WH, Dept of Education Revise Language on Students Outlining How they Can “Help the President”
From Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
In an acknowledgment that the Department of Education provided lesson plans written somewhat inartfully, surrounding the President Obama’s speech to students next Tuesday, the White House today announced that it had rewritten one of the sections in question.
President Obama will talk to students from Pre K thru 12th grade about personal responsibility and the importance of staying in school, White House aides said.
As one of the preparatory materials for teachers provided by the Department of Education, students had been asked to, "Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. “
Today, after Republicans accused the White House of trying to indoctrinate school children with liberal propaganda the White House and the Department of Education changed the section to now read, "Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education goals.”
“We changed it to clarify the language so the intent is clear,” said White House Spokesman Tommy Vietor.
The idea, Vietor said, was that students should think of how they could help the President in terms of reducing the national dropout rate.
Yesterday, the Florida Republican Party sent out a press release portraying the address as more of a policy speech rather than a specific educational address to children. The White House says that’s not true and there is no evidence that the President intend to discuss any policies.
"As the father of four children, I am absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama's socialist ideology,” Jim Greer, Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida said, “The idea that school children across our nation will be forced to watch the President justify his plans for government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies, increasing taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt than any other President, is not only infuriating, but goes against beliefs of the majority of Americans, while bypassing American parents through an invasive abuse of power.”
The Department of Education though did not “force” – as Greer claims – schools to do anything. Schools districts across the country have the option to choose if they show the President’s address to their students.
Greer goes on to say said that the President has turned to America’s children to “spread his liberal lies” by “indoctrinating American’s youngest children before they have a chance to decide for themselves."
Again there is no evidence to support that charge.
Some conservatives radio hosts are going father: calling on parents to have their children stay home from school on Tuesday.
The White House says the intention of the speech – and the lesson plans – have been misunderstood.
Other passages that remain in the preparatory lesson plans for teachers– one written for Pres K – 6th grade, and a separate one for 7th grade – 12th – grade instruct students to set goals for themselves based on what the President’s speech will instruct them to do.
Students should discuss, the lesson plan writes, “What do you think the President wants us to do? Does the speech make you want to do anything? Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us? What would you like to tell the President?”
And another section within the preparatory materials instructs students to discuss, “Is President Obama inspiring you to do anything? Is he challenging you to do anything?”
White House aide said this has to do with meeting the goals the President will lay out about personal responsibility for students.
"The goal of the speech and the lesson plans is to challenge students to work hard in school, to not drop out and to meet short-term goals like behaving in class, doing their homework and goals that parents and teachers alike can agree are noble,” a White House spokesman tells ABC News, “This isn’t a policy speech. This is a speech designed to encourage kids to stay in school.”
Education Secretary Arne Duncan penned a preview of the President’s message in a letter sent to school principles last week.
“The President will challenge students to work hard, set educational goals, and take responsibility for their learning,” Duncan wrote, “He will also call for a shared responsibility and commitment on the part of students, parents and educators to ensure that every child in every school receives the best education possible so they can compete in the global economy for good jobs and live rewarding and productive lives as American citizens.”
Mr. Obama will deliver his speech from Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia – yet his remarks will be broadcast live on the White House website and C-SPAN, which all schools were encouraged to show in their classrooms.
“This is the first time an American president has spoken directly to the nation's school children about persisting and succeeding in school,” Duncan continued in his letter to school principals, “We encourage you to use this historic moment to help your students get focused and begin the school year strong. I encourage you, your teachers, and students to join me in watching the President deliver this address.”
- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
*This post has been updated.
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
I’ll take the responsibility to encourage my children to study and work hard myself. No thanks, Mr. Obama!
Posted by: PhilPhat | September 2, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Hey Obamba, leave them kids alone!
Posted by: jennifert7 | September 2, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
The right wing is clearly insane.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I have no problem with him encouraging kids to stay in school.
It is the suggested activities the administration has produced that is objectionable.
Asking children how they can help the President, and why it’s important to listen to the President, etc.
We teach critical thinking to our children. We don’t teach them to please political leaders.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
great. my public education is showing…
T H E Y ‘ R E
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Ryan C. I highly doubt you would feel the same if Bush were developing curriculum and asking DURING the school day for his curriculum to come into your child’s classroom. Why can’t we as parents get an advanced copy of this so that we can decide what to do with OUR children? He asked schools to approve watching his speech before the schools were even able to see his curriculum. No school allows anything to be taught in their schools without reviewing it extensively first. He is overstepping his bounds big time. This is not his place!!!
Posted by: Kristi L. | September 2, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Carry that water, maybeee. carry that water.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
“Ryan C. I highly doubt you would feel the same if Bush were developing curriculum and asking DURING the school day for his curriculum to come into your child’s classroom”
Presidents have addressed school children for decades.
Also you may remember something called the NoChildLeftBehind Act which certainly had a much larger affect on curriculum than a President’s speech being broadcast on 1 day.
But hey Glen Beck said be scared so right wingers cowered.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
I hope Sunlen will add a link to the Department of Education worksheet meant to accompany the speech.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Um, why is it controversial to ask students, parents, and schools to jointly share in the responsibility of an education.
Jeez
Posted by: melissa | September 2, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Sunlen Miller says “This is the first time an American president has spoken directly to the nation’s school children …” and then at the end says “President Bush regularly gave speeches … to school students”.
So which is it? Is this a historic new thing or not? If Bush regularly did this, then it is no big deal, and the conservatives have no reason to be alarmed. If this something that has never been done before in the USA, then people have a reason to be concerned with setting new precedent.
Posted by: Darin K | September 2, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
I hope Sunlen will add a link to the Department of Education worksheet meant to accompany the speech.
Posted by: MayBee |
1. Do mommy and daddy have a picture of Rush Limbaugh in the house?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
NEA document for activites for Obama speech (prek to 6th grade)
Before the Speech:
• Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his
speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama and motivate students by asking
the following questions:
Who is the President of the United States?
What do you think it takes to be President?
To whom do you think the President is going to be speaking?
Why do you think he wants to speak to you?
What do you think he will say to you?
• Teachers can ask students to imagine being the President delivering a speech to all of the
students in the United States. What would you tell students? What can students do to help in
our schools? Teachers can chart ideas about what they would say.
• Why is it important that we listen to the President and other elected officials, like the mayor,
senators, members of congress, or the governor? Why is what they say important?
During the Speech:
• As the President speaks, teachers can ask students to write down key ideas or phrases that are
important or personally meaningful. Students could use a note‐taking graphic organizer such as
a Cluster Web, or students could record their thoughts on sticky notes. Younger children can
draw pictures and write as appropriate. As students listen to the speech, they could think about
the following:
What is the President trying to tell me?
What is the President asking me to do?
What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?
• Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do
something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do? Is he asking
anything of anyone else? Teachers? Principals? Parents? The American people?
• Students can record any questions they have while he is speaking and then discuss them after
the speech. Younger children may need to dictate their questions.
After the Speech:
• Teachers could ask students to share the ideas they recorded, exchange sticky notes or stick
notes on a butcher paper poster in the classroom to discuss main ideas from the speech, i.e.
citizenship, personal responsibility, civic duty.
• Students could discuss their responses to the following questions:
What do you think the President wants us to do?
Does the speech make you want to do anything?
Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?
What would you like to tell the President?
• Create posters of their goals. Posters could be formatted in quadrants or puzzle pieces or trails
marked with the labels: personal, academic, community, country. Each area could be labeled with
three steps for achieving goals in those areas. It might make sense to focus on personal and
academic so community and country goals come more readily.
• Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education
goals. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to
make students accountable to their goals.
• Write goals on colored index cards or precut designs to post around the classroom.
• Interview and share about their goals with one another to create a supportive community.
• Participate in School wide incentive programs or contests for students who achieve their goals.
• Write about their goals in a variety of genres, i.e. poems, songs, personal essays.
• Create artistic projects based on the themes of their goals.
• Graph student progress toward goals.
But I guess its better whip up hysteria huh maybee?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
But I guess its better whip up hysteria huh maybee?
Posted by: Ryan C |
- Do mommy or daddy say back things about President Obama?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
I must agree that a presidential address strictly centered on staying in school and the importance of education would be the bee’s knees. But this BS about coercing kids to automatically believe that Obama is a man who should be just listened to and followed blindly is very irritating. He’s such a megalomaniac.
Posted by: Doug | September 2, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
• Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education
goals. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to
make students accountable to their goals.
===============
So innocuous the wording was changed on this list.
It’s actually not from the NEA, but from the US Department of Education.
And it’s actually:
“Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the President”
But that’s why a link from Sunlen would come in handy.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Foghorn said:
“We teach critical thinking to our children. We don’t teach them to please political leaders.”
Thanks Foghorn. That is my point as well. We don’t need to start down this road. If Obama wants to do some TV commercials about the importance of staying in school..fine. But we DO NOT need him to start dictating to our children. Maybe he should have a nationwide address to the parents instead about the importance of being involved in their children’s education.
Posted by: North2AK | September 2, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
“Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Sep 2, 2009 5:28:23 PM”
Classic right wing.
When confronted with facts, create bigger lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
My son will be staying home from school that day. Educating my kids are my job and the school’s job, not Obama’s.
Posted by: MJ | September 2, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Did mommy and daddy have a Sarah Palin sign in their yard?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
So suddenly, encouraging kids to do things for the President, and reinforcing the importance of listening to the President and other elected officials is just dandy with the left?
Really?
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
“So which is it? Is this a historic new thing or not? If Bush regularly did this, then it is no big deal, and the conservatives have no reason to be alarmed.”
Darin K | Sep 2, 2009 5:25:33 PM
Our schools really need to work on reading comprehension. Read the actual announcement:
“This is the first time an American president has spoken directly to the nation’s school children about persisting and succeeding in school,”
It narrowly defines the “first time” by attaching it to the subject of persisting and succeeding in school. There is a reason the whole sentence is there.
And while the ‘Did a Republican do it? Then it’s OK’ is a ridiculous metric (Republicans have to do everything once before it is safe for a Democrat to do it?), yes Republicans have done it before.
“Thank you, Ms. Mostoller, and thanks for allowing me to visit your classroom to talk to you and all these students, and millions more in classrooms all across the country.” Bush Sr, 1991
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
This is a message that is worth making, if indeed, that is the only “agenda” Obama has, in making it.
I will be very disappointed, if Obama uses that to talk about his health care plan. In that case, Mr. Greer would end up being right, and that material is not appropriate to bring to school children. Those decisions are parental.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 2, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
“So suddenly, encouraging kids to do things for the President, and reinforcing the importance of listening to the President and other elected officials is just dandy with the left?
Really?
Posted by: MayBee | Sep 2, 2009 5:38:08 PM”
For elementary school children?
You think disobey authority is a good message?
Seriously were you taken in for re-education for displaying too much independent thought?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“So suddenly, encouraging kids to do things for the President, and reinforcing the importance of listening to the President and other elected officials is just dandy with the left?”
MayBee | Sep 2, 2009 5:38:08 PM
I suppose you think Barney is brainwashing our kids into blind followers of dinosaurs too.
The left HAD NO PROBLEM WITH PRESIDENT BUSH DOING THE EXACT SAME THING. It was entirely uncontroversial. Not even the far left whackos paused in their tree hugging to comment.
The Republicans have gone off the deep end in their hatred of Obama, and it is documented that the vehemence of it is simply unprecedented in big ways (400% increase in death threats) and small (a Republican chairman melting down at Obama doing the same thing as Bush did without any quibbles over a decade ago).
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“My son will be staying home from school that day. Educating my kids are my job and the school’s job”
ROFLMAO!
The lack of self awareness in that statement is quite funny.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Maybee said:
“So suddenly, encouraging kids to do things for the President, and reinforcing the importance of listening to the President and other elected officials is just dandy with the left?
Really?”
That’s right Maybee, the left would certainly not be in favor of a republican politician doing the same thing. But then again they just chnage the rules to suite thier needs. Like Massachusetts governor Patrick wanting supporting the apoointment of an interim senator to fill Kennedy’s vacant seat. The democrats changed the rules last time when a republican gov was in office so he couln’t appoint someone to fill Kerry’s seat. No they want to change the law back…democrats could care less about equel treatment or law.
Posted by: North2AK | September 2, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
“So innocuous the wording was changed on this list.”
You mean its not the same as the right wing websites say?
I am shocked, shocked I tells ya.
That’s a copy paste directly from the pdf and the Dept of Ed home page.
Why don’t you tell us your source of give me a clue as to the link.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
And while the ‘Did a Republican do it? Then it’s OK’ is a ridiculous metric (Republicans have to do everything once before it is safe for a Democrat to do it?), yes Republicans have done it before.”
It had to be done.
These right wing lunatics were comparing Obama addressing the kids to Hitler.
Because only Hitler would talk to kids about staying in school and working hard.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Also note “the Left” had no problem with Bush mentioning his Administration’s education policy in his ‘invasive abuse of power’ address to millions of impressionable young minds. The hysterical paranoia shown by the Right is just not normal.
“thanks for allowing me to visit your classroom to talk to you and all these students, and millions more in classrooms all across the country.
“We made a start nationally now by setting six National Education Goals to meet the challenges of the 21st century.”
“Block out the kids who think it’s not cool to be smart. I can’t understand for the life of me what’s so great about being stupid.”
I miss Bush Sr. and am proud I voted for him.
(The President spoke at 12:15 p.m. in a classroom at the school. His remarks were broadcast live by the Cable News Network, the Public Broadcasting System, the Mutual Broadcasting System, and the NBC radio network.)
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“The Republicans have gone off the deep end in their hatred of Obama, and it is documented that the vehemence of it is simply unprecedented in big ways (400% increase in death threats) and small (a Republican chairman melting down at Obama doing the same thing as Bush did without any quibbles over a decade ago).”
Its only a matter of time before another right wing lunatic kills someone.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
“Block out the kids who think it’s not cool to be smart. I can’t understand for the life of me what’s so great about being stupid.”
Ryan, you wanna field that one?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
“Posted by: North2AK | Sep 2, 2009 5:53:40 PM”
Tell me again how the Democrats changed the rules when Kerry resigned his Senate seat.
I enjoyed that.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
That Bush Sr was a regualar abuser of his power to indoctrinate our school kids it seems. From 1990:
“Cheered on by a crowd of screaming and sign-waving school kids, President Bush visited Orange County for the second time in a year…
Bush stood in front of colorful banners with cartoon characters and anti-drug slogans as he told about 13,000 elementary and high school students packed into Santa Ana Stadium, “Anyone who thinks America lacks the will to win the drug war better take a look at the spirit we have here today in Orange County.”
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Baloney. Working hard in school and responsibility for learning are LOCAL and parental responsibilities, not the president’s.
He should concentrate on winning the war and securing the nation, which he is neglecting while he dabbles in areas that are none of a president’s business.
Don’t worry about our “productive lives as American citizens”. That’s an individual citizen’s responsibility, the that of the federal government to “spark” or monitor.
Perhaps just a speech wouldn’t be so bad. It’s the lesson plan and questions that are highly offensive, and teach nothing about how the president actually serves the people, and that government is supposed to do the people’s bidding. The kids are not supposed to worry about obeying the president.
Like that one townhaller said, “Stay away from my kids.”
Posted by: mr | September 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
“Did mommy and daddy have a Sarah Palin sign in their yard?”
Foghorn Leghorn | Sep 2, 2009 5:36:27 PM
This is what passes for intelligent debate for Republicans nowadays?
And as the historical, documented record shows – no, “libs” never had this kind of vicious, irrational melt down when President Bush did the exact same thing.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Tell me again how the Democrats changed the rules when Kerry resigned his Senate seat.
I enjoyed that.
Posted by: Ryan C |
That’s not what he told you. What he told you was correct. How could you not know that?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“He should concentrate on winning the war and securing the nation, which he is neglecting while he dabbles in areas that are none of a president’s business.”
mr | Sep 2, 2009 5:57:19 PM
Don’t you mean none of a Democratic president’s business? Since literally no one complained when President Bush did the exact same thing.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
The left HAD NO PROBLEM WITH PRESIDENT BUSH DOING THE EXACT SAME THING. It was entirely uncontroversial. Not even the far left whackos paused in their tree hugging to comment.
———–
If Bush sent out questions asking school children to list ways they can do what the president asks, I heartily denounce it.
A school teaches critical thinking by saying “what did you think of the President’s speech? What did you agree or disagree with?”
you don’t encourage critical thinking by assuming a position to be correct and thus followed. Mott there is no invitation for negative reaction.
As I said, I don’t have a problem with the speech but for the time it will take up.
Posted by: Maybee | September 2, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Anyone care to comment on the Democrats who are getting upset at the recent expansion of BOTH parties?
Posted by: ProfElwood | September 2, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Hey Sunlen
You don’t mention if the previous, previous, previous president Bush provided a syllabus and sent it directly to EVERY school in the USA. I do not presume to know your political leanings but I suspect if W. had done this that the story would be a bit more critical and might even suggest fascism and “political youth” and indoctrination.
Posted by: David | September 2, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
omg!! this just shows that repubs are whack jobs. only tthey could take a well intentioned message and twist it up into some garbage. where in any of this did it say that the president was going to speak on his beliefs or agenda? spread socialism? i swear these people are drunk. obama is simply going to speak to the children about taking some responsibility for themselves. how in the world is anything wrong with that? im just sittting here shaking my head in disbelief at these whack jobs.
Posted by: birdy | September 2, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
“libs” never had this kind of vicious, irrational melt down when President Bush did the exact same thing.
Posted by: jhw539 |
No. “libs” melt down over the use of the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance.
And neither President Bush ever did any like this but keep saying that they did.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
If Bush sent out questions asking school children to list ways they can do what the president asks, I heartily denounce it.
Posted by: Maybee |
As do I.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
“And neither President Bush ever did any like this but keep saying that they did.”
Foghorn Leghorn | Sep 2, 2009 6:06:10 PM
I’m not just saying they did, I am posting quotes pulled from the Bush Library archive. That’s called “citing reality.”
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
We need to get these kids minds right, the dear leader needs to speak.
Posted by: Darthgator | September 2, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Hmmmmmm! — Is he going to tell his “brown-shirt” youth to squeel on their parents?? — Kind of like reporting anything “fishy” on the internet?? — Obama’s a socialist hack who needs to be exposed!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 2, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
it’s the worksheet questions that are creepy to me, all about “what can we do to help the president…” how does that relate to the kids staying in school. let’s admit it: sounds statist and weird.
if you’re interested in seeing the questions, check out the .gov site. easy to find.
Posted by: kelli | September 2, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
“Fine. Do you own research on the appointment debacle
Posted by: North2AK | Sep 2, 2009 5:56:33 PM”
See I actually know the story not filtered thru right wing blogs.
I’ll help you out by posting a Globe story on it.
“In a pair of votes that lacked suspense but not passion, Beacon Hill Democrats yesterday stripped Governor Mitt Romney of his power to choose a replacement for Senator John F. Kerry if the newly-minted Democratic presidential nominee wins the White House.
The vote on the bill, which would establish a special election to fill the Senate vacancy, ends more than six months of wrangling, arguing, and maneuvering over the issue. A number of ambitious Massachusetts Democrats are eager to run for the post if it becomes open, and national Democratic leaders believe that the seat could make a difference in their drive to reclaim the Senate.”
Personally I think there should be a combination of an appt by standing Gov then a special election.
That makes the most sense for keeping the office Democratic (given a Senator term length) and you do not deny the state representation in the Senate.
But I think for MA right now they should stick with their current rule.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
“If Bush sent out questions asking school children to list ways they can do what the president asks, I heartily denounce it.”
Maybee | Sep 2, 2009 6:03:51 PM
Funny that no one did. The question is clearly intended to ask kids how they can meet the Presidents challenge to persist in school. This is simple enough that third graders will understand it.
Again, NO ONE freaked out about President Bush flogging his Adminstration’s National Goal Report directly to millions of school kids.
“Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address.”
President Bush, 1991 to millions of schoolkids live.
That’s reality. You’re completely irrational to freak out about the President challenging kids to work hard in school, and NO the left did NOT show this sort of irrational hatred in the identical situation.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I read this same story over at Fox news and they supplied several examples of why the whole thing smacks of propoganda.
Why doesn’t ABC News tell us about the lesson plan the White House provided to the schools and why it is so inappropriate?
Posted by: mwester | September 2, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
well i guess we might as well just stop having the kids pledge allegience to the flag since their parents don’t like the president of the country it represents.
before i read this article, i knew people were stupid. but now, i just… i’m completely beside myself. who in the frikkin world, in their right mind, would be angry that the president would make a speech to children encouraging them to stay in school and take responsibility for themselves? no matter what said of the aisle… this is a good thing.
i guess the birthers are happy with their children’s present role models: scantily clad teenage girls and rappers.
down with obama!! up with hannah montana and britney spears!!
Posted by: birdy | September 2, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Hey if you the writer can’t see that this crosses the line into indoctrination and brainwashing than you are part of the problem…folks its time we wake up and stop this nonsense more and more we are slipping into a Venezuela or Cuba…we can change it now throw them all out ASAP
Posted by: phillysmart | September 2, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
“Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address.”
President Bush, 1991 to millions of schoolkids live.
Imagine the meltdown Republicans will have if Obama says that exact same line. Of course, no liberal was in the slightest concerned by Bush saying it – extolling staying in school and working hard is bipartisan. Just a snippet of DOCUMENTED REALITY before I leave the board to the paranoid rantings.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Resist the socialist they want to control your mind…watch how they attack on the blogs…they have been programmed to react….like the movie they live wear the glasses and see them for what they are…ugly, vengeful people
Posted by: phillysmart | September 2, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
“A school teaches critical thinking by saying “what did you think of the President’s speech? What did you agree or disagree with?”"
That lack of self awareness again….
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Yet more proof that republicans are idiots!
Posted by: clay | September 2, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Speak Dear Leader, SPEAK!
Posted by: Ryan | September 2, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
I bet Obama goes overboard on “save the planet”, “green jobs”, “save energy”, everything on his agenda! — He will leave out the “tax you to death” part!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 2, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
OMG! The President telling children to work hard in school is SOCIALISM! How dare the President tell my child to get good grades. That’s brainwashing! Who does he think he is? The President of the United States or something!? It’s outrageous!
Posted by: mshare | September 2, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
“preview of the President’s message in a letter sent to school principles last week.”
Principles? You mean principals I assume. What’s wrong with our schools again?
Posted by: HawkTeacher | September 2, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
The indoctrination begins, soon all of the text books will hail President Obama as the one who brought balance to the force. Oh wait that was the prophesy about Darth Vader and that didn’t go so well. “The dark side clouds everything. Impossible to see the future is.” So true…..
Posted by: joeyjojo456789 | September 2, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
What would Democrats have said if Bush gave a speech that talked about individualism, faith in god, freedom and being all you can be. Wonder what the democrats would have said? I bet it would have been fire and brimstone. Republicans need better catch phrases for things they dont like. Like Obama Brain Washing. Or Indoctrination into the brown shirt cause. Maybe that would do it? How many kids know what a brown shirt is?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 2, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
joey — the “gifted” younglings will be brought up to know the “socialist force”! — How many can he turn to the dark side?
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | September 2, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
OK Johnny tell me, how much does daddy make? How many flush toilets are in your house? Does Mommy smoke? Do other kids ever call you fat? Do your parents let yo eat candy? OK just sign at the bottom of the census form and turn it in to the thug I mean nice man wearing the red ACORN T-Shirt.
Posted by: joeyjojo456789 | September 2, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
There is no way I would allow my children to watch this propaganda. Parents, call the schools and opt your children out. It is your right.
Posted by: save nc | September 2, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
GHWB said: “Let me leave you with a simple message: Every time you walk through that classroom door, make it your mission to get a good education. Don’t do it just because your parents, or even the President, tells you. Do it for yourselves. Do it for your future. And while you’re at it, help a little brother or sister to learn, or maybe even Mom or Dad. Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address
=========
Yeah, I see you left off the part about how he specifically told the kids to do something *not* because the President told them to.
Read the questions at the department of education website. Remember they are coming from the government, and given to teachers to use in classrooms around the country. Decide for yourself if this is the best way to teach children, or to encourage critical thinking. Ask yourself what the goals of that questionnaire really are (“Do you remember any *other* times the President made a historic speech?”).
I will remind anyone who cares that in May, Michelle Obama made a speech to school children encouraging them to make the President’s job easier. I objected then. This isn’t a new thing.
But if you like it, great.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
“Of course, no liberal was in the slightest concerned by Bush saying it – extolling staying in school and working hard is bipartisan. Just a snippet of DOCUMENTED REALITY before I leave the board to the paranoid rantings. ”
Phillsmart… is your name an intentional joke? Are you really 18, or just too forgetful to remember that liberals DID freak out.
And in case you hadn’t noticed, staying in school isn’t exactly the only topic.
Posted by: artemis | September 2, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
As a public school teacher it is a non-issue because due to the digital conversion we don’t have access to tv channels. We can’t replace worn carpet that is a trip hazard, so certainly we can’t buy converter boxes for all those tvs in the building. I think the inauguration was probably the last tv we will ever see except for dvd’s.
Posted by: kathy | September 2, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Most people would want an authority figure, like the president, telling kids to work hard in school. Certainly we and our kids have to put up with the military coming into the schools now trying to recruit which I am completely opposed to.
Republicans want to keep their kids home? Let them.
Posted by: jan | September 2, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The best Bush could do was read “My Pet Goat” to children while the Twin Towers in New York City burned down! Is there anything this new president can do that doesn’t make you idiot Republicans cry like little schoolgirls? You ignoramuses.
Posted by: Atheist 1 | September 2, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
As long as it’s not a policy speech, I actually like the idea of the president speaking to school children and telling them to stay in school — so many communities struggle with high drop out rates and students who simply don’t try, I don’t see how this can hurt. But, on that same note, it would be an abuse of power to use this opportunity to talk about healthcare or other policy.
Posted by: Copy cat | September 2, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
the POTUS – regardless of who holds the position – does a good thing to use the position as a bully pulpit for good messages. Sounds like this is a good message and one all parents would normally applaud. However, at this moment in time, the specific POTUS has raised suspicions in many parents’ minds as to his philosphy of issues such as “fair” and “good” and “right”. Not only that, he has illustrated that his far left core convictions permeate every word he says, thought he forms and conviction he preaches. Add to that, the historical significance of being our first black President (something, in itself, I’m thrilled about) and it makes any negative reactions to him be fodder for those who want to cry racism. With sinking approval ratings, I think the POTUS has (at least, temporarily) lost much of the nation’s trust in his integrity and will see his numbers drop even lower after this speech. It’s the wrong time and, regrettably, he is either too insulated from the citizenry to know that or too prideful to regard it.
Posted by: stephen andrews | September 2, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Remember that these kids are future voters…. many of these high school students will be voting in the next election. Campaigning 3 years early, maybe?
Posted by: S.R. | September 2, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
This is the President come on this is the Leader of the Free world is your money that important to you? Or what is it? Taxes til death has always been the program what about this makes for socialism that it may help fellow Americans but war on weak is a top priority of the tax dollar. Dang that is a telling character flaw do you see that?
Posted by: Vic | September 2, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
YES thank you!!!! now finally ppl realize what a mistake it was to elect obama!!!!!!
also in response to mwester: Bush is WAY different than obama, 1st Bush did not promote socialist activites!!!! 2nd the 1991 was asking for feedback and what can you do to change the country..
re phillysmart:: people are not saying that scantily clad kids are good, in fact 99% of parents do not agree with the way their kids dress, its immoral. AND yes we do have a right to be mad at a president who does not uphold AMERICA’S ideals, who promotes socialist ideals, that is just wrong and he is wrong and i personally believe that he wants to destroy the economy in this country
mshare: agree with you!!
The Loyal opposition re: a lot of kids know what brown shirts are, there are a lot of smart ppl out there, its just that you are not one of them
way to go ChicagoBob!!!!
I also recommend to everyone read the Obama Nation, if you say it really fast it sounds like abomination!!!!
BOO OBAMA
Posted by: bellanotte | September 2, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Why not? Just because many of their parents are fatheads doesn’t mean the kids must be too.
Posted by: JR | September 2, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Socialism! It’s all Socialism! Beeee Afraid!!! Beeee Afraid!!!! Obama will hypnotize the children. Socialism…socialism…socialism. Beeee Afraid!!! Beeee Afraid!!! Good grades equals Socialism. Don’t want my children to hear that…getting good grades and staying in school will indoctrinate them to…Socialism. Beeee Afraid!!!
Posted by: mshare | September 2, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
The parents are afraid because there kids might think rationally unlike them.
Compassion & responsibility aren’t evedentally taught in their homes.
Posted by: jozy | September 2, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
atheist1,
i’m not a republican. never have been. what in the world are you talking about? what could any president have done once the planes hit the buildings? and would it make a difference had he been reading war and peace? what else is he supposed to be reading to children? and what do you expect a president (say obama) to do in front of 30 seven year-olds when he gets the news? flip out, horrify the kids and go crazy? bottom line dude, there are a whole bunch of independents who have big problems with the obama administration. just like they had big problems with the bush administration. everyone who supports obama is not a democrat and everyone who opposes him is not a republican. but the president beaming into every classroom in america to make a political speech (and let’s all be real…EVERYTHING a president does in his presidential capacity IS political) should be disconcerting to any american, regardless of party or not. it is NOT a good thing that politicians are becoming more effective in using the media to advance themselves. regardless of political viewpoint, things have been getting orwellian since the reagan era…and the pace is increasing. the most troubling thing about obama to many is not so much is policy proposals as it is concern over his mastery of media. once government commands the media, we’re all done, regardless who is in power. beware.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 2, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Pep speech is hardly socialist…Encouraging students to do well is hardly socialist, demonstrating the possible is hardly socialist…it’s called routing for U.S.A.
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
We have all witnessed quite a show since Barack Obama became president. Because the country was facing “crisis” after “crisis,” Obama and his team were more than happy to inject government into the private operations of banks, the auto industry, and energy sector.
But, of course, that’s not enough. Now with the latest cybersecurity bill making its way through Congress, Obama not only will have control over General Motors but could also have control over the Internet. With the power to “shut down online traffic by seizing private networks,” Obama would take one more piece of freedom and add it to his growing list of industries and activities which fall under government “supervision”
Whatever happened to “By the People For the people?”
Posted by: redseal33 | September 2, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Wow, cool- obama is going to begin indoctrinating the youth.
I understand plans are underway to have physical activities like marching with shovels be scheduled next.
Posted by: 2Brixshy | September 2, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I do not appreciate taxpayer funds being used to spread Obama’s socialist agenda to my grandchildren! This is absolutely unbelievable. He can keep his socialist/community-organizing rhetoric away from young children with impressionable minds, especially Pre-K and Elementary levels. His audacity is growing at a dizzying pace……….
Posted by: kygrown | September 2, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Pep speech is hardly socialist…Encouraging students to do well is hardly socialist, demonstrating the possible is hardly socialist…it’s called routing for U.S.A.
=======
Go to the department of education website and read the suggested learning materials for this speech.
Tell me what it looks like the focus of the questions are.
If you don’t think it talks about The President, what the President is asking you to do, and the goals of the President more than it talks about the USA, please let me know.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“As the father of four children, I am absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama’s socialist ideology,” Jim Greer, Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida.
This guy needs to get on the next plane and get the heck out of the United States – for GOOD!! Is he for real??? real? He thinks that talking to kids about taking responsibility to succeed in school SOCIALIST? This guy needs to be locked up in a rubber room.
Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“what could any president have done once the planes hit the buildings? and what do you expect a president (say obama) to do in front of 30 seven year-olds when he gets the news? flip out, horrify the kids and go crazy?”
How about this? “Excuse me children. A situation has come up that requires my attention.” Then simply stand up and walk out of the room.
There is something between running and screaming like panicked schoolgirl and sitting like a lump for 7 minutes waiting to be told what to do.
Posted by: cicclinton | September 2, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Didn’t we have an election? You voted, your vioce was heard. We have an elected President, now let support him!! Go USA,, the greatest Nation on Earth!!!
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Chavez must be green with envy.
Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Since when is the President of the United States not a good role model for our children? If the President can’t give the students of America a pep talk then who can? Rush Limbaugh? Yikes. If the goal of the address is to encourage the young people to stay in school learn to think for themselves and wade through the B.S. that surrounds us, then what is there to be afraid of?
Maybe you are afraid some will listen.
Posted by: Lolly | September 2, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I am a senior citizen and feel that I did a very good job on instilling good judgement to my children. Both of my children went to college and have done very well for themselves.
I feel my children are responsible enough to talk to their children about staying in school and doing their best.
If the president wants to speak to my grandkids, I feel I should have a chance to talk to his children on staying in school and not dropping out.
What gives him the audacity that he is a better roll model than their own parents or grandparents. How arragant is this president trying to be???
Posted by: Ron E | September 2, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
These comments are outrageous. I can’t believe how these partisan folks will, apparently, take ANY opportunity to be disagreeable and just plain stupid. One comment here asked why ABC wasn’t giving us the rest of the story – and said FOX news had more information. I looked it up on FOX news and, apparently, what the poster was talking about were the quotes from the super-partisan Cato Institute and the American Enterprise Institute. These people’s opinions are not worth hearing – certainly not on this subject – I’m guessing that’s why a more credible organization like ABC decided not to include them. These people bashing the suggested “lesson plans” from the DOE are idiots. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what the DOE is suggesting that teachers do with their classes about the upcoming speech. All of it is designed to help the students become better listeners and to set short-term goals for their education. Anyone who thinks otherwise is obviously being told what to think and, therefore, cannot think for themselves. You people are unbelievable. Saying that this is an attempt to “glorify the President” in our children’s minds is too ridiculous to even respond to. What a perfect role model and background story to inspire kids. Even Newt Gingrich is working with Obama and the DOE. You people that are opposed to the President encouraging schools and school children need to have your heads examined. I applaud the President and the DOE for trying to make a difference in our children’s lives.
Posted by: Dennis | September 2, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
The point is being missed, folks: giving a speech to students about taking responsibility to succeed in school is not socialist – the problem arises when he attempts to INDOCTRINATE young, impressionable children whose parents may not agree with his political agenda.
Posted by: kygrown | September 2, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
I’m now convinced that the Obama haters are truly nutty racists. I’m convinced also that whenever they say “socialist” they mean “black man”. It makes me a little angry, but it makes me much more sad for this country that people are so engulfed by hatred for the first black president that any innocuous thing (that has been done before by white presidents) he does is eyed with such code-worded suspicion, based on his race.
Posted by: Tony | September 2, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I think Obama speaking to the school children this week is a fantastic idea and will inspire millions of students to do well in school this year.
I also think that those who confuse Obama’s intention to inspire young people to study hard with the health care debate need to see a counselor. I have never in my entire life read such hateful and down right racist comments in my life.
Shameful!!!
Posted by: Keith | September 2, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
“I read the letter from Obama to teachers accompanying the President’s speech. The letter encourages teachers to have their students write letters about what they can do to support Obama’s policies. NOT the US policies, but the DEms policies”
I have posted the suggested activities list and they say nothing of the sort.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
What’s next… all the kids will have to carry a litttle red book like in Mao’s China?? What is wrong with the presidents political team!! I sent money to Obama’s campain and now I cant stand his administration.
Posted by: as if | September 2, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
The point is being missed, folks: giving a speech to students about taking responsibility to succeed in school is not socialist – the problem arises when he attempts to INDOCTRINATE young, impressionable children whose parents may not agree with his political agenda.?”
Except this speech will not be doing anything of the sort.
Seriously this is about as non controversial as it gets but apparently Republicans have gone insane.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Obama’s approval #’s are sinking faster than Ted’s car at Chappaquiddick, and I doubt this speech will help much.
It’s unlikely he will inspire anyone for the rest of his term, but hey, at least the kids will act like they respect him.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Personal Bartender | September 2, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
i am so confused. how did things get so crazy. i try to read the republican veiw points to try to understand their point. but i swear – these people are absolutely nuts!
Posted by: so confused | September 2, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Obama’s team has officially lost their minds… The only way to save his presidency now is to fire Imanuell and Axelrod and tell the hard left to take a hike. He needs to focus all his energy and capital on creating jobs…”It’s the economy stupid”
Posted by: as if | September 2, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Bravo Mr. Greer!
PhillyMann, I’m glad your voice was heard, but I did not vote for Obama nor did my family so our voices were not heard. Therefore, we do not support any of this. There are many strings attached to Obama’s plans and people think they are getting stuff for free. Nothing is free. Just like the Muslim religion, he is trying to brain wash children to believing things without the facts. Better yet, why don’t we put a picture up (that we as citizens have to pay for) with Obama’s face on it in every classroom so that he could be praised instead of God, who is not allowed in the classroom. Why should I have Obama brainwash my kids. My job as a parent is to lead my children in the right direction and protect them any which way I can. This is not an area for children. Children can’t vote and should not be subject to any of this. Fortunately, my children are smart and will not believe everything they hear without searching the facts first.
Posted by: cin333 | September 2, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
It’s Greer’s comments that convince me that there is way too much “politics” in politics.
For or against Obama’s policies, it doesn’t matter. No where did I read that Obama wanted to discuss health care reform, economic conditions, or anything else with students, it seems he only wants to tell them to stay in school (a “pep talk,” as others have described it, sounds like a good description from what I read). Unless you’re going to tell me Miss Miller wrote a biased article (in which case I would strongly disagree with you), Greer’s comments appear to be unfounded and irrational.
For better or for worse, Obama had a lot of support from the youth during his campaign, and I’ll assume he still has a good amount today. As an educator, I can tell you I do not think kids take their education seriously enough. To me, a “pep talk” from a leader they respect is more than welcome. Now if he were to start “preaching policy” to them, then I would strongly disagree with his actions. But insofar as I can tell, there is no reason to believe that’s his plan.
I think on all issues, both sides of the aisle need to stop with the fearmongering, lies, and highly partisan rhetoric, and discuss fact. The arguments I see now are out of control–telling people to keep their kids *out of* school? Ridiculous. You have to be mad with lust for power and influence, or else completely obtuse to believe that one day of school will “taint” your children, even if opposing views are presented to them–that’s the purpose of college anyways, as far as I remember.
To those that may disagree, I ask first for a *RATIONAL* argument to believe the President will try to sway your children politically. Assuming you can give one, I then ask why you lack faith in your children’s abilities to process his dialogue and form their own opinion on it, or why you lack faith in your teachings to your children on whatever it is you disagree with. Assuming you can answer that as well, I finally ask how your children would fare in higher education settings, in which open, sensical/rational debate of opposing viewpoints is not only commonplace, but respected and encouraged (dare I say it’s the norm).
I’m as moderate as they come, and generally speaking probably lie closer to the conservative side of the spectrum. However, I do not respect people that make baseless arguments without any rational argument or evidence. In this case, we’re talking about the American educational system, which I’m sure all sides can agree is quite flawed. We all should be working together to make sure our children leave our educational system ready to take on the world intelligently.
Posted by: Andrew | September 2, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Maybee: LOL, went to the website, can understand how you would twist it, the exercises are suggested not mandatory, doubt they would be done in the GOP leaning states anyhow, and the school district I reside in, is a three way…Dems, Repubs, and Independents…Don’t you get it? We are losing on education, why do you think Asia is doing so well and becoming very innovative? Education…their average student is an equivalent to our academic superstar, pretty sad occurrence, don’t you think? We’re in 21st century not 20th century-jobs are in technology, math, engineering and science(particularly chemistry and physics)…And who are gracing the most premiere Universities in the United States? We are a culture of get rich quick without putting in the effort and dedication towards it, we have in essence become spoiled…and I don’t worship the president and I also do not agree with all of his policies, but I give this man kudos for an honest effort to serve our country and I wish him to succeed because we will all benefit…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Wow. And for all these years when I was a kid, and people told me to do well in school, I had NO IDEA that I was being indoctrinated into a socialist agenda. I am proud to have resisted the socialists by doing poorly in school and not caring about it!
Posted by: Mallory | September 2, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
It’s sad further proof that Republicans have gone waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ’round the bend.
And I’m so damned sick of ignorant people using “socialist” as a political “n” word, an epithet to be flung at anyone who is not as right-wing as they are (which means about 95% of the population). If Obama suggested opening schools days with The Lord’s Prayer, these nitwits would be screaming “socialist” and pulling their kids out of school. Anything that’s different from what THEY want is “socialist”, as if they are all some kind of paragon of capitalist virtue. An oxymoron for sure.
Posted by: windrider | September 2, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Okay, I am a parent and am outraged not because Obama wants to speak to children but because of his “menu” for teachers to hand out and make the children fill them out. Here are the links to his “lesson plans”. You can access these through the white house website as well.
This one is for K-6.
http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/prek-6.pdf
This one is for 7-12.
http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/7-12.pdf
Read these and tell me how this is about our country and not about Obama and his policies. And this is not someone to look up to simply because he is president. He is a liar and admitted drug user.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Will he tell them it is bad to smoke cigarettes and do drugs too?
His administration is so inept it is frightening.
Posted by: ctmom | September 2, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Ryan C- why do you blatantly lie? Go back and read the suggested activities again because one of them reads:
Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.
This is word for word from the DOE recommendations. It does not ask kids to write down suggestions on what they can do to improve their study habits, to stay in school but how they can help the president! If he would just stick to encouraging kids to do better in school that would be great- but he is asking our kids to help HIM. When greater then 50% of the country thinks this guy is a socialist p-g we don’t want our kids doing ANYTHING to help him. and I don’t want them being taught in school what a great inspiring person this man is because most of us think he is a crook who is hell bent on ruining this country!
Posted by: noguilt | September 2, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Some Americans are opening their eyes to the true reality in America. It’s not so much about Obama policies that’s initiating this current “Socialism” outcry. It has more to with the fact that he is a black man who has been given power that has traditionally belonged to white males. They will never come forth and state that they dislike him because he’s black. They would prefer to attack his policies and scream Socialism in order to frighten those Americans that doesn’t have the ability to think for themselves. Is this racism? You couldn’t call it anything else.
Posted by: johnnyle | September 2, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Except this speech will not be doing anything of the sort.
Posted by: Ryan C |
You’ve seen the speech, have you?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I am an educator in an elementary school. I have read the suggested lesson plans and for anyone to claim this is anything other than encouraging our students to take responsibility for their actions and their education is completely false. There are so many people in this world that are full of anger and resentment and I fear that anger and resentment is being passed on to our children and students. The president stood before an african american audience and encouraged them to become better fathers and to take responsibility for their actions. He is doing the exact thing here only he is talking to the future of our country. Please research and read the lesson plans with a clear train of thought. He is doing a good thing and for that I thank him.
Posted by: sunny | September 2, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
“In an acknowledgment that the Department of Education provided lesson plans written somewhat inartfully,”
That’s nonsense Jake. It was an acknowledgment that it was a trivial change so why not be nice to the paranoid Right.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
noguilt: LOL, they are suggested not required…give it rest, you can request your child not be a part of it…get a grip
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“President Obama will talk to students from Pre K thru 12th grade about personal responsibility and the importance of staying in school”
Now that is scary! Personal responsibility and staying in school!
Sacrilege!
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
I have not heard ANY of obama’s speeches and I do not intend to. I also will not allow my children to hear them either. When he lied about contacting Canada re: NATO during the OH primaries, then his people bullied and intimidated the caucus attendees, then he allowed the superdelegates to be intimated; partnered w/Acorn to steal or make up votes; flash forward to all the broken promises and lies (tranparency, bipartisanship, etc.)
This guy sat in a hate filled church for 20 years; he is not a good role model for my children and I will not have my children exposed to his lies and deception.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“I have not heard ANY of obama’s speeches and I do not intend to. I also will not allow my children to hear them either.”
Fair enough. Will you be burning his books too?
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
johnnyle: I tend to agree with you, however, not all republicans are racists we should make that clear…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
We are losing on education, why do you think Asia is doing so well and becoming very innovative? Education…their average student is an equivalent to our academic superstar, pretty sad occurrence, don’t you think?
===========
phantomniter:And who are gracing the most premiere Universities in the United States?
====
I give up. Who is gracing the most premiere universities in the United States?
What part of Asia are you talking about? It is a very big continent, some countries obviously doing better than others.
But let me ask you about this questionnaire that you think should only be used in Obama-supporting areas. Doesn’t that tell you there is a problem?
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Thanks for the update, Jake and Sunlen.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Fair enough. Will you be burning his books too?
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:06:03 PM
Maybe but when is your flag burning party?
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
This speech sounds like an excellent idea. Obama can be a great inspiration to school kids all across the U.S.A.
Pay no attention to the wing nuts, hell if Obama said Good Morning they would accuse him of pushing a socialist agenda.
Posted by: uray | September 2, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
julieterra, have you read the lesson plans? It is not about the kids doing better, its about what they will do for him and how they feel about his speech. What quote made the most impact? How is that about doing better in school and taking responsibility?
Posted by: Jana | September 2, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Andrew: Thank you for the very well thought out and well written post. It is great to read a rationale, intelligent, and calm post. It presents with so much maturity, and openness for productive discussion. Too bad the majority of posts are just not at this level.
Posted by: Ann | September 2, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
of course these people are scared! if someone encourages education and their children listen. . . they might become educated . . they will read. . . and think for themselves. . and then what will happen to the republican party!
Posted by: i get it! | September 2, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
THE LESSON PLANS ARE SUGGESTED, NOT REQUIRED…and you might as well take your kids out of the socialist public schools…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
honey92345: Be careful what you say. President Obama may have admitted to drug use in his past, but so did George W. Bush (YES, alcohol IS a drug.).
Posted by: Ann | September 2, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Examples from the classroom activities suggested:
“Why is it important that we listen to the president and other elected officials, like the mayor, senators, members of congress, or the governor? Why is what they say important?”
OR “We heard President Obama mention the importance of personal responsibility. In your life, who exemplifies this kind of responsibility? How? Give examples.”
Whoaaaaa! ”Personal responsibility!” That’s sooooo SOCIALIST! And how dare he ask students WHY what elected officials (note no notice of Democrats or Republicans) say is important. It’s only Republicans who are worthy of being listened to!!
Yes, God Forbid Our President talks to school children!! So threatening! So scary! OOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH! I’m so scared!
Posted by: mshare | September 2, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Ann, who said I admire Bush? And alcohol is a LEGAL drug unlike cocaine.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Ann, who said I admire Bush? And alcohol is a LEGAL drug unlike cocaine.
Posted by: honey92345 | Sep 2, 2009 8:12:59 PM
Sorry to butt in but I believe George Bush had a problem w/Cocaine too.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
If “this is a speech designed to encourage kids to stay in school,” then that should be its message. The President must refrain from injecting politics into the schools. I vote for a Constitutional Amendment separating school and state. Most of the smart people have already taken their children out of state run schools, already. Let’s not teach the remainder of them that government is the solution to their challenges in life.
Posted by: jjsmith | September 2, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Wow. . .I haven’t seen this much vitriol and hatred for a president since, well, George W. Bush. It was the media-enabled liberals who first made it okay, even cool, to openly hate a sitting president as a matter of policy. Now they have to reap what they sow, since conservatives can’t be expected to act with decorum, especially with so arrogant a man in office.
Posted by: KTX | September 2, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“…thanks for allowing me to visit your classroom to talk to you and all these students, and millions more in classrooms all across the country.
Don’t do it just because your parents, or even the President, tells you. Do it for yourselves. Do it for your future. And while you’re at it, help a little brother or sister to learn, or maybe even Mom or Dad. Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address.”
President Bush, 1991
No one, not even the farthest left, was unable to comprehend his context and freak out. Documented history is that everyone thought it was a fine thing for the President to address school kids, and no one was insane enough to attribute nefarious intent to his words. This paranoid ranting is strictly an illness of the Obama haters on the far right.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Jenny, sorry to repeat myself but I never said I admire Bush.
Posted by: Jana | September 2, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Maybee: India, China, South Korea, Singapore, Japan-and although India is relatively poor due to a riveting population explosion and lack of food supplies, they are emerging, China once starving to death(thanks due to part to minimizing family size), has edged out Germany to become the third largest economy in the world-and do we have a problem if the assignments are only performed in Dem leaning states, no, one has the option of removing their child or abstaining the child from the assignment…and during my public education experience in social studies, always had a bias teacher, most of us were able to detect that, and the less unfortunate weren’t…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Fair enough. Will you be burning his books too?
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:06:03 PM
Maybe . . . Posted by: Jenny | Sep 2, 2009 8:07:45 PM
——————————–
Oh good, that completes the extremist picture. Refuse to let your children listen to the President and burn his books . ..
You’re way overboard, tone down the rhetoric. It’s not healthy for you, your children or the country.
Extremists, whether Islamic, Christian, Jew or other . .. are a BIG part of the problem.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
This reminds me of the military dictators in Latin America that had these types of tactics to brain wash kids from an early age. I’m appauled!
Posted by: AGT-R | September 2, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
honey92345: I never said you were a Bush admirer, never implied that either. I did say to be careful what you say (accusations you use to bring someone down, to put them in a poor light). Whether the drug is legal or not is not the issue or concern. What you said was Obama admitted to drug use (no reference in the original post to legal or illegal). Alcohol is a drug and Bush had problems with it.
Posted by: Ann | September 2, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Part of the problem, leftwing nuts, is that ever since BO was elected – actually before – it’s been all Obama all the time.
I wish he’d just get off the television and give us a break – I’m so sick of him!
Posted by: SweetAlmondVerbena | September 2, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“…thanks for allowing me to visit your classroom to talk to you and all these students, and millions more in classrooms all across the country.
Don’t do it just because your parents, or even the President, tells you. Do it for yourselves. Do it for your future. And while you’re at it, help a little brother or sister to learn, or maybe even Mom or Dad. Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address.”
President Bush, 1991
No one, not even the farthest left, was unable to comprehend his context and freak out. Documented history is that everyone thought it was a fine thing for the President to address school kids, and no one was insane enough to attribute nefarious intent to his words. This paranoid ranting is strictly an illness of the Obama haters on the far right.
————————————–
I agree jhw. It`s the paranoid, fanatical Republican right – and it`s because President Obama is not a `good old boy`.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“This reminds me of the military dictators in Latin America that had these types of tactics to brain wash kids from an early age. I’m appauled!”
AGT-R | Sep 2, 2009 8:19:51 PM
Or perhaps President Bush in 1991, who did the exact same thing without any controversy. But he was a Republican and Democrats don’t seem to have the same paranoid persecution complex as Republicans.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
the problem is we don’t trust him!
Posted by: elz | September 2, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Sweet Almond, we’re only 8 months into this…pretty soon, he’ll have his own talk show (like Chavez).
And I’m not kidding….
Posted by: J House | September 2, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
I think if I were in these parents position I would be letting my kids have one more day of summer vacation. Ultimately I have been so disgusted with the failure of the public school system that I have chosen to home school my kids.
Posted by: Jason | September 2, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Will he lie to the children,the way he lies to us? It would be a good lesson/dscussion at home with your children at the dinner table that night about trusting strangers.
Posted by: SueQ | September 2, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
If this had not leaked on that .doc site, would any of the language have been changed? Why didn’t President Transparency release the language himself, before there was a firestorm? Because, had it slid through unnoticed, the media would not have reported on the firestorm from parents…..period.
Posted by: sybilll | September 2, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
“Wow. . .I haven’t seen this much vitriol and hatred for a president since, well, George W. Bush. It was the media-enabled liberals who first made it okay, even cool, to openly hate a sitting president as a matter of policy.”
Posted by: KTX | Sep 2, 2009 8:15:31 PM
Meanwhile, back in reality at this point in his term Bush had the grudging cooperation of Congressional Democrats in enacting his signature Bush Tax Cuts and No Child Left Behind Act and was within weeks of receiving the highest approval ratings in modern polling history.
But that’s just, you know, documented reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
So many Obama cultists assume everyone who questions Obama is a right wing nut… This is not true, I’m an independant who supported him early on and now I cant stand his administration. Please stop with calling everyone racist,right wing, crazies….It’s only making his approval numbers drop faster along with congress.
Posted by: as if | September 2, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
“If this had not leaked on that .doc site”
sybilll | Sep 2, 2009 8:26:18 PM
Are you honestly saying this ‘controversial language’ wasn’t (and still is) publicly available for download from a government website? Or you deliberately lying or in your paranoia are you just willing to believe anything as long as it is negative about the President?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
The largest bank in the U.S. is under the stewardship of the US Govt, as well as the largest insurance company, largest car company and quite possibly the largest healthcare insurance entity (if the President gets his way)within an industry that represents 1/6th of US GDP.This president has spent more of the people’s money in the last 8 months than all previous Presidents in the last +230 yrs.
Yet, jwh thinks paranoid Republicans are the problem…
Posted by: J House | September 2, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Let’s see the speech. I’m sure it’s fine. Trust but verify.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
SueQ: will he lie to us? Who knows haven’t met the perfect politician without lies and distortion but hey, I doubt he’ll be as brazin as Bush was with his…we all know how we trusted Bush after the Iraqi quagmire and found no WMD, lives were lost…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 2, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
who did the exact same thing without any controversy.
=========
President Bush did the exact same thing in 1991? Then why is Arne Duncan calling this “historic”?
Do you have a link to the student learning materials the Bush Ed Dept produced for his speech?
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“The largest bank in the U.S. is under the stewardship of the US Govt, as well as the largest insurance company, largest car company”
Pardon me for being rude, but the TARP funds to those entities were initiated and largely dealt out by the Bush administration, at the direction of his Financial advisers.
Why do you paint the current President with such an evil brush? Could it be your agenda?
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
This paranoid ranting is strictly an illness of the Obama haters on the far right.
————————————–
I agree jhw. It`s the paranoid, fanatical Republican right – and it`s because President Obama is not a `good old boy`.
***********
It’s not just the far right, my dears…I campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton and will again. We saw the cheating and lying in the obama campaign; we saw his tactics and we see them now against the American people. It’s a script they use. There are many of us who are Dems and Indies who will get payback in 2010 and 2012.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Maybe the President should also go back to school,not just address the students of schools. Maybe then he could learn about the Constitution and The Bill of Rights.
Posted by: CJ Dean | September 2, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Oh good, that completes the extremist picture. Refuse to let your children listen to the President and burn his books . ..
You’re way overboard, tone down the rhetoric. It’s not healthy for you, your children or the country.
Extremists, whether Islamic, Christian, Jew or other . .. are a BIG part of the problem.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:19:10 PM
***************
Julie – go to bed now, dear. You’re in way over your head. It’s the Liberals who are the big problem and your time is over. We’re taking the country back. Sorry you can’t handle that.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
phantomniter – China and India can’t be held down forever. With their huge populations, they are going to end up with a larger number of educated people someday. We can’t be scared of them.
Currently, getting a good education in either country can be a struggle because there is so much poverty and lack of access. There are some amazing schools there, of course, but people from around the world work hard in often sub-par schools precisely because they want an opportunity to come to our American Universities.
That said, state universities limit the number of non-state and foreign students they’ll accept. The opportunities for our students are the envy of much of the world.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
“It’s not just the far right, my dears…I campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton and will again.”
————————-
Jenny, surely then your honest enough and insightful enough to agree that MANY if not MOST of those currently posting their anti-Obama rants here are the paranoid, fanatical Republican right – and it`s because (to them) President Obama is not a `good old boy`.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
“It’s the Liberals who are the big problem and your time is over.”
Oh I see now Jenny, you’re a Democrat who supports Clinton and you’re anti-liberal and pro-religious extremists. Excellent.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
julieY,
I didn’t paint the President with ‘an evil brush’.
Why do you see evil when I state the FACT that our govt has taken owenership of major sections of the US economy?I also blame Republicans, and the former President for his actions in this whole affair.
And this President can be criticized for writing checks (with our money) that he can’t cash (well, he’ll be comfortably retired, while our children, and theirs, help pay his bill).
But, you see ‘evil’ in my commenting on this?Why such a kneejerk reaction?
And BYW, this has NOTHING to do with TARP.
There is one reason the President loaned GM money…union votes.
You simply don’t get it if you think otherwise.Why didn’t he save the other millions of other Americans who lost jobs and businesses and loan THEM money?
The former President also deserves blame for AIG/Goldman/Lehman/Citi…
it was a shameful turn in American history.
Posted by: J House | September 2, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Jenny, surely then your honest enough and insightful enough to agree that MANY if not MOST of those currently posting their anti-Obama rants here are the paranoid, fanatical Republican right – and it`s because (to them) President Obama is not a `good old boy`.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:43:04 PM
************
It’s not that. It is that obama marketed himself as a moderate. Blue dogs, Indies, and many Repubs bought it. Now that he is in office, it’s a different story – he is scaring people with his ideology and policies. Average Americans who are prideful of their country are watching their president apologize for the country they love. It’s not sitting well with moderate America at all. That’s what you see stirring. Yes there is racism and hate but it goes both ways. EVERYONE has prejudices – everyone was raised differently.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
boy, for a group of smart, ivy leaguers who waltzed unfettered into the white house by staying on–and indeed, controling–the message for more months than most of us would like to remember, the administration sure has bungled this.
in the scuffle over health care have they lost their over all mojo?
Posted by: kelli | September 2, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
“There is one reason the President loaned GM money…union votes.”
It was Bush who made special provision that TARP funds could be used for the auto industry – sorry to disappoint you.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Obama is speaking to the right audience – the ones he is burdening with all his social welfare programs. The little kids are the ones who have to foot the bill for his out of control and wasteful spending. To bad they won’t have the opportunity to ask him any questions!
Posted by: js | September 2, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Obama’s speech to the kids may be benign, but the problem is that a lot of people don’t trust it to be. And that trust is well founded. Just look at the radical views Obama has espoused over his entire career. Look at he radical people he surrounds himself with and the points of view they espouse. And the fact that they believe in using the education system to further their agenda — look up Bill Ayers and his thoughts on education for example. Then there are all the “community” agitating and Saul Alinsky tactics Obama and team have been employing since the campaign. He just can’t be trusted to speak the kids without their being some underlying motive of advancing his views behind the speech because that is his track record and the track record of all those he surrounds himself with. And this is not paranoia. It’s plain fact that anyone can look up, if they were not predisposed to give Obama the benefit of the doubt ahead of time because of their own support for him.
Posted by: Texas | September 2, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
davidfrat21, The government did control the media for the past eight years—or at least a part of the media—Fox “News.” I am an Independent, not a Democrat or Republican ( I voted for Reagan in 1980 and Obama in 2008. I vote issues, not parties) I am here to tell you that A LOT of Independents are VERY HAPPY with President Obama! Me included. By this time into the George W. Bush presidency he had already taken 5 weeks vacation! Obama is out there working and trying to change things, trying to undue eight years of the worst presidency this country has ever seen. (and the worst Vice Presidency too.)
You ask what Bush could have done when he heard the news of the Twin Towers, instead of sitting there like a moron for seven minutes? He could have gotten up, calmly excused himself, saying as the president he has very important issues to attend to, and then go attend to them. My Pet Goat indeed, Bush was Our Worst Vote.
Give Obama and chance. He promised change for the better, and he’s delivering on it. Don’t be afraid.
Posted by: Atheist 1 | September 2, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
“Just look at the radical views Obama has espoused over his entire career.”
What radical views?
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Oh I see now Jenny, you’re a Democrat who supports Clinton and you’re anti-liberal and pro-religious extremists. Excellent.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:46:16 PM
*****************
You’re so quick to judge, Julie. I’m not a Democrat at all. Not sure where you got pro-religious in my posts either. Another label on your part. You really like to label and make judgments. You don’t have to be religious to despise lies or cheating.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
“You ask what Bush could have done when he heard the news of the Twin Towers, instead of sitting there like a moron for seven minutes? He could have gotten up, calmly excused himself, saying as the president he has very important issues to attend to, and then go attend to them.”
I guess he never thought of that. He had too many ‘radical’ views to do anything that sensible.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
My son will go to school but I had to warn him to try not to laugh too much.
Posted by: Elle | September 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
I really want to vote Mr. Bush out but couldn’t in 2 tries. I have one more try to kick Mr. Obama out of office. Mr. Obama is as inexperienced as he is hypocritical.
Posted by: young_voter | September 2, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
The Obama administration has crashed and burned faster than any other president in history. Now that’s something to fist-bump over. Congratulations Mr. President, I knew you could do it!!
Posted by: Jackie | September 2, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Julie,
Sorry to inform you that bailing out GM was on Obama’s watch (I’d post the link if they’d let me), but I’m not defending Bush.I’m not a Republican and I didn’t vote for him.
The first (TARP), and all ‘bailouts’are fundamentally wrong.
He had the GM CEO fired….surely you read the paper.
And I was against the ‘bailout ‘ of Chrysler, which you probably don’t even remember.Believe me, that was for union votes too.
Posted by: J House | September 2, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
“Not sure where you got pro-religious in my posts either.”
Jenny, it’s not that complicated to figure out. I attributed some of the major problems the world faces to religious extremists – of all kinds. And you blamed ‘liberals’.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Well jeepers! I didn’t vote for Obama but Republicans are making fools of themselves by fearmongering and predicting the WORST possible scenario for everything Obama proposes.
Republicans have gone farrrr rrrrright – too far for me!
Our students need a lot of encouragement – and his basic message will resonate with many.
Posted by: joseyj | September 2, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
J House . …
“In December, the Senate rejected a House passed auto bailout package using non-TARP funds. In lieu of authorization, the Bush administration used TARP money to provide a $13.4 billion bridge loan to GM and a $4 billion loan to Chrysler.”
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Maybe people should try the left wing approach, have them attend class but tell them to turn their backs to the president while he is speaking?? I seem to remember students doing this to Bush… simply employ their tactics against them!
Posted by: yea right | September 2, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Are we headed for an America that is mostly split along racial lines? A lot of the posted comments seem to suggest just that. Most of us thought that with the election of a black President, we had somehow gotten beyond race but that doesn’t appear to be the case. It appear that the verbal attacks on Obama are becoming more personal and racist in origin. During President Bush’s 8 year term in office, he made huge mistakes that negatively altered the course of this country as well as others. I never saw any blogs during his term that referred to him as a Socialist, Communist, or a Hitler. I hope that Americans can respect Obama for what he is(POTUS)because we’re the ones that voted him in. If you dont agree with his policies, there is another election in 2012. I believe that the racist verbal attacks on Obama can only inflame the bigots of all races causing them to lash out at others which will only further negatively alter the course of this country.
Posted by: johnnyle | September 2, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
The schools should be required to show “Pinocchio” after Obama speaks. How else will the kids understand why Obama’s nose is growing?
Posted by: Mr. Mom | September 2, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
We’ve stopped watching Fox News pundits because of all their hysteria and lies.
No telling how many elderly have had heart attacks simply because they’ve been led to believe Obama will cut Medicare benefits and ration treatment!
Medicare Advantage SHOULD BE cut!Taxpayers shouldn’t be paying $180 BILLION to insurance companies to subsidize wealthy seniors.
If seniors want more coverage than standard Medicare – they should pay for it themselves!
Posted by: joseyj | September 2, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
One man’s “inartful” is another man’s propaganda.
I personally am totally creeped out to find that the Department of Education is writing political lesson plans for the nation’s schoolchildren. If my kids were still in public schools, I would forbid the school from forcing them to watch this.
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Jenny, it’s not that complicated to figure out. I attributed some of the major problems the world faces to religious extremists – of all kinds. And you blamed ‘liberals’.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 8:57:35 PM
********************
I don’t get it or get what type of point you are trying to make. The liberals of this country are hurting it right now – they secretly added special interest projects to the stimulus bill that we cannot afford – and that our children cannot afford. The liberals are trying to pass two pieces of legislation that will only continue to hurt our economy right now – the cap and trade and health care. We need to focus on the economy and jobs right now – not their pet projects. Anyone with common sense knows we must prioritize; it’s not about how many “wins” we can get while in office.
As far as religious extremists, how many buildings or people have Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Muslims blown up for their respective religions? Then let’s compare the data for amount each religion gives to charities. I think it would be an interesting study.
Posted by: Jenny | September 2, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
So Obama is reduced to brainswashing school students.
What a pathetic excuse of a President he is.
Posted by: Gregh | September 2, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Some of you people are really pitiful but it has become quite obvious that no matter what President Obama does it won’t be right. I am really confused though, it has been fine for all the other Presidents to address students but if President Obama does it then he is trying to indoctrinate the children and steal their minds. I mean the criticism and the fear mongering coming from the Obama haters has gotten completely out of control. It’s to a point now that you haters really sound stupid. You people really need to get a grip and realize the harm you all are doing to the children as well as the country with your unreasonable hate and disrespect for our duly elected President. Sad….
Posted by: catmom | September 2, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Let me be the first to say that I was wrong. Jimmy Carter is not the worst President ever – Obama is.
Posted by: Fran | September 2, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“It’s not just the far right, my dears…I campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton and will again. We saw the cheating and lying in the obama campaign; we saw his tactics and we see them now against the American people. It’s a script they use. There are many of us who are Dems and Indies who will get payback in 2010 and 2012.”
**************************************
Worth repeating – and you know what they say about PayBack… :D
Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 2, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
In the U.S. department of education they also tell the teachers to get students to “read books about barack Obama.”. That is a problem.
Posted by: Jess | September 2, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
catmom, the problem with this is he not just addressing them, he is having the teachers hand out lesson plans. No other president has asked students to say what quote inspired them the most, and how they will help the president. O
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Oops, that should say “in the *letter* by the U.S. Dept of Education to teachers, they ask that students “read books about Obama”. Pretty sure Chinese students had to read about Mao too.
Posted by: jess | September 2, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Yeah, it’s gotten this low…Republicans will say or do ANYTHING, no matter how ridiculous, to try to take down Obama. They don’t even care anymore how stupid they sound, because they’re all have each other down at the bottom of the barrel. There will be a day when they start lionizing stupidity outright. They’ve been there before. As if the ideology that advocated segregation, sexism and slavery knows what’s good for the country.
Posted by: AnimusVir | September 2, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Are we able to do what the President is asking of us?
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
they* (gramar counts!)
Posted by: AnimusVir | September 2, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Why does Obama have to be ‘caught’ at something before he changes his tune? He was going to use speaking to little school children as a way to demonize people who disagree with his health care program. Look how he used the 11 year old daughter of one of his aides to act like she was asking a question at a town hall meeting.
Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
If we follow our own Dear Leader, we can become just like this other first-world, industrialized country:
“In a letter to The Daily Telegraph, a group of experts who care for the terminally ill claim that some patients are being wrongly judged as close to death.
“Under NHS guidance introduced across England to help doctors and medical staff deal with dying patients, they can then have fluid and drugs withdrawn and many are put on continuous sedation until they pass away.
But this approach can also mask the signs that their condition is improving, the experts warn.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 2, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“Do you remember any other historic moments when the president spoke to the nation?”
This is a historic moment, apparently.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“How will he inspire us?”
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Maybe they will listen to him… (kids in the 6′th grade and under) 1/2 of America is not! The more he opens his mouth and pushes us in further debt…the more the dems will pay in 2010…Wake up moderates…your watching your country crash! It want be Bush’s fault in 2010!
Posted by: Pwgage | September 2, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Yes, we must prevent Obama from appearing on TV and preaching his “socialist” agenda to our precious children. By the same token we must prevent “astronauts” from appearing on school TVs and preaching their “techno-faith” to our poor unsuspecting youth. After all, streaming video from so-called “astronauts” may force our children to be exposed to the myth that they are on a “planet” in a place called “space”, “orbitiig” a “round” earth that “rotates” on its “axis”, all the while “revolving” around the “sun” which techno-faithers insist is the center of a “solar system” which exists in a “universe” of which the earth is only a small part. I refuse to allow my children to be exposed to any notion contrary to the fact that the Earth is, indeed, flat, is the center of creation (which is but 6,000 years old), and around which which the rest of creation revolves. :-)
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 2, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
“What specific job is he asking me to do?”
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
“Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama.”
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“Under NHS guidance introduced across England to help doctors and medical staff deal with dying patients, they can then have fluid and drugs withdrawn and many are put on continuous sedation until they pass away.
But this approach can also mask the signs that their condition is improving, the experts warn.”
Fascist Hyena | Sep 2, 2009 9:23:42 PM
And yet they STILL have a longer life expectancy than Americans by a full year. Amazing. Particularly if you know their cuisine. Two of my grand parents lived long happy lives in the UK and passed away peacefully under the NHS’s care, although my grandfather was down a throat by the time he went due to aggressive measures against cancer during his last couple years. (OK, mostly happy lives- my granddad was pretty ticked when one of my aunts took away his motorbike after he fell off it and broke his arm on the way home from the pub – while at a stop sign.)
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
“Don’t do it just because your parents, or even the President, tells you. Do it for yourselves. Do it for your future. And while you’re at it, help a little brother or sister to learn, or maybe even Mom or Dad. Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address.” 1991, President Bush
It was a good speech too, and no one from the far left or right was terrified by Bush’s ‘invasive abuse of power’ of giving it to “millions” of students.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I am so sick of this nonsense ranting off the right. Second to that I’m sick of the Obama administration feeding it. They sure are rather naive in how they put stuff out there.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
“The liberals of this country are hurting it right now – they secretly added special interest projects to the stimulus bill that we cannot afford.”….. There was republican pork in that bill too. Just saying.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
“And yet they STILL have a longer life expectancy than Americans by a full year.”
Not if you exclude automobile accidents and homicides. How about we reduce the speed limit to 55, we outlive the Brits, I don’t have to pay for a $10,000 per year health plan for people who would rather not have to work for a living?
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
This is a great opportunity to teach critical thinking by analyzing the speech and lesson plans instead of just using them as instructed.
Posted by: Yehudit | September 2, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
It’s past time Americans stood up for their Country, but now STAND UP FOR YOUR CHILDREN!!
Posted by: Fred | September 2, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
“This is a great opportunity to teach critical thinking by analyzing the speech and lesson plans instead of just using them as instructed.”
I wouldn’t have a problem with that. I have a BIG problem with the Department of Education, the head of which is appointed by the President, drafting lesson plans for children to come up with ideas on how they can help the President. Blech.
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
GOOOO WAKEFIELD HIGH SCHOOL
Posted by: JJwe | September 2, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
“Don’t do it just because your parents, or even the President, tells you. Do it for yourselves. Do it for your future. ”
vs.
“How will he inspire us?”
“What specific job is he asking me to do?”
I see a key difference there.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“Not if you exclude automobile accidents and homicides. How about we reduce the speed limit to 55, we outlive the Brits, I don’t have to pay for a $10,000 per year health plan for people who would rather not have to work for a living?”
Bridget | Sep 2, 2009 9:36:58 PM
Are you serious? You are just randomly picking off America’s two highest stats… why exactly? Why don’t we randomly zero out tobacco related deaths and see just how much better the UK looks versus America then?
I’m not sure what your 55mph nonsense is. The max speed limit in the UK is 70 mph, motorcycles are far more common, and their roads were laid out by drunks staggering home from the pub. I guess if their emergency treatment system is better at handling car crash victims you consider that bad or something.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Jeff wrote: >>>>He was going to use speaking to little school children as a way to demonize people who disagree with his health care program
WOW! that’s getting into the tinfoil hat and black helicopter stage.
Jeff – time to change the Fox News channel to oh maybe something like opera for awhile.
Posted by: joseyj | September 2, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
” I don’t have to pay for a $10,000 per year health plan for people who would rather not have to work for a living?”
Yes Bridget, we must make absolutely sure that those lazy, good for nothing, children don’t have access to health care or medicine. If they want health care they should get a job like the rest of us. Ooops! Most jobs don’t come with health care benefits anymore do they? Let them die, there is plenty more where they came from. I am particularly incensed by “conservatives” who will fight tooth and nail to make sure that all of the “pre-born” are born. Then, once born will fight tooth and nail to make sure that these same children do not have enough to eat, a place to live, warm clothes, or access to health care. Hypocrites.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 2, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
My kids will be getting a history lesson with their mom on September 8th. We live in a historic city with wonderful sites to explore. I know many parents who will be doing the same.
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | September 2, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
I am the parent of a 9 year old in 4th Grade. Shouldn’t I be allowed to see the exact text of the speech Obama i going to give my child? If it is strictly about the importance of education that is fine with me. But if he starts preaching faith or politics I do not want my child to be part of it. Each school should schedule Gymnasium time for parents who want their children to opt out of the address if requested.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Is this where he tells the kids that he is responsible for the fiscal burden that their generation must endure?
Posted by: Boxcar | September 2, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
“I see a key difference there.”
MayBee | Sep 2, 2009 9:48:53 PM
I am immensely amused at your selective editing after your earlier attack on me for not posting the context for that exact quote. It is hardly surprising that someone who irrationally hates Obama sees evil in his every word.
I would note, that in 1991 no one on the left- NO ONE- was so consumed by hatred that they attacked Bush by taking a snippet of his speech out of context.
“Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals.” President Bush 1991 (cue ominous music)
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
jhw539, Key difference between the two speeches, Bush did not hand out “lesson plans” that are supposed to be taught to them. Obama is.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
“I am the parent of a 9 year old in 4th Grade. Shouldn’t I be allowed to see the exact text of the speech Obama i going to give my child?”
Dan | Sep 2, 2009 10:01:25 PM
Do you review every single day’s lesson plan too? Fire up the helicopter to check in on your child’s lunch options? No one freaked out about President Bush’s speech to millions of schoolkids – no one. Not a single mention in the media. Why is that?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“You are just randomly picking off America’s two highest stats… why exactly?”
To prove that there are lies, damned lies, and statistics, of course. Why exactly do you use the longer life expenctancy of other countries to “prove” that their health care system is better when it proves no such thing? Take out accidents and homicides and our life expectancy moves out ahead of everybody else.
It’s not nonsense that lowering the speed limit to 55 mph would do a great deal to reduce our accident rates and accident fatalities. Not to mention that it would reduce auto emissions, simultaneously eliminating the need for cap and trade and health care reform.
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
jhw539, I agree with your question – why is that? Could it be that Obama is a radical and the American public has finally opened their eyes to his ways? Could that be why people are concerned?
Posted by: Marcy | September 2, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
“Bush did not hand out “lesson plans” that are supposed to be taught to them. Obama is.”
honey92345 | Sep 2, 2009 10:05:21 PM
That’s your key difference? That the advent of the internet made it possible for Obama’s administration to post a 2 page suggested, entirely optional, absolutely no requirements, discussions pamphlet? Rather than incorporate suggested activities into the speech itself (write me a letter)?
Sorry if I just don’t find that credible. Do you think for Bush’s speech teachers just turned it on and walked away or something? Come on.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
“Not a single mention in the media. Why is that?”
Prolly because his Department of Education didn’t draft obsequious lessong plans.
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
“Yes Bridget, we must make absolutely sure that those lazy, good for nothing, children don’t have access to health care or medicine. ”
Um, have you heard of CHIP health insurance and Medicaid?
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
In response to:
Do you review every single day’s lesson plan too? Fire up the helicopter to check in on your child’s lunch options? No one freaked out about President Bush’s speech to millions of schoolkids – no one. Not a single mention in the media. Why is that?
You are kidding right? I see my son’s homework and textbooks every night during homework. I see his daily agenda book he fills out. I talk to my son everyday so – yes – I know exactly what takes place in his classroom. Heck … I even pay for his school lunches online and I can see daily whether or not he ate lunch and even if he grabbed an extra bag of chips.
I also know that none of his books teach Socialism as a positive style of government and also know that none of the books are discussing religion. I guess you don’t have kids …
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
According to the latest polls Obama is the “Biggest Loser”. What is that famous quote … for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country …. or something like that.
Posted by: JYD | September 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
“Could it be that Obama is a radical and the American public has finally opened their eyes to his ways? Could that be why people are concerned?”
Marcy | Sep 2, 2009 10:09:18 PM
Seems extremely unlikely. He hasn’t done anything radical – to the point he has irritated the left end of the Democratic caucus. Meanwhile, his poor secret service agents are left to deal with 400% more death threats than last year due to the unprecedentedly crass and insulting attack tone Republicans have taken. Contrast this to President Bush Jr, a true radical judged by his Iraq invasion and extreme economic policies, who was near record approval levels around this point in his term, with Democrats in Congress grudgingly but in good faith allowing him to implement his first trillion dollar Bush Tax Cut.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
No one freaked out about President Bush’s speech to millions of schoolkids – no one.
Posted by: jhw539 |
Bush was a simpleton remember? What harm could he do?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
jhw539, Key difference between the two speeches, Bush did not hand out “lesson plans” that are supposed to be taught to them. Obama is.
Posted by: honey92345 | Sep 2, 2009 10:05:21 PM
***************************************
While I’d agree Obama’s PR people are STUPID right about now? I’d also agree this paranoia is pretty dang stupid as well. Oh how I hate the Fox “news” channel.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
“I also know that none of his books teach Socialism as a positive style of government”
Dan, Socialism is an economic construct, not a form of government. Perhaps you should read your children’s textbooks a little closer….
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 2, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
“I am particularly incensed by “conservatives” who will fight tooth and nail to make sure that all of the “pre-born” are born. ”
So what are you blathering on at me about? I’m prochoice.
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
This is just another tactic by the White House to gauge how the public feels about the situations at hand. Just like when my youngest was in elementary school. They had mock Presidential elections to see which way the numbers were going, Republican or Democrat.
Posted by: d | September 2, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Bridget – sorry about the non-sequitor. My comment wasn’t directed at you.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 2, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
LOL … you got me …
“I also know that none of his books teach Socialism as a positive style of government”
Dan, Socialism is an economic construct, not a form of government. Perhaps you should read your children’s textbooks a little closer….
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Bush did not hand out “lesson plans” that are supposed to be taught to them. Obama is.”
honey92345 | Sep 2, 2009 10:05:21 PM
That’s your key difference? That the advent of the internet made it possible for Obama’s administration to post a 2 page suggested, entirely optional, absolutely no requirements, discussions pamphlet? Rather than incorporate suggested activities into the speech itself (write me a letter)?
Sorry if I just don’t find that credible. Do you think for Bush’s speech teachers just turned it on and walked away or something? Come on.
Posted by: jhw539 | Sep 2, 2009 10:10:45 PM
Actually, it was optional then as it is now but they did not say how historical it was for Bush to be doing that speech. Also, there are many examples in Obama’s lesson plans about how the children can help him and what they think about him, not encouraging them to higher standereds. I could keep listing the many examples if you wish, I just choose to point out the flaw in your statement “I would note, that in 1991 no one on the left- NO ONE- was so consumed by hatred that they attacked Bush by taking a snippet of his speech out of context.
“Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals.” President Bush 1991 (cue ominous music)”
Actually, it was optional then as it is now but they did not say how historical it was for Bush to be doing that speech. Also, there are many examples in Obama’s lesson plans about how the children can help him and what they think about him, not encouraging them to higher standereds. I could keep listing the many examples if you wish, I just choose to point out the flaw in your statement which I reposted above.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Accepted. :)
Posted by: Bridget | September 2, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Obama needs to get down to business and pull out all the stops – someone get Oprah on the phone.
Posted by: Danny | September 2, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Sorry, repeated a section when I was trying to clear up the text. It was meant to be posted at the bottom.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
“I talk to my son everyday so – yes – I know exactly what takes place in his classroom. . .
I also know that none of his books teach Socialism as a positive style of government and also know that none of the books are discussing religion. I guess you don’t have kids …”
Dan | Sep 2, 2009 10:14:08 PM
So you talk to him AFTER THE FACT about his days lessons. Yet you need to pre-vet a stay-in-school speech?
And it’s appalling that your son’s school apparently doesn’t teach the correct definition of socialism (the US and every modern nation has a socialist military, food safety system, education, and at least some degree of health care – medicare only in the US) and its essential role in modern societal structure. This is a matter of basic educational literacy about the role and forms of government. This kind of willful ignorance and apparently incorrect education is why they implemented a representative government – I guess they were right not to trust the masses to be properly educated without superstitious bias.
As for no comparative religion education, that’s sad but unlike education on forms of government unlikely to result in a voter unable to comprehend the value and danger of government.
(My daughter’s lessons consist of colors and shapes at the moment, but my nieces are 10 and more than capable of digesting opposing viewpoints rationally.)
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Does anyone know if showing this address at school is 100% Mandatory? I mean … did the White House threaten to cut school funds if they choose not to show it?
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Jhw- but you know the full quote. I highlighted the difference in the motivation bush was offering the students vs what the us department of education wants teachers to stress as the motivator for their actions.
This has nothing to do with hating Obama. I dislike his policies, but as I said I am fine with him giving this speech. I am unhappy with the product the DOE put out for classroom discussion. It is too much about the man, and not enough about critical thinking.
In my opinion, the best thing you can teach a child is good decision making.
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
And it’s appalling that your son’s school apparently doesn’t teach the correct definition of socialism (the US and every modern nation has a socialist military, food safety system, education, and at least some degree of health care – medicare only in the US) and its essential role in modern societal structure. This is a matter of basic educational literacy about the role and forms of government.
Posted by: jhw539 |
Socialism is an economic construct, not a form of government. Perhaps you should read your children’s textbooks a little closer….
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 2, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Racism is as much alive today as it was 40 years ago.
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
I feel so sorry for these young kids, geez life is hard enough as it is than to have some politician trying to make mileage off of them, its really a shame with Obama is trying to do.
Posted by: SJ | September 2, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
I knew the race card couldn’t be far away! It’s getting old, very old.
Posted by: IRR | September 2, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
PhillyMann, who has said anything about racism? This is a matter of politics and does not belong in pre K-6 grade because his numbers in the polls are slipping.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
(My daughter’s lessons consist of colors and shapes at the moment, but my nieces are 10 and more than capable of digesting opposing viewpoints rationally.)
Posted by: jhw539 | Sep 2, 2009 10:21:27 PM
So your 10 year old nieces are more interested in the current state of affairs in the USA and why the majority of citizens dislike Obamas policies than they are Barbies and Hannah Montana? And they can rationally digest all of this? I’m impressed. More than likely they will be forced (with being able to rationally decide to do it) to make I love Obama posters and write thank you letters like all the other kids after the speech on Tuesday.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
IRR : Dude it’s nearly 250 posts here. That card has already been played
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Can anyone explan why Obama has Ezekiel Emanuel,Holden(Science Czar) and Van Jones as advisors?
There is nothing in the past or present that Obama has accomplished that deserves such blind allegianceand trust
Yes, you may think that the Repubs may make fools of themselves but so do the liberals by trying to win an argument by calling them racists.It appears that the liberal/radicals argument can not be won with facts.People know very little about his
accomplishments because there are so few.His educational records are sealed.So liberals can’t use his intelligence and academic work. Community organizer and Senator.Better read his books and Senate record.His votes are mainly present and absent.
Posted by: SueQ | September 2, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Dear Jake,
Is there some reason you failed to point out this entire hoopla began with a column by Michelle Milkin. And yet again the MSM takes a cue from the spin machine off the right and reports this garbage as though there’s something to it? Is there also some reason you failed to make mention of all the other presidents pretty much doing this before Obama?
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
“No one freaked out about President Bush’s speech to millions of schoolkids – no one.
Posted by: jhw539 |
Bush was a simpleton remember? What harm could he do?
Foghorn Leghorn | Sep 2, 2009 10:14:49 PM
? Our President in 1991 was (and is) a very intelligent man and was widely admired for it. He had held positions ranging from Director of Central Intelligence to a part-time professor. I don’t recall anyone, of any partisan persuasion, calling our President in 1991 a simpleton (and I am happy to say I voted for him in 1992, although I am ultimately pleased with how Clinton shaped up).
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
” life is hard enough as it is than to have some politician trying to make mileage off of them”.
Yeah, no matter what else Obama is, he is a politician first and foremost. And politicians use people as photo-ops. In that respect he’s no different than any other politician. How many congressmen have we seen lately using their wives as props while they confess their sins on TV?
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 2, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
K-6 kids are in a world of their own, and that is how it should be let them enjoy these years, they sure don’t need Obama introducing his way of thinking to them, and besides is he going to be POTUS for life?
By the time these kids are voting age would they really give a hoot as to what he thought, that man is ill and I really cant understand what is the motive behind all of this
Posted by: SJ | September 2, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Is Obama going to tell the children that he just got back from vacation in Martha’s Vineyard and was renting a $50,000 a week home? That will help set the stage for what they can do for him. Go get em Barack.
Posted by: TonyS | September 2, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
THis has nothing to do with race. There have been plenty of bad WHITE presidents as well.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Stop it!! This has nothing to do with policies. He’s talking to children about staying in school. Can someone please explain to me the harm in that?
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
SueQ!!! Yes, yes! I can explain it! See, Obama has only filled 43% of his appointments. This is because congress must advise and consent. Only republicans have put 100′s of holds on his nominations. He nominated a republican for Sec. of War and they have put three holds on that so far. With a hold nobody can vote. Never fear – the dem’s play this game too on republican presidents. Anywho, what this means? Well, Obama appointed czars to get some staff. I mean, after all – we have two wars going on and it’s a little important we have a Sec. of War? So, to rest your mind here? As soon as the immature boys on the hill allow some appointments to go thru these czars should go away after a period of time.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
PhillyMann, Didn’t you hear? Shhhh, he’s a secret Commie Muslim terrorist! He’s going to turn all the children into the same. :)
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
So far, to me, the real failure of the Obama administration is that they’re unable to silence the spin from the left that accuses conservative white independents and republicans of being racist everytime they argue against the democrats and the President’s proposals on principle. This is the surest way for 2010 to become a repeat of 1994 in Congress and for Obama to be a one-term President. A number of white independents I know who voted for Obama in 2008 are already regretting that decision now in light of the Gates incident and several pontifications from Obama that are just patently offensive to them. Their objections to the Health Plan proposal are well thought out and not due to misinformation or ignorance or the fact that they are white. Enough said. If the democrats ram Health Care through with no republican support, they’ll seal the end of their control of Congress in January 2011.
Posted by: Rob | September 2, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
secondlook, No other president handed out “lesson plans” for the teachers to hand out for the children to do. Here are the links to the “lesson plans.” They are not about encouraging our children, they are about promoting him and his ideas.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Dan: There have been plenty of bad WHITE presidents as well.
I agree 1000%, so why the big fuss over this one? You name airports and parks after those “bad” ones, but you are upset that this one wants to speak to the youth about making good choices!
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Oh a speech with a lesson plan how sweet, I guess this speech is just not about staying in school is it now?
I really wonder what can K-6 graders assist the WH and his administration with?
Posted by: SJ | September 2, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
“So your 10 year old nieces are more interested in the current state of affairs in the USA and why the majority of citizens dislike Obamas policies than they are Barbies and Hannah Montana?”
I’m proud to say they’re more entranced by soccer than Barbies, (a little less pleased with the Nintendo DS fascination) but what does this have to do with a standard stay in school speech?
“More than likely they will be forced (with being able to rationally decide to do it) to make I love Obama posters and write thank you letters like all the other kids after the speech on Tuesday.”
There’s that irrational paranoia again. Completely and totally unsupported by the ACTUAL contents of the oh-so-controversial lesson plan. If thank you notes are required, then it will be entirely due to the local teacher – just like when President Bush in 1991 asked for letters during his speech.
And my nieces are quite good at writing thank you letters and will rip a polite one off at the drop of a hat even for a gift they really didn’t like (like a Barbie, or Hannah Montana poster). And if they were forced to make an I Love Obama poster I would be concerned they would strain a muscle from the eye rolling that would ensue. They’re kids, not idiots.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I guess you guy want Palin talking to the children huh? One question on 9/11, wasn’t Bush talking to children? Man you guys are such hypocrites!!!
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
honey92345 – I suppose if you wish to “see” something like that in this you could make it out to be that. In your republican head. I read the plan. Whoop. Sounds like a normal lesson plan (I happen to not think all schools are breeding Commies tho.) Now, if the President goes on air tomorrow and tells them to all grow up to be good little Commies? I might agree with you. But since he’s telling them what all other presidents have told them? Stay in school, get good grades, behave? Not real controversal to ask them what the President wants them to do.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Dan: There have been plenty of bad WHITE presidents as well.
I agree 1000%, so why the big fuss over this one? You name airports and parks after those “bad” ones, but you are upset that this one wants to speak to the youth about making good choices!
Posted by: PhillyMann | Sep 2, 2009 10:37:58 PM
If he merely comes out and tells kids to stay in school, education is important and you too can be president some day that would be great! But more than likely he has an agenda that goes beyond that. Don’t you remember the majority of his campaign was directed to college age students and first time voters?? He figures perhaps now he can get them on the band wagon even younger. I guarantee that between now and Tuesday at 12:00 there will be MANY changes to his speech based on public outcry.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Who can doubt that the estimable soi-disant Communist Mr. Van Jones will do a wonderful job as Mr. Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar?”
Who knows what a Green Jobs Czar is? What is he being paid?
Why did Mr. Obama squander our national unity?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 2, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Hey Dan, How about you wait and see what he says? So you don’t make a fool of yourself.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
secondlook, wow did you not read any of it? How many presidents have said, go read books about me and tell what inspires you the most?
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
I covered myself by indicated there will be lots of changes to the speech before Tuesday! :-)
Hey Dan, How about you wait and see what he says? So you don’t make a fool of yourself.
Posted by: secondlook | Sep 2, 2009 10:45:10 PM
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
honey give me the link again for that one because NO I did not see go read a book about me.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
I’m glad they changed that particular directive. The speech was OK w/ me; it was the accompanying materials, esp. this question (how can you help the President?) that I found objectionable.
Posted by: connor | September 2, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Actually the document recommended teachers read books about Obama ..
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
secondlook, Here is the link again and it is at the top of the page. Of course they are already changing it, as the article on this page made clear.
“As one of the preparatory materials for teachers provided by the Department of Education, students had been asked to, “Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. “
Today, after Republicans accused the White House of trying to indoctrinate school children with liberal propaganda the White House and the Department of Education changed the section to now read, “Write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short‐term and long‐term education goals.”
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Dan: Don’t you remember the majority of his campaign was directed to college age students and first time voters??
That’s because the younger generation don’t suffer from white supremcy like the older ones do, like the ones represented here in this blog. Young whites are growing up with other races and realizing there is “no” difference. We play sports togather, work side by side and it’s a beutiful thing. Most of there idols are of different races, but you older ones still think that white is right and everyone else is wrong.
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
honey92345 – Read them both again. There is nothing about reading a book about “him.”
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Dan, yes it did reccommend that teachers read it and then ask the children questions about him. So that implies that the children are supposed to hear about it from the teachers..
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
So you are agreeing that he is likely to have more of an agenda than just telling our kids to stay in school?
Dan: Don’t you remember the majority of his campaign was directed to college age students and first time voters??
That’s because the younger generation don’t suffer from white supremcy like the older ones do, like the ones represented here in this blog. Young whites are growing up with other races and realizing there is “no” difference. We play sports togather, work side by side and it’s a beutiful thing. Most of there idols are of different races, but you older ones still think that white is right and everyone else is wrong.
Posted by: PhillyMann | Sep 2, 2009 10:50:48 PM
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
I predict another drop in the polls of 5% after Obama gives his speech. Does anyone know if he will be bringing Mr. Telepromptor?
Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Fascist Hyena: “Who knows what a Green Jobs Czar is? What is he being paid?”
He is being paid out of the Executive’s staff budget which was provided and approved by Congress. Same as usual. It’s a bit sad that a new title for an org chart shuffle seems to freak you out.
“Why did Mr. Obama squander our national unity?”
Obama squandered our national unity? One, he has never, ever, had approval ratings anywhere near what Bush Jr had (and see how that turned out). And two, it is pretty clear which party chose to turn to flat out lies, stalling, and obstructionism rather than any semblance of working together (as Democrats did with Republicans in the 90′s to reform welfare, or with Bush Jr for his Bush Tax Cuts).
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
“As one of the preparatory materials for teachers provided by the Department of Education, students had been asked to, “Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. “……… I see no reason to doubt the explination put out by the WH on this. These are the same people that flew low planes in NYC. The make mistakes. Feel free to continue thinking he’s gonna get you tho. Or eat your children.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Remember all those fanatical right wingers who were screaming about soylent green a few weeks ago?
How President Obama was going to kill off old people just like in a science fiction movie?
Well now those same people think he’s an evil devil going to corrupt the children with his evil words and his evil ideas.
Do you detect any deranged bias?
Get a life.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
secondlook, here is a direct quote from the page.
Before the Speech
•
Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama. Teachers could motivate students by asking the following questions:
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Dan, yes it did reccommend that teachers read it and then ask the children questions about him. So that implies that the children are supposed to hear about it from the teachers..
Posted by: honey92345 | Sep 2, 2009 10:52:14 PM
****************************************
So. Good grief. It’s about “current events” and trying to excite kids. I hated Bush and could have cared less if he did this in the schools. Anything to get them involved.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
second look: ” – Read them both again. There is nothing about reading a book about “him.”"
====
From the Department of Education:
“Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama.”
Posted by: MayBee | September 2, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
“by reading books about presidents”
===================
What an affront to education! Sacrilege!
Burn the books about presidents! Burn all the books! Give out no information about the current president!
Give out no information about presidents of any kind!
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
No, I don’t think he has another agenda. However, the same thing that created this change is not Obama himself, it that white children don’t believe in that white supremacy crap their parents are feeding them. They grew up watching black excel in all different phases of life so they know success is not a color thing, it’s a determination thing.
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
“Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama.”………….. Key words here – “about presidents AND Barack Obama.” Again, much ado about nuthin. Have you checked the children? Obama might have gotten them as you’ve been typing.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I’m no literary expert … but … Aren’t the only books available about BHO … books that he as written about himself ???
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Paul, why do you say that? Please explain.
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
secondlook,
“So. Good grief. It’s about “current events” and trying to excite kids. I hated Bush and could have cared less if he did this in the schools. Anything to get them involved.”
Wow you think 4 years old is a good time is a good time to get involved in current events? Or even 10?
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
secondlook, ACtually, I have school age children and frequently volunteer at their school. So I do get to see what is out there and for the most part am happy with the schools and their efforts. Its when politicians try using them for their agendas that I have a problem.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 2, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Oh heavens! Actually mention or talk about the CURRENT president in school! Like to actually know or mention his name!
Sacrilege, communism!
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
What about where teachers are instructed to teach kids why it is important that they do what the president tells them to do? The problem really is that parents do not trust Barack Obama. They want Barack Obama kept as far away from their children as possible. The citizens of this country do not trust the man in the white house, do not want his radical policies, and want him, his radical wife, and their radical friends out of our government.
Posted by: Tim | September 2, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
honey, He’s NOT trying to use this for an agenda. I am sick of this out of you guys. We didn’t accuse Bush of this every time he did something.
Posted by: secondlook | September 2, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Whether you understand it or not, America is a country that was created by radicals.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
It’s safe to say that Obama will be a one-term president. Amen.
Posted by: jackC | September 2, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
No my friend jackC, he will get elected again.
Posted by: PhillyMann | September 2, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
“What about where teachers are instructed to teach kids why it is important that they do what the president tells them to do? ”
Posted by: Tim | Sep 2, 2009 11:08:59 PM
Teachers are instructed by a two page pamphlet posted on a government website? Wow, what strict orders. And lets see what happens when we take a line COMPLETELY out of context (right after a stay in school and be responsible for your own success speech) and mix well with paranoia. What if Obama said something like this:
“Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals.” President Bush, 1991
Of course, no one – NO ONE, not even the farthest right hippy – attacked President Bush for his (well written and appropriate) speech to millions of school kids.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
secondlook,
That is pathetic reasoning from Obama pyscophants.
If you read the entire Obama address, it looks like a entire propaganda speech to school kids.
This is borderline ridiculous coming from Obama and shows the guy has narcisstic personality disorder.
Posted by: Gregh | September 2, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Whether you understand it or not, America is a country that was created by radicals.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 2, 2009 11:13:43 PM
yes .. freedom fighters that wanted as little government intervention as possible in the lives of the citizens. Our country has been tilting more and more the other direction … and Obama is ready to put the fat kid on one side of the seesaw and get it over with.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
“If you read the entire Obama address, it looks like a entire propaganda speech to school kids.”
Gregh | Sep 2, 2009 11:17:07 PM
The text has been posted? Where? I would be interested in comparing it to Bush’s 1991 speech (which also pushed his Administration’s education programs – a perfectly reasonable thing to do really).
Where is the text of Obama’s upcoming address?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Didnt the Dixie Chicks caught heat for talking about the president …why is it okay now?
Posted by: Alex | September 2, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
“Whether you understand it or not, America is a country that was created by radicals.”
These people were fighting for what was right, and their rights – they were radicals just like the civil rights movement, just like the people who fought against the waste of lives in Vietnam, just like people who fought for women’s right to vote.
Your world knows nothing about being a radical.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Remember how, so recently, we thought we were a nation unified behind a post-partisan leader?
Now he has dashed our hopes, squandered our national unity. He’s even trying to indoctrinate all of our children. At taxpayers’ expense.
We never really thought that Big Brother could insinuate himself into our society. But here he is.
So sad. So disappointing. So much Hope, all squandered.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 2, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
The people who are making ther kids stay home are stupid. We need more leaders not follwers half the people agaisnt this have no real reason to be other than they don’t like Obama. You lost suck it up.
Posted by: Alex | September 2, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Does anyone in the WH actually think before they make decisions?
They just don’t get it.
Many people are very suspicious of Obama and do not trust his motives as reflected by the polls and protests.
Encouraging all school children to think of ways to help Obama–a very bad idea.
Just looks like another government power-grab.
Posted by: larry | September 2, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I am absolutely appalled that Pres Obama is going after the children of the United States of America because he is losing ground with their parents.
I FORBID MY CHILD TO BE BRAINWASHED LIKE THIS IN HER OWN CLASSROOM
AND I ENCOURAGE ALL PARENTS TO DO THE SAME.
I WILL KEEP HER HOME FOR THE DAY OR TAKE HER OUT OF SCHOOL FOR THIS SPEECH.
STAND UP AMERICA. IT IS TIME WE TAKE A STAND AND SHOW OUR OPPOSITION. YEAH FOR THOSE WHO SPEAK OUT AT THE TOWN MEETINGS. AND FOR THOSE ON THE HEALTH CARE EXPRESS.
I THANK YOU.
Posted by: Cathy | September 2, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Banks, mortgages, car companies, freedom of speech, the internet, health care and now government take over of our kids.
What’s next for the control freaks in the White House?
Posted by: max | September 2, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
At least we still have our Assault Weapons! Actually it looks like Health Care will be the Democrats kryptonite just like the Assault weapon ban was back during the Clinton Era …
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I personally know of two kids who will be watching and being glad they have parents raising and advising them, and not this empty suit who apparently believes – in addition to all the other crap he’s trying to pull – that he’s a surrogate parent to every child in this country. The arrogance is astonishing.
Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
“Now he has dashed our hopes, squandered our national unity”
Nonsense, that is your propaganda trying to pretend this is a divided nation (and perhaps tyring to create a divided nation) – and its very sick you’re doint that and most Americans know.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Despite continued attacks from Republicans in August over his health care plans, President Obama’s overall approval rating has only dipped a couple percentage points. In the latest CBS News poll released Tuesday night, the president’s overall approval rating is 56 percent, which is down two points from the last poll taken at the end of July.
Posted by: julieterra | September 2, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
WOW! The President sees an opportunity to help motivate our nations students (who by the way have close to a 50% high school dropout rate and a 32% college graduation rate) focus on completing school and he’s criticized for spreading liberal ideology? I guess if he were a football player or a rock star completing community service for a DUI he would be more acceptable to the American people. And any parent who takes their child out of school because the democratically elected leader of our country wants to encourage them to do their best is insane. When Bush read to children on 9/11/01 no one said he was influencing a generation to become Republicans; he was encouraging them to read. This is sad people…please think for yourselves and stop watching Fox News for the latest hate speech and fear mongering!
Posted by: S Law | September 3, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Obama and his gang are just inept. It’s not surprising that people expected the worst, given Obama’s constant lying.
“Inartful writing”? Maybe. Maybe not. Can’t believe a word he says, so it makes no difference. He blew it.
He seems to blow everything.
He’s incompetent and should resign. He’s doing the opposite of what a president should do: He’s frightening the people!
Go away, Obama. Go far, far away, please!
Posted by: tanarg | September 3, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Obamabots, was Pelosi the one who said those who oppose Obama are Natzis, and other Obamabots saying the opposition to healthcare was not due to the fact they actually read the bills but due to the “fact” they were racists and didn’t like a black man as president and Reid saying all those who oppose Obama policies are “evil” and stating the local paper should go out of business for their opposition? Funny how Reid didn’t say that when the local paper supported him in 2004.
I guess this is a dems way of bringing our nation together, call all those who oppose their policies enemies and belittle them personally.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
“WOW! The President sees an opportunity to help motivate our nations students (who by the way have close to a 50% high school dropout rate and a 32% college graduation rate) focus on completing school and he’s criticized for spreading liberal ideology? I guess if he were a football player or a rock star completing community service for a DUI he would be more acceptable to the American people. And any parent who takes their child out of school because the democratically elected leader of our country wants to encourage them to do their best is insane. When Bush read to children on 9/11/01 no one said he was influencing a generation to become Republicans; he was encouraging them to read. This is sad people…please think for yourselves and stop watching Fox News for the latest hate speech and fear mongering!”
============================
Couldn’t agree more S. Law.
On the postive side, I notice it’s mostly just the same old Obama-haters posting the same old nonsense. They’re on here day in and day out posting their ‘Obama can do nothing right’ doctrine.
Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am
THEY HAVE AN OPTION!!!!! Anyone who can say that the President is trying to take over the our children, or the he is trying to do the same thing that Hitler did is missing the point. This is not mandatory. He will give the speech whether anyone is watching or not. What is wrong with the President of the United States encouraging kids to do their best in school? This paranoia is getting way out of hand.
Posted by: B. Casey | September 3, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Posted by: Dave | … “was Pelosi the one who said those who oppose Obama are Natzis”
No, she never said that. She said protestors were “carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on healthcare.” Which was true. The intent was to say no to Obama’s Nazism, I believe. And IMO it was and is beyond the pale. Nancy Pelosi made an observation. She didn’t call anyone a Nazi.
“I guess this is a dems way of bringing our nation together, call all those who oppose their policies enemies and belittle them personally.”
Personally, I’ve observed the GOP calling liberals, progressives and Dems their policies enemies– communists, socialists, lefties, be afraid– and belittling them personally– see commentary regarding Obama, Dr. Emanuel, Van Jones, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and so on.
It would be nice if we and our representatives in Washington could all put our differences aside and work together, but it takes compromise on both sides to do that.
Posted by: Alyson | September 3, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am
YES OR NO??? Are you folks UNBIASED…or are you colored by propaganda, misinterpretation and fear-mongering exaggeration? Come on, this is just plain ridiculous, furthermore….you’re stretching an already incredulous story farther past the bounds of newsworthiness. REPORT THE NEWS….WHAT WAS SAID….leave the interpretations to us..the “we the people” where it should be. That or admit you’re part of the “National Enquirer” style of news.
Posted by: Anthony Munsterman | September 3, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Obamabots, we LIKE Obama. We really do. He’s a nice guy. He’s intelligent. He’s very personable.
We don’t like his budget of spending more than any other president, his authorizing funding abortions for mothers outside of this country, his cap trade program to escalate our utility costs, his conduct of the Afgan war, his constant apologies for prior administrations policies, his handling of our economy, his judgement in hiring tax cheats and lobbyists on his staff, his bloating of the federal government and his constant “I am my brothers keeper” line he keeps using while his real brother lives on $20 per month and doesn’t get a dime of Obama’s millions and his aunt he claimed in his book he greatly appreciates but has been here in the US for years illegally, living in public assisted housing and also not received a dime from him or Michelle.
So, other than being ineffective and a hypocrite, he’s a really nice guy!
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am
….’indoctrinate all of our children’…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
this is great stuff…..
betcha Hollywood is reviewing all the paranoid stuff here for “V part 2″.
stay tuned
Obama will look up at the sky, and be accused of trying to destroy the sun.
next: Jello…. a plot to destroy the ‘young yutes’ of America.
can’t wait for the secret Obama plan to hyp-mo-tize america with swine flu shots
so we all can be relocated to FEMA camps..
( hope they hold off until after hockey season)
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Posted by: Dave
damn,..you’ve got it all figured out, you should call up the GOP, volunteer, and figure out where you can run for office… Michael Steel’s number is somewhere’s online..
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 1:58 am 1:58 am
of course these people are scared! if someone encourages education and their children listen. . . they might become educated . . they will read. . . and think for themselves. . and then what will happen to the republican party!
Posted by: i get it! | Sep 2, 2009 8:10:09 PM
****
stay tuned
Obama will look up at the sky, and be accused of trying to destroy the sun.
Posted by: Treace | Sep 3, 2009 1:54:19 AM
***
:>) What a thread, huh? Is it just me or does it make others wish the going Galt thing hadn’t simply been noise and bother?
Posted by: Alyson | September 3, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am
It would be nice if we and our representatives in Washington could all put our differences aside and work together, but it takes compromise on both sides to do that.
So far the ONLY time Dems have ever reached out for Reps input is when the Dems put together bills so bad not even enough Dems will vote for it. So far Dems have only asked for Reps to support bills Dems or their lobbyists have written.
Evidently the Dems in Congress and the Pres don’t like to read the bills they pass, nor do they know who wrote them or what is in them.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Alyson
re: ‘going Galt’
John Galt leads a movement where the wealthiest individuals leave their jobs for low-paying jobs in order to protest the socialist economy.
I’d really like to see arrogant Republicans do that, love to watch them
lose their homes, go bankrupt because of health insurance and sickness etc….
I know… sort of cruel… to wish that on anyone..
I keep forgetting that that is actually Republican policy and goals.
Hey…… what a great idea for a new reality show.. Going Galt With the GOP’ers
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am
By definition, if Obamabots would read and could think for themselves, they wouldn’t be Obamabots.
====
stay tuned
Obama will look up at the sky, and be accused of trying to destroy the sun.
No Obama is the first President by his own words to ever believe he can change the weather, the tides from rising and what the temperatures will be throughout the world. He can command the heavens…
And as he stated, he will bring god’s kingdom to here on earth. Wow. What a guy!
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Questions Obama Does Not Want Your Kids To Be Given
J.J. Jackson* | September 2, 2009
Next week, just in you have not heard, President Obama is going to be talking to America’s children on September 8th. Hey, he has got to do something to try and drum up support after all so why not target a very impressionable group right? Obama’s speech to our children comes complete with a list of questions students should answer before, during and after the President’s speech.
The lesson plan, I guess you would call it that, can be viewed here. Its pretty much a bunch of fluff but really, do you expect much more from these people running our country?
So I thought I would take a minute and come up with some useful questions that students should be challenged to answer while listening to President Obama’s speech. Teachers, if you would like to incorporate these questions into your plans for the day you would do your students a great deal of good. Do I expect many of you to do this? Heck no because too many of these questions are hard and would portray the President in a less than flattering light.
Questions:
1) President Obama and members of Congress have proposed sweeping plans to remake the health care and insurance system of the United States. Looking at the Constitution which is the Supreme Law of the Land can you find any authority for such plans anywhere in this founding document?
2) Having found no authority for such a plan anywhere in the document what do you think about a man who is trying to lead Congress in enacting an program with no constitutional authority? Should a man or woman that cannot abide by the Constitution and has sworn to uphold the Constitution actually be President or a member of Congress?
NOTE: Understanding that some students may rely on the “general Welfare” or the “necessary and proper” clause as justification for such acts it may be necessary for you, as a teacher, to discuss with your students the view of the founding fathers on this issue and that neither clause was meant to imply Congress had the authority to act beyond the specifically enumerated powers listed under the Constitution.
3) President Obama and Congress recently distributed money from the Treasury, money that does not exist, to pay Americans to trade in their older cars and buy new cars to stimulate the automobile industry. Can you find any authority in the Constitution for such an act?
4) Having found no authority for such a plan anywhere in the Constitution, answer question 2 again.
5) Last year then Senator Obama and Congress spent billions of non-existent dollars on bailouts for those in the banking industry that made bad investment and business decisions. Can you find any authority in the Constitution for such an act?
6) Having found no authority for such a plan anywhere in the Constitution, answer question 2 again.
7) President Obama after taking the oath of office used his authority to oust the President of a private American corporation. Can you find any authority in the Constitution for such an act?
8) 8. Having found no authority for such a plan anywhere in the Constitution, answer question 2 again.
9) President Obama after taking the oath of office placed the United States government in the position of shareholder for a major American corporations. Can you find any authority in the Constitution for such an act?
10) Having found no authority for such a plan anywhere in the Constitution, answer question 2 again.
How many of you out there will have the courage to have your students ask and answer these question? How many of you out there will roll over and abide by what the government tells you to do and allow our most precious asset, our children’s minds, to be stolen?
****By the way, today 9/2/09, the US Dept of Education changed the Lesson Plan that teachers are to use:
“Department of Education Deletes Line About How Schoolkids Can Help Obama”
Posted by: Zoie | September 3, 2009, 2:29 am 2:29 am
“They would prefer to attack his policies and scream Socialism in order to frighten those Americans that doesn’t have the ability to think for themselves. Is this racism? You couldn’t call it anything else.”
Yawn. Get a new line. Seriously. If Americans were truly that racist, Obama would have never become President in the first place.
Posted by: Jenn | September 3, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Posted by: Dave | … “was Pelosi the one who said those who oppose Obama are Natzis”
No, she never said that. She said protestors were “carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on healthcare.” Which was true. The intent was to say no to Obama’s Nazism, I believe. And IMO it was and is beyond the pale. Nancy Pelosi made an observation. She didn’t call anyone a Nazi.
===============================
Dave you were just shown to be a liar. Actually, Alyson is too kind to do that – you showed yourself to be a liar.
Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Dems idea of ‘going Galt’:
Harry Reid going from a federal salary from Searchlight Nevada to being a multimillionaire.
Nancy Pelosi and husband has millions up the kazoo.
Ted Kennedy railling we should keep the death tax while making sure he doesn’t pay a dime of it.
Last but no least the let’s all give up high paying jobs to become community organizers while landing sweetheart jobs and book contracts, the Obama millionaires !!!!
Oh, but make sure not a dime is given to my less well off relatives.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am
So, is this the first of the Big Brother televised indoctrination sessions for our children? NO! My children will NOT do the bidding of the Government in any way, shape or fashion. How about bringing American History back to the class room and teaching children the wonderful, wise words of our Founding Fathers? Too Patriotic? I thought so.
Posted by: Sunnyr | September 3, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
“How about bringing American History back to the class room and teaching children the wonderful, wise words of our Founding Fathers?”
Psst. Sunnyr . . . American history IS taught in the class room – and the wise words of the Founding Fathers. It’s just that all the teachers are alien invaders from Zoron! Run for your lives!
Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
I went to a local high school class of seniors and asked “What three countries fight in WW 2?”. No one knew the answer.
I then asked “What country did we fight to gain our independence?”. Again no one knew.
I gave them a clue. “The country is in Europe and they speak English!”. They STILL guessed wrong !!!
What are they teaching our kids? Evidently not history.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 3:07 am 3:07 am
Oops! My mistake,
“What three countries fight in WW 2?” should have been “What three countries did we fight in WW 2?”
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Obamabots idea of bringing the country together is to always attack any criticism of Obama’s policies by claiming the person is a racist and a liar.
How many times has the WH responded to criticism by attacking the person personally rather than respond to the point being raised? It happens a lot.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am
Hey…… what a great idea for a new reality show.. Going Galt With the GOP’ers
Posted by: Treace | Sep 3, 2009 2:20:24 AM
***
I like it!! Although, alas, I thought part of it was that they were kinda MIA too. Like, hard to find. Off the grid in their own utopian society where no man lives for another and vice versa. Oh well.
Posted by: Alyson | September 3, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am
Proof that facts don’t matter to Dems:
Reps give more money and a higher percentage of their income to charities than Dems.
Evidently Dem leadership and Dems as a group don’t care to give to others in need when it comes to their OWN wallet.
Posted by: Dave | September 3, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Hitler, like Obama and all socialists/marxists/communists like to target children for indoctrination. Clearly Obama was trying to indoctrinate the children into little Obama fascists like Hitler did with his Nazi Youths. Be very afraid…very very afraid.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 3, 2009, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Many don’t recall but Obama and his terrorist buddy Bill Ayers served on a number of socialist education foundations together. You guys remember that sex education thing for 5 year olds? Guess where it came from. Anyways, the net result after Obama and his socialist foundations involvement and millions $$$ spent, the kids test scores dropped. Wonder how this happened?
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 3, 2009, 5:14 am 5:14 am
I wonder when we will be required to have a photo Obama in office, home, school building, and street corner. Funny History just keeps repeating itself—Hitler is back just with a bit darker skin color and a bit taller. Heil Obama!!! ya’ll.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 3, 2009, 5:22 am 5:22 am
I can’t wait to see the notes taken by those Kindergarten kids. Probably written with those giant sized Crayolas. Will the kids be urged to ask Obama why he has spent so much money on lawyers to keep his academic records hidden from the Real Americans of this country?
Posted by: Sam Deakins | September 3, 2009, 5:24 am 5:24 am
Wasn’t it the Communists that held the belief that if you got a child by age 10, you had them for life? Hmmmmm….gotta start somewhere, right?What is happening to our country is truly scary.
Posted by: Annie | September 3, 2009, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Now that the cat is out of the bag, the White House will probably water the speech down to something perfectly innocent. Who knows what propaganda the kids would have endured had this not gotten out? The teachers’ guidelines offer a clue.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | September 3, 2009, 7:07 am 7:07 am
“What can you do to help the President?”
“What can you do make your parents think like the President?”
“What can you do to make your neighbors think like the President?”
No mention, of course, of how you can help your country- just the President.
That is Barack Obama.
Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2009, 7:27 am 7:27 am
“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”
Barack Hussein Ilyich Lenin
Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am
Obama,like Hitler, Chavez, Castro and many others has personality, attitude, charisma,and boldness. It got him the presidency . Problem is he doesnt have the wisdom and knowledge to operate on. When in trouble TALK,TALK,TALK. Lie distort,promice,blame. The liberals want to believe him, the press cant afford to let their man sink so they dont ask the questions that reveal his shallowness. If the press gave Obama the scrutiny they do Palin his ratings would be below 20%.
Posted by: Nolen | September 3, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am
This is what Hitler did.
This is what Mao did.
This is what Stalin did.
This is what they do in Gaza.
Perfect.
Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am
This is frightening,you know the NEA is going to support this. If this isn’t stopped say good by to the America we know and love. It won’t happen over night but if this goes unchecked it will happen slowly and steadily. The novel 1984 might just be dated wrong!!!
Posted by: hkdakota | September 3, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Downright creepy. Combine this address with the “I Pledge” video that’s being pushed by educational groups to be shown to elementary schools and it gets even creepier. This is really, really alarming.
The “I Pledge” video is an excellent piece of propaganda because is masterfully integrates the innocuous with the sinister. It’s a must see.
Posted by: Woody | September 3, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Does Obama ever intend to just stay in the Oval Office and WORK? Perhaps he thinks he IS working, as giving speeches to sway the masses is probaby all he’s ever done before.
Why isn’t that working now? Why aren’t we swayed?
Because we aren’t the poor and disfranchised looking for a handout. We’re workers and tax payers (unlike so many in DC) and people who take care of ourselves and each other without being told to. We’re people trying to find a single entity operated by the federal government that isn’t corrupt and overly expensive. We’re people who want the government to stay within the limits of the Constitution.
So, Mr. President, roll up your sleeves, turn the TV cameras and teleprompters off, and do what America wants you to do. Balance the budget and pay down the deficit. Don’t spend another red cent on a single other program or trip until you do.
Start saving money. Strip out the pork like you promised to do. Get rid of unauthorized, unelected, unconfirmed positions (Czars) that drain the American coffers. Get rid of agencies that operate in the red or work to make them profitable. Be a good steward of our money, our rights, states rights and our futures.
Posted by: C Kelly | September 3, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Hey Obama. GET OUR OF OUR LIVES.
The constant lying.
The staggering arrogance.
The dangerous narcissism.
The astounding incompetence.
Obama wants to put as much of the private economy under government control as possible to create his nanny state utopia where he is the boy king.
Let’s continue to stand strong against Obama in every way and get Congress out of the handS of Pelosi and Reid in 2010.
Obama is a smug, smirking con man. Nothing more
Posted by: Derrick | September 3, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
To all the lefties accusing critics of being stupid, crazy, evil paranoid, etc. presidential aides have admitted “helping” the Department of Education write the lesson plan accompanying the speech. They have also admitted it was inappropriate and are “rewriting” the plans. I think they are sorry they got caught, not sorry for propagandizing to little kids. But regardless, you can stop trying to defend them. They have apologized and are not defending themselves.
Posted by: Ken | September 3, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
This is stupid and irresponsible on the part of these Liberal politicians,if I still had kids in any of these schools THEY WOULD STAY HOME ON THAT DATE!!! I would also consider “HOME SCHOOLING”
Posted by: bamajim | September 3, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Wow. I just cannot believe the vitriol. These people call themselves patriots?
Posted by: Slackjawed | September 3, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
The sane people have left the GOP. All that’s left is the mouth breathing nuts. It’s way to late for the mentally stable Rep. to put the nuts back in the bag, so we are bailing out and becoming independents.
Posted by: Clint | September 3, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
How can kids help the President?
well, since he CANNOT convince the adults in the country to follow him anymore, I guess its time to try the kids!
What the hell, when your in the midst of a losing streak, you look for any kind of win!
Posted by: Mike_C | September 3, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
So what grade do you think my son will get when he writes “I can help President Obama by buying him a copy of Economics for Dummys”…
Posted by: RonPicard | September 3, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I am not nearly as concerned about what Obama will say as I am about the garbage that will be foisted on the kids before and after by their union-hack teachers. Obama knows his words will be publicly scrutinized and he will be careful. But no one knows what the teachers say except the kids sitting in their classes. Rather than boycott, it might be more productive and interesting to take a day off from work and go sit in the class as observers with tape recorders and video cameras. That would intimidate more than a few teachers and likely mute their propaganda.
Posted by: Shazamm | September 3, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I honestly think Republicans are losing their minds. This is not even funny. I cannot see myself supporting them as I did in 2004 and 2008 anymore. I am lost for words.
Posted by: James | September 3, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
There won’t be one student in the entire country who is going to change his or her mind about dropping out based on a presidential speech.
Posted by: Julie B. | September 3, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Ron,
Yuor son would get an A+ … IF he recommends buying the book with funds from the great “Stimulator” !
Posted by: Mike_C | September 3, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
The Congressman from Florida would have LOVED to re-elect George W. Bush. That says alot about him.
Posted by: Marnee | September 3, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
To all the lefties accusing critics of being stupid, crazy, evil paranoid, etc. presidential aides have admitted “helping” the Department of Education write the lesson plan accompanying the speech. They have also admitted it was inappropriate and are “rewriting” the plans. I think they are sorry they got caught, not sorry for propagandizing to little kids. But regardless, you can stop trying to defend them. They have apologized and are not defending themselves.
Posted by: Ken | Sep 3, 2009 9:11:09 AM
***************************************
Sorry Ken. This is a non story. How do we know? Well, Presidents have done this sort of thing for ages. But I’m sure this won’t stop your people there from making up some new bogus conspiracy type spin for next week.
I have called myself an indy all my life. Voted republican. It’s getting to the point where I can’t be associated with this party anymore due to the behavior of late.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
This is shameful and disrespectful to the Office of the President. I watched videos in school with President Reagan and Bush growing up, and I don’t think you were complaining then. You blab on about wanting the deficit controlled, but none of you complained about the costs of the Iraq war, the Medicare prescription drug plan, or tax cuts that weren’t offset. You say you want government out of your life, unless it’s the bedroom where gay marriage should be banned. You called war protestors un-American for criticizing President Bush yet you call Obama a socialiast and compare him to Hitler. You’re all hypocrites. You lost because Americans think you’re wrong. Shut up and go home!
Posted by: Disgusted | September 3, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
For the White House to claim they are not forcing schools to do anything, that schools have a choice to participate or not, that is technically true and functionally false. But as if often the case with this administration reality and rhetoric do not quite match – and it is reality with which we must deal.
A single example is sufficient proof. Inauguration Day. Spend the entire class day watching the Inauguration. Optional? Um… if you thought losing an entire day of instruction a bad idea you were labeled a racist. If you were teaching a lesson and wanted people in the next room to turn it (broadcast of Inauguration) down a notch you were labeled a racist. If you wondered why President Bush 2′s Inauguration did not receive as much deference… you were labeled a racist.
Notice the verb tense – these are real examples from local schools from teachers I know personally. There is *no way* most teachers can opt out of September 8 without suffering the rage and calumny of more “sensitive” colleagues and administrators.
Posted by: Rick | September 3, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
For JHW, who keeps insisting nobody complained about Bush’s 1991 speech:
======”From the Washington Post, published Friday, October 4, 1991: Democrats assailed the Bush Administration today for spending $26,750 in taxpayer money to hire a production company that oversaw President Bush’s telecast from an eighth-grade classroom here to schoolchildren around the country on Tuesday. The money came from the Education Department’s salary and expense budget. As a result, Representative William D. Ford, the Michigan Democrat who heads the House Education and Labor Committee, demanded that Education Secretary Lamar Alexander appear before the committee to defend his “spending scarce education dollars to produce a media event.” And the House majority leader, Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, said, “The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the President.” “===========
Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Worth repeating:
“So what grade do you think my son will get when he writes “I can help President Obama by buying him a copy of Economics for Dummys”…” – RonPicard
Posted by: JustAGuy | September 3, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
MayBee – Ha. That’s kind of funny and doesn’t surprise me. This sure isn’t the democrats accusing Bush of sucking the brains out of children though, huh? And thanks for the proof Bush did the same thing.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
New Rule Democrats! From now on only republican Presidents can speak to the Children. If a democrat does it they are trying to turn your child into something.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Maybee: your post does not make any sense as it pertains to this story or other comments that you are trying to disparage. Of course Bush was using his visit to the school as a publicity opportunity. He was not at all telling the kids what to think or how to help the him like Obama weenie is doing. Obama is trying to indoctrinate these kids and to instill in them that the only good party is the Democrat party. Get this clown and his stooges out of office!
Posted by: Obamabots | September 3, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
secondlook- FWIW, this is Bush 41. And it’s been commented on here that he also gave an address to school children.
But JHW has been insisting nobody criticized it, and I’m just pointing out that isn’t true.
Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“Reaching those goals is the aim of a strategy that we call America 2000, a crusade for excellence in American education, school by school, community by community.
…
Let me know how you’re doing. Write me a letter — and I’m serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals.” President Bush, 1991 to “millions” of students
No one – not one far left nut – was ranting and hysterically pulling lines out of context to suggest President Bush was subverting our kids when he pushed his Administration’s education agenda. The paranoid ravings of the Obama haters are unprecedented; Obamas actions certainly are not.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 3, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
More sour grapes, more or less?
From Politifact–
“We asked the Republican Party of Florida for evidence that Obama intended to discuss health care, banks, automobile companies or taxes with the nation’s schoolchildren. They couldn’t point us to anything.
A spokesman said the party was particularly concerned about the study questions the department had provided. “The goal of these materials is to tell students why they should support President Obama in his overall agenda,” said Katie Gordon.
“If the former administration had done something like this, the media would be handling this a lot differently,” she added.
We reviewed the study materials but didn’t see any mention of controversial issues, let alone any attempt to indoctrinate students in socialism. The pre-K through 6th grade materials said the main ideas of the speech would be “citizenship, personal responsibility, civic duty.” The materials for high schoolers mention “personal responsibility, goals, persistence.”
We searched previous media reports to see if former President George W. Bush ever gave a nationwide address to schoolchildren, but based on our search, it appears he did not. He did, however, regularly visit individual schools and discuss the importance of education with students.
We did learn, however, that President George H.W. Bush addressed the nation’s students in a televised speech during school hours in 1991. ”I can’t understand for the life of me what’s so great about being stupid,” Bush said, according to news reports from the time. He told students to ”block out the kids who think it’s not cool to be smart” and ”work harder, learn more.”
Democrats at the time criticized the speech. “The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students,” said Richard Gephardt, then the Democratic majority leader in the House of Representatives.
Republican Newt Gingrich defended Bush’s speech, though. “Why is it political for the president of the United States to discuss education?” Gingrich said at the time. “It was done at a nonpolitical site and was beamed to a nonpolitical audience. . . . They wanted to reach the maximum audience with the maximum effect to improve education.”
But we digress.
In ruling on Greer’s statement, we wondered whether we should give him latitude for legitimate commentary on Obama’s speech. But he crossed a line when he said that Obama intended to discuss “plans for government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies” and other policy matters not germane to education. That is factually incorrect, and the party could not offer any support for the statement. For raising the specter of socialist ideology and indoctrination, the party takes its claim to an additional, absurd level. We rate the Republican Party of Florida’s statement Pants on Fire!”
Posted by: Yep. Your pants ARE on fire! | September 3, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Maybee:
I understand your post and it was well done but I doubt it will reach its intended office.
To my friends from the left: Setting aside the total clumsiness of this whole affair, try to remember a time in your life when you didn’t trust the president and then empathize.
The solution is simple. Let’s keep ALL politicians away from our kids. Then again, we are not a country of simple solutions.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Teachers: Get all the names of those children who do not attend, fail to swear allegiance to our supreme leader or are dissenters. We will place them on “the list”. How else will we get our labor camp force going? Gotta start somewhere comrade.
Posted by: Steve | September 3, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
the answer is simple..
- afraid of public education….keep your kids home and home school them, or pay for private schools, c’mon you guys can afford it,.. your the Galt crowd..
- afraid of a Presidential speech……. turn off the TV, computers, phones, cell phones, radios, and muzzle your kids so they can’t speak or watch it, keep your kids home, (but do the above first)
- take time off from work and protest the teachers union
- burn some books
- read a book on ‘creation science’
- make up some new threat to America like ‘birth certificates’
- revise the history of the last 8 years, so that Obama gets blamed for 9/11
- make your kids watch some really ‘brilliant’ folks like Michelle Bachmann, extolling the virtues pf God, country and armed insurrection.
- move to Texas
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
These are suggested plans not required…my guess, the school my children attend will revise it with a question such as this what would you as president do to improve education? And besides, if McCain had been our president, I wouldn’t of been offended if he gave a pep speech to students around the country…I would applaud it, regardless of political aisle, it’s more about the encouragement and fortitude to progress, and the belief that education is a pathway to one’s success…I and besides since parents are up in arms about the lesson plans, I doubt they will be offered…the U.S. is in severe trouble, our academic superstars would be considered to be average by China’s, Japan’s, South Korea’s, India’s and Singapore’s standards and visit some of these countries and observe the technology being used, you’ll understand how far behind we are…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 3, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
MayBee, The politicians of one party ALWAYS critisize the other party. It’s the nature of the business. This isn’t the same thing as me having to listen to more of my fellow citizens protest that the Commie is going to turn children into Commies. Evidently we citizens slept thru Bush Sr. speaking, as I didn’t recall it. Notice below how Obamabots still tries to insist this one is more sinister whe he has nothing. This mentality will be the death of the republican party shortly.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
That is factually incorrect, and the party could not offer any support for the statement.
Posted by: Yep. Your pants ARE on fire!
that about sums up republicans
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
“To my friends from the left: Setting aside the total clumsiness of this whole affair, try to remember a time in your life when you didn’t trust the president and then empathize.”…….. Well that’s hard. It wasn’t long ago. We were complaining about a costly war, etc. and told to leave the country, that we were unpatriotic and pretty much that we’d burn in hell.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
You lost because Americans think you’re wrong. Shut up and go home!
Posted by: Disgusted
Practice what you preach son, Take a good long look at the poll, The American People Are telling you very, very clearly that your wrong now on this issue!!!!
We take a vote today on this bill and the American public kills it !
Slice it anyway you want to, The American People DO NOT WANT this concept of “healthcare reform” !!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | September 3, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“The solution is simple. Let’s keep ALL politicians away from our kids. Then again, we are not a country of simple solutions.”………….. No. Bad suggestion. I’d applaud this if it was McCain getting ready to speak to the children like this. Just because a tiny percentage of paranoid freaks have to make a big deal out of something is not reason to never do it. This mentality is ruining my country. It’s very zero tolerance. Like let’s make sure there is never a problem. Which is interesting – as that ended up being my biggest grip with my daughter’s high school.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
…try to remember a time in your life when you didn’t trust the president and then empathize….
of, course, the Dems don’t bring guns to voice disapproval.. or rant about secession..
Posted by: No Mas | September 3, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
It wasn’t long ago. We were complaining about a costly war, etc. and told to leave the country, that we were unpatriotic and pretty much that we’d burn in hell.
Posted by: secondlook |
Yes I know and now the speaker of the house is writing op-eds accusing Americans of being un-American and everybody on both sides of the aisle are liars.
Baby steps. Keep the politicians away from the kids. It’s creepy.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
This article is very biased and written in a way to spread fear and hysteria. Is it wrong to help your President make America a better place? If so, then why ask the kids to say the Pledge of Allegiance?
There is nothing wrong with engaging children in politics and giving kids the awareness that they are US citizens too. They have a responsibility to keep America strong by doing their best in all that they do, stay in school and challenge themselves (like take AP course instead of a free period).
If the President attempts to brainwash children for his agenda or political party then shame on him. But if he is encouraging kids to learn out the government then great because there are kids out there that are don’t even know that states have constitutions. Get the kids involved in being a part of America rather than sitting on the sidelines, reading non-factual articles and jumping the gun.
Posted by: Eve | September 3, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Foghorn, She said “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.” I’d agree. It’s America and we all have a voice. Try again.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
of, course, the Dems don’t bring guns to voice disapproval.. or rant about secession..
Posted by: No Mas |
and the Reps haven’t spent four decades turning public education into a national disgrace.
and no left winger has carried out a politically motivated assassination since Sirhan Sirhan.
etc.
etc.
etc.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
“…This mentality is ruining my country. It’s very zero tolerance. Like let’s make sure there is never a problem. Which is interesting – as that ended up being my biggest grip with my daughter’s high school.” Well practice what you preach – Secondlook.. You are no different than anyone else on here.
Posted by: TroublingTimes | September 3, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Like all narcissists, Obama is enamored with hearing himself pontificate on subjects on-which, in the absence of his ubiquitous teleprompters, he is mentally challenged . But, while talking to America’s children at the grade school level, perhaps he could take the opportunity to explain to them WHY he is saddling them and their future earnings potential with a crippling debt burden in order to implement his coveted Marxist agenda, with which, (as his Father before him) he dreams of transforming our Nation into the shared misery of a Socialist Utopia. Greg Neubeck
Posted by: gneubeck | September 3, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
TroublingTimes, Care to explain that one?
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
“and the Reps haven’t spent four decades turning public education into a national disgrace.”…….. And they did this how?
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Moby, I’d hardly call this a flattering article. If anything it does nothing but give creedence to Michelle Milkin’s column.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
re: american ‘education’…..
ask your teachers to hand out simple b&w maps of america, minus the state names…, see how many names of states the kids can fill in…..
I’ve done this for elementary schools, junior and senior H.S.’s……. the results are depressing
I’d be willing to wager that the results would not be much better for 70 to 80% of the folks who post here……
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Foghorn, She said “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.” I’d agree. It’s America and we all have a voice. Try again.
Posted by: secondlook |
She also said protestors were “carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on healthcare.” Why don’t you excuse that comment too?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
It’s a fact Foghorn. Must I dig up photos? So the speaker isn’t allowed to comment on photos she’s seen there?
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Foghorn, it just took me about 30 seconds to find a photo of a child in a stroller with a sign with a swastika.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Since when does the federal government in the United States give lesson plans to students across the nation? Parents should be skeptical when children are indoctrinated to ANY president’s ideals. To downplay the role of the teacher and the parent in a child’s development is totalitarian. We used to have rights in this country. Think for yourself. If you don’t, you’re a ditto-head for one side or the other; even if they don’t call themselves that. Teachers have lesson plans already mapped out and shouldn’t need to follow a national strategy. Where does it fit within the standards that teachers are not already teaching? Not every student should have to do this in a “free” country. This was not covered in our school’s curriculum night and there will be serious problems if they add it in without parents and administrators review and approval. It’s just asking for trouble regardless of who is in power. This administration’s leaders resort to name-calling just like some of the people posting comments in this venue. They all show they can’t think for themselves to provide thoughtful conversation. It’s immature and non-productive. If we want real change we need to embrace people who don’t agree with us and compromise. You’re not wrong. I’m not wrong. It used to be okay to have a difference in opinion. Can you handle someone with a different opinion? If you resort to name-calling and a one-sided view, the answer is no and I wish that you could open your heart and mind.
Posted by: Melissa | September 3, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
and no left winger has carried out a politically motivated assassination since Sirhan Sirhan.and no left winger has carried out a politically motivated assassination
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn
grasping at straws are you?
“According to Sirhan’s mother, Mary Sirhan, he killed R. Kennedy because of his Arab nationalism..”
more revisionism….I know Bush didn’t invade Iraq… it was a left wing conspiracy….
Posted by: No Mas | September 3, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Posted by: No Mas |
I think maybe you missed the point.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
We used to have rights in this country.
Posted by: Melissa
which ones have been taken away and by whom?
Posted by: Treace | September 3, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Foghorn, it just took me about 30 seconds to find a photo of a child in a stroller with a sign with a swastika.
Posted by: secondlook |
My mistake. I thought it was a secret that everyone opposed to the current plan for “reforming” health insurance was a gun carrying racist but you have outed us.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
secondlook, I think troubling times was saying, from reading your past posts, you also have no tolerance for people who have a different political view point then you.
Posted by: rose |
Exactly. You posted this…
We were complaining about a costly war, etc. and told to leave the country, that we were unpatriotic and pretty much that we’d burn in hell.
Posted by: secondlook |
and when I bring up similar charges made by the left against the right all you do is rationalize and apologize for them. Are you capable of seeing fault with both sides or not?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
No rose, and you’re not going to take the typical play out of a right play book here and turn it around on me. If you wish to argue legislation, spending? Have at it. This dealth panel secret Commie Muslim government stuff is ridiculous though. To sit here and try to argue with somebody that the right isn’t pulling out swastika’s in protest is absurd as well. The bottom line is some of you guys are just furious you lost, and I don’t care what Obama did you’d make it into something evil. I will admit I think the far right is ruining my country anymore. I’ve had about enough. My feelings on this began with the insulting I got when ever saying a peep about Bush. Over real things. Like war. Legislation.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Foghorn, Are you trying to play the “oh we’re having hurtful things said about us” card or something here? The simple truth is a fring extreme on the right are making “all of you” look bad. Sorry, but they’re connected to your party. If you allow them to keep acting like idiots then most in the middle or on the left will have a bad impression here. I actually know smart conservatists that don’t eat up all things Beck and I absolutely respect them. The screamers (I can tell you’re hardly one) need to be told to shut up a bit by you guys.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
secondlook, you asked, I told you my opnion. The truth hurts sometimes. I have read many of your posts, you are, in my opnion, not tolerant of the right. So what? who cares? you don’t know me and I don’t know you so don’t worry about what I think of you. Your anger is getting the best of you and you continue to make my point.
Posted by: rose | September 3, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
No rose, and you’re not going to take the typical play out of a right play book here and turn it around on me.
Posted by: secondlook |
Why not? That’s what you are doing.
And did you ever see a protester with a swastika before 2009? Did you ever see a president with a hitler mustache before Obama? Anybody ever call a president a nazi before Jan 2009?
You’re whining because someone called you a name. I’m whining because you are whining.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
secondlook,you just made my point.
Posted by: rose | September 3, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Of course the president’s poll numbers are going to wane, it’s the nature of the beast, the economy inherited was and still in shambles and had been stabilized from a possible depression, people are desperate and when that scenario arrives, people will blame the top…and we all know this will not be as recessions past, we are competing for jobs globally, our education levels are low comparable to most industrialized nations and including emerging nations such as India, do you all expect us to continue to live a lavish lifestyle if our kids can’t add 2+2 and are high school drop outs in a high tech science oriented world? This president visions the long term, give him kudos for this most of all, he’s not about quick fixes, it’s about a sustainable future for a very competitive market place…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 3, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
“And did you ever see a protester with a swastika before 2009? Did you ever see a president with a hitler mustache before Obama? Anybody ever call a president a nazi before Jan 2009?”… More of that “well they did it” to excuse something I guess.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The point of this whole thing is that a president has no right to hand out lesson plans telling students to read books about him and tell how they can help him achieve his goals. It is not the presidents job, it is the teachers and parents job to motivate and help the children. 5 to 13 year olds do not need to have to worry about his problems with anything. If this was strickly an address just to encourage them, that would be different as was the case with other presidents. This is not the case as his own advisors made clear.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 3, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
More of that “well they did it” to excuse something I guess.
Posted by: secondlook |
Wrong again.
Once more, are you capable of seeing wrong on both sides?
Was it wrong to call Bush a nazi or is it only wrong to call Obama a nazi?
Is it ludicrous to tar an entire political party because of the actions of a few or isn’t it?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Apparently schools in NY, Boston and LA are not open on Sept 8. Ooops.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The simple truth is a fring extreme on the right are making “all of you” look bad. Sorry, but they’re connected to your party. If you allow them to keep acting like idiots then most in the middle or on the left will have a bad impression here.
Posted by: secondlook |
How do you argue with this?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Foghorn, Good grief so the “occasional” person might have said Bush was a Nazi. I don’t think there were network shows (Beck, Hannity, etc.) promoting this to where the entire liberal left was all over this. This isn’t a valid argument. It’s more the right yelling thru those town halls. I hardly think the left is perfect – I just think they’re not such a well oiled machine. You guys put those talking points out and they stick. I think Beck is trying to incite violence or something with his ignorant shows.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
The simple truth is a fring extreme on the right are making “all of you” look bad. Sorry, but they’re connected to your party. If you allow them to keep acting like idiots then most in the middle or on the left will have a bad impression here.
Posted by: secondlook |
How do you argue with this?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn
**************************************
Maybe the same was I’ve told 9-11 the government did it conspiracy freaks they are nuts and give liberals a bad name? Maybe how I’ve told those involved in class warfare they might want to move to China and they give liberals a bad name.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Foghorn, Good grief so the “occasional” person might have said Bush was a Nazi… You guys put those talking points out and they stick.
Posted by: secondlook |
So if town hall protester carries a swastika then the all conservatives are responsible but if a Bush protester does it he’s just an outlier and it in no way reflects on the left.
Gotcha down.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Take a moment to picture the school’s response if one of their third graders answered thus:
“What do you think the President wants us to do?”
- I don’t care what he wants us to do. He ain’t the king, he’s the hired help.
“Does the speech make you want to do anything?”
- Yes, ma’am. It makes me want to tell him to shut up and get back to work.
“Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?”
- Sure, we’re able. We’re just not going to. But the question is, is he able to do what we’re asking of him?
“What would you like to tell the President?”
- What I’d like to tell the President — and whichever boneheads thought up this scheme — would probably get my mouth washed out with soap.
Posted by: Texpatriate | September 3, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
“Apparently schools in NY, Boston and LA are not open on Sept 8. Ooops.”…. To show how reasonable I am? I’d agree this one is rather funny. They do blow stuff up there. They were dumb for doing this lesson plan like they did because they should have been aware by then that they were being accused of wanting to turn those children. The Obama WH does make some great errors. Then there are low flying planes in NYC, and the greatest blunder of all? The health care talk where he blew it at the end commenting on the professor getting arrested.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
far right made its bed…we’ll see the results in 2010…and then 2112…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 3, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
“So if town hall protester carries a swastika then the all conservatives are responsible but if a Bush protester does it he’s just an outlier and it in no way reflects on the left.
Gotcha down.”………….. Oh, now we behave like a princess at all times and it’s just that one person? The right conspiracy freaks taking guns to where Obama is, screaming down everybody at a town hill, etc. etc. is adding up. All of this is fed by the entertainment shows off Fox. Like that czar secret shadow government theory. You can acknowledge they ruin your reputation or not. Your choice.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
“The right conspiracy freaks taking guns to where Obama is, screaming down everybody at a town hill, etc. etc. is adding up. All of this is fed by the entertainment shows off Fox. Like that czar secret shadow government theory.”
Agree.
Posted by: julieterra | September 3, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
far right made its bed…we’ll see the results in 2010…and then 2112…
Posted by: phantomniter | Sep 3, 2009 12:00:13 PM
A little ahead of yourself.
Posted by: Lizzie | September 3, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Why does President Barack Obama need the help of schoolchildren?
Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“…ask what you can do for your country”
- John F. Kennedy
“Ask what you can do for your President”
- Barack Obama
Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Treace and secondlook: Pres. Obama wants to talk to the Kindergarden, because they might believe what he says, the rest of the country and those with any brains left, question his motives. But of course you two brainiacs, are so far above the rest, that we can’t even speak up anymore.
Only you are they ones with voices and reason. NAH
Posted by: Lizzie | September 3, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Lizzie you can speak up all you want. If you’ll ponder some facts and stop with the paranoia. Nobody spoke up when Bush Sr. did this and I find this more about nothing. Oh, and speaking up isn’t screaming over top somebody else either.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
“The Department of Education though did not “force” – as Greer claims – schools to do anything.”
*********************
Nice strawman. He did not make that claim. He said that SCHOOL CHILDREN would be forced to watch Obama’s speech. Sure, there will be some fortunate kids out there who’s school districts will opt not to show it, but there will likely be many more who will.
Posted by: Jim T | September 3, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Independents want results to issues at hand, if the Dems can solve it, we’re happy, if the GOP can solve it we’re happy, if they can both work together we’re happy, but I’m fed up with this right circumventing progress…socialist, obamabots, messiah, he’s trying to brainwash kindergartners, and you’re the same parents sending your kids to public school how socialist and complaining about a public service pep talk to engage our children to do well in school? And those lesson plans are not obligatory, they are suggestions, get a grip…also, do you know what your teachers are telling your kids all day long? I can get access to my kids webcast, can you?
Posted by: phantomniter | September 3, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
phantomniter – What you said. They’re starting to annoy me like spoiled children, and I have the urge to send them to time out. They’re about on that maturity level. Lizzie is trying to tell me I think I’m smarter than everybody else. No, just this extreme fringe eating the republican party.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
secondlook: What’s really annoying about the far right is they pick at the most inconsequential and blow it out of proportion, yes, there are points I can understand but if they stick to them instead of the radical name calling…Most of us who complain of Bush and Cheney don’t resort to that kind of name calling, we refer to their policies and it affects and the immorality…and you are doing a good job in your arguments…and besides it’s hard to respect a person’s opinion with name calling…
Posted by: phantomniter | September 3, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
secondlook:”Nobody spoke up when Bush Sr. did this and I find this more about nothing.”
Bush Sr. did no such thing. Sure, he spoke directly to school children about the dangers of drugs. Oooh, scary. I don’t recall him asking school children what they can do to help their president, write it down, and then discuss with their classmates what they think the President wants them to do, or if they’re “inspired” by President Obama. All at the direction of accompanying materials from the DOE to the teachers. It’s creepy.
BTW, have you taken your “I pledge” pledge yet?
Posted by: Woody | September 3, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Great, what’s next, telling kids to report their parents to the authorites if the thermostat is turned up too high, like they do in Britan? Great, now my kid will send me to jail if I don’t seperate my paper from plastic, even if there is NO recycling offered where I live. (You know, in the non yuppie neighborhoods!)
Children are the PARENTS responsibility, NOT the Government’s. Just another reason why “Johnny can’t read…” He’s to busy being indocrinated into beurecratic political parties. We’ve heard about seperating church and schools, and look what you get… government indocrination (“worship”) instead. Funny, they have this in North Korea, Russia, China, hmm… I wonder what the link is? Ya Think!
Posted by: jafo | September 3, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Since when do we work for the president? I am fairly confident that he works for us!
Posted by: Allison Holmes | September 3, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Once Republicans forced the removal of the “hail the leader” context of the lessons that went along with the speech, I thought a message from the president was a good idea, especially to students who have historically struggled at school.
I am somewhat concerned by the University of Chicago influence on this president and the education reformists who teach there, mainly William Ayers who was given awards for education reform by Venzuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. I don’t think we want our children to follow that model.
Posted by: pam | September 3, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
TIME TO PULL YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF
GOVERNMENT-RUN SCHOOLS. WHAT I WANT TO KNOW. IS SHOWING HIS DUMB SPEECH INDOCTRINATING OUR CHILDREN MANDATORY? IF SO, AVOID IT AT ALL COSTS.
Posted by: LINNY | September 3, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Another example of backtracking by this administration when pushed back by American citizens standing up. The lesson plan published said NOTHING about the “staying in school” theme they now profess. It specifically outlined how to set goals to “help the President” (not our country) and then had teachers grading and monitoring these goals. This is yet another of their “plans written somewhat inartfully”.
Posted by: Jennier | September 3, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
If you’ll ponder some facts and stop with the paranoia. Nobody spoke up when Bush Sr. did this and I find this more about nothing.
Posted by: secondlook |
This was posted a couple of hours ago but you apparently didn’t have time to ponder it.
======”From the Washington Post, published Friday, October 4, 1991: Democrats assailed the Bush Administration today for spending $26,750 in taxpayer money to hire a production company that oversaw President Bush’s telecast from an eighth-grade classroom here to schoolchildren around the country on Tuesday. The money came from the Education Department’s salary and expense budget. As a result, Representative William D. Ford, the Michigan Democrat who heads the House Education and Labor Committee, demanded that Education Secretary Lamar Alexander appear before the committee to defend his “spending scarce education dollars to produce a media event.” And the House majority leader, Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, said, “The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the President.” “===========
Posted by: MayBee |
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
This is a waste of time and energy to try to peg Obama for some dark plan to brainwash our children.
It has the same spirit of the folks who tried to scare us about the “Death Panels” of the preposed Healthcare Bill, that turned out to be a service that seniors have now with some plans, and it was nothing what turned out to be Sarah Palin of all people spreading lies though Tweeter.
It’s outrageous to see the response, that all these parents who obviously hate Obama would rather keep their kids away from him his speeches, pretty much telling us that they know their kids will not be able to reason and will suddenly become Socialist if they do, and teachers will spank anyone not watching because that would be the Socialist thing to do… Get real, it’s a talk about staying in School, yet these parents would rather their kids ditch to set the tone of what is not unusal in the nation, dropouts educated to about the same level of Palin, if they are lucky.
Posted by: Quincy | September 3, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Enough Foghorn – You just want to get me. There is a big difference between the usual political rhetoric, and the citizens jumping up to yell he’s going to eat the children.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The Dept of Education totally screwed this up by going direct to the principals of the schools, instead of to the Superintendents of the school districts. Then, the district could have decided PRIOR to the administration’s press release, whether they would particpate. As typical with this administration, it came off as HEAVY-HANDED. Thank goodness, my district has decided NOT to participate and will make the video available on their website so that PARENTS can decide whether to view this with their children or not. Our kids, our decision. Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: MLM411 | September 3, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
secondlook: What’s really annoying about the far right is they pick at the most inconsequential and blow it out of proportion, yes, there are points I can understand but if they stick to them instead of the radical name calling…Most of us who complain of Bush and Cheney don’t resort to that kind of name calling, we refer to their policies and it affects and the immorality…and you are doing a good job in your arguments…and besides it’s hard to respect a person’s opinion with name calling…
Posted by: phantomniter | Sep 3, 2009 1:16:10 PM
***************************************
I agree. If they wish to argue expansion of government on the healthcare, as well as spending? Have at it. This other nonsense is just off the deep end though. This is not the first time republicans have tried to paint the liberal as a full on Commie though. Years ago they got them convinced some new mental health faclity somewhere was where the Commie president was going to take people and brainwash them. I guess those people eventually figured out they got played. Hopefully this group will.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Enough Foghorn – You just want to get me.
Posted by: secondlook |
Want to muzzle opposition while continuing to advance your own agenda?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Bush Sr. did no such thing. Sure, he spoke directly to school children about the dangers of drugs. Oooh, scary. I don’t recall him asking school children what they can do to help their president, write it down, and then discuss with their classmates what they think the President wants them to do, or if they’re “inspired” by President Obama. All at the direction of accompanying materials from the DOE to the teachers. It’s creepy”……. I read both lesson plans. If McCain had put that out there I’d think nothing of it. It’s a typical lesson plan. Unless you hear voices in your head (from Beck).
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Foghorn, I will admit it. I have an agenda. Will this make you happy? My agenda is to deprogramme the far side of right off of the notion that Fox is fair and balanced. Why you ask? Not because I hate conservatives. I know many. I have some of the parts. I’m a centrist. It’s because I happen to think Fox has taken the IQ down over there so bad it’s pathetic. I really think it’s going to completely ruin your party and somebody will be hurt coming up. “Death panels, Commie, Socialist, Muslim, government will have your checking account info, government will kill grandma, democrats will know you’re republican and deny you healthcare, Obama has too many czars and they’re running a secret government, etc.”
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
I forgot Foghorn. Fear mongering. I have HAD IT with the fear mongering.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
The left has for years been made fun of for being PC and for not being Patriotic enough, or American enough. And we have heard so much about “no child left behind” but when Mr Obama wants to try and get these kids all on the same page and get them moving forward to build a strong education system he is somehow NOT doing the thimgs the right says they should do? I am sooooo confused.The “right” jumps at every stinking little thing like it is the end of the world as they know it. Cry wolf and keep it up and no one will listen to you.
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | September 3, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
The man is still campaigning – but these kids don’t vote YET!!!. I agreed with someone that when Bush did it the Dems complained that is is paid politically advertising and they were against it. I guess since it’s their man this time it is ok. Talk about a waste of money – on both sides. I gave this man and his crew the benefit of the doubt and believed he might do some good. At this time I am sick of the constant – Obama TV – every day. I am beginning to honestly feel we are becoming something very different in this country. In N. Korea it is all propaganda by what the gov. It is only what they say that you will hear. They never know the real truth – we are becoming the same.
Posted by: EMW | September 3, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
As an independent and former republican I consider both sides of the issues when I read these opinions that are allegedly written by “Joe the plumber” types. What I have found is a strong domination of hate speak from the right. It sticks out like a sore thumb. In my fraternity, we have a saying: “Beware of deadly silence.” The people who are not speaking out about the appalling behavior of Rush and Sarah will show their displeasure the next scheduled election day. The once Grand Old Party is now the Grand New Party having been high jacked by those who think that the country should delete the past one hundred years and start all over again.
Read your world history. Such behavior has proven disastrous over the ages.
Posted by: Watcherman | September 3, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Who pays these people to dig up this stuff and make mountinas out of mole hills. Are we so messed up we can’t just stay calm and stop all this baiting and ranting. I for one would love to have an issue to really talk over and debate not this kind of silly paranoid girlie c r a p!
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | September 3, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“I agreed with someone that when Bush did it the Dems complained that is is paid politically advertising and they were against it. I guess since it’s their man this time it is ok”…. Again, big difference between politicians and political rhetoric, and a pack of crazed conspiracy theory voters.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I think it is very telling where peoples hearts are if you want to keep their child at home away from this it speaks to how really strange this has become. We can’t seem to agree and I think it goes more to trying to find every way possible to disagree. I for one refuse to believe we have fallen so far down we can’t even agree on having children asked to do their best and be good Americans. And I believe that is all we see here. The POTUS is a good person and is not trying to do anything bad to the children of this country.If Mr G W Bush wants to go on the air and say this stuff I think it would be great and I would think everyone would agree he is not evil either. In fact if Glen Beck wants to go on the TV and tell kids to stay in school work hard and be good and loyal Americans I am all for it. Public Service announcements would be a good idea for all these polls and talking heads.
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | September 3, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
You have to understand one thing: The Right does not believe in education. They are a party of college dropouts. Rush, Hannity, Rove, and Beck never graduated from college. Therefore they will fight any attempts that Obama has to promote education. The Right wingers get their base from spreading lies and ignorance. They lose if people are educated and can think for themselves.
Posted by: Megan | September 3, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Bonnie – I agree that we can no longer agree on what to agee to. We are learning from our government. They no longer want to do what is right and good for America. They only want to better THEMSELVES. They do not have to live by the rules and regulations that they make us abide by. That is why we are no longer agreeing. I have no problem in having the President tell the kids to stay in school, but when they are finished with his speech they better be ready for the test. In NYS they only teach how to take and pass the Regents (another test) to get out of school.Kids keep dropping out. Maybe they can try this and see if it works.
Posted by: EMW | September 3, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
After the politicizing was removed I don’t see anything wrong with it but it’s a shame you have to call them out on it and watch this administration like a hawk. Don’t they even know how to be professional at the Dept. of Education?
Is it really so hard to understand that we don’t want our children to be used as a political prop or that the original lesson suggestion plans could be viewed as such? God are they incompetent.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 3, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
This is a malignant invasion of the already socialist infested education system. It plants cancerous seeds from a governmental tumor for which there has not been demonstrated a cure. It is a frightening thought that a majority of legally defined Americans might condone, or otherwise not condemn, this premeditated decomposition of the minds of our progeny. Aborting the person, not the Presidency, might be conservatively acceptable.
Posted by: Cadbury | September 3, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Posted by: Megan | Sep 3, 2009 2:52:48 PM
And so did Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, what point are you trying to make here? I have never seen more misguided statement.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 3, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
The last I checked, we elected these people to SERVE THE PEOPLE – we are not supposed to serve them. Give me a break already with all this crap.
Posted by: Me | September 3, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
This President is disgusting..takes over banks, car companies, Cap & Trade, now he’s trying with Health Care and now our Children. Mr. President have you no decency? Hitler did the same with the Hitler youth, and some even turned in their very own parents..Also, wasn’t it just two weeks ago, that the Preseident wanted Ameriacn people to report on their fellow citizen via email for suspicious or in his opinion, misinformation about Heathcare..this is is a fanattical, left wing-loon…
Posted by: Steve | September 3, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
all this ‘nazi’ talk…… you do exactly what the real nazis would have wanted and actually did…..
you demonize those who aren’t on your side, ypu claim to b the party of the patriots, your xenophobic, you bring guns to meetings, you murder the educated and the doctors, you make the educated the enemy, you burn books under religious guise, you claim threats that don’t exist and invade other countries to justify your imaginary threats….
nice work Republicans…you know who would be proud
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Posted by: Megan | Sep 3, 2009 2:52:48 PM
I don’t have time or the patience to refute this ignoramus so come on people, tell her exactly who runs the worst school districts in the country. Who exactly is responsible because we have dropped from number 3 to number 37 in the world in reading and math. Why inner city kids can’t go to the same schools as the Obama kids? That soft bigotry is really behind our failure to educate the poor. And then tell her who not only benefits the most from this dependency and ignorance but the real truth that they designed it to be this way on purpose so asking them to take responsibility for it is a joke.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 3, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
While the Wall Street Journal editorial page can always be counted on to cheerlead the flat-earth economics of the Republican Party,
on occasion the paper’s reporters contradict GOP orthodoxy. And so it is today on the subject of the Obama stimulus package. Just one day after Eric Cantor (R-VA) followed the lead of John Boehner and Newt Gingrich in calling the recovery program a “failure,”
the Journal’s Deborah Solomon reported otherwise in a piece simply titled, “U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus.”
Posted by: Newsman | September 3, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Are you smarter than a Fifth Grader? The answer is pretty obvious from what I’ve read in the blogsphere. To start, what explanation will the parent’s who force their children to stay home offer to those children? What can they say, other than the President of the United States can’t talk to you if I’m not there because he can’t be trusted. He’s the President of the United States of America and he can’t be trusted to encourage our children to excel!
Gee, it must have seemed like a good idea at the time. It’s not possible to hit every single school in the country and chat, read a story, so why not use technology. Why not also make it easier for teachers; make up a lesson plan that they can use, adjust or discard if they so choose. Speaking of that lesson plan, the part that seems to really generate some ire is “why is important to listen to (elected officials). I’m going out on a limb here, but could it be important to listen so that if one disagrees with what one hears, then those elected officials can be contacted? Those elected officials can be defeated at the polls, you know, a lesson in democracy!
Those who choose to keep their children at home will I hope, protest and protest loudly if the mayor of their city or their congressperson or ANY elected official comes to school for any reason whatsoever; to give a speech, to present an award, to dedicate a learning center, to work in the cafeteria, to read a story. Do not allow it, have your children call you to come and get them if it’s attempted.
How could President Obama know that this too would become a political football, used by those who oppose his policies? Yes, perhaps he should have known. It’s a sad state of affairs but apparently those who want to regain power know their base audience and just how easy it is to manipulate that audience…like shooting fish in a barrel.
Posted by: quincy | September 3, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Mental illness is spreading rapidly through the conservative community. These jerks have gone berserk over the fact that a black liberal was able to win the election for President of the United States over poor, old Johnny McSame by such a large margin (364 to 173 electoral votes). I’ve always been aware of an underlying ignorance that affects a minority of Americans (mostly from the south) out on the far right wing. But, what I didn’t realize was the depth of their stupidity. These people belong back in the Dark Ages as they have lost any grasp of reality that they may have possessed. Unfortunately, these idiots are trying to make sure their children are raised with the same degree of ignorance that infects their mentality. They will fail as intelligence always wins over ignorance in the long run.
Posted by: caliguy55 | September 3, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
what I don’t understand is this, every time the WH gets called on something and they “change” whatever it was they were called on, the left still defends them. When the WH “changes” something it is because they were wrong the first time not because a few “right wing racists” are spreading fear and lies! They lie, get caught, change their story and the left fall all over themselves trying to talk america into believing Obama and his admin. are honest and honorable. Man it must be nice to be so blind. Maybe not…..
Posted by: rose | September 3, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
These people belong back in the Dark Ages as they have lost any grasp of reality that they may have possessed.
Posted by: caliguy55
no one in the dark ages knew any better..
these nut jobs have the whole world at their fingertips info wise and they still chose to remain stupid….
Obama said: ‘they take pride in their own ignorance’
truer words were never spoken
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Left wing mantra “Obama said it so it must be true”
Posted by: rose | September 3, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Posted by: rose
the difference is that Dems, can make mistakes, and try to correct them….
Repubs, are dogmatic and would rather run America into the ground (which they did) than admit they made a mistake which is why Repubs keep repeating the same nonsense politically
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
And the bots play the smear card—–when Obama is snagged harassing kids about how they plan on supporting him, and forcing kids to deal with liberal teachers of Obama Groupism…..you know a long standard fascist/communist brainwashing technique to indoctrinate children. Obama has no business harassing kids—good thing people are watching to slow Obama down, but how stupid it would be to continue to try indoctrinate kids on Tuesday—obama will try (he is just that stupid.)
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 3, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Right wing mantra: It’s on Fox so it’s pure truth.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
School children never should be subjected to viewing a movie from the president. Tax payer dollars are paying the salary of the teacher to conduct class in learning the necessary subjects that will advance them with the knowledge to go on to higher learning. The president works for this nation and ALL THE PEOPLE. We have a two party system for a reason–to keep checks and balances on each party to inhibit the power of one over the other. Parents have every right to object to an outside influence coming into the class and conducting a session that has nothing to do with educational subjects. It is the parents job to encourage their children to do well in school. We already know that Obama has Czars that are, in some cases, bearers of communistic ideas and beliefs. We are AMERICANS and very much want to stay free, not socialists, and not communists.
Posted by: Joan | September 3, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Are the children at Sidwell Friends going to be treated to this public service announcement or is this just for the peons?
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 3, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
outside influence coming into the class
Posted by: Joan
yes… the president of the united states
is an ‘outside influence’….
lemmings to the sea they are
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
All hail BO….. nothing like a presidential infomercial….. spreading his socialist view of the world..
Posted by: Vet1973 | September 3, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Are the children at Sidwell Friends going to be treated to this public service announcement or is this just for the peons?
Posted by: Ferrari5858
why don’t you call up the main office and ask if you’re so concerned…. I hear they have telephones that allow people to speak from far distances….
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
apparently alot of people no longer trust this president. if you dont trust someone would you let them talk to your kids? didnt think so. i thought bill clinton did a decent job as a president but i certanainly would never let him talk to my kids, especially my daughters.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
apparently alot of people no longer trust this president
Posted by: catman
‘alot of people?
20, 40,
‘apparently’
love those hard facts
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
tj….47% approval. the trust has been abused. the benefit of doubt is gone.there is anger stemming from being duped in november.enough talk and cheap platitude speeches….create a job please.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Posted by: catman
and next month the % may be up, it may be down.. only after 4 years will we know the ‘real’ %
Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
tj…very true. i wish he would come over to the middle as there are too many things to accomplish. all politicians read way too much in their perceived mandates…bush did it and obama followed suit. all i can tell you is everywhere i go all i hear is the president and pelosi tried to pull a fast one and got caught. trust is a hard thing to get back.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I cannot let these ignorant liberal comments go unchallenged. It is so disgusting to see how the liberals constantly scream “RACISM” every time someone disagrees with Obama! That in and of itself is the zenith of ignoranace! They can’t argue the points nor can they let their “dear leader” stand on his own merit so they dumb down the arguement by always twisting it into racism. How in the world is that considered intelligent and open minded? The liberals love to paint themselves as the compassionate, free thinkers of our society. Yet the liberals very actions and comments reveal their true hypocritical nature. They speak of having an open mind yet they reveal that their mind is actually closed to any idea that is not their own. They speak of tolerance and acceptance yet their hatered for anything conservative eats them up so much that they resort to name calling and character assassination. That’s what ignorant people do. When they can’t open their mind and consider all aspects of an arguement and when they feel defeat, they resort to name calling and character assassination and twisting the arguement into something that it isn’t. Now of course there are racist people out there, DUH! But they wil also continue to be irrelevent in these arguements because they don’t bring anything to the table either except their own ignorant comments. You liberals look like a bunch of sheep ‘down there’ aimlessly wondering around while you wait for your “dear leader” to tell you what to do next because you cannot think for yourselves. I completely disagree with this political move by Obama. This reaks of Kim Jong Il or Stalin. He is wrapping his warped ideals up in a nice little package that looks like a pep rally for education. But we all know he is really trying to get to our kids while they are young and impressionable and while their parents are not around to interfere with Obama’s brainwashing. Obama has polarized this country worse than Bush ever could have done in 4 or 5 terms. But the liberal drones will continue to prop him up by screaming racist at every person who disagrees with him, as if just becasue he is black he is some kind of perfect god and can do no wrong. Gosh you people are just mindless drones and I will never forgive any of you for giving Obama an opportunity to destroy this country and create a socialist paradise that takes from me and gives to the welfare crowd. “Equality through poverty” is where we are headed.
Posted by: Praxis | September 3, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
tj the stimulus, cap and trade , health care, the harvard profeesor gig and VAN whatever the czars name is, have hurt obamas credibility. i want the country to succeed so that means obama needs to be successful. the company he keeps may need to revamped.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
jhw, the Washington Post of October 3, 1991:
“The Democratic critics accused [Bush] of turning government money for education to his own political use, namely, an ongoing effort to inoculate himself against their charges of inattention to domestic issues. The speech at Alice Deal Junior High School, broadcast live on radio and television, urged students to study hard, avoid drugs and turn in troublemakers.”
This info was very easy to find on Google.
Posted by: mad | September 3, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
jhw, regarding your claim that the left didn’t complain about George H. W. Bush doing exactly the same thing:
“The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students,” House Majority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said. “And the president should be doing more about education than saying, ‘Lights, camera, action.’ ”
Gephardt was Majority Leader and a Democrat. That made him a pretty important lefty who objected to the president speaking to school children.
Posted by: mad | September 3, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
jhw, here’s another lefty who objected to the president’s speech to school children in 1991:
“Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo.), chairwoman of the Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families, said it was outrageous for the White House to “start using precious dollars for campaigns” when “we are struggling for every silly dime we can get” for education programs.”
Posted by: mad | September 3, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Of course the right wing is screaming. The President is promoting EDUCATION! They had no issue when tucked in Ronald Reagan’s addresses he also promoted his tax cuts! What does a little kid need to know about that for?
Posted by: Try the truth | September 3, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
the right wing isnt screaming…they are merely leveling the playing field and using the dems own tactics. its so much harder being in charge isnt it?its alot easier to be the minority party and take pot shots at the majority.i ve listened to it for 6 of the last 8 years.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
JHW, it appears that the Democrat chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee also had a problem with the president’s speech in 1991:
“Two House committees demanded that the department explain the use of its funds for the speech, an explanation that Deputy Secretary David T. Kearns provided late in the day in a letter to Rep. William D. Ford (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee. Education Secretary Lamar Alexander was out of town.”
It appears that very powerful democrats were very unhappy with the republicans president’s speech to school children back in 1991.
Posted by: mad | September 3, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
It`s time for impeachment proceedings. Unload the Socialist!
Posted by: Roy Patterson | September 3, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Looks like some reporters should have paid more attention in school– I’m sure the letter was sent to “principals,” not principles.”
Posted by: JR | September 3, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
There’s a nice clip in internetworld of Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe dissing the hyperventilated reaction to Obama’s education address. He says, “Seriously, why don’t we want the president of the United States, any president of the United States, delivering the message to kids: work hard, stay in school, succeed?” He added, “Get your ratings if you want, you’re just screwing your political party.” (likely to conservative radio and television talk show hosts?)
Posted by: Alyson | September 3, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
What an ignorant notion that BO is a socialist. The bailout for the banks and car companies was not his idea or caused by his policies. There is no evidence of socialism. The fact that he want to provide health care for the poor does not make him a socialist. But for all those people who would say let the poor die like dogs – we won’t help our neighbors – what do they call people like that ? Republicans.
Posted by: listener | September 3, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Interesting that the main stream author of this articledoesn’t smell the whiff of propaganda here.
If they wanted to do a nice job for the kids they would have him answer questions about recess, bullying, drugs, and achievement.
Instead they will have to be indoctrinated in global this and that, nationalized Socialist medicine, and feel good platitudes designed to incite class envy and higher taxes.
Great job
your highness
Posted by: Barry Soetoro | September 3, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Will I be “scared” to have my children hear “socialistic dogma” telling them that they ought work hard in school, not skip classes or drop out, that they should behave in school and do their homework — to set goals for themselves that everyone, including the kids themselves, their teachers and their parents, can agree are noble? Least terrifying of all of all would be a message telling my children to use their God-given brains to THINK!
I might be inclined to keep my kid out of school though, if I were a parent who taught them otherwise.
Posted by: Ena Wason | September 3, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
What a great opportunity to further your child’s learning by asking your kid the same questions you are asking yourself right now. Isn’t that supposed to be the point anyway? Ask them what they think about it!
Posted by: Educator | September 3, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
why would the president have to tell kids to work hard? wheres mom and dad?also why should kids work hard in obama world?if they do they will have to pay the taxes that others dont.personally i dont care as i want my kids exposed to all kinds info but i have to say enough speeches. he speaks so much no one listens any more.
Posted by: catman | September 3, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
The same right wingers screaming about indoctrination having been demanding school prayer for years.
Just more sickening hypocrisy.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
It is fine to teach your children to work hard, get good grades, be good people, etc. but the lesson plan that was sent out was not all about the children, it was about what they think of his speech, how does he inspire them, what was their favorite quote. It specificly says read books about the president of the united states and past presidents and about Barack Obama. This is a lesson plan to be handed out to 4 to 13 year olds. Why on earth would you have children answer this things that are then supposed to be turned in and grade by the teachers?
Posted by: honey92345 | September 3, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
“There’s a nice clip in internetworld of Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe dissing the hyperventilated reaction to Obama’s education address. He says, “Seriously, why don’t we want the president of the United States, any president of the United States, delivering the message to kids: work hard, stay in school, succeed?” He added, “Get your ratings if you want, you’re just screwing your political party.” (likely to conservative radio and television talk show hosts?)”
A few of the adults on the right are speaking up.
The problem is they are far outnumbered by the lunatics.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Did anyone bother to proof this article before it was published? A grade of “D” for Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller. Here we are talking about the pros and cons of the Presedent’s little talk to school children and the article is full of spelling and other errors. Get it together.
Posted by: gary pierce | September 3, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
“It specificly says read books about the president of the united states and past presidents and about Barack Obama”
OMG!
Learning about our past presidents!
The horror!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Obama, you should have left in the bit about the kids helping you, because your going to need all the help you can get. You are wasting your time trying to change the public opinion of your socialist agenda. As soon as the people caught wind of it, your pole numbers went straight in the tank. Also, why do you pay attorneys to conceal the release of your personal background information. What are you trying to hide. The leftist spin doctors in the media and the social drones that support you have not investigated this issue fully.
Posted by: Spawn44 | September 3, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Ryan C, Actually yeah, especially for a 5 year old. Leave these books for kids in high school not elementary school. My 6 year old does not need to hear about how the current president was a drug user. And notice that it mentions reading about him twice and of course by name. Hmm wonder why?
Posted by: honey92345 | September 3, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Several things that the article and statements behind mention bother me.
1. There is a huge difference in the 2 statements, “What I can do to help the president” and “How I can achieve my short and long term goals”
2. Other questions in the workbook include things such as “If the president was going to give another speech, what should he say and who should he say it to” are subjects brought up in a focus group that candidates and elected officials use to prepare them for upcoming elections.
3. As a parent, I like to know what my children are learning, hearing and seeing. I have my own views but I try and make sure that my children know as much info so they can decide what they think is right.
4. I don’t understand why a president that likes to be heard and seen as much as Obama does would not make it common knowledge to parents of America that he was going to broadcast his speech live. Why not tape it and let parents decide what they think before a million conclusions could be jumped on.
5. I will agree that it is ridiculous that Obama would use this opportunity to teach our children about this policies. Not many kids in the k5-12th grade range know much of anything about the policies and probably do not much care either.
6. On the other hand, I can see where people would be led to believe that Obama is using the opportunity to keep himself in the children’s eyes. Maintaining a familiar face for the next election.
7. As a parent, I do not need a president to help challenge my children. I do that myself as it is part of my job as a parent.
8. If the president was going to call on students, PARENTS and educators, then why leave the parents out of the loop?
9. Some Democrats object to the whole speech and all that is talked about is the whacko right.
10. Not all Republicans are right wing whackos. Just like not all Democrats are not left wing whackos. America could be a lot closer to “unity” if politicians and the media would stop demonizing both sides.
11. I am tired of hearing the racism theme interjected constantly by certain parties. I know of a child who was told by an adult that they must be racist because their parents had a McCain sticker on their car. Way too far! I have taught my kids that there is no difference between races. We should all be looked at as people. It is hard for understand why someone will want to think that they are racist just because of their color. It is even harder for them to understand given that we have “mixed” relationships in our family.
12. Lastly, the reporter who wrote this piece was either in a hurry or did not pay attention to the English portion of his studies. Multiple spelling and grammatical errors. HA HA
Posted by: KP | September 3, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
And in the latest display of empathy from the left…
air america has posted a snarky piece about the guy who had his finger bitten off entitled “Anti-Reform Protester Forced To Use Government Insurance”.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
air america has posted a snarky piece about the guy who had his finger bitten off entitled “Anti-Reform Protester Forced To Use Government Insurance”.”
Yeah poor guy.
All he did was punch someone in the face and knock them down then stick his finger in their face.
Right wingers cowards apparently prefer to sucker punch.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
YOU WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT THE PRESIDENT WOULD HAVE LEARNED SOMETHING WHEN HE USED AN ELEVEN YEAR OLD CHILD AS A “PLANT” TO TRASH THE OPPOSITION. NOW HE IS GOING TO USE EVERY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENT IN THE COUNTRY AS HIS POLITICAL PAWN. SO WONDERFUL. PERHAPS OBAMA CAN ALSO USE MARK LLOYD, THE LATEST CHAVEZ LOVING COMMIE ON THE FCC BOARD.
THE GUY WITH THE POLITICAL SIGN SURLY WAS RIGHT, “AND THE NIGHTMARE BEGINS.”
Posted by: Manitu | September 3, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I’m sick of hearing all youse commie pinko meatheads protesting about what’s wrong with our great country….listen and listen good…..AMERICA – Love it or Leave it!!!!
What’s that? Youse commie pinko meathead protesters are Republicans???? Sorry, never mind.
Posted by: Archie Bunker | September 3, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Multiple spelling and grammatical errors. HA HA
Posted by: KP
you should be careful going there after 8 years of ‘W’ and Bush speak…… I mean really
Posted by: + or - | September 3, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Wow!!!. A smart well educated pesident telling kids to studt hard and stay in school…..what is this world coming to when kids are encouraged to self-actualize. For those who wrote hypocritical statements abot BO’s speech, that would mean your kids realizing the “best” versions of themselves. Right wingers have a deep seated hatred for this president and I don’t believe for a second it has anything to do with jis policies. The financial crisis didn’t just start, unemployment didn’t just start to rise, the housing crisis didn’t just start, the wars didn’t just start….in other words you had EIGHT!!! count them EIGHT!!! years to complain and you said nothing. We had the village idiot in office for eight years and conservatives were fine with that, but stop the presses; we now have a smart president that actually kknows and exemplifies what statemenship is. I won’t sit here and bash America for the ranting of some of its lowest common denominators.
Posted by: Ken in Atlanta | September 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Obama will no doubt go down in history as the President that was dambed if he did and dambed if he didn’t. Back when I was in school it would have been an honor to have the POTUS speak to us, and if he said something my parents didn’t agree with, they’d have told me different when I got home that day, it’s as simple as that.
Posted by: Paula | September 3, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Ken in Atlanta: Will you please quit making so much sense? You’re disrupting the balance.
Posted by: Paula | September 3, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
all the fearful parents should take their kids out of school and keep them home….. why would you want your kids going to socialized american schools anyways, teach them yourself, stay home from work, they’re your kids…
pay for them to be in private schools….. if it’s such a burden on your family life to hear the President, put your kids somewhere else…..
make sure they have their gun and bible handy
Posted by: 007 | September 3, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
There is a huge difference in the 2 statements, “What I can do to help the president” and “How I can achieve my short and long term goals”
Absolutely 2 different statements. If you lefties can’t figure that out you are illiterate. I have no problem with the later question or him speaking to school children. As long as he sticks to education and not promotion.
Posted by: julie | September 3, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
julie, I see the difference. I just pretty much figure they meant it in context to helping the President by doing well in school, etc. Not well said, but not intended to suck brains out of school children. However, I understand the paranoid right is going to see something else.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
We are keeping are kids out of school that day!!!
The only question that I am asking myself is if Obama’s address will have subliminal messages. Maybe it will say, “I’m unqualified to be President” when played backwards.
Posted by: Two See | September 3, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
The White House now admits that one of the lessons plans surrounding the speech was written clumsily, subjecting it to misinterpretation, and had to be re-written.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 3, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Ryan C, You really should try for an intelligent response. There were numerous problems with the lesson plans as his own people are admitting. Of course, they are say “inartfully written” which means they DO want to tell children to help him further his ideas but just not so blatantly.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 3, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Nothing was written “inartfully.” We as a nation just aren’t softened up enough to simply accept such nonsense as “how may we serve the President.” Especially when the question is aimed at encouraging the worship in schools that has been rampant since the Inauguration. There is absolutely no reason why his election should be considered more important than any other.
Unless you’re a racist who only sees his color.
Posted by: Eyes Open | September 3, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Well honey, For one thing this gig has been pulled before. A few times. The right has scared the people that the left was a Commie. And a person that was truly thinking for themselves wouldn’t be so concerned about this, nor assume.
Posted by: secondlook | September 3, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
So SECONDLOOK lefty I’m sure you would be alright if it was Bush using the same questions. Doubt it.
Anyway I’m not suggesting that he’s looking to brainwash. Obviously I’m not a fan of Obama. I would just like him to change the tone. That’s all. Bag on me all you want.
Posted by: julie | September 3, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Well honey, For one thing this gig has been pulled before. A few times. The right has scared the people that the left was a Commie. And a person that was truly thinking for themselves wouldn’t be so concerned about this, nor assume.
Posted by: secondlook | Sep 3, 2009 8:06:09 PM
Well, seeing as you aren’t listing examples of the other times this has happened I can only comment on what is happening now. As I have researched the lesson plans and read the letter that the ED sent out to the school principals, I can honestly say I have assumed nothing.
Posted by: honey92345 | September 3, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Paula, I agree. These people just make so upset because they know as well do that it has nothing to do with his policies. Like I said, we had the village idiot in office for eight years and they were fine with that. The right claims that BO wants to indoctrinate…..what would you call fighting like hell to keep prayers, Christain payers, in schools. Would that not be indoctrination? This is why I call them hypocrites. Of course they will say it’s different, it always is when a republican does it. Bush 1 asctually discussed policies with students, where was the outrade. Wasn’t that SOCIALISM? That is the new buzz word this season. Personally I think it’s code for what you really want to say. I just don’t see the justification for such so called outrage when we had eight years of dead soldiers in an unjust war, eight years of giving to the rich (by the way how has that worked in terms of creating jobs with unemployment higher than before), eight years of deregulation, eight years of warrentless wiretaps on AMERICANS, eight years of failed foreign policy, eight years of energizing our enemies while straining our relationships with allies. I just don’t see how that wouldn’t have bothered you but a guy whose been in ofice barely eight months is compared to Hitler. No dice. I may be young but I was raised by parents with strong values and was taught if it doesn’t ring true….then it more thank likely isn’t. All I ask is be real and state your own truth and stop hiding behind lies to justify you position.
Posted by: Ken fromAtlanta | September 3, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
“which means they DO want to tell children to help him further his ideas but just not so blatantly.”
The paranoia of the right wing would be much funnier if I knew it was not going to lead to right wing violence.
And right now the right wing sounds like it did in 94-95 so its only a matter of time before another right wing nut does more than just shoot up a church or museum as bad as those violent acts were.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
I just find it amazing that virtually everything that comes from this admistration is “misinterpreted” or “doesn’t mean what it says” or “they didn’t say it as well as they should have”. These are intelligent people who can’t seem to articulate what they really mean…or are they actually saying what they mean & when it doesn’t go over they way they want, they back-pedal?
Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 3, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
First of all, if Bush had tried to do this the outrage from the left would be deafing. Second, the President addressing schoolchildren seems innocuous but it does remind one of totalitarian governments. And it is not just this address that has people concerned. We have the White House using children to get their parents to fill out the census forms. There will be a week of lessons at the beginning of the year. Then there is the “I Pledge” video that has been shown in some schools. Among the pledges are “I pledge to be of service to Barack Obama”, “to be a servant to our President and all mankind”. It does not matter if the other pledges are non- political. Those 2 sentences are disturbing.
If you take all three of these things together it is very troubling.
Posted by: Laura | September 3, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Yes it is very disappointing our culture doesnt respect the highest position in the land and ENCOURAGING their kids to be disrespectful too!!!! On top of that, keeping the kids home! What a bunch of LOSER parents….talking about political BS….maybe these parents need to take a chill pill!
Posted by: chicagocitizen | September 3, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
007 “why would you want your kids going to socialized american schools anyways, teach them yourself, stay home from work, they’re your kids…
pay for them to be in private schools….. if it’s such a burden on your family life to hear the President, put your kids somewhere else…..
make sure they have their gun and bible handy”
I do pay for them to go to private school and our Bibles and Guns are very handy. Thanks!
Posted by: Ms. B | September 3, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | Sep 3, 2009 7:45:44 PM
We are keeping are kids out of school that day!!!
The only question that I am asking myself is if Obama’s address will have subliminal messages. Maybe it will say, “I’m unqualified to be President” when played backwards.
__________________________________
Bwahahahahahaahaha!!!!
Posted by: Ms. B | September 3, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Does anyone else get a weird feeling from that last quote? I feel that a kind of I, Robot situation coming on…
Posted by: Amber | September 3, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
uhh, what is lost in all the chatter is the congress and the president are supposed to serve…. you guessed it, US!!!!!!!!!!! not the reverse. Leaders serve the people, not themselves. Every SINGLE one of them need to go. They all serve themselves first, just objectively look at what they do. They never take a stand that is unpopular, even if it is the right thing to do. Obama, never should have been a nominee, let alone president. Gore? Seriously, only serves himself. Pelosi? can you say private jets at OUR expense? barney frank, Chris Dodd, and the latest one who got caught, Rangle. None of these scumbags currently in office, all 537 of them have put you and i above themselves. leaders serve, us, all of us. These guys just serve themselves. We need to let them pursue other opportunities as they come up for re-election. heck, they can serve themselves at mcdonalds.
Posted by: Todd | September 3, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Worst. President. Ever.
Most. Incompetent. Administration. Ever.
Posted by: horn | September 3, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Geez, its bad that the schools aren’t even safe from propaganda.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 4, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Obama can’t help himself—-his ego and his need to be a bananna republic dictator is strong. My bet is he will be saying really bizarre self serving nonsense on Tuesday that we will all be reading about next week.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 4, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Gee, I remember Al Gore addressing a large group of children to help him push his “Global Warming” agenda, because the children knew better than the parents, that the Earth needed to “Go Green” to save the human race, oh and help make Al a little richer. I know Obama would never circumvent parents teachings on “Service to this Nation”.
Posted by: John R. | September 4, 2009, 5:31 am 5:31 am
This is heartbreaking. At what point did demonizing the President to schoolchildren become okay? What next, banning Civics lessons for suggesting government might occasionally be a force for good?
I remember Presidential addresses as a schoolkid. They were an event, and the Presidency was something to aspire to. I’m sickened that parents seem to feel it’s totally okay to prevent the guy from talking about staying in school just because they don’t like some of his unrelated policy.
I mean, what do you say to people who are perfectly willing to tell their children that the President is some sort of bogeyman. They’ve abandoned democracy because they didn’t like the result. Can you reason with someone like that? Someone who is cheerfully throwing an unpatriotic fit?
Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2009, 5:40 am 5:40 am
To Grace,
Grace, ***ANY*** president who asks its citizens to make a pledge to his personal leadership rather than to their COUNTRY and its constitutional foundation is EVIL. It matters NOT who that president is, or what he stands for – up to and including our most conservative presidents: Ronald Reagan and G.W. Bush. PLEDGE to NO MAN OR WOMAN holding *ANY* OFFICE IN THIS COUNTRY.
Any student of history would immediately that this was exactly how Adolf Hitler rose to power and murdered not only 6 million Jews but anyone who even WHISPERED against Hitler. Any lack of support for Hitler was teason, punishable by death and it took Germany a long time to see how evil their leader really was.
Presidential addresses are fine – at HOME – but not as school propoganda. Obama is a SOCIALIST, m’dear. Do you not understand what that means?
Posted by: Vicki | September 4, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
This manufactured debate by right wing shock jocks is really scaring me away from the Republican party. When did the right wing shock jocks take over the party and control the debate. This debate seems petty and nutty to anyone who has actually read the agenda of the speech and the proposed lesson plans. When they asked “what can you do to help the President” it was obviously about helping the President achieve the goasl of getting kids to stay in school. I have held office in the Republican party and voted Republican, but I have to say that the takeover of the party by the right wing shock jocks embarasses me and make the party look petty and crazy. The party is only being hurt by this — Republicans are seeming to get crazier and crazier.
Posted by: RachelM | September 4, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Wanna know why the White House is asking students to write letters about how to help the president?
It’s because we elected a know-nothing who in now so desperate, that he’s asking OUR KIDS for advice!
Posted by: Just Sayin' | September 4, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
BTW, if Obama wants to pass Health Care, he could just relabel it “Mental Health Care for Liberals”. What Republican (or any other sane person) wouldn’t vote for that?
Posted by: Just Sayin' | September 4, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
To “Vicki”
The United States has operated on principles of social democracy since the Great Depression. It’s the opposite of fascism.
Trying to make the two appear similar is disingenuous.
Posted by: Alan | September 4, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
As a teacher, this is the first time I have ever heard of a President addressing students during the day…although there are districts out there that don’t have the technology to show the address, I come from a district with some of the most advanced technology available including its own TV station and closed curcuit system, yet I have never heard of such an address. In a time when we allow students to sit by and boycott saying the Pledge every morning, why would we force them to watch a message from the President that is so in love with himself that he gets in front of the camera when ever he can. Is he so desperate to win over the adults who can read through his plan, that now he has to enlist our children? Shock jocks aside, our voters need to be smarter than this on their own…don’t believe everything infront of you and what ever you do learn that you can’t believe everything your kids come home and tell you!
Posted by: Teacher Extraordinaire | September 4, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“As a teacher, this is the first time I have ever heard of a President addressing students during the day…”
So, Teacher Extraordinaire, ahem, are you saying that Reagan and Bush Sr. gave their speeches at night? I’m confused.
Posted by: Confused | September 4, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Ms. B says:
“We are keeping are kids out of school that day!!!”
I fear that the apples won’t be falling very far from that erudite tree….
Posted by: KJ | September 4, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
The firestorm of controversy is another way for Mr. Limbaugh to earn his $38 million a year salary. His candidate didn’t win, so invent reasons to hate each other. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have all people working together for the good of the country? sorry was that a socialist idea?
Posted by: Joyce | September 4, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
they’re already helping him by paying for his HUGE budget, for many years to come!
Posted by: det | September 4, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
A private personal army of his own to control and do with as he wishes? As strong as our American Military? Sounds like what was done before in Germany. Start with the “children” before they have their own ideas. Turn in their parents if they differ from Obama’s ideas.
That’s pretty scary. Control the teachers, and therefore control the students. Do it “for the children”.
Posted by: RowleyAmerican | September 5, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I cannot believe this is an issue. As a Canadian living in the US with elementary school children I believe that your President deserves far more respect than this. Last week my children spent 90 mins watching a Disney movie in class. Was this a good use of educational time? Did this motivate or inspire them? Only to want to go to the toy store to by the toys. It is the job of our leaders to inspire the youth of our country. Is is such a bad thing that your children may become interested in politics? Look up to their President and become inspired? There are far more issues that should concern the parents of school aged children and teens, with regards to what they learn in schools. Afraid that the President will ‘brainwash’ your children..in 20 mins? Believe in your children. They are smarter than you think, and maybe even smarter than you. This debate could spark a revolution among teenagers who may be insulted by their parent’s seemingly lack of confidence in their ability to listen and learn critically.
Maybe these parents who are against their children listing to this speech need to understand this..when the President of the US, and leader of the free world speaks (on any topic), the whole world listens, so too should you and your children. Make ‘informed’ decisions.
Posted by: Canadians in USA | September 5, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
I think this should be addressed to all families homes and let children and parents watch it together, and be able to discuss issues as they come up which are important to their particular situation. Or not watch it at all, if they so choose. As a parent of 4 grown children, I would be very interested in what he has to say and I have no way to listen as an adult who took part in the voting process of his election. The cliche “it takes a village to raise a child”, but we need to know what they are being told and taught. AIR IT ON THE NEWS CHANNELS
Posted by: Donna | September 5, 2009, 2:30 am 2:30 am
And New York students don’t start school until WEDNESDAY, so how do they benefit if this is so important?
Posted by: Donna | September 5, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
gee. …..was it only last year that the left was demonizing Pres. BUSH?? AT LEAST HE KEPT US SAFE. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE TRAINING CAMP IN SOUTH FLA. THAT THE GOVT. HAS? I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS. MAYBE HE WAS LOOKING FOR RECRUITS
Posted by: alice | September 5, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am
No CONFUSED, I am not saying anything about Reagan and Nixon…I am saying that I was in school during Nixon and teaching during Reagan’s terms and I never saw a presentation during the day to students…our schools never showed them! We did constructive educational things during the school day…We never had Sex Ed classes, etc. OUR presidents had better things to do than pose for school students…
Posted by: Teacher Extraordinaire | September 5, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
He is trying to encourage YOUR children to Stay in school and go to college….Become an awesome member of Society!! I love how you say that he’s going to brain wash them yet you’re the ones telling them he’s bad and making up their minds for them. If you don’t like him that’s fine, I hated bush but still respected him as a president. Show some respect and give your children the benefit of a doubt, they deserve better and let them make up their own minds. Focus on protecting them from drugs and criminals not a speech from the President of the United States.
Thank you Canadian MOM….They waste almost 2 hours showing them movies…we can do that at home..About time a president is all about pushing schools to focus on education and set goals for it’s students and teach students how to also do it for themselves.
Posted by: SM | September 5, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
This whole things is a big double standard. It’s OK for a Republican president to addressed a national audience of students and toot his horn and push his political position but it’s not ok for Obama to tell students to stay in school?
You guys are hypocrits.
On November 14, 1988, President Reagan addressed and took questions from students from four area middle schools in the Old Executive Office Building. The speech was broadcast live and rebroadcast by C-Span, and Instructional Television Network fed the program “to schools nationwide on three different days.”
In his speech to students and the question and answer session following Reagan
1. stressed the importance of low taxes and free trade. Next he
2. stressed the importance of religion in our nation.
3 touted the economic achievements of his administration ,
4.put in a plug for the line item veto,
5. told the students that lowering taxes increases revenue
6. boasted of his administrations aid to Negro colleges
7. and told students that if guns were banned, burglars would be “celebrating forevermore”
Go ahead. Read Reagan’s entire Televised speech to the students here at the Ronald Regan Presidential Library archives.
Posted by: Norris Hall | September 5, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
I am saddened by the uproar over Pres. Obama’s speech to school children. So many people whom I have heard oppose this, do so on the basis that it is the parent’s job to teach politics. I am a teacher. Many parents of our kids are working 3-4 jobs to feed them. Some have dads or moms in prison. These children are happy to come to school where they get attention. They enjoy the instruction they receive. These children can’t help the fact that parents aren’t there to instruct and help them. Good teachers know that teaching is about much more than content instruction. It is often about character-building. Right or wrong, that is reality. This must be done to insure a stable democratic future for our nation!
One teacher I know who favors the President’s speech told me that out of a school of 800, only 3 parents volunteered to help at the beginning of school. The number of parents at her school who are raising their voices over the speech are incredibly more.
President Obama has the responsibility of serving all Americans. Parents who are blessed to be able to spend evenings around the table having discussion with their children, who have the technology to watch a Presidential address with their children, who have an option of the most up-to-date schools which are located in elite neighborhoods have a greater responsibility to our country. “To whom much has been given, much is required.” My prayer is that these privileged will look beyond their families and do what is best for our country. I pray that they will teach their children to have compassion, to listen and understand others, to make their own decisions — not simply adopt the opinions of their parents.
My children were educated in Austria, a socialist country. They attended national Austrian schools. We were Baptist missionaries, but they attended mandatory catholic religious instruction. I didn’t agree with this doctrine, but we had great relationships with the teachers. They played sports in teams organized by political parties, which did not represent my point of view. My sons are well-rounded, good citizens and good parents. Surprisingly, they do not necessarily have the same political views as their parents. They tend to be more conservative, but I am so proud of them. We did what we could. Thankfully, we were able to discuss things to which they were exposed, and we trusted them to the Lord. They are well-rounded, creative-thinking, good parents.
Maybe we got lucky, but their childhood education did not corrupt them. I think it gave them great strength and character.
Posted by: Glebrown | September 5, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
No president, democrat or republican, black or white, conservative or liberal, liked or hated, should be delivering speeches to children without their parents present, just for the sake of the parents who may oppose the president.
Posted by: zarb | September 5, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
What’s it gonna take to open peoples hearts and eyes. Rep or dem the gov. keeps us fighting while the keep getting richer and the middle class is disappearng.
What it comes down to is greed . It is human nature to be greedy. When we learn that if you have 3 of something keep 1 to use 1 for a spare and share the last one. Once we overcome greed we can free the world . Oh no I’d better quit posting before someone comes to arrest me for being a commie!
Posted by: Judy | September 5, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
maybe his address to school kids is a request to borrow the money it will take to pay for his big-government programs.
Posted by: right..... | September 5, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Canadian mom—you object to your children being shown 90 minutes of Disney movies? Then get in there and object!
You say “Believe in your children. They are smarter than you think, and maybe even smarter than you. This debate could spark a revolution among teenagers who may be insulted by their parent’s seemingly lack of confidence in their ability to listen and learn critically.” Did they learn any critical thinking of the Disney movie? No, they wanted toys. YOU should be the one to encourage your children in school, you should be the one talking to your children about politics when the time is right, you should be the one to help your child be an ‘awesome member of society’
This is not an innocent encouragement speech–there are lessons plans given to the teachers. Haven’t they already gotten their plans made? As RowleyAmerican said:::That’s pretty scary. Control the teachers, and therefore control the students. Do it “for the children”.
This is not disrespecting the President, this is objecting to his politics and agenda. It is a move to market ‘brand Obama’ to our young people.
It’s wrong
Posted by: birdlover | September 5, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
As a survivor of years of indoctrinations of a “socialist” regime in former Czechoslovakia I get the shivers over this. We spent countless hours worshiping the presidents etc. of that country and Soviet Union. We also wrote letters and poems on behalf of those dear commrades of ours. This reminds me so much of growing up under an oppressive regime of people who thought they knew better than us and our parents.They also pulled wool over our eyes, thinking we had been all just idiots, they also had been saying that the “burgeois revisionists” amongst us did not understand the importance of those changes. They sold the simple workers “change” as well.
Can’t Americans see where this Babrak Obama is taking us?!?
I am so scared for America! We’ve had it good for too long, and we forgot how good we’ve had it,
so we are now toying with socialist ideas. Wake up America!!! Before it is too late.
Posted by: Milan H | September 5, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Canadian mom made several excellent points including a simple show of respect for the President. As a fourth grade teacher I can attest to the fact that our youth struggle to read and write and that it will take a collective will to excellence to drive us up out of the pit of mediocrity into which our fascination with entertainment and materialism has consigned us. The President is exhibiting appropriate leadership by exhorting and encouraging students who now rank very far down the list in the world in math and reading. Many of the world’s citizens speak better English than our own children. Everyone has an agenda including those who are using this as an opportunity to advance their own with absurd and fear-driven commentary. Suddenly America is worried about what their children will hear in this speech? In that case, we had better examine at our society from start to finish.
Posted by: nan | September 6, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Hi, Tuesday, out President is going to be speaking at my High School. Personally, I think its a great he is going to be speaking there and I see nothing wrong with it at all. And no, I am not a Democrat, I am in fact a Republican.
Posted by: Wakefield Student | September 6, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
If “anybody” wants to address my child, and I dont care “who” it is.. they come through me first. This should be a speech aired over the television where parents alike should be able to hear it and not exclusively to children, that in its self is inappropriate, sending a message of entitlement concerning the presidents position of authority. Inferring that what he says is above reproach by anyone, much less in need of parental approval and uses the teachers and school system as his coherts. Many children who look up to their teachers will automatically assume, that no matter what is said by Mr. Obama is approved by the school, because the teachers are said to be there to guide the students so the calculations of the students will be to ablige whatever Mr. Obama says, just as their guideance of the teachers does.
I see this as a baby-step to what will soon to come..Periodic Socialistic indoctrination within the classroom.
Posted by: K Johnson | September 7, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Fear is a product of personal lack of intellect. Many seem to have selective amnesia of past 8 years. They fear social change, I fear the Republican Right is to America what the Taliban is to Afganistan. Uninformed extremists. The New American Taliban Party.
Posted by: KMac | September 7, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Go to the White House website and look at the transcript for President Obama’s speech to America’s school age youth. I hope all of the folks out there who became enraged at the idea of the president giving this speech have also given up their love of apple pie, baseball, the national parks, and Old Glory. Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, and all the other right wing flamers out there should take their self-serving, moronic, brainwashed selves and just go someplace else aside from America because the rest of us who do love this country would be SO much better off without them.
Posted by: EdP | September 7, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Well said EdP. They wanted to “Liberate Iraq” so bad that they promoted the lies to Americans, might I suggest they all go to Iraq to live!
Posted by: KMac | September 7, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Is there a website where you can find out how many tax dollars are being spent of the education budget to broadcast the President’s speech? In addition, what were the costs associated with writing the lesson plan, assembling the lesson and distributing it? Considering the current budget crisis, is this the best use of tax dollars for education? In my opinion, far too much time and money is being wasted training kids about social issues and not enough, as evidenced by test scores, on academics. It seems to me that the teacher who has been preparing for the first day of school for weeks, should address her class before the President.
Posted by: Laura | September 7, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Funny, I bet you didn’t care how much of the budget was being spent on bullet-proof vests for soldiers in Iraq when dubya was our leader. Or how much of the budget was being spent taking care of those same soldiers in our federally-funded VA hospitals. I didn’t hear any parent, or anyone else for that matter, getting all up in arms about that.
BUT
God forbid that the current president spend budget money on telling our children to do good in school, so they in turn can put more money back into the budget with all the good jobs they are going to get once they get out of college! HOW DARE HE!!!He should be promoting abstinence in our schools like our last one! Now there is a guy really had the finger on the pulse of this country, I tell you what!
Posted by: whatajoke | September 7, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
I don’t like most of Pres. Obama’s agendas or actions lately. However, I did read the transcript of his speech, and so long as he sticks to it more or less, it is benign, maybe even positive.
Wisdom can come from numerous sources, even those that we wish we could reject. And we (I speak to fellow conservatives) are fools to reject it FOR THE SOLE reason that it comes from a liberal.
Lastly, to all those parents claiming that they don’t like the speech because they can’t “supervise” it, how can you begin to stand on your soap-box and proclaim that principle when you are sending your kid(s) to public (aka, government-run) schools? How can you be worried about “indoctrination” by the government due to this ONE speech, but not be worried about the thousands of hours they spend in government-approved texts? You might want to think a bit more about that.
Posted by: BMS | September 8, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
This article by ABC Senior White House Correspondent Tapper says “Education Secretary Arne Duncan penned a preview of the President’s message in a letter sent to school principles last week.” Doesn’t he know a principal is his pal?
Education Secretary Duncan isn’t any better. He says “We encourage you to use this historic moment to help your students get focused and begin the school year strong.”
It’s a great thing Obama understands his job is to lead. Maybe in some future time, senior journalists and the top education bureaucrat will actually be capable of writing English correctly.
Posted by: chesscanoe | September 8, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
If God isn’t welcome in my children’s school, then neither is the president…I don’t care WHO the president is.
Posted by: Carla Clapp | September 8, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Much ado about nothing. There was a couple interviewed on the news, talking about why they were going to keep their kids home from school today. The woman was in tears, whining about not wanting her “babies” indoctrinated into “his socialist agenda”. Maybe she should just keep her kids out of school permanently, so they don’t get exposed to anything that might be different from what she believes. How sheltered does she keep them? Does she have so little faith in the way she raised her children, to think that they would be swayed by a single speech? Does she have so little faith in the beliefs she taught her children that they’ll just abandon them when something different comes along? I know I raised my son to have a mind of his own, and to look at all the facts and evaluate for himself. I trust him to stand by his own beliefs, and not be like a leaf, blowing wherever the wind takes him.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
For once I agree with Camille Paglia, who said: ‘An example of the provincial amateurism of current White House operations was the way the president’s innocuous back-to-school pep talk got sandbagged by imbecilic support materials soliciting students to write fantasy letters to “help” the president (a coercive directive quickly withdrawn under pressure).’
If the planned speech was really so non-political, the WH should have released a copy in advance, along with the study materials. Absent that, the parents who don’t want their kids to “help the President” with his political problems, aren’t to be blamed for not wanting their kids forced to listen to whatever speech he might come up with — and pressured in a classroom ‘discussion’ of how to “help” him.
Personally I support public option, and I wish Obama did!
Posted by: bemusedoutsider | September 9, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
One word to say about this outrage: disingenuous. Your conclusions and “outrage” (because let’s be honest, it was fake) say more about you than they do about the subject at hand. Like “death panels,” it is all a bunch or horse puckey trotted around like fact. You know it, I know it – and you should be ashamed. How about you save the hysterics for real issues?
Posted by: YouCannotBeSerious | September 9, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
This speech is just another reason that I homeschool my children. I agree with the comment about people who are worried about that speech, but do not worry about the rest of the school year when their children are being indoctrinated during the rest of the school year in a government-run school where God, the Bible, or prayer is not allowed. If a teacher was to repeat what President Obama said at the end of his speech, “God bless America”, she would probably face a lawsuit and put her job on the line. President Obama is definitely a Socialist president and I can understand why parents would be concerned about his planned speech. If we could only learn from history: every country which has ever become a Socialist/Nazi/Fascist/Communist dictatorship has always started with indoctrinating the children (which are easier to reach if they are in a government-run school 40+ hours/weeks) prior to showing their TRUE intentions. They also attempt to control the media and the press so that the masses can be brainwashed (if it wasn’t for blogs, conservative radio shows (i.e. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc), and Fox News, as well as various Conservative political/current event publications (like God’s World News, Newsmax.com, The Washington Times, Phyllis Schlafly’s newsletter, etc.), the masses would be almost completely brainwashed right now!! And speaking about kids being able to “think for themselves”, if the government was so concerned about kids being able to think for themselves, why don’t they teach both evolution and Creationism in the schools??? Why isn’t the Bible allowed??? There seems to be some bias here. Christian students are routinely harassed, not only by other kids, but by teachers and School officials (not to mention the ACLU (American Communist Leaders’ Union- LOL). It is high times for parents, who care about their kid’s minds, to take full responsibility for their childrens education and to take them out of the government schools for good. That would force them to shut down, and compulsory education would no longer exist. Long before compulsory education came into existence, Americans ranked among all other nations as one of the most literate, educated people in the world. The literacy rate was very close the 100%; it is woefully much lower than that now; and we rank near the bottom in comparison to other countries (achievement test scores), some of them being third-world countries!! What is wrong with our education system?????? DUH!!!!! The government got involved, that’s what! Everything the government gets into, it ruins. When are people going to realize that?? By the way, a lot of the voters who helped to get President Obama elected were graduates from public schools/college students. Does that tell you anything? The public schools/colleges have both been ruined by the government (yes, the colleges are just as bad!) and the young people have been indoctrinated into socialist thinking, which explains why they voted for a Socialist candidate. Does anyone recall seeing a group of young adults waving a Communist/Soviet Union flag on the night of Obama’s election victory?
It was commented on during the Fox News coverage, and even posted on the internet. I wonder how many people even noticed it. Well, I guess most people are already brainwashed and have been dumb-downed for so long that nothing catches their attention much anymore; it has happened so many times throughout history (i.e. China, Russia, Germany, Italy, Cuba, Canada, most of Europe, etc.) As the old saying goes, “History repeats itself because we fail to learn from history”.
Posted by: Mary J Rowell | September 11, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am
Two more things I failed to mention in my spiel: The concerns that parents have over their children hearing the President speak have nothing to do with the fact that he is African-American. The socialist ideals the the president has presented and lesson plans that were prepared for the students following the speech are what got parents concerned. It apparently has happened in other socialist/communist countries, and these parents are wise enough to perceive this instead of blindly submitting to everything the government does. Race has nothing to do with it!!
The second thing I wanted it remind readers is of the old adage,
“The hand that rocks the cradle controls the future”. Parents are the ones held accountable (by God, who incidentally created the family)for their childrens welfare, including their education and belief system, not the government!! Who do you want to control the future of America, the Federal government, or the mothers/fathers? That is the ultimate question.
Posted by: Mary J Rowell | September 13, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Mary J Rowell —-you are so right about everything you wrote! You covered all the points right-on! thank you.
Posted by: birdlover | October 6, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am
I am haitian living in america…I just wanted to let you all know about the brutality that’s going on in haiti due to the un troops….I’m sure you all are aware of this already…..the trooops are making haiti worser than it already is .they are killing young men and women especially in the streets of port-au-prince..I see. Pictures of them lying dead on the streets bloood running all over the place with no medical aid..not only that kids as young as 12 and 13 years old are being raped by brazilians troops daily. They rape them with the promise of food and money and sometimes they dnt even go through with their promises.they are suffering from sexual slavery child pornography and many other hardships under the authority of these troops….the un needs to get out of haiti and they need to do it now. My country need some serious help and instead of provind that the us has omly established more..people have siad that people are paying to make haiti look bad..the worser we look that would be somewhat beneficial to american interest.I haven’t been to haiti for almost 10years now..I plan to go next year in january…a lot has changed since I left I heard..I just hope I could go there safe and come back to america..that is if I even come back…PLEASE GET UN TROOPS OUT OF HAITI NOW..WE DNT NEED OTHER PEOPLE RULING OVER OUR LAND..NOT IF THEY ONLY ADDING TO THE MASSACRE! SO HOW ARE YOU MAKING A DIFFERENCE?
Posted by: katty antoine | November 18, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm