By Kristina Wong

Sep 24, 2009 6:38pm

High Noon for the Public Option in the Senate Tomorrow

ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports: Tomorrow is high noon for the public option in the Senate. I am told that Senators Chuck Schumer and Jay Rockefeller will force a roll-call vote tomorrow morning in the Senate Finance Committee on two amendments that would create a government-run insurance program – a top priority for liberal Democrats that was left out of the bill drafted by Finance Chairman Max Baucus. The amendments are not likely to pass because they will be opposed by all Republicans, and at least four Democrats on the committee are cool to the idea of a public option (Lincoln, Carper, Conrad, Bill Nelson), but Schumer has been trying to negotiate with those Democrats to craft a version of the public option they could support. If the amendments fail, it would appear the public option is all but dead in the Senate (although liberals will try to resurrect it when the full Senate takes up the bill).UPDATE: Rockefeller and Schumer announced the vote last night, declaring "it's time for a debate on the public option."  But, it turns out, that time won't come until next week, because the Finance Committee is only working until noon today, giving Baucus & Grassley time to catch 2pm flights back home.

User Comments

The “public option” needs to be given end of life counseling.

Posted by: Max | September 25, 2009, 5:38 am 5:38 am

Without a public option, we will definitely need some kind of cap on insurance company profits and insurance executive compensation. It would also be good to limit insurance company kickbacks to politicians who are doing everything they can to ensure that whatever reform bill passes will increase insurance company profits.

Posted by: Joel | September 25, 2009, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Most of the problems would go away if they would just let people purchase across state lines. competition lowers costs.

Posted by: hkdakota | September 25, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

One word on government mandated healthcare of any color —
UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Toothless Dawg | September 25, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Tort reform, of course, is just crazy talk! Crazy talk, man!!!

Posted by: wws | September 25, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I wish she would show us the numbers of how the public option saves money. The CBO needs to see them as well. the only way the public option will save money is for the government to either reduce the amount of services available to enrollees (e.g. no expense because you do not get treatment) or they reduce what they pay the providers (that will not happen with the unioned health care workforces). they could also raise the co-pays and deductibles though Maxine Waters will be irate.
Even if you take all the non profit and public health insurance providers, strip out the profie or excess fund balance, reduce the SG&A expenses by half or more, you are only savings 10% or so of the premiums based on current underwriting. However, once you add in, no limits, no lifetime/annual max, pre-existing conditions, preventive care, etc, the cost for all these will make ALL insurance premiums go up.
Furthermore, the Federal government has not demonstated an ability to manage, Medicare, Medicaid and VA benefits. If this is the model that is going to save costs, may god h ave mercy on us! We all know how these programs are net underfunded by TRILLIONS of dollars.

Posted by: scott jeffries | September 25, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Please extend my gratitude to the Senate for the roll call vote. It will provide a handy list of those who voted for the bill, making it so much easier to identify the ones we will work to unseat in the next election.

Posted by: dprosenthal | September 25, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

It’s good for the compnies to make good profits, and for their executives to be highly paid. Those things only happen whn a company is offering products that people really like at prices they are willing to pay. Cap profits or salaries and talented people will work somewhere else.
The CEO of FedEx is fabulously wealthy because of FedEx’s services and prices, and the efficiency of his employees. The Postmaster General is a salary-capped hack with slow, surly employeees.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 25, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Why is it that every god damn single decision of this administration and congress seem to be wrong, wrong, wrong? Either these are the dumbest people ever, or they are truly enemies of the state.

Posted by: Java Joe | September 25, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I am usually not a fan of Olypmia Snowe, but for once she is on the right track. She is insisting that every bill be completely written and posted and scored by the CBO for at least 72 hours before the Senate Finance committee vote on it. How reasonable is that? Yet the Dems won’t go along…stealth and lying are what they need to pass this monstrosity. Ask yourself, if these people really believed the American people were behind them would they shoot down Senator Snowe’s proposal. Of Course not…which shows they know these bills can’t survive the light of day.

Posted by: Rob | September 25, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

How did we become a country who thinks it is perfectly appropriate to let a bunch of political hacks in the federal government set ‘caps’ on profit or salaries? Are we such a bunch of helpless pansies that we think we can’t survive in the world unless the government takes care of us? Welcome to socialism and be careful what you wish for.

Posted by: JLG | September 25, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Euthanize the public option.

Posted by: avery | September 25, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

I think we need a “cap” on book royalties written by egomaniac politicians.

Posted by: Kevin | September 25, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I love it when people complain about profits of the insurance industry, and complaining about high premiums as a result of those profits.
Do you really think that is the way an insurance company makes money.
Here is how it works. Insurance company polls the medical industry for reasonable charges(called usual and customary btw) on a variety of services, then looks at their pool of customers and estimates, based on age and medical conditions, what those people would reasonablly cost the company in reimbursements. It then calculates the premiums on people based on average salary, age and medical conditions with a bit of extra tacked on for administation. When the premiums are received they put a portion of that to cover expected reimbursements and then invests the rest in short, medium and long term investments.
That is why insurance companies are making money hand over fist now. The stock market took a nose dive, the insurance companies then took as much spare capital as they could and bought up as much as they could while we were looking at 6-7k averages and now are reaping profits.
Enjoy the profits guys.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | September 25, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

All you cons who want to carp about the public option, that’s fine, we’ll leave it out and we’ll just go to the emergency room and we’ll let hospitals and insurance companies keep jacking YOUR rates up. I’ll be glad to go to the ER and let you pay more, just like the deal we have now, which the GOP has given us for the last 40 years by stymying any reform. Just don’t cry when your rates go up. I’ll be down at the ER making sure your rates go up at the slightest provocation. If I chip my toenail I’ll be down there just to be sure your rates go up.

Posted by: JL | September 25, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.