By Natalie Gewargis

Sep 3, 2009 12:03pm

Biden: Obama Will Get Specific on Health Care Priorities in Address to Congress

ABC News’ Karen Travers reports: Vice President Biden said that in his speech to Congress next week, President Obama will lay out in “understandable, clear terms” what he wants to happen in his push for healthcare reform legislation. “Stay tuned for Wednesday,” he said. Mr. Biden, speaking at The Brookings Institution in Washington, said he didn’t want to pre-empt his boss’ remarks but the prospects for successful health care reform are “high.” “We’re going to get something substantial,” the vice president said. “It’s going to be an awful lot of screaming and hollering before we get there, but I believe we’re going to get there.” Mr. Biden launched a vigorous defense of the $787 billion stimulus plan, which has drawn steady criticism from Republicans, and offered an optimistic look at how the legislation pulled the country back from the brink. “The Recovery Act has played a significant role in changing the trajectory of our economy, in changing the conversation about the economy in this country,” the vice president said. “Instead of talking about the beginning of a depression, we’re talking about the end of a recession eight months after taking office.” This Saturday marks 200 days since Mr. Obama stimulus bill was signed and Mr. Biden said that while there is much work to be done, “where we are today is a much better place than we could have possibly been without it.” The vice president said that next week the Council of Economic Advisors will release a report on the projections of jobs created and saved because of the Recovery Act. Mr. Biden said he is confident the report will show the Obama administration has exceeded its goals and will back up his prediction that the stimulus will have saved or created 150,000 jobs in the first days and another 600,000 jobs in the second 100 days. Biden laid out a progress report on the administration’s promises and said it has met or exceeded its goals on expanding care in health centers in all 50 states; funding education jobs that were at risk and hiring or keeping 500,000 law enforcement officers on the job.  - Karen Travers

User Comments

This is priceless. Obama waited FIVE MONTHS to finally divulge his demands for ObamaCare, and Axelrod says Republicans have bargained in bad faith?
Maybe Axelrod would do better to tell his boss to stop outsourcing leadership to Pelosi, Reid, & Co. and start getting to work a little sooner — perhaps in the next month or two.

Posted by: I'm not a President, but I Play One on TV | September 3, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

OMG, another commercial. Its not enough that he wants to talk to the Kindergarden, in hopes that maybe they believe what he says.

Posted by: Lizzie | September 3, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

======================================
Can someone explain why Obama is so quick to coddle Muslims but neglects his own citizens who are of a conservative persuasion?
======================================
Obama and the whole liberal Democrat echelon are in complete denial that the majority of citizen (their own constituants) strongly oppose the government run healtcare ideology
======================================

Posted by: N Waff | September 3, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

LOL… President Obama will lay out in “understandable, clear terms” what he wants to happen in his push for healthcare reform
The other night on TV i saw a clip showing Obama over & over & over again saying the prase “Let me be clear”
It is very obvious that “being clear” is something he needs serious help with.
It is nice to know that He, his VP and his administration is now ADMITTING htey were never clear on this issue in the past!

Posted by: Mike_C | September 3, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The real story here is that congress and the Whitehouse tried to push this legislation through by August 1st without public comments, debate, or even reading the legislation.
If and when we reform health care we should use a truly innovative plan. America is the most creative culture on the planet. A plan like John Mackey’s with health saving accounts is a good start.
That plan allows people to accumulate cash that is theirs to keep over a life time. Insurance is for high cost procedures. People are aware of what procedures cost and that drives down prices. Outrageous malpractice insurance costs are reduced. The cost of procedures is a direct result of that malpractice insurance going to insurance companies and lawyers (pardon my use of profanities).

Posted by: welldirected | September 3, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Worry not what you hear when he goes to Congress…Later it will be ooops! we made a mistake there ..now this is what going to really happen….We should name him the Changeling.
WE will continue to sit on our duffs and do nothing.

Posted by: Anvil | September 3, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

“Can someone explain why Obama is so quick to coddle Muslims but neglects his own citizens who are of a conservative persuasion?”
=================================
Do you really think there are no Muslims who are conservative Americans?

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

===A plan like John Mackey’s===
Isn’t this the guy from Whole Foods that is being boycotted by the left and buycotted by the right?
Odd times we are living in.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

NO Bama,
The problem lies in the fact that his ego thinks he is destined to be a WORLD LEADER
when in reality all he done is organize neighborhoods and give nice speeches full of what he thinks you what to hear but what he can’t really deliver.

Posted by: Anvil | September 3, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Unfortunately, no one of consequence trusts the President anymore. He’s lied at every turn, changed his stance and revised his history when he felt necessary, and made claims that aren’t even remotely defensible.
How is another speech going to change this?

Posted by: Emormous Skeptic | September 3, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

President Obama will lay out in “understandable, clear terms” what he wants to happen in his push for healthcare reform……………………..right because we are so stupid (for voting you in) that we must not understand the complex ways in which he thinks. So he has to dumb it down for us. Please BO just stop and leave us alone.

Posted by: 'Un-American' | September 3, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Revamp the ‘message’ all you want BOJoe. The substance of the bill is evident, that’s what we care about, and it needs a lot of work. So, keep trying to make things “crystal clear” and “understandable” and you’ll get exactly what you have put into it…nothing. Information at our fingertips is a pain, isn’t it!

Posted by: jonec1200 | September 3, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Exactly how will another arrogant, condescending, mocking, taunting speech help Obama’s credibility problem?
He always comes across as a know it all Harvard elitist chastising his dumb students.

Posted by: max | September 3, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

President Obama will throw out applause lines for Democrats to cheer.
He will take no questions or challenges to his assertions.
Afterward, Rahm, Axelrod, and Obama will point to the non-cheering Republicans as the party of “no”.
That’s what he wants to get out of this speech, in my opinion.

Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

you played the american public and tried to pull a fast one. you demonstrated you have a forked tounge. the trust is gone.

Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Obama should stick with little kids to stroke his ego.
They still believe him.

Posted by: jack | September 3, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

I concur that it is BS (as the bottom line of saved jobs will be that 750,000 teacher / police jobs would have elsewise disappeared – I don’t think so. And where are the private sector job that were supposed to be 65% of the number)
—- but Biden must be on some new medication, his sentences seem to make sense, he defends without being defensive. His famous humor is actually working in his favor and he sounds like he actually believes what he is telling the mayors and governors about transparency
Obama and his front man Gibbs on the other hand … no sense of humor, repeat constantly clarity while descending into confusion, and transparency…HAH.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Another prime time speech.
Way to shift strategies Obama!

Posted by: larry | September 3, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Obama is hoping this will give him a bump in the polls.
He’ll get many standing ovations.
Won’t have to answer questions.
He can scold the Republicans and pretend to get tough with his own party.
He’ll act all tough and cocky.
Big difference this time.
Everyone is wide awake and fully aware of Obama’s attempt to take over as much as possible in America.
Another speech won’t help this time.

Posted by: ollie | September 3, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

The address will be historic.

Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

-He always comes across as a know it all Harvard elitist chastising his dumb students.-
He already got rolled by 2 guys who went to LSU.

Posted by: Vlad | September 3, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

The address will be historic.
Like the last one.

Posted by: Hah | September 3, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I cant stand to see his face or hear his voice so I’ll just read about it later.

Posted by: JULIE | September 3, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Maybe he could explain to us why members of congress and all federal employees can buy health insurance across state lines, but the rest of us cannot.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 3, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

A fool on a fools errand.

Posted by: Bj | September 3, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

“Maybe he could explain to us why members of congress and all federal employees can buy health insurance across state lines, but the rest of us cannot.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Sep 3, 2009 1:31:12 PM
________________________
Federal employees do not buy their insurance. It is provided.
[The rest of you contribute to our coverage]

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

So why did it take Obama so long and why didn`t he come up with his plan first before this all started?
Answer: lack of experience, no ideas and no leadership as the answer?

Posted by: wilma and wanda | September 3, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Seriously,
Do all of you who treat Obama like crap really believe that George Bush would of done a better job, or for the matter John Mccain???
I am happy to have a president who is able to change in teh face of reality, someone who won’t be so stupid as to always adopt the same ideology..
The crazies are the one drooling and screeching at townhouse meetings, they probably don’t even know why they are screeching.. just a bunch of sheep is what they are… ouhh… socialists are evil.. kill them all communist!!!!
Seriously.. there is nothing communist about health care reform nor is there any need dumb the debate to ‘that is evil, you cannot do it’ for the american public.. we are better than that.. or should be anyway.

Posted by: Clockwork | September 3, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

===lack of experience, no ideas and no leadership as the answer?===
While I agree with you, expect him to lay the blame on him staying “vague” on republicans. Trying to allow those “negotiating in good faith” a chance to do so, but since they in fact did not “negotiate in good faith” he has no choice now but to lead us out of the wilderness. There will be a lot of “let me be clear” and “as I’ve always said” and “we cannot afford” and “lion of the senate” thrown in, but at the end of the night, republicans will be blamed for whatever failure the public has mistakenly attributed to Obama. And the oceans will part and lights will be placed strategically over his head so the halo can be seen.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Clockwork,
===Do all of you who treat Obama like crap really believe that George Bush would of done a better job, or for the matter John Mccain???===
Yeah.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

===The crazies are the one drooling and screeching at townhouse meetings,===
I would have placed the crazies as the ones biting off the fingertips of those opposed to Obamacare.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“So why did it take Obama so long and why didn`t he come up with his plan first before this all started?”
____________________
You certainly have a secure grasp on politics and history. yikes.
Is 8 months into a Presidency a “long time?” ….Is the healthcare reform idea President Obama’s, or could it be possible that every liberal & a few conservative presidents since the 1940′s have tried to address healthcare in a similar manner?
So, President Obama did not “come up with all of this before it all started”

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Clockwork: You are so right! Healthcare is very important so WHY didn’t Prs. Bush do something about it in the EIGHT years he was in? Oh yes he did do something about it…he sat and watched it go sky high so most people cannot afford it. This is not easy and I applaud Pres. Obama for tackling it. Healthcare reform must be done and if Congress and a lot of citizens would stop the screaming and scare tactics and reasonably sit down and discuss this in a calm manner instead of being involved in town hall screaming matches this country would be better off!

Posted by: Barb | September 3, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

===Is 8 months into a Presidency a “long time?” ===
It was certainly a long time when Bush was hit with 9/11.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Axley: You gave a sarcastic remark to Clockwork “yeah” that you believed Bush would have done a better job.
THEN WHY DIDN’T HE????????? He did NOTHING about healthcare!
Do you actually see what you wrote?

Posted by: Barb | September 3, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

===Do you actually see what you wrote?===
Yeah.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

See this is why our country is in such a mess…People like Axey…they don’t give reasonable posts, just keep attacking the president. This is an AMERICAN problem not a political one and we should all be discussing this calmly and reasonably not with crazy idiotic remarks.

Posted by: Barb | September 3, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Barb
If I may veer off a minute.
Sad as it is, you have to admit: Watching all those toothless fools yell against their own self-interest helps support the move for higher education.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

-See this is why our country is in such a mess-
Why don’t you take care of yourself instead of wanting everyone else to pay for it? That’s the problem. I remember what Obama said about the Post Office vs. FedEx. Why should healthcare be any different? Stop spending money on ring tones and ring dings and buy your own insurance.

Posted by: Stu | September 3, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Barack Obama, early in his Presidential campaign, did not push universal health care as forcefully as his rivals did. (His position on health care was several notches more centrist than it had been earlier in his career, no doubt because he was aware of the issue’s sixty-year history of drawing relentless and successful Republican attacks.)

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Barb,
While I appreciate that you think people like me have more power than people like you, I will just note that democrats control Washington. If they want Obamacare, I, and those like me, can’t stop them.
I will also point out that if I had answered you and the other poster with more than one word, you would still be claiming I’m hating on the president.
I could have noted that under Bush, seniors now have prescription medicine. Under Bush, more monies were directed towards Aids than any other president. Under Bush, Massachusetts was granted a waiver to use federal monies for their universal healthcare plan. Under Bush, federal money was doubled towards community healthcare clinics.
I wouldn’t have to tell you all of that if our esteemed media did its job.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

By 1965 Congress and the public were far more amenable to liberal reforms.
Medicare was passed. The first law putting substantial federal money into needy local schools passed at around the same time, and for the same reasons. So did the first tough civil-rights law since Reconstruction.
Healthcare reform is next.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Axey – very good points. You have to realize that Barb gets all of her information from the Comedy channel.

Posted by: welldirected | September 3, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

===Axey – very good points.===
Thank you. I didn’t mention tort reform. Or Bush’s willingness to sit down at the table with all sides to discuss the looming bankruptcy of social security. I didn’t mention the standing ovation that democrats gave us when Bush noted during a SOTU speech that he tried and failed on SS reform. That too was an American problem not a political one, but the left cheered themselves anyway. I commented at the time that the video of that standing O would come back and haunt them when SS does its belly flop. I believe Obama said it would happen in around 7 years, if his massive overhaul of healthcare wasn’t rammed through by the first of August.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“could have noted that under Bush, seniors now have prescription medicine. Under Bush, more monies were directed towards Aids than any other president. Under Bush, Massachusetts was granted a waiver to use federal monies for their universal healthcare plan. Under Bush, federal money was doubled towards community healthcare clinics.
I wouldn’t have to tell you all of that if our esteemed media did its job.”
Posted by: Axey | Sep 3, 2009 2:37:35 PM
___________________________
Ah, which piece of propoganda do I start with?
on funds for AIDS…
Mr. Bush proposed increasing the funding for fighting AIDS inside the U.S. by 7% from 2003, to $16 billion. These actions were welcomed.
BUT…
While encouraged by both this actions, skepticism about the motives behind the actions. As it turned out – the Brookings Institute had shown that the funding for AIDS in Africa has come in part due to cuts in other existing African child-health aid programs. “…This is because the Administration’s increase of $450 million for the Global AIDS initiative is offset by a $470 million shortfall in its Child Survival and Health request relative to the fiscal 2003 appropriations bill….”

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

It is remarkable the anger and self-pity of our victorious progressive generation that they must deal with “toothless fools” and “scare tactics”
Who is acting irrationally, who is seeking to cut off debate, who are the spoiled children who becoming the school class council are crying when they can’t get the cookies and ice cream lunch nor can they outlaw homework.
Grow up and try to convince Middle America with real, affordable solutions that give them the power, the choices.
We already know the sad stories – many have LIVED them – we just don’t believe your fairy tale of BIG BROTHER will give it to us for free and tax savings to boot.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

===Ah, which piece of propoganda [sic] do I start with?===
See? My one word worked just as well.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

“I could have noted that under Bush, seniors now have prescription medicine.”
_______________
True, BUT
..this maneuver helped funnel government funds to the pharmaceutical industry.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

===True, BUT===
So predictable. Which is why I answer with “yeah”.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

-True, BUT
..this maneuver helped funnel government funds to the pharmaceutical industry.-
I’ll take the money and whip up stuff in my basement! Where do you think drugs come from? I’m guessing you buy nothing made by a corportaion or company, right?

Posted by: Sawbonz | September 3, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Under Bush, Funds to Community Health Care Clinic were increased, BUT
Community Health Care Clinics became busier because of the recession and cuts at other social service agencies.
So, the ‘increase’ of funding did not consider the increase in demand.
Oh, those sneaky Bushies.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I wouldn’t have to tell you all of that if our esteemed media did its job.
Posted by: Axey | Sep 3, 2009 2:37:35 PM
____________________
some believe Fox News and conservative radio are doing a great job inciting energy into their marginalized followers.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Bush’s False Claims About Children’s Health Insurance
September 21, 2007
“The president mischaracterizes congressional efforts to expand the SCHIP program.
President Bush gave a false description of proposed legislation to expand the 10-year-old federal program to provide health insurance for children in low-income working families.
He said it “would result” in covering children in families with incomes up to $83,000 per year, which isn’t true. The Urban Institute estimated that 70 percent of children who would gain coverage are in families earning half that amount, and the bill contains no requirement for setting income eligibility caps any higher than what’s in the current law. (The compromise bill that was released a few days after Bush’s press conference does rescind an administration effort to block New York state from increasing its eligibility cap to that level.)
He also said the program was “meant to help poor children,” when in fact Congress stated that it was meant to expand insurance coverage beyond the poor and to cover millions of “low-income” children who were well above the poverty line. Under current law most states cover children at twice or even three times the official poverty level.
The president also says Congress’ expansion is a step toward government-run health care for all. It’s true that some children and families with private insurance are expected to shift to the government program. But the Congressional Budget Office estimates that such a shift is relatively low considering the number of uninsured these bills would reach.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

California authorities say a clash between opponents and supporters of health care reform ended with one man biting off another man’s finger.
Ventura County Sheriff’s Capt. Frank O’Hanlon says about 100 people demonstrating in favor of health care reforms rallied Wednesday night on a street corner. One protester walked across the street to confront about 25 counter-demonstrators.
O’Hanlon says the man got into an argument and fist fight, during which he bit off the left pinky of a 65-year-old man who opposed health care reform.

Posted by: Yes We Cannibal | September 3, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

yell against their own self-interest
===========
Who is a better determiner of someone’s self interest than his own self?

Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

AMA: “Insurers denied coverage to 12.6 million nonelderly adults in 2007 due to preexisting conditions.”

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

O’Hanlon says the man got into an argument and fist fight, during which he bit off the left pinky of a 65-year-old man who opposed health care reform.
Posted by: Yes We Cannibal | Sep 3, 2009 3:30:43 PM
In a world of toothless fools, a toothed man gets extra protein.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

O’Hanlon says the man got into an argument and fist fight, during which he bit off the left pinky of a 65-year-old man who opposed health care reform.
Posted by: Yes We Cannibal | Sep 3, 2009 3:30:43 PM
_________________
Mike Tyson comes to mind. Perhaps the GOP could enlist him.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Who is a better determiner of someone’s self interest than his own self?
Posted by: MayBee | Sep 3, 2009 3:35:08 PM
______________________
…and who better to against their own interests, someone cajoled and manipulated?

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

-Who is a better determiner of someone’s self interest than his own self?-
Obviously a federal bureaucracy!

Posted by: Moar | September 3, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

O’Hanlon says the man got into an argument and fist fight, during which he bit off the left pinky of a 65-year-old man who opposed health care reform.
Posted by: Yes We Cannibal | Sep 3, 2009 3:30:43 PM
________________
Perhaps the GOP could enlist him.
Posted by: gus amaral | Sep 3, 2009
He’s a DEM, Gus, a dim DEM but a DEM.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

===He’s a DEM, Gus, a dim DEM but a DEM.===
To be fair, the MSM is not reporting him as being a democrat. Unless I missed it. For all we know, he could be a republican that supports Obamacare and likes pinkie fingers.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

===”Insurers denied coverage to 12.6 million nonelderly adults in 2007 due to preexisting conditions.”===
I know I’m looking forward to this portion of the bill passing. I will drop my healthcare and wait until I need it before I spend anymore of my money on it. I just hope they expand this to include homeowner’s insurance. How awesome would that be if I didn’t have to pay for homeowner’s insurance until my house burned down?

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

“Mr. Biden said he is confident the report will show the Obama administration has exceeded its goals and will back up his prediction that the stimulus will have…”
Blah, blah, blah.
“Unemployment benefits are expected to run out by the end of the year for more than 1.3 million Americans unless Congress or individual states authorize another extension.” – AP

Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 3, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

…and who better to against their own interests, someone cajoled and manipulated?
=============
Indeed.
So, let’s say person A has good insurance, lots of savings, and a relatively high income.
Should he support Obama’s health care “reforms” if it will raise his taxes? Would that be against his self-interest?

Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

===”Insurers denied coverage to 12.6 million nonelderly adults in 2007 due to preexisting conditions.”===
I know I’m looking forward to this portion of the bill passing. I will drop my healthcare and wait until I need it before I spend anymore of my money on it….Posted by: Axey | Sep 3, 2009 4:00:27 PM
And Axey, to be fair to our poor Gus on this count – there should be high risk pools available nationwide.
But there either must be mandates or in the private sphere, the preexisting “punishment” for not having coverage. They should get under “bridging” coverage like COBRA. Waivers could be allowed for minors reaching adult, if they were covered under some other plan as child, and those incompetent to obtain coverage for themselves.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

The people no longer trust this president. It is not possible to believe what he says. He has reached the point where people hear him but don’t really listen to him.
Seven months ago the nation was united in Hope. Obama has squandered that unity.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 3, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

“Mr. Biden said he is confident the report will show the Obama administration has exceeded its goals and will back up his prediction that the stimulus will have…”
Blah, blah, blah.
“Unemployment benefits are expected to run out by the end of the year for more than 1.3 million Americans unless Congress or individual states authorize another extension.” – AP
Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | Sep 3, 2009 4:06:32 PM
P.S. Unemployment rose to 9.5% in August, and an additional 298,000 jobs were lost. Timely comments, Joe!
Yes, by all means, lets hand over absolute control over one sixth of the US economy to the dolts who gave us the Stimulus Clunker.

Posted by: "Baghdad Bob" Gibbs | September 3, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

===And Axey, to be fair to our poor Gus on this count – there should be high risk pools available nationwide. ===
Why? People take calculated risks that they would rather have a new car, new boat, cell phone, internet, computer, game boy, Juicy and A&F. Meanwhile, I’m driving an 8 year old car, never got the boat, have a cell phone, internet and computer, but I pay for my own health insurance. But then, I’m also one of the idiots that paid off my home early. Oh well…next lifetime, I swear I’m gonna be a liberal.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Did no one ever play the game of “Life”? They may have already done this, I haven’t played the game in years and years, but if they haven’t, and if they were to remake the game, they would have to include the option of not purchasing health insurance until you land on the square that would make it useful to have. No one would ever win the game.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“Oh well…next lifetime, I swear I’m gonna be a liberal.”
——————————
You think liberals have not paid their mortages like you. You’re an arrogant idiot.

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

“they would have to include the option of not purchasing health insurance until you land on the square”
—————————-
Again, a wrong interpretation. The intention is to get it so that insurance is paid, and people are covered.
You seem to gloat about the fact you have coverage. Nice quality of character you have there.

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

===You think liberals have not paid their mortages like you.===
No. Not all fools are liberals. It just seems to me liberals have an easier time excusing their behavior than I, as a conservative, would.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

=== Nice quality of character you have there.===
The liberal here gloating about me, and you, providing him his insurance would probably be the quality of character you prefer, no?

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

The remnants of the fanatical Republican right live in such a bubble of lies and unreality, they claim liberals don’t pay their mortgages or have health insurance.
Out to lunch.

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

===The remnants of the fanatical Republican right===
Which also happen to be strong enough to prevent Obamacare from passing in a democratically controlled congress with the most hope and changey president evah from the same party!

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

===The remnants of the fanatical Republican right===
Which also happen to be strong enough to prevent Obamacare from passing in a democratically controlled congress with the most hope and changey president evah from the same party!
—————————————
The remnants of the fanatical Republican right live in a bubble of lies and unreality – and hate and delusion. Health reform will PASS.

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

===Health reform will PASS.===
Probably. In fact, it could already be passed if democrats weren’t blocking it.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

The great thing is that health reform will PASS.
Then the anti-Obama screamers and insulters will have to move on to another issue to hate.
Don’t worry, he’ll take his children out for ice cream again sometime and you can attack him again for that.

Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Don’t worry. Be happy.
Democrats control the Senate, the House and the Presidency. No check and balance there !
It’s a wonder health care, cap and trade and card check haven’t passed, the war ended and all the troops home by Christmas, the recession is over, the elimination of all nuclear weapons and the whole world likes us now and is cooperating on global climate change.
Wow. Now if only all Dems agreed…
No need to ask Reps for any opinion on any subject.
Oh, and put Cheney and Bush and those who helped them in jail.

Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

“The great thing is that health reform will PASS.
Then the anti-Obama screamers and insulters will have to move on to another issue to hate.
Don’t worry, he’ll take his children out for ice cream again sometime and you can attack him again for that.”
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 3, 2009 4:48:39 PM
You need to direct your uncontrolled RAGE at the villainous, immoral Blue Dog Democrats who are stopping ObamaCare. On filibuster-proof Capitol Hill, the GOP can’t stop anything.

Posted by: Health Czar | September 3, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Bankruptcies due to medical bills increased by nearly 50 percent in a six-year period, from 46 percent in 2001 to 62 percent in 2007, and most of those who filed for bankruptcy were middle-class, well-educated homeowners, according to a report that will be published in the August issue of The American Journal of Medicine.
“Unless you’re a Warren Buffett or Bill Gates, you’re one illness away from financial ruin in this country,” says lead author Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., of the Harvard Medical School, in Cambridge, Mass. “If an illness is long enough and expensive enough, private insurance offers very little protection against medical bankruptcy, and that’s the major finding in our study.”

Posted by: gus amaral | September 3, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

so WHY didn’t Prs. Bush do something about it in the EIGHT years he was in?Posted by: Barb | Sep 3, 2009 2:22:41 PM
Because his was free and he liked the plan he was on.

Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 3, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Then the anti-Obama screamers and insulters will have to move on to another issue to hate.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 3, 2009 4:48:39 PM
Yes We Will!
(Trying Axey’s approach although I couldn’t seem to get it down to one word.)

Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 3, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Steffie Woolhandler is a lifelong radical
– just saying this is a not a study by establishment medical authorities suddenly seeing the light.
- its a survey specifically designed by progressive hacks to get the results desired.

Posted by: robertb | September 3, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

===Ah, which piece of propoganda [sic] do I start with?===
See? My one word worked just as well.
Posted by: Axey | Sep 3, 2009 3:05:39 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The word sic may be used to show that an uncommon or archaic usage is reported faithfully.
Often used to highlight an error, (sometimes for the purpose of ridicule)sic has been misidentified as an abbreviation for “said in context”, “spelled in context”, “said in copy”, “spelling incorrect” and other phrases.

Posted by: wordsmith | September 3, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

In August a group of 60 Democratic lawmakers wrote to the president to say they would vote AGAINST any healthcare bill that excluded the public insurance option on which Mr Obama had campaigned.

Posted by: Pete PUMA | September 3, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

===Posted by: wordsmith | Sep 3, 2009 5:52:50 PM===
LOL. I would like to nominate your post as best of the day.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Ok, the new version may be understandable but will it be believable? The last one wasn’t!

Posted by: JK | September 3, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Wonderful news. Obama’s Green Czar is a truther! Yeah, just reasonable centrists are running this administration.

Posted by: BH | September 3, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

The word sic may be used to show that an uncommon or archaic usage is reported faithfully.
Often used to highlight an error, (sometimes for the purpose of ridicule)sic has been misidentified as an abbreviation for “said in context”, “spelled in context”, “said in copy”, “spelling incorrect” and other phrases. – from Wikipedia
————
so; thus: usually written parenthetically to denote that a word, phrase, passage, etc., that may appear strange or incorrect has been written intentionally or has been quoted verbatim: He signed his name as e. e. cummings (sic). – Random House Dictionary
————–
Thus; so. Used to indicate that a quoted passage, especially one containing an error or unconventional spelling, has been retained in its original form or written intentionally. – American Heritage Dictionary
————–
Random House and American Heritage dictionaries trump a Wikipedia entry.

Posted by: Pitt Knicker | September 3, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Pitt Knicker,
I must admit, sad as it is, that I was indeed pointing out a misspelling. Mainly because as a toothless person I was joining in the support of the move for higher education that Gus was pushing earlier today.

Posted by: Axey | September 3, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Ok, so he is going to be specific on what he wants done. How about he be specific on exactly how he is going to do it and how it will be run. Who will run it? How it will be paid for?
This time he needs to put forth a concise picture not the obscure crap of this committee will do this..this committee will do that..You can keep your current insurance, oh no 1st it has to meet certain criteria..What criteria?? How much is reasonable to pay for insurance? If we are forced to get health insurance per current bill or pay a penalty, who sets the price as to what is reasonable? Does it go by our income or what?
We deserve to have the truth of this bill set before us. We deserve to be told specifics. We are smart people, we can read and understand. We are not children that need our hand held and we do not need to be told how to run our lives. Especially by those who can’t seem to tell us anything but generalizations about how this should work. Tell us how it will work then maybe we can support it.

Posted by: CJ Dean | September 3, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

This is the reality of electing Barack Obama.He has overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress,but he doesn’t have the political skills to get this through.It should be apparent that Mr. Obama is not calling the shots,nor has he since the inauguration.The entire agenda has been crafted by Pelosi,Reid and congressional Democrats;nobody in the White House is doing any heavy lifting.Mr. Obama’s solution to everything is to make a speech-apparently it is all he is capable of doing.Despite the campaign, when it comes to the major issues of his Presidency( ie, the economy and defense) he is so devoid of imagination that he reappoints the previous administration’s team.He is clueless in Afghanistan-there is no defined goal,there is no clearly defined strategy,there is a complete lack of historical perspective.Of course, the excuse is “George Bush did this” or “It’s George Bush’s fault” or “we were given a terrible situation”.I am tired of the excuses.This gentleman has less experience as an executive than your average 7-11 managerand it shows.

Posted by: Nephron | September 3, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

35 million on food stamps,more than 6 million unemployed and God knows how many working multiple part time jobs tells me that business is not reinvesting. While we fight about healthcare our President and our politicians have taken their focus off what should be our number 1 priority. With quality jobs people then can buy their own insurance.

Posted by: david | September 3, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I agree with the CBC. President Obama must NOT compromise. President George W. Bush did not compromise when he sent troops to attack Iraq. President Bush was bold. And the Republicans were happy. Now is up to you President Obama. You are in the White House and we elected you. You must be bold and next week tell us that you support the public option. Otherwise, you are out of my picture.

Posted by: francis | September 3, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I am sure obama will be as “specific” as a blank check. The people have been specific and the word is “no”. Google it, maybe on a blackberry.

Posted by: Reflect09 | September 3, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Posted by: julieterra | Sep 3, 2009 9:43:53 PM
At what point will you admit the Obama “stimulus” plan didn’t work and was ineffective in solving the problem? How bad would the economy have to get?

Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

The President and the Democrats need to stop trying allow the Republicans to be a part of this. Frankly, they have been given too many chances already and their votes are not needed.

Posted by: auntiedancer | September 3, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Posted by: auntiedancer | Sep 3, 2009 10:51:42 PM
The ONLY reason they are talking to Reps is too many Dems won’t vote for it either.
If they had the votes, it would have already been passed in Aug.
Dems by themselves have large enough majorities to pass anything.

Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Biden saying that Obama will speak in “understandable, clear terms” is pretty much an admission that Obama has up to now been speaking in gibberish.
But anyone who’s been paying attention knew that already. The challenge for Obama is to show that he can speak in any other way. Not holding my breath.

Posted by: PD | September 3, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Mr. Obama lacks a lot of leadership.

Posted by: young_voter | September 3, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Mr. Obama lacks ANY leadership, at least on this topic.

Posted by: Nephron | September 3, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Health care is not important. What is important are jobs. People are in dire need, and all the Obama administration is doing is talking health care.
What people NEED is jobs. No one is going to save themselves from financial ruin, if this government doesn’t start doing something about jobs, and bringing manufacturing back to this country.
I am convinced, there isn’t anyone in Washington, who has any real ability to tackle the problems in this country……and I am positive, they have no concept of priorization.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 4, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

YA Right… more lies….King BO is going to give us a line of BS… there will be NO SPECIFIC’s…. It will only very broad general statements….. so matter what the Congress passes he can claim victory….

Posted by: reprovemedia | September 4, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

The recent jump of the jobless rate to 9.7% is a strong indication of the failure of the stimulus spending initiated and controlled by the politicians such as Biden, who has very little knowledge of business, engineering technology. What they have achieved is mostly road pavement and other minor tasks which is supposed to be covered by local government using the local tax money.

Posted by: austin | September 4, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

When all is said and done, history will record that Obama saved capitalism from itself.
Jerk.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 4, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Granted the Obama administration is saner than its political opposition. But that doesn’t warrant the pronouncement they have saved capitalism. Rather, this administration seems willing to bend the American people over and let the capitalists give it to them up the kazoo.

Posted by: steven c wilson | September 6, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.