By Jaketapper

Sep 6, 2009 8:20am

Under Fire, Presidential Adviser Van Jones Resigns

In a letter released just after midnight Saturday, Van Jones, President Obama's Special Advisor for Green Jobs at the Council on Environmental Quality resigned.

"On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me," Jones wrote. "They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide."

Jones said that he had "been inundated with calls – from across the political spectrum – urging me to "stay and fight. But I came here to fight for others, not for myself.  I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past.  We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."

A best-selling author who has been heralded as an innovative thinker in the "green jobs" movement, Jones had come under fire from conservative media and lawmakers for past statements for which he apologized Thursday. 

The tipping point for the White House appeared to be Jones' admission earlier this week that he had signed a petition in 2004 calling for congressional hearings and an investigation by the New York Attorney General into "evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur."

In a statement issued Thursday evening Jones said of "the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever."

An administration source said Jones says he did not carefully review the language in the petition before agreeing to add his name.

But after that admission, asked if Jones enjoyed the confidence of the president, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs would only say on Fridat that Jones "continues to work in this administration."

A former civil rights activist in the San Francisco area, Jones told the East Bay Express in 2005 that the acquittal of Rodney King's assailants in 1992 in that infamous police brutality case changed him significantly.

"I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th," he said. "By August, I was a communist."

Jones and other young activists in 1994 formed a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM, rooted in Marxism and Leninsm. Two years later, Jones launched the Ella Baker Center, an Oakland, Calif., based "strategy and action center" which states that it tries to "promote positive alternatives to violence and incarceration."

It was many of the associations formed around this time that served as fodder for conservative critics. In a New Yorker profile of Jones from earlier this year, Jones described his modus operandi as “traditional activism, the politics of confrontation and outrage. I was proud to be hated by the city fathers on both sides of the Bay.”

Over time, Jones focused instead as environmental jobs as a way to lift struggling communities out of poverty, work for which he's been praised as an innovator. Former Vice President Gore told the New Yorker: “I love Van Jones. I love his work. I love his heart and his commitment and his intellect. I love his mission. He has wisely picked a part of this set of interwoven challenges that should have been addressed much more forcefully by me and others long ago.”

But even as Jones lowered his profile in his new position as President Obama's "Green Jobs Czar," critics questioned comments he'd made in his previous incarnation as an activist and advocate for poor and minority communities. What seemed to hurt Jones the most politically, however, was the discovery of his name on the 9/11 "Truther" petition, which suggested President Bush or those in his administration at the very least allowed 9/11 to happen so as to launch wars for oil.

Having expended much time and energy discrediting conservative conspiracy theorists alleging (despite all evidence) that the President was not born in the U.S., and the non-existent "death panels," White House officials found it difficult to justify a top adviser who had associated with similarly fringe sentiments from the Left.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., chairman of the House Republican Conference, said on Friday that given "recent revelations concerning the associations and statements of the president's green jobs czar, Van Jones should resign his position and if he is unwilling to do so, the president should demand his resignation. His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this Administration or the public debate."

Republicans made it clear that they intended to use Jones as Exhibit A in a political prosecution that the Obama Administration has too many "czars" — unconfirmed by the Senate, with too much power.

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., ranking Republican on the Green Jobs and the New Economy Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, called for a hearing probing Jones' fitness for the job. 

Jones, Bond said, "is responsible for directing administration policy and spending on tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer funding regarding environmental policy and green jobs programs.  However, since the White House appointed him as a 'czar,' Mr. Jones was able to avoid any oversight or confirmation by the U.S. Senate."

Bond said he was alarmed by Jones' name on the 9/11 "Truther" petition. "Jones in hindsight is embarrassed by the public disclosure of his participation in the petition drive and now asserts he did not read the fine print of the petition," the senator said. "But can the American people trust a senior White House official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?”

- jpt

User Comments

Strange how your network covers the resignation but so studiously ignored the story for an entire week.
Could it be that you are in the tank for Obama?

Posted by: Regulus de Leo | September 6, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Yeah, it IS tough being smeared with your own words.
Glenn Beck and FOX News must be laughing their butts off.
I know I am. :D

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am

This is good. In this time of political unrest we don’t need anyone as radical as this in a high place of government, especially a racist at that. I hope our President will do a better job of vetting his replacement.

Posted by: DL13 | September 6, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Jake. I just twittered you. 2bluestarmom here….I’m sorry if I am coming on to harshly. We the people just want you guys to come back to us & do your job. Find the Truth & report it!
We’ll respect you in the morning!
Coming from a woman, that’s ground breaking news in of itself. ;-)

Posted by: A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness | September 6, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Thank you for reporting who, what, when, where,and why, instead of your opinion. Bless you for honest journalism!

Posted by: kanawha | September 6, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I have a poll. Would you respect the msm, main stream media more, if they told you the truth or if they hid the truth, for political favor?
Hint (no brainer)

Posted by: A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness | September 6, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Have to say, it’s becoming more and more obvious that AbcNbcCbs are completely in the tank for Obama – there was virtually NO coverage about this whackjob on networks other than Fox. I find Beck OTT and a bit annoying, but he was right on this issue, and it’s really too big a story to have been buried by the MSM in the way it has. The irony is that I (and most anyone under the age of 30?) get their news from the net anyway, so the whitewashing by the ‘major’ networks is a moot strategy anyway, LOL :)

Posted by: David Low | September 6, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Jones under the bus without a single word from Obama.
Ouch.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

This guy admitted he was a communist. He gets appointed a CZAR by a leader of the United States who is the most left leaning politician at the Senate level and who has an extreme sense of self empowerment and ego…….
I think reality time is setting in.

Posted by: Donvon | September 6, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Jone – “opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me.”
What was said that was a smear — when everything reported by Beck were his own words.
He addmitted is a Communist.
He is part of 9/11 Truther.
Why did Valerie Jarret recommend this guy?
Appointing ‘czars’ — There needs to be some oversight. More than a few of Obama’s Czars are over the top.
Obama said he would surround himself with the “best” — and have an “open transparent” administration.

Posted by: susie | September 6, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

It’d be interesting how broadcast evening news, MSM, i.e. NYT, WaPo report this resignation given that they NEVER covered the controversy in the first place. For example, at ABCNews only this blog mentioned the brouhaha at all. From CBS, NBC, CNN… nada.

Posted by: berserk | September 6, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

“Obama said he would surround himself with the “best” — and have an “open transparent” administration.”
Words, just words…

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

VAN JONES IS A QUITTER!!

Posted by: Chuck | September 6, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

What is most remarkable about this Van Jones nutjob is that Obama sat around, waiting for Jones to resign.
What a total lack of leadership from the President of the United States of America!! In the absence of an assassination, please, guys…no more comparisons of Obama to Lincoln. He’s just not there.

Posted by: Wise Man From the North | September 6, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

What about the rest of the czars. My understanding and it looks pretty clear in the Constitution that they are illegal without proper vetting in the Senate:
“Article II. Section 2. “He (the President) shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consults, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein provided for, and which shall be established by law; but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.”

Posted by: RM | September 6, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Tapper, why don’t you report the WHOLE TRUTH? What did Jones say about the Republicans verbatim rather just reporting he said “derogatory comments”?
What about the rest of Jones communist background?
What about Harvard turning out these radical hate-America students?
Come on Tapper…are you going to join Gibson and resign because the lack of full disclosure will finally tear up your gut or will you start reporting the full truth and be willing to face the consequences with your job? Let your conscious be your guide, or is there a conscious?

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Jake,
I respect your work, and hope in the future to see ABC news do a better job.
This news story should not have just been reported by FOX. We should have known the facts about him, before they put his name on his office. FOX and MSM both missed the boat.
How about stories of who, what, when, why and where concerning all Obama appointees?

Posted by: kanawha | September 6, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Waiting for the Obama’s Supporters “spin” on this – probably the usual rants about, well, you know.
La lah la la, Lah la la…

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Van, calling Republicans a vile name a few months ago is not a ” smear campaign.” you are insulting half the country… The people who pay your salary. I would think a minimum requirement to work in the white house would be a respect and love for all Americans, a willingness to serve all.

Posted by: Elle | September 6, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

The alleged calls from supporters urging him to “stay and fight” apparently couldn’t overcome the calls he’s not mentioning from the White House to stop embarassing obama.
Next!
Oh, and “confrontation and outrage” as political tools aren’t as much fun when used AGAINST you, are they, Jones? And how do lies and distortions figure in? Is your name on the petition? Then truth and clarity brought you down. Your own actions spurred by your fringe beliefs are responsible. Stop blaming others, they only pointed out the simple truth.
Points to you, though, for not playing the race card publicly — yet.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

What about the rest of the czars. My understanding and it looks pretty clear in the Constitution that they are illegal without proper vetting in the Senate:
“Article II. Section 2. “He (the President) shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consults, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein provided for, and which shall be established by law; but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.”
Posted by: RM | Sep 6, 2009 8:58:15 AM
**********************
Great idea, RM. We MUST enforce our constitutional laws on our administration. We must make sure they adhere to the constitution. We must make sure they answer to the people. It’s over for them.

Posted by: Jenny | September 6, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

A smear campaign against him??? Are you kidding me? Anything that has been said about the man has been backed up with proof. Go to FoxNewsNation and look at the full article they have about some unbelievable things he’s said in the past. He is one of the most bigoted, racist, separatist idiots I have ever heard about. It will actually scare you to read some of the comments.
I sincerely hope people will start to wake up and see what is happening in OUR government now. OUR government. BTW a big thanks to Glenn Beck for sticking to his guns until this jerk got exposed for what he really is.

Posted by: Shoe | September 6, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Seems to me Glenn Beck Alinsky’d Van Jones. Oh the delicious irony.

Posted by: Jenn | September 6, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

What WILL it take to shame the MSM into doing the jobs they are supposed to?
Where is the investigative reporting?
What will Chris Matthews and Olbie do???

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

ceeLeelee wrote: “Yeah, it IS tough being smeared with your own words. Glenn Beck and FOX News must be laughing their butts off.”
Which Beck is laughing his butt off – the Beck who said Obama “has a deep-seated hatred for white people,” or the Beck who 90 seconds later said, “I’m not saying that he doesn’t like white people?”
Was it the Beck who said our health care system is a nightmare or the Beck who said it is the best health care system in the world?

Posted by: WWW | September 6, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

WWW -
Want some whine with that cheese??? :D

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

ABC, CBS, NBC news are a complete joke, if FOX NEWS was smart they should start investagating in full force the connections the three so called networks have to Obama and his goofball friend Axelrod. The ties to the GE boss has to be put out there with full force. This is the highest form of coruption that must be exposed.
This should be Becks next week long must watched series of shows.

Posted by: Jim | September 6, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

I’m afraid it will take a direct refusal to be manipulated by all Americans who currently listen to these hate spewing demagogues, before we can get back on track and focus on the issues. Come on America! Don’t let yourselves continue to be manipulated by these smear campaigns. There are more important things to do.

Posted by: mw | September 6, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

“Don’t let yourselves continue to be manipulated by these smear campaigns.”
Yawn. Since when is exposing the truth of what someone said on RECORDED VIDEO a smear campaign?
If it was a smear campaign, why didn’t the mainstream media, who’s in the tank for Obama, fight the accusations and discredit Beck? Hmmmm?

Posted by: Stacey | September 6, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

The folks over at RBO have been covering Van Jones since April. They have put together the Van Jones Reader with sources/video clips. Anyone interested in the FACTS take a look. How did this guy pass security? All these czars need investigating.

Posted by: getfitnow | September 6, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Good riddance. Now lets get some reaction from the journos who puffed him.

Posted by: mesquito | September 6, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Smear campaign. Oh yeah. Just shows the complete arrogance of the man. And I don’t even want to touch the arrogance of President Obama. :/
There are more than two dozen czars who may or may not be good candidates for service in the WH. Hope somebody looks at all of them before it’s too late.

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Jones is another example of the questionable appointments that Obama has made during his administration, i.e., Geithner, et al.

Posted by: Loophole | September 6, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Isn’t it strange that supposedly “smart” journalist would rather jeopardize their career along with the media they are working for just to “cover” the butt of this president..it does not make sense! The main stream media has pushed me to Fox News so I can get real news! Do they not understand that people need to know what is going on in their country? Are they not concerned that their viewers will abandon and boycott them in droves? They should start reporting real news now if they are “smart” because we Americans are more informed now than ever before..thanks to the internet and Fox News! WE are “smarter” now than they are and that should scare the “nasty” out of them!

Posted by: ross | September 6, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Very poor judgment on part of Jones. Glad he resigned;should have been vetted better & not appointed. I’m a staunch Obama supporter, but Jones was a mistake who fed into the worst fears of Obama-haters.

Posted by: miller | September 6, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

ceeLeelee wrote: “Want some whine with that cheese??? :D”
Evading my questions. Typical.

Posted by: WWW | September 6, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

There is only one race and that is the human race. American is confused about race -please look it up and get it right. People of color are the ones who have suffered, have been lynched, made fun of and vilified, marginalized because they were Black, Latino, Arab or American Indian. Look at the way White or European systems of government have conducted themselves when they invaded lands of people unlike them. All of this confusion and turmoil stems form the past. It is time that we get right with the truth about the past so that we will have a future. Think about it before you respond to me. People – go back and read your bitter words, step back for a minute and think about what you are saying. Do your research first before you speak. Yes, this is America, where we have freedom of speech and that’s good – everyone has an opinion. Are you paying attention to what’s happening to us here in America? Are you aware of the environmental issues that are impacting all of us? What about all of the people who are out of work because business are having to cut back. What about the future of your children and grandchildren. What about the quality of life for everyone? America needs to wake up and grow up—-remember, American this government is not that old. How America was formed needs to be examined. It was built by enslaved Africans and Native Americans on land stolen from Indigenous people. Please, do your research-read the Doctrine of Discovery, Manifest Destiny, Eminent Domain, Papal Bulls, – Read about what happened to Indigenous Peoples of the Americas from the time of the invasion to what is happening to them now. I love the soil of this Earth Mother that provides us with everything we need-so please don’t think that I am anti-America. This is the land where the ancient bones of my people are buried. Remember, the truth shall set us free—-we are all related and connected-what happens to one of us affects all of us.

Posted by: P.G. Willie | September 6, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Oh, the pain of victimization and oppression! These right-wing hate mongers just won’t relent. Just think of it, every time I say something, they turn around and hold me accountable for it! It’s just not fair.
Good riddance Mr. Jones. Let the investigations into the backgrounds of the czars continue. This wack-job
is just the tip of a very large iceberg!

Posted by: Mike4Truth | September 6, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

“Was it the Beck who said our health care system is a nightmare or the Beck who said it is the best health care system in the world?” Beck is right, the system is a nightmare, but our health care is the best in the world. Perhaps you would be happier with the nightmare of the NHS in England coupled with the horrible care?

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | September 6, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

“Very poor judgment on part of Jones. Glad he resigned;should have been vetted better & not appointed. I’m a staunch Obama supporter, but Jones was a mistake who fed into the worst fears of Obama-haters.”….miller
Miller,
Why do you continue to be a “staunch Obama supporter” in light of the corruption in the White House and the lack of transparency that Obama himself campaigned on? We don’t hate Obama, we just love America more and won’t let the lack of TRUTH go unnoticed! Why doesn’t Obama come out and say that Jones was “stupid” for doing what he did, now that the TRUTH is known, while Obama calls the Boston police “stupid” when the TRUTH was not known? Why does Obama say the AARP endorses his health care program when AARP says they don’t endorse his health care program? Why does Obama allow a little girl to be “planted” in a Massachusetts town forum to ask a manipulated question, only to find out the liitle girl is the daughter of a Massachusetts Obama campaign leader’s girl?
The TRUTH must prevail or America will fail…or maybe, that’s what Obama has in mind!

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

WELL SAID KANAWHA

Posted by: BYRON | September 6, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

People of color are the ones who have suffered, have been lynched, made fun of and vilified, marginalized because they were Black, Latino, Arab or American Indian. Look at the way White or European systems of government have conducted themselves when they invaded lands of people unlike them.Posted by: P.G. Willie | Sep 6, 2009 9:35:56 AM
************
Don’t EVER forget that WOMEN of ALL colors have been oppressed and continue to be around the world. Women were the PROPERTY of men in many US states well into the 20th century and were the last to have the right to vote. Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, political opposites, CONTINUE to be vilified by the media and haters (for whatever reason they choose). On Tuesday when everyone goes back to work, women are still being paid less then their male counterparts.

Posted by: Jenny | September 6, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

WWW -
I answered your “distraction” questions, but it never made an appearance on this blog. Hmmmm.
Not to worry – looks like you are watching more of Fox News than I am. Nice to know you are a part of their viewing audience.
Kudos to Glenn Beck.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

The fact that Fox news had to dig for the facts about Jones in just deplorable. That the MSM doesn’t even report
The fact that Jones calls the comments he made a “smear campaign” against him is a joke. He was in the pocket of Nancy Pelosi and it backfired. We will continue to ask questions of our officials. Remember they work for us and it is our duty to ask and bring things like this to light. This does not make us wingnuts. It makes us good Americans

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

This story should be absolutely huge across all media channels. Let’s see what happens during the week. Will it steal attention from Obama’s big speeches this week? I sure hope so.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Does no one proof read these things? It does make things hard to take seriously with such spelling errors as “Fridat” instead of “Friday” etc.
Someone needs to let Mr. Van Jones know that he cannot hide is radical associations. If these were as innocuous as he pretends then he would find some way to answer to them instead of hiding behind retalitory attacks like “opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me”
He needs to know that we are not as a rule against reform, we are against those who would try to regulate morality because that always leads to totalitarianism.

Posted by: me4you | September 6, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

RE:The tipping point for the White House appeared to be Jones’ admission earlier this week that he had signed a petition in 2004 calling for congressional hearings and an investigation by the New York Attorney General into “evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur.”
.. I would have signed such a petition. The petition didn’t state that Bush officials allowed the attacks on 9/11, rather that there is evidence that suggests this and an investigation is warranted. There was such evidence and such an investigation was, and still is warranted.

Posted by: Roger | September 6, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

I have to admit that I too have switched to FOX News. I kept thinking one of the other stations will pick up on the Van Jones story. So, I kept checking MSNBC, CNN, NBC and NOTHING. Very sad, I don’t always agree with Fox but, at least they report ALL of the news. Glenn Beck is entertaining, funny, extreme and not afraid to get out there and report the news as he sees it. In America, Mr. Beck can say what he likes and in America we can choose to listen or turn the channel.

Posted by: Miss Ross | September 6, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Come on even if you are liberal you cannot approve of this man and his racism toward whites, his unamerican statements and his radical views. He was using his radical views under the quise of being a Green Jobs Czar. The fact that the MSM didn’t even report on this shouldbe enough to make you wonder.
by the way i am a moderate democrat and not as you would say ” Wingnut”

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Hot off the press:
Van Jones is out. Wright is wrong. But who is still in? Mr. Obama.

Posted by: young_voter | September 6, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

“Come on even if you are liberal you cannot approve of this man and his racism toward whites, his unamerican statements and his radical views. He was using his radical views under the quise of being a Green Jobs Czar. The fact that the MSM didn’t even report on this shouldbe enough to make you wonder.
by the way i am a moderate democrat and not as you would say ” Wingnut”"…Karen
Karen,
Democrat or Republican or Independent, you are right!
The TRUTH wil set you free!
Why Obama wants to continue to hide the
TRUTH and circumvent the TRUTH needs to be closely watched.

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

when are white people going to wake up? this guy couldn’t have passed a background check or security clearence. van jones was hired because of his views. obama has the same beleifs.

Posted by: kip | September 6, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

“To avoid being mistaken for a sellout,” Obama wrote in Dreams from my Father, “I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets….At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society’s stifling constraints”. Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko, Wright, the First “Lady”, now Jones. Anyone see a pattern? To know who surrounds Obama is to know Obama.

Posted by: censored | September 6, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Thank god for FOX news what is wrong with the media in the USA, come on guys get real don’t you care about this country?
Time to stop all this pandering to Obama and start to do your jobs, geez what will it take for the media to stop this nonsense that has been going on since the primaries?
Please sirs, please do your jobs!!!!

Posted by: SJ | September 6, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

“To know who surrounds Obama is to know Obama.”…censored
No words have better been said!
The TRUTH will set you free!

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

WHAT!!! Ya’ll are finally reporting something regarding our “Green Czar”! We need to get rid of more of them. How about just a plain overhaul (clean-house). I am ashamed that I was a faithful viewer of ABC News for many years. If ya’ll don’t tell I won’t!!!

Posted by: C H Johnson | September 6, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

By the way…I’ll go back to watching FOX/Nation!!!! At least one network is looking out for us/US!!!

Posted by: C H Johnson | September 6, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I knew Obama wouldn’t have the guts to fire him.
Now Obama needs to explain why he wanted Jones in the first place.
Most people know why. But why doesn’t Obama have the backbone to be truthful about his own views instead of pretending and deceiving?

Posted by: riley | September 6, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Poor Jones. It’s a terrible thing to be smeared with your own words.

Posted by: drjohn | September 6, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Obama and Valerie Jarret better stay clear of Fox.
They will be the only media with the courage to ask why the WH was so delighted to recruit such a radical.
Fox, Jake, and a few other blogs are looking out for the people kept in the dark by the MSMedia.

Posted by: jacl | September 6, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

One radical czar down.
Now who is next?
The one that wants forced sterilization?
Adviser Zeke Emanuel that thinks age determines your worthiness to live?
The czar that wants to cut off talk radio and control free speech?
Fox is coming after you…

Posted by: larry | September 6, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Time to stop all this pandering to Obama
Posted by: SJ
this from the folks who wanted to make Palin V.P. and a heartbeat away from the presidency? the birthers’…the deathers’….the indoctrinators’..the fraud ‘protestors’… ‘Joe the Plumber’…the folks who revere Orly Taitz…the folks who don’t realize the medicare is a govt. run program..etc…
the public understood what was wrong with the Republicans in 2008, esp. when they nominated Palin… they knew republicans could not be taken seriously by offering her as a candidate. America really listened to her and was appalled and frightened.
Much the same now….. a lot of screaming by various GOP-o-saurs that the sky is falling with a generous serving of hate and paranoia.
The loud rants will always make the news, and the desperate will leap for joy at any success of the ‘tear down america’ fear campaign.
this too, shall pass…

Posted by: 007 | September 6, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

The MSM is a sorry bunch.
They are not looking out for us.
Americans deserve to know just how radical and racist Van Jones really is.
Why would our “post racial” president want Van Jones?
Obama is lying to us.

Posted by: tyler | September 6, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I have $10 on jetta jamison’s ticket put of the country. Where do I send it?

Posted by: Bigguy | September 6, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

007 in case you did not notice, no one went out to do a hatchet job on Van Jones, this gentleman has is own words and actions to thank for his demise today.
Shame on you and all like you that would ask Americans to accept this kind of radical person advising the President, some of you really show much love of this country and its future.

Posted by: SJ | September 6, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Van Jones is just a younger updated version of Rev Wright.
The only reason Obama threw Wright under the bus was to save his campaign.
Notice he didn’t fire Van Jones.
Obama needs to resign too.
No one trusts him anymore.

Posted by: kyle | September 6, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

GOOD RIDDANCE!! He was a radical black nationalist and a self-avowed communist. NO WAY should he be in the White House.

Posted by: Gordon | September 6, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Thank God for FOX NEWS!
TRUTHFULNESS in reporting!
Too bad we don’t have the same truthfulness in the White House.
Last MSM station out the door, turn out the lights!

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Thanks MSM for absolutely nothing.
You do not care about all Americans just those who share your liberal ideals.
I hope Obama is worth your integrity.
It’s no wonder Fox is kicking your butt.
Good riddance.

Posted by: bailey | September 6, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

One thing this Van Jones story has shown me is that Hannity was right on target when he was yelling about the media not paying close attention to the people that surround Obama.
Fox got licks dialy for saying that but it sure seems to me now that there is some truth in there somewhere that the MSM seems to be conveniently ignoring.

Posted by: SJ | September 6, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Thank you Jake.
Thank you Fox.
Thank you blogs that keep us informed and tell the truth.

Posted by: millie | September 6, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

007:”Much the same now….. a lot of screaming by various GOP-o-saurs that the sky is falling with a generous serving of hate and paranoia.
The loud rants will always make the news, and the desperate will leap for joy at any success of the ‘tear down america’ fear campaign.
this too, shall pass… ”
The panic is palpable. This will not pass quietly into the night. It is the beginning of turning of the tide. Obama tried to sneak Mr. Jones past Senatorial oversight and past the American public. Mr. Jones is just the beginning.
The truth shall set you free.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

accept this kind of radical person advising the President, some of you really show much love of this country and its future.
Posted by: SJ
you need to do some serious review, [if your capable] of the 8 years of the bush administration, your concept of ‘radical’ seems to be, shall we say, limited in scope…..
we already ‘know’, that ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ ‘hate america’… ever check the legislation over the last 100 years that’s designed to protect citizens,..? guess who wrote the vast majority of it…I’ll give you a hint..it wasn’t David Addington…
enjoy your Sunday, perhaps have a serving of freedom fries while you do your suggested reading assignment.

Posted by: 007 | September 6, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Bring Cheney back!
He knows the threats to America, and one of the biggest is right here in America like people with Jones-like mindsets. These radicals will not prevail!

Posted by: TruthinAmerica | September 6, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Sorry but Obama is just as radical and racist as Van Jones. That’s the only reason he would hire somebody like that!!!!

Posted by: Justin | September 6, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

A smear campaign? Yeah, I hate it when the media uses someone’s own words and documented actions (demostrating is support of a cop killer in 1999) to construct a smear campaign. What a joke! Jones and his ilk are so far removed from reality it’s frightening. How did Valerie Jarret approve of this hiring? This raises some very serious questions about either the competency or the motives of one of Obama’s most trusted advisers.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Did the MSM do an almost total blackout of this story so that when he was forced to resign they could make the claim he was a low level staffer, not worthy of reporting on? I would imagine the NYTs readers woke up this morning and said WTH? This controversy has been going on for weeks and MSM only report it when he resigns.
I hope after this those that get their news from only the MSM will expand their horizons. Whiplashes are painful.

Posted by: Axey | September 6, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

007 that same legislation that you and others love to complain was put there to keep nut jobs like Van Jones out of the WH.
Unfortunately it seem that Obama wanted to avoid the screening process and bring people with odd racist views like Van Jones in, but thanks to a few vigilant eyes he was stopped in his tracks.
Only thing it leaves me to wonder now is how many more are there just like Van Jones already in this administration or waiting in the wings to be welcomed in.

Posted by: SJ | September 6, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Time to investigate other Obama appointments – who knows what else will come slithering out from under the over-turned rocks. Birds of a feather …..
We knew what kind of associations Obama had, many chose to ignore it.
This man is unfit to be president.
The anti-American president from the Un-Democratic Party ……

Posted by: Terry | September 6, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

thank you Fox for honest reporting?
wow…that is a good one
who really honestly reports anymore?
no one does
honest reporting = giving facts without analyzing those facts to make us agree with those reporting
have any of you even objectively and thoroughly looked at the evidence behind the 911 attacks accusations?
thought not.
i love how everyone just spits out what fox news tells them without looking at the assumptions behind the “facts” they are spreading

Posted by: shirley | September 6, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Not so easy to destroy America is it Obama?
Some of us actually love our country the way it is.
God bless America

Posted by: jack | September 6, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Reverend Wright believed the US deserved 9/11 and believed the same thing that Van Jones believes. obama said he didn’t believe what Rev Wright believes and supposedly stopped his relationship with Wright and stopped attending his church. However, obama puts Van Jones in his administration – someone similar to Wright. obama lied to the American people.

Posted by: Jenny | September 6, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Good by Van.
I bet Chavez would love a guy with your talent.

Posted by: max | September 6, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Posted by: SJ
I can only suggest to you again that you review the hiring of he bush administration, esp. with regard to iraq and the ‘justice’ dept.
I know you won’t do that….as it’s much better to vent frustration after the 2008 election, and it’s understandable…
does it ever make you wonder why many of these imagined crisis last for such a short time, that is, until the next ‘crisis’ is discovered..
the current debate works out to about 25% substance, and 75% crazy speak..

Posted by: 007 | September 6, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Reverend Wright believed the US deserved 9/11
Posted by: Jenny
‘good christians’ Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell believed that and sermonized that to their ‘ministries’

Posted by: TJ | September 6, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Glad to hear Van Jones is so noble to give up his position so the administration won’t be further stressed trying to keep him afloat. Those nasty people with their smear campaigns should be a ashamed causing all this unnecessary adversity. Jake Tapper should also be encouraged to resign after that pathetic and biased coverage of Mr. Jones resignation.
Glenn Beck has done a great job in his informative reporting as does all Fox news . Also, Van Jones is also the co-founder- of Colors For Change- the group who is getting the advertisors for Beck’s show to cancel because of Beck’s comment of Obama being a racist in regard to his criticism of the cop and professor mess. The fact that is was a racist comment is to be disregarded and the only acceptable reality is Obama is above reproach..therefore Beck should be eliminated. Thank God for free speech in the USA – even Glenn Beck has a voice!! ( as do all of us who are writing here now)

Posted by: carolk | September 6, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

WE should get people in these positions who are actually qualified. I would like to see some one like Intel chariman of the board Craig Barret in that job. The job is important. The administration seems to never hire anyone with technical expertise – OK Larry Sommers knows what he is doing – and is disliked in the administration.
Lets get some good technical people in the administration. We do not need politicals who are known because they hate one segment of society or another.

Posted by: welldirected | September 6, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

It’s not conservatives or Republicans who won this round. The American people won. Good riddance to a foul-mouthed radical in the Administration. Thanks to Glenn Beck, Jake Tapper and a few others for informing the public. The people are paying attention.

Posted by: Juju | September 6, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

007 tells us, “the current debate works out to about 25% substance, and 75% crazy speak..” I’d say most of the crazy speak came from Van Jones himself. Once you see the quotes laid out, from his comment within days of 9/11/01 that it was “the bombs we drop on Iraq” (back in the days of the no-fly-zone missions) that “fell on NYC,” to his statement in February of this year that Republicans are a**holes, you wonder how he ever passed the vetting process. But then, he did not have to face Senate confirmation, so I guess they didn’t need to worry about anything not directly related to green jobs. of course, his talk about green jobs is pretty scary, too.
Oh, well. Glad he’s gone. The Obama administration did the right thing by quietly pushing him out the door without a lot of fanfare.

Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Jake Tapper, excellent and honest reporting. I wish we had more Jake Tapper types who question the who, when, what, why, where and how of a news story in main stream media. Jake, you rock!

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | September 6, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Pres. Obama stated, while debating McCain one day, to judge him who he will surround himself in the White House.
(He was referring to all of the ‘smart’ people that will help him while President).
Okay. We took him at his word. We judged Van Jones unfit for duty.
He needs to go back to being a communist (of all things!), and write a book on how America pulled off 9/ll -(HIS theory!)
“I didn’t know or I didn’t fully read nor understood” statement does not fly.
He does not appear to be stupid. Obama had it right: he is an intelligent guy.
He just needs to take it down the road, however, and join any type of club he wants to.

Posted by: Next | September 6, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Washington Post:
“The slide has only quickened. Emerging from an angry August recess, Obama is weakened politically and faces growing concerns, particularly from within his own party, over his strength as a leader. Dozens of interviews this summer in six states — from Maine to California — have revealed a growing angst and disappointment over the administration’s present course.”
Somebody tell us: what was a man like Jones doing in a presidential administration?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 6, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

I can’t wait to see who “Exhibit B” will be. This type reporting has made ABC News what it is today. Thank goodness for FOX.

Posted by: justamom | September 6, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Total failure on the part of ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, Washington Post and other liberal media for helping to cover up this story.
Shame on the media for siding with the politics of a President and not investigating and reporting news in an objective manner that helps inform the citizens of the United States.

Posted by: Robert L. | September 6, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

So, now many green jobs did he create before his resignation?

Posted by: LaLydia | September 6, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

“They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.” HUH?
The evidence is damning and the dem’s want to say they’re “lies and distortion?” In a court of law, Mr. Jones would be found guilty and no amount of pleading the fifth would change any of the evidence that is out there. The state run media once again has failed in their job of holding this president responsible for who he surrounds himself with and also for the people he appoints. But this resignation says more about who and what President Obama is than it says about Mr. Jones and his radical views. In other words, BMO is known by the company he keeps; Wright, Ayers, Jarrett, ect. Add Mr. Jones’ name to that list. And in that same court of law Mr. Obama is guilty by association.

Posted by: Steve | September 6, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Not so easy to fix the problems with America, is it Obama? Some people like the country the way it used to be.
Birthers and truthers need to go, though.

Posted by: Kevin B | September 6, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Hannson:
“What is interesting about Van Jones’ supposedly divisive comments are that many in fact dovetail with Obama’s past revelations in more indiscreet moments. Aside from a shared rhetoric of spreading and redistributing wealth, I don’t see how white polluters of the ghetto is that much different from anything Rev. Wright said, Obama’s own ‘typical white person’, or his stereotyping of the Pennsylvania clingers or the Cambridge police.”
Jones was hired because Obama shares many of his views.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 6, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

They thrust their fists against the post and still insist it’s Bush’s fault.
The rightwingconspiracy-it’sallaboutrace argument fell apart a long time ago.
Obama, like Bush, surrounds himself with people who think exactly as he does. Obama and Bush are exactly the same, egotistical extremists with grand plans for America. I’m beginning to believe the tax-cheats running the IRS and other departments are the “good guys” in the mix.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

You crazy conservatives are hilarious! Glenn Beck? You are listening? The jokes on you.
Hilarious.
I hope you all are aware that less than a third of the American population knows the three branches of government.

Posted by: Ana | September 6, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Obama’s bud has bit the dirt. Make no mistake. Obama was not troubled by Van JOnes positions only by the bad publicity.

Posted by: not the change we needed | September 6, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Jake you are awesome . You could be taking credit for this , if you had not hid from the story like a little girl with the rest of the lamestream media .

Posted by: nat turner | September 6, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Yeah, Ana, those “crazy conservatives” are to blame here. After all, everybody knows that they MADE President Obama hire this left-wingnut who believes that Geroge Bush & Co. conspired with the CIA to kill over 3,000 lives.
Jones was a “Jeremiah Wright” radical and the MSM happily tried to bury the story. Say what you want about FOX, but at least they covered this story BEFORE Jones resigned.
The real tragedy is that the MSM is only now “reporting” on this story, after Jones has resigned and in typical left-bent fashion they’re doing so as if Jones’ background was moderate and mainstream. Get real.
And welcome to the party, Jake. Very late as usual, but welcome.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Anyone who thinks that Obama did not fully understand this guy’s past and either agreed with or embraced it is suffering from self deception. It is illustrative of the change he is trying to force on Americans. I can hear the Obama denials now… “I was not aware of these past comments by Mr Jones”…. “I was not aware of these views of Mr Jones”… etc, etc ad nauseam. This will be redolent of how he was not aware of Rev Wright’s views and comments or the views, actions and philosophy of William Ayers.
Unfortunately, the real environmental movement (which I support) has some very noble and dedicated people who are now going to suffer from this appointment by Obama. It appears Obama’s political philosophy, motives and strategy trumped genuine concern for the environment when he inserted a phony like this into the position. Apparently the appointment was not about green jobs as much as it was about radical political motives. Chalk this up as a stunningly clear example of what he really meant when he said he’d bring change to America.
This was not (as this paper tries to indicate) a victory for Republicans; it was a victory for the republic. Is it really the paper’s position, given what we now know about this guy, that independents and Democrats really still want him in this role? Please!! Thankfully some of the media did its job by exposing what this man represented.
The real problem we have is that Obama cunningly decided on a strategy to insert people like this under his czar program in order to avoid exposing what many of these czars really represent. It is a rather cunning but deceitful way to sub-rosa position radicals like this into the government to push along this change he desires. Hopefully this is the beginning of the end, as further scrutiny may finally be applied to many of the other czars that are still operating below the radar.

Posted by: RJ | September 6, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Ana – your last sentence is exactly why this administration was elected. thanks for making it clear. While the liberals gloat at the ignorance of Americans about their government and use that to bring power to their own party – the rest of us are trying actually inform Americans of what is really going on.

Posted by: dwayne | September 6, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

He was the David Duke of the Dems. I’m sure ABC would have had at least a dozen stories under Breaking News about him if he were a Republican. ABC is so filled with people moving between the revolving doors between the DNC and ABC they will only pursue stories against conservatives. The John Edwards story gets scooped by the Enquirer? I would bet my house that ABC sat on that story for more than 6-12 months. ABC’s Linda Douglas was unbiased in her reporting all those years I’m sure. George Steph. is very unbiased in his reporting too… right! At least 75% reporters (ABC included) are liberal “journalist”. MSM you’ve made yourself an embarrassment…

Posted by: freemort | September 6, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

His crime… he made an unforgivable sin… he violated true Alinsky priciples by truthfully representing his points of view. He was unafraid to speak the truth about his and the rest of the Obama administration’s actual agenda. He is an unappolagetic radical anti-American White hating racist communist. He is exactly the same as most of the other people Obama has chosen to associate himself with over the years.

Posted by: Steven Miller | September 6, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Jake, it’s not just the petition that reveals Jones to be a truther – he was also on the planning board for a truther march in San Francisco. Hard to claim THAT was because he didn’t read carefully.

Posted by: Justin | September 6, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

“I hope you all are aware that less than a third of the American population knows the three branches of government.”
Boy, with this President we sure know what these branches would look like if he was given “Hugo Chavez” like power. They are quite simply the branches of…
Liberalism, Socialism and Communism.
When these labels were tossed around with the Clinton Administration, most moderates and liberals laughed it off and tossed it aside. Now President Obama, with guys like Van Jones, is making these labels, once used as scare tactics, a hoped reality.
Thankfully, there are some more reasonable, cooler heads in Dem. dominated Congress that will stand up to Pelosi and Obama – Go Bluedogs! Otherwise, Van Jones would be the average appointee rather than the exception.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

The great irony: President Obama is setting up a Hillary run in 2012.
Hillary v. Palin? Oh, what a circus that would be….

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

freemort,
Those are excellent observations.
“The John Edwards story gets scooped by the Enquirer?”
Exhibit A that the MSM has outsourced real journalism (unless a Republican official) of Democratic candidates. When it comes to guys like Jones and Rangell, the MSM follows rather than leads.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

First they came for the communist black nationalist truther czars, and I didn’t speak up…
Posted by: Chris |
lol

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 6, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

The real story here Jake is the utter failure of the MSM, you included, to cover this story leaving it to the evil Glen Beck and us evil right wing denizens to expose this clown for what he is.
What this means Jake is that this particular commi/greenie nut has been forced to resign by the hoi polloi which is a comment on the weakening grasp of power that the MSM has.

Posted by: John | September 6, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Where was ABC’s coverage of Van Jones for the past few weeks? Where was it when he was appointed? Why is ABC so clearly in Obama’s pocket? What ever happened to JOURNALISM at ABC? When Charlie finally showed his true colors and lost his objectivity, I gave up on getting the full, truthful, even handed coverage of issues from ABC!

Posted by: Bill | September 6, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

www, no one is defending Beck here…nor should be. But what’s funny about your post is that it has nothing to do with Jones. Yeah, Beck called it out, but so what? If Jones wasn’t the loony-tunes anti-thesis of Beck he’d still have a job.
Are you now going to defend Jones, or are you just running around with your fingers in your ears while appearing to throw a tantrum that the hard right landed a legitimate blow?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Robert L. got it right. Not only does this story indite the press for it’s lack of playing the vanguard of protecting the public interest, it also is an indictment of the MSM’s culpability in insulating the public by not reporting on this story until now. Once again, the MSM shows its true colors by its hesitancy and unwillingness to “vet” these public figures by giving them a pass.

Posted by: Steve | September 6, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Jake says: “Having expended much time and energy discrediting conservative conspiracy theorists alleging (despite all evidence) that the President was not born in the U.S…”
All WHAT evidence, Jake? The evidence I’ve seen is that they trot out a little-known official from an office in Hawaii government to say “the birth certificate is real! … I’ve SEEN it” combined with the millions that Obama has spent to keep this thing covered up.
All the evidence seems to back up the concern, not refute it.
But at least you’ll get style points from the “All Barack Channel” heads, if nothing else.

Posted by: Gadsden | September 6, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

You folks that keep ragging on Jake might want to check the links to the left. Mr Tapper has been on this story.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 6, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

“On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me,” Jones wrote. “They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide.”
The dude was a truther, and was never vetted before being “appointed.” And what’s hilarious is that folks outside the MSM forced the guy to resigned by spending a few moments Googling his past and now he’s all up in arms about it.
But hey, no way Jones “goes BACK” to this kind of thinking, right?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

When you spend too much time hanging out at the White House as a reporter, sometimes you lose the ability to actually report on what is going on with an objectivity. I think that is what has happened to Jake. This guys Jones has quite a history, it’s not just about the “truther” thing. He is on TAPE saying that only white kids do a Columbine. He says black kids may shoot each other, but never a whole school. What kind of nut is this to say these things, and in public too? Where was the MSM. Oh yeah, vacationing with Obama.

Posted by: al | September 6, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

The thing about Van Jones that was absolutely most disturbing to me was his revelation that he considers his eco-ecomony goals as just a minimal step/stage toward achieving a marxist transformation of our ecomony. As green job czar he was given power to pursue this goal. Am I wrong to think his green-jobs philosophy is the most controversial aspect of his appointment? If not, then why aren’t Jake or others mentioning it?
“… Inside that minimum demand was a very radical kernel that eventually meant that from 1964 to 1968 that complete revolution was on the table for this country. And I think that this Green Movement has to pursue those same steps and stages. Right now we are saying that we want to move from suicidal gray capitalism to some kind of eco-capitalism where at least we are not fast tracking the destruction of the whole planet. Will that be enough. No it won’t be enough. We want to go beyond systems of exploitations and oppression all together. But that’s a process. What’s great about the movement that is beginning to emerge is that the crisis is so severe in terms of joblessness, violence, and ecological threats that people are willing to be very pragmatic and very visionary so the green economy will start off as a small subset and we are going to push it and push it and push it until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society.” Van Jones April 2008 speaking to Rust Belt Radio.

Posted by: John E. | September 6, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I think many of you are missing the narrative.
iVan Jones is a visionary that was smeared and forced to resign by the right wing hate machine and will now be more popular than ever before with the loony left. There are millions of $$$ in his future.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

In a statement issued Thursday evening Jones said of “the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever.”
Yeah, right. He had five years to ask the petition’s owner to take it down. And don’t tell me that most reasonable people, don’t do a hard vetting of themselves before they accept a job in the White House. If they don’t do even a cursory due diligence on their own past before accepting a position in a public setting, then they deserve the outcome.
Jones clearly knew about the petition and given his other activists roots and ties he that supports this kind of thinking, was probably proud of it, until the blogosphere jumped all over him and threatened his job and Obama’s damaged credibility.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Obama please resign now.
Hillary has the backbone you lack.
She would of had the good sense to not appoint blatant radical commies to important positions.
And she wouldn’t have been dumb enough to try and ram everything down our throats–threatening our freedom.
Everything Hillary predicted about Obama has come true.
His only skill is to read a speech, and is dangerously unqualified.
Hillary or Palin 2012

Posted by: glenn | September 6, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

what valerie jarrett said about recruiting van jones (she was watching him and knew his background): “Oooh. Van Jones, alright! So, Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We were watching him, uh, really, he’s not that old, for as long as he’s been active out in Oakland. And all the creative ideas he has. And so now, we have captured that. And we have all that energy in the White House.”

Posted by: al | September 6, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“There are millions of $$$ in his future.”
The Van Jones Show on Air America is worth millions? I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one…
Although, I’m sure a witty best-seller on how he was victimized by the “right wing hate machine” (that was supposed to be dead and irrelevant according the MSM a few months ago) will be his next ambition.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Fox is “draining the swamp”.
Isn’t that what Pelosi promised?
She and Obama were going to get rid of the corruption in Washington.
They lied big time.

Posted by: max | September 6, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I’m not sure who is more corrupt..
The MSM or the government.
How does a news organization justify turning their backs on the American people?

Posted by: ollie | September 6, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“What seemed to hurt Jones the most politically, however, was the discovery of his name on the 9/11 “Truther” petition, which suggested President Bush or those in his administration at the very least allowed 9/11 to happen so as to launch wars for oil.”
By the way, where is all that Iraqi oil we stole? LOL.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Those of you who hate Fox News have been brainwashed. Why is it taking you so long to GET the fact that Fox covers stories the other “news” channels will not? And don’t trust Fox for all your news, either. Spend some time on the internet instead of watching some stupid movie or tv show and LEARN something.

Posted by: WhatABlip | September 6, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Gibbs said it was Van Jones’ decision to leave.
Which means in spite of all that has come out about Jones, Obama would have kept him as an adviser.
Are you kidding me?
And Obama wonders why parents don’t want him speaking to their kids.

Posted by: jack | September 6, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Ana, I agree that this factoid is unspeakably sad: “I hope you all are aware that less than a third of the American population knows the three branches of government.” However, you bring it up while cackling about the stupidity of people who follow Glenn Beck. What on earth makes you think that these two groups are the same folks? I am sure the Venn diagram of these folks would have some overlap, but there are still two different circles. There are foolish folks on both ends of the political spectrum and sometimes even here in the middle. *G*

Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

By the way, where is all that Iraqi oil we stole? LOL.
Posted by: BH |
Don’t go stirring up the OILers.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 6, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Obama’s defense of Rev Wright was that he was an old-timer bitter over the struggle for Civil Rights.
Van Jones is 40 years old and he is just as bitter.
He appears to blame all whites for things that happened years ago.
And continues to blame America for things that happened hundreds of years ago.
How does Van Jones fit into Obama’s plan for a post-racial America?
Obama is full of it.
Watch what he does not what he says.

Posted by: tyler | September 6, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Posted by: Ana | Sep 6, 2009 11:49:51 AM
“I hope you all are aware that less than a third of the American population knows the three branches of government.”
————
Yeah, but don’t worry, Ana, in that one-third you won’t find any SEIU or ACORN or Obama t-shirts.

Posted by: ouch | September 6, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“Don’t go stirring up the OILers.”
You’re right, sorry.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

So those of us who protest Obama’s massive spending and government takeover
are unAmerican mobs.
But Van Jones who trashes America, cops, white people—he gets hired by Obama.
Something is terribly wrong with the Obama administration’s logic.

Posted by: larry | September 6, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

On the one hand, the petition isn’t really that contraversial, saying only that officials “allowed” it to happen. After all, Bush did ignore the warnings of his security people. Thats pretty old news. Even Bush supporters admit that much. Its not like saying he caused it or anything.
On the other hand, Jones is needed in the community, where I daresay he’ll be alot more effective than he would be in the tepid Obama administration.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 6, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Jake, I appreciate the journalistic effort that you put into this, after all, the NYT, the WAPO, the LAT, the AP, Reuters, and numerous other news outlets like CBS, NBC, CNN, could not seem to find out this wealth of information about Jones. You are the ultimate investigative reporter to scoop all the other news outlets, the only problem I really have, is why it took you this long to write about all of Jones’ numerous statements and activities? How many others in the admin have things like this in their past (and not so distant past at that)? I really like how Jones says he was smeared by a vicious campaign of lies. I am pretty certain that everything that I have heard about Jones comes from videos of him and his writings about his communist beliefs and his efforts to destroy capitalism, etc… Pretty sad that all the major news outlets were surprised by this and only able to cover it, and mostly not well, after it is mostly over. I hope the Senate still investigates the admin’s practice of bypassing their confirmation by using these “Czar” positions.

Posted by: Jason | September 6, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

So long MSM.
You are officially irrelevant.
Your sickening bias for Obama has destroyed you.
America deserves better. We deserve the da*n truth!
Too bad we can’t sue you for looking the other way as Obama appoints communist and radicals that want to destroy our country and take our freedom.
You deserve to go out of business and waste away in the ratings.

Posted by: rick | September 6, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

flash override says: “On the one hand, the petition isn’t really that contraversial, (sic) saying only that officials “allowed” it to happen.”
If I knew that my country’s leadership knew of and could stop an attack like 9/11 and they chose not to, I would fear for my freedom if I was in a movement seeking to expose that kind of crime. And yet the “truthers” knew that they had nothing to fear, because the government wasn’t going to come after them. You have to ask yourself why they were so confident they could speak out without fear. It is because deep down they had to know that their government was incapable of committing such a horrible act and also incapable of arresting and silencing all the “truthers.” It is a horrible thing to think that US citizens could allow 3000 other US citizens to be killed, and for what? Jones and the rest of these fools argued in the fall of 2001 that the attacks on the US were the result of US operations overseas. “The chickens were coming home to roost” argument. When they realized that was not gaining traction against Bush they switched to this argument that the buildings were blown up by the CIA or some other US government agency. This has all been a cynical political attack on the Bush admin and is pretty disgusting. The sad thing is that the Obama admin has not yet (they will soon just like they did with Ayers and Wright) repudiated Jones.

Posted by: Jason | September 6, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

“Nothing to see folks, move along.Van Jones never happened, he doesn’t exist,blah,blah,blah.In other news,it will become dark after sunset.”-main-stream media quality of reporting.Another area of negligence: failure to report the inability of this administration to fill mid-level positions in the federal government.Jake,get out of D.C.and talk to federal employees about the chaos that is going on in federal departments because the middle managers aren’t there.

Posted by: Nephron | September 6, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

if we’re calling for hearings and investigations, I’m all for that…. no exclusions for anyone or any party……
seems that Bush, Cheney and the rest of the crime family would be a good place to start, the first steps are already being taken….
the preliminary info is already horrendous.
here’s a conspiracy theory for you:
doesn’t it seem strange that once Obama got into office that his opinion of investigating Bush & Co. really changed…his reluctance to show the pix of the torture abuse……
I think the info is so terrible, that even Obama can’t release it due to the damage it would cause domestically and around the world.

Posted by: Free 4 All | September 6, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Great reporting Jake.

Posted by: Robert | September 6, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“An administration source said Jones says he did not carefully review the language in the petition before agreeing to add his name.”
Jake, why do you repeat this lying garbage, unchallenged? If you you can’t smell rotten garbage just give up the journalism business.

Posted by: keys2truth | September 6, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Where was the press? I understand that only Fox reported on this? Is that true? Night after night I listen to the news and no one uncovered anything about this guy? The press is either totally inept or in bed with our president. No wonder newspapers are going belly up.
A communist as an advisor? What is this country coming to?

Posted by: B Man | September 6, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

the real ‘death panels’:
After the mortgage business imploded last year, Wall Street investment banks began searching for another big idea to make money. They think they may have found one.
The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.
The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return — though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money.

Posted by: TJ | September 6, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

By the way…the Bush administration did have advanced knowledge of an attack….Your boy Bush was on vacation when he got the news
How patriotic is that?

Posted by: Brian | September 6, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Obama only cares about flaunting his desire to do anything he wants. Is Van Jones offensive and unworthy for the position? All the better! Now he can try to get away with something even more outrageous.

Posted by: keys2truth | September 6, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

B man: “The press is either totally inept or in bed with our president.”
Isn’t the answer obvious?

Posted by: keys2truth | September 6, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

jones made ‘negative comments’ about republicans…….certainly a federal offense, worthy of resignation…
good thing michelle bachmann isn’t held to the same standard

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“Obama appoints communist and radicals that want to destroy our country and take our freedom.”
______________________________________
Yeah sure. We’re going to take away your freedom to be a paranoid extremist . ..

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

MM,ever hear of the mass extiniction of the North American megafauna that happened about, say TEN THOUSAND YEARS ago?The extinction comment is flat-out WRONG.There is no “tipping” point in regard to iceberg melting-THEY ALL MELT!There is still no proof that anthropogenic warming exists-only theories that have not been confirmed by experimental scientific method. Rapid climate change(if we are seeing it at present, which is doubtful) can be explained as a natural event. The Younger Dryas events happened 10000 to 12000 yrs. ago -totally natural rapid climate change. However,I don’t think that Van Jones knows a damn thing about climatic changes, meteorology,geology or any natural science.He was a pure political appointment by Ms. Jarret and Mr. Obama.

Posted by: Nephron | September 6, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

The most appropriate person never gets thrown under the bus.
Aren’t all of you Messiah sycophants getting just a little bit tired of all his lies and incompetence?

Posted by: keys2truth | September 6, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Is just where you graduated from the only criteria?
Posted by: Susan
of course not, but since the ‘right’ seems deathly afraid of education, books, the non-religious, women who speak for themselves, science, etc…I’ll take my chances with an educated, independent thinking and rational human being.
btw: re: ‘or even the loathing for whites ‘
certainly an ‘educated’ perspective’ LOL

Posted by: TJ | September 6, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Aren’t all of you Messiah sycophants getting just a little bit tired of all his lies and incompetence?
Posted by: keys2truth
no….. how else would ‘we’ be able to track the ‘birthers’, ‘deathers’, ‘indoctrinators’, and purveyors of the absolute search for marxist socialist totalitarian dictators… got to keep track of all of you so you can be sent to the FEMA camps….

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Aren’t all of you Messiah sycophants getting just a little bit tired of all his lies and incompetence?
Posted by: keys2truth | Sep 6, 2009 1:48:48 PM
***
I’m tired of the GOP’s lies and incompetence and it’s echo chambers’ smear campaigns, bloodthirstiness, close-mindedness and overall lack of integrity, innovation and intellectualism.
But I am unhappy that Van Jones left and that the robust public option may get the same amount of support that Van Jones did.

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

no….. how else would ‘we’ be able to track the ‘birthers’, ‘deathers’, ‘indoctrinators’, and purveyors of the absolute search for marxist socialist totalitarian dictators… got to keep track of all of you so you can be sent to the FEMA camps….
Posted by: yes | Sep 6, 2009 1:53:42 PM
****
Better answer. LOL

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

On the other hand, Jones is needed in the community, where I daresay he’ll be alot more effective than he would be in the tepid Obama administration.
Posted by: Flash Override | Sep 6, 2009 1:07:51 PM
***
that’s the upside, though the sharks are still licking their chops and swimming toward a new victim.

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

you know, the far away crazy ‘right’ has already gone through so much negativity in their sordid nomenclature campaign against Obama, one wonders to what new depths they will fall with their fetid, sociopathic verse.

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Posted by: Nephron | Sep 6, 2009 1:45:30 PM
Excellent! But you’ll never convince them that the earth has already cycled through ice and tropics. It messes with “the message.”
And *someone* on this thread made a comment about “the right” being against education. ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

next time, ( if there is a next time ) a Republican president is handed 2 wars, and a crashed economy, I hope the ‘if you haven’t fixed it in 8 months rule, you failed’ is still applied.

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

This epsisode is another self inflicted nail driven into the dying, old corrupt mainstream media. Obama hired a guy overseeing a budget of $30 billion who is on recording supporting a cop killer, supported truthers, and talked about a radical incremental plan to bring about “fundamental change” i.e. socialism to the US but nobody in the MSM lifts a finger to bring the story out.
Obama is obviously extremely leftwing and no amount of MSM coverup will diminish that hard fact.

Posted by: BigVaska | September 6, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

But you’ll never convince them that the earth has already cycled through ice and tropics. It messes with “the message.”
Posted by: Eyes Open
yes, “the message”…the evangelicals certainly have curious views on science, did you know that the earth is only around 6000 years old…..and that every thing in the bible is absolute truth….curious that they align themselves so closely with ‘C Street’ republican types.

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Tick tock Charlie Rangel.
Tick tock radical czars/advisers.
We’re coming after you next.

Posted by: kyle | September 6, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

next time, ( if there is a next time ) a Republican president is handed 2 wars, and a crashed economy, I hope the ‘if you haven’t fixed it in 8 months rule, you failed’ is still applied.
_____________________________________
seems a bit of a fantasy world to expect reasoned fairness from the Republican right . ..

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Obama conveniently will never be asked why he thought it was OK to appoint Van Jones knowing about his views.
BO won’t be asked if he shares his views, or why he didn’t fire Jones.
It’s not hard to figure out all of this but wouldn’t it be great to see Obama squirm?

Posted by: larry | September 6, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I love the ‘radical’ references about Obama…
’cause, ….
_bringing guns to political meetings certainly wouldn’t be considered radical
_talking about seceding from America wouldn’t be considered radical
_invading Iraq for no reason wouldn’t be considered radical
_ saying that an invisible being ie: god, told you to start a war wouldn’t be considered radical
but I digress…..

Posted by: yes | September 6, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

It’s hilarious to watch Jones perform on those clips.
He has the same mannerisms as Rev Wright, and is just as loud and obnoxious.
Great choices Obama.
Your judgement is reassuring.

Posted by: jack | September 6, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Another old stereotype seen repeatedly on the boards here: “…since the ‘right’ seems deathly afraid of education, books, the non-religious, women who speak for themselves, science, etc…I’ll take my chances with an educated, independent thinking and rational human being.”
I am not on the right, but I am a firm Republican and I know lots of folks who self-identify as leaning right (and yes, I lean right on fiscal issues myself). I am not atypical of the Republicans I know, and I am a female who holds a PHD (can’t get much more educated than that), is religious but not a Biblical literalists– so I believe in a higher power but also in evolution, has two children who are scientists, has thousands of books in my personal library— and I’ve read them all, and is obviously not afraid of women who speak for themselves, as do I.
My more conservative friends are the same mix of educated and uneducated, politically engaged and uninformed, religious and unreligious as the rest of America. My more liberal friends, and as an academic that would be the majority of my friends and colleagues, are similarly mixed. I would not dream of lumping all of them, on either side of my moderate middle, together and insulting them in the process. I am quickly remembering why I took a bit of a break from reading this blog recently.

Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Thank you Glenn Beck!!!!!

Posted by: Phyliss | September 6, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Howard Dean is on Fox saying Van Jones only signed the 9/11 petition because someone handed him a clipboard and Jones signed it.
Right before that he tried to imply that Jones was a brilliant Yale graduate, lawyer, author.
But not smart enough to read a petition
before signing it?
Hey didn’t Obama sign something without reading it? It cost us $787 billion.

Posted by: tyler | September 6, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Those of you that support Jones–have at it. But you cannot dispute the facts about his history and thinking. Check the video tape! There’s tons out there. This man was arrested twice. How did he get a security clearance?

Posted by: getfitnow | September 6, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

The right is very good at judging and condemning people on a couple of sound bites. It’s their TV fanatic version of fairness. Also, if anyone at any time was a community organizer, an activist or an advocate . .. the person is obviously out to destroy America and take away their freedom to be a paranoid extremist.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

“This man was arrested twice.”
_____________________________________
Scooter Libby was arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for crimes committed while IN Vice President Cheney’s office!!!
That’s where the Republican administration was at.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

“Julieterra, wake up. Bush is not president anymore”
____________________________________
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
We will not forget.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Jones had some powerful endorsements from the left and right, entirely based on his most recent work.
National co-chair of John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, Meg Whitman:
“There’s a guy over in Oakland, I think his name is Van Jones. And he and I were on a cruise last summer in the Arctic, on climate change. And I got to know him very well. And a lot of the work he’s doing to enfranchise broader communities I’m a big fan of. He’s doing a marvelous job… ”
Of course she is disassociating herself from him now due to his radical personal history, but that quote alone provides a snapshot of how mainstream he had become by the time he was hired by the White House as a special adviser on green jobs.

Posted by: Danny | September 6, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Cheney had his number one man committing crimes while working in the office of the Vice President.
We will not forget the Republican administration.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Posted by: yes | Sep 6, 2009 2:11:14 PM
No, actually the “message” I was talking about was the “humans are evil and destroying the planet” message by the left. Ignoring the freeze-thaw cycles of this planet.
Any educated person knows the earth wasn’t created 6000 years ago. And all religions have their creation stories.
Nuts is nuts, left or right.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Van Jones down, The freedom of speech loving American people are coming for you next Mark lloyd!
Just wondering how long it will be before you resign or be fired because of the public outcry that is and WILL be mounting against you.
Little censorship going on here?
My last comment was taken down. Guess they don’t want you to hear that a reformed Democrat is painfully aware what the democrats, who I am ashamed of now, are trying to do to our country.

Posted by: Randy | September 6, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Concerned in Ohio writes: “Obama needs to appoint an Under the Bus Czar.”
____________________
You got me to chuckle at that one!
Maybe he could hire Glenn Beck…they should at least have a get together at the White House…

Posted by: Danny | September 6, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

“I was talking about was the “humans are evil and destroying the planet” message by the left.
_____________________________________
Sure, and you probably didn’t believe acid rain was real, or thalidamide deformed babies, or pesticides actually are poisoning our watersheds, or that mercury is now found in all of the fish caught in the Unites States, or that arsenic from gold mines was poisoning the water and the land, or that water aquifers have been over used and are receding . . . and so on.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 3:07:02 PM
Oh, for cryin’ out loud….are you really that bent?
Only you know anything.
Pollution is rampant, has been for thousand of years, castle toilets used to be built over a rivers, mercury was used in makeup, run-off from every developing industry has affected the basic water supply. Remember the “educated” part of my post. I know that.
But nobody is going to stop global warming/cooling. And what about that continental drift? Have you heard of that? It’s this thing where the continents smash into or move away from each other. Better get a handle on that.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

“castle toilets used to be built over a rivers, mercury was used in makeup, run-off from every developing industry has affected the basic water supply. Remember the “educated” part of my post. I know that.
But nobody is going to stop global warming/cooling.”
_____________________________________
Each of those things you describe were reversed because humans were smart enough to recognize what they were doing wrong and change it with their intelligence.
You should apply some of yours.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Yes,what is your point? That I am a creationist?I am a firm believer in evolution-ontology recapitulates philogeny .However, if anything it encourages me to question “conventional wisdom”-particularly the current global warming nonsense.Why have none of James Hansen’s predictions come true? Try Occam’s Razor-he’s wrong!

Posted by: Nephron | September 6, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

You should apply some of yours.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 3:23:33 PM
Again, only you know anything… sad and lonely you must be, trying to enlighten us and we insist on seeing things from multiple viewpoints, not your “correct” viewpoint.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 6, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Since several posters here seen to enjoy spreading the story that Van Jones “was arrested twice”, just a fact-check. He was arrested in the round-up of people at peaceful protests, never charged and quickly released. In at least one of these protests, and possibly both, he was there as an observer, on the sidelines, not as a participant.
To attempt to label him a criminal for being arrested at a protest is, in a word, wrong.

Posted by: Joyomama | September 6, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

yes,
surely you are able to understand that one could honestly say that all those things you proposed were radical AND still believe that guys like jones and wright are radical. they’re not mutually exclusive propositions. aside from being “radical”, however, jones sounds like he’s simply a simpleton. note everyone who gets into or graduates from harvard is brilliant…some aren’t even all that smart. jones sounds like a block-headed bully.

Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 6, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

In the Democratic Party, you say something crazy, they demote you.
In the GOP, you say something crazy, they elect you.
Personally, I don’t think Van Jones did anything too terribly wrong.
But, given the high standards that Republicans have for public figures… when is Michelle Bachmann going to resign? When is Fox News going to fire Glenn Beck?
Never.
And that’s the difference between the two parties.
The Democrats will meet you halfway.
The GOP won’t.
I suppose it’s time to see whether or not the people want to negotiate their future with liberals… or want to have the future dictated to them by conservatives.
As an independent, the Republicans are looking more and more repulsive everyday. A certain Van Jones quote springs to mind.

Posted by: barfy | September 6, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The “Green Initiative” would have stalled anyway unless the United States is willing to take on economic reform. We need industries and polices which ensure that American workers and companies benefit from the innovations the develop. We also need to curb imports and exports. We simply can not compete with other countries that support child labor and inhumane working conditions.

Posted by: Todd Bryant | September 6, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

so ABC News, aside from this reporters blog, where on your 30 minute network news was a story about van jones past?
oh thats right, your in line with NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC who are continually kissing the back side of this administration and afraid to report on anything controversial, because this administration has probably threatened you with losing media privledges in the white house.
Thank goodness we have FoxNews and Glenn Beck who once found this information out kept on reporting the truth. Its no wonder Beck’s show is number two in cable news and its not even a prime time slot.

Posted by: james | September 6, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

This is what happens with so many Czars that avoid the Senante confirmation process. A zealout, right or left wing can get a high profile, high impact job and push their extremist agenda.
The American people should demand of the White House and Congress to give greater oversight of those spending these reserves. If Reid is cautious of doing this with a President of his own party, they should be wary that an oppositing party member may very well be the next President.
How many more of the Czars and top administration official share Van Jones values? (I supported and votes for Obam) I am deeply dissappointed wiht him returning to the same policics of Bush, Cheney and the Neocons.

Posted by: scott jeffries | September 6, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

To prove my point, I would like you to pay attention to what the conservatives are saying now:
Van Jones resigned. Now they want Obama to resign.
They cannot tolerate alternative opinions, even when people vote in favor of those alternative opinions.
What we are seeing are the first steps of an American fascist movement, by which a well-organized, nativist, traditionalist fringe is going to strong-arm the government into carrying out their wishes against the will of the majority.
Like it or not…. we ELECTED Obama. Anyone who tries to take away our peacefully and legitimately elected president needs to be called out like the vipers they are.

Posted by: Barfy | September 6, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Just for record, Jones is resigning because BECK and other caught on to him being a COMMUNIST AND CONVICTED FELON—————–WHICH IS RATHER TELLING THAT OBAMA WOULD PUT THIS PIG IN. It is not about him calling the republicans names, like the bots are trying to spin this.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 6, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I’m curious about where they come up with these people. More importantly, why? There’s always radical hate speech or associations from their pasts. Is this the best they can do? Who is calling the shots here?

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

“Jones is resigning because BECK and other caught on to him being a COMMUNIST AND CONVICTED FELON”
____________________________________
For what is Jones a “CONVICTED FELON”?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Hey radical leftists… ignorance is bliss, no?
Bye bye Van, do let the door hit you…

Posted by: BK | September 6, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

One communist thug czar down—–I think the Diversity Czar should be next since he is working on shutting down all dissenters of Obama’s radio targeting BECK.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 6, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

When was Jones convicted of a FELONY? And for what?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

When was Jones convicted of a FELONY? And for what?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Julia; The ball is in your court. Better just go to the store and buy some chicken salad.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I’m getting tired of the smears about it being just bible thumpers against Obama—-I’m an atheist that sees Obama for what he is —– a Fascist.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 6, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

For that matter I take issue with the claims that Obamabots are better educated—–looking at the political map—it was the inner cities where higher crimes and uneducation run rampant.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 6, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Breaking News: Van, Bus collide.

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

“Van Jones resigned. Now they want Obama to resign.”
___________________________________
Scooter Libby, the top man in VP Cheney’s office was charge, tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for crimes committed in Cheney’s office!
Jailable crimes committed in the office of vp Cheney!
Did Cheney have to resign? No . . .
Right wingers are absurd extremists.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

He didn’t become mainstream in his views, he learned how to speak as if he were mainstream and integrate stealthily into the mainstream to further his agenda. There’s a whole generation of these seeds being sown – look at our current Dr. God President.

Posted by: BK | September 6, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Jones’ resignation sounds like Palin’s, only Jones has a lot less class. When do the recriminations and accusations of QUITTER!!!QUITTER!! QUITTER!!! start on Jones?
Also, since no one believes anything Olby says, who careswhat he says about Beck? Bring it.
Winners in all this: Fox News. Us. Freedom, liberty and truth.
Losers: Marxists and MSNBC.
Thank you Glenn!

Posted by: MJ | September 6, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Potatoe…
It’s not the Bible thumpers…. it’s the right wing fascists.
Read an actual history book on fascism (ignore the books by pundits)… and look at the real parallels between what’s happening, particularly in the South….
Honestly, if you were to actually read about the history of fascism, you’d see that it is NOT the Democrats that we need to worry about.
All the ingredients are there on the right. It’s not a religious thing… although Christians are being exploited … but primarily it is a coalition of people who share common fears and anxiety… and the handful of extremely wealthy interests who are manipulating these fears and anxieties to create an aggressive political movement.
They lost the election. Now they want a coup.

Posted by: barfy | September 6, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

When was Jones convicted of a FELONY? And for what?
Come on you right wing liars. . . put up or shut up.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Van Jones was man enough to resign for his extremist views. Now how about the resignation of Michelle Bachman,and about two-thirds of the republicans in congress.

Posted by: dwaldrop | September 6, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Good riddance. It’s time that the truth come out about the people Obama is associating and surrounding himself with.

Posted by: Jon | September 6, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Its remarkable that Van Jones had to resign from his position before ABC decided to write about it. Your investigative reporters must have been on vacation and missed this two week old development.
When is ABC going to gain the courage to become protectors of the people instead of being bedmates with the administration.
No wonder FOX news is so far ahead; they found the courage.

Posted by: Gary Kiefer | September 6, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“Till every commie radical in the Marxist Party in power is exposed…..”
________________________________
More extremist nonsense.
If only those clean, honest and decent Republicans were in power snorting their noses around they would bomb Iran, bomb Venezuela, bomb North Korea, bomb Bolivia, bomb Cuba – kill hundreds of thousands of people – and fix this whole economy nonsense in a snap of their blessed fingers.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

We owe a huge THANKS to Glenn Beck for exposing this idiot.

Posted by: conservocop | September 6, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

“ou really don’t know that Jones is not only a convicted felon”
____________________________________
I said put up, or shut up.
When was he convicted of a felony? And what was he convicted of?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Anyone actually defending this A$$ has no clue. And naturally, ABC isn’t going to give you the truth.
What ABC and NBC, along with this administration is VERY reminiscent of what happened in Germany just prior to the haulocaust.
Instead of attacking the protesters of obama and this jones idiot, listen to what they’re saying and find out the truth. Then resort to the name calling if you must.

Posted by: conservocop | September 6, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Mr. Van Jones, the “Green Jobs” czar’s ouster leaves much to be desired. He was primarily hired to be on the WH Council on Environmental Quality, only because he was well versed on green energy issues. His expertise was needed on related matters and the jobs there would be to curtail high unemployment figures in poor areas, and to help a sagging economy. His past rhetoric and remarks,some of which sounded asinine to some Republicans, should not be used as a pretext to get him to resign. He also apologized for the 9/11 petition he signed. “It was a mistake”, he later admitted. I never saw a lynch mob as that on FOX News asking for Mr. Jones’ head. Crumbs!

Posted by: Emmanuel Bandoh | September 6, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Smack on that msnbc,especially keith olbermann(jugghead);)

Posted by: charlie | September 6, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The concern now is the extreme left’s death threats to Glenn Beck and his family. Pray for Glenn and his family. The Chicago politics of this administration are scary and dangerous.
One more week, and the TEA Partiers are going to make thier stands!

Posted by: conservocop | September 6, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Karen ROFLMAO

Posted by: plopsdad | September 6, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Democratic strategist and FOX News contributor Bob Beckel predicted that Jones would be out of a job by Labor Day, and he wondered how Jones got the “czar” post in the first place.
“He’s got every right in the world to be a self-avowed communist, but the Secret Service would no more allow a self-avowed communist into the White House as they would Charlie Manson, so that’s what I don’t get,” Beckel said.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“When was Jones convicted of a FELONY? And for what?”
Julie, the guy believes that George Bush and his administration conspired against America in order to retain power. If that’s the kind of person you want making policy decisions in the White House, that’s fine, but don’t fault us for thinking that Mr. Jones and your defense of him is ridiculous and that Mr. Jones is someone who lacks the judgment to make sound, reasonable decisions.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Ignoring this hate filled communist is the most outrageous display of slanted journalism yet. You people are becoming a danger to this nation.
Long live the HONESTY at FOX.

Posted by: Safetyhit | September 6, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Jones own words after the Rodney King riots; “Yes, the Great Revolutionary Moment had at long last come. And the time, clearly, was ours! So we stole stuff. Y’know, stole stuff. Radios, tennis shoes. Well, not everybody, of course.” There is a straight forward, unbiased story about the man on FoxNews.com, ‘The Radicalization of Obama’s Green Czar’. Now I know some of you shun Fox, but dare to educate yourselves.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

“Birthers” – nutters who think the President forged his birth certificate in order to run for President.
Truthers – nutters who think the former President murdered 3,000+ fellow citizens, damaged his nation’s economy, and evoked trumped up fears over terrorism in order to start a war with Iraq – which ended up killing another 3,000+ soldiers.
So, at the end of the day, which nutter group would you see as more unreasonable and/or dangerous?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

It would be interesting to see main stream reaction to a REAL indepth expose of the life of Van Jones on national television (as some of us are already aware).

Posted by: deanbob | September 6, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“Van Jones was man enough to resign for his extremist views.”
Mr. Jones only resigned because he got caught and probably because the President asked him to…the last thing the President needs right now is kind of distraction when he’s trying to ram..er..push..health care through Congress. Obama knew that after the Cambridge Police fiasco, that trying to defend Van Jones was only going to solidify the American’s public growing unease about Obama’s moderate portrayals and assurances – you know, the one he had during the campaign before the mask started to slip?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

If everyone read Van Jones’ resume, they would be very worried about BO. 2012 can’t get here fast enough.

Posted by: BK-1970 | September 6, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

deanbob wants a Van Jones white wash…the highly sanitized version that only the MSM can deliver that makes left-wing extremists look like the late Tim Russert.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Emmanuel, I think the adminstration’s efforts to create more green jobs will be able to proceed perfectly well without Mr. Jones. You say, “His expertise was needed on related matters and the jobs there would be to curtail high unemployment figures in poor areas, and to help a sagging economy.”
His expertise on “related matters” translates to “he’s a community organizer,” and I think the administration has that covered.
You suggest the green job czar could have helped improvement the employment ssituation in “poor areas,” but I have sseen no correlation between the placement of green energy industrial sites and blighted neighborhoods. Many of the green jobs are in western and midwestern states, near the areas where there is abundant land suitable for wind or solar energy production. The manufacturing of such things as wind turbines and solar panels seems to follow the same pattern, which makes sense.
Finally, the sagging economy is not going to be lifted up by green jobs. There is the example of Spain, where more than one non-green job was lost for every green job created. We are not going to expand the work force by counting on jobs related to producing green energy. At best, some of the currently unemployed may gain reemployment in such a field, but not in numbers sufficient to offset the original job losses.

Posted by: moderate | September 6, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

dwaldrop
Same can be said of the dem’s. Whats needs to be done is a massive clean out in 2010, anyone senitor in for more than 2 terms needs to be voted out.

Posted by: plopsdad | September 6, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

=============================
MLK Jr painted a vision when we would not look at the color of the skin but the content of the character
=============================
For Van Ness, his character is a one of a radical, an anarchist and a reverse racist. His own writings, his own words, his own appearances have come back to reveal his character – which is unacceptable to all decent persons.

Posted by: N Waff | September 6, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

“There is the example of Spain, where more than one non-green job was lost for every green job created.”
Yes, let’s take one traditional job, trade it for a green job and call it one new job created, saved but not destroyed..all the while the unemployment number is either unchanged or rising. Makes perfect sense!

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I have heard individuals giving him credit for standing down as the environment “czar.” Why? He had to step down because just like many of the other individuals appointed by Obama, he had hidden facts about his life that the main stream media was not willing to openly give to the people of the United States. Obama knew who he was before he appointed him, but the people didn’t. Now they do, so to save face, Obama of course wants him to leave. He may have had good ideas when it comes down to “green jobs” but the fight against “global warming” is a fight against nothing.

Posted by: Scott | September 6, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

How did someone with the un-American resume of a Van Jones ever pass the vetting process? Did the FBI do a poor job, in which case a few head should roll at the J. Edgar Hoover Building? Or, worse, did the President know about it and not care?
In any case, all of the czars should be reinvestivated and placed under the oversight of Congress. There is no excuse for this shadow cabinet.

Posted by: Richard B | September 6, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

ABC you and the other networks have failed in your reporting. Along with the newspapers you are in the tank for the Democrats and the Obama administration. Clearly you have failed in your job to be fair and to present all angles. Take this as a beginning to make it better.

Posted by: Jeff G | September 6, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Why are we Americans ok with appointed others who are so unAmerican? It kind of scares me. Let’s get some people up there who will actually love the country that has given them so much…not because of government but because of the freedoms that are slowly trying to be taken away from us.

Posted by: Scott | September 6, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Thank God for Fox News, talk radio, and the Internet!
In a direct affront to the U.S. Consitution and our liberty, OBAMA has surrounded himself with anti-American overseers and has empowered dozens of CZARS in his shaddow government. This must be stopped.
Removing Van Jones is a small start, but there are still dozens more to purge frofm top management.
Thank you Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh! Thank you Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes! Please keep up the great work.
And to Disney/ABC: Please stand up for America. Be fair and brave like Fox.
America is at greater risk of a totalitarian takeover today than at any time in the past 200 years. Tell the story, sound the warning.
No more Obama infomericals on ABC, please. We don’t trust him or anyone who shills for him.

Posted by: Duke MHA | September 6, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Will ABC News pick up on the drift of most of these comments and finally start reporting from the center, instead of from the far left? Wouldn’t actual objectivity be a blessing? I am sure all the liberals are hoping and praying — well, not praying — that ABC keeps the blinders on and bends to the will of Chairman BHO.

Posted by: Richard B | September 6, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Obama’s message to kids:
You can be a tax cheat(Timmy), under investigation for influence peddling (Rattner), a race baiter (Jones), a self-avowed commie(Jones), an advocate for a copkiller(Jones) and still have a place in my administration.
Heck you can be president with virtually no qualifications!
Study hard and stay in school.

Posted by: tyler | September 6, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Guess Rahm couldn’t come up with a global warming crisis urgent enough to keep Van Jones.
That “crisis” excuse only works once.

Posted by: max | September 6, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

At least Jake Tapper had the balanced sense to report on the Van Jones story on his blog, while his employer, ABC News, was silent on it. Jake, you are starting to appear professional like your fellow watchdog Major Garrett of Fox News. Good Job. ABC, CNN, NBC, CBS, and the AP cannot continue to assume that average Americans are not keen to the mainstream media’s bias in favor of the progressives and liberals. Please mainstream media, be the watchdogs of our society like you used to be. We agreed with you being tough on Bush Jr. in his 2nd term, and we don’t like Obama turning America into a socialist State with his underground network from George Soros, Tides, Apollo Alliance, ACORN, AFL-CIO, etc, etc. If the mainstream media doesn’t start being a watchdog soon, thet may lose their 1st amendment right to freedom of the press someday.

Posted by: bloodhoundwithpadnpen | September 6, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

When Rev Wright scandal came out – I blew it off, i said those are sound bites, means nothing….its taken out of context. —- When the Bill Ayers Scandal came to light…I thought he is no longer the terrorist he was, people deserve a second chance, besides he is a school teacher….. — When Obama hired tax cheats, I was angry about that, but thought Obama knows what he is doing, people deserve a second chance, maybe we all cheat on taxes. When Obama said that small town people cling to guns and religion — i wasnt happy since I am a bible thumping democrat.— again I blew it off. Next, I heard about obama czars, I was confused, Obama promised transparancy, how can you have transparency, when you circumvent the vetting process of the cabinet. Again…I blew it off, but I was becoming a concern american. Did I do the right thing voting for Obama. The Last straw – Obama Czar VAN JONES, “what was obama thinking!!!!” I am finished with the Democrat Party, I will not Join the Republican Party. WHAT IS LEFT. AMERICA YOU NEED REAL CHANGE , not CHAINS.

Posted by: john rezno | September 6, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

How much did the RNC have to pay this idiot, Van Jones ? Could the Republicans be that smart ? Or is Barry Chavez that dumb ?

Posted by: matt | September 6, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I have a stupid question. Why a ‘Green Job’ Czar? Why not a ‘Job Creation’ Czar with a green job mandate or initiative? Are we to expect a ‘Blue Collar Job’ Czar? A ‘White Collar Job’ Czar? Please excuse me if the answer is obvious to some, and I just can’t seem to grasp the whole concept. I could be conspirical and say it sounds suspiciously like a ‘Job’ Czar position was just created for political reasons?

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Obama arrogantly thought he could get away with Van Jones as he did Wright, Ayers, Pfleger, Rezko, Turbo Tax Tim, and the other radical czars.
How many green jobs did Jones create with our $30 billion?
The only jobs are in the government.

Posted by: ned | September 6, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

After hearing Mr. Jones speak on C-Span, I think that he is a bright person. However, he speaks from the heart sometimes offending others with “his” truth. I hope that he will continue to pursue his green goals in the private sector.

Posted by: bmcc | September 6, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

President Obama is a bust.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

You right wingers think this compares in any way to VP Cheney’s number one man Scooter Libby being tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for COMMITTING CRIMES while working in Cheney’s office – as part of his government duties?
You’re biased lightweights.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

An interesting comment on today’s political shows.
Comparing the Bush and Obama administrations:
“One administration would rather err on the side of safety for many at the expense of a few.
The other administration would rather err of the side of safety for a few at the expense of many.
Whose side would you rather be on?”
I may not have the quotes exactly right but this might help explain the drop in Obama’s popularity.

Posted by: ollie | September 6, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

The people who watch main stream media won’t understand why he left because no one reported the words of Van Jones. Did you miss the part where he has proclaimed himself to be a communist?

Posted by: m vale | September 6, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

1 down 5,000,000,000,000 czars left to resign Obama’s shadow government.

Posted by: Thinking a Little Harder | September 6, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Good riddance to a bad racist, communist, whackjob. And since Obama said during his campaign that we would get to know him by the people he surrounds himself with – well – this guy’s character speaks volumes of Obamas as well. For those on this board that have no clue what is going on, because ABC is too much in the pocket of the Dems – just query against Van Jones and Video on the web – and watch him, in his OWN words, to figure out why he is OUTTA THERE.

Posted by: clr33 | September 6, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“You right wingers think this compares in any way to VP Cheney’s number one man Scooter Libby being tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for COMMITTING CRIMES while working in Cheney’s office – as part of his government duties?”
I don’t know what your screed is really all about here, since I don’t folks by and large making that point, but I think you can and should lose your job for reasons other than committing a crime while on the job.
But to be serious and fair, would you really give a pass on a “birther” being appointed to a WH “czar” position without any Congressional scruitiny?
I’m guessing the answer to that question is no.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“”One administration would rather err on the side of safety for many at the expense of a few.”
______________________________________
Yes, and one administration was at the wheel when the 9/11 attacks occurred, ignored warnings and told the security czar to concentrate on Iraq, not Al Qaeda.
Guess who that was?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

WHy a ‘Green Job’ Czar instead of a ‘Job Creation’ Czar? Washington is at it’s weirdest!

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

“Yes, and one administration was at the wheel when the 9/11 attacks occurred, ignored warnings and told the security czar to concentrate on Iraq, not Al Qaeda.
Guess who that was?”
You mean the Clinton Admin. who ignored Al Qaeda for almost eight years after the first World Trade Center attack?
I don’t see how that makes your point and what this has to do with Van Jones.
Are you a “truther”, Julie?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

“The difference is huge and apparent.”
So you believe that fringe left radicals are right when they say that 9/11 was an inside job? Seriously?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“I don’t see how that makes your point and what this has to do with Van Jones.”
______________________________________
BH try to keep up with the posts here and read them. ‘ollie’ introduced the topic of safety below.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

So how is Van Jones going to change the “system” now?
Wouldn’t it just be easier to go live in Cuba or Venezuela since America is such a horrible place? He and Chavez can have complete control of speech and the press.
Obama is finding out that it’s not so easy to destroy America.

Posted by: kyle | September 6, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

The democrat party has been invaded by radicas, anti-free speech, pro Fidel Castro fanatics!

Posted by: danargue67 | September 6, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

BH, Scooter Libby did not have an ideology to undermine the capitalistic system and create a Marxist socialist state but as a Communist, that would be the goals of Van Jones. Does it not bother you at all that Van Jones had the ear of the President? Does it not bother you that as poor a vetting job as was done with Jones that there could easily be more of the same still reigning as Obama czars? On the other hand, maybe Obama knew all about Jones’ backgound and approved of it. Now THAT should bother you.

Posted by: Richard B | September 6, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

“The difference is huge and apparent.”
Yes, the difference is huge and apparent. Cheney’s Chief of Staff was convicted of criminal acts in his position at the White House. We’re not talking about someone signing a petition – we’re talking about CRIMINAL ACTS in the office of VP Cheney.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Uh, excuse me, but Van Jones WAS ALSO ARRESTED AND JAILED, but that’s a good plus to serve in today’s White House.

Posted by: danargue67 | September 6, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

How many radicals have been exposed since Obama started Campaigning. How many tax cheats have been hired to make sure we pay our taxes correctly. What number of Communist will make you , the American public finally say enough is enough. Will it take 5, perhaps 10, How Many COmmunist is too many.

Posted by: Frank | September 6, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Sadly, the “hoof n’ mouth” problem we had with GWB has infiltrated Mr. O’s admin!
Politicos should really learn to be quiet, when THEY have nothing contructive to say! (Which is most of the time!)

Posted by: GCG | September 6, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

When Van Jones was in jail is when he learned a lesson for life. He was surrounded by communists and other radicas and decided, “Hey, I like this hate-America thought process, I think I’ll join.”

Posted by: danargue67 | September 6, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

“We’re not talking about someone signing a petition – we’re talking about CRIMINAL ACTS in the office of VP Cheney.”
Well, yes, actually we are talking about someone signing a petition because that and Mr. Jones’ little march is what got him canned (yeah, he resigned without any pressure).
Julie, I don’t know if you have a job or not, but believe it not, people get fired and are forced to resign for reasons other than breaking Federal law. Did you know you can get fired for padding or omitting things from your resume? So in the end your equivocation is pretty ridiculous given that you yourself would be screaming from the rooftops for the resignation of a WH official if a conservative President had appointed a “birther” to some czar position that managed billions of tax payer dollars.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

“Uh, excuse me, but Van Jones WAS ALSO ARRESTED AND JAILED, but that’s a good plus to serve in today’s White House.”
______________________________________
That you don’t understand Libby committed criminal acts in his job at the White House, nor the implications of that shows how stunned the fanatical right has become.
Hypocrites beyond belief.
Criminal acts WHILE SERVING in the White House – Republicans forget soon easily; we don’t.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama’s had more ethically challenged appointees in eight months than Bush had in eight years! That is simply amazing. If Bush had plotted the same course as Obama the MSM would be burning up the airwaves and stopping the presses like people wouldn’t believe. But that a Dem. President does it? Eh, no biggie. Amazing.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

“That you don’t understand Libby committed criminal acts in his job at the White House, nor the implications of that shows how stunned the fanatical right has become.”
I haven’t forgotten. It was a huge black eye for the President. But that was the LAST Admin. Julie and despite my hopes to the contrary, this President is pretty much the same…the only change we’ve gotten is a lurch to the loony left, away from the loony right.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

“I haven’t forgotten. It was a huge black eye for the President.”
____________________________________
Black eye? Having people committing and being convicted of criminal acts while holding high positions in the White House is more than a black eye. It’s actually, how should I put this so you understand … CRIMINAL activity in the White House!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I’m confused. My local TV news broadcast stated that Van Jones “retired.” But this site says he “resigned.” Which is it? Did my local news misrepresent what has been going on?

Posted by: MikeO | September 6, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Typical of a liberal, you are trying to steer away from the real issue. This in’t about Scooter Libby or George W Bush — it’s about the Obama Administration allowing a Communist to advise the President. You are okay with that?
Scooter Libby was indeed ousted and incarcerated for misdeeds. There was nothing found in his vetting that would indicate that in some time in the future he might be complicit in outing Valerie Plame. That’s a lot different from missing video speeches in which a prospective appointee discussed his blantant racism, Communism, socialism and anachist tendencies. Either Van Jones was not vetted properly or he was vetted properly and the President and his staff agreed with Jones’ philosphies. Scooter Libby’s crimes were widely reported in the media before he was brought to trial; how much have you heard or read about Jones’ resume before this resignation, other than on Fox? This is the price you pay for allowing a biased and liberal media to monopolize the flow of news.
Do yourself a favor and catch Beck and O’Reilly from time to time. They are entertaining, informative and fair. You will find liberal democrats on O’Reilly’s show almost every night to defend their positions.

Posted by: Richard B | September 6, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“I haven’t forgotten. It was a huge black eye for the President.”
____________________________________
Black eye? Having people committing and being convicted of criminal acts while holding high positions in the White House is more than a black eye. It’s actually, how should I put this so you understand … CRIMINAL activity in the White House!
______________________________________
Cheney’s Chief of Staff Libby was tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for obstruction of justice, perjury and making false statements to federal investigators. All criminal acts committed as a key member of the Republican White House.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

“Scooter Libby was indeed ousted and incarcerated for misdeeds.”
_________________________________
You write them off as ‘misdeeds’ when there were in fact multiple criminal acts.
The reason this information is being presented is so you can get some relative perspective on what has happened.
“misdeeds” . . . right

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

HOLY CRAP!!!!
The Obama supporters call the right fascists and Obama has a non repentant Marxist working for the govt as a green advisor?
What is so ironic about the right calling the left commies for all these years and yet when Obama really has a self called communist and Marxist in the govt this is not front page top story on all the news outlets?!?!
When and did the president of the Untied States know Van Jones was a communist? What sort of joke is the vetting process if they didn’t know.
Do they care what he said HIMSELF and if so WHY did the white house not care.
Obama is called a socialist and that is hate speech and idiotic but HE APPOINTS A MARXIST AS AN ADVISER no one cares?!?!!?
I want answers! I want to know what the white house knew about this man! I want to know who hired him and did they know?
This is not a game. Bush has nothing to do with this. The GOP didn’t say what he said Van Jones did.
OBAMA APPOINTED A COMMUNIST/MARXIST ANARCHIST TO POSITION IN HIS ADMINISTRATION THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.
I want answers I want the FBI to find answers and this ‘coward’ wants answers!!!
Or is the justice department to busy prosecuting the CIA than investigating this????? DAMMIT this is not a fricking joke THIS IS SERIOUS.
Obama said he wanted to change the united states.. INTO WHAT????
The cold war was not a game. Vietnam was not a game. Korea was not a game.
THIS IS SERIOUS. I WANT ANSWERS!!!!

Posted by: David from WI | September 6, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Obama is arrogant and drunk with his own power.
Who knows what this country would look like if it had not been for Fox News, talk radio, and a few brave bloggers.
Obama would have had free reign to do as he wanted.
It’s hard to believe the WH has not already broken a few laws.

Posted by: larry | September 6, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

“Black eye? Having people committing and being convicted of criminal acts while holding high positions in the White House is more than a black eye. It’s actually, how should I put this so you understand … CRIMINAL activity in the White House!”
Yeah…never, said it wasn’t…so when you’re done putting words in my mouth, why don’t you explain what your real point is here as it relates to Van Jones?
Until I hear otherwise, I’ll just consider you a truther that’s just defending your ideological agreement with Van Jones?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

O ne
B ig
A &&
M istake,
A merica !

Posted by: Richard B | September 6, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

i absolutely agree that the bush administration allowed the 9-11 attacks to happen. Although i do not think they knew that the towers would come down or that planes would be flown into buildings, or that so many would die, they definitely knew that something was up because we have all heard about the intelligence that was ignored about those guys learning to fly planes in florida and i think they figured it would just involve highjacking so they let it happen in order to put forward the neo-con agenda. no way could that attack have happened in america unless we seriously let our guard down on purpose. we have the best intelligence in the world. bush wanted to attack iraq from the time he took office, if not before. come on, we are not stupid.

Posted by: ljn | September 6, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“bush wanted to attack iraq from the time he took office, if not before. come on, we are not stupid.”
_____________________________________
Yes, this was clearly outlined in the famous neo-con document. And Richard Clark points out clearly that while he tried to get the Bush administration’s attention focused on Al Qaeda, the administration told him to focus on Iraq. Both before 9/11 and immediately after. They were talking about attacking Iraq immediately following 9/11 even though all the evidence pointed away from Iraq and towards Al Qaeda.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Surprise surprise.
ABC News is right now at this minute spilling the beans on Van Jones and showing many of his controversial clips.
It’s about time.
And there is Howard Dean saying that Van Jones is a “star”.
Smart move Howard. You look like an idiot saying Jones was tricked into signing the 9/11 petition.

Posted by: millie | September 6, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

By appointing someone a “czar”, the President avoids having confirmation hearings and therefore no research into that persons background or abilities. It seems to be a pretty risky way to organize a government. I am concerned about the number of “czars” that have been appointed without confirmation. I suspect there are more Van Jones out there and the Obama people better start looking before they have some more embarrassing moments.

Posted by: jim 234 | September 6, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The problem with Czars is that there is no approval/vetting process that Cabinet members are subject to.
Every member of our government is either directly elected, or submits to an approval process. The most recent was for
Sonia Sotomayor. Their past and present are carefully examined, and the full Senate votes up or down on the nominee.
Czars are appointed by the President.
While other Presidents have appointed Czars, no President has appointed so many. That fact alone should concern every American.
Congress needs to put a vetting process in place for Czars. That would have prevented someone like Van Jones from even being nominated.
Poor Van Jones. He’s been attacked with his own words, his own signature.
Didn’t anyone teach him to keep his words short & sweet, because sooner or later he’d have to eat them?
Well, someone should have.
Why is it so hard for some to admit that Van Jones never belonged in the White House.
I just wonder how many more Czars have skeletons rattling around. We certainly can’t count on the MSM to look into who’s running the country, now can we? I guess it’s more important to run that Levi Johnston’s latest dirty laundry.
How about running a story on who the Czars are, ABC?
Just pretend Bush is President.

Posted by: MisElaineous | September 6, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

“LJN, you actually believe that the President of the United States and everyone with access to information indicating a major terrorist attack would simply sit back and wait for it to happen?”
________________________________________
I think we can all agree they did a pretty poor job of preventing it.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“Yes, this was clearly outlined in the famous neo-con document. And Richard Clark points out clearly that while he tried to get the Bush administration’s attention focused on Al Qaeda, the administration told him to focus on Iraq. Both before 9/11 and immediately after. They were talking about attacking Iraq immediately following 9/11 even though all the evidence pointed away from Iraq and towards Al Qaeda.”
_________________________________________________
Richard Clarke is a know-nothing self-important idiot.
Al Queda was in Iraq.
We had been at war with Iraq since 1990 when they invaded Kuwait.
Saddam had known WMD programs that he was also known to use, but that he wouldn’t account for to the UN search team.
The only person cheering the 9/11 attacks on that day besides the Paleostinians was Saddam Hussein.
The attack on Iraq was authorized by a bi-partisan Congress.
After we attacked Iraq, there were no more attacks on this country and our military took out significant numbers of AQ terrorists at the risk of their own lives.

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

“a vicious smear campaign against me. ” lol…aaahhhh poor jones….whimper…whimper..no one hurts like you….lol you ain’t seen nothing yet left radicals…the rest need even more looking at….down with the czars! by the way I am not democrat nor republican…

Posted by: singleeye | September 6, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

“I think we can all agree they did a pretty poor job of preventing it.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 6:45:15 PM”
—————————————
The lion’s share of the blame lies on the Clinton Administration, who had a feckless foreign policy, refused to get Osama Bin Laden even when he was offered to them by the Sudanese and who set up the Gorelick wall that forbade the CIA and FBI from trading critical information.
It’s a long road to walk between “not preventing it” and directly causing and planning the 9/11 attacks, julie, as Truthers like Van Jones allege.

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

“The lion’s share of the blame lies on the Clinton Administration”
_____________________________________
Bush and Cheney had control of the security apparatus for longer than Obama has been in power.
They had all of the national security information at their fingertips, same as Clinton did.
It happened on their watch.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Julie’s needle is stuck trying to equivocate and justify Van Jones’ radicalism by drudging up the corruption in the Bush Administration.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

richard b – thats real original;the reference to the kool-aid. yes, as i said they had no idea of how terrible this would be, but you have to look real hard at those three men, bush, cheney and rumsfeld. cheney and rumsfeld were leftovers from a time when the worst that could happen was planes being highjacked by low-level terrorists. if you do some research, we knew about these guys who were here on expired visas taking flying lessons down in florida and this was just put on the back burner because bush, who did not really think for himself until his second term, allowed guys like cheney and rumsfeld to do his thinking for him; and he wanted to find any way possible to take out hussein in iraq, ever since saddam tried to take out bush sr. it is well documented that w wanted to impress his dad. we are in a huge mess that should never have happened. i didnt drink the kool-aid; i can think for myself. i think you might just be keeping your head in the sand. also, i have already reproduced; a liberal and an independent, and video games are not my forte. you should re-think your stereotypes.

Posted by: ljn | September 6, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Richard Clark points out clearly that while he tried to get the Bush administration’s attention focused on Al Qaeda, the administration told him to focus on Iraq. Both before 9/11 and immediately after. They were talking about attacking Iraq immediately following 9/11 even though all the evidence pointed away from Iraq and towards Al Qaeda.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 6:32:55 PM
***
Good point. Keep up the good fight, julie terra. Your energy never fails to astound me. There was stunning incompetence surrounding 9/11 and then the catastrophic events were used to start a pre-emptive war with Iraq based on contested intelligence, and also to condone torture. there are still many, many unanswered questions.
What just slays me is that the GOP mainstreams their radicals and radical ideas and ignites their echo chamber, sending out sharks to attack the left’s more passionate and charismatic progressives while using their existence and associations to radicalize the mods, like the President. It’s not over. There will be more shark attacks, of course. They brag about it. They’re proudly patting themselves on the back — but I’ve noticed while out and about this week, including today, that most people don’t care about this czar thing. And they sure don’t buy the government takeover baloney. They kinda roll their eyes, and say things like, “Isn’t Glenn Beck a conspiracy fruitcake? I thought he hung out with truthers and racists himself. What a hypocrite.” They think the school speech thing was so shrill and stupid that they shake their heads.
And that keeps me hopeful.
Keep up the good fight, julie terra!

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Today the “Green Jobs” Czar resigned due to his outrageous comments that have been brought to light. Why is it that ABC has not reported on this before the resignation? If the resignation is important then why not the reasons for his resignation? In my opinion ABC should have kept the public informed about this guy before tonights news!

Posted by: Caudill | September 6, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Julies warped argumentation would be like trying to justify Bernie Madoff’s crimes because Charles Manson’s were so much worse.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“Keep up the good fight, julie terra!”
So Alyson, you’re a truther too? LOL. That figures.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Gore and Jones should get married. They both have much in common…love of each other and communist ideas.

Posted by: roger king | September 6, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

“Julies warped argumentation would be like trying to justify Bernie Madoff’s crimes because Charles Manson’s were so much worse.”
_____________________________________
No, I’m encouraging you to use your common sense and get some perspective.
The Republican Bush administration had Cheney’s Chief of Staff convicted and sentenced to jail on multiple criminal offenses committed in his duties in the White House.
Get some perspective. This guy signed a petition to demand an inquiry into 9/11, became a major activist after the Rodney King beating and flirted with organised communism as a way to get better rights for his community – then became a eco-capitalist. Big deal.
Seriously, I used to be a Republican at one time. Does that mean I still am?
NOT AT ALL!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I wonder if BO got VJ a job working for ole Al Bore…. got to be a payoff in this…

Posted by: ShowMeTheMoney | September 6, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Its a good day in America. A good day.

Posted by: jermiah Wrong | September 6, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Its funny how the BO lackeys are trying to say that BO had NOTHING to do with this obvious firing…..

Posted by: Thief In The Night | September 6, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Glenn Beck 1 Obama/Jones 0 Only 36 more Czars to go.

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Alyson:”…but I’ve noticed while out and about this week, including today, that most people don’t care about this czar thing…”
Well there you have it. Guess we’re getting all worked up over nothing. So you have no objections to a proper vetting of the rest of Obama’s czars? People won’t care, so what’s the harm?
We’ll see this week how many people care. This story has long legs. It speaks to Obama’s judgment, what he and Valerie Jarrett think is acceptable thought and behavior for a presidential appointee. A Marxist in the White House. Yeah, I’m sure all those swing states in middle American don’t care about that at all.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 7:11:10 PM No, I’m encouraging you to use your common sense and get some perspective.+++++++ROFL, coming from you that is just hilariiiious.

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Well ABC like all the pro-Obama media like NBC, CNN, CBS, and NYT will never bring anything up that will reflect badly on the Obama administration. Only the Fox News Channel tells the truth that the American public demands. The ratings don’t lie that the majority of viewers don’t trust the mainstream media outlets.
Van Jones stating that this was a smear campaign against him is ridiculous. Verify the facts on Van Jones’ background and beliefs and there’s nobody to blame but himself. The Truth the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth led to his demise!!!!

Posted by: WatchDog | September 6, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Julie; concentrate on your ‘objective’. Then some one like Van Jones can start a camp like Manson.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

BH | Sep 6, 2009 7:02:56 PM Julies warped argumentation would be like trying to justify Bernie Madoff’s crimes because Charles Manson’s were so much worse.+++++++Thats seems to be the line of defense for pretty much every topic in these forums lately.

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Good night Julie and Alyson. I have some real work to do.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“The Republican Bush administration had Cheney’s Chief of Staff convicted and sentenced to jail on multiple criminal offenses committed in his duties in the White House.”
__________________________________________________
Wrong again, julieterra!
It wasn’t the “Republican Bush administration.” It was a (black, Democrat) Washington, D.C. prosecutor and jury.
And it was one count of perjury.
President Bush commuted Libby’s sentence.
“Get some perspective. This guy signed a petition to demand an inquiry into 9/11, became a major activist after the Rodney King beating and flirted with organised communism as a way to get better rights for his community – then became a eco-capitalist. Big deal.”
—————————————-
There is no way that VJ can be classified as any kind of “capitalist!”
He has declared that he loathes Capitalism and embraces Communism.
Check out his own words before you write another inane post defending him!

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

I can’t believe that anyone in their right mind would support Van Jones. Since when did it become OK for a top presidential advisor to be a self avowed communist? Perhaps if ABC spent more time on real issues like this and less time on Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston, a radical, communist, racist like Van Jones he would have never become a Czar in the first place. When is ABC going to look into the rest of Obama’s Czars?

Posted by: Drew K | September 6, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this Administration or the public debate.” This is rich, coming from a Republican.

Posted by: CO | September 6, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Jenfidel – your ‘facts’ are lies.
The jury convicted Libby on one count of obstruction of justice; two counts of perjury; and one count of making false statements to federal investigators.
Your depiction of the jury is laughable. You should try learning about the truth, not your own imagination.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

“All these crimes were committed in the office of Vice President Cheney.”
____________________________________________________
There were no “crimes” committed in Cheney’s office!
All of Washington knew that Plame was a CIA operative.
“This is the way Republicans behave in the 2nd highest office in the land.”
______________________________________________
I’m proud of them and wish they were still there!
I felt safe, protected and secure.
Can’t wait until we can impeach the lot of the NObama Administration who are destroying this country!
“Van Jones committed no such serious crime, and certainly not while serving in the office of the Vice President.”
————————————
Van Jones has been given $20 BILLION–where is it???
And what does an avowed Communist like him do with $20 BILLION???
And what is a green job anyway???

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

“Since when did it become OK for a top presidential advisor to be a self avowed communist?”
_______________________________________
You should study the man’s history with a little more thoroughness and care. He once said he was a ‘communist’.
I used to be a Republican; does that mean I’m still a Republican?
NOT AT ALL!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“There were no “crimes” committed in Cheney’s office!”
___________________________________
Try to stick to the facts Jenfidel, not your ideological ravings.
The Republican Bush administration had Cheney’s Chief of Staff convicted and sentenced to jail on multiple criminal offenses committed in his duties in the White House.
The jury convicted Libby on one count of obstruction of justice; two counts of perjury; and one count of making false statements to federal investigators.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

”’His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this Administration or the public debate.” This is rich, coming from a Republican.
CO”
_________________________________________Why is that?
No Republican I can think of has exhibited either.

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

So you have no objections to a proper vetting of the rest of Obama’s czars? People won’t care, so what’s the harm?
****
Seems like a redundant use of resources to satisfy a small school of sharks, particularly ones who claim to be concerned about spending so I do object. The larger point is that most Americans aren’t worried about it– it’s just the fringe. I don’t think we need to feed the fringe.
Oh, and BH, to repeat, no, I’m not a twoofer. I don’t think much of conspiracy theories. I suggest you read posts more carefully.

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

GLENN BECK ROCKS!

Posted by: Kathy in Pa. | September 6, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

“Try to stick to the facts Jenfidel, not your ideological ravings.

The jury convicted Libby on one count of obstruction of justice; two counts of perjury; and one count of making false statements to federal investigators.
julieterra”
Libby was “convicted” because his memory was thought by the all black Democrat jury of being poorer than Tim Russert’s.
Some crime.
This is why President Bush commuted his sentence and didn’t issue him a pardon: so that Libby can appeal this sentence and have it overturned for the travesty of “justice”
that it is!
While you Leftoids cling to the Libby conviction for dear life, your pal- convicted and proven murderer- Mumia was “wrongfully convicted” and should be set free!

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

“You’re one. You don’t even believe in the law of the land.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 7:57:05 PM”
I’m not in the crowd that wants to let murderers like Mumia go, so don’t talk to me about rule of law!

Posted by: Jenfidel | September 6, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

julieterra:”You should study the man’s history with a little more thoroughness and care. He once said he was a ‘communist’.
I used to be a Republican; does that mean I’m still a Republican?
NOT AT ALL!”
One does not make such profound and controversial public statements, form organizations and march in support of cop killers on a whim. Nor can such a past be easily dismissed simply because a person says they non longer believe in something that was the essence of their being for so many years of their life.
In fact, Van Jones’s claim of “that’s not me any more” is so laughable that Obama no longer has the benefit of the doubt with the American people. We haven’t heard the last of, “Obama WAS for single payer in 2002 but not any more.” Hmmm, suddenly that rings kind of hollow, wouldn’t you say?

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Alyson:”Seems like a redundant use of resources to satisfy a small school of sharks, particularly ones who claim to be concerned about spending so I do object. The larger point is that most Americans aren’t worried about it– it’s just the fringe. I don’t think we need to feed the fringe.”
There’s a reason why the framers gave the Senate the power to approve Cabinet members and senior members of the Executive Branch. It’s called checks and balances. It’s to ensure our Chief Executive knows his appointees must account for themselves before an open hearing. So you’re telling me this is a waste of time? Which other Articles of the Constitution would you consider to be “serving the fringe”?

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

“One does not make such profound and controversial public statements, form organizations and march in support of cop killers on a whim”
___________________________________
Gotta love these generic condemnations of the man. It’s almost as if they were printed somewhere so you could read and follow it. How many ‘cop killers’ did this man march in support of? Do you know the circumstances? Do you know anything at all, or just what you’ve been fed? These are question.
By the way, I didn’t become a Republican ‘on a whim’ either.
Am I a Republican now? NOT AT ALL!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Van Jones is a quitter.

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

It never fails to amaze me how these clowns get so cocky after their party comes into power. This happens with both the Dems and Repubs and they never seem to learn from others mistakes

Posted by: independent | September 6, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

The fact is Jones’s resignation is just the beginning, not the end. You will see Senators calling for a full account of all czars and a review of the czar appointment process, and rightly so.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

No Worries in Obamaland….A new CZAR has been created!!!!
just what we do not need.

Posted by: scott jeffries | September 6, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Hey, ABC, why did you wait all week to report on this, and not show any of the vile, hateful video of Van Jones?????

Posted by: Fred | September 6, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Alyson wrote: “There was stunning incompetence surrounding 9/11 and then the catastrophic events were used to start a pre-emptive war with Iraq based on contested intelligence.”
First of all, there were over 40 Presidential Daily Briefings that dealt specifically with al Qaeda–13 of those meetings were due to responses to questions by President Bush or his top advisers. The CIA confirmed that the PDB dated August 6, 2001–”Bin Ladin Determined To Strike In US”–was compiled as a direct response to an inquiry by President Bush as to whether al Qaeda was planning an attack against the United States. That PDB concludes with:
“Nevertheless, FBI information since that time (1998) indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
“The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full-field investigations throughout the U.S. that it considers bin Laden-related. CIA and the FBI are investigating a call to our embassy in the UAE in May saying that a group of bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives.”
Following that PDB, the Bush Administration began making changes. One of the areas looked at was the “wall” that prevented law enforcement from communicating with the intelligence agencies–a “wall” that was put into place by the Clinton Administration. The PDB mentions that BOTH the CIA and the FBI were investigating the SAME call to our embassy in the UAE. Could this group of bin Laden supporters been the 9/11 attackers? Had the FBI and CIA had a joint investigation could they have prevented the attacks of 9/11? Certainly, had the FBI and CIA been communicating with each other the months leading up the the attacks they likely could have put some of the “dots” together.
Now then actually the invasion of Iraq was really not a pre-emptive war. Technically it was a resumption of the 1991 Gulf War. That’s because Saddam Hussein never complied with any of the conditions of the 1991 Cease Fire. After 12 years of diplomatically trying to convince Saddam Hussein to comply failed, the UN Security Council issued it’s final ultimatum. When the UN Security Council made it clear they would not follow through on its ultimatum, President Bush issued one of his own. When that failed to convince Saddam Hussein to comply, President Bush rescinded the cease fire. One of the conditions of the cease fire was that Iraq had to prove they destroyed their WMDs. Of course since Saddam Hussein wanted his neighbors and the rest of the world to continue believing that Iraq had WMDs, he had no intentions of ever complying with the conditions of the cease fire.

Posted by: James Danley | September 6, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Posted by: Woody | Sep 6, 2009 8:03:11 PM
***
First, he was a civil rights lawyer. And there has always been controversy surrounding Mumia Abu-Jamal’s conviction and sentencing. I realize the GOP has become the pro-torture, anti-rule-of-law party but I find nothing unusual about a civil rights lawyer and activist advocating for a death row prisoner who many in the activist left view as an unjustly convicted political prisoner.
Second, we’ve already argued about the rest, whether people who were radical for less than a decade of their fortyish year life can find a way to be less radical and more pragmatic. I believe, yes– and that we should encourage that. Many on the right seem not to believe in growth, maturation, evolution of thought, second chances, redemption, or what have you. Whoever you are at your most radical or worst moment, that’s who you are forever to them. It’s a depressing world view but one that I appreciate being able to see now spot-on. (I wonder if that means they still see Glenn Beck as the alcoholic loser tool he used to be as he told his audience tearfully or Limbaugh as a drug addict or McCain as philandering hothead– No, of course not. They’re real patriots and capitalists. It only applies to Democrats and those with backgrounds more colorful in a way they can’t appreciate or understand.)

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

julieterra:”Gotta love these generic condemnations of the man. It’s almost as if they were printed somewhere so you could read and follow it. How many ‘cop killers’ did this man march in support of? Do you know the circumstances? Do you know anything at all, or just what you’ve been fed? These are question.
By the way, I didn’t become a Republican ‘on a whim’ either.
Am I a Republican now? NOT AT ALL!”
No one really cares if you were a Republican or not. I voted for Mondale and Dukakis. So what?
There is nothing generic about my condemnations. I didn’t feel the need to recite chapter and verse all of Jones’s document radical ramblings. You can find them easily enough now that ABC “broke the story (lol)”. And rest assured my commentary is my own and comes from the heart. Just as I assume yours does. That’s what makes it so entertaining.
According to the San Franciso Gate newspaper Van Jones led a demonstration of about 150 people on October 7th, 1999 in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal, a convicted cop killer. They were upset that the Supreme Court rejected their claims that Mumia did not receive a fair trial. The case made headlines. I encourage you to the read the original SFGate story. There are some other interesting insights into Jones’s psyche.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

But in jail (after the Rodney King beating trials), he said, “I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’” Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. “I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.” In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.
“Van Jones worked for the Apollo Alliance that helped write the stimulus bill and described himself as “a community organizer.” Jones helped form the group STORM – an acronym for Standing Together to Organize a Radical Movement, with the goal of “mobilizing young people of color into militant direct action.”
The group published a pamphlet “Reclaiming Revolution” which stated: “All of STORM’s members developed a basic understanding of and commitment to revolutionary Marxist policies with a particular emphasis on the historical experiences of third world Communist movements.” Van Jones revered Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao Tse-Tung.
________________________
yup, sounds to me like a guy who only “once” said in passing that he was a communist.

Posted by: BK | September 6, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

I hope Republicans continue to probe what happened here with Van Jones.
How could the internet/bloggers so easily vet Jones’ radical, vile spewing anti-American background when the most powerful office, The White House, couldn’t.
Also,I think the Obama Administration needs to still be asked if they agree with Van Jones’ assertion that white polluters are poisioning people of color.
I mean Mr. Obama do you have those same thoughts about white polluters as your close friend Mr. Jones?

Posted by: sheryl | September 6, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Woody, why don’t you cite exactly where the issues lie with the constitution? As of right now, I haven’t yet heard a compelling case that the “czars” are unconstitutional. Are you saying the way they’re vetted is unconstitutional, or just having them is? Where do you stand, and can you build a compelling case rather than simply referring to checks and balances or quoting Glenn Beck? To me, it’s not obvious that there is a problem with the constitutionality– and the arguments I’ve heard have been pre-school level, not fully addressing the difference between these czars and past czars. I think it’s a fringe argument. So, I have problems with the constitution being broken– but I also think there are some nuts who claims quite a few things are unconstitutional (see Michelle Bachmann and the tenthers that claim federal highways are unconstitutional.)

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“According to the San Franciso Gate newspaper Van Jones led a demonstration of about 150 people on October 7th, 1999 in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal, a convicted cop killer”
_______________________________________
Okay, so you were wrong when you said earlier that he ‘marched in support of cop killers’ – he went in one march in support of one particular case.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Who in this day and age defends the president of the United States for appointing a self described Marxist/communist?
Another failure of our education system.
And the dept of education calls those that wanted to keep their kids form listening to the president silly?
Oh that is nothing compared to the president of the United States appointing a communist/Marxist to a position.
So the head of the justice department is going after the CIA but are OK with this?
I want to know what adult would find this acceptable?
I want answers NOW! This is NOT ACCEPTABLE. Korea, Vietnam, the decades of the cold war, the Cuban missile crisis, almost going to nuclear war against the USSR under JFK and THIS PRESIDENT HAS THE STUPIDITY NOT TO THINK THIS WOULD UPSET AND ANGER PEOPLE????
I want to know why they didn’t care and what they knew. How many people had to die do defend this country against communists only to have this president appoint a self described Marxist in ANY position in the GOVT?!?!?
Obama is called a socialist and people laugh he appoints a communist/Marxists and its NO BIG DEAL?????
Howard Dean even says its unfortunate he has to leave????
Are the Democrats out of their minds????
I don’t want this administration to do another SINGLE THING TILL WE HAVE ANSWERS.
NOTHING!!!! This isn’t a game this is serious.

Posted by: David from WI | September 6, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Alyson:”…we’ve already argued about the rest, whether people who were radical for less than a decade of their fortyish year life can find a way to be less radical and more pragmatic. I believe, yes– and that we should encourage that… (ad hominem attack on the “right”, etc.)
Yes, I find it impossible to believe Jones had some sort of centrist epiphany although I can’t speak for anyone else. The main difference with Jones and all of your favorite conservative punching bags is … wait for it … Jones had incredible POWER. He was a Presidential appointee vested with the power to meddle with our energy policy yet the Senate never had a chance to approve of him. Why? Because he wrote a book about “green jobs”? Please.
Jones’s radicalism is in his political thought and philosophy, all of his own choosing. How you can compare that to the all too common human frailties of drug and alcohol addiction is beyond me. Look, even Obama threw him overboard. It’s time to move on, to Holdren perhaps?

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

FROM A WASHINGTON POST PIECE: “A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Sunday that Jones’s past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank.”
If they didn’t bother to find info available on the Internet about VJ, I wonder what sleazy details might (likely) there be about the other Czars. Of course it’s just as likely this is a blatant lie.
Bottom line: Obama can’t be trusted.

Posted by: keys2truth | September 6, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

It is frightening that such a person could be part of the White House staff and be so close to and the President.Was there a background check on this racist and anti American individual. If so who did it and do they still have their job?

Posted by: Freedtoo | September 6, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

julieterra:”Okay, so you were wrong when you said earlier that he ‘marched in support of cop killers’ – he went in one march in support of one particular case.”
Mea culpa. I stand corrected. So which is worse, marching in support of more than one cop killer or LEADING a demonstration in support of a single cop killer when the Supreme Court tells you it’s over? Talk about splitting hairs.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Let us not forget that Van Jones’ proud revolutionary moment caused 55 deaths, destroyed/damaged thousands of businesses and cost over 1 billion dollars. Even though he was not charged, his boasting pride in his involvement in the tragic Rodney King riots is awful. Good luck carrying California in 2012, Obama!

Posted by: shawn | September 6, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

How can the president take an OATH to defend the Constitution of the United States and then appoint a MARXISTS to ANY position in govt?!?!?!?
How did they not think Americans would care? How many US Solders had to die fighting communists only to have the president appoint a Marxist as an adviser?
DID THEY KNOW AND WHY WASN’T HE FIRED WHEN THEY DID KNOW??!?!!?
THIS IS NOT CHANGE ITS IDIOCY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER?!?!
He compares himself to JFK. If JFK would have found he had a communist in the govt he would have had him ARRESTED!!!!!

Posted by: David from WI | September 6, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

“Okay, so you were wrong when you said earlier that he ‘marched in support of cop killers’ – he went in one march in support of one particular case.”
___________________________________
I think it’s a huge difference. You implied this guy “marched against cop killers”. He did nothing of the sort. He went out in one particular situation he felt strongly enough about to organize a march.
By the way, it is neither against the law nor anti-american to march in protest.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

I think a BIG problem that’s being overlooked with Van Jones are his statements about green jobs and how they will be one of many stepping stones for minorities. I read on FoxNewsNation’s website many statements from this racist jerk that were just stunning. His whole agenda with the environment and “green jobs” is to take away from the evil white people and give to the oppressed, misunderstood, poor minority. It’s insane that this man was ever even given the opportunity to serve in any administration. I thought the point of “green” was to help “save the planet”. I didn’t know it was about race. I urge everyone who has posted here to go to the FoxNewsNation website and check it out for yourself. Just be glad he is gone.

Posted by: Shoe | September 6, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

“To me, it’s not obvious that there is a problem with the constitutionality– and the arguments I’ve heard have been pre-school level, not fully addressing the difference between these czars and past czars. I think it’s a fringe argument.”
Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution is the “Advice and Consent” Clause, “…and he (President) shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law …”
Would you be so bold if you were sitting before a Senate panel to argue that a czar is not a public Minister or Consul and the Senate has no right to provide advice and consent over their appointments? I would like to see that. I believe all czars, past and present, are unconstitutional.
Anywho, I admire your tenacity, your desire to see the good in people (as long as their not Republicans) and adherance to your ideology. Stick with it.
FWIW, JFK was and still is one of my heroes. We need more Democrats like him.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Posted by: shawn | Sep 6, 2009 8:54:34 PM
Oh sheesh. A right wingnut pretending he cares about death tolls?

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

It’s not really funny how many people are defending this Van Jones. His words came from his mouth and people slander the messenger. Just because ABC is an inept news organization and now spins the actual time lines is a joke. Then I read a few blogs justifying Van Jones, because he was Time’s man of the year. Well just for the record Hitler was Time’s man of the year for 1938 in Jan. 1939 issue. What happened to principles in this country what has happened to disgrace every man that ever spilt blood for this country to now even debate such trash so close to our President. You defenders are very scary people and need to have your agendas exposed. By the way I hate both parties and value liberty over all ideologies.

Posted by: Libert425 | September 6, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

DL13 said: This is good. In this time of political unrest we don’t need anyone as radical as this in a high place of government, especially a racist at that. I hope our President will do a better job of vetting his replacement.
**
Too bad the country didn’t vet OBAMA, the Communist-in-Chief.

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

He needed to resign. He is in a public office representing alot of people. Glad to see him gone.

Posted by: Steve | September 6, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Obama is afraid he’s next, though I think Glenn will save him for later, after there’s plenty of other revelations about the “company he keeps” that we are supposed to judge him by (according to Obama’s own words).

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Obama liked Jones’s views — what did you think? He knew most people let HIM through with his past involvements with socialist organization, his radical views on the economy, and his associations, so he figured it was safe to let someone just like him into the WH. Were it not for Glenn Beck, he’d have succeeded.

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Anywho, I admire your tenacity, your desire to see the good in people (as long as their not Republicans)…
FWIW, JFK was and still is one of my heroes. We need more Democrats like him.
Posted by: Woody | Sep 6, 2009 9:09:46 PM
***
Not true on Republicans! I love the senators from Maine, I like Arnold though I don’t always agree with him, I voted for the Republican mayor in my suburb of Chitown. And I love my mom! (and shhhh, now that Bush is out of office, I can admit that while I thought he was an incompetent president in some ways and I didn’t agree with him on issues almost ever, I never hated him. I appreciated his efforts in Africa and in his last few months in office and during the transition, and I thought he had a good heart and truly believed he was doing the right thing. Like, I’d hang out with him as long as we didn’t talk politics and there was no way he could start a war, or touch my money–lol.)

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

“By the way, it is neither against the law nor anti-american to march in protest.”
When did anyone ever imply that it’s not? It’s one of the most American things we can do. Jones led one legal demonstration is support of a convicted cop killer. Good for him, I guess. Apparently that won’t play in Peoria, however. This is national politics 101.

Posted by: Woody | September 6, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

“Get some perspective. This guy signed a petition to demand an inquiry into 9/11, became a major activist after the Rodney King beating and flirted with organised communism as a way to get better rights for his community – then became a eco-capitalist. Big deal.”
LOL. Yeah, that’s incredible spin. Actually, it’s what you call lies. This quy signed a petition hosted by an organization that branded the Bush organization war criminals. He was affiliated with groups that are, without a doubt, racists. Then he called himself a self-avowed Communist.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 9:25:06 PM what do you call saying that we need to pass this new unread trillion dollar healthcare bill in three weeks or else?

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

The media can deny the “death Panel” beliefs all they want. The truth is Sarah Palin won that debate. The book Your Life, Your Choices proves her point for her.

Posted by: bassman | September 6, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Great coverage guys. Maybe the next time you can cover a story before they resign.

Posted by: S. Morcaldi | September 6, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

” This quy signed a petition hosted by an organization that branded the Bush organization war criminals. He was affiliated with groups that are, without a doubt, racists. Then he called himself a self-avowed Communist.”
_____________________________________
This guy signed a petition he thought was calling for an inquiry into 9/11. He definitely joined activist groups fighting for the rights of people of color – you call them racist. And he said after a radical summer that included the video-taped Rodney King beating (and acquittal of the officers), he was a ‘communist’.
Your spin is your spin. We all have our spin.
By the way, which body is the one who took in all the evidence and proclaimed those groups are ‘without a doubt’ racist? And what credentials does this body that make that decision have? Was this some type of government investigation?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Posted by: Jenfidel | Sep 6, 2009 9:21:21 PM
***
Jen, you may want to read up on it a little more. Hitler wanted to change the name of the party. By the time, he took over, the few lefties still in the party were booted out. All of his alliances were on the right side of the political spectrum. He hated both communism and capitalism. His totalitarianism had roots in nationalism and racialism. Most scholars label Nazism as “fascism” which would make it extreme right wing totaliarianism. Granted once you get to either extreme in a totaliarian state, they resemble each other– but there does seem to be a lot of misguided conflating of socialism, communism, Marxism and Nazism that goes on.

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Van Jones disqualified himself by being an avowed foul-mouthed fringe Marxist and 9-11 kook.
Although the administration failed miserably at vetting him, at least Obama finally corrected that mess-up in firing him.

Posted by: Maureen | September 6, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Was this some type of government investigation?+++++My question is who has the authority to investigate since this commie was appointed, no election,no vetting or confirmation proceedings and he only reports to the president

Posted by: Boxcar | September 6, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Zoyo, maybe the concern is that a community organizer like Jones, in charge of tens of billions of dollars, might just funnel some of that to ACORN – all under the guise of “green jobs.”

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

mw wrote: “I’m afraid it will take a direct refusal to be manipulated by all Americans who currently listen to these hate spewing demagogues, before we can get back on track and focus on the issues.”
**
We are off to a good start, don’t you think? Who should be next — Jarrett or Obama himself? I look forward to helping out in the effort with all my heart and soul, whoever’s next.
Long live American freedom!

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

It is irresponsible for news organizations not to publish all of the supportive statements made by Democrats on behalf of Van Jones. Van Jones truly reflects very current and mainstream Democrat thinking as reflected by the makeup of the House, the Senate, the Presidency, major filmmakers, and major University centered tenured thinkers.

Posted by: raym39 | September 6, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

You defenders are very scary people and need to have your agendas exposed. By the way I hate both parties and value liberty over all ideologies.
Posted by: Libert425 | Sep 6, 2009 9:10:54 PM
***
Sure. Claiming you’re so scared of people with opinions that differ from yours and that you think we need to have our “agendas” exposed pretty much exposes you as a Glenn Beck parrot. You may not be an idealogue, but demagogues are worse.
Oh look. Here’s your cue to cry for the camera.

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Oh! Here’s Van Jones FELONY charge the right wingers have been yelling about all day . .. .
From F*X news itself!
“Jones was arrested along with hundreds of participants in a peaceful protest march.
Charges against him ultimately were dropped, and he says he received a “small” settlement.
FELONY conviction indeed. You guys are LIARS!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Valerie Jarrett who was born in Shiraz, Iran w/American parents and has been Senior Advisor to the President and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Relations and Public Liaison HAD INTRODUCED VAN JONES WHO IS THE COMMUNIST, RACISM, AND INSULTING OF AMERICA, FORMER THE PRESIDENT OF USA, THE PARTY TO OBAMA. I’ve found that there are a huge loophole in Jarrett’s
duties which has not check Van Jones’s background at all before recommendation him to the President of USA. The Jarrett, as a Advisor to the President,
has made a big and big mistake.

Posted by: jsr | September 6, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

TruthinAmerica said:
“Bring Cheney back!
He knows the threats to America, and one of the biggest is right here in America like people with Jones-like mindsets. These radicals will not prevail!”
**
That is the truth!!

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

And again from F*X news . . . .
“In 2004 Jones signed a statement calling for then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and others to launch an investigation into evidence that suggests “people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.”
If you right wingers could read you would see the petition F*X brings to light reads an investigation what “MAY” have happened. An investigation into what ‘may’ have happened. Oh! how shocking . …
The lesson as always, right wingers lie.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Good riddance, he will not be missed.

Posted by: Bix | September 6, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

“Your spin is your spin. We all have our spin.”
We may have our own spin, we do not have our own facts. Let me share a few with you:
Jones was a self-described “communist” during the 1990s and previously worked with a group dedicated to Marxist and Leninist philosophies. His comments, even in recent years, were often racially charged. He’s blamed “white polluters and white environmentalists” for “steering poison” to minority communities. In 2005, he drew a distinction between white and black youths involved in shooting incidents by referencing the 1999 Columbine High School massacre.
“You’ve never seen a Columbine done by a black child. Never,” Jones said. “They always say, ‘We can’t believe it happened here. We can’t believe it’s these suburban white kids.’ It’s only them!” he said. “Now, a black kid might shoot another black kid. He’s not going to shoot up the whole school.”
But go ahead, reverse the words “white” with “black” in the quotes above and then try to tell me that you would consider it a racist statement if a Republican had made it. In fact, the media has crucified whites of all ideologies for far less racially charged statements.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

“Bring Cheney back!
He knows the threats to America, and one of the biggest is right here in America like people with Jones-like mindsets.
____________________________________
Cheney couldn’t even keep people in his own office from breaking the law and getting convicted and sentenced to jail.
He had a FELONY in his own office, with the man he selected as his Chief of Staff.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

bassman wrote: “The media can deny the “death Panel” beliefs all they want. The truth is Sarah Palin won that debate. The book Your Life, Your Choices proves her point for her.”
Sarah Palin’s death panels and Michael Steele’s VA suicide book have both been rated “Pants on Fire” lies by Politifact. So you’re saying one lie has been proven true by another lie. Shyeah, right.

Posted by: WWW | September 6, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

“If you right wingers could read you would see the petition F*X brings to light reads an investigation what “MAY” have happened. An investigation into what ‘may’ have happened. Oh! how shocking . ..”
Yeah, has never insinuated that the Bush Administration is guilty for war crimes. The issue is that he signed on with the truthers, like yourself I gather, that insinuate that the President is a mass murderer. It’s that kind of mental instability that we need OUT of public policy.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Julieterra wrote: “By the way, it is neither against the law nor anti-american to march in protest.”
Peaceful protest, yes! Riot, NO! The Rodney King riot left 53 dead and resulted in $1 billion in damaged property. Certainly you aren’t advocating that killing 53 people and causing property damage is “neither against the law nor anti-american!”

Posted by: James Danley | September 6, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

ocialist/Comm.unist/Radicals in the WH! and those speaking out about it are called the crazies. What country am I living in?
The fact that O did not fire him the second these numerous radical facts came to light, indicates that he is well aware of them and never felt a need to condemn them which proves his agenda is just as radical.
Over the years each president has had ONE or TWO Czars, but this guy has THIRTY something!!!What the heck is he doing….building a AR.MY OF CZARS!! accountable to NO ONE except the president. It’s time congress steps in and put a stop to this. This smells of shadow government which hopes to make congress obsolete.

Posted by: Bee | September 6, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

“If you right wingers could read you would see the petition F*X brings to light reads an investigation what “MAY” have happened. An investigation into what ‘may’ have happened. Oh! how shocking . ..”
All Van Jones has been accused of is regarding 9/11 is signing the above petition. Stick to the facts.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

FascistHyena asks:
“Somebody tell us: what was a man like Jones doing in a presidential administration?”
***
Why, reflecting the boss’s views, what else?

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“Certainly you aren’t advocating that killing 53 people and causing property damage is “neither against the law nor anti-american!”"
__________________________________
Didn’t say it was. Did anybody say killing 53 people was not against the law?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“All Van Jones has been accused of is regarding 9/11 is signing the above petition.”
Julie, if Sarah Palin was President and was revealed to have signed a petition would you be good with it?
You know you wouldn’t.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

“Julie, if Sarah Palin
______________________________________
You think signing a petition asking for a full investigation of 9/11 is anywhere near in the same ballpark? If you say ‘yes’, you haven’t seen some of things the Government of the United States has been involved in – secretly – and behind the backs of it citizens.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

julieterra -SURE – MAKES A LOT OF SENSE??

Posted by: Manitu | September 6, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Okay, julieterra, the posters may have misspoken. But that’s really a minor thing in the grand scheme of things. People make mistakes.
Said more correctly: “He’s a self-admitted thief, but he wasn’t charged or convicted of a crime, as far as I know.” Happy now? LOL.
Jones: “Yes, the Great Revolutionary Moment had at long last come. And the time, clearly, was ours! So we stole stuff. Y’know, stole stuff. Radios, tennis shoes. Well, not everybody, of course.”

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

‘Truthers’ Make ‘Birthers’ look tame. While the MSM media has a great time using ‘Birthers’ for comical relief, they hardly mention “Truthers”.
“Truthers” would rather believe that their own government attacked the USA, destroying the Twin Towers. They believe that the Pentagon was damaged by a bomb of our own making, denying that a plane hit the Pentagon. They can watch the security tape of that clearly shows a jet slamming into the Pentagon, and be unmoved. It begs the question; if we were attacking ourselves, why did we bring the 4th plane down? Google it. There are 2 separate debris fields, miles apart.
Rosie O’Donnell made headlines when she ranted that “Steel doesn’t melt!” over and over on The View. Rosie is a “truther”. She was putting forth a popular theory among ‘truthers’, that bombs were placed under the Towers to cause their collapse. They think that our government placed the bombs under the towers. Why don’t any of them research the topic, or ask a engineer?
The intense heat generated by burning jet fuel does not melt steel, it weakens it, allowing it to bend.
Van Jones is a ‘truther’. He signed the petition. In addition to Jones describing himself as a communist, and a radical wanting revolution, I have to question the man’s intelligence.
“Truthers” ignore facts, even when the facts are literally right before their eyes.

Posted by: MisElaineous | September 6, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

One down many more to go …
1. Herb Allison-TARP Czar
2. Alan Bersin-Border Czar
3. Dennis Blair-Intelligence Czar
4. John Brennan-Terrorism Czar
5. Carol Browner-Energy Czar
6. Adolfo Carrion, Jr-Urban Affairs Czar
7. Ashton Carter-Weapons Czar
8. Aneesh Chopra-Technology Czar
9. Jeffrey Crowley-AIDS Czar
10. Cameron Davis-Great Lakes Czar
11. Nancy-Ann DeParle-Health Czar
12. Earl Devaney-Stimulus Accountability Czar
13. Joshua DuBois-Faith-based Czar
14. Kenneth Feinberg-Pay Czar
15. Danny Fried-Guantanamo Closure Czar
16. J. Scott Gration-Sudan Czar
17. Richard Holbrooke-Afghanistan Czar
18. John Holdren-Science Czar
19. Van Jones Green-Jobs Czar
20. Gil Kerlikowske-Drug Czar
21. Vivek Kundra-Information Czar
22. George Mitchell-Mideast Peace Czar
23. Ed Montgomery-Car Czar
24. Dennis Ross-Mideast Policy Czar
25. Gary Samore-WMD Czar
26. Todd Stern-Climate Czar
27. Cass Sunstein-Regulatory Czar
28. Paul Volcker-Economic Czar
We have work to do lets go!

Posted by: obamabot | September 6, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Government does NOT CREATE JOBS.
Where did this mythi come from?

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“If you say ‘yes’, you haven’t seen some of things the Government of the United States has been involved in – secretly – and behind the backs of it citizens.”
___________________________________
BH – I really am disappointed. Have you not paid attention to American history over the past decades? It is not news that the Government has had all kinds of secret programs run behind the backs of its citizens . . .
You’re kidding right with your false sense of indignation? Right?

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

“You think signing a petition asking for a full investigation of 9/11 is anywhere near in the same ballpark?”
By the way, we had an extensive 911 investigation that fully investigated 911 and completely torched the Bush and Clinton Admins. It was a complete and full investigation.
What these nutters want, and you I presume, is the Bush Admin. to admit that they were mass murderers due to a crack-pot conspiracy theory some professor cooked up in his basement. That is a huge difference between what you portray and what is reality. Van Jones knew what he was signing when he signed it and even the nutter organization, , called him on it when he tried to weasel out of it.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

“It is not news that the Government has had all kinds of secret programs run behind the backs of its citizens…”
I think you need to layoff watching the Alias reruns.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

“Birthers” – nutters who think the President forged his birth certificate (to hide that he was born overseas) in order to run for President.
“Truthers” – nutters who think the former President murdered 3,000+ fellow citizens, damaged his nation’s economy, and evoked trumped up fears over terrorism in order to start a war with Iraq and Afghanistan – which ended up killing another 3,000+ soldiers that should be laid at his feet.
So, at the end of the day, which nutter group would you see as more unreasonable and/or dangerous?

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

“we had an extensive 911 investigation that fully investigated 911 and completely torched the Bush and Clinton Admins. It was a complete and full investigation”
____________________________________
I don’t know alot about that investigation, so I can’t comment with any informed knowledge.
I do know the investigation has been harshly critisized by many. I do know they spent many, many times more investigating Bill Clinton’s office romance than they did investigating 9/11.
And no, I do not trust the government.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

David from WI,
The answer is that all the evidence points to the conclusion that Obama, likewise, is a Communist. You *did* live in the U.S., did you not, during the campaign?

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

“I do know the investigation has been harshly critisized by many. I do know they spent many, many times more investigating Bill Clinton’s office romance than they did investigating 9/11.”
The length of an investigation is irrelevant if its findings are substantive, thorough and contain a well documented methodology to support its conclusions. I have seen no credible expert, by any objective standard, conclude that the investigation was incomplete or that Bush came out smelling like a rose as a result of the commission’s findings.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

You all who are concerned about appointments Obama is making ought to be more concerned about Obama himself. He surrounds himself with people who think like him. What are you going to do about having a Communist in the White House? We tried to stop this from happening, but you Dems won the election anyway because none of you stopped and thought about who he had been associating with and what he had been saying all these years.

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Czars having policy authority are distinct from typical presidential ‘advisors’ who have no policy implementation authority. That is what makes them un-constititional appointments, because they abrogate the system of ‘checks and balances’ that our founding fathers so thoughtfully put in place.
Article 2, Section 2 of the US Constitution states: “…and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”

Posted by: BK | September 6, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

David from WI,
David, David, David. Don’t you get it? Obama is a Marxist, too.

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Van Jones chose to resign. It was his choice. He’s a big boy. Why blame anyone else for his choice. Can libs EVER take responsibility for their own actions? If Van Jones is so wonderful why didn’t he stay & fight for his job? Libs say Palin is a quiter??! Big tough Van Jones takes a week or two of one network shining the spotlight on him while ALL the others cover for him and Van Jones the brilliant quits!?? Think about it. He didn’t take a fraction of the beating that Palin & her family has had to endure and the guy folds faster than a limp noodle!! Just answer one question: If Van Jones is such a genius great asset for our country, our environment, our economy & our future why didn’t Obama fight like hell to keep him? He didn’t even ATTEMPT to fight for him. He doesn’t seem any more bothered watching Van Jones go under the bus than his former pastor the Rev. Wright. Why is that?

Posted by: eyeswideopen | September 6, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Actually, I don’t know that Jones had such a large budget…

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

“What are you going to do about having a Communist in the White House? We tried to stop this from happening, but you Dems won the election anyway because none of you stopped and thought about who he had been associating with and what he had been saying all these years.”
Er, I thought the Republican rallying cry during the campaign was that Obama was a closet socialist who pals around with terrorists. When exactly did “socialist” become “communist?”

Posted by: WWW | September 6, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

The media have not been asking the tough questions. How did Van Jones make it in the administration in the first place? What are the backgrounds of these other czars? Van Jones is not the only czar with a sketchy background.

Posted by: Will | September 6, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

EWO, the Van Jones is quitter angle after one week is an interesting one. Palin had to endure months of the kind of media pressure that Van Jones caved in on in just a few days.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

WWW said: “Er, I thought the Republican rallying cry during the campaign was that Obama was a closet socialist who pals around with terrorists. When exactly did “socialist” become “communist?” ”

Maybe when Jones was vetted by Glenn Beck and others?

Posted by: tanarg | September 6, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

“You think it’s funny when the Vice President’ Chief of Staff perjures himself, obstructs justice, makes false statements to federal investigators and is sentenced to jail..”
I think it’s irrelevant to the Van Jones situation. The Bush Administration ended on Jan. 20th of this year, and given that Dems. completely control Congress and the WH this obsession with the past needs to stop being an excuse for why this Congress and WH can’t move forward.

Posted by: BH | September 6, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

“The length of an investigation is irrelevant if its findings are substantive, thorough and contain a well documented methodology to support its conclusions.”
______________________________________
Still, this was one of THE major events in all of American history. You’d think they could put at least as much effort and resources into it as they did Clinton’s fling with an intern . . . if not a lot more.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

“Maybe when Jones was vetted by Glenn Beck and others?”
Er, and they did this vetting during the campaign?

Posted by: WWW | September 6, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

“When exactly did “socialist” become “communist?”
_____________________________________
It’s been one name after another thrown at the President. Muslim, arab, anti-american, non-american, foreigner, terrorist . .. you name it, the fanatical right have called him it.
It’s all fear and smear. It went on all through the election, it continued after the election, it continues today.
It’s really the only tactic the right seems to have anymore. Name calling and smear. Oh, yes and fear mongering.
Obama brings a Republican into his Cabinet, do they call Obama a Republican? No.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Obama’s Communist leanings were talked about in the campaign, called by the kinder word “socialism.” All of his lovely associations…. etc. etc. Google if you’ve forgotten or slept through it all.

Posted by: tanarg | September 7, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The question is why did Obama hire such a person in the first place.
Like birds of a feather flock together, could it be that Obama himself share similar political views.

Posted by: Gregh | September 7, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Progressive is the eupemism for socialism and as Vladimir Lenin said, “the goal of socialism is communism.”

Posted by: antisocialist | September 7, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

It’s been one name after another thrown at the President. Muslim, arab, anti-american, non-american, foreigner, terrorist . .. you name it, the fanatical right have called him it.
It’s all fear and smear. It went on all through the election, it continued after the election, it continues today.
It’s really the only tactic the right seems to have anymore. Name calling and smear. Oh, yes and fear mongering.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

“Obama’s Communist leanings were talked about in the campaign, called by the kinder word ‘socialism.’”
Heh, I knew you were pulling our collective leg, tanarg.

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

“Oh, yes and fear mongering.”
Tell me about it! The right has taken fear mongering to a whole new level these days.

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I’m sure many of you have seen Glenn Beck’s hit list, but if not, his latest twitter asks his “Watch Dogs” to “FIND EVERYTHING YOU CAN ON CASS SUNSTEIN, MARK LLOYD AND CAROL BROWNER.” And warns “Do not link before burning to disc.” As with Dr. Emanuel, conservative websites have already started reading Sunnstein’s most theoretical writing and pumping up the sound bites and portions that out of full context sound really strange. You know, cuz that’s how it works. Be prepared :>)

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Quiz, who said this:
1) I will get my advice from people who think like me on a broad range of topics.
2) We will fundamentally (ensure you look up the real definition) change the country.
Now look at his accociates and you know where we are headed. The Anarchists should be the happiest of all.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

“Tell me about it! The right has taken fear mongering to a whole new level these days.”
Yeah it’s “fear mongering” to ask that a truther resign for his racism and real fear mongering.
Btw, if there is nothing to these “fear” tactics why is it that Obama is so easily panicking. I though the “vast right wing conspiracy” nutter talk died last November when the Dems swept all facets of govt.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am

“Funny Jones said it was a conspiracy to get him but it was his own video clips and books that sunk him.”
Too true. Wacky folks like Beck can scream all they want, but if there is no substance to their ranting no one will listen. Van Jones was forced to resign not through lies, but by sharing with the American public just a handful of his quotes. Given the freshness of this story and the lack of interest in the media to really put resources behind vetting Jones, I’m sure there is a great deal more to be found on Mr. Jones that what’s been revealed in just the last few days.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Funny thing is they say the right is racist for their protest over health care while the only real racist crap is comming from the Czars and Bamas buddies.
We are on to them now, using the race card no longer works we just come at you all harder.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Anybody notice the Van Jones story has been brewing for a week but, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and LSNBC have not mentioed it until he resigned.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

“As with Dr. Emanuel, conservative websites have already started reading Sunnstein’s most theoretical writing and pumping up the sound bites”
_______________________________________
The right wing (as manifested on here at least) is at an advantage at times because they have no morals or ethics – the truth doesn’t matter, treating people fairly doesn’t matter, just the damage done. They are like german shepherd attack dogs.
Liberals on the other hand, being liberals, tend towards treating people properly and fairly, honesty, justice and such.
A generalization, and not absolute, but there’s truth in there.
Fortunately the attacks on Emmanuel didn’t really get much traction. And many future attacks on others won’t either.
Unfortunately for Van Jones, he really was a community activist working hard to help people living in alienation, poverty and disadvantage – and if you do that (especially as a younger person) you come across ideas of activism from all over various societies, and you might well get involved in collective power, shared community resources, community ownership as possible solutions – and if you care, strong activism along those lines. You might even join or start a marxist community movement – whatever the hell that is . . .
There are many ways to build up strong communities and strong communities are important to strong countries.
He eventually morphed into something that was probably very worthwhile to pursue – eco-capitalism. And since he was a graduated lawyer and a surviver, he probably had a lot of intelligence, ingenuity and entrepreneurial smarts.
He was well-admired by many people including people very highly placed in McCain’s campaign.
Regrettably for him, the resume is too easy to pick at – signing a 9/11 petition means nothing – as is pointed out some of Beck’s associates are questioners about 9/11. Still, the right are attack dogs, and Beck attacks for big, big bucks. I’m sure there’ll be a reward for him.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Funny as usual with libs they disappear when faced with fact.
BH,
Be careful about judgement on Beck, it is entertainment with fact vice the Saturday night Live approach of entertainment with propaganda and lies. Beck has been screaming about Jones since day one. I swear I have never caught him in a lie. His vision is out there but is possible.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

You don’t have to focus on the radicalism in this administration because the incompetence speaks for itself.
——————-
Jones is unable to define what a “green job” is. In fact, no one is.
President Obama devoted nearly $60 billion of his stimulus package to building a new green-based economy rich in renewable energy and strategies to cut carbon. But despite the price tag, not one green job yet exists. It comes down to a problem of etymology. No one can yet agree on what a green job actually is.
Good thing we allocated $60 billion to allegedly create a numbers of something no one can define.
The working definition paints a broad stroke: a job that’s good for the economy while simultaneously healing the earth. But that leaves lots open to interpretation-natural gas is technically a cleaner fuel than crude oil, but it’s still unsustainable-making it difficult, if not impossible, to measure whether eco-based jobs are being created and whether, as the administration has claimed, they’re the saviors of a sagging economy.
the Leftist group The Apollo Alliance claimed credit for helping to write the stimulus bill, which steered $60 billion towards developing “green jobs.” Which coincidentally is their mission:
The Apollo Alliance is a coalition of labor, business, environmental, and community leaders working to catalyze a clean energy revolution that will put millions of Americans to work in a new generation of high-quality, green-collar jobs.
Again, they can’t define what “green jobs” are. Again, no one can.
On The Apollo Alliance Board is Van Jones, who got the “Green Jobs Czar” gig overseeing the $60 billion.
Will Jones direct any of that copious coin back to his current/former pals at The Apollo Alliance to help not create any undefinable “green jobs?”

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

It was the honourable thing that Jones could do at this point. The things he said in the past just continued to haunt him.
He is not alone and others could follow.

Posted by: Kottaras | September 7, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Fear-mongering of the “Pants on Fire” variety, emanating from the far right end of the spectrum:
•Obama wants to mandate circumcision
•Children will be indoctrinated and grandchildren may be aborted
•Forced abortions plus sterilants in drinking water to control population
•Mandatory euthanasia counseling sessions
•A VA manual encouraging vets to commit suicide
•Death Panels

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

“Funny thing is they say the right is racist for their protest over health care”
____________________________________
Dan you’re wrong and you’re dumb and you’ve made that up.
Nobody said anything of the sort.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Liberals on the other hand, being liberals, tend towards treating people pr0perly and fairly, honesty, justice and such.
Really?? Like the continued attacks on Palin? Maybe like accusing the guy that showed up at a town house with an assault rifle of being a white sup only to find out he was black?
Maybe it was the Van Jones videos that did it.
You all got the first dose (yes I said first) of your own medicine and you hate mongers are now getting the same you have been dishing out!

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

“Maybe like accusing the guy that showed up at a town house with an assault rifle of being a white sup only to find out he was black?”
_________________________________________
Dan, again you’re wrong. People don’t give a crap what color you are, if you’re showing up at public meetings with assault rifles – you’re a jerk.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

“Like the continued attacks on Palin?”
____________________________________
Sarah Palin made a fool of herself over and over again. She attacked her own credibility every time she opened her mouth.
People didn’t even have to make up lies about her – just showing what she said was enough.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Yeah, I loved how palin mentioned that Alaska and Russia are within eyesite of one another and the Bots attacked her mercilessly for it. I guess they don’t like it when others apparently know more than they espeicially some Alaskian Hick. Even funnier was when one of the news stations for jokes went and asked bots about what was actually said—Those that voted for obama were unable to tell the difference between Palin’s fact and SNL comedy skit. Talk about stupid—-the bots should never be calling anyone else stupid considering.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 7, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am

julieterra, a year ago I would have labeled you an Obama blogger, now I just think either uninformed or afraid to admit yu are wrong.
Palin had experience issues but as a VICE and not PRES she would now be cleaning this dirty, filthy corrupt goverment out. I cannot believe we have a Dem congress women praising Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. Feeling tired please dont ask me to research for you again.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Stupid?
Who said the following?
There are fifty…umm…awww….ohhhh….ummmm….there are 57 States in the US.
Hint: He has big ears, and a big mole next to his nose along with a big mouthed racist wife, czar, and reverend.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 7, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Couldn’t tell the “difference between Palin’s fact and SNL comedy skit”
That’s because several of the skits SNL ran they didn’t change a word Palin said. They didn’t have to – they ran her words as she had spoken them. It was so ridiculous it was comedy without being rewritten.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Was Van Jones going to funnel money to the Apollo Alliance (where he was on the board)and who helped write the stimulus bill from which he received 60 billion dollars.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

PotatoeGater22
I challange you to find a single place where she actually said that, this does not include Saturday night live.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

“I swear I have never caught him in a lie.”
Which of these two statements is the truthful one?
“This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people…” – Beck, 30 seconds into his July 27th appearance on Fox and Friends
“I’m not saying that he doesn’t like white people…” – Beck, 2 minutes into his July 27th appearance on Fox and Friends
And these two?
“What does it mean for the rest of the world if we lose our position as the innovator, as having the best healthcare in the world?” – Beck, Fox News channel, 2009
“We seem to be… a society or a system now in healthcare that is just trying to shove the patients out that door as fast as they can. Is that any way to run a system?” – Beck, CNN Headline News, 2008

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

The leftists were going crazy over Cheney and Haliburton. Well what if Cheney was on the board of Haliburton, then had Haliburton write a spending bill, then oversaw defense contracts and funneled the money from said bill to Haliburton. They wouldn’t have to worry about going after him for some CIA BS, they could have arrested him for that.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Here’s clips from three of your posts again, Dan from Alexandria. “YOUR own words,” not mine. (I took some out, restrung them a bit,corrected the spelling of associates but didn’t add any.)
Well Alyson,
you have nothing to worry about.
Funny thing is these things were made up.
it was a conspiracy to get him and his associates but plenty of video clips give Van Jones, CASS SUNSTEIN, MARK LLOYD AND CAROL BROWNER a honeymoon. They are not racist commies, marxists, grandma killers, anarchist or anything like that. fact. I swear.
My advice: Be careful about Beck commie propaganda and lies. Beck has been screaming since day one. Boys bragging.
Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | Sep 7, 2009 1:03:52 AM

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

It is time to go, the more I read the more I lose faith in Democracy. It is the rights you were given that are being used to take them away, At a point one must let you learn from the mistake.
It has always been my thought that unlike Rush, I ope he succeds. My wife is from Yugoslavia, when they chain you up I have another passport to escape with.
Be careful, you may get what you wish for.

Posted by: Dan from Alexandria | September 7, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am

“People didn’t even have to make up lies about her – just showing what she said was enough.”
You mean like Van Jones? The difference is all the supposed ethics violations have returned exactly 0 hits and despite her hyperbolic nuttiness she resonates with moderates. Van Jones? Gone in 60 seconds…as a fringe extremist…and so to speak.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am

“Like the continued attacks on Palin?”
she was one of the primary reasons republicans and independents abandoned McCain to vote for Obama, along with a dreadful 8 year record….
Palin is somewhat unique, even with her inability to articulate any cogent, sensible positions during the campaign, and on occasion, make absolutely no sense at all, add the discovery of many shall we say partial truths and exaggerations about her record in Alaska…… she is still thought of as Thomas Jefferson… very strange imho…..
re: julieterra’s point about showing up at meetings with guns…
that is not normal….and if you think of recent history, the last few people to show up with guns at a political shot, J.F.K, R.F.K, M.L.K.
Ronald Reagan, attempted to shoot G. Ford.
when a person shows up at a political rally on health care, to prove he can bring his gun out in public… there’s something seriously wrong with that person and the reasoning behind their action.
The ‘right’ has become pretty hysterical about Obama’s speech to school kids, ranting about indoctrination..it’s easy to find the info on previous presidents doing these kind of talks with kids, but….
surprising how everyone doesn’t realize all the real indoctrination we’ve all received in our schooling with regard to american history.

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

The real irony here, and the thing that I think helps our democracy is that a nutter like Glen Beck was right. Despite his angry, over-the-top rhetoric, he and his handful of interns (or whomever runs his show) was able to take an obscure blogger’s posting and blow it up to into a national story.
Was this because the right wing fringe has suddenly found a sympathetic ear? No. It’s because truth always wins and always resonates. Despite most people laughing Glen Beck off at first, it was the truth behind his frantic arm waving and thirst for revenge (of the ColorforChange boycott) that won the day.
In all seriousness, Glen Beck should have been neutralized for wackiness. But despite the MSM’s propensity to marginalize him, his antics won out not because he’s Glen Beck but because truth prevails.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 1:53 am 1:53 am

exactly 0 hits
****
remember this?
from ADN:
“A legislative investigation has concluded that Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power in pushing for the firing of an Alaska state trooper who was once married to her sister, or by failing to prevent her husband Todd from doing so.
The report by investigator Steve Branchflower was made public late this afternoon by a bipartisan 12-0 vote of the Legislative Council, which authorized the investigation.
Branchflower’s report contains four findings. The first concludes that Palin violated the state’s executive branch ethics act, which says that “each public officer holds office as a public trust, and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action is a violation of that trust.”
Let me guess. That doesn’t count. Eyeroll. Neither does her extreme rhetoric or her church or her associations.
Actually, I don’t think they are conclusive– I think she’s just unqualified to be a VP– but if she was a Democrat, would you?
Ah, the hypocrisy.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

“The ‘right’ has become pretty hysterical about Obama’s speech to school kids, ranting about indoctrination..it’s easy to find the info on previous presidents doing these kind of talks with kids”
___________________________________
The right is hysterical about almost anything the President does – its a knee-jerk reaction. The go hate spewing if he takes his kids for ice cream.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am

She ‘resonates’ because she resembles and has about as much depth and intelligence as a character on an afternoon soap opera.
No depth, no intelligence – but she seems so FAMILIAR!
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 7, 2009 1:53:09 AM
***
That’s funny, julie. But I’d LOVE to meet a moderate she resonates with. Most moderates I know ran from the Republican ticket after McCain chose her as VP.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am

“Branchflower’s report contains four findings. The first concludes that Palin violated the state’s executive branch ethics act…”
Yup, and what was Palin’s response to that report?
“Well, I’m very very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing, any hint of any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any of that.”
Heh.

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am

“Palin cited the 20 ethics complaints brought against her and her staff when she announced her resignation as governor. Most have been dismissed, although a legislative committee found Palin had abused her power when she dismissed a public safety commissioner who refused to fire her sister’s ex-husband.” – UPI, Sept. 4, 2009.
I even cited a MSM source for you Alyson.
“Most have been dismissed..” LOL. All but one have been dismissed and the one that “stuck” was because Palin fired her sister’s ex-husband who was abusive and even tasered his own kid. If you read the findings of that report, you come to the conclusion any “abuse” was technical at best. And, what I was really getting to was that the net result of that legislative committee resulted in 0 sanctions and 0 political damage.
For the record, I’m no Palin fan or apologist. I personally don’t think she commands the intelligence or character necessary to run the country – of course, neither does Obama in my book. But the media’s determination to destroy this woman has been breathtaking and trumped up ethics violations are a headache every governor has to deal with…of course, we only seem to hear about such “violations” with governors whose names are followed by an R.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

“Most moderates I know ran from the Republican ticket after McCain chose her as VP.”
Actually, Palin revived a McCain campaign that trailed double digits in the polls. Before the economic meltdown in early Sept. McCain actually had regained the lead in the polls, until John tried to suspend his
campaign and then parachute into Washington…from there on McCain was a train wreck and was owned by Obama in the debates.
Palin negated the energy behind Obama’s campaign and the historic mystique attached to it. It was the bank implosions in Sept. and Oct. that changed the race, not Palin.
Palin has no chance in 2012. But if she educates herself over the next four years and doesn’t run headlong into the birthers camp, she may be a force in 2016…depending on the political landscape.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

“All but one have been dismissed…”
Don’t forget about the one where a settlement was negotiated by lawyers. From ABC News:
“Palin already is drafting changes to her 2007 and 2008 tax returns, spokesman Bill McAllister said. This comes after learning that she is responsible for taxes on personal use of a state vehicle and nearly $18,000 she improperly collected as expenses from the state while staying at her Wasilla home about 40 minutes from Anchorage.”

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

I wonder if most truthers would deny that the lunar landings took place too.
Nah..couldn’t be. A Great Society Dem was in the White House.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am

5 billion of the 60 billion in stimulus received by Van Jones was to go to weatherization and the rehiring of laid off construction workers. As of July according to the AP not one dime had been spent. The money has been tied up in the bureaucracy because the non profits haven’t received instructions on who or how to hire. Not one laid off construction worker has been hired, not one window has been installed.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Those hounding Jones are cut of the same cloth as those who hounded Tom Paine. Were Paine, the person who invented the United States of America, alive today he would have vastly more in common with Jones than with Obama.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 7, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Ah, welcome to the party ABC. You are pretty late, however. We are almost ready to go home and plan the next one.
–Conservative America–

Posted by: Rob` | September 7, 2009, 2:26 am 2:26 am

“Palin already is drafting changes to her 2007 and 2008 tax returns, spokesman Bill McAllister said.”
Again, some smoke perhaps, but no real fire. It’s not exactly “Rezko material.”
BTW…
“In October, an investigator hired by the Legislature determined Palin had abused her power in attempting to get her former brother in-law fired as an Alaska State Trooper.
“The Legislature declined to pursue any punishment for the violation.
“A parallel investigation performed by the Personnel Board at the behest of Palin did not find any wrongdoing.”

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Posted by: BH
Glen Beck found some statements by Jones that are offensive to the ‘right’, granted…..
offending the ‘right’ is not a capital crime…but
are they any more offensive than Marsha Blackburn not knocking down ‘death panels’? implying that Obama wants to kill older americans?
or the insanity that was the birth certificate craze..and actually parading Orly Taitz on TV as some kind of ‘informed authority’, and listening to some Republicans in D.C say they don’t know if the elected president of the United States is a real citizen..?
or Ms. Palin’s “the America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” ..
or all the nazi/hitler nonsense….
doesn’t it seem to you a little bit much to compare Obama with a person and events that murdered 10 million and was responsible for around 75 million deaths worldwide?
I won’t even get into the wrong minded comparisons of pre WW2 Germany and America in 2009.
when one has no position or policy, the result is what we see today, imagined hysteria to gain political support, all part of the political game…
the unfortunate thing of course, is that we are not in the ‘game’, until we vote., assuming that we do vote, with a somewhat informed vote….
btw: I don’t believe Palin could ever get elected. Back in the day, Gary Hart dared the media to catch him.. and the media did,
Palin is a similar thing, she placed herself in a ‘holier. more patriotic than thou’ spotlight, and found out that spotlights are very hot.

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

BH, did you cite that before? I responded to the following post:
***
The difference is all the supposed ethics violations have returned exactly 0 hits…
Posted by: BH | Sep 7, 2009 1:45:54 AM
***
Anyway, bygones. Not sure what you’re getting at. My impression while campaigning in the Midwest was that Palin fired up the base that was lukewarm about McCain, but following her interview with Couric, it was much easier to persuade independents and mods to get on board with Obama-Biden. I say that from a campaigning perspective. For a few weeks after she joined the ticket, people were excited but the bloom fell off the rose in the swing states I went to fairly quickly, even before the financial crisis. That may not have been true in Ohio or other places. I don’t know. I just never met a moderate in person that she resonated with, at least after the first couple weeks, when she started talking more. We’ll see what happens in 2016.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

“Those hounding Jones are cut of the same cloth as those who hounded Tom Paine. Were Paine, the person who invented the United States of America, alive today he would have vastly more in common with Jones than with Obama.”
LOL. This is simply too absurd for words…
Paine invented the USA? Dude. Study an 8th grade history book someday.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Posted by: julieterra | Sep 7, 2009 1:31:14 AM
Perhaps you should read about the real effects of just one so called green industry, ethanol. The production of ethanol and the resulting effects on the environment and the economy are not even close to what was claimed. I know, I live in a state where it was pushed heavily.
The following study addresses some of the myths of the so called green economy.
You can also read about the effects that cap and trade will have on our steel industry, one that has been struggling to make a comeback.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

“A parallel investigation performed by the Personnel Board at the behest of Palin did not find any wrongdoing.”
The Personnel Board members are appointed by what authority? The governor’s office, you say? And what authority has the power to fire Personnel Board members? The governor’s office, you say?
Heh.

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

are they any more offensive than. . .
Posted by: yes | Sep 7, 2009 2:28:29 AM
****
Awesome post! Thank you so much because you’re so articulate, and you summed up so much of my frustration with this whole thing. I would say a resounding NO, they are not any more offensive than those things.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Palin’s interview with Couric was on or about 9/24 the same day McCain suspended his campaign. His standing in the polls had already eroded as consumer confidence had plummeted since Labor Day. Palin rallied the base and attracted moderates, but ultimately McCain was still at the top of the ticket and the blame or credit would ultimately rest with him – because voters ultimately vote for the Presidential candidate not VP.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am

“are they any more offensive than..”
No, but they’re not czars in Obama’s Administration with tens of billions at their disposal to distribute to their buddies. What Jones’ believes isn’t criminal, but that doesn’t mean voters do not have a right to be outraged by someone who thumbs his nose at America, makes racist statements and holds crazy, unstable ideas while being entrusted with tens of billions of their tax dollars.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Palin’s interview with Couric was on or about 9/24 the same day McCain suspended his campaign. His standing in the polls had already eroded as consumer confidence had plummeted since Labor Day.
***
Ah. I didn’t remember those being at the same time. Well, THAT was a bad week. LOL.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am

You know what is really ironic is that Jones was a guy who studied hard, by accounts was a bookish kid, made it to Yale, and yet continues to believe that no one else can do the same thing without his help. That’s the problem with liberals they seem to make it fine but never believe that anyone else can do anything without a hand out and that is the ultimate insult to anyone who has ever accomplished anything and it is also what keeps some people enslaved.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am

but that doesn’t mean voters do not have a right to be outraged
Posted by: BH
no argument there, but there is a difference between being ‘outraged’ and,, hysteria and blind rage….
re: czars in Obama’s Administration with tens of billions at their disposal to distribute to their buddies
while I understand your concern here, it’s difficult to have this discussion after 9 months, and after Iraq and the many no-bid contracts and 9 billion in cash that was ‘lost’.. I hope you understand that I draw the comparison just to show not that anything is more right or wrong or equivalent, only to suggest that the end of Obama’s 4 years will really determine the proof of his policy decisions…. we know about the enormous cost of Iraq, both in life and money,
many mistakes were made…

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 3:03 am 3:03 am

That’s the problem with liberals
Posted by: Ferrari5858
nothing like a sweeping generalization….
OK….how about:
- That’s the problem with republicans, they enjoy getting people killed starting wars, never finish the ones they start, so they can make money and pay american workers less while taking away their benefits.
true or false ?

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Awesome post!
Posted by: Alyson
most kind…. nothing like a patriotic pint of Sam Adams and a dram of colonial bourbon to inspire the soul to lofty heights…… ;-)

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Posted by: yes | Sep 7, 2009 3:17:00 AM
Even though that statement is not worth wasting time on, here goes. First are you implying that only Republicans are business owners, that no Democrat has an employee? Second, Iraq invaded Kuwait, we didn’t start the war with Iraq, and flying over every six months and bombing them for eternity was not a solution but trying to change the mindset in the middle east is.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 7, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

Rep. Pence, who describes himself as “Christian, Conservative, Republican, in that order,” said Jones’s “extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate.”
Beyond the obvious here (the hate-filled rhetoric we see every day from racist, right-wing wackos, including those in public office), it is an interesting comment considering that Pence is an extremist right-wing evangelical Christian who has taken thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Blackwater’s owner, Erik Prince.
Prince has also donated to Pence’s Political Action Committee “Principles Exalt a Nation.” In December 2007, three months after Blackwater operatives gunned down 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad’s Nisour Square, Pence and his Republican Study Committee, which serves “the purpose of advancing a conservative social and economic agenda in the House of Representatives,” organized a gathering to welcome Prince to Washington. “Not only has Mr. Prince personally been targeted by partisan warfare repeatedly over the past months, but the use of contracting throughout the government has been under attack by this Congress,” Pence’s committee’s statement said. Should Pence resign for cavorting with and accepting campaign cash from a man who allegedly “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe,” in the words of a former employee?

Posted by: 007 | September 7, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

“re: czars in Obama’s Administration with tens of billions at their disposal to distribute to their buddies
while I understand your concern here, it’s difficult to have this discussion after 9 months, and after Iraq and the many no-bid contracts and 9 billion in cash that was ‘lost’..
____________________________________
Bingo, another direct hit.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

“so I think your bingo is a little premature.”
_____________________________________
Not at all. The Bush administration really did ‘misplace’ $9 Billion in Iraq. It isn’t just the pretend look into the future you’re taking, it really happened – the Republicans have really led the way on this.
Seems to me Rumsfeld had also just ‘misplaced’ several Billion in the Defense department when 9/11 hit.
The Republicans are always the pot calling the kettle black, LOUDLY and with great VEHEMENCE, but they’re too egotistical to even see it. Hypocrites.
We haven’t forgotten.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 4:11 am 4:11 am

Monday, January 31, 2005
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Nearly $9 billion of money spent on Iraqi reconstruction is unaccounted for and missing.
______________________________________
‘Lost’ on the Republican watch.
Didn’t VP Cheney work as a top level executive for Halliburton just before sliding into the Vice Presidency?

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 4:29 am 4:29 am

“this is gonna be too much fun watching the frantic lefties”
_________________________________
Lefties?
There are no ‘lefties’ in Amerca. There are only extremist Republican right wingers . . . and everybody else.

Posted by: julieterra | September 7, 2009, 5:06 am 5:06 am

Sadly I had to get this news weeks ago from Fox News . CBS, NBC, ABC CNN and most newspapers are AWOL in reporting negative news about the Obama administration. I continue to get my news from other sources such as Drudge Report, Newmax, Fox, and Washington Times not because I want to but because I will not get the whole breaking story in a timely manner.

Posted by: jaabqn79 | September 7, 2009, 5:16 am 5:16 am

THE BIGGER THE GOVERNMENT GROWS – THE SMALLER THE INDIVIDUAL BECOMES. SPOT ON AND HISTORICALLY ACCURATE. A CONCEPT THAT LIBS CANNOT COMPREHEND.

Posted by: Manitu | September 7, 2009, 5:51 am 5:51 am

A ‘green’ Czar?

Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Under fire, Obama fires! Unbelievable BS!

Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

A green Czar is stupid.
_______________________
No, a green Czar is just seasick.

Posted by: Chuck Ling | September 7, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

a White House official conceded Sunday that Jones’ past statements weren’t as thoroughly scrubbed due to his relatively low rank. >>>> LOW Rank in charge of 60 BILLION Dollars? That is what the White House Feels is CHUMP CHANGE? OMG what kind of morons did we send to Washington.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 7, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Julie; Why a ‘green’ Czar?

Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

And all the left can do is put its hands in its pockets and try to bring up the past. The present hurts too much to comment on. Obama HIGH unemployment HUGE spending unprecedented deficit wants to Push Cap and Trade ANOTHER job killer and tax increases to kill more jobs. What kind of morons are in the White House. Harvard and Yale need to be turned into a Wal Marts for turning out these failures.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | September 7, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am

“I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”
Jones and other young activists in 1994 formed a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM, rooted in Marxism and Leninsm.
…Hats off to ABC News for telling the WHOLE story, and quoting this man’s own words, as opposed to other obviously biased news outlets. Not only is there a problem with communists in the WH, but the whole thing with czars does not pass Constitutional muster.

Posted by: RightWingNut | September 7, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

And Obama likes this guy? Strange stuff goings on!

Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

the whole thing with czars does not pass Constitutional muster.
_____________________________
Pardon me, but why not pass the Grey Poupon instead.

Posted by: Chuck Ling | September 7, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Andrew Breitbart sums it up nicely:
“For most people in this country, the resignation was the first they had heard of Van Jones.
For this sin of journalistic omission, there’s institutional media blame.
Bias is too tame a word for the utter shamelessness on display:
Only Republican scandals – real and imagined – matter.”

Posted by: OMC | September 7, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Julie; Don’t give up! It’ll turn around.

Posted by: LongT | September 7, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

“There are no ‘lefties’ in Amerca. There are only extremist Republican right wingers . . . and everybody else.”
LOL! Don’t get over to Democratic Underground, Huffington Post, or Daily Kos much, do you?

Posted by: Stacey | September 7, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

As a life-long (now former) Democrat, it took me way too long to figure out that the present MSM is not the one I had always relied on for getting my daily influx of news. Like the ‘old Democratic Party’ of my Dad’s generation, the MSM has lost its way in the political jungle of today. Five years ago, I wouldn’t have been caught dead with Fox News on in my home, now I watch it 24/7 because they are the only ones with the professionalism to actually bring the whole news to America, not some Obama-biased form of it. And while I’m glad Jake had the good sense to report on Van Jones, finally – I blame him and all reporters for not standing up to this administration much earlier so the American people could have had the whole truth on Obama, before they placed their votes on election day. If America doesn’t rebound from this attack on our independence, I blame the afore-mentioned for their cowardice.

Posted by: Elaina | September 7, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

“There are no ‘lefties’ in Amerca. There are only extremist Republican right wingers . . . and everybody else.”
Oh, please. A truther lecturing all of us about the “myth” of left-wing extremism.
It’s no wonder the nutter left doesn’t understand its opposition.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

It is sad it is taking so long for many in this country to realize that Obama is just a slicker version of Van Jones and has surrounded himself with the same crowd and holds many of the same views.
These are not good people, forget about party affiliation & recognize it for what it is.

Posted by: Adam Smith | September 7, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

“Our question is, will the green wave lift all boats? That’s the moral challenge to the people who are the architects of this new, ecologically sound economy. Will we have eco-equity, or will we have eco-apartheid? Right now we have eco-apartheid.” – Van Jones, 2005.
Yup, no racism here. LOL.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Yup, no racism here. LOL.
Posted by: BH | Sep 7, 2009 10:32:05 AM
No racism, particularly if you take the time to put the entire quote in full context.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

More Van Jones gems:
“I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’”
“I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.”
“I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, [1995 - I believe] and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

“No racism, particularly if you take the time to put the entire quote in full context.”
Alyson, you’re actually going to tell me that “eco-apartheid” is intellectually viable and not racially charged when retrofitted with all his other racist comments?
Stop drinking the Kool Aid.
But go ahead, post the full quote. It doesn’t change anything..it’s still racist.

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

“There’s a tradition of very nasty polemics on the left. I’ve seen it split coalitions, movements, parties. This is my concern: it’s easy to start a fight, it’s hard to finish a fight.” – Van Jones
Speaking truth to power!

Posted by: BH | September 7, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Open question: How many green jobs did Van Jones create?
Follow up- where has Jones shown he can compete with conventional energy sources?
LOL

Posted by: drjohn | September 7, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

“A best-selling author who has been heralded as an innovative thinker in the “green jobs” movement, Jones had come under fire from conservative media and lawmakers for past statements for which he apologized Thursday.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why didn’t he come under fire from the MSM, your network included? Do you all think his comments and views are A-OK? This is exactly why the MSM is going down the tubes. It’s shameful.

Posted by: jennifert7 | September 7, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

And one more- how many people has Van Jones lifted out of poverty?
LMAO

Posted by: drjohn | September 7, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Pew Research reportes that Obama is rapidly losing white voters.
Since April Obama’s approval among white Democrats has dropped 11 pts.
9 pts. among white Independents
12 pts among white women
But Charlie Rangel, BO supporters and some Democrats are stupid enough to blame Obama’s problems on white people.
And Obama appoints Van Jones who clearly is a race-baiter.
What a clueless bunch in the WH.

Posted by: jacj | September 7, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

I love Howard Dean’s defense of Van Jones.
Jones is a brilliant Yale graduate that was tricked into signing the 9/11 petition. A clipboard was shoved into his face and he signed it. Brilliant!
I guess Dean is working on his credibility for 2012.

Posted by: riley | September 7, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

retrofitted
***
Retrofitted being the key word. At least your transparent about your methods. Sigh.

Posted by: Alyson | September 7, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Forget about Van Jones and think about what all of this says about Obama.
There was no need to vet Jones because Obama wanted him because of his radical ideas.
And like everything else Obama tries to pull off that is out of the mainstream–Obama arrogantly thinks he can get away with it.
Must be frustrating for BO–all these roadblocks from Americans trying to save their country from radicals.

Posted by: max | September 7, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Obama loses all around.
He didn’t have the guts to defend Jones publically–angering the progressives.
He didn’t have the guts to criticize Jones for all the offensive racial comments–feeds the idea that Obama is himself a radical.
More proof that Obama simply doesn’t have the backbone to take a stand either way and cannot be trusted.

Posted by: larry | September 7, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

The big losers in the Van Jones story?
Van Jones
Obama/White House
MSM
The MSM does not have our backs.
But they sure are looking out for Obama.
And he treats them like doormats.
Good riddance MSM

Posted by: larry | September 7, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

“Five years ago, I wouldn’t have been caught dead with Fox News on in my home, now I watch it 24/7 because they are the only ones with the professionalism to actually bring the whole news to America, not some Obama-biased form of it.”
Then you probably heard these “Fair and Balanced” comments that aired recently on Fox:
•Just when you think this administration can’t get any more surreal and Orwellian, here they come to indoctrinate our kids.
•They do this type of thing in North Korea and the former Soviet Union … very cultish.
•The left has always used kids in public schools as guinea pigs and as junior lobbyists for their social liberal agenda.
•Gee, who is having indoctrination next week? Oh, yeah, that’s right, the president…
•I think the President IS Jeremiah Wright.
•Democrats and Progressives… have their boot heels on the necks of poor, black, and Hispanic children everywhere in America… Now they’re attacking old people. They want old people to die sooner.
•The People’s Republic of Pelosi will never go along with it.
And you probably saw this banner across the bottom of the screen: “Intentinal [sic] death sentence? Pastor’s fears over health care reform.”

Posted by: Jess Sayen | September 7, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Isn’t it sad and infuriating that defenders of Jones are starting to play the race card?
Completely ignoring the things Jones said about white kids and the whole white race.
This tactic has lost it’s punch and is already backfiring.
Obama is quickly losing white voters that initially gave him a chance.

Posted by: kyle | September 7, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

The MSM didn’t even bother to vet Obama.
Why would they bother with Van Jones?
What a sorry excuse for journalism.
They don’t deserve to be called news outlets.

Posted by: bailey | September 7, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

“Then you probably heard these “Fair and Balanced” comments that aired recently on Fox:”
You make the typical argument based on a fallacy- the conflation of the Fox News Channel with Fox News.
O’Reilly is not Fox News. Nor is Hannity.
The MSM is dying- and at their owns hands.

Posted by: drjohn | September 7, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Even though that statement is not worth wasting time on
Posted by: Ferrari5858
you now understand why ‘sweeping generalizations’ about either side don’t add anything to the discussion

Posted by: yes | September 7, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

“You make the typical argument based on a fallacy- the conflation of the Fox News Channel with Fox News.”
Elaina said she watches Fox News 24/7. So is there another Fox News channel that airs nothing but news 24/7 without O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck, etc.?

Posted by: Jess Sayen | September 7, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I don’t feel Van Jones was given the chance to change anything he was to busy being under attack.I feel we have lost a good man for the job just because he didn’t want to waste the presidents time trying to defend him as he was aware that the president had to many other things to focuse on besides him.I just hate we didn’t give him the chance he deserved to show the people what he could have done.At some point we will regret not have given him the chance to show us what he was capable of doing.God Bless America as we are going to need it.

Posted by: MARIE | September 7, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Obama is quickly losing white voters that initially gave him a chance.
Posted by: kyle
that was so considerate of those of those ‘white’ voters to give Obama a ‘chance’….

Posted by: + or - | September 7, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

white

Posted by: Common Sense | September 7, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

black

Posted by: Common Sense | September 7, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Just goes to show that the people that have no lives watch Faux news daily and nightly. The rest of the world lives on as their viewers are told what to think. Faux news — it’s the new Jerry!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 7, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Land of the free??? If it is a free country then you are free to be a communist. Ann Coulter has said that.

Posted by: paul | September 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

All the people who criticized Van Jones have done or said things much worse.
ABC News is starting to sound more and more like Fox every day. The “controversy” about Van Jones is not that big a deal. UBER-HYPOCRITE Glenn Beck has said much worse, AND said it on tv, AND never apologized, AND all conservatives continue to back him up.
The truth is that the major story this year is that American conservatives have started a political civil war against the Dems, using lies, fear and hate. And the major networks, ABC included, won’t say anything about it. They won’t point it out. They won’t give it a name. Is this journalism? Or is ABC just broadcasting the conservatives’ talking points?

Posted by: paul | September 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

re: Glen Beck
who can forget the memorable portrayal of the poisoning of Nancy Pelosi at a ‘cocktail’ party on his show, … it wasn’t an oscar worthy performance, but it showed a definate flash of the ordinary and paranoid.

Posted by: TJ | September 7, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

To those who claim Beck has done worse and not apologized: Glenn Beck is not working for the
White house, he is in the private sector. Nor is Glenn Beck responsible for directing $30 billion dollars of taxpayer’s dollars.

Posted by: Tere | September 7, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

he is in the private sector.
Posted by: Tere
broadcasting lies to millions…….

Posted by: antipasto | September 7, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Van Jones was arrested for inciting a riot after Rodney King…he proudly describes the looting and destruction of Asian businesses of that terrible day..and night. He was/is proud of how he was able to work thugs into a frenzy of looting, burning and smashing private property. He like so many of BOs buddies, is a racist thug.

Posted by: mjishernameo | September 7, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Van Jones is the tip of the iceberg.
There’s over 30 “czars” with supernumerary powers no one knows what they are except the White House.
The *compensation czar* says he can retroactively “claw back” salaries and bonuses from private workers in private businesses and industries from years ago “under the law”? We don’t normally have laws that apply to the past.
What law are these? Administrative law comes from exec. edicts (emergencies), case law (court rulings), and statutory law (legislation). What laws are czars functioning under?
What law gave the former “green czar” the law to mandate changes in energy development and use in regards to employment?
Our Constitution LIMITS government’s intrusion in citizens’ lives. Czars have no such limitations.
Bork’em. Call Congress relentlessly–Nobama. 202-244/255-3121.

Posted by: Renny | September 7, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Glenn Beck said the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, “has proposed forcing abortions and putting sterilants in the drinking water to control population.”
So when are you Constitutional Watchdogs gonna sic ‘im?

Posted by: WWW | September 7, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

I’m noticing a lot of angry dems on here. Angry their guy got caught yet again doing something something unethical. Seems to be a pattern.

Posted by: rose | September 7, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Is this an attempt at unbiased journalism? If so, it falls short. Why not mention the other comments this man uttered? Poor blacks being poisoned,by whites, hmm, it is in the past, he is a changed man, since Feb of this year? Go ahead , Google this guy,,,,
How can we trust an administration that is this inept to take care of the things that really count? It is really scarey,,,They break their own rules, change their own rules according to their desires,throw away most of our Constitution and are working on our Bill of Rights. What is next? hmm,,,the media? The media better start doing their job or they will lose in the end too. Investigate, ask questions, demand answers, you are supposed to be the watchdogs,,,Don’t be afraid to tell the whole truth,good and bad, as long as you let them know you are watching them.

Posted by: Cheryl | September 7, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

The real story?
The shameful failure of the MSM to do its job in reporting on the Obama administration.

Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | September 7, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Funny how the racist White House is now dealing with a double edge sword. CNN, CBS, ABC, and others are saying the White House is under attack and the American public is paying attention. CNN Alex Berker said the hiring will drop the president approval ratings even more than the 27 point slide since May.

Posted by: Arrow | September 7, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

“CNN Alex Berker said the hiring will drop the president approval ratings even more than the 27 point slide since May.”
27 point slide since May? What poll is that? Even Rasmussen has him down by only 10% during that period.

Posted by: Numeros | September 7, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Presidents tend to appoint people of like mind. 1 Communist down, hundreds to go.

Posted by: Truth | September 7, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME – - – What would John Charles Daly say if he knew that ABC ignored such an important story as this Van Jones fiasco or more importantly the obvious lack of vetting by the Obama White House!!

Posted by: Ken | September 7, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

There’s no excuse for this. And whoever argues otherwise is succumbing to the socialist agenda of the current white house. Obama refused to wear the American flag pin on his suit, until a disabled veteran gave him one before a speech, so he felt obliged to wear it. Textbook do-good’ers are all suckered….

Posted by: John Doe | September 7, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

ANOTHER LOSER GONE – LEGIONS MORE TO GO. WHAT THE HELL DOES A CZAR DO IN OUR GOVERNMENT? WHAT A BUNCH OF BULL!!!

Posted by: Manitu | September 8, 2009, 6:04 am 6:04 am

President Obama’s vetting of people in his administration continues to be a problem. What makes it even worse is that these peoples past can easily be found out in today’s information age.
One need only do a search on Van Jones and you will find more than enough fodder in which to blemish the president’s appointment to this position. Cronyism has been a hallmark of Chicago politics and the president coming from that environment continues that, by appointing people without first learning about past associations.
The president is fast becoming his own worst enemy.

Posted by: indymind | September 8, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

“…by appointing people without first learning about past associations.”
You honestly believe that President Obama wasn’t aware of the past associations? What makes you think these appointments weren’t made BECAUSE of the past associations!

Posted by: James Danley | September 8, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

BY HIS OWN WORDS VAN JONES IS A HATER. DO WE REALLY NEED MORE HATERS IN THIS ADMINISTRATION. HE WANTS TO DESTROY THE U.S. AS WE KNOW IT. JUST LIKE OBAMA.

Posted by: J.Cooper | September 8, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Jake, You forgot to mention that he was a self confessed COMMUNIST! Is this a minor detail you just overlooked?? How about researching the other CZARS.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 8, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

It took you a while to report on this.
Where were you weeks ago when Van Jones was appointed? His credentials and attitudes were known back then.
Do you actually do any journalism at ABC?

Posted by: Mark | September 8, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

And another one bites the dust.

Posted by: Bridget | September 9, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I am amazed that abc finally came out with this at all. Where were you when Beck broke the story? I googles Jones and learned in 3 minutes what he was “about”. Is the media involved in covering up things we as citizens have a right to know. Shame on you ABC!

Posted by: Renee | September 11, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

If he actually called for a re-investigating of 9-11, then he IS on the people’s side…

Posted by: Anthony Wrifford | October 4, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.