By MichaelJames

Oct 11, 2009 3:20pm

At Dole’s Request, White House Tells DNC to Pull Health Care Reform Ad

The Democratic National Committee has agreed to pull a TV ad featuring former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, R-Kan., following objections Dole conveyed to the White House that the ad twists his support for a bipartisan compromise for health care reform legislation into something else entirely.

The ad, which was set to launch Monday, features Dole and other Republican former officials advocating in general terms for health care reform.

Dole is quoted saying, "I want this to pass. … We've got to do something," and the ad attempts to contrast that attitude with that of current GOP congressional leaders, which the DNC describes as "siding with the insurance companies and just saying no to insurance reform."

"I wish they hadn't done it," Dole said of the DNC ad in a phone interview with ABC News on Sunday afternoon, saying that the ad's depiction of current GOP leaders "is just not my view."

He found it a bit ironic that "all I've been doing is urging bipartisanship" and that was used for partisan purposes.

"The ad doesn't reflect what I was trying to do," he said. "I just didn't think it was fair when I've tried to be helpful in encouraging a bipartisan solution for the DNC to run an ad that I interpreted and I know others did as a backhanded comment about Republicans."

Dole also objected to any impression that the ad suggested he endorsed any specific legislation when he's tried to keep what he's supporting "pretty generic."

Dole conveyed as much to White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel yesterday, who told the DNC to pull the ad.

"We have great respect for Sen. Dole and his commitment to reform," a DNC spokesman told ABC News. "As soon as Sen. Dole's concerns were communicated to us we immediately agreed to pull the ad."

President Obama cited the support Dole and other Republican former officials have expressed for health care reform in his weekly address Saturday, though some of those Republicans — former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., for example — have expressed misgivings about specific Democratic legislative proposals.

Dole told ABC News, "My whole message is you can't score unless you're in the game. I still believe a compromise is there. No one I know is flatly against health care reform." The 1996 GOP presidential nominee said that there's "still plenty of time to get a bipartisan result. And that's really going to start when bill gets to the floor" of the Senate and "amendments are offered."

"I was up there a long time and I learned it's never over 'til it's over," Dole said. "I'm an optimist. I guess that's my problem."

Rejecting the arguments of some Democrats that the current crop of Republicans isn't as inclined to compromise as he was, Dole said, "there's a lot of good men and women in Congress from both parties. And come crunch time they will think long and hard — depending on what's in it — before they vote no."

"I'll take some of the blame for the Clinton failure," Dole said, referring to former President Bill Clinton's failure to pass comprehensive health care reform legislation in 1994.

The World War II veteran said he doesn't think a failed bill can be used the same way to hurt Democrats in 2010 as it was in 1994.

"It's a different time," he said, "and the whole issue has become much more important. It's going to be drag on the economy if we don't figure out some long term way to fix it."

Working with other former Senate majority leaders former Sens. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., Howard Baker, R-Tenn., and George Mitchell, D-Maine — before Mitchell resigned to serve as President Obama's special envoy to the Middle East — Dole and others at the Bipartisan Policy Center have not only issued statements urging compromise, in June they suggested a framework for bipartisan health care called “Crossing Our Lines: Working Together to Reform the U.S. Health System.”

"Some of the recommendations we made are in the Baucus bill," Dole said, referring to the bill being offered in the Senate Finance Committee by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. "I agreed on mandates which I don't really like. Daschle, for example, yielded on the public option, something that he strongly believes in. We understood and I think members of Congress ought to understand, there aren't any easy votes on this issue. Trying to avoid any political risk at all is going to be difficult."

Dole said if he were President Obama, he'd "want some of the other party on board for a couple reasons. It gives the president some protection if it's bipartisan. Secondly, the American people will feel better about it if both parties are involved."

He suggested the president add tort reform measures to the legislation which "would bring some more Republicans around."

He said he doesn't see the difficulties in voting for this bill as partisan, necessarily.

"It's a survival vote," he said. "Members are seeing what their constituencies want — and right now they're opposed to this. Eighty-percent like the health care they have."

"We're getting down to the semi-finals," he said. "I'm not convinced Republicans are against it. They may be opposed to the Baucus bill, but they're not opposed to health care reform."

"My view for my Republican friends is to try to stay in the game," Dole reiterated. "This will be the most important vote any sitting members of the House and Senate will have."

- jpt

User Comments

Um, did I miss a quote from Dole where he SAID his words were twisted? Did I miss a paragraph where it said the White House produced the commercial? (The DNC did.)
Ohio is supposed to be smarter than this.
Buckeyes represent!

Posted by: Concerned ABOUT OH | October 11, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

The “essence” was correct!

Posted by: D. Axelrod | October 11, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Who needs him. Pass the frigging health care bill with a serious public option. If we can find 1-2 trillion for the Bush/Cheney arms industry giveaway, we can surely manage to pay for what the rest of the civilized world has had for decades now.

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

A footnote to the seer, short-sighted economic imbecility of the Cash for Clunkers program:
WASHINGTON – Struggling states and towns got a dose of badly needed money this summer from a Cash for Clunkers program that poured hundreds of millions of dollars of tax revenue into their budgets.
“Now, like the auto industry, recession-ravaged governments are seeing revenue fall off as car buyers take a breather from the frenzied sales of July and August. That means less money for schools, roads, public safety and other projects that get much of their funding from sales tax collections.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

The head of the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, must of made one of those “inspiring” phone calls to him.

Posted by: mshare | October 11, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

This is no surprise…. BO lied to get elected…. he continues to lie to the homosexuals………. this is about pushing his socialist agenda down our throats………. this is one of the most dishonest Administrations America has ever had….

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 11, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

-If we can find 1-2 trillion for the Bush/Cheney arms industry giveaway, we can surely manage to pay for what the rest of the civilized world has had for decades now.-
500 million was already spent on Gore’s buddies to build cars in Finland. Sorry…

Posted by: Gore Effect | October 11, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Poor Republicans. They’re so persecuted. So are the bankers. It’s awful. God save the rich!

Posted by: Hilary | October 11, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Real Republicans left the Party years ago. The shrinking 30% who still call themselves Republicans are an extremist bunch of anti-government backwards Southern racists.
A public option IS reform. Everything else just lines the pockets of the Insurance Companies.

Posted by: thebob.bob | October 11, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

So when is BO going to apologize to Bob Dole for lying about what he said….

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 11, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Maybe Dole should cut his eyebrows, and he’ll remember what he said.

Posted by: sara | October 11, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

to thebob.bob: Stop speaking for me! I am a Republican. I’m not an extremist, and I’m not backwards, nor anti-government. I will not leave my party because SOME of them are what you said. I believe we true conservatives who love this country can re-gain control of our party and our values. I hope and pray that intelligent Americans from all political parties can stop the hate, the spite, and the stupid behavior you just displayed.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

to mshare: Limbaugh is not the head of the Republican, not literally, not figurativly. He is a ridiculous excuse of ‘talking head’ that should be ignored by all intelligent Americans. Stop spreading such filthy, stupid lies.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Solantic? Ahh change of story..oh well, for those of us who don’t have clue what Solantic is, the Wiki states “Solantic, based in in Jacksonville, Florida, was co-founded in 2001 by Scott and Karen Bowling, a former television anchor whom Scott met after Columbia bought what is now Memorial Hospital Jacksonville in 1995.[4] Solantic opened its first urgent care center in 2002. It provides urgent care services, immunizations, physicals, drug screening, and care for injured workers. The corporation attracts patients who do not have insurance, cannot get appointments with their primary care physicians, or do not have primary care physicians. Solantic is intended to be an alternative to the emergency room care that these types of patients often seek, or for not seeing a doctor at all.
In 2006, Scott said that his plans for Solantic were to establish a national brand of medical clinics.[4] In August 2007, the company received a $40 million investment from private equity firm, and said that it expected to have open 35 clinics by the end of 2009, with annual revenues of $100 million once all these clinics were open, compared to $20 million at the time.[25] As of March 2009, Solantic had 24 centers, all located in Florida.[26]
Solantic has been the target of numerous employment discrimination suits, including one that settled with 7 plaintiffs for an undisclosed sum on May 23, 2007. These suits allegedly stem from a Scott directed policy to not hire elderly or overweight applicants, preferring ‘mainstream’ candidates.[27″ Sounds like a good ideal to me. Why should everyone waste money on insurance when paying out of pocket is so much easier and cheaper.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

to concerned about Ohio: Here ya go…I realize the word ‘twisted’ isn’t there but anyone (with an IQ above moron) should be able to understand that’s exactly what he meant. For those below that IQ level, you can’t be helped anyway.
“I wish they hadn’t done it,” Dole said of the DNC ad in a phone interview with ABC News on Sunday afternoon, saying that the ad’s depiction of current GOP leaders “is just not my view.”

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This whole health scam is about BO getting more money and power to scam from America. Socialist/communist often target health care as way to further themselves.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 11, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

I really wish the people in this country would stop being so divisive, petty, and hateful toward each other. This Democrat vs. Republican thing has gotten out of control. The “temperament” of politics in general has gotten out of control.
All Republicans are not evil bought-and-paid-for pawns of American corporations. There are incompetent and ill-intentioned politicians on both sides of the aisle.
I don’t think that the Obama administration has anything to do with the new divisiveness in this country. I do, however, think that the campaign effort started by Obama has contributed heavily to this anger. We heard a call to “change” – yet we still don’t know what “change” really means. I think many people (especially those too young to have seen our government work for very long) expect that this means a revolution of sorts.
Well, I hate to disappoint these people but that just isn’t going to happen. If we get change, it will be slow, deliberate, and implemented with wisdom not anger.
So lets lose the anger toward one another and start working together. I think Fmr. Sen Dole and the White House seem to be in sync now. Let’s not undermine that with more anger and untruths.

Posted by: Jon F | October 11, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Why is that goof ball Daschele around
contributing anything. He should be
working on his personal finances and
taxes.

Posted by: wis134 | October 11, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

is there no end to the capacity for puffball fakery on this administration’s part?

Posted by: Michael R. Brown | October 11, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Bought and paid for…380 000 000 Dollars…that’s how much health insurance and health care industry executives have directed in the last few months to lobbying, ad and campaign contributions to the elected representatives of We the People to kill the health care reform we need and want. No wonder Congress will not carry out our wishes – it’s a lowly branch office of Big Business Inc. whose main business strategy is: Privatize Profits, Nationalize Losses. Good luck to us.

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

I guess what Mr. Obama should do is focus all his attention on foreign policy and to hell with the rest of us here at home like Bush did for 8 years. Maybe he should create false issues for people to believe in like Bush did. Republicans have no room to talk about anything. They definitely shouldn’t call anyone a liar because quite frankly, no one is better at it than they are. They did nothing significant in 8 years and they continue to attempt to destroy anything and anyone who tries. I know your game and I’m not playing.

Posted by: b4reel | October 11, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Good post Jon F | Oct 11, 2009 4:53:11 PM

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Neither the DNC nor the President lied here. Bob Dole said what he said to the KC Star. He just does not want it used by the DNC as if he were endorsing health care reform because his party’s leaders are dead set against it and any other initiative prioritized by Mr. Obama.

Posted by: magottlieb | October 11, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

johF: Thank you, thank you, thank you. You stated my very opinion perfectly. I cruise the posts on the stories that catch my interest hoping to find just a few intelligent people willing to discuss the issues rationally, intelligently and with open minds. I’m glad I found you!

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Robin “Who needs him. Pass the frigging health care bill with a serious public option. ”
You poor, misguided soul. Passing the bill will mean nothing if Republicans pick up 50, 60 , or 80 seats in the mid-term elections (Some are predicting 100 seats). If the healthcare bill is not done in a bipartisan manner the Democrats will take a beating and the provisions of the healthcare bill will never be implemented. Currently, 33% support the bills passing though congress while 55% oppose them. Nearly 2/3 of seniors oppose this bill — seniors dominate mid-term elections. I believe we are seeing the Democrats commit suicide for a bill that will simply never be realized.

Posted by: Jenny | October 11, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Test

Posted by: TLJ | October 11, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

to magottlieb: And just when did you have that personal conversation with Mr. Dole that you can state so confidently what he thinks, believes, feels? You never did; you have no idea what Mr. Dole ‘really’ meant or why he did what he did. You are part of the problem.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Let’s face it Republicans have 1 basic strategy : Distract, delay and lie. They want to fight Obama on any reform and then whine about not being included in a bipartisan effort. Give me a break !!!

Posted by: TLJ | October 11, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

The Democrats have been arrogant. They have not met with the house Republicans since April to discuss healthcare. The immediately kill any resonable attempt to shape the healthcare bill if it comes from Republicans. They should list; Republican ideas such as allowing insurance companies to cross state lines can reduce cost while costing nothing to implement. Increased use of Health Savings Accounts could also help reduce overall helathcare costs. Unfortunately, Democrats seem more interested in using healthcare as a pretext to increasing the size of government rather than improving the system.

Posted by: Jim | October 11, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

If the healthcare system is in such crisis that the Democrats have to vote on it immediately, why then will the bill not be implemented until 2013? The Democrats are playing politics with our healthcare with little regard for the results. I believe they have tipped their hand by delaying implementation until after the next presidential election. They know the results of this reform will be bad and they are trying to disassociate their party from those eventual results. If the Democrats are not willing to face voters on the merits of their plan then we as citizens should not feel comfortable with the changes they are contemplating. Our childrens lives and health are more important than a political victory that is being pursued at any cost.

Posted by: Kimberly | October 11, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I guess what Mr. Obama should do is focus all his attention on foreign policy and to hell with the rest of us here at home like Bush did for 8 years.
**********
Then why isn’t he focused on job creation instead of adding to the growing deficit with this bloated health care bill?

Posted by: Jenny | October 11, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Bob Dole has taken so much Viagra that he has hardening of the arteries and doesn’t remember what he said to whom.

Posted by: Trent | October 11, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

The Democrats have been arrogant. They have not met with the house Republicans since April to discuss healthcare. —Jim
That’s a joke, right? Please! The Republicans could care less about reforming health care. That would cut the big money flowing into their back pockets from the health insurance company.
Ideas? Hahahaha. Republicans don’t have any ideas that don’t keep insurance companies stealing and killing Americans, 45,000 of them a year.
Arrogance? The Republicans reek of arrogance in turning a blind eye to Americans who have suffered and died and will continue to suffer and die because of lack of REAL health care reform.
They play the game of calling Obama a liar to COVERUP for the lies and more lies they tell EVERY DAY to the American People.
Obama could cure cancer and they would be against it.
Republicans don’t care about Americans or America! They care only about profit and keeping Americans as ignorant slaves to BIG corporations and Wall Street.

Posted by: mshare | October 11, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

to magottlieb: And just when did you have that personal conversation with Mr. Dole that you can state so confidently what he thinks, believes, feels? You never did; you have no idea what Mr. Dole ‘really’ meant or why he did what he did. You are part of the problem.
***************************************
Does Mr. Dole? THat is the trouble with the GOP

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

If the healthcare system is in such crisis that the Democrats have to vote on it immediately, why then will the bill not be implemented until 2013?
****************************************
Because it will take that long to negotiate the contracts with the providers. Like the Health Insurance Industry, the providers will have to agree to take the insurance issued by the government, at the prices agreed on.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

to thinking (I suggest you try that) And how do you KNOW Mr. Dole doesn’t know what he thinks? I will keep challenging anyone who is so arrogant as to claim what someone else thinks, believes or feels when there is absolutely NO way they can know. My point ‘thinking’ and everyone else guilty of this: stop the lies, the unfounded insults and let’s try discussing the issues honestly, intelligently and courteously as adults. If any of you can’t do that, go back to your comic books.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Jenny – are you one of the 500 ex-Congressional staffers (hired by the health insurance and health care companies to protect huge future profits) whose large year-end bonus depends on killing any attempt at health care reform? You seem very intelligent and knowledgeable about the inner workings in Washington…

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

to thinking (I suggest you try that) And how do you KNOW Mr. Dole doesn’t know what he thinks?
***************************************
How do you know what I am thinking? What an absurd argument.
Go away!
Oh I didn’t mean that.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

and to thinking again: You are intelligent enough to understand there is no way to implement a program of this size in less than years. I salute you for that. At least you are not one of the groveling idiots who demand instant gratification without thinking things through. I do have actual knowledge of what it takes. I worked for a Medicare contractor for 20 years and now work for a Medicaid contractor. You see, Medicare and Medicaid are government programs, but the actual day-to-day administration is done by private companies. For Medicare, those companies are usually either insurance companies or wholly-owned subsidiaries of insurance companies or spin-offs from those companies. It is a massive, major process that can easily fail if extreme care and planning is performed at every step.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Inspirational Goverment-Run Healthcare Story Of The Week, Part Deux:
Doreen Nicholls, 72, had her healthy leg amputated below the knee after she was wrongly told she had cancer. (UK)

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

thinking: come on! Can’t we agree to disagree agreeably? I think we can agree on many things as well. I wasn’t claiming to know what you are thinking. I was questioning how you might know what Mr. Dole was thinking. And, sorry, but I won’t go away.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

If the healthcare system is in such crisis that the Democrats have to vote on it immediately, why then will the bill not be implemented until 2013?
************************************
Because it will take that long to negotiate the contracts with the providers.
—————————–
That is just lame. The ONLY reason this bill will not be implemented for FOUR years is that the Democrats are trying to hide from the voters. They hope our anger will subside by then. It will not. When our family members get substandard care under the new system we will remember who foisted these reforms on us. Eighty percent of us are happy with the healthcare we have today, if we find the new system does not meet this high standard it will be Democrats who are blamed.

Posted by: Curt | October 11, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Inspirational?
Harvard study finds nearly 45,000 excess deaths annually linked to lack of health coverage
September 17, 2009
Inspirational Goverment-Run Healthcare Story Of The Week, Part Deux:
Doreen Nicholls, 72, had her healthy leg amputated below the knee after she was wrongly told she had cancer. (UK)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Oct 11, 2009 6:04:03 PM

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

45 000 dead Americans every year because of a system a small cabal of corporate execs and anti-government ideologues are paying a fortune to keep in place. That’s 15 World Trade Centers per year. We invaded Iraq (oops wrong country, oh well) for a lot less. How about invading that cabal?

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

I did something very patriotic last night. I wrote my president via email. I thanked him for his efforts to bring access to health insurance to all Americans. I agree in principle with much of the Finance Committee version says. I also disagree with a lot of it. I simply don’t see how we can afford it as it exists. I also have serious concerns about health care availability. We have a shortage of almost every type of health care provider in many parts of the US now.
My one personal concern is that I will lose my employer group coverage. The so-called penalty is a mere pittance to what my employer pays for each US employee. They will drop EGHP for all US employees the very second it becomes legal to do so.
In my email to President Obama I suggested a minimum penalty for the first year should be an average of what the employer paid for 2008 and 2009.
I doubt if he will ever see my email; but I sent it.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

If the Democrats are so sure the American people support their healthcare initiatives, why then are they contemplating trying to push the bill through by attaching it to other legislation (hint; support is only 33% among the American people)?
Why have the Democrats voted down an attempt to place the bill online for 72 hours before they vote on it?
If the reform package does not include coverage for abortion, then why did the Democrats vote down amendments that would have specifically prohibited coverage for abortion (the Catholic bishops have not been fooled)?
Is the attempt by the Obama administration to force young people to buy unsurance legal (hint; they know it isn’t and that the court will throw it out)? What will that mean for taxes for you and me? I think you can answer that.
One final quesion; how do you steal $500 billion dollars from medicare and then tell seniors with a straight face that their healthcare won’t be affected?
The Democrats deserve the beating they will take in the next two elections for forcing this misguided bill on them.

Posted by: Jenny | October 11, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Inspirational?
Harvard study finds nearly 45,000 excess deaths annually linked to lack of health coverage
September 17, 2009
Inspirational Goverment-Run Healthcare Story Of The Week, Part Deux:
Doreen Nicholls, 72, had her healthy leg amputated below the knee after she was wrongly told she had cancer. (UK)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Oct 11, 2009 6:04:03 PM
Posted by: Robin | Oct 11, 2009 6:09:22 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now that you mention it…Yes!
On Sept. 20, 2003, Lisa Strong, a Florida Woman, Lost 2 Arms and 2 Legs after a misdiagnosis by her doctors.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

That is just lame. The ONLY reason this bill will not be implemented for FOUR years is that the Democrats are trying to hide from the voters. They hope our anger will subside by then.
****************************************
Yea Sure.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

One final quesion; how do you steal $500 billion dollars from medicare and then tell seniors with a straight face that their healthcare won’t be affected?
****************************************
Politico 10/08/09
In fact, as recently as April, 137 Republican members — the majority of the House Republican Conference — voted for such a plan in a GOP alternative budget that called for “replacing the traditional Medicare program with subsidies to help retirees enroll in private health care plans.” Under their plan, future retirees would not even have the option of buying into the traditional Medicare program. Medicare as we know it — upon which generations of seniors have depended for health care — would cease to exist once the last retirees still eligible pass away.
Protecting Medicare? No, these Republicans voted to end the program, throwing our seniors at the mercy of the insurance industry, whose practices include denial, termination of coverage for pre-existing conditions, discrimination and sky-high fees for the elderly.
How can the GOP pretend that they Care?

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Wow Jenny | Oct 11, 2009 6:22:55 PM, you sure know a lot about the inner workings of Washington – which Congressman did you work for before going to work for a health insurance company, and is your expense account a lot more generous now? Do you keep in touch a lot with the other 499 ex- Congressional staffers now lobbying against health reform? Btw (little hint: a clear majority of Americans would simply want Medicare extended to all, not just over 65), your health care reform supporter numbers are mileadingly low. But hey it’s part of your job, so guess that’s OK

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Curt: in case you didn’t see my note to thinking. No, it’s not lame. Well, it’s possible that the Democrats would like to delay it, but it’s definitely impossible to implement the massive changes necessary to make health reform work in just a few months. It is a long, exhaustive nightmare to be truthful. I know because I have worked for a Medicare contractor and for a Medicaid contractor.
When working for the Medicare program I participated in 3 computer system implementations and many upgrades. Those alone take 1-2 years. I also was personally involved in medical policy development and implementing them. One new medical policy requires months of data analysis, writing, re-writing and coordination among all contractors and the federal government. Ghastly.
It takes time, lots of time, hard work, and brain power.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

…If the Democrats are so sure the American people support their healthcare initiatives, why then are they contemplating trying to push the bill through by attaching it to other legislation (hint; support is only 33% among the American people)?
Today, October 11, 2009, 15 minutes ago | Jenny
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rasmussen 2-3 Sept survey: Support for Health Care Reform Plan Up to 46% from previous survey.
Support was 41% in 24-25 Sept survey.
Where did you get your 33%?

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I am not paid by anyone to endorse free medical care; my poor wife and i live on $1,00.00 a month Social Security, and can not afford any kind of Health Cafre and/or Insurance. But, I do pray you will see that the Senators and Represenatives will vote for free medical care for US Citizens!
Please
Bill

Posted by: padre_bill | October 11, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

If the Democrats are so sure the American people support their healthcare initiatives, why then are they contemplating trying to push the bill through by attaching it to other legislation (hint; support is only 33% among the American people)?
******************************************
Gallup Poll 10/05/09
Americans remain largely divided on whether Congress should pass healthcare legislation, with a full quarter continuing to be unsure. However, when the leanings of undecided Americans are pressed, healthcare reform now enjoys a slight advantage, 51% to 41%, versus the 50% to 47% spread seen last month.More …

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

“Rasmussen 2-3 Sept survey”
Why are you quoting a poll that is more than a month old? Pew (left wing poll) only shows 33% in a poll released just a few days ago. Rasmussen’s latest poll has support at 41% and opposition at 56% — again very dismal numbers.

Posted by: Jenny | October 11, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Don’t worry. The democrats have promised to rein in medicare fraud to help fund health care. Bwahahaha! They definitely think we’re stupid.

Posted by: LongT | October 11, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I think I’ll go out into my back yard and look under rocks for some gold. I’m sure there’s some out there.

Posted by: LongT | October 11, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

“Pew (left wing poll) only shows 33% in a poll released just a few days ago.”
The Pew poll says 42% favor the health care proposals.

Posted by: Numeros | October 11, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

My mistake, it does say 34%

Posted by: Numeros | October 11, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Gallup: 40% support passage of a new healthcare bill, and 36% say they oppose a new bill. When the leanings of those without an opinion are taken into account, 51% of Americans favor or lean toward favoring a bill, while 41% oppose it or lean toward opposition.
Rasmussen*: 46% favor the health care reform plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. 50% oppose.
CBS News: 61% would be disappointed if Congress doesn’t pass health care reform this year and the system continues as it is. 29% would be pleased if reforms do not pass.
Ipsos/McClatchy**: “Do you favor or oppose the healthcare reform proposals presently being discussed?” 40% favor, 42% oppose.
Quinnipiac: American voters oppose 47 – 40 percent President Barack Obama’s health care reform plan.
Pew: “Do you generally favor or generally oppose the health care proposals being discussed in
Congress?” 34 favor, 47 oppose.
National Journal: Asked whether they support “the current legislation to reform health care,” 49 percent of respondents say yes; 42 percent say no.
*Choice pollster of conservatives
**Tied with CNN for most accurate pollster in the 2008 presidential election results

Posted by: Numeros | October 11, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Why are you quoting a poll that is more than a month old? Pew (left wing poll) only shows 33% in a poll released just a few days ago. Rasmussen’s latest poll has support at 41% and opposition at 56% — again very dismal numbers.
***************************************
From the same Pewe you just reported
And 55% say they favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans, which is largely unchanged from late July (52%).
So it seems that the Senate Bill as it stands does not have wide support in fact looses support because it does not a Government Insurnace plan.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Jenny | Oct 11, 2009 6:56:44 PMRasmussen’s latest poll has support at 41% and opposition at 56% — again very dismal numbers.
Jenny, in the most recent, highly respected (you’re an expert in these matters so I’m sure you’ll agree) Kaiser Health survey, when people were asked among many other pertinent questions about “Creating a government-administered public
health insurance option similar to Medicare to
compete with private health insurance plans” 58% agreed with this and 34% disagreed.
Jenny, I respectfully ask two things of you:
First,will you go to your browser, type in “single payer US poll” and click on the first entry that comes up, to confirm this for yourself?
Second, will you get down on your knees with me right now, RIGHT NOW, to pray for guidance to find a way in order to save 45 000 American lives currently killed, in this the richest country on earth, by lack of affordable health care?

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

If the government takes over health care it will not be free. The tax payers will pay for it. Look that Canada! Is that what we want?
Smaller Government, flat tax, 10th Amendment.

Posted by: Keith | October 11, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Much as it drives the goofballs nuts to face the truth, freedom and democracy are the gifts George W. Bush gave to Iraq, and he did it with The Surge against unanimous Democratic opposition and a great deal of it from his own party:
“The overall level of violence in the country continues to decline, despite the occasional terrorist bombing. This has led to continued economic growth, and more Iraqis are using their freedom of movement, and action, to protest government incompetence. The inept performance of elected and appointed officials is more stark in Iraq, where economic freedom has created many spectacularly successful entrepreneurs, and a growing middle class. Thus it is obvious that Iraqis can get things done, and more Iraqis are openly upset at the poor performance of their elected officials.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Eighty percent of us are happy with the healthcare we
have today, if we find the new system does not meet
this high standard it will be Democrats who are
blamed. Posted by: Curt
*************************************
That’s eighty percent that can afford the
insurance. What about the hugh percentage that
had to drop the insurance because it is too
expensive!
What you are telling us is that it is now only the
elite that have good coverage. BTW I have 2 jobs,
one used specifically for insurance coverage only.

Posted by: spacerook1 | October 11, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

More from Pew
Two-thirds (66%) favor mandating that all Americans have health insurance, with the government providing financial help for those unable to afford it. Nearly six-in-ten (59%) favor requiring employers to pay into a government health care fund if they do not provide health insurance coverage to their employees. A similar majority (58%) also favors raising taxes on families with incomes of more than $350,000 as a way to pay for reforms. And 55% say they favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans, which is largely unchanged from late July (52%).

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

“Rasmussen 2-3 Sept survey”
Why are you quoting a poll that is more than a month old? Pew (left wing poll) only shows 33% in a poll released just a few days ago. Rasmussen’s latest poll has support at 41% and opposition at 56% — again very dismal numbers.
Today, October 11, 2009, 18 minutes ago | Jenny
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My typo. It should have said:
Rasmussen 2-3 Oct survey: Support for Health Care Reform Plan Up to 46% from previous survey. Support was 41% in 24-25 Sept Survey.
The survey is a week old…as you probably already knew.
However, I prefer to use the Rasmussen since it is the more ‘Conservative Leaning’ poll.
So, when it crosses 50% it is a sure bet…Right?

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

“Much as it drives the goofballs nuts to face the truth, freedom and democracy are the gifts George W. Bush gave to Iraq, and he did it with The Surge against unanimous Democratic opposition and a great deal of it from his own party:”
Fascist Hyena | Oct 11, 2009 7:17:32 PM
Wonder how many thousands of our men and women in arms would still be alive if Bush had listened to those who said more troops were needed before we even went in (like Shinseki) rather than boldly ‘staying the course’ for years with failing strategies?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

“And 55% say they favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans, which is largely unchanged from late July (52%).
So it seems that the Senate Bill as it stands does not have wide support in fact looses support because it does not a Government Insurnace plan.”
Thinking | Oct 11, 2009 7:15:14 PM
Are you serious? Is this what passes for critical thought on the Right? That’s pathetic – you cannot assume that those 55% do not support the current bill.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Democrats having been going at healthcare reform like a bull who has been hit by lightening. They have NOT accepted much input to any of the bills. Most of the bills were written by the Appolo Foundation, a left wing social reform group.
Medicare is going to have to expand with all of the baby boomers about to enter into it…so how can they cut it by $500 billion or even $1.00. They admit there has been huge amounts of fraud…so how are they going to reign in the fraud when Medicare is about to have millions of more users? All of it is absurd

Posted by: Laura | October 11, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Keith | Oct 11, 2009 7:16:22 PM Canada….darn straight, that’s what we want. I have lived in Canada at various times, well over a decade – no waits, excellent care, complete choice of doctors and hospitals, moderate copays, cheaper drugs – and NO Canadian parent has spent a single sleepless night chosing between bankruptcy and expensive care for a sick child. Why do you continue to cheer our way of doing things, we’re the number 1 economy (still) with number 37 health care?

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

“Look that Canada! Is that what we want?”
Keith | Oct 11, 2009 7:16:22 PM
YES. Americans would save A TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR and have high quality care. I have many Canadian friends, including one who went through extensive treatment for a brain tumor. I would love a Canadian style system (although not sure why we wouldn’t take the better features from the French system).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Who is running things in the White House Charlie Rangel?
Understandable since he can get away with just about anything.

Posted by: kyle | October 11, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

“Democrats having been going at healthcare reform like a bull who has been hit by lightening. They have NOT accepted much input to any of the bills.”
Laura | Oct 11, 2009 7:28:30 PM
What utter nonsense. This process has been going since March now with months of intense debate over every aspect. Every paragraph of the Senate bill has been painfully pounded out by ‘the gang of six’. And we’re not done yet.
Why does the Right keep throwing out obvious lies rather than try to debate the actual issues that matter?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

“And 55% say they favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans, which is largely unchanged from late July (52%).
So it seems that the Senate Bill as it stands does not have wide support in fact looses support because it does not a Government Insurnace plan.”
Thinking | Oct 11, 2009 7:15:14 PM
Are you serious? Is this what passes for critical thought on the Right? That’s pathetic – you cannot assume that those 55% do not support the current bill.
****************************************
1st I am not on the right.
2nd we are talking about the PEW research poll that should the favorable ratingh for the current Senate bill at 33%
3rd Pew shows support for PO at 55%
4th There is a disconnect between those numbers what is it? No PO
5th if you are going to jump in follow the thread first

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Today, October 11, 2009, 3 minutes ago | jhw539
“And 55% say they favor a government health insurance plan to compete with private plans, which is largely unchanged from late July (52%).
So it seems that the Senate Bill as it stands does not have wide support in fact looses support because it does not a Government Insurance plan.”
Thinking | Oct 11, 2009 7:15:14 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The other Senate bill has a ‘Public Option’.
It looks as though it will be merged in to the final for the floor vote.
In fact, I think the final bill will have BOTH ‘Co-ops’ and ‘Public Option’.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Sounds about right.
Obama is having to fabricate bipartisan support for health care.
He does realize that Dems can do it w/out Repubs? If he had control of his own party.
When Obamacare turns out to be awful Obama needs someone to share the blame.
It won’t be Bob Dole–smart man.

Posted by: larry | October 11, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Yes, it would be wonderful if the government could compete with private insurance companies to provide affordable health insurance.
What are the chances the private sector can compete with the government? When the federal insurance fails to break even, it just gets more operating capital from the taxpayers. When a private company fails to make a profit, it eventually goes out of business.
There is currently no meaningful competition now for people 65 and older. Private companies just leave them to Medicare because private companies cannot compete with taxpayer-underwritten Medicare rates.
Medicare alone has an unfunded liability of over $30 trillion…with the majority of eligible baby boomers not yet 65…yet it will stay in business. How can any company compete with that?

Posted by: MizFW | October 11, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I’m a Canadian, and I’d like to set the story straight…. Our Health Care system has some problems… BUT…works well for us. Wait times are normally for elective procedures. Serious injuries/conditions/treatments are handled in a very timely manner. For instance… I had an ovarian tumour-diagnosed as probably cancerous on a Friday. I was operated on the very next Monday… and post-op was at the Cancer Center as soon as I healed. Had a parotid tumour – operated on within a couple of weeks… successfully!… My bill: $0.00 NIL. We do not have bancruptcies or home foreclosures because of medical bills. When you quoqte the Canadian system, please remember that we outrank the U.S. in life expectancy, and in outcomes.

Posted by: Barbara-Canadian | October 11, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

…We do not have bancruptcies or home foreclosures because of medical bills. When you quoqte the Canadian system, please remember that we outrank the U.S. in life expectancy, and in outcomes.
Today, October 11, 2009, 1 minute ago | Barbara-Canadian
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hi Barbara, unfortunately, in this country the Health Insurance Industry and the Republicans don’t care about ‘life expectancy’ and ‘outcomes’.
They care about ‘Profit Expectancy’ and ‘Incomes’.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Ex Senator Dole is on the board of directors of at least one hospital chain that uses very irregular billing practices.

Posted by: Mick | October 11, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

The other Senate bill has a ‘Public Option’.
It looks as though it will be merged in to the final for the floor vote.
In fact, I think the final bill will have BOTH ‘Co-ops’ and ‘Public Option’.
**************************************
Best have a strong PO, my hope is that the house which is closer to the people prevail.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

to spacerook1: you said “What you are telling us is that it is now only the
elite that have good coverage.”
I have very good employer group insurance making $35K a year. I really do not think I could possibly qualify as elite.

Posted by: malcat | October 11, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

government run anything is always a mess. How anybody could ignore this simple fact is amazing but understandable one you understand why they do it. It is about enslaving another 30M people with entitlements that they can say somebody else will take away. This is about vote buying and power, nothing else.

Posted by: bryan | October 11, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Best have a strong PO, my hope is that the house which is closer to the people prevail.
Posted by: Thinking | Oct 11, 2009 7:48:04 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would bet that Barack would support a ‘weak’ PO just to squeak it in. The rationale is that it would cover most (if not all) the remaining left off of the Baucus bill.
He still has to come in under budget. So, he spends $81 billion to start the ‘Public Option’. Then he is at budget target.
Then, he has something that everyone wants (except the Republicans and the Insurance Industry) and it has plenty of competition.
At this point let the Republican filibuster it to death if they can. Barack and the Democrats can say that they did all that he could do for the poor, disadvantaged, and middle class people in the 2010 elections.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Mick… We have had universal health care in Canada since 1959. Each Province oversees it’s system, however it is funded by both Provincal and Federal governments. (through our taxes). Although each Province has jurisdiction, there are federal mandates that require universality, and it is totally portable between Provinces. There are very few co-pays.. the differential between standard ward hospitalization, and/or semi or private rooms is one that comes to mind. We choose our own physicians, get all the diagnostic tests, home-care, etc. I make these points because I have been watching the dialogue in the U.S.-am appalled at the premiums you guys pay (wow… just wow), and wonder why there is such opposition.

Posted by: Barbara-Canadian | October 11, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

America will be a better place when everyone has health insurance.
Does anybody know how awful it is to be turned away from a hospital or medical care, because you don’t have the money to pay for care??? France does have a GOOD
public insurance, so does Canada and England (we know relatives and friend who live there and we have been there. Some of the lies about their systems are rediculus. Nothing is perfect.
However, America has nothing. Emergency
rooms are not good for broken bones,
heart attacks- and other horrible things- FOR GOD’S SAKE, WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
Am
wh

Posted by: JJvence | October 11, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

” ‘We have great respect for Sen. Dole and his commitment to reform,’ ” a DNC spokesman told ABC News. ” ‘As soon as Sen. Dole’s concerns were communicated to us we immediately agreed to pull the ad.’ ”
Too bad Democrats don’t also respect Americans enough to be truthful about what their reform proposals will do to the best health care system in the world, which is to increase the cost of health care to Americans while at the same time creating a worse system that also depends on more and more rationing by politicians and their appointees who thoughtfully insulate themselves from review or liability for mismanaging the entire mess — a health care mess that they won’t even mandate for themselves.
But their reforms won’t protect them from liability at the next election, by which time it will be difficult to remedy the mess that they are hell-bent on creating RIGHT NOW even though they don’t dare let the whole mess actually go into effect until 2012, after the next presidential election!
If the Democrats are so proud of what they want to create, it would sure seem like they would want to have it go into effect RIGHT AWAY.
But they know better, and really think they will get away with their deception bby ramming something through fast and delaying it’s full implementation for a few years.
Otherwise, why did every one of the democrat members of the Senate Finance Committee vote against posting their reform bill in full on the internet, with the final cost analylsis of that bill by the CBO, for everyone to admire and praise once the bill is reduced to writing and before it is voted upon? There’s absolutely no good reason for not posting the bill, along with COB’s cost analysis, before the final vote by the committee. Especially since all the “wonderful benefits” of the bill wouldn’t even go into effect until 2012.
What’s the big rush? Because they know good and well that they’re trying to stick America with a huge lemon.
If Democrats were truly seeking real reform, have to wonder why NONE of their “reform” bills contains a single word about controlling costs of law suits against doctors and hospitals by discouraging frivolous suits, or a single provision to allow Americans to shop all over the nation for coverage.
Follow the money, right to the pockets of politicians in the form of campaign contributions. Self-serving, corrupt, lying politicians with absolutely no accountability until the next election will do a worse job of providing health care than any insurance company.
For a preview, look no further than the lie that the DNC tried to slip by Dole.

Posted by: TParty4USA | October 11, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

To TParty4USA… I don’t want to be seen as “meddling” in your country’s business. I only posted to right the wrong comments about Canadian health care… but reading your post I can’t help but remark that you surely must know that such a huge overhaul of your system necessarily takes time… logistics, computerization, set-up, etc.
Our system was years in development. Since every other industrialized country does have an equivalent system, it would therefore be easier to implement.

Posted by: Barbara-Canadian | October 11, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

If healthcare reform is such a great idea why does Obama even need the support of any Republicans? He has the house, he has the Senate and for the most part he has the press ready to pull out countless horror stories of bankruptcies and people not being treated.
Could it be that people from all walks of life smell a rat and have grown tired of one “crisis” after another? Of bills worth billions passed without being read and spent by God knows who? Of the deals being made in backrooms with Insurance and drug companies?
Our politicians are a mess, they are immature and act like spoiled brats. If the current climate is change then I long for the same.

Posted by: david | October 11, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

TParty4USA | Oct 11, 2009 8:03:52 PM – aren’t you shocked that the health care/health insurance industry has paid out 380 000 000 dollars in the last months alone for lobbying, ads and campaign contributions to Dems and Reps alike in order to kill any meaningful health care reform? The Democrat Senate Committee Chairman Baucus alone got 1.5 million to tow the line and not carry out the will of we the People. 50 million dollars in contributions in total have flowed to the sitting members of that Committee during their careers from health care industry special interests. As patriotic Americans, who have up to now believed we live in a democracy, what should you and I do about this leveraged buyout of our government by corporations who are elected by nobody and truly not accountable to the citizens, who by a 58-34 margin, in spite of a massively funded disinformation campaign, want Medicare extended to all, not just those over 65? Help me out on this…

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Sounds entirely lame, like the kids in school who couldn’t acknowledge they were friends with other kids in school because their clique wouldn’t like it. It was a compliment to say you were for reform, and a shame to take it back.

Posted by: Sara B. | October 11, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Manassas, Virginia – Just nine months into his presidency, Mr Obama has proved more of a hindrance than a help to the Democratic candidate, Creigh Deeds. Unlike Democrats across the country in 2008, the state senator is keeping a very loose grip on the president’s coat-tails.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 11, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Republicans, even after they leave office,they are still afraid to let their words be used for a good purpose. Must be their phones ringing off the hook with threats and hate from other republicans. Wimps!

Posted by: Veryvicki | October 11, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Could it be that people from all walks of life smell a rat and have grown tired of one “crisis” after another? Of bills worth billions passed without being read and spent by God knows who? Of the deals being made in backrooms with Insurance and drug companies?
Our politicians are a mess, they are immature and act like spoiled brats.
***************************************
It could be the fear generated by those spoiled brats in the GOP, that drag up lies of Death Panels, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, sex clinics in schools, indoctrination, kill Gramma, etc.?
Couldn’t be the lies the GOP keeps telling about how they have a better plan, how if we are all mandated to buy private insurance that the cost will be less. Like competition in the electric market, like how our gas, and energy cost are dropping.
See when things become a necessity, when the market becomes so big, then the free market system fails, and the industry becomes so big, and there are so few compititors that they can out price any new commers so when they fail up goes the prices. That is where we are at today.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

61% of the people polled want the Health Care Reform and the Public Option. It is republicans who are owned by the health care industry and will never want the average people to have decent health insurance. Most people know how broken health care is and that we need the government to help.

Posted by: Veryvicki | October 11, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Pathetic republicans, even after they leave office,they are still afraid to let their words be used for a good purpose. Must be their phones ringing off the hook with threats and hate from other republicans. Wimps!
Today, October 11, 2009, 6 minutes ago | Veryvicki
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Actually, that would be ‘their phones ringing off the hook with threats and hate from the Republican leader, Rush Limbaugh”

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I just spent a month in Greenland working with some Canadians and all agreed that they didn’t want the U.S. healthcare system to change because it was their only option for healthcare if they had an emergency and didn’t have time to wait months for rationed care in Canada. These Canadians would be considered liberal by most standards, but opposed changing the U.S. healthcare system because they foresaw that the U.S. would soon outlaw its citizens from paying for care outside the gov’t run system — the very problem they deal with in Canada now.

Posted by: JPT | October 11, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I just spent a month in Greenland working with some Canadians and all agreed that they didn’t want the U.S. healthcare system to change because it was their only option for healthcare if they had an emergency and didn’t have time to wait months for rationed care in Canada.
***************************************
You expect us to believe your story?.

Posted by: Thinking | October 11, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

61% of the people polled want the Health Care Reform and the Public Option. It is republicans who are owned by the health care industry and will never want the average people to have decent health insurance. Most people know how broken health care is and that we need the government to help.
Posted by: Veryvicki | Oct 11, 2009 9:07:03 PM
=================
Really? Then why are the Dems so obsessed with disparaging the Republicans? By your account they already have overwhelming public support, right? Just call for a vote! I guess it’s not that simple.

Posted by: Woody | October 11, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

You expect us to believe your story?
=============================
We’re all surprised you don’t.

Posted by: JPT | October 11, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

JPT | Oct 11, 2009 9:13:22 PM, Interesting anecdote, and if you have unlimited finances, it buys you what you need and this is possibly the best country to be – so we should just keep what we’ve got, maybe tweak it a bit? My ten plus years in Canada convinced me their health care system is far better for its citizens. My family and I personally never waited for anything, and I had zero worries about being able to afford needed health care (especially if a catastrophe were to strike). Again, we are ranked number 37 in the world in health care.

Posted by: Robin | October 11, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I just spent a month in Greenland working with some Canadians and all agreed that they didn’t want the U.S. healthcare system to change because it was their only option for healthcare if they had an emergency and didn’t have time to wait months for rationed care in Canada…
Today, October 11, 2009, 16 minutes ago | JPT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I’m wondering if Barbara-Canadian or JJvence would mind replying to this ‘claim’?

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Dole’s mistake is not understanding how much the political game has changed. For Democrats in Congress, health care reform is not a goal but a vehicle for increasing their power over a key segment of the economy. Alas, Dole is stuck back in the ’80′s and early ’90′s, when both major political parties often worked toward a common objective (e.g., better tax system; decreased illegal immigration).
It’s time for Dole, Frist and other former Senators to bow out gracefully. They are only damaging their party and the nation.

Posted by: Krupskaya | October 11, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

All these politicians are self serving and dont care about you they only care about themselves! Why don’t you ask America Samoa how they feel about the special ammendemnt she put into legislation to prohibit them from getting the extra monies so her 17 million dollar investment with Starkist, who is also her major campaign contributor, has an advantage over their competitors. If that is the type of compassionate person you trust with your health care then keep on drinking. They all need to be voted out and start over with new people that are not corrupt. The person talking about the insurance lobbyists and republicans how come you did not mention that Baucus made a deal with the drug makers to the tune of 90 billion dollars. If you people cant see the corruption in Government then you deserve what you get. The Canadian person fails to tell you how much they pay for taxes and in England they pay 90% of their wages in taxes. So when everybody is making ten cents to every dollar you earn you will be the same ones complaining and whinning what happened!

Posted by: dante | October 11, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I just read the Pew poll results. It appears that the public is under the impression that the ‘bill’ is the Senate Finance Committees ‘bill’ without the public option.
It looks like there will be overwhelming support for the final ‘merged’ Senate bill to have the ‘Public option’ as well as increased taxes on the rich to pay for it!
For Against
Overall bill: 34% 47%
Pre-existing coverage: 82% 14%
Individual mandate: 66% 30%
Employer mandate: 59% 36%
Taxes on the wealthy: 58% 39%
Public Option: 55% 38%

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 11, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Good for Bob Dole for lodging this protest and good for the White House for getting the ad pulled. Some of you are arguing that Dole’s words were not wrenched out of context or twisted, but I think Sen. Dole explaining his objections quite well here and it is clear that he considers what the DNC was trying to do misleading at best.
Bob Dole is an old-school Republican and I respect him a lot. But then, I am also a huge fan of George H.W. Bush, my favorite recent president. I may have been the only person in America who voted for Ronald Reagan because of the bottom of the ticket. I wish there were more politicians like them active in Washington today— on both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: moderate | October 11, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

“For Democrats in Congress, health care reform is not a goal but a vehicle for increasing their power over a key segment of the economy.”
And who has power over that key segment of the economy now? Big greedy insurance companies, who the Republicans are little servant boys for? We know health care reform was certainly never a goal for them.

Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

mshare, are you being silly or deliberately obtuse? Rush Limbaugh is a talking head on the conservative side, just like Keith Olbermann is a talking head on the liberal side. Neither is the leader of their respective party, nor does either pretend to be. Do you accuse every Democrat who says s/he won’t vote for a bill without a public option of just following Mr. Olbermann’s directives? Of course not.
Besides, while they are both Republicans, Sen. Dole and Rush Limbaugh are quite different in their opinions and attitudes on this issue. Limbaugh would never reach out to Dole and Dole would never listen to him if he did. But then, you knew that already, didn’t you?

Posted by: moderate | October 11, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

And who has power over that key segment of the economy now? Big greedy insurance companies, who the Republicans are little servant boys for? We know health care reform was certainly never a goal for them.-
And our new President, B. Obama, (a Republican, right?) likes to meet with Big Pharma. Nothing new here…

Posted by: The Usual | October 11, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Leave Bob Dole alone!!!
Leave Bob Dole alone I tell you!!!
Taken from the “Leave Britney Alone” video.

Posted by: hank | October 11, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

“And our new President, B. Obama, (a Republican, right?) likes to meet with Big Pharma. Nothing new here…”
But how much does Big Pharma like to meet with him? -Since he’s meeting with them–and this is the new part–to negotiate ways to keep their prices DOWN, whereas when Republicans meet with big business it’s to find ways to keep their prices UP.

Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

“I just spent a month in Greenland working with some Canadians and all agreed that they didn’t want the U.S. healthcare system to change because it was their only option for healthcare if they had an emergency and didn’t have time to wait months for rationed care in Canada.”
I have several Canadian friends and not one holds that opinion, including the one who went through a couple years of treatment for a brain tumor.
“These Canadians would be considered liberal by most standards, but opposed changing the U.S. healthcare system because they foresaw that the U.S. would soon outlaw its citizens from paying for care outside the gov’t run system — the very problem they deal with in Canada now.”
JPT | Oct 11, 2009 9:13:22 PM
You were “just” up there and yet your idiot friends had not heard of the 2005 Canadian Supreme Court ruling that resulted in the establishment of a private health care system?!?!? (As a sidenote, the plaintiff who brought that suit against Quebec was after a hip replacement – the sort of thing available with little wait in the US, where SOCIALIZED INSURANCE, aka Medicare, provides coverage for the vast majority of hip replacements).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

“mshare, are you being silly or deliberately obtuse? Rush Limbaugh is a talking head on the conservative side, just like Keith Olbermann is a talking head on the liberal side.”
moderate | Oct 11, 2009 10:11:39 PM
Olbermann has never demanded and recieved an apology from the head of the DNC. Rush has forced the head of the RNC to apologize and toe his line. Olbermann has never demanded and received apologies from multiple elected Democratic officals. Rush has from elected Republicans. There is no comparison.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 11, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

-But how much does Big Pharma like to meet with him? -Since he’s meeting with them–and this is the new part–to negotiate ways to keep their prices DOWN, whereas when Republicans meet with big business it’s to find ways to keep their prices UP.-
That must be why the meeting was secret because the great surprise will be lower costs! And I’m sure Big Pharma rather enjoys the access.

Posted by: The Usual | October 11, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

“You were “just” up there and yet your idiot friends had not heard of the 2005 Canadian Supreme Court ruling that resulted in the establishment of a private health care system?!?!?”
Now why would Canada go and do that?! Private health care is a failure, right?

Posted by: Shocked | October 11, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

“And I’m sure Big Pharma rather enjoys the access.”
They might consider themselves lucky that they went from being one of the industries that was running the White House to one the White house will still listen to.

Posted by: Skip | October 11, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Remember that liberals want ‘equality’ at all costs. You can’t be equal and be on top of the mountain, or even on the hillside. Equality to the liberals means everyone on the same level, at the lowest common denominator, down in the valley. They won’t be happy until we all have rotted teeth in the same way the British do, thanks to their wonderful NHS. If you see a happy smile in Britian, it was paid for privately.

Posted by: Ed | October 11, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

I’m not surprised the DNC took words out of context to make their commercial. Lies seem to by standard MO.
Democrats have a super majority and total control of the federal government. They have the power to pass whatever bill they want to pass. They want bipartisanship so they can blame Republicans when the whole thing blows up in their faces.
As soon as they limit the public option to citizens of the United States, I’ll go for it. As long as they propose using taxes from Americans to take care of citizens of other countries I will be asking my congressman and senators to oppose it.

Posted by: oonogil | October 12, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

“And who has power over that key segment of the economy now? Big greedy insurance companies…”
It’s long past time to grow up. The insurance companies are constrained by their contracts, by state law, and above all by competition. The government need not concern itself with either contracts or competition. That is why Medicare denies 6.8% of all claims, roughly double the average rate for private insurance companies and higher than any of them.
But serfs will always believe that if only the government takes over, everything will be just fine.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

“Olbermann has never demanded and received apologies from multiple elected Democratic officals.”
Olbermann has a tiny audience and zero influence over public opinion.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Pew poll:
“Public support of the individual mandate is strong, until coercive measures are mentioned. A July Pew poll found that 65 percent of Americans supported requiring everyone to have health insurance, but that support plummeted to 34 percent when NBC asked if people should pay a penalty if they did not have insurance.”
No harm in presenting the full story, is there?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

“…in the US, where SOCIALIZED INSURANCE, aka Medicare, provides coverage for the vast majority of hip replacements.”
SOCIALIZED INSURANCE in the United States denies 6.8% of all claims, faces an unfunded liability of $33 Trillion, and is about to become insolvent.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

“It looks like there will be overwhelming support for the final ‘merged’ Senate bill to have the ‘Public option’ as well as increased taxes on the rich to pay for it!”
I love it when children exult about the prospects for “taxes on the rich,” ignoring altogether the effects they have had on the economies of such places as California and New York, and ignoring the salient fact that the rich simply do not have nearly enough money to pay for this extravaganza no matter at what rate you tax them.
In my own case, I am rich but am vitually exempt from income tax because the huge bulk of my holdings is in after-tax money. Tax away, suckers. You can’t lay a glove on me, but you can certainly keep unemployment at European levels forever.
This is a marvelous time to be rich and fully retired; it’s a great vantage point from which to watch this suicidal circus.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

“The Medicare denial rate found in the [AMA] study was, on a weighted average basis, roughly 1.7 times that of all of the private carriers combined.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

SOCIALIZED INSURANCE in the United States denies 6.8% of all claims, faces an unfunded liability of $33 Trillion, and is about to become insolvent
Today, October 11, 2009, 10 minutes ago | Fascist Hyena
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nothing that more taxes on the rich couldn’t cure.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 12, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I love it when children exult about the prospects for “taxes on the rich,”…
..In my own case, I am rich but am vitually exempt from income tax because the huge bulk of my holdings is in after-tax money. Tax away, suckers. You can’t lay a glove on me, but you can certainly keep unemployment at European levels forever.
This is a marvelous time to be rich and fully retired; it’s a great vantage point from which to watch this suicidal circus.
Today, October 11, 2009, 7 minutes ago | Fascist Hyena
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, were just going to have to close those loopholes.
Maybe we can pass a general ‘clawback’ tax for people like you.

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 12, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I love it when children exult about the prospects for “taxes on the rich,” ignoring altogether the effects they have had on the economies of such places as California and New York, and ignoring the salient fact that the rich simply do not have nearly enough money to pay for this extravaganza no matter at what rate you tax them.
Today, October 11, 2009, 11 minutes ago | Fascist Hyena
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tax increases for the rich not being enough to get through tough times like today? Well, let’s see…Hmmm.
Did you know that leading up to 1918, the top rate of the income tax was increased to 77% (on income over $1,000,000) to finance World War I?
Bush, Cheney, and the Republicans (the wealthy of the country) started the $1,000,000,000,000 Iraq war on a false premise. So, we are due for a tax on the wealthy (and a ‘clawback’ from people like you) to pay for it.
Did you know that from 1918 until 1929 the top tax rate was steadily reduced from 77% to 24%? Remember what happened in 1929? Isn’t it amazing how history repeats itself?
Did you know that from then until 1932 (during the Great Depression) the top tax rate was increased to 63%, and then steadily up to 94% in 1945? Do you remember when the Great Depression ended?…1939.
So, what do you think?…Should there be enough money residing in the rich to do what they have done before?

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 12, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

“The Medicare denial rate found in the [AMA] study was, on a weighted average basis, roughly 1.7 times that of all of the private carriers combined.”
Today, October 11, 2009, 13 minutes ago | Fascist Hyena
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Again…nothing that a tax increase on the rich (and a ‘clawback’ from people like you) couldn’t fix!

Posted by: ErnestNM | October 12, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

“mshare, are you being silly or deliberately obtuse? Rush Limbaugh is a talking head on the conservative side, just like Keith Olbermann is a talking head on the liberal side. Neither is the leader of their respective party, nor does either pretend to be.”
A Gallup survey released in June asked Americans to name the “main person who speaks for the Republican Party today.” Among Republican and Republican-leaning respondents, Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich tied as most often named.

Posted by: Numeros | October 12, 2009, 3:08 am 3:08 am

the rich simply do not have nearly enough money to pay for this extravaganza no matter at what rate you tax them.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
don’t know about that, seems there’s enough of the rich corporate folks getting 20 to 30 million dollar bonus, super retirement packages etc.and most corps don’t pay any taxes anyways……let alone all the folks who use foreign banks to hide their money..
time to make em’ pay up

Posted by: Reggie | October 12, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

‘GOP wishes there were Nobel prize for ‘fear, hatred, racism’

Posted by: Trips | October 12, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

The scare tactics continue day by day ,but we will not be able to afford insurance in the near future unless something is done soon! I’m retired and recently needed a pacemaker put in and I have good federal Blue-Cross Blue Shield insurance and my cost was still over $4,000.This is projected to double within the next 5 years! I can’t imagine what others are currently paying for insurance and can’t understand how they can possible afford their cost to double in the next 5 years. There’s a old saying that “There ought to a Law” and thats what this bill is all about!!I would like to here from others here what they currently pay for health insurance and could they afford a doubling in cost every 5 years because that is the path we are currently on without reform!!

Posted by: Ken | October 12, 2009, 4:23 am 4:23 am

I am 100% behind some kind of health care “reform”. And, I am 100% puzzled why no one, from any party, is questioning why we are trying to build a new program on top of a “failed” foundation. This country, supposedly, spends twice as much on health care as any other nation on earth. We still have millions of people left out. Now,
it looks as though “we” are happy with spending $800 billion to a trillion more over the next decade. Why can’t we cut 50% off the current cost and end up with as much as everyone else? That would be a step up.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am

I recently got two x-rays made at one of our local hospitals. A front and lateral view, simple enough. Amount charged to my insurance: $204 for the x-rays and an additional $204 for someone to look at them. Total: $408. This does not include the $170 doctor visit required to get the referral for the x-rays. Now the total grows to $578 and I have’nt been “treated” yet. Four days later I visited a Chiropractor. My insurance does’nt that. Cash price: $30 for the identical x-rays which included someone reading them and $25 for treatment. We have a failed system folks. And now we want to build a new program on top of what we already have.
We need a new system…..no doubt about it! Here is the big but – we cannot build a new program on top of a corrupt system. If we are already paying twice as much as everyone else in this country, I cannot accept the idea paying more will fix the problem.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Why are the democrats so jealous of the American Dream, put your hands back in your pockets. The rich have worked hard for what they have and don’t need to pay for deadbeat democrats. THey supply jobs for middle class america. GET A JOB and get your PRIORITIES in order. Health Insurance is a business, make a better choice than you did with your vote!!

Posted by: HH | October 12, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

We need reform now! We need to hit the “reset” button on Pharma and Health Insurance companies for a start. That must be done before any new program can be considered. First you throw out any and all “arrangements”, handshakes and back-slaps and get down to business. Why do I have a retail price of $122 on my Diovan HCT (blood pressure medicine) for a one month supply when I can get it from Canada, postage paid, for $29.95? Same manufacturer, right here in the USA.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Was this ad a surprise? It’s no worse than Obama creating that photo op with 100 or so MDs in their “whites” in the Rose Garden. Those were the ONLY 100 or so doctors that support this nonsense. Just go to the website of the American Medical Association and see what doctors support. This whole administration is based on lies and deceit. That’s the socialist way. It’s all about power and control. Wake up America!

Posted by: STEVE | October 12, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

This problem goes far beyond political parties. It is all “smoke and mirrors” when it comes to congress making any true reform. Keep your eye on the ball people. I started using an “inhaler” three months ago. Now I’m constantly reminded by my pharmacy, by mail, to refill it. They add at the bottom of the letter: we are being compensated by the manufacturer. Guess what – we pay that compensation! Our representatives won’t make the decisions that need to be made.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Sneaky Washington – trying to use GOP snippets out of context to lie about Healthcare. Now they are also trying to hide a PWC research report that shows this health bill will increase your health premiums by $1500 (family) by 2013 ($600 single) – and by $4500 a few years after that!!!!! But they don’t want to tell you this!
PWC – by the way – is a tax specialist company… they don’t sell health insurance and don’t win or lose any way this thing goes. In face, given all the tax hikes we will also get from this bill, I would say they would win if the bill went through. So – I tend to believe reports like theirs over some Govt beuracrat any day.

Posted by: clr | October 12, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

OMG!
Obama lied about Dole and twisted his words?
I am shocked, I tell you.

Posted by: drjohn | October 12, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Posted by: Old Republican | Oct 12, 2009 8:57:57 AM
In other words, we should all pay for your health care. We all somehow owe you that.
Why not simply move to Canada?

Posted by: drjohn | October 12, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I’m not sure what we’ll end up with when it comes to health care reform. Unless the present system is totally dumped, it’ll be more of the same. As a nation, we already pay twice as much as everyone on earth and still have millions of people with nothing. Someone suggested a different path the other day. We should vote on lobbyist rather then congressional candidates. That way we could save on the cost of the middle-man. Somehow that is starting to make sense. This is really sad.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 32% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -8.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

drjohn: I’ll pay my own way. I don’t need anyone’s help. When I start navigating my way through the present system, I find something out. Our system is totally corrupt. A lot of people are left out with no place to go. We cannot have true reform without getting rid of old practices.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Dole is your typical republican politician. He says something and than later denies he said or agreed to it. Who voted these jerks in?????????

Posted by: Republican lies | October 12, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

America! A country that will deny the many in an effort to prevent a few from taking advantage of a system. meanwhile, middle class Americans are getting diseases and sicknesses that are destroying their retirement. But none of it matters to those yet affected by a medical emergency. So, in the typical American way, if it doesn’t effect my “right here – right now” I don’t want it. BUT when that American does finally get cancer from their eating habits, smoking habits, poor exercise habits, or other form of laziness, they’ll be BEGGING for some help. Who ya gonna call then? All Americans better hope this healthcare reform passes that covers all of us. Health Insurance Companies are killing us slowly and driving up the cost of medical services for those who have minimum or no coverage.

Posted by: Legal Beagle | October 12, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Fascist Hyena: I think you missed the point on this entire conversation. This is’nt about the president. He can always provide more leadership but Congress will determine the “Bill” that he will have to sign. I really don’t see anything good coming our way.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Republican lies: He was’nt voted in. He has been retired for a long time. Gee?
What were you thinking?

Posted by: Old Republican | October 12, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

The cost of insurance can be slowed if we take measurable action to give alternatives to the people. This will make health insurers competitive in order to win business. And it is a good thing for America! Making medicine and people’s health a capitalist consumer commodity is savage and immoral.

Posted by: Legal Beagle | October 12, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Central banks flush with record reserves are increasingly snubbing dollars in favor of euros and yen, further pressuring the greenback after its biggest two- quarter rout in almost two decades.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

“Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Sunday that unemployment is headed into double digits, while the medium-term inflation outlook poses more risk than generally believed, according to reported comments.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

America! A country that will deny the many in an effort to prevent a few from taking advantage of a system. meanwhile, middle class Americans are getting diseases and sicknesses that are destroying their retirement. But none of it matters to those yet affected by a medical emergency… Health Insurance Companies are … driving up the cost of medical services for those who have minimum or no coverage.
Posted by: Legal Beagle | Oct 12, 2009 10:20:26 AM
Nice post. What a big surprise that the insurance industry would come out with a hatchet job today that overlooks key elements of the bill. I do agree with the report that a weak individual mandate is problematic, but there are many odd assumptions made in the report. Frankly, I hope Pelosi sent the single payer bill to the CBO, too,along with the various versions of the public option. If we need a strong mandate, let’s put one in alongside a robust public option. If the insurance companies can’t compete, good riddance. Let’s leave single payer on the table by getting it scored. I’m so sick of the distract and divide tactics. We need not-for-profit alternatives to the same old malarkey. No reform is not a viable, or wise, option.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Related to my last comment, Ezra Klein has a good post up at his blog regarding “The Insurance Industry’s Deceptive Report.” check it out.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“But serfs will always believe that if only the government takes over, everything will be just fine.”
Serfs? What do you think that makes you? Some kind of Baron? -Keep dreaming. Yeah Medicare may deny 6.8% of claims compared to private insurers–the ones which will sell you coverage at all. The problem is private insurers deny coverage to so many people. In that case the denial rate on claims would be practically 100%. If the health insurance industry based on profit alone will not protect our citizens to our satisfaction we have every right to create a government program to do so.

Posted by: Skip | October 12, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Overall, 49% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. Fifty-one percent (51%) disapprove.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

“What do you think that makes you? Some kind of Baron?”
No. It makes me a self-respecting free man.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

It’s fascinating to me that so many serfs believe that evil lurks in “the insurance industry,” as if that industry were populated by people who are somehow ethically and morally inferior to those who work in, say, the dairy, jewelry, automotive, aerospace, entertainment, agricultural or construction industries, to name but a few. (All participants in those industries work “for profit,” by the way.) In fact it is populated by persons who are neither more nor less honorable than the population at large.
As with all industries, health insurance companies must provide a product that consumers like at a price they are willing to pay, or they do not survive. (If for some reason you have a childish aversion to “profit,” you can go to non-profits such as Blue Cross or Blue Shield.)
Insurance companies do not deny coverage to people with whom they have contracted unless the denial is pursuant to the contract; otherwise (unlike the government) they are liable to monetary damages and ultimately to failure. They do not deny policies to any person who comes to them before they are ill or injured; anyone who waits to apply for insurance until the risk has already been realized is simply a freeloader for whom I have no sympathy at all.
Under the Baucus plan, of course, all the people who would otherwise freeload will be coerced into buying insurance that they do not want. They will be fined if they do not buy it, and will be jailed if they do not pay the fine. They are, in the main, young and healthy people who today elect to self-insure.
If the people they have elected force them into this scheme they will have only themselves to blame. I suspect that when this plan, if enacted, begins to be enforced, there will be widespread outrage.
By the way, for many years it has been the law in California that every drive must be insured. Nonetheless, something close to one in five voters is uninsured today.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Nothing surprizes me on what comes from either political party. We know the lobbists are in it for money. And the Media loves everything Obama, so the real truth will never be known. The outcome will end up that the Middle Class Citizens have to pay for it. Even if it stinks to high heaven. Get your close-pins ready.

Posted by: Spiderman | October 12, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

A couple of things that a Fascist might want to keep in mind. First, regarding “freedom” : Monopoly, oligopoly and cartel elements in capitalism tend to restrict the freedom of the consumer. Power and wealth tends to concentrate and corrupt. It’s more than possible to be a corporate serf– ever been on a coal mine tour in West Virginia to see how that used to work out for coal mine serfs not so long ago? Also, liberals and progressives typically seek freedom in lockstep with equality, and believe there is a place for government intervention. I don’t think the people in the health insurance industry are “evil.” I think their so-called commodity isn’t well suited to the market, and that the market can’t cure the ills of how we do health care and health insurance in the States.
Health insurance companies are financially incented not to pay out, to find a way to not cover people with pre-existing conditions, and to find ways to rescind contracts when illnesses become costly. Recission of costly contracts is even on the performance evals at some insurance companies in the private sector. So, health insurance is not a commodity like jewelry, or dairy. Period. And Blue Cross, Blue Shield is no longer “no profit.” Look it up! In fact, while profits in the industry are reasonable, ever take a look at what their (Blue Cross’s) execs make, and how much their bonuses are? No?The top six executives at Blue Cross each made more than $1 million in 2008, topped by the chief exec at close to $4 million. They’re incented to not reform the industry in a way that touches their bonuses.
I worked in the health insurance and managed care industries, and I think you should check out some of Wendell Potter’s interviews. He’s spot on, and you sound naive. Seriously. Oppose health care reform, if you must, but do it on defendable terms, not due to laissez faire free market utopian mythology and naivete.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Incidentally, there’s a story at TPM about how a Republican aide is telling Republicans to make sure they check how much money they received from health insurance lobbyists before they use to the new AHIP report to oppose the reform bills. Hmmm… sounds like prudent advice since it’s fairly obvious the insurance industry lobby is an important sugar daddy on the Hill.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

===to find a way to not cover people with pre-existing conditions===
I can’t wait until they extend this to home owner’s insurance. I don’t want to purchase the insurance until my house burns down.

Posted by: Axey | October 12, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“As with all industries, health insurance companies must provide a product that consumers like at a price they are willing to pay, or they do not survive.”
That is only true in the case of the healthy. It is not profitable to insure the sick, or pre-existing conditions. Trying to claim evil or not that the insurance companies do not engage in dropping contracts to save money takes some audacity at this late stage of the debate. Instead deflecting the main issue by arguing about the morality of profits suggest a real alternative besides Blue Cross. If profit motive alone will not protect all of our citizens–because it’s not profitable–the government may be instructed to do so or we can force the health insurance companies to do so relegating their role to that of public utilities.

Posted by: Skip | October 12, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

it is no surprise when the republicans objcct to anything record breaking. They are a party that plays safe and always sink the economy or new initiatives. George Bush Jr, and Sr. examples administration.

Posted by: sam | October 12, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“…the insurance companies do not engage in dropping contracts to save money takes some audacity at this late stage of the debate…”
It’s unlawful to do so in California, and if not unlawful in other states it could readily be made so.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Trust the Washington scoundrels at your own peril! Team Obama seems to have the propensity to say or do anything at any time to bolster a particular issue — for just a short period!!! Do they just take the public as a TOTAL IDIOT BASE????

Posted by: PappyHappy | October 12, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Democrats have an un-filibusterable majority in the Senate, a clear majority in the House, and a sitting President. Why do they keep blaming Republicans for no health care bill ?

Posted by: Craig | October 12, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“If profit motive alone will not protect all of our citizens–because it’s not profitable–the government may be instructed to do so or we can force the health insurance companies to do so relegating their role to that of public utilities.”
One thing you can’t “force” the health insurance companies, or any other company, to do is to stay in business while losing money.
It is, in fact, profitable for insurance companies to enroll as many people as they can. People who develop pre-existing conditions before attempting to obtain insurance should be able to participate in a nation-wide high-risk pool, as they do in Switzerland. As it stands today, individual states must do it on their own because the ingenious congress you love so much forbids multi-state contracting. I myself participated in California’s high-risk pool for a number of years.
The indigent who cannot afford private insurance to day are, for the most part, eligible for Medicaid. There are several million people eligible for Medicaid who simply haven’t bothered to enroll. There are many million young and healthy people who could afford health insurance but elect not to buy it because they want to spend their money in other ways.
The truly needy can be provided for in myriad ways without destroying a system with which about 250 million Americans are quite happy.
The ultimate goal of the statists is to ensure that no one can get any better coverage than anyone else, no matter how diligently he strives to support himself and his family. (One of the criteria used by the World Health Organization in rating national systems is how much difference there is among recipients. If everybody gets the same mediocre coverage, they think that’s a plus. That has eternally been the attitude of the serf.)

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 12, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

‘”I really don’t think it’s worth the paper it’s written on,” AARP Executive Vice President John Rother told reporters Monday. “If anyone believes it, that’s a problem.”‘
AARP .. neutral through disbelief

Posted by: John Q Public | October 12, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

It’s back to basic health care math again. If you want universal health insurance, everybody has to obtain insurance and stay insured for their entire lives. Otherwise the slackers who get insurance only after they get sick will kill you. That’s why insurance companies deny coverage for preexisting conditions. It keeps costs under control for the rest of us folks who consciencously maintain our coverage.
Ifr the Democrats are serious about creating a fair universal health care system, the mandate has to be coupled with severe penalties for noncompliance. The Baucus plan as it was first sold contained penalties severe enough to incentivize slackers to obtain coverage. So, it was an honest plan in that respect. But those penalties were watered down to the point that they were about as big a joke as this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. Price Waterhouse is absolutely right to call Baucus on this.
Face it, Dems. There aren’t enough rich people in this country to stick with this bill. At some point in time you are going to have to be honest with your constituents that universal health care is going to cost them money. A lot of money and it will cost them for their entire lives.

Posted by: Bridget | October 12, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

“The ultimate goal of the statists is to ensure that no one can get any better coverage than anyone else, no matter how diligently he strives to support himself and his family.”
I haven’t heard even the proponents of single-payer advocate trying to eliminate private insurance altogether though opponents claim that would be the end result of course. Thus those who strive diligently would be able to purchase supplemental insurance, deflating this caste conspiracy theory.

Posted by: Skip | October 12, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“Dole told ABC News, “My whole message is you can’t score unless you’re in the game.”
It seems that Dole is playing an entirely different game than the GOP members of congress. He’s trying to have it both ways. He’s pretending that the GOP is interested in health care, and they may be, but they are more interested in playing politics.

Posted by: Flash Override | October 12, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“I haven’t heard even the proponents of single-payer advocate trying to eliminate private insurance altogether though opponents claim that would be the end result of course. Thus those who strive diligently would be able to purchase supplemental insurance, deflating this caste conspiracy theory.”
I’ll tell you who won’t be able to get the sort of coverage they want…..Me! I eat right, excercise regularly and go to the doctor pretty much once a year for a check up. I like high deductible insurance because it’s cheap. It provides protection against major medical coverage and discourages me from running off to the doctor asking for antibiotics for a cold or allergy. That’s the exact sort of insurance everybody should have, but the Democrat’s plans will make it illegal. At least HR 3200 would have insured that high deductible plans would inevitably be phased out. And I suspect anything else the Dems produce will do so as well because they need to drag me kicking and screaming into an expensive plan so I can subsidize the uninsured with my premiums as well as my taxes.

Posted by: Bridget | October 12, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

The fascists are wrong:
“t is, in fact, profitable for insurance companies to enroll as many people as they can.”
Wrong: it is profitable for insurance companies to enroll as many healthy people as they can, and not pay any claims.
“the ingenious congress you love so much forbids multi-state contracting”
Wrong: insurance companies can sell policies in any state they want. They have to meet the state requirements, which is what they don’t like.
“The indigent who cannot afford private insurance to day are, for the most part, eligible for Medicaid.”
Wrong: not only do you have to be indigent, but you have to have less than $2000 worth of assets. (also depends on a myriad of state rules)
“a system with which about 250 million Americans are quite happy.”
Not wrong (technically) but misleading. Yes 75% of those with private plans and 74% on government-run plans rate their insurance plan as excellent or good. However, those numbers drop quickly when you sort by those who have actually had medical problems. People who have used their private insurance are very unhappy with it.

Posted by: Flash Override | October 12, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

“At some point in time you are going to have to be honest with your constituents that universal health care is going to cost them money. A lot of money and it will cost them for their entire lives.”
I don’t intend to get into the which will cost more debate however it should at least be noted that it’s going to cost their constituents a lot of money for the rest of their lives if nothing at all is done too.

Posted by: Skip | October 12, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

No. It makes me a self-respecting free man.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
LOL .. you just sound narcissistic and angry that you lost

Posted by: hey you | October 12, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

If the Democrats are serious about creating a fair universal health care system, the mandate has to be coupled with severe penalties for noncompliance. The Baucus plan as it was first sold contained penalties severe enough to incentivize slackers to obtain coverage. So, it was an honest plan in that respect. But those penalties were watered down to the point that they were about as big a joke as this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. Price Waterhouse is absolutely right to call Baucus on this.
***
I agree about the mandate– it did get watered down and it’s the one good point that comes from the report the insurance lobby paid for– although as you all know I say if there’s a mandate there must then there ought to be a robust public option tied to Medicare rates on the national exchange, and we (Dems and others who are reform-oriented) might as well go for it since neither the vast majority of elected officials in the GOP nor AHIP seems very serious about health care reform.
I also agree with Skip’s take on single payor advocates and supplemental insurance– in fact, under the Swiss plan the money is made on the supplemental insurance market, I believe, Fascist. I do tend to say, hey, if the private sector can’t compete, good riddance, but that’s because I think it’s a canard. It IS a canard. C’mon. They can innovate and evolve. They just don’t want to. Might cut into some bonuses, or lobbying dollars.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

The fascists are wrong….
Posted by: Flash Override | Oct 12, 2009 2:36:31 PM
Nice post! I hope everyone reads it:>)

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Why should anyone believe what is coming out of this administration? The President’s recent doctor photo-op serves as another example of the administration’s efforts to show demonstrable support for health care, excuse me, insurance reform. Are we to believe that 100%, or that even a majority, of doctors support reform as proposed/debated in the current legislature? No. Contrived photo-ops on both sides of the aisle deceive more often than they do not.
For example, approximately just 18% of doctors belong to the American Medical Association. Eighteen percent of doctors are hardly a majority, yet the administration regularly cites the AMA’s broad based reform support intimating that all doctors support reform, which is simply not true.
Applying similar logic/tactics to the economy; Are we to believe that the recession is over? That the Stimulus Package has saved/created any jobs? That government ownership of private business is good? That the deceptively named Freedom of Choice Act (i.e. card check) will be good for business and the economy? That the administration will not raise taxes on those earning less than $250K annually (or some other figure depending on what day it may be)?
Those who read these threads are much more engaged intellectually in the process than most. Now, more than ever, it’s critical that you remain engaged and lobby support for your beliefs by encouraging others to take a much more active role in this process. Remember that the electorate placed these current politicians in office and that the electorate could do it again. The United States cannot allow that to occur. Get involved.

Posted by: Scott | October 12, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Alyson
An Obama internet community organizer paid by the word.
Ugh.

Posted by: Obamatopia | October 12, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Skip, while you may not want to get into a discussion of which will cost more, the problem your party is facing, and the reason Baucus watered down the mandate to begin with, is that many of the uninsured you’re always wailing about are healthy young adults who are voluntarily uninsured because their iphones and cable tv subscriptions are higher priorities than health insurance. Many of them voted for Obama in the mistaken belief that he was going to tax somebody else to provide them with free or low cost insurance, and that’s not what’s going to happen. He now risks losing not only the elderly, but also the young healthy adults who comprise a large percentage of the uninsured. Quite a dilemma.

Posted by: Bridget | October 12, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Obamatopia, a Republican mouthpiece paid by the word.

Posted by: knowerseeker | October 12, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

We just need public health care, period; forget about insurance reform. Let the well-to-do deal with the worsening insurance if they want to seek private doctors.

Posted by: knowerseeker | October 12, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

I see Obama’s thugs are out ….trying force their health scam down our throat even though most now know socialized medicine doesn’t work—it bankrupts the countries its in, forces taxes up, and lower the quality of medical care for all. I say kick the illegals out instead.

Posted by: PotatoeGater22 | October 12, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

These corporate, profits over health, insurance companies show how much fear they have created by seeing how many of you have taken up their call. These threats to raise costs is just blackmail. There is no hiding that fact. It is amazing how so many Republicans have fallen into this trap of protecting that which is draining this countries success dry all in the name of higher profits. Small businesses can no longer afford to get started because they cannot afford to pay the already super-high premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Many small and large businesses that have insurance coverage are dropping or minimizing the coverage of their employees just to stay in business or to remain competitive. Why are so many Republicans who have historically been all about protecting business and creating opportunity for new business not seeing this. Why are Republicans so blinded by how many jobs are lost to overseas interests because we cannot compete against their lower costs of ownership as they do not pay the exorbitant health-coverage costs that we are “blackmailed” with. This whole private industry, insurance and pharmaceuticals mostly, are destroying this country from the inside out. The Governments public option ‘IS THE ONLY” option to take away the draconian throttlehold of our countries economy and our personal health. These private corporations have more to say about our rights to quality health-care and our rights to live or die than any possible government plans. All for the sake of a greater profit. Do not be fooled by these scoundrels who have lost their compassion and their balance with what is humanely right for our citizens health and what is economically correct for our nations needs. These private, profit-based corporations have become “very unpatriotic and very inhumane.” THEIR PROFITS ARE TRUMPING HUMANS”. The average single American is not important enough in these corporations books. I vote for a very strong government run public option.

Posted by: dlboggan | October 12, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Craig | Oct 12, 2009 1:38:32 PM — You posted: “Democrats have an un-filibusterable majority in the Senate, a clear majority in the House, and a sitting President. Why do they keep blaming Republicans for no health care bill ?” ————- Because Craig, so many people keep falling for their miss-information and lies. Are you one of them?

Posted by: dlboggan | October 12, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Bridget | Oct 12, 2009 1:47:41 PM— You posted: “It keeps costs under control for the rest of us folks who consciencously maintain our coverage.” —– Bridget, wow, think about what you just posted here. So you truly believe that there everybody can “consciously” afford to pay the exorbitant insurance coverage that these profit based corporations force upon us? And when we are self-employed or between jobs or have a small business, you think that it is easy to pay the extremely high premiums and out of pocket costs. Americans can little afford these high costs and be able to start and stay in business. Do you even know what a “pre-condition” is? Do you know anyone who has lost a job and had to try to pay the super high costs of COBRA or tried to get coverage from other insurance companies for a pre-condition. Have you ever met or known of a person who has had their insurance dropped because of any number of excuses that can be dreamed up to save the profits of an insurance company. Do you know an insured person or family that out-of-pocket costs, in one year is a major portion of their income for that year? And all of this SO YOU CAN CONCIENCOUSLY MAINTAIN YOUR COVERAGE. I hope you can explain this attitude to our maker when that time comes. Please explain to me, Bridget, would this attitude of yours the same as Jesus if he had a choice about his fellow brothers and sisters? Are we your fellow-brothers and sisters? The un-insured, the pre-conditioned sister, the un-employed, those born with defects, those children of families that are too poor, the suddenly uninsured due to whatever excuse? I Love you, but do you love us? I wonder?

Posted by: dlboggan | October 12, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Bridget | Oct 12, 2009 2:22:21 PM: You appear to be a very young, healthy human being who has no insight to what life can do to change your life in a moment. One moment you are healthy, eating right, exercising and the next you are in a wheel chair for life or have life threatening cancer. None of this a “choice”. Life happens to every human being and that includes you. You visit your doctor once a year but there may be a time that once a year may not be enough. It may require hugely expensive multiple visits with a life time of treatments of one sort our another. Physical disability, or disease. You name it, it can happen to you too. Today’s insurance companies work at minimizing unhealthy and unprofitable people from the insurance rosters. So, I beseech you to reach out and touch your heart upon those who are not the healthy lucky ones and find out through real discovery what the rest of the world has to deal with. Step outside of your box and open your eyes. Be compassionate. I promise you it won’t hurt you as bad as you might think.

Posted by: dlboggan | October 12, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

SHEEPLE

Posted by: secreg756 | October 12, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“h most now know socialized medicine doesn’t work—it bankrupts the countries its in, forces taxes up, and lower the quality of medical care for all”
Out of every country in the G-8, G-20, OECD etc etc, the United States is the ONLY one without “socialized” medicine.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 12, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

An Obama internet community organizer paid by the word.
Posted by: Obamatopia | Oct 12, 2009 3:46:00 PM
LOL. I keep getting this from the same handful of folks, likely the same person under different monikers (gotta change monikers often to make it look like there’s more of you than there are who think like you, yes? I don’t do that but I’ve noticed many who do.) Glad my posts are so annoying to the opposition that some think I actually get paid for them.
***
Obamatopia, a Republican mouthpiece paid by the word.
Posted by: knowerseeker | Oct 12, 2009 4:57:11 PM
I think you’re right!! Projection much?

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Be compassionate. I promise you it won’t hurt you as bad as you might think.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 6:13:08 PM
…The Governments public option ‘IS THE ONLY” option to take away the draconian throttlehold of our countries economy and our personal health. These private corporations have more to say about our rights to quality health-care and our rights to live or die than any possible government plans. All for the sake of a greater profit. Do not be fooled by these scoundrels who have lost their compassion and their balance with what is humanely right for our citizens health and what is economically correct for our nations needs. These private, profit-based corporations have become “very unpatriotic and very inhumane.” THEIR PROFITS ARE TRUMPING HUMANS”. The average single American is not important enough in these corporations books. I vote for a very strong government run public option.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 5:40:25 PM
**
Nice posts! I vote for a very strong public option as well. It’s time to quit watering things down to please AHIP and the GOP.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Many of you know very well that all other industrialized countries in the world DO provide universal health coverage. So, why cannot America do the same? Second, what child or grandparent or any person are you going to deny coverage to? I will tell you what, let us put you in charge to make that decision. You decide if a child is going to live or die or be sick for the rest of their lives because you denied them the need. You can be choose to be GOD with their health or the life. Put yourself in the place of decision and ask yourself, are you able to decide another human being’s fait. I ask you now, if you are a Christian, how would Jesus choose in this need for our society and how would Jesus choose for each person’s needs for proper health care or life and death. So, I ask again, what would you do?

Posted by: dlboggan | October 12, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

At the last minute, just a day before the health care committee was supposed to vote on the Baukus plan, the insurance companies suddenly pull the plug, saying that the plan is too expensive. What a slight of hand! They go along with health care reform and then say, “oh, no!” These are the same people who were vehemently against the Clinton plan for health reform and look at how they keep raising the insurance costs.
It’s the big money insurance lobbyists who oppose health care reform that are tossing all their money at those in Congress who will stall to protect the status quo.
I am also tired of health care reform opponents whose only idea of change is to pass tort reform legislation. In other words, put a monetary cap on those who have suffered grievous medical injuries.

Posted by: findlayway | October 12, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

I don’t understand the hatred directed towards “private profit based” business. I own a business and unless we make a profit I cannot stay in business. I suspect that most of you also work for a company that has the same requirement. Making a profit allows a company to continue to exist, to continue to employee people, to provide benefits like insurance, to invest in making the company solid and sustainable, to invest in our communities, to support local charities, to sponsor youth sports teams, to pay taxes that fund our parks, libraries, and creative arts.
In our quest for responsible healthcare reform, let’s not demonize the many good, quality businesses and business owners that take the risks everyday in order to gain a reward (profit) so that we can help make our world a better place.

Posted by: Ken | October 12, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Price Waterhouse on the effect of the weakened mandate in the Baucus bill:
“In states that allow underwriting of individuals (45 states plus the District of Columbia), premiums could increase by approximately 41% to 59% on average by 2016, depending on the strength of the individual coverage requirement. These increases would take several years to be fully realized, but would begin to rise as unhealthy or sick individuals began to purchase coverage, while younger, healthier individuals decided it was less expensive for them to forgo coverage without consequence or consideration of the impact of the overall pool.”
The laws of economics simply reflect well-known aspects of human behavior.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | October 13, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Initially they said the ad was misleading because it claimed Dole supported the dems proposal. Considering Dole said he does not support any of the dem proposals I would say the ad was a lie.

Posted by: syndicate | October 14, 2009, 5:39 am 5:39 am

Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “Do you even know what a “pre-condition” is?”
Yes, and since insurance companies do not have the power to mandate that everybody obtain insurance, it’s the one way they have to make sure that slackers don’t abuse the system to the detriment of the rest of us who conscientiously maintain our coverage.
“Do you know anyone who has lost a job and had to try to pay the super high costs of COBRA or tried to get coverage from other insurance companies for a pre-condition.”
The reason COBRA is so high is because the employee plans provided (in large part at taxpayer expense) are ridiculously expensive. Low copays, low deductibles, and low out of pocket coverage is expensive, and the federal government is following the same path. When my children ceased to become dependents, I scoffed at the COBRA coverage and found them suitable coverage for less than $100 per month.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “I hope you can explain this attitude to our maker when that time comes. Please explain to me, Bridget, would this attitude of yours the same as Jesus if he had a choice about his fellow brothers and sisters? Are we your fellow-brothers and sisters? The un-insured, the pre-conditioned sister, the un-employed, those born with defects, those children of families that are too poor, the suddenly uninsured due to whatever excuse? I Love you, but do you love us? I wonder?”
Show me in the bible where is says I have to pay to provide coverage for people that is more expensive and more gold plated than anything I would willingly pay for myself or my family.

Posted by: Bridget | October 14, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “You appear to be a very young, healthy human being who has no insight to what life can do to change your life in a moment.”
ROTFLMAO. You should be more careful about the assumptions you make.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “You visit your doctor once a year but there may be a time that once a year may not be enough. It may require hugely expensive multiple visits with a life time of treatments of one sort our another. Physical disability, or disease. You name it, it can happen to you too. “
Yes indeed, which is why I maintain low cost catastrophic coverage, the same sort I would support as part of a public option or a government mandate.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “Be compassionate. I promise you it won’t hurt you as bad as you might think.”
No doubt it doesn’t hurt you at all to be compassionate with other people’s money.
Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 12, 2009 “You posted: “It keeps costs under control for the rest of us folks who consciencously maintain our coverage.” —– Bridget, wow, think about what you just posted here. So you truly believe that there everybody can “consciously” afford to pay the exorbitant insurance coverage that these profit based corporations force upon us?”
Do you have any idea what the cost of the basic benefit mandated by the government is going to be? Try $5000 for individuals and $10,000 for families. And that’s just to start. The Democrats aren’t even pretending anymore that their plans will do a thing to control the high cost of health care. In fact, by adding tens of millions of new people to the same system with the same number of doctors, nurses, labs, and hospitals will increase demand thereby increasing costs or decreasing service. Obama may walk on water but he can’t repeal the law of supply and demand.

Posted by: Bridget | October 14, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Rick wasn’t a very good Senator. He would be an even worse president.

Posted by: Leopoldo Turbyfill | January 9, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.