By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Sep 20, 2009 9:00am

President Obama: ‘Skeptical’ on More Troops for Afghanistan

President Obama supported a flexible timeline for withdrawing troops from Iraq.

Now some of his fellow Democrats like Senators Russ Feingold, Diane Feinstein, and Byron Dorgan are calling for the same in Afghanistan.

While the President didn’t commit to that, he did say – for the first time, I believe –that he was “skeptical” about sending more troops to Afghanistan.

Here’s our exchange:

STEPHANOPOULOS:  Afghanistan is a big issue facing the country right now.

OBAMA:  That is a big issue.  That's worth talking about.

STEPHANOPOULOS:  You were for a flexible time line in Iraq.  Some people now are saying that's exactly what should happen in Afghanistan if the same conditions hold. Do you agree with that?

OBAMA:  Here's what I think.  When we came in, basically, there had been drift in our Afghan strategy.  Everybody acknowledges that.  And I ordered a top to bottom review.  The most important thing I wanted was us to refocus on why we're there.  We're there because al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans and we cannot allow extremists who want to do violence to the United States to be able to operate with impunity.

Now, I think we've lost — we lost that focus for a while and you started seeing a — a classic case of mission creep where we're just there and we start taking on a whole bunch of different missions.

I wanted to narrow it.  I did order 21,000 additional troops there to make sure that we could secure the election, because I thought that was important.  That was before the review was completed.  I also said after the election I want to do another review.  We've just gotten those 21,000 in.  General McChrystal, who's only been there a few months, has done his own assessment.

I am now going to take all this information and we're going to test whatever resources we have against our strategy, which is if by sending young men and women into harm's way, we are defeating al Qaeda and — and that can be shown to a skeptical audience, namely me — somebody who is always asking hard questions about deploying troops, then we will do what's required to keep the American people safe.

Watch our exchange HERE.

- George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Um, excuse me, Mr. President. What about your promise to bring them home?

Posted by: WhatChange? | September 20, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

way to seel out our troops already in afghanistan and jeopardize their mission barry! all this to appease your liberal kook base, what a ‘leader’- NOT and YOU are supposed to be the more experienced leader than sarah palin (least thats what evryone told us last year)? please barry, after 8 months in office i am still trying to find something you are good at. where’s that birth certificate bro?

Posted by: realman1963 | September 20, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

I believe we can win in Afganistan if we focus on hearts and minds. The Taliban is the worse of all evils and I think most Afgans know it.

Posted by: LongT | September 20, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

I am soooo tired of Barrack Obama ALWAYS
being refered to as OUR BLACK PRESIDENT!
HE IS NOT!!! Why has everyone forgotten his MOTHER??? He is BI-RACIAL!!! HE is NOT BLACK!!! Following this rationale, all biracial people should be considered black…I being 1/4French,1/4 Irish and 1/2Apache should be considered Apache?
I’m just so sick and tired of both he and the pundits (you included)using this misconception as a selling point for politics and policies.
To reiterate…HE IS NOT BLACK-HE IS BI-RACIAL!!!

Posted by: patricia jones | September 20, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Take the cowardly way out.

Posted by: DANIEL | September 20, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

If this guy isn’t going to fight then he needs to get out before we lose any more of our brave soldiers in vein.
Fish or cut bait Obama.

Posted by: rplat | September 20, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Too bad McCain didn’t win. We could have already nuked Iran and defeated Al-Qaida in Africa, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Posted by: tom | September 20, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Historically, even the strongest militaries have rarely won fights against militias.
Americans did not win in Iraq. They shook hands with Sunnis to calm down the situation. Sunnis in Iraq were the ones doing the terror in Iraq.
Pakistan army could not defeat the mukhti bani, which was weaponized and trained by India, and lost East Pakistan.
Russians could not beat Mujahideen, a rag tag militia, though supported heavily by American weapons and CIA/ISI training & orchestration.
I think it will be the best decision if Americans make a deal with taliban, bring the war to an end, & bring soldiers home.
Pakistan’s success over al qaeda is not going to last, it will back fire, every day we hear about terrorist attack despite the success they claim.

Posted by: Steve | September 20, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

President Obama is acting on his campaign promises more accurately and honestly than any of the 8 presidents I’ve seen serve in my lifetime. This includes Iraq, health care, the environment, and Afghanistan. He is also under more of a microscope than any president ever has been. We should not let our new obsession with the gossip machines of cable media and the internet obscure the integrity and greatness of this man as a trustworthy leader.

Posted by: bob10001 | September 20, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

If any person that has a project to deliver on, has to have a fair amount of skepticism. Everywhere you look in life there are many obstacles which I call ‘derailers’. If our focus (tunnerl vision) is so attuned to the end product, and we fail to recognize the periperal obstacles that we can miss a better opportunity along our course.
It reminds me of the wonderful people who have tried to remove mines in a field or war zone. Do they run through the course and hope to avoid them? Or do they steadily, but effectively, work their way through and grab what they can, when they can?
If we are not tuned into the peripheral vision obstacles that little the highways of life, than there maybe opportunities missed along the way. Good luck Mr. President.

Posted by: JR Jake | September 20, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Was this before or after the arrest or investigation of the people in Colorado and Queens who claim affiliation with al Queda and another terrorist threat?
Biracial, tri-racial (French, Irish, Apache), who cares what “race” the president is (I know a lot of people do) as long as e is doing the best job possible to keep America safe. Most of us here are mutts anyway!

Posted by: DeLia | September 20, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Well said, bob10001. I wholeheartedly concur.

Posted by: sign seeker 17 | September 20, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

please bring back paul kugman or someone similar.
please fire peggy noonan who has to be one of the most ill informed, useless pundit on television. an absolute non event. on your show today, she has no idea as to what even any of the bills are on health care or how you would move forward on merging any of them.
peggy noonan is a waste to be on television as a pundit. useless.

Posted by: stephen hughes | September 20, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Is it me or does George seem overly aggressive and borderline rude? He is too eager and even cutting him off. Whats with that?

Posted by: Monica32 | September 20, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Why don’t they post the whole interview unedited, I want to see that, come on ABC!

Posted by: Jake | September 20, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Funny to see all the Republican hypocrites now blaming Obama for having troops there.

Posted by: David | September 20, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

I just watched with my own eyes on the video Obama said that he didnt even know that Acorn was going to receive “a lot of money”($8.5 Billion) Oh my gosh. Who cares about a lowly eight and a half billion dollars going to criminals? IF YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT THIS OBAMA——–WHO DOES????? ONE OF YOUR CZARS??? WHERE IS OUR MONEY??? WHERE IS OUR PRESIDENT???

Posted by: tim | September 20, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Another renegged campaign pled.
No wonder he is on the road to being the worst ever president.

Posted by: jonny | September 20, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

WOW.Is George trying to put ABC News back into the mainstream by treating Obama like a real president instead of a “black man” whom we cannot criticize apart from being racist? Making Obama legitimate might restore some trust in ABC News, but it will take time for us to get used to moving forward instead of backwards into the 1960′s.

Posted by: Sandra | September 20, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Yes Monica, it is just you. The rest of us have watched how the old media at least tried to keep a president honest by CHALLENGING his ideas. Remember how democrats said that criticizing Bush was the highest form of patriotism? Dont you believe we have any patriots left in the media?

Posted by: Sandra | September 20, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

No voting present this time, Obama. Lives are at stake. Either bring the Taliban down like Bush did to Al Queda in Iraq, or get out. I will support you either way, but I will not support nor respect a Commander in Chief who continues to vote “present.”

Posted by: reneemf | September 20, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Just because he holds the job doesn’t mean he knows anything about fighting a war!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 20, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Listen to the Commanders of the Troops on the ground and give them what they need. We are at war Politically Correct decisions on military matters in a time of war get more people killed. The way Obama is going the movie “Red Dawn” will be a true story soon!!!!

Posted by: Matthew Lashley | September 20, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

George did not do a very good job on this interview. It seems like he set out to argue about the definition of tax rather than the issues at hand. David Gregory got you here George. Much better interview.

Posted by: JH | September 20, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

You mean we didn’t define the mission before we allocated an additional 21,000 troops or did have time to think about it while campaigning about this being the right war last year? Once again we have democrates playing politics with Americans in harm’s way.

Posted by: Texan2112 | September 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

LOL, Im laughing so hard, i just heard her saying “45,000 americans die each year because they lose their health insurance, thats one out of every 12 americans.” I know she meant something else, but still, ROFL.

Posted by: Sarah | September 20, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

WAHHHH! We want to be brainwashed, send someone who wont challenge our beloved leader! Someone call the WAHHHHHmbulance!

Posted by: terry | September 20, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

George may be more interested in his ratings!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 20, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

The MILITARY leader has asked for more troops because he feels that is what he needs to get the job done and the CIVILIAN is telling him no. I wasn’t aware that the President or anybody he surrounds himself with is QUALIFIED to make that kind of decision (regardless of what authority they have).

Posted by: Chri$ | September 20, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

I am a women, and I want to see a women president, but I want a qualified women president, and that is why I would not have voted for Hilary. It is time for everyone to admit that they voted for Obama because of his race, not because he was qualified and right for the job. The only racism that is going on is that the media and the people that decided they wanted a black president, not Obama for president. Obama knew this and they used this to get elected. You want to have an open honest conversation about race? Then this is where we need to start. And also I’m tired of being talked down to by our representatives and people in the media, as in “normal American people don’t think this way” “silly beliefs” it is time our elected representatives and our press remember who they work for. Us simple, silly, abnormal people are the ones whom pay their paychecks, and give them the money that runs this country.

Posted by: Ava Hawke | September 20, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Our military is USED by high-dollar investment strategists who have WDC tightly controlled. The USA has NO RIGHT to be occupying another nations soil and it should NOT be tolerated! We would not allow this kind of foreign military aggression upon our soil and we should likewise be respectful to the lives of citizens of other nations! GET OUT NOW!

Posted by: AgressionSucks | September 20, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Texan, I do believe it was a GOP super-majority that landed us in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Posted by: AgressionSucks | September 20, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

George was TRYING to ASK questions !! That is what an interview is !! BUT someone else kept talking over him – I guess not wanting his IDEALS “questioned”.

Posted by: Denisea213 | September 20, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Texan, I do believe it was a GOP super-majority that landed us in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted by: AgressionSucks | Sep 20, 2009 12:11:07 PM
there never was a republican super majority that voted for the wars. Tehre was a majority, but democrats could have filibustered, but they didn’t because the war was popular at the time and they thought they had to vote for it to get reelected. It is that simple. So don’t delude yourself into thinking it was all the republicans fault for everythign wrong in the world.

Posted by: rylin25 | September 20, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Of course Obama wouldn’t want to talk bout ACORN very much :)
Why didn’t George ask Obama about his relationship with ACORN? Aren’t they pretty thick? Isn’t Obama’s support of ACORN the reason why ACORN gets so much taxpayer money in the first place?

Posted by: John | September 20, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Finally we have a president who is asking the tough questions and thinking hard about use of our troops. We are in Afghanistan because of the 9/11 terrorist attack and taking away a safe harbor from Al-Qaeda. We are not there to conquer Afghanistan.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I am soooo tired of Barrack Obama ALWAYS
being refered to as OUR BLACK PRESIDENT!
HE IS NOT!!! Why has everyone forgotten his MOTHER??? He is BI-RACIAL!!! HE is NOT BLACK!!! Following this rationale, all biracial people should be considered black…I being 1/4French,1/4 Irish and 1/2Apache should be considered Apache?
I’m just so sick and tired of both he and the pundits (you included)using this misconception as a selling point for politics and policies.
To reiterate…HE IS NOT BLACK-HE IS BI-RACIAL!!!
Posted by: patricia jones
________________________________
In actuality, yes, he is bi-racial but when he ran for office, he ran as a BLACK president. He IS a member of the NAACP. He DID attend the million man march led by Louis Farrakhan and wasn’t his election a historical election because of Obama’s skin color?

Posted by: marco | September 20, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

If you read, or saw, the interview… This President wants results before commiting MORE American lives… how can any of us find fault in that? The goal of wiping out Al Quida, and capture of the man responsible for 9-11 has become skewed. We need to take that back, but there needs to be results. How can ANY American dispute this?

Posted by: Troy Street | September 20, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Democrats want to lose the war. We’re back to 9/10/01 thinking and their more interested in installing socialism and tyranny here than in defending American interests or remembering that we got attacked by the Taliban in the first place. Idiots.

Posted by: Jon | September 20, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Afghanistan, and western Pakistan aka Waziristan, is where our troops should have been to begin with – never Iraq. NATO supported it, and we’d be out by now except for Bush — found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

Posted by: Reg373 | September 20, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Obama is going to cost lots of lives in afganistan because of his weak liberal stupid policies. Obama make carter look like a good president. We cannot take much more of obama’s crap he is destroying the US

Posted by: JA | September 20, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Oh, good, politicians in Washington are going to run a war in Afghanistan. It worked so well in Viet Nam.
Regardless of what you may think of Bush, at least he finally listened to his commanders in the field instead of Rumsfeld. When he did, things turned around.

Posted by: MizFW | September 20, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

President Obama should rightly so be skeptical of sending more troops to Afghanistan. By changing the paradigm in strategy does not mean the war on terror or with militant Islamic groups is not worth pursing, it just means we must progress to means where we get a better return for our resources.
Most Democrats and moderate Republican agree the war on terror will never end, it will require skills of management and prevention. The symptoms and root causes of the conflict caused by 9/11 should be re-framed, again.
Currently the war in Afghanistan does not need more U.S. troops but to be better manage with technology and multinational force on the ground to stabilize nation building efforts. The real war in Afghanistan is winning the hearts and minds of tribal leaders and their people who could careless about the Afghan central government and who care more about their local power and resources.
As for the bigger picture, our strategy should recognize the Islamic world as two different communities, Shia and Sunni. If we do not listen and learn from the outside our culture and interests, we cannot lead and manage conflict of others or those who want to draw U.S. into muddy waters of religious, political and economic conflicts, e.g., Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Pakistan.
The question remains how can the U.S. better leverage and manage conflict with it partners and adversaries?

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | September 20, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

So President Obama whom I voted for…as part of the 21,000 man surge in Afghanistan, what did my son get wounded for on Aug 29th when on foot patrol a suicide bomber blew himself up from just 15 ft away? My son is one of the lucky ones…only ten days later he was back on patrol again. But when he comes home on R&R in Oct he is going to have a veterinarian friend cut some shrapnel out of his shoulder, arm, ear, and thigh. And we will get his hearing tested since he is partially deaf in one ear now. So much to do in just 14 days.

Posted by: Steve | September 20, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

The President has the right idea on focus. Take the time to information gather and make the decision. Lack of focus can mean some costly mistakes

Posted by: ruth | September 20, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

In spite of massive incompetence, George W. Bush left office with 29% still giving him a positive rating; Cheney left with 19% still rating him highly. Many of these die-hards would never vote for a person of color for high office. From these people comes the vitriolic-filled signs and slogans that are personal to President Obama, not issue-based. President Carter merely called out those people, saying: “I think . . . an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity towards President Barrack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he’s African-American.”
I am a litigator; George Will is NOT. Carter is not pounding the table. Liberals are just asking that responsible Republicans call out the race-tinged slogans and behavior where they see it and not let Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh take control of their party.

Posted by: Phil in Colorado | September 20, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

bob10001 did you ever drink the kool aid

Posted by: bob10002 | September 20, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

OBAMA: Here’s what I think. When we came in, basically, there had been drift in our Afghan strategy. Everybody acknowledges that. And I ordered a top to bottom review. The most important thing I wanted was us to refocus on why we’re there. We’re there because al Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans and we cannot allow extremists who want to do violence to the United States to be able to operate with impunity.
————————–
We cannot defeat Al Queda in Afrans because Al Queda is not there. They are now in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries. Our foe in Afrans is the Taliban. Why does the administration keep denying this simple fact.

Posted by: Beto Ramos | September 20, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

greetings __________________
i think it should be
a all volunteer American
army in Afghan so all the
big bad boys that want to figh
can go over and kick some butt,
that’s the American way is it not
and those who want to come home,
come home- so put your money where your mouth is and sign up or shut up!
let freedom of choice ring
you can have my old rifle and 10Division patch .
a-men to that brother i see that hand!!!
Blessings ____ bobknab

Posted by: bob knab | September 20, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Bob, you’ve drank the whole pot of kool-aid calling Obama a “trustworthy leader”. Are you serious?

Posted by: Ryan | September 20, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I believe something is wrong with George. Look at him. Is he drunk on something? I guess I should first ask does he drink?

Posted by: Magdiel | September 20, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

He’s so calm and intelligent. When he explains the way things are, it’s like hearing a voice of reason after a month of fearful children at Town Halls and that Senator from Billybobsville yelling “you lie”.
I’m reminded, why the majority of my America voted for him. Thank you Mr. President. Keep working hard and staying so calm and mature while the other side does the opposite!

Posted by: Ron in PA | September 20, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Man I sure hope that the healthcare reform bill that Obama put out passes. We really need this! I appreciate what he’s doing and hope that the kids in congress can stop playing games so we can get things done.

Posted by: Bill Thorton | September 20, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

The headline is totally misleading, George. Obama was clearly referring to the Afghanistan strategy under bush when he said “we’ve lost – we lost that focus.” You knew that, but wanted to create a controversial headline. Please report the news and stop trying to create it.

Posted by: dmj | September 20, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

We need to send more troops, we have to finish the job, even if we are there for a long time. If we leave Al Quaeda will rebuild and continue to send people to kill the US. Look at the foiled plot the other day for a bombing in NYC. We are stuck having a relationship with Afghanistan and Pakistan for a very long time. The minds of most Arabic countries is that they fight for thousands of years, so we will have to come back if we don’t finish and some people here will suffer to so crummy attack they take out on the US again, and again, and again until they finally just finish the US. It will be gloomy, if we leave now. Send more troops, let’s make progress building and forging relationships with those people in Afghanistan who are good.

Posted by: Sue | September 20, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Mr. Stephanopoulos,
I want to emphasize why President Obama is absolutely accurate on his description of healthcare being a tax.
I have been constrained with a pre-existing condition since going headfirst through the dashboard of a Volkswagen beetle as a Cadillac hydroplaned into us in 1968 when I was five months old. The result of that has been a “pre-existing” condition of trauma induced epilepsy. I from the age of 17 when it was finally diagnosed, to 1992 when it was possible for me to get health insurance by becoming a contractor for a temporary employment agency that offered health insurance after working all around the beltway; I have done everything in my power to pay my own way and work myself to the ground as hard as possible to “deserve” health insurance. Having spent my entire adulthood seeking to be a responsible person, I am deeply confused by the concept of the majority of the population that they are “owed” healthcare. I believe that I should be paying into it so that when I need a surgery that costs nearly $300,000 to get the seizures controllable by medication, that I was responsible to pay close to 25% of my income to cover. Thanks to a neurologist that suggested that I apply for Medicare, I was able to gain disability and be able to get coverage. From the day that began, I personally worked to get employed to where I did not have to obligate the citizens of the U.S. to pay for me. I was determined to get that to happen and after nearly 10 years of effort including working several years for no income to gain experience to get employed, it did happen.
My husband and I pay $200 every two weeks to pay health insurance premiums.At one point we paid $1,400 per month, but with my pre-existing condition that still was a bargain. I have not heard a single person on either the media side or the governmental side looking for an actual solution to get health insurance for those that want it. The bottom line is that until an American citizen can walk into Humana or Cigna or Blue Cross and buy health insurance the same way they walk into Geico or Nationwide or Progressive to get auto insurance, this is entirely moot. The average citizen who is not below the poverty line or over 65 is not able to get health insurance even if they were more than willing to pay the $900 you and the President both pay on the incomes you both make. That is where the total disconnect is located; and where it needs to be addressed. Particularly as according to the U.S. Census Bureau noted that at the end of 2008, 46.3 million Americans now have no health insurance and are incapable of going to get it. That number has increased in 2009 and the numbers of contractors, temps and the underemployed may very well make that an even more untenable number.
It is accurate that the population beneath the poverty level who is incapable of working for above minimum wage for their lack of education of skills should be covered anyway and charged within their means. Otherwise, as the President noted, “That’s just piling on.” However, as he also noted, “If, on the other hand, we’re giving tax credits, we’ve set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we’ve driven down the costs, we’ve done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you’ve just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances.” Those of us who have done everything in our power to fulfill our responsibilities as citizens do not deserve to have to pay for choices made by people who do not chose to contribute to a system that they will almost always take away from at some point.
Mr. Stephanopoulos, you brought up the Webster’s Dictionary’s definition of a tax: “a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.” The health care costs are not a charge of money imposed by authority on persons for “public purposes”; rather, it is a “user fee.” This is a charge for what a taxpayer and/or ward of the state cost the system for using the healthcare system. If they are willing to become a cost to society without contributing to the society, then that is being a liability to the state. They don’t need to contribute beyond their means, but it is still a user fee, not a tax. The reckless person who figures they are immortal and does not look to when the may need a doctor, is not only being irresponsible to them, their families and the citizens; but is actually assuming that they are entitled without contributing anything to being owed something.
This is frankly part of what we as a society need to work on most fundamentally and until we do, this will never improve.

Posted by: Beck | September 20, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Obama = Manchurian Candidate.

Posted by: DeepThoughts4ABC | September 20, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

America has lost her will to complete a mission. For the sake of our soldiers you either go in with full force and protection or you don’t go in at all. You put in as many troops as you can to get the job done. We have the power – we have the force – we just don’t have the will. Our leaders are couch generals.

Posted by: M. Sheldon | September 20, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Where is Osama Bin Ladin, I thought Obama is going to get him, words only words just to win the election. Lies all lies.

Posted by: Marlene | September 20, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

President Obama on Acorn.
“it is not a major national issue that I pay much attention to.””
His idea of a major national issue is when his black friends are arrested by white cops.

Posted by: james | September 20, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

obama is all that the repubs say that he is not…he willo bring most , if not all, of these issues to healthy as possible conclusions, then the repubs will take credit for the ‘good’, amplify and blame obama for ‘not so good’..so be it..i just hope that the 68% that voted obama in remain true to this vote in 2o12, when they see that he is the best thing since roosevelt…

Posted by: danny aikin | September 20, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Come on George – generally love the show but pulling out Webster’s to define “tax” in the context of mandatory insurance for those who can afford it is ridiculous! Very pathetic, thinking it will be hard for me to watch the show again.
@ Stephen Hughes – I agree, he is being aggressive to the point of ridiculous!

Posted by: rjh | September 20, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

First of all I am a republican,I really don’t think that should matter at this point.What matters is we are all Americans and I think more than ever we all need to remember what it means to be an American.I did not vote for Obama and have heard lots of complaining about what direction we are headed in,but the thing is none of these people who are complaining have any idea’s that are any better.Obama is the President and no matter what people should show some respect for the man and the office for what he holds!!! Give the man a chance and you may be surprised at what he may do.Remember to take some pride in our Country and things will turn out in all our favors.God Blessed America!

Posted by: Edward Wilkinson | September 21, 2009, 2:01 am 2:01 am

All we heard during President Bush’s last term was how Iraq was the “wrong war, wrong time, etc) from the likes of Sen. John Kerry, then Senator Barack Obama, and any other liberal spouting leftists talking points. Senator Obama stated on the campaign trail that we should be in Afghanistan, not Iraq.
Fast forward to the fall of 2009 and President Obama’s hand picked Commander of US forces in Afghanistan; Army Gen Stanley McChrystal (a warrior’s warrior with impeccable credentials) will soon issue a sobering report urging more troops be sent to the region. According to the report, failure to send those additional forces risks “mission failure”. Comments by the President this past weekend suggest he may not honor that request. How pathetic Mr. President.
The President seems to be caught between the proverbial “rock and a hard place”. Face the wrath of ultra anti-war, pacifists in congress and those who make up the base of his party or support Gen McChystal’s request. Well like it or not Mr. President, its time to put aside remaking the country and lead on a real issue. Are you really willing to allow the United States to lose a war?

Posted by: Preston Thomas | September 21, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Obama = Manchurian Candidate

Posted by: Deepthinker4U | September 21, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Would someone please tell me what the difference is between socialism and subsidized capitalism? Both of them appear to accomplish the same goal.

Posted by: Gary | September 21, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

“”"”"”i just hope that the 68% that voted obama in remain true to this vote in 2o12, when they see that he is the best thing since roosevelt… “”"”"”"
Posted by: danny aikin
Have you taken a look at his approval rating? Actually, Obama got near 58% of the vote and his rating is about 10% below that right now.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

THANK YOU FOR NOT LETTING THE PRESIDENT LEAD YOU DOWN THAT CROOKED ROAD HE CALLS TRUTH, THANK YOU AGAIN FOR NOT DRINKING THE KOOLAID.

Posted by: DOUGH | September 21, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Bill mauer if I spelled it right said we who complain are racist and are calling Obama the N word. I find that offensive and Bill should be kicked off his show for even implicating that. Did we call you all who compalined about bush racist? did we call you all names like you are doing now? No. This is bull and now makes me and some of my friends push even harder to get the jimmy Carter worst president clone out of there. jimmy carter and gang tried to start a race card and now it is backfiring on them. We will now campain even harder against Obama because of the dem name calling.

Posted by: Jim Rod | September 21, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

That’s his decision, but the General is correct….if a significant increase in troops, to totally eliminate the Taliban, is not provided, then we will have simply wasted the last 8 yrs. of our effort there.
You don’t win wars, by going half the distance.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 21, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Preston Thomas —– Don’t forget Pelosi stating “I don’t think there is support for any more troops in Afghanistan in Congress”. So, the Prez and number 3 in line appear to agree we may not give our Generals what they request. If you can fire a General, can we fire a Prez and a Speaker?

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

This is the war that Obama said we should be fighting. Remember the campaign, Captain Wee Wee? Did you really mean it?

Posted by: Willie12345 | September 21, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

“”"”"The question remains how can the U.S. better leverage and manage conflict with it partners and adversaries? “”"”"”
Posted by: threeriverscrossing
By sending more troops! Did you not see the request of the “General on the ground”? Obama needs to send more troops to have an overwhelming force to kill all that need to be killed. Then we can come home.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

“”"”"The President has the right idea on focus. Take the time to information gather and make the decision. Lack of focus can mean some costly mistakes “”"”"
Posted by: ruth
Recent history for you. Obama fired the previous General and put McChrystal in there to do exactly as you state: “Take the time to information gather and make the decision”. Now that he hears exactly what the General he fired told him, that they need more troops, he looks to balk on it. He fired one General and in the interim of the new General doing his assessment, we lost more troops than any other month. War doesn’t stop for us to make decisions. We pay Generals alot of money to make those decisions for our military. OBAMA, GIVE THEM THE NECESSARY RESOURCES TO WIN NOW!

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Skeptical about winning? I thought President Obama said he would not let al Qaeda win in Afghanistan. Now he has to be convinced on whether it is winnable. Sounds like another nose extender to me.

Posted by: afloatinasea | September 21, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama and his communist cronies want America to fail and lose in Afghanistan.

Posted by: LEE | September 21, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Obama does not want to send troops without carefully looking into it like we did for seven years before. Not much thought given by the republicans for eight years so why the fuss now? Because it is Obama. He takes his time to think and he will listen to his commanders but he wants to know “what is the plan?’ I doubt he will invest men needlessly and will do the right thing. I would rather he take his time to analyze the situation then to quickly send more men to injury and possibly death. He is not in favor of war and did not believe in the one in Iraq as I did so I would rather he take his time and get it right.

Posted by: talmag | September 21, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Outstanding interviewing job George showing once again Preident Obama is trying to pass another pig with lip stick painted on it.

Posted by: rczman | September 21, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

“”"”"”i just hope that the 68% that voted obama in remain true to this vote in 2o12, when they see that he is the best thing since roosevelt… “”"”"”"
Posted by: danny aikin
Have you taken a look at his approval rating? Actually, Obama got near 58% of the vote and his rating is about 10% below that right now.
Posted by: lfrichar
__________________
Actually, Obama received about 53% of the popular vote, and his current approval rating is 53.6% (RCP average).

Posted by: Numeros | September 21, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Barak Obama! Way to turn your back on the soldiers in harms way in Afghanistan! Way to break yet another campaign promise! EITHER GET THEM ALL OUT NOW – OR GET THEM ENOUGH MAN POWER TO STOP THEIR SLAUGHTER!
No more of this voting “PRESENT” cr*p. Our kids over over their DYING – and BO can’t even figure out why we are there now? This guy is an UTTER LOSER! HE CAMPAIGNED on THIS being the important WAR – that BUSH should have never taken his eye off THIS war — that he would RAMP IT UP TO WIN! Now he leaves our men there, but not with enough to stop the slaughter???? We have RECORD BREAKING losses of men in the past few months in Afghanistan!

Posted by: clr | September 21, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Its Fine if he’s skeptical. The
Generals should have to make their
case, but if they do he will just have
to take the heat from the Left and do
whats Right. :-)
Anybody talking about making a deal with the Taliban doesn’t know what
they are talking about. They would
sign anything to make us go away and then do whatever they wanted including take revenge on anybody there who was
foolish enough to trust us.
We need to wipe out the Poppy Trade and their Money Flow will dry up and with it their ability to recruit.
Have the Farmers grow Food Crops and then pay them an Inflated Price, say 80% of Poppy Prices. Distribute the Food to other parts of the Country.
The Billions we pay for that will be saved in Troops Lives and Equiptment.
Not to mention the Savings from having the main source of Heroin ended.
We could cut the DEA budget by an equivalent amount.
Some dunces proposed paying the Farmers not to grow Poppies but the fields have to be filled with something so have them grow food. Its not like Afghanistan couldn’t use it.
Sorry about the Novel Length Commentary.
Cheers!

Posted by: KC | September 21, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

George: I cannot apologize to you for a blog I posted a few months ago basically recounting my observations of you as a high profile network newsman seemingly showing a lean toward your political ideology, often compounding the indication with many leading questions exhibiting the same views. Even as a freelance writer, a journalist should not apologize for a legitimate story properly constructed at the time. I think you were nothing short of stupendous in your interview with President Obama. You were a quintessential member of the Press or media. I will consider you to be the new Walter Winchell if you keep this up.

Posted by: Jay Adler | September 21, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

I am sorry to have to issue this comment but I am meeting Americans all over who share the following worry. Our government is beginning to figuratively resemble a rudderless ship.
As a sidebar because the smart money is on a heavy Congressional flip in 2010,keep your eye on Governor Pawlenty, I think he is Presidential Timber. In our country, someone always comes along.

Posted by: Jay Adler | September 21, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Thanks George! Finally a liberal willing to speak out in search of the truth! Nice job!

Posted by: James | September 21, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“Our government is beginning to figuratively resemble a rudderless ship.”
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll, 72% of Americans say Obama “is willing to make hard decisions,” and 66% describe him as “a strong and decisive leader.”

Posted by: Numeros | September 22, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am

I think that we all need to just let President Obama do his job. For those who always complain about he doesn’t do this and he doesn’t that, why? STOP complaining, what you really want to say is that you are MAD because he’s an African American, and that has blinded your view. Let him do his job, why didn’t we hear all of this when BUSH was in office? Stop being so hateful towards others, because this didn’t start with President Obama, your evil thoughts been in you for a long time and you need to CHECK yourself before it’s to late.

Posted by: Matthew Livingston | September 22, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

This whole Iraq/Afghan thing is crap. This is the main reason half of our military is getting out at the end of there contracts. You don’t hear about that. All you ever hear is how many we have gotten to join. Trust me the military personel getting out far out weighs the number comming in.

Posted by: Lucky1 | September 22, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

THANK YOU GEORGE; you are the only one who didn’t let Obama intimidate you! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!

Posted by: Tyger | September 22, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

George:
What a stroke of civility, intellectual integrity and refined discorse to provide a definition from Webster’s Dictionary. Imagine my dismay when Pres. Obama chose to bluster and treat you and your audience like petulent and ignorant children. My only regret is that PC and an artificial requirements allow anyone serve this type of insult to ABC’s audience unchallenged!

Posted by: Roger Sorensen | September 22, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Mr. Obama, with all due respect, I think the generals are more qualified than you are to make assessments on what troop levels we need.

Posted by: Alex | September 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

We went to Afghanistan after 9/11 to “get the bad guys”. Eight years later surely they aren’t hanging out in the places we didn’t find them to begin with. If we are truly at war why are only a handful of Americans involved in the war effort? To stay in Afghanistan without everything necessary to accomplish our goals is not good for our troops, not good for the people of Afghanistan, men, women, girls and even the boys. To stay another three of four years redeploying the same troops that have already done multiple deployments is not what a “united” group of people should even consider. There is so much media about the women and children, mostly girl children, in Afghanistan and I am truly so very sorry about their circumstances. Does anyone out there have a clue as to what is going on with the children here? The children who have had mom or dad or even both in and out of their lives repeatedly. Do you understand how difficult it is for them to focus somedays and do their best at school? Have you ever tried to explain war to a 2 year old? Have you ever seen the love a 2 year old can have for a parent? How about a four year old who thinks dad is the coolest thing out there but with the third deployment 2 months away will have spent more time without dad than with dad. How about Dad trying to perform a terrible, stressful job knowing that it WON’T be over soon. Can you even begin to imagine this scenario with mom being deployed? I can’t. Do you know how many moms and dads are not regular army, marines, etc. but instead part of a guard unit. Not like what so many people like to say is “their choice”(being deployed) but people who were willing to give back during “katrina” type times in exchange for education or a downpayment on that critical to the economy mortgage. Do we not care as much about the women, girls, boys, people of the U.S. as we do those in Afghanistan? If we are at war, do it. But please remember war is not healthy for children and other living things so please do it quickly and don’t talk about health care until you understand how important it is to have war out of your life in order to be healthy as individuals and a nation. I hope the president and all others with power over this hell will stay focused on what they can and cannot fix and will have the wisdom to know the difference.

Posted by: julia | September 23, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Uhh Al Queda was not in Iraq, think before you post….
RE: No voting present this time, Obama. Lives are at stake. Either bring the Taliban down like Bush did to Al Queda in Iraq, or get out. I will support you either way, but I will not support nor respect a Commander in Chief who continues to vote “present.”

Posted by: Brad | September 23, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

LOLZZZZZ!!!! MR. O U DA BEST!!!

Posted by: Bonquisha | September 25, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

How can anyone say hearts and minds. These people do not care, or they would fight these people themselves. We are losing more and more Soldiers to hearts and minds everyday. We need to be more aggressive. I am so sick and tired of seeing our comrades die in vein, while politicians preach hearts and minds. Hearts and minds is the biggest reason for ill success in Vietnam. If we are here to fight, then let us fight. Quit tieing our hands behind our backs.
Disgruntled Soldier.

Posted by: John | September 26, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

I myself have been to Iraq 2 times and Afghanistan 3 over my past 12 years of dedicated service. I neither Democrat nor Republican. I have been pretty happy with the efforts of our president. He has made great strides in accomplishing tasks in all areas. Our nation was in a very tough place and he has worked to bring it back. It will take time and all our people see is what has not happened. You have to be patient. It takes time for our economy to recover and with the new build up in Afghanistan it will take some time to accomplish alot of the tasks to put an end to the terror threats.
For someone to say we should make a deal with them is unacceptable. We left Sumalia because noone wanted us there. We were there for support and the loss we took compared to the accomplishments weren’t worth the risks. We leave there now we will take another hit because they are not trustworthy nor are they conventional in the methods.
For those that support our military I thank you all and I am proud to serve. We will continue to accomplish the tasks set before us. We believe in our President and we believe in the cause.
Have a great day

Posted by: doug | September 27, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

I am glad that you people want to take our troops out of Afganistan. That will mean that they will be comming to a neighborhood near you. So when they blow up your business, school or your place of recreation, you will realize what a good idea it was to with draw our troops.

Posted by: Paul | September 27, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

If the U.S. and Israel get behing a Central Asian Union consisting of Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikstan, Turkmenistan, Krgyzstan and Uzbekistan the problem would be solved. A union like this modeled after the European Union would give Iran another buffer on its backdoor. A buffer that would be supported by Russai, China and the U.S. It would also show that Israel is committed to peace in the region overall.

Posted by: if | September 28, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

You really expect President Obama to do in 7 months what the idiot that got us all in this mess took 8 YEARS to screw up?
If he coulod do that he would be “The Chosen One”

Posted by: Missy | September 28, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Look at the big picture people, these people are not fighting out of anger, it’s there Faith, it’s what they cherish, just like Americas freedom, try to take that from us and it’s hell to pay.

Posted by: nicholas Harden | September 28, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.