By Nitya

Sep 22, 2009 12:12pm

The Must-Read Book for Obama’s War Team

It’s not uncommon in Washington for a book or an article to become the must-read of the moment for every player in town.  (You may recall Atul Gawande's New Yorker article last Spring looking at the health care system in McAllen, Texas that was required reading for everyone at the White House and up on Capitol Hill as the health care debate was kicking into high gear. )

With President Obama expressing skepticism about a further troop buildup in Afghanistan and his commander on the ground, Gen. McChrystal, advising that more troops are urgently needed to avoid "mission failure," the Afghanistan war is front and center.

And so Washington has a new must-read book.

My colleague Martha Raddatz and I have been told that many on the national security team at the White House are now reading "Lessons in Disaster" by Gordon Goldstein.

It’s a very powerful book focused on Vietnam-era national security adviser McGeorge Bundy.

From the Publishers Weekly blurb:

“As national security adviser, McGeorge Bundy was the prototypical best and brightest Vietnam War policymaker in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Bundy was, according to foreign policy scholar Goldstein, an out-and-out war hawk who again and again demonstrated a willingness, if not an eagerness, to deploy military means in Vietnam. Goldstein worked with Bundy in the year before his death, in 1996, on an uncompleted memoir and retrospective analysis of America's path to war. While drawing on that work in this warts-and-all examination of Bundy's advisory role, this book is something different, containing Goldstein's own conclusions. He painstakingly recounts his subject's role as national security adviser and ponders the complexities of the elusive inner Bundy: for example, the buoyant good humor in the 1960s that seemed unbowed by the weight of difficult strategic decisions. Among the surprising revelations: late in life Bundy came to regret his hawkish ways, although he maintained to the end that the presidents, not their advisers, were primarily responsible for the outcome of the war. Vietnam, he said, was overall, a war we should not have fought. “

One of the conclusions Goldstein says Bundy reached is that President Kennedy would have likely NOT escalated US involvement in Vietnam had he lived. He says that JFK emerged from Cuban Missile Crisis determined not to get rolled again by military.  

The book was reviewed last November in the New York Times by Richard Holbrooke with comments relevant to the current situation in Afghanistan.

A great, great book. Well worth the read as the Afghanistan debate heats up.

User Comments

George, the only books any of them may have read are Obama’s, after Saul Alinski’s; Rules For Radicals.
These are the most predictable people I have ever seen in the White House.
Have the morning conference calls with Rahm & Carville been awkward George?
What did Carville say after Barry’s little temper tantrum?
Get back to us. We want to know :)

Posted by: Sam Adams | September 22, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

There is no way to wage a war, successfully, that tries to be run in a “decent and respectable manner”.
The enemy doesn’t do that, so thinking that we should, is simply foolish.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 22, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

LMAO at Georgie..Obama should be reading Michelle Malkins “Culture of corruption” and Glenn Becks ” arguing with idiots” ALL #1 best sellers

Posted by: Bawlknee Phwank | September 22, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Hey Instead of reading a BOOK, why don’t they go and ask the men and women that were in ‘Nam, about having guns with no bullets. Perhaps McCain can give an inside review of what it is like to have no back-up and to be bombarded with seeing Americans say they hate you. Perhaps you can ask the men who came back and still sit outside and cry reliving the nightmare of not being able to defend themselves and wondering if this is the night they die.
Read a book — How absolutely STUPID!

Posted by: DeeAdams | September 22, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

You know I heard the NEA scandal and can see how inconsequential the main stream media have become. The current scandal with the NEA just goes to show everyone how much quid pro quo and underhanded tricks are going on. God knows they would have BEEN doing 24×7 coverage if this was a republican. BUT its OBAMA so EYES CLOSED everyone because we are CORRUPT and have no morals. NOT A ONE George. Not a single moral bone left eh?

Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 22, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I see the haters are out in force today. Give it a rest guys!

Posted by: skeptic | September 22, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

not haters, just realists. if we are going to be in a war, the soldiers need help, people and tools. if money is to be spent, brains are necessary to do it wisely. And if you are going to be a reporter, you should be unbias and stick to the facts of who, what, when, where and why and not lean one way or the other.

Posted by: ironbuttannie | September 22, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

If I were going to recommend something for the Obama team to read, I would start with the Constitution of the United States. It appears as though it would be first time reading for most of them.

Posted by: Patriot Lost | September 22, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Will General McChrystal be thrown under the bus by the non-serving self-server who claimed this as a “war of necessity” to get elected? What a phony and what a disgrace.

Posted by: PAXALLES | September 22, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

This strategy is easy. Build protection around the urban areas, own the major roads, and hammer the bad guys with predator drones, everytime they so much as spit, on a borderless basis. Forget trying to win the hearts and minds of the tribal warlords, there’s no attainable victory in consorting with devils. Oh yeah, and twist Karzai’s arm to hold a runoff. He needs to be holding the bugle in favor of a runoff. That’s the only way any strategy is going to work.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 23, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Wow, Sam Adams | Sep 22, 2009 2:56:43 PM, all that’inside knowledge’ about the White House. You are definitely very important.

Posted by: Robin | September 23, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I don’t believe that you can draw similarities and war methods from one war to another.

Posted by: Nat | September 24, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I have over 600 books covering the war in Southeast Asia from the jungle to the cockpit over Hanoi to the Oval Office. This book is one of the most illuminating I have read. It’s a scathing critique of the decision makers and should be required reading. Alongside the stellar ‘Dereliction of Duty’. Obama should read both.

Posted by: James McNeill | September 28, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Now my confidence is reinforced… Not liking what they are hearing from a military professional with years of actual combat experience, and having zero experience of their own in military affairs, the Obama team is reading a book…. LoLoL

Posted by: Greg | October 5, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.