By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Sep 23, 2009 6:22pm

Coming Up: Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Sen. John McCain (R- Ariz.)

Iran and Afghanistan – two big stories for our Headliner this week: Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.  Arguably the most influential voice on the President's national security team, Secretary Gates is critical in framing the Afghan strategic review for President Obama, who just last Sunday told me he was skeptical about sending more troops to Afghanistan.  We'll talk to Secretary Gates about the leaked McChrystal report warning of failure in Afghanistan if more troops were not sent and confirmation Friday that Iran has concealed a second nuclear enrichment site.

Then, an EXCLUSIVE interview with Republican Senator John McCain, who is leading the call to send more troops to Afghanistan. Senator McCain has been supportive of the President's Afghanistan policy, but is now criticizing the President for delaying a decision to send in more troops. 

On our roundtable, Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, the first reporter to get his hands on the 66-page McChrystal report. His story on Monday set off the debate in Washington. He'll be joined by The New York Times' Thomas Friedman, ABC News' Martha Raddatz and George Will to debate Afghanistan, national security policy and all of the weeks politics. 

You won’t want to miss this. See you Sunday.

- George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

And McCain why he would have been worse than Obama for conservatives…

Posted by: matt | September 23, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

McCain again…is there no one else who is an expert.
oh, forgot, he is the President.
boring.

Posted by: muggsy | September 23, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Wow, what an incredible coup for an interview! McCain has only been on TV three hundred or so times this year! I can’t wait to hear what he has to say now.

Posted by: TR | September 24, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

The US hasn’t got the stomach for success in Afghanistan. It will require a strong and tough policy, which we will not have, and can not expect to get, from Obama.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 24, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

“You won’t want to miss this.”
Why?
McCain’s on every other week, and it’s the same navel-gazing group of DC insiders every time.
Missing this show would be like missing an infomercial. The same program will be on again and again and again and again…

Posted by: Brian | September 24, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Note to George: McCain lost

Posted by: GenXWho | September 24, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Let me echo some of the other comments here — how many times can you have McCain on?
It’s like you committed to all these appearances during the 2008 campaign and never noticed that he actually didn’t win.
Are there any members of the Democratic Party — you know, the one that runs the White House, the House and the Senate — who might one day be persuaded to appear on your show? No?

Posted by: Eric R. | September 24, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

McCain again, you’re kidding right? You realize we decided we didn’t care what John McCain has to say last Nov. That hasn’t changed. Unbelievable.

Posted by: mrblond | September 24, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Not to spoil your exclusive but I think I can give your viewers a preview of your show:
1. John McCain’s policy views are important. This is because he received an electoral drubbing and because his stated views on Afghanistan (for one) during the campaign were frequently contradictory.
2. McCain will be terribly CONCERNED that the President – the one who actually won the election – might abandon another military quagmire in which we have the opportunity to hemorrhage blood and treasure indefinitely. See: Russian Occupation, late 1980′s. To do otherwise is to lose “face,” which is far more important than actual human lives and hundreds of billions of dollars. We must therefore escalate.
3. McCain will offer advice to the President about how he should proceed, George will present a dilute alternative before concurring with McCain that any deviation from what the military pressures Obama to do is very CONCERNING.
4. The notion that McCain, a far-right minority-party senator currently involved in no major legislation or negotiations, is a Very Important Person to interview on national television.
Dude, what on Earth were you thinking? This is the 13th Sunday talk show McCain has done this year. Did you accidentally delete all your political contacts save one?

Posted by: hypusine | September 24, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“”"”"Missing this show would be like missing an infomercial. The same program will be on again and again and again and again…”"”"
Posted by: Brian
Are you sure you’re not talking about Obama?

Posted by: lfrichar | September 24, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

We knew what McCain’s stance on both of the wars was when he ran for president AND LOST. If he had won we would be spending twice as much as Bush on both Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Hello, McFly, you lost, now go away.
Gee George, I guess you are working directly for the extreme far right now? Starting to appear that you are pandering to them. I’m sure Fox has an opening for you over there. How ’bout you go check that out?
And yes, missing it will be like missing an infomercial.

Posted by: CarpeDiem | September 24, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

George: you say McCain has not worn out his welcome. So be it. But you’ll get the same ‘ol message yet again on Sunday. War war war!

Posted by: barbara miller | September 25, 2009, 1:58 am 1:58 am

George says:
“Then, an EXCLUSIVE interview with Republican Senator John McCain, who is leading the call to send more troops to Afghanistan.” Which, btw, no one could have predicted.
George also says, defending his McCain booking:
“McCain is the leading GOP voice on Afghanistan. We think it’s important for our viewers to hear that perspective…For a show focusing on Afghanistan, he is easily the right GOP guest. No apologies for inviting him.”
Because McCain has been involved in formulating Afghanistan policy? Because he was a POW in another pointless war the US withdrew from? Because he set foot in the country? Because he declared multiple contradictory Afghanistan policies? Nope. Because he invited your good friends to a staged BBQ at hos Arizona mansion. You are awesome, non-corporate-influenced-news-outlet. Way to look out for what the people want
Yay, news!!

Posted by: hypusine | September 25, 2009, 5:42 am 5:42 am

Also, ABC has no economic interest in what happens militarily in Afghanistan. That is AWESOME. And false, but who cares!

Posted by: hypusine | September 25, 2009, 5:45 am 5:45 am

You should be getting that Derelict of Duty president of ours on to ask why he is not doing what is needed to protect our troops! Another 5 troops were slaughtered today while we wait for our chief idiot to make up his mind on what he wants to do. Either get ALL of these boys out now, and admit you are defeated and a coward – or get the reinforcements in that the Generals need to be a success. There are no half-measures in war, just full body-bags when you pussyfoot around. The blood of these soliders is directly on OBAMA’s hands. They did not need to die. They died because Obama is not providing them the tools to do what they need to do. Heck – Obama even took the air cover away from the ground troops to make it more unsafe for them over there!
How about sending Biden’s kid to the front line over there? Then I imagine we would see a much faster decision coming out of these jerks on what to do.

Posted by: clr | September 25, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

WAR IS TERRORISM WITH A BIGGER BUDGET AND UNCALLED FOR LOSS OF HUMAN LIVES!

Posted by: lovet i umesi | September 25, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Ask the Senatores:
I know it’s difficult to understand, but maybe it’s because education’s much to slow for most. All I hear is talk talk, talk and bicker, bicker, bicker and all the while more people are getting sicker.
Losing one’s health care and home is not our children’s fault as their put out on the streets. The ones saying they don’t want to pay for health care are paying more through social services. Look how much we could save in each State if we could educate all about our needs
I’m ashamed knowing how many people spend an hour each week in church claming to be Christians, and the rest of the week it’s:> (Me, me, me! I’m the one! I’m having the power! I’ve got it all!)
I’m wondering what happened to the;
1) Cloth the naked: 2) Feed the hungry: 3) Give to the homeless: 4) Heal the sick:
5) Comfort the dying:
We do the Christian thing, social services. One can’t get health care from Church congregations. And that claim of being civilized Christian people!
Dean Ebert

Posted by: Dean Ebert | September 25, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

My hats off to the President for rethinking the fight against the Taliban and other terrorists. You can only fight terrorists with terrorism–not conventional methods. Our current methods won’t work. Bring them back and retrain them. Then send them after the terrorists.

Posted by: Barry W. Shook | September 27, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I love that Martha Radich put Bill Woodward in his place this morning during Afghanistan discussion on This Week wtih George. He said “I’ve spent years on this…” She said “SO HAVE I” – YOU GO GIRL.

Posted by: Lisa | September 27, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

These are holy wars. The only way to come out with honor is to embrace God’s word. It is an easy thing to show the Taliban or Iran their excesses and errors when we bring in God’s word. The primary message for the prophet Muhammad to give was to follow the whole Bible, not just part. Moses and Jesus said to live by every word of God. (Deuteronomy 8:3, Matthew 4:4; Qur’an, Ahmad. Numbers: 5.68, 89; 42.14-16)
God confirmed the Bible at that time (600+AD) as something to be followed. Muslims would have made it into Arabic, so they can not now say that it is changed. The way is prepared for peace and victory when each side sees and accepts the corrections needed to be submitted to God’s word, the main requirement to get into God’s kingdom now and in eternity. Islamic radicals are willing to give their lives to enter God’s kingdom; when they realize they cannot enter without a change in strategy, they will stop fighting.

Posted by: Marie Devine | September 27, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.