401K? Do you even know how much cancer medications cost even WITH insurance?
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Melanie ——- “Living will” is good, I am against the possibility a doctor “MAY” or MAY NOT not decide may sign orders for life sustaining treatment.
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Actual quote for the USA article:
“Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American.”
USA Today headline:
‘Un-American’ attacks can’t derail health care debate (written by Pelosi/Hoyer or USA Today? Can’t tell, though a REPORTER could ask!)
Jake’s headline (more accurate than USA, but still incomplete quote):
“Top House Democrats Call Town Hall Disruptions ‘Un-American’
I agree with Pelosi and Hoyer, and I hope everyone reading this column does, as well! Drowning out opposing views IS un-American, because it interferes with every person’s 1st Amendment rights, and we should all oppose these tactics, no matter who uses them what their motivation is or how they found out about the meeting.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
WA! WA! WA! Dont think that by passing this idiotic health care bill is justified because the tax payer has to foot the bill for people who have no insurance. I have health coverage and pay taxes. Our taxes have to go somewhere and futhermore taxes will never go away. So suck it up!!! Stop using Taxes as a reason for passing this wacked out health care plan!
Posted by: LLagrande | August 10, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Providing you health care insurance is not the federal governments responsibility, at least not yet. Health care wasn’t foreign to the framers of our constitution. I would think that if they envisioned the federal government giving everyone medical care, they would have put that in.
Posted by: KR | Aug 10, 2009 12:25:03 PM
OOH – then tell all the 65 and older population in this country to get off Medicare…. Go ahead, I dare you!!! We could end this whole discussion right know – no medicare, no medicaid and no Social Security for any American from this day forward. Those once covered are on their own – their adult children will have to take care of them and get them private health insurance!!! IF – AND THAT IS A BIG IF – ANY PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANY WOULD COVER THE ELDERLY WITH THEIR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS!!!
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
“if they envisioned the federal government giving everyone a piece of the ‘all men are created equal’ ‘truths’…. they would have included women, non-whites and native americans in the doc.. but I guess that little omission had to be added later”
Well thats rather rediculous of a statement. What would we call “mankind” today? Humankind. You would have to know a little about cultural norms to understand what they said. When the framers said all men are created equal, it was used in the terms of “mankind”, a term we still use today. And thier statement of all men created equal was visionary for their time. While they did mean it during the framing, adopting it took time, something they were aware of at the time. They didn’t envision the consitution would abolish slavery or change policy on indians. They also called it an “imperfect” union. So please, don’t use these demographic arguments. They are so childish.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Pelosi is right, it is Un-American to shout out lies and mis-information, to scare the elderly. they are telling these lies that the Gov. is going to kill them, they are telling the American people that they are going to take away their right of Choice, when in Fact the opposite it true. The Public Option is just that a Option, yet these neo-cons and insurance companys have everyone believing they are taking their Choice away…Its a bunch of lies. The truth is 14,000 ppl a day are losing their health insurance everyday in this country, wheres the choice in that. Every day 1000′s of Americans are being denied medicine and operations that will keep them alive everyday, because the insurance companys dont want to pay for them. We have the right to LIFE, LIBIRTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, yet the first one LIFE is being denied by the insurance companys. WAKE UP AMERICA. The insurance companys are allowing people to die just so they can keep their profit up. Why should a company be able to make a profit off of the deaths of American? So far this year 2.5 million American have had their health insurance droped because they have become a “liability” to the insurance companys. That’s the whole population of Nevada, think about that. Every singal person in the state of Nevada has been droped from their insurance company so far this year. We need reform and we demand a public option.
Posted by: Ralph | August 10, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Here’s something to ask Mr Gibbs about…
Sunday, August 09, 2009
Your Taxpayer Dollars at Work! Obama is Paying the Thugs and Activists Using Schemes, Ads and other scams
Need a job?
Build the public support it is going to take to pass health care reform this summer with the California Public Interest Research Group (CALPIRG). Go out in your community and make change happen. And make friends and money along the way.
Earn $350-500 per week. To apply for a job, visit our website or call Chris at (916) 455-5000.
Posted by: pauldia | August 10, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
The government has to lie to us in order to do what’s best for us.
Posted by: LongT | August 10, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“Living will” is good, I am against the possibility a doctor “MAY” or MAY NOT not decide may sign orders for life sustaining treatment.
Posted by: lfrichar | Aug 10, 2009 12:33:35 PM
You don’t think private insurance employees decides whether are not you get a treatment??!!?? Please…
Posted by: Melanie | August 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
God Bless Nancy Pelosi and her 24% approval rating. If the sweet dear was any dumber she’d have to be watered twice a week.
Posted by: sas | August 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
I have actually read the wikipedia article, unlike some others who would rather listen to radio talk shows, and commentators commenting on comments…
” the U.S. spends more per capita than any other nation in the world,[11] but is the only wealthy industrialized country in the world that lacks some form of universal health care.”
Insuring America’s Health: Principles and Recommendations, Institute of Medicine at the National Academies.
(Yes, this was written by none other than US government agency, not some nut)
Posted by: basic_human_right | August 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“OOH – then tell all the 65 and older population in this country to get off Medicare…. Go ahead, I dare you!!!”
I don’t support it the way its implemented. Its a blouted, innefficient, government obomination of a program. It’s also the only game in town so of course people don’t want to get rid of it. So here we are, a costly government program thats people have grown to rely on, even in its failing state. Imagine that? Isn’t that the hallmark of a socialist system? Rely on it, even if its innefficient and varily effective? What other option is there? But this is a good thing?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
These people at the town hall meetings are not loons. They are concerned Americans who are saying no to what Obama is selling. Why is it that the Dems objections to bills, people, etc. makes them enlightened, moral intellectuals and those who oppose their stance are crazy morons who are mob members that have been placed in these meetings by the Republicans? Obama, Pelosi, and their ilk had better wise up. Those of us who put them where they are might just decide to remove them in the coming elections.
Posted by: Charleston | August 10, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“adopting it took time, something they were aware of at the time
Posted by: KR
like heath care for all…. no time like the now,”
I’m sorry, I don’t equate slavery and indian dislocation to government subsidized health care. And don’t pull out the “poor” argument, theres already medicaid for them.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Gina | Aug 10, 2009 12:32:46 PM- Another example of spouting off with not a bit of proof! People are attempting to speak, the “protesters” don’t allow a debate, they dust scream and threaten. You said by the people, so what is the issue? The majority of Americans want HCR! I don’t expect an answer, your one of those that posts under numerous names to make it seem people agree with you! Think about it, if you have to do that, it’s sad!
Posted by: Try the truth | August 10, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
” the U.S. spends more per capita than any other nation in the world,[11] but is the only wealthy industrialized country in the world that lacks some form of universal health care.”
Folks, common sense here. Good health care costs good money does it not? More spent on our health care per capita than these other nations is NOT A BAD THING!! It points to rationed care and cost controls in those other nations. Why is it so hard to get this?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I hear all the, “this will bring cost down”, but here is my question:
What happens if this gets signed into law, and it DOES NOT bring the costs down and the system becomes a mess like Medicare, Medicaid, The VA, IRS and about all other Government run system are in??
At that point, the Government OWNS us. They OWN us more then they do now. What will we do then?
We depend on then now to TAX us equally, but they do not. They use taxes to get our votes. What do you think they will do with this? The SAME THING!
Yes, we NEED TAX REFORM, but I DO NOT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT. Sorry. I do not and can not.
Posted by: ajax659 | August 10, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I’m sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we’re Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Posted by: Jason Sanborn | August 10, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Oops; “NEED TAX REFORM” should be “NEED HEALTH CARE REFORM”
Posted by: ajax659 | August 10, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
“big of you to be so concerned, death is death be it from slavery, genocide or left in the streets of america to die”
Where is this? Show me Americans left in the streets to die? Please, show me. We already have universal care. We already pay for it in both taxes and insurance. No one is denied care in hospitals. So please, grow up.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
I love this so much I will quote it:
Indeed, insurance agencies can choose to deny you treatment, stating that it would be experimental, or that it is excluded because of pre-existing limitations.
Until somebody experiences a loss of a close one, who was fully insured, but because insurance refused to pay for the treatment, I don’t think they realize how silly and unhealthy this discussion has become – blaming people of being not aligned with the American spirit, for being socialist and fascist;
people, wake up and turn off your TVs, as it seems that the media pundits have caused major chaos in your brain.
I encourage everyone to read the bill, and if they do not like something in it, or have any proof that it will hurt America, maybe you can be American enough to provide suggestions as to how to improve the bill, instead of wasting everyone’s time.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
It’s not unamerican to fear a gov’t takeover of healthcare. It’s unamerican to allow it. They are exempting themselves from the program yet they have such contempt for people speaking up about not wanting the program? These people disgust me. They’ve completely forgotten who pays the bills around here.
Posted by: p | August 10, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Pauldia –
The PIRGs in each state, such as California Public Interest Research Group (CALPIRG)have been around since 1971, when Obama was 10 years old. It was started by Ralph Nader as a way to protect consumers. Let the misinformation about the PIRGs stop here!
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
First Town Hall Disruptions are as American as it gets! Our Country was founded by people who disrupted “Town Hall” meetings. That said as an Independent (with Libertarian leanings) I find it telling that the same people that Disrupted Meeting Sponsored by the Republicans are no screaming fowl. The next and Most important things to remember that No matter what they call it, what is being proposed in not “Health Care” reform it in fact proposal that Creates a Giant Government Agency that will cost at least 1.75 Trillion over 10 years and is far more likely to top 1 Trillion Dollars a year. It will leave 2/3rds of those who Currently do not have coverage with out coverage. ( At these prices we could simply buy a private health care plan for all those with out coverage. I will bankrupt countless small businesses as it inflicts mandated health care coverage of their employees on them. Further by fining those who don’t have a health care plan countless people will be forced to choose between paying their mortgage or paying there Health Care so they can pay a fine and loose their home or pay their health care and loose their home. All of this might be worth it if the proposal offered did something significant to control Health Care Costs. To quote the CBO “The Proposal does nothing to control the Upward Trajectory of Health Care Costs” What it would do is place at least four people (all of whom have to be paid) in the chain of decision making about your health care. Keeping your own Dr. is ppointless if it is not your Dr. directing your health care. The decision makers are in fact people whose performance will be judged on how much money they save the care plan (in short how many services and how much care they deny you). These are the fact Ms. Pelosi (BTW Ms Pelosi isn’t your state Bankrupt?) These are the facts Mr. Hoyer (BTW Mr Hoyer doesn’t your state have some of the most oppressive taxes in the Country?)
Posted by: Rick | August 10, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Un-American is when Pelosi accuses our intelligence community liars. Un-American is when Pelosi and Congress chastises executives for flying expensive jets to congressional dog and pony show to testify before a bunch of clowns who themselves just approved millions for private jets”
And since it was verified afterwards that the CIA, under Cheney’s order, HAD INDEED LIED to Congress for years…. so what’s your point?? she was right, the right-wing was wrong (as usual).
And I’m sure you’d just love to see Ms. Pelosi fly public airlines after Glenn Beck all but declared a fatwa on her life to his minions of American Taliban nutjobs/domestic terrorists.
Posted by: Chuck | August 10, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
“No one is denied care in hospitals.”
Maybe you should discuss this with LA (CA) attorney general, who has proof of patients being dumped on the streets, not being fully treated, still bleeding or with the broken bones.
Associated Press:
L.A. patient dumping settlement misses Skid Row
By SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER (AP) – Jul 28, 2009
LOS ANGELES — The city attorney stood on the roof of a homeless shelter high above the human misery of Skid Row in April and announced a $1.6 million settlement from a hospital accused of dumping about 150 mentally ill patients on the streets below.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Personalize Heathcare, don’t Nationalize it. I want to keep control.
Posted by: EGBOK321 | August 10, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“Until somebody experiences a loss of a close one, who was fully insured, but because insurance refused to pay for the treatment, I don’t think they realize how silly and unhealthy this discussion has become”
This is such a loaded example. There are soo many issues between state laws etc. Look, if you enter into a contract with health insurance, you need to know the details. But, to think that the insurance company can simply breach the contract at a whim isn’t entirely true. You sign a form and agree to the policy, the insurer (as per insurance laws) cannot opt out at a whim. You don’t think state and federal laws haven’t addressed this in the past? It has. You have to look it up.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Melanie. No, there are SOME Americans that need help but there are many who are just lazy or dare I say it, illegal.
They are the reason that the few who need cannot recieve it.
Posted by: Navvet | August 10, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t have any provision in it to fund highways, bridges, or water in it. It doesn’t say the government should fund fire, police, or a military either.
If you have any understanding of the U.S. Constitution, you’d know it provides a broad framework describing elections, how government is organized; the relationship between state, local and federal governments; the balance of power between the branches; the rights of individuals (Bill of Rights); but it does not specify spending bills or specific departments or Congressional appropriations.
But the founders and framers knew that Congress would appropriate, the Executive administer, and the Court would align and arbitrate to Constitutional principle the actions, annual expenditures and revenues of Government.
Why is there so much stupidity being vomited out by people who know nothing about our Constitution yet use it as a bludgeon for their narrow self-serving cause?
Posted by: Michelle | August 10, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
That’s some true American Spirit.
“They are the reason that the few who need cannot recieve it.”
Bravo!
Posted by: american_spirit | August 10, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
I seriously wonder of any of these self-proclaimed “patriots” believe in our Constitution at all. What a joke.
Posted by: Richard Prince | August 10, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Pelosi and her cronies want to shush the shouters because they don’t want any questions asked except by those that they have planted in the front rows of the town hall meetings. The Democrats are sending in the thugs from ACORN to to quell any protest to their socialists health plan for this nation. A plan that is intended to tax the responsible citizens of this nation who work and pay outrageous premiums for health care for their families because the illegals drive up the cost by getting all of their care free in Emergency Rooms across this country. Under Pelosi-Obama’s plan the illegals will continue to get their health care free and the rest of us who have health coverage will be taxed to death to pay for it.
Posted by: sonya | August 10, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“Maybe you should discuss this with LA (CA) attorney general, who has proof of patients being dumped on the streets, not being fully treated, still bleeding or with the broken bones.”
Smarty pants. You posted the consequences of doing so in the same post…
“… $1.6 million settlement from a hospital accused of dumping about 150 mentally ill patients”
It was AGAINST THE LAW and the hospital paid for it. How many millions are treated? I love when people point to a tiny example and say its endemic in society. Sillyness.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I think these idiot democrats need to remember who they work for.
Posted by: Joe Eckhardt | August 10, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
I am still waiting for someone to address my question of why congress refuses to subscribe to the public option for themselves. I am waiting … Anyone?
Posted by: conversefive | August 10, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
“This is such a loaded example. There are soo many issues between state laws etc. Look, if you enter into a contract with health insurance, you need to know the details. But, to think that the insurance company can simply breach the contract at a whim isn’t entirely true. You sign a form and agree to the policy, the insurer (as per insurance laws) cannot opt out at a whim. You don’t think state and federal laws haven’t addressed this in the past? It has. You have to look it up”
You know what I will do, if you continue, I will look up the cases, numerous cases against illegal insurance activities (denials of care, breach of contracts) and post it here.
For your satisfaction, you seem to be having pleasure by discrediting other people.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
“INSURANCE MAN’S BLUES”
Please Mr. President,
I don’t want to share.
Please Mr. President,
Please don’t make me to share.
I got more money than I’ll ever need.
But I don’t really care.
[please feel free to add verses]
Posted by: com1.rich | August 10, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
“The U.S. Constitution doesn’t have any provision in it to fund highways, bridges, or water in it. It doesn’t say the government should fund fire, police, or a military either.”
pssst… those are state functions except for military. The constitution DOES discuss directly about the military and common defense. Should read it sometime.
The federal government subsidizes state responsibilities, such as police, fire, highways etc. The only federal system was the interstate system by Eisenhower, specifically born out of national defense and movement of forces in case of an invasion of the US.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I tell you what’s ‘Un-American’ it’s a bunch of elected officials trying to shove a bill down our our throats when it is clear a majority do not want it not the bill they have now anyway. 80% of those who have insurance love it. Of the uninsured there a millions who are not documented who get care already. This bill is nothing more than a power grab. They own the bank and the car companies now its time for BIG INSURANCE after that if will be BIG OIL until the administration controls all major industry.
Posted by: 'Un-American' | August 10, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I have read 750 pages of hr3200. It appears that the government is plannig to take complete control of your health. I agree that it will create jobs to adminster the plan. The adminstrtive cost is going to cost more than the health care. Contact your congress person to vote no on this bill, not that it will do any good if he is a democrat like mine. Keep up sticking up for obama Jake, he might find a job for you yet.
Posted by: Lee S | August 10, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“You know what I will do, if you continue, I will look up the cases, numerous cases against illegal insurance activities (denials of care, breach of contracts) and post it here.”
Isnt the fact that they are illegal and in court a show that the government is already involved an making sure insurance pays when they are obligated? Your not helping your point here. Is the government failing to enforce the law?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“Folks, common sense here. Good health care costs good money does it not? More spent on our health care per capita than these other nations is NOT A BAD THING!! It points to rationed care and cost controls in those other nations. Why is it so hard to get this?”
Then tell me why are we ranked 34th in the world for our health care system, 72nd for performance, and 24th for life expectancy. We have rationed care now by the insurance companys they drop 14,000 ppl everyday from health care because they become a “liability” to the company. todate the insurance companys have droped 2.5 million americans. by the end of the year they would have droped 5.1 million americans is that not rationed care. is it not rationed care when a company denies you a operation that will save your life?
Posted by: Ralph | August 10, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
If the obama administration would have been straight up and open about the bill, in terms of content, restrictions, and what we are, and will be subjected to, the ill will associated with the, lack of basic knowledge by the supporters, and the attitude of “Do what I say, and make believe you like it” would not have fostered the feeling of “Voters are all chumps” and need to be railroaded before they are fully imformed
So this is the American way?
Posted by: ZK | August 10, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Wow, Ralph. Talk about fallacious information. Every single person in Nevada has been dropped from their health insurance company so far this year?
They are not lying to seniors and those on Medicare. Obama has told it to us straight! He will cut 500 BILLION in payments and services from us in order to help pay for his desired overhaul of the system. Instead of scrutinizing Medicare and ridding it of corruption and fraud, he will simply cut services to those who depend on health care services the most. What’s broken about Medicare is not the patients overusing it or the ethical doctors who are trying to work within it’s confines and getting shafted, but the fraud and corruption that is RIPE in every big government entity. There is no mistaking that(even more) RATIONING is coming to MEDICARE, because the President has told us so. Is that not considered un-American? To sell out the disabled and Golden generation to pay for his paternalistic plan to control Americans lives?
I want out of Medicare so bad but I don’t have that option right now. I had it so good on private insurance, and after doing taxes last year it cost me only $2400 more for out of pocket expenses in 2007 on private than for my costs on Medicare. That is so negligible that I now know that I made a terrible decision opting into Medicare when I was offered the option.
Posted by: BK | August 10, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
The only people saying don’t speak are the protesters. There is NO objection to showing up and both sides talking. The objection is when one side does not allow the other to talk. How is that denying them rights, or demonizing them for their opinion. What is not right is one side preventing the other from actually talking by shouting down any attempts to talk by others. Is that so hard to understand.
Posted by: darkeyes909 | August 10, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“People are attempting to speak, the “protesters” don’t allow a debate, they dust scream and threaten.”
Yawn.
The unspoken leftist mantra: Accuse your enemies of what you yourself do.
Posted by: Jenn | August 10, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“Then tell me why are we ranked 34th in the world for our health care system, 72nd for performance, and 24th for life expectancy. We have rationed care now by the insurance companys they drop 14,000 ppl everyday from health care because they become a “liability” to the company. todate the insurance companys have droped 2.5 million americans.”
Stop the insanity! The WHO ranking (37th) was largely based on self perception polls of people who only experienced health care in ONE system, not the other. Also, average expectancy DOES NOT factor health care alone. It includes car accident deaths, fell over and hit your head on the table deaths. With 4 times the population of the other nations above it, thats expected.
The drops in the health insurance rolls is directly tied to UNEMPLOYMENT folks. Come on, this isn’t rocket science. To attribute those drops in the rolls to liability issues is very disengenuous.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Is the government failing in assuring people rights?
Yes it is, because PEOPLE have to bring INSURANCE companies to court. Government does little to help people who have been neglected by insurance companies.
I am sure you work for a big company and have insurance that you think will never do such a thing to you or your children. How about that case when insurance company (Aetna) denied coachlear implant for both ears, saying that having it in both ears is experimental, for a child who was growing up. As soon as they realized that this will bring national attention, they called the family and said “we have overturned our decision.”
How about that?
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“opponents are afraid not just of differing views — but of the facts themselves.”
Fact is a four letter word to a Republican. Faith and ideology is all that matters.
Fear, Hatred, Distortion and Division is all they’ve got.
Posted by: thebob.bob | August 10, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Questioning government at every turn is as American as our flag. That is what our country was founded on so for some yahoos in Congress to brand anyone unamerican is really quite laughable.
Here is a really good idea. All those that are now in office, need to be voted out during the next election regardless of how long they have been in office.
Working as a politican in our government was never intended to be a full-time job so especially for those that have been in office for eons, they need to go.
Posted by: Annette | August 10, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
nancy pelosi wouldnt know an american if she saw one. she is from planet soros.
Posted by: catman | August 10, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Yes, we are a bunch of insane people, wishing that our children and grandchildren would not have to bother with insurance companies that might or might not provide coverage for care.
Posted by: insanse_people | August 10, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Everyone should have reasonable access to health care, and that is simply not the case in our country. It must be fixed, or we’re going to explode from the debt of emergency care for those who don’t get preventative care!
Why are we so willing to spend our tax dollars fighting wars and bailing out the banks, and we’re not willing to care for the health of our fellow citizens?
Posted by: mjbinic | August 10, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I see the democratic controlled SEIU union or wait maybe its the SEIU controlled democratic party is all about free speech or he best one Obama’s ACORN.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | August 10, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
“Get your government hands off my medicare!!!!!”
Posted by: gobot | August 10, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Yes, shouting down your fellow citizens IS American, only if that fellow is doing something wrong.
Shouting at politicians who refuse to answer questions that were not posed, is not so American.
Anyway, it seems that this tactic is working, just deflect the issue, and go blaming each other for being un-American. That’s truly American.
Posted by: none_other | August 10, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. -Theodore Roosevelt
Posted by: SS | August 10, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Everyone should have reasonable access to health care, and that is simply not the case in our country.
Everyone EXCEPT illegals and those who cannot afford it AND/OR are lazy.
Posted by: american_spirit | August 10, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
This is the basic gist of the tea partiers’ protest:
EVERYONE EXCEPT US MUST SHUT UP. If you talk, you are trampling on our rights.
Shutting down a Town Hall meeting by screaming over everyone else is the same thing as burning books.
Posted by: gobot | August 10, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“Yes it is, because PEOPLE have to bring INSURANCE companies to court. Government does little to help people who have been neglected by insurance companies.”
Is the laws government? Does the court (government) apply the law? Why is this method not desirable? Are you saying our court system (governmetn) is a failure or failing? If thats the case, why advocate more government?
“I am sure you work for a big company and have insurance that you think will never do such a thing to you or your children.”
Contrary, I was military for 13 years and currently a government contractor. Experiencing both government care and private care, theres no doubt which one is better quality. I had spine issues while flying in the Navy. Navy doc said “your back is fine” and denied me an MRI. A year later, with a different doc, he gave me an MRI and found 4 bad discs in my back. In frustration, i paid out of pocket to go to a specialist that told me surgery was the only course. No way was I letting these same military docs cut on my back.
“How about that case when insurance company (Aetna) denied coachlear implant for both ears, saying that having it in both ears is experimental, for a child who was growing up. As soon as they realized that this will bring national attention, they called the family and said “we have overturned our decision.”
Did the FDA say it was experimental, thus not approved? Most insurance policies do not cover experimental procedures, is that illogical? Guess what, neither does the government. If you think this example would be different with government insurance, you’re sadly mistaken.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
none_other That I don’t think that now is the time for a public option in healthcare; that I don’t want the waste and corruption of the current government healthcare plans to be expanded to the rest of the system; that I believe other reforms, like tort reform and better practices by doctors, would go a long way to controlling costs and improving care; is simply opinion. It is not as in your doublespeak ‘disinformation’.
Posted by: bct | August 10, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I am an American – proud of it. Now this lady has called me Un-American – why because I disagree with her. Listen here lady – it is one of my most American things we can do – that is – to voice our opinion and let our voices be heard. This nation was created by people who let their voices be heard. Lets just hope at the next election people are actually listening. You don’t belong in that office – soon hopefully you will be replaced. Maybe we can get someone in there who understands what America is.
Posted by: Nancy | August 10, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“Also, average expectancy DOES NOT factor health care alone. It includes car accident deaths, fell over and hit your head on the table deaths.”
Are you kidding me, these numbers that come from the World Health Organization they do not take into account people falling over and hitting their head. and your other statement that “was largely based on self perception polls of people who only experienced health care in ONE system, not the other.” is a flat out lie. if our system was so great we would be #1 in all fields. It’s because of people like you that all this mis-information is spread. You cant take the FACTS so you just lie about those FACTS.
Posted by: Ralph | August 10, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
You want to make health care right, then make your sick family member apply for insurance and get denied. See how fast the family member will die fighting the system.
Posted by: american_spirit | August 10, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I’m waiting for someone from ACORN to give us a “Leave Obama Alone” video.
Posted by: Marc | August 10, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Even Republicans admit that their methods are radical… that they are “strong arm” tactics justified by the fact that Saul Alinsky wrote about them years ago… and Alinsky was a leftist!
And, everyone knows, that if a Liberal has done it in the past, this gives Republicans the right to do it without limit in perpetuity.
Posted by: gobot | August 10, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Let’s see; the government can’t run a failing post office, medicare is insolvent, social security is going bankrupt, state Medicaid is bankrupting states and being slashed because of inefficiency. Hmmmm, Hey, I have an idea, let’s create the biggest health bureacracy in history where we the government can show the stupid people who elected us that we have learned from our mistakes.
Posted by: Andrei sakharov | August 10, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“Are you kidding me, these numbers that come from the World Health Organization they do not take into account people falling over and hitting their head.”
Um… yes it does. Average life expectancy of the population does not seperate by health care recieved, its for the entire population. Look into the numbers, it’s right there. It includes drug users, alchoholics, etc etc.
“if our system was so great we would be #1 in all fields. It’s because of people like you that all this mis-information is spread.”
I’m spreading misinformation? I’m telling people to look more closely at the data that was used because it doesn’t accurately depict the health care situation. As a matter of fact, if you take data that only compares health care recieved, such as cancer survival rates which is directly attributed to early detection and treatment, the US is the world leader. How do you explain that away genius?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“Get your government hands off my medicare!!!!!”
==========================================
Isn’t medicare a government run program? Might be a good idea to know what you are angry about….
Posted by: indy_voter | August 10, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
How about learning basic communication skills, and the proper way to propose a question to your favorite politician.
Perhaps that is impossible, due to lack of substance and assumptions in the question, such they are not, and will never be answered, all you can do is keep yelling.
Posted by: communication | August 10, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I guess SEIU members beating up a person quietly protesting something he does not agree with is american.
Posted by: ApacheLX | August 10, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
It’s a good thing none of those righteous Liberals ever objected to anything George Bush and his administration did (or tried to do).
Posted by: S | August 10, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
Hillary Clinton
Posted by: Who said this?? | August 10, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Now we are unamerican to practice freedom of speech and the right to assemble. The democrates are afraid to come out and answer question so they are lieing to save face. Guess what?? You will not be re-elected into the life long position you think you have. And for Obama the americas first communist dictator under the guise of a dictator will not be re-elected if not impeached.
Posted by: Jim Rod | August 10, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“Fear, Hatred, Distortion and Division is all they’ve got.”
The unspoken leftist mantra: Accuse your enemies of what you yourself do.
Posted by: Jenn | August 10, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Preventing folks from having a discussion at a town hall meeting by deliberatly shouting everyone down is not “freedom of speach”. It’s harrassment. There are limits on everything. Your “right” to swing you fist ends where the next guys nose begins. Your “right” to express your opinion ends where it prevents someone else from doing the same.
Posted by: fed up | August 10, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Hillary Clinton in 2003,
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
Posted by: Jessica | August 10, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
“Tell Obama about cancer survival rates. His mother surely attributes her “long” life to the “early detection and treatment” options that were offered to her by the insurance company.”
Wow, never seen this tactic before. Take factual data and try to refute it with a single situation. Wait wait, let me look at the data again.. nope didn’t change, US still leads the world in early detection, treatment, and survival rates for cancer. How could that be if Obama’s mother died of cancer? Crazy facts. Someone should change these facts to reflect Obamas mother.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
abc where is the story about Polosi and her 550million dollar fleet of aircraft at her beckon???? Polosi is one of the most lying politicians out there. What ever happend to her CIA is lying claim?? washed under the rug?? or did you can doers forgive her.
Posted by: Jim Rod | August 10, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
FOUND ON PAGE 30 OF OBAMACARE BILL
SEC. 123. HEALTH BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
13 (1) IN GENERAL.— There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a 15 panel member panel of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee, to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced and premium plans.
This part of the bill goes on to describe how the panel is selected: the Surgeon General, plus 9 members who are appointed by the President (cannot be employed by the Federal government or elected officials), and 9 members appointed by the Comptroller General of the U.S. (cannot be employed by Fed. Govt or elected officials).
In essence, this committee will be exactly what Sarah Palin described it – a death panel. They will decide what care a person gets, and how much care. Decisions will be made using the Complete Lives philosophy expounded by the left-wing Democrats. Simply put, this philosophy says that people between the ages of 14 and 40 are of most value to society, and therefore deserve most of the available healthcare dollars. Next will be younger children and infants. The elderly and infants who are born with disabilities will receive benefits, as they are supposedly a drain on the collective group’s resources.
Is this really what America believes? To me, it isn’t. It sounds like something from Nazi Germany.
Please, people, READ THE BILL. You won’t like what you find.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Obama to Americans,
“SHUT UP” and “Get out of our way”
Sounding more like Rev Wright….
Posted by: Tammy | August 10, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
As a community organizer, Barack Obama trained people to intimidate those in power in order to achieve a goal. He was awfully proud of his early efforts to change the political landscape. Why does the community organizer now object when the community organizes against him?
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Another wingnut talking point bites the dust (No. 2397):
“People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless”
Of course, that same Stephen Hawking who wouldn’t have a chance in the United Kingdom was in fact born in the United Kingdom, has lived his entire life in the United Kingdom and lives there still today, at the ripe old age of 67. (He was in fact hospitalized earlier this month.) Hawking is, you might say, living, breathing proof that these people are first-class fools.
(thanks Jay Bookman)
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Bob, I wouldn’t compare the Federal Post Office with Fedex. That’s Apples and Oranges because Fedex is typically express mail for the Post Office, and that starts not at 44 cents, but $4.95 and it can get up to $16 quickly depending where are shipping.
Then ontop of that, the Post Service is shutting down Post Offices all over to cut cost, and many of the mid-management jobs so the Post Service is not seeing it’s best days right now. That means they will have to keep raising prices to meet the market or keep slashing jobs and offices for the shortfall.
Posted by: Quincy Brown | August 10, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Town Hall Health Care Protesters: Is It Anger or Stupidity?
As the news media continues to bring us pictures of frustrated individuals who enjoy shouting in these town hall meetings for local and national attention, you cannot help but wonder why. It is quite simple why these people are upset over the proposed health care bill, either they cannot read or comprehend the bill or both. The town hall meetings should be about asking questions about parts of the bill they do not fully comprehend, but instead they choose to display how mentally and physically tough they are and how stupid they are. Anyone of the protesters can get a copy of the proposed health care bill from the Internet or from their congressperson. So the excuse given by some congressperson, “they want to know what’s in the bill” during the TV interviews does not hold water. YOU HAVE TO “READ” THE BILL FIRST. And if that was the case, “they want to know what’s in the bill”, then why are they, congresspersons, the “FOX NEWS FACTOR” not explaining the bill to their concerned constituents and TV AUDIENCES? Secondly, even if the protesters could read the bill they chose not to because it would cause them to actively get involved and educate themselves about legislation that affects them directly. And that does not make sense to them because they want someone to sit down with them like a child and explain it to them word for word, letter by letter because reading simply hurts their brain and the pain is just simply unbearable. And finally you have to keep in mind that these protesters are mostly middle age and older white republican Americans who probably did vote for Barrack Obama and this is their public way of airing this dislike for his presidential victory. If they were really serious about understanding the proposed health care changes they would be raising more serious health care concerns rather than their voices.
Charles Colorado
Posted by: Charles Wright | August 10, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Had our forefathers been contenet to “sit down and shut up”, there wouldn’t be an American Way to defend. Folks who try to cram unpopular programs down the throats of others should expect a gag reflex that may have unpleasant outcomes.
The Clintons tried to do this early on in the Bill-ary White House and now we’re getting The Second Dose. I wonder if this effort might be connected to Hillary’s decision to end her campaign – sort of “I’ll quit if you push health care reform” kind of a deal.
Posted by: DMorrisPE | August 10, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Well, Nancy and Steyn did get one thing right: “an ugly campaign is underway not merely to misrepresent the health insurance reform legislation, but to disrupt public meetings and prevent members of Congress and constituents from conducting a civil dialogue.”
Actually, there seem to be TWO such campaigns, because liberals are doing this as surely as conservatives are. It is still disruption when it’s done by SEIU and OFA, just as it is when it is done by tea party and dittohead activists. MOST of the people turning out for these town halls are none of the above– just aggravated ordinary citizens not usually aroused to speak out in public, learning the ropes as they try to stop the speeding train called Democratic health care reform.
We are being told by folks like Pelosi that there are two options– the status quo and the president’s plan. Well, since the president’s plan is not a single bill, but some sort of all-over-the-map support of five different bills, it’s no surprise there is confusion and frustration in the public.
And there are other alternatives. Yes, we need to reform health insurance. We need tort reform and an end to defensive doctoring, portability of health care, pooling of coverage for individuals and small businesses, government subsidies to help the uninsured afford private health insurance, and perhaps sliding scale government contributions to health savings accounts. We need a vigorous debate resulting in truly bipartisan measures.
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Page 50, Section 152 of Obamacare (HR 3200)
SEC. 152. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH CARE.
22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise explicitly permitted by this Act and by subsequent regulations consistent with this Act, all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services.
Translation: Free healthcare for illegal aliens (at the expense of taxpayers).
DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. READ THE BILL.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
KR, thanks for being willing to do the thankless job of pointing out the flaws in WHO statistics. Those who want to use these figures to denigrate the American system of health care don’t want you to rain on their parade by using facts. They just want their facile talking points. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Gobot, you said that the gist of town hall protesters’ argument was “everyone but us needs to shut up.” Funny, I didn’t know the president was a town hall protester.
Here’s what he said last week, “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.” OF course, he figures he gets to decide who “the folks who created the mess” are. And apparently his assessment and mine on that matter are not always in sync.
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I am a right wing radical, just as King George III defined our great founding fathers!
Posted by: Leo | August 10, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
It is the house and its leadership that is being Un-American and betraying the Amercan people by not taking the time to think through and carefully define the provisions and implications of this bill on the American people, nor putting measures in place to measure the new program.
Posted by: Gregg | August 10, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“Another wingnut talking point bites the dust (No. 2397):
“People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless”
Of course, that same Stephen Hawking who wouldn’t have a chance in the United Kingdom was in fact born in the United Kingdom, has lived his entire life in the United Kingdom and lives there still today, at the ripe old age of 67. (He was in fact hospitalized earlier this month.) Hawking is, you might say, living, breathing proof that these people are first-class fools.
(thanks Jay Bookman)
Posted by: Flash Override | Aug 10, 2009 1:34:54 PM”
The lesson AS ALWAYS?
Well you all should know by now how dishonest the right wing is.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The Democrats scream that the townhall & tea party protests are “organized.” Even if they were, isn’t that exactly what Obama’s “Organizing for America” is all about – organizing protests?
The hypocrisy of Obama and his band of thugs is truly amazing.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
It is sad to see the direction Obama and his liberal democratic friends is taking us in. Freedom of Speech is very American. You can’t say we were not forewarned. I am a senior citizen and I have downloaded and read parts of the bill that people are talking about. They (we) are right to be concerned. There is a section that requires end of the life counseling.The elderly will be dispensable as will the disabled. rationing is also in the bill under the heading of creating a panel that oversees costs. And remember, Jake and all, you will be a senior citizen one day too. Obama and Congress and their family members will be exempt. They already have free unlimited medical care. There are only 4 percent of legal citizens who are uninsured. Just increase the role of Medicaid. And when the pharmaceutical companies are in bed with Obama and members of Congress and support the health care reform bill, you have got to wonder what is in it for them. Money is a powerful motivator.
Posted by: Fran | August 10, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
This is the same kind of stupid organized and orchestrated crap as the “taxation” rallies that were held earlier (if you remember them). Republicans want you to think that this is a grass roots campaign that just happened spontaneously. Anyone with any intelligence can see it for what it is – more ridiculous manipulations by your friendly Republicans. It is sad they have nothing else of any value to offer.
Posted by: DaveM | August 10, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
@Janet
Another right wing talking point bites the dust:
“Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.”
Sec. 152 applies to fee for service and insurance, not to free care. If in fact, discrimination against citizenship status is included, there is nothing that gives “free care”, and in fact makes it a violation of the law to use taxpayer money to fund health care for people here illegally.
This is a good example of how you can take a line out of any text and make it look like it means the opposite of what it really means.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“Wow, never seen this tactic before. Take factual data and try to refute it with a single situation. Wait wait, let me look at the data again.. nope didn’t change, US still leads the world in early detection, treatment, and survival rates for cancer.”
Yes again thinking “we’re number one” because your insecure right wing brain needs to does not mean it is so.
“Coleman and colleagues drew on data from nearly 2 million cancer patients, ages 15 to 99, whose medical information was entered into 101 population-based cancer registries in 31 countries. The patients had been diagnosed with one of four cancers: breast, colon, rectum, or prostate cancers during the years 1990-1994. They were followed up to 1999, with the researchers comparing five-year survival rates.
The highest survival rates were found in the U.S. for breast and prostate cancer, in Japan for colon and rectal cancers in men, and in France for colon and rectal cancers in women, Coleman’s team reports.
In Canada and Australia, survival was also high for most cancers.
“Survival in the USA is high on a global scale but varies quite widely among individual states as well as between blacks and whites within the USA,” he tells WebMD.”
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
SHOW ME THE WEB SITE!! I want to read all 1000 pages of this bill. How do all of you know what it says when the darn thing is not on the web anywhere that I have found? I want the bill not the Fox News version or the CNN vrsion. Just the bill so I can read it for myself.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
When Democrat leaders start calling American citizens “mobsters” and “un-American,” it smacks of desperation. Don’t these people read the polls?
So-called journalist Andrea Mitchell suggested on MSNBC that Americans “might not know what’s best for them.”
So now we’re not just racist, redneck, un-American mobsters, but we’re also too stupid to know what’s good for us?
Way to go, Democrats!!!! Insulting the voters is exactly the right strategy to keep your elected positions. As a Republican-leaning Independent, I say keep up the good work!!!!!!
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
“Please, people, READ THE BILL. You won’t like what you find”
Yes actually read the bill vs the out of context crap that right wingers like Janet are posting.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
If you speak up your un-American, so shut up and pay your taxes !!!
Posted by: hkdakota | August 10, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Jenny, google HR 3200 or America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, and you’ll find the bill. Or you can go to Congress and find it.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
We tried to ask questions at the town hall meeting I attended. People stood in line and one at a time went to the mick. Ron Klein was not there and his two office aides never answered a question. They looked bored, taking notes and said: “We will get these notes to Mr. Klein.” No wonder people feel that no one in Wash.cares about their opinions;, they just want to get the bill passed so they can look good to the liberal Pres. who is running this country like a dictatorship. We will not “quit talking” so that you can get your way. Your are suppose to care about what the people want and most Americans do not want this healthcare bill. Listen to us!!!
Posted by: M. Perry | August 10, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
“SHOW ME THE WEB SITE!! I want to read all 1000 pages of this bill. How do all of you know what it says when the darn thing is not on the web anywhere that I have found? I want the bill not the Fox News version or the CNN vrsion. Just the bill so I can read it for myself.”
Go to thomas
Under the bill number put in h.r. 3200.
That is the bill the house passed.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Why is it when a liberal protests it is free speech and when a conservative protests it is part of a mob or artificial?
Why doesn’t ABC cover both sides of the story. Oh yea, I forgot they LOVE Obama no matter how far from the constitutional principles he is taking this country.
Posted by: Kirk | August 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
To Janet – and all others who want to read what this administration wishes to pass off on us. Utterly disgusting, but even more frightening is what is vague!
Posted by: Leo | August 10, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Why is it when a liberal protests it is free speech and when a conservative protests it is part of a mob or artificial?”
Probably because you have Republicans officials showing up to these things pretending to be just folks.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
How long must we wait for health care reform? This isn’t something new you know. The status-quo is unacceptable to almost everyone but those corporate goons currently empowered to sell health insurance to Americans. We must change it or cave-in to their greed.
I say enough talk!!! It’s time for CHANGE.
We’d better do something now. Even if it’s wrong. We can fix it later. That’s right. If you’re hungry but you don’t fully understand the menu, do you starve? They had their day. Didn’t work out. Now let the people have the care they need. Let us have something for a change.
Posted by: com1.rich | August 10, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
“Yes again thinking “we’re number one” because your insecure right wing brain needs to does not mean it is so.”
Wasn’t me Ryan, was a European group talking about their cancer care lagging behind the U.S. There are 391 posts here already but its down a few pages by now that someone else posted. Can probably find it. They should put a search function on posts.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
All this hysteria and people shouting “READ the BILL” is really nothing but mindless lashing out and fear mongering. There is no actual bill to read, only three different proposals of bills. The House of Representatives ALWAYS throws piles of “stuff” against the wall to see how much will stick. Then the Senate will go at it with a meat cleaver and tamp it down to be more politically palatable. The correct response for the public would be to look at the various proposals, listen to their representatives and let them know their preferences by polling, by lobbying and by calling and writing. This revolt is premature, and really just an effort to derail and humiliate the president that sticks in the craw of the far right.
Posted by: phoenix lady | August 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Ryan C and I agree on something: READ THE BILL. Then make up your mind.
Support for this bill is going down in the polls because people are beginning to actually read it.
Liberals always like to think that the GOP somehow controls ordinary people with their “right-wing propaganda.” Well, if they did, McCain would have won the election in 2008.
The truth is, the Average Joe is pretty smart. They don’t listen to Republican OR DEMOCRATIC propaganda. They make up their own minds, as they are doing now.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Helloooooo Benedict Arnolds! How are the traitors, treasonists and saboteurs doing today?? Your sabotage of public discussions is NOT freedom of speech! You are violating other’s right to freedom of speech. And, of course, we know who is doing this: Republican, right-wing “religious” types and others who have been hired and coached by churches and corporations. When you go into a meeting with the purpose of disrupting that meeting so that no one can express their point – that is not freedom of speech. There is nothing wrong with strong opinions, however, when you sabotage somebody else’s right to express theirs – then you are violating their rights. And, if you participate in corporate or church-sponsored disruption tactics, you are likely breaking the law as well as violating the rights of others. If you are church-sponsored, then your church should lose its tax exempt status. Why should tax payers sponsor right-wing religious politics? I suspect this has been an unanswered issue right along. Also, the Republicans are not only refusing to work on fixing this country’s problems, they are active trying to sabotage the current government. Repubs are not just the Party of NO, they are political saboteurs! This not only unethical, it is genuine TREASON! They caused and contributed to many of our current problems, and yet, they are trying to sabotage those who are trying to fix those problems! This will backfire in your faces. You will not win. You can lie, smear, distort, sabotage, subvert your little hearts out – you still will not win!!
Posted by: Sentinel | August 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
@Ryan C. There is no use in arguing with the right wingers. It is exasperating because instead of having an intelligent debate about the merits of healthcare reform, they resort to name calling and disseminating false information. What Right wingers fail to understand is a) insurance companies already ration health care (in order to make a HUGE profit), b) Bush prevented Medicare from negotatiating for lower drug prices (as all other gov’ts do), and c) the U.S. has one of the highest costs of health care. We HAVE to get the cost down. As someone in the health care field, with friends who are physicians not only in the U.S. but also in Germany, France, Australia, Eastern Europe, etc, I’ve been able to see both sides of the equation from both the patient perspective and the physicians perspective. We desperately need health care reform. I am of the opinion that single payer is the only way to go, ala France or Germany, but if someone can present an intelligent alternative, I’d be happy to hear it.
Posted by: Porto Valdibora | August 10, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Thanks Ryan. Just the bill. Great. Now to read it.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
“We’d better do something now. Even if it’s wrong. We can fix it later.”
Well then, lets fix medicare/medicaid first then before we sign up for another “even if it’s wrong”? We should demand the government get something right before they bite off on another thing to get wrong.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
“a) insurance companies already ration health care (in order to make a HUGE profit)”
EXACTLY!
Have a pre-exisitng condition and you won’t get covered.
Get sick and they drop you.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
It is un-American to exercise your First Amendment rights and ordinary citizens shouldn’t have Second Amendment rights, that should be reserved for the elite. What the heck, let’s just circumvent the whole Constitution and let Obama do what he thinks is best for the country. It’s un-American, racist and treasonist to criticize our president or anything he does. You people should be ashamed and face a firing squad.
Posted by: Oonogil | August 10, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
“is exasperating because instead of having an intelligent debate about the merits of healthcare reform, they resort to name calling and disseminating false information.”
I think just about everyone supports a kind of health reform. I think you see greater polarization when it comes to a public plan, mostly based on the innefficiencies of medicare/medicaid.
How bout if you are drawing unemployment you are auto enrolled into medicaid? Do we have to create a whole new program? Why not fix and modify the one we have.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
I really don’t know if this is a good bill or not, but neither does congress my only question is WHAT IS THE HURRY, slow down and make sure it’s a good bill.
Posted by: hkdakota | August 10, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Porto – Your post leaves out the fundamental necessary reform: Tort Reform. One of the reasons docs have to charge so much is their quarterly premiums are approaching 30,000.00-40,000.00 per year. You also leave out a crucial bit of info: The Trial Lawyer Association of America and the American Bar Association are the biggest contributors to the Democratic Party. So, it is obvious that Obama has no intention of reigning in the hand that feeds him. You cite Germany, France, Canada and the like. I guarantee you do not see the level of lawsuits against docs in those nations. Here, it’s out of control. It is all being done by democrats. John Edwards is a classic example of a democrat scumbag who made millions by going after docs – of which 99% were probably completely innocent.
Posted by: mm | August 10, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“”a) insurance companies already ration health care (in order to make a HUGE profit)”
EXACTLY!
Have a pre-exisitng condition and you won’t get covered.
Get sick and they drop you.”
Come on now with the one-liners. “HUGE profit” of the industry, I’m guessing is stemming from the presidents state of “record” profits that turns out to not be true. Their profits this year are far below that of 2006 and 2007, and have been in decline with the economy. Also, their profit margin is below retail and technology markets. Insurance profits an average of 5%, compared to 15-20% of other markets.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Ryan C: Could you cite some names? o wise one? This is a double standard like of never seen.
Posted by: mm | August 10, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
The only anti-americans are the partisans who imported, alien philosophies as socialism, comunism and marxism to our country, the USA. We do not recognize Marx, Engles and the rest of them as our patriots. The patriots that we recognized are our forefathers Jefferson, Adams and the rest of them. The great Lincoln.. etc.The anti- american mantra comming from the left is a real joke.
Posted by: MFB | August 10, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
“Have a pre-exisitng condition and you won’t get covered.”
Why are they switching insurance with a pre-existing condition? Maybe this process should be fixed. People have cellphone contracts longer than they have health insurance contracts. I disagree that government is the way to fix this.
“Get sick and they drop you.”
Obviously there are laws that prevent this. Most of these cases involve fraud on part of the customer not being truthful about their current health during the application process. Fraud voids the contract and even the law won’t protect you there. That being said, if the current laws are not addressing this issue, then review the laws.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Top House Democrats Call Town Hall Disruptions ‘Un-American’ – and yet they somehow miss that socialism is very, very Un-American.
Posted by: Erik | August 10, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
DON’T ALLOW YOURSELVES TO BE USED AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BY BIG INSURANCE.
SUPPORT YOUR COUNTRY
SUPPORT YOUR GOVERNMENT
SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT
JUST SAY NO TO BIG INSURANCE!
Posted by: com1.rich | August 10, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
We already have nationalized health care. Look to each Native American trible and the health care they have. It is the worst in the world. Even third world countries have better health care than native Americans. We also have Medicare and Medicaid. Both of which are about bankrupt and Congress has done nothing to help out. I am all for a nationalized health care system as long and every congress person, the President and his family and all members of his cabinet are part of the health care plan. If they won’t join it, then it AIN’T good enough for me.
Posted by: platteman | August 10, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Our president doesn’t support our country….so to support one is to not support the other.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | August 10, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Sentinel – Spare us your phony outrage. A conservative speaker cannot even give a lecture on a college campus anymore because her or she will be threatened, booed off the stage, or physically removed from the scene. I have never seen liberals treated this way in the public arena. Now, the republicans are tearing a page out of the democrat playbook: Public mobilization, marches and scream tactics. You guys invented this. So now, when we turn the tables on you, you cry foul. Pathetic. Why can’t liberals stand on their own two feet?
Posted by: mm | August 10, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Obviously there are laws that prevent this. Most of these cases involve fraud on part of the customer not being truthful about their current health during the application process”
Blame the customer not the insurance company!
To sum up the right wing case we should praise the insurance industry for making healthy profits only covering healthy people and scorn the government for rationing care.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Americans have the right to voice their opinion whether they agree or disagree with the government. The democrats and republicans need to get their act together and start listening to the people of this country instead of taking care of own interests.
Posted by: Mamamia | August 10, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
KR, didn’t you see “Sicko”?
They interview a woman who had insurance until she was diagnosed with cancer or something really expensive. At that point, the insurance company voided her policy (they call it rescission) on the basis that she failed to disclose a previous medical condition.
She failed to note on her application that she once had a yeast infection.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Ryan C. doesn’t seem to like my comments. Ryan, you can always report me to thugs-r-us@whitehouse.gov or 1-800-KARLMARX.
Below is the info you will need to turn me in:
Janet KissMyButt
We Love Glenn Beck Lane
Red State, America 62231
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
“A conservative speaker cannot even give a lecture on a college campus anymore because her or she will be threatened, booed off the stage, or physically removed from the scene.”
Yes the Bund is unwelcome on most campuses as is the Klan.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
The Dems have attacked the 2nd and 14th Amendment already. Why not the 1st Amendment to the Consitution of the US.
Posted by: Patriot | August 10, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Does anyone remember the so-called caucuses that dominated the pre-election sites when Obama’s “goons” out-yelled everyone?–Do these town halls eerily remind you of those-?-Seems to me that these objectors have taken a page out of Obama’s well greased organizations.
Posted by: virginia | August 10, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“Blame the customer not the insurance company!
To sum up the right wing case we should praise the insurance industry for making healthy profits only covering healthy people and scorn the government for rationing care.”
Um… no. Take at look at insurance laws. It is tied to contractual law. The only way an insurance company can opt out of the contract is under breach of contract terms, terms of contract met, or a law being broken in execution of the contract. I say this because there is a deliberate attempt to MISINFORM people about arbitrary dropping of insurance when thats illegal. Being illegal then you can take them to court to apply the law. There are a ton of insurance laws created to protect you under good contract terms.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“Obviously there are laws that prevent this”
I nearly died falling out of my chair laughing at that one.
Oh the irony, it burns!
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“KR, didn’t you see “Sicko”?”
Lol is this a joke? Moore is a master at ommitting facts to paint a picture and influence his viewers. It is an art. To give you an example, Kevin Rhoads did an analysis on Fahrenheit 911. You can search it, it’s online. It outlines the tactics Moore takes to omit facts and paint a picture. I would never take anything out of a Moore movie as an example of anything other than the point of view of Mr. Moore.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Ryan C,
Where are all the poll numbers you used to post when Obama was winning? You were relentless, not to mention arrogant.
Don’t you want to post your Messiah’s falling poll numbers? Or how about the poll numbers showing Americans aren’t buying Obamacare?
Or how about Obama’s rating among Independents?
Wouldn’t you like to fill us in on how well your Messiah is doing these days?
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“Um… no. Take at look at insurance laws. It is tied to contractual law. The only way an insurance company can opt out of the contract is under breach of contract terms, terms of contract met, or a law being broken in execution of the contract. I say this because there is a deliberate attempt to MISINFORM people about arbitrary dropping of insurance when thats illegal.”
And yet it happens.
The right wing is about protecting insurance company profits so they attack they consumer who gets hosed by their insurance company.
That is their tactic just like KR attacking the ADL because they said Rush Limbaugh’s Hitler screed was offensive.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
@Flash Override,
I bet if the Government tried to pass a bill to stop that from happening would be a hell of a lot easier then this health care bill they are trying to pass, AND GET 100% of American Backing it. No, we can’t just pass a BILL or BILL to protect peoples rights, and make sure pre-existing conditions can not be held against you, we have to create an entire new Health PLAN?? What is the numbers 280 million HAVE health insurance, 40 million don’t? And, we are going to change it all for them? Be cheaper to pay to relocate them all to Cananda.
Posted by: ajax659 | August 10, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“Where are all the poll numbers you used to post when Obama was winning?”
Winning? You mean the election?
Well see that happened last November and he won.
Currently he sits at 53.5% approval according to RCP’s poll aggregate.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
From MSNBC: Organized labor gave more money to congressional campaigns (92% to Democrats) than any other interest group at a time when overhauling health care and easing the ability of unions to organize sit atop Congress’ agenda.
Union political action committees shelled out $11 million to lawmakers during the first six months of this year… according to a CQ MoneyLine analysis of the latest filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
From the Washington Examiner: The best chance for compromise legislation on health care may be a plan under construction in the Senate Finance Committee that would pay for a public plan in part by taxing some worker health benefits.
But the union workers who helped Democrats win Congress and the White House and whose support will be key in getting a health bill signed into law would not pay the tax.
With cost estimates already as high as $1.6 trillion, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., has proposed paying for the bill in part by taxing health care benefits for workers who earn more than $100,000, or $200,000 for married couples, according to those familiar with the discussions.
Baucus is also weighing a tax based on the value of health care benefits that exceed a yet-to-be determined cap. A tax on benefits that exceed the cap by a mere $3,000 could amount to $750 in taxes annually for a worker who earns as little as $34,000, say experts.
But those union members serving under collective bargaining agreements would not be subjected to the tax, according to proposals under discussion.
Union workers enjoy some of the most extensive and costliest health benefits, and union officials complained their members would be unfairly burdened by a health care tax because their contracts cannot be changed quickly enough to avoid it.
Union members also represent one of the biggest and most powerful Democratic constituencies and their support of any health care reform proposal is viewed as essential to getting a bill passed in Congress.
Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I dont see the “un-american” angle. So, we are no longer granted freedom of speech? We are no longer allowed to speak our minds? When did this happen? Are we communist already? That was fast!
Posted by: Klatu | August 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
“And yet it happens.
The right wing is about protecting insurance company profits so they attack they consumer who gets hosed by their insurance company.”
If it happens then it would be a clear win in court. It’s what our laws and court system are for yes? If its not working and its a government function, why put more of this into the governments hands?
“That is their tactic just like KR attacking the ADL because they said Rush Limbaugh’s Hitler screed was offensive.”
No, again, your selective memory is working hard. I said did the ADL scorn Democrats for calling protestors “brown shirts” and of course, the answer is no. That makes the ADL a politically motivated organization and their opinion, political.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
If this is such a good plan, then why are the democrats trying to strongarm it thru with their Capone tactics? The true UN-AMERICANS are the House Democratics that refuse to acknowledge WE DONT’ WANT THIS1
Posted by: brad | August 10, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
“Lol is this a joke? Moore is a master at ommitting facts to paint a picture and influence his viewers.”…. I’d agree Moore is biased in his films. I didn’t see Sicko. But this example? Yes, it is known they are looking for anything they can to deny coverage if somebody gets the big one. Google it.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Funny how when Bush was around it was the Democrats proclaiming that “Dissent is Patriotic”.
Hypocrite much?
Posted by: Anya | August 10, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
I dont see the “un-american” angle. So, we are no longer granted freedom of speech? We are no longer allowed to speak our minds? When did this happen? Are we communist already? That was fast!
Posted by: Klatu **********************
Well, it happened during Bush. See, when we complained about a war? We were told we were UnAmerican. We were told we needed to leave the country. Short memory out of you guys.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
“Or how about the poll numbers showing Americans aren’t buying Obamacare?”
Actually the polls show good support for things like making insurance companies cover those with preexisting conditions, a public option and providing insurance for those who are too poor to afford it on their own.
Things like taxing employer provided benefits or changing Medicare did not do well in polling.
Pew: “Although the public has a more negative than positive general reaction to the health care proposals being debated on Capitol Hill, there is broad support for many of the core elements of the legislation currently before Congress. Nearly two-in-three (65%) favor requiring that all Americans have health insurance, with the government aiding those who cannot afford it. Nearly as many (61%) favor requiring employers who do not provide insurance to pay into a government health care fund. And there is broad support (79%) for prohibiting insurance companies from denying insurance to people with pre-existing conditions.
But reactions to the methods proposed to make sure more people have access to health care coverage are mixed. A thin 52% majority favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans. There is broad support (63%), however, for raising the taxes on affluent people to help pay for changes to the health care system. On the other hand, there is equally strong opposition (62%) to new taxes on employees with health insurance benefits above a certain value. Most (58%) also oppose putting tighter restrictions on what medical procedures Medicare and Medicaid will cover.”
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
OK, I voted for McGovern, Carter (big mistake), and Clinton. I am not some ditto-head, etc. I am also not a math major. Someone please explain to me how you ADD 50 million people to the system and don’t increase costs? The numbers simply don’t add up and that is what people are asking! You can tax all the billionaires all day long (there are not enough of them) and the numbers STILL don’t work. Until someone can explain it, folks will continue to not support it.
Posted by: Alan | August 10, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“Yes, it is known they are looking for anything they can to deny coverage if somebody gets the big one.”
I don’t think this is false. The first thing they do is make sure they were not lied to on thier application about the condition. The lie would be fraud and thus, breach of contract and they no longer have to honor it.
However, we shouldn’t be switching insurance so much. We shouldn’t be forced into group plans with employers. We should stay with one insurance unless we can get a better deal elsewhere. Instead, change jobs, change plans, eventually thats going to bite you. If you can be a customer of ATT for 20 years, why not health insurance?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“Funny how when Bush was around it was the Democrats proclaiming that “Dissent is Patriotic”.
Hypocrite much?”………. If Sheehan pulled her stunt they immediately took her out. Dissent and disrupt to shut down all dialog are two differnet things. Go protest outside.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
“I said did the ADL scorn Democrats for calling protestors “brown shirts” and of course, the answer is no.”
You attacked the ADL because your favorite pig Rush got called out for his offensive speech.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Ryan picks and chooses what polls he wants to quote.
Try looking at Obama’s numbers with Independents, the people who actually decide elections in this country.
They don’t like big government any more than Republicans.
Posted by: Janet | August 10, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Funny how when Bush was around it was the Democrats proclaiming that “Dissent is Patriotic”.
Hypocrite much?
Posted by: Anya | Aug 10, 2009 2:41:22 PM
========================
You leaving out one thing..
THIS IS A TOWN HALL. I place for civil organized discussion.
If you want the protest. Picket outside the place. Obvious none of these beet red folks with the foam coming out their mouths and steam billowing out their ears are not looking to discuss/reason anything.
Posted by: Omentum | August 10, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Y’all.
Freedom of speech includes the responsibility to use it wisely.
You don’t yell “Fire” in a crowded theatre if there is no fire.
Freedom of speech does not mean you can walk up to Senator Leahy and scream in his face (like I saw on GMA this morning). That is not democracy. That’s being disrespectful. And yes, un-American.
Having a different opinion and expressing it civilly is the most American action a person can do. And if you listen, that is what Obama is asking for. Reading headlines and jumping to conclusions without reading the op-ed is not.
And if you are going to scream, crazy-lady, please use a breath mint. God Bless America (and Altoids).
Posted by: whit | August 10, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“I don’t think this is false. The first thing they do is make sure they were not lied to on thier application about the condition. The lie would be fraud and thus, breach of contract and they no longer have to honor it.”….. Well, if “forgotten” strep throat in 1979 was truly an indicator that one would have cancer in 2005 I suppose this would be a legit argument. No, it is not about fraud. Fraud is they knew they had cancer when they took out the new policy. This is about cruelty to make a buck. Why is it so many of you think insurance companies are full of virtue? There are horrible stories out there. Like I said – try Google.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“You attacked the ADL because your favorite pig Rush got called out for his offensive speech.”
Actually I’m not a fan of Rush. But nice of you to assume. You seem unwilling to admit that the ADL came out against Rush, but did not come out against the Democrats calling protesters “brown shirts”, in clear referrence to nazi strong arming? Why is one worthy of scorn, and the other not, unless your organization is a partisan organization? Explain.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“Nice racist statement from a member of the Party of Tolerance. My God, Ryan, you are pathetic.
Posted by: mm | Aug 10, 2009 2:46:21 PM”
Associating conservatives with the Klan is racist?
Look up the Council of Conservative Citizens.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“Well, if “forgotten” strep throat in 1979 was truly an indicator that one would have cancer in 2005 I suppose this would be a legit argument. No, it is not about fraud. Fraud is they knew they had cancer when they took out the new policy. This is about cruelty to make a buck.”
Any court cases that uphold this hypothesis?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
The right to dissent and to differ in opinion is a distinctly American right.
Are the Democrats saying that we do not have the right of dissent and to question government? Really?
The real problem is that Democrats dislike free choice and that fact that others disagree with them.
I plan to continue calling them to the carpet to explain their socialist plans and to continue to be in their face at every chance to stop the slide away from free enterprise and into their dream Marxist state they so love.
Long Live America and it’s founding ideals.
Jon
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“Try looking at Obama’s numbers with Independents, the people who actually decide elections in this country.”
Obama is running in 2010?
Because off season elections tend to be dominated by whose base comes out.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Jon,
As far as I’m concerned yes you have all the right in the world to make complete a$$es out of yourselves. Carry on. We would expect nothing less anymore.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Funny how when Bush was around it was the Democrats proclaiming that “Dissent is Patriotic”.
Hypocrite much?
Posted by: Anya | Aug 10, 2009 2:41:22 PM
==========
But you do have a point
When Bush started this war with Iraq (who did not attack us)
We should have screamed and protested like what you see here in these town halls.
Maybe it would have made a difference.
kudos Anya
Posted by: Omentum | August 10, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
BTW Jon, Tell me. In 2003 when Bush and republicans passed a several billion dollar expansion of entitlement called Medicare Plan D? What did you say then?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
KR – An uninsured person fighting cancer typically doesn’t run out for that lawyer. If they do? Well, it might get settled by the time they’re dead or cured. If you don’t believe me seek information. How hard is it for republicans to think “Hey, could that be true? Let me find out?”
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“You seem unwilling to admit that the ADL came out against Rush, but did not come out against the Democrats calling protesters “brown shirts”,”
The ADL came out against Rush for his extensive comparison of Obama to Hitler.
In you mind it was a sin that they did not come out against a brown shirt comment.
I also do not recall them taking right wingers to task for calling Obama’s AmeriCorp proposal his brown shirt army.
But I guess the ADL were oh so wrong to dare call Rush offensive.
They should have known they would be attacked by his brownshir…err…dittoheads.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
” In 2003 when Bush and republicans passed a several billion dollar expansion of entitlement called Medicare Plan D? What did you say then?”
Was very against it. Was very against TARP. Some of us don’t give up principles for party leaders.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Janet – Thank you for your words… Although Glen Beck is a little too much for me.
Posted by: mm | August 10, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Its the governments job to make rules and regulations on how a Privite businesses run. Operating a business is not in their scope. They have failed and failed again in their attempt ot run the programs they have. Now they want to start another. The current government is way too involved in peoples lives, telling them what is good for them and what they can’t have (retiring – here is a pill and a chit for the crematorium, use it when you feel bad). This is a Power Grab by the elites. The power is in your wallet, not theirs. TORT Reform will get rid of many of our Health Care over costs, you don’t hear anything about that from our Government. The reason is obvious – Power and Money. Term limits would help too.
Posted by: Spanky | August 10, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Janet – They’re “dishing it back on republicans” because they have remotely tried to do a bit of bi-partisan here. It’s obvious it gets them nowhere. They will pass something and all of your screeching will be for nothing. Today in my hometown? Big article on how they’re probably going to pull bennies of retired police and firemen. Because they’re broke. So, add a few more that want this most likely.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“The ADL came out against Rush for his extensive comparison of Obama to Hitler.
In you mind it was a sin that they did not come out against a brown shirt comment.”
They explained they did not like the comparisons to Nazi-ism. Well…? Why would that apply to a radio talk show host and not a member of Congress?
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
“Some of us don’t give up principles for party leaders.”
Psssst principles are not “cause Rush said so”.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
“Some of us don’t give up principles for party leaders.”
Psssst principles are not “cause Rush said so”.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
“An uninsured person fighting cancer typically doesn’t run out for that lawyer. If they do? Well, it might get settled by the time they’re dead or cured. If you don’t believe me seek information.”
They get the care, question is do they go into debt or does the insurance cover it. The court figures that out. Unless the courts are not doing their job? This comes down to a failure of the application of the law, or the law being broken. All of which are government functions and if it’s not working, why look to the government to fix it with something else?
Personally, I think anyone with medical debt should qualify for interest free government loan, paid back through taxes.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
BTW Jon. Real cost of The Pill Bill? Approx. 540 BILLION/ 10 years. You getting this yet? Yeah, chump change. But it’s O.K. if a dang republican does it. Cauze they’re not commies!
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
“They explained they did not like the comparisons to Nazi-ism. Well…? Why would that apply to a radio talk show host and not a member of Congress?”
All this attacking the ADL just to defend Rush Limbaigh….amazing.
Btw, Has the ADL commented on Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin?
Or did they just go after Rush because his commentary was particularly offensive.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
ajax659, the Democrats could take a bill written by Bush and the Republicans would still vote against it. (As a matter of fact, one of their biggest talking points about HR 3200 is funding for a Bush mandate on “end of life counseling”)
Because it isn’t they think reform will work, its that they are scared that it will and the Democrats would get credit for it.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 10, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
KR – As much as we might disagree? I like your last line. In the old days we owed. Funny how that’s not allowed anymore.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
whit – Does this include the Jessee Jackson’s and Al Sharpton’s of your party who demonize, march, boycott and scream down those with whom they disagree?
Posted by: mm | August 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
It’s one thing to protest, bring signs, and chant outside. It’s another when people try and pack a room to the degree that it’s a fire hazard or threatens the safety of people.
It’s especially a whole other thing when people THREATEN VIOLENCE AND DROWN OUT the voices of other citizens from being able to speak their mind.
Many of these “protesters” scream at the top of their never allowing anyone else to speak. That IS definitely “unAmerican”!!
First Amendments rights are for ALL people, not just Republicans.
Posted by: mshare | August 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“”"”"”"”There is broad support (63%), however, for raising the taxes on affluent people to help pay for changes to the health care system.”"”"”"”"
Posted by: Ryan C
This poll was probably conducted by phone with people below the middle class level. It is extremely rare to see support for ANY more tax increases. Here’s what you need to know. The dems are going to ram this down our throats with, or without rep support. I would rather they take their time and give us a new program that can be tweeked instead of having to redo everything. What is the rush?
Posted by: lfrichar | August 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
You know KR, that might not be a bad idea.
Posted by: Flash Ovderride | August 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“”Some of us don’t give up principles for party leaders.”
Psssst principles are not “cause Rush said so”.”
So clever Ryan. You think your quips are intelligent and witty, when they are just annoying and childish.
Even after I told you I am not a Rush fan, you still believe I am. I’m not going into why I don’t like the guy, or more talk radio hosts. Its not worth my time to tell it to you.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
“As much as we might disagree? I like your last line. In the old days we owed. Funny how that’s not allowed anymore.”
I think there are more creative ways to address our health care issues. Concentrating on lowers the actual cost of health care, by looking at providers and what their big costs are and finding ways to lower that. Federal government putting more into the private R&D sector, no interest loans for medical debt, etc. We don’t have to try and recreate insurance with the government, but use market economics to bring the costs down. But this current bill does very very little for this.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Remind me which side is financed by big evil companies??
—The drug industry has authorized its lobbyists to spend as much as $150 million on television commercials supporting President Obama’s health care overhaul, beginning over the August Congressional recess, people briefed on the plans said Saturday.
The unusually large scale of the industry’s commitment to the cause helps explain some of a contentious back-and-forth playing out in recent days between the odd-couple allies over a deal that the White House struck with the industry in June to secure its support. The terms of the deal were not fully disclosed. Both sides had announced that the drug industry would contribute $80 billion over 10 years to the cost of the health care overhaul without spelling out the details.
With House Democrats moving to extract more than that just as the drug makers finalized their advertising plans, the industry lobbyists pressed the Obama administration for public reassurances that it had agreed to cap the industry’s additional costs at $80 billion. The White House, meanwhile, has struggled to mollify its most pivotal health industry ally without alienating Congressional Democrats who want to demand far more of the drug makers. White House officials could not immediately be reached for comment.—
Posted by: Obama Cuts Secret Deal with Villainous, Immoral Drug Companies—Won’t Disclose Details | August 10, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“This poll was probably conducted by phone with people below the middle class level.”
Pew did it.
“the latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted July 22-26 among 1,506 adults reached on landlines and cell phones”
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“As much as we might disagree? I like your last line. In the old days we owed. Funny how that’s not allowed anymore.”
And btw, one place I am a supportive of government being involved in health services is emergency care only. Just like police and fire departments, we all benefit from emergency care and it should be handled somewhat the same way. Long term critical care and basic care should be our responsibility with insurance.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Who was the Russian General who said the United States would break up into 4 sections within 2 years of Obamas election? Hmmmmmmmmmmm he may be on to something
Has Nancy Pe-kno-ke-losi called anyone Nazi today LMAO
Posted by: stardate: 2729.9 | August 10, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Secondlook says: “Jon you don’t even know legislation. You’re nothing but another drone. BTW, I’m a centrist that lived in Canada and hates their way. hahah Gotcha. I’m just educated before I open my mouth. Yeah, that pill bill was just peaches. Good one.”
Hmmm… So how it is you come to support a bill that is designed to strip you of your rights to determine your own medical care and end of life decisions?
As for the pill deal – Let’s hear it – I’d like to know EXACTLY what you are carping about so I can research it.
So far, you’ve met the profile of a Democrat shill to the max, but I’ll throw you one and be fair – Cite your sources and I’ll examine them fairly.
My main beef is that the Democrats are painting ordinary people with the brush of “radical” just for disagreeing. If being American and disagreement are no longer in the same breath, then I fit the “mob” label, since I’m true to my Constitution and love of country.
Intelligent response and no name calling from you please.
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
“The knee jerk defense of Rush in any circumstance and your attacking groups like the ADL says otherwise.
Then again maybe its just a feeling onn your part that bigots need to stick up for each other.”
Criticising ADL for being one sides in their criticism is a valid statement to point out their partisanship. Now that you’ve called me a biggot, I’m done responding to your posts.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
It’s only patriotic when you snitch on your neighbors for the president.
Posted by: larry | August 10, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Barack Obama on 9/17/08:
“I want you to argue with them and get in their face,”
But what’s sauce for The One apparently ain’t sauce for the rest of us.
Posted by: Bridget | August 10, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
MM – I think that Jesse, Al, Sarah, Anne, Rush and the rest of the hate mongers should form their owon political party. Hate for America. What do you think. I seriously doubt that Al and Jesse are any more representative of the Democratic party than Rush (contrary to what he may think), Anne and even Sarah are to the Republicans.
Posted by: Jenny | August 10, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Those that agree with Obamacare are grassroot, patriotic, levelheaded American citizens.
Those that disagree are unAmerican, violent, racist, Nazi mobsters.
Posted by: larry | August 10, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
- – - – -Barack Obama on 9/17/08: “I want you to argue with them and get in their face,” But what’s sauce for The One apparently ain’t sauce for the rest of us. – - – - -
Oh sooooo very true! The Anointed One cannot abide dissent or free expression, can He?
We, the Little People, must fall into line and assent to the higher class!
Like we’re ever giving up freedom or the right of dissent and free assembly. We’ll never let that right go.
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Some reform is needed. Why not have a panel of repsected experts (in the various fields of healthcare) analyze the problems? The house bill doesn’t takle effect until 2013; so what’s the rush?
Posted by: deanbob | August 10, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
This Bill is Unconstitutional at Best. It’s going to Force this lame Health Care Reform upon many Businesses and Citizens who do NOT want it. One has NO choice but to participate or you’ll be FINED. Also why would the Govnm’t need access to MY personal banking and financial records, if they are the Ones paying the bill, and especially paying the bill directly to the Dtrs or Hospitals?? It’s so they can OWN every aspect of one’s life and finances by having access to one’s personal accts. thereby having control over everyone’s money.
Posted by: MPass86 | August 10, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I find it interesting that the Dems have so much frothing hatred for the very tactics that got there candidate elected.
First, if anyone had any intellect at all they would not be so quick to dismiss these protestors. Organized or not you can’t force someone to protest unless there are a group who have a grievance to begin with. Being organized does not diminish the fact that these are American citizens exercising their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. There is nothing more patriotic.
Second, if it were just the protests then how do you explain away the plummeting support for this in the Polls? The two together paint a very convincing argument that these are constituents that are frustrated at being marginalized. Is it any wonder that someone who is not being heard might get upset and yell? Hmmm, unique concept.
The Dems seem out of touch with reality and are walking a dangerous path in marginalizing and attacking the people they represent. If it continues and this bill passes despite the bipartisan opposition then 2010 could usher in a whole new kind of “Shock and Awe” at the polls.
Shawn
The American Conservative Party
P.S. If people researched this stuff on the Internet instead of relying on the puppet media they might have read a story by the AP(hardly conservative) that shows Dems have supressed every alternative piece of Health Care legislation the Republicans have tried to bring to the floor.
Posted by: Shawn | August 10, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
This Bill is Unconstitutional at Best.
Posted by: MPass86 | Aug 10, 2009 3:18:12 PM
The Constitution is whatever we judges decide is “fair.”
Posted by: Wise Justice Sotomayer | August 10, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
larry. Who gave you your talking points?
Posted by: deanbob | August 10, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
=== The house bill doesn’t takle effect until 2013; so what’s the rush? ===
I wonder how many people know that it doesn’t take effect until after the next presidential election? Kind of convenient for Obama, no?
Posted by: Axey | August 10, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Take out a “low interest loan” to pay for medical care? Are you kidding? That’s what medical insurance is for. The problem is middle and lower income families can’t afford the insurance, sometimes even if the company they work for has coverage. And then there’s the corruption and obscene profits of the insurance companies. Who’s going to regulate that? The same fear and doom and gloom tactics used to describe our need to go to war are one and the same in the health care debate. We have become a selfish intolerant society.It doesn’t take a catastrophic illness to bankrupt a family.
Posted by: Bea | August 10, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“Take out a “low interest loan” to pay for medical care? Are you kidding?”
No thats not what I said. I said NO interest government loans to pay for aquired medical debt. Meaning, if you did not have insurance and you accumulated medical debt, instead of bankruptcy, that debt is paid for at no interest in the form of a government loan. This could have different pay back options, either with monthly installments in the form of taxes withheld or out of the tax return.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“Criticising ADL for being one sides in their criticism is a valid statement to point out their partisanship.”
Except the ADL was very critical of MoveOn for comparing Bush and Hitler so your partisanship claim falls on its face.
You knee jerk defended Rush Limbaugh and attacked the ADL.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Jon, do your own research on Medicare Plan D. It was in the press when it went down and evidently you tuned out, because if you had not you’d see how so many of you sound like hypocrites now. It’s the largest entitlement expansion in my lifetime and I’m 50. As far as your ridiculous notion that this strips me of my rights? Well, the longer this is allowed to continue the longer fewer of us will even have insurance. Actually I’m well off and covered. But even I get we’re a lay off or retirement away from getting the screws put to us. The “end of life decision” thing is again pure spin and it shows your ignorance. If you wish to argue this on merits? I’m up for it. It’s when people don’t know their facts that it drives me up a wall. And sure, the dems are hitting back trying to paint you guys. And I say it’s about time. Because for the last few years your party appears to be getting about as rude and obnoxious as it can get. Trust me – the worst behavior is off the right. The other side may be liberal – but they tend to know their facts. And they don’t spend their lives demonizing half of the country like the side of smug does. Your party is imploding and I’m not sure I can ever vote republican again at this rate.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Jake…… this is Un-American. Americans do not solve issues in this manner. Name calling, bullying, screaming, denying others free speech Is Not American. We learned how to disagree in Kindergarten. Remember.
Posted by: tychisum | August 10, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“=== The house bill doesn’t takle effect until 2013; so what’s the rush? ===I wonder how many people know that it doesn’t take effect until after the next presidential election? Kind of convenient for Obama, no?”
It *is* striking how that little detail is not more prevalent in discussions. He gets in without fanfare for a second term and then the real pain hits as the literal bottom falls out of our medical care system. The truth is that this is part of the plan for Obama. Too bad he is a one-term wonder.
I agree with the others. For Nancy Pelosi and her counterparts to angrily denounce fellow Americans for speaking their voices shows that these people do not deserve the offices they hold.
I’m suggesting that we call their offices, in person, and register this discontent.
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“So if anyone is behaving like Nazis, it the government with their shameless acts of oppressing (and esp lately, sending union thugs to rough up old people and those in wheelchairs).”…… Why can’t you guys stop your exaggerating?
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
McConnell from Kentucky is typical of the petty Republicans who throw Rocks, and Hide their hands. Mitch McConnell has never denounced the “Birthers” either……. stating they have a right to call an elected American President, Un-American, meaning he is not a U. S. citizen. Now would true Americans believe this Less of their country? I think NOT!
Posted by: tychisum | August 10, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Health care reform is needed, otherwise, no one will be able to buy groceries – they will only be able to make their health insurance payment.
The current proposal may need some refining, but it’s ridiculous what’s been going on in these town hall meetings.
Change is not easy but it’s not impossible.
Posted by: Linda | August 10, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
I guess that I’m an old, well dressed NAZI (and I’ll stay that way to protect the 1st admend.)
Posted by: Gunnerv1 | August 10, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
I recall a group of people that lost a certain vote in California. When they protested, they usually intimidated people or got violent, yet no Democrat ever said anything. But know when people voice an opinion that they don’t like, well, not that’s different.
Posted by: Eric | August 10, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Wouldn’t that no interest loan payment be better spent by using it for a medical insurance premium, say by taxing a person before they get sick? Imagine if every working American had just 2% of their income pooled by the government to use for medical coverage for all American citzens.Our tax dollars already sustain the poor, disabled, military and elderly. And yes, there is no system that’s perfect. But medical insurance should not be a profit inducing business. Well, no insurance should be. With money making as a priority, there will always be corruption. And it’s the guy in the middle that gets the shaft.
Posted by: Bea | August 10, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“Health care reform is needed, otherwise, no one will be able to buy groceries – they will only be able to make their health insurance payment.”
Thats a bit of an exaggeration. Though health care insurance won’t go down unless costs of providing care go down, and this bill doesn’t address health care provider costs, only costs to patients which is at the bottom of the cost chain.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
No, McConnell…. this shows nothing but the same ole way of doing things…. Hate and Fear for the Republicans. I know as well as any other American that these “un-American Bullies” are the foot soldiers of the Healthcare Industries that does not see anything moral about their practices…only money. It is so sad that these very bullies will be denied benefits for pre-existing conditions, and their rates in the current healthcare system double when they need it most. As a healthcare worker, doing intake, you always ask and present papers for living wills, and It is the Choice of the Patient to refuse to sign or sign. This isn’t new…. other than the Republicans are selling the uneducated, and some ignorant enoughto believe this means “euthanasia”. Then some of these people are just “raddled” that America has elected a smart, intelligent working President that happens to have “brown” skin. Let’s just call it what it is, please. I say these things because intelligent people listen and learn, and was supposed to be taught since age 4 or 5 that ‘you can’t take in anything, if you’re constantly putting out (shouting, yelling, bullying). Shut up and listen maybe you will know the facts, and you will be able to debate.
Posted by: tychisum | August 10, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“Jon, do your own research on Medicare Plan D.” – That’s all I needed to hear – What you were talking about.
“It was in the press when it went down and evidently you tuned out, because if you had not you’d see how so many of you sound like hypocrites now.”
More of your name calling. You just cannot resist, can you?
“It’s the largest entitlement expansion in my lifetime and I’m 50. As far as your ridiculous notion that this strips me of my rights? Well, the longer this is allowed to continue the longer fewer of us will even have insurance.”
I’m also 50 and I have a father who, if under the currently proposed scheme, will be marginalized and his medications (anti-seizure – stroke patient) will likely be held back and we’ll be forced to watch him die. We have been told as much by Obama’s own videos and by those informed doctors who are informed about the intentions of this administration.
To me this is a personal life and death issue and I face it daily in my house. So don’t lecture me. I’m dealing with the reality right now and I distrust any government intervention at all. If you were to see the sheer terror our vets (my father being one of them) are in over this entire medical debacle, you would be shocked.
Actually I’m well off and covered. But even I get we’re a lay off or retirement away from getting the screws put to us. The “end of life decision” thing is again pure spin and it shows your ignorance.”
More name calling. Please… If you want to converse, stop with the dedicated spin to insult me. As for end of life decisions, I cite the following:
— The provision, tucked deep within the House bill, would provide Medicare coverage for an end-of-life consultation every five years, and more frequent sessions if a person is suffering a life-threatening disease.
Health providers would be required to explain to seniors the end-of-life services available, including “palliative care and hospice.”
“This provision may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia if enacted into law,” House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Mich. said in a statement last month.—
The trouble with this is that once you start the mandatory “explanation”, this does have all the signs of a slippery slope associated with it. This is my main beef with this “helpful” nanny-state idea.
“If you wish to argue this on merits? I’m up for it. It’s when people don’t know their facts that it drives me up a wall. And sure, the dems are hitting back trying to paint you guys. And I say it’s about time. Because for the last few years your party appears to be getting about as rude and obnoxious as it can get.”
I don’t disagree with you. The problem is that both sides have been equally divisive and the sheer elitism one sees in video and radio broadcasts from the Democrats does not help their cause any, does it. And to be blunt, my party deserved it’s loss in November on the basis you speak of. We needed to be humbled and we have been. So do understand this lifetime Republican may see more than you think he does.
“Trust me – the worst behavior is off the right. The other side may be liberal – but they tend to know their facts.”
I respectfully disagree. Considering the outright lies that have surfaced from the fiscal debacle and stimulus packages, I’m convinced that the real problem is the lack of checks and balances to keep the system true and in a self-corrective mode. Power unchecked is power abused. Consider that. Again, a respectful reply.
“And they don’t spend their lives demonizing half of the country like the side of smug does. Your party is imploding and I’m not sure I can ever vote republican again at this rate.”
Wrong. My party HAS imploded and is now finding it’s voice again. There is nothing smug here in this voice. My concerns are heartfelt and out of concern for the direction of the country. The trouble is that some believe it is dead. Far from it.
I do think reform of health care in the form of cost-controls is the right answer, but not a nanny-state single payer system. That will happen with bipartisan support but to just rush to social re-engineering and tossing out existing systems while demonizing anyone who calls the efforts into question? I think we are being good Americans to ask questions and demand more of our leaders.
Posted by: Jon | August 10, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“Wouldn’t that no interest loan payment be better spent by using it for a medical insurance premium, say by taxing a person before they get sick? Imagine if every working American had just 2% of their income pooled by the government to use for medical coverage for all American citzens.”
Because it won’t be 2% when its done. In Germany, a combined family income of 90k a year pay 12% income tax for health care. Thats $1,000 Euro a month or around $1340 a month in US dollars. Add in rationed care and cost pricing that is driving doctors to do less for their patients and its not an optimal system. Personal responsibility and competition needs to be part of the equation.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
@Larry: Shouting people down is not arguing. “Free speech” ends where you suppress the free speech of others. And Obama isn’t asking anyone to snitch–which would be silly, since these events are all video’d anyway. He’s asking people to report incidents and statements, not individuals. That’s so his team can respond to all the disinformation that’s being pumped out by the backers of the disruptions, which are corporate-funded lobbying groups staffed by veteran political operatives.
As it happens I’m critical of the current draft plan from the other side: I favor single-payer national health insurance. I grew up with it, in the UK. It worked fine. “Bureaucrats” did *not* come between me and my care providers–as they have done several times in the private plans I’ve been in over here. Right now my cousin is being treated in the UK for recurrent cancer, with procedures that no private plan would cover close to 100% of here. He’s getting that care free, like any other British citizen. I’m sorry, but you Obama-haters simply don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re being manipulated by masters of the game. Whereas I’m talking from experience. What’s more, I’ve read the damn draft bill. It doesn’t say any of the stuff your leaders claim it does. So sure, go to town hall meetings, and question and argue. That’s your right. But don’t act like thugs and suppress discussion.
Posted by: Adam | August 10, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Tyrants are never known for their willingness to hear opposing views. It seems that the Dems like to behave like the old French nobilty.
Posted by: afloatinasea | August 10, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
These people weren’t exercising their rights. They were there to disrupt and agitate. What about the rights of the other people in the meeting? Those that were there to listen, learn, discuss and question? If someone acted like that in any other public place they would be hauled off in cuffs. Or sent to detention.
Posted by: carly | August 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“But medical insurance should not be a profit inducing business.”
Research I have done has been to the contrary. Much of those profits do fund a lot of research into new techniques and procedures. Believe it or not, insurance companies are motivated to keep you healthy because thats how they make money. So they do invest in promising research in order to provide better care and more affordable care, and thus, they make money. The difference is they are in competition with each other for your premiums and that competition is what drives efficient care. The government has no such motivation.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
SEIU Local 2001 memo, issued this week in preparation for Rep. Jim Himes’ town hall in Stamford, Conn.
“Action: Opponents of reform are organizing counter-demonstrators to speak at this and several congressional town halls on the issue to defend the status quo. It is critical that our members with real, personal stories about the need for access to quality, affordable care come out in strong numbers to drown out their voices.”
Posted by: Community Agitator | August 10, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I find I like to listen to all sides and decide for myself. These interuptions by both left and right keep me from getting the information I need to make a rational decision.
At this point I have a hard time feeling that our health system has our best interests at heart. I watched the house debate on TV and listened to adds to the bill to make sure our veterans are exempt from the plan on required health insurance. I see how the seniors got screwed on medicare Part D and drug companies make great profits, (bill passed at 0300 hrs) and most of the sponsors now work for the drug companies. Even after paying thousands in health insurance coverage, I still get charged thousands in co-pays and deductibles. Learn the facts, quote the facts, and ask congress to re-pay Social Security for the loans it took out during Vietnam.
Posted by: Allen | August 10, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
@Adam, what is the Tax Rate in the UK?
Posted by: ajax659 | August 10, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
There is an organization called GOOOH (for Get Out Of Our House), and pronounced like the word go. They sound interesting and have an intriguing plan to evict the 435 politicians from the U.S. House of Representatives.
I find it interesting as I don’t believe that it was our founding fathers’ intent that we have career politicians. If you look at how the senate was laddered from the beginning for continuity and the house to only a two year term it seems likely that the intent was for ordinary citizens to do their term and return home.
Members would not need a retirement plan as they would return to their own position in society, pulling their weight and never developing the elitist ruling class attitude.
What we have is a mockery of that intent. These people love being referred to as “the honorable” or “my distinguished colleague”. And as one in the senate says, “Don’t call me ma’am, I earned the title of senator.”
The average salary on the hill is $172K (not including perks and honorariums) , compare that to an average wage on the street of $45K and you will quickly see why they don’t understand us. And dumb as many of them seem they think they are better than us. Humble when seeking our vote but speak to us like children if they bother to answer our letters.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 10, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
When was the last time you visited a Doctor’s office….. honey please…. before Any Surgery in the U.S., you are automatic given these papers to sign or not to sign. I know, you never took the time to read them, right? So please stop yelling and taking a “powerless” party word for you well-being…. they just want their power back…… do you really think they give one Hoot about you? No, just the money bags in the Healthcare Industry that will be forced to stop Robbing the American people…..the right, with all their right to life should practice what they preach. Soooo hypocritical. Every person in America has a right to Affordable Healthcare… do you know of anyone that doesn’t want to live? Oh, by the way, what you wish for someone else, you wish it on yourself.
Posted by: tychisum | August 10, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
But don’t act like thugs and suppress discussion.Posted by: Adam | Aug 10, 2009 3:47:14 PM
Did you think of that by yourself or did ACORN tell you what to write, and they should know being the best of intimidating people and shouting them down and threaten with violance.
Posted by: Lizzie | August 10, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
“….medical insurance should not be a profit inducing business. Well, no insurance should be.”
Posted by: Bea | Aug 10, 2009 3:41:56 PM
Food is at least as essential as health care. Therefore, production and distribution of food should not be profit inducing business either.
In that case, we better collectivize agriculture right now, Comrade!
Posted by: Seriously?? | August 10, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Jon your party is wrong…….denying Americans Affordable Healthcare. Remember you stand for “right to life”, when and where that begin and ends?
Posted by: tychisum | August 10, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
As life and death decisions are turned over to legislators, politics are becoming very personal and very real again for the first time in a long time… Not since the draft, not since Roe v Wade, not since civil rights.
Moneywatch: Billionaire and “One Worlder” George Soros is tossing in $5 million to help push this poison pill health care through Congress.
Moneywatch II: The drug industry is spending $150 million on television commercials supporting President Obama’s “blue pill” health care.
Moneywatch III: So far in 2009, the Union’s PACs have dispensed $11 million (92% to Democrats, that’s $10,120,000 to Democrats) to encourage lawmakers to overhaul health care and ease the ability of unions to organize. And that doesn’t include the cost of those snazzy SEIU purple people beater shirts.
Moneywathc IV: What is going on between the White House and the Insurance Industry? Why hasn’t there been a visible campaign (the REAL Harry and Louise) against the White House proposal by the insurance companies? Why are they keeping so quiet. (Anyone who thinks the town hall protesters were sent from the insurance companies is willfully suspending reality. These are people who do not want to become Soylent Green.}
Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 10, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“Every person in America has a right to Affordable Healthcare… do you know of anyone that doesn’t want to live?”
I knew very few who would put that responsibility into the hands of government beaurocrats. We do need reform, I think people disagree on the level of government involvement. Some of the reasons insurance is high comes from government mandates. Even though I am a male, my insurance is required to cover my screening for breast cancer. So government can induce unecessary costs into the market. Thorough review of mandates should also be looked at.
In the end however, doesnt matter who pays for it, it costs money. That money has to come from somewhere. Insurance companies have to operate efficiently or they go out of business. Government has no such threat and little motivation to operate efficiently, ergo medicaid/medicare.
Posted by: KR | August 10, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I don’t get it. The extremists Republican right-wingers destroyed our economy, launched a right-wing Christian Crusader war in Iraq, use lying, smear, sabotage tactics, subvert the Constitution, etc, etc, etc,etc,etc – and they are the victims???????? Well, guess being the “victim” is part of the plan!
Posted by: Sentinel | August 10, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“But medical insurance should not be a profit inducing business. Well, no insurance should be.”
WHY?
Essentials to life:
1. Water
2. Food
3. Shelter.
Healthcare is meaningless if you do not have food or water or some shelter.
This incredibly chisdish idea that profits should not be allowed is insane.
Companies sell WATER. Companies SELL FOOD.
Should your local farmer who has a few acres and sells his crops to local grocery stores not be permitted to make money?
Why should anyone be permitted to sell a home for money?
why shouldn’t they just surrender it to the next person in line when they are done with it?
WOW…lets just turn this whole country inot a 300+ million person commune!!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT COVERAGE.
(a) Grandfathered Health Insurance Coverage Defined- Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable coverage under this division, the term `grandfathered health insurance coverage’ means individual health insurance coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:
(1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT-
(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.
Keep my existing police? Sure, as long as I keep my job. The way this law is written, all new hires will HAVE to take the so called ‘public option’ because insurance companies will be prohibited from taking new customers!
When it comes to lies and disinformation, liberals win hands down.
Posted by: akcoyote | August 10, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
“Barbara Boxer is on to us, chums. Last evening, California’s junior senator appeared on MSNBC and averred that those of us protesting the Democrats’ health care reform are far too well-dressed to be authentic.”
That cracks me up-are we suppose to look like CRAP in order to be “authentic protesters”? LMAO, I guess so if you look at the typical liberal protester…….(My words not Michelle’s)
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I have posted this section along with other sections-VERBATIM- yet the liberals try to spin it however they sit fit, although unsuccessfully I might add they still try!
At least you are one of a few of us who are posting the actual bills and proving how the government intends to TAKE OVER and RUN health care!
========================================
SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT COVERAGE.
(a) Grandfathered Health Insurance Coverage Defined- Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, for purposes of establishing acceptable coverage under this division, the term `grandfathered health insurance coverage’ means individual health insurance coverage that is offered and in force and effect before the first day of Y1 if the following conditions are met:
(1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT-
(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.
Keep my existing police? Sure, as long as I keep my job. The way this law is written, all new hires will HAVE to take the so called ‘public option’ because insurance companies will be prohibited from taking new customers!
When it comes to lies and disinformation, liberals win hands down.
Posted by: akcoyote | Aug 10, 2009 4:13:39 PM
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“I’m also 50 and I have a father who, if under the currently proposed scheme, will be marginalized and his medications (anti-seizure – stroke patient) will likely be held back and we’ll be forced to watch him die. We have been told as much by Obama’s own videos and by those informed doctors who are informed about the intentions of this administration. ”
…… This is bunk. Nothing has been said about denying medication. Refer back to the lovely 2003 legislation where we gave them everything and then some. This is “spin.”
“The provision, tucked deep within the House bill, would provide Medicare coverage for an end-of-life consultation every five years, and more frequent sessions if a person is suffering a life-threatening disease.”
…….If you are dying I do believe it’s a nice thing to be able to go discuss a DNR or living will? Eh? Nice thing. Not mandatory. But there if you need it. But what do we do with this nice thing? Which is an additional bonus for your father? We twist it and scare the old people with it. Boehner is lying to you Jon. He knows it. This stupid spin began with some NYC politician on some call in show and Boehner ran with it. And I just have this huge problem with scaring the elderly. That is about as low in fear mongering as it can get.
They all play tricks. They all lie. I would love to give them all term limits. I don’t trust this plan either. Tho for different reasons – mostly that again they’ll soak me the taxpayer in favor of ridiculous profits. And yes, I believe in capitalism – to a point. We are now ruled by corportism. Both sides of the isle. If you will look closely you can see that both sides are pretty much the same.
And whining because they’re being all mean? Oh the list of names I could write that have been used for months on Obama and all liberals.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Those of us who oppose government taker over of healthcare realize that these 1000 or so pages are merely the tip of the iceberg.
We have no clue as to the details or mechanization of implementation. The lines that we have difficulty with as far as pervasiveness may be far more so when interpreted by the myriad of czars, commissions, committees and whomever.
Also realize that if it becomes law it can be revised at will just as IRS codes are. At best the only thing we might ever see would be comments published in the congressional record.
If you have ever attempted to oppose or alter something you read in the congressional record you will know just how hopeless that cause might be.
Now is the only time to protest, and it is working. We are getting under their skin, Obama has activated his OFA to hit the streets and Pelosi is trying to demonize the opposition.
Strange that flag burning is acceptable but opinions opposing Pelosi are “un-American.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 10, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Oh the list of names I could write that have been used for months on Obama and all liberals.
Posted by: Secondlook | Aug 10, 2009 4:17:30 PM
yes FASCIST is my favorite one that seems to fit. I also like Narcissistic.
Posted by: 'Un-American' | August 10, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I would like to post two comments from Jake Tapper on Twitter:
1. It’s perfectly reasonable to expect Members of Congress to read the legislation they vote upon — especially a bill like health care reform
(30 minutes ago from web )
2. it’s also reasonable to expect opponents of legislation to cite specific FACTS in any bill they object to
(19 minutes ago from web; sorry, jt, I corrected your spelling))
I think that is reasonable to expect the same from people arguing in favor of it, as well. If more of the discussion on this blog were fact-based, there would be a whole lot less crazy on all sides! I do wish that Jake would chime in on the discussion now and then; it might help.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“I have posted this section along with other sections-VERBATIM- yet the liberals try to spin it however they sit fit, although unsuccessfully I might add they still try!”
Except you haven’t.
You’ve been posting the right wing blog versions that are chopped up.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“Every person in America has a right to Affordable Healthcare… do you know of anyone that doesn’t want to live?”
————————————–
Exactly where are those words (“right to affordable healthcare”) written into ANY law in this country? (some states have made insurance mandatory – take a good long look at how well that has worked out….i.e. Massachusetts, Hawaii…etc)
Exactly what court has upheld that “law” ?
Every moron who makes that stupid claim needs to answer these three questions FIRST.
Why do you not have a right to water?
(you have access to it, but you HAVE to PAY for it!)
Why do you not have a right to food? (Again, you have access to it, but you HAVE to PAY for it!)
Why do you not have a right written into a law to have shelter?
(Duh, you guessed….you have access to it, but you HAVE to PAY for it!)
Why are all you whining crying liberals so cranked about this issue, yet after decades of spending trillions of dollars on other “social” issues such as poverty, we STILL have these problems?
People still live in the streets, people still go hungry. Kids still drop out of school (despite efforts from both sides of the political spectrum)
WHY? We have heard govt promises on these issues ALL the time. Name one politician who doesn’t claim to put education right up front whenever he speaks during an election cycle.
Yet, we still have huge numbers of 6th graders who cant even do fundamental 3rd grade math facts! But hell, lets just spend more & more & more money!
There is nothing in the HR3200 bill or any of its derivatives that is any different from any other promise that has come from the gov’t on a big issue in the past 40+ years.
Posted by: Mike_C | August 10, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
KR:
You do know, I hope, that although breast cancer is rare in men (about 1% of cases), and regular screening is not necessary, having coverage for breast cancer detection and treatment comes in handy for men in that 1%.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Un-American – Here’s a hint on that word “elitist.” This one makes me giggle. So, some “elitists” have convinced the people of their party to call those people of that other party “elitists.” Shucks. They suckered you. I still wanna know why the republicans weren’t socialists/fascists/commie when they did the pill bill.
Posted by: Secondlook | August 10, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Ed Taylor
“Strange that flag burning is acceptable but opinions opposing Pelosi are “un-American.”
Both are protected by the First Amendment and are as “American” as apple pie, however repugnant.
Pelosi and Hoyer said “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American.” I agree! It interferes with the 1st Amendment rights of others, and is WRONG, whether it comes from the rigth or the left.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Posted by: Mike_C | Aug 10, 2009 4:12:16 PM Don’t bother wasting your breath, logic and business is way over their head. Medicare already doesn’t pay for the cost of services, but somebody does and that is why they never notice less in service. When insurance isn’t around to pick up the real tab then we’ll see just how much the govt. money tree grows is willing to fork over to dispense the kind of care people are used to.
The govt. has a bottom line too and it’s called ‘your pocket’ and because of this administration your pocket is empty.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
“I have posted this section along with other sections-VERBATIM- yet the liberals try to spin it however they sit fit, although unsuccessfully I might add they still try!”
Except you haven’t.
You’ve been posting the right wing blog versions that are chopped up.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 10, 2009 4:28:11 PM
======================================= Ryan, in opposition to you on many occasions I have posted the tax portion VERBATIM and you have NEVER once answered it. Where the government will tak your GROSS annual income 2.5% if you DO NOT Have Government APPROVED health insurance.
Would you like for me to post it straight from how the bill reads as of today AGAIN?
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
It clearly reads that if you do NOT have APPROPRIATE health insurance coverage, which means coverage the government approves off, they will tax you 2.5% of your ANNUAL gross income…there is no other way to read this Ryan, but go ahead and do your best to sping it sweetie…….
Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage
Sec. 59B. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage.
‘‘SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLEHEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at
any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over
‘‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.
‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—
‘‘(1) TAX LIMITED TO AVERAGE PREMIUM.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The tax imposed
under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the applicable national average premium for suchtaxable year.
‘‘PRORATION FOR PART YEAR FAILURES.—
The tax imposed under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of tax so imposed (determined without regard to this paragraph and after application of paragraph (1)) as—‘‘(A) the aggregate periods during such taxable year for which such individual failed to meet the requirements of subsection (d), bearsto‘‘(B) the entire taxable year.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
begins on pg 167
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Remember when the people protest Bush at his Texas ranch on IRAQ war.
Now people protest again in town hall meeting about health care.
You go figure the reation of Bush and Obama toward these protestor.
When people raise up and spoken out their concern then they will be label with a negative name.
Only the blind, deaf government can spin it around for their own good political purpose.
I admire these protestorbecause their spend their own time, money to fight back a dump government.
Posted by: herny | August 10, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Posted by: [*|*] | Aug 10, 2009 4:36:09 PM$ In the past 40 years we have spent almost 9 trillion dollars in the war on poverty, guess what it is still around 13% exactly the same as it was in 1970.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
I don’t know what the answeris, but what I do know is NO AMERICAN should have to die b/c they have NO health insurance! And for you dolts who don’t believe it’s happening…do your home work! It happened to a friend of mine who had an heart attack at 40. He had just started his own business and could not yet afford health careinsurance, He was left to die because he could not afford the surgery needed to save his life. He died 2 years ago. That should NEVER happen in America!
Posted by: rebelle | August 10, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
KMDay
You are misreading that section ” a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of” means 2.5% of the income over your modified adjusted gross income of 250,000, not the first 250,000. We are talking about a very small number of people, and the amount is different in the incomplete Senate bill.
This is called the individual mandate, and it is a legitimate controversy. The other option is the employer mandate — requiring employers to provide insurance. Which makes more sense?
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
These politicians are so out of touch that they have no idea what the needs of their constituents are. “Dissent is Patriotic” – Hillary Clinton
Posted by: Alex | August 10, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Like so many comments posted in response to these stories, they have nothing to do with the story itself. So let me give it a try.
How does shouting, name calling, and general incivility advance any argument? Quite simply, it doesn’t. People revert to this behavior in the presence of a weak argument.
Posted by: catmustea | August 10, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Shouting so that no one can hear or speak, much less discuss, is not dissent.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
To Oh Yeah: That was great…hopefully, some people will see the ridiculousness of this. Everyone has a right to speak out…that means everyone….both sides. To accomplish anything one must be able to ask questions, politely, and then to listen. Nothing can be accomplished with the kinds of meetings we recently had. However, that being said, that is exactly what Hannity, Rush and Beck want…nothing accomplished. They admit to that. We need a health care reform and some of the smart republicans know this excluding S. Palin who is out looking for the “death panel”.
Posted by: talmag | August 10, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
All the name calling, shouting and disruptions at these meetings reminds me of the screams of ‘terrorist’ and ‘traitor’ yelled at Republican rallies during the election.
Dangerous, inflamatory, hysterical and not to be condoned in any way.
Same with the hate postings on here.
Posted by: bobfillon | August 10, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
catmustea,
Maybe posting off-topic vitriol is the Internet version of shouting down a speaker? Welcome to the fray!
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Posted by: rebelle | Aug 10, 2009 5:01:32 PM Nobody ever said that, people are against being forced into a govt. run system when they are happy with their health insurance, I have never heard anyone say they are against insuring the uninsured, there is a dispute about how many uninsured there are and whether this count includes illegal immigrants. Most people I know are happy to pay a little more to help the uninsured, that is not what this is about.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Shouting so that no one can hear or speak, much less discuss, is not dissent.
Posted by: Joyomama | Aug 10, 2009 5:05:59 PM
=======================================
Joy-it is dissent just not productive. What most are crying foul for is that there have literally been hundreds of thousands of emails, faxes, phones calls from each state and they all give them same blanket answer with no real answers.
The only way to get answers is to hold their feet to the fire and confront them in person. The problem with that is when you get 100-200 people in ONE room and only 2 hours, you have a lot of people talking over a lot of people.
I agree, they need to stop yelling but congressional leaders need to stop playing games and stop lying also.
It is frustration and when most people get frustrated they lose their cool.
On the flip side, liberals have done and do the same thing. There was ZERO violence in these town hall meetings until ACORN and the UNIONS came out, please remember this.
You cannot go around calling people who oppose the democratically controlled government angry mobs (in a bad sense), un-american and racists because they do not like/agree with what you are doing which is too much government control.
They are not arguing that NO health care reform is needed, they are arguing for NO GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE but rather government regulation of the health care industry with respect to the insurance and pharm. secetors.
There is a big difference.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
KMDay
You are misreading that section ” a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of” means 2.5% of the income over your modified adjusted gross income of 250,000, not the first 250,000. We are talking about a very small number of people, and the amount is different in the incomplete Senate bill.
This is called the individual mandate, and it is a legitimate controversy. The other option is the employer mandate — requiring employers to provide insurance. Which makes more sense?
Posted by: Joyomama | Aug 10, 2009 5:01:37 PM
========================================
Joy—my point was that if you do not have an approve health care plan, which means it has to be one the government approves of.
That in itself if the government telling us what type of insurance we are allowed to have. If it is not, then they need to be more clear.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Disruptions… It’s one thing to have a differing view point… it’s another to be disruptive. Even those opposed to GWB and his Iraq war behaved a bit better! There is no reason to think these outbursts aren’t sanctioned and paid for by the insurance companies, or any of those that stand to lose by healthcare reform. Be careful my fellow Americans… weigh the options, and don’t believe everything you read on the internet!
Posted by: Troy Street | August 10, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Send these dissenting unAmericans to Siberia with the rest of the dissenters.
Posted by: stubborn cons | August 10, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This isn’t about health or care, this is the govt’s. attempt to get as much money as possible to bail out Medicare because they know under the current system it will be bankrupt, the baby boomers aren’t even into the system yet, and they still can’t pay and they know that when they are costs will skyrocket. 70% of the health care already given in this country is for 10% of the population, mainly for seniors. This is another tax grab to mainly bail our Medicare and they are pretending that it is something else.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | August 10, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
“There was ZERO violence in these town hall meetings until ACORN and the UNIONS came out”
We’ve all seen that video tape of the proported ‘violence’ and this has been again intentionally blown up by the irresponsible right wing into something it is not.
The right wing uses hysterical language and lies to distort the reality of the situation.
Pretty sleazy tactics.
I agree with bobfillon…
“All the name calling, shouting and disruptions at these meetings reminds me of the screams of ‘terrorist’ and ‘traitor’ yelled at Republican rallies during the election.
“Dangerous, inflamatory, hysterical and not to be condoned in any way.
“Same with the hate postings on here.”
Posted by: Jeff C | August 10, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“Ryan, in opposition to you on many occasions I have posted the tax portion VERBATIM and you have NEVER once answered it. Where the government will tak your GROSS annual income 2.5% if you DO NOT Have Government APPROVED health insurance.”
Sigh…..that is excess over $250K, genius.
But I guess posting the whole section is mark of improvement even if your analysis is completely wrong.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Ferrari5858
The problem is that when a family gets brought into the ER bleeding and unconscious from a car accident, no ethical doctor would check for proof of citizenship, much less an insurance card. So we pay for the undocumented, as it is. Reducing the numbers of undocumented people is an immigration question, not a health care question. And I believe that immigration reform is also on the agenda, but I am glad he’s tackling the economy and health care first.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
the ice cream man drives his truck in my neighborhood. sometimes i buy my kids ice cream from him…ice cream they wouldn’t ordinarily have had that day due to the fact that we don’t always have it in the fridge. is the ice cream man “manufacturing” my kid’s interest in his ice cream? no, he’s simply bringing the product closer to them. how are these protests any different? aren’t the organizers simply bringing the protest to a site to protest? or is the allegation that these people aren’t really opposed to the health care reform? is the allegation that they are paying actors who otherwise wouldn’t be opposing the plan?
Posted by: davidfrat21 | August 10, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Ok my question is WHO reviewed and approved that OP-ED using the word un-American? Was it the same person who authorized the clueless Air Force 1 “fly-over” that scared Manhattan?
Cleanup in aisle 1600
Posted by: Croation | August 10, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
I find it funny that when Liberals protest we call them criminals, wild political and animal rights hooligans. When a grumpy ol white dude with a Glen Beck T’shirt and a sign that says “Not with my Money” or “Socialism” screams and get’s in a fist fight with protestors or “America Haters”, while getting to the rally with government ran buses on government paved roads…well…kills me! (just like they will euthanize old people). C’mon folks quit eating the crazy pudding.
Posted by: Jason | August 10, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
“There was ZERO violence in these town hall meetings until ACORN and the UNIONS came out”
We’ve all seen that video tape of the proported ‘violence’ and this has been again intentionally blown up by the irresponsible right wing into something it is not.
The right wing uses hysterical language and lies to distort the reality of the situation.
Pretty sleazy tactics.
I agree with bobfillon…
“All the name calling, shouting and disruptions at these meetings reminds me of the screams of ‘terrorist’ and ‘traitor’ yelled at Republican rallies during the election.
“Dangerous, inflamatory, hysterical and not to be condoned in any way.
“Same with the hate postings on here.”
Posted by: Jeff C | Aug 10, 2009 5:26:10 PM
=======================================
I am curious to know what you are labeling as hate posting. If one does not agree with Obama that makes them racist, is that where you are going with this because if so, North Korea is looking for a few good followers.
Itis not racist to disagree or even protest the President and his policies beause if it is, then how many millions were racist for protesting and disagreeing with Bush?
You cannot have it both ways-most americans will not be duped into the double standards idealogy of this administration.
You mention only one violent incident when in fact there have been a few, but you want to play down that one Union beating as an isolated incident and play up the ONE swastika with a line through it as those who oppose the governments take over as some how criminal.
Come one, again yuo cannot have an administration who rules on double standards and hypocrisy-people will NOT buy into it.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
“It clearly reads that if you do NOT have APPROPRIATE health insurance coverage, which means coverage the government approves off, they will tax you 2.5% of your ANNUAL gross income…there is no other way to read this Ryan, but go ahead and do your best to sping it sweetie…….”
The right wing…ignorant and proud of it.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Republicans have always been for small government and less spending (only they do the opposite when they are in power). Funny how they forget that when they want a war or cut taxes and there is not enough money to cover items we need. So scream and yell, you still lost the election and have to wait for the next election in 4, or hopefully 8 years to get “Your America Back,” just like I had to wait, only I didn’t freak out! In 4 or 8 years we should be able to get health care for all Americans.
Posted by: Kerry | August 10, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
So, comparing Bush to hitler, calling him a Nazi, camping out on the road to his ranch, and the whole line of crap that those who oppose him as okay, why because he is white? Why, because he is a republican? Seriously, you need to come to the game with something more than you people who disagree with Obama or protest against his policies as racists—that has become old and is increasingly getting to a point where you will see lawsuits upon lawsuits of defamation of character if not libelous accusation when people start throwing those types of labels and accusations around so freely.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
KMDay
I agree with some of what you said, although I am not sure you are right about the time line with regard to violence. It was only a matter of time, in that climate, before someone got hurt. That’s where shouting people down tends to end.
When you say “NO GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE” do you mean turning Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans’ and Military health care over to the private sector? Wouldn’t that create even more hardship?
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
” am curious to know what you are labeling as hate posting. If one does not agree with Obama that makes them racist, is that where you are going with this because if so, North Korea is looking for a few good followers.”
Where did Jeff C mention racists?
Posted by: Ryan C | August 10, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
” am curious to know what you are labeling as hate posting. If one does not agree with Obama that makes them racist, is that where you are going with this because if so, North Korea is looking for a few good followers.”
Where did Jeff C mention racists?
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 10, 2009 5:35:21 PM
======================================
Explain hate posts to me then, please.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Those that agree with Obamacare are grassroot, patriotic, levelheaded American citizens.
========================================
Typical liberal diatribe. “I’m right. You’re wrong.” Sorry pal but we’re mad as H*LL and we are NOT going away. Better get used to it.
Posted by: akcoyote | August 10, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Ryan, in opposition to you on many occasions I have posted the tax portion VERBATIM and you have NEVER once answered it. Where the government will tak your GROSS annual income 2.5% if you DO NOT Have Government APPROVED health insurance.”
Sigh…..that is excess over $250K, genius.
But I guess posting the whole section is mark of improvement even if your analysis is completely wrong.
Posted by: Ryan C | Aug 10, 2009 5:28:18 PM
=======================================
how is it wrong? The bill, as it reads today clearly states “Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage”…not employers, INDIVIDUALS……meaning if the INDIVIDUAL does not have acceptable health care coverage. Why should the government decide what type of health care coverage we carry?
Are you purposley missing he point? this will not be a government run health care system and they are not going to tell you what to do, but it clearly states that if the individual does NOT have acceptable health care coverage.
My health care coverage choices is NONE of and should not be their business.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
This is totally unaceptable. Unless the speaker is a conservative trying to talk at Columbia U. Oh, and it’s acceptable to physically attack a woman like Ann Coulter as she tries to give a speech. Oh, and it’s acceptable to disrupt Congresssional hearings if you are a member of Code Pink (and you get invited and brought into the hearings by Democrats). And of course it’s acceptable to disrupt private businesses like banks (even to the point of confronting bankers at their private residence) if you are ACORN and are trying to intimidate bankers into making “socially acceptable” loans in order to lay the foundation for a complete collapse of the financial system when those loans are not repaid.
Posted by: RDH | August 10, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
These disrupters have my utmost contempt. They are behaving like thugs. They have no legitimate reason to be at those meetings other than silencing those who disagree with their agenda.
Posted by: leftyintexas | Aug 10, 2009 5:30:10 PM
=======================================
nice! and when the Unions and ACORN and Greenpeace and those who opposed Bush and his policies protest/protested, burned cars, flags, destroy store front windows, tip cars over—-that is American and peace demonstration right?
i love the liberals motto: “Whats good for the goose is NOT good for the gander” ……if you disagree with Obama and his corrupt administration you are racist…..if you protest against the BLATANTLY obvious corrupt congress you are Un American……
Outstanding! Please note my OBVIOUS sarcasm!
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
This whole Healthcare issue is too secretive!
Posted by: Gordon Griswold | August 10, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Wingnuts Law: The key to sucess is sincerity. Once you have faked that, you have got it made.
Posted by: Sentinel | August 10, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
How does Madam Nancy know that the questions being asked of the representatives are an ugly campaign to misrepresent the health insurance reform(new name for health care reform)because she probably hasn’t read any part of the bills she and the House leadership are touting as great and wonderful. If it is so great and wonderful why doesn’t she the rest of congress and the President subscribe to it. If it is not good enough for congress and the president it is not good enough for the citizens of the United States.
Posted by: Apachelx | August 10, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
People are asking some very good questions that Pelosi and the top dems do not wnat to answer. the most extreme elements of the Democrats are only going to be happy until we all have a single payer system.
The UK and French government health plans so widly admired are runnign huge deficits and are a detrement to their economies.
Thinking the public plan will be cheaper and will help reduce costs is pure fantasy. until you can control medicare/medicaid, you cannot control health costs.
furthermore, to say if you like your current plan, you get to keep it is hogwash. Its dependent upon your employer keeping it. If they decide the payroll tax is cheaper, they will terminate their plan and allow you to go find your own coverage. That is not choice to me.
This plan makes government that is already out of control and too big, spending too much TOO BIG still.
It does nothing to address the costs behind health care.
Posted by: scott jeffries | August 10, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
KMDay
And when have I ever said it was OK for anyone to be disruptive? Are you saying that two wrongs make a right?
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
KMDay
And when have I ever said it was OK for anyone to be disruptive? Are you saying that two wrongs make a right?
Posted by: Joyomama | Aug 10, 2009 6:05:42 PM
=======================================
Absolutly not! My only point is the hypcorisy and double standards-not that it is okay to do it also.
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Ryan C, you wrote of HR 3200, “That is the bill the house passed.” What you meant to say, I’m sure, is that the bill had passed out of committee in the house. None of the health care/insurance reform bills has passed the house (or the senate) as yet. Just a slip of the keyboard I’m sure.
I mean, we wouldn’t want anyone to claim “the lesson” here is that “liberals lie,” now would we?
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
KMDay
I agree with some of what you said, although I am not sure you are right about the time line with regard to violence. It was only a matter of time, in that climate, before someone got hurt. That’s where shouting people down tends to end.
When you say “NO GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE” do you mean turning Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans’ and Military health care over to the private sector? Wouldn’t that create even more hardship?
========================================
No, these programs have already been implemented and they are proven to be broken, full of scandals and fraud.
These need to be left alone because they have been in place, but they need to be fixed.
This is the point of most of those who do NOT want the government intrustion to the extent of what they are trying to do.
They cannot properly run the entities you have mentioned above and have failed at fixing them. Why on earth should anyone believe they can run the entire country’s health care when they cannot run those properly?
Posted by: KMDay | August 10, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
They can stop all of this now. Enroll all congress the pres all union members and all federal employees into the program first no special insurance for anyone. Not for are elite congress ——-.
Posted by: daniel | August 10, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
If anyone has bothered to read the legislation you will quickly learn the bill is designed to allow the Federal Government complete and total control of health care, complete access to your bank account info, your personal health info and obviously allows for the government to dictate who can be treated for what. Not to mention mandatory and the penalization of private companies and citizens who do not purchase it.
COMPLETE AND UTTER SOCIALISM BUT WORSE! I’D LIKE TO KNOW WHEN LIBERTY AND FREEDOM BECAME SO “YESTERDAY”
IF OUR CURRENT HEALTH PLAN IS SO BAD WHY DO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS GET TO KEEP THAT PLAN WHILE THE PLEBS GET AN ASPIRIN FOR A HEART ATTACK????? hmmmm??
Posted by: Armed Sceptic | August 10, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Honest thought…Can someone please show me the “list” of healthcare problems everyone claims is out there?
I keep hearing its broken..it needs fixed..or radically changed.
But has anyone really stopped to ask to see the list of problems?
Only then can we begin to have honest debate to solve the issues.
Otherwise, we can keep throwing jabs at each other ad nauseum….but then..politicians can’t help themselves!
Posted by: ClarkOHrepub | August 10, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Vote all the trash out of office all of them.
Posted by: daniel | August 10, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Troy, I would respectfully disagree with some of what you wrote. You said, “Disruptions… It’s one thing to have a differing view point… it’s another to be disruptive. Even those opposed to GWB and his Iraq war behaved a bit better!”
Do you really think they did? I seem to remember demonstrators interrupting speeches and town halls, burning Bush in effigy, etc., over the war. While I had a differing point of view, I understood their passion and did not begrudge them their activities.
I also remember similar disruptions during the social security debate during the bush years. So this is not an entirely new phenomenon. It is, however, a case of the shoe being on the other foot, for the most part.
I have not taken part in any disruptive behavior at a town hall meeting. I do not condone that behavior in others. I think it is counterproductive and inappropriate. I wish it were not happening. However, I do not consider it unamerican.
I am bothered, however, when you write, “There is no reason to think these outbursts aren’t sanctioned and paid for by the insurance companies, or any of those that stand to lose by healthcare reform.” Actually, there is not reason to think that they ARE sanctioned and paid for by those you mentioned. There is no evidence that I have seen, and I have been looking for it, that is the case. I have seen testimony from numerous people who participated that they are not shills for any lobbyists, and I personally know a few people who have gone to town halls quite upset and I am dead certain they are acting on their own.
Are conservative groups spreading the word about town halls? Are groups that are opposed to government-run health care doing the same? Yes and yes. Just as OFA and labor unions and other liberal groups are doing the same thing. Is it okay for the OFA to do so? Then it must be okay for the Tea Party folks to do so.
Me, I’m not part of any of those groups. Then again, I’m neither a conservative or liberal, either.
One thing I completely agree with in your comment is your conclusion: “Be careful my fellow Americans… weigh the options, and don’t believe everything you read on the internet!”
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Wow, Clark, that’s a tall order!
I am willing to bet that many people here have their own horror stories. Try my mom, who needed heart surgery when she was 64 1/5 and ended up paying half of her life savings because the insurance she was paying refused to pay for a big chunk of her bill. One helpful person actually said “too bad you couldn’t wait until you were 65″.
Then there’s my son, who is 22 and has chronic illness that requires monitoring and has landed him in the hospital once already. When he graduates from college, we can continue him on our insurance if we are paying 50% of his support or we can sign him up for a COBRA plan at $800/month.
Time did a very good Health care issue a couple of months ago that had some good charts and tables that made things clearer, and I would guess that somewhere on this site you can find ABC’s special report on Health Care, as well.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
rebelle, I am sorry to hear about your friend. It is a terrible shame that he could not find someone to help him get the medical attention he required.
In my community, no cardiologist would refuse to treat someone because of a lack of money. The cardiologists I go to have a sliding scale they use for people without health insurance, as does the other cardiology group in our community and the hospital where heart procedures are done. There are not-for-profit hospitals in the large city nearest us who do not turn down anyone.
While I have had a great many friends, acquaintances, colleagues, and family members who have had medical problems in recent years, and while I have had medical problems of my own, I am thankful that I can say that none of them ever was in peril for their lives because of finances, regardless of their monetary circumstances. I am truly sad to learn that your friend did not have the support he needed.
Yes, there should be health insurance reform that will help those who are uninsured, like your friend, even though they actively seek insurance. Government subsidies should be provided, large pools for small businesses and individuals should be mandatory, etc. However, there should not be a public option. Reasonable people can hold that opinion, just as reasonable people can support the public option.
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
If you missed the ABC special report on health care, it’s on this page:
Look for “Prescription for America”, in the middle of the page
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
moderate,
I agree that reasonable people can disagree — reasonably! One of the reasons I, along with millions of others, voted for Obama was his platform, which included a health care reform with a public option. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll in June showed that “76 percent of respondents said it was either “extremely” or “quite” important to “give people a choice of both a public plan administered by the federal government and a private plan for their health insurance.”
I have seen no evidence that those numbers have changed. So when our (small-d) democratically elected president and congress put together the health care reform plan that voters elected them to do, I expect to see a public option. The AMA and the pharmaceutical industry have come out in favor of a public option. The insurance industry — not so much, and it’s not surprising!
I would be interested in hearing your objections to the public option. My main concern is that so far most of the insurance companies have demonstrated no interest for patient care. Kaiser-Permanente is one huge exception, one that Obama has praised for its organization and dedication to patients over profits. (Thought they do make a profit, but not by denying coverage and dropping people!) K-P is not one of my choices — if it were, I might select it! In some part of the U.S., there are very few choices, a public plan would offer a low-cost option for people who fall between the cracks.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
To: ClarkOHrepub…who posted…
Honest thought…Can someone please show me the “list” of healthcare problems everyone claims is out there?
I really appreciate this mature approach that you have displayed with the way you posed this question.
I am a single Mom who has always gotten my insurance through my employer. From 2002 to 2007 I changed jobs 3 times, I did not seek these jobs, they came to me through previous customers and acquaintances, each time offering me more money… As a single Mom, I have to go where the money is. So there goes pre-existing conditions, which with health care reform would prohibit insurers from refusing coverage because of any existing medical history.
I have noticed during these at least 5 years, my employers would shop around and change to find the least expensive insurance plans costing more with less coverage and bigger deductibles…
These are all consumer protections that would be covered with Health insurance reform.
Plus, Health care reform would extend coverage for young adults to age 26,
I could have extended health insurance coverage for my daughter as she put herself through college…
I work with many self-employed that cannot afford health insurance so they do without… I work also with small business owners who can no long afford to cover their employees…
so yeas the current system is unsustainable but, some don’t want to hear this because they have theirs and they really don’t care about anybody else not really realizing that they could be anybody else, in a heart beat…
People have been dropped by their insurers when they have become ill.
And if insurance premiums continue as they have, many will find that they can no afford what they insurance they have…
Thank you for you reasonable attitude and question…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | August 10, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
The real problem with this health care “bull” is because OBAMA DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IS IN IT AND HE APPROVES OF SOMETHING HE DOES NOT EVEN KNOW! HOW CAN YOU PUSH A PROGRAM THAT YOU HAVE NOT EVEN READ….AND EVEN 99% OF THE CONGRESSPERSONS HAVE NOT READ IT! NOW THAT IS WHAT I CALL “FISHY”!! THE TRUTH IS THAT THESE “EMPLOYEES” OF OURS WILL DISOBEY US AND PASS A BILL ANYWAY WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT…THAT WILL BE THE TIME WE FIRE THEM…IN 2010 AND 2012!
Posted by: Ross | August 10, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Wow stop yelling – didn’t your momma teach you any better?
Posted by: Yellalizer | August 10, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
joyomama, why no public option? between medicare, medicaid and people who go to the ER because they can (wealthier and poorer), 2.5 trillion is already forked over by the taxpayer. let’s add a bunch more. oh, and where are those thousands of unemployed doctors ready to take on new patients?
Posted by: jonec1200 | August 10, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I have to yell…liberals are like my wife…doesn’t listen unless I yell!
Anybody interested should go to CBS.com and on the lead page..under politics “What Will Health Care Reform Cost You” ! It will explain what the plan is for medicare and medicaid! It also will tell you just how dangerous this plan is! Maybe mainstream media if finally getting…maybe they realize THEY would have to be on the same plan and they don’t like it either!!
Posted by: Ross | August 10, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Hoyer:”Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.”
Hardly. Sometimes it takes some yelling to be heard over the constant whispers of lobbyists. You work for us, not those that line your pockets, take you to dinner and pay for your junkets. You work for us! Don’t you get that? It’s still the economy, stupid. Ignore that mantra at your own peril.
Posted by: Woody | August 10, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
The Republicans spent years calling anyone who opposed Bush’s war in Iraq unpatriotic. It was wrong then and this is wrong now. I guess neither party believes in freedom of speech anymore.
Posted by: allie08 | August 10, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
TIME FOR A MAJOR CHANGE IN CONGRESS! Regardless of party, way too many consider the constituents PEASANTS. They have forgotten who they work for!!
I am personally ashamed of someone who took an oath of office — as did Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer — and then have the audacity to call the fellow citizens UN-AMERICAN for using FREE SPEECH.
TIME FOR THESE TWO TO GO!! Maybe there is some leadership within the Blue Dogs between now and 2010!!
Does anyone trust anything that comes out of Pelosi’s or Hoyer’s mouth now???
Posted by: PappyHappy | August 10, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Honest debate (the democratic process) is American. Yelling and acting like a jackass in order to shut other people up and restrict debate is non-democratic and therefore un-American.
Pretty simple. If you have something to say, say it. But being angry doesn’t give inherently you a license to drown out other voices of opinion.
Posted by: Lincoln Highwater | August 10, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
I am an American, I have a valid birth certificate and I don’t like Pelosi’s attitude. I also don’t care for the involvement of ACORN and SEIU!
But most of all I don’t want Obama’s government controlled healthcare!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 10, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Why Nancy Pelosi so many times called American Citizens who has opposite opinions against Obama Un-American under the Obama rather than George Bush ? She has leaded DEMOCRATIC Party.
Posted by: Sharon | August 10, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Yelling and screaming isn’t un-American it’s just stupid. What is even more amazing is these poor fools don’t realize they are being duped into making these protests by their own people in order to take attention away from the real problems we face. Too bad for them.
Posted by: tabs4959 | August 10, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Ed,
Does this mean that you believe, contrary to all the evidence, that President Obama was not born in Hawaii? That really hurts your credibility on other issues!
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Un American!!!!! Nancy Pelosi You scare me more than anyone else in the White House at the moment. This health care reform concerns me for many reasons. 1017 pages long and advised not to bother reading the latest book the white house is about to publish because the average person wont be able to make heads or tales of it. I am concerned about my parents and how they will be able to continue taking care of my 55 year old brother that lives at home with them. He is severly handicap and is covered by insurance through the company my father retired from. My Dad worked hard, very hard, for the benefits that followed him in retirement. My brother can not speak, walk, fead himself, use the bathroom, bath himself, or scratch that itch he may have on any given part of his body. He could have been put in an institution but my parents would not have it. What happens to him? What happens to my parents that are now 80 and 78? My husband is retired and has health benefits from his former employer, what happens to us? We paid our taxes and did our time to earn these now free and partialy paid benefits. Nancy Pelosi you need to learn to think before you speak. How American are you? Shame on you again!!!
Posted by: fedup | August 10, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The health care bill would be easier to accept if all US citizens (including Congress, the Senate and the President)would have the same plan. As it stands now, commoners would get the government plan, those that write the rules (Congress, Senate and the President) get excellent coverage in a private health care plan that is unavailable to the rest of us. How fair is that?
Posted by: tired of the hoopla | August 10, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
This is not just about healthcare. It is about the American people getting so fed up with all government and their involvement in every aspect of our lives. They own the banks, car companies and now want to control our healthcare. Our taxes are out of sight and climbing higher everyday. We need to take our Country back. Back from government, back from illegal aliens, bank from all those that are able bodied but are on our welfare system etc. It isn’t about republican or democrate it is about taking personal resposiblity for America. Government is suppose to work for the people unfortunatly we have become slaves to the government.
Posted by: Jennifer Johnson | August 10, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
tired of the hoopla
The politicians you name don’t have special insurance. Some are on Medicare (those who are eligible) with private supplemental. Those who are veterans have the VA. The rest have access to the same plan choices as other federal workers. If there’s a public option in the new plan, they would have that option. I don’t think anyone should be forced to take the public option, do you? And since no one will be forced to take that option until the existing bills, I don’t see a reason to limit the choice of any one class of citizen.
You wouldn’t like that if it were done to you, I’m sure!
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Joyomama:” If there’s a public option in the new plan, they would have that option. I don’t think anyone should be forced to take the public option, do you?”
You’re either being disingenuous or naive. All private plans that exist today will cease to exist in their current form if this bill becomes law. Why? Because they must conform to all the rules and regulations within the bill to become a “qualified” plan. That’s the beauty of it all. So when Obama says, “you can keep your current insurance”, he’s not lying. He should be saying, “you can keep your current insurance if it still exists. As soon as any of its core parameters change, you have to move on.” The rub is your current insurance will not be offered as it is today. Clever. Very clever.
Posted by: Woody | August 10, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I don’t see that in the bill. If USPS, UPS and Fedex can coexist, and public and private college, why not public and private insurance? I am not being naive. I think you — or someone you listen to — is trying to scare us. I think the insurance companies are afraid to see the end of the gravy train!
Posted by: Joyomama | August 10, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
“The rub is your current insurance will not be offered as it is today”
So you’re saying that if this bill is not passed that all these private plans are going to stay the same? They’re not. The cost of all these private plans is increasing all the time.
Posted by: Skip | August 10, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Joymama, sorry I didn’t get back to you sooner. I must first confess that I am lucky enough to have a very good insurance company, so our perceptions of whether insurance companies care about patient care are very different. I have had a couple of heart procedures, and was pleasantly surprised by the amount of rehab and aftercare covered by my standard policy. My insurance company (not KP but another of the really biggies) has a 24-hour hotline to nurses to answer questions about my heart condition, and they offer the same service for other chronic diseases.
You and I will have to agree to disagree about whether the majority of the public wants a public option. Different polls phrase the question differently and get different results. Sorry, but I do not think President Obama was elected because his health care plan contained a public option. I think he was elected because he wasn’t George Bush (funny, neither was John McCain) and because people generally wanted change.
My objections to a public option? First, it creates an uneven playing field that will inevitably crowd out private insurance. The president speaks of “competing” with private insurance to drive their costs down, but a government-run entity does not compete on a level playing field with a for-profit public entity. Also, if competition from a government-run program was the key to keeping the system we have but improving it by driving costs lower, why hasn’t Medicare and Medicaid had that effect?
In addition, there is already competition between the various private insurance companies. Has this led to lower costs and all those other benefits the president claims for his competitive public option scenario? No? Why not?
I object to a public option because I see it as the camel’s nose under the tent toward a single-payer system, which I definitely do not want.
I also object to a public option because that will be one more expensive, bloated, uncontrollable government program we will have to pay for in coming years. It is unnecessary because good insurance reform could focus on increased access to private insurance instead.
I object to a public option because many people will wind up in the plan even though it is not their preference. Private individual coverage will be phased out; many businesses will drop coverage to save money, knowing the public option is available to their employees; and there is no incentive for the legislators to include mechanisms to improve access to private insurance in any plan that includes a public option, which would then compete with those private insurance companies.
My preference is reform that increases access to quality affordable private insurance to the currently uninsured. I also prefer incremental changes to the system to reduce costs and improve coverage for those who currently have insurance— tort reform to drive down defensive doctoring, portability of coverage, larger pools (or everyone in one big pool), improvements in such issues as pre-existing conditions and annual caps. Vast improvements can be made without resorting to the public option.
I am sure I could come up with plenty of other reasons I am not in favor of the public option, but it’s past my bedtime, so it will have to wait.
Posted by: moderate | August 10, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
“I think he was elected because he wasn’t George Bush (funny, neither was John McCain)”
So say you. I think McCain was just another corporate stooge.
Posted by: Skip | August 10, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
“My preference is reform that increases access to quality affordable private insurance to the currently uninsured. I also prefer incremental changes to the system to reduce costs and improve coverage for those who currently have insurance–”
I sounds nice but who is going to do it? As Dean pointed out the Democrats think their plan will work, the Republicans in all the years they had control never made any kind of serious move to address these issues and we have no reason to believe they ever will do anything no matter how nice their ideas might sound.
Posted by: Skip | August 10, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Pelosi should be asked to step down if she feels that FREEDOM OF SPEECH is UN-AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is our greatest constitutional right. Many have died for our right to voice our opions to our government. It is upsurd to have a speaker of the HOUSE that says it is UN-AMERICAN to speak our mind and utilize our constitutional right!!FREEDOM OF SPEECH!! It is EVERY AMERICAN’S RIGHT!!
Posted by: Sue | August 10, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
If our president could pass the same screening that I did to be a pilot in SAC, I would be happy.
Only fools will go for this so called health care bill. I believe that any person that promises government help to anyone should be in=eligable to hold public office.
Posted by: Sheldon Moore | August 11, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Pelosi is a joke and needs to be removed. Since the people of San Fran are way too stupid to remove her maybe Cali should become its own country and she could be queen.
She adds no value as an elected representative and is out of touch with the real world. How could she be empathetic with “her people” when none of her people couild afford one private jet let alone 5. Send her to a socialist/communist country because that is where she belongs. Ooops the only socialist country left is the country that the US is gradually becoming.
God give me strength we have about 1 and a half years left and if something doesnt change with the electorate we will be lower than cuba….
At least we will have a government health plan, long waiting lists, limited drugs and a bureau deciding if we will live or die. Given this let me die!
Posted by: Jim Raymond | August 11, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
The following is a copy from a memo perpetrated from the group “Freedom works”.
A Political Action Memo
We here in Fairfield County Connecticut conducted an action at Congressman Jim Hime’s Town Hall meeting in May 2009. We believe there are some best practices which emberged from the event and our experience, which could be useful to activists in just about any district where their Congressperson has supported the socialist agenda of the Democrat leadership in Washington.
…
– Artificially Inflate Your Numbers: “Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put the Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. The Rep should be made to feel that a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington.”
– Be Disruptive Early And Often: “You need to rock-the-boat early in the Rep’s presentation, Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge the Rep’s statements early.”
– Try To “Rattle Him,” Not Have An Intelligent Debate: “The goal is to rattle him, get him off his prepared script and agenda. If he says something outrageous, stand up and shout out and sit right back down. Look for these opportunities before he even takes questions.”
Posted by: devilkev | August 11, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
I have to agree with Pelosi. Disrupting the town calls is denying free speech to those that want to partake in the American process. This type of behavior is common in countries that hate America. If these people don’t like the Idea that the dems are putting forth, then they should be part of the debate and give their Ideas. Not stop the debate from happening.
Posted by: dylan | August 11, 2009, 4:48 am 4:48 am
Sure they are. The dtopic has to be clarified here. There are legimite concerns that should be dicsussed but taking a serious probem and turning it into disruption and vandalism constitute an act of treason to this country.
Posted by: samurai | August 11, 2009, 4:49 am 4:49 am
this is an attempt at mob rule, pure and simple. and glenn beck is an idiot.
Posted by: al rotundo | August 11, 2009, 7:23 am 7:23 am
#1..Nancy Pelosi? She is not going to support anything that does’nt lead to her own enrichment. She has about as much credibility as Chris Dodd who has zero. I am a 60 year old, lifelong, “die hard” Republican and I’ve never missed voting in a general election. I have helped elect/re-elect as many Democrats and Independents as I have Republicans. Sometimes it was because they had a better idea and sometimes I was simply too afraid of my own party’s candidate.
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Government health care SAVED MY LIFE after my insurance company SENT ME HOME TO DIE. Your elected representatives ANSWER TO YOU. Who do the insurance companies answer to?
Posted by: al rotundo | August 11, 2009, 7:24 am 7:24 am
and this town hall crap is nothing but an attempt at mob rule.
Posted by: al rotundo | August 11, 2009, 7:25 am 7:25 am
I find it ironic, insulting and absurd that the speaker of the House of Representatives proclaims that those who are using their constitutional rights of free speech to oppose implementing socialism are called un-American. Folks, no matter how you may view your health care needs this statement should be a major Red Flag to you! Step outside the issues and really think about this statement…
Posted by: Allan LeBeau | August 11, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
#2..We have 435 representatives in the House and another 100 in the Senate. If you disqualify all the ones that accept direct contributions from the health care industry, lobbyist and political action committees, then have an attempt at legislation, we might get somewhere. Our legislature has given away any means of controlling cost. Now “they” want to build a new program based on what we no longer have. This really sucks.
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am
#3..70-80% of Americans are “OK” with their medical care. I am one of them. That leaves 20-30% that don’t have anything or less than what they need. We can do better. But, I won’t give up what I have to solve the problem. Our health care industry is totally “over the top” on screwing the american people. Our congress has legislated away any means of contolling costs. No one is “orchestrating” my opinions, I’m mad as hell.
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am
A lot of the disrupters I’ve seen at these town hall meetings are over fifty years old. I’d be be willing to bet that most of them have poor or no insurance coverage and yet they come to these meetings with the intent to see that good and affordable insurance coverage is denied to themselves. It makes no sense whatsoever. These people are so conservative that their beliefs have clouded their common sense and good judgment. As the President has stated many times before, if you have an insurance you are happy with, then keep it. No one is going to take it away from you. But as for the rest of us, stop trying to prevent us from getting good health care. We all know the Repub. party is behind all the lies and rumors concerning the health care plan put forth by the Democrats. When is the last time the Repubs ever anything positive for this country?…Never.
Posted by: leftyintexas | August 11, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
God give me strength we have about 1 and a half years left and if something doesnt change with the electorate we will be lower than cuba….
Given this let me die!
Posted by: Jim Raymond
go see yer boy Glenn Beck, I hear he now is looking to share special glasses of wine
Posted by: {0|0} | August 11, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
I guess this is what happens when people feel they’re government is ‘zooming’ them.
Posted by: LongT | August 11, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
CNN just had a story about a woman who needed a new battery for her pacemaker. She was in the hospital for 2 days. Final bill; nearly $200,000! The new pacemaker battery; $72,000.
Posted by: LongT | August 11, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
I see, public disruptions are Un-American? That’s interesting….how did things like the American Revolution ever begin without “disruptions”?
This is a great ploy to try to hide what is really happening here. If anyone thinks this is really a good health care plan – read the details!
Instead of “may God help us!” I say, may we continue to help ourselves and may we continue to stand up for and fight against that which is wrong and destructive to our country.
Posted by: Bobbi | August 11, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
#5..(for 0/0) I won’t attempt to change your mind. Every American deserves affordable healthcare. We are suppose to be the “leaders of the free world”.
I voted for many of the Democrats that hold office today. I am a Republican and my opinions are not “orchestrated”. The program being put out there right now is not the answer. Do use any kind of prescription medications? Would you like to buy them at 50-75% off of your current price? People all over the world buy our stuff for pennies on the dollar. Congress won’t do anything about it. Ask your representatives about re-importing. A Senate committee just passed a measure to allow it but it will never pass. We don’t really have a healthcare problem – we have a corruption problem. When the creed changed from “do no harm” to “follow the dollar”, America went down the drain.
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Woody, you explained the fine print on qualifying plans very well. Thanks!
Joyomama, you suggest that having public and private insurance coexisting is equivalent to public and private colleges coexisting, but that’s not quite so.
Yes, the part of that analogy with which I agree is that the public institutions have government support, so the private institutions have to provide added value to set themselves apart from the cheaper public alternative. That’s a good thing.
But the difference is, the public universities do not set the rules by which the private universities operate.
The Harvard Board of Trustees does not get to create the regulations for the local community college. The public universities do not get to be referee, judge, owner, and opposing team simultaneously. Public health care coverage, in effect, would.
The public universities, while they receive funding from the states, have limits on the budgets. (believe me, I teach at one, so I know) A public health care program might have limits as well– but that would create an outcry about rationing and complaints, as does any attempt to rein in the existing public programs of SChip, Medicare, and Medicaid. So public insurance would not have the same constraints as public universities in terms of finance, and that would lead to a bigger problem with out-of-control spending on health care than we already have.
Posted by: moderate | August 11, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
A classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Anything that comes out of this woman’s mouth is tainted. People should be encouraged to take an active role in there government and any government official that attempts to discourage this participation through smear campaigns should be removed from office.
Posted by: John Thoel | August 11, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
oops -their-
Posted by: John Thoel | August 11, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
#6..I recently got “referred” to a pulmonary specialist, from my doctor, to solve a breathing problem. Now I find that my doctor receives a “fee” for the referral. The “specialist” charged my insurance roughly $495 for the 10 minutes he spent with me. He prescribed not one, but two, inhalers.
He receives a fee from them. I filled the prescription and guess what? I get a letter, from the drug store, telling me they are being compensated from the drug company. They are going to remind me when I need a refill. We cannot afford this stuff. All of this compensation – we pay for it. If our current system is out of control, how can we expect to build a new system on top of it?
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
#7..Every citizen in this country deserves the absolute best healthcare available. We have the finest doctors, facilities, science and technology of anyplace in the world. But we can’t get it. Many people die because of the lack of it. This is really, really sad.
Posted by: Old Republican | August 11, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
GUESS THE Democrat-Socialists have forgotten about the Boston Tea Party. Wanna know what’s “un-American” ? Trying to shove legislation down the throats of Americans before anyone even knows what’s in the legislation. You political hacks work for us, not the other way around.
Posted by: Ron | August 11, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Un-American? People, some of whom remember FDR well, maybe with some wisdom to share, being put down by the government. These people young and old are the essence of our great country. Fight the tyrany, less government and less taxes, less spending, free markets.
Posted by: Ray | August 11, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Our cost is higher but we have the best system in the world – Bar none… Destroying our system is incredibly stupid! Reign it in and bring the cost down – YES! Destroy it by handing it over to a government that can’t effeciently run anything – ABSOLUTELY STUPID! We still have toxic assests in the government run banks after billions of taxpayer dollars… Where’s the common sense in America.
Posted by: Ray | August 11, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
This isn’t about health care, choice, a “public” option, fiscal responsibility, or even perceived government intervention. It is about Republicans and their profitable relationship with the insurance industry, who stands to lose billions if forced to actually compete for American’s health dollars. Ask anyone whose insurance was canceled because they have reached their max payout or canceled because some major illness was deemed “pre-existing”. Every day, the insurance industry balances your health care against profits. Ultimately, at the end of the day, which, do you think, carries more weight for them?
Posted by: DaveM | August 11, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Ron – Medicare and Social Security are two of the largest “socialist” programs in the world. Do you want to do away with them? What will we do – put our elderly on an ice floe, like the eskimos, and send them out to sea? Maybe we can do a Soylent Green kind of thing and put them back into the food chain rather than be a drag on society. Do you even know what socialism is? The quality of a culture can be determined by how well it takes care of its elderly and those that cannot take care of themselves.
Posted by: DaveM | August 11, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
if you like your insurance you can keep it? if you like your doctor you can stay with him. no lobbyist will work in my admin. no taxes on 95% of working americans.close gitmo. get out of iraq and afgan. what do all these have in common? they are all lies..95% of working americans dont pay income taxes,only about 50% do.gitmo still open ,troops still in those countries.oh and if you like your ins. and doc. thats fine as long as your ins. policy doesnt change.i.e single and get married.oops you must use the gov.plan..married and have a baby oops gotta use the gov.plan, rates go up oops gotta use the gov. plan…your employer thinks it would save the company money by dropping their health plan because they know that the gov. plan is there so they drop it then you have to use the gov. plan its all in the there all you have to is read it.all these senators havent read it and proudly say so, thats because after they jam it down our throats then they can say oh i didnt know that was in there.just like with the stimulus that obama pushed thru they knew the aig bonus was in there(yes they admited they they knew it was there),but they rammed it thru.then sat back and complained about it.got the acorn people to protest in front of the peoples homes ,just like they have the union and acorn people getting involved with the town hall meetings to make the honest hard working people who provide for themselves,and dont want the welfare medicine. to look like a “mop” funny when dems protset they are just expressing their feelings and being patriotic when republicans do it they are a mop an un american.go figure
Posted by: terry | August 11, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Ron – FINE – Fix the system, don’t destroy it… STUPID STUPID STUPID!
Posted by: Ray | August 11, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Without anything in writing we are being asked to buy a pig in a poke. what is said by them at the meetings is not what will be in the bill, have the bill first then see what we think.
Posted by: Bondsman | August 11, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
What is un-American, is that the elected representatives, are ignoring the wishes of their citizens, that elected them in the first, and are even going so far as to discredit their views.
That is why we must move away from the wealthy and powerful, being elected to congress. They only care about those in their own wealthy and powerful social level, and to heck with the common man!
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 11, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Ray – fixing it would require “fixing” the insurance companies, who don’t want to be fixed because health insurance is very, very profitable. What do you think that the government can do to completely change the way the companies do business? Create a massive, expensive oversight commitee? Gee, that’s worked so well for the financial industry. I have great insurance now, but what happens when my company no longer pays for it? Or I have a catastrophic illness and I am no longer profitable to my provider, and they drop me. Lots of good folks spend the last months of their lives fighting with insurance companies just to get the final medical care they will ever need. The number one cause of bankruptcy in this country is out-of-control medical expenses. We do not have a system that a) works; or b) is sustainable. Pay to fix it now or pay a lot more later.
Posted by: DaveM | August 11, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
What I find so very troubling is that the Left NeoCons, now in power, are using the same media tactics that the Right NeoCons used when they were in power. The same social class and the same interests… And the same fear of democracy and free speech.
Surely we can do better than a health care system that costs trillions and results in over 150,000 people a year dying in hospitals from properly prescribed drugs; a health care system that still can’t reduce infant mortality; a health care system that relies on uninsurable, unproven vaccines…
I don’t think that trillions more dumped into health care will improve outcomes. (Where will all the $$ come from? The Fed’s magic printing press?)
This unread legislation will, however, improve the bottom line of the winners (most likely the drug companies and hospitals) and hurt the bottom line of the insurance companies. I’m not crying about the latter… I’m not at all happy about the former.
Posted by: Ralph Fucetola JD | August 11, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
To all the posters here that DO NOT know or understand, all proposed legislation can be seen in it’s ENTIRETY on the Library of Congress website. This includes the proposed health care legislation, ( HR3200). You can read it “WORD-FOR WORD “. Please DO NOT listen to the uninformed Neanderthals that would have you believe that We don’t have an open government.
Posted by: JOSEPH | August 11, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Left NeoCons
Posted
by: Ralph Fucetola JD
pretty funny term: ‘Left NeoCons’
well, when the ‘Left NeoCons’ start a war like the real Neo-Cons did in Iraq needlessly, with falsified info, mismanage it, have no exit plan and have no plan for winning it, subcontract it out to their buddies so they can make billions, and manage to lose track of 9 billion in cash..
maybe then I will embrace your term: ‘Left NeoCons’
Posted by: {0|0} | August 11, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Obama keeps saying “if you like your healthcare, you’ll be able to keep it…” This is either intentional deception or incredible naivete. Millions of small businesses will take the first opportunity they get to dump their employees into any government plan that comes along so as to be out of the yearly negotiations and all the administrative hassle of offering health-insurance benefits. In that scenario, how will you be able to keep the same healthcare?
Posted by: Bendar Dundat | August 11, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“Tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic. And we should stand up and say we are America, that we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!” — Hillary Clinton quote
Posted by: ? | August 11, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
What is Un-American is asking Americans to rat out thier friends and neighbors who disagree with spending money that we don’t have to pay for a health care plan that won’t improve the system that we have.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 11, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
What is Un-American is asking Americans to rat out thier friends and neighbors who disagree with spending money that we don’t have to pay for a health care plan that won’t improve the system that we have.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC
proof?
crickets is all I hear
Posted by: jt | August 11, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Here is how to fix health care.
1. Tort reform. No P/S awards over $250K
2. Term limits on elected officials -No more that 2 terms.
3. Let congress pay thier own health care and provide for their own retirement plans.
4. No lobbying for Alcohol. tobacco, insurance, health care.
5. SEAL THE BORDERS AND SEND THE ILLEGALS HOME!
That is Government’s job. Don’t add beaureaucrats to an already stupid system.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC | August 11, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
What is Un-American is asking Americans to rat out thier friends and neighbors who disagree with spending money that we don’t have to pay for a health care plan that won’t improve the system that we have.
Posted by: No Common Sense in DC
proof?
crickets is all I hear
Posted by: jt | Aug 11, 2009 4:07:00 PM
You won’t have to do that anymore, as soon as they clear to put cookies and spyware on your computer, they know where an who you are.
Posted by: Lizzie | August 11, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Both parties have lost touch with the public and what it means to work in DC. They act like we work for them when it should be the other way around. Its time to vote them all out and start over.
Posted by: Chris | August 11, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Both parties have lost touch with the public and what it means to work in DC. They act like we work for them when it should be the other way around. Its time to vote them all out and start over.
Posted by: Chris
AMEN to that! Also time to insist on two-term limits so that representatives in Washington always remember where they came from and who they are.
Posted by: Just sayin' | August 11, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
UN-AMERICAN is a Congressman (Jason Altmire-D) that doesn’t have town meetings and could care less what the voters think.
Posted by: d | August 11, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Try being informed instead of just opinionated.
Posted by: TrueNorth8 | August 11, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
when did it make you UNamerican to stand up and protest what you think is wrong with our elected officials and the way they vote? i always heard it was your right and your responsibilty to question our government. but now days if you disagree with our government you are called unamerican by pelosi and other people. well maybe some of these professional politicains need to be on this side of the fence and get in touch with what the people who elected them want and need or maybe pelosi has so much money maybe tax her and her family till they are not rich. or maybe these elected officials both rep.@dem. need to remember the reason they were elected and learn to work together and then and only then will they get any good work done to help the people
Posted by: john g. | August 11, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
========================
Yes, according to liberal Democrat Representatives, listening to the citizens they are supposed to represent is un-American
========================
Obama sold himself as the great UNITER but he’s turning out to be the great DIVIDER. He’s cause the worse division in this nation in decades, and the Democrats, demonizing ordinary citizens, are compounding the problem.
Posted by: N Waff | August 12, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am
d- even those having town hall meetings don’t care what people think. I have written to both of my Senators & my Representative in the House. I gave them my opinion about the bill (that I do not like anything in it) and gave alternative suggestions. I got back a form letter thanking me for supporting them in supporting this. And then they wonder why people are angry.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | August 12, 2009, 6:22 am 6:22 am
Yes Ms. Pelosi and only the little people pay taxes right Leona?
Posted by: hkdakota | August 12, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am
In the recent town hall meeting,Pres. Obama appeared to have ‘performed’ better than other Dem. lawmakers facing their constituents, because he started by blaming the health insurance industries as the villains to people’s suffering (such as bankruptcy..). This tactic also tend to ‘justify’ the future government role as big brother to apply control of the health care business, that means BIG GOVERNMENT to decide how the money to be spent in the process to achieve the goal of universal health care, even if Obama has said the government has no intention to run the health business.
Posted by: austin | August 12, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Washigton will ignore Americans now on healthcare just like they did with the bailouts. American said 300:1 “no bailouts.: Guess what happened. Obama and the Democrats ae going ram rod a stinking health bill that will destroy healthcare as we know it in this country. America can ot trust Washington any longer.
Posted by: Dave | August 12, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
It’s high time for a Revolution. This notion of an American “Democracy” with no respect for the Constitution or rule of law has undermined our Republic.
It’s time to take it back – by force if necessary.
Posted by: Brad | August 12, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Senator McConnell certainly unleashed my “energy” with his comments. My open letter to him.
Posted by: sandy | August 12, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Republicans are looking for a breather. After the election defeat they are looking for an issue. There are forums inside American democracy to discuss about any issues. These kind of demonstrations will not help their cause.
Public health bill is a genuine issue for all Americans and we need a healthy discussion inside and outside the congress and Senate to have a good point of view.discussion inside and outside the congress and Senate to have a good point of view.
Posted by: Mortgage leads | August 12, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Isn’t it amazing? When theses Town Hall meetings have the speakers drowned out by members of the audience, the top Dems call it Un-American. Yet when a conservative speaker gets drowned out by student protesters at a Liberal University, they say nary a thing…Good old Double Standard at work…
Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Hey Ralph, who do you think escalated the Vietnam War?….Your good buddy JFK & Johnson after him….Took Nixon to get us out of there…What’s the JD stand for? Just Dumb ?
Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Response to Bendar – whose comments reflect the kind of “NO” without rational consideration of what a mess the current system is in. Being able to keep your current plan makes no sense when, in a few years, that plan will be unaffordable to you and your employer.
Maybe you should be talking to your employer to figure out why he/she can’t afford to keep their current plan? ‘Administrative hassle, negotiation,’ constant fear of one sick employee causing astronomical rate hikes… hmm, if I were a business owner, being able to know that my employees are fully covered, can’t be dropped, could take the huge amount I (and my employees) currently pay to insurance companies and instead pay much smaller amount to a health tax… I think I’d jump too!!!
Posted by: Michael Birtel | August 12, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Michael Birtel, How do you know that they would be paying a much smaller amount? You have insider info we don’t?….Plus, even if the premiums would be less, Obama’s top financial wizards have said tax increases cannot be ruled out. so guess what, we’d still be paying out more . I know Obama has repeatedly said that there would be tax increases on the middle class, but I don’t believe it.
Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Scott, not believing it and facing facts are two different things. Heres how much we currently pay to medical costs (conservative estimates from U.S World Reports study):
$ 12,680 — Average annual premium for family healthcare coverage in 2008
$12,106 — Average for family healthcare coverage in 2007
$ 11,480 — Average in 2006
$10,880 — Average in 2005
$9,950 — Average in 2004
Are you happy to continue to turn over +$12000 per year to give private health insurance companies a 12 billion dollar profit, and to risk being dropped the second you get sick or are late on a payment?
Even if you believe your taxes would increase exactly the same amount to pay for a universal system, would the fact that you would get care NO MATTER WHAT, NEVER face bankruptcy for illness… and, to top it off the reality is that on a government plan more of your 12k would go to actually paying for care rather than to advertising and administration and CEO salaries at insurance companies, and that this would LOWER THE COSTS of all healthcare (in other words, improve the healthcare system); with all this, give me an actual argument why it makes financial and common sense to maintain the current system of increasing costs, less care, higher profits, more uninsured.
Posted by: Michael Birtel | August 12, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Hey leftyintexas …You are right, no one will take our private insurance away from us. With a government plan, they wouldn’t have to. The employers would simply eliminate their plan & have their employees go with the Government plan & insurance companies would go under since their costs wouldn’t be subsidized by the taxpayers,& believe me, your taxes would go up , no matter what Obama says, in order to fund a government plan, thus making a government plan more costly than we are being le to believe. On another note, the Feds have yet to say what the premiums would cost us, so how do we know we would be saving money? For all those posters who may live in Canada or wherever else they have a single payer system, ask them how much of their income goes to taxes, a lot more than ours does & ours is bad enough.
Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Scott, so what if taxes go up? You seem to miss the fact that you would no longer be paying premiums, so the portion of your income that goes to healthcare would, worst case, be the same – with more security if you get sick. All studies have shown that the amount of money spent in america for the current terrible system that leaves tens of millions uninsured would, under a public system, pay for all Americans to have dependable helth care. It is simple, if you take the same money you give to corporations that are in business to make a profit and pay that into a public fund, all Americans would have care, all Americans would be more secure, Americans would be better off, period. But I guess you are just looking out for number one.
Posted by: Michael b | August 12, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Pelosi, attacking regular American citizens, is indeed showing her weakness and disadvantaged maturity level. It’s like criticizing the peasants for not agreeing with the serfs.
Furthermore, to say that discussing health debate correlated with euthanasia and nazi tactics as “over the top” is another weak argument. After all NOT ENOUGH people in nazi Germany questioned Hitler, Goebbels, or Hoerring. This is how they systematically institutionalized their atrocities.
History repeats itself. The citizens gave Hitler “unwavering faith” and either denied the atrocities or had such faith in him, that they assumed the nazis were acting for the greater good. Both attitudes were wrong, as we saw.
The Nazis were also socialists. The term nazi comes from the german abbreviation “Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei” or National Socialist German Worker’s Party. In other words, socialist liberals rose to power in Nazi Germany.
Scratch the surface of a liberal, like Nancy Pelosi, and you’ve got a tyrant.
Posted by: Kevorkian II for hire? | August 12, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Kevorkian needs to read a little more and listen to fox a little less. why don’t you actually find out the difference between “national socilaism,” the concept of socialism, and of liberalism before spouting off about Nazis and the real human suffering they and their ideology inflicted on mankind when you clearly know nothing about either.
Posted by: Michael b | August 12, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Michael B.
Prove it. With facts please.
Posted by: Kevorkian II for hire? | August 12, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Michael b.
I gave you more facts in two sentences of my original post than you did in your entire comment.
By the way, in case you didn’t notice this is ABC News I’m reading not FOX. Your rashness in stereotyping is staggering.
Posted by: Kevorkian II for hire? | August 12, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Obama Lied where is yourm Troop withdraw from Iraq & Afganistan and now he and hillary want to put some in Columbia. He and the Democrates failled us with stimulus Plan then Blaimed Bush again and again yet they failed why beleive them with our health Care. Yes it needs fixed but not with another barrow another 3 Trillion to start and billions to run. Add it up Libbys you know it will cost more. Ask anyone who is in bussness when Gov is involved it costs 2-3 times more for gov. waste and red tape they create . Yes you know the figgures just barrow more. where are the jobs to pay anyway.
Posted by: Ben Grazes | August 12, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
K- you write these words but you don’t know what they mean: ” In other words, socialist liberals rose to power in Nazi Germany.”
Um no, the “socialism” of the Nazis had nothing to do with the idea or form of Socialism and revolution Marx put forward. Nazis were Nationalist elitists and racists concerned with the purity of the Germanic “race” – they were fascists and had nothing but contempt for Liberalism. Fascism is totalitarian, authoritarian, uses ideological terror, fear and violence to suppress and control dissent and maintain power. Are not in the least bit interested in democracy or conversation. Either you were with them or you were against them, there was no middle ground. Hmm, sound like anyone we (and the rest of the world, unfortunately) know?
K wrote:”I gave you more facts in two sentences of my original post than you did in your entire comment.”
I don’t see a single fact in your rant. Show us all one, please.
“By the way, in case you didn’t notice this is ABC News I’m reading not FOX. Your rashness in stereotyping is staggering.”
Which you clearly don’t watch – because no one at ABC is going around comparing Nancy Pelosi to Hitler.
McConnell is a rabble rouser who is misrepresenting what Pelosi and others are saying about the screamers. These people have every right to have their own opinion and to participate in the public forums as sane and reasonable adults. But democracy, American Democracy that is, doesn’t work by shouting louder than the other guy, it works by having a conversation and demonstrating that you have a better idea. Show me a screaming protester that has been able to just engage in a conversation, articulate their concerns beyond regurgitating Fake News, I mean Fox News talking points and make a case for continuing to work against their own best interest by supporting the rich corporations instead of looking out for the health and welfare of himself and his neighbors?
It never ceases to amaze me how poor and working class people, who are getting screwed the most by greedy profiteers who hide under the idea of “free market capitalism” – but are first in line for government bail outs, and take no responsibility for their bad “free choices” – are the staunchest defenders of the rich elite and monster monopolistic corporations.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Posted by: Michael Birtel | August 12, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Dave M,
You have got the liberal talking points down pat don’t you?… Some of the reasons our heath insurance costs are so high is due to Trial Lawyers having the Dems in their back pocket. Astronomical payouts make sure that the insurance companies charge the rates they do. Plus the premiums the Doctors have to pay factors into this as well. Add to that the unneeded tests ordered by Doctors to ensure they won’t be sued for not having taken them, all play a part in this. Same goes to the illegal aliens using emergency rooms as Primary care facilities. I could go on but I’m unlikely to have an impact on your opinions as you are unlikely to change your mind with by some of the facts I have just given. Oh, by the way, oin all of the plans being considered, nothing addresses Tort reform, I wonder why?
Couple what I have said above with the fact that the CBO has said that the deficit will go up under the proposed plans & still won’t cover everyone & that the AARP doesn’t endorse the plan….What more do you need to realize this plan isn’t the answer…Oh that’s right, you’re a moveon.org hardcore Lib aren’t you?
Posted by: Scott | August 12, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
scott – are you intentionally propagating lies? “AARP doesn’t endorse the plan…” lie.
From AARP news release: “AARP doesn’t want misinformation and fear-mongering to dominate this debate. From allegations about rationing care to wild reports of government-sponsored euthanasia, the rumors just keep getting crazier.”
from La Times: “The AARP advocates bipartisan cooperation and would like to see our elected representatives in Washington working together to get health care reform passed.”
more choice spin: “Recent polling by FOX News shows seniors, many of whom are on Medicare, don’t want a major overhaul — 93 percent rate their current coverage as good or excellent, and 56 percent say they oppose the creation of a government-run option for all Americans.”
Um, Medicare is government run healthcare. so are these seniors being misrepresented or are they all selfish twits who just don’t want “All Americans” to have to apparently excellent government run health care they enjoy? (Fox is spreading lies and fear by implying that health care reform means you will lose medicare and be euthanized. This is immoral. And it treats Seniors like idiots. Stop listening to this BS.
Oh, and Scott, you write about “…Trial Lawyers having the Dems in their back pocket.” Have the trial lawyers just started being a problem in the last 6 months? Were they a problem when the Republicans were in charge? And they don’t have any Republicans in their pockets, right? Come on.
Posted by: Michael Birtel | August 12, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Since this is such a fact and stat hungry crowd…
For consideration:
50 Million Uninsured in America
62% of U.S. Bankruptcies Involve Medical Bills
One in Five Americans Forced to Postpone Care
Employer-Based Coverage Below 60%
94% of Health Insurance Markets in U.S Now “Highly Concentrated” – almost monopolies.
114 million people, including 30 million children, visited emergency rooms in 2003, compared with 90 million visits a decade ago. In that same period, the number of U.S. hospitals decreased by 703, the number of emergency rooms decreased by 425, and the total number of hospital beds dropped by 198,000
Any reform opponents out there, if you can stop yelling for a moment, would you please share your thoughts and join the discussion to let us know how you address these health care problems directly, which means we don’t want to here about Tort Reform and Illegal Immigration… let’s focus people, please.):
Posted by: Michael Birtel | August 12, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
I can’t remember any Town Hall meetings getting into the news and having as many attendees as the ones on Health Care. There must be something about the Health Care that has the citizens attention, be it good or be it bad.
Posted by: d | August 13, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Wow, seems some people forget that the govt is already running a couple different healthcare programs. You know them, MediCare, MedicAid, and let’s not forget the good ol’ VA plan. Now ask yourself how good any of these are! The first two are broken, and the VA plan is severely underfunded. And who is to blame? The same folks who are now saying we need to trust them yet again with another healthcare plan.
Posted by: USMC-former | August 20, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., attack those who’ve been raucously protesting health care reform at town hall meetings. —————- Thus proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that they (Pelos and Hoyer) are the true “un-Americans”! ————– We want to remain free of socialism!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 24, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm