By Gorman Gorman

Sep 10, 2009 1:04pm

President Obama Accepts Wilson’s Apology, Says He Hopes the Political “Fever Breaks a Little Bit”

Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:

After what he called an "excellent and informative Cabinet meeting," President Obama told reporters that he accepts the apology of Rep. Joe Wilson, R-SC, who shouted "You lie!" during the president’s address to a joint session of Congress last night.

"Yes I do," the president said. "I’m a big believer that we all make mistakes. He apologized quickly and without equivocation. And I’m appreciative of that."

Mr. Obama then turned to use Wilson as something of an example – making this a teachable moment, perhaps – saying that "we have to get to the point where we can have a conversation about big, important issues that matter to the American people without vitriol, without name-calling without the assumption of the worst in other people’s motives."

The president suggested that while Democrats and Republicans have "different ideas…for the most part we have the same aims, which is to make sure people who work hard…and act responsibility, are able to get good jobs, good wages, raise their families, make sure those kids have a good education, that they are protected from misfortune or accident by having health care and retirement security in place." He also said keeping the American people safe.

He said when it comes to party affiliation, "most Americans don think about those labels that much. They are turned off when they see people using wild accusations, false claims, name-calling, and sharply ideological approaches to solving problems. They want pragmatism."

The president said he hopes "some of the fever breaks a little bit," and he admonished the media to be helpful by "not giving all the attention to the loudest and shrillest voices."

The cabinet meeting was largely about health care reform, the president said, though Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates briefed the president on national security, while Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner discussed the "promise and peril of our current economic situation."

-Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Tucker Carlson:
“Never has a president been warped by Washington quicker. At times tonight, Obama sounded like an embattled second-termer with a 35 percent approval rating. What percentage of his speech was spent lashing out at his enemies, real and imagined? Radio and cable-television pundits, George W. Bush, former Congresses, unnamed ghouls employing “scare tactics,” whose “only agenda is to stop reform at any cost”—they’re all against him, Obama said. And they’re lying.
This isn’t how confident leaders speak. These are the complaints of a man on his way to bitterness. So soon?”

Posted by: I'm not a President, but I Play One on TV | September 10, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Tucker and concerned in OH….you two really need to get real but if you chose to continue to make stuff up then have at it. It’s like so many Americans these days are beyond reason.

Posted by: Sabrina | September 10, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Obama: He said when it comes to party affiliation, “most Americans don think about those labels that much. They are turned off when they see people using wild accusations, false claims, name-calling, and sharply ideological approaches to solving problems. They want pragmatism.”
========
Oh, Irony!

Posted by: MayBee | September 10, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The President was lying, but I wish Joe’s angst would have been kept under control. Do people understand that emotions will, at times, override good sense – that is being human. Haven’t we all made stupid mistakes!! Illegals will continue to receive services and health care, because they can not be denied under the law. So it doesn’t matter whether they are covered or not. You young people will be paying forever

Posted by: Betts W | September 10, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

It’s already been said, but I gotta get it out of my system, too …
“We have to get to the point where we can have a conversation about big, important issues that matter to the American people without vitriol, without name-calling without the assumption of the worst in other people’s motives.”
That may be the most hypocritical statement I’ve ever heard in my life, given how the President and his associates have responded to the Americans making noise at the recent townhalls. “Without name calling”? Without “assumption of the worst in other people’s motives”? Like calling protesters “brown shirts” and “evilmongers,” even “right-wing terrorists,” and “assuming” they were assembled and bussed in by FOX News to the townhalls, even insinuating that some of them were out to see the President dead??
WHAT A HYPOCRITE! President, you’d darn well better start paying attention to the “loudest and shrillest voices,” because that seems to be the only way for us average Americans to get Washington’s attention these days. BRAVO, JOE WILSON. You said a mouthful!

Posted by: Amy | September 10, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Truth is in the eye of the beholder…

Posted by: Parallex View | September 10, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Jake,
Why don’t you all do a piece on whether Rep. Wilson was factually correct in noting that the President was lying.
Just a thought.

Posted by: Steve | September 10, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

“The President was lying . . . ”
___________________________________
Not according to the vast majority of investigative reporter who have been studying the legislation. What the President said – and what Wilson called a lie – is true.
Very embarrassing for the Republicans. Their smear and fear campaign keeps getting exposed.

Posted by: julieterra | September 10, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Lies, waste, fraud?
Why isn’t Obama outraged over the billions of stimulus money that the crooks at ACORN may receive?
Obama is a hypocrite.

Posted by: bailey | September 10, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I hope Wilson realizes that he is now the face of violent GOP opposition to reform and has done a great service to Democrats…

Posted by: Matt | September 10, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

I bet the vast majority of people commenting here today didn’t even watch the address last night, much less have read even a portion of the bill. The bill does NOT extend coverage to illegal immigrants, which is what Wilson was screaming about. So, Wilson was the one who lied last night.

Posted by: EML | September 10, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

The progressives have called Obama much worse over the past month or so.
And as soon as Obama backs down on the public option they will start up again.

Posted by: millie | September 10, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

All it took to pull the Democrats back together again was a Repub insulting Obama?
I thought it was his soaring speech (number 264) that gave them another tingle up their legs.
How long will it last?
At least until Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan
Or until he folds on government run health care.
Dems are a fickled bunch.

Posted by: kyle | September 10, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I agree. The president did lie as he often does and Rep. Joe Wilson’s web site is overloaded with people trying to contribute because finally someone on the right had the courage to tell the emperor that he has no clothes.

Posted by: Walsh | September 10, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“Looks like the non-partisan Congressional Research Service is also calling Obama a liar.”
Is HR 3200 Obama’s plan?
Nope.
The only liars are the right wingers like you, the Ashley Todd Hoax spreader, again trying to appeal to anger and racism about illegal immigrants.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

-The only liars are the right wingers like you, the Ashley Todd Hoax spreader, again trying to appeal to anger and racism about illegal immigrants.-
Why should I be paying for healthcare for non-citizens? This doesn’t sound like savings to me…

Posted by: Loco | September 10, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I think Obama has gone off the deep end because his popularity is fading away.
He’s been on TV twice today and looking alittle desperate.
I hope he feels better after that angry attack on the straw men last night.
He probably sucked his thumb all night.

Posted by: larry | September 10, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Under H.R. 3200….”
Where exactly does it say that the government will pay or provide for those illegals to have health insurance in your quote? Maybe it means that they will have to buy it just like the rest of us do. I see nowhere in the above language specifically stating that we will provide it or pay for it. So lets not distort the facts – lets speak the truth and see what happens instead of creating fear and mistrust, you can be loud and shrill but your still just loud and shrill.

Posted by: jozy | September 10, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Thnak God the Dems would never make any masty remarks about a repub president nor would they boo him at the State of the Union – no way!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: jamescbuilder | September 10, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

-At least until Obama sends more troops to Afghanistan-
That’s coming…And soon.

Posted by: KaBoom! | September 10, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Right wingers, please prove us all wrong! Please post the exact passage that says illegals will get health care. The exact quote please. I’ve read the bill, that is not stated. But, think about it, no matter what happens, we will always have illegals, they go to hospitals, if they can’t pay all our costs go up, maybe it wouldn’t be such a bad thing to allow them to pay for health insurance.

Posted by: Try the truth | September 10, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Psst Obama.
You lost in the ratings to “So You Think You Can Dance” on FOX!!!
FOX….
The one network that is kicking your butt. And all because of three little words.
Fair and balanced.

Posted by: jack | September 10, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

“Obama sounded like an embattled second-termer with a 35 percent approval rating.”
At not time did Obama sound like former President Bush.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

jack | Sep 10, 2009 2:05:09 PM – The only people calling them fair and balanced are, well them. Now take their ratings for last night, then take the combined ratings for the 3 major networks, who had more viewers?

Posted by: Try the truth | September 10, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

jozy–
hr3200 does not explictly say that illegals will be able to access health care. that’s true. what’s also true is that democrats consistently vote down bills that would require any person wanting medical care to require proof of citizenship. it’s a back door measure and a smart one for obama, the pragmatist; say that it’s a “lie” that the bill allows for coverage of illegals on the one hand and yet on the other support his party that has and will vote against any measure that would allow a person trying to sign up for “the public option” to show proof of citizenship.

Posted by: kelli | September 10, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

jack,
FOX is neither fair nor balanced. Just because they say it’s so doesn’t make it so. I don’t truly objective person could say so. They are biased to the core and proud of it…

Posted by: indy_voter | September 10, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

oh, i wish someone would remind the good president of his philosophy 101 lessons, that pragmatism comes with a capital “P” and is an American philosophical movement born right here in the good ‘ole USA which states that what works is what is true. I truly believe the president believes that but most Americans believe it only to a point. For example, would it have been wrong to fight Nazism if we had not won? of course not. Our first principles of fighting evil (back when we all agree what evil was, it seems) was good and that led to the strategy of how to fight that evil. Obama is a political pragmatist which he stated quite well in his own memoirs: “if you can get elected, you should. And then you govern.” The ends justify the means, because what works to get you where you want to go is good and true and leads you to a place of power so that you may do more “good.”

Posted by: kelli | September 10, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Where was Obama’s southern accent?
The one he used in the AFL-CIO speech?
How does Obama do that?
Did he learn that in Snakeoil Salesman School?

Posted by: riley | September 10, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“Rep. Joe Wilson’s web site is overloaded with people trying to contribute”
Nope but his opponent is raking it in.
“Rep. Joe Wilson’s (R-S.C.) untoward outburst Wednesday night has had a positive effect for at least one person. Rob Miller, a Democrat planning to run against Wilson in 2010, has taken in more than $350,000 from over 5,000 people through the website ActBlue since his opponent heckled the president.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

EML, please see my earlier post, about how the bill does not explicitly provide measures for illegals and at the same time does not require proof of citizenship for those who would purchase the “public option.” it’s classic and smart “third way politics” obama-style. he can say a truth that in the workings will turn out to be a lie. very shrewd.

Posted by: kelli | September 10, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Illegal alien provision DOES NOT ALLOW for oversights..Example: Imposing an 55mph speed limit Without restrictions or fines if one breaks that speed limit, just a suggestion not a law…Denial of benefits to non-American citizens is just words on paper nothing more…no restrictions, no fines, NO OVERSIGHT….This provision, if allowed to remain as stated, will add unlimited costs…….

Posted by: Parallex View | September 10, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Imposing an 55mph speed limit Without restrictions or fines if one breaks that speed limit, just a suggestion not a law..
Posted by: Parallex View
in my neck of the woods they have this strange thing called…. ‘speeding ticket’s…. handed out by the funny looking guys dressed in a blue colored uniform….

Posted by: 007 | September 10, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“Rep. Joe Wilson’s web site is overloaded with people trying to contribute”
Erick Erickson of redState “Conservative Activists Are Proving to be a Pathetic Bunch”
That was in response to poor fundraising for the embattled Wilson especially compared to his opponent having dump trucks of campaign cash roll in.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“The president said he hopes “some of the fever breaks a little bit,” and he admonished the media to be helpful by “not giving all the attention to the loudest and shrillest voices.”"
So does this mean less coverage of Obama? Please?

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“”Rep. Joe Wilson’s (R-S.C.) untoward outburst Wednesday night has had a positive effect for at least one person. Rob Miller, a Democrat planning to run against Wilson in 2010, has taken in more than $350,000 from over 5,000 people through the website ActBlue since his opponent heckled the president.”
Won’t do much good. Wilson’s outburst will be a badge of honor he can proudly wear come 2010. I smell re-election for one Joseph Wilson.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Thats the big story . One Rep getting a hot . What is that compared to creeping socialism . Obama was lying . That should get some notice . All illegals are going to be covered , first when care providers are prohibited from asking , and second when amnesty is granted by both parties .

Posted by: nat turner | September 10, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Highlight of the speech.

Posted by: Lizzie | September 10, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

At Obama’s Town Hall in July he continually stated the 46,000,000 number of uninsured Americans. Last night he said there are 30,000,000. I guess 16,000,000 became insured in the last 6 weeks! I tried to get in Congressman Wilson’s web site to make a financial contribution, but the site was down due to traffic. I thing I am not alone!By the way Obama says we have $600 Billion in medicare waste and fraud. Why does it take a health reform bill to go after this? Bo it now, or is Mr Holder too busy prosecuting the CIA?

Posted by: pauldia | September 10, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Having read all the posts here, my prior belief that any attempt to reason with modern Repubs is an act of futility has been reinforced. This morning Wilson admitted that he apologized only after being told to by his leadership and he declined to acknowledge his mistake before the cameras. Obama, immediately, publically and graciously accepted the faux apology. Repubs then respond with more sarcasm, vile and mendacity. Unfortunately, the modern GOP views civility, reason, and respectful dissent as weakness. Extreme ideologues never respond to reason. They only understand greater adverse political power. Dems need, to exercise the power that the last November’s elections gave them.

Posted by: BBear | September 10, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

So does this mean less coverage of Obama? Please?
Posted by: tjp612
nah…. less coverage of yer 2 girls, Palin & Orly Taitz

Posted by: 007 | September 10, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Republicans take note learn from the President how to have some class now President Obama what a guy! you have some real class learn something Republicans!

Posted by: Angie in PA | September 10, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Angie, you need to pick-up on some of that class as well.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | September 10, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

“nah…. less coverage of yer 2 girls, Palin & Orly Taitz”
Who is Orly Taitz? Never seen her. I guess she must not get coverage you think she does…but good try! :)

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

STDNT DRVER
What Class has the Republican party shown since Obama Became President? they have done NOTHING But lie
Birth Cert
Death Panels
Illegal Aliens being covered
Mandate abortion
Even when the Things Republicans are spreading are called out as LIES! They still continue to lie they must think were stupid well maybe they can fool the 20 percent or so that support them but not the Majority of the people, so telling people that the President and Congress is gonna pull the Plug on Grandma yeah REAL CLASSY!

Posted by: Angie in PA | September 10, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

No Drama Obama will pretend to be above the fray, in spite of his vindictive partisan rant last night.
Obama has plenty of thugs to do his dirty work.
I’m sending a donation to Wilson for saying what I wanted to say.

Posted by: ollie | September 10, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

“I wonder why Obama has idiots like Van Jones around him. He has worse taste in men than Lana Turner”
Dennis Miller

Posted by: bailey | September 10, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Joe got it right and there was no need to apologize.

Posted by: Johnny L | September 10, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“According to ActBlue now, lifetime total on ActBlue:”
That is his total for 2010.
Your dishonesty seems pathological.
His total from ActBlue in 2008 was 10 supporters and $804.
Not surprising since he’s a social conservative who had no national help in 2008.
So its very likely he did not have much money via Act Blue until the rude outburst by Wilson.
The lesson for the day? The Ahsley Todd Hoax spreader is pathologically dishonest.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Obama, immediately, publically and graciously accepted the faux apology. Repubs then respond with more sarcasm, vile and mendacity. Unfortunately, the modern GOP views civility, reason, and respectful dissent as weakness. Extreme ideologues never respond to reason. They only understand greater adverse political power. Dems need, to exercise the power that the last November’s elections gave them.
Posted by: BBear | Sep 10, 2009 2:36:29 PM
***
I agree with you BBear, particularly about exercising the power that last November’s elections gave them.

Posted by: Alyson | September 10, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

I’m wondering if the Independents were fooled for the second time by Obama’s
so called “game changer” speech last night.
The first time he duped them was election day.
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

Posted by: jack | September 10, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“My door is always open” Obama said.
Did he bother to mention the Republicans have not been invited to the WH since April, and turned down in May.
He lies.

Posted by: larry | September 10, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

It would be nice if Obama called off his thugs and stopped threatening to “call out” people who disagree with him. Maybe he could apologize for a the nasty name-calling being slung by him, his party members in congress and his minions.

Posted by: jennifert7 | September 10, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

“Even though I voted for Nader instead of Bush both times, I regret it because Bush is more of a MAN than obama will ever be. larry sinclair tells the truth.”
Jenny’s right wing slip is showing…
Independent who hates liberals but voted Nader and thinks a lunatic who is a Free Republic hero tells the truth.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

“Did he bother to mention the Republicans have not been invited to the WH since April, and turned down in May.”
Good little parrot….
Boehner told reporters that the president has not invited House GOP leaders to the White House for meetings on healthcare reform since the end of April.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

A person can throw shoes at Pres GWB and be arrested. But to shout at Pres Obama during a speech loud enough it can be heard around the world, an apology is good enough. There seems to be an inconsistency. Both acts are equally disrespectful.

Posted by: Uncle Lester | September 10, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

“What’s amazing in a mere 10 minutes, his numbers have climbed by almost $15000.
So, $1500/minute is what ActBlue wants you to believe.”
ROFLMAO!
Or it just went up $15000 in the last ten minutes and you can’t apply that average to the total time, especially between the hours of 12 and 6am when I doubt much donating happened.
But being pathologically dishonest you had to invent some average.
For those keeping track, Democrtaic Congressional candidate Rob Miller’s fundraising via ActBlue.
10,410 Supporters $377,475 Raised

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Health care policy researchers are contradicting President Obama’s claim that a government-run health insurance program would be self-sufficient and could rely on premiums, saying it’s not possible to insure up to 30 million people with better coverage and reduce costs at the same time.
“The numbers don’t hold up,” Grace Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute, a think tank devoted to health policy, said Thursday
The Commie appointing President is a LIAR

Posted by: Obama plays possum | September 10, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Wilson’s outburst was ridiculous and he should have apologized. Though, the irony is the amount of distortions the President told last night without any apology. Here’s one of the largest:
OBAMA: “I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits either now or in the future. Period.”
THE FACTS: Though there’s no final plan yet, the White House and congressional Democrats already have shown they’re ready to skirt the no-new-deficits pledge.
House Democrats offered a bill that the Congressional Budget Office said would add $220 billion to the deficit over 10 years. But Democrats and Obama administration officials claimed the bill actually was deficit-neutral. They said they simply didn’t have to count $245 billion of it — the cost of adjusting Medicare reimbursement rates so physicians don’t face big annual pay cuts.
Their reasoning was that they already had decided to exempt this “doc fix” from congressional rules that require new programs to be paid for. In other words, it doesn’t have to be paid for because they decided it doesn’t have to be paid for.
The administration also said that since Obama already had included the doctor payment in his 10-year budget proposal, it didn’t have to be counted again.
That aside, the long-term prognosis for costs of the health care legislation has not been good.
CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf had this to say in July: “We do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount.”" Source: AP
But hey, civil decorum is so much more important today than getting your facts straight in a speech prepared by the President himself over several days.
I mean it’s not like the Dems. shouted down then President Bush during his SOTU address in 2005. LOL.

Posted by: BH | September 10, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

This says it all: countrys direction
RCP Average: -22.6%
Right Direction 35.8%
Wrong Track 58.4%

Posted by: Obama plays possum | September 10, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“The transition from candidate to rookie president to grumpy old man.
A man already turned bitter, paranoid, and inflexible after his first serious challenge” Tucker Carlson
Like a spoiled child that can’t get his way and has never been told “NO”.
I wonder if Michelle had to rock him to sleep. He was wee weed up.

Posted by: millie | September 10, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Biggest lie was WMD’s in Iraq. Yet, the mindless boot-lickers still voted for Bush in ’04. Now, all of the sudden, they’re truth seekers and fiscal conservatives. They have ZERO credibility to even post here.

Posted by: JV | September 10, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

“The numbers don’t hold up,” Grace Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute, a think tank devoted to health policy, said Thursday”
ROFLMAO!
Free market think tank doesn’t like government option! Shocking!
But of course the right wing does not identify them as such.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“They have ZERO credibility to even post here.
Posted by: JV | Sep 10, 2009 3:35:19 PM”
You don’t get it.
The right wing could care less about their credibility.
The key is to repeat the lie over and over again so its absorbed by their gullible base.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Hey Ryan C,
Do YOU believe it is “possible to insure up to 30 million people with better coverage and reduce costs at the same time”?
Do you? If you don’t then you’ll need to retract your infamous “right wingers lie” tagline appended to your last post.
If you DO believe it is possible, there are a lot of us out here who would be interested in hearing how. You’ll have our complete attention.
Look forward to hearing from you.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

To put Rob Miller’s big day in perspective.
Up to now (last FEC report June 30th 09), he had raised $67K while Wilson had raised $284K.
In 2008, the total raised by Miller was $614K vs over $1.1M for Wilson.
The game has changed.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

“Do YOU believe it is “possible to insure up to 30 million people with better coverage and reduce costs at the same time”?”
Yes I do.
Though I think the path towards that is single payer.
The President disagrees.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

“The game has changed.”
Doesn’t matter. Count on Rep. Wilson wearing this badge of honor on his way towards winning re-election in 2010.
I haven’t checked contributions to Harry Reid’s opponents…hmm…I wonder how that is going….
BTW, Ryan C, look forward to response to question I posed to you.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Since the Stimulus become law in February, 3.1 million Americans have lost work (Bureau of Labor Statistics) and only 18% of Americans say that the trillion-dollar plan has helped the economy. Unemployment is 9.7%.
In June when the unemployment rate was 9.5%, Vice President Joe Biden told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, “The second hundred days [of the recovery package] you’re going to see a lot more jobs created.” But since then, the economy has lost 492,000 jobs.
Now, the administration claims to have “saved or created” more than one million jobs so far!
Congressman Joe Wilson called it right!

Posted by: Dude, Where's My Credibility? | September 10, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“Yes I do. ”
How Ryan? You we’re specifically asked how, not just whether you think it’s possible. And we’ll need a little more than a “Yes, we can!”
Oh, and before you reach for the preventive services myth, you might want to acknowledge that the even the AP called the President out on that whopper last night.

Posted by: BH | September 10, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

“Doesn’t matter. Count on Rep. Wilson wearing this badge of honor on his way towards winning re-election in 2010.”
His “badge of honor” has not raised him much money.
Now he gets to go against a better financed and supported opponent who already has ready made oppo ad.
“I haven’t checked contributions to Harry Reid’s opponents…hmm…I wonder how that is going….”
From Opensecrets, using the data last sent June 30th 2009
Harry Reid (D)* $10,930,627
Sharron E. Angle (R) $35,217
Billy Parson (R) $12,757
Chuck Kozak (R) $0
Edward Hamilton (R) $0
Terry Suominen (R) $0
Jeff Durbin (I) $0
John Gregory Chachas (R) $0
Robin Titus (R) $0″

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

tjp612:
If you voted for Bush, then go away. You’ve done enough damage and should be on your knees begging God for forgiveness for what you put this country through. You owe an apology to every family member of the brave young men and women who died because of your vote.
Not only that, Bush came into the office with a projected budget surplus of over $3 trillion but he left Obama with a $1.8 trillion deficit.
Clinton cut spending from 22.1% of GDP to 18.4%. Bush raised it to 20.9%.
In 2003, the Bush administration repeatedly lied about the cost of the drug benefit plan to get it passed, and Bush himself pressured reluctant conservatives to vote for the program.
Because reforming Medicare is an important part of getting health costs under control generally, Bush could have
used the opportunity to develop a comprehensive health-reform plan. By not doing so, he left his party with nothing to offer as an alternative to the Obama plan. Instead, Republicans have opposed Obama’s initiative while proposing nothing themselves.
You have no reason to be here.

Posted by: JV | September 10, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

“Something you guys prove here everyday.”
Great comeback, brah-vo. Such petulance…I can see why you are such a fan of Barry’s – The two of you have a few things in common.
So, Ryan C, just how would single payer insure up to 30 million people with better coverage and reduce costs at the same time? We’re interested in your brilliant insight because we’re not seeing how single-payer could get us there…It doesn’t wash with those of us who have little faith in government to run programs of this scale successfully (not much of a positive track record out there…).
Look forward to your response.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

“How Ryan? You we’re specifically asked how, not just whether you think it’s possible. And we’ll need a little more than a “Yes, we can!” ”
Who is we?
The rest of the cube dwellers at the RNC internet outreach?
This was your question.
“Do YOU believe it is “possible to insure up to 30 million people with better coverage and reduce costs at the same time”?”
I answered yes and the path towards achieving that would be single payer.
Single payer increases the risk pool and has far less administrative costs than private insurance which is more concerned with turning a profit than making sure healthcare is received.
That said I am open to other universal care options.
What Germany and Japan have done is interesting.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“Posted by: Dude, Where’s My Credibility? | Sep 10, 2009 3:51:24 PM”
ROFLMAO!
At least give credit where credit is due
“Senate Republican Communications Center”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“Now he gets to go against a better financed and supported opponent who already has ready made oppo ad.”
Again, won’t matter. Joe Wilson wins big in 2010, no question about it. His opponent better be careful, his negative/oppo. ad may backfire.
w.r.t. Harry Reid: What about Danny Tarkanian’s numbers? I didn’t see him included in figures (not that he’ll reach Harry Reid like numbers, given all the special interests Harry has in his pocket – won’t matter, Harry is going down, as is Chris Dodd in the housecleaning that will be 2010).

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“If you voted for Bush, then go away.”
Actually, I did not. Honest truth. Prior to 2008, I hadn’t voted since ’92. Obama and his re-distributionist outlook got my attention real quick last year and I voted in 2008.
“You have no reason to be here.”
My, that’s a bit harsh, isn’t? The rest of your post is somewhat nonsensical, no need to delve further.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Ryan,
How do you pay for it? This is what the President is getting skewered over. Right on the heels of the OBO revising the 10 year budget up $2 Trillion. People want reform. I want reform. But the question is how do we realistically pay for it. As usual, the nutter left has no answer, just as the nutter right as no new ideas.

Posted by: BH | September 10, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“Oh, and before you reach for the preventive services myth, you might want to acknowledge that the even the AP called the President out on that whopper last night.”
You means this
CBO “In sum, expanded governmental support for preventive medical care would probably improve people’s health but would not generally reduce total spending on health care. However, government funding for some specific types of preventive care might lower total spending. In its estimates, CBO seeks to capture the likely future effects on the budget on a case-by-case basis.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

===If you voted for Bush, then go away===
I voted for Bush and I refuse to go away.

Posted by: Axey | September 10, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Ryan C,
“Single payer increases the risk pool and has far less administrative costs than private insurance which is more concerned with turning a profit than making sure healthcare is received.”
Thank you for your response. Honestly, I wasn’t expect any elaboration from you.
How can you assume that single payer would have “far less administrative costs than private insurance”? What examples of successful federal government institutions can you point to that would lead anyone to believe the federal could be successful in administering a single payer system?
Furthermore, the following are single-payer systems:
- Medicare (reserves projected to be exhausted by 2017)
- Social Security (reserves expected to be depleted within ~20 years)
- Medicaid (killing state budgets
- Indian Health Service (“better not get sick after June, budget will be all spent”)
- VA (not exactly – unfortunately/regrettably – a shining example of positive healthcare)
But yet, you think things will be “different” this time around? What am I missing?

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

“Again, won’t matter. Joe Wilson wins big in 2010, no question about it.”
He didn’t win all that big in a super safe GOP seat against an under financed opponent with zero national support.
“His opponent better be careful, his negative/oppo. ad may backfire”
The right wing lout vs the war vet.
I am betting that South Carolina takes the war vet.
“w.r.t. Harry Reid: What about Danny Tarkanian’s numbers? I didn’t see him included in figures”
I stated those were the latest FEC figures as of June 30th.
I see that Hugh Hewitt ran a fundraiser for him in which he lies…shocking for a right winger!
“if they sent $10 to Danny Tarkanian, Reid’s only declared opponent in the 2010 election,”
As you can see from FEC reports, Reid already has a Republican State Senator opponent among others.
But Hewitt is a right winger.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Uh, Ryan. Here’s the part you sliced off.
“OBAMA: Requiring insurance companies to cover preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies “makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives.”
THE FACTS: Studies have shown that much preventive care — particularly tests like the ones Obama mentions — actually costs money instead of saving it. That’s because detecting acute diseases like breast cancer in their early stages involves testing many people who would never end up developing the disease. The costs of a large number of tests, even if they’re relatively cheap, will outweigh the costs of caring for the minority of people who would have ended up getting sick without the testing.”

Posted by: BH | September 10, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“How do you pay for it? This is what the President is getting skewered over. Right on the heels of the OBO revising the 10 year budget up $2 Trillion. People want reform. I want reform. But the question is how do we realistically pay for it.”
We raise taxes.
That is the way to realistically pay for something.
While there are other measures that may contribute to save money, in the end taxes will have to go up.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

“Uh, Ryan. Here’s the part you sliced off.”
I didn’t use AP fact check.
I went to the CBO letter itself.
But here is the part you sliced off the AP fact check.
“That doesn’t mean preventive care doesn’t make sense or save lives. It just doesn’t save money.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Miller has NO SHOT. The Dems are going to get trounced in ’10. And Miller will be part of the collateral. He can raise over $100 million. Don’t matter. Wilson won by 8 points in a off year for Repubs. He will trounce Miller in a very conservative district. Especially when they find out all his money comes from the communists at DailyKOS.

Posted by: Jeff | September 10, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

“How can you assume that single payer would have “far less administrative costs than private insurance”?”
Marketing/advertising budgets, executive pay, billing procedures designed to deny all but the persistent from getting their coverage.
Administrative costs for private insurance are far above what we spend on Medicare.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“He didn’t win all that big in a super safe GOP seat against an under financed opponent with zero national support.”
Yeah, but Obama won’t be at top of ticket this time around and come 2010 independents (and some Democrats) will be re-thinking votes they cast in 2008.
“The right wing lout vs the war vet. I am betting that South Carolina takes the war vet.”
I used to live in SC, you would be wrong, sir.
“if they sent $10 to Danny Tarkanian, Reid’s only declared opponent in the 2010 election,”
Well, if Hewitt said this, it is not true. But we all enjoy how you go overboard with your signature “the lesson as always? right-wingers lie” tagline – very endearing.
I hope you are doing some research to respond to the prior questions I posed to you:
- How can you assume that single payer would have “far less administrative costs than private insurance”?
- What examples of successful federal government institutions can you point to that would lead anyone to believe the federal could be successful in administering a single payer system?

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

What am I missing?
Posted by: tjp612
lol…….almost too tempting….

Posted by: 007 | September 10, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

I thought the Obamanation was the loudest and shrillest… did I miss something.. voice wise?? ?? ??

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | September 10, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

@ Ryan C
“We raise taxes. That is the way to realistically pay for something.”
Yeah, because we’ve seen that approach works GREAT in states like Californa, New York, New Jersey (and other “blue” states).
Way to go. Great thinking there, champ!
I realize Liberals are very limited in their thinking when it comes to economics (can’t blame ‘em though, many of them did not do well at math in school and later received majors in non-quantitative fields such as poli sci).

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

@ 007
“What am I missing?
Posted by: tjp612
lol…….almost too tempting….”
Bring it, my friend…would love to hear from you. :)

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“Miller has NO SHOT. The Dems are going to get trounced in ’10. And Miller will be part of the collateral. He can raise over $100 million. Don’t matter.”
“Wilson won by 8 points in a off year for Repubs”
In 2006 (an even bigger off year for the GOP) he won by 30pts.
2008 was the closest race in that district in 20 years.
When Wilson had a 2 to 1 advantage in fundraising to say nothing of the name recognition as an incumbent.
He is going to have a much tougher time with a social conservative/war vet who has a bigger war chest and party support.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

“He is going to have a much tougher time with a social conservative/war vet who has a bigger war chest and party support.”
C’mon, Ryan C. This isn’t a fight worth fighting. As explained:
- Obama will not be at top of ticket, which will have a negative impact on Dem candidates (section of “yes we can” crowd will not show up to vote, particularly younger voters)
- Democrat Party/Obama Fatigue will be endmic one year from now
Wilson by 15%-20%. Easy.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

“Yeah, but Obama won’t be at top of ticket this time around and come 2010 independents (and some Democrats) will be re-thinking votes they cast in 2008.”
This is an election more likely to turn on the candidates as you can see from Miller’s showing in 2008 when he was outraised 2 to 1.
“Well, if Hewitt said this, it is not true”
IF he said it? Its on his townhall blog.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“I realize Liberals are very limited in their thinking when it comes to economics”
ROFLMAO!
Recession? Right wing says cut taxes.
Boom time? Right wing says cut taxes?
Debt? Right wing says cut taxes.
Any situation? Right wing says cut taxes.
“can’t blame ‘em though, many of them did not do well at math in school and later received majors in non-quantitative fields such as poli sci).”
ROFLMAO!
Yes statistical theory and study have nothing to do with political science.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

“Wilson by 15%-20%. Easy.”
ROFLMAO!
He could barely manage that running against virtually no opposition in 2006.
The right wing lout is going down!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“This is an election more likely to turn on the candidates as you can see from Miller’s showing in 2008 when he was outraised 2 to 1.”
Not for Republicans, my friend. Tables are turning.
Also, as mentioned by someone else, how are SC voters going to respond when Wilson points out where his opponent received a big chunk of his funding?
Wilson by 15%-20%. Easy.
BTW – How is raising taxes to pay for ObamaCare going to foster economic growth? It won’t. If I recall correctly, I think you live in CA (could be wrong) – Are you pleased with the financial state of CA? With Obama’s/Dems exorbitant spending are we as a country not headed in same direction?

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Ryan C,
Please let us know how much more you sent in this April to help with the nation’s defecit and other economic problems. I’d like to match it.

Posted by: Mr. Helpful | September 10, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

If he is going to raise taxes (beyond the expiring cuts and the sin taxes).. now would be the time.. it only costs more if we wait… if you spend, you tax..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | September 10, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

we can’t vote the louts out.. it would cause a real estate panic in D.C. ..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | September 10, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

-While there are other measures that may contribute to save money, in the end taxes will have to go up.-
What happened to savings?

Posted by: BS | September 10, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“Any situation? Right wing says cut taxes.”
Could it – just maybe – be because TAXES ARE TOO HIGH?
Per the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report (2009-2010):
“Extent and Effect of Taxation”: U.S. #59 of 133 countries
“Total Tax Rate”: U.S. #67 of 129 countries
Look at states with high tax rates (e.g., California) – They are bleeding jobs! (Coincidentally, I received an invite today for a conference in California that had topics such as “Keeping Companies and High-Paying Jobs in California” and “Time for Change: How to Reform the State’s Budget Process”).
What do Dems/Left do when they want to spend more money? Propose to raise taxes!

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

By all means, have Rob Miller take that windfall of his and plow it into attack ads with the theme “Joe Wilson thinks Barack Obama’s being less than honest about health care!” See what that gets you.
I dare you. I double dare you. LOL.

Posted by: Community Agitator | September 10, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“Not for Republicans, my friend. Tables are turning.”
What turning?
Even as Democrats have lost some points in approval, the Republicans have not gained anything.
Why? Because they offer the moderates nothing but insane right wingers.
Only Rasmussen, the right wing pollster, has the GOP ahead in generic balloting.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“Could it – just maybe – be because TAXES ARE TOO HIGH?
Per the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report (2009-2010):
“Extent and Effect of Taxation”: U.S. #59 of 133 countries
“Total Tax Rate”: U.S. #67 of 129 countries ”
So taxes rates aren’t too high.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

“If he is going to raise taxes (beyond the expiring cuts and the sin taxes).. now would be the time.. it only costs more if we wait… if you spend, you tax..”
Agreed.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

@ Ryan C
“Even as Democrats have lost some points in approval, the Republicans have not gained anything.
Why? Because they offer the moderates nothing but insane right wingers.”
Wrong. Again. Thinking like this will lead to big surprises come 2010. It’s coming, my friend, it’s coming. Count on it. Broaden your social circles and you’ll see what’s going on (tho’ if you live in CA – which I think you do – it may be difficult!)
Wilson by 15%-20%…Book it!

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“So taxes rates aren’t too high.”
Taxes are NEVER too high for tax and spend liberals!

Posted by: tjp612 | September 10, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

“What do Dems/Left do when they want to spend more money? Propose to raise taxes!”
Shocking that one would seek to pay for one’s spending increases.
You would think this would be an issue people could find common ground on.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

“Taxes are NEVER too high for tax and spend liberals!
Posted by: tjp612 | Sep 10, 2009 5:41:07 PM”
You just posted that our total tax rate ranked 67th out of 129 countries claiming our taxes were too high.
But I see you’re flailing about now.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

“Why? Because they offer the moderates nothing but insane right wingers.”
Wrong. Again. Thinking like this will lead to big surprises come 2010.”
Not really.
Dems will lose 5 to 10 seats.
Or about the historical average for the same party as the President in an off year.
Which will leave them still in firm majorities.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

-So taxes rates aren’t too high.-
I’ll ask again. How much additional do you send in?

Posted by: Mr. Helpful | September 10, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

“By all means, have Rob Miller take that windfall of his and plow it into attack ads with the theme “Joe Wilson thinks Barack Obama’s being less than honest about health care!” See what that gets you.”
Tie it in with Mark Sanford’s embarrassing of South Carolina.
Rob Miller now has nearly $500K

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Rob Miller now has nearly $500K
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 10, 2009 6:09:09 PM
***
Wow. That’s awesome. I didn’t expect that in such a consistently red state though I’m unfamiliar with the district. Maybe the Sanford dramedy HAS turned a lot of Republicans off. What’s also awesome about Wilson’s lack of decorum followed by an apology (which turned out to be a faux apology based on his ungraciousness since) is that in addition to the ever-growing fundraising totals for Miller, he’s energized the Democratic base. Which is important!

Posted by: Alyson | September 10, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I also read a great quote from independent Bruce Bartlett, a conservative economist and former Republican who is sick of the GOP and their misplaced rage:
“No doubt, right wing publishers like Regnery and Crown will be beating down Wilson’s door today to sign a book deal that will put him at the top of the New York Times bestseller list along with drivel from the likes of Michelle Malkin, who has probably already started writing her biography of Wilson, titled, “The Man Who Spoke the Truth.” By the end of the day a Wilson for President web site will be fully functioning if it isn’t already. Watch for the announcement on Glenn Beck’s show this afternoon,” – Bruce Bartlett.
Joe Wilson/Michelle Bachmann 2012!
or Joe the Wilson/Joe the Plumber 2012!

Posted by: Alyson | September 10, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

And I came across THIS bit of information about Joe the Wilson:
Looking into the background of Rep. Joe Wilson, R-South Carolina, after his heckling of President Obama last night, I came across this, he’s a member or has been a member of Sons of Confederate Veterans. Per David Niewart at Crooks and Liars, “This is an organization that, as the SPLC has detailed assiduously, has been taken over in the past decade by radical neo-Confederates who favor secession and defend slavery as a benign institution. Leading the takeover is a radical racist named Kirk Lyons, who’s been an important legal figure on the far right for some years.”
Interesting. Wonder if Glenn Beck will consider that “radical” or praise him for his associations.

Posted by: Alyson | September 10, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“Wow. That’s awesome. I didn’t expect that in such a consistently red state though I’m unfamiliar with the district.”
Its a very red district.
Wilson has run unopposed and virtually unopposed (his Dem opponent raised all of $12K against him).
Miller was the first to really give him a run.
Is Wilson in trouble? Not yet but half a million in a Congressional race is nothing to sneeze at.
Also I agree with you on the energizing of a base that seemed uninterested in a fight.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Posted by: Alyson | Sep 10, 2009 6:45:01 PM”
TPM also posted how he blasted Strom Thurmond’s illegitimate (and African American) daughter for being a liar then after apologizing for that he still said she should have kept quiet.
“Rep. Wilson, a former page of Thurmond’s, immediately told The State newspaper that he didn’t believe Williams. He deemed the revelation “unseemly.” And he added that even if she was telling the truth, she should have kept the inconvenient facts to herself:
“It’s a smear on the image that [Thurmond] has as a person of high integrity who has been so loyal to the people of South Carolina,” Wilson said.”
Those Southern Republicans really miss the segregation days.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

TPM also posted how he blasted Strom Thurmond’s illegitimate (and African American) daughter for being a liar then after apologizing for that he still said she should have kept quiet.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 10, 2009 6:53:47 PM
***
Several patterns become clear and some people are calling the dude a martyr for a cause (eyeroll.)

Posted by: Alyson | September 10, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Does Rep Wilson reside at CStreet? I don’t think he shouted in a heat of the moment. I think he had other motives.

Posted by: aw | September 10, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

who were the 2 guys with the hate on their faces to Wilsons left and right?

Posted by: TJ | September 11, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Joe Wison should have thrown his shoe at Obama……the “Master of Deception”.

Posted by: Phil Roach | September 11, 2009, 7:17 am 7:17 am

The central fact that Obama is a liar seems to have been lost.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | September 11, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am

@ Ryan C
“You just posted that our total tax rate ranked 67th out of 129 countries claiming our taxes were too high. But I see you’re flailing about now.”
Sure, if all we want is an “average” economy rather than a world leader. #67 will do just fine.
Your hero Obama and his cronies doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism, so it is not a surprise that you do not either.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

“And I came across THIS bit of information about Joe the Wilson”
And so the “Joe the Plumber/Sarah Palin Demonization” begins… Classy…
BTW, Joe Wilson says two words (“You lie”) and it is as if this type of behavior (speaking out against sitting president in address to Congress) is completely unheard of… I guess y’all are just conveniently sweeping under the rug THE BEHAVIOR OF DEMOCRATS AT THE 2005 STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS.
The hypocrisy is stunning. I would call it disappointing, but my expectations are not that high.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 11, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

The hypocrisy is stunning. I would call it disappointing, but my expectations are not that high.
Posted by: tjp612 | Sep 11, 2009 8:53:57 AM
***
Someone on the right points fingers about demonization and hypocrisy??? I find that pretty darned funny. My point was, really, would the right, or more specifically people like Glenn Beck, be hypocritical and defend or praise him despite radical associations or be every bit as concerned about him and his associations as they are about those on the left with radical associations. Guess we’ve found out– and that hypocrisy doesn’t surprise me either. Why do I have the feeling you haven’t called those on the right for the same sorts of things? I personally don’t believe in guilt by association. I think he’s a jerk, but he certainly wouldn’t be the first in Congress. He’d get royally ripped in a presidential run, however.

Posted by: Alyson | September 11, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.