Gibbs Responds To Van Jones Resignation
This morning on This Week Gibbs gave me the first official response:
GEORGE: Does the president believe that he is the victim of a smear campaign or does the president think that Jones actions and words merit resignation?
GIBBS: “Well what Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual. The president thanks Van Jones for his service in the first eight months helping to coordinate renewable energy jobs and lay the foundation for our future economic problem…The president accepted his resignation, but Van Jones as he said in his statement he was going to get in the way of the President.”
GEORGE: So the president doesn't endorse in any way the things that Van Jones said before but the president doesn’t want him to go?
GIBBS: He doesn't but he thanks him for his service."
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Again, Gibbs doesn’t answer the question.
Posted by: crystalinWI | September 6, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
The underside of the President’s bumper must be getting messy… his grandmother, Van Jones, Bill Richardson, Rev. Wright, Daschle….
Posted by: under the bus | September 6, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
It’s not over, there are more where he came from, but I couldn’t be happier about his resignation.
Posted by: Shawn | September 6, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Now how about the others? John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, that “Diversity” czar… So much corruption.
Posted by: John | September 6, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
It’s a great start, but we have a long way to go
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | September 6, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Vann Jones quit. Obama did not fire him. That tells alot. Apparently Obama doesnt feel that Jone’s views are all that unacceptable.
Posted by: Mike | September 6, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Considering the complete lack of coverage this garnered form ABC, NBC, CBS, Major Newspapers, I’m surprised that he actually resigned. I also find it hard to believe that the Obama administration new nothing about his radical views.
Posted by: Matt | September 6, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
That’s about as clear as mud.
GEORGE: So the president doesn’t endorse in any way the things that Van Jones said before but the president doesn’t want him to go?
GIBBS: He doesn’t but he thanks him for his service.”
He doesn’t what? He “doesn’t endorse in any way the things that Van Jones said” or he “doesn’t want him to go”?
Posted by: Rich in Tokyo | September 6, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
If Gibbs has any integrity, he should resign too. Must get dizzying to spin for this administration.
Posted by: Elle | September 6, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
And yet another one ran over by the Obama bus!
Posted by: Roger | September 6, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
I am glad the communist resigned, now we need to investigate why the president of the united states wanted to hire such a radical. Van jones comments on columbine were borderline racist.
Posted by: Sean | September 6, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
The Obama administration threw Van Jones under the bus. Another in the growing list of disappointments and failures.
Posted by: Lou Novak | September 6, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Amazing how Obama’s promised transparency has so quickly come down to smooth non-statements like this of Gibbs. His greatest asset is the ability not to answer the question posed.
This admin does not have one single honest aspect to it. This is the greatest fraud perpetrated on the American presidency.
Posted by: Paul B. | September 6, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Unbelievable that the pres. wanted him to stay. America wake up, this pres is so scary, it tell volumes of where he is going to take this beautiful country. He will do ANYTHING to wheel his power and the majority of Americans voted him in after being warrend about his associates. How blind were those who voted for him. Open your eyes America!!!!!
Posted by: dingelo | September 6, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Unbelievable! That’s all ABC has to say about, Van Jones, an avowed Communist in the White House? Why wasn’t ABC reporting on this man. There are actual videos of his speeches. Only Fox News reported this.
All Americans need to ask this question:
Where is the rest of the Media,and why are they not reporting important information to America???
Posted by: Concerned American | September 6, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
The American people are getting pretty fed up up with this Marxist POTUS. Enough rope and well, you know the rest. Let’s just hope the damage done can be controlled; our now historical debt alone is a national security issue, we can’t afford more of this nonsense. Surely soon, mouthpiece Gibson will realize he no longer has credibility.
Posted by: fedup_11 | September 6, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Even President Obama’s people are cautious about being associated with President Obama’s actions. He pushed a health care plan he didn’t even know what was in it; that is blind leadership. He didn’t want time for the long plan to be debated; that is manipulative and secretive leadership. He is proving the worst charges against himself by his insistence in hiding his identity records that could end the controversy over his eligibility because of his father and step father both being of other nations, giving him at best dual citizenship and allegiances. He is not a reassuring president, but a worrisome president. We cannot follow or be secure in this leadership and neither can his own people. The only question is, Who will be next to depart from him?
Posted by: Marie Devine | September 6, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Obama will come out and sugar coat this for everyone. Now people, you all know that Obama had no clue what this man had said in his past. Remember Rev. Wright. I cant believe Obama did not fire him. We need Donald Trump as a YOU ARE FIRED czar.
Posted by: kk | September 6, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Uh huh…well, if you believe this bs, I have some beach front property in arizona to sell ya!
We have been diagnosed with “cancer” in our government and for that matter, our country.
A few “tumors” have been discovered and diagnosed as malignant.
Do we approach this destructive disease “conservatively?” (no pun intended)
Or do we use aggressive measures to make sure “all of the cancer” is removed?
Removing only one of the tumors ie; “Van Jones” or a few other of the tumors Czars, Sunstein, Jarrett, etc..Pelosi, Reid, Franks, Obama, Federal Reserve, Acorn, SEIU and all entities who subscribe to the communistic take over of the body.. who have been suspected of being malignant, does not guarantee we have eradicated the cancer.
We need “aggressive” treatment and total removal of the “cancer” to improve our chances of survival.
Get the picture?
Posted by: A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness | September 6, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Van Jones did not commit any crime, did not evade taxes, did a reasonable job for the past 8 months and he is forced to resign on the basis of his views expressed almost a decade ago. What is going on? Are people no longer able to freely express their views and the administration will not stand by their appointees. No wonder the disappointed independents are moving away from the Kowtowing administration to special interests.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | September 6, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
So basically, George provided Gibbs with a dodge. That isn’t reporting or interviewing…it is leading the witness! How about asking him if the POTUS knew he was hiring a Communist? (Of course he did!)Ask if they’re going to do any more serious vetting as a result of this mess they created. These advisors need to be subject to the “advise and consent” of the Congress. This is absolutely ridiculous!
Posted by: Bobbi | September 6, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Wish Gibbs, and a few others, would go too!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 6, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Jones claims he was smeared. How can anyone be smeared with the truth?
Posted by: TX_MBell | September 6, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
how can ANYONE trust this character Obama who seems to put political viability and personal aggrandisement above ANYONE. Whether family, friends, mentors, father-figures, fundraisers, pastors, political supporters, or associates. As soon as their true radical nature, or any potential criminality, comes out to the public Obama abandones them. Or even just uses them in speeches for personal gain to make political points (like calling an eldery, ill grandma a “typical white person”) or denying long time mentors and the “person who brought me to Jesus” after decades. This guy is scary.
Posted by: Ed | September 6, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Does this mean the media might finally do their job and spend more time looking in to the background of these other czars?
ABC has dedicated more coverage to the Obama families dog choice or Michelle’s clothing choices then they have to all these czars he has been appointing.
Posted by: JeffinSac | September 6, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
i have to laugh at some of jones’ “defenders”… many of his comments were made months ago… not decades – and anyone who was in support of a communist group just 3 years ago has no business advising the president. more than that, it says a lot about our president that he feels the need to surround himself with many people who feel much the way van jones does.
Posted by: paige | September 6, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Chalk one up for Glenn Beck
Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Jones is a QUITTER!
Posted by: Paula | September 6, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Why does ABC’s reporting, or lack of, totally suck when it comes to reporting a White House Czar who calls people a-holes , and himself a communist? Why do you suck ABC?
Posted by: Gladys | September 6, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
“The president thanks Van Jones for his service in the first eight months helping to coordinate renewable energy jobs and lay the foundation for our future economic problem…”
“and lay the foundation for our future economic problem…”?
Freudian slip? Gaffe? Truth?
Posted by: Tony Byron | September 6, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
The Obama administration makes a feeble attempt to turn a self-proclaimed Communist and Marxist radical into some kind of martyr.
Not gonna work, Obama – America knows just who you are now – a radical Communist and Marxist, and a liar.
Enough of Obama – IMPEACH!
Posted by: One_American | September 6, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Good work “FOX NATION”
Posted by: james stone | September 6, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
I love how the panel shushed up the entire point George Will made about the NEA. Great article written by filmmaker Patrick Courrielches. Has everyone heard about this? They laugh that some think our President’s agenda is to indoctrinate our children. NOW his talk with the kiddos will be simple….because those who love this country called him out on this! Did you see the original lesson plan? Chavez and Obama want to indoctrinate our little ones!
Posted by: Cheryl | September 6, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Is Glen Beck now in charge of White House personnel decisions?
What kind of independent leaders and visionaries does the Administration expect to attract if the White House will not stand behind its choices and its people?
Van Jones is the organizer of a movement whose vision has caught the imagination of this generation. The ‘green jobs’ economy is a driving motif of the President’s re-investment strategy. As a staffer, he lowered his profile and acted appropriately for a member of the team..
It is clearly hard for the White House to build its complete, strong team – and this timid retreat in the face of whacky acusations will not make it any easier to attract talent.
Posted by: Meg Power | September 6, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
gjkotw01
This is now old data. Jones expressed these same views in video from February and March of this year.
He is a radical and should not have been appointed in the first place.
Posted by: df | September 6, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
1 down and 34 radicals to go–33 CZARS and 1 President!!
Posted by: df | September 6, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
I don’t believe the Bush Administration played a role in plotting 9/11; however, many Americans do. Mr. Jones made a grave error in signing a petition fully understand what was being said. I think he did the right thing to resign, since his presence would be used to divert attention from many important issues that President Obama wants to address. I wish him well, however, as I think his work on green energy is important, and I hope this setback does not prevent him from moving forward with this work.
Posted by: Kaye Martin | September 6, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
These people need to be looked at more closely: John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, that “Diversity” czar…Mark Lloyd. So much underground policy. Considering the complete lack of coverage this garnered form ABC, NBC, CBS, Major Newspapers, I’m surprised that he actually resigned. I also find it hard to believe that the Obama administration knew nothing about his radical views. Valerie Jarrett senior advisor stated Jones had been looked at for a long time.
Posted by: grey0066 | September 6, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I would like to ammend the statement that I submitted earlier. What I meant is that it was an error to sign a petition without fully understanding what was being said. That having been said, I hope this incident is only a temporary setback and that Mr. Jones will be able to move forward with a promising career.
Posted by: Kaye Martin | September 6, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
What was that ? The Babbler In Chief didn’t want him to go but doesn’t agree with him ?? Hmmm, sounds like Mr. O’Babble’s explanation of how he managed to sit in Jeremiah Wright’s church for 20 years yet never heard the racist and anti-American remarks that made Wright infamous.
Posted by: Ron | September 6, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Finally, mainstream media addressing an Obama issue(after-the-fact). Van Jones had a library of videos to support his radicalism. Carol Browner was listed as a commissioner in Socialist International (until she was nominated by Obama) Commission for a Sustainable World Society that calls for shrinking the economies of rich countries. Is that the job of the US government?
Posted by: valboski | September 6, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Ignoring Van Jones is exactly why FOX has become the major power in news today. But this time, you and the other now worthless liberal, distorting news outlets offend me as an American letting a monster like that go unscathed.
Posted by: Safetyhit | September 6, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Gee, and I never got to ask him just what he had achieved in his 8 months of employment as a “greening” czar..I guess his boss, Obama, will share that with us as we paid this self-proclaimed Communist……..now, how about the other “Czar”…like Emanuel’s brother…….and shouldn’t anyone playing a role as a major policymaker go through some kind of vetting process..maybe the Roberts court should look at that question??????????????
PS…Gibbs would be a great crossword puzzle developer for the NY Times….can anyone figure him out…I know, I know, its the silly season….
Posted by: justj joey | September 6, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness—-you could not have said it any better.
Posted by: arkdelta | September 6, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
GIBBS: “Well what Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual.” What a BS answer!
Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Van Jones Resigns – Obama Accepts
That’s it? Done? No more said? Okay, then how about our elected officials start asking some questions lik: Who are these Czars? Who chose them? How are they paid? Why are they making deicisions our Congressmen are elected to make? I would suggest they get some answers and be prepared for the 9-12 March on Washington. We will be there, to DEMAND answers. A huge thank you to Glenn Beck and Fox News for keeping us informed of these “villains” in our Republic. Carla
Posted by: Carlabee2 | September 6, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
It’s not just Van Jones. In the last two weeks, ABC hasn’t even mentioned anything about Charles Rangle.
Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Bagdad Bob “Gibbs” still has trouble with the truth. He should be the next to go.
Posted by: hank | September 6, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Just keep watching that nut case Glen Beck.You just learn so much and it’s all the God’s honest truth .I have a lot in the Everglades I want to sell any takers????
ROTFLMAO
Posted by: Ed | September 6, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
The vast majority of you who have left comments thus far sound like uneducated hillbillies. A true conservative knows what Van Jones said was wrong but doesn’t use it as an excuse to rant about nonsense. Wake up, read, and bring up the real issues.
Posted by: Texanna | September 6, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
GIBBS: “Well what Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual.++++++++++Now where did I put my shovel and hip waders?
Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
The most advisor driven President of all time can’t get a better vetting team? There must be money in the budget for that. Haven’t they been humiliated enough with their (his) poor choices? “Poster boy” needs to do some better research and not worry about his next TV appearance or GQ cover shot as much. Let’s HOPE this guy is Carter #2 and he’s out at the end of his term. Wake up America….he is taking us down the wrong road.
Posted by: DEB | September 6, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Hey A Voice in the wilderness might want to look again. Some of his statements were way back like in Feb and April of 2009. Oh man that is a long time ago lol. Why are we not allow to hold people to what they say and believe even if it
was 5 years ago. It’s like he became the Green Czar and all of a sudden his views changed on a dime. Come on people wake up.
Posted by: Ellerbestyle | September 6, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
If Van Jones is a communist what does that make you? — take to the streets if what you say is true otherwise you’re just sheep.
Posted by: Eric Shaefer | September 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
If Van Jones is a communist what does that make you? — take to the streets if what you say is true otherwise you’re just sheep.
Posted by: Eric Shaefer | September 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Such burning questions from George & ABC. I’m sure the Obama administration is down in the war room right now quivering wondering where ABC is going with this
Posted by: Jay | September 6, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
…must be part of the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ that Hillary was talking about in 1994…
Posted by: Bill | September 6, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I think Obama was doomed from the start because there are a lot of closet racists out there who failed to give him a chance. I understand the conservative/liberal differences but the comments have little or nothing to do with that. I feel sorry for the true Republicans and Conservatives who get grouped in with the rest of the bigots who are jobless and probably have been for a while, and yet blame it on a president who inherited this mess.
Posted by: Johnny J | September 6, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I always say “what goes around comes around”. Looks like Van Jones is out and Glenn Beck is still in. (Hahaha) Way to Go Glenn. Keep up the good work. 1 down, (haha) It won’t be long before the rest will put there foot in there BIG MOUTHS. (haha)
Posted by: Birther1957 | September 6, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Obama wouldn’t of hired Jones, if he didn’t find his OUT SPOKEN views not only ok but something he wanted pushed for. It should be obvious that OBAMA MUST SHARE THE SAME VIEWS AS JONES.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 6, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
You would think that a journalist, even one like Stephenopolis that only plays one on TV would have been asking Gibbs just How did a self avowed communist, 9/11 Truther and cop killer defender end up working as an Obama Czar overseeing $30 Billion in public funds.
Of course if you did you would be wrong.
Posted by: robtr | September 6, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
You have to remember George Steph is on Rahms morning Spin calls. He is a puppet for the Obama admin. Rahm is his buddy and ABC news will never to their job to report and inform and protect Americans with truth in journalism if it Negatively imkpacts the Obama admin.
We just have to get our news on the blogs and Fox. than god for now we still have them.
Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
When will we get Gibbs resignation for never giving a clear answer on a question that does not flatter the President. Compare Gibbs to nothing more that a babling idiot that has no comprehension of the English Language
Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I first encountered Jones over a decade ago when he was running Police Watch, a group that purported to monitor police brutality claims in the SF Bay Area. (Somehow, under Jones’ watch, very few of the cops they stalked were black.) I attended a seminar put on by Jones’ group for lawyers who handled civil rights cases on behalf of those injured at the hands of the police. At that seminar, Jones pointedly ignored the white male lawyers in attendance who made comments or asked questions during the appropriate times in each session, while indulging every question or comment made by the black lawyers present. It was so obvious that several white attorneys attending commented on it. Finally, having been ignored once too many times, I loudly stated, “Question here!” before Jones tried again to “move on” to the next topic. For all his loudly-trumpeted learning, the Yale Law graduate could not answer what I subsequently researched to be a fairly simple question about a question of federal-state law in such cases, a “reverse-Erie” issue for those in the know. Call Jones’ attitude what you will, but in light of his entire record I call it racism.
I, too, was disappointed by GS’ failure to press for direct answers to his questions to Gibbs on this issue. C’mon, George! Ask David Gregory for some pointers on how to properly press White House press secretaries for answers. He used to be pretty good at it.
Posted by: Herb Spencer | September 6, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
The media(other than Glenn Beck)needs to do some heavy lifting of their own. What do these czars stand for???
Posted by: Wayne | September 6, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
We have two problems; 1) An administration that is attempting to change the “freedom-first blueprint” of our country without amending the Constitution, and 2) A main stream media that will not report those attempts as such.
Van Jones did not swear to uphold the Constitution to get his job. But, ala Obama, would it have made a difference?
Posted by: Dominic D | September 6, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Biden is watering at the mouth to be president…did it ever occur to anyone that Biden accepted VP because it is the ONLY way and the shortest way to the presidency? Obama would be smart to not turn his back to Joe. JFK didn’t learn that lesson. Guess who might be working in the background to undermind BHO?
Posted by: Clif | September 6, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
========================
This is very bad news. The President has no objection to a radical, anarchist and a reverse racist.
========================
With a “president” like that, we are doomed.
Posted by: N Waff | September 6, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Can’t believe George let Gibby get away with that dodge. Oh, wait, it’s George S., of course I can believe it.
Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Stephanopolous is just another Useful Idiot and Fellow Traveller in the Media Shills for Obama. He never mentions Jones is a Communist, racist, and essentially hates the USA. Perhaps George should research his “news” stories occasionally. But, of course, he WANTS there to be Communists in the White House!
Posted by: JJ Kane | September 6, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Frankly, the self-anointed, self-appointed reporter of news and analysis, “chief correspondent” George Stephanopoulos, should throw himself under the bus. He was treacherous in the Clinton Administration and he is a traitor for the Obama Administration. Nothing newsworthy or truthful comes from this ABC leftist.
Posted by: ruthie | September 6, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
What gets me about this is you have those ‘crazy right-wing bloggers’ and ‘Faux News’ digging up this dirt, while the MSM talks about Obama’s dog and asks him what ‘enchants’ him. And we’re supposed to be mad at the bloggers and Fox?
I don’t watch Fox News, but I do read some ‘crazy right-wing bloggers’ and I’m incredibly thankful that there’s someone out there digging for dirt. Everyone should be, regardless of his party!
Posted by: AtheistConservative | September 6, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
There’s no question Obama knew all about Van Jones’past! His Senior Advisor and closest confidant (to Mrs. Obama too) Valerie Jarrett, can be seen on video talking about how she has followed Van Jones since his days in Oakland (which were pretty radical.) There is simply no way Mr. and Mrs. Obama can squirm their way out of this…THEY KNEW AND KNOW VAN JONES very well and that’s why he was chosen to work in the White House!
How twisted is this Van Jones? He states “They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.” Has he not seen himself on more than a dozen videos online spewing his madness and hatred? The only lies here are his! This is why we must not let the government regulate or take over the internet, radio or any other media source. If they do, we will never know the truth! Van Jones should be number one of a long list to go!
Posted by: Debbie T. | September 6, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
His appointment was an endorsement of Van Jones and his prior activities.
Posted by: geddy lee | September 6, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
They need to vet out the Seditionist’s and since it’s wartime………….
Posted by: Hunter | September 6, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Obama knew VJ and his background. That’s why he wanted him in th WH. He has completely surrounded himself with this kind of scum. He knows he will only be a one term president and he wants to take the nation down as far as he can, as fast as he can. Then those to whom he bows and the dictators whom he appeases will reward him for carrying out their mandate, that being the destruction of America. He is a traitor and any right thinking American must see that…..
Posted by: Clif | September 6, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
With Van Jones resignation there is one less “DECLARED” Communist in the White House. Now we have to extricate the “CLOSET” Communists still in residence. Greg Neubeck
Posted by: gneubeck | September 6, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
This is truly a sad day for America and for all those who died in Korea and Vietnam and those that risked their lives during the cold war.
The Democrats are called commies and its considered being a hater??? The president is OK with appointing a Marxist and people defend that action?!?!
One thing is certain, he is ABSOLUTELY NOT ANOTHER JFK.
Posted by: David from WI | September 6, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Sean: 9:46am “borderline racist”. Since when did conservatives get concerned about racism? Usually they ignore it or deny it even exist.
Posted by: Mike from Carolina | September 7, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am
George,what else is out there that you and your associates will not report?What Van Jones believes is not worth a hill of beans compared to the media’s failure to report those beliefs.When did curiousity become politically incorrect?
Posted by: Nephron | September 7, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
I am listening to all this “blather” about:did the White House Vet Him…did Obama know or didn’t he know about Van Jones…does Obama care…? Well, of course they “vetted” the communist dog, and Obama hired him specifically because he wanted Van Jones to push his own agenda. By the way, Van Jones; this so-called “Green Jobs Expert”; what exactly has he been doing besides shooting off his mouth the past eight months? Isn’t he the same guy that couldn’t come up with a definition of a Green Job? Come to think of it: What is a Green Job? The only green job I can think of is simply not working. But, maybe that is what he is “expert” at. What a piece of trash. Now when and how are we going to get rid of the rest of them? The sooner the better for all concerned. I hope that when Obama addresses the joint session of Congress, some Americans in the audience have the “Chutzpah” to stand up and bring the man back to reality. The socialist dumbocrats (sic) will be content to lose ten pounds jumping to their feet and clapping with Pelosi.
As an American President Obama is “Above his paygrade”, and I wish he wasn’t “Present”.
Posted by: ewings21 | September 7, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Quick Question…
Anyone got any ideas how we can get rid of Gibbs? Would you buy a used car from this guy? I have never held the White House press corps in very high esteem, but Gibbs actually makes me feel sorry for them.
Posted by: ewings21 | September 7, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
It’s also Obama that should be investigated. United States President’s should be natural born Americans. He’s not even leading this country in the right direction. We are getting farther into debt and he is a disappointment as a leader of this wonderful country. Please don’t let him pull us into the mud!!!
Posted by: Concerned American | September 7, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
“Is Glen Beck now in charge of White House personnel decisions?
What kind of independent leaders and visionaries does the Administration expect to attract if the White House will not stand behind its choices and its people?
Van Jones is the organizer of a movement whose vision has caught the imagination of this generation. The ‘green jobs’ economy is a driving motif of the President’s re-investment strategy. As a staffer, he lowered his profile and acted appropriately for a member of the team..
It is clearly hard for the White House to build its complete, strong team – and this timid retreat in the face of whacky acusations will not make it any easier to attract talent.”
No, this would not been necessary if the background check had been done! There are requirements of staff working for the Federal Government, which is working for us The People.
Posted by: Gunilla | September 8, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
I am not surprised that this story was not covered by ABC. Your network has ignored all the topics that are detrimental to Obama. You have a responsability to your viewers to cover all the news not just what you pick and choose. People of this country now can clearly see the biased view given my the three major networks, This to me is far more scary than one nut job in the White House. If they did not cover this story adequately what else are they hiding.
Posted by: Richard | September 8, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Might you want to report all this, George?
Obama’s green appointee is self-described “rowdy black nationalist” who explains that his environmental activism was a means to fight for racial and class “justice.”
I’m sure if Bush had appointed a self-described “rowdy white nationalist” the media would have sat on the story for weeks… uh, huh.
But that was BEFORE the Los Angeles riots. After that, Jones said, “I was a communist.”
Yes, Obama has APPOINTED A COMMUNIST to a White House position. And Obama circumvented the Congress (and probably the Constitution) to do so.
In the interview, Obama’s appointee explained: “I met all these young radical people of color – I mean really radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’ I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.”
Obama’s is now on record supporting a guy who was a founder and leader of the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. Supportive lefty groups have described STORM’s agenda as “third-worldist Marxism (and an often vulgar Maoism).”
Obama’s appointee also said he was willing to hide his radicalism, as long as it advanced the radical agenda: “I’m willing to forgo the cheap satisfaction of the radical pose for the deep satisfaction of radical ends.”
And GIBBS says OBAMA doesn’t want him to go!!!!
GEORGE: “…the president doesn’t want him to go?”
GIBBS: “He doesn’t.”
Posted by: HEY GEORGE! | September 8, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Well, those who voted for Obama must have liked what they heard. He said he was going to “fundamentally change the US.” You sure got what you asked for!
Posted by: June | September 8, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Resign? Does anyone believe BO didn’t throw him out the door of the bus? Get Real!
Meanwhile, maybe George can answer why this story was ignored by Katie and the rest of the little 3 networks? It must be embarassing to explain how this huge story came and ended without a peep from them.
“Sold out” doesn’t even begin to answer that question. Hitch your wagon to Barry and you will go down with him.
Barry is going to need a bigger bus.
Posted by: Jimi | September 8, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
What’s going on with the Media?? Why didn’t ABC or Katie Couric ask questions? The Media’s bias is sickening. Where are the journalists? They are all over useless Palin stories but not all over the vetting process of instrumental parts of our government that affect the USA -citizens? I think people like Pelosi and our mainstream media think we are stupid. The media is useless for reporting facts and truth. They are great at dodging and avoid tough questions about our President and his Czars. Why doesn’t the media investigate that man named Soros?
Mr. Stephanopoulos would you please do a story on the codependency of the mainstream media and President Obama. Find out why no one asks him the hard questions and why you guys let Mr. Gibbs get away with avoiding questions and not answering them.
The media was all over the vetting of previous white house appointments so why isn’t the media checking out the background of Obamas people??? PLEASE DO YOUR JOB–WE THE PEOPLE DESERVE IT!
Posted by: lee | September 9, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
czar background checks are not required, as the old job title of assistant to the community organizer commander in chief.
Posted by: marc Phillips | September 9, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am