The Note: Buzz Factor: Does Obama Have Something New to Say?
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: It's only overexposure if something's exposed that the White House would rather wasn't.
And it's only ubiquity if there's just enough revealed to hold our collective interest.
A president who's everywhere hasn't been much of anywhere when it comes to the biggest/only item on his domestic agenda.
Thursday's rally in College Park, Md., barely broke through — lost in a missile-defense flurry that seemed to surprise some US allies almost as much as it did the White House press corps.
On health care, President Obama has been letting Congress drive the bus this week — specifically, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who's been driving alone. (Though just maybe using a White House map.)
Now comes President Obama's latest big moment — except it's really three or four days' worth of moments. Those Sunday interviews take place Friday afternoon — look for a first glimpse of George Stephanopoulos' interview on his blog Friday, and on ABC's "World News."
It's the president's chance (as if heeded to create them) to say his piece — over and over, and over and over, and over and over.
It's not a bad time to say something new. (And to try something new, with First Lady Michelle Obama talking health care at 11 am ET.)
Buzz alone doesn't change Senate math: "Even by the norms of his ubiquity, Mr. Obama has been on an especially prodigious media binge lately, pitching his health care plan seemingly everywhere but the Food Channel and Fox News," Mark Leibovich writes in The New York Times. "One senior White House aide, speaking about media strategy only on condition of anonymity, cited a ‘buzz factor,' saying that by completing a feat unprecedented for a president, Mr. Obama would draw even more attention to his message. ‘Doing five becomes a story in itself,' the aide said."
"Clearly, the White House has made its choice. Obama will hit the airwaves whenever he can, as often as he can, in as many formats as he can, any time he's got something to sell. Which is pretty much all the time," The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz writes. "But here's the wrinkle. Obama may want to drive a message on Sunday about health care reform and how the economy is turning around. The hosts, however, can ask about whatever they want."
Any number of topics, surely, are better than the current story:
Starting with … the new bipartisanship? The Senate bill might get the vote of "every Democrat and perhaps Olympia Snowe," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., per ABC's Z. Byron Wolf.
"I believe he'll get Snowe and he could get Collins and he might get three or four others," former President Bill Clinton tells Bloomberg's Patrick Cole and Thomas R. Keene. "If they believe a bill is going to pass, some of them will vote for it."
The Baucus bill, for all its faults and critics, still looks like the vehicle.
"Perhaps some of the fire aimed at Baucus should be redirected at the president," Slate's John Dickerson suggests. "It also moves a stalled process forward, which also delights White House aides anxious to make a deal and move on. Now that all the pieces of legislation are on the table, the president can start building support for a final piece of legislation."
An even bigger table: "After months when health care negotiations in the Senate were confined largely to Baucus meeting privately with five other Finance Committee senators to try to craft a bipartisan deal — ultimately without success — the dynamic was noticeably altered Thursday, a day after Baucus produced his long-awaited bill," the AP's Erica Werner reports. "Many more senators were in the mix, and many of them had something to say."
"The trick is to maintain the fiscal balance — lowering the deficit over time — that may be the Baucus bill's greatest selling point, as Democratic House and Senate leaders begin the arduous task of fusing five legislative efforts into a single final bill," Shailagh Murray and Lori Montgomery report in The Washington Post.
"The White House tried — and failed — Thursday to cool fierce Republican opposition to its health care overhaul by announcing a $25 million preliminary program aimed at eventually revamping the nation's controversial medical-malpractice legal system," McClatchy's David Lightman reports.
Is there an app for this? "Imagine the debate over health care legislation on Capitol Hill as a tussle among three friends out for dinner," Noam M. Levey writes in the Los Angeles Times. "All three have been struggling to pay their bills lately. When the check arrives, they try to figure out how to divide it. The problem is no one can really afford the meal. And if one manages to pay less, the other two will go home even deeper in the hole."
Will this turn down the heat? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who knew Harvey Milk and George Moscone, choked up thinking about the prospects of speech turning into political violence: "I have concerns about some of the language that is being used because I saw — I saw this myself in the late '70s in San Francisco, this kind of — of rhetoric was very frightening and it gave — it created a climate in which we — violence took place," said Pelosi, D-Calif.
Said NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions, R-Texas: "No longer content with criticizing concerned citizens for being 'un-American,' the Speaker is now likening genuine opposition to assassination."
And Rahm Emanuel's ceasefire ends: Change Congress has a new ad up targeting Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., a leader of the "Blue Dogs" in the House, over his opposition to the public option. (Featuring Keith Olbermann, in more than a cameo, and narrated by Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig.)
What the president would like to turn around: "Everywhere you turn lately conservatives are winning the public debate," Politico's Martin Kady II writes at "The Huddle." "ACORN? De-funded. Van Jones? Long gone. The public option? On life support. Cap and trade? Punted to next year. Joe Wilson, sanctioned by the House, is a hero back home."
Caking in perceptions: "What we are seeing is an electorate growing just as disgusted with the Democratic majority as it did with the Republican one in 2006," Charlie Cook writes for National Journal. "Sure, November 2010 is a long way off, and the economy may well be substantially better by then. But Democratic lawmakers, who must face the voters two years before Obama does, should remember that the public's attitudes tend to eventually harden. Think cement."
Getting to 60: "House lawmakers approved legislation last night that gives Governor Deval Patrick the power to appoint a temporary successor to the late Edward M. Kennedy in the US Senate, putting Massachusetts on track to have a new senator in place by next week," Matt Viser reports in The Boston Globe. "The legislation now goes to the Senate, where top lawmakers believe they have enough votes for it to pass, presuming some supporters do not get cold feet. Republicans, however, vow to use parliamentary maneuvers to stall final passage for as long as possible."
In the race to fill the rest of the term — Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass., is up with the first ad, laying claim to the Kennedy legacy. "Only one candidate stood with Ted Kennedy against Bush's Iraq war and mirrors his progressive record," the ad says, per Greg Sargent's "Plum Line" blog.
ABC's Jonathan Karl tracks more airports to nowhere: "Welcome to the Greenbrier Valley Airport, gateway to the posh Greenbrier resort, a place where rooms start a 500 bucks a night," Karl reported on "Good Morning America" Friday. "The airport is about to get more than $2 million in stimulus funds to spruce up the terminal building. There are only two commercial flights a day like this one here at the Greenbrier Airport, and on average each of those planes only has about three to nine passengers."
Karl reports: "The Senate [Thursday] rejected a measure to strip $1.4 million in federal funding for the John Murtha Airport in Johnstown, Pennsylvania."
One of those other topics that just may get covered Sunday:
"President Barack Obama's decision to drop plans to deploy a ballistic-missile defense shield in Central Europe — drawing immediate cheers in Moscow and criticism elsewhere — is a gamble by the U.S. that scaling back its defense ambitions will improve security in the long run," Mark Champion and Peter Spiegel write in The Wall Street Journal. "The U.S. about-face was a major diplomatic coup for Moscow, which has fiercely opposed the previous plan to put a battery of 10 ballistic missile interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic."
"The Obama administration is not abandoning missile defense in Europe, but it is junking the previous administration's view of the missile threat posed by Iran and what that means for Europe," the AP's Robert Burns reports.
"Officials say a new threat assessment suggests that the Iranian missile threat to Europe is focused more on short and medium range missiles rather than from long-range missiles currently under development," ABC's Luis Martinez, Martha Raddatz, and Ann Compton report.
Vice President Joe Biden: "I am less concerned — much less concerned — about the Iranian potential. They have no potential at this moment, they have no capacity to launch a missile at the United States of America," Biden told CNN, per ABC's Jake Tapper.
But: "Iran experts at the U.N.'s nuclear monitoring agency believe that Tehran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and worked on developing a missile system that can carry an atomic warhead, according to a confidential report seen by The Associated Press."
Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., (who supports the president's move) on ABCNews.com's "Top Line" Thursday: "We heard about how this administration was going to be so much more adept at handling diplomacy, but it turns out in one of the first major diplomatic actions that they've taken they just didn't handle it well at all. You just don't say to two countries who have stood up and said we're willing to do this, after considerable cajoling from us, that you're going to walk away from them and give them. . . 12 hours' notice."
The Wall Street Journal editorial: "President Obama promised he would win America friends where, under George W. Bush, it had antagonists. The reality is that the U.S. is working hard to create antagonists where it previously had friends."
ABC's George Stephanopoulos: "The big question: will Obama's decision in advance of next week's G-20 Summit and the October 1st start of nuclear talks including Iran make the Russians more open to tough sanctions against the Iranians? If so, conservative criticism is a small price to pay. If not, you ain't seen nothing yet."
Making the Iranian issue more interesting: "Courting renewed international criticism, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran on Friday called the Holocaust a myth as his country marked an annual pro-Palestinian demonstration amid reports of clashes between his supporters and opposition protesters," reports The New York Times' Alan Cowell.
First Lady Michelle Obama is doing health care, fruits and vegetables, and the Olympics: "A top White House adviser said first lady Michelle Obama is planning to make a dramatic presentation when she offers the closing argument for the bid by her hometown of Chicago to win the 2016 Summer Olympics," Bloomberg's John McCormick reports.
"There won't be a dry eye in the room," said Valerie Jarrett, who plans to travel with the first lady to Copenhagen for the Oct. 2 International Olympic Committee vote. "I'm sure that it will touch the hearts of each of the IOC members."
ACORN falls, again: "Key House Republicans say that the end of federal funds for ACORN is nearing after the lower chamber voted overwhelmingly to cut off taxpayer dollars currently sent to the controversial nationwide community organization," The Hill's Molly K. Hooper and Walter Alarkon report.
(And now making its way into a GOP primary . . . Refresh Drudge until you see the ad with Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, with the question, "Got ACORN?")
Starting Friday in Washington: Value Voters Summit 2009. Speakers include former Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass.; Gov. Tim Pawlenty, R-Minn.; former Gov. Mike Huckabee, R-Ark.; former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa.; Bill O'Reilly; Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council; Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind.; Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va.; and Carrie Prejean. Plus: a "National Health Care Townhall."
But: "Nearly 2,000 social conservative activists from 49 states gather for a Values Voters Summit in Washington Friday and Saturday, but movement favorites former Gov. Sarah Palin and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich will not be addressing the throng," Ralph Z. Hallow reports in the Washington Times. (Palin and Gingrich will be on the straw poll ballot, though Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, asked to be removed.)
Other Newt news: "Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is launching ‘The Americano,' a bilingual Web site to counter the liberal Internet sites on ‘all issues that concern American Hispanics today,' " Hallow reports.
The T-Paw shift? "He just moved to block ACORN funding in Minnesota. Last week, he called fears over so-called death panels ‘legitimate' and ‘not irrational,' and floated the notion that asserting states' rights under the 10th Amendment might be a ‘viable option' to block federal health reform," Rachel E. Stassen-Berger writes in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. "All are recent pronouncements from Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, and all suggest a distinct shift of tone to the right."
The Kicker:
"Yay for vegetables!" — First Lady Michelle Obama, welcoming the new farmer's market a block away from the White House.
"We'll have Elmo give Chuck a special briefing…. Elmo knows how to sneeze." — HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, after NBC's Chuck Todd sneezed into his hand — not his sleeve.
For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note's blog . . . all day every day:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Obama wants to be liked by everyone
so he can’t be too direct on what he
wants or how he gets there. That is
why he voted “present” so many times
when in the Ill.legislature. No leadership qualities. Ok for student
council president but not for the leader
of the free world.He is a big disappointment.
Posted by: wis134 | September 18, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The president needs his big slate of media appearances to fully explain to the public where reform stands now and what the conflicting responses to the Baucus plan they’ve been hearing really mean. This weekend will be invaluable to the president and the White House in soothing the public and solidifying the gains already made in the polls on health care.
Posted by: matt | September 18, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Klein, let me give you a hint. When playing the card game – spades, you typically take into account what’s in your hand, right? So knowing what’s in your hand, you have guestimate your challenger’s hand. Strategical genius applies when you’ve forced the hand of your opponent and you have no joker’s to play. The Repub’s have been out spaded; no pun intended, just keep watching.
Posted by: Coherent1 | September 18, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Unfortunately Matt the President will only talk circle around the issues just like he always has and probably always will. As POTUS he should concentrate more on getting the job done and sticking to his campaign promises than giving meaningless interviews at an unprecedented rate. I predict he’ll hit the talk show circuit immediately after he looses in 2012. Soon after that he’ll appear on “Worlds Dumbest Criminals” with all the other D list celebs.
Posted by: unclewolf1 | September 18, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
wis134: Great observation! The current role of our President in the Health Care discussion could be described by a single word: “present”.
Posted by: H1N!Hysteria | September 18, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
There is nothing new, really.
There is only 2 ways to go. Either national health care for everyone (except the 12 million illegal immigrants), or a private system of free choice.
Nothing else is truly workable.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 18, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
He says the same thing over and over and over, without really outlining any plan. People are sick of the rhetoric….put it on paper, let us look at it, then we will decide. Until then…he needs to stop talking….we’ve heard it already.
Posted by: bo | September 18, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
He’d get a lot further if he defied senior Democrats in congress and called for provisions that would prevent those in the U.S. illegally from getting any kind of gov’t healthcare–instead of just lying that those provisions are already part of the plan.
This is no small matter, providing illegal immigrants with free health care is a guaranteed path to financial disaster.
Posted by: FAST FRANKIE | September 18, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
There is a video interview on the front page of the New York Times website, everybody interested in the healthcare reform debate should watch. Take a good look at Olympia Snowe: she is what the Republican Party USED to look like. She, at least, is trying to tackle the healthcare mess, she is not an obstructionist. I am a Democrat, I didn’t vote for Snowe in the last election, but I’ve got to say, if McCain had chosen her instead of Palin as VP, I would at least have repect for him today.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
obama can hold an audience – he speaks their language. people listen and understand what he is saying. This will only push health care reform ahead. When republicans speak – people turn of the tv or leave the room. No one in what is left of the republican party – can duplicate his efforts. all they can do is say no and not offer any alternatives. republicans really don’t care about anything except to defeat obama -
Posted by: cjr | September 18, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
CJR remember your words when you see the 20 TRILLION dollar bill for Obamas out of control spending. No, do not blame it on the past administration. Congress was controled by the dems his last two years and they did all they could to make him look bad so the dems could have a shot at the white house. Guess what? you got it and now its in a mess because the village organizer hires dumb tax cheats and racists to run it.
Posted by: Jim Rod | September 18, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Republican Party – the party of nein, nein, nein!
Posted by: Jay | September 18, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Baucus’ plan calls for $8,000-$13,000 premiums for all individuals and families. I don’t pay that now why would I want to raise my premiums and get government insurance? And they are going to fine me $3800 if I don’t buy insurance. And they want to take it out of my paycheck mandatorally.
Looks like a loser to me.
Posted by: FEELINGTOGETHERNESSS | September 18, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Obama keeps repeating the same lines that when studies turn out to hurt his case, not bolster it.
the “fired up, ready to go” story and the councilwoman in Greenwood SC is old and tired. if anything it does more to make the opposition fired up and ready to go defeat Pelosicare.
Posted by: scott jeffries | September 18, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Get the President off the air. This narcissist hogs the airwaves for the sole purpose of boosting his own ego and control.
Posted by: ConstantXI | September 18, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
haven’t people realized yet that obama’s #1 priority with the health
bill(s) is to have his name on SOMETHING…ANYTHING? nowadays, the game is, pass a bill, claim it’s the greatest thing ever for the middle class, pat yourself on the back, and then if it proves a disaster, simply blame the other side for it not working. politics is no longer about getting anything substantive done. rather, it’s about claiming victory, slamming and demonizing your opponents, and laying the groundwork for your historical legacy. he just wants something passed. he even said as much a few weeks ago…”we’re going to get something done this year.” that “something” can be anything. then the partisans on both sides will argue about how great or awful “it” is. it’s all a game and we’re all getting played by both sides.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 18, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
The President is like a dishonest used car dealer. All he is trying to do is to find a sales pitch to get you to buy his lemons.
Posted by: ConstantXI | September 18, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
The Republicans do have health care reform ideas. It is the fawning Obama media that refuses to cover them however.
Posted by: ConstantXI | September 18, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
So the law is being violated in Massachusetts and no special election will be held just so Obama can get an extra vote in the Senate to push his 10 trillion dollar health care debacle that will sink America’s economy and make the US a lesser power.
Posted by: ConstantXI | September 18, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
A gadfly that, as Mark Twain might say, “is somewhat economical with the truth”!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Saying no to stupid ideas should be commended. The Republican Party is finally starting to stand up to Obama in a more forceful manner. Vote the Democratic Congress out in 2010 to prevent Obama from totally destroying this country!!!
Posted by: ConstantXI | September 18, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
What’s happening in Mass is democratcy(sic) at its sleazy best!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Just a week or so ago, news outlets and others were saying Obama hadn’t stood up for what he believed on health care reform. He was letting others do it. Now that he is really promoting what he believes, he is said to be over-exposed. Do you think all this “he should,” “he shouldn’t” is just to fill media air time and column inches?
Posted by: JAB | September 18, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Looks like Obama is going to play all HIS media to the hilt this weekend!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
WHAT STATUTE GRANTS GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE CITIZENS PURCHASE A HEALTH CARE POLICY
The Federal Government has the authority to tax but where is its authority to require citizens to purchase a health care policy with after tax dollars? If we the people allow this, what will be the definition of disposable income? What other segment of the economy will demand government make us buy their product?
Unemployment is 10% or higher and there is no free lunch. I challenge Washington to bring back and keep good jobs in the USA and there will be no uninsured problem! If they fail I am for Cap and Trade: hand the politicians there caps and trade them in for new ones!
Posted by: BenDoubleCrossed | September 18, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Overexposure? You’re kidding. The extreme Right’s hate anybody/anything has been overexposed. This country needs Obama’s “overexposure” … now!
Posted by: Tim | September 18, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Like in football, some coaches TALK a good game and others get the job done without saying much. Obama is a talker and doesn’t have much history on getting anything done.
Posted by: Jeff | September 18, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
The Baucas plan, if it indeed is as stated, continues to allow insurers to free enterprise the ill.
President Obama, please help us understand this will not happen.
Posted by: gus amaral | September 18, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Today, September 18, 2009, 6 minutes ago | gus amaral
The Baucas plan, if it indeed is as stated, continues to allow insurers to free enterprise the ill.
President Obama, please help us understand this will not happen.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’m discouraged too. However, keep in mind that his strategy may in fact involve exactly everything that has happened. It occurred to me that the plan may be to pin down the Republicans on paper so that there can be no dispute later on.
The Baucus bill will raise costs and the insurance companies will make more money. But, it is not Barack’s Bill unless he signs it. Then he owns it. But that is not going to happen because it will not make it to his desk due to lack of Democratic support.
On the floor, specific parts will be debated and tagged to the Republican and Democratic parties. Then everyone will know where each Party stands in the Senate. This same process can happen with the Congressional Bill. Then, when everyone knows exactly where the compromise position is, he can say that this is unacceptable and we will have to do the best can with ‘Reconciliation’. He can always say that he went beyond the ‘extra mile’ to compromise, and no one will be able to dispute that.
There seems to be some speculation that Barack is using the ‘Rope a Dope’ approach. If not he certainly employs a ‘Slow to Anger’ approach. He performed the same way in his campaign. This has advantages with an overly aggressive opponent as it allows them to burn themselves out or otherwise reveal their tactics and true motives.
The past few days I sensed a peak in the far-right-fringe extremism. The 75,000 man march (2,000,000 by the “University of I don’t know”-Beck, 1,500,000 by Beck, 500,000 by Fox, and 100,000 by the sponsors) was not well received by the public. It seems that after President Carter spoke, everything went quite. He was seen as very credible by most…except the far-right-fringe.
Posted by: ErnestNM | September 18, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
ConstantXI
“no special election will be held”
There will be a special election in five months. This law is just to enable the governor to fill the seat until the election. Otherwise, Massachutes would only be represented by one, instead of two senators for five months. According to the new law, the interm Senator will not be allowed to run for the seat, thus eliminating any advantage an appointed incumbent might have.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
ConstantXI
In his speech yesterday, he outlined how to make sure illegals dont get healthcare, he wants to legalize them all. Nothinglike adding another 15 million to the voting register.
Posted by: plopsdad | September 18, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Empty rhetoric, misinformation, and intellectual dishonesty is how I would describe the current Presidential administration along with Pelosi and Reid. The conservative march on Washington was estimated by British media services at 2.2 MILLION. The Republican’s are offerring ideas, and have a healthcare plan. Everyday people are getting very sick and tired of the current Democratic Party. Many people that I work with and know are calling it ……………”The Communist Party”, and looking back at history I see too many parallels to ignore. I think people need to take a long hard look at what is going on with 8.5 billion dollars of stimulus money going to ACORN. Ummm….the community organization that is okey with underage prostitution of illegal immigrants, and more. ACORN is a federally funded partisan group attempting to create political direction with your tax dollars using whatever means necessary to buy support. COMMUNISM.
Posted by: jon | September 18, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
A czar to jump-start the economy? Does anyone believe that any one man has the economic expertise to jump-start the economy?
Who are all these czars anyway, are they constitutional? I have written Senators Burr and Hagan on the czar issue, but neither have chosen to respond.
Seems to me the czars circumvent the congress, and are placed to represent each discipline of an industrial nation so they can take over when the right crisis comes along!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
On a different note: Am I the only one on here that thinks Speaker Pelosi’s mental state is in question? I’m not saying this to be funny but I think she is unbalanced at best. Her quote to the Post- She said she is clueless about the ACORN amendment. “I don’t even know what they passed” “what did they do? “they defunded it?” Didnt the Obama admin fire IG Walpin because he was confused and disoriented? To think this woman is two heartbeats away is scary.
Posted by: 912er | September 18, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I also question Pelosi’s mental state, when you couple the ACORN commentary with the CIA lies to her all the time rhetoric of the recent past she seems to be an embarrassment to the party.
Since the house didn’t remove her from her position their scolding of Wilson is meaningless.
But what do you expect from the house after its CO2 and climatology confusion that passed “cap and tax”
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Ed Taylor, 912er, jon, Jeff, ConstantXI
We finally have a smart, gifted, calm President and a normal Vice President, who are overseeing an administration that is responsive to conservative concerns, seeks to work with Republicans in a bi-partisan fashion, puts country before Party, and all you can do is smear, lie, insult and attack these gentlemen? Where were you when Bush/Cheney were adding trillions of dollars to the deficit?
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I find Barack Obama to be a real embarassment for the country. The man just doesnt have what it takes to be a leader.I feel bad for us.
Posted by: JULIE | September 18, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Now this Jimmy carter clones administration is going after Americas back yard. They want to tax Garage sales and Yard sales. Thanks all you yes we can idiots. You have broke the backbone if this nation and it will take years after he is voted out to fix it.
Posted by: Jim Rod | September 18, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Amy in Maine- where in my post did you see me attacking the President? I was questioning the mental state of Pelosi.
She has done everything but work in a bi-partisan fashion so I quess you would have a problem with her also.
Posted by: 912er | September 18, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Bring him on! The more exposure, the
better. The more he pushes this hokey
health care plan, the more his numbers
will drop. Give him his own prime-
time reality show while you’re at it.
Posted by: Trajan | September 18, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
NOW OBAMA IS TALKING ABOUT LEGALIZING ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. ALL 12 MILLION+. GEE, LOOKS LIKE JOE WILSON IS CORRECT AND THAT OBAMA IS TRYING TO SECURE 12M VOTES FOR HIS PARTY OF CZARS. “FOR THE FIRST TIME IN MY ADULT LIFE I AM ASHAMED TO BE AMERICAN”
Posted by: HE DID LIE !! | September 18, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
“It’s only overexposure if something’s exposed that the White House would rather wasn’t.”
Not quite. Overexposure is when something’s exposed that the VIEWER would rather wasn’t. The VIEWER! The CONSUMER determines if something is overexposed. Rick, this is Marketing 101.
Posted by: Woody | September 18, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Amy in Maine- What network are you watching? Do you honestly believe anything you just stated? We the people are not “attacking” the President like you and Pelosi say. It is in our rights to question and disagree with our government either Republican or Democrat. When people act like sheep and sway to every word of our elected officials then they are given the power they seek. At that point they no longer work for the people but for their own ideology. Power becomes corruption and if you fail to see that in this or the past three administrations, then I feel sorry for you and OUR contry.
Posted by: 912er | September 18, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Ed Taylor | Sep 18, 2009 10:26:14 AM….”Looks like Obama is going to play all HIS media to the hilt this weekend!”…..I heard that Obama has shunned FOX News Sunday (Mike Wallace).
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Amy in Maine,Bush did add trillions to the deficit but that’s history. Malign Bush all you wish, but the CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER is that Obama and HIS congress have taken both the deficit and debt beyond rationality.
We may never be able to recover from this reckless spending. Have you noticed that there is no plan from either party to mitigate the national debt?
All Obama has ever mentioned is reducing the deficit in the out years (second term?). Let me explain, reducing the deficit and paying down a national debt (that is expected to top 24 trillion within 10 years) is a whole ‘nother story.
We argue about how to spend money that is non-existent while the nation is in free-fall!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The headline on the front site was “Obama is Everywhere — Yet Nowhere in Health Care Debate.”
Early on, it contains the critical one-liner: “A president who’s everywhere hasn’t been much of anywhere when it comes to the biggest/only item on his domestic agenda.”
Later on, it says: “Mr. Obama has been on an especially prodigious media binge lately, pitching his health care plan seemingly everywhere but the Food Channel and Fox News….”
So what we have is some vague, fuzzy self-contradictory criticism of the President for being everywhere and for being nowhere.
Let the President do his job. If you have a legitimate criticism, articulate it in specific, concrete, non-mystical, coherent words and sentences.
Posted by: Truth | September 18, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
2003 is history. Obama and his minions are destroying us as we argue over only the details we have heard.
Cap and tax will tax everything that requires energy to pick, build, manufacture and transport. Never you mind that it’s based upon junk science!
In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Obama again use this false story yesterday at the University of Maryland where he was heckled by a brave student for lying. Maybe George will ask him about thes falsehood on Sunday?
From Mr. Obama’s address to the joint session of Congress :
“One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn’t reported gallstones that he didn’t even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it.”
This is the sad story of Mr. Otto Raddatz, a case that Mr. Obama has cited several times before, including in his August 16th editorial in the New York Times.
For the record, however, the case is not exactly the way Mr. Obama has characterized it, at least according to the sworn testimony of Mr. Raddatz’s sister.
From Ms. Raddatz’s opening statement, from pages 58-59 of the transcript (a pdf file) of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation Committee hearings on ‘The Termination Of Individual Health Policies By Insurance Companies,’ Tuesday, June 16, 2009:
Otto began more chemotherapy for purposes of preparing him for a stem cell transplant. In the midst of his chemo treatments, Otto received a phone call and letter from Fortis Insurance Company stating his insurance was canceled. It was rescinded all the way back to the effective date of August 7, 2004.
This meant none of his cancer treatments would be covered. Most importantly, he would not be able to receive the stem cell transplant need [sic] to save his life. My brother only had a very small window of time in which to have the stem cell transplant. He needed to be scheduled within the next 3 to 4 weeks.
My brother was told he was canceled during what they called a “routine review” during which they claimed to discover a “material failure to disclose”. Apparently in 2000 his doctor had done a CT scan which showed an aneurysm and gall stones. My brother was never told of either one of these conditions nor was he ever treated for them and he never reported any symptoms for them either.
After months of preparation, the stem cell transplant could not be scheduled. My brother’s hope for being a cancer survivor were dashed. His prognosis was only a matter of months without the procedure.
Mr. Radditz was faced with having to pay for the stem cell transplant himself in order to save his life.
However, Mr. Raddatz’s lawyer sister contacted the Illinois Attorney General’s Office. They investigated and found that the doctor who did the CT scans could not remember whether he had ever told Mr. Raddatz about his findings.
Consequently, the insurance company overturned their original decision to rescind her brother’s coverage, and he was reinstated in the words of his sister, “without [any] lapse.”
Again, from Ms. Raddatz’s sworn testimony:
After two appeals by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office, Fortis Insurance Company finally overturned their original decision to rescind my brother’s coverage and he was reinstated without lapse. This is after weeks of constant phone calls between myself and the Attorney General’s Office and we were literally scrambling hour by hour to get this accomplished so that my brother wouldn’t lose his 3- to 4-week window of opportunity that he had prepared for and lose his opportunity to have the procedure.
In other words, Mr. Raddatz’s did receive the stem cell transplant without delay.
Indeed, Ms. Raddatz does not seem to claim anywhere in her testimony that the insurance company’s actions shortened her brother’s life. (Though she does accuse them of having been cruel and unethical.)
From page 75 of the hearings transcript:
Mr. Barton. My next question is to the gentle lady there in the middle. Your brother, has he had his stem cell transplant?
Ms. Raddatz. He did indeed receive the stem cell transplant. It was extremely successful. It extended his life approximately 3-1/2 years. He did pass away January 6, 2009, and he was about to have a second stem cell transplant. Unfortunately, due to certain situations, his donor became ill at the last minute and so he did pass away on January 6. But again, it extended his life nearly 3-1/2 years and at his age, each day meant everything to him…
This is not quite the impression Mr. Obama gives with his rendition of Mr. Raddatz’s story.
Despite Mr. Obama’s claims, Mr. Raddatz’s treatment was never delayed. And he did not die because of it.
Meanwhile, in this very same speech Mr. Obama accused others of misrepresenting the facts.
Posted by: pauldia | September 18, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
The Baucus plan is a fraudulent Trojan Horse with bad intentions. In seeking a consensus, you do NOT give away the bedrock cardinal element that makes the plan a “reform” measure. Any Health Care Plan that does NOT contain a single-payer option is NOT a reform plan at all and it will NOT have any potential to remedy the fatal flaws in the current system. Health Care experts like Marcia Angell, senior lecturer in social medicine at Harvard Medical School, already know this. And any Dems who contend otherwise are disingenuous, dishonest frauds. Baucus needs to be defeated in his next re-election bid, for foisting this content-barren, malicious fraud on the American people. Baucus, like too many Dems, is more interested in fostering the ‘pretense’ of reform than with mustering the courage to actualize true, genuine ‘reform.’ It’s like, “Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die to get there.” Everybody wants ‘relief’ from never-ending skyrocketing Health Care costs, but nobody wants to challenge the enormous, tyrannical greedy corp gorilla that’s orchestrating that vicious out-of-control cycle of corp price-gouging.
Posted by: Reflecting_Pools | September 18, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Any so-called health care plan, like the Baucus proposal, that seeks to make health insurance MANDATORY, while failing to provide the “MEANS” for obtaining it, and while failing to provide the least expensive, most reasonable “COSTS” for obtaining it, can only be described as a maliciously fraudulent red-herring, price-gouging surrogate that has, in effect, thrown out the baby with the bath water. Any Dem in Congress who supports such a cruel, dishonest phantasm, masquerading as reform, needs to be defeated in their re-election bids in 2010. They are gutless pretenders who simply want to ‘hide’ their votes behind a ruse decoy, so it will ‘appear’ that they vociferously supported ‘reform,’ when in fact, they voted for “politics as usual” and for more of the same corporate price-gouging practices that have decimated the health care system as we know it.
Posted by: Joanna60 | September 18, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Here’s how to be “somewhat economical with the truth”.
“Nobody’s going to pull the plug on grandma.” No but HR 3200 has 10 pages regarding how grandma might be counseled with regard to the cost and effectiveness of her treatment. Google QALY.
Conclusion, I don’t want those people in the room with grandma, or even close to the plug.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
This is what happens when you elect a paranoid, egotistic, narcissistic manic for president. The man believes he is God.
Obama is more in line with Jim Jones than with the rest of the country.
Posted by: jturskyenet | September 18, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Posted by: jturskyenet | Sep 18, 2009 12:19:53 PM
_______________________
Ah, the words of the confused and mislead…
Posted by: greely | September 18, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
The Raddatz story was an ordeal though Obama reported it “with some economy of the truth”. However, I wonder how it might have played with the Comparative-Effectiveness-Research (CER).
CER is not only in HR 3200 but was neatly tucked into the unread stimulus bill as well? I wonder why it was slipped into the stimulus and what other sinister stuff may be hidden there? CER in medical circles naturally leads to QALY (Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year).
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
The path to making substantive improvements to the way we provide health care in America is pretty straightforward.
If Congress would make one positive, common sense change each year, without disrupting lives or causing national division, we could incrementally improve everything from the viability of hospitals in our communities to a more ethical and responsive insurance industry.
Rather than tear this country in half over a political snow job, Congress could repeal a law that has proven counterproductive or pass one intelligent piece of legislation that could allow the talent of the American people to make things better.
We have waisted years by reducing this debate to a political chess match. American talent and pragmatism has been pushed aside. In its place we have substituted political chicanery for what still could be a national culture of self improvement, initiative, good ideas, and the learned ability to accomplish great things at the local level.
Congress is not the solution. It has become the problem. The American people, I trust, still have the brains and the talent to correct that, as well.
Posted by: jggrimm | September 18, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
But Amy, you must have missed my earlier comment:
We may never be able to recover from this reckless spending. Have you noticed that there is no plan from either party to mitigate the national debt?
All Obama has ever mentioned is reducing the deficit in the out years (second term?). Let me explain, reducing the deficit and paying down a national debt (that is expected to top 24 trillion within 10 years) is a whole ‘nother story.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
So the law is being violated in Massachusetts …
Where in the world did you get the notion that it would be illegal for Massachusetts to have two senators as does every other state in the nation?!
Posted by: hang | September 18, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I don’t get Fox News, but was able to find audio only on a free-to-air satellite channel. I listened to Glenn Beck yesterday and found that even though his presentation is a bit kooky, this man speaks the truth.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Ed Taylor
I saw a snippet of an interview with Barack Obama’s grandmother, before she died. She was one smart, sweet lady, and obviously a positive influence on his life. The man lives with his mother-in-law. Biden lives with his elderly mother, as well. Do you really think Democrats are conspiring to euthanize our elderly and disabled population? How cynical and misinformed can you get? The amendment to cover end-of-life counseling was introduced by a Republican. A compassionate Republican. Who’d have thunk it?
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Amy in Maine | Sep 18, 2009 12:38:53 PM….Both have more than enough money to ensure their elderly get any care required or deisired.
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
President Obama is doing a great job under the circmumstanced. THE GOP will destroy American to bring him down. That is sad, one of the many reasons I am no longer a republican.
Posted by: Brandon | September 18, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
912er
I was leery of the President’s healthcare reform efforts, until I learned the opposition was relying on lies, smears and misinformation to attack the President’s efforts. I saw the hysterical, dumb as dirt, town hall-ers spewing irrational vitriol and I started to thimnk “hmmmmmmm, if these jerks are against it, then maybe its actually a good plan” THEN I got the facts, and I started to see the Republicans have been lying to the American people.
Watch the video with Olympia Snowe on the New York Times website. Here is a Republican, who has conservative principles, and is working with the President in a rational manner. No More Lies!
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Obama Rocks! People of all persuasions are dying every day because that do not have insurance and Republicans (the so called Christian party)is arguing about fiscal responsibility. What a joke!
Posted by: peoples_prez | September 18, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Amy, Do you think for one minute that Obama or Biden will be subject to HR 3200? They are not going to let their elders be subject to any panels.
Also, it doesn’t matter who added those ten pages they are there. I am an independent so I can berate a misguided republican as easily as I can a misguided democrat.
Both parties, on occasion, sound as if they want to reduce the deficit. However, the only thing a reduced deficit can offer as a slower fall into an ever increasing national debt.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Babies are dying by abortion every day too!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Most of the town hallers are quite articulate. The media seeks out the oddballs with the shrillest voice and most controversial signs for its focus.
Our efforts are effective because they are beginning to cause the Obamcare supporters to falter and babble rather than offering rational argument.
When they fall back on statements like “relying on lies, smears and misinformation to attack the President’s efforts. I saw the hysterical, dumb as dirt, town hall-ers spewing irrational vitriol and I started to thimnk “hmmmmmmm, if these jerks are against it, then maybe its actually a good plan” THEN I got the facts, and I started to see the Republicans have been lying to the American people.” You know you have their attention.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
To see what a conservative saw in DC on 9/12 google Tim Carter TJCTV.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
You can give a speech every day, it will not make a bill any better!! — COMMON SENSE tells you that you cannot give BETTER coverage to those who have insurance, put MILLIONS more people into the system, pay for it by ending WASTE and ABUSE, claim you will LOWER health care costs, CREATE a government-run exchange, INCLUDE government health care coverage and NOT SPEND a dime — all at the SAME TIME! — It’s fantasy!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 18, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Democratic Party: The party of “You want someone else’s money? Yes-Yes-Yes”
Posted by: Asaninidsay Yupper | September 18, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Amy in Maine | Sep 18, 2009 12:52:40 PM….You accuse Obama’s opposition of lies. Can we hear a few of those lies?
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
deanbob
Lies: death panels, insurance for illegal immigrants, coverage for abortion, government take over of health care.
Truth: I went without health insurance for years when I worked in daycare, retail shops and restaurants. My nephew pays an arm and a leg for Cobra, because his employer dropped insurance as a benefit. I know people who will never get out of debt because of their old medical bills. I know that 9 out of 10 hospital bills contain errors, I know Joe Wilson voted for a bill to repay hospitals the millions they lose treating illegal immigrants, I know premiums are going to go up, and costs will go up, if we do NOTHING.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Rupublican Party new slogan: “Thou shoult not have any other God before me, except the almighty dollar. To hell with the sick and less fortunate, we’re the every man for himself party.” – Glen Beck
Posted by: peoples_prez | September 18, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I think that you all need to sit down because Obama is OUR PRESIDENT now and you should give him the respect that he deserves no matter if you like him or not and if you dont so what just dont say anything negative about him even though we all have our own opinions in what we say.
Posted by: Takyra Curry | September 18, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I think that you should all just sit down because Obama is OUR PRESIDENT now and you should give him the respect that he deserves
Posted by: Takyra Curry | September 18, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
And if you don’t like him or not dont say anything negative even though we do have our own opinion in what we say.
Posted by: Takyra Curry | September 18, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Rick McDaniel wrote: “There is only 2 ways to go. Either national health care for everyone (except the 12 million illegal immigrants), or a private system of free choice. Nothing else is truly workable.”
I hope you don’t mean public vs private, because Japan’s system is very much like ours: 240 private health insurers, most insurance through your employer, private medicine – there are even a greater percent of private hospitals than in the USA.
But they allow non-profit health insurance, which is basically what we had just a generation ago. For-profit health care is not natural. In order to grow your business you must have greater health problems or higher charges – two things that work against the citizens.
And they have ONE network: a government-private board sets it up and it knocks paperwork from the 25% in the USA to 3% in Japan.
Posted by: The_Mick | September 18, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Could the Dems have screwed it up any more than this?! Obama is a child!
Posted by: Amyloo | September 18, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Now the Obama administration is trotting out Michelle to state her case for health care reform. There she is, sob stories and all. Yes indeed, we do need health care reform but not the Obama brand. There are so many more sane ways to overhaul health care without going to these extremes that the Obamas are proposing. I am so tired of seeing Obama’s mug every time I turn on the TV. Enough already! Go away!
Posted by: Amanda Moserski | September 18, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Takyra Curry | Sep 18, 2009 1:40:01 PM I think that you should all just sit down because Obama is OUR PRESIDENT now and you should give him the respect that he deserves++++Good luck with that.
Posted by: Vicky | September 18, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Amy, you provided a list of nouns. A lie implies a noun and a verb at a minimum. None the less – to one of your accusations…. If I am old with a potentially deadly condition and the panel that determines who is eligible for treatment denies my treatment and I die, what would you call that panel?
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Takyra Curry | Sep 18, 2009 1:38:46 PM
Respect cannot be demanded or commanded; it is EARNED.
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
deanbob |
I would call it “a panel of health insurance executives…and their accoutants.”
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Amy, Fair enough, that’s what you’d call it. Would I be a liar if I called it a death panel?
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Does a speed limit sign stop speeding? Does Obama’s saying illegal aliens won’t get healthcare prevent it? Obviously, the answer to both question is the same – NO.
Posted by: deanbob | September 18, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“Lies: death panels, insurance for illegal immigrants, coverage for abortion, government take over of health care.”
Sorry, these are not lies;
Death Panels: Ten pages on end-of-life counseling.
Illegal immigrants: Obama says no, but unless wording is changed they are not specifically excluded.
Abortion: Obama says nob but amendments to specifically exclude it were voted down.
Government takeover: Give me a break, what else could you call it?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Ed Taylor
Death Panels: My health insurance company requires my provider to provide me with a Living Will to sign, i.e., in the event I am a vegetable, they want permission to pull the plug.
“End of Life counseling” has been shown to ease the anxiety of terminal patients and their families, it is NOT some left wing conspiracy to move the elderly off this mortal coil. To suggest Democrats advocate setting up panels to recommend who should die, is ludicris.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“Government takeover: Give me a break, what else could you call it?”
I think this is where you are getting upset about abortion, immigration and end of life counseling, you think this bill is a government takeover of our health care system, like the British have National Health Care.
Here is what the bill is: It says everyone must have health insurance, and there will be subsidies for those who can’t afford it. This will result in 30 million new customers for PRIVATE INSURANCE companies. A bonanza for them, but in return: they can’t drop coverage or deny it for pre-existing conditions.
Government is not involved in making medical decisions, who lives and who dies, what kind of procedures will be allowed, nothing like that, this is about getting every one insured, and getting insurance companies from playing games with people’s lives.
Posted by: Amy in Maine | September 18, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“Will this turn down the heat? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who knew Harvey Milk and George Moscone, choked up thinking about the prospects of speech turning into political violence…”
Oh, please. They were shot by a fellow Democrat disgruntled at being fired from City Hall. There was nothing political about it. If she’s equating that with SEIU thugs beating up black men outside of town hall meetings then the Botox really has gone to her brain.
Posted by: Orion | September 18, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
When reading about ALL those committees in HR 3200, I notice they have union membership (SEIU?) but no ordinary citizens represented.
I venture that no one knows what the death panel counselors might whisper into grandma’s ear. But I am not for giving them the chance.
I, the CBO and notable medical authorities don’t believe there is any money for subsidies. The president mentions deficit but remains silent on the debt. Parsing the language like this also represents being “somewhat economical with the truth”.
They didn’t face the truth on cap and tax, and I don’t expect them to face it on healthcare either.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Has anyone googled Tim Carter TJCTV yet?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Here’s another takeover that has just crawled out of the white house closet:
The House took up legislation this week addressing the Obama Administration’s proposal calling for a complete and immediate federal takeover of student loans by eliminating the successful Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFEL). This means that students and parents will soon only have one option when it comes to getting a loan to go to college: the federal government.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
According to CBO’s and JCT’s assessment, enacting H.R. 3200 would result in a
net increase in the federal budget deficit of $239 billion over the 2010-2019 period.
That estimate reflects a projected From the CBO report:
“10-year cost of the bill’s insurance coverage
provisions of $1,042 billion, partly offset by net spending changes that CBO
estimates would save $219 billion over the same period, and by revenue provisions
that JCT estimates would increase federal revenues by about $583 billion over those
10 years.”
Also, remember your math Amy, deficit reduction is doublespeak to take eyes like yours off the increasing debt.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Here’s a little quote from HR 3200:
“For purposes of reporting data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished during 2011 and any subsequent year, to the extent that measures are available, the Secretary shall include quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that have been adopted or endorsed by a consensus-based organization, if appropriate. Such measures shall measure both the creation of and adherence to orders for life sustaining treatment.”
What is your take on a consensus-based organization? It was a consensus sciecs that gave us cap and tax, investigative, experimental science was ignored. Never-you-mind that solar activity dictates climate instead of CO2, that’s just an inconvenient truth!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
The insurance industry, of course, loves the Baucus plan. Need we say more?”
Yes, we DO need to say more. This plan, as it stands now, will do to the health insurance industry what Congress did to student loans some time in the murky past – guarantee a profit to private industry at the expense of taxpayers.
It’s bunk, and it is redistribution of wealth from taxpayers to for-profit insurers.
You can see, now days, that Republicans really are not for reduced spending. They oppose student loan reform because it will end the $87 billion dollar pipeline of profit that we will shell out over the next ten years to banks.
If we give private insurers the right to collect on an individual insurance mandate, and don’t protect taxpayers by offering a robust public option (not just an option for the 5% who can’t qualify, as Obama alluded to in his speech), we’ll be setting up a permanent tax funnel direcly into the voracious hole of the for-profit insurance industry.
No deal, Max.
Posted by: Ralph in Minneapolis | September 18, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
God, I am so exhausted by all of this. Exhausted, demoralized. It seems so hopeless. I am becoming more cynical and bitter by the day.
Will there ever be a decent healthcare program? Will there ever be regulation of Wall Street and big business? Will the middle class ever get a chance again?
Posted by: Cali | September 18, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Insurance companies in the Swiss system, while private, still operate as non-profit. However, the higher the customer satisfaction and the more people they sign up, the higher the salary their executives are allowed to earn. So, market forces drive customer satisfaction. It works because Swiss politicians want their citizens to be healthy, while our politicians want our health care industry to be healthy.
Posted by: Reza | September 18, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Forcing the uninsured to buy from and thereby adding to the insurance companies largess is unacceptable. Without a public option to choose there is no reform that can possibly decrease costs. What is to stop the Insurance company’s from raising premiums and deductables and co-pays.
Posted by: D. Peterson | September 18, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I think the Baucus plan is a travesty, a steaming pile of corporate welfare that will make many people’s situations worse. People are required to buy private health insurance, but there’s no requirement for the insurance companies to provide policies that are both affordable and useful. In fact, I believe that the Baucus proposal is a passive-aggressive way of pretending to implement health care “reform” so that the public will come to hate the very idea.
Posted by: pdxtran | September 18, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
When 6 Senators, all receiving big bucks from the health care industry, put out a “reform” package what should we expect? Of course the insurance industry is well cared for and the consumer is screwed. Let’s not mention the rank and file Republican Senators like my “representatives” McCain and Kyl whose main concern is that a public option might hurt the poor poor multi-billion dollar insurance industry. I don’t recall the Senate requiring members to swear an oath to protect big business, but apparently they assume that’s their main job.
Another good questions is how exactly would these millionaire Senators and their country club friends have a clue as to what is affordable to average Americans?
Posted by: Scottsdale Jack | September 18, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Here’s the truth hidden in the doublespeak regarding illegals, Obama is going for immigration reform (amnesty?)which he says will resolve the question once and for all.
So, we will pay for them in the healthcare plan after all. Isn’t doublespeak wonderful!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 18, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Pretty soon now, watching our president
nightly will rival watching the “Lost
in Space” rerun package. Same old,
same old…..Save it up for one big
speech and disavow Soros, Jarret, ACORN,
V. Jones, Sundstein, Lenin, Marx
and Trotsky. It’ll change your dismal
numbers instantly.
Posted by: Trajan | September 20, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am