Federal Deficit Hits Record High of $1.38 Trillion in August
ABC News Matthew Jaffe reports: The federal deficit rose by $111.4 billion in August to a record high of $1.378 trillion with one month still to go in the current fiscal year, the Treasury Department announced Friday. The government in August took in $145 billion in receipts, but $256 billion in outlays led to an overall monthly deficit of $111 billion. That number is better than anticipated – most expectations were that the government had added $162 billion to its tab last month. The record deficit stems from increased government spending to stop the recession and financial crisis combined with lower government tax revenues. In late August, the Obama administration projected that the deficit for the full budget year will eventually hit $1.58 trillion. “The deficits we’re dealing with right now are truly staggering amounts of money,” former Bush administration official Tony Fratto told ABC News. “The administration is long past due for coming forward with a credible plan to bring down deficits in the future.” — Matthew Jaffe

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Hmmmm….. Let’s blame it on Bush!
Posted by: joedoe | September 11, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Clearly more tax cuts are just what we need, said an otherwise discredited former Bush official.
Posted by: Paul Dirks | September 11, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Have ACORN work on the budget. They offer help on number adjustments
Posted by: jamescbuilder | September 11, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Bush did it.
Posted by: Axey | September 11, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
===Have ACORN work on the budget. ===
LOL. But in all seriousness, ACORN is getting a huge amount of taxpayer money.
Posted by: Axey | September 11, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
What will Obama say?
Stop those scare tactics Palin, media, Repubs, and townhall mobsters!
Posted by: rick | September 11, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Obamanomics at work. Great job, Barry.
BTW, to you Obamabots who will blame Bush, remember the following:
- Barry is on the hook for 2nd half of $350B in TARP funds (he chose to spend)
- Barry in on the hook for $787B “stimulus” package (abject failure)
- Barry is on the hook for $400B Omnibus Spending Bill (remember that Nancy and Harry held up 2009 budget in 2008 as the awaited the coronation of The-One-We’ve-Been-Waiting-For)
It’s Barry’s ballgame now.
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
It’s that mess Bush left for Obama.
And he doesn’t mind cleaning up someone’s mess.
But shut up and get out of the way.
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH
FOX FOX FOX FOX FOX
Posted by: millie | September 11, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“Clearly more tax cuts are just what we need, said an otherwise discredited former Bush official.”
The tax cuts were an appropriate response to lagging economy (still apporpriate today). Where Bush dropped the ball was not cutting spending. Obama is making things worse by accelerating spending.
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Don’t worry Obama is going to give a MAJOR speech next week on the economy.
What’s that–speech number 267?
No doubt he’ll say he inherited a mess,
has created or saved a million jobs, and the stimulus is working.
Posted by: bailey | September 11, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
A fantastic time to think about health care–it won’t cost a dime.
Posted by: max | September 11, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in January there was already a trillion dollar deficit sitting in the books on the table left by Bush…
Funny how so many right wingers on here like to attribute this all to the new President.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“Don’t worry Obama is going to give a MAJOR speech next week on the economy.”
I think I also heard he will be on “60 Minutes” again… CBS should give him an office and put him on staff.
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I wuz gonna blame CNN!
Posted by: Gibbsy | September 11, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Perhaps our president should live by his own words to the studentss and be accountable for his own action or inaction. It is so easy to blame someone else for one’s problems. Bush is not the President and has not been for nine months (literally), but really didn’t have any power to do anything for much of the year or so before he left office. While I didn’t agree with much of what he did, how much longer will the new administration and opposing party try to blame everything on him…another year, another decade?
Posted by: bkm | September 11, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Interesting that ABC would go to a Bush administration alum for quips on massive deficits.
Does anyone realize that the deficit was forecast to be over a trillion dollars even before Barack Obama was elected? This is all Bush debt…
Posted by: matt | September 11, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Hey, we could all go to acorn and learn how we too can go into prostitution businesses with underage illegal girls and cheat on our taxes. Seriously , 16 months of straight declines in tax revenues , mortgae defaults climbing, job losses and a business sector not reinvesting in America should just about do us in but to make sure I suppose a good dose of healthcare should weaken our finances more rapidly.
Hey Ying can you spare a yen?
Posted by: david | September 11, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.”
a.) You are incorrect
b.) Barry ran for the position and accepted the position – warts and all – on 1/21/09. It’s time for him (and his supporters) to grow up. Leadership is easy when there are no problems.
c.) He and his Democrat buddies in Congress voted for TARP and other bail-outs that are in large part driving the debt.
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
“The fiscal year runs October to October.”
bonneytruth takes after her boy Barry thinking if you just keep repeating the same thing over and over, eventually the masses will believe it to be true.
Wrong.
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
This sounds like a financial matter, let Charlie Rangel work on it.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | September 11, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in January there was already a trillion dollar deficit sitting in the books on the table left by Bush…
Funny how so many right wingers on here like to attribute this all to the new President.
Posted by: bonnytruth | Sep 11, 2009 3:49:21 PM
FUNNY HOW SO MANY LEFT WINGERS ON HERE LIKE TO ATTRIBUTE THIS ALL TO THE OLD PRESIDENT
Posted by: Republicus Maximus | September 11, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.
The problems is you can’t blame this all on the new President.
Regrettably, the last President left quite a deficit and the country in a commplete economic mess.
So, sure wish the right wing could if not have decency, at least be fair.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
This sounds like a financial matter, let Charlie Rangel work on it.
He’s a whiz!
Posted by: Tim G. | September 11, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I would agree with anyone that Bush spent money like a maniac but remember that 700 billion plus spending was approved just before he left office, approved by a democratic house and senate. Also take into account that Bush overcame no telling how much in losses right after 911 2001 and that Bush’s spending was on social issues;ie medicare presccrpitions and education.
Posted by: david | September 11, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
FUNNY HOW SO MANY LEFT WINGERS ON HERE LIKE TO ATTRIBUTE THIS ALL TO THE OLD PRESIDENT
Well, he did trick all those libs about WMDs!
Posted by: Aziz | September 11, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Anyone care to remember that Obama as Senator could have opposed all that deficit spending instead of voting for it?
Dening his personal responsibility is simply a pathetic excuse. Enjoy your delusions!
Posted by: keys2truth | September 11, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Dear Aziz:
No trick, the WMDs are still there, just buried – we will use them in the next war with Iraq.
Posted by: Republicus Maximus | September 11, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
“So, sure wish the right wing could if not have decency, at least be fair.”
Sure, we could be fair…but Barry would have to at least show us he is doing something to make the problem better rather than WORSE!
His actions imply he has no concern for deficits and debts whatsoever. Afterall, he’s got himself his!
Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
EVERYTHING FREE IN A AMERICA HEALTH CARE YOU THINK THE DEFIITS BIG NOW JUST WAIT
Posted by: natale from mass. | September 11, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Posted by: bonnytruth | Sep 11, 2009 3:54:57 PM
Don’t you mean the deficit left by the Dem-controlled Congress (since 2006) who passed the budget?
Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 11, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
This is all Bush debt…
Posted by: matt | Sep 11, 2009 3:56:45 PM
Don’t you mean this is all Dem-controlled Congress (since 2006) debt?
Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 11, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Regrettably, the last President left quite a deficit and the country in a commplete economic mess.
Posted by: bonnytruth | Sep 11, 2009 4:20:35 PM
Don’t you mean regrettably, the Dem-controlled Congress (since 2006), Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Chris Dodd and the liberal financial experts they covered for left quite a deficit and the country in a commplete economic mess?
Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 11, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Enjoy your delusions!
Posted by: keys2truth | Sep 11, 2009 4:25:33 PM
Present!
Posted by: Are my pants actually on fire? | September 11, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
You know, if Charlie Rangel, Tim Geithner, and Tom Daschle would just pay their taxes, that could go a long way.
Posted by: chew bacca | September 11, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
“This is all Bush debt…” ~ Matt
OMG! Why did you vote for Obama if you didn’t want him to be responsible for anything, including running the country?
Posted by: Alice | September 11, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
It’s not Obama’s fault we’re in deep doo-doo. It’s the fault of the voters who hired him, thinking a rookie could do the toughest job on earth.
Posted by: John Coonen | September 11, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Some people with an agenda are so eager to cast all the blamd on the new President.
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Funny how the right wing likes to blame all this on the new President.
Regrettably, the last President left quite a deficit and the country in a commplete economic mess.
The right wing behaves with little decency, but could at least be fair.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 11, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
This is nothing! Wait until all the new spending programs come into being. We will wish for deficits only of this size.
Posted by: scott jeffries | September 11, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Hree months ago, the president announced that there was $313 Billion in “waste, fraud and abuse” that could be eliminated from Medicare. What has he done to eliminate it? He needs no new legislation to do it. It is entirely the responsibility (and duty) of the chief executive. Of course, he has no executive experience of any kind…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 11, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Why are the Democrats so intent on undermining and ultimately destroying Medicare, Social Security and Private Health Care Insurance that millions of people like and are so dependent on?
The Democrats’ Trillion dollar Health Care Reform Plan will raise an already unsustainable deficit even higher. To say otherwise is not being honest. Higher deficits will further undermine Medicare and Social Security making their coming bankruptcy even more imminent. Once the baby boomers turn 65 there will be a 30% increase in Medicare enrollment. Thus, a 500 billion dollar cut to the Medicare budget will drive another stake into Medicare’s heart.
Moreover, according to the Democrats, due to all the fraud and waste in Medicare, 500 billion can be cut from Medicare without any cuts to services. Which makes a sane person ask why the government has neglected for so many years to rid the system of all this waste and fraud? Answer, because the reality is the inevitable outcome of a 500 billion dollar cut to Medicare are severe cuts to services for Seniors, with little if any abatement to waste and fraud and the Seniors know it. Ditto for the similar government run public option which will be subject to similar drastic cuts at the whim of the President and Congress.
So now that the Democrats have succeeded in gutting the heart out of Medicare and Social Security their knife now goes to the private insurance companies. Never mind 80% of he people are very happy with their private insurance plans.
So in order to sell their plan of a government take over of health care to the people, politicians must lie by telling the people they can keep their private insurance if they like them. The truth is, private insurance cannot compete with a government run tax paid for public option that can regulate private insurance out of business and under cut their prices. As a result, Companies will drop millions of people off of their private insurance plans and force their employees on the public option and the politicians know it.
The regrettable truth is government has proven time and time again that they are an incompetent manager of the peoples money and never keep any of their promises. Despite these facts, the greed for more power and more and more of the peoples money persists and grows like a cancer in their pursuit of a government take over of health care.
In conclusion, the representatives that vote for the Democrats’ Health Care Reform Bill will be voted out of office. This is a given as more and more people see the truth and realize that the ultimate outcome of Health Care Reform will be, higher deficits, higher taxes and fees and the ultimate destruction of Medicare, Social Security and Private Insurance which the majority of people like and are dependent on.
Posted by: james | September 11, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Bonnytruth is simply incorrect. The deficit in Mr. Bush’s final budget (drafted by the congess and approved by Senator Obama) was $456 billion. Every dime above that sum has been added by Obama and the current congress.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 11, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Government earmark money is seen as easy money with little accountability. Often the administrators of programs so funded have little qualifications for their positions and are paid salaries considerably higher than the norm. In a recent report I read on the subject excessive travel reimbursements and fees paid to consultants were also potential problems. The program in question was the Citizen-Soldier Support Program (CSSP) in North Carolina which was intended to help soldiers returning from battle assignments. Some of the employees lacked experience in military or health issues and even had politically left leanings
This an on-going program that has spent several million over the past several years, I mention it only as an example of money that is paid where the recipients don’t have to look anyone in the eye to receive it. The government is terrible on oversight as can be seen with TARP and stimulus earmarks. Healthcare and “cap and trade” if implemented will just be more of the same, look at what ACORN is doing at present with “wink and nod” oversight. No my friends, a “nanny government”, more big government, is not the answer. Our congress is inept (intentionally so) in rolling back its own salaries (the average congressional salary is a ludicrous $130K higher than street salaries/wages) so how can one believe it can oversee these programs. Also, the programs would be managed by Czars which are not beholden to congress and answer only to the president (of late it seems that the congress answers only to the president also).
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 11, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
1.58 trillion? I don’t like these numbers. Let’s add health care, cap and trade, amnesty and tax increases – make it an even 3 trillion…
Posted by: Obama the Joker | September 11, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
The fiscal year runs October to October.
By the time President Obama took office in late January, there was already a trillion dollar deficit left in the books on the table by George Bush.
Some people with an agenda are so eager to cast all the blamd on the new President.
Regrettably, the last President left quite a deficit and the country in a commplete economic mess.
The right wing behaves with little decency, but could at least be fair.
Posted by: bonnytruth | September 12, 2009, 4:03 am 4:03 am
please, whatever you do, do not tell obama what comes after a trillion!
Posted by: jimbo ellis | September 12, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am
When I see these numbers, and hear the cries of “foulplay”, “it’s healthcare”, I hear an f16 fly overhead. Somehow our astronomical defense budget comes to mind. Are Trident submarines really necessary? Can we mothball a carrier group? People are hungry in my Vermont town – really hungry.
Steve
Posted by: Steve Ames | September 12, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Steve Ames – You said “When I see these numbers, and hear the cries of “foulplay”, “it’s healthcare”, I hear an f16 fly overhead. Somehow our astronomical defense budget comes to mind. Are Trident submarines really necessary? Can we mothball a carrier group? People are hungry in my Vermont town – really hungry.”
There is only one problem with your logic. The US Constitution lists 17 enumerated powers given to Congress. One of them is the support of a strong military and nowhere in the Constitution is any branch of the federal government authorized to provide healthcare or even food to the citizens. The idiots in DC have been spending more than they collect in revenue for over sixty years and it has finally caught up with them. Can you run your household for even a year spending more than you make every month before you are hauled into court, why are these idiots allowed to continue in this manner? We have to assume responsibility for our own finances and they are supposed to be responsible for the finances of our country. Your argument that Dear Leader Chairman Maobama inherited a large debt from Bush holds little water, the President does not generate spending bills Congress does. The President lets Congress know what he would like to spend money on and it up to Congress to generate the spending which the Preident signs after Congress has approved it. This administration is spending money at a rate far greater than Bush did.
I think that there was some concern about the size of the federal debt when Bush was in office but what he did in eight years Obama is on track to double in less than four years. At the current rate of spending (which has significantly increased under the present administration) our tax revenue will pay for nothing other than the interest on the debt owed by the government. In the first year that the debt was recorded (1789) the debt was $75,463,476.00 and when Barack Obama took office (January 19 2009) it was $10,628,881,485,510.00 and as of 10 September 2009 it is $11,795,045,980,436.61. This is an increase of $1,166,164,494,926.61 since this administration took over and if this rate of spending is continued the debt at the end of one year in office will be approximately $13Billion and at the end of four years in office will be approximately $20 Billion. This is debt that the country does not have the money to repay anywhere in the near future. Looking at history James Madison, John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford Hayes, Chester Arthur, Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover accomplished the one thing that no administration since 1933 has accomplished and that is to reduce the government debt while in office. All other Presidents have increased the government debt during their term of office. Who had the biggest change you ask? In order of magnitude (percentage of change as over the years the actual numbers have increased so the only fair method is to look at the percentage of change during each administration) they are:
1. Abraham Lincoln (2,959% increase, Civil War years)
2. Martin Van Buren (1,558% increase, Andrew Jackson had reduced the debt by over 99% during his preceding terms)
3. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1,147% increase, WW II)
4. Woodrow Wilson (822% increase)
5. James Polk (395% increase)
6. James Buchanan (315% increase)
7. Ronald Reagan (286% increase)
8. James Madison (216% increase)
9. George W. Bush (185% increase
10. Gerald Ford (147% increase)
This is the top 10 so the next question to answer is where did William Clinton rank among the Presidents who had an increase in the government debt during their time in office? William Clinton had an increase of 136% in office which ranked as number 13 (not a ranking to be proud of). Where would Barack Obama rank if his administration continues the rate of spending we have experienced to date? Barack Obama at the current rate of spending would have an increase of the federal debt which would rank him as number 9 on the list of top ten ahead of George W. Bush. This data is all verifiable from the Department of the Treasury website, just google government debt to the penny and it will lead you to the right area.
Posted by: A true American Citizen | September 12, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Given the fact that the government in general really doesn’t seem to know how to maintain a budget properly, and all the various elements only care about what is most appealing for their states / parties, what else do you expect? Providing that Obama’s experience stems from tuning his public speaking skills over the years, combined with his blatant lack of any experience managing a company, state or anything else for that matter, Obama only compounds the problem and a major change in 2010 is needed to reverse all these extravagant programs.
Posted by: Financially Prudent | December 16, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am