President Obama to Appoint Ron Bloom Manufacturing Czar
In Cincinnati tomorrow, President Obama will announce that he's appointing Ron Bloom his Senior Counselor for Manufacturing Policy, White House sources tell ABC News.
Bloom is currently Senior Advisor to Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner as a member of the President’s Task Force on the Automotive Industry, named to that position in February. He will remain in that position even while he takes on his new task.
A key part of the team that advised the White House on the struggling U.S. auto industry, Bloom and team pushed U.S. automakers General Motors and Chrysler to come up with viable plans for the future, pushed the CEO of GM to resign, and pushed the U.S. government agreed to become a major shareholder in GM, ponying up $50 billion.
Working with the Auto Task Force, President Obama also supported Chrysler entering into a "short, surgical bankruptcy" and entering into a deal with FIAT while agreeing to provide the company with approximately $3.3 billion in debt or in possession financing to support Chrysler though the chapter 11 proceeding
A former vice president of Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, Bloom was a restructuring expert for the U.S. Steelworkers. In his new position, Bloom will work with the National Economic Council, and the Departments of Commerce, Treasury, Energy, and Labor.
In a statement to be released Monday, President Obama will say, “Last week we learned that our manufacturing sector expanded for the first time in 18 months and had the highest monthly output in two years. It’s a sign that we’re on the right track to economic recovery, but that we still have a long way to go. That’s why I’ve asked Ron Bloom to help coordinate my Administration’s manufacturing policy. Distinguished by his extraordinary service on the Auto Task Force and his extensive experience with both business and labor, Ron has the knowledge and experience necessary to lead the way in creating the good-paying manufacturing jobs of the future. We must do more to harness the power of American ingenuity and productivity so that we can put people back to work and unleash our full economic potential.”
Bloom's statement will read: "A strong manufacturing sector is a cornerstone of American competitiveness and a critical part of President Obama’s economic strategy. As we meet the challenges of globalization and technological change, it is vital to have a concerted effort across the Administration to support an innovative, vibrant manufacturing sector.”
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
OMG, not another Czar??? I am beginning to feel like I am back in the USSR.
Posted by: Cammy | September 6, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“In a statement to be released Monday, President Obama will say, “Last week we learned that our manufacturing sector expanded for the first time in 18 months and had the highest monthly output in two years. It’s a sign that we’re on the right track to economic recovery, but that we still have a long way to go. That’s why I’ve asked Ron Bloom to help coordinate my Administration’s manufacturing policy.”
Oh, no. It was doing so well… Now the federal government kiss of death will be on it! Will it go the way of the Post Office, Social Security and Medicare?
And, WHY ANOTHER CZAR?? These guys can come have beer in the Rose Garden and hash over ideas with their good buddy, but he has a CABINET that is APPROVED for working on policy! What is it now? Thirty something people, offices, staffs, office supplies, power bills, phone bills, furnishings… ON MY DIME?
Just balance the budget and work on the deficit.
Let your people (Czars) go!!
Thanks, Jake!
Posted by: C Kelly | September 6, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
God, I hope they bothered to google this one.
Posted by: mesquito | September 6, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Is there going to be a Special Advisor or Senior Counselor or Czar for every stupid thing these people do? What does this make now…..43? Something like that. Why has this not been needed before? Why is Congress allowing this nonsense to go on without asserting any oversight which is their JOB? Why are we paying all these people at a time that we have no money when we’ve never needed them in the past? I am so fed up with this President! It sure didn’t take long.
Posted by: Bobbi | September 6, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
why is no one watching the networks???
Posted by: johnboy11 | September 6, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
You have got to be kidding me? I guess we are mobilizing the new Government! The one that we didn’t vote in! Oh yeah, I guess you people voted for the guy who is hiring them all.. What was I thinking..
If we don’t stop all this then we are really in for it!
Posted by: SM | September 6, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Journalists, stop calling these people czars. That’s not their titles and no one in the administration refers to them that way. It’s not even technically correct. Just stop it. They’re advisors.
Posted by: Jason Clinton | September 6, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Here a Czar, there a Czar, everywhere a Czar Czar… ol mcdonald had a Czar, e i e i o…
Shadow Government that does not answer to anyone but obummer. No FBI background check, No Congressional oversight, Nothing! Just radicals or people that no nothing of the industry they are taking over… however, they have their marching orders and secret agendas….
Where are the Congressmen and Senators?
Posted by: Czar Mania | September 6, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
So who’s the Czar watching the Czar’s?
Posted by: Jerry Hightower | September 6, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
You people whining about “czars” are insane at best. Every President has advisors, and Republican and Democratic administrations have called these advisors “czars” for DECADES! They have had more or less of them, but there is also a lot more that needs FIXING this time around (ahem).
Just because you started paying attention to politics last week (because Glenn Beck told you Obama was coming to eat your babies) doesn’t mean you are obligated to spread your panic and cupidity everywhere you go.
That said, I totally agree that our President needs to use the Googles on this new appointment. Blatantly embarrassing stuff should be addressed preemptively so as to not feed the trolls of our popular discourse, such as Monsieur Beck.
Posted by: Seth | September 6, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
It would be really great if the news media stopped using the word Czar to describe every new appointment. The Republicans and the far right have decided to do what they do best-take a word , distort it, and then use it in a negative fashion. Surely, ABC must have noticed what the Rush Limbaugh’s and Glen Beck’s of this world are doing with the word “Czar”. It is not a factual description of an administrative appointee, so knock it off already.
Posted by: Laurel1181 | September 6, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
What are the odds? 2010 can’t get here fast enough. The fascists are still trying to brainwash the masses. Luckily, there are not as many useful idiots as they thought there would be. One thing for sure, you may be able to fool a good American once, but eventually they catch on. When you bring in a communist and have your minions trying to make it sound like it’s just another great guy, you find out what America is really about. America is not Cuba. If you’re all about collectivism, move on out. We don’t need nor want you here. This is not a country that wants continued government involvement in our lives. I’d gladly give up medicare and social security in return for keeping my hard earned money.
Posted by: MotherRedDog | September 6, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
When Ron Bloom isn’t overseeing one of the areas he’s responsible for National Economic Council, and the Departments of Commerce, Treasury, Energy, Labor, and Car Czar, what will he do in his spare time? Hang out with his union buddies or play basket ball with the president?
Posted by: Lynn | September 6, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
STOP with the ‘Czar’ BS already! There is a reason that the constitution explicitly forbids ‘titles of nobility’ and there is no such position as ‘Czar’.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 6, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I’m no fan of Obama (understatement heavy), but I’m amazed that conservatives are filling the airwaves (and comment threads) will all this talk about losing their liberty to Obama. That it’s time to take up arms to protect our civil liberties from his “socialist” agenda. Etc.
It’s amazing because it was the *previous* president who shredded the constitution with conservatives and Republicans cheering him on! And take it from me — an actual democratic socialist — Obama’s embrace of Wall Street and corporate business pretty-much-as-usual ain’t “socialist” in the least.
Plenty of us warned that once you let a president use signing statements to ignore laws (as Bush did almost daily), issue executive orders that allow the president to label a citizen an “enemy” and imprison them indefinitely without charge, subcontract war and violence to paramilitary forces like Blackwater at home and abroad, etc., you can be darn sure subsequent presidents aren’t going to give up those powers easily. Obama is using them regularly, and gearing up to formalize the detain-without-charge nonsense that Bush started.
It’s funny how the idea of making sure everyone has some basic health insurance is the last straw for these people. The outrageousness of trying to do such a thing! Sure, cut taxes and run up a huge debt like Bush did, transfering wealth to his cronies, and push through a prescription drug program that enriches the pharmaceutical companies *without any attempt to pay for the plan with tax or budget offsets* — that’s okay.
Meanwhile, utter and total silence from these phony Patrick Henrys when it comes to the corporate-government nexus that truly threatens our democratic ideals and our liberty.
Huxley warned that we’d enslave ourselves if enough pleasures and amusements and enjoyable distractions were sent our way. Glenn Beck — whose marketing slogan includes the word “entertainment” — goes off on Van Jones, the self-important, self-promoting “green jobs” “czar”, and that’s the issue so many are focused on?
Wake up, folks. And put away those guns you keep bringing to health care events. Instead, organize for getting corporate money out of politics completely, and overhauling campaign finance, and pushing reforms to make our elections more democratic. You’re being suckered by TV entertainers.
Posted by: Amazed | September 6, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
More Czars!
If we each get appointed to a Czar position, there will be zero unemployment. We will all have government health care and high paying jobs… but who will we get to staff our offices?
Posted by: Skullduggery | September 6, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Who is Ron Bloom? What is his history and Qualifications?
Posted by: Philip V. | September 6, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
I hearby annoint myself the household cookie czar.
Really, the silliness of the fear-mongering over a term that was invented by Gerry Ford and has been in use for close to 40 years is pathetic. Use the person’s actual title — which in this case is not czar.
Posted by: Joyomama | September 6, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
“Congress returns this week, and here’s hoping that its members, Democrats in particular, learned a little something from this summer’s town hall meetings. The lesson to be drawn from these occasionally raucous events is that America is on the verge of–or already knee-deep in–one of those moments that periodically roil the country and rearrange our preconceived notions about public life. And not a moment too soon.”
The fun part is watching the dunces striving so mightily to remain in denial.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 6, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
All this talk of someone looking over manufacturing.. Hey I got an Idea.. Repeal NAFTA and bring the Jobs OUR Goverment sends or lets others to Send to Other countries so that the Greed of corporate America can earn bigger earnings.. What Happens when there are No jobs left for People to By the goods that are made in other countries.. Then What. The people should Take back control..
Posted by: I trexler | September 6, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
So is this man a or communist, may be a radical?????
He is not?
Well Obama might have got ‘one’ right.
I guess I will have to watch FOX news to know who these people are.
The rest of the media will not find out or care.
And you call yourselves journalists?
What a joke???
Posted by: David from WI | September 6, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I am well aware of the history of the title of czar and am not overly concerned about it. I don’t think “russian dictator” when I hear it in the context of American government, honestly.
However, I am concerned not about the titles but about the proliferation of people holding these sorts of positions. That is, there are way too many people in the Obama administration who hold very senior positions but who are not subject to congressional confiramtion or oversight– that’s why they are referred to as “czars” and why they are a bad idea. Czars do not fall on the normal organizational chart– they are not cabinet members and often do not report to cabinet members. You will notice that Mr. Bloom will be working with 4 cabinet departments and two other groups in his new duties.
If the president feels the current cabinet system is outmoded or in need of an overhaul, why doesn’t he just propose changes to it? He can create new cabinet positions or combine departments, whatever. But to keep creating positions that ignore the order of the cabinet process is not a good idea, in my opinion. The checks and balances provided by the working relationship between cabinet-level administrators and their assistants, who must be vetted and approved by the Senate and who are subject to Congressional oversight, are important.
Does anyone really think that Mr. Jones would have been approved by Congress once his remarks about, say, Columbine, were made public? Might someone at a confirmation hearing have asked him about his past political associations? His statements about the “bombs of Iraq” landing in NYC on 9/11? His scatological description of Republicans?
That’s the problem with the proliferation of czars– not the titles. It is the bypassing of the normal chains of command and of the checks and balances between branches of government.
Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Who would be best for transportation ‘czar’ – Laura Bush or Chris Christie?
Posted by: Flash Override | September 6, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Another CZAR??? How many does this make??
Posted by: ssmith | September 6, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Obama certainly is a master at community organizing. In a few short months he has organized 30 plus appointed ‘Advisors’ or Czars to run our country. Who needs the House and Senate when you have the ‘Oh so very brilliant and talented” comrades that are they only ones who can save us all. They are the very spine of Obama. The foolish mainstream media cannot, or worse, will not see the forest for the trees. The Great Organizer and his band of brothers wers granted the golden pass of being ‘vetted’ and was given the chance to spin his devastating web of progressive socialists to write the bills that congress doesn’t read and can’t explain. Take a good look at the rest of his advisor’s backgrounds and find the common thread. Can’t wait to see what happens in the coming week.
Posted by: Remuda | September 6, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
“We must do more to harness the power of American ingenuity and productivity so that we can put people back to work and unleash our full economic potential.”
What a load of horse apples! How ’bout harnessing some FAIR TRADE? We HAVE ingenuity and productivity. All we need is a level playing field.
Posted by: Lori | September 6, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Another Bloomin’ Czar? Hows about you
media guys get on board and laugh along
with the rest of us? Or is being a bit
critical of President Howdy Doody
strictly “Verbotin” as they used to
say in East Germany…
Posted by: Trajan | September 6, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Bloom…what’s he gonna do?…..
manufacture more Czars?
Posted by: Trajan | September 6, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
This “czar” business is getting pretty old. How many “counselors” or “advisers” or “Czars” does one person need. Seriously. Is it because he needs someone to blame for everything??
Posted by: Ryan | September 6, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
What’s with all this use of the term ‘Czar’?
Ron Bloom’s title is Senior Counsellor for Manufacturing Policy.
Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Yet another CZAR??? Come on where is the media on this?? These Czars are zero accountability to anyone except Obama. They were not elected NOR are they even Constitutional. Its way past time the press take this on and stop coddling this insanity. If you think Van Jones was NOT vetted, you would be wrong. Obama knew exactly who Jones and his ideology was and that should raise a 100 red flags to begin the process of exposing what lies beneath his other 40 something Czars. Start doing your damn job(media, press) and remind us what journalism USE TO MEAN.
Posted by: TheMagus | September 7, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
After Van Jones fiasco, it would be prudent to investigate the legitimacy
of all the other czars. Bloom sounds like he’s mainly working for the unions.. is this just another way to fund left-wing causes?
Posted by: paul | September 7, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
thats what they did in the soviet union only they didn’t call them czars they called them commisar’s. obama has to quit this nonsense and stop acting like a communist
Posted by: john | September 7, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am
If the manufacturing sector is on the uptick without government intervention why do they feel the need to get involved. This makes no sense.
Posted by: bkm | September 7, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am
@ Amazed: Conservatives were upset with Bush which is why he only won by razor-thin margins AND the Republicans have lost 2 consecutive elections. But anywho, what does Republicans have to do with any of this? They don’t have power in Washington, really since the Dem takeover in ’06. If Obama wanted to pass his agenda, he should be able to do so. Why not? Maybe because the Left and Dems wants to keep using Republicans as strawmen because attacking the American people would backfire on them like it did during August. The rest of your post is pure bovine scat.
Posted by: Titletown | September 7, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Even before ’06, Democrats had power. I know this because the Republicans were constantly saying they couldn’t get anything done because of the Democrats. Its a truism in the majic rainbow world of Washington DC that Democrats are the problem when Republicans are in power, but when Democrats are in power the problem is the Democrats.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 7, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am
..It is the bypassing of the normal chains of command and of the checks and balances between branches of government.
Posted by: moderate
That’s true, but every president, including GW Bush used signing statements to ‘circumvent’ any constitutional prohibitions to procede with policy decisions, as I understand it, GW Bush used this process a great deal. The constitution really doesn’t exist, if the executive branch of the government can bypass it whenever it sees fit, and, we won’t know about it for years, if ever.
We all want our country to work for all it’s citizens, sometimes I think we get caught up in a mythological representation of America as we see it in movies, and read about in books.
We are all ‘indoctrinated’ by our schooling.
We speak of ‘the Founders’ and the ‘heroes of the American revolution’, certainly noble and uplifting but does it really apply to 2009 America?
Posted by: TJ | September 7, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am
Remember what Obama said earlier this year………that we will know who he is by the people he surrounds himself with. Well, I guess now we know.
Posted by: lovestoread | September 7, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am
Creating a parallel gov’t. not responsible to the Congress with no background investigation, no vetting procedure. This is a power-grab, an abuse of presidential authority. How many godamn Czars does this president need? Gov’t. is the PROBLEM not the solution. Is this another Van Jones with radical views? Is this just a pay-off to union supporters? Is it purely a personal pay-off to a supporter? Who the hell knows but you can be sure the mainstream media will not investigate – the mainstream media is now part of the Ministry of Propaganda – I’m waiting for a new Czar for that too, any day now. What I’m sure of is that I don’t trust this administration for a minute, all smoke & mirrors, misrepresentations, outright lies & deception, & incredible incompetence.
Obama is scary, that’s the bottom line.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 4:58 am 4:58 am
I have a suggestion for another Czar.
Why not appoint Charlie Rangel the new Czar of Tax Evasion? He’s eminently qualified, just the man for the job.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 5:23 am 5:23 am
Attention left-wing liberals – We have read commie Saul Alinsky`s book “Rules for Radicals” and using his methods he details in the book against you.
Page 130: “The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it”.
Bye, bye Van Jones. Next?
And the fifth rule will be used more and more: “Ridicule is mans most potent weapon”.
We need more jokes about the incompetence of Team Obama and his Politburo.
And the third rule: “Whenever possible go outside the experience of your enemy.”
Prime target: the slums and ghettos of inner cities that have been controlled by Democrats (from school board member to Mayor) at every level for close to a century. Who is to blame for keeping these poor and educated in the slums other than the people that use the poor to pad their own lifestyles and take their votes? Answer: the Democrats.
Read the liberal´s handbook, “Rules for Radicals” and use the methods against them.
Posted by: Radical Sally | September 7, 2009, 7:12 am 7:12 am
BOTH parties are responsible for the mess we are in! We(the American people ) need choices other than who has the most money to run this country! The fact that you have to be a millionaire in order to run for president should have been a red flag a long time ago! This White House is making the biggest power grab in history! But no one will realize this because the truth of our history has been taken out of schools!! TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY!!
Posted by: Mimi60 | September 7, 2009, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Mimi – You’re absolutely right – BOTH parties are responsible. We have a professional political class that is very much out of touch with most Americans. But at this point in time, the Republicans are less dangerous than the looney-leftists that have hijacked the Democratic Party. Long term, we might need a third party option to challenge both Republicans & Democrats.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am
I thought greedy capitalists as Czars was bad? Another limousine liberal millionaire, with 4 houses, is another unvetted Czar? I guess someone has to make sure union bosses get their Boca Condo funding, their mistresses health care paid for, and the no-show jobs for their punk nephews.
Every Independent and Republican should run on NO MORE CZARS! Bring back checks and balances to the Nancy Pelosi/Van Jones DC elites.
Posted by: Karen | September 7, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Why do we have a shadow government?
How long before Obama ignores the elected government?
Posted by: drjohn | September 7, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
“We must do more to harness the power of American ingenuity” American ingenuity isn’t something to be harvested (and therefore, controlled); it is something that has to be given the freedom to occur. Control stifles creativity and ingenuity.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 7, 2009, 8:06 am 8:06 am
Is this Ron Bloom better than Van Jones?
Posted by: young_voter | September 7, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Who comes up with these people? I’m getting rather concerned.
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
TJ, I see your point about signing statements: “That’s true, but every president, including GW Bush used signing statements to ‘circumvent’ any constitutional prohibitions to procede with policy decisions, as I understand it, GW Bush used this process a great deal.” And candidate Obama railed against Bush’s abuse of the technique (to be clear, he never said he would not use it as well, and I readily acknowledge that he left that option open to himself) and promised he would rein in the practice, using it rarely.
So far this year, he has signed 5 such statements, outpacing Bush. There is a website connected to Pace law school that makes these statements available, but the “transparent” administration does not make it easy to find them on its own website. So do you find that troubling, or is it a case of, “well, Bush did it so it’s okay for Obama to do it, because he does it for better motives.”
Posted by: moderate | September 7, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Obama is the worst president ever inflicted on this country. Even worse than Nixon.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | September 7, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Only in America.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | September 7, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
What the hell is a ‘manufacturing’ Czar?
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
Has Obama found away around the Constitution?
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Obama, what a guy!
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Obama-Holder choose to
prosecute those that kept us safe after a murderous attack but either facilitate or turn a blind eye to freeing same murders. His next appointee should be a Perfidy Czar!
September 06, 2009
Obama knew about Lockerbie Bomber Transfer
Clarice Feldman
It seems that Obama is not going to get away with blaming the Brits for releasing the Lockerbie bomber. At least not if Downing Street can help it. The British say the White House and Secretary of State Clinton were fully informed of the decision and are deflecting blame onto the British now that the decision has proven to be unpopular.
(Of course, given how the American press hides stories, like Van Jones that reflect badly on the President, unless Americans seek out alternate media or read the foreign press the White House deflection will probably work.)
Here is how the Daily Mail reported the Obama administration’s knowledge of the transfer of Megrahi:
British officials claim Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton were kept informed at all stages of discussions concerning Megrahi’s return.
The officials say the Americans spoke out because they were taken aback by the row over Megrahi’s release, not because they did not know it was about to happen.
‘The US was kept fully in touch about everything that was going on with regard to Britain’s discussions with Libya in recent years and about Megrahi,’ said the Whitehall aide.
‘We would never do anything about Lockerbie without discussing it with the US. It is disingenuous of them to act as though Megrahi’s return was out of the blue.’
Posted by: pauldia | September 7, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am
We’re in big trouble people.
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Catch a falling Czar and put him in your pocket, save him for a rainy day.
Catch a falling Czar and put him in your pocket, never let him fade away.
Or,
Twinkle, twinkle little Czar, how I wonder who you are…
Posted by: OMC | September 7, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Pauldia. This business with the Libyan terrorist is just a minor misrepresentation by this administration. America’s whole foreign policy is a fiasco. While we are mostly focused on domestic issues like this ObamaCare disaster, America’s position in the world is going down the tubes.
The mainstream media is engaged in a major cover-up, there is little or no coverage on the failures of Obama’s blundering, what coverage there is is ”buried” on back pages, everything is reported out of context, the ”spin” is making my head spin!
What are we doing about Iran? The answer is nothing. It looks like Obama & his appeasement team has accepted the idea of a nuclear Iran. A nuclear armed Iran will have enormous consequences.
We are being anesthesized by the mainstream media.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
just freakin’great. another ivy leaguer. his tenure should go just swimmingly.
Posted by: mark c | September 7, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Why are all these people being referred to as czars? Is this an Obama word or the medias? In either event, I’m sick of hearing it!
Posted by: Beverly | September 7, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
“How long before obama ignores the elected government?”
written by drjohn @ 8 sumptin on 9/7
To hell with the elected government……he is ignoring the will of the American people!
He was never going to do what we want. He will shove down our throats obama Care whether we want it or not. It has never been about the good of our nation….it has been about how the future sees and how he sees himself according to revisionist history.
Barry is hands down the worst person to EVER be seated President. He knows absolutely nothing about business, government, people, National Defense, the economy or growing a garden in his backyard!!
Barry is……who he surrounds himself with. Right….. Van, Jeremiah, Louie, David, Saul, Bernadine, etc,etc,etc?
Posted by: American Infidel | September 7, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am
What does the maniac obama remind you of. Him mommy tells him no candy–so he sneeks out the back door and comes in the side door and takes the whole box of candy. This is a VERY dangereous man. He answeres to NOBODY BUT HIMSELF!! Is that why remmington can’t manufacture ammunition fast enough? I have always said forget about gun control. Just control the amunition and maybe thats why he needs a manufacturing czar
Posted by: janranch | September 7, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
If the tone of these comments are any indiction of how the general population feels about President Obama, then his Secret Service detail was right in re-dubbing his code name – OTB (short for One-Term Barry)!
Posted by: A_COL | September 7, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Manufacturing has posted a slight gain in the past two months so Mr Obama is appointing Ron Bloom to put a stop to it once and for all. (Remember this administration’s goal is to tank the US economy. None of their policies are designed for recovery only to destroy.
Posted by: steelmag | September 7, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 28% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13 .
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 7, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Oh, a manufacturing czar now, hmm, where is going to work…China, Mexico, after all….that is where OUR manufacturing went! Our manufacturing left this country when the states and feds decided to tax the hell out of business..you name a tax and either the state or the feds taxed it to death..in another country!
Posted by: ross | September 7, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
It boggles the mind that this is not on the front page. Just took a look & Jake’s article is the only thing on ABC about this racist nut resigning.
Tapper is about the only objective journalist here any more.
I hope his job is secure…he sticks out like a sore thumb in this place.
Posted by: Adam Smith | September 7, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
New surveys show steep declines in Obama’s approval ratings among whites — including Democrats and independents– who were crucial elements of the diverse coalition that helped elect him.
(LA Times)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 7, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I assume this new manufacturing czar is going to do his best to unionize whatever remaining manufacturing jobs that have not already been driven overseas by the unions, correct?
Gotta find spots for all those unemployed UAW jokers that bankrupted GM & Chrysler (Ford next) with the help of weak, inept management using band aid brand corporate financial planning.
So, tell me what is Blooms background?
AFL-CIO like the new New York Fed chair’s???
Can’t wait until we remake this place into a workers utopia like the old Soviet Union…
Posted by: Adam Smith | September 7, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Why are all these people being referred to as czars?
Posted by: Beverly | Sep 7, 2009 9:36:56 AM
It’s a colloquial political euphemism. Nobody actually has the word “czar” in their title. And it’s not a new thing. The Bush -Cheney admin kept some of the so-called “czars” left over from the Clinton and the H.W. Bush administrations, AND oversaw the creation of a “food safety czar,” a “cybersecurity czar,” a “regulatory czar,” an “AIDS czar,” a “manufacturing czar,” an “intelligence czar,”a “bird-flu czar,” and a “Katrina czar.”
Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
So, we have to have a “manufacturing czar”?
Are we admitting that the end goal is central planning and control of the economy yet? Or are we pretending he’s going to “advise” and not run roughshod over companies?
Hey, maybe we’ll run another GM style setup and tell a CEO he’s fired from his company because the Government says so… While also pretending we aren’t taking anything over.
Does anyone get tired of pretending?
Posted by: Gekkobear | September 7, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
As Pravda (no kidding) pointed out recently, the far more appropriate term would be “commissar.” The first czar I remember was somebody’s drug czar. Although all recent administrations have had them, Obama has appointed far, far more than any of his predecessors.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 7, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Czar is the Russian word for Caesar, which my dictionary translates to 1. any emperor, or 2. tyrant or dictator.
I think Pravda is right: Barry is Caesar and the cronies he is hiring are his commissars.
Posted by: Monika | September 7, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
How about the Czar that believes in forced sterilizations/abortions.
The Science Czar?
He also believes the government has the power to limit the number of children a couple can have.
Nice Obama.
Should help you win over mainstream America.
Posted by: bailey | September 7, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
How many taxpayer dollars do all these CZAR’s get paid…
Posted by: CZAR_Mania | September 7, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Every Western and Asian industrialized country actively and financially supports their manufacturing sector. Based on the ignorant comments from our simple minded political right we should do nothing, and let the rest of the world eat us for lunch. No wonder we’re in an economic mess, Americans have gone from dumb to dumber and all it took was eight years of Bush. When these fools start offering constructive solutions and stop ranting and raving about being poor threatened white people maybe they will be tken seriously. In the meantime I hope the Secret Service and Homeland Security are tracking their DSN’s and listing them as national security risks by virtue of their racist comments.
Posted by: Figaro | September 7, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Apparently BO’s Cabinet is a bunch of incompetent figure heads…
Posted by: CZAR_Mania | September 7, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Great another unvetted left-wing socialist trying to run our country into the ground.These people believe there’s only four cities in the U.S.,N.Y.,D.C.,L.A. and the most crooked Chicago.And guess who’s from there,the biggest crook of all,Your President.
Posted by: 1_Independent | September 7, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
A new way to pay off your political supports… make them a CZAR…. with NO Senate oversite….. hummmmmm
Posted by: CZAR_Mania | September 7, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
What’s the message Obama is trying to send to America with all these Czars? Didn’t communist Soviet Union have them for centuries? Is Obama trying to warm us up for communism? He’s already taken over the car industry, banking industry, and job market with all these czars and government takeovers, and now trying to take over the health industry.
According to wikipedia:
“communism is a family of economic and political ideas and social movements related to the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, or stateless society based on common ownership and control of the means of production and property in general, as well as the name given to such a society. The term “Communism”, usually spelled with the capital letter C, is however often used to refer to a form of government in which the state operates under a one-party system and declares allegiance to Marxism-Leninism or a derivative thereof, even if the party does not actually claim that the society has already reached communism.”
And so here we are – can we now start spelling AmeriKa with a backwards K?
Posted by: AmeriKa | September 7, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Figaro. You’re the perfect example of an Obama supporter.
You think that Homeland Security should suppress our right to free speech, that’s very Democratic of you, you’ll be right at home in the People’s Republic of Obama where criticism of the Fearless Leader is a punishable offense. We don’t need a ”cult of personality” leader in America. And that racist argument is pretty stale already as is the ”Bush did it” argument. We’re not the racists, you can save that comment for Rev. Wright, Mr Gates the self-important egomaniac, & Van Jones whose opinions are so beyond the pale it would be funny had he not been appointed as Czar by someone who evidently shares his world view.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Obama likes the arrogant, loud-mouthed, radical, obnoxious types surrounding him.
Rev Wright, Father Pfleger, Van Jones, Bill Ayers.
Most people would be turned off by their abrasive behavior.
But Obama seems to love it.
Must be hard for Obama to wake up everyday, put on that fake dopey smile, and hide his inner radical.
That’s the only thing that makes him different from his radical pals–he hides it well.
Please wake-up Independents…
Posted by: millie | September 7, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
“When Congress enacted a law in 1982 that created a drug czar, President Reagan scorned the provision:” “The creation of another layer of bureaucracy within the Executive Branch would produce friction, disrupt effective law enforcement, and could threaten the integrity of criminal investigations and prosecutions.… The so-called “drug Czar” provision was enacted hastily without thoughtful debate and without benefit of any hearings.”
Posted by: CZAR_Mania | September 7, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
The Obamamessiah, Holder, Jones, Sharpton, Jesse J jr, Rangel etc…have all made fantastic fortunes based on race baiting & promotion of class warfare in this country. That is what is the root of Amercia not being a “post racial society”
A true post racial America would put all of them out of business and they will never allow it and will fight tooth and nail to ensure America never becomes color blind.
Posted by: Adam Smith | September 7, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
So why do the “Commissars” matter?
Because, for the most part, they are policy wonks comprising an elite liberal thinktank for the President. They are the people he and the Congress consult.
So far Obama has allowed Congress to write the legislation that has been proposed. Most assume that those in Congress are writing it. Think about that — people that profess that they don’t read the bills are writing them?
Uh-uh. I don’t think so. The staffers with major input from the policy wonks — the Czars/Commissars – are writing the legislation. That’s why Congress Critters don’t know what is in the legislation. That is why they can only recite talking points at their Town Hall meetings that have been passed down by the Administration and the parties’ National Committees.
For heavens’ sake, Harry Reid thanked just resigned Green Jobs Czar Van Jones for writing a great majority of the Stimulus Bill (green jobs – weatherizing people’s houses?) and Jones also wrote much of the Cap & Trade legislation that was passed by the House and awaits a vote by the Senate. That legislation allows the Federal government to reach into areas it never has before — all the way down to setting standards in local counties and cities for zoning and building standards.
Jones is an advocate of social justice. He has blamed white people for poisoning hispanic field workers. He was not just some low level advisor as the MSM and left blogosphere is now trying to spin it.
Even the commissars that are thrown in for balance, and politically Cass Sunstein who leans libertarian in most things would be one of them, embrace at least one major pet project that would not be considered mainstream in the United States (with Sunstein it is requiring people to Opt Out of being an organ donor rather allowing you or your surviving family to decide whether or not your organ’s will be donated).
Other Commissars are knee cappers like Ron Bloom — Union negotiators who know how to use “leverage” to get what they want.
Don’t be fooled that these people are just “advisers”. They are the people planning and writing significant portions of the laws that will be dictated to our citizens. Many are employees that serve at the will of the President and report only to him.
We see how well Van Jones was vetted. What about the rest?
Posted by: Soylent Green is People | September 7, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Soylent Green. The major input on legislation is from lobbyists so you can imagine in whose interest it is.
Every special interest group is out to get what they can at our expense.
You picked the right nom de plume, these people are out to skin us & eat us alive.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
If Obama were truly serious about restoring vigor to our manufacturing sector, then he’d propose ideas that have been proven to stimulate the creation of wealth like corporate tax cuts, reductions in environmental regulations, and tort reform that eliminates frivolous lawsuits. Unless and until we hear these sound solutions coming from Washington, we’ll get nothing in the way of the changes needed to restore our standard of living.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy | September 7, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Alyson:
Obama’s administration has 32 Czars! You listed only 8 over the course of 8 years. Obama has been in office only 8 months.
You do the math:
Bush 8 years: 8 czars
Obama 8 months : 32 Czars
Posted by: AmeriKa | September 7, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“If Obama were truly serious about restoring vigor to our manufacturing sector, then he’d…”
… appoint a manufacturing czar with some experience in manufacturing.
Posted by: PD | September 7, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Terry. I consider the lobbyists to be policy wonks for special interests. The difference is that lobbyists give money to get more money for their clients. The Czars/Commissars are mainly trying to get money and power/recognition for their special interests.
Either way, you are correct that they wish to eat us alive.
We now have a Union-taught “Manufacturing Czar” in Ron Bloom with Card Check (the deceptively named Employee Free Choice Act) on the table. Meanwhile, the same guy continues to the the “Car Czar”.
We have a “Diversity Czar” in the FCC who praises the government take over of the airwaves in Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. Can some version of a Fairness Doctrine be far behind? Special credits and ratings systems (kind of an affirmative action for the airwaves) is already being considered for minority owned radio and terrestrial broadcast tv stations.
Elite thinkers are fine when they stay in their Ivory Tower echochambers and bounce ideas off of each other. Few but the approx. 20% of our country (per Gallup & Rasmussen polls) who self-identify as Liberals would consider their rarified air theories about how this country should be run to be anything but rubbish.
All the Czars need to be thoroughly vetted and the question of whether this kind of extra level of government without Congressional approval is even Constitutional must be addressed.
Posted by: Soylent Green is People | September 7, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
@bailey;
Thank you for the definition of Czar. I told to myself with all the Czar we have here how come we are not in Russia. I believe the Obama Administration needs a little dressing up.
Posted by: Joe Fattal | September 7, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
PD: Someone who has an exceptional and successful record in manufacturing and industry would be fine.
Ron Bloom is not that person. His success is in Union negotiation NOT Manufacturing strength and profitability.
=================
Posted by: PD | Sep 7, 2009 12:40:02 PM:
“If Obama were truly serious about restoring vigor to our manufacturing sector, then he’d…”
… appoint a manufacturing czar with some experience in manufacturing.
Posted by: Soylent Green is People | September 7, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“How about the Czar that believes in forced sterilizations/abortions. The Science Czar? He also believes the government has the power to limit the number of children a couple can have.”
Yeah yeah, back in July Glenn Beck said the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, “has proposed forcing abortions and putting sterilants in the drinking water to control population.”
Politifact rated that one a “Pants on Fire” lie.
Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
What does a ‘manufacturing’ Czar do? What the heck is going on?
Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
They will have us in chains and we will be writing letters saying how terrable it is!
The late great U.S.A.,we had it all,
and we let the politicians take it away from us.we wanted to be a democracy and we forgot all the rules of being a republic!
Posted by: Bill Aubin | September 7, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Soylent: My point exactly.
Posted by: PD | September 7, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Lordy is Obama doing some preaching in Cinncinati at the AFL-CIO.
Preaching to the choir.
He’s even using his best southern preacher accent.
I think he’a alittle angry and perhaps emasculated by all of the attacks lately.
Or maybe mad because he had to let Van Jones go.
He’s mocking and taunting his critics.
Also stuttering like crazy when he goes of the prompter.
It’s as if he’s going to say “lipstick on a pig” at any moment.
Someone please tell Obama he’s president, no need to keep campaigning.
Posted by: millie | September 7, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The liberal Philly Inquirer is perplexed:
“So it’s difficult to understand how our federal lawmakers could seriously consider legislation that would depress economic growth and job creation for the next 20 years. But that’s what we can expect from the far-reaching climate-change legislation headed for a vote in the Senate when Congress returns from its summer recess.”
This is something quite close to madness.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 7, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Soylent Green. Somehow, over the years, we have allowed gov’t. to become a monster, this isn’t even a partisan issue since both political parties are responsible, if you can even use the word responsible when referring to our irresponsible & rather unaccountable political class. Now, with far left ideologues in power, the whole thing is really out of hand. Our political class is so out of touch with the people they theoretically represent it isn’t funny but our responsibility as citizens is to bring them back to reality or throw them out. Personally, I’ve had it with ”experts” with zero real-life experience & no common sense.
Posted by: Terry | September 7, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Dr. Zero expresses my own views most elegantly:
The system of providing social benefits to an increasingly large dependency class, by taxing a dwindling group of productive citizens, went utterly bankrupt. This is dramatically illustrated by the failure of Obama’s health care plan, which even the most politically disinterested Americans can see we clearly don’t have the money to pay for, with trillions of dollars in debt towering over us. Exit the tax collector… enter the “czar.” When the American Left saw that it could no longer extract enough tax money from an increasingly grumpy, overtaxed electorate, it became logically necessary to compel industry to provide what the Left desires. Wrapping this strategy in high-minded language like “green jobs” does not change its essential nature.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 7, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
NO MORE CZARS!!!!!!!!!! We have more czars in 9 months than Russia had during their entire history!!! Get rid of these jack a**es and let the cabinet do their jobs!!!!! I hope the real media vets everyone of them and sends them into oblivion like jones!
Posted by: lovingpolitics | September 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
ENOUGH STINKING CZARS ALREADY!!! WHAT IS THIS? Obama finds people that can’t be approved by Congress due to their backgrounds and creates this shadow Government of his own choosing. No BUDGET OF OUR TAX MONEY SHOULD GO TO THESE IDIOTS!!! WHERE is the Transparency here??? Is This THE CHANGE?
Posted by: Bill | September 7, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Is this one a communist too? I guess I’ll have to go vet him to find out.
I know how, I’ll do a Google search.
Oh that is so much more efficient and effective than how the white house does it.
Step one find out if has any little things that might upset the American public.
Step two use the internet to find out FIRST.
Step three don’t forget not give a crap if you find out the man is a self described Marxist and anarchist.
Step four don’t forget to not give a damn that Americas might be upset that your DID hire a COMMUNIST/MARXIST ANARCHIST.
And we trust this man to write a health care bill all by his lonesome????
Posted by: David from WI | September 7, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
now now lets all get a grip. old ron will make fine czar. of course rev jeremiah would be better but he is too busy and he is still peaved about that crazy old uncle thing..
Posted by: rking | September 7, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“We must do more to harness the power of American ingenuity and productivity so that we can put people back to work and unleash our full economic potential”
So when do we all get our cars that the taxpayers are due for you dumping all taxpayer money into the system and OWNING a large portion of GM?
IT is taxpayer money correct? We did give them money to screw those evil bondholders (you remember those evil wicked retired teachers and police officers)
Do we all get to take turns to go to the shareholder meetings?
Still waiting to find out if this guy is a Communist Marxist and or Anarchist.
No comment Mr President? No? Not a drinking buddy of yours.
Is it time for your administration to attack the CIA seniors or police departments again? NO? Just hire another communist that worked so well for you last time.
Posted by: David from WI | September 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Where is all the real reporters that check all the backgrounds of current
czars by really reading there books
it is easier than ever with the internet
yet we have a bunch of lazy butt reporters that just want to write how they feel that the story would read in
their own mind and not the real truth.
Posted by: maria | September 7, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Bloom’s statement will read: “A strong manufacturing sector is a cornerstone of American competitiveness and a critical part of President Obama’s economic strategy.
THEN THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STAY OUT OF THE WAY.
Posted by: jindy60 | September 7, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Here we go again…did this one fill out the entrance exam? WH says Van Jones didn’t and so they “didn’t know” what a friggin nut case he is.
Ok, how’s about a golf czar…to monitor Barrys handicap, and limit the amt of time he spends on the course over READING legislation….
Posted by: mjishernameo | September 7, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
ABC journalists please step up and give us more critical reporting of all of these “czars” and all of the President’s men.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 7, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Douped voter-I have a glaring question to ask everyone. How many feel we still have a free press in the USA? It appears as though they have be bought and paid for by the Obama admin. Only Fox news is giving out a balanced news broadcast.
Posted by: Bcorp | September 7, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Question is how is this guy related to the Unions he represents? Create jobs funny that is what the stimulis was going to do. In time of universal Deciept telling the truth is revolutionary.
Posted by: Marion | September 7, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
At a time when the economy is so fragile, we need to be saving money, not spending like a drunken sailor. Get rid of the CZARS and their staffs and save a ton of $$$$.
Posted by: deanbob | September 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
We need to allow drilling to add jobs, increase taxes and royalty payments to the treasurt, and reduce dependence on mid-East oil.
Posted by: deanbob | September 7, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Obama is a traitor to the Constitution and should be impeached. He won’t be, yet. If the Clintons see an opening, maybe.
Posted by: RCl | September 7, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Have to wonder how many “Czars” it will take before the “revolution” starts…
Posted by: 1enlightened | September 8, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am
To effectively overthrow a government you have to have an effective shadow government that will step in. So how powerful and big does Obama’s shadow government need to get? Are we losing our representative for of government to czars under the direction of ?
Posted by: TX_MBell | September 8, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am
In other words, Mr. Bloom helped screw bondholders, stole $50 billion from taxpayers and gave it to the thugs at the UAW. His time as the head of the Steelworkers Union is why there is not steel industry in the US. His goonish stupidity drove manufacturers overseas, his union boss/Boca Condo/payola is why unions are hated by Americans.
To praise Ron Bloom, and not point out that he is a millionaire thugs is like saying Tony Soprano was in the waste management business.
Posted by: Karen | September 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Not to knock the Bloom off the rosey picture that Obama would like us to see….but:
Bloom is heavily entrenched with oprganized labor, specifically the UAW. I suppose that, because Obama paid them off (quid pro quo) by siezing the equity in GM and Crysler and gifting his “special friends”, a UAW hack shpould be running the industry.
My guess is that GM is dead, only the life support from the Feds is keeping the up the appearance of life. The union has not penalized themselves, taken no action that would indicate that they understand market forces (such as reducing their wages and benefits), and why should they? They fully expect an open credit line back to The Fed for ever.
Organized labor is not about making new jobs for all Americans. They are gate keepers. Theu are there to keep their member’s jobs intact and to attempt to deny them to non-union working stiffs. No matter what they say, you can see the truth of this assessment based on what they have done, what they are currently doing and what they intend, under this god forsaken administration and congress.
We should stop calling these people Czars, under the Obama label. We should call them what they truely are; commissars, in the Stalin tradition.
Posted by: B Dubya | September 8, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Another Van Jones appointment? Does he have a criminal background? Has he paid his taxes?
This administration wants to bypass congress by appointing Czars. Congress gets no say in these matters and so we end up with another Chicago crony. This appointing of czars stinks of cronyism and I hope the media gets their head out of their arse and starts doing some investigating on their own.
And you wonder why Obama’s poll numbers are going south! ABC please do your job and vet this guy.
Posted by: indymind | September 8, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
This just proves what change really is, more czars?
Do these czars replace our representative government?
Does the congress have any control or authority?
Transparency? Yes, it’s clear we are heading into the pit of socialism!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 8, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Since we are still presumably in America, can all of the supposedly high-IQ types in the current administration work on finding a better word/title than “czar”? Yes, they can.
Posted by: s | September 8, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
communism.
Posted by: jon | September 8, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
OH MY GOD–after Obama gave us a new health care program that will cause all seniors to have to march down to the local hospice prior to having an anal probe by space aliens prior to being turned into spam, and after his brainwashing speech to the children where he forces our little babies to pledge allegiance to the kenyun sun gods, now this? We all know that the new czars are worse than commie pinkos–they also eat wheat-grass inflected yogurt every day. EVERY DAY! Beam me up, Scotty,I am sooooo afraid….
Posted by: UFO Watcher | September 8, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
RED ALERT!
It appears that Obama will soon (if not already)have a czar in place for every major discipline of an industrial nation.
These czars appear to be unconstitutional (but no one seems to care, not even congress!
Czar originally meant emperor , a ruler with the same rank as, or with the approval of another emperor or king.
It seems that all is needed for a complete socialistic coup is a crisis large enough for Obama to take complete control!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 8, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
It seemed like a good time to google “how to catch wild pigs” and see how close we are to having a gate close.
With each czar appointed and each bill in the house we draw closer.
Does anyone know where H.R.45 stands?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 8, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Ron Bloom, a former Steelworker union operative charged with running the American auto industry from Washington. Now that car manufacturers are doing so “well,” Bloom is about to get a promotion:
The Obama Administration may elevate Ron Bloom, head of the government’s auto task force, to a job that would set U.S. manufacturing policy more broadly, people familiar with the matter said.
Bloom’s responsibilities at the new position? They’re extensive, to say the least:
As the chief policy maker on manufacturing, Bloom would be charged with reviewing U.S. competitiveness in the global economy. His job would likely encompass trade, taxes and other economic issues . . .
Just what American industry needs: another “czar” whose relevant work experience involves running struggling companies into the ground and exploiting their workers. We’re sure industry leaders across the country are thrilled at the prospect of taking orders from a UNION CZAR.
The result of this personnel move seems likely to be more forced unionism, less American competitiveness, more job losses, and ultimately more bankruptcies and taxpayer-funded bailouts of corruptly run union pension plans.
Posted by: Politburo | September 8, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
And just what are we as a nation going to manufacture after all the small businesses are run out of town by this administrations policies and taxes. Nobody in their right mind will want to endure the penalties they will get by opening or staying in business. Most are already getting out of the country!
Posted by: Phil | September 8, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
NO MORE CZARS!!!!!!! FIRE THEM ALL!
Posted by: lovingpolitics | September 8, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Why do we need so many czars? These special advisers receive automatic appointment from the president – they do not go through the approval process/questioning with Congress, unlike other White House appointments. If Van Jones had been forced to go through a Congressional investigation and questioning to receive approval, I doubt he would have made the cut. It would have saved the White House a great deal of embarrassment.
We have a checks-and-balance system in place for a reason. Stop with the czars or put them through the regular Congressional approval process others in the administration must go through.
Posted by: Number 8 | September 8, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I did a little research on this man.
It looks to me like another socialist.
Posted by: Jesse | September 8, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Bloom was a “restructuring expert” for U.S. Steelworkers, union one would suppose. Since he had a hand in gifting the U.S. automobile industry to the UAW, he is a great choice for “manufacturing czar.” If, of course, your objective is to unionize most, if not all, of private manufacturing in the U.S. That will be a great boost to productivity, and thus wages, and thus the competitive position of U.S. industry vs foreign competition. NOT! They can’t be this stupid, can they? Or are they really setting out to destroy the U.S. economy so they can usher in the socialist utopia. I’m not a conspiracy guy but even decisions by coin flip would give them a 50% improvement in their success rate.
Posted by: gobsmacked | September 8, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I thought American manufacturing was dead.
Posted by: steve-o | September 8, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I’ve worked over 20 years in manufacturing, now I’m out of a job. I am waiting patiently for my shovel ready job.
Posted by: mazakk | September 8, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Is everyone on crazy juice. The “Czar” was first used by the Nixon administration. They have long drawn out official titles. Nixon appointed the”Czar”. George W Bush had at least 13 Czars, Karl Rove being one of them. Where was the outrage then? Furthermore, over half of these “Czars” have been CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE,lololol. Come on people. Yelling lil one word retorts. Socialist, Communism. Is LOGIC and REASON officially DEAD in the US. I know it’s a lot to ask, but before some of you start spreading, hate, division, and fear (yeah just like the Bush years fear tactics) could you do a lil research, maybe read a book or 2, like a History book maybe!
Posted by: Genee | September 16, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
This guy is another Mao lover- he and Dunn in the last week in the news. He doesn’t extol H. Ford, Bill Gates, or any other business icon. The only guy he can talk about is Mao and, on top of that, he says that Capitalism is a lie and that it’s all about political power anyway. Another Fabian Socialist. The part that really pisses me off is that now they fell so empowered they come out publicly and state their real agenda and views. How many of them does obama have to appoint before Americans get off their rear ends and stop this.
Posted by: vigo | October 21, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm