Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax
President Obama signaled in our interview that he was prepared to address some of the concerns raised by key Senator Jay Rockefeller, who called the Baucus bill a "big middle class tax increase" this week.
That means he'll support more subsidies for middle class families.
But in our most spirited exchange, the President refused to accept the argument that a mandate to buy health insurance is equivalent to a tax.
Here it is:
STEPHANOPOULOS: You were against the individual mandate…
OBAMA: Yes.
STEPHANOPOULOS: …during the campaign. Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don’t. How is that not a tax?
OBAMA: Well, hold on a second, George. Here — here's what's happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average — our families — in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I've said is that if you can't afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn't be punished for that. That's just piling on. If, on the other hand, we're giving tax credits, we've set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we've driven down the costs, we've done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you've just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that's…
STEPHANOPOULOS: That may be, but it's still a tax increase.
OBAMA: No. That's not true, George. The — for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I'm not covering all the costs.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But it may be fair, it may be good public policy…
OBAMA: No, but — but, George, you — you can't just make up that language and decide that that's called a tax increase. Any…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Here’s the…
OBAMA: What — what — if I — if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5 or 8 or 10 percent next year and you say well, that's not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don't want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I — I don't think I'm making it up. Merriam Webster's Dictionary: Tax — "a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes."
OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam's Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no, but…
OBAMA: …what you're saying is…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I'm taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we're going to have an individual mandate or not, but…
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you reject that it’s a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.
Watch it HERE.
- George Stephanopoulos
Email
Biden Reflects on Grief, Suicidal Thoughts
Is Congress Sounding Dumber?
I was wondering do we live in a free country. I can’t afford to have a car to put insurrnace on. there for I can not get health insurance and my employer dose not cover part timers. and I have tried to get help from the medicare medicade and city health dept but I do not quilify what make youthink that you can make people of a free counrty do this its pass time for you to open your eyes and leave your race out of this.
Posted by: Lisa Ranshaw | September 20, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
ABC’s Stephanopoulos-
A ‘flack’ for the present adniistration without presenting a rebutle view;
IS NOT IN THE INTEREST OF THE COUNTRY OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
Posted by: Jesse Califano | September 20, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Obama says he is talking debating only with George???
I thought this show was watched by millions of citizens listening to Obma
Posted by: Jeff crocket | September 20, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
He is so condescending and arrogant- does he really believe the American people buy into the notion taxes will not increase…or that this idiotic plan of his wont add to the deficit? did ‘ol curious’ george have the guts to ask him about the CBO projections? why do they differ from BO? and hey, where’s that birth certificate?
Posted by: realman1963 | September 20, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Why does Obama constantly use the verbal tic of “Look, …” when he wants to seize the moment in a conversation?
It’s an egotistical interruption that suggests “look at me, ignore your own opinion.” It is incredibly insulting and disrespects the natural course of reasoned discussion.
It is a seizure, and he does it so casually and with a smile on his face that he seeks to evade prosecution on the point. He is, however, practicing the art of willful seizure.
Posted by: wondering | September 20, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Could it be that even George Stephanopoulos isn’t buying Obama’s spin now? Now THAT’S a surprise!
Posted by: LongT | September 20, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
To WhatChange?:
The “Pardon me Mr President” line and the charge of a Stalinist bent tell me that Mr. WhatChange listens to too much talk radio in the form of Mr Limbaugh. Health care reform will happen. Get used to it!
Posted by: PAS | September 20, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Obama is a liar, this plan taxes healthcare 13billion the first year and has an exise tax of 35% on individual plans called “Cadillac Plans”, Jay Rockefeller, D-W VA, said that tax hits all coalminors, not exactly making 250K a year. Obama lied, Joe Wilson was right.
Posted by: bob | September 20, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
I simply can’t believe that taxes won’t go up. The estate tax (death tax) break is gone in 2010 as well as the favorable treatment of capital gains. That will be the story a year from now. Just wait and see.
Posted by: LongT | September 20, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore”..note the imperial “we”.
this guy is dilusional. he seems to think that subsidizing insurance premiums for those who dan’t afford it is somehow different than “other people carrying other peoples burdens”. the only difference is who controls the money.
Posted by: linda | September 20, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
How many millions of dollars does George get paid to fain concern for those of us who struggle trying to deal with insurance that will not cover our illnesses? Once again, in an attempt to appear fair, we see the media repeating falsehoods claimed by special interests as legitimate opposition. Shame on all of you.
Posted by: mike | September 20, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Can you imagine what would have happened if all of the state-run media would have, at a minimum, asked questions like this instead of ignoring the real news?
Posted by: Mike Austin,TX | September 20, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
I love how people constantly call Obama egotistical…what sounds insanely egotistical to me is a country full of people who don’t understand that more and more people everyday fall below the poverty line over healthcare…more like the LACK of healthcare. Why would this man fight so hard just to raise your taxes? You aren’t thinking it out. It’s a huge problem. If you worked in or knew anything about healthcare you would understand, but mostly it’s people who listen to what they’re told. People who don’t think adequate healthcare is a right are deluding themselves. No matter what we end up paying, if we are proactive we pay less. You all won’t see this as a problem until it’s you lying in that bed and someone comes in to tell you that you aren’t covered your private insurance. If you have a better solution then give it, but I don’t hear that from the people fighting this, it’s just me me me.
Posted by: Valerie | September 20, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
IF IT WALKS LIKE A DUCK . . . .
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 20, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
The Pres. may not want to call it a tax increase but it is. Reality doesn’t change just because he wants to call it something else. Thats called denial!
This is the first step off the cliff/slippery slope where the govt. will have to keep raising taxes and more taxes and more taxes- there are not enough providers now ( the Baucus plan does nothing to increase the number of providers) – specifically there are no where near enough providers that accept Medicaid and Medicare rates- and keep in mind under the Baucus plan reimbursements will be even lower than now ( Baucus plan TAKES 500 BILLION FROM MEDICARE), so there will be a huge shortage of providers accepting these coverages- not enough money and not enough providers = rationing of care! There are ways to make insurance reform work for more people and not tax and spend- would be helpful if the Pres. and his Congress – Pelosi, Baucus, Dodd, etc. would be truly open to hearing better ideas instead of driving more govt programs,tax, and spend, etc down our throats!!
Posted by: Angela | September 20, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I see . . . when this guy is challenged for raping the treasury, wasting our wealth and stealing our citizens hard earned money to pay off his parasitic constituents, he get “testy”. Well, he had better get used to the taste of “testy” because citizen dissent is going to raise it to an unimaginable level.
Posted by: rplat | September 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
I am not following the logic of financing government-run insurance until the costs of healthcare have first come under control: call it a “tax” or not, money will be redistributed from the middle and upper middle classes to the healthcare sector. Seems to me that the healthcare sector, at 17% of our existing GDP, already is getting its fair share of the wealth in this country. How many pharma execs, doctors, or hospital execs do you know who are not in the upper class already? Without cutting costs out of the current healthcare delivery system, we will just be moving our country to the point that healthcare consumers 25-30% of our GDP.
Posted by: profdot | September 20, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I agree Valerie….the people who aren’t for healthcare reform are those lucky ones who have it via their employer or they can afford a private plan.
I constantly read young people simply don’t want to spend money on insurance. Did it ever occur to anyone that perhaps they simply can’t afford it either? Gone are the days when you get a full-time job with bennies. It’s an employer’s market out there and when that happens employers feel they have the right to “abuse” employees. They get away with it because people don’t want to complain for fear of losing that job.
Young people are losing hope…no good paying jobs, hardly any with benefits, not a bright outlook for their futures.
UNLESS they might be lucky enough to get a college education that they can’t afford to pay for (and many aren’t lucky enough to have parents with deep pockets) and even then where are the jobs? Many are overseas now.
This countries’ future generations are starting to be a hopeless generation – spoiled by their parents but then when faced with adulthood they have no idea how to care for themselves. And if they try to they have a hard time finding jobs and the ones they can find are low paying and/or no bennies.
It’s easy for people to sit in their glass houses and thrown stones…
Posted by: Mary | September 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Well the duck is practicing what he preaches which is have some freakin compassion for those out their going though it…I’m still waiting on that from a lot of this board who seem to they are invincible and their insurance companies will never let them down. It’s really hard to work with people when they find out the truth that they are not covered and they are left scared and disbelieved that they never knew. This is not a lie, this is real life. I’ve worked in hospitals and nursing homes and it happens everyday, so keep on telling yourselves it will never happen to you. Insurance companies do not care about you, and they will make money anyway they can. It’s a business.
Posted by: Valerie | September 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Wilson was right.
Posted by: Uh, Clem | September 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
If the goverment imposed regulations on auto insurance the same way they do health insurance we couldn’t afford to insure our cars also.
Posted by: buckaroobonsai4545 | September 20, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Obama is telling George that he cant just make up any language he wants. And George stated the literal meaning. Obama rejects it to make up his OWN language. And he once again believes that he is so superior to the stupid citizens that they will never figure it out. Give us a break O.
Posted by: Chip | September 20, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
I agree that drug companies are out of control. When I worked at a community mental health agency I’d see them stroll in with their alligator shoes and court the Dr.’s into prescribing my clients this and that. It’s a mess, but people still need to get that we are going to pay this anyway…it’s still going to happen. I say we take care of it now before we are 30 years down the road and in so much more trouble with the Baby boomers coming of age. As for providers not taking medicare, it’s because the others pay a better rate which isn’t fair because they give crappier service. I’ve worked with these “advantage” plans which are really a joke. They deny coverage and equipment that seniors need so they can get them out of the Hospital or rehab quicker and guess what happens…they come right back 3 times sicker than they left needing a whole new expensive hospital stay and rehab again, now needing MORE treatment than if we would have had the coverage for them the first time. If those programs didn’t exist medicare would be accepted, and it’s not a terrible rate they give either…it’s just not exorbitant as the HMO;s are that are an incentive to take their crappy service. PS sometimes they don’t even want to pay providers. Medicare never had that problem in my experience.
Posted by: Valerie | September 20, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
I AGREE WITH OBAMA GEORGE….HE IS RIGHT…LISTEN..WHEN WHEN IN THIS NATION ARE WE GOING LEARN ORDER? WHEN ARE WE GOING TO LEARN THAT YOU CANT HAVE ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD FOR FREE? WHEN? WHEN IS THE AMERICAN PUBLIC GOING TO REALIZE THAT EVERYTHING IS A BALANCE? WHEN? I KEEP WAITING FOR THAT DAY AS IF IT WERE THE SECOND COMING…BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A TREMENDOUS DAY OF SPIRITUAL AWAKENING WHEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REALIZED THAT IN THIS WORLD YOU CANT HAVE ANYTHING FOR FREE!!!! SAME WITH MEDICAL CARE!!! IF YOU WANT HEALTH CARE YOU HAVE IT, BUT YOU HAVE TO TAKE IT RESPONSIBLY…SAYING I AM GOING TO TAKE MY CHANCES MEANS THAT SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR YOUR FAILURE!!! ITS THE SAME WITH AUTO INSURANCE!!! IN MOST STATES AUTO INSURANCE IS MANDATORY AND IT MUST BE MANDATORY BECAUSE IF YOU HIT SOMEONE AND YOU ARE NOT COVERED WHO PICKS UP THE TAB? THE STATE!!! SAME WITH HEALTH INSURANCE!!! YOU MUST BE COVERED. PERIOD..THATS RESPONSIBILITY!!! THATS WHAT PAYS FOR YOUR INSURANCE AND MINE IN THE END!!! IF YOU DONT WANT THAT, WELL THEN LETS MAKE PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE FREE…DO YOU WANT THAT? NO YOU DONT BECAUSE THAT WOULD RAISE YOUR TAXES EVEN MORE…LISTEN…EVERYTHING IS A MEASURE AND WHAT OBAMA IS SAYING HERE IS ABSOLUTE TRUTH…YOU CANT HAVE IT ALL..EVERYTHING HAS A PRICE!!! PERIOD!!! IF HE CAN COME WITH A HEALTH INSURANCE OPTION IT IS UP TO YOU TO HAVE IT!!! NO MORE MEDICAID!! NO MORE BS, NO IRRESPONSIBILITY, NO MORE CRIMINALS WITH TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS IN A FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNT FILING FOR WELFARE..WHICH HAPPENS ALL THE TIME!!! THIS IS THE SYSTEM OBAMA WANTS TO BEAT AND HE IS RIGHT IN POINTING OUT THAT YOU CANT HAVE A SYSTEM WHICH IS NOT PAID FOR…IF YOU WANT HEALTH INSURANCE YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT, BUT THE IDEA IS YOU PAY LESS, YOU PAY A REASONABLE AMOUNT…REASON PREVAILS!!!
Posted by: TruthSaves | September 20, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Auto Insurance is responsibility that we participate in voluntarily for the privelage of driving. we are not fined for not having insurance unless we drive. And the money goes to PRIVATE insurers, not the government—YET. So by Merrriams definition this is not a tax. Now here is the inhumane question, ready? Do i want to pool my resources to cover insurance for those who smoke cigarrettes, drink alcohol, take drugs and rockclimb or surf with sharks? or eat pure lard? If i strive for good health, I choose a pool of insured people who are like me. responsible. just like i want AUTO INSURANCE.
Posted by: fred | September 20, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Ok, so why didn’t George flip the script? Obama said “No, but — but, George, you — you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase. Any…” Fact: Webster’s Dictionary: Tax — “a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.” So no matter what color you paint it, it is a tax. Regardless of what language the president makes up and insists it isn’t a tax…it is. If the government charges you for something, it IS a tax….doesn’t matter what it’s called. And contrary to what the president obviously believes, I do consider car insurance which is mandated by my state, a tax, just as I consider the licensing/registration fees, the licensing fees for my business, the insurance for my business etc. that is all mandated by the government is a tax. Paint it pretty call it fees, mandate or my pretty pony whatever you want, to it’s still a tax.
Posted by: blantona1 | September 20, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
realman1963… Where’s your birth certificate? Does it say Native American? If not, then you’re a European American and not a real American!!
Posted by: Martin | September 20, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I couldn’t believe that he agrees with getting rid of Medicare Advantage–just another way for government to decide who will get care. Also, he is the President of this country, signed a bill that allocated a great amount of money to Acorn and he said he didn’t know that Acorn received any money and didn’t know about the recent actions regarding Acorn. That in itself, does not give me a warm fuzzy regarding Government providing any regulations over anybody. Obviously there are no regulations in politics, people get passes for not paying taxes, get all kinds of perks, but heaven help the American citizens when it comes Government take overs. By the way, people didn’t like President Bush’s policies, does that mean they didn’t like white people?
Posted by: Joan | September 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Obamessiah is such an arrogant and condescending foo1. Why is it he never allows the questioning party to make their point without jumping in? Why is it he feels the need to dispute the accurate and accepted definition of “tax” ?? Why—-because it only serves his agenda?? Does he honestly think that those who can’t afford insurance today will not view the mandate as an imposed tax? Does he honestly think that those who currently have insurance will not view the mandate as imposed tax when they are penalized for having “Cadillac” coverage? Does he honestly think that those who currently have coverage will not view the requirement to subsidize the low income earners’ insurance policies??————– You can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig !!!
Posted by: Filipe | September 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Fred, although this is logical I have to ask you WHY do people do these unhealthy behaviors? If good nutrition, access to education about health information, smoking cessation and other PRO-ACTIVE resources were assessable and readily available, it might be a different story. Obesity is a really terrible problem, America doesn’t know how to eat, but if your mama didn’t teach you who would? I feel that if we just had some accessible resources and low to no cost classes available in ALL areas in country we might see a change in health of our nation. People eat the double cheeseburger and say yeah I know it’s bad, but they don’t know HOW bad it is. Most people don’t know how to read the labels or what that means in the long run for their health and weight. I don’t think we need to bandage it, I think we need to get to the root of the problem.
Posted by: Valerie | September 20, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Regarding health care reform protests:
There are four fronts — philosophical, constitutional, economic, and pragmatic — in the war against health care reform.
The outcome on the philosophical front will determine who wins the war.
Battles are being fought between opposing sides issues in moral, social, and political philosophy — between an alliance of liberty — rational egoism, individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism — and an alliance of coercion — altruism, collectivism, and statism.
The United States was founded on the ideal of individual rights. Our founding documents are imbued with the moral philosophy of principled self-interest and the social-political philosophy of individualism — the theory that individuals are ends-in-themselves; that each one of us owns our own life; that each one of us has the right to exist for our own sake; that no one has the right to force anyone to live for the sake of others; that each one of us has the right to be left alone to pursue our own ends in life as long as we don’t infringe on the liberty of others to do the same; that we should deal with one another by voluntary means; that the proper role of government is to protect our rights by legislating, adjudic ating, and enforcing laws that prohibit other individuals or groups — foreign and domestic — from initiating force against us.
Our founding documents did not openly embrace the moral philosophy of altruism and the social-political philosophy of collectivism — the theory that the interests of the collective (tribe, church, monarchy, Aryan nation, proletariate, society, “public interest”, etc.) take priority over the interests of each individual in it; that the individual has value only insofar as he or she serves the collective; that the proper role of government is to subjugate the individual to the collective; that the government is entitled to own, use, and dispose of the land, the means of production, personal property — even the lives of individuals, as necessary, to promote the welfare of the collective.
If you buy into the altruist claims that there is a moral imperative to help people in need, that you have a moral obligation to help people in need, that you are your brother’s keeper, that people in need have a right to be helped, that people in need are morally entitled to your help, that depriving them of help is just evil — then you are morally disarming yourself and can’t fight very effectively for liberty in health care.
If you can argue that people have to take responsibility for their own health care, that those who are unable to do so must rely on charity, that throughout history fellow citizens, doctors, and business owners have practiced the virtue of benevolence, that they will continue to help people in need, but that forcing them to do so at the point of a gun is immoral — then you are morally armed to fight effectively for liberty in health care.
Posted by: over_neocommunism | September 20, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Just because you don’t call it a tax, doesn’t mean it isn’t one.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 20, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Comparing mandatory health insurance to mandatory auto insurance is a typical apples and oranges comparison politicians use to hoodwink the public. First, mandatory auto insurance is to protect other people and their property, not yourself. You need insurance on your vehicle only if someone else holds the title, which is again protecting them rather than yourself. If I own my car outright and bang it up, I can pay cash for the repairs and if I can’t pay the auto shop doesn’[t have to provide service. If I want to pay out of pocket for my health service because its cheaper than the deductible amounts and the premiums between visits (and so far that’s been the case) I should have that choice. The only reason the President wants to force people to take insurance is because there’s no other way to get the money base for his plan to even work, and once you have no choice but to pay for something there’s nothing to limit what you will pay for it.
Posted by: Publius | September 20, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
fred… When you buy Auto Insurance, there are bad drivers no doubt in any pool just as there are good drivers. I really doubtful there is such a thing as Auto Insurance where every buyer in the pool is totally a good driver.
It’s the same with any health insurance you have out there. There is no doubt unhealthy people in any pool as there are healthy people.
Now with this said, I really am against making it a mandate to make every citizen buy health insurance, especially when they can not afford it.
As of now, health insurance for full coverage is largely unaffordable. Low income people just can’t afford it, and to make them force to have coverage will not work. Until it is affordable, how can anyone meet the mandate to have health insurance?
So in the end, Obama’s reasons is quite flawed due to the present-day circumstances Americans have when it comes to paying for affordable health insurance.
Posted by: GWP | September 20, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
In one interview, President Obama said the health care reform was “not radical.” He is right.
The present health care system is unsustainable. A 130% increase every ten years will price everyone but people like Bill Gates out of health care insurance in the next couple decades. And that’s for insurance with huge deductibles, low caps, and insurance which only insures mostly healthy people. And even then, most insured people know they could well lose their health care or their jobs if they get an expensive illness.
So the proposed changes are not radical. They are essential for survival, both for individuals and the nation.
I think a public option plan is essential. Nothing else will control costs and insurance company abuse.
Posted by: JAB | September 20, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
TruthSaves —– “IF YOU WANT HEALTH INSURANCE YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT, BUT THE IDEA IS YOU PAY LESS, YOU PAY A REASONABLE AMOUNT…REASON PREVAILS!!!”—————– Since you are so convinced that this is “RIGHT”! Please explain to all of us how it is that forcing mandatory insurance on everyone will bring down the costs to a “REASONABLE AMOUNT” ?? Nothing in his plan addresses the costs of any medical procedures or expenses being reduced. Nothing in his plan addresses the costs of adding millions of uninsured to the insurance roles— with exception of charging those who have insurance an additional amount in order to cover the uninsured—this is certainly not a cost reduction. How does any of this plan reduce the cost medical care?? People will still get sick—this won’t go away! People will still become disabled—this won’t go away! People will still have accidents—this won’t go away?? People who fail to comply with the mandate will still go to the ER for care—-this won’t go away!!! Please explain—– How does any of this proposed plan make healthcare more affordable??? The great orator does a whole lot of jaw flapping and hand waving but provides not substance or details to support his claims—– then has the audacity to complain that those who question his policies are spreading lies !!!!
Posted by: Filipe | September 20, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
It’s amazing we (taxpayers) don’t complain when the government spends nearly 500 billion on national defense, including weapon systems that America can’t afford or need for example; the missile defense system which cost nearly 8.8 billion annually… Any threat to America and our allies will not come from the east “Iran” but the west “Communist China”… Since we’re so fearful of every nation that’s politically different to ours…
Posted by: Martin | September 20, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
You raise an important point, Truthsaves. if the government is going to cover everyone, then shouldn’t the government also make everyone it covers abide by certain norms known to promote good health — no smoking, no drinking, healthy eating, regular exercise? Why should all of the country pay for those to be treated who have not taken good care of themselves? It’s simply a question that needs to be addressed.
Posted by: profdot | September 20, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I voted for this clown. Oh man, I am so sorry for that.
Posted by: james432 | September 20, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
GET OVER IT PEOPLE!! Healthcare is expensive. Instead of over $10000 a year in premiums your taxes go up $500. WHAT DON’T YOU GET?? He can’t call it a tax because America is too dumb to do arithmetic so he calls it something else. George please stop the gotcha nonsense that embarrassed you in the Pennsylvania debates.
Posted by: alan lakernick | September 20, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
fred wrote: “If i strive for good health, I choose a pool of insured people who are like me. responsible.”
What do you mean you “chose”? There is no such choice possible because it costs those of us who are insured an average of $942 per year extra in the cost of our policies (as of 2005 – surely over $1000 now) in hidden costs for the uninsured.
The head of Johns Hopkins said last Spring that his hospital alone spent $21 million per MONTH on the uninsured. He said that those costs were passed on in higher charges to the insured, otherwise Hopkins – and virtually every other private or public hospital – would go out of business.
I worked for a very large school system and teachers’ take better care of their health than average so my policy only costs 2/3 of what it would cost an individual. Still, I’m being soaked that extra money every year, so I don’t have a “choice” right now to NOT pay for the uninsured, do I?
If everyone was insured and you knock that $1000 bucks off the premium costs, the extra costs would not cause much if any net raise in premiums.
Posted by: The_Mick | September 20, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
There is no way it is not going to cost ‘us’ more. The government does give medical care. We buy insurance to help us with the high medical charges. However, the doctors & hospitals do not always get what they charge. My bill says the doctor/hospital charges $8,000 for an x-ray (whatever) and the bill says ‘the plan only authorizes X’. Sounds like horse trading already agreed to. These new charges will be passed to consumers.
Posted by: James L. | September 20, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
So, since the proposal is that those of us who can afford health insurance spend just a little more…not a tax, though…to make sure that health insurance is affordable for those who are bleeding us right now through Medicaid and outrageous health care costs, does anyone really — REALLY think that health care costs will decrease or that what we’re paying now for Medicaid will go away? Certainly not. We will just be paying an additional “charge…imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.” But, that’s not a tax, right?
Posted by: Shelly | September 20, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
After listening to the interview, I am more convinced it is a tax increase. NO matter what you want to call it. The government says you have to buy something and you have to pay for it.
I have come to the conclusion that we to reform our health care system, we are going to after to address the major sections as separate issues. true they are all inter-related, but there are discrete areas of the system that the reforms can come into place, making it easier to reform the whole.
The government needs to allow national insurance co-op and company competition to replace the 50 state rules now. The government should and could reform and obtain the cost savings needed for Medicare and Medicaid NOW. We owe to our parents and grandparents to fix it.
The government can also reform the HIPPA regulations to assist in electronic records, better outcome monitoring, etc. while protecting the privacy of the patient.
Other areas, the government has no reason, nor the capacity to act in and should allow that to the individual.
Posted by: scott jeffries | September 20, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Our president, by design (yes) or by accident (not) is taking our country down the road of destruction. This path is taking private industry, payoffs to the unions, scraping the missle system in Europe (NATO brothers), attempting to take over healthcare, now telling the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute that “undocumented” people should be made legal. Just the week before BHO was using the term illegals. This was done before millions of citizens after Joe Wilson called BHOs bluff. Now one of the many questions that remain concerning BHOs destination for our great country is when the “national emergency comes so that he can declare “marshall law”. One may say I am crazy for writing such nonsense. I pose this question to those people. Did anyone think BHO would have taken us this far from liberty and freedom in just 8 months? How far will the next 8 months take us? As Romney said, “when anyone thought about Jimmy Carter, would they think about the good old days?”
Posted by: findthemorons | September 20, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
The costs imposed by this socialist government on me and my business in the so called health reform will run me twice the amount of profit of the company. I, and thousands like me, will go bankrupt, and my employees will lose theri jobs. Sounds like a great plan lefties.
What happened to the American spirit of self-responsibility? What happened to the Constitution’s limits on federal government? Throw the bums out!
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
I agree with the president that taxes are not going to be raised . Only those who just want to keep their ears closed are fighting against change period by allowing the insurance giants to continue pocketing money off hard working people with high premiums and are not able to even use their insurance to prevent health problems. As for those people who are concerned about paying extra for those who don’t have auto insurance”Hello, you have been doing that for years even when Bush was in office! So what is the real problem here. To Peggy Noonan, the people who are complaining in the polls are the ones who have everything taken care of for them, they are the weak minded people who are being swayed by the fearmongers. The Polls are not speaking for the everyday people who are not afraid of anything being taken away from them, they live from paycheck to paycheck,nothing is given to them and they work hard dealing with high premiums and the insurance companies are pocketing the hard working people’s money not even caring that these hard working people can’t even get proper medical help due to insurance companies greed. Thank God for the Sunday Funnies because the President is not getting the respect for what he has committed to do for his constituents which outweighs the negativity that the media is focusing on.
Posted by: Lisa Cardigan | September 20, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
The costs imposed by the plans under consideration will kill innovation, and what has made this country great for so long. While some changes are necessary, address problems in small increments. There are always uninintended consequences and wholesale change is a monumental mistake.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
STEPHANOPOULOS: But your critics say it is a tax increase. OBAMA: My critics say everything is a tax increase… Look, we can have a legitimate debate… —– So to Obama a debate is legitimate if he controls which arguments may be used by each sides. Wow, he must win a lot of debates with those rules.
Posted by: tcm13us | September 20, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
The problem with you Lisa is you have not read any of the proposed bills and engage is zero analysis. Ask yourself when companies are faced with astronomical increases in the costs of doing business, who do you think they will look to for payment. THE CONSUMER. All pricess will go up and you will be out of pocket. Call it what you want, it will cost you! Don’t parrot these goofs, think first.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
“Someday you might end up out of a job or just deciding not to work because you are lazy. In that case-
We will have to provide housing for you. For that reason you need to purchase a $1500 housing insurance policy. It is not a tax.
We will have to provide utility vouchers. It makes sense you need to purchase a utility insurance policy. $500, not a tax.
We will have to pay for your transportation. A $1000 transportation insurance policy will be paid to your government. It is not a tax.
We will have to give you food stamps. You need to buy a $1500 food insurance policy. It is not a tax.
We will have to pay for your doctor bills. A $4000 insurance policy will be required. It is not a tax.
We will have to provide welfare payments. You need to buy a $1500 insurance policy. It is not a tax.
You will no longer be able to pay your portion of income, property, and other taxes that you are currently paying. You need to purchase a $6500 tax insurance policy. It is not a tax tax.
I realize my opponents try to mischaracterize insurance as a tax to scare people and obfuscate the issues but reasonable people know the difference between taxes and a simple insurance policy no difference than what you pay for your car.”
Posted by: barackem | September 20, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Valerie, you have my vote! Well put.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
What you should have said is, “No, President. I consulted the dictionary because I was sure you would deny it was a tax increas and I wanted to saying something more civil than YOU LIE. Now, It’s your word against Webster, not Wilson or Stephanopoulos.”
Posted by: jim | September 20, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
It is all about obama’s comment to Joe the Plumber–the REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH.
You voted for someone who apologizes for America, and who wants to change the very fabric of our country. I happen to believe we had a great country. By the way, unlike Michelle Obama, I have been very proud of our country for many years.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
People–please write and call you elected officials. I have written in excess of 120 emails and made many calls. We have to get the message through to them.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Has anyone ever discussed funding these ideas with a National Sales Tax? Teh dems won’t discuss it because that means everyone has to contribute, not just those of us who work our butts off for a living. Fact is when people have skin in the game they are less likely to promote taxes.
Posted by: chas | September 20, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Obama can claim the sun rises in the west but it does not make it so.
Posted by: drjohn | September 20, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
I’m a healthy, single, self-employed 61 year old female who already pays 12.5% of my income for health insurance, not including co-payments. I don’t have any major health problems and I don’t take any prescription drugs. I can hardly wait to turn 65 so that I can receive medicare. Health insurance premiums are way too high! I’m so thankful that we have a president who is wise, thoughtful and intelligent, and is looking out for the average citizen. How did we get so lucky!
Posted by: notpolitical | September 20, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
It’s a tax, folks. I don’t give a crap what the President wants to call it, forcing people through a government mandate to pay for something which has no constitutional basis in TYRANNY!! Health Care is NOT AN INALIENABLE RIGHT! Government cannot secure a right by way of taxation. It is simply NOT POSSIBLE. For, in order to secure this so called right, some people must be compelled to give up their rights to their own property, in order to secure these so called rights for others.
Let us all remind ourselves of the words of John Locke:
“The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property….Therefore, whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, the government officials put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force or violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties and estates of the people, by this breach of trust, the government officials forfeit the power the people had put into their hands….and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and provide for their own safety and security.”
John Locke, Second Essay Concerning Civil Government
Posted by: Tony C | September 20, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
So, I am a young person making $45,000 and I am doing my 1040 and I come to this line that says I owe the government $3500 because I don’t have health insurance. How am I to know that this is not a tax that breaks the Obama Administration’s promise not to increase my taxes. Are they going to be able to put something into the instructions that says, “Btw, whatever Webster might have said, this is not a tax!” ?
Posted by: jim | September 20, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
WHY MESS WITH 90% WHO LIKE THEIR INSURANCE? Provide for the 10%! LEAVE US ALONE YOU MARXIST FREAK.
Posted by: mark | September 20, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
I know a guy who has had 2 heart attacks with no insurance. He has a job, makes good money, but refuses to take his employers insurance and refuses to purchase his own. He say’s why should I pay for insurance when they have to treat me when I go to the ER, they’ll just write it off!! He smokes, he drinks, he parties hard and drive a nice new pickup!! So when you say it’s our right not to have insurance, well I sick of paying for your right to take advantage of the system!
Posted by: Kay | September 20, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Usually Obama argues that young people don’t get insurance because they are invincible. He doesn’t say they use much health care, but he does say that if everyone is included that it spreads the cost of health care. If I am 35 and have never gone to the doctor, then forcing me to pay in is simply a way to redistribute my money..a tax.
Posted by: Me | September 20, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
notpolitical, your health insurance premiums are already too high, your president is taking over more of the private sector that will be necessary to pay the debt on a federal debt that is spiraling out of control, add at least a trillion dollars to the debt for his health plan that your children and grandchildren will be burdened with. If cost overruns in other federal programs are any predictor, that health debt will probably be more like three to ten trillion. Add another ten trillion this group wants to add to the debt by Obama’s second term and an ever growing list of government commitments that will cost at least 100 trillion. We have a president who told us abortion and full coverage for illegal immigrants wouldn’t happen when he knew it would. He told us he could keep costs down by making other programs more efficient without any kind of tort reform. Why would he be able to make an already bloated central government more efficient when others haven’t and when we are adding so much more to the system? The Medicare you are so anxious to receive is already being subsidized by the private sector but the private sector will shrink and no longer be able to subsidize costs at the same time hundreds of billions will be taken from Medicare. How did we get so lucky to have such wise, thoughtful, leaders so ready to look out for the average citizen? This must be heaven and we just don’t know it.
Posted by: barackem | September 20, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
This is very complicated but I support someone that’s trying to make change for the greater good of everyone instead of a few. President Obama’s intent is good. We shouldn’t and won’t agree with everything but we can’t continue with the same, that’s insanity. If you want something you never had, you got to do something you’ve never done.
Healthcare reform will pass! President Obama thanks for your leadership, intelligence, courage and wisdom. If you continue to lead with those characteristics you, your administration and America will prevail.
Posted by: irun2fast | September 20, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
So is making people purchase car insurance a tax? So what is the
advantage of this Medicare Advantage
program and cost? Let us talk about
really issues and not the fact that
they all seem to be running for re-election already and not doing the
work they were sent to Washington to do…
Posted by: moreofthesame | September 20, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
You can’t afford healthcare insurance?
That is the whole issue affordable
healthcare insurance. So you do not have
a car and do not drive… different than
you getting sick and going to the ER and
the rest of us paying for it.
Posted by: moreofthesame | September 20, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Auto Insurance is responsibility that we participate in voluntarily for the privelage of driving. we are not fined for not having insurance unless we drive.—– so can we fine you if you
get sick and go to the ER? LOL
Posted by: moreofthesame | September 20, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
If I am forced to pay for something at the risk of going to jail… It’s EXTORTION!!!! Thanks O’bomba!!! Nice way to treat the poor… Put them in JAIL if they can’t afford your mandatory token health plan that takes care of the special interests instead of the people.
Why SO upset folks? He promised (he’d leave you with) “Change!” Hey can you spare a quarter!!! Uncle Sam just gave all mine to WALL ST.!!! Bernanke, Obama, Bush, will it EVER end!!!
Posted by: jafo | September 20, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
What is Medical Advantage and how did that program get implemented? My brother
is upset that his Medicare Advantage
will go away and it will cost him a
bit more out of pocket…. But don’t we
as taxpayers subsidize the insurance company?
Posted by: moreofthesame | September 20, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
A tax is a tax is a tax, no matter how you spin it Obama…
I refuse to let the government tell me how to spend my money…
If I have no job… will you still charge the mandate if I have no insurance.
Obama believe that he is the saviour… but he is our downfall…
god help us poor people… we cannot afford this joke of president.
Posted by: NewIndependent | September 20, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
George, you diminished your interview skills today as you interviewed President Obama. Next time, if there is a next time, be more respectful! You continued to interrupt him when he would be answering your questions. It appears that you were trying to hard, when asking what you thought were “tough” questions.
Posted by: irun2fast | September 20, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
The insurance mandate is certainly not a tax unless you consider it a tax when uninsured people use emergency rooms and the costs go to those who pay.
The insurance mandate is just a way of fulfilling the original concept of health insurance–all pay and all are covered.
Posted by: JAB | September 20, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
The problem with health care comes down to the fact that we have disconnected that care from the consumer. We would have the same problem if we decided to have government or our employer take responsibility for our housing, food, transportation, etc. Even though we have turned the health industry on it’s head with this upside down approach, politicians can’t seem to try to fix this problem without resorting to even more upside down ‘solutions’. Once they ‘solve’ this, how long before they make our lives better by tackling other basics that have so far been ignored? Maybe some day our country can be as thoughtful and caring as Cuba and finally let our government solve all our problems instead of just health care.
Posted by: barackem | September 20, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
The insurance mandate is certainly not a tax unless you consider it a tax when uninsured people use emergency rooms and the costs are shifted to those who pay.
The insurance mandate is just a way of fulfilling the original concept of health insurance–all pay and all are covered.
Posted by: JAB | September 20, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Wow! Whatever happen to the “PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY” that conservative and Republicans so preach to high heaven? But when that personal responsibility includes people actually taking responsibility for themselves in health care, well, then it’s asking too much! It’s a tax increase, it’s communism, it’s socialism, it’s racist, it’s every EXCUSE in the book NOT TO TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! What hypocrites! IT’LL cost TOO much!! Welcome to why we need health care reform!
Posted by: mshare | September 20, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
What matters is what something is, not what it is called.
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
This all seems to be our government thinking that the citizens can not take care of themselves and the government should have the job. There are no provisions to reform the insurance industry and remove the protections the companies have now.
When citizens give away the responsibilities of their lives to anyone, they have to realize they have given away their right to decide that part of their life.
Big government: BAD, Big Business: BAD….
Big government and big business working together to ‘help’ the country….
time to run for cover citizens!
Posted by: sherwg | September 20, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
A Tax by any other name is still a Tax.
Posted by: Marion | September 20, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Not since President Clinton tried to question the definition of “is” have I seen a President unwilling to admit the obvious.
Posted by: tillyerkt | September 20, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
The government MANDATES ME TO WEAR MY SEATBELT, AND HAVE CAR, HOME INSURANCE. DO YOU CALL THAT A TAX TOO? LIKE THE GOVERNMENT GIVES A HOOT WHETHER I LIVE OR DIE IN MY CAR. PLEEEEEEEEEEZE. GEORGE, YOU ARE SO STUPID.
Posted by: sara | September 20, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Obama said:
“… but you’ve just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that’s…”
That’s a lie. If you do not have insurance coverage you still get a bill and the provider will make every effort to collect. The end result is that liens will be placed on your property and eventually bankrupsy will be the end. The provider will get some if not all amounts owed.
That’s why providers charge non-insured inflated prices that are up to 3 times more. When they sell the account to a collection agency for 50% they stll make a profit.
Posted by: John | September 20, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Here is the perfect definition of the current Republican anit-Democrat campaign: “Demagogy (also demagoguery) is a strategy for gaining political power by appealing to the prejudices, emotions, fears and expectations of the public — typically via impassioned rhetoric and propaganda, and often using nationalist, populist or religious themes”. And, of course, this “strategy” is all fueled by Republican/Wingnut “lying”. Hence, this “campaign” will follow the same path as “McCarthyism”.
Posted by: Sentinel | September 20, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
TRUTHSAVES….according to the Last 8 years……YOU CAN have programs that WAS NOT paid for…..medicare prescription drug plans! The jack-o-lanterns of the Republican party are soooo hypocrites. So, I guess the Bush administration left that debt to the new administration as well.
Posted by: sara | September 20, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
It it’s Democrat and an initiative by them, you can be it IS a tax. Call it what it is Obama… Stop telling us creative lawyer-speak.
Posted by: Jon | September 20, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
TObama with another lie.
It’s not the same as mandatory auto insurance.
Mandatory auto insurance is to cover the damage you may do to others. You are not required to carry insurance to fix your own car or pay your own medical bills.
What’s amazing is how media stooges are letting Obama get away with it. Is ABC News afraid that they will be admonished by Nancy Polosi if they call out Obama’s lie?
Posted by: John | September 20, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
And OIL DIDN’T PAY FOR THE IRAQI WAR….I AM! WHAT DID I GET…. FOR THIS WAR….. NOTHING!
Posted by: sara | September 20, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Hey Georgie, My Dictionary does not state MANDATE IS A TAX…. IT IS A COMMAND
Posted by: sara | September 20, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The medical system is fraught with abuse. The costs in this regard are enormous. The consensus is that it is our life.. so it should cost whatever it takes.
illegal immigrants working or not are routinely helped by the system like welfare, public services to help them get medical care at enormous costs. Hundreds of thousands of dollars for procedures that would never happen in their own countries. Only for them to return there after procedures along with all the funds wired out to their families. Hey it’s a great system and if the Americans are stupid enough to do it then they deserve it. Kids are often adopted out to so called foster families in the US to help them qualify for surgeries outlawed by US law and even government agencies find ways around these laws.. WE should all get the health benefits these government people have and they help bring these rates to high levels because the government is already so involved in paying these premiums that Insurance companies know they will get their money anyway. It’s tax dollars,, that is an endless supply!!! Remember all these laws put in place… will be circumvented by public agencies. These medical procedures cost far more than many of them will make in 10 lifetimes…
Posted by: Focus | September 20, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
You don’t want the government to force you to pay for health insurance, but you do expect the government to force a hospital to care for you when you show up at the ER? Sounds like you want a system similar to France?
Or you don’t have a car, so don’t purchase car insurance. If you believe this is how to handle health care, you must be willing to not seek care from a clinic or hospital if your sick. Is this really your answer?
Also, folks what you would pay into this plan would be based on your ability to pay!! If your on food stamps hello you won’t pay. If you can afford to buy booze, cigs, car insurance or CABLE (FOX) TV you can buy health insurance.
Posted by: kay | September 20, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
This President is delusional if he really believes it isn’t a tax increase. Of course, it is. However, he is a smart man and knows it is, yet chooses to continually says one thing and does another=hypocrite.
Posted by: Theresa | September 20, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
if it’s not a tax why do we get tax credits for it? I see both their points. callit what it is and move on
Posted by: geb | September 20, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Obama is lying when it comes to health care, either he doesn’t have a clue about what he says or its an out and out lie, his plan(s) don’t make sense. I don’t want this moron killing me or my family over his stupid policie. Americans wake up give the dems the boot in 2010 and 2012
Posted by: JA | September 20, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
“You were against it in the primaries”.
Surely, this is a more promising line of attack. Obama will redefine anything to meet his policy agenda, it’s a dead end to talk to him about what is or is not a “tax”.
Better to point out again and again that he broke his promise, that he was against the notion of a mandate itself, in fact reamed Hillary Clinton for imposing such a burden on the working poor.
Posted by: apetra | September 20, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Sometimes it seems that people are just saying – I’m ok and the hell with the rest of you. It’s embarrassing.
Please, can’t we start caring for others?
Why don’t the American people start with the notion that everyone on the planet deserves medical care without having to go bankrupt in the process.
If we start with that proposition and explore the ways to achieve that goal the whole conversation would be different.
What if one encounters a bleeding, dying person in the middle of the road and the quickest way to save the life of this person is to personally drive them to a hospital.
Using that analogy, the current conversation about helping others to get better health care goes something like this – I can’t put that bleeding dying person in my car because I just had it detailed and unless someone is willing to not only reimburse me but also pay to detail it again I’m just not willing to pay for this. After all I’m not bleeding, I’m ok right now and that’s all I care about.
How can anyone defend that way of thinking?
It’s just so selfish and myopic.
Posted by: ej | September 20, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
“OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what…” if this is any indication of obama’s lawyering ability, it’s no wonder he had to go into politics. i’d love to hear one of his closing arguments…”ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecutor is stretching a little to have gone to the criminal code to cite to you the elements of the crime my client is accused of committing.” huh?
Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 20, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I guess that all depends on what the definition of what ‘tax’ is…is.
Posted by: David from WI | September 20, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
A lot of people just don’t have the wattage to understand that WE’RE ALREADY BEING ASSESSED THESE TAXES THROUGH A COST REDISTRIBUTION BY THE PRIVATE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY.
There is a huge difference in what an insured person’s provider is paying vs. what an uninsured person is charged (if anything). Why? BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO PAY THE UNPAID BALANCE (plus profits and exec. compensation).
People who don’t understand that they are already being heavily taxed by their insurance providers need to get a clue.
Posted by: bdop4 | September 20, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
If you want healthcare to be a right then PUT IT IN THE CONSTITUTION or shut up about it. The reason healthcare is so expensive now is because instead of us paying directly for it we instituted 3rd party (spelled insurance companies for all you ignorant)people to negotiate and pay for it. If it were like any other part of commerce we’d know what the costs of procedures and services were and would be able to shop for better care and prices. But since we leave that to somebody else it has going through the roof by the providers who wait for payment and add on to the costs of doing business with insurance. Add to that the fact the Medicare and Medicaid never pay the actual cost of anything medical and that further inflates the charges and increases the paperwork. Anybody here actually think the Government can provide better services and not increase the waste, paperwork and reduce fraud? If you are you are delusional.
Posted by: Michael | September 20, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Thank you George. You are absolutely right about the use of the word “tax.”
Posted by: Kimo | September 20, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
To all of you please read HR 3200 first. Its a little over 1000 pages, but it is triple spaced so it is not that long. I have read it and I can say that Obama is leaving out some of the detail that is described within and I came out with an understanding that this is a severely incomplete bill that will likely far outpace estimates in cost because it is not well thought out. As most other people I am not advocating that our current health care system operators correctly, but this bill is not the solution. Its a knee jerk reaction, take the proper time to do it right and then present it.
Posted by: Perceptionofreality | September 20, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
OBAMA! Please don’t stop with the mandates! Mandate health insurance fines, mandate dental insurance, mandate military service, mandate what kind of soft drinks you can drink, what kind of coffee(decaf of course), what kind of sex people can have(condoms of course) In short become the true DICTATOR that you want to be and come out of the closet for you are no fan of freedom and liberty-I can assure you. Oh yes, your left wing media buddies will hail you with whatever accolades you demand from the suckers and those who elected you. May the voters have the good sense to vote you and your corrupt democrats out of office soon.
Posted by: rockychance | September 20, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Milwaukee had a TEA PARTY yesterday with 10,000 people protesting Obama policies. No racism was evident, and no coverage by your mainstream LIBERAL media.
Posted by: Kevin | September 20, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
If it is not a tax, why is it that under Baucus’ most recent plan, people who do not maintain health insurance for themselves and their families would be forced to pay an “excise tax” of up to $1,500 per year—roughly comparable to the cost of insurance coverage under the new plan. Note that they do not receive any insurance for that tax, they have to pay it for not having insurance.
Posted by: Liberty for all | September 20, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Classics of doublespeak:
War is Peace!
Freedom is Slavery!
Ignorance is Strength!
The Mandate is not a Tax!
Obama must think we’re idiots. I live in Massachusetts. Health care costs are exploding here because the state imposed a system on itself similar to what the Democrats wish to impose on the whole country. The cost of health insurance here is higher than any other state, and increases at a greater rate each year than other states. The Massachusetts system is dysfunctional, and spreading it across the nation will not improve it.
Posted by: mwl | September 20, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Apparently a tax means precisely what Mr. Obama thinks it means and colloquial definitions are meaningless.
Posted by: jche | September 20, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
This is a perfect example of Obama’s distortion and lies. This is a tax pure and simple because it confiscates money from people at the direction of the government. I refuse to watch any network carrying Obama’s lies ever again.
Posted by: brian | September 20, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Explain:
1. People should have health insurance to help cover their share of the costs in treating them.
2. These people will receive credits that will remove any semblance to it being a tax because it will cover the cost.
3. 1 and 2 cancel each other out repeatedly.
Posted by: Carr | September 20, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
I supose Stephenopoulos would have to use the Obama Dictionary in order to not be a “stretch”. When challenged and without a teleprompter, the man is just another liberal professor: nothing special.
Posted by: Theresa | September 20, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Carr….you have nailed Obama PERFECTLY. He’s very good at being a demagogue himself, while labeling his critics demagogues. They can’t be demagogues if all they are doing is responding to Obama’s proposals. It’s all so stupid.
Posted by: Tony C | September 20, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I’m confused. We insist we want a private system of insurers as brokers between us and the actual providers of our healthcare. Reasonable enough–Germany and Switzerland have a similar model. We say we don’t want to pay for other people’s health care. Sounds fine (although technically, any insurance pool is built on the assumption that someone else’s unused premiums will be used to pay for services needed by someone less lucky or healthy. It’s why its called pooling risk.). But right now, roughly 40 million Americans do not have insurance, and unless they are very wealthy or they are denied care–turned down at the emergency room for not carrying their checkbook or insurance card–most of their major medical expenses will be paid for by “charitable” care, which is simply a nice way of saying that the cost gets shifted to individuals with the means to pay, like say, insurance holders. So we’re paying for someone else’s care. Why not just admit it and develop a more sane, orderly, and efficient way of doing what we are already doing in the most stressful (for those without insurance who can’t hope to pay a huge bill and go bankrupt with it still largely unpaid) and inefficient way possible? Call it what you like, but requiring insurance (and providing tax breaks, incentives and subsidies as needed) seems like a pretty reasonable way to be humane (not turning people away at the emergency room) and financially sane.
Posted by: canoedog | September 20, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Why are people accepting Obama’s premise that there needs to be “shared” responsibility? You know, one way to eliminate the need for socializing the cost of health care is to take the government out of the health care business. It’s no more complicated than that. Government involvement has warped the supply of health care as well as the demand through a complex panoply of cross subsidies. Overfunding Medicare has led to an explosion in demand and no one in 40 yrs has been able to unravel who is overusing the system and who is gaming the system and all you Obama clones are only kidding yourself if you think this new president is going to be able to do it now. You just all love the warm, soapy hope and change line of CRAP.
Posted by: Tony C | September 20, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Not only is Obama raising taxes, he implementing new weird ones. Including targeting new taxes for tampons, condoms, wheelchairs, oxygen tanks, and others to name just a few.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 20, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
PotatoeGater22
Waiting for that to show up on the next Limbaugh broadcast. Along with shocking revelations about Obama’s mother’s mysterious martian abduction 9 months before he was born.
I am not an enthusiastic Obama supporter by the way, but given the options and lack of meaningful discussion offered by his detractors, I am left with no choice.
Posted by: canoedog | September 20, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Tony C
I think you are suggesting that we eliminate all regulation and insurance and simply go to a traditional fee for service. I get sick, I go to the doctor, I pay. This system is used through most of the developing world. It’s perfectly ok, but there are drawbacks. Communicable disease: If my neighbor gets tuberculosis (or any other contagious disease) and cannot pay for treatment, is that any comfort when my daughter contracts the disease and I can afford to pay for her care. Advanced care: Chances are slim that private companies will invest the billions of dollars needed to develop advanced medical treatments, if the pool of potential buyers is relatively small, ie, only the extremely wealthy individuals. Cold remedies, maybe, advanced genetically engineered cancer treatments not so likely. This is part of the reason treatments for diseases that plague only poor regions of the world lag behind treatments for relatively minor ailments that are common in wealthier parts of the world (all of which have some sort of pooled risk approach). I understand the impulse on this, but pooling risk does increase options (just like pooling buyers allows big box retailers to sell their products for less than the corner market).
Posted by: canoedog | September 20, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Well, George, how did that slap in the face feel; and how does it feel to know that Obama’s minions are CHEERING because he tried to make a fool out of you?
How much longer is the press going to put up with being ordered around like a bunch of unruly school kids.
This guy is a punk.
Posted by: Linda Eaton | September 20, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Obama is so arrogant. You know, his ” I know better than everybody” attitude is really making people angry. This entire health care law is about buying more votes and power. If he buys another 30 million votes, he figures he might be elected permanently like Chavez.
Posted by: brian | September 20, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Like usual Obama is bad at analogies. Auto Insurance is not mandatory. You get it IF you want to drive legally in your state. But according to Obama, EVERYONE needs to buy health insurance or they will be fined. HOW IN HECK IS THAT NOT A TAX?
People today have a right as a US Citizen not to get health insurance EVEN if you can afford (say you are 20 yrs old). But now according to Obama-land, you have to buy it no matter what. Again HOW IS THIS NOT A TAX?
Posted by: lionheart | September 20, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
If you have a car then insurance is required. No one is forcing you to buy a car. Why not allow health insurance companies compete across statelines? How about looking at Pharmaceutical companies who spend the majority of their money advertising. How about stopping hospitals charging $5.00 for an asprin? Run Medicare & Medicaid properly and possibly people could trust you with national healthcare.
Posted by: Angela | September 20, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I know that George worked for the Clinton’s however I think that in this case he was very professional. The job of a reporter is ask probing questions and when the answers are evasive to keep at it. George kept coming back at the President until it was clear that he was never going to respond fully or honestly. The office of the President deserves respect and so George pushed it about as hard as he could without coming across as rude. The net effect as you can see from these posts is that the truth did prevail and the Presidents prevarications did not go undiscovered. Good job George from a conservative who appreciates the truth.
Posted by: James Bucholtz | September 20, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Lionheart,
By your logic, and following the lead of the current healthcare system, anyone should be able to go and pick up groceries, clothes, or any other commodity and pay what they can. The store can simply shift the cost to someone else. Unless we are willing to eliminate all care until you can prove the ability to pay–even if you are brought in unconscious on a gurney–you still have the problem, that unlike other services, people will still be able to access the good (service) regardless of ability to pay. The image of accident victims waiting at the scene of a tragedy while someone locates their insurance card, or secures a commitment that someone can pay, is morally pretty reprehensible. So is the image of a 23 year old dying because their cancer treatment is way out of their reach financially. It would be easy if we simply said these people should be allowed to die, but as soon as we say that saving their life has value, we need to figure out how to pay for it. And I still believe that figuring out a way to have everyone play a part (with help for those too old, disabled, or temporarily unable to afford it due to job loss) in shouldering the cost of a system in which we all benefit makes sense. Again, call it what you like, but we are paying for care for those without insurance in grossly inefficient ways as it stands.
Posted by: canoedog | September 20, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Irrespective of the mindsets and voices of those who hate, and those who say “no” whenever President Obama says “yes,” requiring people to carry health insurance is NOT a tax.
It is sad that so many in our country are so full of venom, from one source or another. Of course, President Carter was spot-on when he stated much of the opposition to policy is race-related. A clear-thinking person, with objective viewpoint, can draw no other conclusion.
I sincerely hope the rabid opposition will open their minds and hearts, and think of the good of the country. Mr. Spock so clearly and rightly stated: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Let’s put aside our selfishness and focus on the “we” instead of the “me.”
Posted by: saftgek | September 20, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
In the United States you have the God given right to kill yourself slowly but no one should pay for your slow suicide.
Posted by: Angela | September 20, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
If government is so cavalier about making enormous cuts to a near bankrupt Medicare, which will result in severe cuts in services for Seniors and ram down the accelerator towards it’s bankruptcy, think what will happen to a government run system when the money starts to runs out?
Answer: Bureaucrats, unions and corporate special interest groups will be first in line to get what ever money there is. The rest of us will be pounding sand waiting for that heart surgery we need to save our lives. No wonder there is so much talk about “death panels.”
BOTTOM LINE, Once President Obama and his minions get control of all the health care dollar they will have the power to fool around with our money and our lives. Than everyone will be kissing their behinds begging them for a freaking aspirin!!!
Posted by: Mary | September 20, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
George,
I can’t believe you let the Obama steam roll over you with that ridiculous answer. This is clearly a tax and he is continuing to prove that he not a man of his word (hello Bush Sr.). Higher taxes for everyone are coming down the road – i just hope our country isn’t bankrupt in the next 8 years. Too bad all you reporters are soo goo-goo gah-gah over Obama and can’t hold up an intelligent debate with the guy. Kinda embarassing interview Stephanopoulos…my opinion only.
Posted by: Rick | September 20, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Health care reform will happen. Get used to it!
Posted by: PAS | Sep 20, 2009 9:17:37 AM ********************* Just as soon as you pay for mine, yours and each and every illegal immigrant. Get used to that. Then get a job doing more than delivering pizzas. Unless you’re one of the 10′s of millions out of work. Then, Of course, you want your medical bills paid for by everyone else. Enjoy the easy life until a rational President and Congress is elected.
Posted by: WhatChange? | September 20, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Joe Wilson was right. He lies constantly. He needs to have that chip on his shoulder knocked off.
Posted by: tricia | September 20, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
It is absolutely a tax increase Mr. President. The only people who don’t see it as a tax increase are the people who don’t have to pay it.
and stop comparing it to auto insurance. Using your own synopsis, you want to charge people for auto insurance who don’t own cars.
Once again, you have done nothing but convince the overwhelming majority of Americans that your plan is a bad idea.
Posted by: Jolat | September 20, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Just wait a minute. You mean we have to pay for this healthcare? I thought it would be free for me. Well, just forget it!
Posted by: mvale | September 20, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
One more thing……
The original house bill DID have death panels, DID give free insurance to illegal aliens, and DID give free government paid abortions on demand.
Now, if the house would have passed that bill, Obama would have signed it.
Posted by: Jolat | September 20, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Can’t believe that they were rushing to pass this in August before it was even written and no one knew what was in it. We still don’t know.
Posted by: mvale | September 20, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Great job George. I believe you are correct in your analysis of the dictionary definition of “Tax” and the President just couldn’t answer your question.
Posted by: mrh | September 20, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Jolat,
You may not own a car, but unless you are a disembodied spirit, you have a body that is subject to accidents and unforeseeable catastrophic illness. This is the point. You can choose to not drive (although I suspect many who are claiming this also have opposed funding for public transportation). You cannot simply choose not to get sick or have an accidents. Unless you are willing to say anyone who cannot afford to pay must be denied service, you are shifting the costs of the uninsured to the insured. Just because an individual takes that gamble in order to pocket an additional $200-$400 a month, doesn’t mean people who do pay should have to cover their costs. And the reality is that some individuals simply may not be able to cover the cost of insurance, and unless we are willing to let them die on the sidewalk outside a hospital, we need to figure out how to get them into a rational system of care that can help avoid exorbitant costs associated with delaying treatment. I don’t hear any clambering to repeal laws requiring hospitals to treat first, ask for payment later in life threatening situations. If you are not willing to push for that, then offer a solution to the cost shifting.
Posted by: canoedog | September 20, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Bush was sooooooo right. He said Obama doesn’t have a clue!
Posted by: David | September 20, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
George: Be careful asking questions of Obama. You and ABC will end up like FOX and be excluded from and news features in the future. The petty attitude of this administration is another matter.
Posted by: Charles Leslie | September 20, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Mandated auto insurance is hardly the same as mandated health insurance. You’re only forced to buy liability insurance. If you applied the same principle to health insurance, then you’d only be forced to buy insurance that covered epidemic-related healthcare, which is obviously not the case. Obama’s comparison is an epic fail.
Second, Obama brings up the emergency room situation as an example of bearing your burden. Well, the only people that don’t pay for hospital bills are the ones that can’t afford it. So he’s essentially saying that this bill is targeted against those responsible – the ones that don’t pay – and yet he subsidizes their healthcare in the same bill. Obviously Obama’s a bit confused about who needs to bear the responsibility.
Posted by: Josh | September 20, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I agree with ej “Why don’t the American people start with the notion that everyone on the planet deserves medical care without having to go bankrupt in the process?”
Each one of us is so vulnerable. Those who oppose reform seem not to realize that they themselves are one pink-slip away from illness,unaffordable care and financial disaster. The greater good is to take care of one another, as ej counsels, but if people can’t stomach that, then they at least should support insurance reform for their own, personal, probable good.
Posted by: Eugenie | September 20, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Just like George and the media, some of you keep fighting the President on everything, like he has a magic wand after all this last President # this country up, I say change the health care system and people need to change there eating habits, work out at the local gym or at home, if you are a smoker or drinker cut down, your body is a temple, and far as say get hit by a bus or car, look both ways, any how when some of you keep fighting the president what that tells me is that you are a unhappy person, you are a follwer and what i mean by that, is you believe you hear instead of finding out the real issues, like the president say’s we can’t stand around and do nothing, if someone has a better plan let him know, and for you jerks who this he is not american, look in the mirror and ask your self are you american.
Posted by: BIG MAN | September 20, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I make 950.00 after taxes. Welfare counts the money I get before taxes are taken, fine. That is 1138.00 a month. My rent because I have two children and need a three bedroom house. My rent is 1130.00 a month! My electricity is about 240.00 a month, most of it beign taxes imposed by the government because apparently they are run by the government. I get charged 10.80 a month for being a customer! They call this their “customer charge”. (I won’t even get into how I thought paying for what I used and the taxes were sufficient, as I have NEVER seen a utility company do this before!)I am told by Welfare that I can afford 850.00 dollars of my own medical bills, because I make too much money to get medical, I can afford my own medical bills?!? I make 7.1125 an hour!That is less than minimum wage! I am considered “medically needy” and have been told to go on Disability to get medical as I have a condition, and CANNOT get medical through an insurance company (( I remind you that I bring HOME after taxes LESS than my RENT), let alone electricity, things like TOILET PAPER, SHAMPOO, SOAP, and school supplies for my kids,clothes for them to wear- I cannot afford even at the thrift shops!))because I cannot afford it! I was told I make too much money at 7.1125 an hour to get medicaid even though I have no other options and I NEED it! I pay taxes like everyone else, on everything I buy. Uncle Sam takes my tax money from my checks just like everybody else. I don’t get free money from the government such as TANF. I had to sleep on a sidewalk two days ina row to get help with my electricity, and it was first come first served. All the while there were people sitting there dripping with gold jewelry and teeth, 2,000.00 dollar laptops they couldv’e PAWNED, here I am with NO jewelry and no medicine while they get their bills payed for sitting on their butts! And not to mention the fact that AUTO INSURANCE is something you have to purchase to enjoy the privelage to DRIVE. NOw people have to pay for mandated health insurance to enjoy the privelage to LIVE? Are we going to have to start applying to have babies like in CHINA?!? Will we start being TAXED if we have an unnapproved/illegal baby? And learn some Godblessed ENGLISH people! When the first immigrants such as my grandparents, came to America, they knew it wasn’t going to be easy, but they LEARNED the customs and language of the country they came to to find freedom and a chance at a better life, all the while they kept their family traditions and ethics alive and brought something to this land. And while I am on tirade the darned rebel flag STANDS for a part of our history as a COUNTRY and a nation. To the trials and tribulations, and the tiems that we slipped and fell, brushed ourselves and each other and carried on. If we gripe and whine about our history and sweep it under the rug, we are doomed to repeat it. We don’t sweep the memories of the Holocaust under the rug because it may offend do we? NO! WE relive it and retell it, with pictures that sends one to the coldest reaches of our souls, so as to NOT doom ourselves and others to the atrocities of our past!!!It is called HUMANITY people and if EVERYONE would let go of the Lilith we call the DOLLAR, and go back to spending time with our children, our neighbors, our families, we wouldn’t BE in this mess!
Posted by: Christina | September 20, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
It is LAW in Texas to carry Auto insurance. We have been victims of 2 wrecks caused by uninsured drivers. Our own insurance had to pay. The bad drivers get off scot free. Even our Auto insurance company could not force them to pay damages.
Same thing will happen with health reform. Those who choose not to pay will get away with it while the rest of us pay thru the nose.
Illegal aliens will get free healthcare without being forced to buy insurance. Just like now.
Posted by: Texan234 | September 20, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
George,
Good try with the dictionary but you did not make a dent. His ACORN answer was also right out there.
Obama said, “it’s not really something I’ve followed closely” and “This is not the biggest issue facing the country. It’s not something I’m paying a lot of attention to.”
But the inner workings of the Cambridge Police Department are a national issue. He must think the American people are stupid, because the reverse is really troubling.
Jon
Posted by: Jon | September 20, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
It is unbelieveable to read comments that just criticize negatively…nobody gives alternatives. If Obama’s plan is not appropriate then what is better? Nobody likes Taxes…what Obama is doing is taxing the middle class whether he admits it or not.
Definition of government:The body with the power to make and/or enforce laws for a country, land area, people, or organization; A group of people who hold a monopoly on the legitimate use of force in a given territory; The state and its administration viewed as the ruling political power.
It is understandable that the american people more than any other people in the world are concerned about the size of the government and the control it imposes on people. But Obama’s ruling party ( by the way democratically elected by most americans )is doing exactly what they are suppose to do to govern in favor of the majority of americans. Most importantly Obama’s policies are an alternative to the disastrous consequences of free capitalism.
I just can’t understand how even the president compares auto insurance with health care insurance. We are talking about human lives! Your life!
If a car is wrecked you get another one..but your body is just one!
The question is how can we have a government that doesn’t interfere with the free spirit of entreprenures but at the same time protects the well-being of the majority of americans.
Posted by: ricci | September 20, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
I love reading the comments in this room because you have people who might hate the presidents policies because they are his own. The truth for me is that healthcare is needed for all and for all to be covered. It will be polarized because of the fact that some will always believe they can take their money to the grave. In truth God did not design it that way. Nobody I know is against the plan, I don’t claim to know the world of course but I am glad to see some people with some sense. To touch on one topic they spoke of about racism. The country is worse off than ever and I really believe that this could go in a destructive direction. With people on the right trying to fire up their base with segregation talk and the using of racial name calling, they don’t realize they are firing up a lot of cultures ready fight (literally). The show dealt with subject in a politically correct day but the people won’t.
Posted by: Paul | September 20, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
If it’s not a TAX INCREASE WHY is the IRS the appointed watchdog and strong arm to make sure people have paid for health insurance????????? WHY is the IRS going to fine people if this is not a “TAX”? I thought the IRS dealt with TAXES.
Posted by: Transparency Anyone? | September 20, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
If someone is given subsidies, someone else is paying for it, that’s a tax.
Posted by: Ron | September 20, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
If the bill stated that if you take the tax deduction then don’t get the insurance you will be fined is freedom to say you have to get health care or be fined is economic and class dictatorship.
Posted by: Robert | September 20, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
If it looks like a duck…. Just a couple of notes on this mess..
a. If govt run healthcare is so good then why is Mass finding it necessary to cut benefits, increase taxes, lower provider payments and generally “insist” their citizens pay more for less and less? And HOW exactly can you possibly say the feds can do it better???
b. If socialized healthcare is such a good deal for the citizens then PLEASE explain how prostate cancer, for example, of the type and stage of Sen Dodds is virtually 100% curable in the US, 85% curable in Canada, and a whopping 77% curable in England–and this isn’t the only example, it’s virtually across the board and DOES include people with little/no insurance in the US. (WHO 5-year survival rates.) And, if it is SO GOOD, why aren’t our representatives and senators and the rest of big government putting themselves on it?
c. Illegals not being covered? Of course not–OB is going to give all of them amnesty so they are all suddenly “LEGAL”. (Just came out Thursday or Friday)
d. How much are you NOW paying for social security and medicaid taxes vs 5 years ago? How about 10 years ago? How about the percentage rate of your taxes and the maximum amount of your wages subject to such taxes…increased or decreased? ANYBODY who says socialized healthcare will be even on the same continent as “revenue neutral” or “paid for from other savings” is a bald-faced liar, especially the “paid for by other savings” lie because all that means is they are going to cut benefits/services in those areas. HOW can there NOT be massive tax increases to pay for this boondoggle??
ANY political who treats a 6% win–53-47%– as a “Mandate to blah blah” is seriously working to remove themselves from power in the next election. Dems are fast discarding the notion that people tend to vote with their pocketbooks in mind and enough concerns have been raised that a lot more people than OB and his henchmen will believe–across party lines even–are beginning to wonder about who they voted for. It happened strongly in ’66, and in ’96 when seemingly invincible Dem majorities in both houses unexpectedly evaporated overnight. They are incapable of recognizing the link between their tax and big government policies and voter displeasure. The only bad thing about the situation is we have to wait until next year to see if they have, once again, blown both feet off at the neck.
Posted by: Ron in FL | September 20, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Look could you people please use proper grammar or spelling when leaving a comment? Your opinions come off as uneducated and juvenile. Especially since computers come with grammar check and spell check! I’m a student who just lost my health insurance and I can’t afford this either. But the president has a point. I like the idea of my city and federal resources NOT being stretched thin by the uninsured. I have asthma and several other problems, but I do not qualify for medicaid or any other services. I don’t want them either. I will find a way to pay for my insurance just like I do my car. People here that are mad are safe in the knowledge that they have access to medicare and medicaid. My generation won’t, thanks to the amount of people who rely on it. Its like the grocers who went on strike because suddenly they had to pay out of their paycheck for insurance! Guess what? Our state workers(including the UC system) and city workers pay into insurance, why shouldn’t people who don’t risk their lives daily or teach our children?
Posted by: NothingYourGonnaKnow | September 21, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
There’s quite a bit of misinformation here as well as spin. Semantics aside, most seniors are taking meds now that they’ll be taking for the rest of their lives. I’m wondering what financial impact Obama’s plan will have long term to pharmaceutical companies that make the drugs everyone takes today, plus all the new ones for diseases that have no cure yet. If their profits decline, their stock prices will drop, and they may choose to not seek out new drugs to combat and perhaps cure deadly diseases.
Posted by: Rob | September 21, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am
It is not a tax but it is an unfunded mandate. We all know what that means. Asking the poor and middle Americans and seniors to sacrifice to provide insurance to those who are unwilling to carry it and illegal aliens is not going to fly. If the Democrats ram this down the throat of America they will pay a terrible price. It is not to late for Obama to save his presidency, but he needs to start listening to middle America.
Posted by: Stephen Howell | September 21, 2009, 4:27 am 4:27 am
Sorry Mr. President you are WRONG on this one. The phrase “EXCISE TAX” is actually part of the wording in the Baucus Bill on page 29, of the Chairmans Mark, sentence one.
“the consequence for not maintaining insurance would be an EXCISE TAX”
Posted by: maria | September 21, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am
This guy lies all the time! I’ve never seen anything like it.
Posted by: LongT | September 21, 2009, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Typical Obama.
He wasn’t even man enough to admit that the Baucus bill clearly states the 35% fee on cadillac plans is CALLED and EXCISE TAX.
It’s written into the very plan Obama is supporting.
What a bamboozler this President is.
Posted by: Mary | September 21, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am
George was unsuccessful in linking the insurance penalty to a tax. Obama’s explaination seemed more reasoned. Other than that, the interview was too short, lacked details, and was followed by 45 minutes of people telling us what they thing the discussion was all about. YAWN!
Posted by: KsDevil | September 21, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am
If I earn some money and the government takes it call it what you like, I call it gone.
Posted by: Ray Gorcyca | September 21, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
The spin from this President is laughable at times. If you forceably take money from us, it is a tax. Let’s point out it will be done by the dreaded IRS, no less!
Posted by: Theresa | September 21, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
If everything worked as described by Obama, I think the mandate (although I’m not usually one to date men) would be a necessary evil.
Unfortunately, this is a scenario where this and that is done, resulting in Insurance companies that SHOULD lower their overall rates – but it would be like leading horses to water. A whole lotta changes can be made, with the end result being the insurers (in cahoots) making token (if any) reductions – after having a cattle drive of new enrolees.
Gimme a Public Option any day. At least we’ll have some control over that. Otherwise it’ll be like getting cats to line-dance in a broadway production… real ones.
Posted by: Uncommon Sense | September 21, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Of course it’s a tax..Obama should stop triangulating.
Posted by: A reader in GA | September 21, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
He can call it whatever he likes, but
the bottom line is that it is a tax
increase.How he can have that fake
smile and turn on the charm while
scamming people is downright scary.
He does not listen, he only talks.
Posted by: wis134 | September 21, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am
The problem is not the mandate (or the tax), it’s that they are forcing us to buy the same crappy products from the same insurance companies who’ve been robbing us for decades. Rather than giving us a REAL non profit approach at the NATIONAL level which would result in serious buying power and a reduction in costs. But NOOOO, instead, they go with a watered down “Co-op” which the private companies will eat up and spit out… and keep the same monopolies state to state in place. Further, they don’t allow those with company sponsored insurance to shop on the exchange.. so those with employer plans are stuck with ONE option. How is that choice? And how will that drive competition? The Baucus bill is a big ole fat wet kiss on the mouths of insurance giants. Sellout!
Posted by: A reader in GA | September 21, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Does Georgie Boy really belive the Big Zero’s explanation of ‘it’s not a tax’??
I always thought that Stephanolopolis
appeared to be an intelligent human being. Guess I was wrong. The Big Zero is a consummate liar and what an embarrassment to have our first black president be a LIAR!I will never be foolish agin to vote for this poor excuse for a human being, much less our president. (small p) No respect for the man.
Posted by: Susan Grant | September 21, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
TruthSaves,
Your last words in your post are reason prevails. Well, here is the error in your reasoning. If the nation goes with the current proposal by the obama administration not only will health care cost more ie…. higher deductables with less access to physicans. Then you get into the waiting list for services. Then you get into the Government mandates of what and how much care you can get. In other words, there will be a government go between you and your physican that will dictate and approve what LEVEL of care that you get. This does not begin to address the cost of prescriptions. This will end any type of freedom of choice for American healthcare. Choice = Responibility…
Posted by: bully4you | September 21, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I don’t think Obama made a strong case for his position.
Had he had some conservative democrats in his circle, he might have already addressed this issue and been ready with a defense better than, “No, it isn’t.”
It seems that Obama’s positions get vetted by the public or in this case by the media (which is an exception).
Obama’s claims about reducing costs were also vetted by everyone but himself and his circle of advisors in the White House. After all, it’s not like they don’t have a former CBO official there.
Obama needs to bring new blood into his policy-making circle.
Posted by: Andrea | September 21, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
No, it would not be a tax increase and the analogy of car insurance was a perfect example. Car insurance should be mandatory if you own/drive a motor vehicle. I don’t want to be paying for illegal’s visits or disadvantaged citizen’s visits to the emergency room either. That alone raises the rest of our premiums to make up for those free rides and it just needs to stop. Everyone needs to be accountable for their own usage of medical requirements so the rest of us are not held accountable for them through having to pay even higher charges.
Posted by: CarpeDiem | September 21, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
“It depends on the what the definition of is is” WHAT A RIOT.. Talk about not being honest. Here is what he should say. IF You want everyone’s premium to go down then EVERYONE has to pay the same AMOUNT. Call it a tax call it the desire for health insurance. Call it the desire for a FREE lunch and there is no such thing. The more Obama lies and obfuscates the worse it gets.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 21, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
What about those who believe that insurance is against their religious beliefs? Amish, Mennonite? They use no social services and pay their own bills. They are counted in the 50 million who don’t HAVE insurance but their religion says they CAN’t have insurance. They have assurance that God will take care of them and they take care of their own.
Posted by: MB Schelinski | September 21, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
No it is not a tax. However, it is an indisputable reduction in freedom of choice, and personal discretion.
That is government taking control of people’s lives. Like it or not, it is socialist, and not democratic……so it would appear the “Democratic Party” doesn’t know the definition of their own party name.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 21, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Rick McDaniel, is it socialist that part of our taxes go towards paying for police and firemen to protect and serve our communities? Why do we not just have volunteers, or private firms doing this for us? And then those who don’t pay into it won’t be protected… Would that be ok with you?
Is it socialist thinking for home owners to be required to carry home owner’s insurance.
Would it be socialist for people to be required by law to have auto insurance if they drove a motor vehicle? There’s one that should be mandatory and it’s not. If it were mandatory, we’d all be paying a whole lot less for our own coverage because far more people would be paying into it. I’m sick of paying for those who WILL NOT take responsibility for themselves and then pass on the costs of their problems to the rest of us who play by the rules.
Posted by: CarpeDiem | September 21, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
My quest for information led me to tape “This Week with George” yesterday morning. Upon viewing the tape, I can only conclude we have much to fear! Our President seemed to object that George Stephanopoulus would use traditional definitions for words in the rhetoric. It appears that the norm is to redefine words, so the American People really don’t know the intent of legislation.
When I couple text of this program with what I have read, I can only conclude that what started as spin has deviated so far from traditional meanings, that now the “spinners” actually believe what they are saying. But to those of us using traditional meanings, these comments seem a series of lies.
I urge our congressmen to do several things which I believe will serve well our nation:
1. Stop the spin. Tell it like it is.
2. Include points from the Hippocratic Oath as you go about your work: Do No Harm.
3. Don’t do for the people what the people can and should do for themselves. Government entrance in numerous areas is discouraging volunteerism, and creating bureaucracies that cannot be sustained.
4. Do not rush to support a health bill. Carefully think through the impact of the changes. When congressmen don’t do their job before voting for or against a measure, they should not be able to hide with the excuse, “Unfortunately, that was an unintended consequence.”
Posted by: Stan | September 21, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
PROFDOT…..we know the President smokes (even in this day and age)…but, not openly. To advance you noble (..and I mean that) noble rationaliztions, how are we going to verify that fact? Will Michelle verify that for us on some time basis or what?
Posted by: justj joey | September 21, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Mr Obama is a SMOOTH talker, he knows how to use those words to sound sooo intelligent he even makes the news media look so stupid, he is a crafty sly cunning conning man, He is a professional lier, Oh I forgot he is the people Messiah, he is to be put up on a pedestal, and he is using the Main media to do this, oh to look so stupid is a honor, Thanks for letting him look so good on your part.
Posted by: mary | September 21, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
We seem to have consensus on only one point in this whole Healthcare “Reform” conversation, and that is that we have financial problems in the administration of medicare and medicaid. Then why the hell don’t we do tomething that would be too shocking and simple to the powers that be in Washington…………..shelf Obamacare for now…….find and eliminate the problmes which even the President says exist in those programs and then see where we are……I would like to see this country putting some $ in the bank instead of taking us…for years to come…down a potential bankruptcy road.
Posted by: justj joey | September 21, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Look (that’s the usual snake oil introduction) Taxes are IRS stuff. Why not just send BHO the rest of your money so he can make sure it is redistributed wisely. But then, what will you sheep do when you run out of my money?
Posted by: Richard Nelson | September 21, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
This is a non issue for NON TAXPAYERS (not cheats trying to get out of taxes). Do yourself a favor, REJECT citizenship of the Federal United States and rid yourself of the insidious Social(ist) Security number and have nothing to do with Washington the Distric of Criminals! look it up for yourself SSA is voluntary the IRC doesn’t apply to most….everything is right in front of you, you just need to take a step back. The President hasn’t and won’t lie. He knows all to well the consequences. Everything he has told you has been truthful in some manner. The Criminals in the District know that the Truth is so close to the face of the public that they can’t see it and will take advantage those who are ignorant of that Truth.
Posted by: Nick | September 21, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
So if it’s not a tax increase what is it?
Oh, it’s like auto insurance everyone has to have it. Okay, then make it mandatory that we all have to have life insurance, personal liabilty insurance, mortgage insurance just in case you can’t make mortgage payments etc. But one question still remains, who is going to pay for everbody who can’t afford it?
Posted by: afloatinasea | September 21, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Kinda reminiscent of when another president wondered aloud about the definition of “is”. Lol….Stephie had seen this before.
Posted by: suyts | September 21, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Lol, it’s funny watching people trying to defend the president’s rejection of reality. PEOPLE!!!!! It’s a govt. mandated expense!!!! A fine if you don’t comply!!!…….IT IS A TAX!!!! Regardless of whether you think it’s reasonable or not, call it what it is. A tax.
Posted by: suyts | September 21, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“Not a tax increase” – now that’s pretty funny!
Posted by: Gary | September 21, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
It is completely appropriate that uninsured folks pay some sort of fine or tax to cover the fact that they do not carry insurance. The overall amount should be fairly low, since these are mostly young people whose health is good overall. They should only pay enough to cover their overall cost to the system. As I recall, when I was in college full time it was mandatory to carry some form of insurance (or the college automatically made you enroll in the student plan). As for separating pools of people out who are in very good health, that could easily include family history and many other factors. Should women pay more because of likely childbirth? Even if you are healthy you could pay more if your family, racial group, etc. is more likely to have certain health problems. This could be an ugly slippery slope that would greatly benefit the insurance carriers, but would not help consumers significantly.
Posted by: Davemoses | September 21, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Obama is goofy to compare health insurance to car insurance. Yeah, we are forced to have auto insurance, because we might damage someone’s property and not have the money to afford to fix the other person’s property you damaged. That’s totally different than forcing people into yet one more friggin government forced agenda. Forcing people into this is wrong. Health care isn’t a right and even rights don’t force action on the pert of the individual. They possess the right without expenditure. For example the second amendment says you have a right to own a gun, but doesn’t force you to buy one via a government mandate. The government can force you to buy auto insurance, but only if you are going to drive a car. If you don’t own a car, you aren’t forced to buy it.
Posted by: TexBork009 | September 21, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I assume that the proponents of this plan will use individuals’ federal income tax returns to determine whether or not the individuals have health care coverage and if not, impose the fine, fee, mandate (whatever you want to call it)? If so, then it is a tax.
Posted by: Getreal | September 21, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Well whether you call it a tax or not, that is not the point. If you call it a tax increase look at what has happened to the people who have had insurance over the last decade. The increase in premiums has been the biggest tax increase on the middle class while the highest income earners received the biggest tax cut. You can not have it both ways if you want to call it tax increase on the middle class. We are already paying for it one way or the other.
Posted by: ftcollins | September 21, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
All of these arguments is evidence why single-payer makes so much more sense. Medicare for all, if one wishes to have a private plan instead – so be it.
But everyone’s taxes go toward paying for universal coverage just like everyon’es taxes go toward the common defense whether one agrees with it or not.
It may be a fundamental change in how one views health care for some, but for me, like voting, health care should be a right not a privilege. A country and its people are largely measured by how they care for the less advantaged in their society. People accept the notion of medicare for those over 65 and social security, but there was a time when neither existed.
Now it’s the notion of universal health care coverage that some people just can’t get their mind around but it will happen and it will happen because it needs to happen and because it is the right thing.
All this arguing only serves to divide us more and to delay the inevitable. Like I tried to say earlier, if we change the conversation to the idea that people need help and how are we, as a society, going to make that happen, the nature of the debate/conversation/argument will change significantly.
Posted by: ej | September 21, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Obama’s answers remind me of a previous President – It depends on your definition of ‘is’. The government forcing it’s citizens to pay money for something is a tax. How can anyone defend such a brazen attempt to hide the truth?
Posted by: Corwin | September 21, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Posted by: TexBork009 – “Obama is goofy to compare health insurance to car insurance. Yeah, we are forced to have auto insurance, because we might damage someone’s property and not have the money to afford to fix the other person’s property you damaged.”
Tex, yes people are forced to obtain at least minimal coverage for their motor vehicles, however there is nothing and no one that checks to make sure they continue to carry that insurance. That’s why we still have problems with people not having it and why our premiums for auto insurance go up all the time. People only have to have auto insurance long enough to register the vehicle in their county/state at their local DMV/DOT. After it’s registered, those people are able to drop their coverage completely and no one comes after them for it. The insurance companies should be reporting it to the DMV/DOT when the coverage is dropped, and they should then be required to inform the police as well.
Do you think it’s right for there not to be checks and balances in place to make sure people do not drop their coverage and continue to drive uninsured?
Posted by: CarpeDiem | September 21, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Any tax on the rich gets passed down in the form of higher prices. That’s a tax on the consumer.
Surcharge on premiums is semantics. Still a tax.
Sorry Mr. President, most Americans are smart enough to know that if the Government spends money taxes will increase or the deficit will grow. Simple math.
All politicians lie. We’ve come to expect it. Obama isn’t even good at it, some people believe him anyway.
Posted by: oonogil2 | September 21, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
My question is, how are they going to fine people who don’t buy health insurance if they don’t pay taxes? Because we all know that 50% of the people in this country don’t pay taxes. Just another way that people that don’t contribute to the country but get to vote on how much of my money should be taken by the government for the “well being of our citizens”. And quit whining how many people are going broke “because of heath costs. Yes it is sad, but it’s probably about .001% of the people. So lets help them out without screwing up the entire system.
Posted by: Doug | September 21, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Mandating something that the IRS is going to penalize you with, it is TAX!!
Keep your eyes open to to your states. The new health care proposals increase medicaid which a portion is paid for by the states. Obama may not directly raise your taxes, but he will mandate the states to do this change and they will incrase taxes. Shifty, shifty politics…….
Posted by: Sue | September 21, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Doug said,
“My question is, how are they going to fine people who don’t buy health insurance if they don’t pay taxes? Because we all know that 50% of the people in this country don’t pay taxes. Just another way that people that don’t contribute to the country but get to vote on how much of my money should be taken by the government for the “well being of our citizens”. And quit whining how many people are going broke “because of heath costs. Yes it is sad, but it’s probably about .001% of the people. So lets help them out without screwing up the entire system.”
Well, first of all the number of people who refuse to pay taxes is around 16% and I would imagine there’s legal doings surrounding that.
Roughly 38% of workers in America don’t make enough money to pay taxes. Now that seems like morality and minimum wage and the value of labor issues. These are the working poor.
This is the group I’m newly a member of as the way I’ve made a living for the last 30 years has all but been done away with as the power elite have pretty much destroyed the buying power of the middle and upper middle classes through there unholy sense of entitlement to make more and more wealth at the expense of the less powerful.
Here’s the interesting number concerning income tax – 2/3rds of American corporations do not pay US federal income tax.
Why is that? Affirmative action. The type we’ve had from the beginning of this country and that’s the advantage the rich and powerful have always had over everyone else. They have always manipulated the system to their advantage and to everyone else’s detriment from the beginning to now.
Reagan tried to exploit this by mischaracterizing the nature of this advantage by trying to sell us on the notion of “voodoo – tricle down – economics,” that somehow all these individuals and entities benefitting from their “affirmative action” will turn around and pass the benefits to everyone else. Bogus!
The insurance companies running roughshod over society is just the latest installment of this “affirmative action.” People are starting to push back and the powers that be don’t like it. That’s understandable, but it is a losing battle.
The powers that be have riuned the middle class, want to extriminate the poor class and the problem with that is that where will the workers and consumers come from.
It’s a short-sighted vision that will ultimately be all our undoings.
Blaming the victims is such an old and immoral ploy to simply keep one’s power. It must come to an end for the survival of the species here on earth, and because it’s just wrong.
In this particular argument over health insurance/care reform almost everyone needs to take a hit of sorts as we rearrange our thinking and actions surrounding this. As always, those with the most at stake are going to have to take the biggest hits. But all of this is necessary.
It’s obscene if even one person has to go bankrupt because they get sick and its immoral for a society to allow someone to die for lack of money when there is plenty of money to take care of everyone if we just look at txes and money differently.
It’s callous to state that just because its a few people who are suffering the most over this system we shouldn’t trouble ourselves over it. If you were one of those people, or if someone close to you was one of those people your tune would be different.
I’m always shocked at those who think they are not part of the human race and think that they can separate their humanity from their lives and still live a meaningful existense. The moral backruptcy is astounishing.
Posted by: ej | September 21, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Pres. Obama comparing mandatory health insurance to car insurance is apples and oranges. Car insurance is mandatory for those who wish to drive a car. You are not forced to pay for car insurance unless you are legally wanting to drive.Health insurance should not be shoved down our throats in this manner. Right now, as someone who is unemployed and cannot afford any kind of insurance plan without going broke, being forced to pay fines and penalties for not wanting health insurance sounds very dictatorial to me. I think the Obama administration is going about this the wrong way, in that there are other ways of reducing costs on health insurance such as lawsuit and tort award caps for malpractice. Forcing people to be insured is going to accelerate the number of people being forced out onto the streets. What a shame.
Posted by: Andrew | September 21, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If we can save $500 billion reducing fraud in Medicare, what are we waiting for. C’mon Obama, get a team together and go after those cheats. Eliminate fraud, waste and abuse in the current system, then reform it.
Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Listen, the thing that gets me is that Obama thinks that he can just make up his own language. It goes back to his whole way of thinking. Don’t believe a big Mack truck is about to hit you even though you can see it your self. Believe what I am telling you. If I was George I would have been so insulted that Obama thinks he can just change the English language for his own benefit. I mean if we can’t use the dictionary to make sure we are talking about the same thing how can we communicate. To accuse George or “reaching” when he is just trying to find a common base of communication is very insulting. Yes, Obama was on the defensive and very testy. He gets that way when questioned!
Posted by: Rosesetta Talley | September 21, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I like Obama’s dumb response about calling it a tax. I swear, it was very Clintonesque… It depends on what your definition of “tax” is. He actually said that if one looks at the truth of the definition of a tax, one is engaged in a tactic of “reaching”? How is the truth somehow “reaching”? This is one more point of proof that Obama’s reality is not based in fact. He makes it up to fit his radical leftist agenda. Once he starts spouting off and disagreeing the the dictionary about the definition of “tax” it’s easy to see that he really simply wants to reject reality. There is no comparison between forced health care insurance and auto insurance. If you don’t drive, you don’t need auto insurance and you buy it in case you damage or injure someone else. With Obama, just being alive is reason to extort income from you. If it were like auto insurance as Obama made the comparison, one would be forced to purchase the insurance in order to pay someone else when you pass on a cold or a flu. Obama should stick to reality, but that appears more and more less likely from him. When he said that he didn’t knwo that ACORN took tax money? Come on. One after the other… Multiple lies per day now. One cannot honestly believe that man anymore. This was supposed to be better once Bush was gone. “It couldn’t be worse.”, we were told. Wow, was that seriously wrong.
Posted by: TexBork009 | September 21, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Charging law abiding citizens $3,800 for not being able to afford insurance is not a tax. IT’S A CRIME!!
It’s Obama STEALING from individuals who cannot afford insurance. Going to JAIL for not having the money for O’s criminal take-over of OUR money is hideous adn as un-American as you can possibly get.
WAKE UP you incredible STUPID IDIOTS that swallow any and all crap that O feeds you. SHAME ON YOU OBAMA!! You are a lying moron!!
Posted by: Cary | September 21, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Obama is always right…just ask him!
Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Based on the Presidents logic, I guess we will start charging all citizens autombile insurance whether they drive a car or not.
Posted by: Doug | September 21, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Just imagine what would have been rammed through, earlier this year. Maybe this issue is is one that wakes up Americans to voting, reading, and voicing collective strength. Let’s hope.
Posted by: jonec1200 | September 21, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I guess George is a racist for disagreeing with Obama.
Posted by: ruggierol | September 21, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
We’re being forced to have healthcare by the government. That’s what President Obama and his buds are pushing. Agree with it or not/like it or not. Taxes will go up to pay for it no matter what he or one of his followers that live on Fantasy Island say. You can call me what you want but he’s mandating that we have health insurance. It’s forced health insurance. We’d cut far more in healthcare by placing limits on how much insurance companies and pharmacies charge, not financing coverage for illegal aliens, not financing girls and women’s multiple illegitimate births that for which taxpayers have to pay, stopping government mismanagment of funds and waste, and putting watchdogs on the watchdogs that montior healthcare now so that the so called watchdogs have stay honest and act like people. Some of the republicans have developed a plan to cut healthcare costs which is not forced healthcare. I pray that President Obama and citezens bent on socialism would see the inappropriateness of there plan.
Posted by: john | September 21, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
This reminds me of the old adage “Don’t convince me with the facts! My mind’s made up! President Obama and his advisors are bound and determined to effectuate “change” even if the truth is staring them in the face! “SAYING I AM GOING TO TAKE MY CHANCES MEANS THAT SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR YOUR FAILURE!!!” is exactly the problem. If a deaf ear is turned on those who are trying to reason with the White House (hence the screaming at the town hall meetings), indeed, “someone” will pay for the failure – US! All of us!
Posted by: eyedoc8314 | September 21, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Glad to see abcnews reporting on the facts. Going to the dictionary is called researching the facts.
I did note through the discussion there are still no facts. I downloaded this thing and read it (took me an hour to find it last night). Its huge! Its going to be very expensive.. and you have no right to opt in or opt out.
Best of luck to us all if it passes. Glad ABC news is finally doing some research, I may have to start watching again.
Posted by: Ed Miles | September 21, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
All I have to say is the amount of ignorance and obtuseness on this board is staggering. The falsehoods that many of you propagate as fact is just beyond belief.
So much fear, masked as ridiculous indignation over perceived dangers that simply do not exist and lies that you keep telling yourself – not to mentioned the completely over the top hatred for a man who is simply trying to make things better for most of you and trying to right many of the bone headed policies of the last administration that has gotten us, in large measure, into the mess we’re in.
The fact is that something must be done with health care because the way it is now is not good for our economy and not good for many of us now and more of us in the future. It appears that many of you just don’t want to see that.
As far as the particulars of just exactly what those changes will be has not been determined and it has been well documented that the best plan for everyone and our economy, which in turn is also good for everyone, would be a single payer completely government run health care system.
I would guess that most of you are either too dumb or too scared or too entrenched in the money making system as it now stands to ever see that reality.
With this much ignorance over this matter I fear we probably deserve the inadequate health care system we now have which either underserves or excludes most people.
If you’re one of the fortunate ones who has yet to experience just how bad our health care system is, you’re either one of those 1% who own most of the wealth in this country, you are presently well employed which you could lose in a moment’s notice, or the system just hasn’t caught up with you yet.
Posted by: ej | September 21, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
==========================
MR. PRESIDENT – YOU LIE
==========================
The bill says on page 29, sentence one of the bill introduced by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont) says: “The consequence for not maintaining insurance would be an excise tax.”
Posted by: N Waff | September 21, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Lets hear that quote again ” OBAMA: No, but — but, George, you — you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase.”…George read that definition from an authoritative, politically unbiased source. Seems the President is making up his own definitions to suit his agenda, and once again dissuade intelligent disscussions on this very divisive issue. By assuming the all Americans are right wing, ignorant, bible toting, gun hugging, nut jobs. Some of Democrates voted for him, to make change, not take what change I have left. Sounds like the same old Chicago political double speak.
Posted by: Resjuda | September 21, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
When the Gov makes you pay them it’s a tax. If you get some type of permit for your money then it would be a fee. This is a tax no matter how much lipstick you apply.
Posted by: Bob | September 21, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Everybody should be able to get health insurance. It is so important to be covered.
Posted by: Health Insurance Guru | September 21, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
The big difference between an auto insurance mandate and a health insurance mandate is that you can choose not to own a car.
With a health insurance mandate, I can’t choose not to have health insurance unless I want to be penalized. I can’t afford health insurance. Forcing me to pay for it isn’t going to make me be able to afford it. I haven’t been to the doctor in four years. I haven’t needed to. The last time I went, I made small payments until the bill was paid off. I wasn’t a burden to anyone
Posted by: Melissa | September 21, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Of course its not a tax its a TAX and FINES TOO thats pretty much extortion.
Posted by: joeyolives | September 21, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
George, you touched a nerve when you gave a concise and precise definition of TAX. Mr Obama’s response recalled to mind a previous president when he gave his non-answer: “It depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is.” Keep pressing the hot buttons; eventually the truth will out.
Posted by: prof lovell | September 21, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Well, let me just rephrase what our well educated Mr.Pre-siden-t said during the interview: apparently it all depends on what the meaning of the word ‘tax’ is.
Posted by: H1N!Hysteria | September 21, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
He is laughing at you George please don’t ask any hard questions.
Posted by: DANIEL | September 21, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
In the same interview, did pres. obama also declines to stop funding of ACORN as many lawmakers advocated ?
Posted by: austin | September 21, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Auto Insurance is responsibility that we participate in voluntarily for the privelage of driving. We are not fined for not having insurance unless we drive. —- no kidding. So you can go without a car or go without driving but
can you divest yourself from your body?
When you can do that you will have a case….you can probably say if I am
not driving I will not cause an accident
with my car..Can you say your body will nnever need healthcare attention? NOPE
and I am sick of paying for those that
have money for a policy but do not take oon the responsibility of getting one.
Posted by: howstupid | September 21, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Obama is planning on making the 12M illegal aliens in this country ‘legal’ in order that they can get our Health Care…PAID FOR BY US TAXPAYERS!!! Isn’t that nice? Oh, and there’s 12M votes he just bought with our taxmoney as well. You people voted for a real gem last November.
Posted by: Bill | September 21, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Well obviously a tax is not a tax, it is a penalty according to the Pres… I guess Obama still hasn’t read the HCR bill. Gosh that is sad.
Posted by: rukidding 55 | September 21, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
LET OBAMA PAY!
Posted by: mzee | September 21, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
A mandate on individuals is not a tax? I could understand if it were a mandate on industry standards, requirements for open bidding, restrictions against monopoly or product dumping. But a mandate on individuals IS a tax — just because you never see the money in the first place doesn’t mean you aren’t taxed. When they take your freedom away in the name of your good, it’s time to start running or fighting. But don’t just stand there and take it!
Posted by: Mandatee | September 21, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Let’s really understand the “health care problem” before we try to “fix it”. The political class are trying their best to sieze more power. They’ve done their best over the last 25 years to make health care less affordable (no competitive state bidding, corruption in medicaid, ridiculous lawsuits that increase doctor’s malpractice insurance…and the list goes on) so that when the time comes (now seems to be that time) they can make the case that “it is gov’t to the rescue”. They do this only to turn around and make another entitlement that grows out of control and makes the public even more reliant on the gov’t — thereby getting more of you knuckleheads out there to vote for the incumbents that offer you more and more stuff for “free” — all in the name of our having “rights” to whatever is the flavor de jour that political cycle.
You guys debate all you want on these forums. All I ask is that in the 2010 elections and beyond, you VOTE FOR WHOMEVER IS NOT THE INCUMBENT. If we had true term limits in this country, I suspect half of the fiscal and social policy problems we have would not exist.
Health care is not a right, and nor was happienss in the constitution — only the pursuit of it.
Let the games continue.
Posted by: pragmatic | September 21, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Fact check says it is a TAX President Obama. so what part of TAX do you not understand. Memo to President Barack Obama: It’s a tax. Obama insisted this weekend on national television that requiring people to carry health insurance — and fining them if they don’t — isn’t the same thing as a tax increase. But the language of Democratic bills to revamp the nation’s health care system doesn’t quibble. Both the House bill and the Senate Finance Committee proposal clearly state that the fines would be a tax.
And the reason the fines are in the legislation is to enforce the coverage requirement.
“If you put something in the Internal Revenue Code, and you tell the IRS to collect it, I think that’s a tax,” said Clint Stretch, head of the tax policy group for Deloitte, a major accounting firm. “If you don’t pay, the person who’s going to come and get it is going to be from the IRS.”
Posted by: rukidding 55 | September 21, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Government run healthcare proponents make claim that government-run health care has lower administrative costs than private care, is that true or just clever mathematics? At a glance it would seem that Medicare only spends 3% of its total outlays on administrative costs compared to 14-22% for private care, but is it legitimate to measure administrative efficiency as a percentage of total costs. By that technique cash for clunkers could be made to appear efficient.
Administrative costs are more accurately represented when expressed on a per-patient basis, where government-run health care’s administrative costs are shown to be routinely higher than private care. In fact, Medicare’s administrative costs per beneficiary from 2000 to 2005 vary from 5 to 48 percent higher than the private sector even though the private sector has additional costs in the form of state health insurance premium taxes which average about 2%. These facts have been somewhat debated by New York Times columnist Paul Krugman and Heritage Foundation fellow Robert Book.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 22, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
We pay for auto insurance only if we drive, and we pay that to private insurance companies…correct me if I’m wrong BHO. That system works, so maybe, just maybe, you should look at the Dr’s and hospitals and find out why they charge so much for procedures. Then, look at the pharma companies and find out why prescriprion drug prices are so high….or are you in their pocket, and that’s why you don’t do it. Seems like the insurance company is a great scapegoat. By the way Valerie, 25% of medicare benificiaries are on advantage plans, and they love them. Quit spouting your liberal lies.
Posted by: Buffalo_Don78 | September 22, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Your president sounds more like a Marxist every time I hear him speak.
Posted by: Vrye Denker | September 22, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am
In the words a recent patriot,
YOU LIE
Posted by: realman1963 | September 22, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Valerie,
I work in healthcare and yes it needs to be reformed. What they need to do is start with the Insurance companies and change how they pay out for various procedures. They insurance companies also need to change their business model because it’s not working. Then they need to focus on the waste in Medicare. They also need to tackle malpractice reform. The gov isn’t up to the task as government cannot run anything efficiently. Just mandating that everyone has healthcare is not going to fix the problem. If you don’t deal with the corruption, liability claims, and waste it’s only going to make a bad problem worse. And yes, who’s going to pay for all this? The American Taxpayer.
Posted by: Colin | September 22, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Hey Truth Saves….
I agree nothing is free. Everything has a cost. However, you made no mention of reforms to the current system, just adding healthcare for everyone. Your auto insurance comparison does not hold water because how do you address the people who take the bus or train to work and do not have a car. Is it fair to make them have to pay for auto insurance when they don’t have a car?
Posted by: Colin | September 22, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
It says in both bills that it would be an excise tax that is collected by the IRS! How can it not be a tax?
Posted by: Grandma | September 22, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
So every one has to have automobile insurance, and it isn’t considered a tax. Is that a fair or reasonable comparison?
Apples and oranges, the mandated auto insurance is liability insurance. It protects those in your path, not you. It pays those law suits by others.
One can opt out of auto liability insurance by not owning a car or not having a driver’s license, but not so for health insurance.
Government run healthcare proponents make claim that government-run health care has lower administrative costs than private care, is that true or just clever mathematics? At a glance it would seem that Medicare only spends 3% of its total outlays on administrative costs compared to 14-22% for private care, but is it legitimate to measure administrative efficiency as a percentage of total costs. By that technique cash for clunkers could be made to appear efficient.
Administrative costs are more accurately represented when expressed on a per-patient basis, where government-run health care’s administrative costs are shown to be routinely higher than private care. In fact, Medicare’s administrative costs per beneficiary from 2000 to 2005 vary from 5 to 48 percent higher than the private sector even though the private sector has additional costs in the form of state health insurance premium taxes which average about 2%.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 22, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Just like Cap and Trade — If you force Americans to pay more for a product (energy) because of Federal mandates, it is a hidden tax!! — This is just their way of getting our money, yet deflecting responsibility!!! — Obama’s a fool if he thinks we wont figure this out — However, he wants to get this crap in place quickly, then dig in his heels so we can’t rescind it later!
Posted by: Perplexed | September 22, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
The point never made in the healthcare debate is that in order for the government to give a single dollar to one man, he must first take it from another who has earned and saved it. But in 2009 there is no ‘second man’. He’s unemployed or had his hours cut back to nothing. The second point is our country is BROKE. Absolutely tapped out. Obama doesn’t have a nickel to pay for anyone’s healthcare and certainly not the hundreds of billions this fiasco will cost. We are trillions upon trillions in the hole. Their great idea to simply print the money from thin air will lead to hyperinflation, destruction of the dollar, and the bankruptcy of our entire country. How many hospitals will be open then? The answer to healthcare insurance is NO insurance for ‘care’, but for unexpected, catastrophic illness ONLY. Work on a cash basis for everything else. Overhead would plummet, and doctors could offer discounted or pro bono care for the poor. That’s what one of the few medical doctors in Congress, Ron Paul, has suggested. Would this common sense approach be so hard? It is after all the way it was done for over 100 years before the insurance companies took over Washington.
Posted by: h5mind | September 22, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
If you do not carry insurance you will be assessed an “excise tax” fine/penalty. The coralary to not having insurance is having insurance and for those that do not want it, buying insurance is a penalty also know as a tax. Obama lies again and again and…
Posted by: Bob | September 22, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
I am absolutely terrified that they were going to pass this healthcare blunder of a bill in August, before we knew anything about it. It’s -pass this and we will work out the details later. It will add over 50 more government agencies and is suppose to save money. Does anyone believe that?
Posted by: m vale | September 22, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Give ‘em hell George! Hold the President’s feet to the fire, you were spot on.
Posted by: Rick | September 22, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
You can disagree over what the definition of “tax increase” is, but what Obama is saying, as far as everyone paying for those who receive care but don’t pay for insurance, is true.
How about this: we allow anyone to go without insurance, no problem, as long as they sign a paper saying they will never accept any medical care that they cannot pay for with cash. Even emergency room care. And yes, we will let them bleed out in the gutter.
Would these “healthy” uninsureds be willing to sign that? If so, then fine – no mandate. If not, then they’re admitting that the plan is to leech off of those who do pay premiums and taxes.
Posted by: MKWq | September 22, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“This is my maiden voyage. My first speech since I was the president of the United States and I couldn’t think of a better place to give it than Calgary, Canada.” –George W. Bush
Posted by: gWb | September 22, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Best comment I’ve seen posted – Great job Rick! (Posted by: Rick | Sep 22, 2009 2:22:34 PM)
Posted by: GoRick | September 22, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Obama sounds so much like Clinton. Remember Clinton – define what “is” is. Word games. Obamacare is a tax, as simple as that.
Posted by: MyTwoCents50 | September 22, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
George came across as very professional and able, more than can be said for the other guy. 2010 get here! and then, oh boy!, we’re on to 2012!!
Posted by: RonB | September 22, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
ricci; You’re wrong. Senator Richard Burr is backing a plan that focuses on cutting healthcare costs. No one ever hears about this plan much because the dems. don’t you to know about it apparently. I just have to ask again, why do we have to pass a healthcare reform bill this second? I understand people are going without healthcare but REALLY! who’s getting what out of this? Anyone who’s been around any time can tell you that somebody’s going to get something out of this and it isn’t going to be the American people getting a true government run healthcare plan. I hope (and we need to ask if members of the senate, congress, the house, and the President are going to have the same plan? People can tout socialism (this is what it is) all they want but the minute some of these people have to wait in a doctor’s office for 4 hours to be seen for a cold, they’ll change sides real quick. Can you see President Obama or Nancy Pelosi in a clinic for 4 hours? Can you see President Obama or Pelosi being told that they’ll have to wait 8 weeks for an MRI? That falls under the heading of GET REAL. A friend and I were talking recently and she told me about a debate that arose during one of her sociology classes over if communism is a good thing. Well when the next test time came and the grades were handed back the teacher marked through the students’ original grade and gave everyone a “C.” As you can imagine the people with “F’s” were thrilled and the people with “A’s” weren’t too happy. The professor said that this was communism. This is sort of what the liberals seem to be after. Well, go live in countries where this practiced for 2 years or more then come talk about it.
Posted by: john | September 22, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Look….it seems to me that the baby boomers are getting old and the only thing that they have left to spend their money on is health care and the government wants to be sure to get their cut of the action…There is your PUBLIC OPTION!
Posted by: Bondservant1958 | September 22, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Is history repeating itself? has congress forgotten why this country had a revolution to gain independence from England?….TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION,,,,,it could never be truer than the case with today’s congress, and its representation of the people,,,it does NOT exist,,,,they are loyal to the LOBBY DOLLAR only. To make laws , written for special interest, and accepting money for that, when the benefits favor corporate America and send the bill to the tax payers, that is taxation without representation, fraud against the American people,,,,,and as BOTH parties are involved equally with corporate America,,,,it constitutes a CONSPIRACY.
Posted by: R. Taylor | September 22, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
This is an Excise Tax; Here is the exact text from the Baucus Bill page 29
Excise Tax.
The consequence for not maintaining insurance would be an excise tax. If a taxpayer‘s MAGI is between 100-300 percent of FPL, the excise tax for failing to obtain coverage for an individual in a taxpayer unit (either as a taxpayer or an individual claimed as a dependent) is $750 per year. However, the maximum penalty for the taxpayer unit is $1,500. If a taxpayer
‘s MAGI is above 300 percent of FPL the penalty for failing to obtain coverage for an individual in a taxpayer unit (either as a taxpayer or as an individual claimed as a dependent) is $950 year. However, the maximum penalty amount a family above 300 percent of FPL would pay is $3,800.
ABC do your job! By the way the bill also states that employeees who have employer based healthcare will pay taxes on the employees portion of the benefits and will not be deducted from Gross Income–Tax. (page 31) If an employee is offered health insurance coverage by his or her employer and chooses to enroll in the coverage, the exclusion from gross income would apply to the employer provided portion of the coverage.
For those of you who have Flex Spending Accounts the max deduction pre-tax will be $2000.00 so if you typically claim more than that–no more–tax increase!
America is watching!
Posted by: Bob Wagoner | September 22, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Obama’s healthcare makes me sick
Posted by: IC | September 23, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am
All these so called non taxes seem to be very taxing on my bank account. They can call it by another name but it’s all the same to me.
Posted by: greg | September 23, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am
How many rich people will pay for the midle class american for how long?
The math is not correct the is going not to raise taxes We need our president to tell us the how many years we the hard workers don’t have to pay if we do is president Obama going to pay for us all? from his own savings. president Obama should not take money from the working people and give it to others let the poeple give not goverment.
Posted by: danielle Cook | September 23, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am
So arrogant..It’s a tax…you can call it whatever you wish but it’s a tax. The American people are not dumb. Whenever he doesn’t like the question his lips pucker up which is a signal to reporter, informing them that he doesn’t like the direction the interview is heading.
Posted by: bailedout | September 23, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am
Hang in there, America: January 20, 2013
Posted by: s | September 23, 2009, 6:10 am 6:10 am
For once I agree with Obama. It’s not a tax. Do you have car insurance? Hopefully. The authorities can now take your vehicle and put you in jail if you don’t and have a wreck. Even if you’re not at fault. That is not called a tax is it. So it’s the same thing. I have insurance. I pay for it myself. Therefore just like car insurance everyone who drives must have it. The problem is some people want things for free. They think they deserve it. Well guess what people. You don’t.
Posted by: Chuckles | September 23, 2009, 6:50 am 6:50 am
For once I have to say way to go George!!! You pinned down Obama on the tax for his programs and he tried to step on you when you brought out the dictionary to explain the definition of tax to Obama. Way to go george, you slapped Obama right on the face. About time you woke up George to see what we have all seen.
Posted by: Jim Rod | September 23, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Sorry George, keep trying to tell you.
Now, Health Care Reform used to be about trying to make sure everyone could afford health care. The Public or government option puts a whole different light on the subject. It is a government takeover of health care. Public option means the government will pay all those big medical bills, insurance companies used to pay. We’ll pay higher premiums and eventually have rationing.
Posted by: James L. | September 23, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Well, if it is not a tax, can someone please tell me what authority the Federal Government (under the U.S. Constitution) has to impose such a mandate upon citizens?
Posted by: Brian | September 23, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Bad Compareson with Automobile Insurance, You don’t need a car, and if you own the car the minimum insurance is for collision to be on the road, and if it’s off the road you don’t need to insure it at all.
Posted by: Gunrunner | September 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
MY only hope is Obama will be a one term president. Obama is making such a large mess that I cant believe.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 23, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I see both sides on this issue. My response is that although this may be beneficial over the long haul, it is not the smartest thing to add yet another social tax on the country at this point. Let the country recover before considering attempting this.
This is just my opinion.
Posted by: Josh | September 23, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Obama’s correct…it is NOT a tax, it is a requirement akin to carrying auto insurance. And if he is able to get a public option through, those who can’t afford premiums will NOT be placed between a rock and a hard place. You know, many medical/Dr’s organizations have been saying this for years; a core component of meaningful health care/insurance reform MUST be universal coverage. The costs of uncompensated care are simply too great and drive up costs for everyone. What people need to realize is that we are ALREADY paying for the uninsured through higher medical costs and insurance premiums and currently HAVE rationed care and “death panels” through insurance companies and lack of coverage/access.
Posted by: raven | September 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
All of you whom are complaining about the spurious claim that the government is taking on too much and that we are all becoming socialists are probably the same people whom didn’t raise one complaint when the Bush Administration grew the National Debt from 4 TRILLION to 10 TRILLION over the past 8 years. Hypocrits – all of you. It’s all about me, me, me instead of what is in the best interests of all. You all would probably have complained about Roosevelt creating Social Security and Johnson creating Medicare and now complain that there won’t be any social security and that Medicare is going to be gutted. Hypocrits and fear mongerers.
Posted by: Tom | September 23, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Tom; You are really off in your summations. For one thing those of us that are against President Obama’s healthcare plan have lived through far more of the democratic “tax and spend” idealism then you apparantly have. It’s real easy to sit back and have your ideals when someone else is footing the bill. Pardon me but again apparantly you and your democratic buds are the most self-centered human beings on earth and please don’t compare the self-centered self-promoting, self-focused doings of this administration with those of Franklin Roosevelt. Mister, President Obama and his buds are a far cry from the policies of President Roosevelt. The current administration isn’t even in the same class and that’s including his affairs. There is probably 5% of the population in our country that are truly selfless and these people are definitely mostly not democrats who think they know what’s best for us when they need to sit down, shut up, and listen to the American people for once. How can you call us hypocrits and fear mongers when President Obama and his constituents are the ones pushing for national healthcare NOW! Because people need it NOW! Someone’s going to get something from this and it isn’t the American people. I again ask you, is the government going to have the same plan? Don’t count on it. Hypocracy runs on both sides of this road dude.
Posted by: john | September 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
After Californians passed laws prohibiting new taxes politicians began imposing “fees”. When confronted by a voter about the difference between a tax and a fee, a local politician let the cat out of the bag: “when you pay a tax you get something in return; when you pay a fee you don’t get anything”!!
Posted by: Bill | September 23, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Thank you George. Although Mr. Obama refers to the tax as a “levy”, I have to thank you for insisting that the English language is precise. I am so sick of hearing Speaker Pelosi, refering to the “language of this bill, or the language of a conversation, as if suddenly crap can be referred to with 20 or more words that make crap sound great. Hey, after all, crap is fertilizer,eh?
Please be a journalist George. Maybe you and Jake Tapper can get me believing in ABC again. I gave up when your chiefs sent Brian suck up to the White House and he performed prostrate before the almighty Obama.
I hope this does not get you kicked of the plane. Air Farce One.
The press did a collective diservice to their profession and the American people when they swooned to get a seat on the plane. I wonder what the hell they will teach in journalism classes now.
Anyway, thanks for having some nuts bud.
Mark
Posted by: Mark | September 24, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
George, I enjoy watching you, even as a conservative voter. I was so happy to see you actually question the president on this very important issue. Thank you for having the guts to ask the tough questions. I’ve totally lost faith in all news networks but ABC and Fox. Please keep up the good work and report with honesty and integrity and I will continue watching your show!
Posted by: Angela | September 25, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
So let me follow this logic. IF I choose to drive, I have to have auto insurance. BUT, IF I choose not to drive, I don’t have to have auto insurance. So sticking with the auto insurance analogy, if I choose not to have health insurance then I don’t have to what…live?
No. I can live…I just can’t choose how I want to live.
Can someone tell me what the real wrong is with this issue?
Posted by: Mike | October 28, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Both sides of the arguement forget or are not even aware that we had free health care in the 50s and early 60s. Ask anyone over 60 about the free clinics spread across the USA. The difference today in the MANDATE is that the insurance comanies get the money and the ones providing the health care (doctors, nurses, etc) get the trickle down money after the insurance companies get theirs and the federal government gets their share-It is nothing more than EXTORTION and a tax levied on us-Ron Noonan (Health care NOT health Care Insurance) You have been “programmed” on insurance-Health care is supposed to be funded by taxes and in no way did I include Insurance-It is not needed if Health care is provided-See my campaign platform for tn govnr.
Posted by: noonanknight | July 18, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
He lied to America and George. I’ve gotten to the point I can’t c=say Liar Loud enough and can”t paint LIAR TALL enough to spray bomb Obama with it. One of the few people I truely dispsie for lieing. Even Mr Bill was sort of forgivable sometimes, Jommy Carter was too stupid to know the difference and still is too stupid to know the difference. Butt his hguy can see the effects of his lies. Oh, I forgot he golfs a lot and never gets out of company with those BIG rich bankers and whatevers he and the Democratics say the Republicans cozy up to.
Posted by: John Smith | July 18, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
By the time the health care overhaul really kicks into effect, nothing in health care today will be recognizable. The 4 years of manipulation, scheming & marketing by insurers & the government will have eliminated virtually EVERY health care insurance plan that exists now.
As we have seen so often, Obama was literally lying through his teeth when he said, repeatedly, “if you like your health care, you can keep it.” Whatever it is you think you like NOW or liked 4 months ago won’t even exist 4 years from now. Your employer is less likely to even offer ANY health care insurance to you by then, and what they offer to you will be defined by health insurance companies, and it won’t be anything like what you have now.
The 4-year delay in implemention of the main health care provisions was a blatant calculation to permit health insurance companies, employers & health care providers to reconstruct the heatlh care system.
And when the tens of millions of currently uninsured get into the system, you simply won’t believe the impact that will have. And when the Democrats get back to what they really want, which is free health care for illegal aliens, that will be the end of it.
American has better use these 4 years to make their own self-protecting adjustments & decisions: like leaving the United States.
And with the vast powers of the IRS provided by Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid, it will become even more the American KGB. This is NOT America. The people behind this are not Americans. They are power-hungry madmen.
In the coming 4 years health are in America will collapse.
Posted by: tramky | July 18, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Lisa Ranshaw,
It is your poor grammar and spelling that is likely a result of your dire economic straits. It is you looking for a handout that is the result of the country’s dire economic straights. Enjoy it while it lasts. 2012 is going to rock the subsistence world.
Posted by: Reality NoCheck 4u | July 18, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
You have to remember folks, unless we are lucky enough to find him guilty of lying and being an illegal and an illegal President, he and hs family will have health coverage for the rest of their lives at out costs. Even if he and his wife go to jail for their lies, they will get health care from the public trough. What the hell does he care what it is going to do to our bottom line or our lives in general.
Posted by: bargal | July 18, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Come to think of it, I would enjoy paying for his and hers health care programs if it is through the penal system for sacmming the American public if and when he is found guilty of being an illegal resident and President
Posted by: bargal | July 18, 2010, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
We will now have a tax rate of infinity on some people.
Even if you have no income, you will have to file a tax return to show you pay for an Obama approved health plan. And if the plan is not acceptable to Obama (inexpensive catastrophic only), you will need to pay taxes (a fine) on $0 of income. That is a tax rate of infinity.
Posted by: JoeB | July 18, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
It’s obvious the messiah didn’t want to label the mandate to buy insurance or the penalty for failing to do so a tax. If he did he would be breaking his promise on no taxes for anyone under 250k. But now that his administration sees that the Obama care bill may not withstand constitutional muster, they are changing their view. Of course the congress has greater power to enact taxes rather then the power the commerce clause gives them, so they are changing their tune to fight for Obama Care in court. And apparently to hell for their promise not to raise taxes. I guess they care more about insuring Obama care is withheld, then their word to the American people. This is why 55% of the American people feel socialist is an accurate portrayal of Obama…..
Posted by: cooperscopy | July 18, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
De Facto government.
Posted by: Joe | July 18, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Still waiting for the people who brought us this legislation to adopt it for themselves. They certainly don’t want it, partially because they’re not sure what’s all in it. But they’re certain it’s good enough for us. And we’ll grow to like it. Nancy said so!
Posted by: Still Waiting | July 18, 2010, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
ABC News Sept. 2009 – Obama: Mandate is Not a Tax
NY Times* July 2010 – Changing Stance, Administration Now Defends Insurance Mandate as a Tax
* Reference NY Times article 16 July 2010
Posted by: Jennifer | July 18, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
The government has to change the healthcare to a tax to get it through the courts the same way it did social security in the 30′s. If healthcare is just a tax like social security how come not every one pays? Fed employees don’t pay SS tax,state teachers don’t pay, state workers don’t pay. Health care is going to be the same way. It’s a tax for the rest of us not for any of them.
Posted by: cc | July 18, 2010, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Question: How do you know Obama is full of it?
Answer: When his mouth moves, of course.
Posted by: NYGlenn18 | July 18, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
He was pretty resolute there insisting Obamacare wasn’t a tax. But now that nearly half the states are suing to overturn his legislative abortion, his administration argues it is in fact a tax and therefore can not be challenged by the states. Hmmmmm. Is this change I can believe in? Or is he just a lying, two-faced, Chicago pol who’ll say anything without the slightest regard to the truth just to get his way. This guy really sickens me.
Posted by: Jim Fitz | July 18, 2010, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
So… now it’s a tax.
Posted by: JD | July 19, 2010, 1:01 am 1:01 am
I’m willing to bet Obama won’t be sitting down for another interview with George EVER, since he is certain to revisit this question if that occurs. “Your administration is using the same argument in court you told me was ridiculous. Why did you lie to my face multiple times when we last spoke about healthcare?”
Posted by: Steve | July 19, 2010, 7:43 am 7:43 am
I’m tired of the auto-insurance comparison. If I don’t want to pay auto insurance, I won’t drive. It’s my choice. Under this new bill if I’m to continue to be alive and a productive member of society, I have to buy health-care or or pay a fine for not doing so. Of course if I chose to be a bum and contribute nothing to society, Uncle Obama and his fellow socialists will take care of me.
Posted by: Elliot | July 19, 2010, 8:48 am 8:48 am
Per Stephanopoulus/Obama interview: “When Congress required most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty, Democrats denied that they were creating a new tax. But in court, the Obama administration and its allies now defend the requirement as an exercise of the government’s “power to lay and collect taxes.” You should read the entire interview!
Of course it is a tax and those who pushed the legislation by shady tactics knew it when they did it…they just assumed that everyone but Democrats was stupid and/or naive.
I don’t feel I am in America anymore…it has always been that our president and administration represented ALL the people….not just the people of their own “party”. I am an Independent America with no representation, and IF we still have voting rights by the time elections roll around, I will be voting against anyone who supports/supported any of the stupid, short-sighted political dancing, with total disregard for majority opinion as well as the Constitution of the United States. The office of President of U.S. is now a campaign office……….and WE are paying for the campaign. We provide expensive transportation, food, lodging, proper clothing for a huge entourage of the “administration” and their family/families. Americans have been thrown under the bus by the current unscrupulous “administration”.
Posted by: Helen | July 21, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
When the wicked rule, the people mourn. Pray for the judgment of Almighty God upon the destroyers of America and nations around the world. Pray that their own evil deeds will return upon them as their judgment. The international bankster gangsters (murderers, war mongers, liars, thieves, global organized criminals) must be overthrown as quickly as possible!
Posted by: JennieWalsh | October 20, 2010, 3:03 am 3:03 am
All you have to do it look at all 10 or so campaign promises Obama actually made, not the “change” and motivational speeches, and every single one of his promises has been broken. If they say it’s NOT a tax hike, you better believe it’s a fact that it will be.
Posted by: Megan | June 20, 2011, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Contracts inside of size were definitily: 43% involving loan companies; 40% between a bank account together with fund director or perhaps nonbank commercial lender; and lastly to actually 17% between a bank and credit union along with non-financial but also people who create a savings fund stands for the money institutions
Posted by: apprendre comment faire l'amour | November 30, 2011, 8:27 am 8:27 am