President Obama Reaffirms Power of Indefinite Detention, Will Not Seek Additional Congressional Powers
The Obama administration reaffirmed its belief this week that it has the power to indefinitely detain prisoners at Guantanamo and said it would not reach out and ask Congress to craft legislation to give them the authority.
Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said that when Congress on Sept. 18, 2001 gave President George W. Bush the authorization to use force against those behind the 9/11 attacks, lawmakers gave President Obama the power to indefinitely detain prisoners captured in that effort.
“Congress has already provided authorization through the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force to detain persons who the president determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, persons who harbored those responsible for those attacks, and persons who were part of, or substantially supported, Taliban or al Qaeda forces or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,” Boyd said.
This is different than President Bush’s claim he had an inherent executive authority to detain people.
The decision was met with mixed emotions by civil liberties groups.
“We're pleased that they're not going to go to Congress to get legislation,” Chris Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, told ABC News, saying that means it will be “less likely that we're going to have a chaotic and harmful debate and legislative process in Congress.”
The ACLU feared that Congress might write laws granting authorities to President Obama than the ones he is asserting.
That said, Anders took issue with the fact that President Obama is continuing indefinite detention of prisoners without charge.
“The Obama administration has continued to polices of the Bush administration of holding people at Guantanamo, Bagram, and elsewhere, and not trying them,” Anders said. “They should not be exercising that authority.”
Anders argues that there exists “no reason why this government cannot charge and try people suspected of terrorism crimes” since the statutes written for those who have aided and abetted terrorism are so broad it’s easy to convict someone of the crime.
In his May address on national security, President Obama described a category of detainees – those “who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases, because evidence may be tainted, but who, nonetheless, pose a threat to the security of the United States” — calling the dilemma of what to do with them the "toughest single issue that we will face.”
At the time, Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, hammered the decision, saying "allowing detention without trial creates a dangerous loophole in our justice system that mimics the Bush administration’s abusive approach to fighting terrorism.”
The president described these detainees as perhaps individuals who have "received extensive explosives training at al Qaeda training camps or commanded Taliban troops in battle or expressed their allegiance to Osama bin Laden or otherwise made it clear that they want to kill Americans."
But perhaps the evidence against them is tainted because of use of brutal interrogation techniques. The president said his "goal is to construct a legitimate legal framework for the remaining Guantanamo detainees that cannot be transferred."
The rules can't "be based simply on what I or the executive branch decide alone. And that's why my administration has begun to reshape the standards that apply to ensure that they are in line with the rule of law. We must have clear, defensible, and lawful standards for those who fall into this category. We must be fair procedures so that we don't make mistakes. We must have a thorough process of periodic review so that any prolonged detention is carefully evaluated and justified.”
Boyd said today that since courts in Washington, D.C., continue to actively review habeas corpus cases of Guantanamo detainees, that counts as carefully evaluating and justifying detentions.
“The administration is not currently seeking additional authorization,” Boyd said.
-jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
CHANGE!!
Posted by: Chuck | September 26, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I am sure this was one of the idiotic provisions passed after 9/11 that basically destroyed American constitutional rights. The thing, however, is to CHANGE what Bush and Cheney did.
Posted by: Laurel1181 | September 26, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Jake will be the next to go Fox. And he will fit right in.
Posted by: abepagota | September 26, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
The lurid hypocrisy of Obama is in plain site of everyone. For years and during the entire campaign, Obama and the democrats hammered Bush for “over-reaching” his authority to detain these terrorists. And now look what Obama is now doing – oh but Bush was different. Bush claimed an “inherent executive power” Can anyone explain the difference? President Bush’s power was inherent because congress gave it to him years earlier!
Posted by: thomas siebelink | September 26, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
This is so funny. So it is clear Obama is a hypocrite, but what will his loyal followers do?
Posted by: jonny | September 26, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
If Obama said ‘No we won’t do this anymore’ he’d get hammered by the Right. If he says ‘Yes we will continue to do this’ he still gets hammered by the Right.
This proves that no matter what Obama does, he’ll get hammered by the Right.
More proof that the Right will not support the President under any circumstances no matter what he does…….
Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 26, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
You don’t suppose the Obama administration has learned that trying some of the POWs would, through the testimony needed to convict them, expose intelligence gathering methods and probably some agents who have infiltrated terrorist organizations, do you?
Would it bet better to compromise intelligence operations and see a few agents beheaded than to leave some captured combatants in jail?
Posted by: MizFW | September 26, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
So he claims he is going to close Gitmo, but yet he has the right to hold them indefinitly but Bush didn’t. Did I miss something?
Posted by: 'Un-Amercian' | September 26, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Isn’t it just great to see that “EVERYTHING” BO promised to do to get VOTES isn’t happening……… and he is affirming Bush policies… hahaha this is great…… this must be driving the lefties nuts…..
Posted by: reprovemedia | September 26, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Obama has been slowly but surely becoming G.W. Bush No. 2.
Posted by: MP Cathmor | September 26, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“I am sure this was one of the idiotic provisions passed after 9/11 that basically destroyed American constitutional rights. The thing, however, is to CHANGE what Bush and Cheney did.”
+++++++++++++++++
Bull!
They did what was best for the country at the time. You idiots are going to be forced to take responsibility for yourselves before too long.
Posted by: rplat | September 26, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Hahahahah how’s that “change” working out for ya?
Posted by: bo | September 26, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Turns out Bush’s policies weren’t that bad after all! All the promises Obama made were simply made to gain popularity leading up to his election! He didn’t realize that many of the decisions Bush made were touch decisions that were in the best interest of the United States of America. Too bad Obama does not understand foreign policy in Europe and Russia. Bush could teach him a few things…..and call them “teachable moments.” We’ve just seen this week that there still are terror cells in the U.S. trying to bring mass destruction and death. We need a strong President who is firm and doesn’t waiver on foreign policy matters!
Posted by: claimAmericaBack | September 26, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Always amusing when naive, ignorant liberals are kicked in the face by truth and reality….but scary when one is playing president. Few writing here understand that we are a nation at war nor do you care – probably because you are happy and comfortable that “others” are protecting you and making the sacrifices. I am disgusted to be a part of this pathetic, spoiled and stupid generation of Americans.
Posted by: shepard100 | September 26, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Also, GITMO will stay open. Where’s all the yelling Libs?
Posted by: toby hill | September 26, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Obama is not a hypocrite, he’s far worse – a naive ideologue forced to make decisions when his world view (fill in any liberal blog name here) is forced to face the world as it really is. Gitmo is an excellent example of this. A similar dynamic is responsible for the dismal poll numbers of the democrat party lead Houses after they awkwardly seized power from their superiors and the mess they’ve made of the nation ever since.
Posted by: shepard100 | September 26, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Cheney must be behind this… twisting the president’s mind and making him go along with his evil plans.
Posted by: Bob O. | September 26, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
The awesome responsibility of the presidency often changes the ideology of the man who ascends to that office. I am quite relieved to see President Obama revise his campaign promise and respond to the realities of Islamic terrorists by restricting the so called rights of Gitmo prisoners in order to protect the lives and properties of Americans. I am reminded how the 1994 Republican Congress and Newt Gingrich partnered with President Clinton to engineer sound policies for the last six years of his administration. The election of 2010 could well accomplish the same for President Obama. I believe if he was free of the radical left wing of the Democratic Party that he could begin to forge a government that works for us all.
Posted by: BubblerDad | September 26, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
OMG!?:) I think i see some preliminary signs of a backbone!!! GOOD FOR YOU BO! and yes i voted mccain haha
Posted by: HA! | September 26, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
So much for changes.
Hard to accept the Bush and Cheney did the right things isn’t it.
Posted by: Reality2009 | September 26, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
This is so wrong.
Posted by: jan | September 26, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Now that Obama has admitted it to himself that he has no idea what he’s doing, White House staff meetings will finally start making progress as they ring with the words “….what would President Bush do…”
Posted by: shepard100 | September 26, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Is this really just another opportunity for two-party fanatics to bash each others’ brains out or yell “I told you so”? Just as many Democratic leaders as Republican break laws, declare illegal wars, and ignore the Constitution. These jokers have no allegiance to any party, voters, or the rule of law. They certainly don’t care about you. Nothing will ever change, regardless of which idiots occupy the White House or hold majority in Congress. Government spending has increased by almost 50% in the past ten years alone– is the economy 50% better than it was then? Are we 50% safer? How about your salary- are you making more money today, or were you laid off too? Wake up, folks. There is no bi-partisan consensus. There are only men with a little power who immediately seek to expand and abuse it.
Posted by: h5mind | September 26, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
When will people in this country realize that GITMO and the leagacy will come back to haunt this country. What we did to Japanese Americans came back to haunt us and the country had to pay for it. Americans never learn from their experience, we seem to be destined to never learn from our mistakes. Just remember the old saying, “What goes around, comes around.” We must think of our actions, for the people that we hold in GITMO when released, for someday they will be, or their family, for some have children. The anger that they will hold and build will make them decide something worse than the Towers. My point people we are not learning from our past and I’m more worried about the damage that will happen in the future.
Posted by: K.McClure | September 26, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I guess this issue is not quite as simple as Obama thought it was when he was spewing criticism of the exact same policy under Bush. Things are a little different when you have all the inside facts aren’t they Dear Leader?
Posted by: Jspatz1 | September 26, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“Jake will be the next to go Fox. And he will fit right in.” -abepagota
I don’t know what your beef is with Jake, he’s more “Fair and Balance” than FOX News any day of the week.
Posted by: BigGator5 | September 26, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
So let me get this straight….Obama is continuing the exact same detention policy that Bush was vilified for, but for Obama it is somehow more noble because he is citing a different authority? Does there need to be any further proof of the incredible double-standard bias of the MSM?
Posted by: kcjeff | September 26, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I have always said that within a few years, Bush’s presidency will be seen in a much different light than when he was being vilified by the left and the MSM, much the way Reagan’s was. Continuing Gitmo, continuing the Patriot Act, continuing the same schedule for Iraq, continuing the same levels in Afganistan, etc., etc. The only thing that is different is the lack of criticism from the media.
Posted by: KUME | September 26, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
I hope the prisoners are never released. These people are animals and deserve being caged as such.
Posted by: Jon | September 26, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
This is really sad accually. I am a 20 year veteran of the US army I am still currently in the army and it scares me to hell. What happends to me in the next war when I become a POW? When the war is over and america demands my release under the ganeva convention and the other side says sorry but they are never being released we can hold them indefinatly just like you do. What will the US say then? Will I sit in a prisoner of war camp forever? We are on a si\lippery slope that will do exacally that to the next generation of american soldiers if they are captured by the enemy in the next war we will be held indefinatly never see are families again and there wont be one argument the US will be able to use to secure our release under the laws of war because the US has determened that they dont have to follow them so no one else will either.
Posted by: mike | September 26, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
So, Obama after all is another Bush. So sad!
Posted by: sabniz | September 26, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
hahaha, BO has figured out that most Americans do not care about gitmo, so he’s going to keep it open, hahaha.
Yeah and all that Bush hate, I’d love to see the look on his face after seeing this. I bet he has that smile that the left hates so much. He kept them safe and they cussed and reviled him the whole time. Now BO is keeping them safe and they “just don’t understand why their new president is following bush’s policies” hahaha (really laughing)
Posted by: Ozarkess | September 26, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
KUME,
You are so right. If it were Bush saying that they needed to hold the detainees indefinately we would hear cries of anguish from the left. But since it is Obama all we hear are “mixed emotions”.
Hypocrites.
Posted by: Rwraith | September 26, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
POWs in every war have always been incarcerated indefinitely. They are not criminals so cannot be tried, they are just captured combatants, yet they can’t be released because they just go out and kill more of your troops. Those of you who don’t understand this, go look at the POW camps in the US during WWII.
Posted by: brian | September 26, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
the same levels in Afganistan, etc., etc.
Posted by: KUME | Sep 26, 2009 12:38:02 PM
I don’t agree with your oversimplifications, but whatever because I actually do understand some of what you’re getting at. (believe it or not.) I’m pressed for time but I do have a minute to nitpick on Afghanistan. We’ve sent more troops, doubling the number of American combat brigades there.
Posted by: Alyson | September 26, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
POWs are not tried and are not released until the end of hostilities. This particular war may last indefinitely, as should the detention of captured combatants. They are the ones who signed up for the fight. Too bad so sad.
Posted by: Bridget aka mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama | September 26, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
no wonder america is doing so badly education wise. you guys can’t read. nothing says he’s not closing guantanamo and nothing says he’s going to exercise his power to hold these people indefinitely. it does state facts like congress gave him the power to. and it does show there is discussion at how best to solve this problem. but nothing says guantanamo isn’t closing.
personally, i think that all who were picked up in the us should be tried for treason with the penalty of death and the others should be dealt with by the afghani or iraq governments. they’ve got some swift justice over there.
Posted by: birdy | September 26, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
“I am a 20 year veteran of the US army I am still currently in the army and it scares me to hell. What happends to me in the next war when I become a POW? When the war is over and america demands my release under the ganeva convention and the other side says sorry but they are never being released we can hold them indefinatly just like you do” posted by mike
Mike, the war isn’t over. And the problem with many of the remaining detainees is not that their countries are demanding their release, it’s that if we send them home they will be imprisoned and tortured by their own country. So our own laws prohibit us from sending them home. And if we bring them here for trial and fail to convict them, where do you think they’ll be released to?
Posted by: Bridget aka mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama | September 26, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
What amuses and angers me the most is that the vile hate-mongering and complete disrespect and loathing directed at POTUS Bush for his policies, is not being directed at Obama for the SAME POLICIES!!
Oh the hypocrisy! Where does the double standard end oh supreme leftist would be masters!?
Maybe Obama should do the honorable thing and appoint G.W. as his War Czar!
Hahahaha! Now wouldn’t that be a hoot!
He lied to get the votes, now he is starting to see his ignorance is dangerous, so he is following the lines of a previous POTUS! OH HOW RICH!
Posted by: Concerned_Dude | September 26, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“Bush’s presidency will be seen in a much different light than when he was being vilified by the”
Really?
The sitting President of the worst terrorist attack in our history, starting a war over a lie, presiding over th worst economic meltdown since the Depression?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 26, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Yes, Obama is just a Bush a wantabe. A much weaker Bush and more idiotic Bush. Hey, thanks bots for giving us someone with all of old George’s faults and then a whole lot more of his own. This country is in for a very bad 4 years or more.
Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 26, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
It’s only evil if a Republican does it…
Posted by: Tim | September 26, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
It is encouraging to see some glimmer of wisdom and backbone from Obama. Now if he can similarly come to his senses on economic policies.
Posted by: Robomentor | September 26, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Bush? The worst economic meltdown since the great depression!? Bush!? Really!?
Do you even WATCH the news? Obama has put us so far in debt that our children’s children won’t even be able to afford to pay attention!
Bush left office with around a 2t deficit. Care to let us know what is is now? My God liberal ignorance knows no bounds.
And lets forget the fact that terrorists have ramped up attacks on our soil. 3 major bomb plots uncovered just this week alone! Thank God we were able to have the power to infiltrate and STOP them due to the efforts of POTUS Bush.
Lord, can the Democrats do anything else to make themselves look like an even bigger bunch of buffons? YES THEY CAN!
Posted by: Concerned_Dude | September 26, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
The folks at MoveOn must be having a kinipshen fit. Maybe they can use all those giant HOPE posters as dart boards.
Posted by: jspatz1 | September 26, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
the funny part about all this is just a few months ago, the right was criticizing the presidentt for closing guantanamo saying his timeline was not realistic. now they’re bagging on him for not doing it fast enough?
the timeline hasn’t changed. the administration is simply voicing their concerns.. not saying theyre not going to do it. whatever.. you guys will find anything wrong with him doesn’tt matter waht.
Posted by: birdy | September 26, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Mike, when the war is over, they get released. It is really very simple. You cannot release enemy combatants who will just go out and try to kill guys like you. Or would you rather let them keep trying to kill you? The war needs to be over, then you let them go.
Posted by: brian | September 26, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Looks like the experiment of letting a zero-experience-but-great-speaker take a crack at the presidency is not working out too well. Now if we can just survive until 2012.
Posted by: USSA | September 26, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Ozarkess says***
hahaha, BO has figured out that most Americans do not care about gitmo, so he’s going to keep it open, hahaha.
Yeah and all that Bush hate, I’d love to see the look on his face after seeing this. I bet he has that smile that the left hates so much. He kept them safe and they cussed and reviled him the whole time. Now BO is keeping them safe and they “just don’t understand why their new president is following bush’s policies” hahaha (really laughing)
**** Hey please point out where in the article BO says he is not closing Getmo. Please learn to read and comprehend what you’re reading.
Posted by: Bill | September 26, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
You could fly an airplane into the open mouths of the lefties when they read this stuff. “…reaffirmed its belief this week that it has the power to indefinitely detain prisoners at Guantanamo.” Are you friggin kidding me?! This has got to drive the radical left absolutely nuts. The biggest case of buyer’s remorse hangover ever.
Posted by: KUME | September 26, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I told you obama was no different than bush..
imprisoning anyone, anytime, bailouts for the finincial industry, his lack of support for the public option
He’s not a liberal, he’s a clown.
Posted by: Doggone | September 26, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Maybe the republicans have done some kind of body-snatcher thing and replaced Obama with an imposter. “Who are you and what have you done with the the real Mesiah?”
Posted by: HailDearLeader | September 26, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
The wheels are starting to come off of the Obama bandwagon. Didn’t even make it through 2009.
Posted by: Hopenot | September 26, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Remember, we consider it a mark of a repressive regime if they hold prisoners indefinitely without charges or trials. And the only authority we have to do it is the one we gave to ourselves. Great.
Posted by: Sheila | September 26, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
“Bush’s presidency will be seen in a much different light than when he was being vilified by the”
Really?
The sitting President of the worst terrorist attack in our history, starting a war over a lie, presiding over the worst economic meltdown since the Depression?
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 26, 2009 1:31:56 PM
***
Ryan C is in the house, and making sense:>)
As for the Concerned Dude, do YOU ever watch the news? The economic meltdown was Bush’s baby, for sure. Our current recession has Bush’s fingerprints all over it. Yes, Obama has added to the deficit, but (a)the meltdown that put us in our current position and (b)adding to the deficit in order to stimulate the economy and take steps toward stopping the meltdown are two different things.
The argument to be had should be more focused on what to do once the recovery gets some legs– when to start cutting spending and hacking at the deficit so inflation doesn’t choke off the recovery down the road.Ultimately, Republicans have little, if any, credibility left on economic, domestic and monetary policy.
As for counterterrorism efforts, if I’m following the mumbo jumbo, you blame Obama that the terrorists are here at all , but give Bush credit for the capture, despite the fact that Bush didn’t actually keep us safe (see 9/11, anthrax, terrorist attacks on allies and troops in Iraq) Hmmm….
Posted by: Alyson | September 26, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Maybe they could accidentally “lose” the prisoners during the transfer to new detention sites, like the government keeps losing plutonium shipments, money shipped to Iraq, and VA military records. Government bureaucracy and all that, you know – can’t exect them to keep track of everything.
Posted by: Publius | September 26, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
the funny part about all this is just a few months ago, the right was criticizing the president for closing guantanamo saying his time line was not realistic. now they’re bagging on him for not doing it fast enough?
the time line hasn’t changed. the administration is simply voicing their concerns.. not saying they’re not going to do it. whatever.. you guys will find anything wrong with him doesn’t matter what.
Posted by: birdy | Sep 26, 2009 1:55:01 PM
***
Yep. No matter what. Although I don’t always agree with him, I like Andrew Sullivan’s take on “neocon panic.” He references in regards to the events surrounding Iran (and Russia) but it works for all foreign policy, IMO.
Per Andrew: “The sheer simple-minded dumbness of these people never ceases to amaze. Obama has maneuvered these past few months to isolate Iran without seeming to bully or dominate. Because of that, he has a decent chance of getting real sanctions approved by Russia and maybe even China. But this delicate piece of diplomacy and public relations infuriates the unchastened neocon right. They like their foreign policy crude and simplistic and … well, Cheneyesque. Even after such an approach failed to provide any real results except the occupation of two countries and the nuclear empowerment of North Korea and Iran. Ideology remains entrenched, immune as ever to the facts on the ground.”
Posted by: Alyson | September 26, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
And the BUSH 3rd term continues… Can we at least hold THIS guy accountable, the last guy got eight years without anything… Haven’t we learned ANYTHING yet??? Hell-o!!!
Posted by: jafo | September 26, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Actually, in reality I see it as far past time for the left to stop blaming Bush for the countries current troubles, when it’s the Democrats who are to blame, including the last years of the Bush Admin when they held power.
The Dems have been running the show for the last 3 years, and it is going downhill and picking up speed.
Anyone with the slightest bit of political knowledge knows the POTUS is limited in authority, and must have the backing or approval of Congress for all but a handful of issues. And since it’s the Dems with their hands at the wheel…..well you figure it out.
And as far as the terrorists are concerned, I think both admins were too soft on them. Public execution would have been much better, with blades dipped in pig fat.
Posted by: Concerned_Dude | September 26, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, IT IS THEIR DUTY,TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Republican? Democrat? Who cares. Both have shown that they care nothing for the lives or liberty of the American people. The Constitution is dead. Obama should be removed from office NOW! He needs to spend the rest of his life sitting in a solitary confinement.
Posted by: Anthony | September 26, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
For someone that loves to blame Bush as often as possible, Obama sure keeps a lot of Bush’s policies.
How’s that working out for you libs?
Like the “change” Obama brought to Washington?
Posted by: max | September 26, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
It was not just Obama, just like it was not just Bush or any other POTUS in recent memory. Congress controls more of how things get done than the POTUS. Read the powers delegated to the office of POTUS. Everything not on that list requires a Congressional vote.
To fix this country we need to take a few bold steps. First and foremost would be to impose strict term limits on all elected officials, especially Congressmen and Senators. Term limits would destroy these lifelong partnerships and corrupt special interests.
After term limits, get some fresh faces in there on BOTH sides, Dem and Rep, for most are or have been party to corruptness in their terms. After that, set to actively repealing any and all laws, gov offices or appointments, ect, that are Unconstitutional.
Return this country to as close to Constitutional correctness as we can get, as fast as we can get it there, and over half of our problems will be solved just with those actions.
The rest will not be solved until men and women have a return to common sense, honor, respect, and decency, and take a course in morality and ethics.
Posted by: Concerned_Dude | September 26, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Lord, can the Democrats do anything else to make themselves look like an even bigger bunch of buffons?
Posted by: Concerned_Dude | Sep 26, 2009 1:52:59 PM
Buffon – the next step after wax on, wax off?
Posted by: Pat Morita | September 26, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
The folks at MoveOn must be having a kinipshen fit. Maybe they can use all those giant HOPE posters as dart boards.
Posted by: jspatz1 | Sep 26, 2009 1:54:13 PM
Kinipshen fit? Is that when a German tailor takes measurements for children’s short pants?
Posted by: Leader Hosin | September 26, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
This government is too corrupt. We should just abolish the federal government. I think it is time for secession.
Posted by: Anthony | September 26, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I believe holding anyone without just cause is tantamount to kidnapping. If there is little evidence substantiated with proof the courts of this land should intervene to ensure human rights are protected. If there is evidence or supporting evidence, put these men on trial.
But to hold anyone in suspended animated based on knowledge that certain people possess, and others want to know is not what we are about as a nation. We preach justice and yet we may not practice justice the way it was structured. If these people have knowledge and/or are a threat to our security than they should be tried. That is the American Justice system.
Posted by: JR Jake | September 26, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Alyson, you and Andrew Sullivan seem to think that getting the Russians on board with sanctions is an end in itself. The end is, or should be, stopping Iran from getting nukes in the first place, or from using them if they do. Sanctions will accomplish neither.
So, it’s real nice and all that maybe the Russians might, but then again may not, go along with increased sanctions on Iran. But it won’t change anything. We need a lot more than that in return for shelving missile defense in Eastern Europe.
Posted by: Bridget | September 26, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
It seems that there is no difference between Bush and Obama.
Posted by: IMA | September 26, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
At this point with most of them why not just ask them if they want to re-join the Taliban. And if so then release them back in Afghanestan. With a GPS chip. Then bag them later with a missile.
Posted by: Tom | September 26, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
An interesting legal question, which will be determined by the Supreme Court after 2012!
Posted by: GCG | September 26, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Wow, what a ‘Change’ from Bush! Getting rid of habeas corpus — how lovely!
Posted by: W. Wallace | September 26, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Our system of law is based on habeus corpus. Briefly that means that everyone detained must have a hearing/trail within a reasonable period of time. If not, they go free.
By reinstituting this system, the administration betrays one of the basic principles our government is based on.
Posted by: Beto Ramos | September 26, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Lemme see… and the “change” was what again??
ALl of the “change” I’ve seen in 8 months has been for the WORSE!!!!
But hey, change is change, right?
LOL!!
Posted by: Namako_H3 | September 26, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Another promise failed? Don’t you love smart politicians?
Posted by: LongT | September 26, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
When I voted for Obama I had a slim hope he might restore our countries use of the Constitution and Bill of Rights as our moral guideline. Too much to hope for I guess. While McCain and Palin would carry on the corrupt practices of the Bush administration at least they would have lived down to my expectations. My slim hope has faded to blackness. Well the cancer is working as fast as it can to remove me from this shame of our Business and Government leaders total destruction of our country. You say you have hope, still. I wish you the best but In this life “Dumbo” with his big ears can not fly. We are doomed to crawl in the offal of what Wall Street and DC has left us. Those criminals who bought the CDS’s are rich beyond the dreams of Avarice. Rich on our money.
Posted by: BillWilliam | September 26, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Come on people don’t act like you don’t know that politicians say things to be elected.
Posted by: Patty Jones | September 26, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
My good people do u not realize who we are dealing with here? Have u no concept of what a real terrorist is?they may seem ok when behind bars at gitmo but turn them loose in anerica and they will make 911 look like a teen age prank. But u decide who deserves to die americans or the terrorist?
Posted by: joe | September 26, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
“Come on people don’t act like you don’t know that politicians say things to be elected.”
So where’s the CHANGE? Where’s the new Era of Responsibility? Obama is proof that a slick $750 million campaign and a compliant media can sway millions of ignorant, starry-eyed sheep who are now realizing the horror of what they’ve done. It’s time to pay the piper, America.
Posted by: Jenn | September 26, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Here is one liberal who didn’t vote for Obama, and now maybe my friends & family can finally see why.
Anthony, where have you been? If you haven’t learned that this is not a Dem vs Rep thing, you are a big part of the problem.
As for terrorists, if they are so guilty, why not try them?
Abandon the Rule of Law at your own peril.
Posted by: gmf | September 26, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
“Obama is proof that a slick $750 million campaign and a compliant media can sway millions of ignorant, starry-eyed sheep who are now realizing the horror of what they’ve done. It’s time to pay the piper, America.”
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll, 72% of Americans say Obama “is willing to make hard decisions,” and 66% describe him as “a strong and decisive leader.” 64% think he understands the problems Americans face in their daily lives.
Posted by: Numeros | September 26, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
“According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll…”
LOL!!
Posted by: Jenn | September 27, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Change… change… where’s the change? The only change I can see is that Obama gave Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano a hunting license to investigate right-wing activists here in the US based not on any crimes they have committed, but solely on their political convictions. Preemptive investigation – or “Waco/Ruby Ridge Part Two.”
Is Obama looking at Guantanamo Bay as a great place to put those pesky pro-lifers and gun rights activists? I thought that part of “change we can believe in” was an end to peremptory and lifelong confinement of subjects without due process of law.
Obama voters, you got fooled big time! Your man is just a skinny, tall version of Richard M. Nixon.
Posted by: loupgarous | September 27, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am
“’According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll…’
LOL!!”
Those who pooh-pooh USA Today/Gallup may also turn their noses up at Pew:
Does Barack Obama impress you as a strong leader?
65% Strong leader
29% Not a strong leader
Does Barack Obama impress you as able to get things done?
58% Able
31% Not able
Does Barack Obama impress you as someone who cares about people like you?
68% He Cares
25% He Doesn’t Care
Posted by: Numeros | September 27, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Hey Numeros, tell the 26+ million unemployed/underemployed Americans (and rising) that Obama is “popular” when they’re losing their homes at record rates and can’t put food on the table. I’m sure they care.
Posted by: Jenn | September 27, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Hey Jenn,
Do you remember September 19, 2008 ??? The commercial paper (debt) market froze up putting tens of thousands of businesses, big and small in risk of going out of business. The U.S. economy had gone into cardiac arrest. REPUBLICAN ECONOMIC POLICIES DEMONSTRATED THEIR UTTER FAILURE. Republican. Failure.
————————————–
“US Readies Largest Bailout to Date in Financial Crisis ..
The Bush administration says it’s preparing a new massive new intervention in the US financial system. Under the proposed move, the government would buy up distressed loans from troubled banks and other lenders.”
Posted by: John | September 27, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Sounds kind of like ‘executive privledge’ to me. What an absolute rookie!
Posted by: LongT | September 27, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
There won’t be a democratic America by 2012 so stop thinking you can just not re-elect “O” and get rid of our problems.
This country is going to “change” big time with or without our saying “OK”.
If you want to see the future just read the book of Revelations! Welcome to the future! The future is now!
Posted by: Melodyangel | September 27, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Without just laws and due process of law we have nothing but anarchy. Before slavery was outlawed it was legal, that did not make it just. When women were denied the right to vote it was legal but it was not just.
The ability to detain someone without charges, evidence or any process of due law is unjust regardless of how ‘legal’ they may claim it to be.
Posted by: Orgizmo | September 27, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
“they may seem ok when behind bars at gitmo but turn them loose in anerica and they will make 911 look like a teen age prank.”
uh-huh. ok Joe.
Oh I see, you must have been Bush’s intelligence advisor back in 2001-2003.
Nice job with that detailed info!
Posted by: Tarl | September 28, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am
OMG! Obama is Bush Lite!
Posted by: Code Pink | September 28, 2009, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Lougarous,
Maybe Janet N is investigating some right wingers because they bring loaded firearms to gatherings? Did you ever think of that? These people (not surprising)have a screw loose and who knows what kind of sick mind they have.
Posted by: Laura Morales | September 28, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Poodle Puppet!
8 more years just like the last 8?
Gates speaks as if he is a Cheney Clone.
Judeofascists loved promoting their “Islamofascism” propaganda.
Carrots(bribery) Sticks(murder) Coercive Diplomacy(extortion & blackmail).
Did you see all the same bloodthirsty AIPAC-paid recycled neocon shills on TV selling more war for profit?
Watch as they pretend to know nothing of the mounting 9/11 evidence, whistleblowers, & leaks that point to them
Posted by: nader paul kucinich gravel | September 29, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am
*MSM ordered to censor G20
“Constitutional Law Professor”
Ventura Sheehan Perot Paul Nader McKinney Kucinich Kaptur Gravel Gonzalez Clemente Choate Carter Baldwin Anderson
Posted by: gravel kucinich paul nader | September 29, 2009, 4:11 am 4:11 am