By Kristina Wong

Sep 29, 2009 3:31pm

Gibbs Explains Why the President Has Only Talked to General McChrystal Once in 10 Weeks

ABC’s Jordyn Phelps reports:

The White House today pressed back against speculations that General Stanley McChrystal is not highly influential in guiding the President’s Afghanistan policy decisions.

General Stanley McChrystal signaled that his consultations with President Obama on Afghanistan have been limited in a 60 Minutes interview Sunday.

“I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once,” McChrystal said.

David Martin, the CBS reporter who interviewed McChrystal followed up by asking, “You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?”

“That is correct,” McChrystal answered.

White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs in a briefing Tuesday dispelled speculations that the President isn’t consulting with the general.

“The president receives a memo every week from General McChrystal,” Gibbs said.

Gibbs says that the weekly memo, which has both military and diplomatic components, guides the President’s decisions regarding Afghanistan and emphasized that Obama meets regularly with the military chain of command. 

In response to a question about how the president views McChrystal, Gibbs responded, “Understand that the President signed off on putting General McChrystal where he is.”

President Obama will meet tomorrow via video conference with McChrystal and other high-level officials to discuss the future plans regarding Afghanistan.

–Jordyn Phelps

User Comments

“Understand that the President signed off on putting General McChrystal where he is.”
“This ain’t Kansas any more, Toto. It’s Chicago.”
The Chicago Way.

Posted by: drjohn | September 29, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Expect Obama to fly into Afghanistan after his trip to Copenhagen on Friday.
It will be a “surprise” visit.

Posted by: Sandy | September 29, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“You were working as a sergeant in a cocktail bar
When I met you
I picked you out, I shook you up, and turned you around
Turned you into someone new
Now five years later on youve got the world at your feet
Success has been so easy for you
But dont forget its me who put you where you are now
And I can put you back down too”

Posted by: drjohn | September 29, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

“The president receives a memo every week from General McChrystal,” Gibbs said.
They don’t call him “Baghdad Bob” Gibbs for nothing.

Posted by: I'm not a President, but I Play One on TV | September 29, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Gibbs says nothing valuable, as usual….a sea of empty words…

Posted by: Stacy | September 29, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

olympics or us troops, olympics or us troops, olympics or us troops. seems we have a problem in washington prioritizing whats important, prety shameful

Posted by: catman | September 29, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Letterman or McChrystal….hmmm. tough one.

Posted by: mjishernameo | September 29, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Jake
It’s got to be an interesting experience to have to talk day after day to someone who thinks you’re a total idiot.
The entire administration top down has nothing but contempt for the intellect of the US.

Posted by: drjohn | September 29, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Obama thinks that if he is not told
directly about what needs to be done
he can put off a decision. Kind of
like the “don’t ask, don’t tell”
only this is for Obama. Obama does
not like to nor knows how to make a
tough decision. He is NOT leader.
Pity those troops waiting to hear whats
next. It must scare the hell out of
them to know their commander in chief is
a waffeling, smiling and scared “leader”.

Posted by: wis134 | September 29, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Obama close friend and right hand man Valerie Jarrett has a lot to gain from the Olympics, much more important then our troops, disgusting!!!

Posted by: Maggie | September 29, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

10 weeks and not spoken to the Commander of a war! I don’t care if General McChrystal was sending a video everyday – Obama needs to talk to the man.
I am having a hard time figuring out what has the most humor. Gibbs obviously having to make up excuse after excuse or the press, for the most part, believing what he tells them.
Hopefully, the kool-aide runs out soon and some of the press wakes up.
My new byline for Obama:
“I don’t think I like indecision…… but I’m not sure.”

Posted by: TucsonWilly | September 29, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

LOOK …..
GW BUSH was in the oval office for 8 YEARS. This Afghan war has been going on for 8 YEARS! Where was the pushing and prodding during those 8 YEARS? Why wasn’t DUBYA pushed to make a decision — during those 8 YEARS? President Obama has been in the oval office 8 MONTHS and people are demanding action now. GIVE ME A BREAK!!! Your arguments and criticisms are FLAWED and HYPOCRITICAL. Stop hating!

Posted by: yvette | September 29, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

I am so fake-outraged by this. Now, I need to turn FOX News back on to see what else I can bash the president about.

Posted by: Reason | September 29, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

yvette,
But he promised healthcare reform by August, Gitmo empty by January, Cap and Trade by June, unemployment no higher than 8%, reverse all of those bad boy Bush security thingies that just keep on moving along. Not to mention falsehoods (I believe that is a term still allowed) like $50,000 amputations and tonsils being yanked out for no reason other than money. Insurance not to illegals (well, at least after they changed the wording a bit) no abortions covered (unless of course they are covered).
yvette – it is not hatred it is worse than that – it is trust. Obama is/has lost the trust of many people because he changes his story or just does not make a decision. He is still campaigning and that is not a way to run a country.

Posted by: Robert | September 29, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Gibbs:”I’m quite certain the President waived at the General from across the Mall the other day. I’m also nearly 99% sure the President subscribes to the General’s Tweets. And they have the same barber. So, to say they don’t communicate is just the vast right wing conspiracy nuts going off the deep end again.”

Posted by: Woody | September 29, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

“GW BUSH was in the oval office for 8 YEARS. This Afghan war has been going on for 8 YEARS! Where was the pushing and prodding during those 8 YEARS? Why wasn’t DUBYA pushed to make a decision — during those 8 YEARS? President Obama has been in the oval office 8 MONTHS and people are demanding action now. GIVE ME A BREAK!!! Your arguments and criticisms are FLAWED and HYPOCRITICAL. Stop hating!”
Posted by: yvette | Sep 29, 2009 4:35:14 PM
Sen. McCain pressured Bush all the time to send more troops to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Posted by: Short Attention Span Theatre | September 29, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

McChrystal needs to have bomber William Ayers on speed dial.
He is the brains and author of Obama’s memior, Dreams of My Father.
Same nautical references, same East River NYC analogy, same Homer style of starting the story in mid-life, then going back in time. Same green-eyed girlfriend whose father owns a country estate with a lake.
Same images of boys riding water buffalo. Same triple-dependent clause senteces.
Obama is a literary fraud, who claimed to have written his books all by himself. Also, it is the basis for the belief that he is a genious.

Posted by: Colonel Rebel | September 29, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“…Why wasn’t DUBYA pushed to make a decision — during those 8 YEARS? President Obama has been in the oval office 8 MONTHS and people are demanding action now. GIVE ME A BREAK!!! Your arguments and criticisms are FLAWED and HYPOCRITICAL.”
Speaking of flawed and hypocritical…. get out a mirror, why don’t you.
This chowderhead prez has had time to have a beer with bickering Bostonites; take 6 months to pick out a dog for the kiddies; go on every news show (except for Fox… he’s afraid of them because they won’t kiss his ring)to promote his agenda(s); vaca in the Hamptons; vaca in NYC; play golf and basketball with his chums; campaign for an insurance business takeover; go into the used car business; and plan to go on a Danish sales job to get the Olympics for his handlers in Chicago
And you’re Still thinking he hasn’t had enough time in office. PUHLEEZE.
And, Enough with the blaming things on the prior administration already. B.O. is heading into the final 3 months of his first year in office….. don’t think he’ll be able to use that excuse much longer.

Posted by: Just Saying | September 29, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

“McChrystal needs to have bomber William Ayers on speed dial.
He is the brains and author of Obama’s memior, Dreams of My Father.”
This is a fav right wing tin foil conspiracy for me.
I guess Ayers sabotaged himself a decade before Obama was a name.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“The president receives a memo every week from General McChrystal,” Gibbs said. Oh, well that makes it all fine then! What an idiotic statement. Did the press let this pass too? I cannot believe all the things this White House has said and done. The press gives EVERYTHING a pass. There are no “investigative journalists” left, just robots that release only what the White House wants released. Try watching the main stream news at night. They all use the exact same verbage like it was handed to them from the WH, and read it. Sickening!!!

Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 29, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

He for the olympics.but we have people dying in what is now his war.come on mr commander in chief the decision cant be put off any longer. their blood is on your hands now.

Posted by: jim bradford | September 29, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Ryan, Just love how you cherry pick the comments to respond to. Serious criticism of the president’s lack of communication with his Afghan commander– you ignore. Serious criticism of the press for letting the ridiculousness of Gibby’s statement pass– you ignore. Out of left field comment about William Ayers– you leap upon and ridicule so you can trot out your views about “right wing morons.”
How about engaging the more serious points raised in Ms. Phelps’s piece and in the comments?

Posted by: moderate | September 29, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The reasons why BHO speaks to McChrystal just once in the past 70 days are because of 1)his ambitious domestic agenda 2) his inability to understand the complexities of war despite all the talk about it 3) his anger with McChrystal who he installed in Afghanistan to be actually his yes man rather than one asking for troop increase.
Last but not the least, BHO is Bush III, because he listens to the commanders on the ground when it suits his political expediencies, but does not care a damn about their views when they clash with his political pursuits.
As usual, Gibbs Lies for BHO.

Posted by: T Reason | September 29, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

wheresmymoney:
The major network news organizations no longer care about the money…. they know they are losing business to Fox and other news organizations that have already realized that most people who watch tv and read the papers and listen to the radio don’t want to spend time or money to be fed the politically correct propaganda/indoctrination garbage that the major network news organizations are serving up…. The major news organizations do not care — they want to press their ideology. And, their ideology is exactly the same as that of the current administration.
Look at newspapers: Losing money, facing bankruptcy, losing readers; dropping circulation, and, yet, the newspapers stick with passing on the left-wing propoganda instead of presenting both sides of issues. Readers know propaganda when they see it… and they are not having it anymore.
The major news organizations have not been honestly reporting news; have not been merely reporting facts without commentary; have not been asking the tough questions that they would have asked a Republican administration; and have been unapologetically acting as though they’ve been in this administration’s pocket since early in the current prez’s campaign.
They don’t care. They figure that their reward will come when the government controls the news outlets too. Fools.

Posted by: news hound | September 29, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“Ryan, Just love how you cherry pick the comments to respond to.”
Does it embarrass you when I take apart one of your loonier comrades?
Perhaps you should do so yourself instead of wink and nodding that you do now giving them acceptance.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

“they know they are losing business to Fox and other news organizations that have already realized that most people who watch tv and read the papers and listen to the radio don’t want to spend time or money to be fed the politically correct propaganda/indoctrination garbage”
ROFLMAO!
Because FoxNews is politically incorrect propaganda/indoctrination garbage and that’s a-ok.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Obama finds the time to talk to the General once in 70 days but he flies to Denmark at the drop of a hat so he can take the full credit IF the olympics are held in Chicago. He still thinks he is a community organizer I guess. BTW did you all know that Bill Ayers wrote both his books yet Obama claimed that Ayers was “a guy who lived in my neighborhood”!! This guy can tell a lie better than Bill Clinton ever could!!

Posted by: Colorado | September 29, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I didn’t really see in your article where Gibbs answered the question of why there was only one talk.
I guess his answer is that reading a weekly memo is adequate communication?

Posted by: Concerned | September 29, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

This is for Little Yvette. I have news for you, just because we disagree with Obama’s policies does not mean we “hate”. Disagreeing with him does not mean racism”. Grow up little girl.

Posted by: Colorado | September 29, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Obama doesn’t know how to talk to military men. He is ashamed in their presence.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 29, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

“The major news organizations have not been honestly reporting news;”
Although not straight news, there was an item last week from Bill O’Reilly on Fox News Channel that’s classic! On his “Pinheads and Patriots” segment, O’Reilly said:
“A new study by Sacred Heart University in Connecticut says that Fox News is THE most trusted television news network in the USA. 30% of Americans say FNC is their most credible source of information. Second was CNN at 19%. Waaay down the list – NBC news 7 ½ %. For doing the study, the folks at Sacred Heart are patriots.”
But, Spinmeister O’Reilly conveniently left out the next sentence from the study: Fox News was also the television news organization trusted LEAST.
Fox News was waaaay at the top of the least trusted list with 26%. Distant runners-up were NBC News and MSNBC, both at less than 10%.
File that under The Spin of Omission.

Posted by: WWW | September 29, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

The key reason why General McChrystal has not spoken with the President, the Commander-in- Chief is the simple fact, chain of command. In the military as in any organizations you communicate with your superior/manager and he or she will pass your message up the chain of command.
Ask yourself, when was the last time you had a face to face meeting with the CEO of the company you work for?

Posted by: Deborah | September 29, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

It’s been passed up the chain-of-command. What doesn’t the President understand about “urgently needed”? I don’t work for a company where lives are on the line; in any case, my input would be irrelevant for the CEO as I’d be too far down the food chain. McChrystal is NOT and is VERY relevant. If not meeting with him, then pass the word DOWN the chain of command – NOW.

Posted by: Nikki | September 29, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Memo #1: Sir, Am in country. Have gotten better understanding of the situation. We need to talk soonest.
Memo #2: Uh, sir. We need to talk.
Memo #3: Hello?
Memo #4: HELLOOOOO!!!! ANYBODY BACK THERE?!?!

Posted by: clayusmcret | September 29, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

It is with intense ecstasy that I report that disgraced fool Dan Rather has had his ridiculous lawsuit thrown out by a New York appeals court. Even more wonderful, he has wasted $5 million on it.
Let this be a warning to left-wing “journalists”: don’t use forged documents to smear a man just because he doesn’t share your goofball politics.
Justice was done today.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 29, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Ryan, didn’t say you shouldn’t call a loon a loon. I’ve done the same myself many a time, actually. But I was suggesting you might ALSO sometimes respond to more serious critics. Otherwise, it looks like you’re ducking them.
Of course, I realize that opens me up to charges of a double standard, since I post very little these days, due to lack of time (and the fact that there’s little new I can contribute to the debates, as it’s all been said and said and said). But I still read the comments whenever I can and you still seem to be a pretty constant presence on the boards, but usually just making snide remarks about weak commenters, not engaging in serious discussions of the issues.

Posted by: moderate | September 29, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Ryan c,it is no longer a right-wing conspiracy story-an Obamaphile author has confirmed that Bill Ayers was intimately involved with writing “Dreams…”He also has claimed 2 separate sources.THE INTERESTING THING IS THAT NO ONE HAS ADDRESSED THE FRANTZ FALON ISSUE IN OBAMA’S AND AYERS’ BOOKS-BOTH BOOKS MENTION THIS OBSCURE PSYCHIATRIST.Why does Obama’s white girlfriend in the book resemble Ayers old flame who was so stupid she blew herself up?Nobody who knew Obama has any recollection about this so-called girlfriend.Jake,do some digging-there might be a Pulitzer out there.

Posted by: Nephron | September 29, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Correction-Frantz FANON.

Posted by: Nephron | September 29, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

“The key reason why General McChrystal has not spoken with the President, the Commander-in- Chief is the simple fact, chain of command.”
So I guess Ike shouldn’t have talked to the paratroopers on the eve of the Normandy invasion. Lincoln shouldn’t have talked to Grant. FDR shouldn’t have talked to MacArthur.
Obama has been negligent here. Everyone recognizes that. It’s time for him to start being commander-in-chief instead of a campaigner. Problem is, he doesn’t know how.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 29, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I don’t get some of you. Don’t the meetings with the NATO Secretary General today and the National Security Council tomorrow register with you folks? Doesn’t the fact that the President supports General McCrystal and signed off on putting him, with his experience, in the position he’s now in register with you folks? Did you not hear what Gates and Clinton said on the Sunday morning talk shows? Do you not care? Haven’t you read that McCrystal himself denies a rift and supports debate? I know we’ve become a culture that thrives on instant gratification, but give them more than a NY minute to deliberate, strategize and assess.

Posted by: Alyson | September 29, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

General McChrystal is not a peon who occupies a low position in the chain of Command. His input on the situation in Afghanistan is a valuable one. And yet the President overlooks him and treats him as one of the White House lackeys. Apparently Obama’s priorities are not tuned in to military needs that are somewhat more important than his “urgent need” to appear in person to plead for the 2016 Olympics! I wish he had taken some time to read a few good books and guides for administration. It could have been a very helpful use of his time before he sworn in! His inexperience is underwhelming!

Posted by: Rudy | September 30, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I’ve been reading all the responses and some of them just crack me up. “Obama meets regularly with the military chain of command.”
Barack H. Obama is the President of the United States of America. He is not some bodies boy.

Posted by: LS | September 30, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

“Barack H. Obama is the President of the United States of America. He is not some bodies boy.”
Right, and that’s why as Commander in Chief of troops in combat he should be more interested in the war in Afghanistan than oh, say, the Olympics or making my kids go to school year round.
Please don’t give me the “but he can walk and chew gum at the same time” line because the reality is whether he can or not, he isn’t.

Posted by: Amy Proctor | September 30, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

WHICH IS JUST MORE BULL!!!

Posted by: Temagami | September 30, 2009, 5:56 am 5:56 am

And this is why Hillary Clinton had more military endorsing her during the primaries.

Posted by: Jenny | September 30, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

I don’t get some of you. Don’t the meetings with the NATO Secretary General today and the National Security Council tomorrow register with you folks? Doesn’t the fact that the President supports General McCrystal and signed off on putting him, with his experience, in the position he’s now in register with you folks? Did you not hear what Gates and Clinton said on the Sunday morning talk shows? Do you not care? Haven’t you read that McCrystal himself denies a rift and supports debate? I know we’ve become a culture that thrives on instant gratification, but give them more than a NY minute to deliberate, strategize and assess.
Posted by: Alyson | Sep 29, 2009 11:30:34 PM
*****************
I don’t get you. There’s been a sense of urgency with every proposed legislation – and don’t try to deny it. None of this legislation is LIFE AND DEATH. But the situation in Afghanistan is. You obviously don’t understand priorities. But Americans do and can see this self-serving president trying to accomplish his own agenda first (i.e. olympics, health care) before he worries about our American soldiers. You can spin this one in your liberal favor.

Posted by: Jenny | September 30, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Obama told us that if gov’t healthcare doesn’t pass, people will die. Maybe, maybe not, probably BS though as he can’t even admit a tax is a tax.
But you can be sure that people will surely die if Barry keeps hemming and hawing on Afghanistan. A decision neeeds to be made. Fish or cut bait, this isn’t the time for trips to Denmark.

Posted by: Paulie | September 30, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

LS | Sep 30, 2009 12:29:21 AM
“I wish [obama] had taken some time to read a few good books and guides for administration. It could have been a very helpful use of his time before he sworn in! His inexperience is underwhelming!”
He should have read “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” by Schirer. He would have gotten a lesson on how the Iran of that time played the allies before setting out on the conquest of Europe, and had most Americans read it before BHO was elected, would have seen the very tactics in propaganda he’s using to deceive the masses, a la Goebbels…

Posted by: hawk | September 30, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

You obviously don’t understand priorities. But Americans do…..
**
Riiiiight. And you’re supposedly an
American because you get it? Because you want to railroad the Prez into making a rash decision? Nevermind the meeting today, or the assessment from McCrystal in the first place? Or getting our NATO allies to participate in the strategy we decide upon? So, what about the lack of support among Americans for sending more troops? (let me guess, they’re not Americans?) Or the crooked government in Afghanistan? Nevermind any of the important questions the NRC will be discussing today because Jenny, she’s allegedly an American and knows exactly what should be done. SHE gets it and the President doesn’t because he’s supposedly the self-centered one. I suppose you miss the good ole days when all foreign policy was based on one misguided idealogue’s gut– a gut that missed the reason we’re in Afghanistan in the first place. Eyeroll.

Posted by: Alyson | September 30, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

-Because you want to railroad the Prez into making a rash decision?-
Hey, we’re not talking about passing healthcare “reform” in time shorter that it took to chose a dog, right? Yeah, railroading… People are getting killed and not just Americans. A decision needs to be made and soon. The Olympics are a distant 2nd place. Give the damn games to Rio. More important stuff is going on, or haven’t you noticed?

Posted by: Waiting | September 30, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Out:
I blame George W. Bush.
In:
I blame Fox News.

Posted by: Community Agitator | September 30, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Waiting,
I support your statements except to the extent that you think the Olympics are a distant 2nd place priority….. Try 115th, maybe 116th. But then again, although the priority is very low for the country, Obama’s Chicago handlers out here have set the priority at #1 for Chicago politicians. He must do their bidding; they pull the strings.

Posted by: Chicagoan | September 30, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Alyson —- Foreign policy is debated, war is not. War requires decisions ASAP. General McChrystal, McKiernan and 7 ex Joint Chief’s have all stated we need more troops. Obama has been sitting on a 66 page report for 1 month and Gates has said he may take another 3 weeks to make the decision. This is completely unacceptable and I believe the only reason McChrystal hasn’t resigned is because he os a friend of Gates and Obama. Do you really think Colin Powell or Norman Schwartzkoff would wait 7 weeks for a decision? They can debate “foreign policy” all they want, but give our Commanders the resources they need to win…OVERWHELMINGLY.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 30, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Posted by: lfrichar | Sep 30, 2009 11:30:10 AM
Well, take exception to my view if you wish, BUT I stand very strongly by taking McCrystal’s view (he supports debate as long as it doesn’t go on too long), Gates’ view, Clinton’s view, General Jones’ view, Colin Powell’s view,and NATO’s view much more seriously than yours or that of Fox News talking heads. Colin Powell, as it turns out, is one of the people talking to the president on this issue, as is John McCain. My understanding is that they have opposite views, which gives me some pause. Do you realize how long these things take, even under Republican presidencies? I think Gates said it took three months to decide to go forward with the surge in Iraq. To me the important thing to consider is that Obama wanted an assessment, and in addition to the request for troops the response he got was that things were worse than McCrystal had expected. IMO, that’s worth talking about. Given things are worse than expected, what are the options? We’ll see how it turns out, but I do think the noisy anti-Obama folks on these boards are wrong about him giving more weight to the Olympics and other ridiculous claims. They tend to shriek about everything, without taking a moment to digest anything or consider all sides of it. Perhaps, Obama was wrong about Afghanistan and he’s man enough to admit it and change course. Perhaps not. Both Afghanistan and Iran represent excruciating sets of choices. I, for one, feel better knowing rash decisions aren’t being made.
All that being said, if this goes beyond another month– four weeks– I’m with you–I think it has to go at least past October 7th when the final results of the Afghan election are known, and that makes sense to me, and then swift decisions will need to be made, given all the information.

Posted by: Alyson | September 30, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah. The prez is good at that. It’s about the only thing he’s been shown to be good at. Oh yes, and getting people to love him despite his not doing anything that remotely helps anyone.
Actually, w/re: Afganistan: I predict our great community organizing leader of the armed forces will take a poll to determine if he should give another speech; then talk with the New York Times and MSNBC to decide what would be the best thing for his popularity; then go on all the talk shows; then go on another vacation; then go on another talk show; then give a few more teleprompted speech; and then show strong action by having his mouth-piece Gibbs tell us all what the prez thinks should be debated.

Posted by: Oh Puhleeze | September 30, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Obama does not want to do Bush era neoconservative nation building. The nation building that Bush did in afganistan includded little more then giving pipeline access to karzai. And it looks like that government has rigged the last election. I am not sure why we want to and are backing Karzai to be honest. I dont know why we would add 40,000 troups to protect the karzai government.
If we are going to send 40,000 troups those troups should be going directly to finding Bin Laden and his closest advisors who are most likely in Pakistan. But that is not what McCrystal’s plan is for. His plan is for an increased presence in the larger cities of Afganistan (where Bin Laden is not). So I am not sure why we would want to follow that strategy. It is not the strategy that I thought we were going to get when i voted for Obama. And Obama is the Command And Chief not mccrystal.

Posted by: robert | October 5, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.