By Gorman Gorman

Sep 29, 2009 2:19pm

‘Top Line’ — Leading House Dem: Compromise Possible on Public Option

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: With the Senate Finance Committee today debating whether to include a "public option" as part of a health care reform package, a leading House Democrat today outlined a possible compromise that may make it easier to keep that avenue open in a final bill.

Rep. Rob Andrews, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions, said on ABCNews.com's "Top Line" that House leaders may be open to sacrificing some of the savings that would be available through a public option to address concerns that such an entity would drive private insurers out of business.

"You could have a public option that has negotiated rates, instead of rates tied to Medicare," said Andrews, D-N.J. "The version of the public option that saves the Treasury and the taxpayers the most money ties the public option to Medicare rates. There's a less-savings version of it that would have negotiated rates — that might be one compromise."

The concept of tying rates to Medicare has drawn particular criticism in the Senate Finance Committee today, with the introduction of an amendment that would do just that by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.

Also in the interview, Andrews reiterated his endorsement of the Senate's use of "reconciliation" to pass health care — a maneuver that would allow a bill to pass with a simple majority, rather than the filibuster-proof threshold of 60 votes.

"I think a much stronger plan for the country would come out with reconciliation," he said.

He also sounded more optimistic than House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., in terms of a timeframe for final House action.

"There's substantial movement," he said. "I believe we'll take a bill to our caucus this week and start asking people to vote for it. And I think you'll see floor action in the House within the next few weeks."

Andrews, a members of the House Armed Services Committee, also reflected on President Obama's difficult choices ahead on Afghanistan: "I don't think that we can occupy a country that for 3,000 years has been unoccupiable. I think any strategy that assumes a long term American presence is doomed not to be a successful one."

Andrews had this to say about the reelection prospects of Gov. Jon Corzine, D-N.J.: "He's in some trouble because every incumbent governor is in trouble in this lousy economy. But he's gaining and I expect him to win."

Click HERE to see the interview with Rep. Rob Andrews.

We also checked in with GOP strategist Kevin Madden about the president's decision to travel to Denmark to lobby for his hometown of Chicago to be awarded the 2016 Olympics — a trip Madden's former boss, former Gov. Mitt Romney, has applauded.

"I think the American people will afford the president 24 hours to go over there and make his case for America and getting the Olympics — Chicago getting the Olympics," Madden said. "I think it's probably a mistake by anybody to read too much into it. to kind of hyper-analyze it and offer criticism that is just reflexive — you know, it's criticism for criticism's sake. So you know, I think there's a minimal risk but . . . they wouldn't go over there if they didn't think they could bring home the gold."

Watch more with Kevin Madden, on health care and Afghanistan, HERE.

User Comments

duh….compromise should have been reached months ago. they dont have the votes for the public option get over it and get something done for the rest of us who are paying outrageous premiums.perhaps we can tax the chicago olympics for the rest.

Posted by: catman | September 29, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

there is no compromise. Between the insurance industry, big pharma, and the shyster trial lawyers Obama and his co-horts in Congress can’t compromise. They were elected by them and they do their bidding. This is why vaccine makers get no-liability deals, bigpharma gets other deals, tort reform is non-existent, and no public option. And why citizens will likely to be FORCED, under penalty of law, to give money to private, for-profit corporations (insurance companies.) Change indeed!

Posted by: Ed | September 29, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government given the power to provide insurance for the citizens of this country. Article 1 list the powers given to Congress and providing insurance, taking over finicial institutions, or car companies are not listed. The tenth amendment specificly states “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This is pretty clear the federal government has no Constitutional right to be involved in providing health care to the citizens.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | September 29, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

if there is no public or non-profit option to reign in medical care costs then they d*mn well better not mandate everyone get coverage. it would be the biggest gift to insurance corporations ever: 50 million new customers that are REQUIRED to sign up for their coverage with outlandish premiums or face punishment by the gov’t.
obviously these ppl cant afford insurance as it is and if this bill passes, they’ll also be saddled with stiff fines for still not being able to afford it. how in the world does that make any sense? this would be nothing but a punishment to the poor and a gift for the lousy insurance corporation.
if no public option or no cap on insurance premiums, then there can’t be a requirement to have insurance.

Posted by: birdy | September 29, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

catman, bringing the olympics to america would also bring much needed jobs. the idea of having it in chicago came long before obama.
and second, our constitution does say the gov’t needs to provide for our welfare. i think our health is the most basic of human needs.
what do people say when they lose everything? “at least i have my health”. without it, we have nothing.

Posted by: birdy | September 29, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I see the healthcare issue as a credit card purchase,we want it, we charge it and then we can’t pay for it then after having the collectors calling us day and night we file for bankruptcy. No way Jose !! You can keep it Mr Reed, Pelosi and Obama !! Olimpycs ? Are you kidding me ?? I think we have enough on our plate to take the Olympics now. Mr President , don’t you think is about ime to be a REAL President ??? Enough celebrity ego that is for Angelina Joly and Bratt Pitt…

Posted by: Not a sheep | September 30, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

birdy– “and second, our constitution does say the gov’t needs to provide for our welfare. i think our health is the most basic of human needs”—
____________________
Actually thats NOT what the constitution says.. It says that the government is to provide for the common defense and PROMOTE the general welfare of the country.
There is a HUGE difference between providing for our individual welfare and promoting the general welfare.
Providing emergency relief from the ravages of natural disasters is an example of promoting general welfare. So is establishing a CDC to produce flu vaccines, prevent pandemics and provide general health education..
Assuring individual health care, government sponsored housing, and other welfare state programs are NOT constitutionally mandated.

Posted by: arkie vet | September 30, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

It’s time to take away the excellent benifits that congress and the senate have and make them deal with the over priced unfair system they are forcing us to endure! I for one am sick of paying for their special treatment so that they can vote to support the very industry that has raped the rest of us in the last 10 years. Let them pay for an 800% increase in the cost of health care and all the other b—sh– that we have forced on us. These people need to be voted out of their comfy jobs and forced to go work for SOB’s that run the insurance companies.

Posted by: dahlimama | September 30, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.