By Kristina Wong

Sep 13, 2009 1:21pm

President Obama: Once Health Care Reform Passes, “I Own It”

"I have no interest in having a bill get passed that fails," President Obama says in an interview with CBS News' Steve Kroft taped Friday night.

"That doesn't work. You know, I intend to be president for a while and once this bill passes, I own it. And if people look and say, 'You know what? This hasn't reduced my costs. My premiums are still going up 25 percent, insurance companies are still jerking me around,' I'm the one who's going to be held responsible. So I have every incentive to get this right."

In another excerpt released today, the president says, “The truth of the matter is that there has been, I think, a coarsening of our political dialogue. I will also say that in the era of 24-hour cable news cycles, that the loudest, shrillest voices get the most attention. And so one of the things that I’m trying to figure out is: How can we make sure that civility is interesting?”

The full interview will air tonight on 60 Minutes.

-jpt

User Comments

If Obama does not sign a bill that contains a government insurance plan, he will forever be charged with passing exactly what the insurance and drug companies wanted.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 13, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

@ Flashoverride:
and what the AMERICAN people wanted….

Posted by: mjishernameo | September 13, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I wish he were right. However, if Congress passes this turkey, we’ll all “own” it.

Posted by: mesquito | September 13, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

What astounds me–simply astounds me–is that significant numbers of Americans who are such craven sheep that they actually believe that ceding the vital responsibility of providing for their own medical care to the United States government is a good idea.
And don’t worry, Flash–even without the public option, the congress will still succeed in eliminating private decision-making from the delivery of medical care. I am glad that I am not young enough ever to bear the consequences of this monstrously insane folly.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

The bill doesn’t even take effect until 2013.

Posted by: B. Mull | September 13, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Obama will own it if successful.
If not it’s Bush’s fault.
Since Obamacare doesn’t go into effect into 2013 Obama is hoping he will safely be reelected.
If OC is a failure at that point what does he care.
Obama didn’t seem to mind saddling the next generation with massive debt.

Posted by: jack | September 13, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

While the Wall Street enablers would have you believe that this is a question of individual responsibility, it isn’t. Its a queston of our responsibility to each other. Now, some have no problem with this concept, except that they disagree with including people who don’t look like they do.
Concerned is right, for once. Without a plan that is owned by the public, it will simply be a way to funnel more tax dollars to insurance companies, the way Bush funnelled all that money to the drug companies.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 13, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

It’s truly astounding how obama supporters just blindly swallow without question…what happened? “Im from the government and I’m here to help you….” HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
With all of the access to information available, still they swallow whole information that DOESNT ADD UP , no matter how it’s spun, it DOES NOT COMPUTE !!!!
Thank God for boomers, at least we know to question authority.

Posted by: mjishernameo | September 13, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The same way he owns the economy and the wars?
Obama blames Bush in almost every speech/remark. All 267 of them.
And if he doesn’t blame Bush, then it’s the Repubs, Palin, the media, or the townhall prtesters.
Can we add the most Thin-Skinned President ever to the Most Transparent.

Posted by: bailey | September 13, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

This hasn’t reduced my costs. My premiums are still going up 25 percent, insurance companies are still jerking me around,’ I’m the one who’s going to be held responsible. So I have every incentive to get this right.”
=======
Who cares if he’s held responsible? It isn’t about him.
If those things happen, it will be bad for millions of people. It will be bad for our economy. The American people will be hurting. Our Health Care system will be in disarray.
Who cares what it does to him politically. It’s about the people, Mr. President. We’ll own it.

Posted by: MayBee | September 13, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

And so one of the things that I’m trying to figure out is: How can we make sure that civility is interesting?”
=======
Probably not by standing in front of Congress and saying your opponents arguments are “bogus” and saying they are “lying”. Probably not by saying “the time for talk is over” before there’s a legitimate plan in the offing, or accusing your opponents of all being servants of special interests.
Probably not by letting your political allies say whatever uncivil things they want without POTUS calling them out. Probably not by saying “And they can’t stop us!” at a political rally.
So far, he’s learned the Berenstain Bear’s “what not to do” lessons.

Posted by: MayBee | September 13, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

“Pick a target. Freeze it. Personalize it. Polarize it.” Seems the community organizer forgets he has a new job now.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 13, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Even if he wins a second term, the ultimate effects of what Obama is doing won’t be felt while he is in office–it may take a decade or more before private insurance is strangled.
In 2003 over 14,000 elderly Parisians died in a heat wave. The French health care system simply could not help them.
Last year 4,000 British mothers gave birth in broom closets, elevators and restrooms of NHS hospitals–there weren’t enough beds. In that same year 400,000 people traveled to the United States from abroad to seek medical treatment.
Yet in their frantic quest to require others to take care of them, many Americans want to abandon our system in favor of one run by a benign government, as the British and French have done.
They will get what they deserve. Unfortunately, millions of their betters who don’t deserve it will get the same thing.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Flash, I have no responsibility for you whatsoever, and– thank God–you have none for me: stay out of my life.
Any man who would rather funnel his money to the government instead of to a private concern with which he freely contracts has the soul of a serf.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

” In that same year 400,000 people traveled to the United States from abroad to seek medical treatment.”
Many, many more people went abroad to India that year to seek medical treatment.

Posted by: flash override | September 13, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

“I have no responsibility for you whatsoever, and– thank God–you have none for me”
A true sociopath.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 13, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Well Obama you continue to amaze me with your arrogance. Nothing about anything you push through the senate or congress forcing the american people to pay for, when we cant afford it, is about YOU. You were elected to do the will of the majority of the people. I think it would beneifit you to remember that or you will be history come 2012.

Posted by: Bo Butler | September 13, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Why should Obama listen to conservatives. He was elected by democrats to follow the democratic plan, like he spelled out on the campaign. This is no longer a conservative world….and Obama is doing just like he promised.
Go Obama…thank you for fighting for those without a voice….may god keep you in his light.

Posted by: karen | September 13, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Does not matter what anyone thinks. If Obama does not own the bill he is criticized, if he owns it he is criticized.
Keep up the good work Mr. President….

Posted by: One of the many voices for Obama | September 13, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

I think its time to thank the GOP for making it clear that they won’t even vote for a bill that has everything they want in it.
This situation has given Obama alot of power over the Blue Cross Democrats, and will end up giving us a better bill.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 13, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Barack Obama’s attempt at making civility interesting, Sept 9, 2009:
“Some of people’s concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim, made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple.”
=======
Now, did President Obama take the time before the Joint Session of Congress to civilly explain what he meant when he’d discussed the IMAC board?
No.
Did President Obama take the time before the Joint Session of Congress to civilly explain what he had meant in April when he discussed setting up a board that would discuss the moral, psychological, and financial questions around end of life care?
No.
Did President Obama take the time before the Joint Session of Congress to civilly explain why he talked at the ABC forum about why sometimes it is better to take the painkiller, when asked by a woman about her 100-year old mother getting a pacemaker?
No.
Of course “death panel” is overheated, inflamed rhetoric. But Obama has a record of words he needs to explain, too.
He is choosing not to take that step, instead he very uncivilly took to the floor of Congress and called arguments about his undeveloped ideas “bogus”.

Posted by: MayBee | September 13, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

nice try, MayBee, but making stuff up is a whole different kettle of fish than having the press cut your statements up into sound bytes.
Don’t blame Obama for what the press didn’t tell you.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 13, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

nice try, MayBee, but making stuff up is a whole different kettle of fish than having the press cut your statements up into sound bytes.
============
What? His Joint Congressional Speech was cut up into soundbites?

Posted by: MayBee | September 13, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“A true sociopath.” Actually, a true lover of individual liberty, the very notion of which is foreign, if not hostile, to the statist and the parasite.
Ten percent of you will be unemployed during Obama’s presidency.
He owns that, too.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I’m convinced Obama doesn’t really care what is in the HC bill as long as he is the first president to do it.
Sure he would like it to be a success because of his huge ego.
I think Obama is already daydreaming of the day he makes history by signing that bill. I can see his smug face right now.

Posted by: larry | September 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

More tan ninety American soldiers and marines were killed in Afghanistan in July and August. Obama owns their loss.
What is his exit strategy?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

More *than* ninety…
(Posting with I-phone.)

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Obama has already had to back down publically on abortion and illegals being covered in Obamacare–thanks to townhalls and Joe Wilson. That’s if anyone trusts Obama’s word.
I think Obamacare will be very watered down but he’ll till claim victory.
Next on the chopping block–public option.
If it comes down to pleasing the progressives or his legacy–what will Obama choose?

Posted by: rick | September 13, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

He will own what? After he completes his first and maybe second term how will he be relevant in being able to do anything about how poorly planned, executed, and polluted it will become with amendments filled with pork and favors? It’s naive rhetoric we cannot afford.

Posted by: TX_MBell | September 13, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Obama wants us to ignore the scare tactics of the Repubs, Palin, FOX, townhallers.
But remember if Obamacare isn’t passed
MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE!!!
It’s a crisis so we have to pass it NOW!! As urgent as the stimulus.
Even though it doesn’t start until 2013.
After reelection. How convenient.
Obama the drama queen.

Posted by: ollie | September 13, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

If Obama is aware of hundreds of billions of dollars of waste in Medicare, why has he taken no steps to eliminate it? Whose responsibility does he think it is to eliminate it?
It’s simply another lie…

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Go Obama…thank you for fighting for those without a voice….may god keep you in his light.
He doesn’t need God. He’s a Lightbringer!

Posted by: Loonie | September 13, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

“Obama wants us to ignore the scare tactics of the Repubs, Palin, FOX, townhallers…Obama the drama queen.”
Speaking of drama queens, did you hear that Sarah Palin will be co-starring in the long awaited sequel to The Sixth Sense? She trembles in fear and whispers to Bruce Willis, “I see death panels.”
Sorry, I’ll try to be civil now.

Posted by: Rudy | September 13, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Our leader should be a “real” American with serious qualifications like Glen Beck or Rush Limbuagh. No one is interested in a black man who was born on some island that tries to pass as a state. I never voted that island in for statehood. We on the Right are trying to de-legitimize this president, mostly because he’s black, and those unamericans in the liberal run media are working against us by treating the president like, well, like HE’S THE PRESIDENT. We are absolutely terrified that a black man is president!!! The SOUTH shall rise again!

Posted by: Patriot | September 13, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

“President Obama: Once Health Care Reform Passes, “I Own It”……..MEMO TO Barack:
YOU OWN “Cash for Clunkers”, the 787 Billion Spending Law, Iran’s Nuclear success(most frightening), the coming Round 2 Depression with the first salvo being fired with tariffs on China(Smoot-Hooly II), the World rejection of the Dollar as a Reserve Currency (intentionally allowing it to fall)Czarist America, & the most divided America since the Civil War.You make Jimmy Carter look quasi competent.

Posted by: pauldia | September 13, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Ownership Memo continued: You own THE worst Cabinet Vetting Process ever, Manhattan Flyover, ACORN funding through HUD, ACORN Child Prostitution scandal,& Coming Attractions the Loss of Afghanistan

Posted by: pauldia | September 13, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

This president and this congress are about to radically alter a system that affects every American’s life, and with which a huge majority of them are happy. They wanted to do so before the August recess, and when they couldn’t do that they now say they need to do it in the next month–even though it won’t take effect until 2013.
And they wonder why millions of people are upset?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Will the US allow the Taliban to drive us out of the place from which the 9/11 attacks were launched, simply because the Democratic party lacks the will and the courage to defeat them?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 13, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Will the US allow the Taliban to drive us out of the place from which the 9/11 attacks were launched, simply because the Democratic party lacks the will and the courage to defeat them?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
of course, ….
just because Bush ignored the warnings of an imminent Bin Laden attack, panic after 9•11….failed to get Bin Laden, started a war by mistake in Iraq complete with faulty policy with no plan what to do after they started shooting, and then mishandled Afghanistan…
of course it’s the Dems fault….republicans didn’t run the government for 6+ years … right.
the real question is will the US allow republican lies to finish the job they stared of destroying america

Posted by: 007 | September 13, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

And they wonder why millions of people are upset? Posted by: Fascist Hyena
that might be true, millions may disagree as you say, but……
the other hundreds of millions do agree and want reform….. but of course, all those people don’t matter as they don’t fit in with the right’s constant paranoid pleas and self flagellation .

Posted by: 007 | September 13, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Posted by: pauldia
you left out the asteroid hitting the earth and
cats & dogs living together….clones, and the return of the dinosaurs….

Posted by: 007 | September 13, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Each year 22,000 Americans die each year because they do not have access to adequate medical care. (According to a study conducted the Urban Institute of Medicine, compiled by Stan Dorn.) That’s 7 times more than the number of lives we lost in 9/11 – and that loss is happening every year.
The infant mortality rate in the United States is twice as high as the infant mortality rate of Sweden or France. It’s also higher than the much-maligned “socialized” medical systems of Great Britain, Canada, and even Cuba. (1) Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina, all have one thing in common. Their infant mortality rates are 3 times higher. (2) Yet Senators from these states consistently attack the medical systems of France and Sweden as “socialistic.” It’s just too bad babies cannot make campaign contributions.
We are supposed to be a Christian nation. If so, why do we permit these human tragedies to occur?
Time and time again, the discussion of Obama’s medical care revolves around costs and balancing the budget. It never considers the tragic cost in human life that is occurring right now as the so-called “debate” still rages.
Jesus spent most of his time on earth healing the sick. Never once did he ask any of the people he healed about their HMO or their ability to pay. Was Jesus a socialist?
If we were truly a Christian nation, there would be no “debate”. We would provide medical care for every one. We would find a way to pay for it, which includes taxing the super wealthy. Ironically, many of the people opposing Obama’s health care reform are supposed to be Christians. If so, they certainly are not practicing what they preach.

Posted by: William Joseph Miller | September 13, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

When a fast moving legislative government is aware of waste in a government program it tends to create new ones to replace the bad one. This gives an opportunity for all those that have their fingers in the cash register a chance to invest their interest into the new program. Creating a new program and neutering the old one also makes it easier for the new guard to get their fingers into a cash registrar. An effective government is one that takes some time to establish just laws, amendments, and repeals. Just bills become laws because they can endure scrutiny. Amendments can me made to address loopholes, injustice, or inequality in how the law is applied. Repeals address injustice revealed by the execution of a law. A thoughtful deliberately paced legislative government can not effectively manage a government program because it is incapable of cleaning its own house. A fast moving legislative government involved in managing government programs too often moves quickly to protect the interest of the corrupt officials/friends in its own ranks. A well paced legislative government gives the people the opportunity to become aware of corruption so that they can vote criminals out of office and elect someone from among the people to repeal or amended laws to make it right for the people. Any government program under the control of a legislative committee or proxy is a conflict of interest and should never be allowed. Midnight votes on laws not read by legislators and not presented to the people for awareness of its content should be made illegal and considered treasonous. With fair and just laws the people can govern themselves and build businesses and community programs that best serve the variety of demographics throughout the country. To impose a one size fits all program managed by bureaucrats violates the principles of a free people. A nation of bureaucracy does not make a free people. It is free people that govern themselves with just laws that make a free nation. Protect our life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Don’t let the bureaucrats subjugate “we the people” to the government.

Posted by: TX_MBell | September 13, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

“Was Jesus a socialist?”
Jesus was a bleeding heart liberal. In fact, he was the king of bleeding heart liberals.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

“..millions may disagree as you say, but……the other hundreds of millions do agree and want reform”
Hundreds of millions??

Posted by: Sigmonde | September 13, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

“It’s just too bad babies cannot make campaign contributions.”
“We are supposed to be a Christian nation. If so, why do we permit these human tragedies to occur? ”
Why do we permit abortion which kills millions ?

Posted by: Sigmonde | September 13, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

“I own it” – How arrogant! This is exactly what will lead him into trouble. You own NOTHING. You are claiming ownership of the tax-payers money, and that I call is the behavior of a dictatorial regime….like the communists. Wait, I just forgot what Obama was…. All right, when he thinks he owns it; I agree.

Posted by: We own the government | September 13, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

“I OWN IT.” BEFORE OBAMA IS THROUGH, HE WILL OWN A COMPLETELY RUINED NATION OF HIS OWN MAKING. HE HAS NO CONCEPTION OF WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN’T WORK!! CAPITALISM COMBINED WITH THE JUDEO/CHRISTIAN ETHIC BUILT THIS NATION. THE LIBERALS ARE ATTACKING BOTH = DISASTER.

Posted by: Temagami | September 13, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Don’t look now but this amateur has gotten us into a trade war with our largest creditor.

Posted by: Nephron | September 13, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

“Why do we permit abortion which kills millions ?”
Because in a democracy with a separation of church and state we cannot take medical control of womens bodies away from them for religious reasons. They have to resolve their decisions with their religion themselves.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

“….we cannot take medical control of womens bodies away from them for religious reasons.”
Killing babies by abortion is a political and legal issue, not necessarily a religious issue.

Posted by: Sigmonde | September 13, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

“Killing babies by abortion is a political and legal issue, not necessarily a religious issue.”
You are going to find it extremely difficult to give legal rights to a person who hasn’t even been born without securing the mother’s legal protection first. If there are huge numbers of unnecessary abortions it’s a failure of our religious leaders too. Why are so many women afraid to have these children? There is plenty of fault to go around. Let’s start with unwanted pregnancy.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

“You are going to find it extremely difficult to give legal rights to a person who hasn’t even been born without securing the mother’s legal protection first.”
If it is neither a political or legal issue, what will your view be if the Supreme Court were to overturn Roe v. Wade? Do you think the SC makes decisions based on religious views?

Posted by: Sigmonde | September 13, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

“Hundreds of millions??”
Sigmonde | Sep 13, 2009 5:55:09 PM
Most polls peg over 70% of people wanting health care reform (ranging from only tort reform through to universal single payer). The US population is over 300 million, so yes, hundreds of millions is technically correct (although it does stretch it a bit).

Posted by: jhw539 | September 13, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“And they wonder why millions of people are upset?”
Fascist Hyena | Sep 13, 2009 4:58:00 PM
Millions of people think Obama was born in Kenya, millions of people think Bush staged 9/11, and millions of people think the global climate temperatures are trending downward.
Millions of people are really stupid in this country.

Posted by: jhw539 | September 13, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Jesus was a bleeding heart liberal. In fact, he was the king of bleeding heart liberals.
Posted by: Skip | Sep 13, 2009 5:51:43 PM
I don’t believe so. From my research, everyone is equal in his eyes and responsible for his/her own destiny. He didn’t control anything, he gave instructions. Taking from the rich and giving to the poor is an option, one that can and will be rewarded. How will the wealthy be rewarded by the obama administration?

Posted by: Jenny | September 13, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

The President will “own it” until he finds a way to blame the GOP for the ensuing disaster.
Is this a “read my lips” moment?

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

“Jesus was a bleeding heart liberal. In fact, he was the king of bleeding heart liberals.”
Jesus was apolitical, and to quote him, his “party” is “not of this world.”

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

“Do you think the SC makes decisions based on religious views?”
I think the SC makes decisions based on political views, and folks on the Right like to mix politics and religion more than I’m comfortable with. So I think it is possible.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

“…the Right like to mix politics and religion more than I’m comfortable with.”
Nutters on the left mix their atheism, agnosticism and their hatred of conservative with their politics all the time.
So it’s not exclusively a right or left thing.
Personally, I think left nutters are more bigoted, intolerant and hateful than right nutters.

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

“22,000 Americans die each year because they do not have access to adequate medical care. (According to a study conducted the Urban Institute of Medicine, compiled by Stan Dorn.)”
Stan Dorn wrote: “In 2002, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimated that 18,000 Americans died in 2000 because they were uninsured. Since then, the number of uninsured has grown. Based on the IOM’s methodology and subsequent Census Bureau estimates of insurance coverage, 137,000 people died from 2000 through 2006 because they lacked health insurance, including 22,000 people in 2006.”
But what about the more than one hundred thousand people who HAVE medical insurance YET die EACH YEAR due to mistakes made in the hospital?

Posted by: James Danley | September 13, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

“But what about the more than one hundred thousand people who HAVE medical insurance YET die EACH YEAR due to mistakes made in the hospital?”
Clearly, the problem lies with physicians and hospitals. So if we merely outlaw all licensed physicians from practicing medicine in a hospital…we’d solve all our problems. LOL.

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Jesus would want us all to sell everything off we possibly could and just give all that money to the poor and the sick no questions asked, and if it wasn’t enough to help them all then we ought to care for them for free ourselves if we have to. Any other interpretation of his teachings is ridiculous. He valued no earthly possessions at all.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“The President will “own it” until he finds a way to blame the GOP for the ensuing disaster.”
BH | Sep 13, 2009 7:03:26 PM
Ask the Republicans how well passing the buck worked in 2008 (and boy did they try – I think everything wrong in the country is still the fault of the minority party to some of them).

Posted by: jhw539 | September 13, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

“Jesus would want us all to sell everything off we possibly could and just give all that money to the poor and the sick no questions asked…… Any other interpretation of his teachings is ridiculous.”
It’s rather presumptuous to claim exclusive knowledge of what Jesus taught – and ridiculing other interpretations.

Posted by: Sigmonde | September 13, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

“Jesus would want us all to sell everything off we possibly could and just give all that money to the poor and the sick no questions asked…”
Right. He wanted YOU and I to sell our possessions and give to the poor.
That doesn’t green light nutters to use Jesus’ words to advance a political ideology that has nothing to do with his ultimate aim: glorifying his Father – particularly when most on the left are incessantly obsessed with obliterating the very mention of God from the public square.
Jesus’ mission wasn’t about starting a political movement.
“…and if it wasn’t enough to help them all then we ought to care for them for free ourselves if we have to.”
Right. WE individuals should do this to and for the glory of God, not Obama, not the U.S. Govt, ourselves, etc..
“Any other interpretation of his teachings is ridiculous.”
Agreed. Which is why nutter lefties and nutter righties should give up the idea that Jesus would be a zealot of either political party.
“He valued no earthly possessions at all.”
Right. Unlike the 538 members of Congress and our President whose collective net worth exceeds $1 million each. So if the left is such a prime example of Jesus’ teachings why aren’t they leading by example? Where’s a Pelosi or John Kerry surrendering millions to feed the poor and provide them health care for the glory of God?
Frankly, I’m not sure you really understand what Jesus really said, taught and why he did what he did.

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“It’s rather presumptuous to claim exclusive knowledge of what Jesus taught – and ridiculing other interpretations.”
I never claimed exclusive knowledge. But I have read the Gospels in several translations and I can tell you there is nothing in there about letting people go sick when we have the resources to help them but balk at the price.

Posted by: Skip | September 13, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

“But I have read the Gospels in several translations and I can tell you there is nothing in there about letting people go sick when we have the resources to help them but balk at the price.”
So what’s your point, Skip? Yes, Americans are lousy at giving to the poor. But are you going to claim that liberals are really more generous than conservatives. Most studies I’ve seen is that despite our lousy persaonl giving tendencies as a whole, conservatives are significantly out giving liberals.

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

And Skip, if you’re going to go down this path maybe you should take the fight into your “own backyard:”
“WASHINGTON — Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden and his wife gave an average of $369 a year to charity during the past decade, his tax records show.
“Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama’s campaign today released 10 years’ worth of tax returns for Biden, a senator from Delaware, and his wife Jill, a community college instructor. The Bidens reported earning $319,853 last year, including $71,000 in royalties for his memoir, Promises to Keep: On Life and Politics.” – USA TODAY, 9/12/2008.
Most high school kids I know give more than $369/year.

Posted by: BH | September 13, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Obama may own title, but the working American will be making the payments for generations to come…

Posted by: Parallex View | September 13, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Year 2013:
Hey Obama, my insurance company is “jerking me around”. Fix it please, since you “own it”….
Is this for real?? I mean I can’t even TYPE it with a straight face….

Posted by: mjishernameo | September 13, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

“I have no interest in having a bill get passed that fails,”
Sure he does.
The stimulus is a failure.
Now on to even bigger failures!

Posted by: drjohn | September 13, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

As a lifelong church goer, former alter boy and proud Catholic I thank God everyday for giving us President Obama. After the last eight years it is finally good to have a competent president in the White House. Thank you again God for giving us President Obama. He will lead the greatest nation on earth into the future and keep us that way. Thank God for President Obama.

Posted by: jane | September 13, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

“The truth of the matter is that there has been, I think, a coarsening of our political dialogue.”
LOL!! That’s rich coming from a man that hired Van Jones, is connected to ACORN, sorta called a Cambridge cop a racist, and hasn’t lifted a syllabel to say anything against the Democrats who’ve unleashed names like Nazis, KKK and SEIU member beating up a black conservative calling him the n-word.
I don’t thank God for Obama at all. This country is in terrible shape and he’s only making things worse because of his lack of and/or wrong kind of leadership.
I cant’ wait until his term ends and he is out of office.

Posted by: sheryl | September 13, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Heres just a quick list of whats wrong with Obama’s administration in just the last week!:
•He hired a 9/11 truther, communist, American hating radical
•He has hired a number of “czars” to run a shadow government that are now coming to light to have very shady views about abortion, gun rights and the Constitution.
•His PR team tried to use the NEA to propagandize his administrations policies (a very totalitarian move wouldn’t you say).
•His Census Board wanted to use the uber corrupt ACORN for its purposes, until an undercover journalist revealed that ACORN doesn’t really have a problem importing underaged latino girls to be sex slaves.
I’m sure the Democratic Congress who voted on the Stimulus Package 7 Obama are still willing to give billions to this pathetic org.

Posted by: sheryl | September 13, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

“That’s rich coming from a man that hired Van Jones, is connected to ACORN, sorta called a Cambridge cop a racist, and hasn’t lifted a syllabel to say anything against the Democrats who’ve unleashed names like Nazis, KKK and SEIU member beating up a black conservative calling him the n-word.”
_________________________________
You really have to scratch around to find these few shreds of nastiness by the Democrats.
On the other hand, the stream of filth from the fanatical right is never ending on this site.
The right are neurotic liars.

Posted by: bonnytruth | September 13, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

You really have to scratch around to find these few shreds of nastiness by the Democrats.
*************************************
No we don’t – it is usually right there on video for all to see.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 13, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

“Scratch around”…..they said it in front of camera’s and wrote op-ed pieces using this coarsing language.
What your post proves is that Obama and his minions are perfecting the art of Orwellian Newspeak doublethinking.

Posted by: sheryl | September 13, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

“Scratch around”…..they said it in front of camera’s and wrote op-ed pieces using this coarsing language.
__________________________________
Yes, scratch around to dig up these few shreds of nastiness by the Democrats . . . there isn’t much to find.
On the other hand, the stream of filth from the fanatical right is never ending on this site.
The right are neurotic liars.

Posted by: bonnytruth | September 13, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

“I own it”….O.K., you got it! Tick…
tick….tick….

Posted by: Trajan | September 13, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

“shreds of nastiness by the Democrats”
At least you admit that there is nastiness by the Democrats, something Obama has failed to acknowledge.

Posted by: sheryl | September 14, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

“shreds of nastiness by the Democrats”
____________________________________
Yes, the ‘nastiness’ should have been in quotes. There’s really been almost nothing.
The right on the other hand, has spewed for endless bile and filth on this site and through all forms of media.

Posted by: bonnytruth | September 14, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

I am sad that with the Dems controlling the WH and the two houses of the Congress, they seem not to be getting things done.
President Obama is playing the nice guy. He needs to realize that over 400million People can not love him. To bake an omelet, you have to break eggs.
To actualize his Camapign promises, he will have to make himself some enemies.
The Republican party will use all the tricks in the books to regain their electoral losses of 2008 in 2010.
The Glenn Becks, Rush Lambaugh, Sean Hannity and Matt Drudge of this world will tar the Dems to no end.
Its time for President Obama to wake up from his slumber. He needs to show Leadership; He needs to instil fear in People for the Office of the President of the United States and he needs to stop pandering to the Glenn Becks of this world.
If he continues this way, we can as well start writing requiems for the Democratic party come 2010.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | September 14, 2009, 4:40 am 4:40 am

This President has never once been accountable for anything – what leads us to think he will accept responsbility for the outcome of health care reform?
When he iniated the Stimulas Plan the contention was that “Bush got us here” and “Obama owns the recovery.” He told us that his Presidency hinges on the outcome.
Since it isn’t working he is still blaming Bush.
He campaigned on the “no earmarks” platform. Take a gander at the Budget he signed in 2009 – a tad rich on the earmarks.
Now he is saying that “he owns Health Care reform.”
That is what he is saying today – my guess is that when it doesn’t perform or contain any of his promises he will blame it on Bush.
The reason this speech did not move the needle is because we all recognize that he is a good speaker and has a calming demeanor, the fact is he can side step, bob and weave and duck responsibility with the best of them – and he does just that.
Fact is, this President promised transparency – (which he is yet to produce, I might add) and, frankly, we are all starting to see through him (this is not the transparency he had in mind).
He is claiming ownership of Health Reform but when the time comes he will blame someone else – the republicans for sure and maybe even Bush.
In a word: he is fast to say what he is going to do and just as fast to blame everyone but himself when it doesn’t work out.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | September 14, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am

One last comment -
When Joe Wilson called out “liar” I think he was saying “The Emperor has no clothes.”
It was inapprobriate and the wrone thing to do at that venue and he has apologized.
But, in the end – isn’t that what he was really saying?

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | September 14, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Obama will be on “60 minutes” every Sunday for the rest of his term and give a “major” speech every Wednesday as well.

Posted by: drjohn | September 14, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Lol. I think he will do better on the Cartoon Channel.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 14, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am

thats the problem he thinks he owns this country.

Posted by: jim bradford | September 14, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

jim bradford wrote: “thats the problem he thinks he owns this country.”
And how is this different from George W. Bush?

Posted by: ray | September 14, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

bonnytruth, from 2000-2008 the def. in the dictionary for nastiness was democrats. They invented it with all the filth they spewed at Bush. I’m hearing today that no president has ever been treated like Obama. What? WHAT? My what short memories the left has. Bush was called everything from the master mind behind 9/11 to ignorant. Come on. You cant have it both ways. The left can dish it out but they sure can’t take it.

Posted by: rose | September 14, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

“I Own It” -Obama
unfortunately we will all own it, and no it doesn’t give him the incentive to get it right…he will be exempt from it’s poisonous effects.

Posted by: keys2truth | September 14, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

“When Joe Wilson called out “liar” I think he was saying “The Emperor has no clothes.”
So does the “Emperor have no clothes” or do the “clothes have no Emperor” (“empty suit”) (?)… I go back and forth on this…

Posted by: tjp612 | September 14, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I think it is interesting to see the comments on this article.
I believe Obama to be saying that once the bill passes, the results will be attributed to him, just as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were attributed to Bush.
I see a comment above about “shadow governments” and notice Fox News pundits like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity warn about them, but in Glenn Beck’s book, he tells his readers to not listen to those same people who propose “shadow governments” and conspiracy theories.
I see comments on ACORN. I doubt that a couple employee’s actions are representative of the entire company. A few priests have made headlines for molesting children, but not all priests are bad. People still attend church.
I see mention of “czars”, but a lot of these so-called czars are in positions created by the legislature or have been confirmed by the senate.
I see mention of “truther” but I don’t see any mention of the right’s “birhter” comments.
It is easy to make numerous accusations with loosely based facts then to actually create a hard hitting argument, and it seems that is what the right is doing.

Posted by: Kevin | September 14, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

“I see comments on ACORN. I doubt that a couple employee’s actions are representative of the entire company.”
How many accusations of voter fraud and documented evidence of ACORN assistance to promote tax evasion and child prostitution is necessary before an investigation is launched?
“I see mention of “czars”, but a lot of these so-called czars are in positions created by the legislature or have been confirmed by the senate.”
You may want to check your “facts” here, Champ. Have any of these positions been “created by the legislature”? Congress does not have oversight over these “departments” and even some Democrats are concerned about the authority they wield. Obama is side-stepping confirmation and diminishing role of Cabinet Secretaries (which do require confirmation).
“I see mention of “truther” but I don’t see any mention of the right’s “birhter” comments.”
There is no equivalance amongst these two issues. One claims that Obama has not sufficiently proven that he was born in the U.S. and eligible for office. The other accuses the U.S. government (specifically, former President G.W. Bush) as having advance knowledge of the attacks of 9/11 which would make the U.S. government complicit in the deaths of almost 3,000 people. Again, there is NO equivalance whatsover. Very weak argument on your part, you are grasping for straws.
“It is easy to make numerous accusations with loosely based facts then to actually create a hard hitting argument, and it seems that is what the right is doing.”
Wrong. This is exactly what YOU are doing.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 14, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Big deal…he says he owns it. No, actually WE will own it, and all the financial downfall that will come with it for generations to come. Think about it. If it doesn’t work, he won’t get re-elected, and will go down as one of the worst Presidents in history (well, that will probably happen anyway). So? WE will STILL be stuck with an overblown plan that DOESN’T work!
Let’s say I go into someone’s home with a bucket of mud and convince them that if I dump it on their carpet, it won’t hurt it, it will IMPROVE it. So, they let me do it. I now own it. I dump the mud. It stains. It ruins the carpet. So? I’m gone. Out the door. They won’t ever let me come back into their home again. But, the stain is still there. And now, it’s THEIRS. Good luck cleaning up that one.

Posted by: Shoe | September 14, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Mr. President, you may “own it,” but We the PEOPLE will have to live with your Trillion Dollar MISTAKE for a lifetime. It would behoove you to stop listening to David Axelrod and start listening to the American people whom you supposedly represent. If you think those hundreds of thousands of Protesters in DC on Saturday are not MAINSTREAM, you are badly deluded and need a reality check!!!

Posted by: Sunnyr | September 14, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

He’ll “own it”?! That’s a laugh. He’ll own it like he’s owned the near TWO TRILLION dollar deficit, or the continued hemorrhaging of jobs, or his non-performance in Afghanistan.
Oh wait, he keeps blaming Bush for that…

Posted by: PatF | September 14, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Yes we can!!!!!!
Because of the past administration and no regulations is why we are in the mess we are today. If anyone think it can do it better, now is the time to speak!

Posted by: Maria | September 14, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Obama is a lame duck.I suppose he will be able to go back and work for ACORN again,after his first and only term.

Posted by: Johnny L | September 14, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Our president has proven to be unaccountable for his statements. So he can say whatever he wants, I can no longer believe him. He is the most rare and dangerous kind of politician. He has tremendous power (especially with no press to hold him accountable) and he is much more interested in redistributing wealth than in getting reelected. His lies will catch up to him but by then the agenda will be enacted.
If he is successful with his leftest agenda he knows the leftists will create a statue in his image. That’s all he wants is the love of the left whether its the left in the USA or the left in Venezuela.

Posted by: Mike | September 14, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

“he is much more interested in redistributing wealth than in getting reelected.”
Agreed – He is dangerous.
In a way you can’t fault his strategy from a personal standpoint: Ram through radical policies that benefit special interest cronies who will then provide pay-back after Barry gets bounced in ’12. Barry will then move on earning tons o’ cash (from cronies via “library donations”, “speaking engagements”, etc. – see Bill Clinton) with no accountability and living a life of leisure and adulation. And, he’ll get back in good graces with Jesse, Al, and others in the race-baiter industry as he sets up their “enterprise” to shake-down government and industry for cash and jobs for another generation due to the “egregious racism” at the hands of this “nation of cowards” who could not bring themselves to elect the first African-American president to a second term. Brilliant.

Posted by: tjp612 | September 14, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

We’ll, 83% of public has insurance that they like. So what’s going on here? The man should stop worrying about a health plan. Fix the other 17% of folks who could use a smidge of help on their health plan. Make sure there no illegals in the plan, or the plan is going to be over. And don’t create a 50 state health plan. We will never let Obama do that.

Posted by: elainekramer | September 14, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

“We’ll, 83% of public has insurance that they like.” — NOT true, you have been misled. When you state this correctly, the error becomes obvious. This says that 100% of the people who have insurance like it. Obviously wrong.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 14, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

“We’ll, 83% of public has insurance that they like. So what’s going on here? The man should stop worrying about a health plan.”
Where did you get that figure from?
According to a July Time Magazine poll, 89% said they were currently covered by some kind of health insurance, and of that group 86% said they were “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with their plan.
That same poll asked “Would it be better to pretty much stay with the current healthcare system and just make some minor adjustments, or does the system need major reform?”
55% Major Reform
43% Minor Adjustments

Posted by: Numeros | September 14, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

I, too, hope this health care reform will do something to stop the yearly large increase in our family’s health insurance premium for less coverage. We spend 10% of our before tax income on good health insurance and money for out-of-pocket on deductibles, co-pays, etc. And our family is healthy, (knock on wood). I can’t imagine how anyone with a chronic illness or a bout with a serious illness can afford it. And that’s if they have insurance.
I love that question, ‘how can we make civility interesting?’ I’d like to think we can get away from the ‘Jerry Springer’ type of media coverage. We need more in-depth journalism and less influence by corporations on what and how the media reports as news.

Posted by: Lydia | September 14, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Even if only 40% of insured were happy with their current coverage, that doesn’t mean this is a good bill and should be passed. Everyone would like improvement in their benefits obviously, and even Republicans favor reform, but feel this bill will result in a decrease in healthcare quality and higher costs that will rise exponentially into the future.
Also, Obama seems to think that the fact that he would “own” the bill is a reason that people should trust that his position is correct. The fact that he would own the bill is no different than how any president owns anything that happens on his watch. Nobody’s buying that one. You better believe Obama and the Democrats would end up strongly associated with this bill, no question about it.
But it’s not about Obama’s credibility or political capital. It’s about doing what’s right for the country and succeeding generations, and preserving what’s good and works in the medical system today.
It’s also not about “civility”. Obama and the left have never been bothered by lack of civility before. It’s about the content of the bill, how it would actually work, and how it would affect the quality of healthcare in the country.
And if anyone thinks this bill would actually REDUCE healthcare costs, or make the economy stronger, I’ve got a bridge you will love. And buy. For lots of money. I’ll take cash.
key said it below: Obama won’t own it — we will. He and the politicians that are pushing this will be insulated from it’s effects, and will continue to get their world-class medical care.

Posted by: mr | September 15, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Even if only 40% of insured were happy with their current coverage, that doesn’t mean this is a good bill and should be passed. Everyone would like improvement in their benefits obviously, and even Republicans favor reform, but feel this bill will result in a decrease in healthcare quality and higher costs that will rise exponentially into the future.
Also, Obama seems to think that the fact that he would “own” the bill is a reason that people should trust that his position is correct. The fact that he would own the bill is no different than how any president owns anything that happens on his watch. Nobody’s buying that one. You better believe Obama and the Democrats would end up strongly associated with this bill, no question about it.
But it’s not about Obama’s credibility or political capital. It’s about doing what’s right for the country and succeeding generations, and preserving what’s good and works in the medical system today.
It’s also not about “civility”. Obama and the left have never been bothered by lack of civility before. It’s about the content of the bill, how it would actually work, and how it would affect the quality of healthcare in the country.
And if anyone thinks this bill would actually REDUCE healthcare costs, or make the economy stronger, I’ve got a bridge you will love. And buy. For lots of money. I’ll take cash.
key said it below: Obama won’t own it — we will. He and the politicians that are pushing this will be insulated from it’s effects, and will continue to get their world-class medical care.

Posted by: mr | September 15, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Even if only 40% of insured were happy with their current coverage, that doesn’t mean this is a good bill and should be passed.
Posted by: mr | Sep 15, 2009 9:55:23 AM
Before I even consider your opinion on any health care bill, let me ask, are you the same mr who twice claimed there were extensive changes made to the Dept. of Education lesson plan prior to Obama’s speech to school children? Are you the same mr who listed 9 questions that you claimed were changed due to pressure, and yet those 9 questions are still in the lesson plan to this very day?

Posted by: Jess Askin (and STILL waiting) | September 15, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This is an emotional issue and we all should support covering individuals through private health insurance. To conquer these serious changes, doesn’t it seem right to advocate for greater transparency in both quality and price information, for it overlaps with many other issues?

Posted by: Audrey | September 15, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“President Obama’s speech last week really moved me. Despite what my colleagues think of me. If what he says is what will EXACTLY happen, how can I not hope and work towards that cause”? Mike Oliphant runs a small Utah health insurance website http://www.benefitsmanager.net/SelectHealth.html and http://www.dentalinsuranceutah.net whom deals with hundreds of people on a day to day struggle to be approved for health insurance. “I get hopeful that I can finally tell people they can qualify for coverage REGARDLESS of their pre-existing medical condition”. Mike’s concern is that Obama’s people won’t deliver what he urges on areas within his speech. “I really have been moved by this guy and wish we could just talk so he could understand the frustration of a health insurance agent. I have been involved on a political level within the state of Utah and their struggle for health care reform. I have seen and regrettably been part of politics at work. I have learned lessons through baptism of fire with politics. For instance, I struggled against House Speaker Clark and H.B. 188 because that was what I was urged to do from our industry (that was all I knew). But after awhile and countless meetings with state and private carriers in Utah, I began asking myself if I was doing the right thing. I realized over time that House Speaker Clark really means what he says and is hard nose about getting reform done in Utah. I got that there wasn’t any behind the scene conspiracy scheme or personal objective of Mr. Clark. His bill makes allot of positive changes in the “health insurance reform” world of Utah. He claims that reform just doesn’t stop there, it must continue through “health care reform”. You see, there is a major difference between the two reforms. Clark “gets it” but I really worry that Obama’s administration doesn’t because if you have noticed the subtle language change of dropping “health care reform” and going to “health insurance reform”. See more about what Utah has accomplished here which utilizes private carrier involvement with true reform. If you can believe it, they reached it with an objective of $500,000. Perhaps the feds should take a look at Utah and House Speakers Clark’s bill 188. http://www.prweb.com/releases/utah_health_insurance/health_care_reform/prweb2614544.htm. Now I find myself on the “other side” of the fence furthering Utah’s cause. Let’s hope we don’t all have a mental breakdown nationally and just take a honest look at the proposals.

Posted by: Mike | September 15, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.