By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Sep 27, 2009 9:00am

Gates on Closing Gitmo: ‘It’s Going to Take a Little Longer’

The Obama Administration is trying to engineer a soft-landing for the President's promise to close Guantanamo by January 22, 2010.
 
Friday morning White House officials told me that some detainees would still be in Gitmo after the deadline after this story broke in the Washington Post. And in our 'This Week' interview, Defense Secretary Robert Gates confirmed that "it's going to take a little longer" than promised to close the prison.

Here’s our full exchange:

STEPHANOPOULOS:  A major story in "The Washington Post" suggesting that the president's deadline of January 22nd for closing Guantanamo will not be met.  And White House officials tell me that at least some prisoners will still be in Guantanamo on January 22nd and beyond. How big a setback is that and how long will it take to finally close Guantanamo?

GATES:  When the president elect met with his new national security team in Chicago on December 7th…

STEPHANOPOULOS:  2009.

GATES:  …last year, this issue was discussed, about closing Guantanamo and executive orders to do that and so on. And the question was, should we set a deadline? Should we pin ourselves down? I actually was one of those who said we should because I know enough from being around this town that if you don't put a deadline on something, you'll never move the bureaucracy.  But I also said and then if we find we can't get it done by that time but we have a good plan, then you're in a position to say it's going to take us a little longer but we are moving in the direction of implementing the policy that the president set. And I think that's the position that we're in.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  That's where we are. So the deadline of January 22nd will not be met?

GATES:  It's going to be tough.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  And — and how many prisoners will be there on January 22nd, do you know?

GATES:  I don't know the answer to that.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  Is it — but, as you said, it's going to be tough and likely will not be met.

GATES:  We'll see.

UPDATE: Later in the program, I spoke with Senator McCain – who has been very critical of how Obama is handling Guantanamo – and when asked about the deadline said: “I never thought it was a realistic goal.”

McCain’s full response below:

STEPHANOPOULOS: We have a lot to talk about this morning. Let's begin where he left off on Guantanamo. During the campaign, you had a very strong position that Guantanamo should be closed, but you've also been very critical of the way President Obama has handled it. Do you still believe that Guantanamo should be closed?

MCCAIN: Oh, yes. But the mistake was — and I'd respectfully disagree with Secretary Gates — was that they didn't have a policy as to how to address these very difficult and complex issues. They are more complex than about any that I've ever — the legal side of this, as well as trying to get cooperation from countries to take these people. So the policy should have been formulated and put into effect, and then the announcement. Again, I just disagree with Secretary Gates. The policy should have been formulated and then implemented, and then you would have had a timeframe that you wouldn't have to say, "Hey, we can't keep one of our first commitments."

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you think it's good news that this deadline is slipping?

MCCAIN: Well, I don't — I think it's — I think it's bad news in that we would have liked to have achieved it, but I never thought it was a realistic goal, because they still haven't gotten the fine- tuned parts of the — of the policy. In an issue like this, the details are really very important.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you fully expect there will be prisoners in Guantanamo after the deadline?

MCCAIN: All I know is, frankly, what I briefed on, and apparently they're certainly not going to make that deadline. But we should continue to work towards the closure of Guantanamo Bay because of the image that it has in the world of brutality and harms our image very badly.

- George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Yet another promise down the ole’ political yube. When will we learn?

Posted by: LongT | September 27, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

When they got in there they quickly figured out the feds had no files on any of these people. The information was everywhere. It was a mess.
BTW, the next time some republican takes office? Within 8 months if he has not fulfilled EVERY campaign promise I shall start calling him a liar. Which means Bush was one too.

Posted by: Secondlook | September 27, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

No kidding Gates/Obama didn’t think through this decision either. What losers!!!

Posted by: stratabuse | September 27, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

When do we, the taxpayers, get our country back?

Posted by: LongT | September 27, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

No wonder Obama kept Gates. It’ll take longer? It’ll take Obama forever.

Posted by: LongT | September 27, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Just more of the same, Obama makes promise, Obama breaks promise, Obama makes excuses first to study issue for 120 days then to make more excuses when he breaks promise again…the guy is simply spineless and inept and cofirms the old saying, those than can…do and those that cannot…teach.

Posted by: CC | September 27, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Robert Gates is the right man for the job. I trust this guy.

Posted by: rightbehind | September 27, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Good. He’s willing to change his plans after studying the available information, instead of hard headedly sticking to dogma and idealism, unlike some of the extremist loons on the far right and far left.

Posted by: Johnny Bohner | September 27, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Obama was irresponsible calling for the closing of Gitmo within a year when it clearly is the best possible place for terrorists who want to kill us. Don’t confuse Gitmo with Abu Ghraib as liberals do. Its time that we who warned the American people that Obama was not what he said he was can say WE TOLD YOU SO!!!

Posted by: Kevin from Wisconsin | September 27, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

I figure it should be pretty easy to close Gitmo — just return all the people to the country of origen — most are Pakistani shepherds who got nabbed by their government and given to the U.S. because the U.S. paid $25K a head for all ‘suspected’ Al Qaeda AND WOW — they ended up with a whole bunch of shepherds and taxi drivers who did know what was going on until they were put in an orange jumpsuit and forced to endure torture on a daily basis like sleep deprivation and the non-stop listening to death metal at painful volumes! — Folks, Gitmo is there to condition the world, especially Americans that torture is now a way of life. And any Americans who do not think that it is not going to happen to you eventually had better wake up. And folks, Obama and Bush are the same — just that one is more eloquent in speech. Quit the bipartisan bickering and wake up!!!

Posted by: W. Wallace | September 27, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

rightbehind; You’ll trust anyone Obama ‘appoints’. Never question authority, huh? Amazing!

Posted by: LongT | September 27, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

When do we, the taxpayers, get our country back?
Posted by: LongT | Sep 27, 2009 10:06:55 AM
I got news for you. I’m a taxpayer to and then some. I never want to see republicans in control again. I trust the democrats more. The conclusion is which democrats do we replace with another democrat.

Posted by: rightbehind | September 27, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Well Georgie…OBama thought he could close Gitmo and put the detainees in NYC in hotel rooms and room service… but for some reason the American people are racist and anti-muslium so we decided to hold off

Posted by: everyone must use single ply tolietpaper | September 27, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

When will people learn that a politician’s campaign promises have no value whatsoever? These jokers will say anything to get elected. Once safely in office, they develop amnesia. Since most of them are lawyers too (yet another profession rife with liars), they will try to spin, twist and dance their way out of any committment whatsoever. That is how the game is played in Washington. And every 4 years, like Charlie Brown with the footbal, we make another run at it thinking ‘this time’ our team will make a field goal. Right now we’re at the “AAAAGH” point with this administration. Suckered again.

Posted by: h5mind | September 27, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

rightbehind; You’ll trust anyone Obama ‘appoints’. Never question authority, huh? Amazing!
Posted by: LongT
Not the case. I have watched this guy. He’s sharp. Although I do admit I have not seen any of President Obama’s appointments that I would question.

Posted by: rightbehind | September 27, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Stratabuse: “When do we, the taxpayers, get our country back?”
I agree. I am so sick of my taxes going to Iraq and Afghanistan. Why is my money being spent to defend them and rebuild their schools, hospitals and roads/bridges? Keep our tax dollars in the U.S.!

Posted by: theregoI | September 27, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Gee, after all of their idiotic rhetoric of the election last year, the Obama/Emanuel White House finally has to face what Bush was telling us all along – Gitmo is not as simple to close as it seems. But then, the Democrats have always gained power by selling whatever sounds good…as long as the voters don’t think twice, they get voted in.

Posted by: Bill | September 27, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Gitmo may never close. It has served a purpose and should be kept open. In reality Gitmo saved US lives.Transferring the prisoners to other prisons does nothing other than increase the risk to US citizens. Obama’s promise to close it by January 2010 was nothing more than political scoring.

Posted by: Kottaras | September 28, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Well what you say ?? Too much talk from big O huh ? I guess his vociferous rethoric just hit the reality wall on this one and many others to come..what do you expect from a rookie ?

Posted by: Not a sheep | September 28, 2009, 6:16 am 6:16 am

Take as long as necessary, to keep terrorists from being released among us, by the worthless court system we have, which turns almost everyone loose, in no time, as it is.
I doubt that a single criminal ever serves a complete sentence, today.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

I think the word ‘duh’ comes to mind…

Posted by: Bill | September 28, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Just another bone headed mistake.

Posted by: sammy | September 29, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.