By Gorman Gorman

Sep 22, 2009 12:13pm

Will Ferrell, Mad Men’s Jon Hamm, Mock Insurance Execs, Push Public Option

The liberal political action committee MoveOn.org joined with comedian Will Ferrell's comedy website Funny or Die to produce a fake public service announcement depicting celebrities defending the health insurance industry.

"Something terrible is happening," Ferrell says in the video. "Health insurance executives are getting a bad rap!"

Ferrell, Mad Men's Jon Hamm, ER's Linda Cardellini and others "express sarcastic sympathy and concern for the health insurance industry and fake scorn for the public health insurance option to highlight the disastrous state of the current health care system and the need for health care reform," per the MoveOn press release. "The actors agree with MoveOn that health care reform must include a strong public option that will help lower skyrocketing health care costs and expand coverage to millions of Americans. The health insurance industry has spent millions of dollars to fight a public health insurance option."
–jpt

User Comments

Have they been funded with big fat NEA (taxpayer) grants to crank out Obama propaganda and worship??

Posted by: Ministry of Truth | September 22, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Ah, to be part of the Hollywood clique.
“We” earn millions but aren’t evil like the insurance execs. What hypocrites!

Posted by: E Go | September 22, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

-”We” earn millions but aren’t evil like the insurance execs. What hypocrites!-
I say windfall tax.

Posted by: Big Spender | September 22, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I agree that a public option could get millions of Americans covered, depending on how it is run.
I disagree with, and see no evidence for, the assertion that a public option will reduce health care COSTS.
Unless there is rationing. Which nobody wants to talk about.

Posted by: MayBee | September 22, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

What do these “stars” know about working America? They make millions.

Posted by: lisa | September 22, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Why are we not talking abour health care too? Lets improve the health care and health Ins system. We do not need to make a Gov run company. Why do we listen to movie and tv stars? Ask a dr you trust what they think! Shocker, they do not like Obama’s plan!!!

Posted by: lisa | September 22, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Let me get this straight. According to ABC this is news worthy, yet Van Jones and the ACORN scandal were not? I think I’ll follow Chuck’s advise and get my real news on the “CABLES.”

Posted by: BABS | September 22, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Glad the overpaid millionaires spouting smart ass commentary based on unsubstantiated anecdotal stories weighed in.
Why don’t you go dribble out some more crap movies like we’ve been seeing and mistake that for relevance in a real debate.
Of course, no mention of the hundreds of thousands of employees in the ins. industry; gotta be only the CEO’s getting paid. No WAY this industry does anything to help anyone stay employed… beat the recession… provide actual care.
Appears some folks are still stuck on Enron and skipped business classes to go study how to react properly to fake dog turd on a set.
Offer a clue, when you get one Hollywood

Posted by: Chazz Michael Michaels | September 22, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

It is interesting that Move On is still pushing for a public option.

Posted by: MayBee | September 22, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Sounds like the big fat rich capitalist Michael Moore getting even richer (and fatter) making a movie about how evil capitalism is.
What a country!

Posted by: New World Order | September 22, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Chazz, Being a celebrity doesn’t mean you can’t have an intelligent point of view. It is a bad thing that lots of insurance industry employees would have to find new jobs if the insurance industry is reformed to decrease its stranglehold on health care. But what is the greater good? Does job security for insurance employees outweigh health and financial security for the rest of Americans? Should the industry continue getting fat off illness and death?
Medicare proves that government can do some things better than the holy private sector. Health is not a commodity. I am emphatically for the public option. Argue the merits of your position, don’t shoot the messengers.

Posted by: Hannalee | September 22, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Medicare proves that government can do some things better than the holy private sector.
==========
Yes. They can run up an unfunded debt and stay in business way better than anyone in the private sector.

Posted by: MayBee | September 22, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

80% of Americans want a public option. That’s because we are smart enough to know true competition brings down prices and too many of us are paying too much for too little health insurance.
I love the commercial. It very clearly demonstrates that standing against a public option is doing nothing but supporting the bloated profits and salaries of executives in the health insurance industry.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

The Public Option did not “go” away…as per BO himself, it is still there hiding behind somebody’s pants. And, BTW who if Ferrell (never have watched him)..a person who makes an ### out of himself is truly not competent to talk about anything with a serious intelligence bent!

Posted by: Sue | September 22, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Medicare proves that government can do some things better than the holy private sector.
==========
Yes. They can run up an unfunded debt and stay in business way better than anyone in the private sector.
Like the Post office!

Posted by: Special Delivery | September 22, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Hey Hannalee;
Follow your own advice before giving it.
Nothing in that video was intellgient discourse, it’s a total misreprentation of the situation using anecdotal information.
The Hollywood people want to actually discuss the public option fine, but wrapping it in a pretext that the alternative is simply to make CEO’s more rich is outright stupidity.
There is nothing to add in the commentary of the debate by that video other than an attempt at “star power”. I don’t watch Blades of Glory or Old School to watch Will Ferrell’s reasoned intelligence regarding social issues.
His role in society and reason for notoriety is quite simply the modern equivalent of a court jester.
Stop drinking the kool-aid and go find out what facts are and then point any that were in there. The 80 million figure is a distortion of the source POLL it’s based on.
You like it, because you agree with it. That doesn’t make it right.

Posted by: Chazz Michael Michaels | September 22, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

E Go, no, the Hollywood ‘clique’ as you call it isn’t evil because they are earning millions. The insurance execs pad their pockets by denying claims and treatments, canceling policies, and other unfair practices to increase their profits. This results in true suffering, bankruptcies and deaths.
How many people die because a Hollywood movie star gets a fat raise on their new movie? Do you see the difference?

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

-I love the commercial. It very clearly demonstrates that standing against a public option is doing nothing but supporting the bloated profits and salaries of executives in the health insurance industry.-
Will Ferrell #9 – Will Ferrell
Estimated Net Worth: $31 million

Posted by: Bloated | September 22, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

-The insurance execs pad their pockets by denying claims and treatments, canceling policies, and other unfair practices to increase their profits. This results in true suffering, bankruptcies and deaths.-
Can you provide any examples?

Posted by: Examples | September 22, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

The ad spot is hilarious and just SO true! Why are we fighting so hard for the Insurance industry that is getting rich off of us? Money spent for health care should go to what??? ONLY HEALTHCARE FOR EACH AND EVERY AMERICAN!!! WHEN AMERICANS ARE HEALTHY THEY ARE PROSPEROUS AND ABLE TO CONTRIBUTE TO OUR SOCIETY MORE READILY.. IT’S JUST SO SIMPLE PEOPLE!!!
NO MORE MILLIONS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE EXECUTIVES!!

Posted by: ltl lulu | September 22, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Satire is an honorable tool to shoot holes into poor arguments.
Maybee, we can only imagine what the debt would have been to cover elderly people if we had to rely on private insurance with its administrative bloatware.
Are there still people out there who don’t know about the suffering and death caused by our private system now? If they don’t know about it firsthand, as do?
I must confess, this is quite a thrill to make so many people angry!

Posted by: Hannalee | September 22, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“The insurance execs pad their pockets by denying claims and treatments, canceling policies, and other unfair practices to increase their profits. This results in true suffering, bankruptcies and deaths. ”
Sheer rubbish. They earn a profit by offering a product that consumers like at a price they are willing to pay. If they don’t honor their contracts they are subject to substantial monetary damages in a court of law, and in any event cannot survive in the marketplace.
When the government denies you treatment, the ballgame is over. The poor souls living with the squalor of Britain’s NHS have no recourse at all. The NHS has just announced that it will have insufficient funds to care for those now approaching old age, and that such people should begin planning to bear the costs of their care themselves.
And yet the sheep continue to believe that the government will take care of them.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 22, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Good ad :>) It’s true that the health insurance industry has spent millions of dollars to fight a public health insurance option. This won’t even that out, but it’s a nice counterpoint.

Posted by: Alyson | September 22, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Follow the money: who gets rich with the public option?
SEIU, ACORN, other unions (bails out their current healthcare liabilities), attorneys, consulting firms, big pharma (already cut deal with Obama), etc. etc.
It is laughably naive to think one side doesn’t have a massive financial agenda.

Posted by: BillyBilly | September 22, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“‘”The insurance execs pad their pockets by denying claims and treatments, canceling policies, and other unfair practices to increase their profits. This results in true suffering, bankruptcies and deaths.”
‘Sheer rubbish. They earn a profit by offering a product that consumers like at a price they are willing to pay.’”
You’re making me laugh. Lots of people are not able– and of course, not willing!– to pay the exorbitant, extortive costs of private insurance. We are being blackmailed for our worldly goods.
When you come up against the brick administrative wall that is private insurance, the ballgame is pretty much over too, especially if you have no one to resort to other than your bought and paid for Congressional representative.

Posted by: Hannalee | September 22, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Examples, just google unfair health insurance practices and you’ll find lots of consumer group facts about these unfair practices. I’m surprised you haven’t read about the stories that make the national news when people are denied treatments because of ‘pre-existing’ conditions they didn’t disclose. One guy hadn’t written down he had acne as a teen and he was denied an operation for cancer. The industry actually employs a team of ‘adjustors’ who look for any small reason to cancel your policy or deny treatment if your illness looks ‘expensive’. Eventually the patient, after paying a lawyer to fight for them, can get their rights restored but in the case of cancer, losing that time can be fatal. Not to mention the added stress.
When Obama said that no one should have to be worried about paying their medical bills when they are ill, just concentrate on getting well, it really hit a nerve for me. It saddens me when uninformed people don’t see the good a public option would do for all of us, those without insurance now and those paying high premiums.
(Personally, I have a sister who worked for a big health insurance company and she was instructed to never pay a doctor’s claim the first time it was submitted. The idea was to make the doctor wait months to get paid, as the longer the insurance company held the money, the more interest it could make on it. Never mind the unnecessary expense for the doctor, passed on to all of us, for all that wasted time re-submitting claims. This is just one way they waste our health care dollars. Ever notice how many people have to work in billing at your doctors office? That’s one reason why.)

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

The NHS has just announced that it will have insufficient funds to care for those now approaching old age, and that such people should begin planning to bear the costs of their care themselves.
More on the awesome NHS system:
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:13 PM on 22nd
Hundreds of thousands of people could be misdiagnosed by NHS doctors every year, an investigation has revealed.
Medics could be getting it wrong in as many as one in six of patient consultations in hospitals and primary care, according to Misdiagnosis, a BBC radio programme broadcast yesterday.
While most cases do not result in the patient suffering serious harm, a sizeable number are likely to experience significant health problems as a result.
But cases of misdiagnosis are not recorded anywhere in the NHS and this has led to growing demands for better reporting systems to help doctors prevent it.-
I’ll take private bloatware any day. And those examples, if you don’t mind Lydia.

Posted by: Examples | September 22, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“It’s true that the health insurance industry has spent millions of dollars to fight a public health insurance option.”
Posted by: Alyson | Sep 22, 2009 1:57:43 PM
SO WHAT? The pharmaceutical industry has spent millions of dollars to fight FOR a public health insurance option. Is one profit-making industry more evil than the other?

Posted by: Health Czar | September 22, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Rasmussen, September 18:
“Fifty-six percent (56%) of voters nationwide now oppose the health care reform proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s the highest level of opposition yet measured and includes 44% who are Strongly Opposed. Just 43% now favor the proposal, including 24% who Strongly Favor it.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 22, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

..”.especially if you have no one to resort to other than your bought and paid for Congressional representative.”
Or the POTUS. The meeting went great!

Posted by: Big Pharma | September 22, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

It kind of makes one sad to read the comments on abcnews.com. Almost like I accidentally stumbled into the Fox No Sense zone. Just a bunch of haters, doing the only thing they know how to do.

Posted by: FrankleeMiDeer | September 22, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

I guess I know who I won’t see in a movie now!

Posted by: Lynn | September 22, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

These are ACTORS getting paid by MOVEON to relay the MOVEON message. A government option, which can operate in the red via unlimited taxation, would DECREASE competition. 80% of Americans want a public option? BS from an AARP funded survey. They are trying to create false public opinion in the face of true opposition. Obama has suggested taking the public option off the table (dont believe it people), so why cant MOVEON move on?

Posted by: Dupree | September 22, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Examples, your example of British doctors misdiagnosing because of their national health plan, frankly, makes little sense. We have a ton of misdiagnoses here, too, because of the nature of being a doctor.
And the fact that they weren’t serious mistakes leads me to believe American doctors wouldn’t rate much differently. How many times have any of us gone to the doctor, told we had one thing and a week later on returning, it was something else. Gosh, it took seeing 4 different specialists all saying something different to diagnose my brother’s recent health problem.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

I’m sorry, explain to me again how private insurance companies selling in the same market as a government run entity is “fair” competition? The government can undercut all insurance companies until they can no longer sustain themselves. This will drive compensations to doctors down and deter people from entering the medical industry. Less doctors = less quanity/quality. That is socialism and it’s not what this country was founded on. We need to reform, yes, but we don’t need to dismantle the entire system for 5-10 million. That’s as stupid as saying 80% of Americans want a public option.

Posted by: Drilling | September 22, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“At least we have a national plan for seniors, government employees, and veterans. I bet all the congressmen and senators love their national health plan. Why don’tr normal people deserve the same plan as them?”
Posted by: Beth | Sep 22, 2009 2:32:30 PM
Congressmen get the type of “Cadillac Plan” that the Senate Baucus bill would tax HEAVILY.

Posted by: Health Czar | September 22, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Drilling, but most Americans do want a public insurance option. They simply can’t see being able to afford health insurance in the future. The average health insurance premium has gone up many times more than the average pay raise. In our family, every time we get a raise it has gone to pay for a higher premium. This is holding back our economy in the same way the high gasoline prices helped cause our recent economic problems. The high gas prices simply was the straw that broke the camels back in too many households.
That is what insurance is doing to many and will do to many more as their premiums continue to rise faster than our paychecks.
The public insurance option will be a dose of real competition for private health insurance companies. It will help those with and without insurance afford health care.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Looks like they got the talking points from the White House.
Were these two clowns on the NEA call with the White House also?
Your tax dollars at work for Obama Agitprop.

Posted by: Pam in Maine | September 22, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

I choose “Die”

Posted by: Monty | September 22, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Just proves that celebrities are stupid. Instead of a public option- that I pay for- how’s about a Hollywood option?? All those grossly overpaid hollywood types actors,directors, producers,singers,musicians, Oprah, comedians etc.can put 85% of their net worth into a pot to finance an option for the folks that won’t or can’t earn their own.
IT’S CALLED CHARITY!

Posted by: Taxpayers | September 22, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

If you can’t trust Frank the Tank, who can you trust?

Posted by: Monty | September 22, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

was Will on the NEA conference call too? Gee I missed him.
Unfortunately, Ferrell’s particular form of comedy is playing the idiot, which may be too close to home for him.
The president doesn’t know the truth from a tree stump; no one quite knows what is in the bills, but we do know that the president has tied to buy off the pharmaceutical companies, the AMA, and the trial lawyers. Harry Reid is already larding any legislation with payoffs for his supporters.
On the other hand 56% of the American people don’t trust the president and Congress.
85% of us have health care. Most of us like it. Of the 15% without, the largest demographic is the 18-35 year olds. the president wants to fix this with a $1500/year/individual tax he does not want to call a tax.
The President wants to strip Medicare of $500 Billion and says there will be no degradation of service. So how exactly are we to believe a word he says?

Posted by: matt | September 22, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Thanks for the reason not to see another Will Ferrell movie. I am done.

Posted by: Greg | September 22, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

It amazes me the way people who have never had to fend for themselves in the business world have this childish utopian dream that some government employee is going to be “on their side” when it comes to saving them (or the US tax payer) money on health care. After working for the last decade on straight commission (I actually have to produce money for my employer in order to get paid), I realize that as much as I dislike the money-grubbing insurance folks, they’re there for a legitimate reason. It’s just business, and I still trust them more than some government employee getting their 70k a year to push around billions of dollars in health care policies. If you think the insurance companies couldn’t care less about you, wait until it’s a bureaucrat with a bad attitude who doesn’t think they get paid enough for the job they’re doing. Saving money…. Ha!!! Isn’t this the same government that was 5 x over budget a decade after the inception of Medicare? I’m not saying a lot of people don’t depend on Medicare, but in order to think that the government is going to SAVE us money on anything the entire country must have the attention span of a gold fish.

Posted by: jason s. | September 22, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I can’t wait until the day I become so stupid that I allow Hollywood to tell me how to think. These people cannot manage their own lives in a respectful manner. Have you ever seen such a high concentration of dysfunctional individuals as you do in Hollywood? And the best part of the joke is that they really believe that America gives a damn what they think!!!

Posted by: robin | September 22, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

the extremist conservative marginalization continues!
Now they “ain’t gonna watch Will Ferrell no more. They don’t like anyone who says nuthin’ bad about Palin neither.”

Posted by: Conserva Tiff | September 22, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

jason s. why should the health care industry take short cuts with people’s health to increase their profits or exec. salaries? This isn’t about a company selling widgets, this is life or death.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

You know Lydia you just outlined what in the system needs to be fixed and it’s fair competition. Insurance regulations cause monopolies which allow them to keep premiums up and drag out payment. Allow some additional competition from the free market and see what happens. I guarrantee a NHS will just lead to a bunch of incompetants trying to figure out how to do as little as possible and then our trusted elected congress figuring out how to increase spending the increased cash flow for their own pet projects. I say ley us keep our money, free up interstate competition, put some guidelines outthere and let industry battle it out.

Posted by: I Wanna Free Ride | September 22, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Lawyers for Poor Americans, I also am surprised that more religious leaders of all faiths are not encouraging their congregations to stand up and support health care reform for the sake of the uninsured.
And the rising health care premiums will make that 45 million uninsured grow exponentially every year.
Folks, if you can’t support a public health option for the sake of the uninsured, then do it for your own, to keep your private insurance affordable. With no competition, the health insurance industry feels free to charge us too much more every year.
And to those seniors fighting a public option, I can’t believe you could be parents or grandparents and not be concerned about your loved ones losing coverage when they need it. Just because you are on Medicare and are guaranteed your good insurance, you should be old enough to have empathy for your fellow citizens who are barely affording it or who have none.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Those who hate the public option because it’s run by “the government”, must be in favor of dumping all those wounded and ill veterans onto the private insurance system by closing the V-A. Let them be denied coverage for their wounds and have to pay a co-payment for their medications. Even Rush Limbaugh likes the V-A, socialized medicine that works. And, how many elderly conservatives want the government to scrap medicare? One funny sign I saw at a town hall meeting sums up the stupidity, “keep the government’s hands out of my medicare”.

Posted by: john | September 22, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Lets see, last report I saw showed the Health Insurance industry made a 2% profit last year. That is outlandish!
Other facets of the health industry did much better but I don’t hear them being attacked. For instance my congressman (A Democrat) is one of the richest people in congress…a Physician. But I don’t hear him calling for curtailing doctor pay or recommending that they all become civil servants.
BTW, I would ask how many of these great actors would actually use the public option if it were enacted, but with the talent level of some of these folks it may not be long before they may need public support.

Posted by: jb | September 22, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Free Ride, interstate competition between health insurance companies would just make the nightmare of filing claims and forms by doctors and hospitals that much worse. Which would make it more expensive for us, as more billing clerks would be needed.

Posted by: Lydia | September 22, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Health insurance profits are 2%. I don’t think so. Moreover, a report by Families USA found that “insurers in the individual market sometimes maintain medical loss ratios of only 60%, retaining 40% of premium dollars for administration, marketing and profit.” “For the 10 biggest insurers in the year 2006 (the year the insurers used for the 1 cent out of every dollar depiction above), profits were anywhere from 2 to 10 percent, or two to 10 pennies on the dollar. That’s two to 10 times as much as what the insurance industry group suggests in its illustrations.”

Posted by: Jimmy B | September 22, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I love reading the responses from the greatly mis-informed. It makes me feel good to be an American.

Posted by: MM | September 22, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

I just want to say Jason S. and Greg are right on the money.We definitely NEED REFORM. Personally, I don’t think it should involve a public option. Instead we should expand/strengthen existing public options Medicare & Medicaid.
1) Exchanging beauracrats private for government doesn’t change the strategy of the game. Changing the players doesn’t change the game, the game remains the same, and that is RATIONING.
2) An insurance company is held liable for any wrongdoing or wrongful denial. TRY SUING THE GOVERNMENT or holding them LIABLE.
3) The bill HR3200 does NOTHING to lower costs, fails to insure everyone and has been shown by the CBO that it is not deficit neutral.
4) SHOW ME THE BILL. The president is making claims that a magical bill exists that will insure everyone, lower the cost of healthcare, and be deficit neutral. Until you see that in writing, assume that the lies being sold to you is the afore-mentioned bill.
5) The president mentioned he will cut wasteful spending of Medicare in order to pay for this healthcare bill. What’s holding back the Senate and Congress from cutting out that waste? You mean to tell me you’re ok with government being wasteful when they are telling us that waste can be cut out?
Instead of listening to the lies of the mainstream media, and the Hollywood elite who are all in the pockets of the Democratic Party, wake up and seek out the real FACTS for yourself.

Posted by: Dmitriy | September 22, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

was Will on the NEA conference call too? Gee I missed him.
posted by matt
its all a pay for play or is it play for pay, I scratch your back you scratch mine. I wonder how much bail-out they received for their endorsement.

Posted by: Lizzie | September 22, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

This baffles the mind. People have been complaining about insurance companies and how they over-control or underpay (or not pay at all) for their health care and want “some” government involvement to force insurance companies to fulfill their commitments. Now that we have something happening where government will offer options and give insurance companies competition, everyone is crying that they don’t want government involvement. What the hay?

Posted by: Fernando | September 22, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

when has the government ever in history been able to cut wasteful spending just name the time this is socialist plain and simple

Posted by: Denver Morgan | September 22, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

EXCELLENT!!! CLEAR MESSAGE!!!!What can I say they don’t have lobbyists in their pockets.. or politics to motivate them..

Posted by: Sharonkathleen | September 22, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

“This is my maiden voyage. My first speech since I was the president of the United States and I couldn’t think of a better place to give it than Calgary, Canada.” –George W. Bush

Posted by: Bushisms | September 22, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

We have public schools so folks can send their kids for an education. WE have public libraries so folks can get books without having to buy each one. WE have public transportation to folks dont all have to bring their cars into the city. We have public roads so everyone doesn’t have to plow or pave their own street. We have public golfcourses so you can play gold without costing you the price of a small house. We have public universities so not everyone needs to sell their house to send their kids to college. We have public lunch provided at the public schools. But anyone at any time can bring their lunch, drive their car, buy a book ,attend a private school, play golf on a privatae course, etc. Having public options only gives options to a public who would otherwise not have educations, not have access to book, not have access to sports, or tennis courts, or etc. We have so many public options for services, why is this freakout over healthinsurance public option?

Posted by: justsayn | September 22, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

NICE JOB MOVEON !! YOU HIT IT OUT OF THE BALLPARK. RIGHTIES ARE NO FUN…

Posted by: Nico | September 22, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I was really interested in Will’s thoughts. He made a million dollars in an elf suit. Talk about overpaid.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | September 22, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

“when has the government ever in history been able to cut wasteful spending”—Obama actually has a bill out there to bring the college loan program back into the government. Right now, the government guarrentees the loans, if not paid back, the government will pay the bank the amount of the loan. BUT if hte loan IS paid back, the BANK gets to profit from the interest. huh???? so the government takes all the RISK but gets no PROFIT from the loan program. obama said no. No, if you want a loan, apply to the government agency, get your loan, pay it back TO US. Our tax dollars that paidfor hte loan gets teh money back when it’s paid back. Perfect example of Obama being a thinking man making good decisions and doing a good job.

Posted by: justsayn | September 22, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

the extremist conservative marginalization continues!
Now they “ain’t gonna watch Will Ferrell no more. They don’t like anyone who says nuthin’ bad about Palin neither.”
Posted by: Conserva Tiff
____________________________
And the “extremist LIBERAL marginalization continues too!”
I’ll bet you all “just hate Charlton Heston so much, you just want to kill him a second time, even though he’s dead? And you don’t like no one who says anythin’ bad about Obama or Clinton neither.”

Posted by: marco | September 22, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I agree, some companies make too much money, we should cap all corporate profits at say, five percent. Top executive pay at say, 200K per year. All the rest could go to the federal government to equalize incomes.

Posted by: Creight | September 22, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

A government option, which can operate in the red via unlimited taxation, would DECREASE competition. 80% of Americans want a public option?—–Why???? Did bookstores go out of business becuase we have libararies? Are private schools out of business? ARe there no more public state run universities??? Oh i beg to differ. some state sponsored schools provide the very best education in the country! Good jobs that want good employees will ALWAYS offer better healthplans than a public option . Did 401K plan go away because there is social security ? Think about what you’re saying, it’s pure foolish and in the real life, it has already shown to be just the opposite of what you’re saying. you people are just argumenetative. IF Obama wants it, you say no. That is your shtick. The party of “no”.

Posted by: justsayn | September 22, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

the video is right on!
and justsayn, i agree with your comments completely (and i’m not just saying that because our names are so similar!)

Posted by: justsane | September 22, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

That was funny , but the alternative is worse. When you’ve had cancer and/or are elderly and are told the statistics are against giving you further treatment you’ll know what people against government healthcare are talking about. Ask people from canada and France whom have been in those situations.

Posted by: Jack | September 22, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Some effective measures and regulations and saving money on foreign wars better be done to bring healthcare costs down or our economy will never be allowed to recover and our paychecks will go down paying for expensive healthcare in old age.

Posted by: mikestretchland@yahoo.com | September 22, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

If you think that was a good debate or analysis on healthcare than lets talk about some waterfront property I have for sale, you are just the kind of person i have been looking for.

Posted by: sammy | September 22, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Who in their right mind gives a rat’s backside what that idiot Ferrell or that two-bit actor Hamm think or believe? Only Obama’s parasitic constituents will succumb to this leftist propaganda.

Posted by: rplat | September 22, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Hey Will
While we’re at lets cut Hollywood pay. Talk about being overpaid. Minimum wage for all of you.

Posted by: Angie | September 22, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Something terrible has happened! Actors make way too much money for the limited services they actually provide. While the rest of us have to work our tails off to make a five figure income and still we may lose our houses, these actors make seven figure salaries for pretending to be other people! They will not be affected by anything the government does except for censorship. They should be careful what they wish for.

Posted by: luigi | September 22, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I loved Will and John Hamm up until now…these Hollywood A holes make me sick. What does this tell you about this pathetic administration when they have to keep on pushing celebrities on us to try and brainwash us. This President really bites the big one.

Posted by: BabsNJ | September 22, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

This is doesn’t even rate a zero on any scale.

Posted by: SjB | September 22, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Really people, does it always have to be about conspiracy? Will Ferrell like anyone else has the right to speak about his beliefs. Remember, you conservative are always preaching about free speech.
Shut up already. Obama won….you guy didn’t live with it!

Posted by: Renee | September 22, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

To the person who said cap exec’s pay at 200K: Why? They run multi billion dollar companies and have huge responsibilities.
Actors on the other hand can make $20M per picture and they bear no responsibilities to the country’s economy.
How about YOU work for minimum wage? Why not? What do you contribute to the country? I think it is this administration’s plan that we ALL work for minimum wage so we are equally poor. Then we have to depend on them for everything. Actors are basically stupid. They live in their own world and have none of the problems you do. Well, except for maybe drug abuse, failed marriages, criminal activity, poor parenting, etc. I guess buying a $10M house doesn’t give you much peace. Why do we continue to love and honor these people? In the long run, they give us nothing. We on the other hand give them everything. We buy tickets to movies, Netflix, DVD’s, very expensive candy and popcorn, and a whole lot more. Not to exclude amazingly high salaries. And what do they do? Give us their opinion? It is so funny that politicians and actors are paid for by US but they love to tell US what to do. Next time you go to work (if you have a job)try telling your boss what to do. Tell him how to vote and what kind of car to drive. Tell him what you can and can’t say at the office. Tell him how much you think he should make at his job. See how that works for you.

Posted by: luigi | September 22, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Hey, Will, why not let Americans do it the way they always have, finance health care like the do cars, clothes etc. Its callled insurance, get some! Its only 333.00 a month , just like car insurance, but allows you to get 100K surgeries! Its amazing, and it works! Some people need to get jobs to pay for it, imagine that! Worry about the fraud first, worry about getting insurance across state lines and the rest will come.

Posted by: t | September 22, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Wow, OK, this is simple. These people on here are most likely the same types that freaked out when we suggested eliminating slavery. So, the only thing to do is pass this thing, let these people cry until they fall asleep in their cereal and then live with the decision that this country can take care of ALL its people and not just the rich. Yes, please talk to people in Canada and UK. Once you get past the general whining that all humans do you’ll find they like their health system and can’t believe we have to pay for ours. So, all of you, get over it. Stop listening to the fear mongers. Live your life knowing that if you or a loved one gets sick or injured you can go to the hospital or doctor and take care of it. That’s it. No money out of pocket, no worrying about how to pay the medical bills.

Posted by: OR | September 22, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

You know, I think they should control actors, atheletes, as well as those poor attorneys (who can make up to Hundreds on millions of cases) salaries. They deserve the same oontrols as the insurance companies. You know these people are sooo smart, they have to make their money pretending!!!

Posted by: ssmith | September 22, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Wow, OK, this is simple. These people on here are most likely the same types that freaked out when we suggested eliminating slavery. So, the only thing to do is pass this thing, let these people cry until they fall asleep in their cereal and then live with the decision that this country can take care of ALL its people and not just the rich. Yes, please talk to people in Canada and UK. Once you get past the general whining that all humans do you’ll find they like their health system and can’t believe we have to pay for ours. So, all of you, get over it. Stop listening to the fear mongers. Live your life knowing that if you or a loved one gets sick or injured you can go to the hospital or doctor and take care of it. That’s it. No money out of pocket, no worrying about how to pay the medical bills.
Posted by: OR | Sep 22, 2009 5:20:16 PM
Ummm, Democrats were wrong then about not wanting to end slavery and they are wrong again about introducing the government into the private sector and introducing the “crowding out affect” to insurance.

Posted by: Dan | September 22, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Nice to see so many of you sticking up for the insurance company CEOs… because…why?!
Because you love that they make their millions by denying people healthcare coverage when those premium payers need it the most, and darn that Obama for trying to cut into their profits and bonuses…makes sense to me!
~ sarcasm ~

Posted by: Patx | September 22, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

too bad we can’t take an honest poll here and find out everyone’s real age…. that would really be illuminating….
how about it Jake, anyway to get an anonymous poll up to get a cross section of Dem/Repubs/Conservs/Indy’s………..maybe even see whose had to deal with the reality of the medical world as opposed to the ‘theory’…..

Posted by: 007 | September 22, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I think they should control
Posted by: ssmith
curious as to who exactly is your: ‘they’……

Posted by: No Mas | September 22, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Ummm, Democrats were wrong then about not wanting to end slavery and they are wrong again about introducing the government into the private sector and introducing the “crowding out affect” to insurance.
Dems then and Dems now are a different breed. We’re a good bit more educated and worldly. We’ve seen and learned things. We see change and can roll with it. If everything around you is changing but you want to pretend things should stay the same you will be left in the dirt. It’s the way things are. Keep the good stuff and change the bad stuff. As far as polls go lets check the education levels of Dems compared to Reps…

Posted by: OR | September 22, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

The public option will increase costs, not decrease them.

Posted by: scott jeffries | September 22, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

I love this. Celebrities who are making millions themselves are complaining about the millions that heath insurance execs are making. Profit is a great evil unless it’s a liberal that makes it. I also love the false premise, if you oppose Obamacare then you support CEO corruption. Maybe the reason people oppose Obamacare is that they don’t want the government “managing” their health.

Posted by: Rick | September 22, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Looks like these “stars” could all give up a few million a piece, pool the money and buy some insurance for the fans that pay 8 or 10 bucks to see their movies. By the way why don’t we call move on what it is ;Soros dot org

Posted by: david | September 22, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

About this comment – “You know these people are sooo smart, they have to make their money pretending!!!” Point 1- They make money because lots of people like for them to pretend. Point 2 – Rightwing politicians make money (and get GREAT insurance coverage) by pretending they share your values, Point 3 – Insurance company execs make money by pretending they give a rodent’s posterior about you – and all they while are denying claims. Their responsibility is to SHAREHOLDERS, NOT POLICY HOLDERS!

Posted by: Cassandra | September 22, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Re: “Remember, you conservative are always preaching about free speech.” No, they’re blathering on about THEIR free speech, not the average American’s. It’s the excuse they use for being objectionable and sounding nutty to the rest of us. And I think it’s great. The more they talk and egg each other on, the better. Tell me more about tea, bubba. (Free speech.)

Posted by: Cassandra | September 22, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Re: “If everything around you is changing but you want to pretend things should stay the same you will be left in the dirt. It’s the way things are. Keep the good stuff and change the bad stuff. As far as polls go lets check the education levels of Dems compared to Reps…” <Good enough to repeat. The U.S.A. has been progressive over most of its history. Not always right (we changed the bad stuff as we moved along) but always seeking to better ourselves for the good of the nation and the individual. Healthcare NOW!

Posted by: Cassandra | September 22, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Don’t buy this crap, this isn’t us putting it to the “big man” at the insurance companies. One of the proposed “reforms” would be to require ALL Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a fine. The insurance companies stand to profit a huge amount from this.

Posted by: mammaduck | September 22, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Excuse me, Will Ferrell doesn’t even know how to “ACT”, how can he pretend to know anything about national affairs?? — He needs to start a special school for the terminally ignorant, then enroll!

Posted by: Hoosier Values | September 22, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

This dorky President can’t even get his moderate Blue Dog Dems to vote for this smelly pile of garbage called Obamacare! Any Government Run Health Care is DOA, regardless of the Useful Idiots in the entertainment industry trying to shove it down our throats!

Posted by: Sunnyr | September 22, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

moderate Blue Dog Dems
Posted by: Sunnyr
moderate? funny….
like the guy from Arkansas who is so in the pocket of a drug company….. $1.6 million more or less….. a real ‘moderate’ …
the sad thing is that so many americans will believe the satire as truth when they see it..
in a way, it reminds me, (and you’ll forgive me as I can’t remember which particular sect it is of christianity) of the religious folks who won’t take their children to see doctors, instead relying on divine intervention as a cure…
when their kids get sicker or even tragically die, they prefer to admit to some problem they have not demonstrating their true faith..
rather than admit their neglect caused the problem.
many would rather suffer the rising costs and unfair practices of the med insurance industry than really try to help themselves by at least trying something new policy wise….

Posted by: No Mas | September 23, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Greetings
Alas we have the best government
in the universe with the best president
in our time in charge working the
best health care system with a public option that will evolve into a single pay system that will be a blessing to all
and Mr. President bring the troops
home they just getting run over like road kill God bless -
Blessings ____________________

Posted by: bob knab | September 23, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

This is the information I’ve been searching at. I’m glad that I found this. Thanks a lot for posting this blog!

Posted by: American Auto Insurance | September 23, 2009, 5:13 am 5:13 am

For whatever YOUR reason to say something up Thr Top…THIS VIDEO was IMPORTANT TO BE SCENED FOR A PERTER PURPOSE TO SUPPOSE NOT UNTIL WE HEAR ALL THAT was intended to be deposed against your gnaughtidgelure.

Posted by: ClownrMacFrownher | September 23, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

My goal is one day to make enough money so that I also can become an “Hollywood Liberal” and make funnies in regard to a very serious issue for those that are unable to see the humor because of their limited circumstances….From someone who lives in the area of the “Rich and Famous” don’t let the sincerity fool you, this is just another way to get cheap P.R ; as well as, fulfilling boredom and relieving the guilt of having soooo much money while others do not…Do you actually believe they would give up their bank accounts??? If yes, why haven’t they???

Posted by: Parallex View | September 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Will Farrell is the biggest joke in human history. He is not funny at all only to half-minded liberals.

Posted by: larry thompson | September 23, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I love how conservatives are so opposed to a government-run health care system. It’s become more than obvious that said health care reform would threaten the wallets and pocketbooks of the wealthy health insurance execs and “Certain” political figures. Lets face it, the state of our current health care system is PATHETIC. People die each and every day because they are unable to receive medical treatment because they do not have coverage. So what exactly is wrong with providing EVERYONE with coverage? The U.S. ranks #37 on the international health care list, just inching it out over Slovenia. But oh yes, we live in the best country in the world, right? Riiiight. We live in a country where the wealthy make the rules, and the rest of us need to fend for ourselves. We live in a country where we would rather let people die who do not have coverage than pay alittle extra so that everyone can live a healthy life. But instead, we live in a selfish country where one thing is certain: The Almighty Dollar Reigns Supreme. Pathetic. Sincerely Pathetic. Its a shame that we have some how managed to make people’s lives a business, where depending on someone’s age or insurance carrier dictates whether they will get medical care or die trying to get it. A country is viewed by how it treats its citizens. If that is the case, it’s no wonder the U.S. is views the way it is. I absolutely hate how shallow this country has become. I know a lot of people who live in Canada, and by a lot I mean several hundred. I have NEVER heard any negative feedback regarding their health care system. The reason conservatives and republicans alike are apposed to President Obama’s campaign is primarily because it will greatlf affect their pockets. I’m sorry, but I have no sympathy for that.

Posted by: Concernedcitizen | September 23, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

since we have sin taxes on cigs and stuff allowing people to be free but pay for there habits
why not a liberal tax
if you want to talk like you care so much pay for your habit
I don’t want to

Posted by: patrick | September 23, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Any connection here to recent NEA scandal, or just a convenient coincidence that this is exactly the kind of propaganda they were trying to force artists to do.

Posted by: bryan | September 23, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Bravo to Will Farell and others, we need more of our actors and actress to support health reform. End the monopoly of the private insurance company. Universal Healthcare for all US citizens.

Posted by: Joseph B | September 23, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

80% of Americans support single payer health care system, just look at the EU countries ( 500 million people), they have single payer universal healthcare. Every of their citizen is covered and nobody left out.

Posted by: Danielle Hollway | September 23, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Thank you Will Farrell for standing up and supporting the majority 80% of Americans. Private health insurance is all for profit and playing with people’s lives. We need more big stars to come out and support this. Be on the right side of history!!

Posted by: David wilson | September 23, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

I support a NATIONAL REFERENDUM on Universal Healthcare, let the American people decide, are you for private insurance companies or for Universal Healthcare for all US citizen. A simple YES or NO can settle this.

Posted by: Moses Cohen | September 23, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

How many people does Ferrell employee with his $31 mil?

Posted by: Illz | September 23, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Joy! another hollywierd hypocrite.With his millions,telling everyone how it should be. I think it’s time to nationalize Hollywood! After all they love what this administration is doing I’m sure they would not mind Obama taking their money and giving it to everyone else!
TIME TO NATIONALIZE HOLLYWOOD!

Posted by: dthomas | September 23, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Ferrell is so STUPID he doesn’t understand how stupid he is. will ferrell’s net worth is 31 MILLION. So if he’s got a gripe about Health Care CEO’s making X Million. then why doesn’t he donate X Million to a non-profit healthcare organization providing free health care. Here’s another thing the Idiot doesn’t realize. If it’s bad for Health care CEO’s to make this much. WHy in the world do we allow actors to make 10+ MILLION for ONE PICture. Let’s put a limit on Actor pay to 1 Million MAX per picture. That should l
ower movie ticket prices and DVD prices. YEA LETS DO IT Lower Movie Prices. Lower DVD;s Screw those damn rich actors. THEY DON”T NEED THE MONEY ACTORS ARE TOO RICH. CUT THEIR SALARY FREE MOVIES FOR EVERYONE. farrell is an IDIOT. STick to making CRAPPY MOVIES

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

DOwn with rich actors Lets have the PAY CZAR limit actors pay to no more than 1 Million per pic. Hell Ferrell should only get 10 bucks for his last one.

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Here’s the deal for all of you people that don’t follow politics. The democrats control both houses of congress and the executive branch. It’s not the Republicans blocking health care. They have enough votes to ram this down our throats. What is stopping them is that the MAJORIY of Americans DON’T want health care reform. Read the polls. So the blue dogs understand this and are voting against their own people. Again. his isn’t the Republicans blocking. This is the democrats FAILING to convince people to pass this horrendous piece of legislation. They have a VERY WEAK president who hasn’t moved the needle even though he never works. He only gives speeches and they are not working. So wuite trying to pin this on the Republicans. You voted for this weak, lack luster president who hasn’t passed one piece of major legislation. Only minor things to punish hard working americans and the CIA.

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

HR3200 would impose a fine on americans that don’t carry healthcare. The Baucus bill in the senate would impose a $3,800 tax on hard working americans who don’t want health care or buy care that doesn’t meet the requirements of the government. This is a Panel. Like the DEATH panels this panel determines if your insurance coverage is acceptable. And Yes I’m not an IDIOT like you. I know that HR3200 doesn’t mention death Panels. For you stupid people thats a Euphemism for a government panel that decides what level of health care is given to what people. What procedures can be given to what people. RATIONED care as in France, Canada and the UK.

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Ferrell in the video talks about privates jets and mini-zoos (Michael Jackson and a few other Celebs had/have mini zoos). Well how many celebs do you know with the exact same thing? Travolta owns a Boeing 707 and other aircraft. Lets cut his pay and give FREE MOVIES to all. GOVERNMENT RUN MOVIES. Single Payer MOVIES and DVDS. LETS Start a new branch of GOVERNMENT that manages ALL MOVIES MADE in the US. They can RATION the movies we see. We can pay for it by Taxing All movie actors and television stars at 80% and tax thier private ets and petting zoos.

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Lets have the hollywood Czar control which movies can be seen. ferrells crap will get shelved.

Posted by: sootsg | September 23, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

FREE MOVIES FREE DVDS DOWN with Hollywood. Lets have a Government Plan for Movies. Lets nationalize the Movie and tv industry. These rich actors with thier mini zoos and private jets are the victims. They are victims of their own wealth. It gives them the perception that they are actually smart. So if they make the per capita salary for our country ($40,900) per year then maybe they won’t think they are smarter than the average American.
Why should these actors make MILLIONS of dollars and we have to pay $10 to $15 to see some crappy movie. I say cap movie ticket prices at $2 a show $1 for matinees. This would lower actors and actresses salaries. And no DVD should cost more than $2.50. Tops.
And don’t forget about the directors and producers. They shouldn’t be allowed to make more than $45,000 a year.

Posted by: sootsg | September 24, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

“I know that HR3200 doesn’t mention death Panels. For you stupid people thats a Euphemism for a government panel that decides what level of health care is given to what people.”
So where is the government panel in section 1233 that Sarah Palin euphemized into a death panel?

Posted by: Shomida Panels | September 24, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

And shouldn’t “government panels” be the euphemism for “death panels?”

Posted by: Shomida Panels | September 24, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Health insurance companies make enough profit to be able to bribe radio personalities, journalists, and even members of congress. Every one of those dollars comes from someone being denied coverage, so it is, in effect, blood money.
Right now there is a monopoly on health care. Creating a public option would break up that monopoly, and eventually save millions of lives, not to mention millions of dollars through preventative care. Don’t be an idiot, its not socialism, its patriotism.

Posted by: Robert | September 24, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

so, what’s the collective wealth of the stars in the shoot? and how much of their millions have they given to the poor? if all these super-wealthy celebrities calling for a public option really gave a crud, they’d take their own money and start insuring the uninsured. unlike the streisands of the world, if i were a billionaire, i’d use most of the money to help others. if people like these would pledge to give only 50% of their wealth, they’d still be rich beyond most people’s wildest dreams…but they won’t, because they live for the attention that being “socially conscious” brings…they don’t really believe what they say. if they did, they’d pony up money. like michael moore and his new movie railing against capitalism…how much money has his lardbutt made in the last 10 years and how much of it has he shared with the poor? bunch of hypocrites.

Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 24, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

concernedcitizen, unless you are so naive as to believe that all these reforms can be done without raising deficits and taxes, then you should know that it won’t just be insurance execs who get the shaft financially…it will be every single hard-working taxpayer. no one with an inkling of intelligence can believe that the plans will even be revenue neutral. it’s economic unreality to think these plans won’t cost generational fortunes.

Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 24, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

i agree that there’s no reason to trust insurance companies. but there’s also no reason to trust the government. thus, with insurance companies in charge of health care, there’s at least the potential for government oversight through regulation. if government is in charge, then who is going to conduct the oversight and regulation? i think a lot of people are missing the point that putting government directly in control will not end corruption, it will simply remove one potential protection…government oversight of private industry. if government’s in control, not only is there no authority to check their actions, they’ll also be immune from legal action because of sovereign immunity. at least you can sue an insurance company now…if government’s in charge, you can forget that. and what about medical malpractice…if a government doctor at a government run facility amputates the wrong leg…too bad…sovereingn immunity. plus, what happens when another right-wing administration takes office (which WILL happen some day)? do all the people in favor of government run health care want a bush-like appointee in charge?

Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 24, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

can some of you who are saying 80% of americans want a single payor system cite something to prove that?

Posted by: davidfrat21 | September 24, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

It’s a cute ad. There’s a lot of truth in it. But as usual MoveOn probably does more damage than good–especially with the figure that 80% of people want the public option (up from 70% just a month or so ago?!, which was also a suspect number–55% so far in the vote on the AOL website).
MoveOn is an organization that pretty much preaches to the choir–and the choir loves the message. For all those in the middle, which may just be the majority of us, this has more of a negative effect–especially when suspect figures are used (if this is the only way they can get their point across, the point itself must not be very strong). Of course, we consider the source; things are not as clear-cut as the uber-progressives or conservatives would have us believe.
Don’t get me wrong, how we pay for healthcare needs to change or we’ll all be broke. And the insurance industry needs to be reined-in (a pound of insurance from BCBS should the same as a pound from United Healthcare). We need to improve access for those who truly cannot afford insurance. There are good ideas about what we’d all like changed (“apple pie” statements) but actually making something happen…well, that’s a different story.
It’s a tough problem with tough choices. Let’s have a well-reasoned, spirited, and realistic debate.

Posted by: SE Michigan Resident | September 24, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Wait a second, wasn’t it the insurance companies that funded Obama’s ad campaign for the public option? I seem to remember that Obama had to agree not to allow Americans to purchase their drugs from Canada in exchange for those ad dollars.
If the insurance companies weren’t on board with this public option, then why help the government advertise it?
Besides, requiring ALL Americans to purchase insurance is a gift to the insurance companies, isn’t it?

Posted by: Bruce | April 7, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.