By Nitya

Aug 19, 2009 5:16pm

White House Hopes Attacks Will “Energize” Iraqi Troops to Fight

Jake Tapper and Karen Travers report:

Responding to the wave of explosions in Iraq today, a Senior Administration official tells ABC News that the attacks – which have killed at least 75 people — “indicate the depths these opponents will go in their attempts to destabilize Iraq. The indiscriminate nature of the attacks — and the blatant killing of innocent Muslims – is disconcerting.”

The official adds that “at the same time, we believe these attacks will energize our Iraqi partners to continue their efforts to build Iraq.”

Note the spin at the end that this will energize Iraqi troops, not scare them off – not a view held by all observers of the conflict. Since the Iraqi government took control of security earlier this year, attacks have grown more frequent and more deadly.

Pushed on the question of what if these attacks don’t “energize” the Iraqis, the official said he would not get into hypotheticals. 

“We believe they have increasing capacity and will continue to work with our partners consistent with the State of Forces Agreement,” he said.

At his briefing today, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs  was asked what the attacks say about the readiness of the Iraqi security forces to take responsibility.

Gibbs said there no concerns that the Iraqis were not up to the task of keeping the peace.

“I think you've heard General Odierno talk about this in the past, and I don't believe it's changed,” Gibbs said.

“There will always be those that believe they can or should be heard only through this type of violence,” Gibbs said. “It's obvious that the vast number of Iraqis believe and want to live in peace and security,” he said. “We will continue to assist the Iraqis in securing their country until the agreements denote that it's time for us to go.”

-Jake Tapper and Karen Travers

User Comments

For now, it is right back to warring between the 2 factions, of muslims, which is part of what’s been going on for the past 6 yrs., until the us build up quieted that down.
Now its back to basics…..civil war.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | August 19, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

There are strong forces beyond Iraq who don’t want a democratic govt to succeed in that country. At least, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi no longer speak for them.

Posted by: pam | August 19, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Those darned Iraqis: not only are they insufficiently grateful for all the US military has DONE for them, they’re shirking their military duties as US puppets. BAD Iraqis, bad, BAD.
Here, let’s swat em with a uh newspaper . . .

Posted by: Bet Noir | August 19, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Whose idea was it to pull a large
contingent of US troops out of Iraq?
Oops, Obama. What did the prez think
might happen? For such an intellectual
giant, there is no apparent common
sense. I’m glad I didn’t vote for him.
Betcha you are too!

Posted by: Trajan | August 19, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Responding to the wave of explosions in Iraq today Harry Reid announced of the Iraq war:
“This war is lost.”
Wait, that was over two years ago.

Posted by: Skittles | August 19, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Heres a novel idea: Why not let them solve their own problems? Only muslims can solve muslim problems. It’s our place to go after the people who attacked us, and solve other problems later. We don’t have the men or the money to police the entire world. Oh, and Bush was the one who decided to pull troops out fo Iraq, not Obama. Either way, I support the decision. Only the Iraqis can solve Iraqi problems, anything else is just temporary.

Posted by: AnimusVir | August 19, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Another Obama failure in the making.

Posted by: windell | August 19, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

ANYONE SEEN Cindy Sheehan, the Code Pinkos, or any war protesters lately ? Shows just how phoney the anti-American left really is.

Posted by: Ron | August 19, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.