Finance Committee Rejects Public Option
ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf reports: After five hours of debate, the Senate Finance Committee this afternoon voted down Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s proposal for a public option to compete with private insurers. Though a majority of the committee’s Democrats supported it, the amendment was defeated overwhelmingly, 15-8. The proposal sought to create a public health insurance option that would set rates like Medicare does. The committee’s chairman, Sen. Max Baucus, strongly suggested that he supported the concept of a public option — but said he was constrained by trying to find a bill that would draw 60 votes. “My job is to put together a bill that becomes law,” said Baucus, D-Mont. “I can count. Nobody has shown me a bill with a public option that gets to 60. So I am constrained to vote against the amendment.” UPDATE: The Schumer market-responsive public option amendment has now failed. It was called at 3:50. The vote was 10-13. Three Democrats opposed. Two Democrats (Bill Nelson of Florida and Tom Carper of Delaware) voted for Schumer’s amendment after opposing Rockefeller’s. But Sens. Max Baucus, Kent Conrad and Blanche Lincoln still opposed. Conrad says we should have a private system like the one in Germany. Baucus said he is still constrained by the public option not being able to get 60 votes. Lincoln would rather not be having this debate and hasn’t said much of anything. Schumer said he’ll continue trying to get 60 votes for some kind of public option. UPDATE: Sen. Schumer’s more market-responsive public option amendment failed too. The vote was 10-13 with three Democrats opposing it. Two Democrats (Bill Nelson of Florida and Tom Carper of Delaware) voted for Schumer’s amendment after opposing Rockefeller’s. But Sens. Max Baucus of Montana, Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas opposed both amendments. Conrad said the US should have a private system like the one in Germany. Baucus said he is still constrained by the public option not being able to get 60 votes. Lincoln, locked in a tough reelection fight in the conservative state of Arkansas would probably rather not be having this debate and hasn’t said much of anything at the Finance Committee markup. Schumer said he’ll continue trying to get 60 votes for some kind of public option.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
can we move on now and get somthing done for the 300 million plus that have insurance and paying way too much?
Posted by: catman | September 29, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Another Victory for Big Business & Insurance Companies!!! This is a vote against us all my friends.
Posted by: Joe Thayer | September 29, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
It ain’t over till it’s over……..
Posted by: zee | September 29, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
These senators have made is abundantly clear whom it is they represent, and it’s not their constituents.
I will work to initiate primary campaigns against those legislators who are voting for the interests of big business rather than the people who elected them. This is the only way to hold our elected representatives accountable.
Max Baucus, Kent Conrad, Blanche Lincoln et. al are among a larger group who should be challenged by a primary opponent. Their support of insurance companies over the people is beyond reprehensible.
Posted by: tessablue | September 29, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Of course. You think any, or at least the powerful, “representatives of the people” want to go against the insurance and trial lawyer lobby? Of course not. A public option and tort reform would cripple, if not kill, much of the shysters out there and also hurt the insurance companies. So instead this character Obama and his co-horts want to FORCE you to give money to private, for-profit insurance corporations and will fine, audit, or even imprison you if you don’t! How is this legal, moral, or Constitutional? To force citizens to give money to private companies? Living is NOT like driving Baucus and Obama!
ps: and why does Obama’s lackey Silbelius keep mentioning how vaccine manufacturers are waived from any liability from their vaccine? Isn’t the profit ENOUGH for them but they also get a “free pass” if it doesn’t work or even causes harm?!?
Posted by: Ed | September 29, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Sad to see the democrats defeat themselves like this but I guess they don’t like being the majority party. It appears they are out and they defeated themselves since this bill doesn’t take one GOP vote to pass.
I guess lobbyist money means more than the people you represent…
Posted by: Chuck | September 29, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm