By Jaketapper

Sep 5, 2009 2:52pm

White House Discloses 10 More Ethics Waivers for Administration Officials

Calling President Obama's Executive Order on Ethics for Executive Branch personnel "the strongest ethics standards in U.S. government history," White House counsel Norm Eisen on Friday announced 10 more waivers for Obama administration officials.

The waivers will allow the officials to participate with persons with whom and entities with which "the appointees formerly had a professional relationship," Eisen wrote, "because there was a compelling public interest in allowing it."

The waivers are for:

* NASA administrator Charles Bolden; Bolden served as a consultant to the science, engineering, and technology corporation SAIC, which has billions in government contracts, and on the board of directors of aerospace and defense giant GenCorp.

The President's ethics rules would otherwise prohibit Bolden from participaring in any matter in which SAIC or GenCorp was a party in any way. That was waived because Bolden's "knowledge of and expertise in current NASA programs are essential to making informed and timely decision-making." He is still not allowed to engage in one-on-one meetings or communications with either organization or to participate in contracting matters involving either company.

* Associate Deputy Secretary of Labor Naomi Walker; Walker was Director of State Government Affairs for the AFL-CIO but has been permitted to communicate with that organization because, the Obama administration decided, prohibiting her from doing so would be detrimental to the Department of Labor and the AFL-CIO's 11 million members. She is still prohibited for the next two years to participate in any  matter having to do with regulations or contracts involving the AFL-CIO.

* Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Ash Carter; Carter was a consultant for defense giant Textron, Inc. focusing on strategy and mergers and acquisitions, trends in military technology and strategy, and how and where military platforms and weapon systems could be deployed effectively. Carter also provided advice on the Sensor Fuzed Weapon, a cluster bomb used by the U.S. Air Force. 

Carter is permitted to have dealings with Textron and any of its divisions and subsidiaries because, in the view of the Obama administration, "national security challenges require your expertise and judgment in making sound acquisition decisions on major defense programs, several of which involve Textron or one of its subsidiaries."

* Attorney General Eric Holder and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer previously worked for the law firm Covington & Burling; Deputy Attorney General David Ogden worked for Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

All three are permitted to cooperate and participate in the investigation into possible prosecutorial misconduct in the case of U.S. v Theodore Stevens even though government lawyers whose conduct is in question are represented by both law firms. The three otherwise remain recused from participation in particular matters with parties in which their previous employers represents a party.

* Deputy Under Secretary for National Protection and Programs Directorate and Director of the National Cybersecurity Center in the Department of Homeland Security Philip Reitinger; Reirliner worked for Microsoft Corportation as Chief Trustworthy Infrastructure Strategy from 2003 until March 2009. Because of his "unique expertise, industry perspective and responsibilities for cyber programs," he is permitted to deal with Microsoft;

* Senior Counselor to the Secretary of Education Margot Rogers and Department of Education Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement James Shelton both worked for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which works on education issues. Both are allowed to have communications with that charitable foundation;

* Peace Corps director Aaron Williams; Williams served on the board of directors of the National Peace Corps Association, and is now prohibited from participating in any matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to NPCA.

Eisen said that waivers have gone to only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments.

Previous waivers went to:

* Former Raytheon lobbyist, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, William Lynn;

* Senior Advisor to the President Valerie Jarrett, the former Vice Chair of the non-profit entity "Chicago 2016," who is leading the White House's efforts to bring the 2016 Olympics to Chicago;

* Director of Policy and Projects in the Office of the First Lady Jocelyn Frye, who is former general counsel at the National Partnership for Women & Families;

* Director of Intergovernmental Affairs in the Executive Office of the President Cecilia Muñoz, former senior vice president for the National Council of La Raza; and

* Associate White House Counsels Jonathan Kravis and Chris Weideman, former employees of Williams & Connolly LLP, which represented the office of former President George W. Bush.

-jpt

User Comments

uh huh…that’s nice Jake. What about the vetting of self proclaimed communist, activist etc. etc. etc. in the white house?
What about the vetting process of these radicals?
Are you going to pursue finding out just how close we may be to having a complete collapse of our nation that is being purposely conducted from within?
Surely Jake, you google to find out “Hot” stories?
Surely you became a reporter because of your passion to inform the public of “truth” events?
It would be a stretch to say, your job with ABC means more to you than your patriotism and integrity.
When you put something up here that will be a SHOUT from the mountain top, profound and a revelation, perhaps then I will come back and applaud you!

Posted by: A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness | September 5, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Posted by: A-Voice-In-The-Wilderness |
Dude. Lighten up and click one of the little linky things to the left on this page. Mr. Tapper is way ahead of you.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 5, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Many of the [right wing] movement’s leading figures are united by more than political campaigns; they are bound together by a shared sensibility rooted in private trauma. Their lives have been stained by crisis and scandal — depression, mental illness, extra-marital affairs…
-Republican Gommorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party

Posted by: Flash Override | September 5, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

And Nancy Pelosi is going to drain the swamp and get rid of corruption in Washington.
But Charlie Rangel gets to stay.

Posted by: bailey | September 5, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

When you have to make this many exceptions to your own rules, then you should be rethinking those rules. Pres. Obama tried to convince us of his own high ethical standards by writing these strict new rules–that he now has to violate because they’re too restrictive. His lack of experience is showing.

Posted by: Dee2008 | September 5, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

they are bound together by a shared sensibility rooted in private trauma. Their lives have been stained by crisis and scandal — depression, mental illness, extra-marital affairs…
-Republican Gommorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party
Posted by: Flash Override |
Doesn’t exactly rise to the level of just one family in the Democratic party.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 5, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Everybody but his most slack-jawed, brain-dead cheerleaders now realizes what a cynical fraud this guy is.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 5, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

What an absolute joke!

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Ethics? Really?! And what are their plans for the commie/radical/truther, elephant in the room. Maybe just throw the rug in the oval office over him and hope that no one will notice?
The WH needs to work on their timing. All considering, this announcement is pretty hilarious and ill-conceived.

Posted by: jacklyn_in_la | September 5, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

10 More Ethics Waivers ?
Well, the Obama-Nation promised the “Most Ethical Administration” ever … he simply did NOT specify if it would be GOOD or BAD ethics!

Posted by: CLS | September 5, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Good story… kinda. Jake, don’t you think the Marxists in the White House are much MORE important than a few ethics waivers? My God… if you want ethics waivers for a story… Charlie Rangel is a walking, talking ethics waiver! How about Sunstein (the body snatcher)? How about more on Van Jones whom you barely reported on. (Actually you reported on the reports). How about that socialist Mark Lloyd the FCC or Carol Browner.
When you were absent from Twitter I thought you might be working on a REAL story. I’m disappointed you picked waivers over Marxists. ABC still got the muzzle out?

Posted by: TexGEOasas | September 5, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I think it’s time that Obama appoints an “Ethics Waiver Csar”

Posted by: NCPilot09 | September 5, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Advisor to the President, Van Jones is a racist. In his Powershift ’09 Conference speech, he said that “white polluters” were poisoning black communities. He said that the whites should have their power and wealth taken away and given to the
people of color. Is that what Obama meant about redistributing the wealth?

Posted by: Marla Baker | September 5, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The Presidebt is a joke.

Posted by: Plumber | September 5, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Ethic waviers is that Political talk for a license to steal?

Posted by: Marion | September 5, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

An “ethics waiver”. Kind of funny, when you think about it. What does it really mean? Are they getting a “get out of jail free” card?

Posted by: Axey | September 5, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

All these conservative capitalists must be un-American, as they like to call anyone who disagrees with them on anything. When it comes to the Founding Fathers and especially the Consitution, I defy them all to find a mention of capitalism (or socialism for that metter) anywhere in the documents that are the basis for our government. Yet, they keep yammering that we are a capitalist nation.

Posted by: Herb Gray | September 5, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

No big thing; just a case of market place advertising. This tells you that if you want to bribe a Obama official, you know exactly which organization to contact without trying to find out who is on the take.
Additionally, you know that when you visit you inside guy at the White House, your privacy will be maintained because they will keep the fact that you visited (and dropped off cash? dope?) secret.

Posted by: NCBob | September 5, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

When it comes to waivers one thing is sure, conservative presidencies don’t have to give waivers, they automaticall waive each and every person working in the White House. But when Obama tries to follow the law, he is condemned for making public waivers. Oh, I forgot, conservatives don’t believe in laws or the Constitution.

Posted by: Herb Gray | September 5, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

So the law only matters, except when it doesn’t. So “we” would go to jail, while “they” get a “pardon” from the President to engage in unethical and illegal behavior… Man, Obama is looking and acting more and more like the last guy EVERY DAY! I thought people voted down Bush’s 3rd term! Why is Obama adopting it??? How many more policies do so-called Democrats have to let slide, because he’s got a D next to his name? McCain had an R next to his, but Republicans knew he was a Democrat so they stayed home? Will “Democrats” stay home when Jimmy Carter II runs in 2012??? Do you really vote party over your own principle… Put another way, do you insist on “cutting off your nose to spite your face”, or burning down the financial house or “village” of the American people, in order to “save it”? Because so far, that’s all Obama has done…
Leave one war to start another, bankrupt Government programs right when they are needed by the people. And start another one that rations medical care, while obliterating what little financial privacy you have left. How much before YOU have had enough? Because some people are already there, and it’s not even the end of the 1st year yet? How much more damage is acceptable in the next three years… That is a question you must ask yourselves…

Posted by: jafo | September 5, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I love that they call these “ethics waivers.” What a great example of what’s wrong with government.

Posted by: Jason | September 5, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

ABCNews misses the biggest ethics waiver of all: Charlie Rangel, House Ways and Means Chairman, gets to keep his job despite numerous ethics and tax violations!!! But then I can’t see the Edith Bunker of the House doing anything about it either.

Posted by: Bill | September 5, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

The Republicans wouldn’t even think of passing regulations like these – never mind coming even close to hitting waivers having gone to only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments.
Congratulations to the new administration! This is a STRONG step in the right direction.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

This executive decision was a badly thought out move from the beginning. Lobbyists are so ingrained into the political system that it´s impossible
to separate them. There are competent, ethical people who do get involved in lobbying, along with the corrupt ones.

Posted by: BachisBest | September 5, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

“This executive decision was a badly thought out move from the beginning. Lobbyists are so ingrained into the political system that it´s impossible
to separate them. There are competent, ethical people who do get involved in lobbying, along with the corrupt ones.”
______________________________________
This is an excellent executive decision. You forget about the tail end requirements.
No one should be allowed to go from a government position, with the privileged information that entails, directly into lobbying for a company, corporation or group involved in the same area. Not right – and not fair.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

It is interesting that these rules do not mention anything to do with Obama and his less than forthright associations and dubious ethics.

Posted by: Jon | September 5, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

julieterra is trying real hard to make chicken salad out of chicken crap. LOL.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

The Republicans wouldn’t even think of passing regulations like these – never mind coming even close to hitting waivers having gone to only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments.
This is an excellent executive decision. Don’t forget about the tail end requirements.
No one should be allowed to go from a government position, with the privileged information that entails, directly into lobbying for a company, corporation or group involved in the same area. Not right – and not fair.
Congratulations to the new administration! This is a STRONG step in the right direction.
(Just for you LongT – you might actually grasp the topic sometime)

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Bunch of right wing idiots here. No brains whatsoever.

Posted by: Jim Bob | September 5, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I’m waiting for the next executive privledge story to come out.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

It does seem a bit silly to make rules that you don’t intend to follow. If the rules are too strict to allow good people to serve, then they should change the rules, not ignore them.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 5, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

It does seem a bit silly to make rules that you don’t intend to follow. If the rules are too strict to allow good people to serve, then they should change the rules, not ignore them.
______________________________
I hear you, but the thing is over 99% of appointees have been able to meet the criteria they set up without waivers. That sounds like very well-constructed rules to me.

Posted by: Danny | September 5, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

It does seem a bit silly to make rules that you don’t intend to follow. If the rules are too strict to allow good people to serve, then they should change the rules, not ignore them.
Posted by: jock59801 | Sep 5, 2009 5:57:39 PM
***
I agree. Perhaps, it provides transparency when someone doesn’t meet the guidelines??

Posted by: Alyson | September 5, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Yup! At least they’re up front about the hypocrisy. Very admirable.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Ethics are for the little people.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | September 5, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Barack Obama has great ethics.
So what if he makes fun of an elderly Nancy Reagan?
So what if he makes fun of the Special Olympics?
So what if he’s good buddies with Jeremiah Wright, Van Jones and Bill Ayers?
So what if he goes overseas and puts down America?
He can do what he wants, he’s a DEMOCRAT!
He QUADRUPLES the deficit, then blames it on Bush!

Posted by: Father Vallan | September 5, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Julie, So? Is that the best you can come up with? You can do better than that.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Listen, you need to quit complaining. President Obama knows much better what’s good for the public than any of you. He is college educated. Most of you live in trailer parks and eat at Burger King, while he dines on fine cuisine.
Just stop griping. He knows what’s good for America better than any of us ever could, and now that we have the criminal Bush administration out of the way, we can roll out an America to be proud of.
If you stand in the way, you will be rolled over, hoever, and, hopefully jailed for obstruction of a New America!
Hail the President! Our Savior!!!!

Posted by: Mark | September 5, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

99% of appointees have been able to meet the criteria they set up without waivers.
Posted by: Danny | Sep 5, 2009 6:08:24 PM
***
That’s a good point. Julieterra said something like only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments needed waivers. (And,btw, Jake, I don’t like your name in the header for these things. For once, I agree with the loyal opposition when they point out that “ethics waivers” sounds . .. odd. Please tell me that’s not what the WH calls them! :>)

Posted by: Alyson | September 5, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

“Hail the President! Our Savior!!!!” Does anyone else find this disturbing?

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Does anyone else find this disturbing?
Posted by: LongT | Sep 5, 2009 6:42:34 PM
I believe it’s a poorly done parody– and yes poorly done parodies disturb me.

Posted by: Alyson | September 5, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Alyson, Although we are on different sides of the fence on some issues, I acknowledge your objectivity.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

You people have NO CLUE!! Our great President is bringing a New World Order to this country. No longer will we isolate people. We will open the borders. We will tell everyone that you can come to this country and do what you will. We will take the money from the rich who horde ita and keep it away from the people. The poeple should have the money that the rich people take from all the poor.
Our President will balance the scales. He can be thought of as a god of sorts, because he knows he can do this! No one will oppose our gentle and very wise leader.
There are MANY people like me who believe. We will report you that don’t believe and that obstruct this new order. This is a new millennium. The old ways of thinking are OVER! You CANNOT continue to get rich while the poor suffer. There will be a redistribution of wealth, by force if necessary, just wait and see. I will be there laughing the whole way.
It’s happening day by day. First Health Care. Next we will use technology to track people. It’s truly a glorious time to be alive!!!!!

Posted by: Mark | September 5, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

He made the “rules” to fool the masses. He’s no more ethical than any other politician.
When is that going to sink in? Never, as long as the Faithful can cling to the dogma that only Republicans are unethical.
Politicians are politicians. And yes, ethics, like taxes, are for the little people.

Posted by: Eyes Open | September 5, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Mark. Wow! You are a very disturbed individual unless you are just trying to be factitious. Hopefully it’s the later. Are you aware of what you are saying? Obama a ‘god’? New order? Tracking and reporting people? Redistributing wealth, by force if necessary? I can hardly believe you’re serious.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Mark, Oh, I get it. It’s a parody. Either way, it’s not appropriate.

Posted by: LongT | September 5, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Say, who gave President Obama a waiver so he could remain in contact with all his disreputable associates? Maybe he doesn’t have one.

Posted by: Ben | September 5, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

This is WRONG!

Posted by: WISDOM | September 5, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Mark, Oh, I get it. It’s a parody. Either way, it’s not appropriate.
Posted by: LongT | Sep 5, 2009 7:08:35 PM
***
One would hope no one has drunk THAT much kool aid– and one would have to wonder what exactly was in that kool-aid. Yowza.
It’s over the top (but by acknowledging that I’m likely egging him on. He reminds me of LaVey, who did an over the top parody in the other direction a couple weeks ago. google LaVey to get the meaning of that one.)

Posted by: Alyson | September 5, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

This Funny….what a lair BO is…. same ole crap…. BO is NO different than any other Politician… it’s just that the media allows him to lie about it

Posted by: I Lie Like A Dog | September 5, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I dont care what the conservitives think about this…. the lefties love my lies….. pass the cool aid please

Posted by: BOCoolAidForEverone | September 5, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Ethics? In THIS administration? Bwahahahahaha!
BO might as well give waivers to everyone. What a joke he and his administration are!

Posted by: JustMe | September 5, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Apparently BO’s Executive Orders, that the Lefties and the Media made such a BIG DEAL about,…. aren’t worth the paper they’re written on….

Posted by: I Lie Like A Dog | September 5, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I made the Executive Game RULES… and I will decide when they apply to me….. so shut up and drink your cool aid

Posted by: BOReallyLovesMe | September 5, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

At least the Obama administration knows what ethics are, the Bush people sure didn’t and neo-cons in general think your talking about a city in England.

Posted by: JR | September 5, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

The President put in strict new ethical guidelines regarding lobbyists moving back and forth between government and corporations or organisations that lobby those same areas of government.
Lobbyists have been identified as one of the major drains on government coffers as they wangle and pry money out of the government for their own interests – using inside information gleaned by working in government.
Only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments required waivers. Thats 1% of the appointments.
In other words, 99% met the new ethical guidelines. And the 1% who didn’t are clearly identified above with their former and current roles. Exceptional transparency.
This is a truly amazing accomplishment in restricting lobbyists in Washington.
One would not expect the CHRONICALLY anti-Obama naysayers to appreciate this, but many people will.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

At least the Obama administration knows what ethics are, the Bush people sure didn’t and neo-cons in general think your talking about a city in England.
Posted by: JR | Sep 5, 2009 8:18:39 PM
****
Love it. On that note, I can leave for the long weekend. Have a good holiday everyone:>)

Posted by: Alyson | September 5, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Care Jake, your just giving fuel to the rightwing insaners or as I like to call them, the neo-freaks.

Posted by: BC | September 5, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

So sounds like for some folks having to use conflict of interest waivers for less than 1% of appointees is an especially poor record?
It’d be interesting to hear that side of the argument from someone who’s interested in more than expressing generic contempt toward Obama and creating juvenile caricatures of him and his supporters.
Ironically, folks doing that seem to have waived any personal responsibility for courtesy, respect, and thoughtful discussion. And oddly enough, that seems to be true of much more than 1% of the right wing posters here.

Posted by: Danny | September 5, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

What this does show is that for anyone to pull together a cabinet and a government they have to bring in people who have EXPERIENCE, and to have EXPERIENCE, you probably had to have worked in the private sector. This happens regardless of whether you are a Republican or a Democrat. The hypocrisy is that Obama campaigned about the purity of his future administration while chastising the Bush administration and now realizes, but will not admit it, that Bush did what he had to do to get EXPERIENCE in his people as well.

Posted by: jim 234 | September 5, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Speaking of ethics…
Exactly how does Van Jones fit into Obama’s plans for a postracial
America?
I don’t know how anyone can honestly say they trust Obama anymore.
He’s lied to all of us.
Watch what he does because you can’t believe what he says.

Posted by: riley | September 5, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

“He’s lied to all of us.
Watch what he does because you can’t believe what he says.”
________________________________
You were lied to by the last administration about a war that ended up killing tens of thousands of people, and maiming and wounding tens of thousand more.
Do you hear that? Tens of thousands of ‘other’ people killed. Thousands more lost eyes, arms, legs and so on . . .
It’s a war that has killed thousands of Americans, maybe even some in your own family – and again maimed many, many thousands more . . .
That same administration left government with the economy in shreds.
Try to keep your priorities in order.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I think it would be better to just impeach Obama now before he completely destroys this country. I cannot believe how far and how fast he has fallen from grace. What a total disappointment.

Posted by: Jeff | September 5, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Well, so much for oil and haliburton connections.

Posted by: Reflect09 | September 5, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

This man has been a tragic disappointment to a once-hopeful nation. Very sad.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 5, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“This man has been a tragic disappointment to a once-hopeful nation. Very sad.” Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Sep 5, 2009 8:59:54 PM
_______________________________
Despite continued attacks from Republicans in August over his health care plans, President Obama’s overall approval rating has only dipped a couple percentage points. In the latest CBS News poll released Tuesday night, the president’s overall approval rating is 56 percent, which is down two points from the last poll taken at the end of July.
So you’re way off base Hyena – even though you’re in here every day to badmouth the President – you don’t seem to learn anything.
Five new, national polls have 52% to 56% of Americans approving of the job Obama is doing.
Now George Bush who left office with a 30% approval rating – that’s a different story. He really was as you put it a “tragic disappointment to a once-hopeful nation. Very sad.”

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Of course he handed out waivers, he has the most corrupt racist anti-american administration in history. One term and out bye bye barry

Posted by: john | September 5, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

“Calling President Obama’s Executive Order on Ethics for Executive Branch personnel “the strongest ethics standards in U.S. government history,” White House counsel Norm Eisen on Friday announced 10 more waivers for Obama administration officials.”
When this President and his administration come out and spew a bunch of baloney and you you libs and the msm just nod in agreement it leads to me to ask all of you one question. Do you all spend much time on planet earth?

Posted by: HobokenJohn | September 5, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“Of course he handed out waivers, he has the most corrupt racist anti-american administration in history.”
__________________________________
This is exactly the kind of hateful, extremist garbage that is driving people further and further away from the remnants of the Republican party.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

“Of course he handed out waivers, he has the most corrupt racist anti-american administration in history.”
__________________________________
This is exactly the kind of hateful, extremist garbage that is driving people further and further away from the remnants of the Republican party.
Posted by: julieterra
___________________________________
The GOP is having a party??!! Guess
no one is showing up except the radio
gossip hosts who love to kiss
themselves in the mirror before they
go on the air.

Posted by: spacerook1 | September 5, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

The “Why are you complaining now, look what Bush did” mantra is getting pathetic.
The debate now is about Obama and his policies. You can nurse your outrage over Bush all you want but inserting it into a discussion of Obama’s administration is irrelevant and tiresome.

Posted by: MizFW | September 5, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Forget about Bush, Julieterra–he’s no longer president, and nothing tou have to say about hhim can help his hapless successor in any way.
Among likely voters who feel strongly one way or another, only 28% strongly approve of him. Thirty-nine percent strongly disapprove. That is a stunning turnaround in three short months.
Sorry to disappoint you, but there are no crinal charges of any kind involved in the Ashcroft matter. Charlie Rangel and Jack Murtha, however, have clearly committed multiple crimes, but are being protected by the politicized Obama/holder Justice Department.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 5, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

“The “Why are you complaining now, look what Bush did” mantra is getting pathetic.|
____________________________________
Not at all. If you folks are going to attack Obama for instituting guidelines for lobbyists and allowing and making exceptions . .
We can talk about how the Republicans had the highest man in VP Cheney’s office Scooter Libby convicted of CRIMINAL ACTS AS PART OF HIS WORK IN CHENEY’S OFFICE and sentenced to jail – and would be still there except Bush gave him a ‘get out of jail free’ card.
There is a difference between criminal acts being committing crimes in Cheney’s office, and a lobbyist being given an exception to work in an administration.
As much as you fanatics are unable to see the difference . . . it still exist.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Don’t these waivers make some of you regret you bought into all this change crap from Obama.
Come on now admit it, you would love a chance to redo your vote, can’t say some of us on here did not tell you guys it was all talk for votes .

Posted by: SJ | September 5, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Julieterra, you owe it to yourself to study up on how to read polls. The CBS poll to which you refer is a poll of “adults.” The current Democracy Corps poll of “registered voters” has Mr. Obama’s approval at 51%. Rasmussen’s poll of “likely voters” puts him at 49%.
He’s in trouble.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 5, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

“Don’t these waivers make some of you regret you bought into all this change crap from Obama.”
_______________________________________
The Republicans would never have put in ethes new ethical guidelines regarding lobbyists moving back and forth between government and corporations or organisations that lobby those same areas of government. Exceptions were to be allowed in special cases through a waiver.
Only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments involved waivers. Thats 1% of the appointments.
In other words, 99% meet the new ethical guidelines. The 1% who were waived are clearly identified above with their former and current roles. Exceptional transparency.
This is a major accomplishment in restricting lobbyists in Washington.
One would not expect the CHRONICALLY anti-Obama naysayers to appreciate this, but many people will.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

On Ronnie’s shift the media would have gleefully shouted SLEAZE FACTOR, where is the media now?
Is the media solidly in Obama’s corner? You be the judge.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 5, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Since World War 2, the United States has started more wars and attacked more countries than ANY other country in the world. I think we all need to pause a minute and consider if this is the correct path for this country (being so dedicated to being a huge war machine) AND acknowledge that as a result some groups hate us and have a valid case in believing us to be the real Axis of Evil.

Posted by: Rick_VT | September 5, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

“On Ronnie’s shift the media would have gleefully shouted SLEAZE FACTOR, where is the media now?
Is the media solidly in Obama’s corner?”
____________________________________
Ed there’s a big difference between what is happening here, and what happened in the Bush administration for instance.
The Republicans had the highest man in VP Cheney’s office Scooter Libby convicted of CRIMINAL ACTS AS PART OF HIS WORK IN CHENEY’S OFFICE and sentenced to jail – and would be still there except Bush gave him a ‘get out of jail free’ card.
There is a difference between criminal acts being committed in the Vice-President’s office, and a lobbyist being given an exception to work in an administration.
As much as some fanatics are unable to see the difference . . . it still exist.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

From the Washington Post:
“DENVER In 2008, Colorado became a symbol of the changing politics in a region once firmly in Republican hands — and also of the grass-roots power and energy fueling Barack Obama’s candidacy. Today, the state embodies the uneasiness spreading throughout Democratic ranks as Obama struggles with major challenges and the 2010 midterm elections approach.”
The wave is spreading across our great country.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 5, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Today, Gallup offers evidence that Obama’s approval number is moving up. Obama’s approval rating in Gallup’s daily tracking poll has now gone up four straight days, and this afternoon stands at 55%.
At the same time, the percentage of those polled who don’t approve of the job Obama is doing has gone down three straight days and stands at 38%.
The fact is that the crazy right wing fringe, making all the noise about Obama’s birth certificate, all the noise about Obama speaking to the nation’s schools, all the noise about socialism and fascism, are indeed a minority. While the sheer volume of noise may lead one to think otherwise, they are a minority.
It’s essential not to confuse the rantings and over dramatic hysterics of the right wing fringe with popular opinion. The truth is the silent majority of Americans, the good and noble people of this fine country, support President Obama.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

“Hail the President! Our Savior!!!!” Does anyone else find this disturbing?

I find having a Communist president quite disturbing.

Posted by: tanarg | September 5, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Obama is really not a disappointment for millions of Americans — they knew all along he was a Communist.

Posted by: tanarg | September 5, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

“I find having a Communist president quite disturbing.”
__________________________________
This is exactly the kind of right wing extremism that is driving people further away from what remains of the Republican party. The days of the extremists are over – the bulk of America has had it with the nonsense and the hate. They don’t want the right wing media hosts throwing temper tantrums to earn their salary. And they’re tired of their screaming followers.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I guess they call that transparency. Not impressed and supported this administration but now guess I am one of those Americans fed/up with both parties. They are all just career politicians who have lost touch with America. I think that anger will spill out in the next election cycle.

Posted by: Steve | September 5, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Steve . . . don’t take your eye off the ball . ..
The Republicans would never have put in these new ethical guidelines regarding lobbyists moving back and forth between government and corporations or organisations that lobby those same areas of government. Exceptions were to be allowed in special cases through a waiver.
Only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments involved waivers. Thats 1% of the appointments.
In other words, 99% meet the new ethical guidelines. The 1% who were waived are clearly identified above with their former and current roles. Exceptional transparency.
This is a major accomplishment in restricting lobbyists in Washington.

Posted by: julieterra | September 5, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Should we file this under HOPE…or CHANGE?

Posted by: Jenn | September 5, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

“This is exactly the kind of right wing extremism that is driving people further away from what remains of the Republican party.”
Why do you care? You hate Republicans. The incredible leadership of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have guaranteed Democratic Party dominance for decades, right? Democrats have super majorities in both chambers. They can ram through whatever they want without regard to those pesky right-wing extremists. Relax. Try to act like you won.

Posted by: Jenn | September 6, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

“This is exactly the kind of right wing extremism that is driving people further away from what remains of the Republican party.”
Why do you care?
_________________________________
I care because so much of the far right wing spew is hateful, divisive paranoia and extremism. There is a lot of smear and fear hate mongering.
And the childish screaming, whining and tantrums throw by the right wing media ‘stars’ is an appalling lesson for young Americans.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

“I care because so much of the far right wing spew is hateful, divisive paranoia and extremism. There is a lot of smear and fear hate mongering.”
But they’re out of power forever, so who cares? Democrats don’t need them to create the utopia you voted for. They have super majorities. Enjoy!

Posted by: Jenn | September 6, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

” Enjoy!”
___________________________________
Thanks!

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

But I will not enjoy that so much of the far right wing spew is hateful, divisive paranoia and extremism. Nor that there is so much smear and fear hate mongering.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

This guy Obama is really getting scary. Can we believe ANY of his promises? How many “waivers” need to be issued because he must go to possibly ethically compromised people for positions because his first picks, like Van Jones, have so many radical ideas that even Obama can’t stick with them. Not only does he sell out his mentors, friends, and family so quickly if there is any impact to himself- which is disturbing enough- but then has to “waiver” most other he finds. Scary guy.

Posted by: Ed | September 6, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

You are of great patience.
Posted by: julieterra | Sep 6, 2009 12:40:22 AM
***
And you totally rock it, julieterra. Have a great holiday weekend :>)

Posted by: Alyson | September 6, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

“then has to “waiver” most other he finds”
________________________________________
These guidelines are in regard to lobbyists moving back and forth between government and corporations or organisations that lobby those same areas of government. Exceptions were to be allowed in special cases through a waiver.
Only 16 out of approximately 1,890 appointments were deemed exceptions and involved waivers. Thats 1% of the appointments.
In other words, 99% fell within the guidelines. The 1% who were waived are clearly identified above with their former and current roles.
To say he has to waiver most of the others is absurdly wrong.

Posted by: julieterra | September 6, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Tanarg writes: “Obama is really not a disappointment for millions of Americans — they knew all along he was a Communist.”
———————————-
Tanarg–If you stick to making factual arguments you can probably do a lot more good for yourself and the rest of us than if you make things up.

Posted by: Danny | September 6, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Ed writes: “Can we believe ANY of his promises?”
———————————–
According to the Obameter at Politifact, Obama has kept 41 of his campaign promises so far, compromised on 11, and broken 7.
That would seem to indicate to me that so far we can believe the great majority of his promises.

Posted by: Danny | September 6, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

I cannot believe any of you people are seriously arguing whether the Democrats or Republicans are better/worse. They are playing you all like fools. They have joint custody of our entire govt, from stem to stern. Every election is just as rigged as the old Soviet elections, except they are smart enough to have labeled half “Democrats” and half “Republicans” to give the proletariat illusory differences to argue over. In truth, there’s no substantive difference, they jointly loot the public coffers while we argue over which group we’d rather be victimized by. All this used to bother me, but I realize now we deserve it as a penalty for our collective stupidity. People generally get the govt they deserve.

Posted by: Mike | September 6, 2009, 6:04 am 6:04 am

I find it amazing that this country has 100′s of millions of citizens and our government is run by people needing a “waiver” to serve. I suppose once you find a chair at the table – you never have to give it up. Yep, that must be it.

Posted by: Old Republican | September 6, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

At least they’re up front with the hypocisy which I find refreshing for a ‘change’. It’s quite admirable.

Posted by: LongT | September 6, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am

You know a man by his friends – just look at Obama’s friends and associates.
I said long ago, on these very blogs, the very same thing Glenn Beck said about Obama which apparently you didn’t like.
It is what it is.
BTW – I am black.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | September 6, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

What a surprise. Obama hasn’t kept one promise he made during the campaign. His administration is the most unruly bunch of Chicago thugs. It is classless administration
They continue to be an embaressment.

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

What happened to the most transparent administration, no lobbyist, the toughest vetting process? No instead he goes back door and hires Czars that need no vetting and until we do the investigating and vetting on our own and the radicals he tries to back door us with he will continue to try and deceive the American people

Posted by: Karen | September 6, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

It’s difficult to find a campaign promise Obama has reneged upon.
Why would anyone believe anything he has to say?

Posted by: drjohn | September 6, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Danny seems pleased the President has only broken his word 7 times and partially broken his word 11 times. I wonder, how many times does a man have to break his word before you can’t believe anything he says? If one of your employees lied to you 7 times, would you allow him to do it an eighth time?

Posted by: Kelly | September 6, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Obviously ,standards mean nothing to this president.How many cabinet and sub-cabinet appointees have had tax problens?How could a tax cheat be nominated and confirmed for Treasury Secretary?How could he even consider the former senator from So.Dak. for a cabinet post when he owed more than 100 grand in back taxes?Despite his lax standards,he still has not filled many,many mid-level positions essential to running the government.I speak with federal employees every day and the disarray at mid-level departments is astonishing-under the radar screen information that the media refuses to cover,a la Van Jones.Well, what could we expect from a gentleman who tried to get off from paying 11 parking tickets from Cambridge,MA. and lied about it on his Illinois Bar application.

Posted by: Nephron | September 6, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Oh,I’m sorry,I forgot.George Bush made him pick his cabinet and made him stiff the tickets. And yes,Van Jones was vetted by George Bush.And George Bush has been secretly running the Kabul Embassy for the first 20% of the Obama Presidency.

Posted by: Nephron | September 6, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

And so it goes;
exchanging one set of special-interest lobbyists for another set of special-interest lobbyists …
Change to believe in?
Really?

Posted by: CW | September 6, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

I thought Obama was going to rid Washington of special interests. Didn’t he say that in his campaign?

Posted by: grannysunni | September 6, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

The Democrat culture of corruption rolls on unimpeded.

Posted by: N. O'Brain | September 6, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Breaking news……….
This just in:
There has been a czar explosion in Washington.
Van Jones was unavailable for comment.

Posted by: N. O'Brain | September 6, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Bottom rule with Obama: Never believe a promise or word he says.
Where is the outrage from the left regarding all of Obama`s broken promises?

Posted by: Robert L. | September 6, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Does this president even understand the meaning of ethics?
Disgusting.

Posted by: Mineko | September 6, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Are we turning into a third world country? Our leaders are acting like it!

Posted by: waggdogg | September 6, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

2010 : American hope is for Pelosi to take her grandchildren.
2012 : Back to American value from kingdom of Obama.

Posted by: Janet | September 6, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

A standard that is on paper only, and which is not enforced, isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

Posted by: bullmoosegal | September 6, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I love Cuban musica and looking forward to be able to go to Cuba for a vacation, truly. It is a beautiful country with great food, music, and vacation spots. Guess what? I’m not a communist. I don’t believe in censorship like Milwalkie and other cities around the country who are censoring the President’s speech to students in our “public” schools who receive “public” funds and grants from who? The Federal Government that’s who. Let’s just take those federal funds away from those “cult” like school districts who don’t allow President Obama’s speech to be aired in their schools. You school districts will take the monies fast and are “socialistic” in nature but oh my gosh, a black president speak to your “white” children and the conservative have a hissy fit. Again, take away all of their funding for this 2009-10 school year, and let’s see where there will be without federal funds!!! Good luck you cult socialistic school districts throughout America. OMG! Get a life!

Posted by: Gg51 | September 6, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

China censors their television, radio, and media sources before they air. Conservatives censor their material before they allow “their” members to view. Hmmm! Act like a communist, talk like a communist, walk like a communist, hmmm — Conservatives are communists, pure and simple. They like to control others so they can pull the wool over everyone’s eyes like they did for 8 years under Bush.Cheney. Get a life! Don’t become a conservative for they are COMMUNISTS! They don’t want you to Catch Onto Their Tricks of their Trade! Conservatives Censor!

Posted by: Gg51 | September 6, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Obama is all lip service—-a complete fraud, con, and is actively trying to kill the constitution. He needs to be impeached and then jailed for his crimes.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | September 7, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Not surprised here. If anyone followed his campaign during the primaries, you saw this wasn’t a person with integrity.

Posted by: Jenny | September 7, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

so PotatoeGater22 what you are saying is.
Communists = conservatives.
That would mean that Obamas green Czar was a conservative?
OK? That makes perfect sense.
Oh sure conservative communist. That is interesting?

Posted by: David from WI | September 7, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Obama is to be commended for being upfrount with his hypocrisy!

Posted by: LongT | September 8, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

If you have to issue ethics waivers, you don’t have good people in the government.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 8, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The American people waived their ethics when they voted this president into office.
What is the point of having ethics if you waive them? Obama continues to lower his standards and you wonder why his poll numbers are dropping. This president has reneged on more campaign promises than any I have witnessed in 60 years. If you thought the town hall meetings were filled with angry people, wait another year.

Posted by: indymind | September 8, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

How can allowing 14 million illegals to be counted in the 2010 census, and having them represented in the US govt.
with up to 9+ seats. Non citizens represented? How does this make sense?
On top of this Mexico is experiencing a shooting conflict on our boarder, which has claimed over 10,000 deaths. More casualities what we have taken in Afganistan during the same time span.

Posted by: XC | September 8, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.