Twitter-Battle: Specter v Grassley on ‘Death Boards’
Earlier today, Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Penn., tweeted under his twitter handle “@SenArlenSpecter”: “Called Senator Grassley to tell him to stop speading (sic) myths about health care reform and imaginary ‘death panels.’”
Specter was referring to Grassley’s comment about the end of life care provisions in the House Democrats’ health care reform bill earlier this week in Winterset, Iowa.
“In the House bill, there is counseling for end of life,” Grassley said. “You have every right to fear. You shouldn’t have counseling at the end of life, you should have done that 20 years before. Should not have a government run plan to decide when to pull the plug on grandma.”
Moments ago, Grassley responded on his twitter account, which is under the name “@ChuckGrassley.”
“Specter got it all wrong that I ever used words ‘death boards’,” Grassley wrote. “Even liberal press never accused me of that. So change ur last Tweet Arlen.”
It’s true that Grassley never specifically used the discredited term that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has used: “Obama ‘death board.’”
(For discrediting see HERE and Factcheck.org and Politfact, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., or the AARP and the National Hospice And Palliative Care Organization.)
UPDATE: Later today, Specter tweeted: "Senator Grassley is not available on the phone today, but I will talk to him as soon as possible to clarify his position on living wills" and "I believe it is appropriate to council people on their choices, but no one should tell anyone else"…"what to do about health care near the end of their lives."
Then he tweeted: "I believe it is appropriate to counsel people on their choices, but no one should tell"…"anyone else what to do about health care near the end of their lives."
-jpt
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Twitter…the continued dumbing down of America.
Posted by: Ryan C | August 14, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
HOLD ON!!
HOLD ON!!!
NOW WAIT A MINUTE !!!!
Specter is useless. He has gone from a double digit lead to being double digits behind in the polls in barely 2 months!
To think the idiot who tried to play the anti-trust card against the NFL over the New England Patriots “spygate” issue because they had beaten his poor Eagles in the Super Bowl a couple of years before that.
+++++++
WASHINGTON — With the Super Bowl fast approaching, a senior Republican senator says he wants the NFL to explain why it destroyed evidence from the New England Patriots cheating scandal.
“I am very concerned about the underlying facts on the taping, the reasons for the judgment on the limited penalties and, most of all, on the inexplicable destruction of the tapes,” Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., wrote Thursday in a letter to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.
The story was first reported by The New York Times.
Specter, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the matter could put the league’s antitrust exemption at risk. In a telephone interview with the Times on Thursday, he said the committee at some point will call Goodell to address the antitrust exemption as well as the destruction of the tapes.
“Their antitrust exemption has been on my mind for a long time,” he said in a Capitol Hill news conference Friday.
+++++++++
He is soon to be Sen. Spectre!
He most likely wont even win his “new parties” nomination.
Posted by: Mike_C | August 14, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
I can only think of the movie Idiocracy, when Frito is celebrating while the police destroy his own car.
The “Tea Party” people are no different.
Blind, pointless rage. Some Republican says “Death Panel” and they fly into a frenzy without even pausing to ask what a living will even is.
Posted by: gobot | August 14, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Ryan C, I could not possibly agree with you any more. The fact that Twitter has become such a part of American life that U.S. Senators are now saying things like “So change ur last Tweet Arlen” scares me more than anything to do with healthcare reform.
It’ll probably be impossible but perhaps I will refuse to vote for any politician who tweets policy.
Posted by: IdealSkeptic | August 14, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Jake, the euthanasia board, that the Dems object to and the Republicans are defensive about was not what Gov. Palin was suggesting in her criticism. She was in fact airing her fears that a person’s “productivity” would be a factor when the bureaucracy that emerges from this bill considers whether or not to provide health care, or what level of health care to provide an individual. This is not unlike the same concerns that Pres. Obama brought up in April when discussing his grandmother’s hip replacement during the final weeks of her life.
Posted by: Russel.G | August 14, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
So he peddled the rumor, just didn’t use those exact words? Sounds like Grassley is splitting hairs. I’ve read what he said and it is clear he was agreeing with the misinformation line that allowing insurance to pay for an advance directives consultation is “pulling the plug on Grandma”. His whole “you shouldn’t be doing this at the end of life, but 20 years before you die” was breathtakingly lame.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 14, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Twitter…the continued dumbing down of America.
I’ll say…
Twitter allows users to include links to video and other material on the Internet, as long as the original note – known as a “Tweet” – meets the program’s principal rule: no message can be longer than 140 characters. The last note from the White House note posted before Friday’s news-conference announcement linked to a video of a statement by Mr. Obama on the need to reform the U.S. health-care system.
Mr. Obama’s last full news conference with journalists at the White House was on June 23.
Posted by: Stu Pidd | August 14, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
You link the discrediting of Palin’s comments, but not her comments? I’d sure like to see them. Is this an intent to report, or to isolate her?
Posted by: KYoung | August 14, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“His whole “you shouldn’t be doing this at the end of life, but 20 years before you die” was breathtakingly lame.”
–> Nonono. It’s “Democrat”-of-convenience Specter, a man whose continuing existence is a testament to the efficacy of the Single Payer care the Congress and Oblabla themselves enjoy, and are determined to withold from the riff-raff citizenry — who’s wrong in THIS one.
It’s perfectly true that “end-of-life” planning, if any, should be done when people are healthy and at home — doing it in pain and fear, probably looped out on Ativan or whatever, in the hospital, open to coercion from G-d-knows-whom, is really NOT a great idea.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Earlier today, Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Penn., tweeted under his twitter handle
My eyes! My eyes!
Posted by: Thank a vet today | August 14, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“discredited term” .. Too funny, Mr. Tapper. Previously, you said Ms. Palin’s catch phrase was/is “thoroughly debunked”. Why be so negative, Mr. Tapper? How about we start describing the term “death panel” as credible inference. After all, Ms. Palin provided full citations to buttress her argument, the words of the culprits in this melodrama being quoted verbatim. You, on the other hand, merely cast aspersions and offer up the opinion of liberal supporters of the President as evidence. It would seem that the old aphorism about apple trees applies.
Posted by: jcarob | August 14, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
It’s hard to believe what a complete bunch of morons the Republican right have become in America.
Posted by: davedillon | August 14, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Obama opens in Montana with a “chopped liver” joke. Too bad the combination of Hawaii, Indonesia, and private school didn’t give Him more of a clue to regional differences in the United States.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Bet Noir:”It’s perfectly true that “end-of-life” planning, if any, should be done when people are healthy and at home”
The bill would cover it up to once every five years at any time upon the patients request – INCLUDING 20 years before end of life and the intent was for it to be done while the patient is healthy and living at home.
Perhaps you should read some of the debunking of this myth – EVERYONE who actually understands it knows that the ‘death board’ spin is an utter lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
So according to Grassley you shouldnt talk about the end of your life and plan if you are dying? You should do it 20 years before well what if your life changes in those 20 years are these Republicans for real?
Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | August 14, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Poor Arlen, He has lost his mind, and need to be counseled about retiring from the Senate. The counselor could be awarded Arlen’s PA ticket. Atleast that way the Dems can hold onto their majority.
Posted by: Arlen Spector jus' lost the re-election | August 14, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
It’s hard to believe what a complete bunch of morons the Republican right have become in America.
Maybe the WH Twitter will have something about that?
Posted by: Francis | August 14, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
“Blind, pointless rage.”
Keep it up Leftie! Hey…maybe by the mid-term elections you will figure it out! Probably not, but then again miracles do happen!
Posted by: Mike_C | August 14, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Hmm: Obama says “different THAN”, rather than “different FROM” — a sure hallmark of NOT being very good with language.
You’d think passing through Harvard Law would have corrected THAT.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Hey gobot, love, a living will is something one discusses with their family.
A “death panel” is group of bureaucrats from the government to pressure an elderly or disabled person to do the right thing and take the “less expensive” route.
Posted by: Left wing is the new right wing | August 14, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
You’d think passing through Harvard Law would have corrected THAT.
Language? Does that have something to do with this “reading” I always hear about?
Posted by: J. Conyers | August 14, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Jake,
Call them Sarah Palin’s Death Panels and please don’t associate them with Obama any more. Don’t put his name with them even when quoting Palin or anyone else. The association is firming in conservative minds.
Posted by: Jerome | August 14, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Bet Noir
The breathtaking quote was Grassley, not Specter. And to suggest that we should discuss advance directives 20 years before we die assumes that we know when that event will take place. As I said, “was breathtakingly lame”.
What does it mean to you that just about every GOP politician who has tried to plant this fear in the last two weeks is on record within recent years as being in favor of insurance coverage of voluntary end-of-life directive consultations? (Including Sarah Palin.)
What it means to me if they are just being obstructionist and hoping it will pay off in 2010.
Posted by: Joyomama | August 14, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
This isn’t about right or left. This is about lying and misleading the public to further your own agenda. For those of us that can read and comprehend what we read, know what this is about. Sooner or later the people that incite hatred with their twisted opinions will be held accountable. What happened to the republican party?
Posted by: pam | August 14, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
And liars! Don’t forget liars!”
There are liars on both sides, what is surprising is how the right eagerly believes such incredibly stupid, repeated refuted, lies.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“This isn’t about right or left. This is about lying and misleading the public to further your own agenda.”
I know, I cringe when I hear Obama lying about the health care bill. It’s shameful.
Posted by: Blue Skies | August 14, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“Angie in Pa” tells us that death boards are utter nonsense. I am glad that Angie has such trust in government programs. I will point out to her that the primary objective of this legislation is to spend less on health care. the government is also planning a board that will evaluate “useful” courses of treatment. So, to that, we add “end of life counseling”.
If Angie did some minor investigating, she would know that Oregon currently ranks illnesses, then, after politicking over the actual place on the list of the various illnesses, they pick a place below which they will not fund. For example, drug treatment is OK. Stage 4 breast cancer and stage 4 prostate cancer, NO.
It is not at all hard to imagine the “Useful” treatment board deciding not to allow the system to spend money treating certain illnesses. Ergo, death panel.
Posted by: Rick Caird | August 14, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
This is about end of life care, not euthanasia. Euthanasia is illelegal. there is no law being changed to allow euthanasia. It’s about insurance coverage for doctor’s visits that discuss health concerns of the dying or elderly. Making living wills and for those that need to discuss the pros and cons of treatment. It’s not about shoving grandma out the door. It’s about letting Grandma make her own choice as to how her illness is treated. And if she wants treatment.
Posted by: henry | August 14, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Rick Caird:”I am glad that Angie has such trust in government programs.”
I am glad that you have such faith in rationing done by private insurers, who make their profits (upwards of $3 billion a year, with CEO pay north of $100 million a year for just one of the largest companies) by finding ways to denying care to the most expensive clients.
“It is not at all hard to imagine the “Useful” treatment board deciding not to allow the system to spend money treating certain illnesses. ”
Every other first world nation in existence has some form of government health care. Could you cite one single example of what you’re talking about having occurred? Or is our government just uniquely inept in the world?
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
-There are liars on both sides, what is surprising is how the right eagerly believes such incredibly stupid, repeated refuted, lies.-
Easy, this isn’t about AGW.
Posted by: AvGas | August 14, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“What does it mean to you that just about every GOP politician who has tried to plant this fear in the last two weeks is on record within recent years as [blablabla]”
With a few exceptions in both parties, it’d be a great relief if the Potomac would rise up and swallow the whole crowd.
But why in the world the smarty-pants former Democrats would prescribe that MEDICAL staff be called on to provide paralegal consultation is a head-scratcher.
Aside from His party, and aside from whatever His “race” is, it becomes clearer by the day (the tonsillectomies, those windfall foot amputations) that Obama’s a fatuous, posturing moron — deal with it. Or don’t.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Arlen Specter is an idiot who never seems to hold on to a set of principles. He kept on jumping back and forth between Democrat and Republican just to get elected. He should retire already!
Posted by: freedomlover | August 14, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
It’s so not a death panel that they took it out.
Specter also said yesterday that in a truly free society no one could be forced to have health insurance.
It’s so much easier being ignorant.
Right, Arlen?
Posted by: drjohn | August 14, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
“Or is our government just uniquely inept in the world?”
Post Office.
Posted by: Mail Call | August 14, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Bet Noir:”But why in the world the smarty-pants former Democrats would prescribe that MEDICAL staff be called on to provide paralegal consultation is a head-scratcher.”
A lawyer is wholly inappropriate to describe the difference between hospice vs hospital care, the various implications of banning various extreme measures, or the difference between no resuscitation and no mechanical breathing equipment, or…
Good insurance plans offer this sort of counseling, and it is always done by doctors.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
It’s VERY SIMPLE.If Congress and the Senate and the President agree to enroll in this health care plan as their own as well as putting their family members under the same plan….well…. But they won’t..Says a lot about the plan does it not???
Posted by: Parallex View | August 14, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
“(it covers it’s losses just like a private business – ”
you mean private businesses that employ union members contributing to 7 billion dollars in losses.
Posted by: Thank a vet today | August 14, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
jhw539:”Seriously, if you hold the post office up as a symbol of failure you are just grossly ignorant of every other postal system in the world …”
“UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, it’s the Post Office that’s always having problems …” -President Obama
Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Posted by: Woody | August 14, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
(Although I gotta get back to work, so you can go back to throwing out bumper stickers.)
Posted by: jhw539 | Aug 14, 2009 4:05:40 PM
Ok. have a good one!
And remember: Si Se Puede!
Posted by: Thank a vet today | August 14, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Seriously, if you hold the post office up as a symbol of failure you are just grossly ignorant of every other postal system in the world (OK, Singapore’s may be a bit better, but they have a much smaller purview).
I’m not, but NPR is:
“WASHINGTON August 6, 2009, 08:17 pm ET
Postmaster General John Potter is trying to think outside the mailbox. “We have a network of 37,000 retail outlets. America loves them and we want to keep as many open as possible, but we cannot just sell stamps in them,” he told a Senate hearing Thursday.
The post office said Wednesday it has lost $4.7 billion so far this year and expects to be $7 billion in the red by the end of the fiscal year because of the recession and the movement of letters and bills to e-mail.
Several hundred offices are being studied for possible closing and the agency has proposed other cost-saving moves including cutting mail delivery to five days a week.”
And I’m not sure what Singapore or anywhere else has to do with it.
Posted by: Mail Call | August 14, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Parallex View:”It’s VERY SIMPLE.If Congress and the Senate and the President agree to enroll in this health care plan as their own as well as putting their family members under the same plan….well…. But they won’t..Says a lot about the plan does it not??? ”
That was actually candidate Obama’s proposal, everyone get’s Congress’s healthcare, but Republicans absolutely shut it down. Where are the $3 billion/year profits in that?
If Republicans agree to enroll everyone in the US under the government insurance, ala Canada, fine. Otherwise, it seems odd that you’re demanding Congress be treated differently than all other Americans (who will by a vast majority continue in their private plans).
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Good insurance plans offer this sort of counseling, and it is always done by doctors.”
–> So THAT’s what happens to all the defrocked docs who can’t get into Medicaid-churning “non-profit” clinics!
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
And I’m not sure what Singapore or anywhere else has to do with it.
Posted by: Mail Call | Aug 14, 2009 4:07:34 PM
Me neither, but it sounds good when that’s all you’ve got. Otherwise, you just end up chanting “Si Se Puede!”
Posted by: Thank a vet today | August 14, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
That was actually candidate Obama’s proposal, everyone get’s Congress’s healthcare, but Republicans absolutely shut it down. Where are the $3 billion/year profits in that?
Profits?! I thought healthcare run by the gubbmint was about savings?
Posted by: Poren Starvin | August 14, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Mail Call:”I’m not, but NPR is:”
No, NPR is not saying the Post Office is a failure. They are pointing out the US Post Office is going through the same sort of cost cutting that FedEx and UPS are. They have too many offices, and are closing them. They may need to go to 5 day delivery like FedEx and UPS rather than six. The only reason it’s news is because USPS has to get Congress’s approval every time they add a penny to a stamp.
Bump US postal rates up to $0.78 for a letter, what Germany charges (for their much smaller country), and the USPS is in the black.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 14, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
“Me neither, but it sounds good when that’s all you’ve got. Otherwise, you just end up chanting “Si Se Puede!”
Yay for Singapore! And did you knwo that The Vatican has a postal service too? They made a movie about it called Il Postino. The Pope himself blesses each letter.
Posted by: Mail Call | August 14, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
That was actually candidate Obama’s proposal, everyone get’s Congress’s healthcare, but Republicans absolutely shut it down. Where are the $3 billion/year profits in that?
Posted by: jhw539 |
Right. Which party is in bed with Big Pharma?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 14, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
“No, NPR is not saying the Post Office is a failure. They are pointing out the US Post Office is going through the same sort of cost cutting that FedEx and UPS are. They have too many offices, and are closing them. They may need to go to 5 day delivery like FedEx and UPS rather than six. The only reason it’s news is because USPS has to get Congress’s approval every time they add a penny to a stamp.”
A success except for that whole billions in debt thing I suppose. And I tried to work Singapore into my commment, but failed.
Posted by: Mail Call | August 14, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“NPR is not saying the Post Office is a failure.”
–> it’s certainly not a failure in attending to its executives’ house-dumping needs, anyway …
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
-They are pointing out the US Post Office is going through the same sort of cost cutting that FedEx and UPS are-
Are FedEx and UPS “going through” the same kind of debt?
Posted by: Poren Starvin | August 14, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“Right. Which party is in bed with Big Pharma?”
–> John Edwards looks better every day.
Posted by: Bet Noir | August 14, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
–> John Edwards looks better every day.
he’s actually a handsome guy. His mistress certainly thought so.
Posted by: On the side | August 14, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
–> it’s certainly not a failure in attending to its executives’ house-dumping needs, anyway …
This comment thread is NOT about Tim Geithner’s inability to sell his home.
Posted by: Yuan Top | August 14, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
SIMPLE SOLUTION TO HEALTHCARE REFORM POLITICAL GRIDLOCK:
Take away every Congressman’s and Senator’s (and ALL their staff’s) healthcare benefits and let them fend for themselves with private insurance companies just like most small businesses and individual workers have to do. They will see the vast expense (over-charging) and difficulty obtaining decent coverage that hits most of their constituents and gridlock will be gone within a matter of days!
Posted by: David Burta | August 14, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Again…If Congress and the Senate as well as the President agree to enroll in the CURRENT Obama Health Care Plan…WELL..Perhaps you can explain to me WHY the left-wing of our political party ALWAYS reverts to cherry picking past events when arguing for the future…TRY to keep it in the now…Don’t care about “what if’s” the what if’s won’t affect me or my family in the future….
Posted by: Parallex View | August 14, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Grassley takes the positon that he did not use the term “death panels”. But did he speak up like the Republican Senator for Alaska did to denounce the terms? No. Did he speak up to denounce Rush Limbaugh’s comparison of Obama’s plan to Nazism. No. Grassley is like many of the politicians in the Republican party. Gutless and driven by the extreme wings of their party. Seems to me that those who should know better should set the example. Grassley fails here otherwise he would not state that the provision is “subject to mis-interpretation”…Democrats like Specter are not much better but I will leave thrashing of him and his new found party to those who enjoy it more….Republicans..
Posted by: indy_voter | August 14, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Did he speak up to denounce Rush Limbaugh’s comparison of Obama’s plan to Nazism. No.
Why is that his job?
Posted by: Seriously | August 14, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
kathie wrote, “But the death panel provision is THOROUGHLY OUT OF THE BILL.
Thank you, Sarah!”
Sarah Palin’s Evil Death Panel is supposed to be lurking somewhere behind the lines in section 1233 of HR 3200. Even though Sarah recently went citation-crazy on Facebook, she has yet to identify the offending lines in 1233 that will kill off ol’ Granny and poor little Trig.
But wasn’t it the senate version that had its end-of-life provision axed? Isn’t that a different version than HR 3200? Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted by: Good for the Goose | August 14, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Arlen Specter, whose son is a prominent personal injury/medical malpractice lawyer has also introduced a bill to let attorneys claim an up-front tax deduction on expenses they incur while building contingency fee cases. Amazing but true: Mr. Specter wants to give a tax cut to sustain the likes of Mel Weiss or Dickie Scruggs in the yachts to which they have become accustomed while they await jackpot jury verdicts. Even Democrats are too embarrassed by this giveaway (estimated cost: $1.6 billion) to pass it as a stand-alone bill, so tort lobbyist Linda Lipsen recently said “we have to tuck it into something” else, such as another “tax vehicle.” — from John Stossel’s blog 8/12/9
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 14, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Maybe Specter and Grassley could slug it out with Nerf Bats. Watching two useless, old geezers slap each other around would be great entertainment.
Posted by: Sammy | August 14, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Watching two useless, old geezers slap each other around would be great entertainment.
Posted by: Sammy |
or a town hall meeting.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | August 14, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Grassley takes the positon that he did not use the term “death panels”. But did he speak up like the Republican Senator for Alaska did to denounce the terms? No. Did he speak up to denounce Rush Limbaugh’s comparison of Obama’s plan to Nazism. No. Grassley is like many of the politicians in the Republican party. Gutless and driven by the extreme wings of their party. Seems to me that those who should know better should set the example. Grassley fails here otherwise he would not state that the provision is “subject to mis-interpretation”…Democrats like Specter are not much better but I will leave thrashing of him and his new found party to those who enjoy it more….Republicans..
Posted by: indy_voter | Aug 14, 2009 4:31:58 PM
======================================
Re you serious? Does Obama stand up and denounce all of the mindless and obvious ignorant drool comming from Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid? What about the BS racial remarks by another democrat who advocated that tax payers should pay for abortions because there are a lot of them in DC and a lot of black people live there.
I mean seriously? If everyone had to stand up and denounce everythng someone said because it offended or was incorrect, we would get nothing done.
I suppose good ol Keith Olberman and Chris Matthews with their TINGLY legs are soooo awesome. How are their ratings doing right now anyway? Somewhere in the pipes after being flushed down the toilet?
Posted by: KMDay | August 14, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Oh, by the way, the so-called “death board” provision–written by a Republican, no less-was stripped out of the bill.
Cowardice or pragmatism?
Either way, that irrational and howling mobs can influence legislation establishes a monumentally dangerous precedent.
Posted by: No Bullroar | August 14, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“In a free society, if people absolutely insist on not being covered, that’s ultimately going to be their choice.” – Arlen Spector
Unaware of the mandate contained in Section 401 of the HC bill that he supports – Spector opens mouth, inserts foot. He should have immediately called the HC hotline and then flagged himself as saying something fishy. The bill does impose individual mandates and assigns penalties for non-compliance.
But the old geezers out there trying. I’ll give him that. At least he’s not off hiding somewhere (even those he’s admittedly not getting an OT for his efforts).
Posted by: Take the Blue Pill | August 14, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Nerf bat slug fest…..LOL…..I would pay to see Michelle Bachman and Pelosi duel it out!
Posted by: KMDay | August 14, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Nerf bat slug fest…..LOL…..I would pay to see Michelle Bachman and Pelosi duel it out!
Posted by: KMDay | Aug 14, 2009 5:32:29 PM
***
That’s pretty funny, no matter who you put your money on. LOL.
Posted by: Alyson | August 14, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
But wasn’t it the senate version that had its end-of-life provision axed? Isn’t that a different version than HR 3200? Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted by: Good for the Goose | Aug 14, 2009 4:34:46 PM
***
I think you’re right. The wtay I read the AP post was that he Senate Finance Committee’s health care plan will not include provisions dealing with end-of-life care and counseling because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly. But the House
According the NYT, a Senate Finance Committee aide confirmed that the panel was not discussing end-of-life measures, and also said they were “never a major focus” of the committee’s negotiations.
However, I haven’t read anything about the provisions that have stirred up such a brouhaha being stripped out of the House bill. Did I miss that?
The AP post from a day ago says, “A health care bill passed by three House committees allows Medicare to reimburse doctors for voluntary counseling sessions about end-of-life decisions.”
Posted by: Alyson | August 14, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
There is ONE thing that Obama is NOT lying about with his Health Care Plan..there are no “Death Panels”.
We DON’T call them “Death Panels”…but what do you think a Denial of Care Claim is? DUH!! Just as Obama said…their will be a committee to determine “effective treatment”… what do you think the term “effective treatment” means in insurance language?
So If you are 75 years old with cancer…should we give you chemo or radiation? What if there is only a 70% chance that you will survive…is this treatment “effective”? What if the odds are 50%? Where is the “cut off” that the treatment is NOT effective?
What if you are in a coma…how long will the govt. public option care for you?? one year? two? When is it NOT effective to care for you? If you are 89 years old…should the govt. pay for a new knee for you? Would that be effective?
Do you really think that the govt. public option (which we WILL be forced into…according to the CBO and ALL NONPARTISAN Research groups!) is going to spend an UNLIMITED amount of money on a person? Keep dreaming.
So we don’t call them “death panels”…we just call them “Effective Treatment Committees”!
Posted by: Mike | August 14, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Mike, you are misunderstanding what the advisory panels are going to do. Right now, depending on what part of the country you live in, you can end up with wildly different treatments for the same illness or injury. For the first time, doctors will have the information on what has the best results. Take back pain, in some parts of the country your chances of having surgery are greater, in some areas physical therapy is the most popular. But no one knows which procedure has the best outcome. Same with meds, in some states, the latest meds are prescribed even though the older medicine has much better results with fewer side effects. It depends how aggressive the drug reps are with doctors in your area, in selling them on the idea of using the newer, more expensive drug.
So you can see how good research can lead to not only cost savings, but much better patient results quicker, with fewer negative effects.
Health insurance companies have denial of claims. That isn’t what this advisory panel is about, it is simply to give doctors general information for what treatment works best, whether for treating strep to back injury to treating high blood pressure. I don’t know about you but I assumed my doctor was receiving this information already where in reality they don’t, they just tend to treat like the doctors around them. Not the most logical way to get people better faster.
Posted by: Lydia | August 14, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Lawrence O’Donnell interviewed Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) in a devastating segment on “Hardball” on Friday, implying that the conservative congressman was a hypocrite for opposing a public option yet refusing to cut government-run health-care programs such as Medicare and Social Security.
O’Donnell repeatedly pushed the conservative Congressman to give a straight answer about what federal entitlements he would cut. Culberson refused to give a response for several minutes before finally admitting that he would have voted for Social Security and Medicare despite the fact that they are government-run health-care systems.
O’Donnell kept pressing Culberson to explain how he can defend Medicare and Social Security since they’re government-run health care programs, otherwise known as “socialism.”
Culberson, who calls himself a “Jeffersonian Republican,” said he supports Medicare and Social Security but denied that they’re socialistic.
That prompted O’Donnell to ask Culberson: “If Medicare is not socialism, why don’t we just delete the over-65 part of Medicare and make it available to everyone? What’s your argument against that?”
Again, Culberson refused to give a straight answer and complained about O’Donnell’s persistence.
O’Donnell replied: “I don’t want you to spin your time away here.”
Culberson later admitted that he would have voted for Social Security in 1935 and “probably” would have voted for Medicare in 1965.
An exasperated O’Donnell asked the Congressman: “You know that Medicare is a completely government-run health care system and yet you’re saying you would have voted for it.”
Culberson’s response: “Yes”
By the end, O’Donnell accused Culberson of hypocrisy and more:
“You lie to America about the evils of government-run health care because you people, not one of you liars about government health care is willing to repeal Medicare, to stand up and be consistent… ‘I hate government health care so I want to repeal Medicare’… That is a lie that you perpetrate every day.”
Posted by: {0|0} | August 15, 2009, 5:34 am 5:34 am
It´s amazing that men like Grassley and Isakson are folding under because of this blatant twisting of facts by Palin. Too bad that these big brave men don´t have the gumption of the Republican Senator from Alaska. The real point is that more and more people are living for a longer time and quite often the last years require a great deal of medical intervention. People have the right to know what the options are. What´s wrong with counseling? This whole hullabaloo about death committees is tragic because a stupid woman in love with her own voice came up with a false label for a potentially beneficial counseling service. But wait, this same phrase death committee could also be used for any group that lays out ALL the options for women who
find themselves pregnant. That may be what people like Palin want, keep people ignorant so they can´t make informed decisions.
Posted by: BachisBest | August 15, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
KMDay,
Yes, I am serious….when folks are spreading outright lies or hate they must be rebutted. Otherwise, they are tacitly approving. A leader takes a stand and doesn’t hide. That goes for those on the left and those on the right. Grassley is looking to appease those in his party who believe in the lies and hatred by saying nothing.
Posted by: indy_voter | August 15, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
By the end, O’Donnell accused Culberson of hypocrisy and more:
“You lie to America about the evils of government-run health care because you people, not one of you liars about government health care is willing to repeal Medicare, to stand up and be consistent… ‘I hate government health care so I want to repeal Medicare’… That is a lie that you perpetrate every day.”
***
I saw a clip online.That really was a devastating segment, and a good argument. Good on Lawrence! The inconsistency and seeming hypocrisy is pretty darned stunning.
Posted by: {0|0} | Aug 15, 2009 5:34:52 AM
Posted by: Alyson | August 15, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I think death panels can be attributed to Zeke Emanuel who had this to say just this January 2009..people between the ages of 15 and 40 should be the ones getting the best care because they will contribute more to society than the sick people under 15 and older than 40..his words…In other words, if you have a sick child with cancer under 15 and a senior over 40 with breast cancer or other cancers you are NOT a viable citizen and therefore your amount of care will be diminshed!! Zeke Emanuel is another Czar who will be determining your health care needs! Anyone listening or reading Emanuels words can and will assume that this is what is to come!
Posted by: Ross | August 15, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Good work, Lawrence O’Donnell, interviewing congressman, John Culberson, August 14th!!! Wish
you were on Hardball all the time.
Posted by: Gary Renzelman | August 15, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“I think death panels can be attributed to Zeke Emanuel …”
Nope. The evil “death panel” was conceived in Sarah Palin’s mind and delivered into this world on August 17, 2009 at 1:26pm on her Facebook page.
Posted by: WWW | August 15, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Make that August 7th, 2009.
Posted by: WWW | August 15, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm