McCain Calls Obama’s Missile Defense Move ‘Seriously Misguided’ But Will It Work?
In the wake of President Obama's decision not to proceed with Bush-era plans for a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic, conservative activists are accusing the President of "appeasement," and the decision drew a sharp rebuke from John McCain.
Here is McCain’s full statement:
“I am disappointed with the Administration’s decision to cancel plans to develop missile defenses in Eastern Europe. This decision calls into question the security and diplomatic commitments the United States has made to Poland and the Czech Republic, and has the potential to undermine perceived American leadership in Eastern Europe. Given the strong and enduring relationships we have forged with the region’s nations since the end of the Cold War, we should not, I believe, take steps backward in strengthening these ties. Yet I fear the Administration’s decision will do just that, and at a time when Eastern European nations are increasingly wary of renewed Russian adventurism.”
“Given the serious and growing threats posed by Iran’s missile and nuclear programs, now is the time when we should look to strengthen our defenses, and those of our allies. Missile defense in Europe has been a key component of this approach. I believe the decision to abandon it unilaterally is seriously misguided.”
Administration officials insist that Obama is putting in place a defense against short and medium-range missiles the Iranians are developing, rather than an expensive and provocative system to defend against long-range missiles the Iranians haven't developed yet. White House released their fact sheet HERE.
Initial response from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is cool but accommodating. He says Russia and the United States should "jointly analyze threats, evolve measures that could be used, and cooperate to put those measures into practice."
The big question: will Obama's decision in advance of next week's G-20 Summit and the October 1st start of nuclear talks including Iran make the Russians more open to tough sanctions against the Iranians? If so, conservative criticism is a small price to pay. If not, you ain't seen nothing yet.
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
it is sad to see the US, under the Obama administration, once again abandon Poland and Eastern Europe to threats from Russia and get caught in the middle between large EU members and Russia economically and militarily. Of course, Obama was quick to abandon Georgia but some thought that was simply because he was so ill-prepared for office. Now Obama has had several months in office and can’t use that excuse this time. Sorry, Poland, Hungary, Czech, Georgia, Serbia, etc. The people are with you even if Obama isn’t.
Posted by: Ed | September 17, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
While there is no question that the relationship between Iran and Russia, is of some concern, there is a higher probability of that relationship strengthening if the original plan was carried through.
Modifying the plan, decreases that dangerous probability, and still can provide for an adequate level of protection, from Iran itself, which is actually the greater danger.
The region is in greater danger of a ground invasion from Russia, than missile attacks, in the first place. A missile defense system won’t address that potential at all.
In any case, it is time for the US to back away from trying to be the world’s policeman, or buying alliances with military power and / or “aid” (which is nothing more than bribery), and try to win friends and influence people, in more appropriate ways.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 17, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
McCain is right. We have just thrown 2 allies under the bus to appease Russia. Russia will not quit selling technology to Iran or NK. We made agreements on security that would benefit us and our allies and backed out because Obama is afraid of Russia….period. I would rather him admit appeasement then tell me we have a different approach with proven, cost-effective existing systems. Translation: What we have is good enough and Russia might be happier this way.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Add these 2 allies to two others -Israel and Honduras..ok who is next to get kicked in the teeth ?? This is another “bone-headed” decision that should have been studied alot longer and intelligence verified. Look at all the faulty Iraq intelligence we were told. Russia is sending defensive missles to Iran and arming Venezuela… do you really think Putin is going to stop that? Hes in charge not the current Pres there. Israel take note: you are on your own with this current Administration.The writing was on the wall before the election but everyone was singing kumbaya.Obama is stacking the UN with radicals like Susan Rice and others in lower level positions. Sooner or later alot of your tax dollars are going to end up there and they wont be in peaceful hands either.
Posted by: jimbo | September 17, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
does this make mc cain a racist? perhaps jimmy carter would think so. all aside i sure hope this administartion is doing the right thing here.
Posted by: catman | September 17, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Rick McDaniel— The only reason Putin hasn’t armed Venezuela with the Russian military machine is because the price of oil went from $145 back down to $70. They didn’t have the money to support it. Chavez already authorized the Russians to occupy their largest base in Venezuela. If you think NK talks smack, wait til Chavez gets his Russians on board. If we were so friendly with Russia, why would they even need this?
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
The best way to address current Russian leadership is to establish essential trade. OTOH you can use the more mobile tech against Russian incursion. This move seems fine to me.
Posted by: Mike | September 17, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
My biggest fear before the election was he would weaken this nation’s security. This pres scares me more than ever. I believe he hates this country and the freedom it stands for. His Utopia is all he wants. In his Banana Republic, the Pledge Of Allegiance will be replaced by a mandatory drill in how to dive under your desk and kiss your arse goodbye.
Posted by: novadine | September 17, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
The rationale behind the proposed deployment had nothing to do with Russian “adventurism.” The fear was that Iran would attack Europe with long range missiles. Russia offered a compromise site that would have been acceptable, but it was turned down.
The only Russian adventure that McCain can be talking about is Georgia, which has traditionally been a part of Russia in the same way that South Carolina is part of the USA.
However, McCain’s campaign advisor had been Georgia’s chief lobbyist in Washington for years, so all we heard was the opinions of Shaakashvili, an eloquent Harvard graduate who wanted to rule Georgia as an independent state.
Now, the missile shield is being discussed as if it had been planned as a defense against Russia all along, although we’ve denied that repeatedly.
Russia even offered one or two compromise sites that we turned down.
It would be better if we could get some distance from our conviction that everything Obama does is wrong, weak, soft, and socialist. The chief beneficiaries of this program would have been the CEOs of Raytheon and General Dynamics.
We should also remember that this would have been enormously costly. The Poles, for intance, rejected our proposal until we bribed them by agreeing to pour American dollars into beefing up their military.
Can we drop the knee-jerk reflexes against Obama and use some perspective? It’s all becoming a little tiresome.
Posted by: Robert Maxwell | September 17, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Well i think Obama has a lot on his plate. These are so many issues he is dealing with and he is carrying a lot of weight. This missile thing is so unimportant. I also think bush and cheney pushed this project since they are deeply invested in the businesses that manufacture these weapons. Its a waste of money!
Posted by: hcg weight loss diet | September 17, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I am surprised that McCain stayed awake long enough to make these statements.
Posted by: BikernAz12 | September 17, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Obama is spot on here… We (USA) have proven missile systems that are seabased and can protect the region (if necessary) just fine without spending BILLIONS to set up a stationary systems in Poland and billions more each year to maintain those systems… WE ARE NOT THE WORLD’S PROTECTORS!!!! WE CAN’T AFFORD IT ANYMORE!!!!
Posted by: Melanie | September 17, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Georgia traditionally part of Russia? Where did you get that information-out of “The Great Soviet Encyclopedia”?Georgia has NEVER been part of Russia.It has been in the Russian Empire and the USSR,but Russians are not Georgians and vice versa.
Posted by: Nephron | September 17, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Melanie —- Do you know anything about those “sea based” systems? It is very costly because those systems are on ships and those ships erquire Navy and Marine personnel 24/7 365 days a year. Initial cost and maintenance of the 2 sites in question will be minor compared to sea based equipment. Obama said we would look into other countries to implement this existing, cost effective system. Russia will respond in the same manner. Amazingly, my company makes the Aegis and we haven’t heard of any new technology recently that Obama seems to think we have. Have you heard anything in the media about this existing technology that betters the missile defense system? i didn’t think so.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“Well i think Obama has a lot on his plate. These are so many issues he is dealing with and he is carrying a lot of weight. This missile thing is so unimportant. I also think bush and cheney pushed this project since they are deeply invested in the businesses that manufacture these weapons. Its a waste of money!”
A lot on his plate? Welcome to the office of POTUS. “Waste of Money?” To keep the peace, prepare for war. Two nuclear club nations have not engaged each other since 1945, on any level…for a reason.
You simply cannot bury your head in the sand and hope that everyone in this world is peaceful. If you have not served as a protector of this great Nation, keep your opinions to yourself as to how to safeguard it’s borders and citizens.
Posted by: Footballer73 | September 17, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
hcg weight loss diet ———- Obama spent 2 years and millions of dollars trying to get his job. He slammed others in his party and embarrassed others, so I don’t have one bit of a problem pointing out his issues. He talks sooo much, that hemakes too many promises he can’t fulfill. His first order of business everyday of his Presidency should be protecting the American people. This system would do that. I think he and Pelosi have a bet on how many Bush ideas they can reverse. I am a 20+ year retiree and served 17 years overseas and can tell you this system was (and now would have been) a nuclear deterrent. If I can shoot you and I have the capability to block your shot from me, I certainly have the upper hand don’t I? Well, I did anyway.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Scraping the system is short sighted. When dealing with Russia, Iran, N Korea and anybody else that pops up the U.S. must do so from a position of strenght. Scraping the missile defense system is an act of weakness in the eyes of our enemies and they will take advantage of it. Obama is in way over his head and for the well being of our country I hope he gets it together real soon. If the US falls so does the rest of the world.
Posted by: LEE | September 17, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Melanie —- Do you know anything about those “sea based” systems? It is very costly because those systems are on ships and those ships erquire Navy and Marine personnel 24/7 365 days a year. Initial cost and maintenance of the 2 sites in question will be minor compared to sea based equipment…. you heard anything in the media about this existing technology that betters the missile defense system? i didn’t think so.
Posted by: lfrichar | Sep 17, 2009
3:28:50 PM
YES – I KNOW PLENTY ABOUT SEABASED DEFENSED MISSILE SYSTEMS… WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY – IT IS WELL-PROVEN(OVER 30 YEARS AND ADVANCING EVERYDAY) AND IT HAS BEEN MADE LAND-BASED TOO AND IS IN-THEATER AS I WRITE…
YOU LOSE…
Posted by: Melanie | September 17, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Time for Obummer to go on another vacation
Posted by: JamesJ | September 17, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Time for Obummer to go on another vacation
Posted by: JamesJ | Sep 17, 2009 4:18:55 PM
Let’s see… One (1) week off in 9 months and it really was a working vacation as Senator Kennedy unfortunately passed during that week… As compared to Bush who took of 1/3 of his entire Presidency as vacation time – that was 973 days…
Posted by: Melanie | September 17, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Nonsense. McCain needs to retire already and go live in one his 8 homes. We should spend billions in Europe that is needed at home for what…we already can destroy and overkill Iran and Russia 1000 times over. Do we need to overkill it 1001 times? Enough of this nonsense of building more weapons that isn’t needed. Spend the money here at home. The Europeans are not worrying about this boogeyman left over from the previous clown administration. Times have change, we need to the same. The threat to the USA is economics and our own home breed idiots that think we should spend every dollar on bombs. The Chineese and Russians figured that out already, that why we borrow from China and Russia sells us their oil. Bombs?…dumbest thing ever. Besides, we have Palin who can keep an eye on the Russians from her window. Mental midgets are back again.
Posted by: jake | September 17, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
When can the United States expect other countries to begin taking ownership for their own protection? I do not recall any of these “ALLIES” lining up to assist us in Iraq or Afghanistan. If there exist other less confrontational approaches to achieving the same results why not?
Posted by: JD | September 17, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“”"”"”YOU LOSE…”"”"”
Posted by: Melanie
No, with this decision we all lose. What’s funny is there was never a defense against installing this system by our government or by democrats on these blogs. Land based interceptors are spread around the globe. This system was specifically for long range nuclear weapons from Iran. From las month to this month, is the threat any less real? According to the IAEA it is even more real today and we are removing one level of protection and stabbing a couple allies in the back while we do it. THOSE ARE FACTS.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Posted by: lfrichar | Sep 17, 2009 4:35:22 PM
We have the technology (both sea and MOBILE land-based) without installing stationary missile systems in Poland… YOU ARE THE ONE WHO CALLED ME A LIAR … now you claim we are all hurt by the President’s decision to use existing seabased/mobile land-based technology… I think you work for a subcontractor and your company is losing out on the President change in policy…
Posted by: Melanie | September 17, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“”"”"”"”"”"we already can destroy and overkill Iran and Russia 1000 times over. Do we need to overkill it 1001 times? “”"”"”"
Posted by: jake
We’re talking about a defensive shield to block their missiles. If we have to fire our missiles, wouldn’t you rather not have any of theirs intercepted instead of detonation above our cities? If a fight breaks out, would you not want a good defense. Obama is telling you our existing technology is better than the planned system over there. Do you believe him?
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Obama is telling you our existing technology is better than the planned system over there. Do you believe him?
Posted by: lfrichar | Sep 17, 2009 4:45:49 PM
Yes, because I know it for a fact!!! We have the technology to intercept missiles from the sea and with mobile land-based units… The technology started 30 years ago… no need to set up stationary systems in Poland…
Posted by: Melanie | September 17, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“”"”"I think you work for a subcontractor and your company is losing out on the President change in policy…”"”"”
Posted by: Melanie
Actually first I never called you a liar. I work for the company that stands to gain because of this decision. My company makes the sea based systems. And I am not a subcontractor, I am in management. I have spent the last 30 years in the defense industry and in my travels, you start understanding different cultures. I think the IAEA solidified the threat from Iran and I knw this decision made Iran feel better about their ambitions.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I am on McCain side on this, Obama once again dropped the ball.
Posted by: Dsmith | September 17, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
geecee — So we stabbed 2 allies in the back over “posturing”? Don’t think so. This was a good “political” decision for Russia and the US and a bad “political” decision for Czech and Poland.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Here’s a poll which could give us an idea of what 38000 people think:
Did President Obama cave in to the Russians?
Yes. Obama’s decision jeopardizes national and global security. 90% (34,291 votes)
Yes. But Obama had no choice if he wants Russia to help pressure Iran. 4% (1,581 votes)
No. Obama made a sound strategic decision base on the latest intelligence. 5% (1,814 votes)
I’m not sure. 2% (584 votes)
Total Votes: 38,270
Posted by: lfrichar | September 17, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
It’s one thing to remake and destroy our health care system. It’s one thing to reward UAW by throwing out established contract law and sweeten union benefits in the bailout.
THis — well, this action by our utterly inept president could kill us all.
Posted by: liz | September 17, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
lfrichar: A Fox news poll with 98% of Fox viewers that do exactly everything that Fox asks of them and believe everything FOX says no matter how much proven otherwise. A Brain-washed poll. You would get the opposite numbers out of Air America viewers.
Posted by: dlboggan | September 17, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Isn’t the Bush-Cheney administration the ones who took us into Iraq to fight “Weapons of Mass Destruction”? And wasn’t this the same administration who declared the war in Iraq is officially over. Personally I think we should scrutinize everything they put into motion. Kudos to the current Administration for recognizing the good that the Bush administration did but having the intellect to understand that there are alternative paths to accomplish the same objective. Be carefull ABC you are liable to be labeled a liberal, communist, marxist,socialist propoganda media outlet
Posted by: JD | September 17, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
I wish he would cuss once in a while to tell us what he really feels. He is too polite or too politically correct. This is another Obama mistake.
Posted by: mike florida | September 17, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Such Harsh words on both sides. Ther is not one person who has made a comment that continually knows all the facts. We (Americans) only know as much as we are told by the media. 1 week out of 9 months is GREAT compared to 965 in 8 years. Holy Cow. If Russia does not concide to the pressure from the US, perhaps there are steps in place to create a new system wihtout spending billions of dollars to make sure we are safe. We are not the Worlds Police! Many get upset because we are not building and yet if we were they are the same people who would critize the cost. Therefore, no matter what he does or does not do to some, it will be wrong no matter what. He may need to take a step back refocus and regroup in regards to all current events.
Posted by: Michelle | September 17, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
I was 10 when CCCP orbited Sputnik – It scared us to death, and now we have a used car lot on the Moon. It took 6% of our national budget to get there! I felt the same when Iran orbited their first satellite 2/09, but most ignored the event. If you can orbit something, you can deorbit it anywhere on Earth with NO WARNING in a couple of minutes. Russia has agreed to not orbit nuclear weapons – IRAN HAS NOT. There is no missile defense against sudden deorbiting. – Look how long it took us to respond to 9/11. Clinton ignored the 1993 World Trade Center attack. Bush ignored specific 9/11/01 warnings. Obama ignored the Iranian orbit.
From a retired intelligence consultant
Posted by: Larry Hartweg | September 17, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Obama promised change and that is what you are getting. He will turn out to be the best President the US will have ever had. When there is peace in the world one does not need bombs. America is bankrupt and that is not because of Obama. He is still paying for pushes unpaid bills. He is cleaning up the mess. lobbyists and big corporations are kicking and screaming and are brainwashing the uneducated and racists to do the dirty work for them. America, this president is working for you, not for lobbyist. Obama is a honest and a true Christian man.
Posted by: Yvonne khan moenne | September 17, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
If Iran orbits an Electromagnetic Pulse Bomb (EMP), and detonates it 300 miles above Kansas, the 48 United States would loose all electrical power, transportation, and communications. All electronics and spare parts would melt. We would be back to 1800 pre-electricity technology for decades. The majority would starve. February 2009, Iran demonstrated the required missile technology. President Carter gave the Shah of Iran Uranium Enrichment Technology. Bush / Cheney negotiated the “123 Agreement” to provide UAE with our nuclear technology (they transship technology to Iran). Obama supported it. N. Korea can provide Iran with Plutonium bomb technology. THIS IS VERY SERIOUS INDEED!
From a retired intelligence consultant
Posted by: Larry Hartweg | September 17, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
McCain’s response is spot on. Why on earth did Obama cancel the Bush plan? It was to keep the Russian’s happy. Iran will most vertainly be happy. It can surge ahead with its plans for Israel’s destruction.
Posted by: Kottaras | September 17, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Why are we having to foot the bill for a defense shield for other countries half the globe away? Who does anything for our defense? I am fine to provide the advanced technology to our friends, but shouldn’t they pay the cost of it? We have hundreds of military bases around the world defending others. We cannot afford it while we cannot educate and protect our own citizens.
Posted by: drdale | September 17, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
McCain? Isn’t this the same guy who signed a confession for the Commies – who dumped his greviously injured 1st wife for an heiress – and who chose a VP that guaranteed his loss in the last election? Who cares what he says?
Posted by: Cassandra | September 17, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
We dont need a missile defense since Obama’s election…remember the world loves us now
Posted by: nuts for obama | September 17, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Obama has just made a tactical move. Tells Russia that the Bush plan is scrapped but in essence it is not. Obama is smarter than we credit him.
The next administration can build it anyway. So no need to panic.
Posted by: Kottaras | September 17, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Hahaha: “misGUIDED” I get it . . . you know ‘guided’ missiles. I knew there was something witty in McCain after all.
Posted by: Thinking a Little Harder | September 17, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Well Obama does with friends of the US the same way he does his friends. Throw the under the bus. This action puts the Easter Europe countries in danger and the US. Obama’s way is appeasement. Strength is the only thing countries like Russia and Iran understand. Appeasement they laught at and walk all over those who try it.
Posted by: Robert | September 18, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
would someone please remind John McCain that he lost the election because no-one believed in his world dominance through military power mantra…..this fool needs to go fishing with Sarah Palin…..
Posted by: dk | September 18, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Well Obama does with friends of the US the same way he does his friends. Throw the under the bus. This action puts the Easter Europe countries in danger and the US. Obama’s way is appeasement. Strength is the only thing countries like Russia and Iran understand. Appeasement they laught at and walk all over those who try it. ————-why is it our responsibility to protect them? To hell with the rest of the world, let them protect themselves. We have enough problems of our own we can’t solve and John McCain and the rest of you misguided warhawks are worried about protecting other countries? Maybe after we can protect our own border and ports first…..honestly we just know it’s only defiance of an Obama proposal….had he continued the same program you’d all be b!tching about that too…..go away, you lost and no-one cares what the insignificant right wing thinks anymore……
Posted by: dk | September 18, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am
It would have been possible to do both. Obama could have set up the Poland and Czech defenses as planned by Bush, and the naval and land defenses closer to Iran now suggested by Obama. Why one or the other?
Posted by: Kottaras | September 18, 2009, 3:52 am 3:52 am
It’s interesting that everything the Russians are doing looks like a copy of us… this bases in Venezuela, arms for alliances, not want missles from a super-power on their doorsteps… Interesting don’t you think? Reap what you sow?
Posted by: jk | September 18, 2009, 6:14 am 6:14 am
Yo weight loss diet:
A lot on Obama’s plate you say? Yeah his plate is full of a colossal amount of American superpower responsibility that this amateur is squandering with his blind ideologically mad pursuit to create our country into a deformed image of a South American nation.
While Obama is drooling with powermad voracious desire to overhaul our domestic policy, he has completely got his back turned to foreign policy. His mad pursuit to quickly sledgehammer our country’s heritage to create into an image of his Chicago-leftist-tyrannical self has meanwhile left us vulnerable from our backside.
While Obama is peeing on America, our enemies are going to catch us with his pants down. I pray not, but it looks like this man is so intent on raping America from the inside that we might see a sucker punch come in from the outside. I hope I’m wrong.
Posted by: Thinking a Little Harder | September 18, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am
Does anyone remember Gates telling the congress that the missile shield technology doesn’t work. Second the military and the intellegence had told Bush that his assesment was wrong but once again just like in Iraq he only listened to the few people that shared his opinion. Ronald Reagan had a stratagy that put Iraq against Iran. Bush killed that policy. Ronald Reagan reached out to Russia again a policy that Bush destroyed by putting up an expeensive non working missile shield. Were Reagan create Star Wars to bring the Russians to their knees because of defense spending, Bush is pushing them away with a system that did not meet the current threat. When will you idiots learn that the best thing a president can do is listen to the military and the military says put up a system for short and medium range threats which we are doing. The president made this decision with the advice and consent of the pentagon and Gates. Do we want a president that ignores his military again?
Posted by: Don | September 18, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am
I didn’t read the other comments. I am curious how does putting up missile defense in Poland protect the US? The country that can reach us now, North Korea will hit teh West Coast and Hawaii. There was no radars being deployed in the Pacific. This was all politics for Bush that he thought would weaken Russia. So Russia promptly started using its veto power which has only helped Iran and North Korea. The Iraq war was suppose to show the terrorist countries that we were serious and bring them to the table. Libya came, but the other two countries seeing a weakness in the US war in Iraq moved even quicker and now have robust programs to threaten the world with. Bush plan is to put up a missile shield in Poland. Are you serious? A majority of the population in both countries opposed the plan and yet Bush shoved it sown thier throats. To the person complaining about using ships, it was always planned to use ship based radars.
Lets not obscure the fact that the system has more failures then success, has never tested against decoys which will be used and never used against countermeasures. In other words the tiger has no teeth. Lets not forget that we have already set up a system in Alaska for anything that could possible make it from Iran and the system is not designed to kill the systems Iran already has that can threaten Europe. What Obama has proposed will. Stop being sheep and turn off Rush. Think with your on mind. Read about the missile defense.
Posted by: Don | September 18, 2009, 7:33 am 7:33 am
McCain and and his allies belong back in the 20th century.
Posted by: Shawn Irwin | September 18, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am
McCain (the economy is fine) has as much credibility as a rock in the road. Being a POW does not qualify you for jack when it comes to making SOUND military decisions. I’ll go with Richard Burt, Reagan’s head of State Dept. Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs. Seems like lots of Reagan’s advisers agree with Obama.
Posted by: Josh | September 18, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am
hey Jake,
it was Poland that invoked Article 5 after 9/11
Afghanistan:
Polish troops are among the few that do the real fighting in Afghanistan.
US Gen. Ramms has disclosed a part of secrecy regarding the Polish special unit GROM, which is being stationed near Kandahar. “GROM conducts regular battles with Taliban” – says general. “These soldiers search, track down and destroy the enemy. We are very pleased with them.”
Poland also controls one of the Southern provinces of Afghanistan.
Irak:
On March 17 2003, President Kwasniewski announced that Poland would send troops to the Persian Gulf to take part in the invasion of Iraq. First combat was confirmed on March 24. Poland was one of the largest military contributors to the forces arrayed against Iraq (with the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia).
“We have got no better friend in Europe today than Poland” – said Mr. Bush after meeting Mr. Kwasniewski
Posted by: MaciejSas | September 18, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
The decisions that Bush and Cheney made always had an underlying modus operandi…how much money can we make our friends?
Posted by: Kim | September 18, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
(From Newsweek): To begin with, it’s important to remember that while plenty of missile defense systems capable of hitting short- and medium-range missiles exist (remember Patriots and Scuds?), none are yet capable of knocking out long-range ballistic missiles. So far, that is a theory that looked good on network-news computer graphics but that never actually existed. The idea was for radar stations in the Czech Republic to monitor missile launches from the Middle East, and for interceptor rockets in Poland to shoot them down en route to their targets. The interceptor rockets, though, don’t even work; after years of trials and billions of dollars of research, a prototype tested in Alaska still can’t reliably tell real missiles from decoys or kill missiles that change course midflight, as truly sophisticated weapons can. Not that it would have mattered: no country in the Middle East actually possesses the kind of missiles that could reach the United States, or even Northern Europe. No, what ultimately killed off missile defense was the news that Iran has nothing like the kind of long-range, Soviet-style ballistic missiles that the system was supposed to stop.
Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 18, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
it is the right decision. Obama is the great friend of U.S. He will always be in the world because of his good deeds,
Posted by: paul | September 18, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Would like Melanie to try something really novel…..Google map of the world. Review results, pick one and find Iran on the map. Tell me how in the hell a the Aegis weapon system, with a range of a little over 100 miles, is going to cover Iran. It’s an excellent system, but look at the geography. Hard to overcome. You lose.
Posted by: brwillham | September 18, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Apparently if you were a friend of the US you are considered one no longer. Just ask Israel, the Czech Republic or Poland.
On the other hand, you should be happy if you are Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, etc. due to President Gutless Wonder.
What strikes me as odd is now we can’t even use the phrase “war on terror” or call terrorists what they are. But we can call Americans terrorists, Nazis or what ever this looney administration thinks appropriate when they simply disagree with Marxist Man. My how things change!
Posted by: TxBoB | September 18, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
It’s comical to see all the right winger’s “whaling” about what “Europe thinks” … Now -that’s a good one …
Posted by: 1enlightened | September 18, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Kottaras -” Why on earth did Obama cancel the Bush plan? ”
I tell you why, and I am sure many will agree
with this: he wants to”unbush” as much as he can, good or bad, just to leave an imprint in history.
Good luck, USA!
Posted by: 2smart4u | September 19, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
WOW, ‘THINK A LITTLE HARDER
What a wonderful post, very graphic, but very much
to the point. Any plans for running for POTUS?
Posted by: 2smart4u | September 19, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Sorry, I meant THINKING A LITTLE HARDER 6:29AM
By the way, I am still laughing!
Posted by: 2smart4u | September 19, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
The system planned by Bush did not exist. There were no missles. There was no radar. There has never been developed by the USA a missle system that could defend against ICBMs.
Posted by: Nardwilly | September 21, 2009, 7:34 am 7:34 am