By MichaelJames

Sep 20, 2009 11:10am

Zbig Brzezinski: Obama Administration Should Tell Israel U.S. Will Attack Israeli Jets if They Try to Attack Iran

The national security adviser for former President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, gave an interview to The Daily Beast in which he suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran's nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.

"We are not exactly impotent little babies," Brzezinski said. "They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch? … We have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a 'Liberty' in reverse."

The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.

Brzezinski endorsed then-Sen. Obama's presidential campaign in August 2007, which at the time was portrayed in the media as a boost to Obama's foreign policy cred. The Washington Post reported: "Barack Obama, combating the perception that he is too young and inexperienced to handle a dangerous world, got a boost yesterday from a paragon of foreign policy eminence, Zbigniew Brzezinski."

Brzezinski was never an official campaign adviser, but Republicans jumped on the endorsement to push the meme that Obama wouldn't be a friend to Israel, as Brzezinski's views of Israel attracted criticism from some quarters in the American Jewish community.

“Brzezinski is not an adviser to the campaign,” former Ambassador Dennis Ross, then a senior adviser on Middle East affairs to the Obama campaign, said at the time. “There is a lot of disinformation that is being pushed, but he is not an adviser to the campaign. Brzezinski came out and supported Obama early because of the war in Iraq. A year or so ago they talked a couple of times. That’s the extent of it, and Sen. Obama has made it clear that on other Middle Eastern issues, Brzezinski is not who he looks to. They don’t have the same views.”

Brzezinski plays no role in the Obama administration; the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Brzezinski's comments come within the same week that the White House distanced itself from comments made by former President Carter, who said he thinks "an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man."

-jpt

UPDATE: Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev told CNN that Israeli President Shimon Peres assured him that Israel would not attack Iran.

"This is the worst thing that one can imagine," Medvedev said. "What would happen afterwards? A humanitarian catastrophe, a huge number of refugees. And Iran would want revenge, and not only over Israel, but over other countries as well. The events in the region would become completely unpredictable. I think the scope of such a disaster would not be comparable to anything. Therefore, before taking the decision to launch any attacks, you need to think the situation through. It would be the most irrational way to deal with the situation. But my Israeli colleagues told me they do not plan to do that. And I trust them.`

User Comments

‘The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.’
Heh! –”research ship” and “mistakenly attacked” ??
A “double header” if there ever was one.

Posted by: stanbattles | September 20, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Next Obama sells Iran the anti-missile defense system he canceled in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Posted by: Winston | September 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Zbig and Carter are the most useful idiots that the Iranians have. How embarassing to this country.

Posted by: Bruce Purmell | September 20, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

USS Liberty was not a U.S. Navy technical research ship
it was a SPY ship knowing what it is doing and the risks associated

Posted by: fren | September 20, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

I had a friend who was killed aboard USS Liberty. His father–a professional naval officer– believed that the attack was mistaken. And apart from that, for those who think it was deliberate, there remains the question of what Israel could possibly hope to gain from attacking a US naval vessel.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 20, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

In case anyone were inclined to forget the nightmare that was Carterism, the doddering old segregationist and anti-Semite raises his face from the porridge bowl and delivers some nonsense about racism that embarrasses even the president.
And now, n the very same week, his oafish national security advisor surfaces to counsel an act of war against our democratic ally in the Middle East.
Welcome back, Carter–we’ve really missed you.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 20, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Nice of Jimmy Carter’s cabinet to come out & help bring some clarity to just how incompetent the entire administration was.
We all know Carter & ZB are anti semitic. Funny how Carter has always gone out of his way to play the race card.

Posted by: John Henry | September 20, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

It’s almost like he’d love to see a total meltdown in U.S.-Israeli relations. Who would want that, except his anti-semitic former boss?

Posted by: mesquito | September 20, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

This is very sad. While this guy “plays no role” in obama’s administration, his daughter helps promote obama’s policies, foreign and domestic, on Morning Joe.

Posted by: Jenny | September 20, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

According to Rasmussen (choice pollster of conservatives) nearly one-out-of-three voters (32%) chose Jimmy Carter as the living ex-president who has done the best job since leaving the White House.
Carter, who served in the White House from 1977 to 1981, ranks first among the four surviving presidents. George W. Bush, who has only been out of office seven months, comes in last with nine percent (9%) support.

Posted by: Numeros | September 20, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

maybe the US needs to be more worried about what Israel is doing, and whether it’s stable enough to be a modern ally and be trusted…

Posted by: ? | September 20, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

USS Liberty was not a U.S. Navy technical research ship
it was a SPY ship knowing what it is doing and the risks associated
Posted by: fren | Sep 20, 2009 11:52:05 AM
So… you are saying the the United States “got what it deserved”? Yeesh…. with “frens” like you, who needs enemies?

Posted by: gobot | September 20, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Frankly, I think Israel should not fly bombing missions through U.S. controlled airspace if the United States decides that it is not in our interest for them to do so.
I am surprised anyone would suggest that we should let any country invade US airspace without our permission.
On the other hand, I am enormously heartened to see how quick Russia was to rebuke Iran following US/Russia negotiations.
This administration, if you pay attention to what they are doing, is very shrewd about foreign policy. Of course, there are people who, for their own political self-interest, want to see Obama fail… But if you look at what Obama is doing in good faith, you cannot deny that he is playing some good chess here.

Posted by: gobot | September 20, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

“Only in Obama’s America would we be talking about shooting down Israeli jets to protect Iranian nuke sites.”
-to protect Iranian nukes?? How about to protect our troops? If we let Israel attack Iran we will never have a prayer of success in Iraq or Afghanistan. Terrorist recruitment will skyrocket and our troops, not Israeli troops, will be their first target.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

aahhhh – Jimmy Carter, those were the days. Good times, huh?

Posted by: robin | September 20, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“If we let Israel attack Iran we will never have a prayer of success in Iraq or Afghanistan.”
When did it become our prerogative to either “let” them or not?
I have some shocking news for Gobot: the skies over Iraq are not “US airspace.”
And neither I nor anyone else cares very much what kind of “job” a president does after he leaves office. The racist, segregationist Carter was the worst president of the 20th century, and he was rightly kicked out of office after one term in a permanently and deservedly humiliating manner.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 20, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

The tapes ground control to air force pilot who attacked the liberty have been released by Israel.
The transmission is in Hebrew but is very clear to those who understand Hebrew: It was a mistake and at some point when the doubt is raised that this is not the Egyptian ship they were looking for the order is given to stop the attack. The fighters could have sunk the ship with another flyover.

Posted by: NSA | September 20, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

A naive dunce of Carterian dimension, Obama has assumed that if he just makes enough concessions and apologies, the nations of the world will want to please him. This is how the WaPo sees it:
“As he takes the stage to address the United Nations for the first time Wednesday, Obama will face world leaders — adversaries and allies alike — whose rebukes of the new American president serve as reminders that the world’s differences with the United States transcend who is in the White House.
European nations have refused to send significant numbers of new troops to aid the U.S.-led war effort in Afghanistan. Few countries have agreed to accept detainees held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Scottish officials ignored Obama’s plea to keep the Lockerbie bomber in prison, and U.S. efforts to head off a coup in Honduras were ineffective. North Korea continues to develop nuclear weapons, Iran may be doing so, and Middle East leaders have rebuffed Obama’s efforts at peacemaking.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 20, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

How long before Obama has to distance himself from Brzezinski’s comments 3..2..1
Even though Obama probably agrees.

Posted by: kyle | September 20, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

The worst president of the 20th century was George W Bush. His foreign policies of arrogance and loudmouth saber-rattling were a complete failure. He didn’t impress anybody, didn’t scare NK and only scared Iran enough to convince them that they needed a nuclear deterrent. We’re still dealing with his mistakes.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

The Israelis are facing an existential threat. The US government is abandoning them and cretins like Carter and Zbiggy have only exacerbated the problem.
The Israelis will act in their own best interest. Expect the “muslim street” to go nuts. The reality is that every government in the region is already considering their options.
Funny thing is that the interests of the Saudis/Kuwaitis coincide with those of Israel.

Posted by: matt | September 20, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“The worst president of the 20th century was George W Bush”
Change that to ‘history of the United States’.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Obama is fast leading the US into a disaster. His appeasement of the Russians will not get him anything except to encourage Iran to build a nuke. The Israelis will bomb Iran and then all of the oil supply will be closed from the Persian Gulf. An economic disaster of gigantic proportions will result and the Russians will end up selling us oil at $400/barrel . Our economy will go into a depression and the government will tell us it needs to take over more functions in order to prevent econmic collapse.

Posted by: brian | September 20, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

I personally think that the liberals in Washington right now are on the track to selling this country out to another nation. Sure does speak volumes when our own president goes overseas and begins an “Appology Tour” apologizing for our involvement in WWII, Viet Nam conflict, Korean conflict, etc. I hedge a bet that he was quashed from speaking anything about 9/11 because many of these folks believe former President Bush to be responsible. Talk about “black helicopter”!!! Israel is our ally, and I suspect that if anything begins to happen in that region, and our president and congress refuse to assist, they’ll be pulled out of office so fast it would make their heads spin.

Posted by: J Kline | September 20, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Not even close, Skippy.

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | September 20, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Brzezinski is a total crackpot. He’s a retread of the Carter administration and that, in itself, is enough to scare me. Can’t wait to see if his ditz of a daughter crows along with him on “Morning Joe”.
Seems like this administration and all those with any connection to it are slowing putting their plans into effect.

Posted by: Shoe | September 20, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Israel is NOT our friend. They knowingly ATTACKED the USS LIBERTY and killed 34 and wounded 171 of my brother U.S.NAVY Sailors. Israel violates UN Resolutions, Spies on the U.S., Invades her neighbors and has caused the U.S. nothing but problems. I’m against any of the BILLIONS of my tax dollars going to any country that ATTACKED us. REMEMBER the LIBERTY!!!

Posted by: William John Webb | September 20, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

“But my Israeli colleagues told me they do not plan to do that. And I trust them”
Big mistake, Israel listens to Israel and no one else.

Posted by: JR | September 20, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

His son *Mark* not Mike.

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

“Carter was the worst president of the 20th century, and he was rightly kicked out of office after one term”
Really? I remember that he lost his office because George Bush and Ronald Reagan negotiated a deal with the Iranians to keep the embassy hostages in captivity until after the election. Then a couple of years later they began selling weapons to the same Iranians to pay for a secret war in Nicaragua.

Posted by: JR | September 20, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Zbiggy Zbiggy Zbiggy… you and Jimmy boy are definately on another planet!

Posted by: billy bob | September 20, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

William Webb-
Do you want to explain the logic of attacking a US ship during the Six Days War when Israel was facing down Egypt, Syria who at the time were satellite puppets of the Soviet regime in the Middle East, along with about four other states?
Then would you explain to me how the Czechs and Poles or allies in the current GWOT deserve to be left hanging in the balance after they challenged Putin at our behest-
yet-
the thugocracy Iran somehow deserves our protection from the IAF?
I guess your hatred of Bush has gone global-and Republicans and the work of Reagan are the real threat-Iran is your neo-ally in that.

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

“I remember that he (Carter) lost his office because George Bush and Ronald Reagan negotiated a deal with the Iranians to keep the embassy hostages in captivity until after the election.”
__________________________________
They were ‘coincidentally’ released on the day Reagan was inaugurated. Never trust a neo-con – they’ll do anything for power.

Posted by: julieterra | September 20, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

“Never trust a neo-con – they’ll do anything for power.”
Truer words have never been spoken.

Posted by: JR | September 20, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

That vile, cuckoo conspiratorial claim against Reagan and Bush has been shown to rank alongside the 9/11 Truthers in falsity. It dishonors those who repeat it, but by now it is made only by those who have no inkling of honor to begin with. In the meantime, her’s a British assessment of our Carteresque new president:
“Regimes in Moscow, Pyongyang and Tehran simply pocket his concessions and carry on as before. The picture emerging from the White House is a disturbing one, of timidity, clumsiness and short-term calculation. Some say he is the weakest president since Jimmy Carter.”
(UK Telegraph)

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | September 20, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Also Hyena, doesn’t it seem odd that Reagan would go to the Iranians for his secret arms deal? He had half the world to pick from but chose the very enemies that had screwed us just years before. Maybe because he knew from his previous dealings that they were open to his offers.

Posted by: JR | September 20, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

It’s nutsy comments like this from ZB that shows why the Carter administration failed completely. All we need is to turn our best ally in the Middle East (i.e., Israel) into an enemy (or potential enemy). Brzezinski is not a credible source for international strategy advice.

Posted by: Bill | September 20, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Give me a break… There is a much of a chance of the U.S. attacking Israeli as there is of the U.S. Congress cutting $500,000,000,000 from Medicaare. They would both carry about the same political damage to the Democrats. Go ahead, make my day!

Posted by: JoeJoker | September 20, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

William-
I’ve taken a brief look at it.
You’re not explaining to me the logic of why Israel would do that….
Obviously Zbigniew has things well pre-meditated by comparison-how long has he been harboring the “reverse Liberty” scenario?
Your also not answering why Iran would deserve our protection-
I guess the fact that they supply the means for IEDs one of the most effective weapons against US troops being smuggled from Iran into Iraq-should be of no consequence?
After all I may assume that you feel that US soldiers deserve that for being dupes of Bush in Bush’s war.

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

edit:
*you’re* also not answering why Iran would deserve our protection-

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

“Then a couple of years later they began selling weapons to the same Iranians to pay for a secret war in Nicaragua.”
“secret war in Nicaragua” is far too polite for what they were funding. ‘Terrorist activities’ is a much more accurate description.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

For all the anti-Semites and Carterite
loons, let’s look at the Liberty Affair:
1. The US Liberty was INTERCEPTING private internal Israeli intelligence code which the US had NO BUSINESS DOING,
especially at a time Israel was
compelled to go to war with the Arabs.
ANY person would question why an ‘ally’
was monitoring top secret code
transmissions of someone else. If the situation was reversed, the USA would quite rightly ask why Israel was monitoring the US during wartime.
2. Israel has apologized repeatedly
for this accident and that apology
has been accepted by all Presidents
and Secretaries of State and Defense.
Only Leftwing (Carter) and Rightwing Fascists (Brzezinski, Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, etc.) think otherwise.
3. No less than George H. W. Bush, James Baker, James Schlesinger, George Schultz, Bill Cohen and others who are not known to be in the ‘pockets of the Israelis’ (maybe not anti-Israel, but hardly the most pro-Israel of former Secretaries of State and Defense)
HAVE ALL SAID REPEATEDLY EXPICITLY AND ON RECORD THAT ISRAEL WAS NOT AT FAULT AND THAT THE MATTER SHOULD BE CLOSED
PERMANENTLY.

Posted by: Maz | September 20, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I’m not anti-Semite to tell you that if Israel attacks Iran and ruins any chance of our succeeding in Iraq and Afghanistan [which it would] after all this country has sacrificed over there, Israel’s favored status here will be in jeopardy. I genuinely hope for Israel’s sake they keep their nerve and don’t attempt something so rash. Some kind of peace process is their only hope for lasting security anyway.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Hey Skip,
“Israel’s favored status here will be in jeopardy” It won’t happen, just as with medicare and tort-reform, the cards are not in your favor.

Posted by: JoeJoker | September 20, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Sam-
However, one of the airborne platforms, a U.S. Navy EC-121, had collected voice conversations between two Israeli helicopter pilots and the control tower at Hazor Airfield following the attack on the Liberty.[11]
The NSA-translated tapes show that the helicopters were first dispatched to rescue Egyptians (control tower to helicopter 815 at 1234Z: “The ship has now been identified as an Egyptian ship”), and that they demonstrate confusion as to the identification of the target ship. (e.g. control tower to helicopter 815 at 1310Z “The first thing is for you to clarify what nationality they are. Notify me immediately.”)
EC-121 is a forerunner to the Air Combat and Command E-3 platform.

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

“just as with medicare and tort-reform” should have been “just as with healthcare and tort-reform”.
Sorry

Posted by: JoeJoker | September 20, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

so ziggy, let me get this staight we should attack israel the only ally in the middle east that doesn’t
harbor enemies of america to save iran>

Posted by: ernest Livingston | September 20, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

“the cards are not in your favor.”
I’m not sure I follow you exactly JJ but just to be clear: I support being a strong ally of Israel; I’d like to see peace in the Middle East. Israel attacking Iran is one of the very worst things that could happen right now. If they do we might as well just pull all or troops. Either that or institute the draft, because if you thought the insurgency was bad before, you haven’t seen anything yet.

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Carter and Brzezinski worked for
David Rockefeller, allowed the
Ayatollah Kormeni to return
alive, to Iran, where they knew
he would create reasons to boycott Iranian Oil, and give Saudi
Arabia and the Anglo-American International Oils much higher profits. Much Higher Oil Profits
is the Ultimate Answer to all,
all, all unsolved questions. All Known questions, and even all as yet
unasked questions!

Posted by: Xeno77777 | September 20, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

I can see why Carters foreign policies were so disastrous – with this idiot advising him. What a ridiculous and dangerous thought …to attack a trusted ally so we can defend religious fanatics and Mullahs of Iran. Has our country gone completelty crazy..Giving these radicals any kind of encouragement is beyond insane.

Posted by: jimbo | September 20, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

“What a ridiculous and dangerous thought …to attack a trusted ally”
Jimbo, that’s the whole point. If we are trusting Israel not to attack Iran because of the enormous stakes we’ve invested in the region and stand to lose for naught if they do, and they give their word they won’t attack Iran, but then they do anyway… then they’re not really a trusted ally are they?

Posted by: Skip | September 20, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Why does the author of this story assume that Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty was a mistake? The survivors of the attack unanimously say otherwise.

Posted by: Joe Shepherd | September 20, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Knowing history for the last 35-60 years is ESSENTIAL to proper understanding of this statement. Those of us who were adults when Carter was president said the same things – He can’t mean it! But he did, and he brought this country down, to the point of military and civilians as hostages for 444 days, till the day Reagan was sworn in as president. Or you could go back to the formation of the UN, with Alger Hiss as the founding secretary general. Israel’s statehood was one of the UN’s first acts. We all need to inform ourselves, and not lean on our history education, to understand and judge rightly. For one thing, Carter and Brzezinski are serious and really believe what they say. They’ve shown it before, and to say they don’t get it means we don’t understand what they are trying to do, which we need to understand.

Posted by: Gail | September 20, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Why didn’t they finish off the USS Liberty?
Ineptness?
That’s not how I’ve ever heard the IAF to be described.
And, remember dead men tell no tales yet you live…
If they were so cunning to do it on purpose in the middle of a scramble against almost all of the immediate Arabic states -they surely would have been smart enough to leave no loose ends.
So they manipulate the world, have the United States at their command yet at the same time they are-
inept?

Posted by: madawaskan | September 20, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Hmmmmmm trust Carter? Obama? or Israel?
I chose Israel

Posted by: I"m afraid I don't know about Acorn | September 20, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I disagree and think Iran is the problem here. If it keeps making threats and building up the nuclear arsenal Iran should be punished not Israel. Seems to me this whole article is for the birds.

Posted by: Steve | September 20, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Let’s talk currently important Issues, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan:
Or is that the same Zbigniew Brzezinski who alongside the hypocrite Carter got Iraq to start a war with Iran ?
or the same Zbigniew Brzezinski who encouraged arming the Mujahideen “you know who” in Afghnistan?

Posted by: Hasan Faris | September 20, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I pray that it never gets to the point where the only way Israel can protect its existence is to launch an attack on Iran. But what country on earth would be asked to stand down while a madmen rushed ahead with a nuclear program wile trumpeting the imminent destruction of its neighbor? The patience of Israel in this matter is unprecedented. Brezinski saying that we should shoot down Israeli planes if that day comes squares with his advice to the Shah to stand down when Khomeini’s fanatics launched an uprising in 1979.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Some of these posts scare the hell out of me.Carter and guide dog Brzezinski should just go away and write memoirs.They are both senile, but are dangerous because some people take them seriously.

Posted by: Freedtoo | September 20, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

It seldom gets publicized, but Al Qaeda and Bin Laden actually had conditions for peace with the west:
1) the establishment of a Palestinian state,
2) all foreign military troops off of Islamic homelands,
3) the end of the House of Saud
Doesn’t get much airplay, but that was pretty much it.

Posted by: julieterra | September 20, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

It should be noted that the U.S.S. Liberty incident is a rallying cry of anti-Semites. It’s code for “we’d be better off without Israel and better yet if we could help get rid of them.”
Israel is not the cause of the U.S.’s problems with the Arabs. Rather it’s a strong little ally which has saved our nation’s butt many times in that part of the world. Like it or not, if Israel goes down, the U.S. will go with it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

“it’s a strong little ally which has saved our nation’s butt many times in that part of the world”
______________________________________
Could you please list the times ‘our nation’s butt’ was saved by Israel . .. I’m not sure what you mean.

Posted by: julieterra | September 20, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

13 full investigations have been done of the Liberty incident. They have all concluded that Israel did deliberately attack what they mistakenly believed was an Egyptian supply ship as it sat off the Egyptian coast during fierce hostilities. It was a terrible tragedy.
Unfortunately, friendly fire happens too often. Israel strafed its own soldiers mistakenly during that time period. I understand the animosity of the Liberty crew. But the Captain of the Liberty stated that he felt Israel had reason to believe it had been fired upon and believed it a case of mistaken identity. Israel has apologized and paid millions in reparations. This case is long closed for all but the rabid anti-Semites who like to fan the flames along with their other Zionist conspiracy theories. Brezinski knew what he was doing in citing it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

USS Liberty attack was no “mistake”. Nice try, do not pass go, do not collect 200.

Posted by: Naomi Todd | September 20, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

What is really heinous about what Brzezinski is saying is that he is calling for a “Liberty in reverse.” In other words he is stating that it is fact that Israel deliberately attacked the Liberty. That is a truly disgusting thing for him to say as if it were a statement of fact. This is an anti-Semitic slur and it will stir up alot of hate as it is doing on this thread.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Respectfully, the conduct and policy of the State of Israel, like all nations, is the appropriate subject of comment and criticism. The Holocaust, like all genocides, was despicable, horryfying and must not be forgotten. It’s awful
existence, however, does not give the political entity, Israel, or its elected officials eternal immunity from critical review.

Posted by: B.Bear | September 20, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

I’m no fan of Zbig, but I agree we should shoot their planes down if they fly over Iraq…..but I’ll believe when I see it.

Posted by: Nathan Yawhoo | September 20, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Netanyahu and Iran could care less what we think, we don’t have much influence anymore. We dropped the missile shield to encourage Russia to help us with Iran. Everyone looks to Russia now, we are irrelevant. Bush ruined our international relationships. Obama’s like a cute kid who wants to be friends with everyone who gets a pat on the head and ignored.

Posted by: charlene | September 20, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Israel is a thriving democracy. There is much debate there on public policy. You see how hard it is to build a coalition of the various parties to form a government. Its leaders and policies should be critiqued as they would be in any democracy. I do not like Netanyahu’s approach. I think that settlement activity should be frozen. I agree with Obama’s strong stance on this. But Brzezinski is wrong to suggest the U.S. militarily attack Israel and even more outrageous to use the Liberty slur to legitimize it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 20, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

“But Brzezinski is wrong to suggest the U.S. militarily attack Israel”
___________________________________
I don’t think he suggested that. He suggested the U.S. intercept Israeli war planes if they were to attempting to attack Iran.

Posted by: julieterra | September 20, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Two things: If Israel gets permission from Saudi Arabia to use their airspace, as has been suggested recently but denied, then Israel does not need to flyover Iraq. However, even given that, the Israelis would still need the cooperation of the US since it is the US that will supply Israel with the ordnance needed for the job and also the massive amounts of military jet fuel that will be required.
Secondly, Israel knows full well that Iran has no nuclear weapons program and, evem if it did, Iran would not be sacrificing itself by attacking Israel and risking retaliatory annihilation in order to stop Israel persecuting Palestinians.
It’s not about Iran’s so-called ‘nuclear weapons program’; it’s all about ‘regime change’ and, despite the rhetoric, the US is just as happy to have regime change as Israel is. The bottom line is; if Israel attacks Iran then the US will back it every inch of the way.
All the Israelis are waiting for is a casus belli.

Posted by: Damian Lataan | September 21, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

.I’m sure #3 went over real well with the Saudis…
_______________________________________-
Not with the royalty, the rich and the powerful . .. but those oppressed and impoverished in Saudi Arabia might give you a totally different story.
The House of Saud is not a practitioner of democracy.
The central institution of the Saudi Arabian government is the Saudi monarchy. The Basic Law of Government adopted in 1992 declared that Saudi Arabia is a monarchy ruled by the sons and grandsons of the first king, Abd Al Aziz Al Saud. It also claims that the Qur’an is the constitution of the country, which is governed on the basis of the Sharia (Islamic Law). According to The Economist’s Democracy Index, the Saudi government is the seventh most authoritarian regime from among the 167 countries rated.

Posted by: julieterra | September 21, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The Liberty was not a mistake. But it was not
not Israel’s fault.
It was LBJ’s attempt to start a nuclear war. Thank goodness for all William McGonagals.
The stronger we our houses do build, the
less chance we have of being killed.

Posted by: bob | September 21, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Posted by: julieterra
Not with the royalty, the rich and the powerful . .. but those oppressed and impoverished in Saudi Arabia might give you a totally different story.
The House of Saud is not a practitioner of democracy.
—————————————–
In this you are correct, however, the oppressed and impoverished are the Wahabiist who are just another form of tyranny. Like the house of Saud they are draconian in every measure and use the poor to their own end.
No Arab state is a practitioner of democracy…The closest is Lebanon.

Posted by: IraqWarVet | September 21, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Of course Israel attacked the Liberty on purpose. I thought everyone knew that by now.

Posted by: Mike Gortney | September 21, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

“No Arab state is a practitioner of democracy…The closest is Lebanon.”
__________________________________
Not exactly true . … Palestine just had democratic elections, Iran the same, Iraq has now had democratic elections, Lebanon is a parliamentary democracy, Yemen is also a democratic republic, Algeria as well, Tunisia.
Of course the big oil nations are given a pass by the big oil governments of the west – it seems it’s okay to be an oppressive government so long as you play ball with big american/british oil.

Posted by: julieterra | September 21, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

If the U.S. “confronted” Israeli planes the way Zbig is advocating and forced them to turn back or shot them down, can you imagine the good laugh Ahmadinejhad would have? It really would be like the good laugh Hitler had with Mussolini after Chamberlain gave away Czechoslovakia. It would be interpreted as stupidity and weakness and signal that the U.S. was an easy mark. No question about that.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Some of these posts scare the hell out of me.Carter and guide dog Brzezinski should just go away and write memoirs.They are both senile, but are dangerous because some people take them seriously.
Posted by: Freedtoo
—————————————–
Agree! Carter and Zbig are anti-Semitic old fools and need to STHU.
I HOPE no one takes them seriously. They are an embarrassment to our nation.

Posted by: Sunnyr | September 21, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Iran has no nuclear weapon sites, that is the conclusion of IAEA. Israel’s attack on Iran, if there is one, will simply be to provoke Iran’s reaction and put our forces in Iraq in jeopardy. Brezinski is right in suggesting that such planes should be shot down. Wish our Air Force had done the same when the Israelis attacked USS Liberty.

Posted by: masmanz | September 21, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

WOW, I am so surprised to see some sanity from the mainstream news. How refreshing.
And my hat is off to Mr. Brzezinski, it took real courage for him to speak out like this.
There is hope for this world!
Thank you Mr. Brzezinski.

Posted by: Mike S | September 21, 2009, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Brezhinski is a total idiot!

Posted by: Benjamin Zeitlin | September 21, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am

The attack on the Liberty by Israel was carried out in broad daylight on a sunny day and there was no chance that the Israelis could not have seen the huge US flag that identified it. Naomi Todd says that the Liberty captain “stated that he felt Israel had reason to believe it had been fired upon.” That’s absolutely hot true and but another example of the kind of lying that has characterized Israel and its supporters for the past 60 years.
The fact that Israel was able to murder 34 US sailors and wound 171 others, including the use of napalm, over a 90 minute period and get away with it was the defining act in US-Israel relations. High level US officials, such as Dean Rusk, were steaming at the time since they knew it was no accident. LBJ, battered over Vietnam and thinking of the next election decided that Jewish money on which the Democratic Party depends, as well as Jewish votes, would be put at risk if he called Israel out for its actions and so he betrayed his oath of office and the sailors under his command. But betrayal by US politicians on Israel’s behalf, mostly by members of Congress, has long been par for the course. One day the voters will start to call it for what it is: treason

Posted by: Jeff Blankfort | September 21, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Good for Zbig! If we allow them to use Iraqi airspace we would be complicit in the bombing of Iran and also suffer the consequences.
Also, the attack of the USS Liberty was premeditated; the Israelis knew what they were doing. Using ethnic slurs against those who tell the truth is losing its effect. Try “The sky is falling!, its been less used.

Posted by: Chet Roman | September 21, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

@hopesprings52:
ASTROTURFING THE STRAWMAN!

Posted by: Wanda | September 21, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am

Well, what do you know? A suggestion for a plan that actually favors the interests of the United States over those of Israel. If Israel were allowed to fly over Iraq and attack Iran, millions of crazed Iranians would flood over the border and attack our troops over something we refused to control. It seems clear to me that if shooting down Israeli aircraft saves one American soldier’s life, it is worth it.

Posted by: John Locke | September 21, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

I. The attack on the U.S.Liberty was not a mistake. It was deliberate. Too bad for israel that much of the crew lived to tell about it.
2. The U.S. Air Force did take off to rescue the Liberty, but Sec. of Defense McNamara had the planes stand down–he called them back.
3. A Soviet ship offered help to the Liberty, but the Liberty declined.
4. Using the term anti-semite is a trick to make goyans feel guilty. It is okay to be anti-anyone that commits war crimes (in Palestine, for example).

Posted by: Charles | September 21, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am

For those USS Liberty “deniers” here is a quote by the Liberty’s commander:
Captain William L. McGonnagle said “After many years I finally believe that the attack was deliberate.”
The following people believed that the attack on the Liberty was intentional:
Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Richard Helms, Director of Central Intelligence
Paul C. Warnke, Under Secretary of the Navy
Dean Rusk, Secretary of State
George Ball, Under Secretary of State at the time

Posted by: Chet Roman | September 21, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty was no mistake. It was a deliberate assault on our intelligence gathering ship while in international waters. It was a clear blue skied day and a large American flag flew over the ship as Israeli planes checked out the ship. Soon unmarked planes returned with missiles and napalm and left 34 US servicemen dead. The Israelis, lying through their teeth as they so often do, claimed that they thought the ship was Egyptian. But any comparison of the Liberty and the Egyptian ship showed absolutely no similarity between the two vessels. Even an idiot would have recognized that and Israelis are not generally thought to be idiots even though they often behave idiotically.
It is likely that Israel did not want the US to know that they were murdering Egyptian POWs, forcing them to dig their own graves and then shooting them.
As for BBear’s assertion that it is an anti-Semitic slur to accuse Israel of a deliberate attack on the Liberty I suggest he/she read James Ennes’s Assault on the Liberty and find out the truth. Ennes and the rest of the survivors were there and B. Bear was not.
As for the US shooting down Israeli planes if they overfly Iraq, go to it. An attack on Iran would have dire consequences for the US and for once US interests should be put ahead of Israeli interests.

Posted by: Janice | September 21, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Why were Russia and Medvedev mentioned at the end? Partly – and critically – because were Israel to actually do such an asinine thing, then it would inevitably escalate into pulling Russia (and quite possibly, China) into the conflict. Both are heavily invested in Iran.
Seeing that Brzezinski’s core beef is with Russia and China, he made said statement to put those nations at ease.
Iran and Israel are only pawns in this wider game.

Posted by: Dan | September 21, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

Is this guy nuts or just that much of an anti-semite? Go figure coming from Jimmy Carter.
We don’t own Iraqi airspace, and if President Obama dares to intervene with an allied nation making efforts to not be obliterated off the map and he tries to order an attack on Israeli’s; there is going to be a military take over of the occupancy of the United States President. It will force a ‘coupe de grace’ which will be backed by the majority of the United States citizens and will force a revolution to the likes no nation has ever seen. So I suggest Obama treads lightly on this issue, especially since he has no experience WHATSOEVER!!!

Posted by: mark | September 21, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am

The USS Liberty was a ship they “mistakenly attacked”? I have read that this attack lasted quite some time.
In fact, in stretches credulity to think of it as a mistake if one reads the record.

Posted by: Bobby | September 21, 2009, 2:56 am 2:56 am

“We don’t own Iraqi airspace”
_________________________________
Nothing like that has ever stopped the United States when it wants to do whatever it wants to do. Remember the attack on Iraq? What was it called again? Oh yes . .. . Shock and Awe. Oh, oh . . . better call it off, we trespassed Iraqi airspace.

Posted by: julieterra | September 21, 2009, 3:00 am 3:00 am

The Israelis are doing bad things to the muzzies in the region that reeks of war crimes and the excuses are endless.
The Holocaust a terrible, terrifying thing serves as testimony to mans inhumanity to each other and yet Israel has now gone full circle from victim to bully in one foul swoop.
Brzezinski is a reptile of the far right
but in this instance I agree with him although I can not see it happening?

Posted by: Charlie Boss | September 21, 2009, 3:01 am 3:01 am

Shame on you, ABC News, for spreading lies: Iran does not have any “nuclear weapons sites” any more than Iraq had “WMD’s.” Do a little fact-checking, or is that too much to ask of today’s journalists? Your inaccuracies are helping to manufacture consent for tomorrow’s unnecessary wars; you seem to have no remorse over having dropped the ball on Iraq.

Posted by: Joanne | September 21, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Remember,Lord Jesus tells Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the begining, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. John 8.44. Israeli zionist attack on the US Liberty, We know Israeli zionist govts tells it was accident, they are full of excuses and liars. Past and present they still liars stories for ever so we don’t trust them because they kill Palestine off and stole the lands and organs and many things. they can do trick and fool everyones around the world and they already choked US Governments and money and control them.

Posted by: Sean | September 21, 2009, 3:25 am 3:25 am

An attack on Iran would be so disastrous for the U.S. that words fail. Iran has not attacked another country for hundreds of years (look it up). Israel, however, is another story. Thank goodness Zbig understands America’s interest here!

Posted by: Benjamin | September 21, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Since you report “Iran’s nuclear weapons sites”, I’d like to see your proof of this . . . or have you learned nothing from the Iraq war?

Posted by: Shawn Irwin | September 21, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Iran attacked a jewish center in argentina killing 85. Iran attacked israel’s embassy in argentina. A plane full of jews was brought down in panama by iran. Also iran was involved in lockerbie scotland bombing. Iran was involved in the kobar towers bombing. Current iranian defense minister was indicted in argentina for the the bombings. Iran has bragged about the killings of the u.s troops in iraq and afghanistan. Iran diplomats were caught with maps of where to wipe out sunnis in baghdad. But then you have leftists come in here and lie and say iran hasn’t attacked anyone in 200 years. Iran orders rocket attacks against israel all the time. Iran, iraq, syria, lebanon are a shiite crescent.

Posted by: dan | September 21, 2009, 3:51 am 3:51 am

The best way to stop ww3 is to be clear with Israel; They must ban,destroy all WMD’s. We should lead the way by doing the same. We are closer to nuclear destruction than ever. Israel is the only nuclear armed nation in the Middle-East with over 200 nukes. The case of the USS Liberty was a false flag perpetrated by Israel to try and drag us into WW3 with the Russians. It is time to draw the line with the International Criminal Network run by Israel and put them on notice that they will be stopped by any means necessary.

Posted by: R. Wainwright | September 21, 2009, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Thank God there is some sanity in our Government. Carter was the wisest US President after Andrew Jackson and JFK. Israel is its own worst enemy. There are living according to the old testament. Our Lord told them their ways are obsolete. Is Israel our friend? With so many betrayals to the USA;USS Liberty; 911;San Francisco spy network; espionage on our defense industry; Supression of free speech; Corrupting our Congress; Media Propaganda;brainwashing of our school children; Gaza Concentration camp war crimes; Sabra, Shatilla; BOYCOTT/SANCTION/DIVEST from ISRAEL; Begin now -it IS working. Start with STARBUCKS;NESTLE; TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS.

Posted by: WW2ACE | September 21, 2009, 4:33 am 4:33 am

“The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force MISTAKENLY attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”
Heh heh heh. What a filthy, cowardly lie. There was a huge American flag flying on the Liberty: absolutely unmistakable. The scum even strafed the lifeboats.
The Liberty Massacre, the Lavon bomb plot, their foreknowledge of the Beirut Marine barracks bombing, 9-11: WE should’ve wiped Israel off the face of the earth ourselves long ago.

Posted by: N.B. Forrest | September 21, 2009, 5:37 am 5:37 am

The attack on the Liberty was no mistake. The author is dead wreong on this. 27 dead American soldiers. The israeli’s wanted no witnesses. High time to demonstrate to our allies, OUR EXPECTATIONS.

Posted by: Bob Van den broeck | September 21, 2009, 6:12 am 6:12 am

To be a supporter of Israel requires one to swallow so many lies, to justify land theft, and to find no shame in racism. That is just too much for people with any decency in them. Israel as it is now – vile, militaristic and racist cannot last.

Posted by: richard vajs | September 21, 2009, 6:44 am 6:44 am

The USS Liberty attack, was a False Flag stunt to bring the US into the Middle East to take over…it was approved by Johnson and Sec.of Defense McNamara…it was a Treasonous CRIME! that has been Covered Up (another Crime). It’s now time for HUMANITY to GROW UP!! (Childhood’s END) The silly religions (that’s right) are here to CONTROL and DIVIDE humanity. True Spirituality has NOTHING to do with the Organized Religions, which are just another effective TOOL in the DUMBING DOWN of Humanity by our OWNERS. Time to WAKE UP and see behind the Veil!! Obama is just another Dancing Puppet dancing to Their Music….We must serve notice that we no longer dance to their Tunes..

Posted by: TruthSeeker | September 21, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

And while you’re “Waking Up” humanity – do NOT take the Vaccinations!!! It is a PHONY Lab Engineered VIRUS designed as a Justification for PHONY MANDATORY VACCINATIONS. The Vaccination is the thing to AVOID at ALL COSTS!!! This is YOUR LIFE and the Lives of your CHILDREN and loved ones that is at stake here. REFUSE THE VACCINE!!! There is AMPLE EVIDENCE of Criminality here by the Criminal Pharmaceutical Companies…They have decided that there are just TOO MANY PEOPLE, and they have a SOLUTION!!! DO NOT TAKE THE VACCINES!!! Just say NO!!!

Posted by: TruthSeeker | September 21, 2009, 6:53 am 6:53 am

ABC knowingly lies. Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, viciously murdering 34 US sailors,wounding another 170. The attack was no mistake. Our Military Commanders sat back and allowed this to happen–afraid of Johnson McNamara, afraid for their careers. Cowards, traitors!
Of course, we must use force, if necessary, and insist that Israel not attack Iran. An attack is unjustified and would be a catastrophe for the world.

Posted by: Cold Wind | September 21, 2009, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Eygpt, Asiria, Medes and Persians, Greeks, Romans. All of these were world powers in their day and now we have our current world power, mostly the UK and US with their ‘Special relationship’.
All of the afore mentioned world governments have fallen or were destroyed and ours is next. The Bible states that there will be Seven Mountains (Governments) that will rule the Earth before the creator destroys the final and seventh power. It is so obvious that Man cannot rule. Look right back throughout history and you can see that we have only ever fought wars and argued over land, money and religion.
There’s only one government that can work and it is the government that belongs to the creator of all things.
Before you comment about the Bible realise that all Muslims are encouraged to read and study the scriptures but not many people know this. Criticise me after you’ve researched this information and if you can prove it as false then I will accept any negative responses to this comment but I doubt you will find a bad response if you search all day long.

Posted by: Mark Lawrence | September 21, 2009, 6:55 am 6:55 am

If there be any political wise men who prognosticates that Israel will not attack Iran, they are foolish, and ignorant of historical reality. The Jews are a belligerent people; more so than the Muslims. We in the West accept their belligerency because we are hypocritical. Brzezinski is right; they act on their won STOP THEM. If you don’t STOP THEM, it will be the destruction of America. I mean, how far does friendship go? Are you willing to be destroyed for your friend bellicose activity? Having said all this, the Jews will act, and they will act with or without America support, because that what you get when you have a friend like Israel: You get stabbed in the face, not the back…in the face!
The Jews, like Iran, are living out a nightmare, unfamiliar to us here in the west. It’s a meddle thing. A crazy thing. No rhyme or reason. Just a blood feud. If Israel leaves Iran alone, Iran will not act. Iran is Persia. A people of wisdom! The Jews, well… So sent the jets up in the sky to protect America’s future. I know you will not, for USA doesn’t have the gumption to confront the Jews. We confront every civilization on earth, but not the Jews. Why is not. I’m not suggesting any hostilities against Israel; for Israel has a right to live in peace and prosperity. They donor have the right to put out peoples future in jeopardy.

Posted by: John Hoskins | September 21, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am

The Republican (that Mr. President you’re liar community, have record for National Defense and they have a record for: “lets us screw the middle class”. Be that as it may. Let’s see if these old boys have the gumption to stand up against Israel, when the future of America is at stake. Mind you, Israel’s future and America’s future are not the same kind of future. Israel lives in Israel lives in a violent region; a violence that they exacerbate. Israel need to calm down, take an aspirin and go to bed. No body is going to attack Israel, if Israel stops acting out their “We Are People of God” illness. Let us comfort Israel. Let do whatever is necessary, to quiet in them their personal demons. Sing songs to them..dance for, but for America’s sake keep them out those jet planes.

Posted by: John Hoskins | September 21, 2009, 7:24 am 7:24 am

Did this gentleman give his statement from his hospital bed in some Alzheimer’s unit? Mr. Carters administration had the opportunity to stand up to Iran and could not muster the gonads to do so. 30 years later ABC is reporting what anyone thinks (including Mr. Carter) from this era thinks. I think that if the nuclear facilities were in Cuba again that may give us a clearer picture of what that region of the worlds attitude may be.

Posted by: pabaz | September 21, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Far be it from me to suggest that Iran is is a holy and righteous people. because it is not. But we must remember, that it was Iran (Persia) that allowed the Jews freedom after the Babylonian Captivity. The spate between Israel and Iran has nothing to do with America. PEROID. The Jews are on their own. They like it that way, so if they start a war, let them finish it. ON THEIR OWN.

Posted by: John Hoskins | September 21, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Any bets ABC and the authour are Kosher?
Reason,the Istaelies and LBJ wanted to destroy/sink USS Liberty was for America to get envolved in invading Egypt. The Israel planes and gun boats were over painted gray to appear as Eygptian.When USS radioed in they were not migs but F16s,LBJ stopped about to push the nuke button. Records show that LBJ ordered the navy carriers not to help.
ABC and the rest of the Kosher news need burning down their presses–they did the same in Hitlergermany–no shame:^/

Posted by: Les Pisrael | September 21, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am

They (Israel) “mistakenly” attacked the USS Liberty. Rubbish! They deliberately attacked the USS Liberty and we did nothing. This was a shameful day for the US. We should have defended the USS Liberty.

Posted by: No Name | September 21, 2009, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Just a small correction: the Israeli attack on the Liberty was not – repeat, NOT – an accident !

Posted by: rbe1 | September 21, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am

John Hoskins – in due time, though not when
we are physically between them in Iraq.

Posted by: spacerook1 | September 21, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Carter is the nations hemorrhoid.

Posted by: cicsasus | September 21, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Mr. Hoskins, I simply must respond to your bizarre account of the ancient roots of the history between Iran and the Jews. You wrote, “But we must remember, that it was Iran (Persia) that allowed the Jews freedom after the Babylonian Captivity.” Let’s provide some historical context: When the NeoBabylonians under Nebuchadnezzar conquered Judah in 586 b.c., they destroyed the Temple and deported the social and political leadership of Judah to Babylon as hostages, where they remained for seventy years.
Then Cyrus the Achaemenid, first Persian emperor, conquered Babylon in turn and freed the Jewish hostages, as you say, ending the Babylonian Captivity. BUT he did so in the process of conquering all the MIddle East and incorporating it into his empire. The Old Testament tells the story of the Jews returning to Judah and rebuilding the Temple, etc., but does not emphasize the simple fact that they did so as part of the Persian state. Cyrus’s son Cambyses went on to conquer Egypt everything from Egypt to India was part of a single empire in which the Jews did not have any more (or any less) freedom than anyone else.
It is not as if the Persians were giving the Jews their independence or endorsing their right to a separate state, all those thousands of years ago.
I know, more history than you probably wanted to read this early in the morning.

Posted by: moderate | September 21, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

An Israeli Pilot was court Matialled because he refused a direct order to fire on the USS Liberty, the Pilot plainly stated that the USS Liberty was flying a US FLAG.
They knew!
As for the Comments about Russia they are building the Reactor for the Iranian using Russian Technicians, is it coincidence that the Russian Parliament just gave the Russian President the Power to attack any country that kills Russian citizens or destroys Russian interests in a terrorist act or act of War?
Until it is paid for completely the Reactor is actually Russian Property!

Posted by: The Lion | September 21, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.
Mistakenly? Not at all.

Posted by: flek | September 21, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Israel bombed U.S. Liberty intentionally and repeatedly, they are nothing but the rothchild’s spawn after WWII put in place to start the final World War to usher in the New World Order for the international bankers.

Posted by: bob | September 21, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

“Brzezinski plays no role in the Obama administration; the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”
How do you know this for certain, Jake?

Posted by: WWTP? | September 21, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Are these D.A.M. Democrats insane?!!! Attack Israeli fighter jets if they attmept to strike Iran……what are the Dems thinking? If we attack Israel, then there goes our best “National Security Intelligence” for that region. Dems have just lost all ability to construct even basic reality thought processes. Is it that difficult to see that Dems just have a yellow streak down their backs and are now being compared to the sissified conduct of the French?

Posted by: Richard | September 21, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Dear Jake, ABC et al.:
1. Scrap your assumption that Iran has “nuclear weapons sites”. Everyone who reads other sources and can connect the dots knows this to be false. Even if they did they too have the right to neither deny, nor confirm it.
2. Since when is Iraq’s own airspace “ours”? You are just invaders and destroyers of values you cannot understand or cannot stomach.

Posted by: Viorel | September 21, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

I think we should. We have be hand maidens to Isreal for too long. As long as we back isreal no matter what there can never be peace in the region. I’m not saying we abandon them but we can no longer agree with everything they do.

Posted by: dragon8me | September 21, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Erm which “nuclear weapons sites” is abc news referring to ????
Iran has NO “nuclear weapons sites” to bomb, their nuclear ENERGY program is totally legal and under IAEA safe guards and if they wanted a nuclear weapon they would have to throw out the inspectors, withdraw from the NPT and then start to enrich to over 90%, they’ve currently only enriched to 3-4% this is enough for energy but nowhere near enough for a weapon, it would take them years and years to reach this, and the NIE from 2007 and just been updated and still they have found NO WEAPONS PROGRAM,
stop lying abcnews!!!!

Posted by: andy | September 21, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

It’s beyond me how the US always kneels in front of Israel! Kneeling actually is not proper to describe what is happening for the past 60 years: the US swallow it all, balls included!!!
Liberty? Why no reaction from the US? The amount of control over the US by the Jews is astonishing. When will you guys react?

Posted by: bluenomad | September 21, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Good job, ZB, bring some of that old Jimmy Carter magic to the Obama administration.
LOL!

Posted by: Jimmy Carter's Second Term | September 21, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

and they didn’t “mistakenly” attack the liberty you propagandist fool, they knew EXACTLY what they were doing.

Posted by: andy | September 21, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

The attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate. It continued for hours, long after Israeli pilots informed HQ that the ship was clearly American. After the ship was wrecked, survivors reported that Israeli aircraft strafed the men in the water. They were trying to kill any witnesses. The attack probably happened because the Liberty had intercepted evidence of a massacre of Egyptian POWs by Israel.

Posted by: dennis | September 21, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Brezinsk and Carter did a great job with the Iran situation. These two were lame back then and now they are just nutty.
Israel is our eyes and ears in the middle east. We need them and they need us. They are our only true friends. This cannot be said about any other country.

Posted by: Kathy | September 21, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

good old Carter warmovers.. always good for a laugh..He wants us to go to war with the one nation in the region we can rely on to do the heavy lifting against terrorists. The Israelis had been fighting alone againts the thugs until 9-11 happened.. Get a life ziggy

Posted by: driverq5 | September 21, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

There is a subtle difference between a “symbionic” relatinship and a parasitic one. If Israel insists on building in the West Bank, they can do so. They are a sovereign nation. But, they don’t have a right to have US fund it. Same goes with war with Iran. It they start it, they can finsih it. We aren’t interfering one way or another.
As far as attacking Israeli jets, that’s pretty provocative. And yes, the USS Liberty was not exactly what “friends” do to each other. I think we should treat Israel like they do us: a friend when it’s convenient. Period.

Posted by: Kilroy | September 21, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Yeah, great idea. Send up USAF pilots to confront the Isrealis,… it might work. The Isrealis could probably use some decent fighter cover for their raid. I’m sure most of our boys would be happy to lend ‘em a hand. You put US fighter pilots in the air and tell ‘em weapons hot, they’re a lot more likley to blast Iranian targets than Isreali fighter-bombers. Zigi Bryz-what? Isn’t he a character in Mad magazine?

Posted by: Capt D | September 21, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

“The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.” MISTAKE? Who are you kidding? Check the Liberty survivor’s web page. You want to stop Israel…stop feeding them money and munitions. Israel is why we’re in this mess.

Posted by: robertsgt40 | September 21, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

How arrogant to think Israel needs to ask anybody’s permission to protect itself. I don’t think they need to use planes. Israel has submarines that can do this job. If Iran had the same capability as the IDF there would be no state of Israel…who are we kidding?

Posted by: Lutka | September 21, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

If President Obama had the courage of a President Eisenhower, there would be no wars in the middle east.
Freeze Israeli assets in America and encourage the same in other countries.
Do not buy their goods or services.
No guns, just some self-inflicted denial. If they pull another sneak attack like that done on the US Liberty, then take them out for their own good.

Posted by: Sam DiMuzio | September 21, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I predict, unless Iran backs down on nuclear, Israel will go in and bomb them within the hour. I am sure we won’t shoot them down. I hope political means can stop all of that, but I sure won’t hold my breath with that nut job in Iran!

Posted by: Justme8811 | September 21, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

The attach on the USS Liberty was deliberate! When will our government stand up for the US servicemen murdered in cold blood by Israel?
Oh yeah and “our airspace in Iraq….” Really?

Posted by: Well Informed | September 21, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

As has been said above: Israel purposely attacked the US Liberty to stop it from relaying the intel it had picked up relating to the Israelis murdering over a 1000 Egyptain Officers in cold blood. The ships Captain and the lead Israeli pilot, who refused to attack the ship, positively identifying it as American, admitted that HQ after informed gave orders to continue the attack. The Mossad is also tied into the 9/11 attacks and other terrorist activities. Israel is not an asset but both a parasite and a national threat to the U.S.A. Among other things, Israelis have now been implicated, along with their army in Gaza and Palestine, in over 5 different countries trafficing in body parts. Besides we are just cattle according to the Talmud, right, that’s what they believe.

Posted by: Robert | September 21, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

In 1962, twelve Vatican Theologian’s published a book called “The Plot Against the Church” under the pen name, Maurice Pinay. After discovering old latin histories by the thousands had had multiple chapters of history removed for now understanabel reasons in all the contemporary rewrites different languages. They explain how this “5th Column” has infiltrated both the Church and governments, how “they” have gained control over all finance and publishing company’s, school ciriculums, and media, for the purpose of their “One World Satanic Government. Explains the reasons for all the wars today and economic woes and what is to come. Get the book it is something else.

Posted by: Robert | September 21, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I hear you talking, but it is hard to say the US should attack a country who is protecting itself and is not an enemy of the US. We did not attack Russia when it attacked and held ground in Georgia. I am not sure who some of you are that recommends attacking another country. I don’t think you have the best interest of the US and it’s people.

Posted by: James L. | September 21, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Cap D – nice post. You obviously have watched Top Gun too many times. The attack you seem so willing to partake in from your armchair is likely the one that will drive the final nail on the US coffin, and hopefully, Israel as well.
Newsflash – our pilots likely know that Israel is the reason we’re in the mess we are in today.

Posted by: White Russian | September 21, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Wow, the Israel hating conspiracy freaks are out today.
Poor misunderstood Iran.
And even though we should have NOT gone into Iraq, I guess Sadam was a warm and cozy leader, and his two sons, fantastic fellows.
Have a wonderful day!

Posted by: Rock72 | September 21, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

We have heard enough from both Carter and Brzezinski. Now that is a real pair. They come out of the woodwork now to put gas on the fire and make no sense. Carter says all Americans who disagree with Obama are simply racists and the other nut wants us to attack an ally, but does not say attack our enemies. Go figure. The WH must be so desperate to find allies, it has to go outside because there are none in Congress.

Posted by: James L. | September 21, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Jimmy Carter said,
“I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man.”
We can adapt his wisdom to the man himself and to the Israel-haters on this board:
–I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward Israel is based on the fact that they are Jews.–

Posted by: Community Agitator | September 21, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Hey NONAME!
“When USS radioed in they were not migs but F16s”
F16s didn’t exist back then. Get your facts straight

Posted by: Martin | September 21, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

driverq5 – yeah, Israel was fighting “terrorists” alone alright – it was fighting the people who have been occupied by Israel for 60 years. We’ll see how calm you remain when someone takes over your home and doesn’t let you eat, work, or leave your home without permission. Israel really did need some help, right? Funny how 9-11 conveniently brought the US into THEIR mess. Funny how Bibi Netanyahu’s first comment on the 9-11 attacks was that “it is good…for Israel”.

Posted by: White Russian | September 21, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I see we have all the anti-Israelies out today. Let me ask one question.
Where would you feel safer – Iran or Israel?

Posted by: Kathy | September 21, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Veterans Day is Nov.11th. Honer all Veterans by asking Congress to launch a FULL Congressional Investigation into the June 8th, 1967 Israeli ATTACK on the USS LIBERTY that has never been done in over 42 YEARS. WE NEED THE TRUTH! REMEMBER the LIBERTY!!!

Posted by: William John Webb | September 21, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I agree with Mr. Brzezinski, if Israel trys to attack Iran, we should shoot their planes down. Iran is NO threat to anyone in the middle east. Israel needs to realize we are there to help protect them, but they (Isreal)need to shut up and keep their military within their borders!!!

Posted by: BR | September 21, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

My 21 year old son is an F-16 mechanic in Balad, Iraq. Our F-16 Fighting Falcons are worn out and ready for the scrap heap. He only gets used/refurbished parts…if they don’t fit they have to take them to the grinder and make them fit. The Israeli F-16′s are brand new 2 seaters, better than our F-16′s. “The Israeli Air Force’s (IAF) F-16I Sufa (Storm), a two seater, is the latest version of the Lockheed Martin F-16. Israel’s Peace Marble V foreign military sales program will supply the Israel Air Force (IAF) with 102 two-seat aircraft and is the largest Israeli F-16 acquisition yet. The F-16I is specially designed for Israel, and has been named “Soufa,” or “Storm” in Hebrew, by the IAF. The F-16I for Israel is based on current Block 50/52 production aircraft. The F-16I has a 23,600-kilogram [52,000 pound] take-off weight, considerably more than the earlier F-16s in IAF service, and is armed with the AMRAAM air-to-air missile.”

Posted by: steven1nc | September 21, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

We can adapt his wisdom to the man himself and to the Israel-haters on this board:
–I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward Israel is based on the fact that they are Jews.–
Posted by: Community Agitator | Sep 21, 2009 10:23:00 AM
__________________________________
It’s not who people are, so much as what they do. Most people learn that concept by the time they are a young adult. Wit respect to all peoples who have suffered genocide: the end does not justify the means.
Jews with left leaning ideas are against what’s happening in Israel with right wing ideas and politics.
Jews are helping the Palestinians with justice from settler land grab.
Extreme ideas (like ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians), IS the issue. The United States has to be extremely careful who they are supporting – as a Democracy, we cannot condone such acts.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 21, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Geez, did Carter have people that nuts in his administration? Well, I guess that really isn’t surprising.
On the contrary, it is Israel’s decision, to act or not, based on the threat presented to them.
The US should not take that step on Israel’s behalf, but if Israel themselves, feel the need to act, that is their own prerogative.
Iran has shown that they are a major enemy of Israel, and that they are militarily active in the middle east. That means if they provoke Israel, they will have no one to blame, but themselves, for any consequences.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 21, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

William John Webb, i would feel much safer in Iran. And im not anti israeli but, i am anti occupation by israelis.
(its like this… Im a patriot, but i sure in the hell dont support Obamas war effort.)

Posted by: Rich | September 21, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Jamesl first lets get the facts straight. President Carter never said all those who disagree with President Obama are racist. He said their was a fringe element. He said the element who depict the President of the United States as a animal or as the reincarnation of Hitler or who wave signs saying we should bury Obama with Kennedy, go beyond the bounds. which I agree with.But I do not believe it is a majority, even among Republicans. If it was President Obama would not be sitting there in the White House today. The problem is when this fringe element is seen no Republician’s stand up to them and say this is wrong and racist, for example when the pastor of a christain church says he hates Obama and hopes he dies and goes to hell and the next day one of his members attends a Obama event with a gun in public view, where is the outrage on the right and the outrage of conserveative christains.

Posted by: kenneth | September 21, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Since when does a rogue nation have intrinsic rights to attack any nation that they deem dangerous to themselves? Just because a nation is building nuclear power doesn’t mean it is making nuclear weapons. The real question raised should be; why does Israel have nuclear weapons? Why doesn’t the international community do something about Israel and their nuclear weapons? The U.S. has a responsibility to control Israeli aggression in the Middle East. Since they are our ally, and we provide up to 7 billion a year in free aide, ( Jewish organizations provide over a billion more ) I would think the U.S. can tell Israel not to act unilaterally in any attacks. Hard to believe that a nation of 7 million can control so much of the world attention. Hard to believe that many Americans are so misinformed about international matters. The U.S. cannot allow a rogue nation to attack other nations based on their perception. Allies of the U.S. coordinate intelligence and act as one. The USS liberty was deliberately attacked by Israel and the USS liberty’s identity was known in advance by Israel. What did the U.S. do about this? Actions speak louder than words, and one only needs to watch what Israel does, not what it says.

Posted by: JR | September 21, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Wow. There’s an awful lot of irrational hatred of Jews on this Board. It just reaffirms for me how important it was for the U.N. to establish that tiny little nation and for it to be strong and independent to protect it from the wingnuts.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Rich, it wasn’t me who asked where you would feel safer. You’re looking below my name instead of above. Yes I’m Anti anyone who attacks our serviceman then tries to say it was a mistake! Look up USS LIBERTY ATTACK and judge for yourself everyone. Israel is NOT our friend! REMEMBER the LIBERTY!!!

Posted by: William John Webb | September 21, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Really great article in the Washington Post [oddly enough] over the weekend on this issue. Good to see the reality of what’s happening in Israel in print.
I agree with White Russian. Let Israel under their current leadership, be accountable for their own behavior.
No more U.S. lead wars for the sake of Israel. No more funneling money to Israel, in turn to pay off our Congress for political leverage.

Posted by: gus amaral | September 21, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

“You’re only doing yourselves a disservice by calling us anti-semites, instead of examining the root cause of hatred towards ZIONISM posing as religion, Judaism.”
A lot of Americans have awoken to the anti-semite game. Israel is a lot like that little punk kid who punches every kid in the mouth and then runs and hides behind his big brother, USA. Well, the big brother comes home with all the bruises from the fight, not the little punk. Israel has been having a hard time hiding the genocide they are carrying out on the Palestinians whose land they stole, this is exposing a lot of the other crimes they took part in. Including their attacks on the U.S., of course, to the zionists, these attacks are no big deal and their is a good excuse for all of them.

Posted by: Jim | September 21, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Hopesprings52 says
“Like it or not, if Israel goes down, the U.S. will go with it.”
Would that be because of Israels doomsday “Samson Option”?

Posted by: White Russian | September 21, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

9/11 was a Zionist job. The Protocols are real. Wake up to the real enemy!
Google:
dancing israelis 9/11
mossad 9/11
Odigo 9/11 Haaretz article
Larry Silverstein “pull it”
Harold Rosenthal interview

Posted by: Wrothchild | September 21, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Interesting to read these comments. There are the Israeli apologists and the nationalist Americans. It points up an important factor that Israel must consider,that their support in America grows weaker so that an attack on Iran could be tipping point.

Posted by: JP Straley | September 21, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

So this man , who did NOTHING as National Security Advisor to the Peanut farmer, presumes to tell us how we should react to Israel’s “predicted” attack on Iran? As far as I can tell, Israel actually does what it says it will do..unlike many who have been in charge of our security and wimped out…Zbigniew…go back into retirement.

Posted by: angus | September 21, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

in your opening statement you refer to irans nuclear weapons sites,its isreal who has the nuclear weapons sites, iran as far as we are told in the uk press has unfinished nuclear reactors its little wonder that you americans go to war at the drop of a hat reading this kind of [if i may use a americanism] CRAP

Posted by: neil | September 21, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Isreal should get shot out of the air if they trt to hit Iran just like they should have 42+ years ago when they attacked our clearly marked ship USS Liberty in broad day light with our flag flying in international waters. LBJ let them get by with murder then I wounder how will Oboma will treat the super power Israel? I doubt he will lift a finger he is just like all the rest of our leaders ISRAEL FIRSTERS.
Phillip
USS Liberty Survivor
Three time President Liberty Veterans

Posted by: Phillip F Tourney | September 21, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

I finally agree with something Brzezinski says. Wow. There are a dozen reasons why attacking Iran is lunacy, and this is how you treat lunatics.

Posted by: Roland Ansgar | September 21, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

With all due respect to the Liberty veterans, there have been 13 investigations of that “friendly fire” incident and all have concluded that Israel deliberately attacked what they believed to be an Egyptian supply ship off the coast of Egypt. The loss of life was terrible and I understand the animosity but friendly fire does happen in “the fog of war.”

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

As a Vietnam veteran, I feel totally betrayed by our government’s response to the deliberate attack of the USS Liberty by Israel. Israel has used and abused the United States for 60 years. Iran has never been a threat to the US, and an Israeli attack on Iran will have far reaching unpleasant consequences for all Americans. Brzezinski is right. REMEMBER THE LIBERTY!!

Posted by: Ranger 67 | September 21, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Hey,gus amaral
They are ALL our F-16′S.
Paid for by the US Taxpayer.
During 2006 Israel attack on Lebanon,even the aviation fuel had to be rushed to Israel,at an extra cost of $250 million.US TAXPAYER GOT THE BILL!
As far as Israel’s attack on the unarmed American communication ship on 6/8/67 being a “mistake”ask the surviving crew:
http://www.liberty.org.
34 US Servicemen were slaughtered in cold blood by Israeli forces on that day.Highly classified USN frequency signals sent out by Liberty were jammed by attacking Israeli forces.
Yeah a mistake!
According to the Christian Science Monitor,the cost of Israel to the American TAXpayer has been over $1.6 TRILLION since 1973.

Posted by: bruce | September 21, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

So conjure up this image — the Obama administration sending U.S. aircraft up to protect Iran’s airspace and it’s nuclear installations from an attack by a democracy that is one of America’s closest allies. Indeed. Why is the left, whose side is forever screeching at the right to stop warmongering and embrace diplomacy, suddenly ready to start blowing F-15s out of the sky over Baghdad instead of reprimanding Israel diplomatically after the fact?
That’s an awfully curious stroke of belligerence given that (a) the IAF would be entering Iraqi airspace to attack not the United States but one of its chief enemies, (b) a successful attack on Iran’s facilities would at least delay a nuclear crisis in the Gulf for a few years, and (c) the only reason Israel hasn’t struck already is because it’s put its faith, very stupidly, in the west’s ability to deter Iran with, ahem, diplomacy.
In an odd way, it reminds me of the DNC promising a “rain of hellfire” on critics of ObamaCare–while The One’s gearing up to schmooze with the dregs of international autocracy this week at the UN. (Hot Air)

Posted by: Appeasement Czar | September 21, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

And what of the Iranian passenger jet that was shot down, allegedly by mistake? What should have happened to the US?

Posted by: deanbob | September 21, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

he suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.
Does this mean that we are officially acknowledging that the terror sponsor state Iran is seeking nuclear weapons? Why would we stop Israel from attacking them in order to defend themselves?
Unless you think the idea of having nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists is a good idea.

Posted by: Jameson | September 21, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Kathy,kathy,kathy,
They are both religious states.
You might want to ask the parents of Rachel Corrie how safe Israel is.She was crushed to death by an Israeli bulldozer(paid for by US taxpayer)at work demolishing a Palestinian’s family’s home in Gaza.
Gaza is the largest open air prison totally controlled by Israel.
Kathy,there was an Israeli investigation into the death of Rachel.
Yes,there’s always an Israeli investigation….Israeli Driver was not found liable in the young American woman’s death.All Israeli investigations end this way. Now a society can choose Apartheid,but the US taxpayer should not pay for it.
Presently Israel is subsidised to the tune of $10 million per day in US aid that we know of…..

Posted by: bruce | September 21, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

IF WE ARE NOT WILLING TO DO THE DIRTY WORK, THEN IT IS UP TO ISRAEL TO STOP THOSE FANATICAL IRANIAN MANIACS!!!

Posted by: Kris in AL | September 21, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

J Kline – They’ll be pulled out of office? You must be implying that AIPAC will pull them out of office by withholding “donors” next election cycle. Or do you mean “pulled out” of office, as in assassinated by the Mossad, a la Kennedy? Where is YOUR loyalty? Israel, i bet. See, this is how things are supposed to work in the US – we make decisions based on the what’s best for Americans, not Israel. If you feel, as so many other “chosen ones” do, that the US should act for Israel against the safety and best interests of OUR country, then you should probably not be a US citizen, you should have your citizenship revoked, as Jews in the Knesset want done to Arabs.

Posted by: White Russian | September 21, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

“The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”
The above assertion, in this article, is an outright lie. The Israelis knew all along exactly what and who the the Liberty was. This is backed up by interviews with IAF pilots who participated in the raid – recorded radio transmissions – accounts by the survivors of Liberty – and US pilots that were prevented from defending the Liberty.
An Egyptian Horse Trader indeed! Israel started the 6 day war to grab more land that was not bequesthed by the UN resolution that created the state of Israel. This has been verified by a former Mossad agent in his book “By Way of Deception”. Israel used every trick in the book.
The reason Israel attacked Liberty was to get Johnson to sign on to their aspirations to use the false pretext of a “threat” that never existed, and then to sink the USS Liberty (a false flag attack) and have the US blame it on Egypt.
Israel’s only problem is that the Liberty didn’t sink – that there were survivors – and that some Israel’s “soldiers” had a conscience. Johnson should have been impeached for what he allowed Israel to do to the crew of Liberty.
And the statement in this article claiming the murder of 40 American sailors and destruction of American assets was a mistake, is why mainstream news, like CBS (near bankruptcy) and ABC news will hopefully be out of business.
And this is the problem

Posted by: Cadavre | September 21, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

It’s beginning to look like the false flag attack is going to be on Israel, to build support for the already “penciled in” October attack on Iran.

Posted by: Jim | September 21, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Millions of people got killed in 2nd world war and Jews act like they were the only one suffered. Total death toll was around 30 million people+. Then they stole land and using USA to attack Iraq and then Iran. Stupid we fall into Jewish trap. Obama be careful. Do not fall into their trap.

Posted by: Adam H | September 21, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

The Presedent will not attack Israeli jets, Zbig Brzezinski is entitled to his opinion, however that is all it is, an opinion, Russia will keep it’s pitbull Iran in check for the moment,Israel will have no need to attack Iran for the moment because they will not be building any nuclear weapons for years to come despite their threats, the deplomacy of this This President will succeed.

Posted by: we'r1 | September 21, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

This man is an idiot. I’m not sure I agree Israel should attack Iran, but if they do we should not be involved in any way.

Posted by: Joe Eckhardt | September 21, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I wonder how American Jews feel now about voting in overwhelming numbers for Barack Obama.
Sure, I get the fact that our rookie president hasn’t endorsed Brzezinski’s plan. But do you seriously think anyone would have been having this conversation if a Republican were in the White House?
And isn’t it obvious that Obama is no friend of Israel? There’s no guarantee Obama would provide the Israelis with military support even if they attempted to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability.
Really, why do Jews consider it “loyalty” to vote for Democrats? Hasn’t anybody ever told them that loyalty is a two-way street?

Posted by: Upon Further Review | September 21, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

“The ultimate expression of anti-semitism is to stay out of debt.”

Posted by: kalidas | September 21, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

hopesprings52, you need to wake up! did any of those 13 so call investigations interview the crew that was being attacked. Why isn’t the media talking to them. Because we are being lied to that we need Israel. Let’s interview the survivors of the LIBERTY and let Americans and the world hear the TRUTH!! REMEMBER the LIBERTY

Posted by: William John Webb | September 21, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

There will be no war or strike from Israeli or America in Iran this year or next 6 years for that matter, Iran will however growl at Israel when ever given the chance, the inevitable will happen, but not during this President watch.

Posted by: we'r1 | September 21, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

@ hopesprings52:
FYI, the Israelis flew over the USS Liberty several times (for more than nine hours!) before attacking it. It had a large US flag, clearly visible. Are you ignorant of this fact? Or else a disinformation shill? then you can apologize to the USS Liberty’s survivors! They’ve already suffered enough at the hands of Israel & the US government – at least have the decency to not spread lies about the attack…
Also, I suggest you refrain from calling Brzezinski an “anti-Semite” (which is SUCH a stale, over-used slur, anyway…).
Sam Bolivar

Posted by: Sam Bolivar | September 21, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

You stinking liar. The USS Liberty was not sunk by the Israelis by accident. It was sunk deliberately and survivors were strafed in the water.
Stop the lies. Stop the propaganda.

Posted by: liarpantsonfire | September 21, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Israel has hundreds of atom-bombs, Iran MAY be working on one. But the idea of bombing any nuclear-facility is total madness: the radioactive debris and dust will spread over areas ,depending on the wind of the day, so large and in non-combatant-areas, that Tjernobyl will look like childs- play.

Posted by: Johnny de Vulcan | September 21, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

It sounds like Brez wants to protect Iran.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | September 21, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

So let me get this straight…It’s OK to shoot down, kill, our allies, living breathing pilots, in order to prevent an defensive move against an certified madman who is bent on destroying anyone who is not in agreement, possibly with nuclear weapons, with his ideology; however, it’s not OK to use aggressive interrogation techniques that may save the lives of innocent civilians which include children….So what makes Brzezinski/Carter Administration any different from the very people they criticize…..liberalism????

Posted by: Parallex View | September 21, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

When Is Israel going to be asked to account for its nuclear arsenal? Israel has been allowed to get away for decades with its nuclear plans – none of which are for peaceful purposes.
From the beginning Israel lied to the Kennedy administration which had grave concerns that Israel was developing the bomb. Israel, already the recipient of billions of US tax dollars lied and lied to the US government and when US inspectors went to inspect Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona, the Israelis bricked up the wall that led underground so that the US would not know what was going on.
And lest anyone forget, Iran said it would forego any nuclear ambitions if there would be a nuclear-free Middle East. That would include Israel of course.
When will the world insist that Israel be held to the same standard as Iran??

Posted by: Janice | September 21, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

The USS Liberty was not accidentally attacked by the Israelis. It was definitely on purpose. Read the book. Learn your history. Some of us will never forget.

Posted by: paul | September 21, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Let keep in mind this the opinion of Brzezinski and not the Obama admin.

Posted by: gman | September 21, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Upon Further Review – You seem upset that American Jews voted in large number for Barack Obama. Maybe it is because many of us put the welfare of our country ahead of what Israel wants. Maybe we don’t have dual loyalty. Maybe it is because our loyalty is first to the U.S. and not to Israel.
And today there are many of us who are upset with Obama because he and his administration are turning their backs on the well documented Goldstone report on Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

Posted by: Janice | September 21, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Rachel Corrie was SET UP by Palestinians. Who sent her into a dangerous situation of their own making, and then ‘tipped off’ Israelis about a bomber in the home. Check your facts!!!

Posted by: InLA | September 21, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

ABC has lost all credibility. The USS Liberty was not attacked by mistake. All evidence proves otherwise. This is not some crackpot conspiracy theory. An fairly recent, well balanced front page investigative report in the Chicago Tribune concluded that the Liberty was not attacked accidently.
What is amazing is the fact that ABC didn’t even write something like: “Controversy still surrounds the bombing of the USS Liberty, with Israel insisting the attack was accidental, and many survivors maintaining that it was deliberate.” Or SOMETHING like that. But no, ABC chose to publish a lie. ABC, you’re a joke.

Posted by: Jim | September 21, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

How dare you declare that the USS Liberty attack was an accident. The US flag was flying and the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing; another false flag operation to blame the attack on the Egyptians. The US command in the area was ordered NOT to provide assistance to the Liberty. Treason by any other name.
And no, “liarpantsonfire”, the ship did not sink. It was badly damaged but it did not sink.
Regarding the subject story, I believe we should let the Israelis attack, if that’s their agenda. But the US should only be an observer if that happens. And no fly-overs in Iraq. They’re on their own here. Allowing a fly-over would indicate we agree with their tactics and agendas.
I still remember the dancing Israelis filming the WTC destruction. Our leaders may forget past misdeads; I don’t.

Posted by: Gordon | September 21, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Sam Bolivar – Are you for real??? What cave have you been living in? Iran is a non threatening country? Have you ever HEARD Ahmadinejad SPEAK??? And don’t even start with teh have you ever met an Iranian, I am one!

Posted by: InLa | September 21, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Israel has been volleying threat of attack on Iran for years they event Had a simulated training.
In fact all these hypes is directed at US troops in the regions tham means Iran attacking US instalation and arming Afghans and Iraqis.
All these Israel threat is to Bully Obama to to ignore the halting of settlments in the West Bank.

Posted by: Phonk | September 21, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Say what? What IS this dude talking about? Pull your head out, dude. Shouldn’t ‘everyone’ from the former Carter administration kind of go back to sleep? Don’t give Obama any more crazy ideas, we’ve had enough for one year.

Posted by: Banderman | September 21, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“accident” the only accident was the valient sailors of the ‘USS Liberty’ fought back and some survived

Posted by: george | September 21, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

The Only contry who can wreak havoc on Iran is USA
Israel will suffer so dearly and they know it if they attack Iran
Iran has misiles that covers the whole Israel. I guess the Israeli forgot the 39 scuds
Intercepting Iran’s misiles is like playing a Euro lottery with the lives of their citizens.
Israel started this bluff years ago and the attack on Syria a weak states is another card Israel played to show off that they are serious
Iran is not Syria or Iraq or any other state. If Israel attack which I am 100% they won’t there will be starvation in the four corners of the planet.

Posted by: Phonk | September 21, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”
ABC news what do you expect
Lying is their daily breakfast
Especially when Israel is involved
There is actually a law in USA that does not exist anywhere in the world
Criticizing Israel is punishable offence.
You can Imagine why ABC says “mistakenly”

Posted by: Phonk | September 21, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

What nuclear weapons sites exactly? All 16 US intelligence agencies say the Iranians haven’t got any.
Oh, you mean if they attempt to attack Iran’s IAEA-safeguarded, NPT-compliant, nuclear power generation facilities?
Now that makes sense- after all, even Israel certainly doesn’t have any of those, and they don’t want Iran to have any either.

Posted by: Duglarri | September 21, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

@ InLa :
First of all, before you get all over me, I wasn’t responding to *your* post, was I? I was responding to one by “Kris in AL”. Thanks.
So you are Iranian? It’s nice to meet you. (^^) And no, I’m actually pretty well-informed about international events, thank you. ;-)
Are you saying that your homeland has been actually threatening attacks Israel, like Israel has been doing against Iran? That would surprise me. Please send me links to back that up. What I’ve read is that the Western media has lied about Pres. Ahmadinejad’s claims – e.g., that Iran would ‘wipe Israel off the map’. The articles I’ve read (links below) have stated that this pro-Zionist claim was disinformation:
“Wiped off the Map” – the Rumor of the Century
by Arash Norouzi
Does Iran’s President Want Israel Wiped Off The Map – Does He Deny The Holocaust?
Lost in translation – Experts confirm that Iran’s president did not call for Israel to be ‘wiped off the map’.
By Jonathan Steele
*******
Also, I’ve read that Iran has not aggressively attacked another nation in some 200 years – is this accurate?
*******
Looking forward to ‘hearing’ your views. Please feel free to email me

Posted by: Sam Bolivar | September 21, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

It’s time to put it to rest on the Liberty slur. It was a terrible tragedy, but…there have been at least six government investigations which reached relevant conclusions as to the facts of the attack. Those investigations, and their results, are as follows:
Report Date issued Conclusion
C.I.A. report June 13, 1967 No malice; attack a mistake
U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry June 18, 1967 Mistaken identity
Report by Clark Clifford July 18, 1967 No evidence ship was known to be American
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 1979/1981 No merit to claims attack was intentional
National Security Agency 1981 Mistaken identity
House Armed Services Committee 1991/1992 No support for claims attack was intentional
The last investigation was spurred by White House Chief of Staff John Sununu, who, after meeting with Liberty veterans, referred them to Representative Nick Mavroules, chairman of the Subcommittee on Investigations of the House Armed Services Committee. After a one year investigation the matter was closed, the investigators evidently finding nothing to support conspiracy claims or any Israeli intentions to attack a US ship.
The incident has been studied to death and always the same conclusion. It was a terrible friendly fire incident. The loss of American servicemen was terrible. But folks need to look at the facts on this. Brzezinski is giving legitimacy to this slur and that is unforgiveable.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

@ InLA:
You claim that, “Rachel Corrie was SET UP by Palestinians. Who sent her into a dangerous situation of their own making, and then ‘tipped off’ Israelis about a bomber in the home.”
—> I have Palestinian friends and Jewish friends, but no one has ever said anything like this before. Any links to back this claim up? What are your sources?
Thanks.

Posted by: Sam Bolivar | September 21, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

“”"”Also, I’ve read that Iran has not aggressively attacked another nation in some 200 years – is this accurate?”"”"”
Posted by: Sam Bolivar
So I guess “insurgency” doesn’t count? Many times over the US has found Iranian weapons proving their involvement. Is the Iran/Iraq war just a forgotten memory? You could say they were defending I guess. They now own the Iraqi Air Force because they never returned them. Threats aren’t aggressive, but we have to look into what Iran is actually doing behind the UN’s back.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

>Report by Clark Clifford July 18, 1967 No evidence ship was known to be American
If it was all a horroible accident then why did the Israeli’s doctor the photos? They certainly knew that it wasn’t the Egyptian ship that they claimed they shot at. If it was an accident then they should have admitted it and compensated the victims families–they have not done this.

Posted by: David Conklin | September 21, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Hi Sam, about Rachel Corrie, which was of course, a tragedy – I wont provide specific links, because as I said, its just another persons opinion. I suggest you google to find the videos of what transpired, as well as interviews of Joseph Smith, aka Joseph Carr, the leader of the Solidarity Movement, and the last person with her. You can clearly see him change his story and avoid clear questions about what happened. You can do a little digging and judge for yourself.

Posted by: InLA | September 21, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

@ hopesprings52:
Thanks for listing the investigations.
However, you have chosen to only provide one side of the information. As far as I understand, the USS Liberty survivors have claimed for decades that it has been the U.S. government involved in the cover-up of what really happened back then… So if their claims are true, it’d be hard to expect any number of GOVERNMENTAL investigations to reach conclusions contradicting the results that the investigators’ employers (Uncle Sam) desired, wouldn’t you think?
Yes, folks need to “look at the facts” – including survivors’ statements, of course. Some studies (reaching quite different conclusions than those you chose to list!) are at:
http://www.gtr5.com/commentary.htm
One example is:
“A Juridical Examination of the Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty”
(LCDR Walter L. Jacobsen, JAGC USN)
This law review article was published in the Winter, 1986 edition of the Naval Law Review.
From page 16:
“Conclusion – Why The Liberty Was Attacked
The Israeli attack on the Liberty was intentional and premeditated. …
Whatever the reason, the attack on the Liberty was not an accident. It was also not true that the Israelis, as they were to later claim, had mistaken the Liberty for the Egyptian horse
transport El-Quseir, which was in port in Alexandria at the time.115 The decision to attack the Liberty was a conscious one, taken by Israeli leadership in the command center.116 ”
So please do not attempt to conceal the ugly truth:
1) Israel intentionally attacked, and attempted to sink, the U.S. vessel, despite the U.S. being its ally;
2) It attacked unarmed victims in life boats, and attempted to kill all aboard;
3) It later strived to conceal its actions;
and,
4) It refused to pay reparations until many years later – and for a relatively minor sum when it finally did.
Any surviving Israeli military personnel responsible for the attacks, and Israel as a nation, should be severely punished for its crimes of that day. Justice must be served, for the sake of the victims.

Posted by: Sam Bolivar | September 21, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

@ InLA:
I see. So you have no links to back up what you’ve said? That’s unfortunate. I generally try to back up my claims, because it makes it easier for people to understand where I’m coming from.
Oh, well…

Posted by: Sam Bolivar | September 21, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”
More lies. The Israeli Govt. knew that the liberty was a US ship. Transcripts of conversations between pilots and their controllers prove it.
Once more the corporate media lies.

Posted by: Bill Jones | September 21, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Saying that Iran is involved in a war or insurgency because weapons of Iranian make are found there is ridiculous.
The United States is the #1 exporter of weapons in the world. So every time someone shoots someone with an M-16 was the US “involved”. Yes, but only in the most peripheral of ways, in the way that maybe all human beings are involved. Directly involved? Not at all.
It is the dumbest of dumb arguments to state we can sell weapons to anyone in the world and not be responsible in the least for how those weapons are used. But, somehow all other countries have to track every weapons sale they ever made and take complete responsibility for how the weapons are used.
Stupidity. Idiocy. Hypocrisy.
Easily seen as a propaganda talking point to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together.

Posted by: Freedom | September 21, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Obarry has gotten in bed with the Russians,by caving in on missle defense,and now the think Obama will act as their puppet? Maybe he will if the Apollo group will let him off their strings first.

Posted by: Marion | September 21, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

hopesprings52, First it was 13 investigation, now 6. How long does government investigations take to complete? What you’re claiming was done in ONE week. Sounds like a cover-up to me. I believe the crew of the USS LIBERTY!!! ISRAEL KNEW!!!

Posted by: William John Webb | September 21, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Our ship USS Liberty was attaked by the Israel in broad day light with the Stars and Stipes in the wind Israel new who we were in international waters.Israel wanted us all dead and fast but we kicked there rear ends and did not fire a shot in this two hour murderous assault. LBJ the bum covered up for Israel they got by with cold blooded murder just as our congress is doing now for Israel the past 42+ years covering up for them!!
Phillip F Tourney
USS Liberty Survivor
Three Time President Liberty Veterans

Posted by: Phillip F Tourney | September 21, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

The pro-Israelis in the US won’t take too kindly to Israel being attacked. Secession and civil war kind’ve not take well!!!!!

Posted by: denn84116 | September 21, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

“”The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”"”"”
That was no accident. Anyone with even an inkling of knowledge knows it was done on purpose.
Israel definitely has to be stopped however. There is no doubt about that. They have gotten totally out of control.
They have spewed enough lies, war and propaganda threw their lifetime. They are war criminals and violate human rights on a daily bases. They are no more a democracy then there is a Santa Clause. Finally the UN passed a resolution to have weapons inspectors go in. Israel will however balk at that one for sure. they will scream and whine. But the fact of the matter is just before J.F. Kennedy was assassinated he too wanted weapons inspectors in there and with good reason.He knew what they were up to. Oddly enough after his assassination it was dropped.

Posted by: Rose | September 21, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

The attack on the USS Liberty was demonstrably NOT a mistake. Is ABC News a news organization? If so, check your facts.

Posted by: Publius | September 21, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Mr. Tourney- I honor your service and mourn the loss of your comrades in this terrible tragedy. But Sir, in the Naval Inquiry your Commander McGonagle testified that he felt sure the Israeli torpedo boats believed they were under fire from the Liberty. Additionally, on June 5, the United States government was asked to inform the IDF of any U.S. ships in the battle area, but the IDF was not told of Liberty’s mission. The United States government was concerned about such dangers and ordered the Liberty farther away from shore but the order was not received in time due to a series of communication failures. These are all facts. A terrible accident. Israel would not be so stupid as to intentionally attack its strongest ally and greatest friend in the world.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Iran has not been attacking anyone. They are using refining for hydro electricity which many many counties around the world do. Israel on the other hand has about give or take 200 to 300 nuclear bombs in is paws. Seems they are doing exactly what they say others are doing.
In the building they were manufacturing their lovely toys (WMD) it had five floors beneath the surface which they kept well hidden. They also contaminated the entire area around it.
They did everything imaginable to hid this from the world. They have one they have more mark my words. On fellow who told the Times about it ended up in jail out of site for years.
The Dimona reactor: in Which Palestinians are the weakest point and closest to the reactor, as Palestinian controlled lands are only 50 aerial kilometer away. Also a lot of the waste is buried in Gaza as well. Even employees of the plants were used in experiments. Ex-staffer at Dimona nuclear reactor says made to drink uranium. How special.
Oh yes go ahead truth the Israelis. Go for it. Be stupid.

Posted by: Willie | September 21, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The attack on the Liberty a mistake?? Listen to the surviving crew members, I think they have a better perspective on this than abcnews. That ship was attacked deliberately by Israel. The only real mystery is why.

Posted by: syvanen | September 21, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

So, Israel is going under Obama’s bus too, huh?

Posted by: no surprise | September 21, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Freedom ———- here is a difference between a “legal international arms sale” and an illegal one.

Posted by: lfrichar | September 21, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Just be grateful that Commander Cheney and Bush are not at the healm. We would be in yet another misguided war.

Posted by: Chuck | September 21, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Tapper, dude, keep two close eyes on this. I’m just an average joe, but I’m seeing smoke … is something cooking?

Posted by: Paul | September 21, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Why am I not surprised that Jake Tapper repeats the zionist party lie that Israel “mistakenly” attacked the USS Liberty? Given your obvious pro-Israel bias you should either recuse yourself from reporting on any issue involving Israel or be prevented from doing so by management.

Posted by: Patrick | September 21, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I love Zbig: He has always kept his eye on the real dangers facing America, rather than the manufactured threats of AIPAC & AEI!

Posted by: Adam Kirur | September 21, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Wow, We turned on Honduras. We’re selling out Poland and Czechoslavakia, and Carter’s former defense secretary wants us to attack Israeli jets. I thought that all of our allies hated us when George Bush was in office. How do you suppose that they are liking us now?

Posted by: Bob | September 21, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Well Bob it’s a lot like. The Al-Quada was a creation of the US to help fight the USSR. The Taliban were put into power by the US and Pakistan.
Saddam was put into power by the US.
They too were allies of the US.
All of the above were funded and supported by the US.
So you see, when we get done with them and they no longer serve our purpose, we wipe them out. It’s getting to be a tradition you see.

Posted by: Rose | September 21, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

“…suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.”
What NUCLEAR WEAPONS SITE?? This article is a masterful piece of perception manipulation. First it takes as a gratuitous fact that Iran has nuclear weapons site(which if they really did nobody would dare attack). The evidence? Well that does not seem to be important. Never mind the real fact, confirmed over and over again by IAEA inspectors on the ground (inspectors that Israel does not allow anywhere near its nuclear facilities), is that Iran can only now purify and only purifies fissile Uranium up to 5%. Enough to use as fuel for their upcoming, interminable it seems, nuclear power plant.
But hey, why deal in fact? Zbigniew Brzezinsky could have NEVER HAVE SAID THAT WE SHOULD ATTACK ISRAELY PLANES ATTACKIN IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS SITE BECAUSE HE KNOWS FULL WELL THAT SUCH SITES ARE AN ISRAELI FABRICATION!!!that is not even mentioned in ABC’s fallacious reporting on that interview.
Have you no decency left when trying to manipulate public opinion? Thank God now that a bigger and getting bigger part of the public see you and your other acolytes for what you really are: propaganda outlets

Posted by: Stanley Laham | September 21, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

If Israel faces a credible threat they have every right to stop it, what an idiot, I suppose letting the middle east get fried with a nuke is better than a missile attack against Iran to stop a something that can cause instant death to millions and send the rest of the world into chaos and suffering. What do some people on here think, that a nuclear weapon is like a cartoon bomb that isn’t going to hurt anyone but Israel and what if Israel nukes them back, causing even more destruction?

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 21, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Is Jake Tapper for real? Israel “mistakenly” attacked the USS Liberty? Read the book Attack on the USS Liberty or go to the USS Liberty web site. I’m guessing Mr. Tapper is terrified of the Zionist lobby.

Posted by: dean luckey | September 21, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Medvedev getting assurances from Israel, that’s rich, they are not the ones doing the threatening, Iran is, whether they have the capability or not, they have threatened to use it when and if they do. Keep your own crazy allies in line before you start worrying about what Israel will do and stand up and do your part to use your power for a peaceful solution to these insane threats from Iran that threaten the fragile stability of the region before the problem really does get out of control.

Posted by: Ferrari5858 | September 21, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Israel may not have been so stupid to attack its best friend in the whole wide-world, but I’m not so sure about the IDF officers guiding and driving the airplanes and torpedo boats.
At best, the combined air and sea attack on USS Liberty was a reckless and grossly negligent act; at worst, it was performed with full knowledge that the ship was likely an American ship.
A question I’d like answered is: Why did the IDF publish fake gun camera images in its History Report about the attack? The gun camera images purported show USS Liberty under attack, but the ship in the images appears nothing like USS Liberty. An innocent party should have no reason to create and present fraudulent evidence.

Posted by: Ken | September 21, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I think Obama should do exactly that. I mean, why should a great Ally like Israel be any different than the packed full diaper of support we just gave the Czecks and Poland?
I’m just glad I’m not considered a friend of Obama!

Posted by: TxBoB | September 21, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

It speaks volumes when someone with a good grasp of the English language supports Israel’s reckless action despite being shown how such action will be detrimental to the United States.
Where do those people’s loyalties lie?

Posted by: Adam | September 21, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Neil brought it up, about five pages back, September 21 / 11:26:31AM, but it bears repeating.
From the first paragraph:
Zbig: “President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them”.
*What* nuclear weapons site?! Is ZB becoming a tad senile or was this a Freudian slip?

Posted by: hyssop | September 21, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Actually, Israel was planning on bombing Iran’s nuclear power plants which would have been a huge mistake. Even though they continue to say that these power plants are nuke bomb factories to justify their actions-most people know that they are just nuclear power plants. HOWEVER, IF ISRAEL WERE TO BOMB THESE PLANTS, THE FALLOUT WOULD GO ALL OVER THE NICE LITTLE BOLT HOLE THAT OUR FEARLESS LEADERS HAVE BUILT FOR THEMSELVES IN THE GREEN ZONE IN IRAQ.
If Israel were to bomb Iran’s power plants, then when the economy heads into the toilet and Congress and most of the other branches involved in the chicanery that has torched the economy would be heading into nuclear winter. They would be safe for a very brief period just before they began glowing and losing their teeth and hair.
MK

Posted by: MK | September 21, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Every time Carter opens his yap he demonstrates the fact that he was the worst president in history…why would we listen to anybody he chose for an advisor? If Zbig wants to go over to Iran and negotiate on behalf of Israel, then let him go. If Israel is going to be in a position of nuclear blackmail and coersion, then why don’t the Obama supporters go and make peace with Iran???

Posted by: Bill | September 21, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Hey Bill, Carter was the most honest, not the worst.

Posted by: Ann Sinatore | September 21, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

mistakenly attacked? again and again? because they had picked up a massacre on radio? Mistakenly spits all all that died on the liberty…shame

Posted by: Tyler | September 21, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Mistake? The Chicago Tribune did a recent article that proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Israel knew it was attacking a US ship. The article included reports by electronic eavedroppers who heard IDF pilots reporting it was a US ship. Their COs told them to attack anyway.

Posted by: speakingtruthtolies | September 21, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Okay… Does anybody find this adminstration INSANE yet!?!
Call the White House and tell them to STOP this madness before we lose men over there if were lucky and OVER HERE if were not!!! Start calling NOW!!!

Posted by: jafo | September 21, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

An attack on Iran by Israel could ignite a major if not a global war.
The head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard stated unequivocally that
“Iran will strike Israel nuclear sites if attacked” (AFP)
Israel in turn will respond with nuclear weapons, according to Ha’aretz.
This is a nuclear war in the making…
Not to mention the minor complication that there are a good number of Russian technicians working at Iranian nuclear sites…

Posted by: Panno | September 21, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

USS LIBERTY:
Per the writer’s statement that the Israelis “mistakenly attacked” the USS Liberty during the Six Day War, the writer is DEAD wrong!
The Israelis INTENTIONALLY ATTACKED the USS Liberty that day.
I had a very good friend who was an Officer on the BRIDGE of the USS Liberty that day. The USS Liberty was a “spy ship” off the coast of Israel with a HUGE AMERICAN FLAG painted on the side of it.
The Israeli jets (American-built F-4′s) repeatedly attacked the USS Liberty again and again. As a former pilot, I can attest tht NO ONE among the Israeli pilots could have MISSED that FLAG and that they were attacking a U.S. Ship! They did it ON PURPOSE killing American sailors!
Did the U.S. declare WAR against Israel for its attack against a U.S. vessel in international waters as the U.S. SHOULD have? No. The U.S. in ’67, cowardly let American sailors die by the Israelis with no retaliation against the murderous Israelis, and let the USS Liberty limp back to its base in Norfolk, Va. looking like “swiss cheese.”
The Israelis KNEW the USS Liberty was a “spy ship” (like the USS Pueblo), but feared the U.S. would notify Egypt of the “surprise” attack.
Israelis have KILLED more Americans than any other “U.S. ally!”
My friend and the Captain on the bridge were both severely injured while the other men on the bridge were killed. The only thing that SAVED my friend was that each time the Israelis would strafe the Bridge of the USS Liberty, the Captain would yell at everyone of the attack and my friend literally dove behind a METAL water cooler that took most of the HITS rather than him. Otherwise, he would have been killed too!
Your writer does NOT know what he is saying in his piece about a “mistaken attack” by Israelis against the USS Liberty. The Israelis INTENTIONALLY ATTACKED and KILLED American sailors that day while the U.S. Government did nothing to hold the ENEMY (Israel) responsible for it.
The “Six Day War” KILLED Americans by the Israeli Air Force, many of whom were TRAINED here in the USA.

Posted by: GC in Oregon | September 21, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

USS Liberty a mistake–
please make an emendation as required
for journalistic integrity.
NSA wiretaps proved conclusively it was a direct attack over 5 hours!
Some of the Israeli Pilots tried to refuse
the order but were told it was a direct order.
If there is an ounce of integrity–make the correction–or ABC will continue in a well-known cover-up.
How dumb do you think the US is?

Posted by: Cato | September 22, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Jacob Tapper–
Methinks your reporting is tendentious–
USS Liberty a mistake even wiki while
skewed shows evidence for the attack being deliberate–as did the highest members in our Gvt. Is that what they taught you akaba Hebrew Academy?

Posted by: Robert | September 22, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

There have been 10 U.S. investigations and 3 Israeli investigations, which have all concluded that the Liberty was an unintended case of mistaken identity. Retired Admiral, Shlomo Erell, who was Chief of the Navy in Israel in June 1967, told the Associated Press (June 5, 1977): “No one would ever have dreamt that an American ship would be there. Even the United States didn’t know where its ship was. We were advised by the proper authorities that there was no American ship within 100 miles.”
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara told Congress on July 26, 1967: “It was the conclusion of the investigatory body, headed by an admiral of the Navy in whom we have great confidence, that the attack was not intentional.”
In 1987, McNamara repeated his belief that the attack was a mistake, telling a caller on the “Larry King Show” that he had seen nothing in the 20 years since to change his mind that there had been no “cover­up.”
In January 2004, the State Department held a conference on the Liberty incident and also released new documents, including CIA memos dated June 13 and June 21, 1967, that say that Israel did not know it was striking an American vessel. The historian for the National Security Agency, David Hatch, said the available evidence “strongly suggested” Israel did not know it was attacking a U.S. ship. Two former U.S. officials, Ernest Castle, the United States Naval Attache at the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv in June 1967, who received the first report of the attack from Israel, and John Hadden, then CIA Chief of Station in Tel Aviv, also agreed with the assessment that the attack on the Liberty was a mistake.
The new documents do not shed any light on the mystery of what the ship was doing in the area or why Israel was not informed about its presence. The evidence suggests the ship was not spying on Israel.
Israel apologized for the tragedy immediately and offered on June 9 to compensate the victims. Israel ultimately paid nearly $13 million in humanitarian reparations to the United States and to the families of the victims in amounts established by the U.S. State Department. The matter was officially closed between the two governments by an exchange of diplomatic notes on December 17, 1987.
However, if so many still believe that a cover-up was involved, then it should be investigated again. The question is, will the survivors and the conspiracy theorists ever accept that it was a mistake, a terrible mistake.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 22, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am

I can’t believe my ears. I am shocked at the chutzpah Brezinsky has in stating this very courageous new direction in foreign policy. Bravo, bravo indeed.

Posted by: john galt | September 22, 2009, 2:19 am 2:19 am

“…suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.”
Brzezinski did not say “Iran’s nuclear weapons sites”. It was Jake Tapper who said that Brzezinski said so…

Posted by: Jan Labanowski | September 22, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica
Time Magazine, March 18 1985:
‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” he says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”
Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:
“In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”
According to Norman Finkelstein of the City University of New York in his book The Holocaust Industry published in the year 2000, ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million’ (p.83)

Posted by: Mike | September 22, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war

Posted by: Mike | September 22, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

I think that among anybody here who knows anything about anyplace other than the USA, the only ones who are supportive of the notion that Israel should strike Iran are the Christian Taliban who are slowly taking over the Republican Party here and the increasingly Likudnik Israeli public. The Christian Taliban here are all eager to get to their Rapture and End Time Scenario and the Israeli public is getting more and more skittish and incsecure about the fact that their only allies left in the world are a bunch of nuts an ocean away that believe 4 winged horseman are gonna come down and save the day after 90% of the jews perish in Israel after some great battle. Hmmm, yea…i guess that’d make me pretty nervous too.

Posted by: michael zacharia | September 22, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am

The 30+ US sailors who were murdered by our Israeli ‘allies’ aboard the USS Liberty are of no concern to Israel. Israel just wants to insure it’s unregistered foreign lobbyists and spies at AIPAC keep the groveling US politicians under control and keep the billions per year flowing (and keep the west bank). Our allies- right!

Posted by: Ray | September 22, 2009, 7:21 am 7:21 am

To inform anyone who isnt aware: there are enough Christians in this country that if the United States sets itself against Israel, there will be a civil war that will shred this nation. A physical, bloody civil war. An attack agains Israel is tantamount to the United States attacking itself. Our forefathers gave us the right to bear arms against a potential rogue government. That would do it.Guaranteed.

Posted by: jess | September 22, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Our symbiotic relationship with Israel are not necessarily rooted in friendship but in strategic importance. We need them as a strong military ally in the region and they need us like a little brother needs a big brother when being picked on by bullies. To shoot down their planes would be a catastrophe for us and the region. What a foolish, short-sighted notion!

Posted by: DaveM | September 22, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

The day that the United States purposely shoots down Israeli Jets is the day President Obama has the worst migrane of his life. Imagine the screaming and anger. If he didnt like being called a liar in congress, he will pray for another day like that. Americans will have to make a choice on that day. He would do well to denounce Jimmy Carters advisers. Presdident Obama cant afford to even imagine a scenario such as that. Or worse, for the voters in America to imagine it.

Posted by: karan | September 22, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

The evidence of the holocaust is so overwhelming that if someone chooses to believe it is a myth,they must be so filled with hate that the blindness has consumed them.

Posted by: jakefromcali | September 22, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

“Upon Further Reviews” comment is wishful thinking. If Iran is attacked we will be drawn into the caldron of war. First because Israel is our most valued ally in the Middle East, if you don’t believe me just ask them and their lackeys in Congress. Secondly, because of the old adage ” A friend of my enemy is my enemy”. Obama is not my choice but it is refreshing to have an America president not marching lock and step with Israel and their unregistered agents of a foreign government (AIPAC, ADL, etc.) in the United States. If Netanyahu and his zealot cohorts attack Iran the world may very well witness Armageddon. If as the “Chosen People” they wish to be ambassadors of peace, “SET THE EXAMPLE AND REMOVE THEIR NUCLEAR WEAPONS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST”. Talk about “chutzpah”, you have them and your telling some else they can’t have them.

Posted by: AmericaFirst | September 22, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

This article sounds like a great idea. I agree w/this article- 100%. Iran has a right to deny the holocaust if they so choose – even though it may not be right. Furthermore, It is Israel who are making horrible threats of war. It has been exposed that they have committed acts of war and of humanity – U.S must do the right thing in order to protect others and that is to take down israel jets if need be..The situation w/the uss Liberty was NOT an accident. U.S should of cut ties w/this state – unfortunately they are a failed state.

Posted by: Desiree | September 22, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

In response to Karen, just to set the records straight Israel is the largest reciepient of foreign aid to the tune of billions and sweet heart contracts every year. That’s why they need us. Also, the United States is the only major country in the UN that votes lock and step with them. If the holocaust evidence is so overwhelming perhaps jakefromcali can tell me why it’s the only subject that is forbidden to publicly debate. In 13 European country’s it is punishable by law to question anything regarding the subject, WHY? If there is documented evidence to challenge what we hear 24/7 regarding the holocaust than bring it into the light of day and prove them wrong. Is there something the jakefromcali’s wish to hide?

Posted by: AmericaFirst | September 22, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

“DaveM” is half right, our forefathers did fight to bear arms against a dictorial rogue government. In this case that government is “ISRAEL”. Just look at what they have done recently to the innocent men,women and children in the largest concentration camp in the world “PALESTINE”.
Karen, the only reaction to what you discribe as the “Obama’s worst migrane” will come from what a writer has accurately described as the “Christian Taliban”. The only “gevalding and shiveh” will be from those blessed to be American citizens but who’s hearts and loyalty are in Israel.
“Wake Up America Before It’s To Late.”

Posted by: AmericaFirst | September 22, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I’d like to know where Zbig stands on missile defense designed to shoot down Iranian missiles headed for Israel….

Posted by: Bridget | September 22, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Neville chamberlain would be proud of all of you. see you in he bomb shelters

Posted by: rikster | September 22, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Israel and her facist supporters once again miss the point Zbigniew Brzezinski was trying to make. Mr. Brzezinski is not advocating the willful strafing of Israel aircraft. He is making a case for not allowing Israel carte blanc to bomb Iran without consequences, one being that if Israel were to fly into American control airspace they would be viewed as a hostile entity. This is no different than what Israel has done for decades. They certainly engaged in this type of response with the USS Liberty.
Israel has violated international law for decades. They refuse to join the IAEA, sign a nuclear non-proliferation treaty and allow inspections of their nuclear facilities. Iran has done this. The U.N.’s Goldstone report has found Israel guilty of war crimes. Netanyahu has casually dismissed these serious charges. Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein were not granted such a priviledge. Israel refuses to stop construction on the settlements in occupied Palestinian territory. These are all acts of a rogue country. What Mr. Brzezinski was advocating much to the chagrin of Israel and her supporters is that such behavior has reached its limit and that there must be serious consequences for a country that sets itself above all others.

Posted by: Jack Olson | September 22, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Why is everyone shocked that Brzezinski said this? In Gulf War I Bush41 threatened Shamir that if Israel attempted to attack Iraq after the SCUD attacks on Israel that Israeli jets would be attacked. To make the threat creditable the president had or threatened to have the IFF(Identification Friend or Foe) codes changed.

Posted by: A.King | September 22, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Traitors continue to deny the attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate, and hold a gun to the heads of those who’d expose it. Amongst the lies they tell us is what Kristol says, that there have been 13 investigations calling it an accident – that’s a lie. Only one of those investigations even concerned whether it was an accident. Even the cover of Kristol’s book has a faked photograph claiming to be the aircraft view of a ship with no flag showing, when it’s the ship months later after it was unloaded and back in the US!
The CIA released their information 10 years after this attack that the planes knew it was a US ship. Later experts go much further, Moshe Dayan told the US the day before to withdraw it or he would sink it. Have a look at the discussion behind the Wikipedia article on the Liberty, it’s all in there, but traitor administrators pull the strings.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 23, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Brzeinski’s comment wouldn’t make any sense if he thought the Liberty attack had been an accident.

Posted by: David G. | September 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Does ABC have any other opposing views to those hypocritical members from America First. The USS Liberty was a spy ship that was warned to get out of Egyptian waters.There was no congressional investigation due to obvious reasons.

Posted by: Gary | September 23, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Honor is a good word. The Military’s Heart and Soul is a stirring narrative brings much deserved honor to our military and their families.

Posted by: violet camp | September 23, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

There is no chance whatever that Obama would shoot down Israeli planes. He has already said that it is a matter for them to decide. I think the right/left wingers have nothing better to do than project onto Zbig their own hopes/fears. They haven’t gotten used to the fact that we have a rational president, having gone through 8 years of W. and Cheney.

Posted by: James Fox | September 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

People who wonder how the truth behind the USS Liberty was concealed so long should check the discussion behind the Wikipedia page on the “incident”. There they will discover all the dirty business that’s been going on. Or would discover it, except the Java script has been set to archive everything after just one month, so you think it’s a low-importance article. (Talk pages at properly written articles hold all the discussions for months or years and amount to 100s of Kbs of text, but at USS Libery incident you don’t get to see it).
If you really persist, you’ll discover the archives are also accessible and are full of evidence of censorship. An editor called “WorldFacts” wished to include references to the “Moorer Report” in the article. It’s an extremely damning account from people now retired from very high-up positions in the US military. WorldFacts wanted to include what it said as the “Moorer Report” so Google would pick it up (obviously, there are millions of references to “Moorer”, so not using “Moorer Report” in the article means that people don’t realise it’s anything significant to the account).
When WorldFacts got really frustrated at the wiki-lawyering and the accusations of antisemitism, he proposed taking the disruptive editing he faced to “litigation”, the word that Wikipedia uses for their Arbitration Committee. WorldFacts was instantly blocked indefinitely for making a “legal threat”! There really is no limit to what the traitors will do to conceal the murder of these 34 Americans.
Most recently, more of the best material has simply been slashed. eg on March 13, 2003, Assistant Secretary for Defense John Stenbit, claimed that the Israelis had warned the United States to move the USS Liberty or they would sink it within 24 hours. His belief and well-referenced testimony was simply deleted as irrelevant at the end of August, and the article is losing lots of other significant information in order to protect Israel.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 23, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Why does ABC identify the Liberty episode as a mistake by the Israeli armed forces? The Liberty was a battleship gray deep draft vessel that was flying the largest American flag it had in the flag locker. This attack went on for hours, by air and sea. The testimony of the surviving crew of Liberty, which is recorded on the ship’s website, makes it abundantly clear that this was a deliberate attack. Why do we allow the Israel Lobby in this country to perpetuate their lies?

Posted by: J | September 23, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Brzezinski and his former boss President Carter are anti semtic bigots. Does any one really care what they have to say anymore?

Posted by: stan | September 23, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

If Iran has nuclear weapons sites, someone needs to destroy them, and if the Isrealis are up to the task, more power to them. Could it start an all-out war? Most likely. But it would be better than an all-out war started by Iran actually using a nuclear weapon.
BTW Where does Brzezinski get off calling Iraq ‘our airspace’ Iraq is still a sovereign nation- unless Zbiggy is planning to annex it.

Posted by: Randall Scott | September 23, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Loud noises!!!

Posted by: Brick | September 23, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

United States law forbids sending foreign aid to any country engaged in illegally developing nuclear weapons. Israel has done the same for decades. Pollard, an Israeli spy who stole plutonium from the US, is serving a life term in prison. Why is the US subsidizing Israel, in violation of our laws? Since the founding of Israel, we have contributed over #100,000. for every one of the six million jews killed during the Holocaust. Enough is enough!

Posted by: Christopher Coughlin | September 23, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

WHAT WOULD HIS REACTION BE IF A NUT SAID HE WAS GOING TO DROP AN ATOMIC BOMB ON YOU?WOULD YOU WAIT FOR IT TO HAPPEN OR WOULD YOU TaKE ACTION TO STOP IT ANY NATION THAT IS OPENLY THREATENED BY ATOMIC WAR SHOULD DEFEND ITSELF -ISRAEL- U.S OR LOWER SLABOVA

Posted by: LARRY | September 23, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

it’s time the isreal issue must be talked about in open

Posted by: tony | September 23, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Israel’s patience is just about run out on the likes of Brzezinski and other bigots like him. Mossad may take the reverse view of warning bigots they may be shot down should they interfere with Israels right to self defence. They would have every right to do so.

Posted by: Trep | September 23, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Zbignew Brezinski shouldn’t be vilified for providing advice indirectly through the media, neither for the advice nor for the means. I’d like to know what Scowcroft or Kissinger think of the suggestion. I have to dismiss those who support Israel with this so far hypothetical act, it would be completely foolhardy. As for the settlements, the US can’t expect Israel to stop the illegal settlements as long as US fundraising organizations continue to send money and supplies to continue them. Along with threatening to scramble fighters over Iraq if Israel sends a bombing raid into Iran, we should threaten to freeze the assets of these Israeli settlement expansion fundraiser groups as well.

Posted by: colinalcarz | September 23, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Israel has to standup to its extremist fringe polulation and act according to the best interests of the vast majority of Israelis who are moderate secularists. Israel’s woes are as much a result of the wackos waiting to bomb the dome of the rock as hezbollah. It wasn’t palestinians who shot Rabin.

Posted by: colinalcarz | September 23, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Liberty disinformation.
Those who argue that Israel deliberately attacked the Liberty argue that the motive was to prevent the US from passing on whatever intelligence it intercepted to the “Arabs.” The main Arab actors in that war were Egypt and Syria with the Jordanian role secondary. Egypt and Syria at the time were Soviet client states. Why would the US in June 1967 provide intelligence to Soviet client states? And today, something new I read above, Dayan warned the US he’d sink the Liberty if it were not moved. Golly. I also notice most of the above posts seem to be from the same coven of anti-Semites, all devotees of the same mythology, a persistent pathology.

Posted by: Stephen in New York | September 23, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

I also take exception with those from the anti defamation league and neoconish sorts who brand anyone with anything less than blind support for any and all Israeli acts as anti-semitic. One can be anti zionist and not be anti semitic one can be anti extremist and not be anti semitic. Why can’t people make critical remarks against an obviously stability destroying plan without having someone whip out their anti semite card? There is no uniform concept of what it means to be jewish or a semite, it stands to reason then that not all acts done by one so called jewish organization are as supportable as those of another with the same ostensible jewish nature but with a completely different agenda.

Posted by: colinalcarz | September 23, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Maybe it’s about time someone does put Israel on the chopping block.
They are very problematic (failed state) and yet cry about how they need protection when in reality their neighbors are the ones who needs protecting. U.S should have cut ties w/them when they intentionally murdered armed forces on the USS Liberty.. they are now officially WAR CRIMINALS WHO ALSO COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. AMERICA OPEN YOUR EYES!

Posted by: Desiree | September 23, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

“The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.”
Get the story right next time ABC, the Liberty was intentionally attacked by unmarked Israeli MIG’s. Israel was trying to pull us into their mess like they have numerous times before. Try doing a little research before misleading the masses with disinformation. It’s about time we stop letting Israel dictate our foreign policy in the region. Nothing will ever improve over there until we do.

Posted by: Scott | September 23, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

“Brzezinski plays no role in the Obama administration; the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”
That’s news! Brzezinski was President Obama’s chief National Security Advisor during his Presidential Campaign. It would be a stretch to believe Brzezinski has no national security advisory capacity behind the scene’s in the Obama Administration.
Beyond that, who does Brzezinski, NSA to Carter, proponent and active instigator of forming and CIA training of the Mujadin, giving them Stinger missiles and so on, who are now taking over Pakistan and Afghanistan mowing down American, British, and NATO troops?
Brzezinski is the last person on earth I would want any where near US foreign policy decision makers. He has his own agenda at interest, not America’s.

Posted by: skyblu5555 | September 23, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Don’t forget co-founder of the Trilateral Commission. Yeah I sure wouldn’t be taking any foreign policy advice from him.

Posted by: Scott | September 23, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

My understanding from the reported NSA
intercepts–was that there was a mass killing by the Israelis of
P.O.W’s and/or Israel was making a false-flag attack hoping to be identified as Egypt.
A school in Wisconsin wanted to
have a memorial and the Anti-defamation league et aliae forced them to cancel.
Make no mistake about it–this was a deliberate 5 hour multiple phased attack–the head of the NSA said as much–do your own research.
Although the hubris of this mis-information is staggering at least it is evident–unlike the dancing Israeli Spies of 9/11–Cameron on Fox did a 3-part report–taken down from the
fox website but available with some research.
Great book Ostrovskys “By Way of Deception” on Mossad and attacks made against the West made to look like Israelis enemies. NY Times bestseller
The reported should be reprimanded!

Posted by: Diogenes | September 24, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Dose Tapper know more than the principals:
That there is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew; evidence of such intent is supported by statements from Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Undersecretary of State George Ball, former CIA director Richard Helms, former NSA directors Lieutenant General William Odom, USA (Ret.), Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, USN (Ret.), and Marshal Carter; former NSA deputy directors Oliver Kirby and Major General John Morrison, USAF (Ret.); and former Ambassador Dwight Porter, U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon in 1967;
5. That in attacking USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against American servicemen and an act of war against the United States;
6. That fearing conflict with Israel, the White House deliberately prevented the U.S. Navy from coming to the defense of USS Liberty by recalling Sixth Fleet military rescue support while the ship was under attack; evidence of the recall of rescue aircraft is supported by statements of Captain Joe Tully, Commanding Officer of the aircraft carrier USS Saratoga, and Rear Admiral Lawrence Geis, the Sixth Fleet carrier division commander, at the time of the attack; never before in American naval history has a rescue mission been cancelled when an American ship was under attack;
Excepts from the Moorer Commission

Posted by: Diogenes | September 24, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Would USA attacked let say Venezuela if Venezuela was building nuclear weapon and would threatened USA? Why Israel can’t defend herself? Any logical explanation? Why Israel’s West Bank legitimately taken during the war started by Arabs in order to destroy Israel should not be part of Israel forever as ALL other countries in the world always did? Should Turkey return territory taken from Armenia? (And Armenia did not start that war!). Should Russia return annexed territory to Poland? And so on…

Posted by: Eugene | September 24, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Brez: USA defends Iran and attacts Israel.

Posted by: ben kodish | September 24, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Seriously, how is our alliance with Israel helping us?

Posted by: Hilary | September 24, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Zbig is getting old. The US doesn’t own a spec of airspace in the Gulf. It’s either Iranian or belongs to a US ally or somebody the Bush Administration agreed for the US to defend, from Turkey and Iraq in the north to KSA in the south. That puts the US in a position of no-win any way it’s put.
American ships in the Gulf are in harm’s way. It is doubtful, even with the target recognition problems the Israelis have had with the American flag in the past, that US ships are sailing with their defensive systems on standby, even. Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, surely remembers the USS Stark, shot up by a then-American ally. I doubt the US Navy trusts anybody’s benevolence in that neighborhood.

Posted by: Mark of Lewiston | September 24, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

The USS Liberty was MISTAKENLY attacked by the Israeli Air Force?!?!? The attack by our so-called “friends”, Israel, on the Liberty was direct and most certainly intentional. There are plenty of eye-witness accounts of the attack for you to check the story. The cover-up of the Liberty attack was/is incredibly shameful. End “aid” for the war-mongering Israel!!
I don’t often agree with Mr. Brzezinski, but I agree with him that we should blow Israeli warplanes out of the sky if they try and set-off WWIII with an attack on Iran.

Posted by: John Gotham | September 24, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

The SS Liberty remains to this day a problem for some who see it as a big mistake and others who see it as a deliberate attack.
Ask then: why would Israel, our ally, attack the ship? The answer given: the Israelis were in the midst of a big atrocity against the Egyptians, with whom at the time they were at war. Ok. Israel bombs its friends to conceal an attack on its enemy?
In any case: if you google you now get the complete NSA tapes of the incident, all now declassified.
Pas: check out Zig’s record in print. He would love to see Israelis attacked no matter what.

Posted by: fred lapides | September 24, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

This is all leading up to the 7 yr peace treaty in the middle east. The Rapture will soon happen and the antichrist will appear right after. Cant everyone see that the book of revelation is being fullfilled? Pray that you will be spared from all that will happen in the tribulation. God’s will be done.

Posted by: Tim | September 24, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

To Tony and some other posters in the same vein.
What WOULD we do? What DID we do. Kruschev at various times, and various Soviet leaders on multiple occasions threatened , nuclear saber-rattling is not new news.
Israel enjoys a regional monopoly on nuclear weapons and a significant numerical superiority even over countries such as China and France. Furthermore to suggest that the United States has been anything less than extravagantly doting on Israeli interests is simply not realistic.
The effectiveness of Israel influence over US foreign policy, and media public affairs etc, is in fact demonstrated in bloody and grisly resolution, when you take an incident like the USS Liberty.
Lesser incidents have been the cause of wars to say nothing of the fact that only a scant few Americans even know about the deadly attack on the USS Liberty or the subsequent ham-handed & half-hearted apologia from Israel.
If Israel thinks that following a radicalized and militarist agenda is so intensely awesome, Go ahead and attack Iran but know that they would largely stand alone, and their hardliners would be lining themselves for yet another grisly Holocaust.
So I for one suggest that Israel and Iran think such energetic stupidity is somehow is useful, then by all means, they should do a nuclear two step or two and have fun pulling the bloody corpses from the smoldering carnage of their respective cities in the aftermath.
Stepping back from the “nuclear” option, however, Isn’t it LONG past due the United States made it completely clear to Israel the economic ramifications of such belligerent and counterproductive foreign policy.
It would be a great thing to see Israel both safe and prosperous but like some mean drunk buddy who calls you when he’s gotten into yet another bar-fight or talking trash, the US needs to stop enabling Israel and get their more strident politicians to a militarists anonymous 12 step program or something.

Posted by: Mark T | September 25, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Zbig is a big idiot and please somebody slap that idiot. Hilary is a goofball..shut up!

Posted by: ziklag | September 25, 2009, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Summary of Opie Obama speech to UN: “Mr. Putin, put back that wall!”

Posted by: HULAgate | September 25, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Our air force will not shoot down Israel jets if the attack Iran, they will stand down. Obama will be tolalty screwed if he gives such an order and those that do street prostest of Israels action will have great difficult finding there way home if at all!

Posted by: Robertcs | September 25, 2009, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Zbig is exactly right. If we let the law of the jungle rule, we’d have every country that could launch pre-emptive strikes launching them with abandon and we’d be close to end of our species for sure and possibly all life on this planet. There is no legal basis for pre-emption other than jingoistic swaggery, which if permitted, takes us back to the dark ages. Why bother with a UN?
Nukes aren’t secrets anymore. The permanent members of the UN security council have a enacted a nuclear apartheid for themselves. Lot of countries have mastered the technology and if push comes to shove, they can turn out a dozen or so nukes in quick order. Some of them include: Most of the western european countries, Japan, S. Korea, S. Africa, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Argentina, Canada, Mexico, Indonesia, Australia. Not to mention the countries that crashed the nuclear club without official membership invitations, ie, Israel, India, Pakistan, N. Korea and very soon Iran.

Posted by: Zbig Knows | September 25, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

If Israel promised Medvedev they would not attack Iran, it was when the two talked about the missing S300 missiles on their way to Iran from Russia when the ship was hijacked by pirates who then ransomed the cargo of “timber”. Many Americans are blindly urging the US to attack Iran, with little knowledge of the repercussions and full of Glenn Beck enthusiastic stupidity. To say Obama is against Israel is quite wrong. He is against the current president’s policy of expansionism instead of trading land for peace and stability. Obama’s chief of staff is Jewish and cares deeply about Israel….and agrees with Obama’s policy. Brzenski is right in this instance, but never forget that he wrote the book about eliminating nation-states from the world, dispense with the Constitution, and form a one world government. Look at Europe. Look who gains more power with every war and global calamity- the bankers. Only a couple countries exist today that are not financially tied to the puppet strings of the Central Banks that include the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Soon there will be a new temple in Jerusalem and a man will stand on the steps of that temple after bringing peace to Israel and the Mid-East. He will be the ersatz Messiah, the false Jesus who will perform miracles and cause many to follow him and accept his mark. The time is close. Pray for salvation.

Posted by: CVal | September 25, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am

What do you suppose Iran will do once it has a nuclear warhead and the technology and practical knowledge? You think they might share it with Libya? How about a nucker in a truck to say… yeah those guys running around in Iraq blowing up buildings and people? You think? Hm… think they might go for us here in the US? You think? What has Obama done about Iran nuclear program? What? Talk to that clown of a president? Hell our own president is becoming a clown himself. Other countries are laughing at us?

Posted by: Yang | September 25, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

We can only pray that Israel launches a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Iran.

Posted by: shrink | September 25, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

I only feel regret about the Israelis in that we don’t have the guts to join them. We could put Iran back to the stone age and make Medvedev cry like a baby. Alas, Israel will have to do it alone. That loser Brzezinski was part of Carter’s admin, so who cares what he says, the old fool. Carter himself hates Jews and Obama is an inept boob. Israel’s greatest problem is in facing this terror state Iran alone.

Posted by: Lewis Field | September 25, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Jimmy Carter was a buffoon who gave us that ayatollah in Iran in the first place. See what “being nice” got us? I can’t believe people are now listening to this buffoon’s adviser’s opinion.

Posted by: Yang | September 25, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

—The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.—
This is absolutely fallacious. Every single surviving member of the USS Liberty says the attack was intentional.
As Thomas Lipscomb notes:

The USS Liberty was an American spy ship well out in international waters north of the Sinai peninsula listening in on the military traffic as the Six Day War progressed. It was overflown thirteen times in the previous two days by Israeli Air Force planes and eight times just prior to the Israeli attack by various IAF aircraft, some passing so close their engine vibration rattled the Liberty’s deck plates and some of their pilots even waved to crew members on board.
It was 2PM on a bright sunny afternoon and with its huge antennae and clunky Liberty ship transport vessel lines lumbering at less than 10 knots it certainly was in no danger of being thought a warship. But as a precaution the Liberty also flew three American flags.
It also had the clear and very large numerical markings of an American naval vessel easily identified in any number of reference works in every defense establishment in the world. Admiral Thomas Moorer later called it the most identifiable naval vessels in the US Navy. One of the flags was shot down during the attack and replaced with a huge one 13 feet long, but the attack went on. The Israelis claimed they saw no flags.
Between 2PM and 4PM the Liberty was repeatedly attacked by Israeli IAF aircraft and torpedo boats, had 34 crewmembers killed and 171 wounded and almost sunk. Many of those knowledgeable about the attack, including then Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Admiral Isaac Kidd, saw it as an intentional act by Israel.

Posted by: Mike | September 25, 2009, 2:52 am 2:52 am

yang: how exactly can you make medvedev cry like a baby, their nukes mean usa will never confront them and serves as a lesson to other states you better get the bomb to stop the usa from bullying you.
but usa cannot even confront israel and get them to do what they want, how will they do it to russia?

Posted by: to yang | September 25, 2009, 4:27 am 4:27 am

A Jimmy Carter adviser is saying that the United States threaten to shoot down one of its closest allies jets? Further evidence of how entirely incompetence pervaded the Carter administration.

Posted by: Richard | September 25, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am

Iran must not be allowed to go nuclear evn for peaceful means. They have no rights when its officials want to wipe another country off the face of the earth.
Instead take the kid gloves off and smash Iran once and for all. There is no sense in talking when action is needed. Thia bullcrap talk has been going on for years and the Iranians are hardening and hiding their facilities.
This is the perfect time because there is a new opposition and they can’t hold out forever.
Carter is a Ghandi gone mad. He would lie down under the wheels of his peanut truck?

Posted by: jethro mayham | September 25, 2009, 4:31 am 4:31 am

Screw Israel. They have always and will always be the cause of problems. They are not a partner for peace nor a friend to the USA. They are a drain on this country. CUT THEM OFF!

Posted by: BK | September 25, 2009, 4:32 am 4:32 am

I could be wrong, but I thought I read elsewhere that Israel has already gotten approval to use Saudia Arabia’s airspace for any such strike against Iran. That makes Brzezinski’s statements more than a little foolish.

Posted by: Whys | September 25, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Well Zbiggy is back in the headlines again, almost like on the day he was Carter’s Security Advisor and led the brilliant negotiations with the Ayotallahs which helped legitimize them in power even as they were holding American hostages.
Zbiggy has a long record of anti- Israel sentiment. This remark is no surprise. The question is why he chose to make it now when there is no special sign of any Israeli attack.
I don’t know the answer.

Posted by: Shalom Freedman | September 25, 2009, 5:04 am 5:04 am

The evidence that Iran is actually building a bomb is contradictory and equivocal at best. The National Intelligence Estimate report released in 2007 says that the evidence suggests that Iran has stopped work on building a bomb as early as 2003.
Similarly, the recent report on Iran by the IAEA praised the country for its co-operation in inspections and cast doubt that Iran was diverting nuclear material to military uses.
Unlike Israel, Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, and has a guaranteed right to enrich uranium. The fact that it is enriching uranium does not in itself prove that it is building a bomb.
There is no reason for Israel to attack the Iranians, as international law does not permit countries to attack each other simply for disliking each other’s governments. The fact that the Israelis are threatening Iran in this manner proves once again their role in destabilizing the area. Kudos to Brzezinski for recognizing this.

Posted by: SAS | September 25, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

If Israel wants war, let it be! Mr. Obama, PLEASE make sure that no U.S soldier is murder in this one! Just get our soldier out of there to go back to their families! I am tire of this Israel-Palestina-Iran nonsense.

Posted by: Jlp | September 25, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Mark T – on your “Israel enjoys a regional monopoly on nuclear weapons” comment. And they’ve used those weapons how many times? Better the devil you know. In fact, I don’t recall them ever threatening to use those weapons. Can you say the same for Iran who is threatening to wipe other sovereign nations off the map?
And I can’t believe people still think Iran is not trying to build weapons. Geez, even the Obama administration has come out with timelines on what they will have and when.
Scarier still is the fact that people actually think we should be taking foreign policy advice from the Carter administration. Were you people even alive back then? Please, President Obama, do what you have been doing and continue to ignore Carter and his people.

Posted by: P | September 25, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

There is no good outcome with regard to Israel, Iran and its quest for nuclear weapons. Iran is determined to acquire them and Israel is determined to prevent that. Neither will back down because both see their very survival at stake.
If Israel attacks Iran, the consequences would be disastrous and not just for the middle east. Oil prices would spike to unheard of levels, the entire world would be plunged into a depression that would at least rival and probably surpass the 1930s.- bye bye the current US standard of living.
The current pro-US regimes in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and most important, Pakistan, would almost certainly be overthrown by radical fundamentalists. The numbers of Islamic fanatics would mushroom and all of them would be aiming their terrorism at the US. Those 2 factors combined would mean that whatever restraint the Pakistani military currently practices over the militants would end and a nuclear terrorist attack on the US would be a real possibility. So the nightmare that we are trying to avoid – nuclear armed terrorists – would happen anyway.
On the other hand, if Iran does acquire nuclear weapons it would be able to dominate its neighbors and whatever influence the US currently has in the region would be reduced to something close to zero. Iraq, already heavily influenced by Iran, would throw the US out and position itself under Iran’s nuclear umbrella. Because they would have little choice, the Sunni regimes in the region would realign with Iran as the preeminent Islamic power. Even Turkey would have a hard time maintaining its pro-western stance and would probably withdraw from NATO.
What people should remember was that there were those that argued for a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the Soviet Union in the late 40s because the idea of a nuclear armed Russia was unimagineable given that they had an avowed aim to wipe out capitalism. Is that so very different from what we’re hearing now?
Not all Iranians are madmen. The real holders of power in Iran (and that doesn’t include Ahmadinejad) know that the real advantage of having nuclear weapons is just that – to have them. They know that any attack against Israel or any other US ally would result in their obliteration, just as the Soviets and Chinese knew it. The world will adjust to a nuclear armed Iran just as it did to a nuclear armed Russia, China, India and Pakistan because it has no other real choice.

Posted by: sweikert | September 25, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Israel will prevail.

Posted by: gambino | September 25, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

TO ALL THOSE WHO HATE ISRAEL,,,LET ME QUOTE THE BIBLE,,,,ZACARIAH CHAPTER 12
LE T ME REMIND YOU MR BREZINSKI .NO NATION WILL ATTACK ISRAEL, AND STAY UNPUNISHED BY THE WRATH OF THE LORD,,,,,ISRAEL WILL BE THE CAPITAL OF THE WORDL BIBLICY SPEAKING…ANY BODY READ EZEQUIEL CHAPTER 38….RUSSIANS STAY OUT OF MIDDDLE EAST …..IRANIANS,,ARABS,,PALESTINIANS ,,, ECT ECT,,, THE BEST YOU CAN DO IS LOOK FOR PEACE WITH ISRAEL… GODS CHOSEN PEOPLE…GOD BLESS U ALL NO OFFENSE FOR ANYBODY,,,, LUV U ALL,,BUT THE WORD OF GOD IS THERE,,IT WONT LIE …

Posted by: EULOGIO MATOS | September 25, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

And Jesus Told BARABAS :
The NEW JERUSELAM WIll not be BUILT BY MURDER AND UPRISING…….Go will fill the LAND as God has Filled the SEA…..

Posted by: DS | September 25, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

The article is incorrect about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty being a “mistake”; Google to read the eye witness accounts of all the US servicemen who survived the subsequent strafing when in the water- it was intentional and a huge coverup. The subsequent commission was only a coverup.
Let’s be clear; Israel dominates the foreign policy of the US and puts the US in a Catch-22. It is a country with an apartheid type democracy and never intends to give up the land that it is stealing from Palestinians – stall, stall, stall. Former prime ministers Menachem Begin aand Yitzhak Shamir were terrorists in the 1930-40s who helped found Israel by blowing up the King David Hotel and many Arab villages. We need the many talents of the Jewish people in this world, but not the blatant conceits of Zionists who feel entitled because they have a book they believe entitles them to do whatever to gain supremacy in the Levant.

Posted by: all 4 peez | September 25, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

I really object to the use of the word “mistakenly” in your account of the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.
Please simply report what happened. We do NOT know if this incident was a mistake. In fact, there is a great deal of evidence that it may have well been an intentional attack. Using “mistakenly” shifts the entire tenor of the conversation. Even saying “the Israeli government asserts or claims that it was a mistake” would be a much more neutral and accurate reporting of this incident.
More information about this incident can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

Posted by: Clarity | September 25, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

You can talk all you want, if Israel doesn’t take care of the Iranians the next door they will be knocking on is the US of A. But by that time they should have missiles which could reach the Atlantic Shores with Nuclear War heads. WAKE UP SLEEPING Beauties !!As I see it you have two choices ;
1) Fight
2) Convert to Islam
No need to hurray our enemies have plenty of time to multiply and conquer the world.
There is no real Peace with Muslims, only conquer. No moderate Muslims , this is only talk to fool the foolish. Don’t believe any of them. If we don’t show them that they must stay in their rat holes they will come to take our homes. They are already splitting up the booty between themselves, earmarking every house and business. Believe me, I have heard them arguing in Arabic, who will take what house!
WAKE UP AMERICAS

Posted by: Morris the Cat | September 25, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

If it isn’t absolutely obvious by now that Israel is a de facto client state of the USA in the Middle East, then nothing will make it any clearer than the manner in which America looked “the other way” following the attack on the USS Liberty. Imagine the ferocious and brutal military response had that attack been launched by any other nation in the Middle East! The relationship between the USA and Israel continues to be a source of extreme danger to world stability and peace in the region. This view is, of course, very unpopular among American friends of Israel, but one of the hallmarks of a true friend is truth-telling. What sort of “friend” lets a “friend” endanger oneself and/or the world without speaking truth to that “friend”. The Holocaust is NOT a blank check. Memories of horrific victimization are NOT a justification for becoming an aggressive victimizer. The MANIPULATION of legitimate compassion and yearning for human justice must cease. In its place must be exercised a more balanced, realistic and fact-based American foreign policy, free of such heavy influence as that exerted by AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). While such a more balanced foreign policy is highly unlikely, it is nevertheless more rational and far more desirable and productive. Unfortunately, there is little evidence to indicate that Obama’s administration will undertake any REAL reassessment of our nation’s Middle East policy. Blind support of Israel’s continued expansion of settlements in Gaza (in SPITE of American lip service to the contrary)is just ONE telltale indicator of our REAL policy vis a vis Israel and the Middle East.

Posted by: concerned citizen | September 25, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I think Iran must be confronted about their nuclear ambitions, but why does Israel get off scott free? You never hear anything about Israel building and stock piling nuclear weapons. When was the last time the UN inspected their nuclear sites. They are not held to the same standard as any other country in the middle east. Could it be that our media companies are deathly afraid of offending the Israeli lobby this is why we never hear about this subject in our media. After Israel has been warned about over flying Iraq to strike Iran, if they choose to do so in spite of it their planes should be treated just like any other hostile planes that would over fly Iraq, their planes should be shot down before they light the match that comsumes the middle east and signs death warrants for our troops. The hawks who want to start a shooting war with Iran should volunteer their sons and daughters to be the first in line to be deployed, or they should shut their mouths and go back under their rocks.
My thoughts on the subject, but I could be wrong :-)

Posted by: Tony | September 25, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

“”This is all leading up to the 7 yr peace treaty in the middle east. The Rapture will soon happen and the antichrist will appear right after. Cant everyone see that the book of revelation is being fullfilled? Pray that you will be spared from all that will happen in the tribulation. God’s will be done”"
This is EXACTLY what is wrong with these IDIOTS. How is this any different than what filth the Taliban spews.

Posted by: Tony | September 25, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I read a book by this guy in college 40 years ago. Had I known what a moron he is, I would have dropped the course.

Posted by: S Berger | September 25, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

One thing that always bogs my my is who has the wright to develop, process, and keep nuclear weapons. All these countries; viz: Britain, France, Brazil, USA, Russia, China, Israel, Pakistan, India, South Africa, and North Korea have NUCLEAR WEAPONS. If these countries mentioned don’t make moves to get rid of nuclear weapons, asking Iran to stop developing hers is absolute HYPOCRISY. It makes not one atom of sense to me. We human have potential knowledge to develop nuclear weapons, but not enough knowledge to look for peace. This takes me to the “REVELATION” in the Bible that predicted nuclear proleferations here on Earth ( The Unquenchable Fire). The United Nation is becoming a toothless bulldog. The G20 is now usurping the powers of UN, hence rendering her (UN) ineffective.

Posted by: kayekoiki | September 25, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

why is it that America and Israel India and the list goes on have the right to have nuclear power and technology and which in the case of Israel and America in particular has been used to cause alot of causalities amongst innocent children babies women civilians…why doesn’t the world ask these countries to disarm…we want to also know their nuclear capabilities and what nuclear mass destruction products they have in their possesion and make them disarm and give up their bullying attitude.

Posted by: sara | September 25, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Finally a US official with the courage to tell it like it is. The US needs to stop once and for all its complicity with Israel’s brutalities.

Posted by: SAS | September 25, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

This article has a major error. The massive attack on the United States “Liberty” by Israeli pilots was NOT a “mistake” as the article tries to lead us to believe. I think this distortion/error is intentional because the facts of the attack are well known by all news persons.
The Israelis did a fly over of the Liberty several times to identify it. The Liberty was flying a big American flag. It was marked as a US Naval vessel. The Liberty had radio contact with the Israeli fighter jets, identifying the ship. They were able to wave to Israeli pilots who waved back.
Then the attack happened. It was a massive killing attack on the United States vessel by the Israelis. The Liberty called for help to a US carrier nearby who was ordered to with hold any help to the US vessel under attack. About 100 American sailors died and many more were wounded. The Liberty did not sink, although Ireali pilots tried to sink it.
President Johnson hushed up the affair where Americans military were killed by Israel. Nothing was done.
Read the book written by one of the sailors on the Liberty.
It is interesting after so many years, writers like the author of this article still continue the effort to cover up how our boys were killed and by whom.

Posted by: Sons | October 17, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

In appeasing the Ayatollahs, the Obama administration is forcing the Israelis to act. If the Israelis believe that Iran is a real threat they will act. When they do so, the price of oil will go through the roof, and the American economy will suffer.
Obama is aware of this, yet he persists in appeasement.
Obama only acts when it benefits Obama. So ask yourself – how does an attack by Israel on Iran benefit Obama? He probably believes that the electorate will turn to him in a downturn driven by substantially higher oil. It’s not true, but that’s probably what he believes and that’s why we are where we are.

Posted by: Lizzie Smalls | October 18, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Usa gets oil from arabs and press them at the same time, they are also support Israeli army and then dont let them to use weapon. I dont und USA politic…

Posted by: ilona@israel | December 13, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I think the U.S. should take Israel out. Let’s bring an end to this corrupt and brutal regime. Israel pretends to be our friend and ally. That’s a croc. The Israelis are capable only of exploiting the U.S. and getting as much tax payer dollars and military hardware from the U.S. as the fools in Congress will allow.

Posted by: tom hollingsworth | March 20, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

In the last two weeks, I have forgotten about all of these dozens of unimaginable horror stories about this Administration and instead have been laughing constantly about one fantastic story. I am still alive to see Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu rub President Obama’s, VP Joe Biden’s, and SoS Hilary Clinton’s noses in the biggest pile of dong created by a free Republic. Little tiny Israel stands up to defend itself and all hell breaks loose. In these long and bloody 63 years, the Palestinians have not once accepted an Israeli offer of permanent peace, or ever countered with anything short of terms that would destroy Israel. I will be laughing for years and thanking God (who is in control) for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. I love this guy and I am not even Jewish.

Posted by: call me Roy | March 21, 2010, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Israel has been and still is a drain on the financial resources of the United States of America as well as bringing harm to both of its citizens and interests all over the world. The rogue state of Israel has been and still is expecting the rights of the 52nd state of the United States of America, only and without any obligations in return. If President Truman had known the disastrous consequences of creating and supporting a foreign rogue state in the heart of the Arab region he would have allowed the Jewish migration from Europe into the Untied States instead of forcing it into Palestine. There could have been an additional star (six-pointed star, promise!) in the American flag and New Israel could have been, in reality with its rights and obligations, the 52nd state, like New York, New Jersey and New Mexico.

Posted by: Abraham Abrahamson | May 3, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Read the Bible if you want to know what is going on in the Middle East. Many prophesies have been fulfilled in our lifetime. Israel is God’s chosen people and He will protect them from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Russia, China, the USA and any other nation that will rise against them. God takes no prisoners. When you die – it’s black or white. Heaven or Hell….INFORM YOURSELVES PEOPLE AND OPEN YOUR HEART TO GODS WORD. IT IS THE TRUTH.

Posted by: Deborah | June 10, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I think the United States of America should go into Israel, take the country over like they have in Iraq and then force democratic electtions where every single citizen has a vote. All of this as though it was a State in the United States, under the American Constitution. That will settle this once and for all. The same laws, the same judiciary, the same structure and no such thing as a “Jewish State” as the constitution would not allow such apartheid. Israel is an American State as it is now except they do not pay Income Taxes, Business Taxes and all other taxes they should be paying instead of taking money they should be giving money. This way the Jews would no longer be a majority and not in control.

Posted by: Mikey | February 20, 2011, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Thank you. I love reading this kid of stuff!

Posted by: captain america child's costume | October 2, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I’m gone to tell my little brother, that he should also visit this blog on regular basis to take updated from latest news.

Posted by: Thea Moga | February 1, 2012, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.